Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition #

Transcription

1 Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition # Record of Site Condition Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act Summary Record of Site Condition Number Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2015/03/19 Certification Date 2014/11/12 Current Property Use Residential Intended Property Use Residential Certificate of Property Use Number No CPU Applicable Site Condition Standards** ESA Phase 1 Property Municipal Address 250 DEW STREET, KING, ON, L7B 1K9 Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry. Contents of this Record of Site Condition This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change. Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/03/19 1 of 10

2 PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC Owner Name Authorized Person Mailing Address Postal Code ONTARIO INC. PETER SCIAVILLA A3, 30 WERTHEIM COURT, RICHMOND HILL ONTARIO, CANADA L4B 1E9 Phone (905) Fax Address Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/03/19 2 of 10

3 RSC Property Location Information Municipal Address(es) Municipality Legal Description Assessment Roll Number(s) Property Identifier Number(s) 250 DEW STREET, KING, ON L7B 1K9 King See Attached Lawyer s Letter (LT) RSC Property Geographical References Coordinate System UTM Datum NAD 83 Zone 17 Easting 618, Northing 4,865, RSC Property Use Information The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use. Current Property Use Intended Property Use Certificate of Property Use has been issued under section of the EPA Residential Residential No Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/03/19 3 of 10

4 Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/03/19 4 of 10

5 PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS Qualified Person's Information Name Type of Licence Under Professional Engineers Act BOB GORDANIFAR Licence Licence Number QP Employer Name Mailing Address CCI GROUP INC. 200, 7900 KEELE STREET, CONCORD ONTARIO, L4K 2A3 CANADA Phone (905) Fax (905) Address bobg@ccigroupinc.ca Municipal Information Local or Single-Tier Municipality Upper-Tier Municipality King York Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change District Office District Office District Office Address York-Durham District Office 230 Westney Rd. S., 5th floor, Ajax ON L1S 7J5 Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/03/19 5 of 10

6 Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Report Document used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04) (YYYY/MM/DD) Type of Report Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD) Author of Report Name of Consulting Company P1 ESA Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Bob Gordanifar, P. Eng., QP CCI GROUP INC. P1 ESA Update Update to the Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Bb Gordanifar, P.Eng., QP CCI GROUP INC. Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Reports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD) Author of Report Name of Consulting Company N/A Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/03/19 6 of 10

7 Site Condition Information Certification date (YYYY/MM/DD) 2014/11/12 Total area of RSC property (in hectares) Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC property Soil brought from another property to this RSC property to remain there following the filing of the RSC? No Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/03/19 7 of 10

8 Qualified Person s Statements and Certifications As the qualified person, I certify that: A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. As of 2014/11/12, no phase two environmental site assessment is required by the regulation for the RSC property and based on the phase one environmental site assessment for the RSC property, in my opinion, it is not necessary for any other reason to conduct a phase two environmental site assessment for the RSC property. As of 2014/11/12, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that, if the RSC property were put to any of the types of property uses listed in subsection 1 (2) of the regulation, are likely to interfere with any of those types of property uses. I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation. I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation. I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry. The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location. I do not hold and have not held and my employer CCI GROUP INC. does not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessment or risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSC are true as of 2014/11/12. By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees. By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, BOB GORDANIFAR, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2015/02/18: a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition. I Agree Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/03/19 8 of 10

9 Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or Agent The following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change as part of the record of site condition Certificate of Status or equivalent for the owner Lawyer s letter consisting of a legal description of the property Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired A Current plan of Survey Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property Phase 1 Conceptual Site Model Owner or agent certification statements Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/03/19 9 of 10

10 Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/03/19 10 of 10

11

12 DAVID CHONG Barrister and Solicitor Suite 202 Telephone No: (416) Don Mills Road Facsimile No: (416) Don Mills, Ontario M3B3N7 Pavidf&PavidChong.ca CANADA January 21,2014 Brownfields Filing and Review Environmental Assessment and Approvals Branch Ontario Ministry ofthe Environment 2 St. Clair Avenue West Floor 12A Toronto, ON M4V 1L5 Attention: Record of Site Condition Officer Dear Sir/Madam: Re: Ontario Inc. 250 Dew Street, Township of King Record of Site Condition I am the solicitor for Ontario Inc. I confirm that: Ontario Inc. is the owner in fee simple ofthe above noted lands. 2. Peter Sciavilla is the authorized signing officer of Ontario Inc. 3. This will confirm that the legal description ofthe lands are as follows: Parcel 40-2, Section 337 Part oflots 40, 41, 42, 43, Plan 337 Designated as Parts 2 and 3, Plan 65R-3869 Township ofking Part ofpin (formerly PIN ) The municipal address for the lands is 250 Dew Street, King. The Assessment Roll Number is

13

14 PARCEL REGISTER (ABBREVIATED) FOR PROPERTY IDENTIFIER V Ontario ServiceOntario LAND REGISTRY OFFICE # (LT) PAGE 1 OF 2 PREPARED FOR DavidOOl ON 2013/07/29 AT 09:37:45 SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS IN CROWN GRANT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: PT LTS 38, 39, 40, 41, 42 & 43, PL 337, PTS 1, 2 & 3, 65R3869 & PT 1, 65R34181; TOWNSHIP OF KING PROPERTY REMARKS: ESTATE/QUALIFIER: FEE SIMPLE ABSOLUTE RECENTLY: CONSOLIDATION FROM PIN CREATION DATE: 2013/03/26 OWNERS' NAMES ONTARIO INC. CAPACITY SHARE REG. NUM. INSTRUMENT TYPE PARTIES FROM PARTIES TO CERT/ CHKD ** PRINTOUT INCLUDES ALL DOCUMENT TYPES (DFLETED INSTRUMENTS NOT INCLUDED) 65R /02/03 PLAN REFERENCE YR /03/20 TRANSFER $800,000 NAWROCKI, SHEILA ONTARIO INC. YR /03/20 TRANSFER $800,000 NAWROCKI, SHEILA ONTARIO INC. YR /03/20 TRANSFER $900,000 DAVIS, ROLPH AUBREY LANGFORD, MARGARET EDYTHE ONTARIO INC. YR /03/20 TRANSFER $800,000 QUATTROCIOCCHI, VILMA ONTARIO INC. YR /03/20 CHARGE $3, 500, ONTARIO INC. VANGUARD LAW GROUP LLP, IN TRUST YR /03/21 TRANSFER OF CHARGE VANGUARD LAW GROUP LLP, IN TRUST VANGUARD LAW GROUP LLP, IN TRUST OLYMPIA TRUST REMARKS: YR YR1805S /04/05 APL CONSOLIDATE ONTARIO INC. YR /05/01 APL CH NAME INST REMARKS: YR ,YR YR1797&96 YR VANGUARD LAW GROUP LLP, IN TRUST SONI, SANJAY YR /06/06 APL CH NAME REMARKS: YR INST OLYMPIA TRUST OLYMPIA TRUST COMPANY YR /06/06 TRANSFER OF REMARKS: YR CHARGE SONI, SANJAY SONI, SANJAY OLYMPIA TRUST COMPANY YR /06/06 TRANSFER OF CHARGE REMARKS: YR SONI, SANJAY OLYMPIA TRUST COMPANY NOTE: ADJOINING PROPERTIES SHOULD BE INVESTIGATED TO ASCERTAIN DESCRIPTIVE INCONSISTENCIES, IF ANY, WITH DESCRIPTION REPRESENTED FOR THIS PROPERTY. NOTE: ENSURE THAT YOUR PRINTOUT STATES THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PAGES AND THAT YOU HAVE PICKED THEM ALL Up.

15

16

17

18 Year Name of Owner(s) Description of Property (including tenants) Property Use Observations from the Chain of Title, Aerial Photographs, Fire Insurance Plans (FIPs), etc to 1928 Michael R. Garrow 1928 to 1937 William H. Glass 1937 to 1952 Frederick J. Dew 1952 to to 1965 The Director, Veterans Land Act Maurice D. Lee Agricultural/ undeveloped Agricultural or Other Use 1946 and 1960 aerial photograph show site as undeveloped, agricultural land. No listings in city directories prior to to 1969 Dennis and Marion Cotter 1969 to 1970 Rocco Gentilcore 1971 to 1973 Antonio and Nazzarene Gazzellone 1973 to to to 1986 Lorenzo and Giovanna Andreone Luciano and Matilda Savini Wayne and Edda Burlington Single residential dwelling on south portion of Site (250 Dew Street). Residential 1976 aerial photograph shows a residential dwelling was constructed on the south portion of the Site. Aerial photographs from 1988 to 2009 show no significant changes to the Site to 2012 Margaret Langford Rolph Davis 2012 to August 2013 August 2013 to present Ontario Inc. Single residential dwelling on south portion of Site (250 Dew Street). Vacant, Undeveloped land Residential Previous Environmental Reports, Interviews identify that former Site buildings were still present in January Site reconnaissance identified that structures at the Site had been demolished. Most recent property use was Residential.

19 PHASE ONE CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL Part of Lots 40,41, 42, 43 of Registered Plan 337, 250 Dew Street, King City, Ontario Phase One Conceptual Site Model Introduction This section presents the Phase One Conceptual Site Model ( CSM ), developed during the preparation of the Phase One Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) completed in December 2013 by CCI Group Inc. ( CCIG ). The presentation of the Phase One CSM makes reference to the following drawings, attached: Figure 1: Site Location Plan Figure 2: Site Plan Figure 3: Phase One Conceptual Site Model The Phase One Property, hereinafter referred to as the Site, is located at 250 Dew Street, King City, Ontario (see Figure 1). The legal description of the Site is Part of Lots 40, 41, 42, 43 of Registered Plan 337, 250 Dew Street, King City, Ontario and the property identification number (PIN) for the Site is Site Features The Phase One ESA Property ( Site ) is located at the northwest corner of Dew Street and King Boulevard, in the Township of King, Ontario (see Figure 1). The total area of the Site is approximately 0.40 hectares (0.98 acres). At the time of our Phase One ESA Site visit the Site was vacant. The former building structure on the Site included one residential building. The former building and structures were demolished and removed from the Site prior to the Phase One ESA. The surrounding area within 250 m of the Site were developed with residential, institutional, and commercial land uses, except for Canadian National (CN) Railway tracks, located adjacent to northern portion of the Site (see Figure 2). Prior to the former residential use, the Site was historically used for agricultural purpose. Site Conditions The Site is located in a developed area, where potable water is supplied to the present and future developments at the Site by the Township of King municipality water system. No drinking water wells were identified on-site or within 500 m radius of the property boundary during water well survey conducted by CCIG. The Regional Municipality of York has indicated that the northern portion of the property is located within the Highly Vulnerable Area (HVA) of The Oak Ridges Moraine. The Site is not an environmentally sensitive area in accordance with Section 41 of the regulation; it is not within or adjacent to an area of natural significance; it is not a shallow soil property as defined in the 1

20 PHASE ONE CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL Part of Lots 40,41, 42, 43 of Registered Plan 337, 250 Dew Street, King City, Ontario Section 43.1 of the regulation; it does not include all or part of water body or is adjacent to a water body or includes land that is within 30 meters of water body. Geological Settings Based on the physiography, geology, and topography information, the Site is located within the Oak Ridges Moraine with the surface soils predominantly composed of clayey silt till deposited during the Upper Wisconsinan glaciation. The shallow bedrock consists of grey and black shale of the Georgian Bay Formation. No water bodies or areas of significance environmental concerns were observed on subject property or in Phase One Study Area. The nearest surface water bodies to the Site were tributaries of the East Humber River located approximately 200 m northeast of the Site. Based on the proximity of the Site to the tributaries of the East Humber River, the inferred groundwater flow was assumed to be in north-easterly direction. Subsurface Structures and Underground Utilities At the time of the Phase One ESA, no buildings or structures were present at the Site. No underground utilities were noted during our Site reconnaissance. It is likely that utilities are located adjacent to the Site. Potential Contaminating Activities Based on the Phase One ESA findings, no potentially contaminating activities (PCAs) were identified on the Phase One Property. The following PCAs were identified within the Phase Study Area (see Figure 3): 2

21 PHASE ONE CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL Part of Lots 40,41, 42, 43 of Registered Plan 337, 250 Dew Street, King City, Ontario Potentially Contaminating Activity (PCA) Location of PCA On-site or offsite Upgradient (Y/N) Proximity to Site Potentially Impacted Media Contaminants of Potential Concerns Source of Information (section of Phase One ESA report) Considered an APEC (Yes/No) (1) Former automotive garage, located at rear of 230 Dew Street, was used for storage, maintenance, fueling and repair of equipment, vehicles and material used to maintain the transportation system. Off-site Y More than 30 m west of the Site. Soil and Ground water Petroleum Hydrocarbons Fractions 1 to 4 (PHC F1-F4), Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and Metals Site Reconnaissance ( ), Record Review (4.1.5), Aerial Photographs (4.3.1), No: Due to the Phase One ESA, Phase Two ESA and remediation completed in 230 & 240 Dew Street. (2) The CN railway tracks located adjacent to northern portion of the Site. (3) Bulk storage of material (adhesives, paints and resins) used for school operations and activities. King City public school located at 25 King Boulevard. (4) Bulk storage of waste oils and lubricants, King Fire and Emergency Services located at 2045 King Road Off-site N Adjacent to the northern property boundary. Off-site N More than 80 m east of the Site Off-site N ~ 210 m Southeast of the Site Soil and Ground water Soil and Ground water Soil and Ground water PHC F1-F4, Polycyclic aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs), metals VOCs Metals PHC F1-F4 Metals Site Reconnaissance (6.2.7), Record Review ( ), Aerial Photographs (4.3.1) Site Reconnaissance (6.3.4), Record Review ( ) Site Reconnaissance (6.3.4), Record Review ( ) No: Due to being downgradient to the Site, distance from the Site, and low soil permeability in the area (clayey silt till) No: Due to being crossgradient to the Site, the distance from the Site, and low soil permeability in the area (clayey silt till) No: Due to being crossgradient to the Site, the distance from the Site, and low soil permeability in the area (Clayey silt till) 3

22 PHASE ONE CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL Part of Lots 40,41, 42, 43 of Registered Plan 337, 250 Dew Street, King City, Ontario Potentially Contaminating Activity (PCA) (5) Storage of waste oil and lubricants, Township of King, local municipal and administration office located at (6) Storage of acid, alkali and gasoline associated product storage for school operation. King City Secondary School located at 2001 King Road. Location of PCA On-site or offsite Upgradient (Y/N) Proximity to Site Off-site N ~ 230 m South of the Site Off-Site N ~ 238 m Southeast of the Site Potentially Impacted Media Soil and Ground water Soil and Ground water Contaminants of Potential Concerns PHC F1-F4 PHC F1-F4, VOCs Metals Source of Information (section of Phase One ESA report) Site Reconnaissance (6.3.4), Record Review ( ) Site Reconnaissance (6.3.4), Record Review ( ) Considered an APEC (Yes/No) No: Controlled storage due to being local municipal and administration office, the distance from the Site, and low soil permeability in the area (Clayey silt till). No: Controlled storage due to being school, large distance from the Site, low soil permeability in the area (Clayey silt till) and cross-gradient to the Site. Based on the above findings, PCA 1 is not considered as an APEC based on the information provided from the environmental investigations at 230 & 240 Dew Street that the identified contamination was remediated and it did not migrate to the Site. The remaining PCAs are not considered to be of concern, as the properties are located either down-gradient, cross-gradient and/or at considerable distance from the Site. Hence, a Phase Two ESA is not recommended at the Site. 4

23

24

25