Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition #

Transcription

1 Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change - Record of Site Condition # Record of Site Condition Under Part XV.1 of the Environment Protection Act Summary Record of Site Condition Number Date Filed to Environmental Site Registry 2015/11/18 Certification Date 2015/04/27 Current Property Use Agricultural/Other Intended Property Use Residential Certificate of Property Use Number No CPU Applicable Site Condition Standards** ESA Phase 1 Property Municipal Address 1070 DUNDAS STREET WEST, WHITBY, ON, L1P 1Y5 Notice to Readers Concerning Due Diligence This record of site condition has been filed in the Environmental Site Registry to which the public has access and which contains a notice advising users of the Environmental Site Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Environmental Site Registry. Contents of this Record of Site Condition This record of site condition consists (RSC) of this document which is available to be printed directly from the Environmental Site Registry as well as all supporting documentation indicated in this RSC to have been submitted in electronic format to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change. Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/11/18 1 of 10

2 PART 1: PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, PROPERTY INFORMATION AND OWNER'S CERTIFICATIONS Information about the owner who is submitting or authorizing the submission of the RSC Owner Name Authorized Person Mailing Address Postal Code HIDDENBROOK DEVELOPMENTS LTD. SEYMOUR SAITOWITZ 601 MAGNETIC DRIVE, UNITS 1 AND 2, TORONTO ONTARIO, CANADA M3J 3J2 Phone (416) Fax (416) Address seymour@tiffanyparkhomes.com Information about the agent Agent Name Mailing Address Postal Code NYLE MCILVEEN 347 PIDO ROAD, UNIT 29, PETERBOROUGH ONTARIO, CANADA K9J 6X7 Phone (705) Fax Address nyle.mcilveen@ghd.com Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/11/18 2 of 10

3 RSC Property Location Information Municipal Address(es) Municipality Legal Description Assessment Roll Number(s) Property Identifier Number(s) 1070 DUNDAS STREET WEST, WHITBY, ON L1P 1Y5 Whitby See Attached Lawyer s Letter (LT) RSC Property Geographical References Coordinate System UTM Datum NAD 83 Zone 17 Easting 663, Northing 4,860, RSC Property Use Information The following types of property uses are defined by the Regulation: Agricultural or other use, Commercial use, Community use, Industrial use, Institutional use, Parkland use, and Residential use. Current Property Use Intended Property Use Certificate of Property Use has been issued under section of the EPA Agricultural/Other Residential No Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/11/18 3 of 10

4 Please See the Signed Statements of Property Owner, or Agent, or Receiver at the End of this RSC The rest of this page has been left intentionally blank Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/11/18 4 of 10

5 PART 2: LIST OF REPORTS, SUMMARY OF SITE CONDITIONS AND QUALIFIED PERSON S STATEMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS Qualified Person's Information Name Type of Licence Under Professional Engineers Act NYLE MCILVEEN Licence Licence Number QP Employer Name Mailing Address GHD LIMITED 347 PIDO ROAD, UNIT 29, PETERBOROUGH ONTARIO, K9J 6X7 CANADA Phone (705) Fax (705) Address nyle.mcilveen@ghd.ca Municipal Information Local or Single-Tier Municipality Upper-Tier Municipality Whitby Durham Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change District Office District Office District Office Address York-Durham District Office 230 Westney Rd. S., 5th floor, Ajax ON L1S 7J5 Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/11/18 5 of 10

6 Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Report Document used as the phase one environmental site assessment report and updates in submitting the RSC for filing The date the last work on all of the records review, interviews and site reconnaissance components of the phase one environmental site assessment was done (refer to clause 28(1)(a) of O. Reg. 153/04) (YYYY/MM/DD) Type of Report Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD) Author of Report Name of Consulting Company P1 ESA Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Report - Proposed Residential Development Dundas Street West, Whitby, Ontario. Project No. G030455E Nyle McIlveen GEO-LOGIC Reports and Other Documents Related to the Phase One Environmental Site Assessment Reports and other documents relied upon in certifying the information set out in section 10 of Schedule A or otherwise used in conducting the phase one environmental site assessment Report Title Date of Report (YYYY/MM/DD) Author of Report Name of Consulting Company N/A Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/11/18 6 of 10

7 Site Condition Information Certification date (YYYY/MM/DD) 2015/04/27 Total area of RSC property (in hectares) Number of any previously filed RSC that applies to any part of the RSC property Number of any previously filed Transition Notice that applies to any part of the RSC property Soil brought from another property to this RSC property to remain there following the filing of the RSC? No Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/11/18 7 of 10

8 Qualified Person s Statements and Certifications As the qualified person, I certify that: A phase one environmental site assessment of the RSC property, which includes the evaluation of the information gathered from a records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, a report and any updates required, has been conducted in accordance with the regulation by or under the supervision of a qualified person as required by the regulation. As of 2015/04/27, no phase two environmental site assessment is required by the regulation for the RSC property and based on the phase one environmental site assessment for the RSC property, in my opinion, it is not necessary for any other reason to conduct a phase two environmental site assessment for the RSC property. As of 2015/04/27, in my opinion, based on the phase one environmental site assessment, there is no evidence of any contaminants in the soil, ground water or sediment on, in or under the RSC property that, if the RSC property were put to any of the types of property uses listed in subsection 1 (2) of the regulation, are likely to interfere with any of those types of property uses. I am a qualified person and have the qualifications required by section 5 of the regulation. I have in place an insurance policy that satisfies the requirements of section 7 of the regulation. I acknowledge that the RSC will be submitted for filing in the Environmental Site Registry, that records of site condition that are filed in the Registry are available for examination by the public and that the Registry contains a notice advising users of the Registry who have dealings with any property to consider conducting their own due diligence with respect to the environmental condition of the property, in addition to reviewing information in the Registry. The opinions expressed in this RSC are engineering or scientific opinions made in accordance with generally accepted principles and practices as recognized by members of the environmental engineering or science profession or discipline practising at the same time and in the same or similar location. I do not hold and have not held and my employer GHD LIMITED does not hold and has not held a direct or indirect interest in the RSC property or any property which includes the RSC property and was the subject of a phase one or two environmental site assessment or risk assessment upon which this record of site condition is based To the best of my knowledge, the certifications and statements in this part of the RSC are true as of 2015/04/27. By signing this RSC, I make no express or implied warranties or guarantees. By checking the boxes above, and entering my membership/licence number in this submission, I, NYLE MCILVEEN, a qualified person as defined in section 5 of O. Reg. 153/04 am, on 2015/11/03: a) signing this record of site condition submission as a qualified person; and b) making all certifications required as a qualified person for this record of site condition. I Agree Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/11/18 8 of 10

9 Additional Documentation Provided by Property Owner or Agent The following documents have been submitted to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change as part of the record of site condition Certificate of Status or equivalent for the owner Authorization for Agent to submit RSC for filing Lawyer s letter consisting of a legal description of the property Copy of any deed(s), transfer(s) or other document(s) by which the RSC property was acquired A Current plan of Survey Table of Current and Past Uses of the Phase One Property Phase 1 Conceptual Site Model Owner or agent certification statements Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/11/18 9 of 10

10 Filed Record of Site Condition # on 2015/11/18 10 of 10

11 Request ID: Province of Ontario Date Report Produced: 2015/11/03 Demande n : Province de l'ontario Document produit le : Transaction ID: Ministry of Government Services Time Report Produced: 16:07:24 Transaction n : Ministère des Services gouvernementaux Imprimé à : Category ID: CT Catégorie : CERTIFICATE OF STATUS ATTESTATION DU STATUT JURIDIQUE This is to certify that according to the records of the Ministry of Government Services D'après les dossiers du Ministère des Services gouvernementaux, nous attestons que la société H I D D E N B R O O K D E V E L O P M E N T S L T D. Ontario Corporation Number Numéro matricule de la société (Ontario) is a corporation incorporated, amalgamated or continued under the laws of the Province of Ontario. The corporation came into existence on est une société constituée, prorogée ou née d'une fusion aux termes des lois de la Province de l'ontario. La société a été fondée le J U N E 0 3 J U I N, and has not been dissolved. et n'est pas dissoute. Dated Fait le N O V E M B E R 0 3 N O V E M B R E, Director Directeur The issuance of this certifcate in electronic form is authorized by the Ministry of Government Services. La délivrance du présent certificat sous forme électronique est autorisée par le Ministère des Services gouvernementaux.

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19 Table: Current and Past Uses Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use June 15, 2015 Present 1968 June 15, Hiddenbrook Developments Ltd. Hobbs and Jaciw Investments Limited Donald McQuay Robert McQuay Vacant Residential (leased to tenants currently) with agricultural farming Residential home and agricultural farming Property Use 1 Agricultural or other use Agricultural or other use Agricultural or other use Agricultural or other use Other Observations from Aerial Photos, FIPs, etc Land registry indicates that Hiddenbrook Developments Ltd is the owner since June 15, The transfer document indicates that Hiddenbrook Developments Ltd acquired the property from Hobbs and Jaciw Investments Limited on June 15, The PIN of confirmed on the transfer document. Recent aerial photo for 2015 shows the Property is used for agricultural purposes. The residential house that is leased to tenants is still present (to be demolished at a later date). No PCAs or APECs identified. Land registry indicated that Hobbs and Jaciw Investments Limited were the owner from 1968 until June Aerial photos from 2004, 2009 and 2013 were reviewed showing the Property is the same general configuration as observed during the site reconnaissance in The lands were used for agricultural purposes and there was a residential home on the lands. Aerial photo from 1985 showed the lands were used for agricultural purposes and the dwelling at the front of the Property is present. The interview of Mr. Greg Malta (owner of the Property until June 15, 2015) indicated that the farm property was purchased from the McQuay family in 1968 and that they farmed the land prior to the purchase. During his ownership, the lands were farmed and the house was leased. No PCAs or APECs identified during interview. No PCAs or APECs identified. Land registry indicated that Donald McQuay was the owner. Aerial photo from 1964 showed the lands were used for agricultural purposes and the dwelling at the front of the Property is present. Interview with Mr. Greg Malta indicated that the McQuay family lived at and farmed the lands at the Property. No PCAs or APECs identified. Land registry indicated that Robert McQuay was the owner Interview with Mr. Greg Malta indicated that the McQuay family lived at and farmed the lands at the Property. No PCAs or APECs identified.

20 Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use Prior to 1857 Francis Farewell Frederick Rowe Mary Gold William Gold David Reed Residential home and agricultural farming Property Use 1 Agricultural or other use Other Observations from Aerial Photos, FIPs, etc Land registry indicated that Francis Farewell was the owner No PCAs or APECs identified. Land registry indicated that Frederick Rowe was the owner No PCAs or APECs identified. Land registry indicated that Mary Gold was the owner No PCAs or APECs identified. Land registry indicated that William Gold was the owner No PCAs or APECs identified. Land registry indicated that David Reed was the owner No PCAs or APECs identified. Notes: Dates and uses are estimated based on information obtained from interviews and research information. 1 the following types of property uses were considered: Agriculture or other use; Commercial use; Community use; Industrial use; Institutional use; Parkland use; and, Residential use.

21 Phase One Conceptual Site Model The Phase One Conceptual Site Model (CSM) is provided as Figure 4 within the Enclosures section. The CSM provides a basic overview, approximate locations of corridors, basic geological and hydrogeological information and any other pertinent data that may affect the Phase One ESA of Schedule D of the Regulation. The CSM is required to contain figures, narrative descriptions and assessments as per Subsection 16(7) of Table 1 of Schedule D (Sub-Heading (iv) in Report Section 7 of the Regulation). The following table and narrative is provided in accordance with O. Reg. 153 (as amended): Table: Phase One Conceptual Site Model Provide one or more figures of the Phase One Study area that, Provide a description and assessment of, i) Show any existing buildings and structures ii) Identify and locate water bodies located in whole or in part on the Phase One Study Area iii) Identify and locate any areas of natural significance located in or in part on the Phase One Study Area iv) Locate any drinking water wells at the Phase One Property v) Show roads, including names within the Phase One Study Area vi) Show uses of properties adjacent to the Phase One Property vii) Identify and locate where any potentially contaminating activity has occurred, and show tanks in such areas, and viii) Identify and locate any APECs i) Any areas where PCA on or potentially affecting the Phase One Property has occurred ii) Any contaminants of potential concern iii) The potential for underground utilities, if any present, to affect distribution and transport iv) Available regional or site specific geological and hydrogeological information, and The Phase One CSM Figure 4 shows the general location of where the residential structure was located. The CSM identifies that Lynde Creek is located to the north within the Phase One Study Area. No water bodies are located within the Phase One Property. No areas of natural significance were identified in the Study Area. There was one drinking water well located on the Property as shown on the CSM Figure 4. Roads with names are provided on the CSM figure. The adjacent lands are rural residential lots, agricultural, municipally serviced residential subdivisions or Lynde Creek. There is a Toyota car lot to the south of the Property. No PCAs were identified. Based on the records review and site reconnaissance carried out as part of this ESA, APECs were not identified at the Property. Based upon the interview, site reconnaissance and records review, Geo-Logic is not aware of PCAs. None. The potential for underground utilities to affect distribution and transport is minimal. Underground utilities would be related to water, septic and gas lines and are not expected to be significant potential pathways. The Site is within the physiographic region known as the Iroquois Plain and the surrounding local terrain is dominated by clay plains. The surficial geology consists predominantly of massive-well laminated material with modern alluvial deposits in the northern area near the creek. The Quaternary geology of this area consists of glaciolacustrine deposits (silt and clay, minor sand, basin and quiet water deposits) overlying limestone of Middle Ordovician aged bedrock. The bedrock depth is expected to be about 4.5 to 6 m. Groundwater is generally expected to conform to the local topography (slopes generally to the southeast).

22 v) How any uncertainty or absence of information obtained in each of the components of the Phase One ESA could affect the validity of the model. The Property has been developed for rural residential and agricultural purposes since the 1800s. The activities related to the Property are, in the opinion of Geo-Logic, not considered to be of significant environmental concern. It is our opinion that the degree of uncertainty is limited and the CSM is valid. Based on the records review, interview and site reconnaissance carried out as part of this ESA, no significant PCAs or APECs were identified. The Property is 7.37 hectares (18.2 acres) in area and is currently to be developed for a residential subdivision. Previously, the land was used for growing agricultural crops such as corn but was not farmed in There was a residential home that was leased out to tenants and is to be demolished by end of September The location of the Property is presented on the Vicinity Plan, Plate 1. There are no landfills or other PCAs illustrated on the Vicinity Plan. The Property Plan, Plate 2 illustrates the topography sloping generally to the southeast and tributary of Lynde Creek to the north and east of the Property. Local shallow water flow is inferred to conform with the topography and flow toward the tributary of Lynde Creek which ultimately discharges into Lake Ontario. The Plot Plan, Plate 3 shows the Property using a recent aerial photo. The Phase One Conceptual Site Model illustrating the Study Area is provided on Plate 4. There are no PCAs or APECs identified from the mapping reviewed. A site reconnaissance observed previous agricultural usage of the lands and a residential dwelling which access was provided. The home utilized private services for water and septic; however, this area is municipally serviced for water, sewage and natural gas. There was no evidence of fill at the Property. No spills or staining was observed at the residential home. There was no evidence of industrial or commercial activities. There were no dry cleaning facilities or bulk fuel dispensing facilities (including gas stations), vehicle repair facilities or garages observed within 250 m. An ERIS report was requested and one (1) record was listed for a water well at the Property. There were 19 other records identified within 250 m. There are no APECs identified based on the records review from ERIS. Investigations of available land registry, fire insurance plans, underwriters reports, city directories, TSSA and MOECC documents were performed by Geo-Logic. Based upon records reviewed, there were no aboveground or underground storage tanks or other infrastructures or activities that would indicate any PCAs or APECs. Digital aerial photographs reviewed from 1964 through 2013 indicated the Property to be first developed for agricultural purposes and residential purposes based upon the aerial photos reviewed. There were no APECs or PCAs related to these documents reviewed. It is Geo-Logic s opinion that there was sufficient information collected for this Property based upon the records review, interview and site reconnaissance to formulate a Phase One CSM. Based upon the information reviewed and evaluated, no PCAs or APECs were identified at the Property or within the Phase One Study Area that require a Phase Two ESA investigation. It is Geo-Logic s opinion that there was sufficient information collected for this Property based upon the records review, interview and site reconnaissance to formulate a Phase One CSM. Based upon the information reviewed and evaluated, no significant PCAs or APECs were identified at the Property or within the Phase One Study Area that require further investigation. A Record of Site Condition can be filed based upon this Phase One ESA report.

23 PHASE ONE PROPERTY VICINITY PLAN DATE: APRIL 2015 Phase One ESA Proposed Residential Development SCALE: REFER TO SCALE BAR 1070 Dundas Street West Whitby, ON JOB NUMBER: G030455E1 347 PIDO ROAD, UNIT 29 Base map compiled from Centre for Mapping, Natural Resources Canada, Map 30 M/15 dated 1989, published UTM Zone 17. Edition 8 DRAWING NUMBER: PLATE 1 PETERBOROUGH, ON K9J 6X7 (705) FAX (705)

24 PHASE ONE PROPERTY PROPERTY PLAN Phase One ESA Proposed Residential Development 1070 Dundas Street West DATE: APRIL 2015 SCALE: REFER TO SCALE BAR JOB NUMBER: G030455E1 Whitby, ON 347 PIDO ROAD, UNIT 29 Source: MNR NRVIS, Produced by CRA under license from Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Queen's Printer Coordinate System: DRAWING NUMBER: PLATE 2 NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N PETERBOROUGH, ON K9J 6X7 (705) FAX (705)

25 PHASE ONE PROPERTY Dundas Street West Image obtained from Google Earth. Dated September 27, Google PLOT PLAN DATE: APRIL 2015 Phase One ESA Proposed Residential Development 1070 Dundas Street West Whitby, ON SCALE: SEE SCALE BAR JOB NUMBER: G030455E1 DRAWING NUMBER: PLATE PIDO ROAD, UNIT 29 PETERBOROUGH, ON K9J 6X7 (705) FAX (705)

26 Residential Phase One Study Area (<250 m from Property) Agricultural PHASE ONE PROPERTY Lynde Creek Inferred shallow groundwater flow direction Agricultural Commercial Agricultural Rural residential Rural residential Former well location LEGEND: Property boundary Phase One Study Area (250 m from Property) Agricultural Residential Approx. location of house to be demolished Commercial car sales lot PHASE ONE CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL - STUDY AREA DATE: APRIL 2015 Phase One ESA Proposed Residential Development 1070 Dundas Street West Whitby, ON Image obtained from Google Earth. Dated September 27, Google Inferred Property Lines are approximate. SCALE: REFER TO SCALE BAR JOB NUMBER: G030455E1 DRAWING NUMBER: PLATE PIDO ROAD, UNIT 29 PETERBOROUGH, ON K9J 6X7 (705) FAX (705)

27 Request ID: Province of Ontario Date Report Produced: 2015/11/03 Demande n : Province de l'ontario Document produit le : Transaction ID: Ministry of Government Services Time Report Produced: 16:07:24 Transaction n : Ministère des Services gouvernementaux Imprimé à : Category ID: CT Catégorie : CERTIFICATE OF STATUS ATTESTATION DU STATUT JURIDIQUE This is to certify that according to the records of the Ministry of Government Services D'après les dossiers du Ministère des Services gouvernementaux, nous attestons que la société H I D D E N B R O O K D E V E L O P M E N T S L T D. Ontario Corporation Number Numéro matricule de la société (Ontario) is a corporation incorporated, amalgamated or continued under the laws of the Province of Ontario. The corporation came into existence on est une société constituée, prorogée ou née d'une fusion aux termes des lois de la Province de l'ontario. La société a été fondée le J U N E 0 3 J U I N, and has not been dissolved. et n'est pas dissoute. Dated Fait le N O V E M B E R 0 3 N O V E M B R E, Director Directeur The issuance of this certifcate in electronic form is authorized by the Ministry of Government Services. La délivrance du présent certificat sous forme électronique est autorisée par le Ministère des Services gouvernementaux.

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35 Table: Current and Past Uses Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use June 15, 2015 Present 1968 June 15, Hiddenbrook Developments Ltd. Hobbs and Jaciw Investments Limited Donald McQuay Robert McQuay Vacant Residential (leased to tenants currently) with agricultural farming Residential home and agricultural farming Property Use 1 Agricultural or other use Agricultural or other use Agricultural or other use Agricultural or other use Other Observations from Aerial Photos, FIPs, etc Land registry indicates that Hiddenbrook Developments Ltd is the owner since June 15, The transfer document indicates that Hiddenbrook Developments Ltd acquired the property from Hobbs and Jaciw Investments Limited on June 15, The PIN of confirmed on the transfer document. Recent aerial photo for 2015 shows the Property is used for agricultural purposes. The residential house that is leased to tenants is still present (to be demolished at a later date). No PCAs or APECs identified. Land registry indicated that Hobbs and Jaciw Investments Limited were the owner from 1968 until June Aerial photos from 2004, 2009 and 2013 were reviewed showing the Property is the same general configuration as observed during the site reconnaissance in The lands were used for agricultural purposes and there was a residential home on the lands. Aerial photo from 1985 showed the lands were used for agricultural purposes and the dwelling at the front of the Property is present. The interview of Mr. Greg Malta (owner of the Property until June 15, 2015) indicated that the farm property was purchased from the McQuay family in 1968 and that they farmed the land prior to the purchase. During his ownership, the lands were farmed and the house was leased. No PCAs or APECs identified during interview. No PCAs or APECs identified. Land registry indicated that Donald McQuay was the owner. Aerial photo from 1964 showed the lands were used for agricultural purposes and the dwelling at the front of the Property is present. Interview with Mr. Greg Malta indicated that the McQuay family lived at and farmed the lands at the Property. No PCAs or APECs identified. Land registry indicated that Robert McQuay was the owner Interview with Mr. Greg Malta indicated that the McQuay family lived at and farmed the lands at the Property. No PCAs or APECs identified.

36 Year Name of Owner Description of Property Use Prior to 1857 Francis Farewell Frederick Rowe Mary Gold William Gold David Reed Residential home and agricultural farming Property Use 1 Agricultural or other use Other Observations from Aerial Photos, FIPs, etc Land registry indicated that Francis Farewell was the owner No PCAs or APECs identified. Land registry indicated that Frederick Rowe was the owner No PCAs or APECs identified. Land registry indicated that Mary Gold was the owner No PCAs or APECs identified. Land registry indicated that William Gold was the owner No PCAs or APECs identified. Land registry indicated that David Reed was the owner No PCAs or APECs identified. Notes: Dates and uses are estimated based on information obtained from interviews and research information. 1 the following types of property uses were considered: Agriculture or other use; Commercial use; Community use; Industrial use; Institutional use; Parkland use; and, Residential use.

37 Phase One Conceptual Site Model The Phase One Conceptual Site Model (CSM) is provided as Figure 4 within the Enclosures section. The CSM provides a basic overview, approximate locations of corridors, basic geological and hydrogeological information and any other pertinent data that may affect the Phase One ESA of Schedule D of the Regulation. The CSM is required to contain figures, narrative descriptions and assessments as per Subsection 16(7) of Table 1 of Schedule D (Sub-Heading (iv) in Report Section 7 of the Regulation). The following table and narrative is provided in accordance with O. Reg. 153 (as amended): Table: Phase One Conceptual Site Model Provide one or more figures of the Phase One Study area that, Provide a description and assessment of, i) Show any existing buildings and structures ii) Identify and locate water bodies located in whole or in part on the Phase One Study Area iii) Identify and locate any areas of natural significance located in or in part on the Phase One Study Area iv) Locate any drinking water wells at the Phase One Property v) Show roads, including names within the Phase One Study Area vi) Show uses of properties adjacent to the Phase One Property vii) Identify and locate where any potentially contaminating activity has occurred, and show tanks in such areas, and viii) Identify and locate any APECs i) Any areas where PCA on or potentially affecting the Phase One Property has occurred ii) Any contaminants of potential concern iii) The potential for underground utilities, if any present, to affect distribution and transport iv) Available regional or site specific geological and hydrogeological information, and The Phase One CSM Figure 4 shows the general location of where the residential structure was located. The CSM identifies that Lynde Creek is located to the north within the Phase One Study Area. No water bodies are located within the Phase One Property. No areas of natural significance were identified in the Study Area. There was one drinking water well located on the Property as shown on the CSM Figure 4. Roads with names are provided on the CSM figure. The adjacent lands are rural residential lots, agricultural, municipally serviced residential subdivisions or Lynde Creek. There is a Toyota car lot to the south of the Property. No PCAs were identified. Based on the records review and site reconnaissance carried out as part of this ESA, APECs were not identified at the Property. Based upon the interview, site reconnaissance and records review, Geo-Logic is not aware of PCAs. None. The potential for underground utilities to affect distribution and transport is minimal. Underground utilities would be related to water, septic and gas lines and are not expected to be significant potential pathways. The Site is within the physiographic region known as the Iroquois Plain and the surrounding local terrain is dominated by clay plains. The surficial geology consists predominantly of massive-well laminated material with modern alluvial deposits in the northern area near the creek. The Quaternary geology of this area consists of glaciolacustrine deposits (silt and clay, minor sand, basin and quiet water deposits) overlying limestone of Middle Ordovician aged bedrock. The bedrock depth is expected to be about 4.5 to 6 m. Groundwater is generally expected to conform to the local topography (slopes generally to the southeast).

38 v) How any uncertainty or absence of information obtained in each of the components of the Phase One ESA could affect the validity of the model. The Property has been developed for rural residential and agricultural purposes since the 1800s. The activities related to the Property are, in the opinion of Geo-Logic, not considered to be of significant environmental concern. It is our opinion that the degree of uncertainty is limited and the CSM is valid. Based on the records review, interview and site reconnaissance carried out as part of this ESA, no significant PCAs or APECs were identified. The Property is 7.37 hectares (18.2 acres) in area and is currently to be developed for a residential subdivision. Previously, the land was used for growing agricultural crops such as corn but was not farmed in There was a residential home that was leased out to tenants and is to be demolished by end of September The location of the Property is presented on the Vicinity Plan, Plate 1. There are no landfills or other PCAs illustrated on the Vicinity Plan. The Property Plan, Plate 2 illustrates the topography sloping generally to the southeast and tributary of Lynde Creek to the north and east of the Property. Local shallow water flow is inferred to conform with the topography and flow toward the tributary of Lynde Creek which ultimately discharges into Lake Ontario. The Plot Plan, Plate 3 shows the Property using a recent aerial photo. The Phase One Conceptual Site Model illustrating the Study Area is provided on Plate 4. There are no PCAs or APECs identified from the mapping reviewed. A site reconnaissance observed previous agricultural usage of the lands and a residential dwelling which access was provided. The home utilized private services for water and septic; however, this area is municipally serviced for water, sewage and natural gas. There was no evidence of fill at the Property. No spills or staining was observed at the residential home. There was no evidence of industrial or commercial activities. There were no dry cleaning facilities or bulk fuel dispensing facilities (including gas stations), vehicle repair facilities or garages observed within 250 m. An ERIS report was requested and one (1) record was listed for a water well at the Property. There were 19 other records identified within 250 m. There are no APECs identified based on the records review from ERIS. Investigations of available land registry, fire insurance plans, underwriters reports, city directories, TSSA and MOECC documents were performed by Geo-Logic. Based upon records reviewed, there were no aboveground or underground storage tanks or other infrastructures or activities that would indicate any PCAs or APECs. Digital aerial photographs reviewed from 1964 through 2013 indicated the Property to be first developed for agricultural purposes and residential purposes based upon the aerial photos reviewed. There were no APECs or PCAs related to these documents reviewed. It is Geo-Logic s opinion that there was sufficient information collected for this Property based upon the records review, interview and site reconnaissance to formulate a Phase One CSM. Based upon the information reviewed and evaluated, no PCAs or APECs were identified at the Property or within the Phase One Study Area that require a Phase Two ESA investigation. It is Geo-Logic s opinion that there was sufficient information collected for this Property based upon the records review, interview and site reconnaissance to formulate a Phase One CSM. Based upon the information reviewed and evaluated, no significant PCAs or APECs were identified at the Property or within the Phase One Study Area that require further investigation. A Record of Site Condition can be filed based upon this Phase One ESA report.

39 PHASE ONE PROPERTY VICINITY PLAN DATE: APRIL 2015 Phase One ESA Proposed Residential Development SCALE: REFER TO SCALE BAR 1070 Dundas Street West Whitby, ON JOB NUMBER: G030455E1 347 PIDO ROAD, UNIT 29 Base map compiled from Centre for Mapping, Natural Resources Canada, Map 30 M/15 dated 1989, published UTM Zone 17. Edition 8 DRAWING NUMBER: PLATE 1 PETERBOROUGH, ON K9J 6X7 (705) FAX (705)

40 PHASE ONE PROPERTY PROPERTY PLAN Phase One ESA Proposed Residential Development 1070 Dundas Street West DATE: APRIL 2015 SCALE: REFER TO SCALE BAR JOB NUMBER: G030455E1 Whitby, ON 347 PIDO ROAD, UNIT 29 Source: MNR NRVIS, Produced by CRA under license from Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Queen's Printer Coordinate System: DRAWING NUMBER: PLATE 2 NAD 1983 UTM Zone 17N PETERBOROUGH, ON K9J 6X7 (705) FAX (705)

41 PHASE ONE PROPERTY Dundas Street West Image obtained from Google Earth. Dated September 27, Google PLOT PLAN DATE: APRIL 2015 Phase One ESA Proposed Residential Development 1070 Dundas Street West Whitby, ON SCALE: SEE SCALE BAR JOB NUMBER: G030455E1 DRAWING NUMBER: PLATE PIDO ROAD, UNIT 29 PETERBOROUGH, ON K9J 6X7 (705) FAX (705)

42 Residential Phase One Study Area (<250 m from Property) Agricultural PHASE ONE PROPERTY Lynde Creek Inferred shallow groundwater flow direction Agricultural Commercial Agricultural Rural residential Rural residential Former well location LEGEND: Property boundary Phase One Study Area (250 m from Property) Agricultural Residential Approx. location of house to be demolished Commercial car sales lot PHASE ONE CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL - STUDY AREA DATE: APRIL 2015 Phase One ESA Proposed Residential Development 1070 Dundas Street West Whitby, ON Image obtained from Google Earth. Dated September 27, Google Inferred Property Lines are approximate. SCALE: REFER TO SCALE BAR JOB NUMBER: G030455E1 DRAWING NUMBER: PLATE PIDO ROAD, UNIT 29 PETERBOROUGH, ON K9J 6X7 (705) FAX (705)