meeting of December 10th be adopted with the above correction.

Transcription

1 THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF SURREY Municipal Hall Avenue Surrey, B.C. Monday, December 17, 1979 Time: 7:OO p.m. A. ADOPTION OF MINUTES: Minutes of a Regular Council meeting held in the Council Chamber on Monday, December 17th, 1979, at 7:OO p.m. All the members of Council were present together with the Municipal Manager, the Assistant to the Manager, and the Municipal C1 erk. 1. In connection with the minutes of the Regular Council meeting of December loth, Alderman Bose stated that he had not seconded the motion on page 16 under Resolution X-454 dealing with the Indemnities By-law, as he is shown as opposed to the motion for third reading. The motion was seconded by Alderman Watkins. Y RES. N0.X-494 RES.NO.X-495 RES. N0.X (4 Moved by AI derman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Fomich That the minutes of the Regular Council meeting of December 10th be adopted with the above correction. (b) Council-in-Comm minutes be adopted. Moved by Seconded That the ttee of December Moved by Seconded That the Alderman Buckley by Alderman Fomich minutes of the 0th be received. A1 derman Campbell by Alderman Schrenk recommendations of these B. DELEGATIONS 1. The Mayor stated that this evening the Council wishes to recognize the former Mayors and Aldermen who had served on the Surrey Council during the last twenty-five years, which years are part of the Centennial years of Surrey which extend from 1879 to He stated that a Centennial plaque would be presented to each of those that were present and he was going to have the presentations made by the various members of Council.

2 Alderman Schrenk then made the presentations to the following: Mrs. Ivy Adamson, a Councillor in 1950 Frederick Beale, Alderman: Alderman Bob Bose, Alderman: 1979 J. Arthur Dunster, Councillor: Alderman Watkins made the presentations to Dr. Barrie Flather, Alderman: Alderman Bill Fomich, Councillor: , Alderman: and Alderman Watkins was also to present plaques to: A. R. Flegal, Councillor: and C. G. Frazer, Councillor: 1960 but they were not present. Alderman Bose presented a plaque to: Alderman Bob Jacobs, Alderman: He was to present plaques to: Roland J. Harvey, Reeve: Jerry P.J. Huot, Alderman: 1978 and W. H. Johnson, Councillor: but they were not present. A1 derman Campbell presented pl aques to: Dalton Jones, Councillor: and Alderman: and Ted Kuhn, Councillor: and Alderman: He was to present plaques to: Rita Johnston, Alderman: and James Karpoff, Alderman: 1973 but they were not present. Alderman McKi tka presented plaques to: Alderman Garry Watkins, Alderman: 1977, 1978 and 1979 Mr. E.D. Wood, Councillor:

3 He was to present one to: Robert Wenman, Alderman: but he was not present. Alderman McKitka then read a list of those members of Council who had served in the last twenty-five years but who were no longer living: J. W. Ardiel L. H. Atchison J. J. Closkey A. S. Dainard F. G. J. Hahn J. F. Johnston R. W. Keery W. A. Mortimer E. A. Pitman R. Readman C. Schultz L. A. Shepherd A. L. Stevens H. A. Stewart Councillor: Councillor: 1954 Councillor: 1954 Councillor: Alderman: Reeve: May 1961 Councillor: 1960 Councillor: , 1962 Councillor: 1954 Councillor: Councillor: Councillor: Reeve: Councillor: Councillor: Councillor: Alderman Fomich presented plaques to: Alderman Ed McKitka, Alderman: Mayor: William 0. Millar, Alderman: He was to present plaques to:. R. C. Miller, Alderman: A1 i ce Moore, A1 derman : 1976 but they were not present. Alderman Jacobs presented a plaque to: Mayor Don Ross, Alderman: and 1979 and is now the Mayor for He also presented a plaque to: Alderman Bonnie Schrenk, Alderman: and He also presented one to: J. T. Smith, Councillor:

4 He was to present one to: Mr. R. G. Ross, Alderman: but Mr. Ross was not present. Alderman Buckley presented a plaque to: The Honourable W. Vander Zalm, Councillor: and Mayor: He also presented one to: J. B. Wallace, Alderman: He was to present one to: and to: W. E. Stagg, who was Councillor for several years prior to being Reeve: W. M. Vogel, Alderman: and Wayor: but they were not present. Mayor Ross presented plaques to: R. M. Nesbitt, Reeve: and in 1961, and who had been - a Councillor prior to that date. K. A. Patterson, Councillor: and Alderman: Dr. John O-Brien-Bell, Alderman: He was to present a plaque to: Mr. T. G. Pearce, Councillor: S8 but Mr. Pearce was not present. 4. Dr. O'Brien-Bell then stated he had been asked by the Mayor to speak on behalf of all those who had received the plaques this evening. He stated he wished to extend thanks to the Council for these presentations and recognition of their service on the Council during the first Centennial years of Surrey. He also paid tribute to the Manager and the staff of the Surrey Municipality, stating that Surrey has the best senior staff in B.C., and even possibly in Canada, and they are responsible for advising Council in regard to their deliberations when they are governing the Municipality. He stated that all the persons appreciated receiving the plaques and the recognition granted them on this occasion. The Mayor thanked those that had come for the presentation this evening, despite the very inclement weather due to the heavy rainfall. He stated one or two had been missed who had been brought II

5 to his attention by Alderman Fomich and they will be recognized at the Volunteer Dinner next year. They had gone back twenty-five years on the recognition but there are some who had served prior to the twenty-five-year deadline who had been missed and would now be recognized. RES. NO. X-497 then Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by A1 derman Fomi ch That the Council meeting do now adjourn for a Public Hearing on several By-laws. The meeting adjourned at 7:40 p.m. and reconvened at 7:55 p.m. 2. Mr. Nizarali Sayani of 911 Fairway Drive, North Vancouver, had been advised of a proposed resolution under Section 873 concerning a fire damaged building at th Avenue. No one appeared in this regard. RES.NO.X-498 Moved by A1 derman Fomi ch Seconded by A1 derman Schrenk That the Council of The Corporation of the District of Surrey hereby declares that the fire damaged building located on Lot One (1) Block Six (6) of the East Half (E 1/2) of Section Twenty-three (23) Block Five (5) North Range Two (2) West P1 an Twenty Thousand Four Hundred Seventy-seven (20477) New Westminster District being Avenue, Surrey, is in so dilapidated and uncleanly a condition as to be offensive to the community. It is hereby ordered that the said fire damaged building be demolished, foundation removed or filled in with clean granular material if necessary, and all debris removed from the site by the owners or agent of the owners within thirty (30) days of service of this order upon them. It is further ordered that should the owners or agent of the owners fail to comply with the aforesaid order within the said period of thirty (30) days, the Engineering Department by their own workmen or contractors, may be instructed to enter on the land and demolish the fire damaged building and remove the debris from the site at the expense of the owner and the charges for so doing, if unpaid by the owner on the 31st day of December of any year, shall be added to and form part of the taxes payable in respect of that land as taxes in arrears. 3. D.S.W.Developments Ltd., c/o Wolstencroft Agencies Ltd., of 317 Columbia Street, New Westminster, B.C., had been advised of the proposed resolution under Section 873 concerning the dilapidated and fire damaged dwelling at King George Highway. The Clerk reported that he had been advised by the Permits and License Department that this site had been cleaned up satisfactorily and no resolution was required.

6 4. Cosmo Zavaglia of th Street had been advised of a proposed resolution under Section 873 concerning a dilapidated dwelling at th Street. No one appeared in this regard. - RES. NO. X-499 Moved by A1 derman Fomi ch Seconded by Alderman Schrenk That the Council of The Corporation of the District of Surrey hereby declares that the dilapidated dwelling located on Lot Forty-Nine (49), Block Twenty-Two (22), Section Nine (9), Block Five (5) North, Range Two (2) West, Plan Twenty-Six Thousand Six Hundred One (26601), New Westminster District being Street, Surrey is in so dilapidated and uncleanly a condition as to be offensive to the community. It is hereby ordered that the said dilapidated dwelling be demolished, foundation removed or filled in with clean granular material if necessary, and all debris removed from the site by the owners or agent of the owners within thirty (30) days of service of this order upon them. It is further ordered that should the owners or agent of the owners fail to comply with the aforesaid order within the said period of thirty (30) days, the Engineering Department by their own workmen or contractors, may be instructed to enter on the land and demolish the dilapidated dwelling and remove the debris from the site at the expense of the owner and the charges for so doing, if unpaid by the owner on the 31st day of December of any year, shall be added to and form part of the taxes payable in respect of that land as taxes in arrears. 5. Yang, Anderson & Collins, Solicitors, of 409 Granville Street, Vancouver had been advised of a proposed resolution under Section 873 concerning a dilapidated dwelling and other buildings at th Street. m No one appeared in this regard. Moved by A1 derman Fomi ch Seconded by Alderman Schrenk That the Council of The Corporation of the District of Surrey hereby declares that the dilapidated dwelling, shed, garage and lean-to located on Lot Four (4), Blocks Ten (10) and Eleven (11) of the North West Quarter (NW 1/4) of the South East Quarter (SE 1/4) of Section Thirty-three (33), Township Eight (8), P1 an Nineteen Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty-eight (19728) New Westminster District being Street, Surrey, B.C. are in so dilapidated and uncleanly a condition as to be offensive to the community. It is hereby ordered that the said dilapidated buildings be demolished, foundation removed or filled in with clean granular material if necessary, and all debris removed from the site by the owners or agent of the owners within thirty (30) days of service of this order upon them. It is further ordered that should the owners or agent of the owners fail to comply with the aforesaid order within the said period of thirty (30) days, the Engineering Department by their own workmen or contractors, may be instructed to enter on the 6.

7 V R ES. NO. X RES. NO. X-50 1 and and demolish the dilapidated buildings and remove the debris from the site at the expense of the owner and the charges for so doing, if unpaid by the owner on the 31st day of December of any year, shall be added to and form part of the taxes payable in respect of that land as taxes in arrears. Alderman McKitka said he would like to have a delegation heard from the Mud Bay Dyking Commission, to hear them in regard to a problem in their area. Dyking Commission be heard. Moved by A1 derman McKi tka Seconded by A1 derman Schrenk That the delegation from the Mud Bay Mr. Gil Van Keulen of th Avenue stated he was speaking on behalf of the Dyking Commission and he submitted a letter from the Chairman of the Mud Bay Dying Commission to Council for their infornation. They were requesting Council to approve of a paving of a short portion of 40th Avenue in the Mud Bay Dyking District. They stated that this portion of road is always in poor condition, as in the summertime it is a washboard and in the wintertime it is full of potholes and mud. They stated the present paving on 40th Avenue ends at 140th Street. They are requesting that the road allowance extending for one-quarter mile west from this point which follows the bend of the Nicomekl River be paved. He stated that thirty residents use the road and it serves an agricultural area. It has an adverse effect on the farm industry because of the condition of the road, particularly in wintertime. Mr. Kitzel, Chairman, stated that his house shakes continually as cars and trucks proceed over the road. The matter was dealt with later in the meeting. C. REPORTS OF VARIOUS COMMITTEES 1. PLANNING COMMITTEE: RES. NO. X-502 (a) Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by A1 derman Jacobs That the minutes of the meeting of December 11th be received. The recomnendations of these minutes were considered and dealt with as follows: 7.

8 RES. NO. X The Planning Committee dealt with an application from Sur-Del Builders Development Ltd., being Application 78-RZ-86(A), which deals with their plans for the second phase of Land Use Contract No. 572 which calls for a 37 unit compact housing project at 96th Avenue and 156th Street under a Development Agreement. Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by A1 derman Watki ns That the Development Agreement under Land Use Contract No. 572 be proceeded with and the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to execute the Development Agreement on completion. with Alderman Fomich against The Committee had dealt with an application from Springfield Development Corporation, being Appplication 79-RZ-135, which is a proposed 22 lot single family subdivision at the north west corner of 60th Avenue and 171A Street. The Committee Is recommendat ion was approved by Counci 1 as f 01 1 ows : Moved by A1 derman Wat k i ns Seconded by A1 derman Jacobs That Appl i cati on 79-RZ-135 be approved to proceed under Section 702 of the Municipal Act, subject to: I (a) meeting all the requirements of the Municipal Engineer; (b) providing a subdivision design to the satisfaction of the Municipal Planner; RES. NO. X-504 (c) dedication of five per cent of land for a tot lot; and (d) payment of development cost charges at subdivision stage. Such approval to be valid for six months from this date. with Alderman Bose against. Alderman Schrenk stated that she was also opposed to this type of development as we are getting a dedication of the five per cent of land for a tot lot but we cannot require the developer now to build it and the result is subdivisions will be ending up with an unkept tot lot in the middle of their subdivisions. The maintenance of these tot lots is now to be the responsibility of the Municipality and it costs between $5, and $7, per year to maintain them. 8.

9 3. The Committee had dealt with Application 79-RZ-138, which is a request for R-2 zoning for property on the south side of 64th Avenue and west of 132nd Street. The Committee had also dealt with Application 79-RZ-140, which is an application for R-2 zoning to allow 18 single family lot subdivision at th Avenue. The Committee had also dealt with Application 79-RZ-143, which is an application for R-2 zoning of property at th Avenue. The Committee had also dealt with Application 79-RZ-153, which is an application for R-2 zoning for a 30 lot single family subdivision in the South Newton area. The Committee had also dealt with Application 79-RZ-163, which is an application for R-2 zoning for an urban lot subdivision at th Avenue. All these applications were the subject of one recomnendation from the Planning Committee which was dealt with as follows: Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That the area in the south west quadrant which is contained within the Urban Growth Area boundary in the South Newton area, be rezoned to R-2 subject to: (a) the Official Regional Plan amendment; (b) the Planning Department preparing a control plan for this area; (c) that the properties inside the Urban Growth Area boundary contained in these five applications be approved for rezoning; and (d) that the properties outside the Urban Growth Area boundary contained in these applications remain as they are presently zoned. RES. NO. X-505 With the approval on the applications approved to be for a six months period. with Aldermen Bose and Campbell against. 4. The Committee had dealt with Application 79-RZ-159, which is an application for R-3 zoning to permit a 24 lot subdivision on the west side of 176th Street in the block.

10 RES. NO. X-506 The Committee recomnendation was dealt with as follows: Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by A1 derman Fomi ch That Application 79-RZ-159 be approved to proceed for R-3 zoning under Section 702 of the Municipal Act subject to: (a) meeting all the requirements of the Municipal Engineer; (b) providing a subdivision plan to the satisfaction of the Municipal P? anner; (c) approval of the Ministry of Highways; (d) dedication of five per cent of land for a tot lot; and (e) payment of development cost charges at the subdivision stage. Such approval to be valid for six months from this date. with Alderman McKitka against. Alderman McKitka spoke against the retention/detention drainage system being employed by the Municipality. He stated the funds for this type of system should be spent on a storm sewer system. He stated that retention/detention system will become very expensive to the Municipality over the years to maintain. 5. The Committee had dealt with Appplication 79-RZ-161, which is an application to permit C4A zoning of an existing service station at 88th Avenue and King George Highway to allow the service station to go self-serve. The Committee recommendation was dealt with as follows: Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by A1 derman Jacobs That Application 79-RZ-161 be approved to proceed under Section 702 of the Municipal Act subject to: (a) approval of the Ministry of Highways;. Ip (b) submission of a site plan, building plan and landscaping plan to the satisfaction of the Planner; and RES. NO. X-507 (c) payment of development cost charges, if applicable, at the building permit stage. Such approval to be valid for six months from this date. I 10.

11 6. The Committee had dealt with Application 79-RZ-166, which is a proposed single family subdivision of 41 lots and a multiple housing project of 45 apartments and 42 townhouse units on the south side of 100th Avenue in the block. This would be a density of 15 units per acre. The zoning would be to R-2 and RM-2. The Committee recommendations were dealt with as follows: RES. NO. X- 508 (a) Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Buckley That Application 79-RZ-166 be tabled to the next Planning Committee meeting and that a report be brought forward to the Planning Committee members on how the Municipality can effectively control recreational standards and designs. R ES. NO. X -509 (b) Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by A1 derman Buckl ey That the Chairman of the Planning Committee and the Municipal Planner approach the Administration to ascertain the most expedient way of adopting the proposed Residential By-laws. mm 7. The Committee had dealt with Application 79-RZ-147, which is a submission by Dayhu Investments Ltd. dealing with a proposed major development project including high rise apartments, offices, service comnercial, and restaurants at the south east corner of 80th Avenue and Scott Road. They were requesting CD Comprehensive development zoning of this area. The Committee recommendation was dealt with as follows: RES. NO. X-5 10 Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by A1 derman Buckl ey That the developer be informed that Application 79-RZ-147 is an ideal project and the Municipality approve of that use of the land but does not intend to rezone it until there is more development on the adjacent land or until Phase I is sufficient to justify an extension. 8. The Committee had dealt with a letter from Mr. and Mrs. W. Munroe of th Street whereby they wished to subdivide their property into two lots, each of which would be 50 x 100 feet in size. The Committee recommendation was dealt with as follows: 11.

12 RES. NO. X-5 11 Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by A1 derman Campbell That Mr. and Mrs. Munroe be advised - that there is no legal mechanism at Council's disposal to relax the Subdivision By-law to the extent required to implement this request. 9. The Committee had dealt with a letter from Mr. J. Klaizner of th Avenue, who was requesting that his property be subdivided into two duplex lots. 12. R ES. NO. X RES. NO. X-5 13 RES. NO. X-514 R ES. NO. X-5 15 (a) Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Buckley That Mr. J. Klaizner of th Avenue be informed to make an application for subdivision under the Subdivision By-law and his request will be at the discretion of the Approving Off i cer. with Aldermen Bose and Fomich agai nst. (b) Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by A1 derman Wat k i ns That the Municipal Planner bring in a recomnendation on how to amend the By-laws to resolve - this problem. with Aldermen Bose and Fomich against. 10. The Committee had dealt with letters from the Newton Community Ratepayers' Association dealing with planning in their area and also the letter that had been written by the Panorama Ridge Ratepayers' Planning Committee dealing with urban zoning south of 64th Avenue. (a) Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Campbell That the Secretary of the Newton Ratepayers' Associ ati on be thanked for her letter and advised that Council has not made any appointment to that Committee. Carr i ed (b) That the letter from the Newton Ratepayers' Association be received and forwarded on to the Panorama Ridge Planning Committee for their information. 11. The Committee had dealt with a lengthy report from the Planner dealing with the delegation in July of this year which had requested that their area, bounded by 84th Avenue, 88th Avenue and 140th Street and 144th Street, be considered for industrial development. I

13 A petition had been submitted at that time indicating approval of the property owners for industrial zoning. The Committee recommendation was dealt with as follows: RES.NO.X-516 Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by A1 derman Wat k i ns That the proposal presented in the report of the Director of Planning be presented to the residents who made the submission to the Planning Committee, for discussion, and following that presentation the residents who made the proposal should call a public information meeting with the surrounding residents to discuss this plan. with Aldermen Jacobs, Fomich and McKitka against. w RES. NO. X-517 RES. NO. X The Committee had dealt with a report from the Deputy Planner dealing with the Cloverdale Local Area Planning Committee. The Deputy Planner had requested that this Committee be extended through to December 1980 and that there be no change in membership. Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That the present Cloverdale Local Area Planning Committee be continued until June 30th, then Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by A1 derman Campbell That Alderman Bose be Council representative on the Cloverdale Local Area Planning Committee. 13. The Planning Committee had received a report from the Director of Planning on the approval procedure for neighbourhood pub applications. The Committee had approved of this procedure. "'Approval Procedure for Neighbourhood Pub Applications': The following is a step by step process for the approval of a Neighbourhood Public House: 1. The proponent will first approach the Municipality through the Planning Department, to establish whether or not the property is suitably zoned or could be rezoned for a neighbourhood pub. This enquiry shall be in written form. 13.

14 2. The Planning Department will report to the Planning Committee indicating whether or not the site is - suitable for a neighbourhood pub. Council, by resolution, will either give the application "Approval in principle" or reject it. 3. On approval by Council, the Planning Department shall issue a letter of "pre-clearance" to the applicant so that he may then approach the Liquor Control Branch. (a) If rejected by Council, a letter of rejection shall be sent by the Planning Department. 4. The proponent shall apply to the Liquor Control Branch at: Liquor Control and Licensing Branch # Willingdon Avenue Burnaby, B.C. V5C 5T1 for preliminary approval. The letter from the Municipality shall be accompanied by a certificate of ownership, or a lease or option to purchase the property involved. This preliminary approval will be either granted or refused by the General Manager. (a) If preliminary approval by the General Manager is received, the applicant will be required to make a survey of the adjoining neighbours The survey is to be made by an independent surveyor and a copy sent to the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch, the Applicant, and the Surrey Planning Department. The survey will then be presented to Council, so that Council can determine if the application will proceed to the By-law stage. If Council does not approve the application, a Rezoning By-law will not be introduced if rezoning is required. 6. Should the property require rezoning, an application shall now be made to the Municipality for rezoning. 7. The Planning Department will introduce a Zoning By-law to Council. 8. Following Public Hearing, if considered acceptable, Council will grant final approval to the Zoning By-law. 9. The Municipality will then advise the Liquor Control Board that the rezoning has had final approval. 14.

15 10. A letter will be received by the Municipality from the General Manager of the Liquor Control and Licensing Branch if he gives his approval subsequent to the receipt of the survey result and rezoning approval." RES. NO. X-519 Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That the above information sheet dealing with Approval Procedure for a Neighbourhood Public House be approved for distribution to the public. 14. The Planning Committee submitted the following seven names together with one Alternate, as persons to be members of the Frazer Heights Local Area Planning Committee: Mr. Larry Starnes (Res ) Avenue!Accountant) Mr. Gordon Kedd.y (Res ) (BUS ) A Street (Insurance Sales) Mr. Chuck Moon (Res ) Avenue (Building Inspector) Mr. J. Dunne (Res ) Street (Distribution Mechanic) Mr. Vic Karoway (Res ) (BUS ) Street (Real Estate Sales) ALTERNATE: Mr. Peter Spoor (Bus ) Avenue (Owner of F1 ori s t Company) Mrs. Rita Bedard (Res ) Avenue (School Board Trustee) Mr. Bill Bowman (Res ) (BUS ) Avenue (Real Estate Sales) 15.

16 RES. NO. X-5 20 RES. NO. X-521 RES.NO. X-522 RES. NO. X-523 Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by A1 derman Campbell That the Fraser Heights Area Planning Committee be appointed with the seven members outlined above together with one Alternate as outlined above. 15. Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman McKitka That the proposal from Dominion Construction Limited concerning an industrial park in the Fraser Heights area be received and referred to the Fraser Heights Local Area Planning Committee. 2. TRAFFIC COMMITTEE (a) Moved by Alderman Jacobs Seconded by A1 derman Campbell That the minutes of the meeting of December 13th be received. (b) Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That the recommendations of these minutes be adopted. 0 D. REPORTS OF VARIOUS BOARDS: 1. GREATER VANCOUVER REGIONAL DISTRICT (a) (b) Minutes of the Park Committee meeting of October 17th were submitted. Minutes of the Technical Planning Committee meeting of November 23rd were submitted. RES. NO. X Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by A1 derman Watki ns That the above minutes be received. 2. ADVISORY DESIGN PANEL: RES.NO.X-525 November 28th be received. Moved by A1 derman Fomi ch Seconded by Alderman Watkins That the minutes of the meeting of 16.

17 3. BOARD OF VARIANCE: RES. NO. X December 12th be received. Moved by A1 derman Fomi ch Seconded by A1 derman Bose That the minutes of the meeting of FRASER VALLEY REGIONAL LIBRARY BOARD D RES. NO.X-527 A letter from the Fraser Valley Regional Library Board was received dealing with the grant they had received from the Community Recreation Facilities Fund in regard to their new headquarters building. The Board proposes to establish a reserve fund to be used to finance the purchase of 25 per cent of the new books needed for expanding Branch Libraries in any one year. This would have the effect of spreading the tax reduction over several years by spending a part of it each year, as needed, to buy books for the expanding Branch Libraries. The Board was asking whether or not the Council wished to receive the full tax reduction for 1980 or approve of the establishment of a reserve fund as indicated above. Surrey's share of this recreation grant in one sum would be $45,151.OO. Moved by A1 derman Watkins Seconded by A1 derman Schrenk That the Council instruct our representative on the Fraser Valley Regional Library Board to support the establishment of the reserve fund for new books, as outlined. E. MAYOR'S REPORT: The Mayor reported that the Lower Mainland area has suffered from very heavy rains over the last few days. He referred to the report that had been received from the Municipal Engineer under today's date in this regard. He stated that some areas are suffering flooding and some roads are cl osed. The report indicated that crews were called out shortly after 2:30 a.m., on the morning of December 17th, in response to flooding calls. By 8:OO a.m. over 210 employees and some 100 vehicles were responding to a deluge of calls. At noon, over 600 calls had been received by the Engineering Department. Basement flooding and plugged culverts were most in evidence. W Three-and-a-half inches of rain fell overnight, with three-quarters of an inch coming between 8:30 a.m. and noon. The precipitation is in excess of the five-year return storm. 17.

18 The report indicated that several roads were closed, due to flooding, and severe erosion had occurred at various locations. A map of the flooding and erosion areas was shown for the information of the Council. The Mayor stated that the crews will be working around the clock to try to cope with the situation. He pointed out that the system is designed for a one-in-five-year storm and this is severe enough to be at least a one- i n-ten-year storm. Alderman McKitka stated that he had received many calls and sandbags had been provided to residents to help combat the flooding situation and he stated that many basements were flooded. - Alderman Watkins pointed out that we should be using the Provincial Emergency Program Funds to get pumps and bags, to have on hand for such emergencies. F. BY-LAWS: 1. "Portion of 70B Avenue Highway Exchange By-law, 1979, No. 6051" was introduced and read for the first time. RES.NO.X-528 Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman McKitka That "Portion of 70B Avenue Highway Exchange By-law, 1979, No. 6051" do pass its first reading. Car r i ed The said By-law was then read for the second time. RES.NO.X-529 Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by A1 derman Watki ns That "Portion of 70B Avenue Highway Exchange By-law, 1979, No. 6051" pass its second reading. The said By-law was then read for the third time..- RES.NO.X-530 Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by A1 derman Campbell That "Portion of 708 Avenue Highway Exchange By-law, 1979, No. 6051" pass its third reading. 2. "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment By-law, 1979, No. 6039" had been to Public Hearing earlier this evening and was now read for the third time. RES.NO.X-531 Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment By-law, 1979, No. 6039" pass its third reading. 18.

19 3. "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment By-law, 1979, No. 6040" had been to Public Hearing earlier this evening. However it was not ready for third reading as the amendment to the Official Regional Plan had not yet been received. At the Public Hearing, delegations had requested that no action be taken on this rezoning until the Local Area Planning Committee for Fleetwood had had input into the application. m RES. NO. X-532 RES. NO. X-533 Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by A1 derman Campbell That "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment By-law, 1979, No. 6040" be tabled and the application be referred to the Fleetwood Local Area Planning Committee for its input. with Aldermen Watkins, Bose, Jacobs and McKitka against. This By-law was discussed again after Item 22 had been dealt with. pointed out that the Council cannot receive representations in regard to a By-law after Public Hearing. The question of whether or not it should be delayed, in view of the fact that this is an expansion of an existing industry that has been in the area for many years, was also discussed. motion. Moved by A1 derman Fomi ch Seconded by Alderman Bose That Council reconsider the above with Alderman Schrenk against. The above motion to table was then before the Council. The motion was ruled out of order by the Ma-yor, as Council could not refer this By-law to the Local Area Planning Committee for input after Public Heari ng. RES. NO. X "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment By-law, 1979, No. 6042" had been to Public Hearing earlier this evening and was now read for the third time. Moved by Alderman Watkins Seconded by A1 derman Campbell That "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment By-law, 1979, No. 6042" pass its third reading. with Aldermen Schrenk, Fomich and McKitka against. 5. "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment By-law, 1979, No. 6043" had been to Public Hearing earlier this evening and was now read for the third time. - RES. Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment By-law, 1979, No. 6043" pass its third reading. NO. X

20 6. "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment By-law, 1979, No. 6002" was read and reconsidered. - Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment By-law, 1979, No. 6002" be finally adopted, signed by the Mayor and Clerk and sealed with the Corporate Seal. RES. NO. X "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment By-law, 1979, No. 6019" was read and reconsidered. RES.NO.X RES. NO. X RES. NO. X RES. NO. X-540 Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by A1 derman Campbell That "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment By-law, 1979, No. 6019" be finally adopted, signed by the Mayor and Clerk and sealed with the Corporate Seal. "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment And No. 9 Development Permit Area Designation By-law, 1979, No. 6026" was read and reconsidered. Moved by Alderman Schrenk - Seconded by A1 derman Watki ns That "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment And No. 9 Development Permit Area Designation By-law, 1979, No. 6026" be finally adopted, signed by the Mayor and Clerk and sealed with the Corporate Seal. "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment By-law, 1979, No. 6022" was read and reconsidered. Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment By-law, 1979, No. 6022" be finally adopted, signed by the Mayor and Clerk and sealed with the Corporate Seal. "Surrey - Provincial Johnston Heights Subdivision Services Installation Agreement Authorization By-law, 1979, No. 6045" was read and reconsidered. Moved by A1 derman Campbell Seconded by A1 derman Watki ns That "Surrey - Provi nci a1 Johnston Heights Subdivision Services Installation Agreement Authorization By-law, 1979, No. 6045" be finally adopted, signed by the Mayor and Clerk and sealed with the Corporate Seal. I 20.

21 11. "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment By-law, 1979, 6038" was read and reconsidered. m u RES. NO. X RES. NO. X RES. NO. X RES. NO. X RES. NO. X Amendment Mayor and C1 erk "Lands Sa e By- Moved by A1 derman Campbell Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. By-law, 1979, 6038" be finally adopted, signed by the and sealed with the Corporate Seal. aw, 1979, No. 6046" was read and reconsidered. Moved by A1 derman Fomi ch Seconded by Alderman Bose That "Lands Sale By-law, 1979, No. 6046" be finally adopted, signed by the Mayor and Clerk and sealed with the Corporate Seal. "Land Purchase By-law, 1979, No. 6047" was read and reconsidered. Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by A1 derman Fomi ch That "Land Purchase By-law, 1979, No. 6047" be finally adopted, signed by the Mayor and Clerk and sealed with the Corporate Seal. "Portion of 133A Street Road Closing By-law, 1979, No. 6060" was read and reconsidered. Moved by A1 derman Bose Seconded by A1 derman Campbell That "Portion of 133A Street Road Closing By-law, 1979, No. 6060" be finally adopted, signed by the Mayor and Clerk and sealed with the Corporate Seal. "Portion of 102nd Avenue Closing By-law, 1979, No. 6061" was read and reconsidered. Moved by Alderman Bose Seconded by A1 derman Fomi ch That "Portion of 102nd Avenue Closing By-law, 1979, No. 6061" be finally adopted, signed by the Mayor and Clerk and sealed with the Corporate Seal. "Surrey Indemnities By-law, 1979, No. 6062" was read and reconsidered. U RES. NO. X-546 Moved by A1 derman Fomi ch Seconded by A1 derman Campbell That "Surrey Indemnities By-law, 1979, No. 6062" be finally adopted, signed by the Mayor and Clerk and sealed with the Corporate Seal. with Aldermen Bose, Fomich and TEKXG against. 21.

22 17. RES. NO. X-547 RES.NO. X-548 RES. N0.X RES. NO. X-550 RES.NO.X-551 RES. NO. X "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment By-law, 1979, No. 6063" was introduced and read for the first time. - Moved by A1 derman Campbell Seconded by Alderman Schrenk That "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment By-law, 1979, No. 6063" pass its first reading. The said By-law was then read for the second time. Moved by Alderman Campbell Seconded by Alderman Bose That "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment By-law, 1979, No. 6063" pass its second reading. then Moved by A1 derman Bose Seconded by A1 derman Watkins That the Public Hearing on "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265, Amendment By-law, 1979, No. 6063" be held at the Municipal Hall on Monday, January 7th, 1980, at 7:30 p.m. "Land Purchase By-law, 1979, No. 6064" was introduced and read for the first time. 6064" pass its first reading. Moved by Alderman Jacobs Seconded by A1 derman Fomi ch That "Land Purchase By-law, 197Q, No. Carr i ed The said By-law was then read for the second time. Moved by Alderman Jacobs Seconded by A1 derman Schrenk That "Land Purchase By-law, 1979, No. 6064" pass its second reading. The said By-law was then read for the third time. 6064" pass its third reading. Moved by A1 derman Fomi ch Seconded by A1 derman Jacobs That "Land Purchase By-law, 1979, No. "Surrey Development Cost Charge By-law, 1979, No. 5936, Amendment By-law, 1979, No. 6065" was introduced and read for the first time. 22.

23 U RES. NO. X-553 Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by A1 derman McKitka That "Surrey Development Cost Charge By-law, 1979, No. 5936, Amendment By-law, 1979, No. 6065" pass its first reading. with Aldermen Bose and Fomich against. The said By-law was then read for the second time. RES. NO. X-554 By-law, 1979, No. second reading. Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Surrey Development Cost Charge 5936, Amendment By-law, 1979, No. 6065" pass its with Aldermen Bose, Campbell a n d i ch against. The said By-law was then read for the third time. RES.NO.X-555 Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by A1 derman Watki ns That "Surrey Development Cost Charge By-law, 1979, No. 5936, Amendment By-law, 1979, No. 6065" pass its third reading. with Aldermen Bose, Campbell and Fomich against. m 20. "Development Cost Charge Reserve Fund Expenditure By-law, 1979, No. 6066" was introduced and read for the first time. RES. NO. X-556 RES.NO.X-557 Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Development Cost Charge Reserve Fund Expenditure By-law, 1979, No. 6066" pass its first reading. with Aldermen Bose, Campbell and Fomich against. The said By-law was then read for the second time. Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by Alderman Watkins That "Development Cost Charge Reserve Fund Expenditure By-law, 1979, No. 6066" pass its second reading. with Aldermen Bose, Campbell and Fomich against The said By-law was then read for the third time. Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by A1 derman McKitka That "Development Cost Charge Reserve Fund Expenditure By-law, 1979, No. 6066" pass its third reading. 23.

24 RES. NO. X-558 with Aldermen Bose, Campbell and Fomich against In regard to "Part 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942", the Clerk reported that it is now proposed to process this By-law to final adoption without waiting for the completion of Part 3. It is therefore necessary to amend Part 1 to add a repeal section to it to repeal the sections of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No as Amended, so that the new By-law can be put in place. He therefore requested that the following clause be added to "Part 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942": "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265", as amended, is further amended by repealing the following sections of said By-law 2265 as amended: PART I - dealing with "Definitions" and "Compliance"; PART I1 - "Zones" as it relates to agricultural, residential, recreation commercial zone P; institutional zone (personal care) P-2; church and assembly zone P-3; and G -- cemetery zone; PART I11 - "General Provisions:; PART IV - "A-1 -- Agricultural Zone"; PART V - "A-2 -- Intensive Agricultural Zone"; PART VA - "A-3 -- Agricultural Zone"; PART VI - "RS -- Suburban Residential Zone"; PART VI1 - "R-1 -- Residential Zone Number One"; PART VI11 - "R-2 -- Residential Zone Number Two"; PART IX - "R-3 -- Residential Zone Number Three 'I; PART IX-1 - "RF-1 -- Floodplain Residential Zone Number One (1)"; PART IXA - "RM-1 -- Residential Multiple Dwelling Zone Number One"; PART IXB - "RM-2 -- Residential Multiple Dwelling Zone Number Two"; PART IXC - "RM-3 -- Residential Multiple Dwelling Zone Number Three "; PART XV - "G -- Cemetery Zone"; PART XVII - IlP -- Recreation Commercial Zone"; PART XVIIA - "P-2 -- Institutional Zone (Personal Care)"; PART XVIIB - "P-3 -- Church And Assembly Zone"; PART XVIII - "Off-Street Parking" as it relates to any of the above-menti oned zones; PART XIX - "Signs"; PART XX - "Special Building Set-Back" as it relates to any of the above-mentioned zones; PART XXA - "F1 oodproof i ng"; PART XXI - "Violations"; I RES.NO.X-559 The zoning maps as they relate to the zones covered by Part 1 are hereb,y attached to and made part of By-law Moved by A1 derman Fomi ch Seconded by Alderman Schrenk That the above section dealing with the repeal section of "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1964, No. 2265" and adding the maps to Part 1, be approved. with Alderman McKitka against. a 24.

25 - Seconded U RES. NO. X RES.NO.X-561 The said By-law was then read for the third time. Moved by A1 derman Fomi ch by Alderman Schrenk That "Part 1 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942" pass its third reading. In regard to "Part 2 of Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942" the Clerk stated that, at the recent Public Hearing, Mill & Timber Products Limited had requested that their properties be shown as zoned to the new "Industrial Waterfront Zone (I-W)" rather than to the "Industri a1 General Zone (I-G)" and "Industri a1 Transportation Zone (I-T)" as indicated. The Planner had stated that the change was in order. Moved by A1 derman Bose Seconded by Alderman Campbell That the following properties be shown on the maps in Part 2 of "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942" as "Industrial Waterfront Zone (I-W)", namely: Lot "Bll, Block 33, Sections 5 and 8, Block Five North, Range 2 West, Plan 1698, N.W.D.; Lot Four (4), Block 33, Sections 5 and 8, Block Five North, Range 2 West, Plan 1698, N.W.D.; and Lots 1, 2 and 3, Section 4, Block Five North, Range 2 West, Plan 6630, N.W.D.. G. MANAGER'S REPORT: The Manager's Report under date of December 17th was considered and dealt with as follows: Item 9878 The Manager submitted a report from the Engineer, dealing with the matter of the intersection of 16th Avenue and 152nd Street. He pointed out that the Municipality has improved 16th Avenue east of 152nd Street and that Genstar Development is improving 16th Avenue west of 152nd Street. In order to do a proper job of 16th Avenue, the intersection of 16th Avenue and 152nd Street should be constructed as one operation. The Engineer stated he has written to the City of White Rock, asking if they are budgeting any funds for improvements to this intersection in 1980 so that the entire intersection can be done at one time. If they do not have any funds, the construction will be terminated at the centre of 16th Avenue. The cost of work on the White Rock side is estimated to be $19,

26 RES. NO. X-562 Moved by A1 derman Fomi ch Seconded by A1 derman Jacobs That the report be received. 311 Item 9879 The Manager submitted a letter sent to the Mayor by the Lower Fraser Valley Exhibition Association concerning Racing Dates Application for They are requesting Council Is support for their application for 1980 racing dates. They have requested dates for April to offset the lost dates this fall due to the grandstand construction, and also dates in September of 980. Fraser Valley the Provincia RES. NO. X-563 Item 9880 Moved by Alderman Schrenk Seconded by A1 derman Campbell That the Council endorse the Lower Exhibition Association's proposed 1980 racing schedule to Government. The Manager submitted a lengthy report from the Engineer, dealing with the interchange at 192nd Street and No. 1 Highway. Former Mayor Vogel had evidently requested an interchange be constructed at this intersection and a letter from the Minister of Highways has now been received in this regard. m The Engineer stated that the Minister was reluctant to have an interchange at 192nd Street due to its close proximity to the 200th Street interchange in Langley. The Municipal Engineer feels that we should consider directional ramps at 192nd Street. The Minister had also stated that the construction of an interchange at 192nd Street would not be sufficient by itself, but extending the North Perimeter Road into Port Kells area and constructing the 96th Avenue overpass off Highway No. 1 would also be considered. The Engineer stated that they are presently participating in a joint study of the "Surrey Major Road Network" with staff of the Transportation Planning Branch to identify future road needs. The Minister had also asked to know what roadworks the Municipality has intended to provide access into Port Kells. The Engineer advised that the following roadworks had been completed to serve the industrial area of Port Kells, namely: - a structural overlay of 192nd Street and Harvey Road from Harvey Road overpass to 96th Avenue; - 192nd Street had been widened to four travel lanes north of 96th Avenue, and - 96th Avenue had been given a structural overlay east of 192nd Street. 26.

27 Engineering is also proposing two-lane reconstruction of 96th Avenue from 182nd Street to 192nd Street, in The Engineer stated that he intended to establish a future roadwork network, a fiscal plan in support of a recornended road construction program and ensure protection of needed right-of-ways. He strongly recomnended that the Minister be requested to have his Planning staff study the traffic impact of the Port Kells industrial area to determine the demand for directional ramps at 192nd Street. The Engineer also recommended that prior to completion of this traffic impact study, the Ministry of Highways be requested to protect the availability of the right-of-way required to construct these directional ramps. Moved by A1 derman Schrenk Seconded by A1 derman Fomi ch That the recomnendations of the Engineer be adopted and the Minister of Highways be so advised. RES. NO. X-564 Item 9881 The Manager submitted his report to Council dealing with the Crescent Beach Comfort Station, with particular reference to a letter received from the Crescent Beach Property Owners' Assocation under date of December 3rd. He also submitted a report from the Parks and Recreation Administrator giving his comments on their letter of December 3rd, for the information of Countil. The Manager commented on each of the items in the letter from the Crescent Beach Property Owners' Association and stated as f 011 ows: The location of the building has been set to best reflect the improvements carried out to Beecher Street to open up a vista towards the sea, and to provide access to the building from the direction of the highest use. It would be hazardous to have parking between the building and the beach front. He stated that the balance of the lot between the facility and the adjacent house to be a park-like setting has been taken care of He stated that the choice of materials should be left to the Architect. The proposed second floor of the building is commensurate with the existing profile of the buildings along the street, and would provide an excellent location for a Senior Citizens facility. The Lifeguard Station is a request from the Parks and Recreation Department, and would best be left to them. The R.C.M.P. constable. office will be made to accommodate an office for one 5. The matter of building materials should be left to the Architect. 27.