Meeting Date: April 10, 2017 Agenda Item: HC/CPA 17-03: Thompson Road, west of State Road 39 Presenter: Krista Kelly ext. 328 Action Necessary: Yes

Transcription

1 Executive Summary Meeting Date: April 10, 2017 Agenda Item: HC/CPA 17-03: Thompson Road, west of State Road 39 Presenter: Krista Kelly ext. 328 Action Necessary: Yes Summary: This is a privately initiated amendment to the adopted Future Land Use Map of the Future of Hillsborough Comprehensive Plan for Unincorporated Hillsborough County. The 2± acre amendment site consists of two parcels located in the Rural Service Area. The subject properties are located on the south side of Thompson Road, approximately a quarter-mile west of State Road 39. The site is developed with a single-family home on the western lot, and is undeveloped on the eastern lot. The surrounding area on the south side of Thompson Road reflects a rural residential development pattern with a variety of agricultural uses interspersed among the properties. Alderman s Ford Park encompasses approximately 1,000 acres on the north side of Thompson Road. The applicant is requesting a Future Land Use designation change from Agricultural Rural-1/5 (AR-1/5) to Residential-1 (RES-1). The impact of the change would be to bring the developed lot into conformity with the Future Land Use Category, recognizing the existing use of the single-family home, and allowing for an additional single family home on the adjacent lot. The site does not meet locational criteria, and non-residential uses would not be allowed unless a waiver was granted. The proposed amendment is consistent with the Plan s Rural Area strategy that recognizes and support suburban enclaves outside the Urban Service Area. The subject properties are reflective of the surrounding rural residential development pattern which is characterized as a suburban enclave. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Planning Commission find HC/CPA CONSISTENT with the Future of Hillsborough Comprehensive Plan for Unincorporated Hillsborough County. Attachments: Amendment Staff Report, Maps, Agency Comments, Site Photographs, and Land Use Designation, Descriptions Plan Hillsborough planhillsborough.org planner@plancom.org E Kennedy Blvd 18 th Floor Tampa, FL,

2 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 2

3 Resolution Item: Unincorporated Hillsborough County Comprehensive Plan Amendment: HC/CPA Thompson Road, west of State Road 39 AYE NAY ABSENT DATE: April 10, 2017 Mitch Thrower, Chair Bowen A Arnold, Vice-Chair Gary Pike, Member-at-Large Matthew D Buzza X X X X Derek L Doughty, PE X Mitch Thrower X Chair Theodore Trent Green, RA Nigel M Joseph Karen Kress, AICP Michael Maurino Jacqueline S Wilds Melissa E Zornitta, AICP Executive Director X X X X Melissa E. Zornitta, AICP Executive Director On motion of Commissioner Buzza Seconded by Commissioner Green The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission, in accordance with Laws of Florida has developed a long-range comprehensive plan for unincorporated Hillsborough County entitled the Future of Hillsborough Comprehensive Plan for Unincorporated Hillsborough County, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes and Chapter , Laws of Florida, as amended; and; WHEREAS, the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission has received a privately initiated map amendment proposal to the adopted Future Land Use Map found in the Future Land Use Element of the Future of Hillsborough Comprehensive Plan for Unincorporated Hillsborough County; and Plan Hillsborough planhillsborough.org planner@plancom.org E Kennedy Blvd 18 th Floor Tampa, FL, WHEREAS, the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission staff reviewed the proposed map amendment to change 2± acres from Agricultural Rural- 1/5 to Residential-and found it to be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the County s long range plan as described in the attached staff report dated April 10, 2017; and

4 Resolution Hillsborough County Comprehensive Plan Amendment: HC/CPA Thompson Road, west of State Road 39 April 10, 2017 WHEREAS, the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal, has considered existing and expected future development patterns and community facilities in the respective area, as well as the adopted goals, objectives and policies of the Future of Hillsborough Comprehensive Plan for Unincorporated Hillsborough County as follows: Future Land Use Element Policy 1.4: Compatibility characteristics of different uses or activities or design which allow them to be located near or adjacent to each other in harmony. Some elements affecting compatibility include the following: height, scale, mass, and bulk of structures, pedestrian or vehicular traffic, circulation, access and parking impacts, landscaping, lighting, noise, odor and architecture. Compatibility does not mean the same as. Rather, it refers to the sensitivity of development proposals in maintaining the character of existing development characteristics of different uses or activities or design which allow them to be located near or adjacent to each other in harmony. Some elements affecting compatibility include the following: height, scale, mass, and bulk of structures, pedestrian or vehicular traffic, circulation, access and parking impacts, landscaping, lighting, noise, odor and architecture. Compatibility does not mean the same as. Rather, it refers to the sensitivity of development proposals in maintaining the character of existing development. Policy 16.1: Established and planned neighborhoods and communities shall be protected by restricting incompatible land uses through mechanisms such as: a) locational criteria for the placement of non-residential uses as identified in this Plan, b) limiting commercial development in residential land use categories to neighborhood scale; c) requiring buffer areas and screening devices between unlike land uses; Policy 16.2: Gradual transitions of intensities between different land uses shall be provided for as new development is proposed and approved, through the use of professional site planning, buffering and screening techniques and control of specific land uses. Policy 16.3: Development and redevelopment shall be integrated with the adjacent land uses through: a) the creation of like uses; or b) creation of complementary uses; or c) mitigation of adverse impacts; and d) transportation/pedestrian connections Rural Area Rural areas will typically carry land use densities of 1 du/5 ga or lesser intense designations. There will be no new extension of public water or sewer service into the Rural Area unless there is a public health concern identified or the development is classified as a planned village as

5 Resolution Hillsborough County Comprehensive Plan Amendment: HC/CPA Thompson Road, west of State Road 39 April 10, 2017 described in this Plan. New development will utilize private potable water wells and septic systems. In some cases, existing water and/or sewer lines may already be in place either by development approvals granted prior to the adoption of these policies or due to public health/safety issues. Expansion of those systems should be prohibited and limited to cases where public health is at risk. Within the rural area there are existing developments that are characterized as suburban enclaves or rural communities. These are residential developments which have a more dense development pattern and character, usually 1 or 2 du/ga. These enclaves are recognized through the placement of land use categories that permit densities higher than 1 du/5 acres. New development of a character similar to the established community will be permitted to infill in a limited manner, but not be permitted to expand into areas designated with lower land use densities. Rural communities, such as Lutz, Keystone and Thonotosassa will specifically be addressed through community-based planning efforts. These communities, and others like them, have historically served as centers for community activities within the rural environment Objective 4: The Rural Area will provide areas for long term, agricultural uses and large lot, low density rural residential uses which can exist without the threat of urban or suburban encroachment, with the goal that no more than 20% of all population growth within the County will occur in the Rural Area. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission staff has determined that HC/CPA is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Future of Hillsborough Comprehensive Plan for Unincorporated Hillsborough; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission finds HC/CPA CONSISTENT with the Future of Hillsborough Comprehensive Plan for Unincorporated Hillsborough Comprehensive Plan and recommends that it be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners for approval.

6 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 6

7 Unincorporated Hillsborough County: HC/CPA Thompson Road, west of State Road 39 Planning Commission Public Hearing: April 10, 2017 Future Land Use Map Amendment Summary Information Application Type Location Property Size Privately Initiated 313 Thompson Road, Lithia, FL 2± acres Folio Number and Existing Future Land Use Proposed Future Land Use Existing Land Use Urban Service Area Community Plan Area Applicable Plan Sections Staff Planner Staff Recommendation Agricultural Rural-1/5 (AR-1/5) Residential-1 (RES-1) Mobile Home on and the other lot is vacant No SouthShore Areawide Systems Plan Future Land Use Element related to the Plan s Rural Area strategy and compatibility Krista Kelly, AICP Consistent Impact of Proposed Change The applicant is requesting the following Future Land Use Map designation change: Potential Impact Current Land Use Category Proposed Land Use Category Acres: 2.0± AR-1/5 RES-1 Maximum Density Up to 1 dwelling units per 5 gross acres (DU/AC) Nonconforming Up to 1 dwelling units per gross acre (DU/AC) Maximum Residential none Development Potential Range of Allowable Uses Farms, ranches, feed lots, residential uses, rural scale neighborhood commercial uses, offices, industrial uses related to agricultural uses, and mining related activities. Nonresidential uses shall meet established locational criteria for specific land use. 2 DU Farms, ranches, residential uses, rural scale neighborhood commercial uses, offices, and multi-purpose projects. Commercial, office, and multipurpose uses shall meet locational criteria for specific land use projects Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Rural scale neighborhood commercial, office or industrial up to 40,000 sq. ft. or.25 FAR, whichever is less intense Rural scale neighborhood commercial, office multipurpose projects limited to 7

8 30,000 sq. ft. or.25 FAR, whichever is less intense Practical Impacts The primary impacts would be: Bringing parcel ( ) into conformity with the Future Land Use Category, recognizing the existing use of the single family home on this parcel. Allowing an additional single family home on the adjacent parcel ( ) The site does not meet locational criteria and nonresidential uses would not be allowed unless a waiver was granted Context of Proposed Change Existing Land Use and Typical Development in the Area *See aerial in Attachment A The subject site consists of two 1± acre parcels located approximately a quarter mile west of State Road 39, off Thompson Road. One parcel of the subject site is developed with one single family home and a detached garage; the other parcel is vacant. The surrounding area reflects rural residential development pattern generally occurring along the south side of Thompson Road. Alderman s Ford Regional Park, a County Park encompassing 8

9 over 1,000 acres, is adjacent to the site on the north side of Thompson Road. The predominate use in the surrounding area is residential. However, there are a few non-residential uses approximately a mile southeast of the site at including a strip mall, an Elementary School and a convenience store at the intersection of State Road 39 and Lithia Pinecrest. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies and Criteria Future Land Use Element Policy 1.4: Compatibility characteristics of different uses or activities or design which allow them to be located near or adjacent to each other in harmony. Some elements affecting compatibility include the following: height, scale, mass, and bulk of structures, pedestrian or vehicular traffic, circulation, access and parking impacts, landscaping, lighting, noise, odor and architecture. Compatibility does not mean the same as. Rather, it refers to the sensitivity of development proposals in maintaining the character of existing development characteristics of different uses or activities or design which allow them to be located near or adjacent to each other in harmony. Some elements affecting compatibility include the following: height, scale, mass, and bulk of structures, pedestrian or vehicular traffic, circulation, access and parking impacts, landscaping, lighting, noise, odor and architecture. Compatibility does not mean the same as. Rather, it refers to the sensitivity of development proposals in maintaining the character of existing development. Policy 16.1: Established and planned neighborhoods and communities shall be protected by restricting incompatible land uses through mechanisms such as: a) locational criteria for the placement of non-residential uses as identified in this Plan, b) limiting commercial development in residential land use categories to neighborhood scale; c) requiring buffer areas and screening devices between unlike land uses; Policy 16.2: Gradual transitions of intensities between different land uses shall be provided for as new development is proposed and approved, through the use of professional site planning, buffering and screening techniques and control of specific land uses. Policy 16.3: Development and redevelopment shall be integrated with the adjacent land uses through: a) the creation of like uses; or b) creation of complementary uses; or c) mitigation of adverse impacts; and d) transportation/pedestrian connections Rural Area Rural areas will typically carry land use densities of 1 du/5 ga or lesser intense designations. There will be no new extension of public water or sewer service into the Rural Area unless there is a public health concern identified or the development is classified as a planned village as described in this Plan. New development will utilize private potable water wells and septic systems. In some cases, existing water and/or sewer lines may already be in place either by 9

10 development approvals granted prior to the adoption of these policies or due to public health/safety issues. Expansion of those systems should be prohibited and limited to cases where public health is at risk. Within the rural area there are existing developments that are characterized as suburban enclaves or rural communities. These are residential developments which have a more dense development pattern and character, usually 1 or 2 du/ga. These enclaves are recognized through the placement of land use categories that permit densities higher than 1 du/5 acres. New development of a character similar to the established community will be permitted to infill in a limited manner, but not be permitted to expand into areas designated with lower land use densities. Rural communities, such as Lutz, Keystone and Thonotosassa will specifically be addressed through community-based planning efforts. These communities, and others like them, have historically served as centers for community activities within the rural environment Objective 4: The Rural Area will provide areas for long term, agricultural uses and large lot, low density rural residential uses which can exist without the threat of urban or suburban encroachment, with the goal that no more than 20% of all population growth within the County will occur in the Rural Area. Staff Analysis Development Trends The amendment site is located in an area that is rural and agricultural in character. There has been very little development activity near the site since the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. The general trend is the retention of rural home sites on tracts of one acre or greater and continued farming and agricultural activities. Staff Finding The proposed amendment site is located in the Rural Service Area. The site and surrounding area on the south side of Thompson Road is designated Agricultural Rural-1/5 (AR-1/5). Further south and south west of the site, a large area is designated Residential-1 (RES-1). To the north, Aldermans Ford Park, the area is designated Natural Preservation (NP). The applicant is requesting a Future Land Use designation change from AR-1/5 to RES-1 to recognize the two 1± acre lots that are the subject of this proposed amendment. Currently, the 1± acre lots are non-conforming with the adopted AR-1/5 land category which allows for 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres or greater. Designating the subject site RES-1 would recognize the existing single family home on one lot and allow the addition of another dwelling unit on the undeveloped lot. The Comprehensive Plan articulates a Rural Area strategy that seeks to retain the rural agricultural character of areas outside the Urban Service Area by calling for a minimum parcel size of 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres or greater. The Rural Area strategy does recognize suburban enclaves in the Rural Area and allows those areas to be designated RES-1. The proposed amendment is intended to bring the existing home on one lot into conformance with the Future Land Use designation, and to allow for the potential to site a home on the currently vacant lot. The proposed residential lots are comparable and compatible with the rural residential 10

11 development in the area. The area s development pattern is reflective of a suburban enclave acknowledged by the Comprehensive Plan. The amendment, bringing the lots included in the subject site into conformity with the Future Land Use category, is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan s Rural Area strategy and does not present an adverse impact to the area. Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find the proposed land use designation change for Plan Amendment HC/CPA CONSISTENT with the Future of Hillsborough Comprehensive Plan and forward this recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. 11

12 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 12

13 Attachment A Map Series 1. General Locator Map 2. Aerial Map 3. Existing Land Use Map 4. Adopted Future Land Use Map 5. Proposed Future Land Use Map Change 13

14 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 14

15 AN S T FIGURE 1 PK BL VD NS RD W DO BR ID GE B MORR BR UC E VE MCINTOSH RD 30TH ST 15TH ST RI I-275 Y HWY DAL E M ABR 56TH ST FORBES RD PARSONS AVE FALKENBURG RD VALRICO RD SR 39 DOVER RD MILLER RD 78TH ST EXISTING MAJOR ROAD NETWORK MAJOR RIVERS WATER TURKEY CREEK RD ORIENT RD RE BL BAYSH O MACDILL AVE MULRENNAN RD RD Y NE AR W Y EX P N SR 60 / BR AN D ON B LVD HC/CPA STATE ROAD 60 AND SKYWOOD DRIVE HC/CPA THOMPSON ROAD, WEST OF STATE ROAD 39 HC/CPA LITHIA PINECREST ROAD, NORTH OF BROWNING ROAD HC/CPA LITHIA PINECREST AND VALRICO ROAD KEYSVILLE RD HC/CPA RD ^^ CR 39 HC/CPA LM JURISDICTION BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Effective to Present. URBAN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Effective to Present. ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commisiion. RD I-75 W VIE ER RI V US HWY 41 BOYETTE BA US HWY 301 MCMULLEN RD HC/CPA SHELL POINT RD AKE DRIVE TL W ES 24TH ST SE REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. 0 9,500 19,000 38,000 57,000 76,000 Feet AUTHOR:WELSH Date: 1/31/2017 LF CITY RD SR 674 CR 579 GU MO SE L E R OY ^ ^ HC/CPA TAMPA SERVICE AREA D ST SYDNEY RD MAYDELL DR 21ST ST HOWARD AVE LOIS AVE 50TH ST ARMENIA AVE HANLEY RD LE BLVD URBAN SERVICE AREA WIGGINS R Y BR KING ML COUNTY BOUNDARY 92 ALEXANDE R D GAN AY AVE ADW BRO VD WY US H I-4 PLAN AMENDMENT JURISDICTION BOUNDARY RD RD RA DF E IDG SA S H GE DB IA M ILL W R WA HO THONOTO ST COLUMBUS DR RID ^ KNIGHTS GRIFFIN RD A WY N LA NK LY D FOWLER AVE 4 0 TH BLVD MPBELL CS CA COURTNEY LEGEND SS Y FLORIDA AVE A VE WA Y NIXON RD U NTR GH N RD ANDERSO CO LI NEB AU R IS COUNTY LINE RD SUNCOAST GUN N RD SHELDON RD CK RD BE AM A TR N JANUARY 2017 PLAN AMENDMENT SUBMITTAL Y A N HW ERS O S EXPWY AN ER BUCHM D Y R RA CE HWY C R AW LE PA TT VE T UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY GENERAL LOCATION MAP / PAUL SR 39 W Y KIN N LUTZ LAK E FERN RD Path: G:\gisroot\Projects\Salls\Plan_Amendment_Map_Series\HCpa\JANquarterlyAmendments\hcpaJan2017loc.mxd µ 15

16 S County Road 39 FIGURE 2 UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY HC/CPA LEGEND PLAN AMENDMENT AREA ROADS AND BOUNDARY LINES COUNTY BOUNDARY JURISDICTION BOUNDARY Canoe LaunchLoop TAMPA SERVICE AREA URBAN SERVICE AREA Thompson Rd Brantley Rd DATA SOURCES: Aerial Photography 2016, Hillsborough County Geomatics. PARCEL DATA: Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission Feet Author: sallsd Date: 1/31/2017 Path: G:\gisroot\Projects\Salls\Plan_Amendment_Map_Series\HCpa\JANquarterlyAmendments\hcpa1703aerial.mxd µ 16

17 S County Road 39 FIGURE 3 UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY EXISTING LAND USE HC/CPA LEGEND PLAN AMENDMENT AREA EXISTING LAND USE SINGLE FAMILY / MOBILE HOME TWO FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY Loop Canoe Launch MOBILE HOME PARK VACANT PUBLIC / QUASIPUBLIC / INSTITUTIONS PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS / UTILITIES RIGHT OF WAY/ROADS/HIGHWAYS EDUCATIONAL HEAVY COMMERCIAL LIGHT COMMERCIAL HIGH INDUSTRIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL Thompson Rd MINING RECREATION / OPEN SPACE AGRICULTURAL NATURAL WATER UNKNOWN NOT CLASSIFIED ROADS AND BOUNDARY LINES COUNTY BOUNDARY JURISDICTION BOUNDARY URBAN SERVICE AREA TAMPA SERVICE AREA COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA BOUNDARY Brantley Rd Existing Land Use: Derived from Property Appraiser parcels and NAL DOR Codes. JURISDICTION BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. PARCELS: Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. URBAN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. national map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission Feet AUTHOR: C.WELSH Date: 1/31/2017 Path: G:\gisroot\Projects\Salls\Plan_Amendment_Map_Series\HCpa\JANquarterlyAmendments\hcpa1703elu.mxd µ 17

18 FIGURE 4 UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY ADOPTED 2025 FUTURE LAND USE HC/CPA LEGEND PLAN AMENDMENT AREA UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY FUTURE LAND USE AGRICULTURAL / MINING - 1/20 AGRICULTURAL - 1/10 AGRICULTURAL / RURAL - 1/5 PLANNED ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNITY - 1/2 AGRICULTURAL ESTATE - 1/2.5 RESIDENTIAL - 1 RESIDENTIAL - 2 (.25 FAR) (.25 FAR) (.25 FAR) (.25 FAR) (.25 FAR) (.25 FAR) (.25 FAR) Loop Canoe Launch RESIDENTIAL - 4 RESIDENTIAL - 6 RESIDENTIAL - 9 RESIDENTIAL - 12 RESIDENTIAL - 16 (.25 FAR) (.25 FAR) (.35 FAR) (.35 FAR) (.35 FAR) RESIDENTIAL PLANNED - 2 (.35 FAR) RESIDENTIAL - 20 RESIDENTIAL - 35 NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE - 4(3) SUBURBAN MIXED USE - 6 COMMUNITY MIXED USE - 12 URBAN MIXED USE - 20 REGIONAL MIXED USE - 35 (.35 FAR) (1.0 FAR) (.35 FAR) (.35 FAR) (.50 FAR) (1.0 FAR) (2.0 FAR) Thompson Rd OFFICE COMMERCIAL - 20 RESEARCH CORPORATE PARK (.75 FAR) (1.0 FAR) ENERGY INDUSTRIAL PARK LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PLANNED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL HEAVY INDUSTRIAL (.50 FAR USES OTHER THAN RETAIL,.25 FAR RETAIL/COMMERCE) (.50 FAR) (.50 FAR) (.50 FAR) PUBLIC / QUASI-PUBLIC S County Road 39 WIMAUMA VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL - 2 NATURAL PRESERVATION CITRUS PARK VILLAGE RIGHT-OF-WAY OR OTHERWISE NOT CLASSIFIED WATER ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS SIGNIFICANT WILDLIFE HABITAT WETLANDS ROADS AND BOUNDARY LINES COUNTY BOUNDARY (.25 FAR) JURISDICTION BOUNDARY Brantley Rd URBAN SERVICE AREA TAMPA SERVICE AREA EXISTING MAJOR ROAD NETWORK COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA BOUNDARY 2025 FUTURE LAND USE: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. JURISDICTION BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. PARCELS: Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. URBAN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. SIGNIFICANT WILDLIFE HABITAT: Hillsborough County Geomatics. WETLANDS AND WATER: Southwest Florida Water Management District. CHHA: Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, June 12, The Coastal High Hazard Area as shown on the Future Land Use map is a general depiction as per HB1359, which is the area below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line as established by the SLOSH computerized storm surge model. More specific information can be obtained by reviewing the TBRPC's computerized storm surge model. ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commisiion. REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission AUTHOR:WELSH Date: 1/31/2017 Path: G:\gisroot\Projects\Salls\Plan_Amendment_Map_Series\HCpa\JANquarterlyAmendments\hcpa1703flu.mxd µ 18 Feet

19 FIGURE 5 UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY PROPOSED 2025 FUTURE LAND USE HC/CPA FROM: AGRICULTURAL / RURAL - 1/5 TO: RESIDENTIAL - 1 LEGEND PLAN AMENDMENT AREA UNINCORPORATED HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY FUTURE LAND USE AGRICULTURAL / MINING - 1/20 AGRICULTURAL - 1/10 AGRICULTURAL / RURAL - 1/5 PLANNED ENVIRONMENTAL COMMUNITY - 1/2 AGRICULTURAL ESTATE - 1/2.5 RESIDENTIAL - 1 RESIDENTIAL - 2 (.25 FAR) (.25 FAR) (.25 FAR) (.25 FAR) (.25 FAR) (.25 FAR) (.25 FAR) Loop Canoe Launch RESIDENTIAL PLANNED - 2 RESIDENTIAL - 4 RESIDENTIAL - 6 RESIDENTIAL - 9 RESIDENTIAL - 12 (.35 FAR) (.25 FAR) (.25 FAR) (.35 FAR) (.35 FAR) RESIDENTIAL - 16 RESIDENTIAL - 20 RESIDENTIAL - 35 NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE - 4(3) SUBURBAN MIXED USE - 6 COMMUNITY MIXED USE - 12 URBAN MIXED USE - 20 (.35 FAR) (.35 FAR) (1.0 FAR) (.35 FAR) (.35 FAR) (.50 FAR) (1.0 FAR) Thompson Rd REGIONAL MIXED USE - 35 OFFICE COMMERCIAL - 20 RESEARCH CORPORATE PARK (2.0 FAR) (.75 FAR) (1.0 FAR) ENERGY INDUSTRIAL PARK LIGHT INDUSTRIAL PLANNED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL HEAVY INDUSTRIAL (.50 FAR USES OTHER THAN RETAIL,.25 FAR RETAIL/COMMERCE) (.50 FAR) (.50 FAR) (.50 FAR) PUBLIC / QUASI-PUBLIC S County Road 39 WIMAUMA VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL - 2 NATURAL PRESERVATION CITRUS PARK VILLAGE RIGHT-OF-WAY OR OTHERWISE NOT CLASSIFIED WATER ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS SIGNIFICANT WILDLIFE HABITAT WETLANDS ROADS AND BOUNDARY LINES (.25 FAR) COUNTY BOUNDARY JURISDICTION BOUNDARY Brantley Rd URBAN SERVICE AREA TAMPA SERVICE AREA EXISTING MAJOR ROAD NETWORK COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA BOUNDARY 2025 FUTURE LAND USE: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. JURISDICTION BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. PARCELS: Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. URBAN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. SIGNIFICANT WILDLIFE HABITAT: Hillsborough County Geomatics. WETLANDS AND WATER: Southwest Florida Water Management District. CHHA: Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, June 12, The Coastal High Hazard Area as shown on the Future Land Use map is a general depiction as per HB1359, which is the area below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line as established by the SLOSH computerized storm surge model. More specific information can be obtained by reviewing the TBRPC's computerized storm surge model. ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commisiion. REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission AUTHOR:WELSH Date: 1/31/2017 Path: G:\gisroot\Projects\Salls\Plan_Amendment_Map_Series\HCpa\JANquarterlyAmendments\hcpa1703flu_proposed.mxd µ 19 Feet

20 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 20

21 Attachment B Agency Comments 21

22 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 22

23 CPA Development Services: Zoning Report Future Land Use Map Change: Agricultural Rural- 1/5- (AR -1/5) to Residential-! (RES-1) Area Characteristics: The plan amendment area is comprised of two folios (1.01 AC) and (1.01 AC). Folio is currently developed with a mobile home, built in 1994, and folio is currently vacant. The immediate area surrounding the subject property is zoned AR (Agricultural Rural, 1 DU/ 5 GA). The properties abut Thompson Road to the north. Other properties south of Thompson Road are developed as a mixture of single family and mobile homes. The lot sizes of the properties surrounding the subject property are between. 3 2 acres and 60 acres. The age of the structures range from PD (Planned Development) # , southeast of the subject property, is approved for mobile homes and RV at a density of.2 dwelling units per acre. Alderman's Ford Regional Park is located northeast of the subject properties on the north side of Thompson Road. The AS -1 zoning district is located. 7 +I- miles southeast from the subject property. Two miles west of the subject properties, along Thompson Road, an established neighborhood, Fish Hawk Trail, which was platted in 1997, is zoned PD # , and comprised of a small lot of single-family residential uses. Residential lots in this neighborhood range between.44 acres and 1.22 acres. The age of the structures range from the 1990's 's. Zoning History: Per the 1973 historic zoning map set the subject property was unzoned. Per the , , 1987, , map sets the property was zoned A (Agricultural) which permitted institutional, agricultural and residential uses on lots greater than 5 acres. Per the , the property was zoned AR. Conformity: No code violations exist on these properties. The AR district requires a minimum lot size of 5 acres. The subject properties are nonconforming to the zoning district. If the property had existed prior to July 26, 1989 the property could be deemed legally nonconforming, however no such deed was found by Development Services staff. Many other nonconforming lots exist in the immediate surrounding area. Implementation: The site is currently zoned AR. The purpose of the AR district is to protect viable long term agricultural lands so classified in the Comprehensive Plan from urban and suburban encroachment by encouraging agriculture and related uses on parcels of at least five (5) acres. A rezoning to AS-1 or ASC-1 would be appropriate to implement the requested comp plan category and bring the lots into conformity. The subject properties lie within Wellhead Protection Zone 1 and 2. A minimum lot size of one acre of upland is required for the use of a septic system in a WRPA Zone 1 and/or WRPA Zone 2 per LDC J. Any proposed re:zoning should be consistent wi~ the Comprehensive Plan's minimum density requirements in Policy 1.2. Attachments: Aerial Map, Agency Comments Matt Lewis, Team Leader LewisM@hillsboroughcounty. org 23

24 CPA Development Services: Zoning Report Future Land Use Map Change: Agricultural Rural- 1/5- (AR -1/5) to Residential-1 (RES-1) I I Project Area D Zoning Boundary CPA N 24

25 Andrews, Charles From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Von Aulock, Sabine Tuesday, January 31, :02 AM Andrews, Charles Glass, Lanette RE: Review Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendments for Unincorporated Hillsborough County Follow up Flagged Charles, Thank you very much for the opportunity to comment. After reviewing the four summary sheets, we have determined that we have no comments except to advocate for setasides for affordable housing. In addition, we wanted to mention the availability of Impact Fee Relief regarding fire or parks with the possibility of mobility. Please let us know if you need this response in the form of an official memo. Thank you again! Sabine von Aulock, AICP Planning and Reporting, Principal Planner Affordable Housing Services Department F: (813) P: (813) E: W: HCFLGov.net Hillsborough County 601 E. Kennedy Blvd. Tampa, FL Facebook Twitter YouTube Please note. All correspondence to or from this office is subject to Florida' s Public Records law. From: Andrews, Charles Sent: Monday, January 30, :18PM To: Glass, Lanette <GiassL@HillsboroughCounty.ORG> Cc: Von Aulock, Sabine <VonAulockS@hillsboroughcounty.org> Subject: RE: Review Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendments for Unincorporated Hillsborough County 25

26 Hillsborough County Florida COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT (CPA) REVIEW AGENCY COMMENT SHEET CPA Case Number: HC/CPA thru Reviewing Agency: Hillsborough County Fire Rescue Reviewer: William Preseau (Division Chief) Date: February 1, 2017 Comments: I reviewed the list and found that there would be no changes to the current Fire Service delivery services for the parcels HC/CP A thru However, as I explained to you in our meeting on Monday, anytime you start adding population the chances of extended response times come into play. How this happens is if the fire apparatus are currently working a call in their first alarm area and another call comes in for the same area, then a unit from the adjacent area is called, hence a longer response time as they are further away. But with that said, this is a daily occurrence and ultimately cannot be overcome unless of course you build a fire station on every street comer. Also, as I mentioned, we are currently presenting our part of the Master Plan to the county commission and if approved we should be seeing in upwards of 29 new fire stations over the next 12 years. This will also make a definite impact on response times and fire service delivery as a whole. I hope this helps and I look forward to helping you guys out on more of the HC/CP A. 26

27 Case Number: Date of Review: Reviewer Name: CPA /7/2017 Amy Beams, CFM, FAEM- Public Works, Hazard Mitigation I) Background and Purpose In order to minimize loss of life, human suffering, damage to public and private property, and economic loss, there must be complete knowledge of the types of hazards that affect Hillsborough County. This hazard identification and vulnerability assessment report is a vital component in the review of requests for development within high risk areas. To assist in the review of development placed within risk areas, a full hazard analysis of Hillsborough County and its jurisdictions is contained within the Hillsborough County Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS). The analyses includes the types of hazards, the geographical location of impact, physical, social and economic impacts, and the vulnerable populations. The information was compiled by Hillsborough County and county municipal planning agencies, the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, Port Authority Tampa, National Weather Service, State of Florida DOT, U.S. Geological Survey, National Climatic Data Center, Local Mitigation Strategy Working Group, and other sources. Consistent with Federal and State Plans and the County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP), the Hillsborough County LMS reflects an "all-hazards" approach to mitigation. II) Development Description/Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendment a. Proposed Plan On File. b. Maps, graphs, tables and pictures that show these areas as related to risks and this project: Table 1. Immediate Items for Consideration Zone/ Notes Item Yes No Level SFHA X X CHHA Storms urge Area Evacuation Level X X X Nearest 5720 OSPREY RIDGE DR Lithia, Fl X 4329 CULBREATH RD Valrico, Fl Shelter(s) 5413 DURANT RD Dover, Fl mph wind X born debris zone Critical Facility Locations X (nearest) I Major Risks: Potential for transportation of hazardous materials Transportation X along these lines. Potential for increased traffic from daily Lines (proximal) congestion or evacuation during an event. Traffic accidents.! 27

28 Case Number: Date of Review: Reviewer Name: CPA /7/2017 Amy Beams, CFM, FAEM - Public Works, Hazard Mitigation Temple Terrace L Plant City L H H M M M L M L 28

29 Case Number: Date of Review: Reviewer Name: CPA /7/2017 Amy Beams, CFM, FAEM -Public Works, Hazard Mitigation - -<L.. :.... '"' ,.,...,.._ ' M M M M M M L L 1'1 M M L M '' Source: 2015 Htllsborough County Local Mtttgatton Strategy <::::) Jurisdictions with significant coastal areas c:::> Inland communities with some chance of flooding High (H): Most of the population affected, major damage to old, poorly maintained, and mobile home structures, some damage to newer structures built to code likely. Moderate (M): Around 50% of the population affected, mobile homes and poorly built or maintained structures most at risk. Low (L): Special portions of the population affected, day-to-day operations not affected, minor cosmetic damage expected to some structures. Ill) Considerations a. Regulations within Hillsborough County Are designed to ensure developments are approved for and/or developed with consideration, in addition to other items identified within the code, to the protection of life and property. With respect to risk in which the site is vulnerable, the request is required to address, at a minimum, the following : i. Hillsborough County (HC) Land Development Code (LDC) Part 3.06 and 6.11 ii. HC Comprehensive Plan Coastal Management Element iii. HC Construction Code Chapter 3 iv. F.S. CH (8) (a) (2) Coastal Management- Evacuation clearance time v. HC Local Mitigation Strategy (LMS) vi. HC Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) vii. HC County Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP) b. Evacuation impact: This property is not currently located within a current evacuation zone. c. Shelter Ratio Impact: As the primary impact of this change would be conformity with Future Land Use Category, there are, currently, no impacts to the shelter ratio. However, any future increase/development of additional single family residential would require assessment of shelter ratios. 29

30 Subject: Request: Location: Hillsborough County Florida CPA 17-03: Transportation Comments Future Land Use Map Amendment Agricultural Rural -115 (AR-115) to Residential -1 (RES-1) 313 Thompson Road CPA Adopted Levels of Service Standard- CR 39: Lithia Pinecrest Road to Keysville Road I D Operating Level of Service- CR 39: Lithia Pinecrest Road to Keysville Road I B DESCRIPTION: I Trip Generation Comparison bq._acres Daily Daily PkHrDir From: Trips To: Trips Trips (max) Current Density 1 DU (ITE ) Development Potential (residential) 2 DU (ITE 210) Pk Hr Dir Trips (max) 20 1 Difference (residential) T ra ffi IC I mpact s ummary: E XIStmg.. C on d'. Ihons w max d eve opment potentia. I Roadway Link PkHrDir Vol PkHrDir Trips Total PkHrDir PkHrDirMSV Available Vol Capacity CR 39: Lithia Pinecrest Road , to Keysville Road Data source: Hillsborough County 2014 level of Service Report (Hillsborough MPO) T ra ffi IC I mpact s ummary: p ro.tecte. dc on d'. Ihons w max d eve opment potential Roadway Link 2040 Volume Daily Project Total Daily MSV Available Trips 2040 Vol Capacity CR 39: Lithia Pinecrest Road 34, ,940 21,945-12,995 to Keysville Road Data source: Tampa Bay Regwnal Plannmg Model, Year 2040 Cost Affordable Scenario PkHrDir: peak hour I peak direction MSV: maximum service volume (i.e. capacity) 30

31 Intersection Delay (seconds) I LOS (PM Peak Hour) NB SB EB WB Total CR 39 at Lithia Pinecrest 33.7 I C 18.6 I B 24.2 I C 13.0 I B 22.8 I C Road TRANSPORTATION SUMMARY: Capacity: Existing The land use change may generate up to 10 additional daily trips and no additional peak hour peak directional trips. The trips generated by development of the subject site will not exceed the LOS standard of the regulated facility, assuming no additional background growth. Capacity: Projected Year 2040 traffic projections indicate insufficient capacity on CR 39 based on current funding levels. Operations/Safety The closest signalized intersection is CR 39 at Lithia Pinecrest Road. This intersection currently operates at LOS C, based on the traffic volume and timing data found in the latest Countywide synchro model. Additional project traffic through this intersection will not likely contribute to its operational degradation. With the recent passage of the mobility fee ordinance in Hillsborough County, projects would not be required to build capacity improvements to mitigate transportation impacts generated by project traffic. The project pays a one-time fee proportionate to the impact generated by project traffic. However, safety-related transportation improvements may still be required at the site plan review process, consistent with the Hillsborough County Land Development Code. Access Management The site currently has direct access to Thompson Road, a collector roadway with approximately 12 foot travel lanes. There are no sidewalks and no bicycle facilities on Thompson Road in the vicinity of the proposed project. Photographs are provided below At its maximum development potential, the site will require one access point for a residential development (1/90 = 0.01, round to 1), consistent with the Hillsborough County Land Development Code. Final determination of location, number of access points, and mitigative improvements to substandard roads will be determined at site plan review of the project. 31

32 Thompson Road looking east (subject parcels on the right) J Thompson Road looking west (subject parcels on the left) Future Plans There are no planned improvements in the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) for fiscal years 2016/ /2021 for any roadways within the vicinity. There are no planned improvements in the Hillsborough County 10 year Transportation Plan for any roadways within the vicinity. Unfunded Improvements Listed in Various Plans There are no improvements proposed in the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan, Cost Affordable Scenario, nor in the Needs Scenario. The Corridor Preservation Plan lists CR 39 as a two lane enhanced road from SR 674 to SR

33 Hillsborough County Florida Amendment Summary Subject: Request: Location: CPA Amendment Cycle Applicant Plan Amendments AR-115 to RES Thompson Rd January 2017 Privately Initiated CPA Potable Water The subject area is outside of the Urban Service Area Wastewater The subject area is outside of the Urban Service Area. Additional Comments: 33

34 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Request HC/CPA Transportation Information Road Name Lithia Pinecrest Rd. Lithia Pinecrest Rd. CR 39 Thompson Rd. From - To Boyette Rd. CR 39 CR 39 to Keysville Rd. Lithia Pinecrest Rd to Keysville Rd CR 39 to Bryan Rd. Number of Lanes Adopted LOS Standard Current LOS Pedestrian LOS Bicycle LOS 2U D C D C 2U D B D C 2U D B D C 2U NA NA NA NA Transportation Analysis Existing The site is on Thompson Road near SR 39. Lithia Pinecrest, CR 39, and Thompson Rd. have paved shoulders, but no sidewalks. This area is currently not served by HART bus routes. Transportation Analysis Future Proposed The current 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan does not identify any improvements in this area. The HART Transit Development Plan does not identify expansion of transit service to this area. Special Area Analysis This area is not identified in the MPO s Demographic Analysis for Environmental Justice Purposes as an area having a high density of minority populations. 34

35 MEMORANDUM To: From: Krista Kelly, AICP Amber K. Dickerson, AICP Department Manager, Planning & Siting Date: February 22, 2017 Re: Hillsborough County Comprehensive Plan Amendment Request Map Amendment: AR-1/5 to RES-1 (2 acres) 313 Thompson Road, Lithia, ( & ) X The District has no comment The District has no objections. The District has no objections, subject to listed or attached conditions The District objects, based on the listed or attached issues. The proposed amendment does not appear to have an impact on potential school enrollment. 35

36 COMMISSION DIVISION DIRECTORS Victor D. Crist Lesley Les Miller, Jr. Legal & Admin. Richard Tschantz, Esq. Ken Hagan Sandra L. Murman Air Management Jerry Campbell, P.E. Al Higginbotham Stacy White Waste Management Hooshang Boostani, P.E. Pat Kemp Water Management Sam Elrabi, P.E. Wetlands Management Kelly Bishop, P.G. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Janet L. Dougherty February 22, 2017 Brandon Henry Planning & Zoning Technician II Hillsborough County Planning Commission Dear Mr. Henry, EPC staff has completed a review of Comprehensive Plan Amendments HC CPA 17-01, 17-03, 17-04, and offer the following comments: Air Management Division HC CPA & allow increased commercial and/or light industrial uses adjacent to residential. While air pollution permits do not take zoning into account, the proximity of those uses to residential can result in increased complaints due to the new activities even when the activities comply with the permit(s). HC CPA planning area is adjacent to Lithia Pinecrest and a natural gas pipeline and breakout station are adjacent to the parcel on Lithia Pinecrest. While neither one of these have an air pollution permit and are not expected to have emissions under normal conditions, there should be coordination with the respective pipeline operators and/or regulatory agencies (such as the US Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration) during the construction phase to ensure there is not damage to the pipelines that could result in air emissions, endanger safety, require evacuations, etc. No comments on Amendment Wetlands Management Division No comments on HC CPA & HC CPA planning area includes areas of wetlands near the eastern perimeter. Any activity interfering with the integrity of wetland(s) or other surface water(s), such as clearing, excavating, draining or filling, without written authorization from the Executive Director of the EPC or authorized agent, pursuant to Section , Rules of the Commission, would be a violation of Section 17 of the Environmental Protection Act of Hillsborough County, Chapter , and of Chapter 1-11, Rules of the EPC. HC CPA planning area includes areas of wetlands on the southern portion. Any activity interfering with the integrity of wetland(s) or other surface water(s), such as clearing, excavating, draining or filling, without written authorization from the Executive Director of the EPC or authorized agent, pursuant to Section , Rules of the Commission, would be a violation of Section 17 of the Environmental Protection Act of Hillsborough County, Chapter , and of Chapter 1-11, Rules of the EPC. Waste Management & Water Management Divisions No comments on the amendments. Environmental Excellence in a Changing World Roger P. Stewart Center 3629 Queen Palm Drive, Tampa, FL (813) An Affirmative Action / Equal Opportunity Employer 36

37 Brandon Henry From: Linda Walker Sent: Friday, February 03, :37 PM To: Brandon Henry Subject: HC/CPA HART does not need to review this one. This is in an rural area that does not have the density to support transit services. Linda Walker Planner II - Land Use HART 1201 East 7th Avenue Tampa, FL Tel: (813) FAX: (813) WalkerL@gohart.org Please note: Hillsborough Transit Authority (HART) is a public agency and all correspondence to or from this Agency is subject to disclosure under Florida's Public Records laws (Florida Statutes, Chapter 119). * Go Green! Please don't print this unless you really need to. Thanks! 1 37

38 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 38

39 Attachment C Photos 39

40 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 40

41 Subject properties 1± acre parcel adjacent to the east of the subject property 41

42 1± acre and larger parcels to the west of the subject site Subject site Scattered development pattern at the intersection of State Road 39 and Thompson Road 42

43 Attachment D Future Land Use Descriptions 43

44 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 44

45 FUTURE OF HILLSBOROUGH RURAL-AGRICULTURE LAND USE CLASSIFICATION Agricultural/Rural - 1/5 (AR-1/5) RESIDENTIAL GROSS DENSITY TYPICAL USES MAXIMUM FLOOR AREA RATIO OR SQUARE FEET Up to 1 dwelling units per 5 gross acres. Alternative methods for calculating density of certain uses are specified in the land development regulations. Density bonuses and credits may be considered in this category and are described in the Plan. No minimum lot size is required to support the concept of clustering and preservation of open spaces left in a natural state. See related policies regarding clustering. Farms, ranches, feed lots, residential uses, rural scale neighborhood commercial uses, offices, industrial uses related to agricultural uses, and mining related activities. Non-residential uses shall meet established locational criteria for specific land use. Adoption/child caring communities are permitted subject to the criteria outlined in Objective 55 and related policies. Rural scale neighborhood commercial, office or industrial up to 40,000 sq. ft. or.25 FAR, whichever is less intense. Actual square footage limit is dependent on classification of roadway intersection where project is located. SPECIFIC INTENT OF CATEGORY To designate either those areas of long term agricultural character or those areas currently involved in agricultural productivity, or other rural uses. This category will also permit residential, rural scale neighborhood commercial, office, and industrial uses in those areas meeting established locational criteria. As long as no subdivision of land is involved, group quarters, temporary housing, rehabilitation centers and residential uses for agricultural/rural related activities can be exempt from the density limitations subject to the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the Land Use Element and applicable development regulations. In addition, mining activities and commercial and industrial uses directly related to or serving the local mining activities may be permitted in appropriate locations, in conformance with adopted environmental, mining, development regulations, and zoning regulations. Areas of rural character are best suited for Adoption/Child Caring Communities in that: (i) they provide a needed respite from the challenges and influences of an urban setting by lessening the stress that children are otherwise subjected to in an urban setting; (ii) rural settings provide for and accommodate the exploration of natural outdoor habitats which positively contributes to the healing process and a child s mental well-being; (iii) rural settings provide a sense of freedom, albeit within the normal structure of a family, and an opportunity to create the sense of a safe family structure; (iv) rural settings provide the opportunity to enjoy and interact with nature. Hillsborough County Future Land Use