Meeting Agenda State College Borough Planning Commission January 24, 2019 Room 304 / 7:00 p.m.

Transcription

1 Meeting Agenda State College Borough Planning Commission oom 34 / 7: p.m. I. II. III. IV. V. VI. VII. Call To Order oll Call Election Of Officers Approval Of Minutes Chair eport Public Hour - Hearing Of Citizens Land Development Plans A. Final Plan, aste ater Treatment Plant Upgrades, UPD Zoning District, Subdistrict The Pennsylvania State University, Owner, Penn State Physical Plant, Project Manager, Hazen, Project Designer VIII. Community Planning A. B. State College Area School District Lighting Ordinance Text Amendment equest Zoning Text Amendment elated To New Construction Of Commercial Buildings In The Downtown I. Official eports And Correspondence A. B. C. Borough Council (BC) Land Development Plans Staff Updates. I. Upcoming Meetings Adjournment Documents: Complete Planning Commission Agenda -.pdf

2 Page of 27 Meeting Agenda State College Borough Planning Commission oom 34 / 7 p.m. I. Call to Order II. oll Call Zoe Boniface Scott Dutt Jon Eich Anita Genger ichard Kalin Mary Madden on Madrid III. IV. Election of Officers Approval of Minutes V. Chair eport VI. VII. Public Hour - Hearing of Citizens Land Development Plan(s) A. Final Plan, aste ater Treatment Plant Upgrades, UPD Zoning District, Subdistrict the Pennsylvania State University, Owner, Penn State Physical Plant, Project Manager, Hazen, Project Designer The proposal is a renovation of the Penn State aste ater Treatment Plant to upgrade and modernize, as well as meet the forecasted waste water treatment for the University over the next -year planning period. The project site is 42.7 acres. The goals of the project are to reduce the impact of the waste water on the local watershed, update treatment to minimize operational risks during low flow seasons, provide flexibility for future campus growth, and operate efficiently and safely. The preliminary plan included a new driveway location. Due to time constraints this part of the project has been placed on hold while the design of the facility is finalized. The current waste water treatment plan from the 9 s will be modernized by installing the latest technological advances in waste water treatment. In addition to the upgrades, this project proposes to reduce the stormwater runoff by converting more than 2% of the impervious area to greenspace, from approximately 6.3 acres down to. acres.

3 Page 2 of 27 An aerial view and the plan set are attached beginning on page 7. Planning Commission Action: Planning Commission Action: As a final plan, the Planning Commission may make a recommendation to staff for approval. Comments made by the Commission will be incorporated into the review letter. VIII. Community Planning A. State College Area School District Lighting Ordinance Text Amendment equest State College Area School District, owner of State College High School at 6 and 63 esterly Parkway is requesting a proposed change to the zoning ordinance. The applicant s request is for athletic field lighting to be permitted at a taller height in the 3B Zoning District (esidential 3B). The applicant attended the December, 28 meeting to introduce the proposed amendment. The purpose of this request is to illuminate the high school outdoor track. Council received the request at their November 9, 28 meeting, and referred it to the Planning Commission. The State College Area School District held a meeting on January 4, 29 with neighboring properties to get feedback on the proposal. epresentatives will return during this meeting to present the concerns expressed at the meeting and discuss concepts to develop the text amendment. The letter of explanation, and a map showing the location of the track is attached beginning on page 7. Planning Commission Action: Planning Commission should receive the request, the additional feedback and discuss. A recommendation is needed to draft an ordinance. B. Zoning Text Amendment related to New Construction of Commercial Buildings in the Downtown The Pennsylvania State University is proposing a change to the zoning ordinance parking requirements. The University s request is to allow for a reduction of the parking space requirements when new construction is proposed that does not include residential uses for a building in the downtown but is proposed to support University innovation initiatives. Council received the request at their January 4, 29 meeting and referred the request to Council. Attached to the agenda on page 2 is the letter of request. Planning Commission Action: Planning Commission receive the request, hear the introductory presentation from the University and provide feedback.

4 Page 3 of 27 I. Official eports and Correspondence A. Borough Council (BC) B. Land Development Plans C. Staff Updates. Upcoming Meetings ednesday, February 6, 29 at Noon Thursday, February 2, 29 at 7 p.m. I. Adjournment

5 Meeting Minutes State College Borough Planning Commission December 2, 28 Planning Commission Page 4 of 27 The State College Borough Planning Commission (PC) met on Thursday, December 2, 28, in the Municipal Building, 243 South Allen Street, State College, PA. Chairman Boniface called the meeting to order at 7: p.m. Members Present Zoe Boniface, Chairman; Anita Genger, Vice-Chairman; Scott Dutt; Jon Eich; and ichard Kalin Others Present Ed LeClear, Planning Director; Jenna argo, Planner; John ilson, Zoning Officer; Denise L. hoads, Administrative Assistant; Tom Flynn, Pennsylvania State University (PSU); Erin Carlisle, Studios Architecture; and David Pike, Sweetland Engineering Approval of Minutes A motion was made by Mr. Dutt and seconded by Ms. Genger to approve the December, 28 meeting minutes as submitted. The vote was unanimously approved. Chair eport Chairman Boniface had nothing to report. Public Hour No one was in the audience who wished to discuss items not on the agenda. Land Development Plan Preliminary Plan, Pennsylvania State University illard Building; UPD Zoning District Subdistrict ; The Pennsylvania State University, owner; Sweetland Engineering, Engineer; Studios Architecture, Architect Mr. Pike, Mr. Flynn and Ms. Carlisle s presentation included: The proposal was to renovate the building to house the College of Communications with 8,22 square feet of renovated space and a new threestory addition. The exterior would undergo a complete restoration which included window replacement and insulation to improve thermal performance. To date, the building had a u-shaped footprint. The proposal included an infill of two stories within the u-shape to link floors together with a shared communal space and broadcast studios. Faculty offices from the Carnegie Building would be housed in this building as well.

6 The project also included audio studios, production classrooms, and a screening room including a news suite with a news lab, an open newsroom, and an emerging technology lab. The original building was built in 949 and a full renovation was proposed. LEED Silver certification included extensive renovations to the building façade and added energy efficient historic looking windows that worked with the existing architecture. Proposed a new addition on the south side. The existing building looked the same with just the energy efficient additions. This would house the new black box studio and the new College of Communications and a skylight would be added with a rain screen system. On the front side of the building they would remove the concrete entry way and stairs. On the back side they would remove the landscaping and some parking and relocate one utility, a roof drain. Proposed putting back a new concrete entryway with two sets of stairs and added parking spaces to the back with new ADA access. New sidewalks would be added to both sides of the building. Proposed a new concrete refuse area, landscape improvements, and a reduction of impervious area of approximately,7 square feet. PC s comments included: Mr. Genger asked for an explanation of the rain screen system. Ms. Carlisle stated it was a panelized system to pull in the color of the building and they were looking to place a window or something to break up the mass into the black box space. Mr. Kalin asked how many parking spaces they were adding. Mr. Flynn stated 7 were being added. Mr. Eich suggested adding faux windows to the blank wall on the black box space and turning it into an art space reflecting what the College of Communications was all about. Ms. Boniface asked what the Design eview Board comments were. Ms. argo stated the board asked if the windows could be historically replicated and stated it looked ok. Mr. Dutt asked about the gray thing on the roof and suggested screening it. Ms. Carlisle stated they were trying to eliminate putting the mechanicals in that space. Mr. Eich suggested using a different color for the blank wall. Mr. Flynn stated Ms. Carlisle and her team were working extensively with the architects to make this building aesthetically appealing. Community Planning Planning Commission Page of 27 Centre egional Planning Agency (CPA) Follow-up on the ecent Peer-to-Peer egional Planning Seminar Previously, a request was made by both the Centre egional Planning Commission (CPC) and the Centre egional Planning Agency (CPA) for a discussion with

7 municipal Planning Commission s regarding the future growth boundary, how to improve the existing urban environment, plans for common infrastructure, how to protect neighborhoods regarding future growth, and how to help preserve agricultural land. The CPC would receive those comments in the first half of 29. Mr. LeClear stated he had been in touch with Mr. May at CPA and Mr. May stated he would like a collection of comments by next Thursday. Mr. Dutt stated both Ms. Boniface and Mr. Eich s comments were well put together. Mr. LeClear stated their comments were consistent with staff s thoughts as well. He stated the Borough had more of a core community of service. Mr. Eich reiterated that he was abstaining from the questions on future regional growth boundaries. Official eports and Correspondence Borough Council (BC): Mr. LeClear reported BC passed the budget. He also noted the Planning Commission would be getting new members, on Madrid and Mary Madden. Mr. Dumas term had expired, and he chose not to be reappointed. Land Development Plans: Mr. LeClear stated there would be a zoning text amendment request regarding the Glennland Building and parking. Another zoning text amendment request would be coming soon regarding PSU s James Building. Staff Updates: Mr. LeClear distributed a handout regarding the proposal and meeting for the State College Area School District South Track Field with Neighbors. It was scheduled for January 4, 29 at 7 p.m. in the High School LGI oom. Upcoming Meetings ednesday, January 9, 29 at Noon Thursday, at 7 p.m. Adjournment ith no further business to discuss, Mr. Dutt adjourned the meeting at 7:26 p.m. espectfully submitted, Denise L. hoads Administrative Assistant Planning Commission Page 6 of 27

8 Page 7 of 27 THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVESITY UNIVESITY PAK ATE ECLAMATION FACILITY UPGADE POJECT GENEAL NOTES AND SITE DATA:. POJECT AEA FO POPOSED LAND DEVELOPMENT: UNIVESITY PAK TP UNIVESITY PAK, PA ONE OF ECOD: PSU EEMPT 7 PAK AVENUE BUILDING UNIVESITY PAK, PA 682 DEED BOOK / PAGE NUMBE: 22-29, , 232-8,3-3, 3-7, P.B ZONING DISTICT: UNIVESITY PLANNED DISTICT (UPD) 4. EQUIED SETBACKS: FONT: 2' EA: ' SIDE: ' (ADJACENT CP-2) 2' (ADJACENT PA, -4) 3' (ADJACENT -3) 4' (ADJACENT -2). EISTING/POPOSED USE: INDUSTIAL / ASTEATE TEATMENT 6. SUVEY BASE/BENCHMAK SHON ON PLAN DAINGS AE BASED ON THE NOTH AMEICAN DATUM OF 983 (NAD83) NOTH, AND NOTH AMEICAN VETICAL DATUM OF 988 (NAVD88). 7. PLAN PEPAATION POVIDED BY: HAZEN AND SAYE 4 ESTCHASE BLVD, SUITE ALEIGH, NC 2767 DENSITY TABLE: TOTAL AEA OF DEVELOPMENT (AC) 8.4 TOTAL GOSS FLOO AEA (SF) TOTAL BUILDING AEA (SF) 73,76 IMPEVIOUS SUFACE MA ALLOABLE IMPEVIOUS SUFACE 2.% MA ALLOABLE IMPEVIOUS SUFACE (SF) 64,3 EISTING IMPEVIOUS SUFACE 2.6% EISTING IMPEVIOUS SUFACE (SF) 246,898 POPOSED IMPEVIOUS SUFACE (SF) 97,8 EMAINING ALLOABLE IMPEVIOUS SUFACE (SF) 366,63 OPEN SPACE MIN EQUIED OPEN SPACE 7.% MIN EQUIED OPEN SPACE (SF),692,49 EISTING OPEN SPACE 87.4% EISTING OPEN SPACE (SF),972,389 POPOSED OPEN SPACE (SF) 2,4,28 EMAINING OPEN SPACE TO BE DEVELOPED (SF) 347,69 HSG ASSUMPTIONS EGULATOY SUBMITTAL - DO NOT USE FO CONSTUCTION STOMATE MANAGEMENT PLAN - FINAL SUBMITTAL THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVESITY POJECT NO HASKELL POJECT.NO PE-DEVELOPMENT CUVE NUMBE (CN) 2, 79.4 AVEAGE SLOPE 3% HYDAULIC LENGTH [FT] 734 Tc [MIN] 3 3 PEAK ATE OF UNOFF (, 2,, AND -Y) [CFS].7,.3, 9., 9.4 UNOFF VOLUME [CF],6 4,89 UNDETAINED AEAS, AEAS TO POND LAND USE FO EACH SUBAEA HSG ASSUMPTIONS POST-DEVELOPMENT B N/A TANSPOTATION, UTILITY, FOEST, MEADO B, O MIN OF HSG C FO COMPACTED STUCTUAL FILL AEAS CUVE NUMBE (CN) 2, 77 Tc FO EACH SUBAEA 3 3 PEAK ATE OF UNOFF (, 2,, AND -Y) [CFS] 9., 3.3, 26.4, 6.3 UNOFF VOLUME [CF],6 4,88 POND DESIGN (N/A) 7 ATE QUALITY DEPTH AND VOLUME EQUIEMENTS ECHAGE VOLUME EQUIEMENTS MOPHOLOGY EQUIEMENTS CAPTUE VOLUMES EQUIED Soils underlain by carbonate geology (limestone or dolomite) shall have a hydrologic soil group (HSG) B used for both pre- and post-development conditions regardless of the NCS description except for compacted structural fill areas which shall use a minimum of HSG C for post development conditions regardless of the NCS or Centre County Soil Survey's description. 2 All undeveloped areas are to be modeled as meadow or woods in good hydrologic condition. Existing impervious areas may be modeled as being impervious for pre-development conditions. The Borough may require a percentage of the existing impervious be modeled as meadow in areas where there are known existing stormwater concerns downstream of the project area or where the site being developed has either defcient or non-existing stormwater management facilities. N/A N/A N/A N/A , :23, 7) The Tc can be computed by any method which best represents the subject watershed , (): Pre- and post- development stormwater management analysis shall be conducted using the following design storms: one-year; two-year; ten-year; one-hundred-year. 2% of Pre-Development impervious area assumed to be "Meadow" 6.62 acres of impervious area not included in this submittal for future development, 2% reduction in impervious area is being permitted 7 N/A, post-construction has a 2% reduction in impervious area N HAZEN POJECT NO. 33- DECEMBE 28 LOCATION PLAN NOT TO SCALE The Haskell Company l l l iverside Avenue Jacksonville, Florida 3222 Phone # (94) 79-4 HAZEN AND SAYE 4 ESTCHASE BOULEVAD, SUITE ALEIGH, NOTH CAOLINA 2767 LOCATION SHEET INDE C - EISTING CONDITIONS PLAN C2 - POPOSED SITE PLAN AND KEY MAP FINAL YAD PIPING PLAN C3 - AEA 3 C4 - AEA 4 C - AEA C6 - AEA 6 STOMATE MANAGEMENT C8 - OVEALL STOMATE PLAN C8 - SYSTEM A- C82 - SYSTEM A-2 C83 - SYSTEMS A-3, A-6 C84 - SYSTEMS A-4, A- C8 - SYSTEM B- C86 - SYSTEMS B-2, C- C87 - SALE NO. C88 - SALE NO. 2 STOMATE MANAGEMENT NAATIVE: THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVESITY IS POPOSING CONSTUCTION OF AN UPGADED ASTEATE TEATMENT FACILITY ON TO PACELS - ONED BY THE UNIVESITY AND BY THE STATE COLLEGE BOOUGH. AS PAT OF THIS POJECT, NE EASEMENTS AE ANTICIPATED TO ALLO CONSTUCTION OF NE STOM SEES AND A NE ENTANCE OAD. THE EISTING ASTEATE TEATMENT PLANT (TP) HAS BEEN IN OPEATION SINCE THE EALY 9'S. IT POVIDES SANITAY SEE SEVICE TO THE MAJOITY OF THE UNIVESITY PAK CAMPUS AND A SMALL POTION OF THE STATE COLLEGE BOOUGH. IN ODE TO MEET LONG-TEM ASTEATE TEATMENT NEEDS OF THE UNIVESITY, THE TP EQUIES UPGADES. THESE UPGADES ILL ENOVATE AND EPLACE AGED INFASTUCTUE IN ODE TO IMPOVE ONSITE SAFETY AS ELL AS IMPOVING TEATMENT AND ENEGY EFFICIENCY. THE LAND USE FO THE PAST YEAS, THE LAST YEAS AND PESENTLY HAS EMAINED CONSISTENT ITH A MI OF FOESTED/OODS, MEADOS, AND VACANT/UNUSED AND UBAN AEAS. THE CONTIBUTING ATESHED CONTAINING THE DISTUBANCE COVES APPOIMATELY 3.8 ACES AND ENTES STOMATE CONVEYANCE CHANNEL. THE POJECT AEA FALLS ITHIN THE THOMPSON UN ATESHED - IDENTIFIED AS A HQ-CF ITH PENDING TMDL IMPAIMENT STATUS. THE POJECT AEA DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY ETLANDS, O ANY ATE BODIES DESIGNATED AS HIGH QUALITY O ECEPTIONAL VALUE UNDE 2 PA CODE CHAPTE 93. THOMPSON SPINGS IS LOCATED ON THE FACILITIES POPETY, NOTH OF THE POJECT AEA AND SEPAATED FOM THE POJECT AEA BY OODS AND AN ACCESS OAD. THE POJECT IS TIBUTAY TO THOMPSON UN, HICH IS IDENTIFIED AS HQ-CF. THOMPSON UN ECEIVES ATES FOM THOMPSON SPING AS ELL AS THE DUCK POND. IN ODE TO PESEVE NATUAL FEATUES, THE E&S PLAN FO THE POJECT MINIMIZES THE ETENT AND DUATION OF EATH DISTUBANCE BY SEQUENCING THE VAIOUS AEA IMPOVEMENTS. IT POVIDES EDUNDANT POTECTION FO THE DAINAGE AEAS OF THE SITE, COMPOST SEDIMENT OCK DIVESIONS, AND POTECTION FO EACH DISTUBED SECTION USING COMPOST FILTE SOCKS AND SILT CUTAINS. TEE POTECTION IS DESIGNATED FO AEAS OF NE CONSTUCTION AND DEMOLITION OF EISTING FEATUES. SOIL COMPACTION ILL ALSO BE MINIMIZED BY EDUCING TAFFIC FLO AND ESTICTING HEAVY EQUIPMENT OPEATIONS TO THOSE AEAS THAT EQUIE IT. THE EISTING STOMATE DAINAGE CONSISTS OF TO STOM SEE MAINS FOM THE BOOUGH OF STATE COLLEGE, AND ONE STOM SEE MAIN FOM PSU. THESE SYSTEMS CONVEGE AT THE NOTHEAST SIDE OF THE POJECT AEA AND DISCHAGE INTO A STOMATE CONVEYANCE CHANNEL. THIS CHANNEL, APPOIMATELY 2 FEET LONG, DISCHAGES INTO THE DUCK POND, HICH IN TUN DISCHAGES TO THOMSON UN. THE POPOSED STOMATE SYSTEM ILL CLOSELY FOLLO THE EISTING SYSTEM LAYOUT. THE OFFSITE SYSTEMS AE POPOSED TO BE DIVETED TO THE EISTING STOM SEE MAINS IN ODE TO EDUCE OFFSITE STOMATE IMPACTING THE SITE. NO ADDITIONAL IMPEVIOUS SUFACE O IMPACTS TO THE STOMATE CONVEYANCE CHANNEL AE POPOSED IN THE UPDATED TP DESIGN. STOMATE MITIGATION IS NOT POPOSED DUE TO THE OVEALL EDUCTION OF IMPEVIOUS AEA ON THE POJECT SITE. THE SITE MAY BE EQUIED TO APPLY FO AND MAINTAIN AN INDUSTIAL NPDES STOMATE PEMIT. A CONDITION OF THE PEMIT MAY BE EGULA SAMPLING OF STOMATE DISCHAGE FOM THE SITE OUTFALLS DUING SIGNIFICANT UNOFF EVENTS. THE INTENT OF THE SAMPLING EFFOT IS TO CHAACTEIZE THE POLLUTANTS ASSOCIATED ITH THE STOMATE DISCHAGES AND EFINE THE FACILITY'S OPEATIONS TO EDUCE THE POTENTIAL FO POLLUTANT UNOFF. DETEMINATION OF THE SAMPLING PLAN (OUTFALLS, FEQUENCY, ETC.) ILL INCLUDE DISCUSSIONS ITH THE EGULATOY AGENCIES (PENNSYLVANIA DEPATMENT OF ENVIONMENTAL POTECTION) AND ILL CONSIDE POTENTIAL EPOSUE OF POLLUTANTS TO STOMATE AT EACH OUTFALL, AND THE SIMILAITY OF EACH OUTFALL TO OTHES. THE POJECT TEAM ENVISIONS STOMATE SAMPLING AT OUTFALL DI-A4 AND DI-A. ACCODING TO THE DEPATMENT OF ENVIONMENTAL ESOUCES, OFFICE OF ESOUCES MANAGEMENT, BUEAU OF TOPOGAPHIC AND GEOLOGIC SUVEY (982), OCK FOMATION AT THE SITE IS THE AEMANN FOMATION (OA). THIS FOMATION IS COMPISED PIMAILY OF LIMESTONE ITH MINO DOLOMITIC LIMESTONE BEDS.

9 E AV 4 E ITE C ST OLL ACE AT EG AP E E A 36 COL AVE TM L DB -4 EGE NUE ENT S /P G 6, PA SUIT LP E 6 / ISSUED FO BIDDING HAZEN AND SAYE 4 ESTCHASE BOULEVAD, SUITE ALEIGH, NOTH CAOLINA 2767 THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVESITY UNIVESITY PAK ATE ECLAMATION FACILITY UPGADE POJECT 99 9 Y Y EFFLUENT PS PLAN TH EB O 24 OU 3 ST SO GH AT UT OF E H S 36 COLL ALL TATE EN E DB 4 GE ST COL, /P G 7 PA EE LEG 3 E T / CE EN T AN UN AN T STATE COLLEGE BOO 243 SOUTH ALLEN STEET STATE COLLEGE, PA DB/PG UNLISTED HASKELL ACHITECTS and ENGINEES, P.C. PENNSYLVANIA - ACHITECTUE # A422L l l l iverside Avenue Jacksonville, Florida 3222 Phone # (94) POPETY LINE, TYP SEE NOTE 3 KONDISKO, JOSEPH & ALLANA M 2 CHUCH ST LIGONIE, PA DB/PG 27/ BELLAIE LP 4 E CALDE AY STATE COLLEGE, PA DB/PG 223/9 ADMINISTATION BUILDING STATE COLLEGE BOO STEET 243 SOUTH ALLEN STATE COLLEGE, PA DB/PG UNLISTED PSU EEMPT BENEDICT HOUSE UNIVESITY PAK, PA DB/PG 287/89 9 PL 6 -Y FLOODPLAIN SEE NOTE BY: CDILSON EFFLUENT S TANK EFFLUENT PUMP STATION PLOT DATE: //28 9: AM Y BY " TFP BIOFILTE TANK DATE /2" -Y FLOODPLAIN (NO BFE) 8 ISSUED FO STEEP SLOPES >% 98 EV IF THIS BA DOES NOT MEASUE " THEN DAING IS NOT TO FULL SCALE LEGEND 9 63 ALLEY PUBLIC 2'.O ADG ACTIVATED SLUDGE UNIT STEEP SLOPES (>%) /8 M. STAHOTA ASP BLOE BUILDING 994- SLUDGE THICKENE BUILDING C. ILSON 2 ASP STOAGE SHED DAN BY: 22 STEEP SLOPES (>%) T. GEINE C. ILSON CHLOINE BUILDING ODO CONTOL SCALE: " = 6' DESIGNED BY: TFP ECICULATION PUMP OOM BENCHMAK: MAG NAIL N: E: ELEV: PIMAY SETTLING TANKS ACTIVATED SLUDGE UNIT TICKLING FILTE PLAN BIDDING 9 2 TICKLING FILTE File: O:\33-AL\33-\DESIGN\DAINGS\CIVIL\C Saved by cdwilson Save date: /9/28 9:4 AM 4 STEEP SLOPES (>%) BENCHMAK: MAG NAIL N: E: ELEV: PIMAY DIGESTE CHECKED BY: CHLOINE CONTACT TANKS STOAGE GAAGE ANOIC TANK POJECT ENGINEE: GIT TANK INFLUENT SAMPLING BUILDING 994- GIT BLDG A SLUDGE PUMP HOUSE PIMAY DIGESTE DELPAC TANK TFP FINAL PUMP OOM PIMAY DIGESTES CONTOL BUILDING ASTE BUNE CHLOINE CONTACT TANK STOAGE SHED TFP FINAL SETTLING TANKS CONCETE ALLS 3 2 D 2 OLD LAB BUILDING 994- TFP BLOE BUILDING POLYME BUILDING Y T SI E IV MECHANICS SHOP BLDG TFP SCUM ETELL 994- TFP AEATION TANKS OTAY PESS BUILDING UN BM: MAG NAIL N: E: ELEV: 3.3 CONSTUCTION CE STOAGE SHED JET/VAC TUCK GAAGE T ES ' NN PE E NT E PO EM S EA SECONDAY DIGESTE SLUDGE STOAGE PAD SECONDAY DIGESTE CONTOL BUILDING Y FLOODPLAIN SEE NOTE 2 2 SECONDAY DIGESTE ETELL POPETY LINES SHON AE FOM 28 BOUNDAY SUVEY COMPLETED BY SEETLAND ENGINEEING AND ASSOCIATES, INC. HOIZONTAL DATUM: NAD 83 VETICAL DATUM: NAVD THOMPSON SPING PS 99 Y SECONDAY DIGESTE BIOFILTE TANK STEEP SLOPES (>%) SEETLAND ENGINEEING & ASSOCIATES, INC. 6 SCIENCE PAK OAD STATE COLLEGE, PA 683 (84) Y 4 2. TOPOGAPHIC SUVEY PEFOMED IN MACH 28 BY: ELECTICIAN SHOP 942- SDMH-976 SDMH-977 SDMH-978 SDMH-979 EFFLUENT PS (SEE INSET, BELO) Y BM: EBA N: 23. E: ELEV: 28.. FEMA FLOODPLAIN DATA OBTAINED FOM FIM MAP NUMBE 4247C636F 4. STOM STUCTUES TO BE EMOVED: Y 4 ELECTICAL STOAGE SHED Y STEEP SLOPES (>%) CO E LL E NOTES: E G Planning Commission Page 8 of 27 SCALE: " = 6' DATE: OVEALL SITE PLAN CIVIL EISTING CONDITIONS PLAN OCTOBE 28 HAZEN NO.: 33- CONTACT N.: DAING NUMBE: C

10 File: O:\33-AL\33-\DESIGN\DAINGS\CIVIL\C2-PEMIT Saved by cdwilson Save date: 2/2/28 :8 PM PLOT DATE: 2/2/28 :9 PM BY: CDILSON E COLLEGE AVE BIDDING /8 ADG EV ISSUED FO DATE AEA AEA 2 ELECTICAL STOAGE SHED SECONDAY DIGESTE BIOFILTE TANK SECONDAY DIGESTE CONTOL BUILDING SECONDAY DIGESTE ETELL AEA 3 TFP SCUM ETELL 994- PIMAY CLAIFIES (FUTUE) 2 PTF CONTOL OOM PTF ODO CONTOL 3 SUPPLEMENTAL CABON FEED FACILITY (FUTUE) 2' UNIVESITY D..O.. BY POJECT ENGINEE: 2 3 DESIGNED BY: DAN BY: CHECKED BY: 3 PTF [] EAST FOSTE AVENUE IF THIS BA DOES NOT MEASUE " THEN DAING IS NOT TO FULL SCALE 8 2 FLO EQ [] AEA SECONDAY DIGESTE MECHANICS SHOP BLDG T. GEINE C. ILSON C. ILSON M. STAHOTA ADMINISTATION BUILDING O.. ' UNIVESITY D. /2" " TFP FINAL SETTLING TANKS 994- UNIVESITY D PLAN SCALE: " = 6' ISSUED FO BIDDING JET/VAC TUCK GAAGE SLUDGE STOAGE PAD OTAY PESS BUILDING PIMAY DIGESTES CONTOL BUILDING PIMAY DIGESTE BN BASINS [3] BLOE PAD CONSTUCTION CE STOAGE SHED STATE COLLEGE BOO 243 SOUTH ALLEN STEET STATE COLLEGE, PA DB/PG UNLISTED D..O.. 7' UNIVESITY 8 3 PIMAY DIGESTE MB ELEC OOM MB BLDG [3] Y FLOODPLAIN SEE NOTE THOMPSON SPING PS ELEC GENEATO KONDISKO, JOSEPH & ALLANA M 2 CHUCH ST LIGONIE, PA DB/PG 27/ l l l iverside Avenue Jacksonville, Florida 3222 Phone # (94) HASKELL ACHITECTS and ENGINEES, P.C. PENNSYLVANIA - ACHITECTUE # A422L ASTE BUNE BELLAIE LP 4 E CALDE AY STATE COLLEGE, PA DB/PG 223/9 ' EST PENN POE POPETY LINE, TYP ALLEY PUBLIC 2'.O.. EASEMENT SOUTH ALLEN STEET THE BOOUGH OF STATE COLLEGE DB/PG 368/49 STATE COLLEGE, PA 68 HAZEN AND SAYE 4 ESTCHASE BOULEVAD, SUITE ALEIGH, NOTH CAOLINA 2767 ' SUFACE ATE BUFFE ' IPAIAN BUFFE UNITEACE APATMENTS LP STATE COLLEGE BOO 243 SOUTH ALLEN STEET STATE COLLEGE, PA DB/PG UNLISTED AEA DB/PG 27/ 444 E COLLEGE AVENUE SUITE 6 STATE COLLEGE, PA 68 EFFLUENT PS (AEA 6; SEE INSET BELO ' IPAIAN BUFFE AEA 6 EFFLUENT PUMP STATION EFFLUENT S TANK Y FLOODPLAIN SEE NOTE OHE SSMH_AD NOTES:. FEMA FLOODPLAIN DATA OBTAINED FOM FIM MAP NUMBES 4247C636F AND 4247C637F; EFFECTIVE /4/29. NO BASE FLOOD ELEVATION HAS BEEN DETEMINED ITHIN THE POJECT BOUNDAIES. 989 SCALE: " = 6' 99 SSMH_AD EFFLUENT PS PLAN SSMH_AD-3A ELECTICAL BUILDING Planning Commission Page 9 of 27 THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVESITY OVEALL SITE PLAN HAZEN NO.: 33- CONTACT N.: UNIVESITY PAK ATE CIVIL DAING NUMBE: ECLAMATION FACILITY POPOSED SITE PLAN AND KEY MAP UPGADE POJECT C2 SSMH_AD-3B DATE: OCTOBE 28

11 Planning Commission Page of 27 NOTES: HE OHE SSMH- (E) OHE OHE OHE OHE POPETY LINE, TYP ' SETBACK SSMH_BD-79 66" SD 4" SS SSMH-2 SEE C44 SSMH- SEE C32 JB- SEE C44 SSMH-3 SEEC44 4" SS 6" COOLING ATE INSIDE 66" SD 66" SD 2" FA 24" SS SSMH_BD-89 6" D PTF ODO CONTOL 4" NP 6" DFM PTF [] 66" SD ELEC DB, TYP SEE ELEC DGS 6" D PTF CONTOL OOM 6" D SEE NOTE 2, TYP -/4" P 4" NP SEE STU AND ACH DGS 4" D 8" DFM 6" D 6" D 6" D " SD MECHANICS SHOP BUILDING " SD 4" NP 2" PTE 8" D 6" NP " SD ELEC MH, TYP SEE ELEC DGS SD NETOK SEE SHEET C8 FUTUE PIMAY CLAIFIE FUTUE PIMAY CLAIFIE " SD " SD " SD 2" NP 24" PTE 4" FM TFP FINAL SETTLING TANKS 994-8" DFM 6" 4" P " NP 4" NP TFP FINAL PUMP OOM " AS 6" FM (ABANDONED) " SD TFP SCUM ETELL 994- PIMAY DIGESTE BLOE PAD BN BASINS [3] 8" SD 3" SD UGC UGC 24" EFF 2" SE 6" D 6" D SEE NOTE 2, TYP 6" TAS PIMAY DIGESTE SDMH-976 SDMH-977 6" P MB BLDG [3] 66" SD DONSPOUT TO SPLASH BLOCK 8" PE 2" 4" NP 6" D " SD 8" NP SDMH " 8" SD 66" SD. TIE EISTING 4" SS LINE FOM TFP SCUM ET ELL INTO 8" TEMPOAY AS LINE 2. CONNECT OOF DAINS TO STOM NETOK AS SHON. SEE DETAIL / C7. 6" EQ 6" EQ " DFM File: O:\33-AL\33-\DESIGN\DAINGS\CIVIL\C3-PEMIT Saved by skane Save date: 2/9/28 3:32 PM PLOT DATE: 2/2/28 :34 PM BY: SKANE UNIVESITY D JB-2 SEE C44 BIDDING /8 ADG EV ISSUED FO DATE BY SSMH_BD-7 POJECT ENGINEE: DESIGNED BY: DAN BY: CHECKED BY: " SS 24" SS SSMH_BD-89A IF THIS BA DOES NOT MEASUE " THEN DAING IS NOT TO FULL SCALE 24" SS 6" EQI T. GEINE C. ILSON C. ILSON M. STAHOTA /2" " SSMH_BD-99 SSMH_BD-8 4' SETBACK ISSUED FO BIDDING FLO EQ [] SCALE: " = 2' PATIAL PLAN - AEA 3 " DFM 24" SS HASKELL ACHITECTS and ENGINEES, P.C. PENNSYLVANIA - ACHITECTUE # A422L l l l iverside Avenue Jacksonville, Florida 3222 Phone # (94) " SS HH 6" P ABANDONED TANKS BELO GADE SSMH_BD- SSMH_BD- HAZEN AND SAYE 4 ESTCHASE BOULEVAD, SUITE ALEIGH, NOTH CAOLINA 2767 MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET C " SD 6" D ADMINISTATION BUILDING " D SEE NOTE 2 24" PE 3" P 6" P " SD " NP THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVESITY FINAL YAD PIPING PLAN HAZEN NO.: 33- CONTACT N.: UNIVESITY PAK ATE CIVIL DAING NUMBE: ECLAMATION FACILITY AEA 3 UPGADE POJECT C3 4" NP MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET C4 KEY PLAN SCALE: " = 3' DATE: OCTOBE 28

12 File: O:\33-AL\33-\DESIGN\DAINGS\CIVIL\C4-PEMIT Saved by skane Save date: 2/9/28 3:38 PM PLOT DATE: 2/2/28 :3 PM BY: SKANE 2" SE / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET C3 " SD 66" SD OHE ELEC GENEATO " SD OHE / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 2" SE BIDDING /8 ADG EV ISSUED FO DATE O BY EMOVE OHE AND ELEC STUCTUES SEE ELEC DGS 66" SD MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET C POJECT ENGINEE: DESIGNED BY: DAN BY: CHECKED BY: " SD IF THIS BA DOES NOT MEASUE " THEN DAING IS NOT TO FULL SCALE " SD CONSTUCTION ENTANCE T. GEINE C. ILSON C. ILSON M. STAHOTA /2" " 24" SS 2" NP 66" SD SSMH_BD-3 ISSUED FO BIDDING Y 66" SD OHE OHE OHE OHE SSMH_BD-49 OHE OHE OHE 24" SS M SSMH_BD-9 MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET C3 24" SS PEIMETE SITE FENCE SEE NOTE /C OHE OHE OHE OHE HASKELL ACHITECTS and ENGINEES, P.C. PENNSYLVANIA - ACHITECTUE # A422L l l l iverside Avenue Jacksonville, Florida 3222 Phone # (94) 79-4 PATIAL PLAN - AEA 4 SCALE: " = 2' ' SETBACK ' EST PENN POE EASEMENT HAZEN AND SAYE 4 ESTCHASE BOULEVAD, SUITE ALEIGH, NOTH CAOLINA ' SETBACK POPETY LINE, TYP SSMH_BD-6 KEY PLAN SCALE: " = 3' Planning Commission Page of 27 THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVESITY FINAL YAD PIPING PLAN HAZEN NO.: 33- CONTACT N.: UNIVESITY PAK ATE CIVIL DAING NUMBE: ECLAMATION FACILITY AEA 4 UPGADE POJECT C4 DATE: OCTOBE 28

13 E Planning Commission Page 2 of 27 MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET C44 MATCHLINE: SEE SHEET C4 NOTES:. CONNECT DONSPOUTS INTO STOM NETOK. SEE DETAIL / C7. DMH-97 POPETY LINE, TYP 6" P 2" P 4" NG 2" NG BOLLAD, TYP 24 " SD ADMINISTATION BUILDING SD NETOK SEE SHEET C83 6" D SEE NOTE UGT UGT 6" P 4" NP ADMIN PAKING UGT FIE HYDANT 3 OHE 2" SS SDMH-6 SDMH-98 SDMH-99 2" SS 2" SS UNIVESITY D OHE 2" SS SDMH-6 SDMH-438 SDMH-62 File: O:\33-AL\33-\DESIGN\DAINGS\CIVIL\C-PEMIT Saved by skane Save date: 2/9/28 3:3 PM PLOT DATE: 2/2/28 :36 PM BY: SKANE BIDDING /8 ADG EV ISSUED FO DATE BY POJECT ENGINEE: DESIGNED BY: DAN BY: CHECKED BY: IF THIS BA DOES NOT MEASUE " THEN DAING IS NOT TO FULL SCALE T. GEINE C. ILSON C. ILSON M. STAHOTA /2" " ISSUED FO BIDDING OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE HASKELL ACHITECTS and ENGINEES, P.C. PENNSYLVANIA - ACHITECTUE # A422L l l l iverside Avenue Jacksonville, Florida 3222 Phone # (94) 79-4 PATIAL PLAN - AEA SCALE: " = 2' SDMH-666 HAZEN AND SAYE 4 ESTCHASE BOULEVAD, SUITE ALEIGH, NOTH CAOLINA 2767 KEY PLAN SCALE: " = 3' THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVESITY FINAL YAD PIPING PLAN HAZEN NO.: 33- CONTACT N.: UNIVESITY PAK ATE CIVIL DAING NUMBE: ECLAMATION FACILITY AEA UPGADE POJECT C DATE: OCTOBE 28

14 ' IPAIAN BUFFE E COLLEGE AVENUE GAVEL SSMH_AD-3A SSMH_AD-3 NOTES: Planning Commission Page 3 of 27. CONTACTO SHALL AVOID INTEFEENCE ITH OVEHEAD UTILITY LINES DUING CONSTUCTION. ANY DAMAGE TO LINES SHALL BE EPAIED AT CONTACTO'S EPENSE. EFFLUENT PUMP STATION " SD ' COLUMBIA EASEMENT File: O:\33-AL\33-\DESIGN\DAINGS\CIVIL\C6 Saved by cdwilson Save date: /2/28 :8 AM PLOT DATE: //28 9:24 AM BY: CDILSON BIDDING /8 ADG EV ISSUED FO DATE BY POJECT ENGINEE: DESIGNED BY: DAN BY: CHECKED BY: -YEA FLOODPLAIN, TYP IF THIS BA DOES NOT MEASUE " THEN DAING IS NOT TO FULL SCALE DUCK POND T. GEINE J. YAN C. ILSON M. STAHOTA /2" " ISSUED FO BIDDING OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE OHE EFFLUENT S POND " EFF / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / 24" SS SCALE: " = 2' 2" NP (ABAN) OHE PATIAL PLAN - AEA 6 l l l iverside Avenue Jacksonville, Florida 3222 Phone # (94) 79-4 OHE OHE HASKELL ACHITECTS and ENGINEES, P.C. PENNSYLVANIA - ACHITECTUE # A422L 24" SS SSMH_AD-286 OHE HAZEN AND SAYE 4 ESTCHASE BOULEVAD, SUITE ALEIGH, NOTH CAOLINA 2767 OHE 8" UTILITY POLE, TYP POPETY LINE, TYP EISTING OVEHEAD POE LINES SEE NOTE ELEC DB SEE ELEC DGS EISTING TANSFOME AND CONCETE PAD SHALL BE DEMOLISHED AFTE NE PUMPS AE SUCCESSFULLY COMMISSIONED. ELOCATE E ELEC POLE FO CONSTUCTION OF NE ELEC BUILDING ELECTICAL BUILDING SEE ELEC DGS ELOCATED ELEC POLE ' IPAIAN BUFFE THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVESITY FINAL YAD PIPING PLAN HAZEN NO.: 33- CONTACT N.: UNIVESITY PAK ATE CIVIL DAING NUMBE: ECLAMATION FACILITY AEA 6 UPGADE POJECT C6 DATE: OCTOBE 28

15 Page 4 of 27 NE STANDING SEAM METAL OOF SYSTEM METAL PANEL AT GABLE NE STANDING SEAM METAL OOF SYSTEM NE ELEVATO AND STAI TOE 2' - ". " ' - 6" 3' - " 4' - " EISTING INDOS TO EMAIN 2' - 8" PECAST SILL AND SPLIT FACE BLOCK BELO NE INDOS " ' - 3/8" 2" 8' - " 3' - 6" SPLIT FACE BLOCK COLUMNS NE STOEFONT ENTY B.O. DECK - OOF (L.P.) 2' - " 9.83 NE PVC TIM BAND TO EPLACE EISTING OOD TIM ST FLOO ' - 6" EISTING BICK SOLDIE COUSE NE GABLE CANOPY / STANDING SEAM METAL OOF TOP OF ELEVATO SHAFT ' - 8" B.O. DECK - OOF (L.P.) ' - " METAL ALL PANEL CANOPY AT NE DOO ST FLOO ' - 6" SPLIT FACE BLOCK GADE GOUND FLOO ' - " SOUTH ELEVATION /8" = '-" EAST ELEVATION /8" = '-" NE STANDING SEAM METAL OOF SYSTEM NE STANDING SEAM METAL OOF SYSTEM NE ELEVATO & STAI TOE NE ELEVATO AND STAI TOE NE GABLE CANOPY / STANDING SEAM METAL OOF TOP OF ELEVATO SHAFT 22' - 8" 6.63 TOP OF ELEVATO SHAFT 22' - 8" ' - 7". 2' - " GADE 28' - 4". 24' - 7". ' - 8" 2' - 3". B.O. DECK - OOF (L.P.) 2' - " 9.83 SOLDIE COUSE HEADE GADE ST FLOO ' - 6" METAL ALL PANEL CANOPY AT NE DOO SPLIT FACE BLOCK GADE 3' - 7". 28' - 4". 24' - 7". 2' - " ' - 6" 3' - 6" 2' - ". B.O. DECK - OOF (L.P.) 2' - " 9.83 ST FLOO ' - 6" GOUND FLOO ' - " GOUND FLOO ' - " METAL ALL PANEL EISTING PLANTE EISTING INDOS TO EMAIN SPLIT FACE BLOCK NOTH ELEVATION /8" = '-" EST ELEVATION /8" = '-" ' ' 8' 2' ' 4' 2' ' 6' ' 2' ' ' 4' ' 3' 2' 8' 4' 2' ' 32' 4' 2' ' 2' 8' 4' 6' 6' 8' 4' GAPHIC SCALE c:\evit_local\33--8-admin-ach.vt 2/9/28 2:34:9 PM BIDDING /8 ADG EV ISSUED FO DATE BY POJECT ACHITECT: DESIGNED BY: DAN BY: CHECKED BY: IF THIS BA DOES NOT MEASUE " THEN DAING IS NOT TO FULL SCALE JONATHAN O. ESSA, AIA ECL ANS ECL /2" " ISSUED FO BIDDING HASKELL ACHITECTS and ENGINEES, P.C. PENNSYLVANIA - ACHITECTUE # A422L l l l iverside Avenue Jacksonville, Florida 3222 Phone # (94) 79-4 HAZEN AND SAYE 4 ESTCHASE BOULEVAD, SUITE ALEIGH, NOTH CAOLINA 2767 THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVESITY UNIVESITY PAK ATE ECLAMATION FACILITY UPGADE POJECT BUILDING ELEVATIONS DATE: HAZEN NO.: CONTACT NO.: DAING NUMBE: OCTOBE A87

16 Page of 27 ALUMINUM GUTTES SNO GUADS AS AZEK FASCIA EQUIED D BOAD C B A ALUMINUM STOEFONT INDO SYSTEM AILING LOUVE ( 6'-8"2"-") 2" 3" STANDING SEAM METAL OOF SYSTEM 2 x3 ALUMINUM DONSPOUTS TO STOM 2" 2" ALUMINUM GUTTES 2 x3 ALUMINUM DONSPOUTS TO SPLASH BLOCKS AT SOUTH ELEVATION ONLY 3' - 4". 9' - 4" SNO GUADS AS EQUIED ALUMINUM STOEFONT INDO SYSTEM AZEK FASCIA BOAD LOUVE ( 6'-8"2"-") STANDING SEAM METAL OOF SYSTEM 2" 36' - ". 3" 47' - ". EL 3.83 EL 2. 2 x3 ALUMINUM DONSPOUTS TO STOM PECAST CONCETE BAND EL 34. TANSLUCENT EMOVABLE PANEL SPLIT FACE CMU EL 7. EAST ELEVATION /8" = '-" PAINTED CONCETE OVEHEAD COILING DOO (SEE SCHEDULE) SPLIT FACE CMU FP DOOS AND FAMES (SEE SCHEDULE) EAST ELEVATION - BEYOND ETAINING ALL /8" = '-" OVEHEAD COILING DOO (SEE SCHEDULE) SNO GUADS AS EQUIED STANDING SEAM METAL OOF SYSTEM 2"3" ALUMINUM DONSPOUTS TO STOM EL 3.83 EL 2. SPLIT FACE CMU 3' - 4". 47' - ". PECAST CONCETE BAND 9' - 4" 36' - " EL 34. 2' - " ' - 2". EL 7. FP DOOS AND FAMES (SEE SCHEDULE c:\evit_local\33--3-bn_&_mb-ach.vt 2/9/28 2:4:33 PM NOTH ELEVATION /8" = '-" BIDDING /8 ADG EV ISSUED FO DATE BY POJECT ACHITECT: DESIGNED BY: DAN BY: CHECKED BY: IF THIS BA DOES NOT MEASUE " THEN DAING IS NOT TO FULL SCALE JONATHAN O. ESSA, AIA JOE ANS ECL /2" " ISSUED FO BIDDING HASKELL ACHITECTS and ENGINEES, P.C. PENNSYLVANIA - ACHITECTUE # A422L l l l iverside Avenue Jacksonville, Florida 3222 Phone # (94) 79-4 HAZEN AND SAYE 4 ESTCHASE BOULEVAD, SUITE ALEIGH, NOTH CAOLINA 2767 THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVESITY UNIVESITY PAK ATE ECLAMATION FACILITY UPGADE POJECT MB-ACHITECTUAL ETEIO ELEVATIONS /8" = '-" ' DATE: HAZEN NO.: CONTACT NO.: DAING NUMBE: OCTOBE A38

17 Page 6 of 27 SNO GUADS DOUBLE BA 2" 6" SNO GUADS AS EQUIED METAL PANEL (UNINSULATED) OVE 6" METAL STUDS ALUMINUM GUTTES 2" 6" 4 2 x3 ALUMINUM DONSPOUTS TO STOM TANSLUSCENT INDO SYSTEM x3 ALUMINUM DONSPOUTS TO STOM EL 64. ALUM. STOEFONT SYSTEM ITH LO E GLAZING 2 2 METAL PANEL (INSULATED) OVE 7/8" HAT CHANNELS OVE 8" LOAD BEAING CMU 9' - 2". ' - 6". 8" CMU-2 ITH LIQUID APPLIED ATE EPELLANT COATING CASTED-IN PLACE CONCETE COLUMN AND BEAM (SEE STUCTUAL) /A PE-FABICATED ALUMINUM AILING 8" CMU-2 ITH LIQUID APPLIED ATE EPELLANT COATING 2 3/A 4' - 2". 2' - ". VETICAL IBBED INSULATED ACHITECTUAL METAL PANELS OVE METAL FAMING OVE 8" CMU EL 46. EL 42. ALUMINUM STOEFONT SYSTEM 4'-8" EMOVABLE TANSLUCENT PANEL SYSTEM 8" CMU-2 ITH LIQUID APPLIED ATE EPELLANT COATING L4 3 2 L3 -/--- COLUMN IN FOEGOUND - SEE STUCTUAL 2'-" IDE '-4" HIGH EMOVABLE TANSLUCENT PANELS - QUANTITY OF 2 TOTAL 4" SPLIT FACE NON LOAD BEAING CMU OVE 3/8" MOTA OVE 8" CMU (LOAD BEAING) 4" SPLIT FACE NON LOAD BEAING CMU OVE 3/8" MOTA OVE CONCETE ALL (SEE STUCTUAL) PE-FABICATED METAL CANOPY OVE ENTY EL 2. L2 L SNO GUADS DOUBLE BA EAST ELEVATION /8" = '-" GENEAL NOTE: CONTOL JOINTS SHALL BE SPACED 24' MA TANSLUSCENT INDO SYSTEM SOUTH ELEVATION /8" = '-" SNO GUADS DOUBLE BA ANY FITUE/FLASHING ATTACHED TO ETEIO FACE OF SPLIT FACE CMU SHALL BE EPLACED ITH SMOOTH FACE CMU AT FITUE ONLY. ALUM. STOEFONT SYSTEM ITH LO E GLAZING ALUMINUM GUTTES METAL PANEL OVE LIGHT GA METAL FAMING VETICAL IBBED INSULATED ACHITECTUAL METAL PANEL OVE 6" METAL STUDS 37' - 8". 3' - 6". 3'- ". 9' - 8". 4 2 x3 ALUMINUM DONSPOUTS TO STOM 4" NON LOAD BEAING SPLIT FACE CMU SET IN 3/8" MOTA BED OVE 8" LOAD BEAING CMU ECESSED CMU ALL 9' - 2". 4 2 x3 ALUMINUM DONSPOUTS TO STOM 4'-8" EMOVABLE TANSLUCENT PANEL SYSTEM 2' - ". ' - 6". 3/A 4/A /A 3' - ". 37' - 8". EL 64. VETICAL IBBED INSULATED METAL PANEL OVE 7/8" HAT CHANNELS OVE 8" LOAD BEAING CMU 2'-" IDE '-4" HIGH EMOVABLE TANSLUCENT PANELS - QUANTITY OF 2 TOTAL 4/A SIM. POTION OF BUILDING BELO GADE 8" CMU-2 ITH LIQUID APPLIED ATE EPELLANT COATING 4' - 6". EL 46. GUAD AIL AND ALKAY - SEE STUCTUAL DAINGS EL 42. 4" SPLIT FACE NON LOAD BEAING CMU OVE 3/8" MOTA OVE 8" CMU (LOAD BEAING) 4" SPLIT FACE NON LOAD BEAING CMU OVE 3/8" MOTA OVE CONCETE ALL (SEE STUCTUAL) EL 2. c:\evit_local\33---ptf-achvt.vt 2/9/28 :36:42 AM BIDDING /8 ADG EV ISSUED FO DATE BY POJECT ACHITECT: DESIGNED BY: DAN BY: CHECKED BY: EST ELEVATION /8" = '-" IF THIS BA DOES NOT MEASUE " THEN DAING IS NOT TO FULL SCALE JONATHAN O. ESSA, AIA JOE ANS ECL /2" " ISSUED FO BIDDING HASKELL ACHITECTS and ENGINEES, P.C. PENNSYLVANIA - ACHITECTUE # A422L l l l iverside Avenue Jacksonville, Florida 3222 Phone # (94) 79-4 HAZEN AND SAYE 4 ESTCHASE BOULEVAD, SUITE ALEIGH, NOTH CAOLINA 2767 NOTH ELEVATION /8" = '-" THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVESITY UNIVESITY PAK ATE ECLAMATION FACILITY UPGADE POJECT PTF- ACHITECTUAL ETEIO ELEVATIONS DATE: HAZEN NO.: CONTACT NO.: DAING NUMBE: OCTOBE A4

18 Page 7 of 27

19 Page 8 of 27

20 Page 9 of 27

21 Page 2 of 27

22 Page 2 of 27

23 Page 22 of 27 Borough of State College MEMOANDUM to: All Borough Employees from: Ed LeClear, Director of Planning and Community Development re: Conflict of Interest Policy and Code of Conduct with egard to HUD Programs date: November, 28 A Conflict of Interest Policy and Code of Conduct with egard to HUD Programs was adopted by the State College Borough Council in 2 and updated by Borough Council as recently as 27. This attached policy will be distributed to Borough employees annually. Please review the policy. If you have questions or comments, please contact me at

24 Page 23 of 27 BOOUGH OF STATE COLLEGE Conflict of Interest Policy and Code of Conduct ith egard to HUD Programs SECTION NON-POCUEMENT CONFLICTS OF INTEEST A. COVEED INDIVIDUALS: Any employee, agent, officer, elected official, appointed official or consultant of the Borough of State College (Participating Jurisdiction) or; any member of an employee s, agent s, officer s, elected official s or appointed official s immediate family; an employee s, agent s, officer s, elected official s or appointed official s partner; or an organization that employs or is about to employ any of the above. CONFLICTS POHIBITED: No person(s) described in Paragraph of section who exercises or has exercised any functions or responsibilities with respect to activities assisted with HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) or Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) or other U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) funds, or who is in a position to participate in a decision-making process or gain inside information with regard to these activities, may obtain a real or apparent financial interest or financial benefit from a HOME, CDBG, or other HUD-assisted activity, or has a real or apparent financial interest in any contract, subcontract, or agreement with respect to HOME, CDBG, or other HUD-assisted activity, or the proceeds from such activity, either for themselves or those with whom they have business or immediate family ties, during their tenure or for one year thereafter. Immediate family ties include (whether by blood, marriage or adoption) the spouse, parent (including a stepparent), child (including stepchild), brother, sister (including a stepbrother or stepsister), grandparent, grandchild and in-laws of a covered person. Occupancy of a HOME-assisted unit by a covered person constitutes a financial interest. ECEPTIONS: Threshold equirements Upon the written request of the participating jurisdiction, the U.S. Housing and Urban Development (HUD) or its successor, may grant an exception to the provisions of the CONFLICTS POHIBITED of section on a case-by-case basis when it determines that the exception will serve to further the purpose of the HOME, CDBG or other HUD program and the effective and efficient administration of the Borough s program or project. An exception may be considered only after the participating jurisdiction has provided the following:. A disclosure of the nature of the conflict, accompanied by an assurance that there has been public disclosure* of the conflict and a description of how the public disclosure was made; and 2. An opinion from the Borough s attorney that the interest for which the exception is sought would not violate state or local laws. *The requirements for public disclosure include publication in a local newspaper or disclosure during an advertised public hearing.

25 Page 24 of 27 Factors to be considered for Exceptions In determining whether to grant a requested exception after the participating jurisdiction has satisfactorily met the requirements of paragraphs a. and b. above, HUD, or its successors, will consider the cumulative affect of the following factors, where applicable:. hether the exception would provide a significant cost benefit or an essential degree of expertise to the program or project which would otherwise not be available; 2. hether the person affected is a member of a group or class of low-income persons intended to be the beneficiary of the assisted activity, and the exception will permit such person(s) to receive generally the same interests or benefits as are being made available or provided to the group or class; 3. hether the affected person(s) has withdrawn from his/her functions or responsibilities or the decision-making process with respect to the specific assisted activity in question; 4. hether the interest or benefit was present before the affected person was in a position as described in the COVEED PESONS Paragraph of this section. hether undue hardship will result either to the participating jurisdiction or the person affected when weighed against the public interest served by avoiding the prohibited conflict; and 6. Any other relevant considerations. B. ONES AND DEVELOPES: Any owner, developer or sponsor of a project assisted with HOME, CDBG or other HUD funds (or officer, employee, agent, elected or appointed official or consultant of the owner, developer or sponsor or immediate family member of an officer, employee, agent, elected or appointed official, or consultant of the owner, developer or sponsor) whether private, for-profit or non-profit (including a community development organization (CHDO) when acting as an owner, developer or sponsor) CONFLICTS POHIBITED: No person(s) described in Paragraph 2.A of section 2 may occupy, or appear to occupy, a HOME, CDBG or other HUD-assisted affordable housing unit in a project during the required period of affordability specified in 92.22(e) or 92.24(a)(4). This provision does not apply to an individual who receives HOME, CDBG or other HUD funds to acquire or rehabilitate his or her principal residence or to an employee or agent to the owner or developer of a rental housing project who occupies a housing unit as the project manager or maintenance worker. ECEPTIONS: Upon written request of a housing owner or developer, the Borough may grant an exception to the provisions of the above paragraph of this section on a case by case basis when it determines that the exception will serve to further the purposes of the HOME, CDBG or other HUD program and the effective and efficient administration of the owner s or developer s HOME, CDBG or other HUD-assisted project. In determining whether to grant a requested exception, the Borough shall consider the following factors:. hether the person receiving the benefit is a member of a group or class of lowincome persons intended to be the beneficiaries of the assisted housing, and the

26 Page 2 of 27 exception will permit such person to receive generally the same interest or benefits as are being made available or provided to the group or class: 2. hether the person has withdrawn from his or her functions or responsibilities, or the decision-making process with respect to the specific assisted housing in question; 3. hether the tenant protection requirements of Sec are being observed; 4. hether the affirmative marketing requirements of Sec are being observed and followed; and. Any other factor relevant to the Borough s determination, including the timing of the requested exception. SECTION 2 POCUEMENT CONFLICT OF INTEEST COVEED INDIVIDUALS: Any employee, officer, or agent of the Borough of State College (Participating Jurisdiction). CONFLICTS POHIBITED: The CDBG, HOME and other HUD Programs follow the procurement policy of the Borough of State College located in the Borough of State College Code of Ordinances, Chapter, Part N. If any provisions of 2 CF 2.38, 24 CF 7.6, and 24 CF are not included or conflict with the Borough s Procurement Policy, the provisions of 2 CF 2.38, 24 CF 7.6, and 24 CF shall supersede the Borough s Procurement Policy. No Covered Individuals in section 2 may participate in the selection, award or administration of a contract supported by HOME, CDBG or other HUD Program if a conflict of interest, real or apparent, would be involved. Such a conflict would arise when any of the following parties has a financial or other interest in the firm selected for award: -employee, agents, or officer of the Borough of State College; -any member of an employee s, agent s or officer s immediate family; -an employee s, agent s or officer s partner; or -an organization that employs or is about to employ any of the above No employee, officer, or agent of the Borough or subrecipient may solicit or accept gratuities, favors or anything of monetary value from contractors, potential contractors or parties to subagreements. ECEPTIONS: There are no exceptions for real or apparent procurement conflicts of interest. A request for a regulatory waiver can be submitted pursuant to 24 C.F... Upon determination of good cause, the Secretary may, subject to statutory limitations, waive any provision of this title and delegate this authority in accordance with section 6 of the Department of Housing and Urban Development eform Act of 989 (42 U.S.C. 33(q)).

27 Page 26 of 27 SECTION 3 CODE OF CONDUCT: Persons covered in section 2, paragraph, are expressly forbidden from soliciting or accepting money, gifts, gratuities, services, favors, or anything of monetary value (excepting unsolicited calendars, pens, or other items of nominal value used as an advertising medium) from any person, company, firm, or corporation to which any purchase order or contract is, or might, be awarded or from a party to any potential subcontract. The Borough shall also take disciplinary action in accordance with the Borough Personnel ules and egulations against any covered persons in section 2 paragraph who violate this conflict of interest policy. Employees will receive a copy of the conflict of interest policy on an annual basis as a mailer included in a paycheck. Elected and appointed officials will receive a copy of the policy at a regular meeting of their respective council, authority, board or commission. Distribution of the policy will be noted in the minutes of the meeting. Members who are absent will receive a copy by mail. Consultants and agents will be provided a copy of the policy as part of their contracts. SECTION 4 SUB-ECIPIENTS: Applicable Conflict of Interest and Procurement Policies for the Borough s subrecipients are covered under CF 2.38, 24 CF 7.6 and 24 CF Each subrecipient has developed its own Conflict of Interest Policy and Procurement Policy in accordance with the applicable regulations. Authorized Official: Ed LeClear, Director of Planning and Community Development 243 S. Allen Street State College, PA Summary of evisions: Adopted by the State College Borough Council on April 8, 2. evised by staff on April 3, 2. evised policy adopted by the State College Borough Council on November 6, 27.

28 Page 27 of 27 Borough of State College MEMOANDUM to: All Borough Employees from: Ed LeClear, Director of Planning and Community Development re: Drug-Free orkplace equirements for the Community Development Block Grant and HOME Programs date: November, 28 The State College Borough Community Development Department is mandated by the Department of Housing and Urban Development to notify all employees who are engaged in the performance of the Community Development Block Grant program and the HOME program of the status of drugs in the workplace. It is unlawful to manufacture, distribute, dispense, possess or use a controlled substance in the workplace. Any employee who does manufacture, distribute, dispense, possess or use a controlled substance in the workplace shall be prosecuted under all applicable State and Federal laws, and shall face appropriate personnel action, up to and including termination; or the employee shall participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State or local health, law enforcement or other appropriate agency. Employees must notify the Borough in writing of their conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction. The State College Community Development Department is required to notify HUD, within ten calendar days after receiving notice from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of a conviction. State College Borough has in place an Employee Assistance Plan designed to deal with drug and alcohol problems in the employee population. The telephone number for the Employee Assistance Plan is ; the website is If you have any questions or comments, please contact me at