Attachments: Resolution, Staff Report, Map Series, Agency Comments, Site Photos, Basis of Review and Application

Transcription

1 Executive Summary Meeting Date: August 14, 2017 Agenda Item: TA/CPA Future Land Use Map Amendment 3702 West Roland Street Prepared by: Tony LaColla, AICP ext. 350 Presented by: Jennifer Malone ext. 324 Action Necessary: Yes Summary: The Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehensive Plan is the official document guiding the long-term development of the City of Tampa. The Planning Commission is required to make recommendations to the Tampa City Council on all proposed changes to the Imagine 2040: Tam pa Comprehensive Plan pursuant to Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes and Chapter , Laws of Florida as amended. Plan Amendment TA/CPA is a privately initiated request to amend the Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Plan Map. The proposed amendment would allow for higher residential density. The subject site is located in the South Tampa Planning District, on the southwest corner of West Roland Street and South Sterling Avenue. The request is to change the Future Land Use designation for an approximate acre subject site from Residential-10 (R-10) to Residential-20 (R-20). Currently, the site is being used as a single family home. The proposed Plan Amendment, which allows consideration of up to 20 units per acre, would allow for the subject site to see a potential maximum of three residential units on site. The maximum Floor Area Ratio would also increase, from the current 0.35 to a Under the adopted Residential-10 category, the subject site could be utilized for single family detached residential development with limited townhomes considered. The Residential-20 Future Land Use category allows for consideration of small-lot single family units including duplexes, condominiums, and townhomes. Limited neighborhood-serving commercial uses consistent with locational criteria for neighborhood commercial and residential office uses are allowed in both the adopted and requested categories. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Planning Commission find plan amendment TA/CPA CONSISTENT with the Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehensive Plan and forward this recommendation to Tampa City Council. Plan Hillsborough planhillsborough.org planner@plancom.org E Kennedy Blvd 18 th Floor Tampa, FL, Attachments: Resolution, Staff Report, Map Series, Agency Comments, Site Photos, Basis of Review and Application

2 This page intentionally left blank

3 Resolution Item: Tampa Comprehensive Plan Amendment: TA/CPA Future Land Use Map Amendment, 3702 West Roland Street AYE NAY ABSENT DATE: August 14, 2017 Mitch Thrower, Chair Bowen A Arnold, Vice-Chair Gary Pike, Member-at-Large Matthew D Buzza Derek L Doughty, PE Theodore Trent Green, RA Mitch Thrower Chair Nigel M Joseph Karen Kress, AICP Michael Maurino Jacqueline S Wilds Melissa E Zornitta, AICP Executive Director Melissa E. Zornitta, AICP Executive Director On motion of Seconded by The following resolution was adopted: WHEREAS, the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission, has developed a Comprehensive Plan for the City of Tampa entitled Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehensive Plan, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter , Florida Statutes, which was adopted by Tampa City Council on January 7, 2016, as amended; and WHEREAS, the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission and Tampa City Council adopted the Procedures Manual for Amendments to the Tampa Comprehensive Plan on October 9, 1986, and subsequently amended; and Plan Hillsborough planhillsborough.org planner@plancom.org E Kennedy Blvd 18 th Floor Tampa, FL, WHEREAS, the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission staff reviewed TA/CPA that proposes a future land use designation of Residential-20 for the subject parcels 0.18± acres that are located on the southwest corner of West Roland Street and South Sterling Avenue; and WHEREAS, the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission reviewed the proposed map amendment, considered existing/future development

4 Resolution Tampa Comprehensive Plan Amendment: TA/CPA West Roland Street August 14, 2017 patterns and community facilities, as well as the adopted goals, objectives and policies of the Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehensive Plan as follows: Livable City - Goals, Objectives, and Policies LU Objective 1.1: Recognize that the City is comprised of five unique districts: University, Central Tampa, Westshore, New Tampa, and South Tampa. LU Policy 1.1.8: Provide diverse housing opportunities that are efficiently served by transit in the New Tampa and South Tampa Districts while maintaining the character of established residential neighborhoods. City Design - Goals, Objectives, and Policies LU Objective 1.2: Create inspired urban design while respecting Tampa s human scale, unique history, aesthetics, natural environment, and sense of community identity as the City changes and evolves. LU Policy 1.2.8: Promote a range of uses in close proximity to each other. These uses shall include, but are not limited to: mixed density housing with a variety of housing options, localserving goods and services, civic uses, and employment generators. Overall Residential Development and Redevelopment Goals, Objectives, and Policies LU Objective 9.3: Compatible development and redevelopment to sustain stable, neighborhoods and ensure the social and economic health of the City. LU Policy 9.3.5: Generally, the location of single family attached housing units shall be limited to the periphery of established single family detached neighborhoods; however, single family attached housing may be considered if it can be demonstrated that they can be integrated with single family detached residential uses by mitigating their negative impacts, if any. Single Family Areas LU Objective 9.5: Maintain the stability of existing areas while expanding opportunities for housing choices. LU Policy 9.5.3: Provide for different intensities of single family areas to reflect differences in the existing and desired character of single family areas across the City. Allow development that is generally consistent with the levels of infrastructure development and environmental conditions in each area. Include opportunities for low-cost subsidized housing in single-family areas. Low Medium Density Multifamily Areas LU Objective 9.6: Increase the diversity and improve the sustainability of multi-family residential areas.

5 Resolution Tampa Comprehensive Plan Amendment: TA/CPA West Roland Street August 14, 2017 LU Policy 9.6.2: Promote a residential development pattern consistent with the compact city form strategy, with increased availability of housing at densities that promote walking and transit use near employment concentrations, residential services and amenities. LU Objective 9.7: Provide opportunities for infill development in areas already characterized by low to low medium density multifamily development and create transitions in development intensity between single-family zones and more intensive multi- family or commercial areas. LU Policy 9.7.1: Provide opportunities for attached housing at slightly higher densities than single-family areas. LU Policy 9.7.3: Use low-density multifamily areas to provide for transitional densities between single-family neighborhoods and more intense commercial and residential uses. Housing - Goals, Objectives, and Policies Adequate Sites to Accommodate Housing Needs HSG Objective 1.3: Ensure that an adequate supply of housing is available to meet the needs, preferences, and financial capabilities of Tampa s households now and in the future in all neighborhoods. HSG Policy 1.3.4: Encourage new housing on vacant, infill, or underutilized land. HSG Policy 1.3.6: Continue to develop a comprehensive strategy for providing additional workforce housing, serving moderate to middle-income workers in Tampa. Promote the location of workforce housing close to employment and/or multimodal transportation facilities. Infrastructure Goals, Objectives, and Policies INF Objective 1.1: Continue to coordinate the orderly provision of public facilities with public and private development activities in a manner that is compatible with the fiscal resources of the City through the continued implementation of the Concurrency Management System. INF Policy : Promote a residential development pattern consistent with the compact city form strategy, with increased availability of housing at densities that promote walking and transit use near employment concentrations, residential services and amenities. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission staff determined that TA/CPA is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission finds Tampa Comprehensive Plan Amendment CONSISTENT with the Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehensive Plan and forward it to Tampa City Coucil for approval.

6 This page intentionally left blank

7 City of Tampa: TA/CPA West Roland Street Planning Commission Public Hearing: August 14, 2017 Future Land Use Map Amendment Summary Information Application Type Privately Initiated Location Address: 3702 West Roland Street. Property located on the southwest corner of West Roland Street and South Sterling Avenue Property Size 0.18± acres (7,910+ sq. ft.) Folio Number Existing Future Land Use Residential-10 (R-10) Proposed Future Land Use Residential-20 (R-20) Existing Land Use One single family residence Roadways West Roland Street and South Sterling Avenue are both designated as local neighborhood streets Neighborhood Bon Air Vision Map Designations South Tampa Planning District, Transit Emphasis Corridors Agency Review Comments No Objections All Agency Comments are provided in Appendix B Applicable Plan Sections Livable City, City Design, Overall Residential Development and Redevelopment, Housing, Infrastructure Application Application-for-Web.pdf Staff Planner Tony LaColla, AICP, , ext. 350, lacollaa@plancom.org Staff Recommendation CONSISTENT Impact of Proposed Change The applicant is requesting the following Future Land Use Map designation change: Potential Impact Current Land Use Category Proposed Land Use Category Acres: 0.18± Residential-10 (R-10) Residential-20 (R-20) Maximum Density Maximum Residential Development Potential Range of Allowable Uses Up to 10 dwelling units per gross Up to 20 dwelling units per gross acre (DU/AC) acre (DU/AC) 1 DU 3 DU Typical uses in the R-10 land use category include single-family detached residential development with limited townhomes considered. Compatible public, quasi-public, and special uses are allowed consideration. Lowintensity office and neighborhood commercial uses may be considered if locational criteria are Typical uses in the R-20 land use category include small lot, single family residential, multifamily developments (apartments, condominiums, and townhomes.) Low-intensity office and neighborhood commercial uses may be considered if locational criteria are met.

8 met. Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Practical Impacts.35 FAR will allow consideration of 2,769 square feet of nonresidential uses..50 FAR will allow consideration of 3,955 square feet of nonresidential uses. The primary impact of this change is allowing for a greater probability of single family attached residential uses or low-intensity office and neighborhood commercial uses. Context of Proposed Change Existing Land Uses and Typical Development in the Area Existing Land Use Map The site is currently being utilized for one single family detached residential unit. Other single family detached residential uses (yellow) are located directly to the south and east of the subject site. There is a multifamily quad-plex (orange) directly to the west of the subject site. The white color directly to the north of the subject site represents vacant parcels. Light commercial (pink) is located throughout the area but primarily along the major transportation corridors of West Kennedy Boulevard to the north and South Dale Mabry Highway to the west. Faithworks Ministries International Church is located to the north and represents an institutional use (blue). The red color represents heavy commercial.

9 Future Land Uses The surrounding area contains a mixture of Future Land Use categories. The subject site, including properties to the south and east, are currently designated Residential-10 (R-10) and are represented by the tan color. R-10 typically allows for single-family detached homes. To the west and north are properties designated as Residential-20 (R-20), represented by the brown color. R-20 allows for duplexes, condominiums, and townhomes, as well as multi-family dwelling units. To the north, along West Kennedy Boulevard, is Urban Mixed Use-60 (UMU-60) represented by the light purple color. This Future Land Use Adopted Future Land Use Map category typically allows for high-intensity commercial, service, office, and residential uses. The pink color along South Dale Mabry To the west represents the Community Mixed Use-35 (CMU-35) Future Land Use category which typically permits retail, general commercial, services, office, and residential uses. Applicant s Request The applicant is requesting a Future Land Use Map designation change on.18± acres from Residential-10 to Residential-20. The Comprehensive Plan describes the Residential- 10 Future Land Use category as low density development, primarily single family detached residential, with limited opportunities for single family attached development. Residential-20 is described as medium to low density development with a mixture of single family detached, attached, and multi-family residential. Applicable Comprehensive Plan Policies and Criteria The proposed plan amendment complies with the following Objectives and Policies of the Imagine 2040: Tampa Comprehensive Plan. Livable City Proposed Future Land Use map

10 LU Objective 1.1: Recognize that the City is comprised of five unique districts: University, Central Tampa, Westshore, New Tampa, and South Tampa. LU Policy 1.1.8: Provide diverse housing opportunities that are efficiently served by transit in the New Tampa and South Tampa Districts while maintaining the character of established residential neighborhoods. City Design LU Objective 1.2: Create inspired urban design while respecting Tampa s human scale, unique history, aesthetics, natural environment, and s ense of c ommunity identity as the C ity changes and evolves. LU Policy 1.2.8: Promote a range of uses in close proximity to each other. These uses shall include, but are not limited to: mixed density housing with a variety of housing options, localserving goods and services, civic uses, and employment generators. Overall Residential Development and Redevelopment LU Objective 9.3: Compatible development and redevelopment to s ustain stable, neighborhoods and ensure the social and economic health of the City. LU Policy 9.3.5: Generally, the location of single family attached housing units shall be limited to the per iphery of es tablished single family detached neighborhoods; however, single family attached housing may be considered if it can be demonstrated that they can be integrated with single family detached residential uses by mitigating their negative impacts, if any. Single Family Areas LU Objective 9.5: Maintain the s tability of existing areas while expanding opportunities for housing choices. LU Policy 9.5.3: Provide for different intensities of single family areas to reflect differences in the existing and desired character of single family areas across the City. Allow development that is generally consistent with the levels of infrastructure development and environmental conditions in each area. Include opportunities for low-cost subsidized housing in single-family areas. Low Medium Density Multifamily Areas LU Objective 9.6: Increase the diversity and improve the s ustainability of multi-family residential areas. LU Policy 9.6.2: Promote a r esidential development pattern consistent with the c ompact city form strategy, with increased availability of housing at densities that promote walking and transit use near employment concentrations, residential services and amenities. LU Objective 9.7: Provide opportunities for infill development in areas already characterized by low to low medium density multifamily development and create transitions in development intensity between single-family zones and more intensive multi- family or commercial areas.

11 LU Policy 9.7.1: Provide opportunities for attached housing at slightly higher densities than single-family areas. LU Policy 9.7.3: Use low-density multifamily areas to provide for transitional densities between single-family neighborhoods and more intense commercial and residential uses. Housing Adequate Sites to Accommodate Housing Needs HSG Objective 1.3: Ensure that an adequate supply of housing is available to meet the needs, preferences, and financial capabilities of Tampa s households now and in the future in all neighborhoods. HSG Policy 1.3.4: Encourage new housing on vacant, infill, or underutilized land. HSG Policy 1.3.6: Continue to develop a comprehensive strategy for providing additional workforce housing, serving moderate to middle-income workers in Tampa. Promote the location of workforce housing close to employment and/or multimodal transportation facilities. Infrastructure INF Objective 1.1: Continue to coordinate the orderly provision of public facilities with public and private development activities in a manner that is compatible with the fiscal resources of the City through the continued implementation of the Concurrency Management System. INF Policy : Promote a residential development pattern consistent with the compact city form strategy, with increased availability of housing at densities that promote walking and transit use near employment concentrations, residential services and amenities. Staff Analysis The approximate 0.18-acre subject site is located within the South Tampa Planning District in the Bon Air neighborhood. This district consists of Tampa s Interbay Peninsula, generally described as south of Kennedy Boulevard and lying between Old Tampa Bay and Hillsborough Bay. The Scenic Bayshore Boulevard runs through this District. Predominately single family residential, the area has many strong and established neighborhood associations including not only Bon Air but also Beach Park, Culbreath Isles, Culbreath Bayou, Bayside West, Sunset Park, Guernsey Estates, Virginia Park, Bayshore Beautiful, Palma Ceia, Palma Ceia Park, Parkland Estates, and Fair Oaks/Manhattan Manor all located north of Gandy Boulevard. The subject plan amendment site is located in close proximity to West Kennedy Boulevard and South Dale Mabry Highway, two of the most traveled thoroughfares and one of the busiest commercial intersections in the city. Both thoroughfares have a transit emphasis corridor designation. Existing land uses along the two corridors consist primarily of a variety of retail and service-oriented businesses and mid to high rise office uses. The area has evolved over the last 20 years, with the addition of higher intensity commercial uses along the corridors. This trend of intensification is expected to continue. The northern part of the West Kennedy-South Dale Mabry intersection is part of a designated regional activity center, the Westshore Business District with much more intensive land uses of

12 Regional Mixed Use-100 and Urban Mixed Use-60. The commercial properties to the north of the subject site facing West Kennedy Boulevard, directly abut the residences to the south located along the northern face of West Roland Street. These commercial properties are currently underutilized and can be considered potential commercial redevelopment projects in the future given the redevelopment and intensification along West Kennedy Boulevard over the past two decades. TA/CPA Proposed Future Land Use Map (July 2003) A 2003 plan amendment, TA/CPA 03-14, initiated by the property owners along this block of West Roland Street changed the land use designation for 10 of 13 parcels from Residential-10 to a Residential-20 Land Use category. At that time, the property owner of the subject site opted out of the joint request. Today, the current property owner seeks the Residential-20 to complement the neighboring properties on that block. The fact that the vast majority of properties on both the north and south sides of this block of West Roland Street transitioned to a Residential-20 Land Use category in 2003, gives this request more validity. The request for Residential-20 will permit consideration of residential uses that are compatible with residential development and plan designations in the area and will provide similar residential land use opportunities that exist or are already approved. The amendment provides for additional residential and low-density office development opportunities, thus providing opportunities for a mix of living and working environments, infill development in proximity to the regional mixed use activity center, and maximizing the use of existing infrastructure (HSG Policy and INF Policy ). The request for Residential-20 would provide for a more appropriate development pattern for this parcel and transition from the high-intensity commercial to the north to the low-density single family to the south (LU Objective 9.7, LU Policy 9.7.1, LU Policy 9.7.3, HSG Policy 1.3.4). While commercial encroachment into the edges of neighborhoods is of concern, the development potential allowed for the requested Residential-20 is consistent with the surrounding land uses (LU Objective 9.3 and LU Policy 9.3.5). The proposed amendment, while allowing for a small increase in density and intensity, will provide for neighborhood stability and a more sustainable and convenient mix of uses that provide varied housing options as well as goods and services (LU Objective 9.5 and LU Policy 9.5.3). Currently, the 0.18-acre subject site provides for one residential unit. This site is underutilized given its location next to a major intersection and two thriving transit emphasis corridors which include HART transit lines #30 and #36. The requested change in future land use designation would allow for increase in density on the parcel. The request is consistent with a number of objectives and policies promoting mixed density housing choices within close proximity to employment, civic uses, and transit corridors (LU Policy 1.1.8, LU Policy 1.2.8, LU Objective 9.6, LU Policy and HSG Policy 1.3.6).

13 Recommendation Staff recommends that the Planning Commission find the proposed land use designation change for the City of Tampa CPA 17-05, from Residential-10 to Residential-20, on the plan amendment site (0.18+ acres) CONSISTENT with the Imagine 2040: Ta mpa Comprehensive Plan and forward this recommendation to the Tampa City Council.

14 This page intentionally left blank

15 Attachment A Map Series 1. Aerial Map 2. Existing Land Use Map 3. Adopted Future Land Use Map 4. Proposed Future Land Use Map Change

16 W North A St N Dale Mabry Hwy N Sterling Ave W North A St N Himes Ave FIGURE 2 CITY OF TAMPA AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY TA/CPA LEGEND PLAN AMENDMENT AREA W Kennedy Blvd ROADS AND BOUNDARY LINES COUNTY BOUNDARY JURISDICTION BOUNDARY TAMPA SERVICE AREA URBAN SERVICE AREA W Roland St S Sterling Ave S Himes Ave S Dale Mabry Hwy W Cleveland St DATA SOURCES: Aerial Photography 2016, Hillsborough County Geomatics. PARCEL DATA: Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. W Platt St Feet Author: colangeg Date: 7/3/2017 Path: G:\gisroot\Projects\GregColangelo\Plan_Amendment_Map_Series\TCpa\tcpa1705aerial.mxd µ

17 W North A St N Dale Mabry Hwy N Sterling Ave W North A St N Himes Ave FIGURE 3 CITY OF TAMPA EXISTING LAND USE TA/CPA LEGEND PLAN AMENDMENT AREA W Kennedy Blvd EXISTING LAND USE SINGLE FAMILY / MOBILE HOME TWO FAMILY MULTI-FAMILY MOBILE HOME PARK VACANT PUBLIC / QUASIPUBLIC / INSTITUTIONS PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS / UTILITIES RIGHT OF WAY/ROADS/HIGHWAYS EDUCATIONAL HEAVY COMMERCIAL LIGHT COMMERCIAL W Roland St HIGH INDUSTRIAL LIGHT INDUSTRIAL MINING RECREATION / OPEN SPACE AGRICULTURAL NATURAL WATER UNKNOWN NOT CLASSIFIED S Dale Mabry Hwy W Cleveland St S Himes Ave ROADS AND BOUNDARY LINES COUNTY BOUNDARY JURISDICTION BOUNDARY TAMPA SERVICE AREA URBAN SERVICE AREA COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA BOUNDARY EXISTING LAND USE: Derived from Property Appraiser parcels and NAL DOR Codes. JURISDICTION BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Effective to Present. PARCELS: Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. URBAN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Effective to Present. REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. national map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. S Sterling Ave Author: colangeg Date: 6/30/2017 Path: G:\gisroot\Projects\GregColangelo\Plan_Amendment_Map_Series\TCpa\tcpa1705elu.mxd Feet µ

18 W North A St N Dale Mabry Hwy N Sterling Ave W North A St N Himes Ave FIGURE 4 CITY OF TAMPA ADOPTED 2040 FUTURE LAND USE CITY OF TAMPA PLAN AMENDMENT AREA RURAL ESTATE - 10 RESIDENTIAL - 3 TA/CPA LEGEND (.25 FAR) (.35 FAR) RESIDENTIAL - 6 W Kennedy Blvd RESIDENTIAL - 10 RESIDENTIAL - 20 (.35 FAR) (.50 FAR) RESIDENTIAL - 35 (.60 FAR) RESIDENTIAL - 50 (1.0 FAR) RESIDENTIAL - 83 (.65 FAR) SUBURBAN MIXED USE - 3 (.25 FAR) SUBURBAN MIXED USE - 6 NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE - 16 NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE - 24 NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE - 35 (.50 FAR) (.50 FAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES,.75 FAR VERTICAL MIXED-USE OR RESIDENTIAL ONLY) (.75 FAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES, 1.0 FAR VERTICAL MIXED-USE OR RESIDENTIAL ONLY) (1.0 FAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES, 1.5 FAR VERTICAL MIXED-USE OR RESIDENTIAL ONLY) GENERAL MIXED USE -24 (1.5 FAR) URBAN MIXED USE - 60 (3.25 FAR) COMMUNITY MIXED USE - 35 (2.0 FAR) W Roland St TRANSITIONAL USE - 24 REGIONAL MIXED USE (1.5 FAR) (3.5 FAR) AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL - 35 (2.0 FAR) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (1.5 FAR) HEAVY INDUSTRIAL (1.5 FAR) RECREATIONAL/OPEN SPACE PUBLIC/SEMI - PUBLIC MAJOR ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE S Dale Mabry Hwy W Cleveland St S Sterling Ave S Himes Ave WATER RIGHT OF WAY TRANSITIONAL AREA (DUE TO ANNEXATION) ROADS AND BOUNDARY LINES COUNTY BOUNDARY JURISDICTION BOUNDARY TAMPA SERVICE AREA URBAN SERVICE AREA COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA BOUNDARY 2025 FUTURE LAND USE: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Originally Adopted - June 08, Jurisdicitonal areas updated by plan amendment. Effective to present. PARCELS: Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. URBAN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Effective to Present. CHHA: Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, June 12, The Coastal High Hazard Area as shown on the Future Land Use map is a general depiction as per HB1359, which is the area below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line as established by the SLOSH computerized storm surge model. More specific information can be obtained by reviewing the TBRPC's computerized storm surge model. W Platt St ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commisiion. REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission Feet Author: colangeg Date: 6/30/2017 Document Path: G:\gisroot\Projects\GregColangelo\Plan_Amendment_Map_Series\TCpa\tcpa1705flu.mxd µ

19 W North A St N Dale Mabry Hwy N Sterling Ave W North A St N Himes Ave FIGURE 5 CITY OF TAMPA PROPOSED 2040 FUTURE LAND USE TA/CPA FROM: RESIDENTIAL - 10 TO: RESIDENTIAL - 20 PLAN AMENDMENT AREA TAMPA FUTURE LAND USE RURAL ESTATE - 10 RESIDENTIAL - 3 LEGEND (.25 FAR) (.35 FAR) RESIDENTIAL - 6 W Kennedy Blvd RESIDENTIAL - 10 RESIDENTIAL - 20 (.35 FAR) (.50 FAR) RESIDENTIAL - 35 (.60 FAR) RESIDENTIAL - 50 (1.0 FAR) RESIDENTIAL - 83 (.65 FAR) SUBURBAN MIXED USE - 3 (.25 FAR) SUBURBAN MIXED USE - 6 NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE - 16 NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE - 24 NEIGHBORHOOD MIXED USE - 35 (.50 FAR) (.50 FAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES,.75 FAR VERTICAL MIXED-USE OR RESIDENTIAL ONLY) (.75 FAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES, 1.0 FAR VERTICAL MIXED-USE OR RESIDENTIAL ONLY) (1.0 FAR NONRESIDENTIAL USES, 1.5 FAR VERTICAL MIXED-USE OR RESIDENTIAL ONLY) GENERAL MIXED USE -24 (1.5 FAR) URBAN MIXED USE - 60 (3.25 FAR) COMMUNITY MIXED USE - 35 (2.0 FAR) W Roland St TRANSITIONAL USE - 24 REGIONAL MIXED USE (1.5 FAR) (3.5 FAR) AIRPORT COMPATIBILITY COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL - 35 (2.0 FAR) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (1.5 FAR) HEAVY INDUSTRIAL (1.5 FAR) RECREATIONAL/OPEN SPACE PUBLIC/SEMI - PUBLIC MAJOR ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT MACDILL AIR FORCE BASE S Dale Mabry Hwy W Cleveland St S Sterling Ave S Himes Ave WATER RIGHT OF WAY TRANSITIONAL AREA (DUE TO ANNEXATION) ROADS AND BOUNDARY LINES COUNTY BOUNDARY JURISDICTION BOUNDARY TAMPA SERVICE AREA URBAN SERVICE AREA COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA BOUNDARY 2025 FUTURE LAND USE: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. JURISDICTION BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Effective to Present. PARCELS: Hillsborough County Property Appraiser. URBAN SERVICE AREA BOUNDARIES: Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission. Effective to Present. CHHA: Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council, June 12, The Coastal High Hazard Area as shown on the Future Land Use map is a general depiction as per HB1359, which is the area below the elevation of the category 1 storm surge line as established by the SLOSH computerized storm surge model. More specific information can be obtained by reviewing the TBRPC's computerized storm surge model. W Platt St ACCURACY: It is intended that the accuracy of the base map comply with U.S. map accuracy standards. However, such accuracy is not guaranteed by the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commisiion. REPRODUCTION: This sheet may not be reproduced in part or full for sale to anyone without specific approval of the Hillsborough County City-County Planning Commission Feet Author: colangeg Date: 6/30/2017 Document Path: G:\gisroot\Projects\GregColangelo\Plan_Amendment_Map_Series\TCpa\tcpa1705flu_proposed.mxd µ

20 This page intentionally left blank

21 Agency Comments Attachment B

22 From: Thompson, Mike Sent: Tuesday, June 20, :53 PM To: Tony LaColla Cc: David Hey Subject: EPC Comments for CPA 17-04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09 Tony, Attached are detailed EPC Staff comments for TA-CPA Additionally staff comments for the other subject CPAs follow. TA-CPA 17-07: Wetlands Management Division Wetlands on-site ( Hillsborough River). Any activity interfering with the integrity of wetland(s) or other surface water(s), such as clearing, excavating, draining or filling, without written authorization from the Executive Director of the EPC or authorized agent, pursuant to Section , Rules of the Commission, would be a violation of Section 17 of the Environmental Protection Act of Hillsborough County, Chapter , and Chapter 1-11, Rules of the EPC. TA-CPA 17-09: Air Management Division The proposed amendment will place residential development next to other Heavy Industrial classified parcels, which can be a source of complaints (even when the facilities are operating in compliance). The parcel is the current site of a permitted air pollution source, Blacklidge Emulsions. If there is any information on where the facility will relocate, please share that information with EPC staff as they will most likely need an air construction permit if they are moving. TA-CPA 17-04, 17-05, NO COMMENTS Let me know if you have any questions on these comments, Sincerely, Michael S. Thompson Project Manager Wetlands Management Division Environmental Protection Commission Of Hillsborough County (813) ext1219 thompson@epchc.org Vision: Environmental Excellence in a Changing World

23 Comprehensive Plan Amendment Request TA/CPA Transportation Information Road Name Kennedy Blvd. Dale Mabry Blvd. West Roland St. S. Sterling Ave. From - To Dale Mabry Hwy to Himes Ave. Roland St. to Kennedy Blvd. Dale Mabry Blvd. to S. Sterling Ave. W. Azele St. to Kennedy Blvd. Number of Lanes Adopted LOS Standard Current LOS Pedestrian LOS Bicycle LOS 4LD D F D D 4LU D F D D 2LU NA NA NA NA 2LU NA NA NA NA Transportation Analysis Existing The site is at the corner of W. Roland St. and S. Sterling Ave. There are sidewalks on both W. Roland St. and S. Sterling Ave.., but no bicycle facilities. HART provides bus service in this area. Transportation Analysis Future Proposed There are no capacity improvements in this area in the current 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan. There are no capacity improvements in this area in the current 5 year Transportation Improvement Program. Tindale Oliver is completing a study in this area to identify opportunities to implement pedestrian geometric design, sign & pavements marking, and signal timing/phasing best practices at major intersections. They also will identify speed management strategies and identify unused driveways and documents a process to coordinate with the CoT and property owners to eliminate these. FDOT is managing a complementary study which will review intersection lighting and identify candidate intersections for upgraded pedestrian lights, identifying locations for controlled pedestrian crossing locations, and a feasibility review for high-priority improvement concepts. The HART Transit Development Plan identifies the need for expansion of transit service in this area.

24 Special Area Analysis This area is not identified in the MPO s Demographic Analysis for Environmental Justice Purposes as an area having a high density of minority populations. Residents in these areas tend to be more reliant on cycling, walking, and transit (when available) for their travel purposes whether to work, school, shopping, and appointments.

25 C STAFF REPORT ON COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PROPERTY ADDRESS: APPLICATION: CPA HEARING DATE: AUGUST 14, 2017 CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE: REQUESTED FUTURE LAND USE: 3702 West Roland Street R-10 R-20 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF SITE The subject property contains 0.18 ± acres and is located in the South Tampa Planning District. The property is currently zoned Residential Single-family-60 (RS-60), which provides primarily for single family residential uses, requiring a minimum lot width of 60 and a minimum lot area of 6,000 SF. The subject property is adjacent to the follow uses: multi-family to the west, single family to the south, east, and northeast, and vacant residential to the north. This site is located one block south of West Kennedy Boulevard. PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION The proposed Future Land Use designation of Residential 20 (R-20) allows for uses between lower and medium intensity uses, including: Small-lot single family units (duplexes, condominiums, townhomes); Multifamily dwellings; Limited neighborhood-serving commercial uses consistent with Locational Criteria for Neighborhood Commercial and Residential Office uses; Compatible public, quasi-public, and special uses (for example churches, schools, recreational and daycare facilities) are allowed consideration; Building heights that are typically up to 3 stories (number of stories varies by location, special district, or overlay district); Maximum Density 20 du/acre; Intensity: FAR 0.5; and Intensity: FAR 2.0 in Ybor City Local Historic District Only. C STAFF RECOMMENDATION City of Tampa Planning staff has no objections to this request and finds it consistent with the existing development pattern of the surrounding area and the following comprehensive plan goals, objectives, and policies: LU Objective 1.1: Recognize that the City is comprised of five unique districts: University, Central Tampa, Westshore, New Tampa, and South Tampa. LU Policy 1.1.8: LU Objective 9.5: Provide diverse housing opportunities that are efficiently served by transit in the New Tampa and South Tampa Districts while maintaining the character of established residential neighborhoods. The requested R-20 is consistent with the character of the existing residential neighborhood located along West Roland Street. Maintain the stability of existing areas while expanding opportunities for

26 housing choices. LU Policy 9.5.1: LU Objective 9.6: LU Policy 9.6.2: Protect low-density, single family areas that provide opportunities for homeownership, that are attractive to households with children and other residents, that provide residents with privacy and open spaces accessible to residents. The subject site is located within the established residential neighborhood of Bon Air. Allowing the requested R-20 land use designation will allow for increased density/intensity consistent with the remainder of the block along West Roland Street. Increase the diversity and improve the sustainability of multi-family residential areas. Promote a residential development pattern consistent with the compact city form strategy, with increased availability of housing at densities that promote walking and transit use near employment concentrations, residential services and amenities. The subject site is located one block south of West Kennedy Boulevard, and within one block east of South Dale Mabry Highway, both are transit emphasis corridors. REVIEW CRITERIA FOR PLAN AMENDMENT REQUESTS City Council must consider the following criteria as set forth in the City of Tampa Comprehensive Plan when deciding the request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment; both staff s professional opinion and factual information is provided in bold below: 1. The requested land use category meets the intent of the general character description of the City Form component in which it is being requested and is otherwise consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Per the Comprehensive Plan excerpts provided below, Tampa s specific City Form? (Pages 29 30), the proposed future land use change meets the intent of the City Form for this area within the Bon Air Neighborhood and South Tampa Planning District. As an urban city, Tampa has a defined city form that encompasses many components such as employment centers, urban villages, mixed-use corridors, mixed-use centers, transit stations, and neighborhoods. Elements of City Form: Development Components The physically built environment called the City Form has six (6) major components which are described below. The City Form includes the following: Employment Centers Urban Villages Mixed-use Corridors Mixed-use Centers Transit Stations Neighborhoods o Urban o Traditional o Suburban and Contemporary o The Waterfront Page 2

27 Tampa s form is and will continue to be shaped by historical development patterns. The City has developed over the span of 150 years, and is influenced by the building patterns that occurred during three significant periods of time. 2. In approving any request for a land use category that provides for an increase in density, intensity or for a broader range of uses, than the existing land use category, City Council shall take into consideration and determine if: a. a land use category of similar density or intensity is located on at least one (1) side of the subject site, and The R-20 future land use category currently exists to the north, northwest, and west. b. the subject site is within 1320 (1/4 mile) of a designated transit stop or designated transit emphasis corridor, and There are two transit emphasis corridors within ¼ mile of the site: South Dale Mabry Highway running north-south and West Kennedy Boulevard running east-west. c. the subject parcel is located adjacent to a parcel which has a land use classification of R-6 or R-10, the subject site is located within 660 (1/8 mile) of a designated transit stop or designated transit emphasis corridor There are two transit emphasis corridors within 1/8 mile of the site: South Dale Mabry Highway running north-south and West Kennedy Boulevard running east-west. 3. In the event that City Council determines that the above criteria are not met, then City Council may deny the amendment or make a determination that the existing land use classification is no longer in the best interests of the public, it may approve the amendment or direct the local planning agency to propose an alternative amendment to the existing land use classification. Based on the existing land use category of R-20 located to the north, northwest and west of this site, the requested R-20 is in the best interest of this neighborhood. The allowance of this modification would allow for the continuation of a low-medium density residential pattern and limited office that is consistent with the existing development pattern of the surrounding area. Currently, the north side of this block, between South Dale Mabry Highway and South Sterling Avenue, contains the R-20 land use with the exception of the subject site. The requested R-20 is consistent with the immediate surrounding land uses and allows for consistent distribution of this land use category along this block face. 4. If a land use is changed based on this criteria, the property owner shall process through a site plan district and, if provided for in the City s land development regulations, shall meet the Development Performance Incentive Criteria, unless the development is within an approved Community Planning Area/Adopted Form Based Code Area, in which case a site plan zoning may not be required, as provided for in the specific plan in the land development regulations. Acknowledged. Submitted by LaChone Dock Urban Planner III Planning and Urban Design Page 3

28 MEMORANDUM Date: June 5, 2017 To: Through: From: LaChone Dock, Urban Planner III, Planning and Development Department Brian D. Pickard, P.E., Chief Planning Engineer, Water Department Brett E. Warner, Planning Engineer II, Water Department Subject: CPA Water Department Response The City of Tampa Water Department (TWD) has reviewed the subject Comprehensive Plan Amendment request. The associated property is within the TWD service area and can be supplied with potable water from TWD s permitted source and / or Tampa Bay Water. Additionally the property can be supplied with reclaimed water from the TWD. Should the property owner require new water service or a revision to existing water service the owner will be responsible for all applicable costs and fees for such service including but not limited to installing new infrastructure and / or upsizing existing infrastructure as necessary to comply with TWD standards. Additionally the owner may be required to provide easements and / or grassed areas (free of structures, overhangs, walls, fencing, foundations, paving, above and / or below ground utilities, dumpsters, retention ponds, trees, excessive vegetation, hardscaping, etc.) for water utility infrastructure. The specific footprint needs, fees and / or costs are determined upon the owner applying for water service and depend on the owner s specific needs identified in the application. Please encourage property owners to contact TWD s planning section as early as possible during site plan preparation to ensure sufficient footprint is allocated for these needs. Fire hydrant flow data is available by contacting Fran D Antoni at fran.d antoni@tampagov.net. The property is currently fronted by 2 UCI, 16 DIP, and 24 DIP potable water mains and a 2 HDPE reclaimed water main. The owner may be required to pay for the upgrade of these water mains to meet anticipated demands. Downtown and South Tampa CIAC fees will apply to the subject property. Please do not hesitate to contact me at brian.pickard@tampagov.net should you have any questions or concerns.

29 MEMORANDUM To: Tony LaColla, AICP From: Amber K. Dickerson, AICP Department Manager, Planning & Siting Date: May 30, 2017 Re: City of Tampa TA/CPA 17-05: 3702 W. Roland Street ( ) x The District has no comment The District has no objections. The District has no objections, subject to listed or attached conditions The District objects, based on the listed or attached issues. Raymond O. Shelton School Administrative Center 901 East Kennedy Blvd. Tampa, FL Phone: FAX: School District Main Office: P.O. Box 3408 Tampa, FL Website:

30 This page intentionally left blank

31 Attachment C Photos Subject Site (SW corner of W. Roland St. and S. Sterling Ave.) Multi-family parcel west of subject site

32 Single family home east of subject site located at SE corner of W. Roland St. and S. Sterling Ave. Vacant parcels and church north of subject site

33 Attachment D Basis of Review Adopting and Amending Plan The Tampa City Council shall have the power to adopt and amend the Tampa Comprehensive Plan in accordance with the provisions of Chapter , Laws of Florida, as amended; Chapter 163, Florida Statutes; and the provisions of this section. The Local Planning Agency may submit to the Tampa City Council proposals for amending the Tampa Comprehensive Plan. Citizens owning or having a substantial interest in property may submit to the Local Planning Agency proposals for amending the Tampa Comprehensive Plan. The Tampa City Council shall review any such proposal for the purpose of assessing its appropriateness in light of the Goal, Objectives, and Policies of the Tampa Comprehensive Plan, and after receiving recommendations from The Planning Commission and Tampa City Administration, shall provide final interpretation of the Tampa Comprehensive Plan and take action. All citizens, whether they are directly or indirectly affected shall be given an opportunity to contribute to the planning and policy-making process through public meetings and hearings. However, all questions of standing shall be reviewed pursuant to relevant law. Amendment to the Adopted Tampa Comprehensive Plan Amendment of any aspect of the comprehensive plan represents a major policy decision by the Tampa City Council. An amendment of the Future Land Use Map, in particular, is a declaration that growth and development pattern initially sought by the City in a particular location, through thoughtful adoption of the comprehensive plan, is no longer appropriate. A significant change in circumstances affecting the suitability of property in a particular area for the kind of development intended by the Tampa Comprehensive Plan, which was not contemplated at the time the comprehensive plan was adopted, may justify a reconsideration of the land use category into which that area has been placed on the map. Future Land Use Map changes not functionally related to the overall purposes expressed in the Map and policies contained herein could seriously undermine the integrity of the Map and other provisions of the comprehensive plan itself. Amendments therefore should not occur with the same frequency as parcel rezoning amendments; and their effect upon the entire Comprehensive Plan, including the practical consequences of the policy shift signified by the amendment shall be considered. It is a stated public purpose that growth and change in neighborhoods must be managed so that the quality of life in this part of the city form is maintained or enhanced. The plan amendment process is one tool that will be used to achieve this. Assessing a Proposed Amendment In assessing the merits of a Plan amendment, the Local Planning Agency and the Tampa City Council shall consider the policy implications the amendment would have on the Future Land Use Map in the general area of the affected property and the development pattern and growth policies currently being pursued there. In order that the Tampa City Council may be able to fully assess the consequences of approving the proposed change, the Local Planning Agency s report to the City Council shall include:

34 An assessment of the consistency of the proposed change with other portions and features of the Plan, and Recommendations for whatever further amendment would be advisable in conjunction with the proper amendment, and An analysis of infrastructure requirements for service necessitated and the benefits generated by the proposed amendment, and/or A finding, if applicable, based on information currently available, that an error or mistake had been made in the original land use designation shown on the Future Land Use Map. If a development proposal is not supported by the Goals, Objectives, and Policies within the Plan, serious consideration should be given to making modifications to the proposal, or the following criteria should be used to determine if a Comprehensive Plan Amendment would be justified. the character of the adjacent neighborhood; the zoning and uses of nearby properties; the suitability of the property for the uses allowed under the current zoning designation; the type and extent of positive or detrimental impact that may affect adjacent properties, or the community at large, if the request is approved; the impact of the proposal on public utilities and facilities; the length of time that the subject and adjacent properties have been utilized for their current uses; the benefits of the proposal to the public health, safety, and welfare compared to the effect on the applicant if the request is not approved; comparison between the existing Future Land Use Plan Map and the proposed change regarding the relative conformance to the goal and policies; and consideration of professional staff recommendations. In the case of more comprehensive proposals (such as a capital improvements program, or a subarea plan/study), a more extensive evaluation may be required to identify potential revisions to the proposal or to the Plan. The report should include an evaluation which includes the following: description of the proposal; identification of Sections of the Comprehensive Plan that would be affected by the proposal; evaluation of the effects of the proposal on the Comprehensive Plan, by Section. If the proposal supports the Plan, the evaluation should also indicate; but if it conflicts with the Plan, the nature and extent of the conflict should be identified; and identification of adjustments to the Plan or the proposals that would reduce any noted conflicts or negative impacts. If adjustments to the Plan are proposed, they should be undertaken and adopted per the Comprehensive Plan Amendment process before final action is taken on the comprehensive proposal.

35 Review Criteria for Plan Amendment Requests In considering a plan amendment, City Council shall review the following criteria: The requested land use category meets the intent of the general character description of the City Form component in which it is being requested and is otherwise consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. In approving any request for a land use category that provides for an increase in density, intensity or for a broader range of uses, than the existing land use category, City Council shall take into consideration and determine if:: a land use category of similar density or intensity is located on at least one (1) side of the subject site, and the subject site is within 1320 (1/4 mile) of a designated transit stop or designated transit emphasis corridor, and the subject parcel is located adjacent to a parcel which has a land use classification of R-6 or R-10, the subject site is located within 660 (1/8 mile) of a designated transit stop or designated transit emphasis corridor. In the event that City Council determines that the above criteria are not met, then City Council may have cause to deny the amendment. If City Council makes a determination that the existing land use classification is no longer in the best interests of the public, it may approve the amendment or direct the local planning agency to propose an alternative amendment to the existing land use classification. If a land use is changed based on this criteria, the property owner shall process through a site plan district and, if provided for in the City s land development regulations, shall meet the Development Performance Incentive Criteria, unless the development is within an approved Community Planning Area/Adopted Form Based Code Area, in which case a site plan zoning may not be required, as provided for in the specific plan in the land development regulations.

36 This page intentionally left blank

37 Application Attachment E

38 DATE: April 28, 2017 TAMPA CIVIL DESIGN Site design and Civil ENGINEERING LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL TO: Hillsborough County Planning Commission PHONE: David Hey FAX: 601 E. Kennedy Blvd., 18th Floor Tampa, FL REFERENCE: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Roland & Sterling Folios: COPIES/AMOUNT Fee of $1, Pre-Application Conference Form Checklist Deeds Agent Authorization Aerial w/parcel Lines Application Neighbor & HOA Listing Survey DESCRIPTION REASON: Your Comments Your Approval Your Information As Per Your Request Your Review VIA: Fax: Pages Total Regular Mail Courier Overnight Express Pick Up COMMENTS: If you have anyquestions or if I can be of any further assistance, please feel free to contact me at (813) , or by as shown below. Best Regards, Jeremy Couch, P.E. ( jcouch@tampacivil.com) 5289 Ehrlich Road Tampa, FL 33624, (813) O, (813) F

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63