Department of Planning & Development Services

Transcription

1 Department of Planning & Development Services S T A F F R E P O R T May 10, 2016 CASE NO: PROJECT: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: REQUEST DETAILS: ZA Zoning Change and Concept Plan / Site Plan for St. Laurence Church On behalf of St. Laurence Church, Kirkman Engineering is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Concept Plan / Site Plan to rezone a tract to the north of the existing church site from AG Agricultural District to CS Community Service District, and expand the existing church site by adding a new 9,680 square foot Parish Hall, remodeling and adding 2,100 square feet to the existing Fellowship Hall, and adding parking spaces at St. Laurence Church located at 549 and 517 N. Kimball Ave., Southlake, Texas. The current zoning is AG Agricultural District and CS Community Service District. SPIN Neighborhood #4. St. Laurence Church is requesting approval of a Zoning Change from AG Agricultural District to CS Community Service District on vacant Tract 5A04A located at 549 N. Kimball Ave. St. Laurence Church has existing facilities on Lot 1R to the south located at 517 N. Kimball Ave. St. Laurence Church is proposing a multi-phased concept plan and a site plan to expand the existing site by adding a new 9,680 Parish Hall, remodeling and expanding the existing Fellowship Hall and adding parking. This application runs concurrently with a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CP16-003), a request to change the Future Land Use from Medium Density Residential to Public / Semi-Public on Tract 5A04A to the north of the existing church site. If approved, the Future Land Use for the church site would be consistently Public / Semi-Public. The applicant has also submitted a Plat Revision application (ZA16-028) to revise the existing Lot 1R to include Tract 5A04A. The proposed Lot 1R1 contains acres. VARIANCES REQUESTED: 1) Zoning Ord. 480 (43.13.a.8) Setbacks/Yards: No non-single family residential building may encroach in the area above a line having a slope of 4:1 from any single-family residential property. The proposed parish hall to the north encroaches in the 4:1 slope at a maximum of approximately 15. The Applicant has requested a variance to not meet this requirement. The horizontal setback needed to meet this requirement for the proposed Parish Hall is approximately 96 feet from the north boundary line. The applicant is requesting a variance for an 83-foot setback. 2) Driveway Ord. 634 (5.2.d) Minimum Storage Length: 75 required. The applicant proposes a storage (stacking) depth of 26. ZA16-015

2 3) Zoning Ord. 480 (39.6) Perimeter Screening: Where a non-residential use abuts a residentially zoned lot or tract having an occupied residential dwelling, a solid fence meeting the material standards of section 39.2(b) shall be erected along the side and rear property lines abutting said residential lot or dwelling to a height of eight (8) feet. The applicant is requesting to not provide screening meeting these requirements along the northeast, east and south sides of the property, but instead use existing vegetation as screening. The applicant is providing an 8 wood fence along the northernmost property line. 4) Minimum Distance to Intersection Along Roadway: Driveway Ord. No. 634 requires a minimum distance to intersection along arterial roadway to a commercial or multi-family driveway of 200 On the Concept Plan / Site Plan the applicant is showing a distance of 180 from the centerline of the proposed driveway to the north to the ROW line of Cotswald Valley Ct. The applicant proposes a 180 distance. 5) Bufferyards: The applicant is requesting a variance for the west and south bufferyard to encroach into the existing parking/paving area. 6) Bufferyards: The applicant is requesting a variance to the bufferyards requirement to reallocate the required landscape items (canopy trees, accent trees and shrubs) from the buffer yards along the south and eastern most property lines to the north and west property lines. 7) Zoning Ord. 480 (43.13.a.4) Horizontal / Vertical Articulation: The applicant will require a variance in order to not meet horizontal / vertical articulation requirements per Residential Adjacency Development Overlay Development regulations along the south elevation ACTION NEEDED: 1) Consider 1 st Reading Approval of Zoning Change and Concept Plan / Site Plan Request ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information - Link to PowerPoint Presentation (D) Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated May 10, 2016 (E) Surrounding Property Owners Map (F) Surrounding Property Owners Responses (G) Ordinance No (H) Full Size Plans (for City Council only) STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) Jerod Potts (817) ZA16-015

3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNER: APPLICANT: PROPERTY LOCATION: St. Laurence Church Kirkman Engineering 549 and 517 N. Kimball Ave. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Tract 5A04A, Samuel Freeman Survey, Abstract No. 525 and Lot 1R, Block A, Saint Laurence Episcopal Church Addition, City of Southlake, Tarrant County Texas, located at 549 and 517 N. Kimball Ave., Southlake, Texas. LAND USE CATEGORY: CURRENT ZONING: REQUESTED ZONING: HISTORY: Medium Density Residential / Public / Semi-Public AG Agricultural District and CS Community Service District CS Community Service District 517 N. Kimball December 3, This property was annexed into the City of Southlake (Ordinance No. 17) January 7, 1969 City Council adopted Zoning Ordinance No. 161, which designated this property as AG Agricultural District December 15, City Council approved 2.8 acres to be rezoned (ZA87-040) from "AG" Agricultural to "CS" Community Service December 1, City Council approved Preliminary Plat (ZA87-041) for 2.8 acres January 19, City Council approved a Final Plat (ZA87-049) for 2.8 acres January 21, City Council approved a SUP (ZA91-074) for a portable building September 16, City Council approved a Zoning Change and Concept Plan (ZA97-109) for 8.5 acres to be rezoned from "AG" Agricultural to "CS" Community Service September 2, City Council approved a plat revision (ZA97-110) for Lot 1R, Block A, Saint Laurence Episcopal Church Addition July 27, Zoning Board of Adjustment allowed a Variance to Ordinance No. 480, Section 33.5.a (ZBA-351), to allow a church steeple with a height of approximately seventy-five (75) feet measured from the lowest grade November 7, City Council approved a Site Plan (ZA00-093) October 20, City Council approved a Site Plan (ZA09-040) for a Attachment A ZA Page 1

4 pergola 549 N. Kimball December 3, This property was annexed into the City of Southlake (Ordinance No. 17) January 7, 1969 City Council adopted Zoning Ordinance No. 161, which designated this property as AG Agricultural District According to TAD the single family residential structure that was located on this home was built in Per applicant, the structure has been demolished CITIZEN INPUT: SOUTHLAKE 2030: To date, a SPIN Town Hall Forum has not been held Consolidated Future Land Use Plan The Southlake 2030 Future Land Use Plan designates 517 N. Kimball Ave. (south portion of the site) as Public / Semi- Public and 549 N. Kimball Ave. (north portion of the site) as Medium Density Residential. The applicant is proposing through separate application a Comprehensive Land Use Plan amendment (CP16-003) to change the future land use designation on the north portion of the site to Public / Semi-Public. The definition for Medium Density Residential per Southlake 2030 says: The Medium Density Residential category is suitable for any single-family detached residential development. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks / Open Space and Public / Semi-Public categories previously discussed. As proposed the proposed Zoning Change and Concept / Site Plan for the church expansion is consistent with the Southlake 2030 Future Land Use Plan. Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan The Master Thoroughfare Plan designates this section of N. Kimball as an 88 A4D (4-lane divided) arterial. ROW has been dedicated for 517 N. Kimball Ave. (existing church site) and the applicant will dedicate ROW for 549 N. Kimball Ave. by Plat Revision. The applicant has submitted a Plat Revision application which is currently under review by City staff (ZA16-028). Pathway Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan The Pathways Master Plan shows this section of N. Kimball Ave. as existing sidewalks <8. This site has a 6 concrete sidewalk spanning the frontage of the property boundary along N. Kimball Ave. This is consistent with the Pathways Master Plan. TRANSPORTATION Attachment A ZA Page 2

5 ASSESSMENT: Existing Area Road Network and Conditions The site currently has access from N. Kimball Ave. According to the Concept / Site Plan, one of the existing driveways along N. Kimball Ave. will be closed, and a new driveway will be provided further north. There will be two (2) access points into the church site from N. Kimball Ave. Traffic Impact Use Square AM- AM- PM- PM- Vtpd* Feet IN OUT IN OUT Church (560) 27, * Vehicle Trips Per Day * AM-In, AM-Out, PM-In and PM-Out are peak hour generators on a weekday * Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7 th Edition UTILITIES: Water The utility plan shows a proposed fire hydrant on the east side of N. Kimball Ave. with an 8 fire line to be added. The plan shows a new 2 domestic service water line to connect to the existing 12 water main along N. Kimball Ave. Sewer Sewer is provided to this site by a 12 gravity main on the west side of N. Kimball Ave. The utility plan shows two existing (2) existing sanitary sewer manholes on the west side of N. Kimball Ave and the plan shows a proposed sanitary sewer manhole on the east side of N. Kimball Ave. The applicant is proposing a 6 Private SSWR line from the existing manhole to the north and a 4 SSWR and 6 SSWR to serve the site. TREE PRESERVATION: According to the Tree Conservation Plan there is approximately 17.2% existing tree canopy coverage at the site. The plan is showing that 87.9% of the existing tree canopy coverage will be preserved. The applicant is required to preserve a minimum of 70% of the existing tree cover, which they exceed with this plan. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION May 5, 2016; Approved (5-0) subject to the Staff Report dated April 29, 2016 and Site Plan Review Summary No. 3, dated April 29, 2016 and specifically granting the following variances noted in the staff report; variance no. 1, variance no. 2, specifically excluding and not granting variance no. 3, granting variance no. 4, granting variance no. 5 with respect to variance no. 6, note the applicant s willingness to review the placement of the relocated landscaping to maximize its location on the northern perimeter of the site, and specifically granting variance no. 7, and also noting the applicant s willingness to meet with the northern four neighbors adjacent to the property to further discuss screening alternatives, also noting the applicant s willingness to consider either relocating or reconfiguring the parking on the northern side. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated May 10, 2016 N:\Community Development\MEMO\2016 Cases\015 - ZSP - St. Laurence Church\Staff Report\ZA CC doc Attachment A ZA Page 3

6 Attachment B ZA Page 1

7 Plans and Support Information Proposed Concept Plan / Site Plan Attachment C ZA Page 1

8 Proposed Concept Plan / Site Plan Close-Up Attachment C ZA Page 2

9 Site Data Summary Chart Attachment C ZA Page 3

10 Tree Conservation Plan Close-up Attachment C ZA Page 4

11 Boundary / Topographic / Tree Survey Close-up Attachment C ZA Page 5

12 Project Narrative and Variances Attachment C ZA Page 6

13 Attachment C ZA Page 7

14 Letter of Revisions Made After the May 5, 2016 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Attachment C ZA Page 8

15 Overall Floor Plan Proposed Concept / Site Plan (left) Attachment C ZA Page 9

16 Exterior Elevations South Elevations Color Rendering South Elevations Proposed Concept / Site Plan Variance to horizontal articulation requested Variance to vertical articulation requested Attachment C ZA Page 10

17 Exterior Elevations West Elevation Color Rendering West Elevation Proposed Concept / Site Plan (left) Attachment C ZA Page 11

18 Exterior Elevations North Elevation Color Rendering North Elevation Proposed Concept / Site Plan (left) Attachment C ZA Page 12

19 Exterior Elevations East Elevation Color Rendering East Elevation Proposed Concept / Site Plan (left) Attachment C ZA Page 13

20 Pedestrian Access Plan Close-up Attachment C ZA Page 14

21 Grading Plan Close-up Attachment C ZA Page 15

22 Proposed Drainage Map Close-up Attachment C ZA Page 16

23 Utility Plan Close-up Attachment C ZA Page 17

24 Landscape Plan Close-up Attachment C ZA Page 18

25 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY : ZA Review No.: Four Date of Review: 5/10/16 Project Name: Zoning Change and Concept Plan / Site Plan St. Laurence Church APPLICANT: Kirkman Engineering OWNER: St. Laurence Church Jonathan Schindler Father John Jordan 4821 Merlot Ave., Suite N. Kimball Ave. Grapevine, TX Southlake, TX Phone: (817) Phone: (817) jonathan.schindler@trustke.com frjohnjord CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 5/10/16 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF ZONING CHANGE AND CONCEPT / SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT JEROD POTTS AT (817) Jerod Potts Planner I Phone: (817) jpotts@ci.southlake.tx.us Planning Review 1. Within the narrative: a. Please clarify which phase specifically improvements will be completed. The narrative currently states All proposed improvements shown in this plan are to be constructed in one phase. Include which phase this refers to. b. Update the narrative to reflect all variances being requested. c. The first paragraph references the existing fellowship call. Please make this consistent with other portions of the application. 2. On the Concept Plan / Site Plan: a. The concept plan refers to Future Expansion and the Site Data Summary Chart refers to Phase 2. Consider making these references to future site expansion consistent, including in the project narrative. 3. Show and label all minimum building setback lines in accordance with the underlying zoning and/or any applicable overlay district (i.e. Corridor, Residential Adjacency and Non-residential Overlays). Buildings must be setback such that no portion of the building encroaches above a 4:1 slope line from a residential property line. However, one story buildings less than 20 feet in height may be as close as 40 feet from the residential property line. If the building is over 20 feet in height (measured from the highest adjacent grade within 5 feet of the building to the midpoint between the roof peak and the plate) provide a cross sectional slope exhibit demonstrating compliance. The proposed parish hall to the north encroaches in the 4:1 slope at a maximum of approximately 15. The Applicant has requested a variance to not meet this requirement. The horizontal setback needed to meet this requirement for the proposed Parish Hall is approximately 96 feet from the north boundary line. The applicant is requesting a variance for an 83-foot setback. 4. All driveways/points of ingress/egress must comply with the Driveway Ordinance No. 634, as amended). Attachment D ZA Page 1

26 a. The new driveway at the north end of the site needs to be a minimum of 200 feet from the ROW of the street to the north. Verify that the distance is measured at the ROW line of the intersecting street to the centerline of the driveway. The applicant has requested a variance to this requirement. b. The minimum stacking depth required is 75 feet. (A variance with justification will be needed. The applicant has requested a variance to this requirement. 5. Provide a minimum 8 screening device meeting the requirements of Ordinance 480, Section 39 along all boundaries abutting residentially zoned or designated property and any property zoned AG having an occupied residential dwelling. This requirement appears to impact the north, east and south boundaries of the site. The applicant is requesting to not provide screening meeting these requirements along the northeast, east and south sides of the property, but instead use existing vegetation as screening. The applicant is providing an 8 wood fence along the northernmost property line. 6. Regarding the scaled elevations sheets: a) Provide an elevation index that shows the perspective view in relation to the site plan for each elevation. b) Ensure that the color renderings match the scaled and dimensioned elevations shown on the full-size plans. i. The south elevation of the proposed new Parish Hall shows cut limestone veneer on all of the drawings except one, where it appears to have been left out on the color rendering (A3.3, 3). ii. The north elevation of the proposed expansion of the Expansion of the Fellowship Hall shows brick veneer between the expansion of the Fellowship Hall and the proposed new Parish Hall, and the scaled elevation sheet shows this area as blank. Please ensure these match (A3.2,2 and A3.4,2) c) The combined elevations showing the proposed Fellowship Hall and Parish Hall (south elevation) do not meet the horizontal or vertical articulation requirements per Residential Adjacency Development Overlay Development Regulations. A variance will be required. 7. Show the location and method of screening of any mechanical equipment. Mechanical equipment must be screened of view from residential properties and adjacent ROW. Applicant has indicated that mechanical equipment will be located on the roof. 8. Parking for a place of worship is based on seating capacity of the assembly areas based on a ratio of 1 parking space per 3 seats. Please update the Site Data Summary Chart to accurately reflect the number of required spaces. Based on a maximum seating capacity of 456, 152 spaces would be required. The following are recommendations and observations by staff where your application may benefit and does not represent a requirement. Staff recommends providing a materials sample board as part of any presentation to the P & Z and City Council. Steven D. Anderson, P.E., CFM Civil Engineer Phone: (817) Public Works/Engineering Review Attachment D ZA Page 2

27 Fax: (817) GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. 2. New Requirement: Provide Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan per TXR The plan must include all required elements in Part III, Section F of the permit. The City of Southlake especially reviews Part III, Section F, (1) (g), Maps. The review is for completeness of a plan to prevent pollution (especially sediment) to the Separate Storm Sewer System. It is highly recommended the project manager provide a series of maps for complex projects, including one map showing controls during mass grading and infrastructure, one map showing controls during vertical construction, and one map showing final stabilization (may be but not always equitable to the landscape plan). Please include timelines in relation to the project activities for installation and removal of controls. SWPPP shall be submitted by second review of the civil construction plans. 3. NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet, if applicable. 4. Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building Inspections Department prior to construction. 5. Label the distances to the nearest drives or street intersections in both directions from the proposed drive. * Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. * Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. * Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan. * Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: EASEMENTS: 1. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15 minimum and located on one lot not centered on the property line. A 20 easement is required if both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement. * Water and sanitary sewer cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be constructed to City standards. INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * Submit 22 x34 civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City s website: Attachment D ZA Page 3

28 * Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines preconstruction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures. * A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization. * Access permit is required prior to construction of the driveway on FM 1709, FM 1938 or SH 114. Permit approval is required before beginning construction. Submit application and plans directly to TxDOT for review. * A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) to connect to the City s sewer, water or storm sewer system. * A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer s Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No *=Denotes informational comment. Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) Fax: (817) kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: Tree Conservation/Landscape Review 1. On previous Tree Conservation Plans the existing trees outside of the northeast corner of the north parking were proposed to be preserved but the grading plan showed 3 4 of topography grade change around them. On the most recently submitted Tree Conservation Plan the same trees are shown to be removed in order to provide for the change in topography. The trees are quality trees that are in good condition and can be easily preserved by constructing a retaining wall at the back of the curb of the parking and access drive. * The proposed tree conservation complies with the required Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance. The property has approximately 17.2% of existing tree cover and 70% of that tree cover is required to be preserved. The applicant is proposing to preserve 87.9% of the existing tree cover. * Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Attachment D ZA Page 4

29 Table 2.0 Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on the entire site Minimum percentage of the existing tree cover to be preserved* 0% 20% 70% % 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% 60.1% - 80% 40% 80.1% - 100% 30% * The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. * Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: 1. Parking lot landscape areas are the required and proposed landscape islands within the parking lot areas and at the ends of rows of parking. These parking lot landscape islands are required to contain at least one canopy tree with the rest of the area containing shrubs, ground cover, ornamental grasses, seasonal color, or a combination of these plant materials. If an area contains a light pole two (2) accent trees and the remaining required plant material may be planted in place of the required canopy tree. Provide the required plant material in each of the parking landscape island areas. When the Landscape Plans are submitted with the Building Plans for a Building Permit, the correct plant material must be provided within the parking lot landscape areas There are thirty-four (34) accent trees proposed within the interior landscape and thirty-nine (39) accent trees proposed to be planted within the North 1 bufferyard. The submitted Landscape plan shows only twenty-nine (29) within the interior landscape, and thirteen (13) for the North 1 bufferyard. When the Landscape Plans are submitted with the Building Plans for a Building Permit, the correct plant material must be provided within the bufferyards and interior landscape area The Landscape Plan is required to be prepared by a Registered Landscape Architect. When the Landscape Plans are submitted with the Building Plans for a Building Permit, the submitted plans must be prepared and stamped by a Registered Landscape Architect. QUALIFICATION TO PREPARE PLANS: For all lots greater than 30,000 square feet, Landscape Plans shall be prepared by a Registered Landscape Architect. For lots less than 30,000 square feet, a Landscape Designer or Landscape Contractor, knowledgeable in plant materials and landscape design may also prepare the landscape plan. Irrigation plans shall be prepared by a Licensed Irrigator or Landscape Architect or other professional as authorized by the State of Texas. The Landscape Administrator may reject plans if deemed of insufficient quality or completeness and require that plans be prepared by a Registered Landscape Architect or other qualified professional. Attachment D ZA Page 5

30 * The proposed building additions are greater in size than 5,000 square feet and/or 30% of the existing buildings square footage. The entire property is required to comply with the Landscape Ordinance and Bufferyards regulations of the Zoning Ordinance. Existing buildings: Buildings in existence on the effective date of this ordinance shall be considered legally nonconforming as it pertains to this ordinance. New construction greater in size than 30% of the existing building or greater than 5,000 square feet shall require compliance with this ordinance as it applies to the entire square footage of the existing building and proposed addition. New construction intended to increase the square footage by less than 30% of the existing building or less than 5,000 square feet shall be required to meet the requirements herein only as it pertains to the square footage of the new construction. * Bufferyards are required to be provided along all property boundary lines. The applicant is proposing to use the existing plant material to satisfy the requirements of the bufferyards landscaping. Any existing plant material which otherwise satisfies the requirements of the bufferyard may be counted toward satisfying all requirements as long as the existing plant material is in good health and not altered during any phase of the proposed development or construction. * Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Kelly Clements Fire Marshal Phone: (817) Fax: (817) kclements@ci.southlake.tx.us GENERAL COMMENTS: Fire Department Review An automatic fire sprinkler system will be required for buildings over 6,000 square feet and/or buildings that have additions to the structure that cause it to exceed 6,000 square feet. (Per 2012 I.F.C. Sec as amended) Submit plans to Reed Fire Protection, Midway Road, Suite G260, Addison, Texas Phone (Fellowship hall addition causes the building to be in excess of 6,000 square feet) The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system can be located on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main, measured linearly along the length of the pipe. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a pit. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5 X5 if the double check is not located on the riser, or a minimum of 6 X6 if it is on the riser. FIRE LANE COMMENTS: Fire lanes require a minimum 30 foot inside turn radius and a minimum 54 foot outside turn radius. (Per 2012 I.F.C. Sec ) FIRE HYDRANT COMMENTS: Fire Department Connections for sprinkler systems must be within 100 feet of a fire hydrant, and within 50 feet of fire department fire lanes. (FDC locations not indicated on plans, add FDC locations, wall mount or remote connection, and fire hydrants as necessary to meet requirements.) Attachment D ZA Page 6

31 Peter Kao Construction Manager Phone: (817) Fax: (817) Park Board comments or recommendations: Community Service/Parks Department Review All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting fee payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) for further details. Land/park dedication requirements: Non-residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of park land for every fifty (50) non-residential gross acres of development. If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, non-residential park dedication fees in the amount of $2,400 per gross acre x 0.93 acres= $2, will be required. However, a credit of $3000 for existing residential dwelling is allowed. Therefore, no park dedication fee is required. Pathway Comments: Should provide pathways consistent with Southlake Master Pathways Plan. Should provide pedestrian access from each building to Trail System or sidewalk connections and between buildings. Should provide 4ft+ concrete sidewalks on both sides of all public and private streets consistent with Article V Street and Right-Of-Way Requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and all State of Texas accessibility requirements. Informational Comments: * Staff strongly recommends contacting Daniel Cortez in the City Manager s Office to determine if a SPIN meeting would be beneficial to your application. Daniel can be contacted by phone at (817) or by at dcortez@ci.southlake.tx.us. For more information about SPIN and the SPIN process please go to SouthlakeSPIN.org. * There appears to be an existing 7.5 UE along the north boundary of the existing church lot that will need to be abandoned due to the proposed improvements. This can be done with the Plat Revision that will be required for a building permit, subject to utility company and City Council approval. * Please note that the proposed standing seam metal roof must have a factory applied non-metallic matte finish. * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * All mechanical equipment must be screened of view right-of-ways and residential properties in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended. * Masonry construction meeting the requirements of Ord. 557 and Ord. 480, Section is required on the proposed buildings. Provide horizontal and vertical articulation meeting the Attachment D ZA Page 7

32 requirements of Ord. 480, Section on all facades within 400 of a property zoned or designated residential. Compliance with the articulation requirements is as shown on the attached articulation evaluation chart. * All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended with regard to type of lighting, intensity, glare and spill-over. Show the type and height of all intended lighting. The applicant has included a note on the Concept Plan / Site Plan indicating that all lighting must comply. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. * It appears that this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone and will require construction standards that meet requirements of the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No. 479 and execution of an avigation easement and release on the required plat revision. * Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43, Overlay Zones. * Masonry materials shall mean and include brick, stucco, plaster, cement, concrete tilt wall, stone, rock or other masonry material of equal characteristics. Stucco and plaster shall only be considered a masonry material when applied using a 3-step process over diamond metal lath mesh to a 7/8th inch thickness or by other processes producing comparable cement stucco finish with equal or greater strength and durability specifications. Synthetic products (e.g., EIFS exterior insulation and finish systems, hardi plank, or other materials of similar characteristics) shall not be considered a masonry material. * Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 33.21, Building Color Standards for Non-Residential Buildings. * Tract 5A04A (549 N. Kimball Ave.) to the north of Lot 1R is unplatted. In order to obtain a building permit for this portion of the property, a plat application must be submitted, reviewed, approved, and recorded with Tarrant County. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Denotes Informational Comment Attachment D ZA Page 8

33 Attachment D ZA Page 9

34 Surrounding Property Owners SPO # Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response KIMBALL LLC RPUD 2202 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT NR KIMBALL LLC RPUD 2206 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT NR KIMBALL LLC RPUD 2210 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT NR KIMBALL LLC RPUD 2221 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT NR 5 AMWT SOUTHLAKE LLC SP2 584 N KIMBALL AVE NR 6 BABARIA, GORDHANBHAI H SF1-A 604 SHADY LN NR 7 CHEN, SHANSHAN RPUD 2209 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT O 8 CHU, EDWARD RPUD 2200 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT O 9 CORP OF EPISCOPAL DIOCESE FW AG 549 N KIMBALL AVE NR 10 DOVE ROAD WATER ASSOC SF1-A 480 SHADY LN NR 11 FABER, HOWARD S RPUD 2205 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT O 12 IVESTER, EMORY O AG 501 N KIMBALL AVE NR 13 JAMES, DAVID B SF1-A 600 SHADY LN NR 14 JUNEJA, VIKAS RPUD 2201 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT O 15 KIMBALL ROAD LP I1 500 N KIMBALL AVE NR 16 LEE, K WAYNE SP2 566 N KIMBALL AVE NR 17 MALONEY, RANDY C SF1-A 426 SHADY LN NR 18 MALONEY, ROBBIE JOAN SF1-A 500 SHADY LN NR 19 MDP SOUTHLAKE LLC SP2 400 N KIMBALL AVE F 20 ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY CO NR LLC CS 550 N KIMBALL AVE PETERSON, ROBBIE JOAN SF1-A 504 SHADY LN NR 22 SCHEIBEL, TRACY E SF1-A 516 SHADY LN NR 23 SCHEIBEL, TRACY E SF1-A 520 SHADY LN NR Attachment E ZA Page 1

35 24 SCROGGINS, MARCUS L RPUD 2204 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT O 25 SMITH, MICHAEL J RPUD 2208 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT O 26 ST LAURENCE EPISCOPAL NR CHURCH CS 517 N KIMBALL AVE Superintendent of Carroll ISD NR 28 Superintendent of Grapevine NR Colleyville ISD 29 Superintendent of Keller ISD NR 30 Superintendent of Northwest ISD NR 31 TDC MANAAGEMENT LLC SP2 560 N KIMBALL AVE NR 32 WANG, KUN RPUD 2213 COTSWOLD VALLEY CT O Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Responses Received: In Favor: (1) Opposed To: (7) Undecided: () No Response: (24) Attachment E ZA Page 2

36 Surrounding Property Owner Responses Attachment F ZA Page 1

37 Attachment F ZA Page 2

38 Attachment F ZA Page 3

39 Attachment F ZA Page 4

40 Estancia Homeowner Responses Attachment F ZA Page 5

41 Attachment F ZA Page 6

42 Letter of Support Attachment F ZA Page 7

43 Public Comment Cards May 5, 2016 Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Attachment F ZA Page 8

44 Attachment F ZA Page 9

45 CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 480, AS AMENDED, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS; GRANTING A ZONING CHANGE ON A CERTAIN TRACT OR TRACTS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS BEING LEGALLY DESCRIBED TRACT 5A04A, SAMUEL FREEMAN SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO. 525, CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS BEING APPROXIMATELY.94 ACRES, AND MORE FULLY AND COMPLETELY DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT A FROM AG AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO CS COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT AS DEPICTED ON THE APPROVED CONCEPT PLAN / SITE PLAN ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN AS EXHIBIT B, SUBJECT TO THE SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN THIS ORDINANCE; CORRECTING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP; PRESERVING ALL OTHER PORTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE; DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST, MORALS AND GENERAL WELFARE DEMAND THE ZONING CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS HEREIN MADE; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR A PENALTY FOR VIOLATIONS HEREOF; PROVIDING A SAVINGS CLAUSE; PROVIDING FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL NEWSPAPER; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Southlake, Texas is a home rule City acting under its Charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article XI, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Texas Local Government Code; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 211 of the Local Government Code, the City has the authority to adopt a comprehensive zoning ordinance and map regulating the location and use of buildings, other structures and land for business, industrial, residential and other purposes, and to amend said ordinance and map for the purpose of promoting the public health, safety, morals and general welfare, all in accordance with a comprehensive plan; and, WHEREAS, the hereinafter described property is currently zoned as AG Agricultural District under the City s Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance; and, WHEREAS, a change in the zoning classification of said property was requested by a person or corporation having a proprietary interest in said property; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, at a public hearing called by the City Council did consider the following factors in making a determination as to whether these changes should be Attachment G ZA Page 1

46 granted or denied: safety of the motoring public and the pedestrians using the facilities in the area immediately surrounding the sites; safety from fire hazards and damages; noise producing elements and glare of the vehicular and stationary lights and effect of such lights on established character of the neighborhood; location, lighting and types of signs and relation of signs to traffic control and adjacent property; street size and adequacy of width for traffic reasonably expected to be generated by the proposed use around the site and in the immediate neighborhood; adequacy of parking as determined by requirements of this ordinance for off-street parking facilities; location of ingress and egress points for parking and off-street loading spaces, and protection of public health by surfacing on all parking areas to control dust; effect on the promotion of health and the general welfare; effect on light and air; effect on the over-crowding of the land; effect on the concentration of population, and effect on transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public facilities; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, further considered among other things the character of the districts and their peculiar suitability for particular uses and the view to conserve the value of the buildings, and encourage the most appropriate use of the land throughout this City; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that there is a public necessity for the zoning changes, that the public demands them, that the public interest clearly requires the amendments, and that the zoning changes do not unreasonably invade the rights of those who bought or improved property with reference to the classification which existed at the time their original investment was made; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, does find that the changes in zoning lessen the congestion in the streets, helps secure safety from fire, panic, and other dangers, promotes the health and the general welfare, provides adequate light and air, prevents the over-crowding of land, avoids undue concentration of population, and facilitates the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks and other public requirements; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Southlake, Texas, has determined that there is a necessity and need for the changes in zoning and has also found and determined that there has been a change in the conditions of the property surrounding and in close proximity to the tract or tracts of land requested for a Attachment G ZA Page 2

47 change since the tract or tracts of land were originally classified and therefore feels that the respective changes in zoning classification for the tract or tracts of land are needed, are called for, and are in the best interest of the public at large, the citizens of the city of Southlake, Texas, and helps promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTHLAKE, TEXAS: SECTION 1. That Ordinance No. 480, the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City of Southlake, Texas, passed on the 19th day of September, 1989, as originally adopted and amended, is hereby amended so that the permitted uses in the hereinafter described areas be altered, changed and amended as shown and described below: Reserved for City Council motion SECTION 2. That the City Manager is hereby directed to correct the Official Zoning map of the City of Southlake, Texas, to reflect the herein changes in zoning. SECTION 3. That in all other respects the use of the tract or tracts of land herein above described shall be subject to all the applicable regulations contained in said Zoning Ordinance and all other applicable and pertinent ordinances for the City of Southlake, Texas. All existing sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, words, phrases and definitions of said Zoning Ordinance are not amended hereby, but remain intact and are hereby ratified, verified, and affirmed. SECTION 4. That the zoning regulations and districts as herein established have been made in accordance with the comprehensive plan for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and the general welfare of the community. They have been designed, with respect to both present conditions and the conditions reasonably anticipated to exist in the foreseeable future; to lessen congestion in the streets; to provide adequate light and Attachment G ZA Page 3

48 air; to prevent over-crowding of land; to avoid undue concentration of population; and to facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, drainage and surface water, parks and other commercial needs and development of the community. They have been made after a full and complete hearing with reasonable consideration among other things of the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for the particular uses and with a view of conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of land throughout the community. SECTION 5. That this ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Southlake, Texas, affecting zoning and shall not repeal any of the provisions of said ordinances except in those instances where provisions of those ordinances are in direct conflict with the provisions of this ordinance. SECTION 6. That the terms and provisions of this ordinance shall be deemed to be severable and that if the validity of the zoning affecting any portion of the tract or tracts of land described herein shall be declared to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of the zoning of the balance of said tract or tracts of land described herein. SECTION 7. Any person, firm or corporation who violates, disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or who resists the enforcement of any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be fined not more than Two Thousand Dollars ($2,000.00) for each offense. Each day that a violation is permitted to exist shall constitute a separate offense. SECTION 8. All rights and remedies of the City of Southlake are expressly saved as to any and all violations of the provisions of Ordinance No. 480, as amended, or any other ordinances affecting zoning which have accrued at the time of the effective date of this ordinance; and, as to such accrued violations and all pending litigation, both civil and criminal, whether pending in court or not, under such ordinances, same shall not be affected by this ordinance but may be prosecuted until final disposition by the courts. SECTION 9. Attachment G ZA Page 4

49 The City Secretary of the City of Southlake is hereby directed to publish the proposed ordinance in its entirety on the City website together with a notice setting out the time and place for a public hearing thereon at least ten (10) days before the second reading of this ordinance, and it this ordinance provides for the imposition of any penalty, fine or forfeiture for any violation of any of its provisions, then the City Secretary shall additionally publish this ordinance in the official City newspaper one time within ten (10) days after passage of this ordinance, as required by Section 3.13 of the Charter of the City of Southlake. SECTION 10. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and publication as required by law, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1 st reading the 17 th day of May, MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY PASSED AND APPROVED on the 2 nd reading the 7 th day of June, MAYOR ATTEST: CITY SECRETARY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: CITY ATTORNEY Attachment G ZA Page 5

50 DATE: ADOPTED: EFFECTIVE: Attachment G ZA Page 6

51 EXHIBIT A RESERVED FOR METES AND BOUNDS Attachment G ZA Page 7

52 EXHIBIT B RESERVED FOR APPROVED EXHIBITS Attachment G ZA Page 8