Department of Planning & Development Services

Transcription

1 Department of Planning & Development Services S T A F F R E P O R T November 14, 2014 CASE NO: ZA PROJECT: Preliminary Plat for Edwards Park Addition Lots 1 and 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Clayton and Clayton Real Estate is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat for the proposed Edwards Park Addition, Lots 1 and 2 for two (2) residential lots on 1.99 acres. SPIN #3 DETAILS: Clayton and Clayton Real Estate is requesting approval of a is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat for the proposed Edwards Park Addition, Lots 1 and 2 for two (2) residential lots on 1.99 acres. The site is located 825 W. Dove Road and currently consists of one (1) unplatted lot. This proposal is associated with the Zoning Change and Concept Plan for the proposed Edwards Park Addition under Planning Case ZA and a Land Use Plan Amendment under Planning Case CP ACTION NEEDED: 1) Conduct Public Hearing 2) Consider Preliminary Plat Approval Request ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information Link to PowerPoint Presentation (D) Preliminary Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated November 14, 2014 (E) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses (F) Full Size Plans (for Commissioners and Council members only) STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) Patty Moos (817) ZA14-132

2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION OWNERS: APPLICANT: PROPERTY SITUATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LAND USE CATEGORY: PROPOSED LAND USE: CURRENT ZONING: REQUESTED ZONING: HISTORY: CITIZEN INPUT: SOUTHLAKE 2030: Brian and Robin Bulatao Clayton and Clayton Real Estate 825 W. Dove Road Tract 1A1C of the Absolom H. Chivers Survey, Abstract No. 525, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas. Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential AG Agricultural District SF-30 Single Family Residential District September 19, 1989; City Council approved the AG Agricultural District with the adoption of Zoning Ordinance 480 and the Official Zoning Map. A SPIN (SPIN #3) meeting was held November 3, 2014 and the SPIN report is located in Attachment C. Consolidated Land Use Plan Land Use Plan designates this property Low Density Residential. The Medium Density Residential category is suitable for any single-family development. Other suitable activities are those permitted in the Public Parks/Open Space and Public/Semi-Public categories. This development is consistent with the future land use designation. Pathways Master Plan The Pathways Master Plan indicates a future sidewalk along the east side of W. Dove Road less than 8 feet wide. Sidewalks along E. Dove Road and Castle Rock Drive to Cheyenne Park Lane will be constructed with this development. TREE PRESERVATION: Two (2) trees are proposed to be removed with this request. Attachment A ZA Page 1

3 UTILITIES: Water The site has access to an existing 6-inch water line along E. Dove Road and an 8-inch water line on Castle Rock Drive. Sewer The site has access to sewer from an existing 8-inch along E. Dave Road and from an existing 8-inch along Cheyenne Park Lane and the southern portion of the east property line. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is the Preliminary Plat Review Summary No. 2, dated November 14, In May 2011, a demolition permit was issued by the City to remove the existing house and pool from the property. According the Tarrant Appraisal District, one acre of the property is listed as residential property and one acre is listed as commercial property. N:\Community Development\MEMO\2014 Cases\132 - PP - Edwards Park Addition\Staff Report Attachment A ZA Page 2

4 Attachment C ZA Page 1

5 Plans and Support Information Proposed Preliminary Plat Attachment C ZA Page 1

6 Attachment C ZA Page 2

7 Site Photographs View south from E. Dove Road View east to Castle Rock Drive dead end (southwest corner of 825 E. Dove Road property) Attachment C ZA Page 3

8 View northwest to Cheyenne Park Lane cul-de-sac (southeast corner of 825 E. Dove Road property) Attachment C ZA Page 4

9 SPIN MEETING REPORT Case Number: Project Name: ZA and ZA Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, Edwards Park Addition SPIN Neighborhood: 3 Meeting Date: November 3, 2014 Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers Total Attendance: 10 Host: Applicant(s) Presenting: City Staff Present: Monique Schill Art Clayton Patty Moos, Planner I City Staff Contact: Patty Moos, Planner I, Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting and clicking on Learn More under Video On Demand; forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date. FORUM SUMMARY: Applicant is seeking a zoning change and plat for 2 SF-30 lots located at 825 E. Dove Road for SPIN #3. Existing 2 acres on the south side of E. Dove Road. Currently low density land use surrounded by medium density use Plan to visit with the Estes Park HOA and neighborhoods Building a cul-de-sac at the end of Castle Rock Drive instead of building a street thru to Cheyenne Park Lane. 4-foot sidewalks around the cul-de-sac and 6-foot sidewalk along E. Dove Road. Landscape bufferyard along E. Dove Road. Water line extension, fire hydrants and sewer connections going in with the development. QUESTIONS / CONCERNS: 1. Estes Park HOA- Is the cul-de-sac going in? Yes 2. Where do the lots front? The north lot fronts on E. Dove Road and the south lot fronts on Castle Rock Drive. 3. Concern about the south lot benefiting from the Estes Park HOA for the landscape maintenance and holiday lights without participating in the cost. No. Trying to correct the missed connections. Houses will be high quality 4,000 sf minimum. 4. Immediately adjacent homes are 6,000 sf+ and would prefer the houses to be larger, if possible. Attachment C ZA Page 5

10 5. Wants quality of the home to be comparable to Estes Park homes. Will be a quality constructed home with energy efficient design. 6. Wants to be able to have the HOA be involved in order to have input in the architectural control and wants to work with the developer to have a level of comfort with the house architecture standard. 7. What will be the size of the house at 825 E. Dove Road? Lot 1 will be a minimum of 4,500 sf with piers, walls with energy efficient standards, well build with many high end details. 8. Will the sidewalk be installed on E. Dove Road? Yes. 9. What are the sideyard setbacks? 20-feet. Presentation: 6:00-6:30 pm SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Attachment C ZA Page 6

11 PRELIMINARY PLAT REVIEW SUMMARY : ZA Review No.: Two Date of Review: 11/14/14 Project Name: Edwards Park Addition Lots 1 and 2 APPLICANT: Clayton and Clayton Real Estate Owners: Arthur Clayton Brian and Robin Bulatao P.O. Box Cheyenne Park Lane Southlake, TX Southlake, TX Phone: Phone: claytonandclayton@msn.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 11/3/14 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE STAFF MEMBER. Patty Moos Planner I Phone: (817) pmoos@ci.southlake.tx.us Planning Review 1. All lots must comply with underlying zoning. As proposed, this plat is subject to the approval of an appropriate change of zoning. 2. Verify the distances on the west and east property lines (the individual distance numbers do not match the total distance). * The intent of the street configurations of Cheyenne Park Lane and Castle Rock Drive was to connect the two streets. The applicant is proposing to extend Castle Rock Lane as a cul-desac. Attachment D ZA Page 1

12 Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) Tree Conservation/Landscape Review TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: 1. The 42 Cottonwood has partially declined and would probably be removed when a house is built on the lot. Informational Comment: * Except as provided by subsection 7.2.b. of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, a Tree Conservation Analysis or Tree Conservation Plan shall be approved if it will preserve existing tree cover in accordance with the percentage requirements established by Table 2.0. If the property has previously received a tree permit related to development, the percentage of existing tree cover at the time the first such permit was issued shall be used to calculate the minimum existing tree cover that must be preserved under this section. Table 2.0 Existing Tree Cover Preservation Requirements Percentage of existing tree cover on the entire site Minimum percentage of the existing tree cover to be preserved* 0% 20% 70% % 60% 40.1% - 60% 50% 60.1% - 80% 40% 80.1% - 100% 30% *The minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved shall exclude any area in public rights-of-way as approved by City Council. * Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: No comments. * Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Attachment D ZA Page 2

13 Om Garty-Chhertri, P.E. Civil Engineer Phone: (817) Public Works/Engineering Review GENERAL COMMENTS: This review is preliminary. construction plans. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil Provide layout of proposed roadway configuration between Castle Rock Drive and Cheyenne Park Lane. Fire Department will need to review the proposed cul-de sac layout and fire hydrant location. Sidewalks shall be required to be constructed with each dwelling. * Street intersections shall comply with TDLR/ADA accessibility standards. * Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. * Sidewalk widths shall conform to the Southlake Pathways Plan. * Use the City of Southlake GPS monuments whenever possible. Monument locations can be found in the City of Southlake website: EASEMENTS: * Verify if easement of water/sanitary sewer/storm sewer crossing the site is in an easement. * Water and sanitary sewer cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. All waterlines, sanitary sewer and storm sewer in easements or right of ways must be constructed to City standards. WATER COMMENTS: 1. Existing water line pipe sizes on E. Dove are labeled incorrectly. Verify correct size. 2. Fire hydrants are required to be at least 3 feet from any obstruction (the curb, etc.) 3. Service from fire hydrant leads are not allowed. * Water lines cannot cross property lines without being in an easement or right of way. * The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers allowed before the meter on the public side. A one inch meter must have a one inch tap, etc. * 12 water line on Dove Road shall conform to the City s water concept plan. * Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way. Attachment D ZA Page 3

14 SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS: 1. Minimum size for sanitary sewer is Sanitary sewer to the Lot 1 will be required due to proximity of sewer line less than 100. Extend sanitary sewer to the eastern property line and provide manhole and sewer stub as required. * Sanitary sewer in right of way shall be constructed to City standards. * 5 diameter Manhole shall be proposed if number of influent pipe is > 2. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 1. Proposed driveway culvert must be sized by an engineer and submitted for approval to the City Engineer. * Storm sewers collecting runoff from public streets shall be RCP and constructed to City standards. The proposed flume will not be allowed. * Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * Submit 22 x34 civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City s website: * Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre-construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures. * A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) to connect to the City s sewer, water or storm sewer system. * A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer s Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No *=Denotes informational comment. Kelly Clements Fire Department Review Attachment D ZA Page 4

15 Assistant Fire Marshal Phone: (817) GENERAL COMMENTS: No comments based on submitted information. Peter Kao Construction Manager pkao@ci.southlake.tx.us Community Service/Parks Department Review Park Board comments or recommendations: All applicants are required to appear before the Park Board to discuss park dedication issues if requesting fee payments or fee credits. Please contact the Community Services Department at (817) for further details. Land/park dedication requirements: Residential developments must provide dedicated parks and/or open space at a ratio of one (1) acre of park land for every forty (40) dwelling units. Two lots are being platted. One lot had an existing house and is exempt from park fee assessment. Second lot did not have an existing house and must be assessed a park fee. If fee payment is approved by City Council in lieu of land dedication, residential park dedication fees in the amount of $3000 per dwelling unit x 1 new dwelling units= $ will be required. Fees will be collected with the approved developer s agreement. Pathway Comments: Should provide pathways consistent with Southlake Master Pathways Plan. Should provide 4ft+ concrete sidewalks on both sides of all public and private streets consistent with Article V Street and Right-Of-Way Requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and all State of Texas accessibility requirements. General Informational Comments * The City of Southlake recommends meeting with the adjacent property owners regarding this project prior to the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. * All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. Attachment D ZA Page 5

16 * Development must comply with all requirements in Zoning Ordinance No. 480, Section 43,; Overlay Zones. * It appears this property lies within the 65 LDN D/FW Regional Airport Overlay Zone, requiring construction standards in compliance with the Airport Compatible Land Use Zoning Ordinance No Additionally, the Avigation Easement and Release shown in Appendix 3 of the Subdivision Ordinance No. 483 should be executed on Plats to be filed in the County Plat Records. * The applicant should be aware that prior to issuance of a building permit a Plat must be processed and filed in the County Plat Records, a fully corrected site plan, landscape plan, irrigation plan, and building plans, must be submitted for approval and all required fees must be paid. This may include but not be limited to the following fees: Park Fee, Perimeter Street Fee, Water & Sewer Impact and Tap Fees, and related Permit Fees. * Denotes Informational Comment Attachment D ZA Page 6

17 SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS MAP & RESPONSES Preliminary Plat for Edwards Park Addition SPO# Owner Name Zoning Address Acreage Response 1. Collier, Donald Jr & Elizabeth SF1-A 800 VICTORIA LN 1.66 NR Radcliff, Zack D Etux Pearlean SF1-A 780 E DOVE RD 0.98 NR Timmons, Clay B Etux Cara L RPUD 774 BLACK FOREST CT 0.55 NR Satsky, Daniel B Etux Amy W RPUD 770 BLACK FOREST CT 0.57 NR Lee, Justin Etux Kim Lee RPUD 775 BLACK FOREST CT 0.60 NR Nordtvedt, Richard Etx Liliana RPUD 2163 ESTES PARK DR 0.38 NR Goldschmidt, Douglas Etux Marg RPUD 2159 ESTES PARK DR 0.37 NR Kapoor, Sanjiv Etux Upasna RPUD 2155 ESTES PARK DR 0.35 NR Baiotto, Brent R Etux Sarah RPUD 774 CASTLE ROCK DR 0.47 NR Menon, Rajasekhar C & Indu RPUD 2151 ESTES PARK DR 0.36 NR Michaelides, Jason Etux Alisha RPUD 905 ASPEN RIDGE DR 0.46 NR Death, James Lee RPUD 901 ASPEN RIDGE DR 0.46 NR McLaughlin, Michael P Etux T RPUD 775 CASTLE ROCK DR 0.36 NR

18 14. Tt Management Llc RPUD 2117 ESTES PARK DR 0.38 NR 15. Bulatao, Brian J RPUD 2112 CHEYENNE PARK LN 0.44 NR Sheehan, James M RPUD 2113 ESTES PARK DR 0.45 NR Canalizo, Charles Etux Alissa SF1-A 740 E DOVE RD 1.49 NR Pierret, Brian Etux Christine RPUD 845 E DOVE RD 1.24 NR 19. Medici, Jeffrey P Etux Pamela RPUD 2123 CHEYENNE PARK LN 0.54 NR Tabrez, Shams AG 855 E DOVE RD 1.95 NR Bulatao, Brian Etux Robin AG 825 E DOVE RD 1.96 NR 22. Berwick, Tracy Etvir Robert D RPUD 23. Hicks, Jon W Etux Holly W RPUD 2119 CHEYENNE PARK LN CHEYENNE PARK LN 0.50 NR NR 24. Long, Michael R SF1-A 801 VICTORIA LN 1.64 NR Superintendent of Carroll ISD Superintendent of Grapevine Colleyville ISD Superintendent of Northwest ISD NR NR NR 28. Superintendent of Keller ISD NR F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Twenty-four (24) Responses Received: In Favor: 0 No Response: 0 Opposed: 0