MEETING MINUTES. Julie Fulgham, Assistant Director. John Kaminski, Assistant City Manager. City Attorney's Office: Allison Marek, Asst.

Transcription

1

2

3

4 P L A N N I N G C O M M I S S I O N MEETING MINUTES Date and Time: February 18, 2016 at 5:15pm MEMBERS PRESENT: John Hyak, Chairperson Vic Caldwell Lucy Herrera Omar Rachid Greg Spears Julia Welder Bruce Woods Mary Anne Wyatt ABSENT: Zachary Koenig STAFF PRESENT: Development Services: Jared Mayfield, Director Julie Fulgham, Assistant Director Will Charles, Planner City Manager s Office: John Kaminski, Assistant City Manager City Attorney's Office: Allison Marek, Asst. City Attorney City Council: Jan Scott, District 4 A: CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 5:18pm by Mr. John Hyak, Chairman. B: APPROVAL OF MEETING MINUTES A motion to approve the January 21, 2016 Regular Meeting minutes was made by Mr. Woods and seconded by Ms. Wyatt. The motion passed unanimously. C: CITIZEN COMMUNICATION None. D: DEVELOPMENT REVIEWS/FORMAL ACTION 1. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN EXTENSION TO THE RECORDING REQUIREMENTS FOR A FINAL PLAT FOR TUSCANY SUBDIVISION SECTION 2A, PHASE 2 Final Plat; 20 Lots, 1 Block, and 5.10 acres Andrea Court addressing; Single Family Residential (R1); Ball Airport Road Development, LLC (Owner); CivilCorp (Agent). a) Planning Staff Briefing Mr. Charles presented the staff report. The final plat for Tuscany Subdivision Section 2A, Phase 2 was approved by Planning Commission at the September 19, 2013 meeting. Construction is currently in progress on the public improvements. However, it was not completed within the required two year period since Planning Commission approval. The owner expects to complete construction by April 2016 and is requesting an extension to the final plat s recording/filing deadline. Planning Staff recommends approval of this extension. b) Final Plat Extension Deliberations Page 1

5 A motion was made by Mr. Caldwell to approve the final plat extension; seconded by Ms. Herrera. Motion passed unanimously. 2. THOMAS CANO JR. SUBDIVISION NO.1 LOT 1, BLOCK 1 variance request and final plat; acre tract of land situated in Farm Lot No. 2, Block no. 1, Range 7 east above town in the original four league grant to the Town of Victoria, Victoria County, Texas; Single Family Residential (R1); 810 Levis Road; Thomas Cano Jr. (Owner); Milton Bluhm (Agent). The applicant is requesting a subdivision variance to the City Code: Section 21-82(a)(1), which requires a minimum lot size of 6,000 Square feet for a Single-Family Residential (R1) lot. a. Planning Staff Briefing Mr. Charles presented the staff report. The property is being developed into one single-family residential (R1) lot. This variance will allow for the owner to waive the minimum 6,000 square foot lot size requirement. The variance would allow the owner to plat the existing lot with only 4,993 square feet after a 2.2 foot right-ofway dedication. Staff recommends approval of the variance request as the lot will be unable to develop without a variance and is an existing tract of land, which would require aquisition of additional land to be in compliance with the minimum requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance. If the Planning Commission recommends approval of the variance request, staff recommends approval of the final plat, subject to City Council approval of the above-described variance request. If the variance is not approved by City Council, the plat will be considered denied as the variance is a condition of this approval. Mr. Caldwell stated he is for facilitating the redevelopment of these types of properties. b. Variance Public Hearing There was no comments during the public hearing. c. Variance Deliberations A motion was made to recommend approval the of the variance request by Ms. Wyatt, seconded by Mr. Caldwell. The motion passed unanimously. d. Final Plat Deliberations - A motion was made to approve the final plat by Mr. Caldwell, seconded by Mr. Spears. The motion passed unanimously. 3. Woodland Square Shopping Center (Cracker Barrel/ Las Palmas) driveway variance request; 1.88 acre tract of land being Lot 1, Block 1, Woodland Square Subdivision; Commercial (C1); 6007 Main Street; Munir Munawar (Owner). The applicant is requesting a driveway variance to the City Code: Section 20-82(b)(2) and 20-83(a) of the City Code which states: A maximum of two driveways are allowed only when a land use has between 200 and 500 feet of frontage, and requires that driveways on arterial streets be located at least 100 feet from a collector. a. Planning Staff Briefing Mr. Charles presented the staff report. The subject property is located at 6007 N. Main and has long been developed as a shopping center with a gas station. When the site was originally platted, in 1983, it was outside of the city limits, and did not have to comply with City of Victoria requirements. The owner has applied for a variance to allow the existing driveways to remain. Without approval of a variance, site plan approval cannot be obtained without modification of the existing driveways to current standards. The property owner has paved additional parking onsite, without prior site plan approval as Page 2

6 required by City Code. Additionally, permits cannot be issued while the site is not in compliance with development regulations and a tenant wishes to proceed with interior remodel plans. For these reasons the property owner is seeking the driveway variance to Sections 20-82(b)(2) and 20-83(a) to allow the two driveways on N. Main Street to remain. The City of Victoria Code of Ordinances, Section 20-82(b)(2) and 20-83(a) states that a maximum of two driveways are allowed only when a land use has between 200 and 500 feet of street frontage, and requires that driveways on arterial streets be located at least 100 feet away from a collector. The subject property only has feet of frontage on Main Street. This is below the minimum required to have two driveways on site. Additionally, one of the current driveways also only has 18 feet of separation from the closest intersection, which is Conti Lane, a collector street. Staff believes that this poses a risk to driver safety when leaving the site, and for drivers using the intersection. The applicant believes that if they were to close or reduce their driveways down into compliance, they would lose maneuverability around the existing gas canopy. For this reason staff has proposed to allow him to maintain some of the concrete that is currently in the right-of-way for maneuverability but the applicant would still be required to close one driveway. A visual of this solution is attached to the staff report. Staff believes that the driveway can be reduced down to what is in compliance with current City Code, and still sufficiently service the lot. The visual shown also reduces the amount of concrete modifications that would be required. The applicant also has the ability to move the driveway farther south, which would also minimize conflicts with the existing gas canopy structure. Staff recommends denial of the driveway variance request as staff does not believe the multiple and enlarged driveways are necessary to sufficiently service the lot. The lot also has two existing driveways on Conti Lane, which is a throughfare with easy access due to its signilized intersection with Main Street. Ms. Wyatt states that she lives nearby and this is a dangerous driveway near this intersection. She further stated she never understood why it was allowed to be constructed, but received that answer tonight. Mr. Caldwell asked what area on site was paved without prior approval. Mr. Hyak asked Director Mayfield to give a history of the enforcement action on the site. Mr. Mayfield stated that the property owner was required to add pavement due to commercial parking activity on unpaved areas on site; the pavement on the rear portion of the property is new. The property owner paved this area without site plan approval. Mr. Caldwell asked why Las Palmas was allowed to expand inside previously. Mr. Mayfield stated the driveway was not required to come into conformance until the parking area was added; tenant interior remodel permits do not trigger site plan review and approval. Mr. Woods stated that to comply with the regulation seemed to be a matter of cost. Mr. Mayfield stated that it was the applicants responsibility to tell the Commissions the reasons and he could not confirm cost was the reason for the variance. Mr. Caldwell reiterated that it is an unsafe driveway and he worries that vehicles with trailers using the driveways everyday will create a logjam. He was also concerned these vehicles may not be able to make the turn into a driveway with a reduced width. Ms. Welder posed questions regarding the size of the driveways. She asked how much driveway they were losing. Mr. Mayfield stated they could have one 30 foot wide driveway on Main Street according to the driveway ordinance. Mr. Woods reminded the Commission of another gas station near an intersection that is in compliance and works. Mr. Mayfield reminded the Commission that driveways on Conti Lane could be utilized for the larger trucks or vehicles with trailers. He stated that congestion on site was a safer condition than congestion on the roadway. Ms. Wyatt stated she believed closing the driveway would be safer. Mr. Caldwell doesn t believe either option is safe. b. Variance Public Hearing Mr. Barney Newell of 3 Tonto Circle addressed the Commission; he stated he speaks for the neighborhood. Mr. Newell believes variances are useful for older parts Page 3

7 E: OTHER BUSINESS of the city, but that this is not a good location for a variance since it is not a safe situation on this site. Mr. Newell stated, "When Conti Lane intersection was constructed, medians were not fully constructed and the drivers turning onto Conti Lane and gas station customers are sometimes in conflict. The proposed location is a better situation. A dedicated left turn lane with a median for Conti Lane should have been constructed. Las Palmas has grown and the success is deserved but they have outgrown their operation at this location. The drive-thru area is not dedicated for Las Palmas. This traffic intermingles with the bakery parking, which causes overflow onto Conti Lane. The new parking lot was not constructed correctly without striping and landscaping." Mr. Newell further stated he doesn t believe in zoning, but he does believe in being a good neighbor. He shared the owner is an out of town owner and he doesn't believe the owner cares about being a good neighbor. Mr. Newell asked the Commission to deny the variance. c. Variance Deliberations Mr. Rachid asked if the remodel plans were for the restaurant or the gas station. Mr. Charles stated it was for Las Palmas. Ms. Wyatt added the letter stated the remodel plans were for Las Palmas. Responding to a question from Mr. Caldwell, Assistant Director Fulgham explained the property will not be in compliance until a site plan for the added parking is approved. A motion was made by Mr. Woods to recommend denial of the variance request and was seconded by Ms. Wyatt. The motion passed 7 to 1. Mr. Caldwell cast the dissenting vote. He stated he doesn t believe the variance will fix the problems at the driveways and intersection. 1. Development Services Monthly Development Report Mr. Charles presented the information in the monthly report. 2. Comprehensive Plan Update - A Special Meeting for consideration of a recommendation on the Comprehensive Plan to City Council is scheduled for next Thursday, February 25, 2016 at 5:15pm in the Council Chambers. Gary Mitchell of Kendig Keast Collaborative, Inc. will give a presentation on the plan. Ms. Fulgham reminded the Commission that the implementation chapter has been completed and the latest draft is on the website. F: ITEMS FROM PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None. G: ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 5:50pm. APPROVED: APPROVED: John Hyak, Chairperson Victoria Planning Commission Greg Spears, Secretary Victoria Planning Commission Page 4

8 P L A N N I N G C O M M I S S I O N Date and Time: February 25, 2016 at 5:15pm SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES MEMBERS PRESENT: John Hyak, Chairperson Vic Caldwell Lucy Herrera Lucy Herrera Omar Rachid Greg Spears Bruce Woods Mary Anne Wyatt ABSENT: Zachary Koenig Julia Welder STAFF PRESENT: Development Services: Jared Mayfield, Director Julie Fulgham, Assistant Director Will Charles, Planner Mary Craighead, Senior Transportation Planner Lila Foster, Planning Technician City Manager s Office: John Kaminski, Asst City Manager City Council: Jan Scott A: CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 5:15pm by Mr. Hyak, Chairman. B: CITIZEN COMMUNICATION None. C: DEVELOPMENT REVIEWS/FORMAL ACTION 1. Comprehensive Plan Review Proposal and discussion of the completed Comprehensive Plan 2035 for the City of Victoria a. Planning Staff Briefing Mr. Mayfield introduced Gary Mitchell, President of Kendig Keast Collaborative, the city's planning consultant. Mr. Mitchell presented the final draft of the "Plan 2035" Comprehensive Plan; bringing attention to how the plan is organized into the Existing City and Future City sections along with an implementation section. He reviewed the fifteen key plan initiatives as well as when they should be implemented and who would be responsible for them. b. Public Hearing None. c. Comprehensive Plan Deliberations Mr. Caldwell questioned whether the Commission would be responsible for annual reviews of the new plan. Mr. Mayfield responded yes, that staff would prepare an annual or bi-annual report for Planning Commission. Page 1

9 Mr. Woods asked if now was the time to address specific items within the proposed plan. He proposed an additional goal that the city would repair any streets with a "poor" rating as per the city's annual street condition inventory within a 5 year time period, and never again allow streets to deteriorate to such a condition. There was lengthy discussion about whether the final draft already adequately addressed the community's desire to fix city streets. A majority of the Commission felt that the plan was fine as drafted and did not want to make any changes to it. Mr. Woods further questioned if this was the moment for the Commission to make recommended changes to the plan because he had many comments and concerns and felt the Commission should make recommended changes to the plan. Commissioner Ms. Wyatt noted it was a good plan and changes were not necessary. Commissioners Mr. Spears and Mr. Rachid also reiterated the plan was developed through a lengthy public process and it was a good plan that was reflective of the community's wants and they didn't believe Mr. Woods changes were necessary or represented a majority of the Commissions beliefs. A motion to recommend adoption of the 2035 Comprehensive Plan was made by Mr. Rachid, seconded by Ms. Wyatt. The motion passed unanimously. D: ITEMS FROM PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None. E: ADJOURNMENT The meeting adjourned at 6:15pm. APPROVED: APPROVED: John Hyak, Chairperson Victoria Planning Commission Greg Spears, Secretary Victoria Planning Commission Page 2

10 Agenda Item #: D-1 March 17, 2016 CASE: 1. Final Plat approval of Lake Forest Subdivision Section 2, Phase III Location: Land Use: Applicant(s): Staff Contact: 5.70 acres located near the intersection of Auburn Hill and Arbor Lake. The property is situated in the J.L. Carbajal League, Abstract 12, Victoria County, Texas. Single Family Residential (R-1) Balusek-Frankson Associates Inc., on behalf of D.G.M.P. Inc. William Charles, Planner LOCATION MAP:

11 Agenda Item #: D-1 Pg. 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION: Lake Forest Subdivision Section 2, Phase III is a proposed final plat of 5.70 acres. The subject property is located near the intersection of Auburn Hill and Arbor Lake. A preliminary plat for this property was previously approved by Planning Commission in February This phase divides the property into sixteen (16) Single Family Residential (R-1) lots within four blocks. Access to the development will be provided via an extension of Auburn Hill. INFRASTRUCTURE: Water: Sewer: Streets: Drainage: Water service will be provided by extending an existing 8 line in Auburn Hill. Sanitary sewer service will be provided by extending an existing 8 line in Auburn Hill. Auburn Hill Existing and Proposed Local Street 60 ROW. Drainage is in accordance with the master drainage plan of the City of Victoria. The Subdivision & Development Ordinance requires Construction Plans when public improvements are proposed. These plans are submitted at the time of Final Plat submittal and must be approved prior to Planning Commission approval of the Final Plat. The Construction Plans for the proposed public improvements have been reviewed by the Public Works Department and are pending final approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The proposed final plat is in compliance with the minimum requirements for Single Family Residential (R-1) development contained within the Subdivision & Development Regulations. Staff recommends approval of the final plat for Lake Forest Subdivision Section 2, Phase III finding it is in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat and meets all applicable regulations. Attachments: Final Plat \\covmain\planning$\planning Commission\Staff Reports\2016\Lake Forest Subdivision Section 2, Phase III.docx

12

13

14 Agenda Item #: D-2 March 17, 2016 CASE: 1. Final Plat approval of TerraVista Subdivision Phase VIII Location: Land Use: Applicant(s): Staff Contact: acres located near the intersection of Sandstone Court and Brushy Creek. The property is situated in the J.L. Carbajal Grant, Abstract 12, Victoria County, Texas and being out of portions of lots 5 and 7, block 16 of the Levi Co. Subdivision as recorded in Volume 59, Page 506 of the deed records of Victoria County, Texas and being a portion of the certain acre tract of land as conveyed from Arthur W. Kenne and Dolores B. Kenne, et al to Landmark Residential Holdings LTD, according to the document recorded in Instrument No of Victoria County, Texas. Single Family Residential (R-1) Urban Engineering Inc., Landmark Residential Holdings Ltd. William Charles, Planner LOCATION MAP:

15 Agenda Item #: D-2 Pg. 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION: TerraVista Subdivision Phase VIII is a proposed final plat of acres. The subject property is located near the intersection of Sandstone Court and Brushy Creek. A preliminary plat for this property was previously approved by Planning Commission in January This phase subdivides the property into 27 Single Family Residential (R-1) lots within 2 blocks. Access to the development will be provided via Brushy Creek. INFRASTRUCTURE: Water: Sewer: Streets: Drainage: Water service will be provided by extending an existing 8 line in Brushy Creek. Sanitary sewer service will be provided by extending an existing 8 line in Brushy Creek. Brushy Creek Existing and Proposed Local Street 60 ROW. Drainage is in accordance with the master drainage plan of the City of Victoria. The Subdivision & Development Ordinance requires Construction Plans when public improvements are proposed. These plans are submitted at the time of Final Plat submittal and must be approved prior to Planning Commission approval of the Final Plat. The Construction Plans for the proposed public improvements have been reviewed by the Public Works Department and are pending final approval. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The proposed final plat is in compliance with the minimum requirements for Single Family Residential (R-1) development contained within the Subdivision & Development Regulations. Staff recommends approval of the final plat for TerraVista Subdivision, Phase VIII finding it is in substantial conformance with the approved preliminary plat and meets all applicable regulations. Attachments: Final Plat P:\Planning Commission\Staff Reports\2016\TerraVista Subdivision Phase VIII.docx

16 DRAINAGE R.O.W. & U.E TERRAVISTA RANCH ROAD CH ISH OLM TRAIL TERRAVISTA SUBDIVISION PHASE II VOLUME 9, PAGES 037-C & 037-D ' DRAINAGE R.O.W. VOL. 9, PG. 080-C & 080-D 60.00' R.O.W. 1 3 BRUSH Y CREEK THE RANCHES AT TERRAVISTA PHASE I VOLUME 9, PAGES 080-C & 080-D ' 51.50' 51.50' 51.50' 52.04' 15' UE & BL N14 40'10"W ' S75 19'50"W L ' ' N04 56'23"W 7.00' ' 19.28' SSR N14 40'10"W ' 51.50' 51.50' 51.50' 52.04' BRUSH Y CREEK 20' BL 20' BL 20' BL 20' BL 20' BL L2 C N46 17'28"W ' L4 S75 19'50"W C1 N78 12'31"W ' 7.00' SEE INSET "A" N78 12'31"W ' 20' DRAINAGE RIGHT-OF-W AY 311 L8 20' BL ' 361.7' ' BL 60.00' INSET "A" R.O.W. 1" = 50' SANDSTONE COURT N33 58'46"E 81.12' 73.77' ' N48 22'02"W ' 20' BL C ' ' C ' ' ' UE SEE NOTE 3 10' UE ' 3.62' ' 52.50' 52.50' 52.50' 52.50' 52.50' 52.50' 52.50' 72.50' ' UE VOL. 9, PG. 067-A & 067-B COPPER ROCK COVE ' BRUSHY CREEK R.O.W. N43 42'32"E ' TERRAVISTA SUBDIVISION PHASE V VOLUME 9, PAGES 067-A & 067-B ARTHUR W. KENNE AND DOLORES B. KENNE TO LANDMARK RESIDENTIAL HOLDINGS, LTD INSTRUMENT NO OFFICIAL RECORDS ' BL 20' BL 20' BL 20' BL 20' BL 20' BL 20' BL 20' BL 20' BL 48.88' 52.50' 52.50' 52.50' 52.50' 52.50' 52.50' 52.50' 72.50' ' 51.50' 51.50' 51.50' 51.50' 51.50' 51.50' 51.50' 51.50' 51.50' 7.5' UE 20' BL 20' BL 20' BL 20' BL 20' BL 20' BL 20' BL 20' BL 20' BL 20' BL ' ' 10' BL 10' BL 10' BL 10' BL 10' BL 10' BL 10' BL 10' BL SEE NOTE 3 L1 S43 42'32"W 98.72' C3 S46 17'28"E 5 85' ' ' N43 42'32"E ' N46 17'28"W 7286 S46 17'28"E ' BL 20' DRAINAGE RIGHT-OF-W AY 20' BL 52.41' 51.50' 51.50' 51.50' 51.50' 51.50' 51.50' 51.50' 24.50' ' ' BL C4 N43 42'32"E ' 15' UE & BL 5' UE S43 42'32"W ' ' 52.49' C5 C ' FIELDNOTE POINT OF BEGINNING ' 20' BL ' 22.76' L ' ' UTIL ESMT & BL 18 SSR ' BL 51.61' L6 SSR S46 17'28"E S46 17'28"E ' ' SSR L5 SSR 12 9 TERRAVISTA SUBDIVISION PHASE IV VOLUME 9, PAGES 039-A & 039-B 19 R40.0' 10' UE VOL. 9, PG. 079-A &079-B 13 TERRAVISTA SUBDIVISION PHASE VI VOLUME 9, PAGES 079-A & 079-B 20 FLINT ROCK COURT 8 14 BLUE ROCK COURT TEMPORARY TURNAROUND EASEMENT LAND USE : 7. ABBREVIATIONS: BL - BUILDING LINE - SQUARE FEET CURVE RADIUS GENERAL NOTES CURVE DATA TANGENT DELTA C ' 14.16' '17" 27.59' C ' 15.00' 90 00'00" 23.56' C ' 22.35' 58 22'43" 40.76' C ' M ALLETTE DR. 2. ADDRESSES : AS SHOWN 5. STATISTICAL DATA : R.O.W. - RIGHT-OF-WAY UE - UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATION MAP CITY LIMITS SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (R1) 3. BUILDING LINES : AS SHOWN 4. STREET CLASSIFICATION : A) GROSS AREA ACRES B) RESIDENTIAL LOTS - 27 LOTS C) DEDICATION (ROAD) ACRES DEDICATION (DITCH) ACRES D) NET AREA ACRES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. DE - DRAINAGE EASEMENT 55.86' SITE BERW ICK RD. BRUSHY CREEK - EXISTING LOCAL STREET - FOUND 5/8" DIAMETER STEEL ROD PERTH RD. MINIMUM EXTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK: COPPER ROCK COVE - EXISTING LOCAL STREET BRUSHY CREEK - PROPOSED LOCAL STREET 58 22'43" BALL AIRPORT RD. TROON RD. SSR - SET 5/8" DIAMETER STEEL ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED "URBAN SURVEYING, INC" ARC LENGTH ' TYNE RD. 6. ALL CORNERS ARE MARKED WITH A SET 5/8" DIAMETER STEEL ROD WITH YELLOW PLASTIC CAP MARKED "URBAN SURVEYING, INC" GLASCOW ST. SHALL BE SET BACK AT LEAST 20 FEET BY CITY ORDINANCE SEC (a)(5) BLYTH RD. DUNDEE ST. ANGUS ST. EDINBURGH ST. 15 FEET, EXCEPT THAT GARAGES OPENING ONTO THE EXTERIOR SIDE YARD CHORD BEARING AND LENGTH S 59 31'11" W 27.25' N 59 40'10" W 21.21' N 14 31'11" E 39.02' N 14 31'11" E 97.54' C ' 39.10' 58 22'43" 71.32' N 14 31'11" E 68.28' LINE DATA LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6 S75 19'50"W S75 19'50"W S14 40'10"E N14 31'11"E S43 42'32"W S47 28'44"W GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET 10.94' 60.00' 10.00' 31.10' 1.50' 74.38' L7 S43 42'32"W 4.28' L8 N14 31'11"E 41.82' FINAL PLAT THIS PLAT IS CONTAINED WITHIN THE CITY OF VICTORIA CORPORATE LIMITS. PLAT IS FILED FOR RECORD IN VOL. OF THE OF VICTORIA COUNTY, TEXAS. DATE TerraVista Subdivision - Phase VIII JOB NUMBER LOTS 1-16 BLOCK 19, LOTS 1-11 BLOCK 20 BEING A ACRE TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE JOSE L. CARBAJAL GRANT, ABSTRACT 12, VICTORIA COUNTY,, PG. TEXAS AND BEING OUT OF PORTIONS OF LOTS 5 AND 7, BLOCK 16 OF THE LEVI CO. SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN Tel (361) N. Com merce VOLUM E 59, PAGE 506 OF THE DEED RECORDS OF VICTORIA COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING A PORTION OF THAT Fax (361) Victoria, Texas CERTAIN ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS CONVEYED FROM ARTHUR W. KENNE AND DOLORES B. KENNE, ET AL TO COV PLAT FILE NO TREF# F-160 LANDM ARK RESIDENTIAL HOLDINGS, LTD, ACCORDING TO THE DOCUM ENT RECORDED IN INSTRUM ENT NO OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF VICTORIA COUNTY, TEXAS. 03/07/16 E TERRAVISTA SUBDIVISION VOLUME 9, PAGES 021-A & 021-B 4 6 BRUSH Y CREEK TERRAVISTA SUBDIVISION PHASE II VOLUME 9, PAGES 037-C & 037-D PAGE 1 OF URBAN ENGINEERING

17

18 Minor Plat Development Services Monthly Development Report February 2016 Name Address Owner(s) Agent Land Use Acreage Date 1 STM Subdivision 7605 US Hwy 59N Thomas Duff Duff RE South Texas CivilCorp C /15/2016 Major Plat Name Address Owner(s) Agent Land Use Acreage Date 1 Terra Vista Subd. Ph VIII Brushy Creek Landmark Residential Holdings Urban Engineering R /19/ Lake Forest Sec. 2 Ph III Auburn Hill D.G.M. P. Inc BJ Davis BFAI R /22/2016 Site Plans Name Address Owner(s) Agent Land Use Acreage Date 1 Southern Tire Mart 7605 US Hwy 59 N Duff RE South Texas LP Machado Patano PLLC C /22/ Texas Road House - Dining Addition 4908 N Navarro Texas Roadhouse Holding LLC Plus Design C /29/2016 February 2016 City Council Action PC Recommendation Council Action 1 Thomas Cano Jr. Subd. No 1 Approval Pending Section 21-82(a)(1) which requires a minimum lot size of 6,000 sq.ft. for a single-family residential lot Land Use Codes: R 1 Single Family Residential R 4 Multi Family Residential C 1 Commercial General Q Quasi Public/ Institutional

19 City of Victoria Monthly Actvity Report Feb-16 Fiscal YTD - 5 month of year Feb-15 Description Total # Valuation (rounded) Total # Valuation (rounded) Total # Valuation (rounded) Residential Single Family 8 $ 1,516, $ 6,903, $ 607, RMH Placement 2 $ 34, $ 529, $ - Res Multi. Family 0 $ - 0 $ - Res Add/Repairs 53 $ 643, $ 2,772, $ 234, Comm. New Constr 4 $ 6,775, $ 22,318, $ 3,112, Comm. Add/Repair 35 $ 2,456, $ 14,217, $ 8,730, Signs 9 $ 53, $ 344, $ 24, Other 22 $ 17, $ 347, $ 189, Plan Reviews 5 38 $ - 4 $ - TOTAL: 138 $11,496, $47,435, $12,900, M.E.P. Permits Issued Feb-16 Fiscal YTD - 5 month of year Feb-15 Total Total Total Electrical Permits 39 Electrical Permits 248 Electrical Permits 46 Mechanical Permits 33 Mechanical Permits 169 Mechanical Permits 64 Plumbing Permits 61 Plumbing Permits 286 Plumbing Permits 72 Total 133 Total 703 Total 182 Permit Fees Collected Feb-16 Fiscal YTD - 5 month of year Feb-15 Total Total Total Building $ 38, Building $ 132, Building $ 18, Electrical $ 7, Electrical $ 25, Electrical $ 3, Mechanical $ 2, Mechanical $ 10, Mechanical $ 3, Plumbing $ 6, Plumbing $ 18, Plumbing $ 3, License Fee $ 4, License Fee $ 18, License Fee $ 3, Plan Review Fees $ Plan Review Fees $ 9, Plan Review Fees $ 3, Misc. Fees $ 13, Misc. Fees $ 20, Misc. Fees $ 3, Total $73, Total $236, Total $37,885.00