RIVER OAKS (F/K/A HOLMAN SUBDIVISION) Minor Final Site Plan

Transcription

1 { MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STAFF REPORT A. Application Information RIVER OAKS (F/K/A HOLMAN SUBDIVISION) Minor Final Site Plan Applicant: Holman, James & Debora K. Property Owner: Holman, James & Debora K. Agent for the Applicant: PDG Realty, Inc., David Giunta County Project Coordinator: Catherine Riiska, MS, PWS, Principal Planner Growth Management Director: Nicki van Vonno, AICP Project Number: M Record Number: D Report Number: 2018_0601_M _DRT_Staff_FINAL.docx Application Received: 04/20/2017 Transmitted: 04/20/2017 Staff Report Issued: 06/16/2017 Joint Workshop: 06/29/2017 Resubmittal Received: 07/31/2017 Transmitted: 07/31/2017 Staff Report Issued: 10/09/2017 Joint Workshop: 10/19/2017 Resubmittal Received: 11/16/2017 Transmitted: 11/20/2017 Staff Report Issued: 01/17/2018 Joint Workshop: 01/25/2018 Resubmittal Received: 02/13/2018 Transmitted: 02/14/2018 Staff Report Issued: 06/01/2018 B. Project description and analysis This is an application for a residential, minor final development site plan. The applicant is proposing the development of a single-family residential subdivision consisting of twenty-one (21) lots on 14.9 acres resulting in a gross residential density of 1.41 units per acre. The subject site consists of two parcels located on SW Mapp Road approximately 750 feet north of SW Murphy Road, as shown in Section E, Figure 1. The site contains two single-family residential structures and includes undeveloped wetland and upland habitat areas, as shown in Section E, Figure 2. As shown in Figure 4 of Section E, the current zoning of the site is R-2B, Single Family Residential District, and the current designated future land use of Low Density Residential, as shown in Section E, Figure 5. The applicant is proposing a residential project consisting of twenty-one (21) single family lots with

2 supporting infrastructure conforming to the development standards for the current R-2B zoning district as generally shown in Section E, Figure 2. Based upon the presence of wetlands and rare and unique upland habitat, the project includes preservation of the 2.48 acres of wetland and 4.7 acres of upland to include 3.1 acres of rare and unique upland. The applicant has provided an analysis that demonstrates compliance with the density transition policies of the Comprehensive Growth Management Plan (CGMP) to ensure that the proposed development is compatible with the surrounding existing development. A visual comparison of the proposed and existing lots, and the proposed preserve areas, is provided in Section E, Figure 2, which consists of an aerial overlay of the existing adjacent development and the proposed project s site plan line work. Surrounding local development is depicted in the aerial shown in Section E, Figure 3. Access will be provided via SW Mapp Road and water and wastewater services will be provided via Martin County Utilities. C. Staff recommendation The specific findings and conclusion of each review agency related to this request are identified in Sections F through T of this report. The current review status for each agency is as follows: Section Division or Department Reviewer Phone Assessment F Comprehensive Plan Catherine Riiska Comply F ARDP Samantha Lovelady Done G Development Review Catherine Riiska Comply H Urban Design Santiago Abasolo N/A H Community Redevelopment Santiago Abasolo N/A I Property Management Colleen Holmes N/A J Environmental Shawn McCarthy Comply J Landscaping Karen Sjoholm Comply K Transportation Lukas Lambert Comply L County Surveyor Tom Walker N/A M Engineering Michelle Cullum Comply N Addressing Emily Kohler Comply N Electronic File Submission Emily Kohler Comply O Water and Wastewater James Christ Comply O Wellfields James Christ Comply P Fire Prevention Doug Killane Comply P Emergency Management Dan Wouters Comply Q ADA Judy Lamb N/A R Health Department Todd Reinhold N/A R School Board Kimberly Everman Comply S County Attorney Krista Storey Review Ongoing T Adequate Public Facilities Catherine Riiska Comply Staff has reviewed this minor development final site plan application for compliance with the applicable goals, objectives and policies of the Martin County Comprehensive Growth Management Plan, the Martin County Land Development Regulations and the Code of Laws and Ordinances. The staff determination is that this application is in compliance with these laws and ordinances. Staff recommends this application for a minor development order, final site plan, complies and is consistent with the Martin County Comprehensive Growth Management Plan, the Martin County Land Development Regulations and the Code of Laws and Ordinances. Staff recommends the approval of the Page 2 of 18

3 development order by the County Administrator or his/her designee subject to any conditions of approval and all administrative processing of conditions of approval. D. Review Board action This application meets the threshold of a minor development and, as such, shall be reviewed by the Growth Management Director as designated by the County Administrator, pursuant to Sections 10.3.A.2. and B., Land Development Regulations (LDR), Martin County, Fla. (2016). Pursuant to Section 10.1.F, LDR, Martin County, Fla. (2016), it shall at all times be the applicant s responsibility to demonstrate compliance with the Comprehensive Growth Management Plan (CGMP), LDR, and the Code. Pursuant to Sections 10.4.A.1., LDR, Martin County, Fla. (2016), a review of this application is not required by the Local Planning Agency (LPA). Pursuant to Section 10.5.A., LDR, Martin County, Fla. (2016), a review of this application is not required by the Board of County Commissioners (BCC). E. Location and site information Parcel number(s) and address: SW Mapp Rd SW Mapp Rd Existing Zoning: R-2B, Single Family Residential Future land use: FLU-LDR, Future Land Use Low Density Res 5/Acre Gross area of site: 649,063 square feet Residential development: Single family units: 21 Figure 1: Location Map Page 3 of 18

4 Figure 2: Subject Site 2017 Aerial with Site Plan Overlay Adjacent existing or proposed development: To the north: Single Family Subdivision (Oak Ridge) To the south: Single Family Subdivision (Capri) To the east: Residential Planned Unit Development (across SW Mapp Rd) To the west: Cemetery Figure 3: Local Area 2017 Aerial Page 4 of 18

5 Zoning district designations of abutting properties: To the north: R-2B, Single Family Residential District To the south: R-2B, Single Family Residential District To the east: PUD-R, Residential Planned Unit Development (across SW Mapp Rd) To the west: PS-2, Public Service District Figure 4: Zoning Map Future land use designations of abutting properties: To the north: Estate Density 2UPA To the south: Low Density Residential To the east: Low Density Residential (across SW Mapp Rd) To the west: General Institutional Figure 5: Future Land Use Map Page 5 of 18

6 F. Determination of compliance with Comprehensive Growth Management Plan requirements - Growth Management Department The Martin County Comprehensive Growth Management Plan, Goal 4.1, Objective 4.1A., Policy 4.1A.1., states: 'The County's existing Land Development Regulations shall conform to all guidelines and standards contained in this Plan and will: (1) Regulate the use of land and water consistent with this element and the FLUM, while ensuring land use compatibility and providing open space; (2) Regulate the subdivision of land; (3) Protect environmentally sensitive lands and incorporate minimum landscape standards; (4) Regulate areas subject to seasonal and periodic flooding and provide for drainage and stormwater management; (5) Regulate signage; (6) Ensure safe and convenient on-site traffic flow and parking needs; (7) Protect potable water wellfields and aquifer recharge areas; (8) Protect endangered and threatened species and species of special concern and their habitats as defined in the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission's official list or as determined as regionally significant by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council; (9) Ensure that any development orders and permits issued do not result in a level of service (LOS) below the base level of service standards adopted in the Capital Improvements Element; (10) Include provisions for the transfer of development rights to: (a) Protect environmentally sensitive areas and/or historic resources; and (b) Specify those receiving zones in the Primary Urban Service District that can accept additional density and where in-fill development allows for new development and redevelopment of previously underused portions of the Primary Urban Service District. Staff has reviewed this application and finds that that it complies with the LDR, as detailed within this report. Staff recommends approval of this development application as consistent with the guidelines and standards of the applicable Comprehensive Plan goals, objectives and policies, as implemented in the LDR. G. Determination of compliance with land use, site design standards, zoning, and procedural requirements - Growth Management Department The Growth Management Department Development Review Division staff has reviewed the application and finds it in compliance with the applicable regulations. There are no unresolved land use, site design standards, zoning and procedural requirements issues associated with this application. Additional Information: Information #1: No land clearing is authorized prior to the mandatory pre-construction meeting for the project. Property corners and preservation areas shall be located by a licensed land surveyor and clearly marked in the field prior to the pre- construction meeting. Authorization for clearing to install erosion control devices Page 6 of 18

7 and preserve barricades will be granted at the pre-construction meeting. No additional land clearing shall commence until a satisfactory inspection of the required control structures and barricades has been obtained. Authorization for the relocation of gopher tortoises within the development, as provided for on state agency permits, may be granted by the Growth Management Department upon review of required permit materials. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR 4.37 Information #2: The applicant has elected Option 2, regarding Agency permit submittal for a consistency review after project approval. Prior to scheduling the mandatory pre-construction meeting for construction commencement authorization, all applicable local, state, and federal approved permits are to be submitted for review by the County Administrator with remittance of a $ review fee. If an application is made to any permitting agency for a modification to a permit that was required to be issued prior to final site plan approval, the application for the permit modification must be submitted concurrently to Martin County. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR 10.9.A (2016) Information #3: Timetable Of Development - Final The timetable of development for final site plans require all permits to be obtained within one year of approval and require all construction to be completed within two years of approval. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR, 10.1., 5.32 H. Determination of compliance with the urban design and community redevelopment requirements Community Development Department Commercial Design The proposed project is not located within the General Commercial, Limited Commercial, Commercial Office/Residential or Waterfront Commercial Future Land Use Designations. Therefore, the Commercial Design reviewer was not required to review this application. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR SECTION B. (2016) Community Redevelopment Area The proposed project is not located within a Community Redevelopment Area. Therefore, the Community Redevelopment Area reviewer was not required to review this application. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR ARTICLE 3, DIVISION 6 (2016) I. Determination of compliance with the property management requirements Engineering Department No dedication of additional right of way is required or proposed by the Applicant pursuant to the Roadway Classifications set forth in Section B, Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. [2001] which includes Table that lists the minimum right of way requirements. Therefore, the Applicant is not required to submit due diligence materials for review by the Martin County Real Property Division. Page 7 of 18

8 J. Determination of compliance with environmental and landscaping requirements - Growth Management Department Environmental The Growth Management Department Environmental Division staff has reviewed the application and finds it in compliance with the applicable Land Development Regulations. The applicant has demonstrated compliance with the county's wetland and upland preserve requirements. A wetland and upland preserve area will be established as part of the project and managed under a preserve area management plan. Landscape The Growth Management Department staff has reviewed the application and finds it in compliance with the applicable Land Development Regulations regarding landscaping. The applicant has proposed construction of a 21 lot subdivision. The applicant has submitted landscape plans that provide 1.72 acres of landscape area which equates to 62% of the development area to document compliance with Section A.1., Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. (2013). Pursuant to this regulation a minimum of 20% of the total development area shall be landscaped. Landscaped bufferyards are required between differing land uses and along certain transportation corridors. It is the intent of the code to encourage the preservation of existing vegetation for use in buffers as opposed to clearing and replanting designed landscapes. Section B., Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. (2013). Surrounding land use is residential so non-compatibility buffers are not required. Section B.1.a, Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. (2013). Wherever new residential dwelling units are proposed to be located along any minor or major arterial road, excluding Community Redevelopment Overlay Districts, a Type 5 bufferyard shall be required to screen the view of the dwelling units from the street Section B.2., Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. (2013). SW Mapp Road is not a major or minor arterial road but instead classified as a major collector street, therefore a Type 5 buffer is not required. Section E.Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. (2013) requires that development activity preserve at least ten percent of the total number of protected trees on the site unless it can be shown that the property would be precluded of reasonable use if the trees are not removed. To meet this requirement the applicant has submitted Landscape and Construction Plans to provide for preservation of 9 of the 41 existing protected trees on the site. Alterations cannot be made to the plans after final site plan approval. Any alteration may require an application to amend the affected approved plans. The applicant is cautioned to consider the placement of utilities and any underground or above ground site improvement that could cause a conflict with the landscaping and possibly cause a change or amendment. Page 8 of 18

9 As-built landscape plans submitted prior to the release of a certificate of occupancy will be checked against the approved drawings. Inconsistencies may block the issuance of the certificate of occupancy and cause the applicant to begin the application process for a change or an amendment to the development order. K. Determination of compliance with transportation requirements - Engineering Department The Traffic Division of the Engineering Department finds this application in compliance. Compliance with Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance: Staff has reviewed the Traffic Statement prepared by Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E., dated March 21, Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E. stated that the site's maximum impact was assumed to be 15 directional trips during the peak hour. Although the 2015 Roadway Level of Service Inventory Report was utilized within the impact analysis, staff has analyzed the level of service with the most recent Roadway Level of Service Inventory Report (2016). Staff finds that SW Mapp Road is the recipient of a majority of the generated trips. SW Mapp Road is currently operating at a level of service D; it is anticipated to operate at level of service D at buildout (year 2019). This application is eligible for a certificate of Public Road Facilities Reservation; road facilities are in place. L. Determination of compliance with county surveyor - Engineering Department The applicant has provided a certified boundary and topographic survey for the proposed development, pursuant to Section 10.1.F., LDR, Martin County, Fla. (2016). Therefore, the Engineering Department was not required to review this application for consistency with the Martin County Codes for survey requirements contained in Article 4, LDR, Martin County, Fla. M. Determination of compliance with engineering, storm water and flood management requirements - Engineering Department The application was reviewed for compliance with the following Divisions of the Land Development Regulations. Staff's finding is summarized after each: Division 8- Excavation, Fill, and Mining: The applicant demonstrated in the Engineer's Opinion of Probable Excavation, Fill, and Hauling excavation of 1,505 cubic yards is proposed and the site will require 1,575 cubic yards of fill material to complete the required infrastructure; therefore, hauling material from the site is not approved with this Development Order. The applicant demonstrated compliance with Division 8. Division 9- Stormwater Management: The applicant has demonstrated the proposed development is designed for full onsite retention by setting the minimum perimeter berm above the predicted elevation of stormwater that will stage within the development after a 100-year 3-day storm having a three-day duration. Page 9 of 18

10 The applicant is proposing the minimum finished floor elevation be set above the predicted elevation of stormwater that will stage within the development after a 100-year storm having a three-day duration and without any discharge from the development. The applicant is proposing the minimum edge of roadway elevation be set above the predicted elevation of stormwater that will stage within the development after a 10-year storm having a one-day duration. The applicant has demonstrated that the system provides water quality criteria for dry retention systems and recovers half of the water quality volume between 24 hours and 5 days, and recovers 90% of the entire volume within 12 days after the storm event. Thereby, the required attenuation, flood protection, and water quality treatment is in compliance with Division 9. Division 10 - Flood Protection: The site does not fall within a Special Flood Hazard Area; therefore, the applicant demonstrated compliance with Division 10. Division 14 - Parking and Loading: The applicant demonstrated compliance with the parking requirements set forth in Division 14 by providing two parking spaces per unit. Division 19- Roadway Design: The applicant is proposing to construct a northbound left turn lane for the development on SW Mapp Road. The proposed design meets the requirements in Division 19. The Engineering Department finds this application in compliance provided the Development Order includes conditions for the following: 1. A Right-of-Way Maintenance Agreement must be executed by Holman Subdivision for the construction and maintenance of the proposed landscaping within the SW Mapp Road right-ofway. 2. Hauling of fill from the site is prohibited. The routes and timing of any fill to be hauled to the site shall be coordinated with the County Engineer. Compliance with all County excavation and fill regulations is required. N. Determination of compliance with addressing and electronic file submittal requirements Growth Management and Information Technology Departments Addressing The application has been reviewed for compliance with Division 17, Addressing, of the Martin County Land Development Regulations. Staff finds that the proposed site plan / plat complies with applicable addressing regulations. All street names are in compliance. They meet all street naming regulations in Article 4, Division 17, Land Development Regulations. Martin County, Fla. (2017). Page 10 of 18

11 Electronic File Submittal The Information Services Department staff has reviewed the electronic file submittal and finds it in compliance with the applicable county requirements. Both AutoCAD site plan and boundary survey were received and found to be in compliance with Section 10.2.B.5, Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. (2016) Both AutoCAD site plan and boundary survey were in State Plane coordinates and found to be in compliance with Section 10.2.B.5, Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. (2016) The AutoCAD boundary survey was received and found to be in compliance with Section 10.2.B.5, Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. (2016) O. Determination of compliance with utilities requirements - Utilities Department Water and Wastewater Service This development application has been reviewed for compliance with applicable statutes and ordinances and the reviewer finds it in compliance with Martin County's requirements for water and wastewater level of service. [Martin County, Fla., LDR, Article 4, Division 6 and 7, (2016)] Wellfield and Groundwater Protection The application has been reviewed for compliance under the Wellfield Protection Program. The reviewer finds the application in compliance with the Wellfield Protection and Groundwater Protection Ordinances. [Martin County, Fla., LDR, Article 4, Division 5] (2016) P. Determination of compliance with fire prevention and emergency management requirements Fire Rescue Department Fire Prevention The Fire Prevention Bureau finds this submittal to be in compliance with the applicable provisions governing construction and life safety standards, subject to making the round-about and associated median curbs mountable structures. This occupancy shall comply with all applicable provisions of governing codes whether implied or not in this review, in addition to all previous requirements of prior reviews. Additional Information: Information #1: New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers placed in a position to be plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. [NFPA 1, ] Martin County Page 11 of 18

12 requires a minimum of 6 inch numbers visible from the road and contrasting from the structure. Information #2: The AHJ shall have the authority to: Require fire department access be provided to gated subdivisions or developments through the use of an approved device or system [NFPA 1, Chapter 18, Section 2.2.2]. Requires an access box(es) to be installed in an accessible location where access to or within a structure or area is difficult because of security. [NFPA 1, Chapter 18, Section 2.2.1]. Martin County Fire Rescue utilizes and required the Knox access system. to order the Knox system. You may contact Information #3: The following fire suppression water flow is the minimum for residential use: The minimum fire flow and flow duration requirements for one and two family dwellings having a fire flow area that does not exceed 5000 square feet shall be 1000 gpm (3785 L/min) for one hour. [NFPA ] Fire flow and flow duration for dwellings having a fire flow area excess in of 5000 square feet shall be not less than specified in Table [NFPA 1] These are the minimum requirements. Additional water flow may be required to supplement fire sprinkler systems or to support other hazardous uses. The developer is responsible to meet any additional flow requirements beyond that which is within the capacity of the utility provider [NFPA 1]. Emergency Preparedness Emergency Management staff has reviewed this application and finds the proposed hurricane action plan to be in compliance with the applicable provisions governing hurricane evacuation procedures. No impacts to evacuation capacity or public safety facilities are anticipated as a result of the construction of this project. Emergency Management staff recommends that a map showing the storm surge evacuation zones be added to the plan in order to property identify residents who may be required to evacuate. Please outline the project boundaries on the Storm Surge Map provided as Exhibit 1 to this report and attach it to the project s hurricane plan. Q. Determination of compliance with Americans with Disability Act (ADA) requirements - General Services Department Proposed residential development is not subject to ADA review under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act unless providing public accommodations. Pursuant to Section 10.1.F, LDR, Martin County, Fla. (2016), no public accommodations are proposed as part of this project. Page 12 of 18

13 R. Determination of compliance with Martin County Health Department and Martin County School Board Martin County Health Department The applicant has indicated that the proposed final site plan contains no onsite potable wells or septic disposal systems. Therefore, the Department of Health was not required to review this application for consistency with the Martin County Code requirements within the Land Development Regulations or Comprehensive Growth Management Plan. [Martin County, Fla., LDR Section 10.1.F. (2016)] Martin County School Board The School Board staff has reviewed this application for compliance with Florida Statutes, Martin County code and School Board Policy and has no objection to this application subject to the following condition (see Item #10, Section U): The applicant must resolve the addition of one (1) student station at the High School level where there is lack of capacity. The fee shall be based upon the District cost per student station at the time of approval of the development order and shall be remitted as part of the post-approval requirements. The School Board staff has reviewed this application for compliance with Florida Statutes, Martin County code and School Board Policy. Pursuant to the School Concurrency Determination attached to this report as Exhibit 2, the applicant must mitigate for the addition of 1 student station at the High School Level. An agreement to mitigate for the 1 student station has been developed and accepted by the Applicant and the Martin County School District and is attached to this report as Exhibit 3. As agreed to with the applicant, the Martin County School District (MCSD) has no objection to this development, subject to the following conditions: 1. Submittal of the executed mitigation agreement between MCSD and the Applicant consistent with section 6.5 of the Interlocal Agreement regarding School Facilities Planning and Siting. 2. Submittal of the mitigation payment, as set forth within the agreement, within 60 days of approval of the development order. S. Determination of compliance with legal requirements - County Attorney's Office Review Ongoing T. Determination of compliance with the adequate public facilities requirements - responsible departments The following is a summary of the review for compliance with the standards contained in Section 5.32.D., LDR, Martin County, Fla. (2016), for a Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities Reservation. Potable water facilities Service provider - Martin County Findings - Comply Source - Utilities and Solid Waste Department Reference - see Section O of this staff report Page 13 of 18

14 Sanitary sewer facilities Service provider - Martin County Findings - Comply Source - Utilities and Solid Waste Department Reference - see Section O of this staff report Solid waste facilities Findings In Place Source - Growth Management Department Stormwater management facilities Findings - Comply Source - Engineering Department Reference - see Section M of this staff report Community park facilities Findings In Place Source - Growth Management Department Roads facilities Findings - Comply Source - Engineering Department Reference - see Section K of this staff report Public safety facilities Findings Comply Source - Growth Management Department Reference - see Section P of this staff report Public school facilities Findings - Comply Source - Growth Management Department Reference - see Section R of this staff report A timetable for completion consistent with the valid duration of the development is to be included in the Certificate of Public Facilities Reservation. The development encompassed by Reservation Certificate must be completed within the timetable specified for the type of development. U. Post-approval requirements Approval of the development order is conditioned upon the applicant s submittal of all required documents, executed where appropriate, to the Growth Management Department (GMD), including unpaid fees, within sixty (60) days of the final action granting approval. Item #1: Post Approval Requirements List: After approval the applicant will receive a letter and a Post Approval Requirements List that identifies the documents and fees required. The applicant will return the Post Page 14 of 18

15 Approval Requirements List along with the required documents in a packet with the documents arranged in the order shown on the list. Item #2: Post Approval Fees: The applicant is required to pay all remaining fees when submitting the post approval packet. If an extension is granted, the fees must be paid within 60 days from the date of the development order. Checks should be made payable to Martin County Board of County Commissioners. Item #3: Post Approval Impact Fees: Impact fees must be paid after the development order has been approved. Submit a check made payable to Martin County Board of County Commissioners within 60 days of project approval. Item #4: Recording Costs: The applicant is responsible for all recording costs. The Growth Management Department will calculate the recording costs and contact the applicant with the payment amount required. Checks should be made payable to the Martin County Clerk of Court. Item #5: One (1) copy of the recorded warranty deed if a property title transfer has occurred since the site plan approval. If there has not been a property title transfer since the approval, provide a letter stating that no title transfer has occurred. Item #6: Original and one (1) copy of the current Unity of Title in standard County format if a property title transfer has occurred since the site plan approval. If there has not been a property title transfer since the approval, provide a letter stating so that no transfer has occurred. Item #7: Ten (10) 24" x 36" copies of the approved construction plans signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record licensed in the State of Florida. Fold to 8 by 12 inches. Item #8: Ten (10) copies 24" x 36" of the approved site plan. Item #9: Original approved site plan on Mylar or other plastic, stable material. Item #10: The original and one (1) copy of the fully executed mitigation agreement establishing compliance with Page 15 of 18

16 school concurrency requirements along with the mitigation payment ($39,916.00). Submit a check made payable to Martin County Board of County Commissioners within 60 days of project approval. Item #11: Ten (10) 24" x 36" copies of the approved landscape plan signed and sealed by a landscape architect licensed in the State of Florida. Item #12: One (1) digital copy of site plan in AutoCAD drawing format (.dwg). The digital version of the site plan must match the hardcopy version as submitted. Item #13: Original of the construction schedule. Item #14: Two (2) originals of the Cost Estimate, on the County format which is available on the Martin County website, signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record licensed in the State of Florida. Item #15: Original of the Engineer's Design Certification, on the County format which is available on the Martin County website, signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record licensed in the State of Florida. Item #16: Original and one (1) copy or two (2) copies of the executed and signed Water and Wastewater Service Agreement with Martin County Regional Utilities and one (1) copy of the payment receipt for Capital Facility Charge (CFC) and engineering and recording fees. V. Local, State, and Federal Permits Approval of the development order is conditioned upon the applicant's submittal of all required applicable Local, State, and Federal Permits, to the Growth Management Department (GMD), prior to the commencement of any construction. An additional review fee will be required for Martin County to verify that the permits are consistent with the approved development order. Item #1: ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS The following permits must be submitted prior to scheduling the Pre-Construction meeting: 1. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) listed species permit or plan Item #2: RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMITS Martin County Right of Way Use Permit must be obtained prior to scheduling a Pre-Construction meeting. Page 16 of 18

17 Item #3: STORMWATER MGMT PERMITS The following permits must be submitted prior to scheduling a Pre-Construction meeting: 1. South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) 2. FDEP NPDES Generic Permit for Stormwater Discharge from Large and Small Construction Activities. Item #4: WATER AND WASTEWATER The applicant must provide a copy of all required Department of Environmental Protection permits prior to scheduling the Pre-Construction meeting. W. Fees Public advertising fees for the development order will be determined and billed subsequent to the public hearing. Fees for this application are calculated as follows: Fee type: Fee amount: Fee payment: Balance: Application review fees: $10, $10, $0.00 Advertising fees*: TBD Recording fees**: TBD Mandatory impact fees: TBD Non-mandatory impact fees: TBD * Advertising fees will be determined once the ads have been placed and billed to the County. ** Recording fees will be identified on the post approval checklist. X. General application information Applicant: Holman, James & Debora K SW Mapp Road Palm City, FL Agent: PDG Realty, Inc. David Giunta 1650 SW Prosperity Way Palm City, FL Y. Acronyms ADA... Americans with Disability Act AHJ... Authority Having Jurisdiction ARDP... Active Residential Development Preference BCC... Board of County Commissioners CGMP... Comprehensive Growth Management Plan CIE... Capital Improvements Element CIP... Capital Improvements Plan FACBC... Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Page 17 of 18

18 FDEP... Florida Department of Environmental Protection FDOT... Florida Department of Transportation LDR... Land Development Regulations LPA... Local Planning Agency MCC... Martin County Code MCHD... Martin County Health Department NFPA... National Fire Protection Association SFWMD... South Florida Water Management District W/WWSA... Water/Waste Water Service Agreement Z. Attachments Exhibit 1: Hurricane Surge Map Exhibit 2: Martin County School District, Concurrency Analysis Exhibit 3: School Concurrency Mitigation Page 18 of 18

19 SW MAPP RD SW HUNT CLUB CIR SW MAPP RD SW SHORELINE DR SW HUNTER'S CLUB WAY SW PALM COVE DR MARTIN COUNTY STORM SURGE SW HUNTER'S CLUB WAY EVACUATION SW LIGHTHOUSE DR SW HUNTER'S CLUB WAY SW HUNTER'S CLUB WAY SW HUNTER'S CLUB WAY SW SAND OAK DR SW SUNDEW CT SW WILDRIDGE CT SW OAK HOLLOW CT SW MEADOW CT SW OAK RIDGE RD SW ELM GROVE CT SW LIGHTHOUSE DR SW OAK RIDGE RD SW OAK RIDGE RD SW ROSEMARY CT SW OAK RIDGE RD SW OAK RIDGE RD SW MIDDLE STREAM CT SW OAK RIDGE RD SW ELM GROVE CT SW OAK RIDGE RD SW BAY HOLLOW CT SW SUNDEW CT SW OAK RIDGE RD SW MAPP RD SW LITTLE OAK TRL SW SHORELINE DR SW CAPRI ST SW CAPRI ST SW CAPRI ST SW MAPP RD SW MURPHY RD SW MAPP RD SW MATHESON AVE Martin County Boundary Storm Surge Analysis SW CROSSINGS CIR Zones AB SW FOXPOINT TRL Zones CD SW MATHESON AVE SW CROSSINGS CIR Zone E µ SW CIMARRON CT 0 SW BROOKHAVEN WAY Staff Report - Exhibit 1 - Page 1 of 1

20 Martin County School District CIP School Concurrency Determination Project: Holman Subdivision Date Received: 2/14/2018 Project #: Owner/Applicant: Location: M Minor Final Site Plan James Holman/Eileen G Enterprises LLC West side of Mapp Rd., East of Fl. Turnpike, North of Murphy Rd. Planned Project Units: 21 Service Area Analysis Project Unit Yield by Type of School School Type Rate Students Elementary: Middle School: High School: SGR = CSA LOS 3 YR Added Capacity Total LOS Capacity Current Student Enrollment Projects w/reserved Capacity This Project Demand TOTAL Demand Available Capacity Elementary (Bessey Creek, Palm City, Citrus Grove) Middle (Hidden Oaks) High School (Martin County High) <-139> High School adjacent CSA (South Fork High) <-11> Concurrency Availability: Pursuant to the City, County, School District Interlocal Agreement for School Planning and Siting, Section and Article 5 of the Martin County Land Development Regulations, Division 5, Section 5.83, the School District has determined that sufficient school capacity does exist to serve the change in residential dwelling units proposed in this application to meet the school concurrency requirements under Florida Statute , at the Elementary & Middle School levels, however the High School is showing insufficient capacity. School capacity: This analysis is only used to serve as a review of the potential impact of the schools within the area of a future residential land use. Comments: This determination does not guarantee that the students from the above referenced project will be assigned to attend a particular school(s). Please note if capacity demand should exceed existing availability, students may be housed in relocateable units. Letter of No Objection: At this time we can provide a letter of no objection with the following conditions: 1. The applicant must resolve the addition of 1 student station that the Holman Subdivision will generate at the high school level where there is no capacity. This will be in accordance with the District cost per student station. District and applicant must agree to mitigation terms for this deficit. School District Contact: Kimberly Everman Date Issued: (Rev ) Telephone: , Ext.134 evermak@martin.k12.fl.us Staff Report - Exhibit 2 - Page 1 of 1

21 THE SCHOOL BOARD OF MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA 1050 SE 10 th Street Stuart, Florida Telephone (772) , Ext. 134 Facsimile: (772) David Giunta PDG Realty, Inc SW Prosperity Way Palm City, Fl /23/18 RE: Holman Subdivision School Concurrency Determination MC Project # H , Mitigation Requirements Dear David: Per our conversation on mitigation requirements for the above referenced project, please note the following regarding the School Concurrency Determination letter and mitigation required: 1. Applicant will resolve the 1 (one) total student station deficiency at the high school level that the Holman subdivision will generate based on the School District s Student Generation Yield. 2. This will be resolved following the mitigation guidelines that are set forth in the current ILA between Martin County and the School Board approved in On page 28 of said document, section (d), outlines the formula for determining proportionate-share of mitigation for capacity deficiencies, multiply the number of new student stations required to serve the new development by the average cost per student station. 4. Based on our most recent approved School District Education Impact Fee report the cost per student station is $39,916, multiplied by 1 = $39, Per ILA agreement, pg. 28 states the applicant s proportionate-share mitigation obligation will be credited toward any other impact fee or exaction imposed by local ordinance for the same need, as administered by Martin County. (Total Impact Fees Mitigation Fee = Balance of Impact Fees due) 6. There will be no refund of any portion of mitigation fee should the development not build-out. 7. This reservation is valid for 36 months of executed agreement. If building permit is not obtained within 36 months, this application will be subject to a new concurrency review. 8. Remittance of the mitigation payment to the Martin County School District shall be within 60 days of approval of the Development Order. 9. Holman Subdivision will be approved by Martin County School District to move forward with this development, when the applicant approves these mitigation requirements by signing below. James Holman Date Kimberly Everman cc: Capital Projects/Planning Specialist Garret Grabowski - MCSD Martin County School District Thomas Sheeran MCSD x134 Catherine Riiska MC Growth Dev. Laurie J. Gaylord, Superintendent School Board Members: Tina McSoley Michael DiTerlizzi Rebecca Negron Marsha Powers Christia Li Roberts An Equal Opportunity Agency Staff Report - Exhibit 3 - Page 1 of 1