JUPITER POINTE MARINA AND RESORT Revised Major Master/Final Site Plan

Transcription

1 { MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STAFF REPORT A. Application Information JUPITER POINTE MARINA AND RESORT Revised Major Master/Final Site Plan Applicant: Jupiter Pointe Marina Property Owner: Jupiter Pointe Marina Agent for the Applicant: John Yudin, Guy, Yudin & Foster, LLP County Project Coordinator: Catherine Riiska, MS, PWS, Principal Planner Growth Management Director: Nicki van Vonno, AICP Project Number: J Application Type and Number: D Report Number: 2018_0322_J _DRT_Staff_FINAL.docx Application Received: 10/14/2013 Transmitted: 10/16/2013 Staff Report Issued: 12/16/2013 Joint Workshop: 12/19/2014 Resubmittal Received: 05/15/2014 Transmitted: 05/19/2014 Staff Report Issued: 07/03/2014 Joint Workshop: 06/28/2014 Resubmittal Received: 02/03/2015 Transmitted: 02/09/2015 Staff Report Issued: 03/23/2015 Joint Workshop: 03/26/2015 Resubmittal Received: 05/18/2015 Transmitted: 05/20/2015 Staff Report Issued: 07/06/2015 Joint Workshop: 07/09/2015 Resubmittal Received: 09/08/2015 Transmitted: 09/09/2015 Staff Report Issued: 10/19/2015 Staff Report Revised: 04/20/2016 Resubmittal Received: 11/30/2016 Transmitted: 12/01/2016 Staff Report Issued: 02/02/2016 Joint Workshop: 02/09/2016 Resubmittal Received: 06/30/2017 Transmitted: 07/05/2017 Staff Report Issued: 10/04/2017 Joint Workshop: 10/12/2017

2 Resubmittal Received: 01/02/2018 Transmitted: 01/03/2018 Staff Report Issued: 03/22/2018 Joint Workshop: 04/12/2018 B. Project description and analysis This is an application for a revised commercial, major development master/final site plan with a request for a certificate of public facilities reservation. The project is located at SE Federal Highway in Hobe Sound between Federal Highway and the Intracoastal Waterway, as shown in Figure 1, Section E. The property owner is proposing to revise the previously approved master/final site plan to a revised master/final site plan to modify the previously approved and unbuilt Members Club building from a two-story 5,168 square-foot structure to a four-story, 4,667 square-foot 20-room hotel, and an addition of a 3,050 square-foot showroom to the existing boat storage building #2. Also proposed is modification to the existing valet parking. The currently approved marina site (approved February 21, 2011) consists of 161,107 square feet of boat storage within two one-story buildings, a 1,425 square-foot single-story Cabana Bar and a 5,168 square-foot Members Clubhouse. The current application was originally submitted on October 14, 2013, with a significantly different proposal to incorporate the 2.71-acre parcel adjacent to the north property boundary and develop a waterfront resort. After several rounds of review, the resubmittal received on November 30, 2016, included major revisions to the previous proposal, omitting the northern parcel and converting the approved clubhouse to a small hotel. The resubmittal received on June 30, 2017, proposed to change the application from requesting approval of a revised master plan only, to a request for approval of a revised master/final site plan authorizing construction of the project. The current project proposal must demonstrate compliance with all regulations in effect at the time of approval, pursuant to Sections 1.4A, 1.6, and 10.1.C., Land Development Regulations (LDR), Martin County, Fla. (2016); and Objective 4.1E., Comprehensive Growth Management Plan (CGMP), Martin County, Fla. (2016). C. Staff recommendation The specific findings and conclusion of each review agency related to this request are identified in Sections F through T of this report. The current review status for each agency is as follows: Section Division or Department Reviewer Phone Assessment F Comprehensive Plan Catherine Riiska Non-Comply F ARDP Samantha Lovelady N/A G Development Review Catherine Riiska Non-Comply H Urban Design Santiago Abasolo Non-Comply H Community Redevelopment Santiago Abasolo N/A I Property Management Colleen Holmes N/A J Environmental Shawn McCarthy Non-Comply J Landscaping Karen Sjoholm Non-Comply K Transportation Lukas Lambert Comply L County Surveyor Tom Walker Comply M Engineering Michelle Cullum Non-Comply N Addressing Emily Kohler Comply Page 2 of 19

3 N Electronic File Submission Emily Kohler Non-Comply O Water and Wastewater James Christ Comply O Wellfields James Christ Comply P Fire Prevention Doug Killane Comply P Emergency Management Dan Wouters N/A Q ADA Judy Lamb Comply R Health Department Todd Reinhold N/A R School Board Kimberly Everman N/A S County Attorney Krista Storey Review Ongoing T Adequate Public Facilities Catherine Riiska Review Pending D. Review Board action This application is classified as a major development, with a previously approved master/final site plan. As such, final action on this request for approval is required by the Board of County Commissioners at a public meeting pursuant to Section 10.5.A.2., Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla., (2016). Pursuant to Section 10.4.A.1., Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. (2016), a review of this application is not required by the Local Planning Agency (LPA). Pursuant to Section 10.1.F, Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. (2016), it shall at all times be the applicant s responsibility to demonstrate compliance with the Comprehensive Growth Management Plan (CGMP), Land Development Regulations (LDR) and the Code. E. Location and site information Parcel number(s) and address: SE Federal Hwy Existing Zoning: R-3A, Liberal Multi-Family Existing Zoning: WGC, Waterfront General Commercial Future land use: FLU-CW, Future Land Use Commercial Waterfront Nearest major road: SE Federal Highway Census tract: Not Applicable Commission district: 3 Community redevelopment area: Not Applicable Municipal service taxing unit: District 3 Planning area: South County Storm surge zone: Not Available Taxing district: District C Traffic analysis zone: Not Available Gross area of site: 13 Non-residential gross floor area: 117,842 square feet Pre-construction developed area: 10 Page 3 of 19

4 Figure 1: Location Map Figure 2: Subject Site 2016 Aerial Page 4 of 19

5 Adjacent existing or proposed development: To the north: Single Family Residential To the south: Single Family Residential To the east: Intracoastal Waterway To the west: Jupiter Hills Golf PUD (across SE Federal Highway) Figure 3: Local 2016 Aerial Zoning district designations of abutting properties: To the north: WGC, Commercial Waterfront To the south: R-3A, Liberal Multiple Family To the east: Intracoastal Waterway To the west: PUD-R, Residential Planned Unit Development (across SE Federal Highway) Figure 3: Zoning District Map Page 5 of 19

6 Future land use designations of abutting properties: To the north: Commercial Waterfront To the south: Commercial Waterfront To the east: Intracoastal Waterway To the west: Estate Density 2UPA (across SE Federal Highway) Figure 4: Future Land Use Designation Map F. Determination of compliance with Comprehensive Growth Management Plan requirements - Growth Management Department Review Pending: Item #1: Generic Comp Plan Compliance-GMD This application cannot be deemed to be in compliance with the Martin County Comprehensive Growth Management Plan (CGMP) until the issues identified in this report have been satisfactorily resolved. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., CGMP POLICY 4.1A.1. (2016) G. Determination of compliance with land use, site design standards, zoning, and procedural requirements - Growth Management Department Unresolved Issues: Item #1: Application Elective Resubmittal Fee An additional fee is required for the review of the elective resubmittal of documents for this development application. Please include the $3, elective resubmittal review fee (includes the GMD, ENG, and EMD fees). Page 6 of 19

7 Additional Information: Information #1: No land clearing is authorized prior to the mandatory pre-construction meeting for the project. Property corners and preservation areas shall be located by a licensed land surveyor and clearly marked in the field prior to the pre- construction meeting. Authorization for clearing to install erosion control devices and preserve barricades will be granted at the pre-construction meeting. No additional land clearing shall commence until a satisfactory inspection of the required control structures and barricades has been obtained. Authorization for the relocation of gopher tortoises within the development, as provided for on state agency permits, may be granted by the Growth Management Department upon review of required permit materials. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR 4.37 Information #2: Timetable Of Development - Final The timetable of development for final site plans require all permits to be obtained within one year of approval and require all construction to be completed within two years of approval. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR SECTIONS 10.1 AND (2017) Information #3: The applicant has elected Option 2, regarding Agency permit submittal for a consistency review after project approval. Prior to scheduling the mandatory pre-construction meeting for construction commencement authorization, all applicable local, state, and federal approved permits are to be submitted for review by the County Administrator with remittance of a $ review fee. If an application is made to any permitting agency for a modification to a permit that was required to be issued prior to final site plan approval, the application for the permit modification must be submitted concurrently to Martin County. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR 10.9.A (2016) H. Determination of compliance with the urban design and community redevelopment requirements Community Development Department Unresolved Issues: Commercial Design Item #1: Plan Consistency And Accuracy Proposed Hotel: The West Elevation and North elevations are considered the primary facades. Proposed Showroom: The West and North elevations are considered the primary façades because are visible from a public street. (Martin Co., LDR, Art. 4, DIV. 20, Sec D.1) 1. The symbol #1 located above the entrance shown on the West Building Elevation of Sheet A does not appear to refer to an awning but to an overhang roof. Please update this symbol with the corresponding design element. 2. Please delete on the South Building Elevation of the Showroom building symbol #1 since it does correspond to the design elements that is pointing to. This building elevation is shown on sheet Page 7 of 19

8 A Please delete or update symbol #1 shown on the elevation number B A-1.02 This symbol does not correspond to the design element that is pointing to. 4. Please delete or update symbol #7 shown on the elevation number C A-1.02 This symbol is not pointing to any design element. 5. Please delete or update the symbol #1 that is pointing to column shown on the elevation number C A-1.02 This symbol does not correspond to the design element that is pointing to. 6. The symbol #1 located above the entrance shown on the West Building Elevation of Sheet A does not appear to refer to an awning but to a pitched roof or overhang roof. Please update this symbol with the corresponding design element. 7. Please delete on the North Elevation drawing on sheet A-2.01 the label that refers to symbol #7 since this label does not refer to any Decorative wood columns and pilasters 8. Please delete or update the label named Painted lap siding shown on elevation number A A The design elements that this label is pointing to are a balcony and a window. 9. Please delete or update symbol #5 shown on elevation number A A The design elements that this label is referring to are not windows but doors as shown on the floor plans. 10. Please delete or update symbol #5 shown under the hotel entrance on elevation number A A Symbol # 5 is not pointing to any windows. 11. Please delete or update symbol #5 shown under the hotel entrance on elevation number B A Symbol # 5 is not pointing to any windows. 12. Please delete or update symbol #5 shown on elevation number B A The design elements that this label is referring to are not windows but doors as shown on the floor plans. 13. Please delete or update symbol #1 shown above the hotel entrance on elevation number C A The design element that this label is referring to are not awnings, located over windows or doors at increments of ten feet or less in length. 14. Please delete or update symbol #5 indicating the hotel entrance on elevation number C A The design element does not correspond to the description of symbol #5. Item #2: Customer Entrance Patio Commercial buildings of more than 10,000 square feet in gross floor area shall provide an outdoor patio area adjacent to the customer entryway of a minimum of 200 square feet in area which provides the following: a. Benches or other seating with structural or vegetative shading; b. Decorative landscape planters. This patio area may be incorporated into a pedestrian arcade that is otherwise in compliance with the requirements of this division 20. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR, G. (2013) Page 8 of 19

9 Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification Please add a note or label on the Site Plan indicating that the square footage of the required outdoor patio. Item #3: Prohibited Wall Coverings and Colors The following shall not be used as a wall covering on a primary facade: Reflective or back-lit panels made of plastic, vinyl, fiberglass or similar materials; Unfinished concrete block (i.e., without stucco finish), specifically excepting split-faced block; Corrugated metal panels where such material will cover more than 50 percent of the primary facade area. The following shall not be used on any primary facade: Black or florescent colors; Back-lit awnings; Unshielded florescent lights applied so as to accent the architectural features of a building or structure. MARTIN COUNTY, FLA., LDR, H. (2013) Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification: Please ad a note to the General Notes section in the Site Plan indicating that none of the wall coverings and colors included in this section will be used on the proposed Hotel and Showroom. Community Redevelopment Area The project is not located within a Community Redevelopment Area, as identified within Division 6, Article 3, LDR, Martin County, Fla (2017). Therefore, the Urban Design reviewer was not required to review this application for consistency with the CRA design criteria within the Land Development Regulations. I. Determination of compliance with the property management requirements Engineering Department There are no property management items, property transfers or right-of-way dedications proposed by the applicant or required by the County as part of the revisions to the existing master/final site plan. Therefore, the Engineering Department was not required to review this application for property management requirements of the Martin County Codes. J. Determination of compliance with environmental and landscaping requirements - Growth Management Department Unresolved Issues: Item#1: Check for Previous Violations Environmental Page 9 of 19

10 Your response states that the PAMP preserve area will be restored in accordance with the original shoreline landscaping plan and requests the work to be completed prior to CO of the proposed hotel building. Article 10 of the county's Land Development Regulations, under Section 10.8.A, require that development activity be in compliance with the approved development order and may result in the suspension of the current development order, and the cessation of county processing of all applications for development. Staff has identified the preserve area is presently not in compliance with your approved PAMP and development order. County code requires the preserve area be restored prior to issuance of any development approvals by the county. Item#2 General Compliance - Environmental Based on your response, it is now clear that access through the wetland buffer preserve if proposed as part of this application. Pursuant to Section, 4.3.E.d, LDR, Martin County, Fla., access to navigable water for properties with a commercial waterfront landuse may be approved with an access not to exceed 30 feet in width and based on the following criteria. The access must be approved by the County Administrator and provide a public benefit. Please explain the public benefit that will be provided in relation to the proposed access. In addition, the original shoreline landscaping plan does not identify the proposed 20 foot access. Please revise the plan to show the access and provide details how adjacent shoreline restoration plantings will be protected from potential encroachments by man-made activities utilizing the shoreline access. Unresolved Issues: Landscape Item #1: Landscape Tabular Data Please also include the following: 1. Identify proposed FL native plant species in the Landscape Tabular Data and demonstrate that at least 75% of required trees and shrubs, and at least 50% of required groundcover species provided are native. 2. Irrigated and non-irrigated turf areas shall be quantified and identified on the landscape plan. Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification Landscape data states that 50% of trees and shrubs need to be native; Martin County, FL Land Development Regulations Section 4.664C requires that 75% of trees and shrubs be native, only groundcovers can be reduced to 50% native species. On the plant list Clusia guittifera, Dianella, and Rhaphiolepis are erroneously designated as native species, please correct and verify percentages of native plantings. Verify that the variety of dwarf firebush to be utilized is not one of the non-native Mexican or African varieties. Item #2: Interior VUA Requirements-Non-Res Sites Please demonstrate compliance with the following criteria for interior vehicular use areas [Section A. 4.b., LDR]. The interior area includes the entire parcel to be developed exclusive of the Page 10 of 19

11 required front, rear, and side perimeter landscape areas. Interior medians of at least six feet in width exclusive of curbing shall be provided between an interior row of parking spaces and an abutting interior driveway or between abutting rows of parking spaces. At least one tree shall be required for every 30 linear feet of interior median, planted singly or in clusters with tree locations not more than 60 feet apart. Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification On Sheet LP-2 there is a note that says Existing vegetation to be removed Typ. with an arrow pointing to the interior parking median; is this just a typo? If not please explain why this material is being proposed to be removed. Item #3: Landscape Protection And Maintenance Please add the following notes regarding landscape maintenance to the plans provided [Section 4.665, LDR]: Protection of required landscaping. 1. Encroachment into required bufferyards and landscaped areas by vehicles, boats, mobile homes or trailers shall not be permitted, and required landscaped areas shall not be used for the storage or sale of materials or products or the parking of vehicles and equipment. Maintenance of required landscaping. 1. Required landscaping shall be maintained so as to at all times present a healthy, neat and orderly appearance, free of refuse and debris. If vegetation which is required to be planted dies it shall be replaced with equivalent vegetation. All trees for which credit was awarded and which subsequently die, shall be replaced by the requisite number of living trees according to the standards established in the Martin County Landscape Code. 2. All landscaping shall be maintained free from disease, pests, weeds and litter. Maintenance shall include weeding, watering, fertilizing, pruning, mowing, edging, mulching or other maintenance, as needed and in accordance with acceptable horticultural practices. Perpetual maintenance shall be provided to prohibit the reestablishment of harmful exotic species within landscaping and preservation areas. 3. Regular landscape maintenance shall be provided for repair or replacement, where necessary, of any screening or buffering required as shown on this plan. Regular landscape maintenance shall be provided for the repair or replacement of required walls, fences or structures to a structurally sound condition as shown on this plan. Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification Add required notes. Also noted, unless the intent is to utilize all native vegetation, Note #1 should be revised to indicate that it is all prohibited exotic species to be removed. Item #4: Additional Landscape Condition The area of the 20 wetland buffer is shown as being sod. This area needs to be replanted in accordance with the PAMP and as shown on the approved landscape plans from Page 11 of 19

12 Item #5: Additional Landscape Condition Reference is made that Existing dead/dying vegetation shall be replaced/in-filled in accordance with the 2009 approved landscape plans dated 4/22/09. I have not been able to locate this plan. It would be helpful if you could submit a copy of this plan. K. Determination of compliance with transportation requirements - Engineering Department Findings of Compliance: The Traffic Division of the Engineering Department finds this application in compliance. Compliance with Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance: Staff has reviewed the Traffic Statement prepared by Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E. dated June 28, Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E. stated that the site's maximum impact was assumed to be 13 trips during the PM peak hour. The generalized service capacity of SR-5 (US-1) between Palm Beach County and CR- A1A is 3,110; therefore, the project impact is less than 1% of the maximum volume of that roadway. This application satisfies the Adequate Public Facilities Standard; because the project impact is projected to have less than 1% of the maximum volume of that roadway, it has a De Minimis impact. [Martin County, Fla., LDR Article 5, Division 1, Section 5.3 (2009)] L. Determination of compliance with county surveyor - Engineering Department Findings of Compliance: This development application supporting survey has been reviewed by the County Survey Division (Engineering Department). The County Surveyor (or delegate) finds the survey in conformance with rules as they apply to this application lying within Martin County's Land Development Regulation Article 4, Florida Statutes Chapter 472 Land Surveying and Mapping or Florida Statutes Chapter 177 requirements. This division recommends approval of the application, subject to compliance with all other applicable standards for the submittal of all post-approval documents and field verification. M. Determination of compliance with engineering, storm water and flood management requirements - Engineering Department Unresolved Issues: Item #1: As previously requested, provide construction plans and details for the proposed foot bridge. Staff understands that final design adjustments may be made during the building permit review. Include a note with the foot bridge detail that states the foot bridge design may be substituted for an approved equal. Additional Information: Information #1: The Development Order shall be conditioned as followed: Page 12 of 19

13 "Prior to the issuance of each Certificate of Occupancy, the builder shall be required to submit a valid National Flood Insurance Program Elevation Certificate to the County s Engineering Department. N. Determination of compliance with addressing and electronic file submittal requirements Growth Management and Information Technology Departments Addressing Findings of Compliance: The application has been reviewed for compliance with Division 17, Addressing, Land Development Regulations, Martin County, Fla. ([2014]). Staff finds that the proposed site plan / plat complies with applicable addressing regulations. The street name SE Federal Hwy is existing and meets all addressing LDRs. An address will be assigned to this property upon approval of this site plan application in accordance with Section D. Unresolved Issues: Electronic File Submittal Item #1: Elec File Format A digital site plan is required to be submitted with the final site plan application. The required digital file format for the site plan is AutoCAD drawing format (.dwg). The digital version of the site plan must match the hardcopy version as submitted. Updated digital site plan files will be required to be submitted by the applicant during the development review process. All digital deliverables must be submitted on CD-ROM and labeled with project name, date, and applicant contact information. Remedy/Suggestion/Clarification: No new AutoCAD revised master site and final plan dwg file was submitted. Only an updated boundary survey dwg file was submitted. O. Determination of compliance with utilities requirements - Utilities Department Water and Wastewater Service Findings of Compliance: This development application has been reviewed for compliance with applicable statutes and ordinances and the reviewer finds it in compliance with Martin County's requirements for water and wastewater level of service. Potable water service to this parcel is currently provided by the Village of Tequesta. The service provider is the Village of Tequesta. Sanitary service to this parcel is currently provided by the Loxahatchee River District. The service provider is the Loxahatchee River District. Page 13 of 19

14 Wellfield and Groundwater Protection Findings of Compliance: The application has been reviewed for compliance under the Wellfield Protection Program. The reviewer finds the application in compliance with the Wellfield Protection and Groundwater Protection Ordinances. Potable water service to this parcel is to be provided by the Village of Tequesta. The service provider is the Village of Tequesta. The applicant has provided a letter from the Village of Tequesta confirming that potable water treatment plant capacity and water main capacity is available to service the proposed development. Water service capacity must be reserved through the execution of a service agreement with Village of Tequesta. The project is in compliance with the Martin County Code [ref. Code, LDR, s.5.32.d.1, 2, and 3.a.(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6) and i.(2) Code, LDR, Art.5, Div.2]. P. Determination of compliance with fire prevention and emergency management requirements Fire Rescue Department Fire Prevention Findings of Compliance: The Fire Prevention Bureau finds this submittal to be in compliance with the applicable provisions governing construction and life safety standards. This occupancy shall comply with all applicable provisions of governing codes whether implied or not in this review, in addition to all previous requirements of prior reviews. Additional Information: Information #1: NEEDED FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENT FOR BUILDINGS Identify the Needed Fire Flow Requirements for all buildings / structures. Fire flow calculations shall be prepared by a professional engineer currently licensed in the state of Florida for each newly constructed building. Per Florida Administrative Code section 61G Fire Protection Engineering documents shall include the point of service for the water supply, a list of NFPA standards applicable to the project, classification of hazard and occupancy for each room or area, suppression system type, design densities, water supply data (fire pump, hydrant flow test data) and any performance based information such as pre-engineered systems. The Needed Fire Flow Requirement must be in accordance with Florida Fire Prevention Code, N.F.P.A. 1, Chapter (latest adopted edition). The Guide for Determination of Needed Fire Flow, latest edition, as published by the Insurance Service Office (ISO). All calculations must be demonstrated and provided. APPROVED WATER SUPPLY HYDRANT FLOW TEST A hydrant flow test will be required to determine the available water supply to meet the needed fire flow for this project. Contact the Fire Prevention office at (772) to schedule. Emergency Management The applicant has indicated that the proposed revisions to the Jupiter Point Marina approved master site Page 14 of 19

15 plan are for non-residential uses and do not result in a demand for shelter capacity and Emergency Management resources, pursuant to Section 10.1.F, LDR. Therefore, the Emergency Management Department was not required to review this application for consistency with the requirements contained in the Land Development Regulations, Comprehensive Growth Management Plan or Martin County Codes. Q. Determination of compliance with Americans with Disability Act (ADA) requirements - General Services Department Findings of Compliance: The General Services Department staff has reviewed the application and finds it in compliance with the applicable Americans with Disability Act requirements. (2014 FBC, FIFTH EDITION\ACCESSIBILITY) Additional Information: Information #1: Development Order Condition The development order shall be conditioned as follows: Existing ADA spaces proposed to be relocated need to remain intact and accessible on site until the construction of all proposed new ADA spaces are completed and accessible. R. Determination of compliance with Martin County Health Department and Martin County School Board Martin County Health Department Findings of Compliance: The Health Department staff has reviewed the application for this project and finds it in compliance with the applicable Land Development Regulations. We have reviewed the revised plans for this project and the site plan is in compliance with our requirements. Martin County School Board The applicant has indicated that the proposed revisions to the Jupiter Pointe Marina approved master site plan are for non-residential uses and do not result in a demand for school capacity and resources, pursuant to Section 10.1.F, LDR. Therefore, the Martin County School Board was not required to review this application for consistency with the Martin County Codes regarding school concurrency. S. Determination of compliance with legal requirements - County Attorney's Office Review Ongoing T. Determination of compliance with the adequate public facilities requirements - responsible departments The following is a summary of the review for compliance with the standards contained in Article 5.7.D Page 15 of 19

16 of the Adequate Public Facilities LDR for a Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities Reservation. Potable water facilities service provider - Village of Tequesta Findings Comply Source - Environmental Services Department Reference - see Section O of this staff report Sanitary sewer facilities service provider - Loxahatchee River District Findings Comply Source -Environmental Services Department Reference - see Section O of this staff report Solid waste facilities Findings In Place Source - Growth Management Department Stormwater management facilities Findings - Comply Source - Engineering Department Reference - see Section N of this staff report Community park facilities Findings In Place Source - Growth Management Department Roads facilities Findings - Comply Source - Engineering Department Reference - see Section M of this staff report Mass transit facilities Findings In Place Source - Engineering Department Reference - see Section L of this staff report Public safety facilities Findings N/A Source - Growth Management Department Reference - see Section P of this staff report A timetable for completion consistent with the valid duration of the development is to be included in the Certificate of Public Facilities Reservation. The development encompassed by Reservation Certificate must be completed within the timetable specified for the type of development. U. Post-approval requirements Approval of the development order is conditioned upon the applicant s submittal of all required documents, executed where appropriate, to the Growth Management Department (GMD), including unpaid fees, within sixty (60) days of the final action granting approval. Page 16 of 19

17 Item #1: Post Approval Requirements List: After approval the applicant will receive a letter and a Post Approval Requirements List that identifies the documents and fees required. The applicant will return the Post Approval Requirements List along with the required documents in a packet with the documents arranged in the order shown on the list. Item #2: Post Approval Fees: The applicant is required to pay all remaining fees when submitting the post approval packet. If an extension is granted, the fees must be paid within 60 days from the date of the development order. Checks should be made payable to Martin County Board of County Commissioners. Item #3: Post Approval Impact Fees: Impact fees must be paid after the development order has been approved. Submit a check made payable to Martin County Board of County Commissioners within 60 days of project approval. Item #4: Recording Costs: The applicant is responsible for all recording costs. The Growth Management Department will calculate the recording costs and contact the applicant with the payment amount required. Checks should be made payable to the Martin County Clerk of Court. Item #5: One (1) copy of the recorded warranty deed if a property title transfer has occurred since the site plan approval. If there has not been a property title transfer since the approval, provide a letter stating that no title transfer has occurred. Item #6: Original and one (1) copy of the current Unity of Title in standard County format if a property title transfer has occurred since the site plan approval. If there has not been a property title transfer since the approval, provide a letter stating so that no transfer has occurred. Item #7: Ten (10) 24" x 36" copies of the approved construction plans signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record licensed in the State of Florida. Fold to 8 by 12 inches. Item #8: Ten (10) copies 24" x 36" of the approved site plan. Item #9: Original approved site plan on Mylar or other plastic, stable material. Item #10: Ten (10) 24" x 36" copies of the approved landscape plan signed and sealed by a landscape architect licensed in the State of Florida. Item #11: One (1) digital copy of site plan in AutoCAD drawing format (.dwg). The digital version of the site plan must match the hardcopy version as submitted. Page 17 of 19

18 Item #12: Original of the construction schedule. Item #13: Original of the Engineer's Design Certification, on the County format which is available on the Martin County website, signed and sealed by the Engineer of Record licensed in the State of Florida. V. Local, State, and Federal Permits The applicant has chosen Option 2 for other agency permit submittal and consistency review. The project is required to submit applicable other agency permits for review, with a $ fee, for consistency with the Martin County development order prior to scheduling a pre-construction meeting. W. Fees Public advertising fees for the development order will be determined and billed subsequent to the public hearing. Fees for this application are calculated as follows: Fee type: Fee amount: Fee payment: Balance: Application review fees: $33, $33, $0.00 Advertising fees*: TBD Recording fees**: TBD Mandatory impact fees: TBD Non-mandatory impact fees: TBD * Advertising fees will be determined once the ads have been placed and billed to the County. ** Recording fees will be identified on the post approval checklist. X. General application information Applicant: Agent: Jupiter Pointe Marina SE Federal Hwy Tequesta, FL John Yudin Guy, Yudin & Foster, LLP 55 East Ocean Blvd. Stuart, FL Y. Acronyms ADA... Americans with Disability Act AHJ... Authority Having Jurisdiction ARDP... Active Residential Development Preference BCC... Board of County Commissioners CGMP... Comprehensive Growth Management Plan CIE... Capital Improvements Element CIP... Capital Improvements Plan Page 18 of 19

19 FACBC... Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction FDEP... Florida Department of Environmental Protection FDOT... Florida Department of Transportation LDR... Land Development Regulations LPA... Local Planning Agency MCC... Martin County Code MCHD... Martin County Health Department NFPA... National Fire Protection Association SFWMD... South Florida Water Management District W/WWSA... Water/Waste Water Service Agreement Z. Attachments Page 19 of 19