Calgary Green Line North 64 Ave N Charrette Ideas Session

Transcription

1 1 Calgary Green Line North 64 Ave N Charrette Ideas Session IBI Group April 19, 2016

2 3 Charrette Agenda Tuesday Time Activity Person-in-Charge 18:30 18:35 5 min Welcome John Forsdick / City Councillors 18:35 18:45 10 min Playback of Gains & Pains Priorities Oliver Hartleben 18:45 19:00 15 min Market Opportunity and Redevelopment Economics Blair Erb 19:00 19:15 15 min Break John Forsdick 19:15 19:30 15 min TOD Components and Board Game Instructions Gary Andrishak 19:30 20:30 60 min Board Game Gary Andrishak 20:30 20:40 10 min Initial Observations on the Board Game Gary Andrishak 20:40 20:45 5 min Next Steps and Thank You John Forsdick

3 Gains & Pains Playback Oliver Hartleben IBI Group 4

4 Gains and Pains Board Summary 1. Green space 2. Quiet community 3. Walkable streets 4. Recreation facilities 1. Increased development 2. Public facility renewal 3. Walkable streets 4. Green space 1. Traffic impacts 2. Walk/bike connectivity 3. Too little development 4. Centre St pedestrian crossings 1. Transit user parking 2. Public space impacts 3. Wildlife impacts 4. LRT traffic impacts Based on original dot voting exercise on

5 Gains Now Number of Responses Based on original dot voting exercise on

6 Gains Next Number of Responses Based on original dot voting exercise on

7 Pains Now Number of Responses Based on original dot voting exercise on

8 Pains Next Number of Responses Based on original dot voting exercise on

9 What We Understood the Community Said: The 64 Avenue North community values: Its green space and recreation facilities Quiet neighbourhoods Walkable streets and connections to recreation The 64 Avenue North community is concerned about: Parking and traffic impacts now and into the future Pedestrian and bicycle connectivity in the neighbourhoods and across Centre St Too little development activity Impacts to open space and wildlife Impact of LRT on vehicle circulation The 64 Avenue North community would like to see: Increased development to fill in the gaps Renewal of public facilities (e.g. community centre) Walkable streets and a vibrant pedestrian realm Quality open space and green space

10 The Link to the TOD Team Work CONCERNS & ASPIRATIONS Walkability & Connectivity Parking & Traffic Public & Green Spaces Renewal of Public Facilities Appropriate Development

11 12 Market Opportunity and Redevelopment Economics Blair Erb Coriolis Consulting Corp.

12 13 The Logic Behind the Numbers + Building Density / Height - Too much density The right density Too little density MAXIMUM DENSITY should not exceed market demand & community acceptance VIABLE DENSITY or Economic Opportunity MINIMUM DENSITY required to make re-development possible

13 14 Market Demand MAXIMUM DENSITY to align with market demand

14 15 Multifamily Forecast by Location with GLN 2015 to 2045 Multifamily Development by Location Attached Units 2015 to 2045 % % Share of City Apartment Units 2015 to 2045 Share of City Centre City 0 0% 31,900 28% Northwest 22,900 33% 22,400 20% GLN Corridor 9,000 13% (+) 10,500 10% (+) Remainder of NW 13,900 20% (-) 11,900 11% (-) Southeast 19,300 28% 21,600 20% Southwest 19,600 28% 25,900 23% Northeast 7,600 11% 10,100 9% Entire City 69, % 111, %

15 16 Market Segments Developing areas Infill/Greenfield A Developed areas Redevelopment B

16 17 Multifamily Opportunity at GLN Stations 2015 to 2045 = Segment Attached Units Apartment Units Total Units A B 96 th Avenue to 160 th Avenue 9 th Avenue to Beddington 5,500 units 6,500 units 12,000 units 3,500 units 4,000 units 7,500 units Total Units Near GLN Stations units 10,500 units 19,500 units

17 18 Illustrative Allocation of Multifamily Units Stations Between 9 th Avenue and Beddington Attached Units Apartment Units = Total Units 64 th Avenue 1,000 units 1,500 units 2,500 units 9 th, 16 th, 28 th Avenue Stations 1,000 units 2,000 units 3,000 units Other Stations 1,500 units 500 units 2,000 units Total 3,500 units 4,000 units 7,500 units

18 19 Case Studies MINIMUM DENSITY to make redevelopment possible

19 Case Study 1: Existing Commercial Centre Street 20

20 21 Case Study 1: Existing Commercial Metric Figures Minimum Land Value Needed to Support Redevelopment $135 psf of site area Townhouses Midrise Woodframe Apartment/Mixed Use Highrise Concrete Apartment/Mixed Use Not viable 6 storeys 3.5 to 4.0 FAR gross Not currently marketable

21 Case Study 2: Older Low Density Multifamily 22

22 23 Case Study 2: Older Low Density Multifamily Metric Figures Minimum Land Value Needed to Support Redevelopment $115 psf of site area Townhouses Midrise Woodframe Apartment/Mixed Use Highrise Concrete Apartment/Mixed Use Not viable 6 storeys 3.0 to 3.5 FAR gross Not currently marketable

23 Case Study 3: Older Single Family Dwellings 24

24 25 Case Study 3: Older Single Family Dwellings Metric Figures Minimum Land Value Needed to Support Redevelopment Townhouses Midrise Woodframe Apartment/Mixed Use Midrise Concrete Apartment/Mixed Use $85 psf of site area Marginal viability varies by property 4-6 storeys 2.5 FAR gross Not currently marketable

25 Case Study 4: Older Duplex Properties 26

26 Case Study 4: Older Duplex Properties Metric Figures Minimum Land Value Needed to Support Redevelopment Townhouses Midrise Woodframe Apartment/Mixed Use Midrise Concrete Apartment/Mixed Use $85 to 90 psf of site area Not currently viable 4 to 6 storeys 2.5 FAR gross Not currently marketable

27 Time for a break! 29

28 TOD Board Game Gary Andrishak. IBI Group 30

29 A quick reminder what the Green Line project is about Layer 1: The LRT line and stations Layer 2: First/last mile connectivity Layer 3: TOD the urban transit village Layer 4: City shaping ability 31

30 32 Charrette Gaming Session Game Board Workbook Playing Pieces

31 Game Board 33

32 34 Playing Pieces BAG 1 Transit Station Streets and Blocks BAG 2 Place- Making BAG 3 Development and Buildings

33 Use of Playing Pieces 35

34 36 Precedent: Green Line Southeast - Gaming Session 1 Board Game (Participants) Design Concept (Consultants) 3 2

35 37 Precedent: Green Line Southeast - Final Product Transportation Open Space Development

36 Transit Station

37 Transit Connection 39

38 Complete Street 40

39 Pedestrian Connection

40 Pedestrian Bridge 43

41 Crosswalk 44

42 Bike Station 45

43 Traffic Circle 46

44 Parking Structure 48

45 Plaza 51

46 Public Art / Landmark 52

47 Community Gateway 53

48 Small Park 54

49 Playground 55

50 Large Park 56

51 Recreation Field 57

52 Community Gardens 58

53 Dog Park 59

54 Pop-up Project 60

55 Green Energy Projects 61

56 Town Houses 62

57 Stacked Town Houses 63

58 Wood Frame Apartment 4 Storeys 64

59 Wood Frame Apartment Up To 6 Storeys 65

60 Concrete Apartment Up To 12 Storeys 66

61 Concrete Apartment Up To 22 Storeys 67

62 Mixed-use 68

63 Affordable Housing 69

64 Seniors Housing 70

65 Live-work 71

66 Shops 72

67 Grocery 73

68 Corner Store 74

69 Restaurant 75

70 Farmers Market 76

71 Hotel 77

72 Office 78

73 Social / Cultural Centre 79

74 School 80

75 Heritage 81

76 Industrial Innovation 82

77 83 Game Board 6,192 Residents (600m radius)

78 84 Let s get started!

79 See You on Thursday at 6:30 pm! 85