EL CERRITO PARKING STUDY FINAL REPORT

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "EL CERRITO PARKING STUDY FINAL REPORT"

Transcription

1 EL CERRITO PARKING STUDY FINAL REPORT Prepared for: City of El Cerrito Prepared by: November 28, 2011

2

3 TABLE OFF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION EXISTING PARKING CONDITIONS Methodology Survey Findings El Cerrito del Norte BART Station Area San Pablo Avenue Midtown El Cerrito Plaza BART Station Area Conclusions BEST PRACTICE EXAMPLES DEVELOPMENT OF PARKING REQUIREMENTS Considerations Testing of Different Parking Requirement Scenarios Future Parking Supply Estimations Recommended Parking Requirements PARKING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES AND EXAMPLES Unbundle Parking Hour Paid Parking Charge BART Patrons for On-Street Parking via Permit Increase BART Parking Fees Establish A Joint Powers Association Allow On-Street Parking to Meet Off-Street Parking Requirements CarShare Services Bicycle and Pedestrian-Friendly Site Design and Aggressive Bicycle Parking Requirements Credit Bicycle and Motorcycle Parking Transportation Demand Management Programs Establish a Transportation Management Association Peer-to-Peer CarSharing Provide EcoPass for Residents Free BART Parking for Carpool and Vanpool Vehicles Attended Parking Summary CONCLUSIONS Page 1 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

4 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 Parking Survey Periods... 6 Table 2 El Cerrito del Norte BART Station Area: On-Street Parking Occupancy Rates... 9 Table 3 El Cerrito del Norte BART Station Area: Weekday Midday On-Street Parking Occupancy Rates for RPP and non-rpp zones Table 4 El Cerrito del Norte BART Station Area: On-Street Parking Duration Table 5 El Cerrito del Norte BART Station Area: Off-Street Parking Occupancy Rates Table 6 San Pablo Avenue Midtown: Midday On-Street Parking Occupancy Rates Table 7 San Pablo Avenue Midtown: Midday Off-Street Parking Occupancy Rates Table 8 El Cerrito Plaza BART Station Area: Midday On-Street Parking Occupancy Rates Table 9 El Cerrito Plaza BART Station Area: On-Street Parking Duration Table 10 El Cerrito Plaza BART Station Area: Midday Off-Street Parking Occupancy Rates Table 11 Best Practice Examples: Parking Management Strategies and Policies Table 12 City of El Cerrito s Existing Parking Codes Table 13 Parking Requirements from Developers Interviews Table 14 MTC Smart Growth Parking Demand Model Table 15 National Average of Parking Demand Rates Table 16 Best Practice Examples of Parking Requirements Table 17 Parking Rates Scenario # Table 18 Parking Rates Scenario # Table 19 Parking Rates Scenario # Table 20 Parking Rates Scenario # Table 21 Minimum Density Scenario: Parking Supply Estimation Table 22 Maximum Density Scenario: Parking Supply Estimation Table 23 Minimum Density Scenario: Net Reductions Compared to Existing Codes Table 24 Maximum Density Scenario: Net Reductions Compared to Existing Codes Table 25 Summary of Parking Management Strategies LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Parking Survey Area... 7 Figure 2 El Cerrito del Norte BART Station Area: Weekday Midday On-Street Parking Occupancy Figure 3 El Cerrito del Norte BART Station Area: Weekday Midday Off-Street Parking Occupancy Figure 4 San Pablo Avenue Midtown: Weekday Midday On-Street Parking Occupancy Figure 5 San Pablo Avenue Midtown: Weekday Midday Off-Street Parking Occupancy Figure 6 El Cerrito Plaza BART Station Area: Weekday Midday On-Street Parking Occupancy Figure 7 El Cerrito Plaza BART Station Area: Weekday Midday Off-Street Parking Occupancy Page 2 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The El Cerrito Parking Study was conducted in order to provide information to City staff, developers, and others as they develop and implement parking standards and programs for transit-oriented developments (TOD). The study included a survey of existing parking conditions and research on best practice examples of TOD parking management strategies adopted in other cities. The study has resulted in a set of recommended changes to parking requirements and 15 recommended parking management strategies that are intended to efficiently accommodate parking needs while reducing overall parking demands in El Cerrito. CHS Consulting has presented the results of parking surveys and best practices research to the City Council on July 18, 2011, and the evaluation of future parking demand and recommended parking management strategies on November 21, This report summarizes the materials presented, and the comments and responses discussed during these meetings. Study Findings The parking survey found that overall on-street parking occupancy rates are generally low (approximately 40 percent), except for the areas surrounding the City s two BART stations El Cerrito del Norte and El Cerrito Plaza BART Stations (approximately 70 percent). Survey findings also supported a popular perception that the BART commuters are using the residential streets near the BART station for their long-term parking needs. The off-street parking occupancy survey shows that, while the BART parking facilities are heavily used during the week day period (approximately 100 percent) the majority of offstreet parking facilities are often underutilized (approximately 45 percent). In order to estimate parking needs for future TODs, CHS Consulting tested parking ratios obtained from various sources, including the City of El Cerrito s existing parking code provisions, inputs from local developers, outputs from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission s (MTC) Smart Growth Parking Demand Model, national average of parking demands, and the best practice examples from eight different cities with successful TOD projects in the United States. The analysis concludes that the parking needs in future TODs would be approximately 20 percent less than the parking spaces required under the City s existing codes. As such, CHS Consulting recommends reduced parking requirements which reflect a realistic level of parking needs. It is expected that the new parking requirements would prevent developers having to provide more parking spaces than needed and would enable the implementation of sustainable TODs in the future. Recommendations In order to ensure that the reduction in parking supply, as a result of reduced parking requirements, would not cause parking impacts, a total of 15 parking management strategies are proposed. These parking management strategies are intended to reduce parking demand while efficiently accommodating parking needs. These strategies in the order of implementation priority and cost-effectiveness on reducing parking demand are as follows: Unbundle parking spaces Install 10-hour paid parking near BART stations at the rate no lower than the comparable rate at BART parking facilities Charge BART patrons for on-street parking Increase BART parking fees to $2 per day and $84 per month Establish a Joint Powers Association Page 3 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

6 Allow developers to use on-street parking spaces to meet off-street parking requirements Encourage the use of carshare services Provide bicycle and pedestrian-friendly site design and aggressive bicycle parking requirements Offer credits for bicycle and motorcycle parking, in lieu of vehicle parking requirements Require Transportation Demand Management Programs Establish a Transportation Management Association Provide EcoPass for residents Provide free BART parking for carpool and vanpool vehicles Employ parking attendants in BART parking facilities Page 4 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

7 1.0 INTRODUCTION The El Cerrito Parking Study is funded by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and the City of El Cerrito. The primary purpose of the study is to determine parking demand, recommend changes to parking requirements, and develop parking management strategies for the future Transit- Oriented Developments (TOD) and businesses along San Pablo Avenue in El Cerrito. It is also intended to address the existing and future commuter parking issues in the City s two Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) stations: the El Cerrito del Norte BART Station and the El Cerrito Plaza BART Station. The parking study initially evaluated the existing parking conditions in the two BART station areas and along San Pablo Avenue by conducting on-street and off-street parking occupancy surveys. The survey results informed the level of existing parking demand, parking problem areas and opportunities for improvements. In addition, research on the best practice examples of innovative parking management strategies and policies adopted in other U.S. cities provided a resource for potential parking management strategies the City of El Cerrito could adopt. As part of deliverables for the study, CHS Consulting has submitted a report summarizing the parking survey results on June 30, 2011, and a memorandum summarizing the future parking demands on November 8, CHS Consulting has also attended two City Council meetings and presented the results of parking surveys and best practices research on July 18, 2011, and the evaluation of future parking demand and recommended parking management strategies on November 21, The comments received from the City Council on the first presentation (July 18, 2011) were addressed in a subsequent memo submitted to the City on July 27, 2011, and the comments received in the final presentation (November 21, 2011) are addressed in this final report. The submittal of this final report completes all the tasks outlined for the El Cerrito Parking Study. This report presents the findings of this effort in the following order: Existing Parking Conditions Best Practice Examples Estimation of TOD Parking Needs and Recommendations for Parking Requirements Recommended Parking Management Strategies 2.0 EXISTING PARKING CONDITIONS This section presents the existing parking occupancy conditions in the El Cerrito Parking Study area. 2.1 Methodology The parking survey includes parking supply, occupancy, and duration. The survey was conducted on Thursday, May 19, 2011 and on Saturday, May 21, The weather was fine and dry during this period. The parking survey area comprised three sub-areas, as shown in Figure 1. They include the El Cerrito del Norte BART Station Area (del Norte Station Area), San Pablo Avenue Midtown, and El Cerrito Plaza BART Station Area (Plaza Station Area). The parking survey includes both on-street and off-street parking facilities in each sub-area. The on-street parking spaces included all curb-spaces where parking is legally permitted. Since there is no striping on the street to delineate on-street parking spaces, the number of on-street parking spaces was estimated by dividing total linear feet between curb cuts by 22 feet. This is consistent with the dimension used by the Page 5 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

8 City of El Cerrito and most local jurisdictions for each metered parking space. 1 The off-street parking survey includes the BART parking facilities and all private parking lots within the survey area, except those that are gated. In addition, a parking duration survey was conducted in the del Norte Station Area and the Plaza Station Area in order to assess potential BART commuter parking spillover conditions in the area. The survey periods are summarized in Table 1. Data collection for the del Norte Station Area is more extensive than the other two sub-areas (e.g., including parking occupancy rates for six different times of the day instead of just around noon time), to respond to requirements of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission Technical Assistance Grant for the TOD study. Table 1 Parking Survey Periods Survey Area Survey Type Survey Date Survey Period Thursday, 19, AM to 2PM, & Midnight On-Street El Cerrito del Saturday, May 21, AM to 2PM Norte Station Thursday, 19, AM to 2PM, & Midnight Off-Street Area Saturday, May 21, AM to 2PM Duration Thursday, 19, :30AM to 2:30PM Thursday, 19, 2011 Noon San Pablo On-Street Saturday, May 21, 2011 Noon Avenue Thursday, 19, 2011 Noon Midtown Off-Street Saturday, May 21, 2011 Noon Thursday, 19, 2011 Noon On-Street El Cerrito Saturday, May 21, 2011 Noon Plaza Station Thursday, 19, 2011 Noon Off-Street Area Saturday, May 21, 2011 Noon Duration Thursday, 19, AM to 4PM 1 City of El Cerrito, Municipal Code Chapter 19.24: Off-Street Parking and Loading, Section General Parking Design Standards El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011 Page 6

9 Wall Ave El Cerrito Del Norte Station Area Cutting Blvd San Pablo Pablo Ave Ave El Cerrito del Norte Black St Potrero Ave San Pablo Ave Mid-Section 80 Moeser Ln Carlson Blvd San Pablo Pablo Ave Ave 580 Lincoln Ave El Dorado St Central Ave El Cerrito Plaza Fairmount Av El Cerrito Plaza Station Area CHS Consulting Group El Cerrito Parking Survey Study Figure 1 Parking Survey Area

10 2.2 Survey Findings This section presents parking survey findings. It includes three sub-sections, one for each sub-area. Each subsection presents on-street parking survey results first, and then off-street parking survey results. The raw survey data are included in Appendix I El Cerrito del Norte BART Station Area The del Norte Station Study Area is defined as an area within a quarter mile of the El Cerrito del Norte BART Station, bounded by Wall Avenue to the north, I-80 to the west, Potrero Avenue to the south, and Elm Street and Junction Boulevard to the east. 2 Land uses in this sub-area include big box retail developments (e.g. Walgreens, Staples and Orchard Supply Hardware) and fast food stores on the west side of San Pablo Avenue, and the El Cerrito del Norte BART Station, BART parking lots, and a BART garage between San Pablo Avenue and the BART tracks on the east side. The area east of the BART tracks is predominantly single-family residential homes. The majority of residential streets in the del Norte Station Area are within a Residential Permit Parking (RPP) zone with a 4-hour parking time restriction. In general, the City designates one side of the street as a RPP zone with 4-hour time restriction and the other side of the street is available for public parking without time restrictions. Residential parking permits at $6 per year are available to eligible households 3 on both the posted and non-posted sides of the street. The maximum number of permits per residence is four. The City enforces RPP between 7:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Appendix II includes the map of RPP zones with 4-hour parking time restriction in this sub-area. On-Street Parking Table 2 presents the parking supply and occupancy results for each street in this sub-area. It shows the Del Norte Station Area has 640 on-street parking spaces. Of these spaces, approximately 10 percent (68 spaces) are on the west side of San Pablo Avenue, and 90 percent (572 spaces) are on the east side of San Pablo Avenue. The average weekday parking occupancy rates 4 ranged from 15 percent (at midnight) to 74 percent (at 11:00 a.m.) on the west side of San Pablo Avenue. The average weekday parking occupancy rates on the east side of San Pablo Avenue range from 41 percent (at midnight) to 61 percent (at noon). On weekends, the on-street parking occupancy rates were generally lower than on weekdays; generally no more than 50 percent of the on-street parking spaces were occupied. The average occupancy rate for streets on the west side of San Pablo Avenue is relatively low, less than 74 percent during the peak hour on weekdays and less than 50 percent during a weekend midday. Approximately half of the on-street parking spaces in this area is along San Pablo Avenue (i.e., 32 out of 68 spaces), and the occupancy rate along San Pablo Avenue is extremely low, less than 35 percent during the weekday and less than 50 percent during the weekend. Table 2 shows parking occupancy rates are over 100 percent along Knott Avenue and Eastshore Boulevard. Parking occupancy above 100 percent indicates that several compact-size vehicles are parked close to each other along the curb in spaces that 2 A quarter mile or 1,200 feet is considered a reasonable walking distance from a rail transit station. 3 Residents who live in a four-hour parking zone (near the El Cerrito del Norte and Plaza BART stations or some streets in west El Cerrito) are eligible to apply for RPP that exempt their vehicles from the parking restrictions. 4 An average occupancy rate noted in this report represents the total occupancy rate for an aggregated area at a specific time. Page 8 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

11 are shorter than the typical length of 22 feet space per vehicle. No double parking or other illegal parking was observed at these locations. 5 The average parking occupancy rate on the east side of San Pablo Avenue is moderately or marginally higher (low- to mid-70 percent range) than on the west side during a weekday midday. However, parking occupancy is substantially lower on weekends, in the low 30 percent range. While the overall average parking occupancy rate is moderate, the midday peak-hour parking occupancy rate is very high along several block faces in the vicinity of the BART station area (Figure 2). Table 2 El Cerrito del Norte BART Station Area: On-Street Parking Occupancy Rates Street/ Total Weekday Weekend Parking Area Parking Spaces 10am 11am Noon 1pm 2pm Midnight 10am 2pm West of San Pablo Avenue Wall Avenue 20 70% 90% 85% 75% 60% 40% 90% 75% Knott Avenue 6 125% 125% 125% 100% 100% 20% 60% 85% Eastshore Boulevard % 125% 108% 108% 108% 0 29% 8% San Pablo Ave % 31% 28% 19% 34% 3% 38% 50% Total 68 66% 74% 68% 59% 62% 15% 50% 46% East of San Pablo Avenue Wall Avenue 11 45% 64% 55% 36% 55% 64% 73% 36% Knott Avenue 30 80% 77% 80% 70% 80% 50% 57% 67% Cutting Boulevard % 110% 119% 124% 110% 76% 35% 44% Hill Street 30 83% 80% 83% 80% 83% 33% 60% 57% Blake Street 57 44% 46% 60% 58% 39% 28% 26% 23% San Pablo Avenue 18 17% 17% 33% 28% 22% 11% 28% 17% Kearney Street 28 82% 82% 79% 71% 64% 18% 21% 25% Lexington Avenue 24 67% 54% 54% 50% 54% 88% 71% 67% Liberty Street 63 67% 68% 71% 70% 70% 32% 33% 33% Elm Street 61 48% 44% 41% 39% 44% 20% 28% 16% Key Boulevard 92 73% 77% 76% 73% 70% 40% 30% 34% Junction Avenue % 31% 33% 29% 34% 41% 39% 44% Total % 57% 59% 56% 55% 38% 37% 37% Source: CHS Consulting Group, June Notes: Parking occupancy above 85 percent is highlighted. Table 3 summarizes the parking occupancy rates for RPP zones and non-rpp zones. It shows that the block faces with time restrictions (in RPP zones) showed substantially lower parking occupancy rates than the other side of the street, which usually has no time restrictions. Some street segments located within non-rpp zones, but with a time restriction (e.g., Knott Avenue San Pablo and Kearney Avenues) also showed low parking occupancy rates. This indicates that potential commuter parking spillover is occurring within residential areas where there are no time restrictions. 5 An additional field visit on Thursday June 23, 2011 confirmed the parking occupancy above capacity at these locations. Page 9 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

12 Table 3 El Cerrito del Norte BART Station Area: Weekday Midday On-Street Parking Occupancy Rates for RPP and non-rpp zones Street RPP Zone Non-RPP Zone Spaces Occupied 1 Spaces Occupied 1 Wall Avenue 31 74% Knott Avenue 34 91% Cutting Boulevard % Hill Street 13 62% % Blake Street 31 52% 26 69% Eastshore Boulevard % San Pablo Avenue % 5 0% Kearney Street 5 80% 23 78% Lexington Avenue 24 54% Liberty Street 37 49% % Elm Street 29 48% 32 34% Key Boulevard 63 63% % Junction Avenue 46 26% Total % % Notes: 1. Parking occupancy above 85 percent is highlighted. 2. San Pablo Avenue is not within RPP zone; however, portions of the street have 2- or 4-hour time restriction. Page 10 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

13 Morris Ave Wall Ave Hagen Blvd Junction Ave Knott Ave Key Blvd Blvd Kearny St St Cutting Blvd El Cerrito del Norte San Pablo Pablo Ave Ave Elm St St 80 Hill St Eastshore Blvd Blake St Lexington Ave Ave Liberty St St LEGEND Study Boundary Occupancy Rate 0~50% 51~70% 71~85% 86~100% over 100% Potrero Ave Not to Scale CHS Consulting Group El Cerrito Parking Survey Study Figure 2 El Cerrito del Norte BART Station Area: Weekday Midday On-Street Parking Occupancy

14 On-Street Parking Duration A parking duration survey was conducted along San Pablo Avenue between Wall Avenue and Potrero Avenue in order to determine parking duration and to assess whether employee or commuter parking spillover occurred. 6 San Pablo Avenue is not within RPP zones; however, portions of the street in the study area have 2-hour or 4-hour time limits (see Table 4). The parking duration survey included recording the last four digits of vehicle license plate numbers every 30 minutes from 10:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. The results of the weekday parking duration surveys are summarized in Table 4. It shows that the majority (85 percent) of vehicles on San Pablo Avenue stayed no more than the allowed time limit. And less than 15 percent of vehicles (7 out of 52 cars) stayed past the time limit. This suggests that the majority of these on-street parking spaces are used to serve the adjacent businesses, and less than 15 percent of parked cars could potentially belong to employees or commuters. Table 4 El Cerrito del Norte BART Station Area: On-Street Parking Duration San Pablo Avenue: Wall Ave to Knott Ave (Eastside) 2-Hour Limit 1 Wall Ave to Knott Ave (Westside) 4-Hour Limit 1 Knott Ave to Cutting Blvd (Westside) No Time Limit 1, 2 Hill St to Potrero Ave (Westside) 2-Hour Limit 1 Total Parked Vehicles Stayed Less than 30 min 10 (45%) 3 (30%) 0 11 (55%) Stayed 30 min to 1 hour 7 (32%) 3 (30%) 0 2 (10%) Stayed 1 to 2 hours 5 (23%) 0 (0%) 0 3 (15%) Stayed 2 to 4 hours 0% 1 (10%) 0 3 (15%) Stayed more than 4 hours 0% 3 (30%) 0 1 (5%) Source: CHS Consulting Group, June Notes: 1. Illegal parking beyond the posted time limit is highlighted. 2. There are five parking spaces on the west side of San Pablo Avenue between Knott Avenue and Cutting Boulevard, but no vehicles parked during the survey period. Off-Street Parking There are 21 parking lots and one garage within this sub-area, including four BART parking lots and one BART garage, with a total of 2,858 parking spaces. The survey did not include the old Target site, where a Safeway with 279 parking spaces was under construction. This site is included only for information purposes. Table 5 summarizes parking occupancy rates for the off-street parking facilities in the del Norte Station Area. The BART parking lots and the garage were almost full, at approximately 95 percent occupancy rate, throughout the day on weekdays 78. The parking lots serving the retail uses on the west side of San Pablo Avenue had much lower occupancy rates, except McDonald s and a Honda Dealer: less than 42 percent on average. This indicates that there are ample off-street parking spaces serving both employees and customers, and, thus, it is unlikely that employee parking demand occurred on the street. 6 Parking duration survey was conducted along San Pablo Avenue because the neighboring businesses have raised a concern over potential parking spillover problems in the area. 7 El Cerrito Del Norte BART Station has Monthly Reserved, Single Day Reserved, Daily $1 Fee Parking, Extended Weekend, Carpool, and Long-Term parking. 8 An 85 percent occupancy rate is usually used as the threshold to determine whether a parking facility is at its effective capacity. Beyond this threshold, drivers must drive around to find a parking space. El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011 Page 12

15 All off-street parking lots were nearly empty at midnight except for some fast-food restaurants and convenience stores. Table 5 El Cerrito del Norte BART Station Area: Off-Street Parking Occupancy Rates Street/ Total Weekday Weekend Parking Area Parking 10am 11am Noon 1pm 2pm Midnight 10am 2pm Spaces West of San Pablo Avenue 1. McDonald's 21 71% 52% 52% 71% 81% 14% 90% 43% 2. Mira Vista's Lot 10 30% 30% 30% 20% 10% 0% 20% 10% 3. Mira Vista Tire & Brake 35 40% 43% 54% 40% 37% 0% 17% 23% 4. Trevino's (Mexican Food) 27 30% 33% 41% 52% 52% 11% 22% 30% 5. Launderland & Fried Chicken 19 32% 47% 47% 58% 32% 5% 47% 32% 6. Honda Dealer 11 0% 27% 36% 45% 45% 9% 64% 91% 7. Bay Tackle Outlet 41 27% 44% 44% 32% 34% 0% 24% 51% 8. Food Mart 3 33% 67% 33% 0% 33% 0% 0% 0% 9. Freeway Motel 17 0% 6% 0% 0% 0% 12% 12% 6% 10. Church s Chicken 16 13% 19% 38% 31% 38% 13% 13% 25% 11. Jack-in-the-Box 26 23% 15% 23% 38% 31% 8% 27% 23% 12. Walgreens % 37% 45% 48% 50% 1% 22% 48% 13. Orchard Supply Hardware % 27% 32% 23% 26% 0% 36% 50% 14. NEK Insurance 18 39% 67% 61% 61% 67% 0% 0% 6% Total % 35% 40% 40% 41% 3% 28% 42% East of San Pablo Avenue 15. Del Norte Place 52 52% 58% 69% 71% 69% 0% 52% 44% 16. Liquor Store 7 29% 14% 57% 0% 0% 14% 71% 43% 17. Safeway (under construction) (279) 0 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 18. BART Parking 1 2,140 93% 96% 95% 95% 94% 4% 15% 24% Total 2,199 92% 94% 94% 94% 93% 4% 54% 44% Source: CHS Consulting Group, June Note: Parking occupancy above 85 percent is highlighted. 1. Include four parking lots and one garage. Figure 3 presents locations of off-street parking facilities and their peak occupancy rates. It shows that the off-street parking lots, except for BART parking lots and the garage, are underutilized most of the time even in peak periods. Page 13 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

16 Morris Ave Wall Ave Hagen Blvd Junction Ave Knott Ave Key Blvd Blvd Kearny St St Cutting Blvd El Cerrito del Norte San Pablo Pablo Ave Ave Elm St St 80 Hill St Eastshore Blvd Blake St Lexington Ave Ave Liberty St St LEGEND Study Boundary Occupancy Rate 0~50% 51~70% 71~85% 86~100% over 100% Potrero Ave Not to Scale CHS Consulting Group El Cerrito Parking Survey Study Figure 3 El Cerrito del Norte BART Station Area: Weekday Midday Off-Street Parking Occupancy

17 2.2.2 San Pablo Avenue Midtown The San Pablo Avenue Midtown section survey area includes San Pablo Avenue and parts of Kearney Street between Potrero Avenue in the north and Lincoln Avenue in the south, approximately 1.3 miles. San Pablo Avenue is known as the City of El Cerrito s Main Street and has a variety of businesses, including restaurants, medical offices, convenience stores, apparel stores, used car shops, and others. The Civic Center is also situated on San Pablo Avenue at the intersection with Manila Avenue. The parking survey in this sub-area was conducted around 12:00 p.m., which is considered the peak hour for many businesses, on a weekday and a weekend day, On-Street Parking There are 661 on-street parking spaces in this sub-area. Of these spaces, 25 percent (163 spaces) are on the west side of San Pablo Avenue, and 75 percent (498 spaces) are on the east side of San Pablo Avenue and along Kearney Street. Table 6 summarizes the midday on-street parking occupancy rates for each street segment in the sub-area. Figure 4 presents the weekday midday on-street parking occupancy conditions. The average occupancy rate in this sub-area is generally very low, with the exception of Kearney Street between Potrero and Madison Avenue. The occupancy rate on this section of Kearney Street is at 109 percent. The adjacent land uses include an elementary school and light industrial uses. Table 6 San Pablo Avenue Midtown: Midday On-Street Parking Occupancy Rates West Side of San Pablo Avenue East Side of San Pablo Avenue Kearney Street San Pablo Avenue Spaces Occupied Spaces Occupied Spaces Occupied Weekday Potrero St - Madison Ave 25 40% 26 15% % Madison Ave - Manila Ave 20 55% 27 15% 0 N/A Manila Ave - Schmidt Ln 16 69% 27 30% 58 29% Schmidt Ln - Moeser Ln 25 80% 27 33% 0 N/A Moeser Ln - Stockton Ave 28 36% 53 55% 96 50% Stockton Ave - Lincoln Ave 34 29% 47 53% 71 45% Total % % % Weekend Potrero St - Madison Ave 25 52% 26 0% 32 38% Madison Ave - Manila Ave 20 45% 27 4% 0 N/A Manila Ave - Schmidt Ln 16 38% 27 4% 58 12% Schmidt Ln - Moeser Ln 32 60% 27 48% 0 N/A Moeser Ln - Stockton Ave 21 21% 53 51% 96 54% Stockton Ave - Lincoln Ave 34 47% 47 74% 71 38% Total % % % Source: CHS Consulting Group, June Notes: Parking occupancy above 85 percent is highlighted. Page 15 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

18 Potrero Ave Potrero Ave Kearny St Cypress Ave Carlos Ave Kearny St Kearny St Madison Ave Madison Ave San Pablo Pablo Ave Ave Jefferson Ave Alameda Ave Manila Ave Bayview Ave Kearny St Schmidt Ln Orchard Ave Tehama Ave Portola Dr Moeser Ln 80 Burlingame Ave Kearny St St Waldo Ave LEGEND Study Boundary Occupancy Rate 0~50% 51~70% 71~85% 86~100% over 100% Plumas Ave Sutter Ave Santa Cruz Ave Huntington Ave Panama Ave Sacramento Ave Fresno Ave San Pablo Pablo Ave Ave Columbia Ave Van Fleet Ave San Jose Ave Kearny Kearny St St Stockton Ave Eureka Ave Lincoln Ave Not to Scale CHS Consulting Group El Cerrito Parking Survey Study Figure 4 San Pablo Avenue Mid-Section: Weekday Midday On-Street Parking Occupancy

19 Off-Street Parking There are 51 parking lots within the sub-area with a total of 1,624 parking spaces. Table 7 presents the average off-street parking occupancy rates by street segment during the weekday midday. Figure 5 presents the locations of these parking facilities and their weekday occupancy rates. The occupancy rate is the aggregated number of all off-street parking facilities by each street segment; the parking occupancy rate for each individual facility is presented in Appendix I. In general, occupancy rates for the off-street parking lots in this sub-area is very low: 50 to 52 percent on the west side of San Pablo Avenue during weekdays and weekends respectively, and 42 to 38 percent on the east side of San Pablo Avenue during weekdays and weekends respectively. Table 7 San Pablo Avenue Midtown: Midday Off-Street Parking Occupancy Rates West Side of San Pablo Avenue East Side of San Pablo Avenue San Pablo Avenue Spaces Occupied Spaces Occupied Weekday Potrero St - Madison Ave % 62 58% Madison Ave - Manila Ave 29 69% % Manila Ave - Schmidt Ln 90 36% % Schmidt Ln - Moeser Ln 56 41% % Moeser Ln - Stockton Ave 34 44% % Stockton Ave - Lincoln Ave 71 42% 94 56% Total % 1,206 42% Weekend Potrero St - Madison Ave % 62 23% Madison Ave - Manila Ave 29 48% % Manila Ave - Schmidt Ln 90 28% 119 6% Schmidt Ln - Moeser Ln 56 45% % Moeser Ln - Stockton Ave 34 56% % Stockton Ave - Lincoln Ave 71 51% 94 64% Total % 1,206 38% Source: CHS Consulting Group, June Page 17 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

20 Potrero Ave Potrero Ave Cypress Ave Carlos Ave Madison Ave Madison Ave San Pablo Pablo Ave Ave Jefferson Ave Alameda Ave Manila Ave Bayview Ave Schmidt Ln Orchard Ave Tehama Ave Portola Dr Moeser Ln 80 Burlingame Ave Kearny St St Waldo Ave LEGEND Study Boundary Occupancy Rate 0~50% 51~70% 71~85% 86~100% over 100% Plumas Ave Sutter Ave Santa Cruz Ave Huntington Ave Panama Ave Sacramento Ave Fresno Ave San Pablo Pablo Ave Ave Columbia Ave Van Fleet Ave San Jose Ave Kearny Kearny St St Stockton Ave Eureka Ave Lincoln Ave Not to Scale CHS Consulting Group El Cerrito Parking Survey Study Figure 5 San Pablo Avenue Mid-Section: Weekday Midday Off-Street Parking Occupancy

21 2.2.3 El Cerrito Plaza BART Station Area Like the del Norte Station Area, the Plaza Station Area is also defined as a quarter mile from the El Cerrito Plaza BART Station, bounded by Lincoln Avenue to the north, San Pablo Avenue to the west, the City Limit to the south, and Norvell Street and Behrens Street to the east. Land use east of the BART tracks is predominantly single-family residential houses. West of the BART tracks and south of Fairmount Avenue is the El Cerrito Plaza shopping mall, which includes approximately 350,000 square feet of commercial developments (including Bed Bath & Beyond, JoAnn Fabrics, Lucky Stores, Trader Joe s, etc) and 1,318 surface parking spaces. The area north of Fairmount Avenue largely consists of multi-family buildings and some single family houses. On the western borders of the survey area and along San Pablo Avenue there are mostly small- to medium-size retail businesses. The majority of the residential streets in this area have a 4-hour parking restriction. Appendix II includes a map of the RPP zone with a 4-hour parking time restriction in this area. The parking survey in this sub-area was conducted around 12:00 p.m., which is considered the peak hour for many businesses, on a weekday and a weekend day. On-Street Parking There are 1,051 on-street parking spaces in the sub-area. Of these spaces, 43 percent (429 spaces) are designated as the RPP zone and 57 percent (622 spaces) are available for public parking with no time restriction. Table 8 summarizes the parking occupancy rates for each street in this sub-area. Figure 6 presents the Plaza Station Area and the weekday on-street parking conditions. As shown in Table 8, the overall on-street parking occupancy rate in this sub-area is generally very low in the RPP zone, but moderately high in the non-rpp zone during midday on a weekday. On weekends, the on-street parking occupancy rates were generally very low, averaging 56 percent or less. The highest midday parking occupancy occurred on the east side of Liberty Street (112 percent occupancy rate) followed by the west side of Richmond Street (103 percent occupancy rate). Both Liberty Street and Richmond Street run adjacent to the BART parking lots, and these block spaces currently have no time restriction. On the other hand, the midday parking occupancy rates on the opposite side of Liberty Street and Richmond Street, where there are no time restrictions, were substantially lower (slightly more than 50 percent). At the request of City staff, CHS Consulting Group conducted a second parking surveys at 2:00 p.m. on Thursday July 14 th and Saturday July 16 th on San Pablo Avenue between Lincoln and Fairmount Avenues, in order to capture the midday parking demand generated by the Cerrito Theater, which has matinee shows typically starting at 1:30 p.m. The parking occupancy rates observed at 2:00 p.m. were slightly lower than those observed at 12:00 p.m. 9 This indicates that the theater operation has little impact on the parking demand generation in this area. 9 The area was 56 percent occupied at 2:00 p.m., as compared to 68 percent at 12:00 p.m. on a weekday, and the area was 63 percent occupied at 2:00 p.m. as compared to 65 percent at 12:00 p.m. on a weekend. Page 19 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

22 Table 8 El Cerrito Plaza BART Station Area: Midday On-Street Parking Occupancy Rates RPP Zone Non-RPP Zone Street Spaces Weekday Weekend Spaces Weekday Weekend West Side of BART Tracks Fairmount Avenue 0 0% 0% 66 70% 32% Central Street 0 0% 0% 42 90% 69% Lincoln Avenue 17 11% 5% 22 69% 28% San Pablo Avenue 0 0% 0% 88 53% 72% Kearney Street 39 74% 51% 37 84% 62% Lexington Street 37 70% 51% 37 84% 81% Liberty Street 37 54% 35% % 60% Willow Street 7 29% 14% 24 79% 38% Oak Street 15 60% 20% 19 95% 32% Total % 38% % 56% East Side of BART Tracks Fairmount Avenue 0 0% 0% 30 63% 23% Central Street 14 36% 14% 0 0% 0% Lincoln Avenue 16 33% 33% 37 81% 24% Elm Street 10 10% 60% 11 18% 45% Richmond Street 36 53% 50% % 46% Everett Street 36 42% 33% 40 98% 50% Norvell Street 43 28% 23% 46 72% 39% Coronado Street 30 30% 50% 0 0% 0% Tahoe Place 20 20% 15% 0 0% 0% Victoria Street 30 10% 20% 0 0% 0% Behrens Street 42 36% 40% 42 57% 50% Total % 34% % 40% Source: CHS Consulting Group, June Note: RPP = Residential Parking Permit Page 20 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

23 Norvell St St Richmond Richmond St St Everett St St Lincoln Ave Lexington Lexington Ave Ave Liberty St St San Pablo Pablo Ave Ave Kearny St St San Jose Ave Willow St Central Ave El Dorado St El Cerrito Plaza Fairmount Ave Central Ave Victoria St St Coronado St St Tahoe Pl LEGEND Study Boundary Occupancy Rate 0~50% 51~70% 71~85% 86~100% over 100% Not to Scale CHS Consulting Group El Cerrito Parking Survey Study Figure 6 El Cerrito Plaza BART Station Area: Weekday Midday On-Street Parking Occupancy

24 On-Street Parking Duration A parking duration survey was conducted in the residential streets east of the BART tracks. The last four digits of vehicle license plate numbers were recorded at 8:00 a.m., 1:00 p.m., and at 4:00 p.m. The results of the weekday parking duration survey are summarized in Table 9. Of the 262 cars that parked at 8:00 a.m., about 30 percent (79 vehicles) parked for less than five hours and about 60 percent (183 vehicles) parked over eight hours, past 4 p.m. Similarly, of the total 111 cars that arrived and parked between 8:00 a.m. and 1:00 p.m., about 33 percent (37 cars) parked less than three hours and nearly 67 percent (74 vehicles) parked over three hours, past 4:00 p.m. These survey results suggest that a substantial portion (approximately 58 to 67 percent) of on-street parking spaces may be used by the commuters for their long-term parking needs. Table 9 El Cerrito Plaza BART Station Area: On-Street Parking Duration Section Cars Parked Before 8AM Left Before 1PM Left Between 1PM and 4PM Remained After 4PM 1. Lincoln Ave 23 30% 13% 57% 2. Willow Street 11 18% 27% 55% 3. Central Ave 2 50% 0% 50% 4. Fairmount Ave 21 24% 0% 76% 5. Tahoe Place 4 25% 0% 75% 6. Elm Street 4 25% 25% 50% 7. Richmond Street 58 22% 24% 53% 8. Everett Street 52 35% 13% 52% 9. Norvell Street 33 33% 6% 61% 10. Coronado Street 12 33% 0% 67% 11. Victoria Street 7 29% 0% 71% 12. Behrens Street 35 37% 9% 54% Total % 13% 58% Section Cars Parked Between 8AM and 1PM Left Between 1PM and 4PM Remained After 4PM 1. Lincoln Ave 18 6% 94% 2. Willow Street 2 100% 0% 3. Central Ave 4 50% 50% 4. Fairmount Ave 5 80% 20% 5. Tahoe Place 0 0% 0% 6. Elm Street 0 0% 0% 7. Richmond Street 18 28% 72% 8. Everett Street 18 44% 56% 9. Norvell Street 24 21% 79% 10. Coronado Street 4 0% 100% 11. Victoria Street 1 0% 100% 12. Behrens Street 17 59% 41% Total % 67% Source: CHS Consulting Group, 2011 Page 22 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

25 Off-Street Parking There are 29 parking lots within the Plaza Station Area, including three BART parking lots, with a total of 2,679 parking spaces. Table 10 summarizes the weekday and weekend midday parking occupancy rates for each parking lot in this sub-area. The locations of these parking facilities and their weekday midday occupancy conditions are presented in Figure 7. Overall, the average midday parking occupancy rates are low both east and west of San Pablo Avenue and during weekday and weekend midday hours. However, off-street parking occupancy rates varied widely depending on the business(es) the parking lot serves. The three BART parking lots have the highest weekday parking occupancy rate, at 100 percent. The Peet s Coffee & Tea parking lot and the Sunrise Cleaners parking lot (which is shared with several other businesses) also showed occupancy rates above 90 percent. On weekends, the BART parking occupancy rate is substantially lower than on a weekday. The parking occupancy rate at the El Cerrito Plaza shopping center was higher on weekends (81 percent) than on weekdays (58 percent). Table 10 El Cerrito Plaza BART Station Area: Midday Off-Street Parking Occupancy Rates West of San Pablo Avenue East of San Pablo Avenue Business Spaces Weekday Weekend Business Spaces Weekday Weekend 1. Speed Oil Change 8 38% 0% 1. Rob's Automobile 17 0% 53% 2. KFC 17 41% 53% 2. Sunrise Cleaners 25 92% 92% 3. Burger King 32 38% 28% 3. L&L Chinese Rest. Construction (18 spaces) 4. Pacific East 4. Nation's Restaurant 34 38% 74% Medical 16 44% 19% 5. Quality Tune-Up 20 55% 50% 5. Cerrito Theater 11 9% 36% 6. ACE Hardware 51 27% 33% 6. Therapy 5 80% 20% 7. ACE Emp. Parking 21 57% 24% 7. Vacuum World 10 50% 50% 8. Mattress Disc, etc 51 20% 61% 8. Liquor Store 9 11% 44% 9. Payless 16 38% 63% 9. Mechanics Bank 39 21% 26% 10. Peet's Coffee&Tea 16 94% 75% 10. Chase Bank 62 29% 19% 11. Wells Fargo Bank 41 71% 85% 12. Pier 1 Import 42 14% 24% 13. Romano s 23 61% 70% 14. Tire Shop 14 86% 86% 15. Dream World 27 70% N/A El Cerrito Plaza 2 1,318 58% 81% 17. Fairmount Auto Service 12 42% 25% 18. Auto Repair Shop 5 20% 60% 19. BART % 38% Total % 48% 2,413 68% 63% Source: CHS Consulting Group, 2011 Notes: 1. Parking lot is locked on weekends. 2. Parking occupancy represents the overall parking occupancy rate for the entire El Cerrito Plaza. In general, parking lots directly fronting stores are nearly full while more remote and bigger parking lots have very low occupancy rates. 3. Includes three BART parking lots. Page 23 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

26 Norvell St St Richmond Richmond St St Everett St St Lincoln Ave Lexington Lexington Ave Ave Liberty St St San Pablo Pablo Ave Ave Kearny St St San Jose Ave Willow St Central Ave El Dorado St El Cerrito Plaza Fairmount Ave Central Ave El Cerrito Shopping Plaza LEGEND Study Boundary Occupancy Rate 0~50% 51~70% 71~85% 86~100% over 100% Not to Scale CHS Consulting Group El Cerrito Parking Survey Study Figure 7 El Cerrito Plaza BART Station Area: Weekday Midday Off-Street Parking Occupancy

27 2.3 Conclusions Based on the surveys conducted for this study, the following is a summary of key findings: The BART parking facilities in both El Cerrito del Norte and El Cerrito Plaza Stations operate at their full capacity during the weekday periods; however, these parking facilities are only 20 to 30 percent full on weekends. It is evident that BART commuters are using the residential streets in the vicinity of the El Cerrito Plaza BART Station. In the El Cerrito del Norte BART Station Area, the weekday midday parking occupancy was substantially higher in the street segments where there are no time restrictions. This indicates that potential commuter parking spillover may be occurring in the sub-area. If resident concerns rise, a detailed vehicle duration study along residential streets may be warranted. In the vicinity of the two BART stations, the weekday midday parking occupancy tends to be substantially higher in the street segments without time restriction than those within RPP zones with 4-hour time restrictions. However, the overall on-street parking occupancy remains fairly low in both sub-areas. During the weekday periods, except for the BART parking facilities, there is a sufficient number of on-street and off-street parking spaces to meet parking demand in each survey area. The survey shows there are several underutilized parking spaces along San Pablo Avenue. (e.g. Moeser Lane Shopping Mall, El Cerrito DMV, and Big 5 parking lots). The overall parking occupancy rates for all three sub-areas are generally low. This may reflect current economic conditions. This situation will be assessed in the next step of the parking study. Page 25 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

28 3.0 BEST PRACTICE EXAMPLES Given the strong emphasis placed on TODs in many states since 1990s, several jurisdictions across the U.S. have successfully implemented or are in the process of implementing TODs near transit centers. Innovative parking management strategies and parking policies have played a vital role for the success of these TODs. CHS Consulting selected six different cities with successful TODs and reviewed their transportation and parking management strategies. These cities include the Cities of Hayward, Oakland, Mountain View, and Redwood City in Northern California, the City of Pasadena in Southern California, and the City of Portland in Oregon. The majority of these cities (four out of six) were selected from the San Francisco Bay Area for the purpose of this study, as understanding the feasibility of parking and transportation policies and their application are highly dependent on the context of settings and specific site characteristics, such as the type of transit services provided in the TOD, land use density, and etc. Like El Cerrito, all four cities from the San Francisco Bay Area are served by heavy rail (i.e., Bay Area Rapid Transit or Caltrain) and local bus systems, and they have implemented or are in the process of implementing TOD projects near transit centers. In addition, the cities of Pasadena in Southern California and Portland in Oregon are considered because they have developed some of the nation s most creative techniques for managing parking and traffic in their TODs. These cities have adopted a total of 26 transportation and parking management strategies (Table 11). All six cities have reduced parking requirements for TODs and also provide shared parking provisions. The second tier strategies that many (but not all) of these cities have adopted include parking pricing, in-lieu parking fees, parking benefits districts, and maximum parking requirements. Each of these strategies was presented to the El Cerrito City Council on July 18, 2011, and they are also included in Appendix III. Page 26 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

29 Table 11 Best Practice Examples: Parking Management Strategies and Policies Transportation & Parking Strategies Hayward Oakland Mountain View Redwood City Pasadena Portland 1 Reduced Parking Near Transit/ TOD Zoning Overlay 2 Elimination of Minimum Parking 3 Shared Parking 4 Flexible Parking Space Size 5 In-Lieu Payment 6 Transportation Demand Management Program 7 Credit Bicycle & Motorcycle Parking 8 Universal Transit Pass 9 Parking Cash Out 10 CarSharing Program 11 Unbundled Parking 12 Market Rate BART Parking 13 Metered Parking 14 Parking Benefit District 15 Remote Parking for BART 16 Transit Discounts/Preferential Parking for Car/Vanpool 17 Attended Parking 18 Parking Exemption 19 Flexible Zone 20 Innovative Parking/Site Design 21 Parking Maximum 22 On-Street Parking Credit 23 No New Surface Parking 24 TOD Property Tax Exemption 25 Free Rail Zone 26 Establish Transportation Management Association Page 27 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

30 4.0 DEVELOPMENT OF PARKING REQUIREMENTS This section summarizes the evaluation of future parking demand and suggestions for parking requirements for TOD projects in El Cerrito. 4.1 Considerations For the consideration of future parking requirements, CHS Consulting tested parking rates from five different sources, including the City of El Cerrito s existing parking code provisions, inputs from local developers, outputs from the Metropolitan Transportation Commission s (MTC) Smart Growth Parking Demand Model, national average of parking demands, and the best practice examples from eight different cities with successful TOD projects across the United States. A. Existing City Codes Under the current zoning codes, the City of El Cerrito requires a new development to provide a minimum number of required parking spaces for each land use on the project site. Multifamily residential developments are required to provide one parking space for each studio or 1-bedroom unit. Dwelling units with two or more bedrooms are required to provide a minimum of two parking spaces per unit in RD (Duplex Residential), RM (Multi-Family Residential), and CC (Community Commercial) zones and 1.5 parking spaces in TOM (Transit-Oriented Mixed Use) zones. Business services and retail sales are required to provide one parking space for every 300 square feet (sq. ft.) of gross floor area. These parking requirements can be reduced by 25 percent, if any portion of a lot is located within onequarter mile of a BART station. Moreover, additional parking reductions may be allowed by an approved shared parking arrangement, which allows parking spaces to be shared by multiple land uses with different peak hours of parking demand. The City of El Cerrito and AECOM have collaboratively selected ten development sites within four different study areas Del Norte, Midtown, Plaza North and El Cerrito Plaza. Development sites in Del Norte, Midtown and El Cerrito Plaza are zoned as TOM, and the development sites in Plaza North are zoned as CC. In addition, the development sites in Del Norte and El Cerrito Plaza are located within a quarter mile distance of a BART Station, qualifying for an additional 25 percent reduction in parking requirements. Table 12 summarizes the parking requirements for each study area. Table 12 City of El Cerrito s Existing Parking Codes Del Norte Midtown Plaza North Plaza Studio/1-bed Multi-Family bed Multi-Family Retail Office Source: El Cerrito Zoning Codes Chapter Off-Street Parking and Loading B. Developer s Interview As part of their market analysis, AECOM conducted interviews with four developers with local experience and knowledge: BRE Properties, Simeon Properties, Blake Hunt and Center Street Housing, and Matteson Development. These developers provided inputs on their perceived parking needs for each Page 28 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

31 study area. They indicated that, based on the proximity to BART Stations and other transit services, multi-family residential developments in the Del Norte area would need 1.35 parking spaces per unit, and those in the El Cerrito Plaza study area would need 1.5 parking spaces per unit. For the Midtown and the Plaza North study areas, they indicated two (2) parking spaces would be needed for each dwelling unit (or 1.5 spaces for live-work townhouse), because these areas are neither pedestrian/bike nor transit friendly: residents who commute by transit would still need a car for shopping and running errands. It is also anticipated that some 2-bedroom units would have two individuals living together, and this would require more than one parking space per unit. Table 13 summarizes the developers inputs on parking requirements. These rates are higher than the City s existing parking requirements by approximately 30 percent. Table 13 Parking Requirements from Developers Interviews Del Norte Midtown Plaza North Plaza Residential Live-work Townhouse 1.5 Source: Developer interviews, AECOM, 2011 C. MTC s Smart Growth Parking Demand Model The MTC s Smart Growth Parking Demand Model estimates the number of parking spaces required for an individual land use, incorporating factors such as the availability and accessibility of alternative modes of transportation, the peak time of use, and the ability to share parking. The model inputs a base parking demand rate which is developed for each land use category based on standard industry sources such as the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Urban Land Institute (ULI), and the other parking studies done in the San Francisco Bay Area. Then these rates were subsequently reduced by 1) mode split factors to account for trips made by residents and visitors who walk, bike or use public transit to reach their destination; 2) peak demand factors to capture the level of parking demand on a weekday midday period as opposed to the peak of daily demand; and 3) shared parking factors to address potential park-once opportunities facilitated by various land uses located in close proximity to each other. In order to account for distinct travel patterns associated with transit amenities and land use patterns within each study area, parking demand rates were developed for each area: del Norte, Midtown, Plaza North, and El Cerrito Plaza. The resulting parking demand rates were closely validated to match the parking data collected by CHS Consulting in May 2011, assuming the total number of observed cars parked on the street and in parking lots and garages represent the total demand for the study area land uses on a weekday midday period. Understanding that current economic conditions associated with the recent recession may not be representative of the typical conditions, it was assumed that the existing parking utilization is approximately 85 percent of what the study area can expect under stronger and more vibrant economic conditions 10. Table 14 presents the summary of resulting parking demand rates for each study area. These rates are lower than the City s existing parking requirements by approximately 15 percent for residential uses and by approximately 35 percent for retail and office uses. 10 It should be noted that the parking demand rates for retail in the Midtown and Plaza North areas showed lower rates than more transit-oriented Del Norte and El Cerrito Plaza study areas due to low parking occupancy; therefore, these rates were manually adjusted to match the level of demand in the Del Norte and the El Cerrito Plaza areas. Page 29 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

32 Table 14 MTC Smart Growth Parking Demand Model Del Norte Midtown Plaza North Plaza Residential Retail Office Source: MTC Smart Growth Parking Demand Model, Wilbur Smith, 2007; CHS Consulting Group, 2011 D. National Average The ITE Parking Generation 3 rd Edition provides a national average of parking generation rates for different land uses based on sample surveys in suburban and urban locations. High-Rise Apartments in Central City, which typically have five or more levels (Land Use Code 222), require 1.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit. Residential Condominium/Townhouses in suburban settings (Land Use Code 230) require 1.7 parking spaces per dwelling unit. Office buildings in suburban locations require 3.4 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of floor area, and those in urban locations require 3 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of floor area (Land Use Code 701). Retail uses need 3.2 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of floor area on weekday periods in non-december months (Land Use Code 820). The parking demand for retail increases to 5.9 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of floor area on Saturdays in December. Table 15 presents the summary of these parking demand rates. It is noted that for the purpose of the El Cerrito Parking Study, the rates from urban locations (by national standard) are more comparable to El Cerrito; typical suburban locations in the U.S. have much lower density than the City of El Cerrito. These rates are higher than the City s existing parking requirements by approximately 25 percent for residential uses and by approximately 10 percent for retail and office uses. Table 15 National Average of Parking Demand Rates Suburban Urban Residential Office Non-December Weekday December Saturday Retail Source: ITE Parking Generation 3rd Edition E. Best Practices Examples As part of Task 1 of the El Cerrito del Norte BART Station TOD Study and the San Pablo Avenue Development Feasibility Study, CHS Consulting Group conducted research on best practice examples of different cities with successful TODs. These cities include Berkeley, Oakland, Hayward, Union City, Mountain View, Redwood City, Pasadena, and Portland. Table 16 presents the minimum parking requirements each of these cities has adopted for TODs. It should be noted that the City of Pasadena set the maximum parking requirements at the same rates as the minimum requirements, and Redwood City s maximum parking requirements are twice their minimum requirements. In Portland, for most commercial office developments served by transit, the maximum parking ratio is 3.4 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Lloyd District (in Portland) supported this policy by even lowering its maximum ratio to 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. Page 30 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

33 Table 16 Best Practice Examples of Parking Requirements Hayward Downtown S.Hayward /Mission Bl Oakland Mt. View Redwood City Pasadena Portland Berkeley Union City Studio/ 1- bed MF / bed MF Retail Office Source: Parking codes of different cities Notes: MF= Multi-Family Residential 4.2 Testing of Different Parking Requirement Scenarios Based on the parking rates obtained from the above five sources, CHS Consulting tested four different sets/scenarios of parking ratios to illustrate differences in potential parking demand and supply. The results of these tests were used by AECOM to test economic viability of the proposed land developments at the ten opportunity sites and were used in a dialogue with the City staff to determine what types of modifications to the current parking requirements may be appropriate for City s action. Scenario #1: Based on City s Existing Code Requirements The first scenario is based on the City s existing parking code requirements. These rates (Table 17) are identical to those presented in Table 12 above and are presented for comparison purposes. Table 17 Parking Rates Scenario #1 Del Norte Midtown Plaza North Plaza Studio/1-bed Multi-Family bed Multi-Family Retail Office Source: El Cerrito Zoning Codes Chapter Off-Street Parking and Loading Scenario #2: Based on City s Existing Code Requirements and Developers Interviews Scenario #2 combines the City s existing code provisions for studio, 1-bedroom residential units, and retail and office uses, with the developers inputs on dwelling units with two or more bedrooms (Table 13). It should be noted that during the interviews, the developers provided parking demand rates for residential uses only and did not provide inputs for retail or office uses. Moreover, the developers did not differentiate parking ratios for studio/1-bedroom units and two or more bedroom units. Therefore, for the purpose of this analysis it is assumed that the developers inputs are for dwelling units with two or more bedrooms. Page 31 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

34 Table 18 Parking Rates Scenario #2 Del Norte Midtown Plaza North Plaza Studio/1-bed Multi-Family bed Multi-Family Retail Office Source: El Cerrito Zoning Codes Chapter 19.24; Developers interviews, AECOM, 2011 Note: Changes from the City s existing codes are in bold. Scenario #3: Based on MTC s Smart Growth Parking Demand Model and Best Practice Examples Scenario #3 includes the parking rates obtained from the City of Oakland s parking code provisions for S- 15 zones (i.e. TOD zones), which require 0.5 parking spaces for each dwelling unit, and Redwood City s parking codes for studio apartments in the Downtown Parking Zone (0.8 spaces per unit). The outputs from the MTC s Smart Growth Parking Demand Model are used for the remaining uses (Table 19). Table 19 Parking Rates Scenario #3 Del Norte Midtown Plaza North Plaza Studio/1-bed Multi-Family bed Multi-Family Retail Office Source: El Cerrito Zoning Codes Chapter 19.24; MTC s Smart Growth Parking Demand Model Note: Changes from the City s existing codes are in bold. Scenario #4: Based on Best Practice Examples Aggressive parking rates used in other San Francisco Bay Area cities are included in Scenario #4. Parking requirements for residential uses in the Del Norte and the El Cerrito Plaza areas are obtained from the City of Oakland s and Redwood City s parking provisions (stated above). Two or more bedroom units in the Midtown and the Plaza North are obtained from the City of Hayward s parking code provisions for residential development in the Downtown Core Area Specific Plan Area (1 space per unit). Parking codes for retail and office uses are obtained from the City of Berkeley s parking requirements in the Central Commercial District. These rates are summarized in Table 20. Table 20 Parking Rates Scenario #4 Del Norte Midtown Plaza North Plaza Studio/1-bed Multi-Family bed Multi-Family Retail Office Source: Parking codes of different cities Note: Changes from the City s existing codes are in bold. Page 32 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

35 4.3 Future Parking Supply Estimations Based on the four scenarios presented above and the land use development programs proposed by AECOM, CHS Consulting estimated future parking supply for each study area. AECOM proposed multiple scenarios with varying densities in each project site. Tables 21 and 22 present summaries of parking supply estimation for the minimum-density and the maximum-density scenarios, respectively, using the parking ratios developed under four scenarios above. Table 21 Minimum Density Scenario: Parking Supply Estimation Study Area Residential (du) Commercial (ksf) Scenario #1 Scenario #2 Scenario #3 Scenario #4 Del Norte 1, Midtown Plaza North Plaza Total 2, ,903 4,187 3,102 2,286 Source: AECOM, 2011; CHS Consulting Group, 2011 Notes: du=dwelling unit; ksf=1,000 square fteet Table 22 Maximum Density Scenario: Parking Supply Estimation Study Area Residential (du) Commercial (ksf) Scenario #1 Scenario #2 Scenario #3 Scenario #4 Del Norte 2, Midtown Plaza North Plaza Total 3, ,171 6,564 4,830 3,549 Source: AECOM, 2011; CHS Consulting Group, 2011 Notes: du=dwelling unit; ksf=1,000 square fteet Tables 23 and 24 show future developments would generate fewer parking spaces if the City modifies its parking requirements based on those tested under scenarios 3 and 4; however, they will generate more parking spaces if City modifies its parking requirements based on scenario #2. Under Scenario #2, which uses the rates suggested by developers, the total required parking spaces would increase by six to seven percent (284 to 393 spaces depending on the scenario) compared to the existing code provision. Under Scenario #3, which uses the rates from MTC s Smart Growth Parking Demand Model, the total required parking spaces would be reduced by more than 20 percent (801 to 1,341 spaces depending on the scenario) compared to the existing code provision. Lastly, under Scenario #4, which uses one of the most aggressive parking rates adopted in other cities, the total required parking spaces would be reduced by more than 40 percent (1,617 to 2,622 spaces depending on the scenario) compared to the existing code provision. Page 33 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

36 Table 23 Minimum Density Scenario: Net Reductions Compared to Existing Codes Study Area Scenario #1 Scenario #2 Scenario #3 Scenario #4 Del Norte ,195 Midtown Plaza North Plaza Total ,617 % Reduction 0 7% -21% -41% Source: AECOM, 2011; CHS Consulting Group, 2011 Table 24 Maximum Density Scenario: Net Reductions Compared to Existing Codes Study Area Scenario #1 Scenario #2 Scenario #3 Scenario #4 Del Norte ,987 Midtown Plaza North Plaza Total ,341-2,622 % Reduction 0 6% -22% -42% Source: AECOM, 2011; CHS Consulting Group, Recommended Parking Requirements Among the four scenarios tested above, CHS Consulting recommends that Scenario #3 be considered as the basis for potential parking code modifications in the near future for the following reasons: 1 Scenario #3 would accomplish the City s goals of implementing TODs that are financially viable for the future opportunity development sites. 2 Current parking occupancy rates are substantially lower than what is considered a threshold (85%) for parking shortage, which suggests an over supply based on the existing parking code. Scenario #3 would cause a reduction of future parking supply by approximately 20 percent. Parking requirements under scenario #3 are considered more aggressive, but more sustainable than the existing parking codes. With the provision of these parking requirements, it is anticipated that average parking occupancy rates at the new parking facilities would not be substantially higher or closer to 85 percent, than we see today, and these requirements will not cause significant parking impacts. In addition, the City may consider even more aggressive parking requirements, such as in those tested in Scenario #4, in the future, if the results of implementing scenario #3 are positive and effective. While the recommended parking requirements are intended to be the minimum requirements 11, it is important that the City of El Cerrito adopt supporting policies which further aim to reduce parking foot prints. These policies and parking strategies should provide a combination of incentives to take alternative modes of transportation, and disincentives to own, drive, and park a car. Options include, but 11 CHS Consulting initially proposed to set maximum parking requirements; however, city staff has indicated that implementing parking maximums may not be feasible in El Cerrito at the present time. Page 34 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

37 are not limited to, setting the maximum parking requirements (or at a minimum a criterion for allowing developers to provide more than the code requirement), providing unbundled parking, increasing bike parking requirements, implementing TDM programs, allowing parking requirements to be met off-site (in-lieu parking), etc. These policies and strategies will be further discussed in the next phase of the study, Development of Parking Strategies. Page 35 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

38 5.0 PARKING MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES AND EXAMPLES While the suggested parking ratios would significantly reduce parking supply for future developments compared to the existing code provisions, it is important that the City of El Cerrito adopts supporting policies which aim to reduce parking demand so that reducing parking supply would not cause parking impacts. CHS Consulting recommends the following 15 parking management strategies for consideration. Each of these strategies is discussed in detail below, and they are summarized in Table 24 with recommendations for priority for action and their effectiveness. These management strategies are recommended to accomplish the following goals: 1 Reduce parking demand for the new land developments; 2 Reduce parking impacts and demand near the BART stations and adjacent neighborhoods. 5.1 Unbundle Parking Description: Unbundle Parking means that parking spaces are rented or sold separately from building space so occupants only pay for the parking they actually need. Developers can make some or all parking optional when selling dwelling and or retail/office units. Informal unbundling can also be encouraged by helping to create a secondary market for available spaces. Potential Benefits: Increase housing affordability for those who do not need or want parking spaces; discourage car ownership, could potentially provide surplus parking to BART patrons. Potential Costs: Incur administration costs; could potentially cause parking spillover problems in the area if free on-street parking is available nearby. Feasibility: This strategy may affect the marketability of residential units without parking; however, effective marketing on lower housing costs and an easy access to carsharing services and other transitfriendly amenities would likely offset its costs. Examples: In keeping with the city s Transit First Policy, the City of San Francisco has enacted unbundled parking requirements in several neighborhoods such as in Rincon Hill, and the Market/Octavia neighborhood. The Rincon Hill Area Plan, adopted in 2005, requires off-street parking space to be sold or rented separately from residential units and commercial spaces for the life of a dwelling or commercial space. Similarly, the Market/Octavia Area Plan which was enacted in 2007 requires that parking costs should be transparent and disaggregated from residential or commercial rents. Moreover, in an effort to further expand these unbundled parking policies, in 2008 the City of San Francisco required all residential developments with 10 or more dwelling units in DRT, C-03, RTO and NCT districts to unbundle parking cots from housing costs. Redwood City also requires multi-family residential buildings or complexes with fewer parking spaces than dwelling units to lease or sell its parking spaces separately from the rental or purchase fees for dwelling units for the life of the dwelling units. References: City of San Francisco, Zoning Ordinance, Section 167 (2008) City of San Francisco, Rincon Hill Area Plan (2005) City of San Francisco, Market/Octavia Area Plan (2007) Redwood City, Downtown Precise Plan (2011) Page 36 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

39 Hour Paid Parking Description: The majority of residential streets in the El Cerrito del Norte and the El Cerrito Plaza BART station areas are within a RPP zone with a four-hour parking time restriction. In general, the City designates one side of the streets as a RPP zone with 4-hour time restriction and the other side of street is available for public parking without limitation. Parking survey results indicate that the parking occupancy in non-rpp zones is significantly higher (86 percent) than those in RPP zones (49%), indicating that commuters are using the residential streets (in non-rpp zones) for free without any time restriction. In particular, the curb spaces surrounding the BART station, which does not have any time limit, is occupied at 100 percent. In order to discourage BART commuters from parking their cars on the street, the City should consider at least charging these commuters at the same rate as they pay at the BART parking facilities by installing 10-hour paid parking in the on-street parking spaces immediately surrounding the BART station and potentially in non-rpp parking spaces in the residential areas near each BART station. On-street parking fees should be established to maintain 85 percent occupancy at all times. In addition, the on-street parking spaces fronting commercial uses along Fairmount Avenue near the El Cerrito Plaza BART station should be made available for the shoppers at all times by restricting parking duration and or increasing hourly parking rate. Potential Benefits: Generates additional revenue to the City to pay for enforcement costs and other parking strategies; retains on-street parking capacity for BART patrons. Potential Costs: Capital costs for meters and maintenance and enforcement costs; cause inconvenience to the affected residents. Feasibility: There are currently 615 parking spaces in the non-rpp zones. Converting these spaces into a 10-hour meter zone would generate additional revenue of up to $263,000 a year for the City from parking revenue alone (not including citations). The City may use this revenue to pay for other parking strategies. It is likely that the enforcement costs are to be paid by citations. Examples: The MacArthur BART Station Transit Village project in the City of Oakland would replace the existing 618-space surface BART parking lot with 675 new residential units and up to 49,000 square feet of neighborhood-serving retail and commercial uses. The project would provide a total of 1,000 structured parking spaces, of which 300 spaces would be reserved for BART patrons and 700 spaces would be reserved for residents and commercial uses. As a result, the BART patrons would face a loss of up to 318 parking spaces due to this project. In order to accommodate additional BART patrons parking, the City is considering providing approximately forty 10-hour metered parking spaces on the streets immediately adjacent to the station. This strategy is expected to provide additional parking supply for BART patrons and a significant revenue stream to the City that could be used for improvements in the neighborhood. References: City of Oakland, MacArthur BART Station Access Feasibility Study, Fehr & Peers (2008) Page 37 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

40 5.3 Charge BART Patrons for On-Street Parking via Permit Description: This strategy recommends that, as an alternative to installing 10-hour parking meters in non- RPP zones (Section 4.6), the City may consider converting all residential streets into a permit-required parking zone. This would require BART patrons, who currently park for free in non-rpp zones, to pay for their fair share of parking fees. Number of permits issued should not cause average midday peak occupancy to exceed 85 percent. Potential Benefits: Generates additional revenue (through paid parking and citations) to the City to pay for enforcement costs and other parking strategies; retains (or increases) on-street parking capacity for BART patrons; potential impacts on residents would be minimal on weekdays. Potential Costs: Administration costs, and enforcement costs. Feasibility: There are currently 615 parking spaces in non-rpp zones. By requiring a purchase of monthly permit to park on these streets (e.g., $84 per month), the City may generate an additional revenue of up to $527,000 a year. 5.4 Increase BART Parking Fees Description: BART currently charges $1 a day or $42 a month for parking. These rates should be increased to $2 and $84 in the near future, respectively. The existing daily parking rate ($1) is significantly lower than the market-rate of $10 a day charged in the adjacent private parking lot at the El Cerrito del Norte Station. With the increase of the daily parking fee to $2, the monthly permit fee should be increased as well in order to encourage BART patrons to purchase daily permits, instead of monthly permits which induce more driving. The monthly parking fee can be raised up to $84 a month. Potential Benefits: Generate additional revenue to BART, which can be used to support other parking strategies (e.g., free carpool parking, attended parking); discourage Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) usage. Potential Costs: Could shift some BART patrons to other stations such as Richmond, which offers free parking. Feasibility: This strategy would generate additional revenue of up to $384,000 a year for BART. However, the strategy would require a two-thirds vote from the BART Board. Initial conversation with BART staff indicated this would not be unreasonable. Examples: A daily parking fee of $2 is charged at major e BART stations such as the Daly City, tsouth San Francisco, San Bruno, Millbrae, and Colma BART stations. A monthly permit parking fee of $63 is offered at the Castro Valley, Ashby, Fruitvale, Pleasant Hill, and Dublin BART stations. In addition, the Lake Merritt, MacArthur, and Rockridge BART stations offer monthly a parking fee of $84 a month. Page 38 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

41 5.5 Establish A Joint Powers Association Description: A Joint Powers Association (JPA) would comprise representatives from the City of El Cerrito and BART. Through the formation of a JPA, the City and BART would collectively implement parking management strategies on BART and the City properties, decide on parking rates, collect parking revenues, and conduct enforcement. The revenues collected through the JPA would be used to enhance patron access to BART stations and to pay for parking management costs. Potential Benefits: Efficient management of on-street and off-street parking revenues and enforcement activities. Potential Costs: Incur administration costs. 5.6 Allow On-Street Parking to Meet Off-Street Parking Requirements Description: The parking survey results show that most on-street parking spaces in El Cerrito, except for those around the two BART stations, are substantially underutilized with an average occupancy rate of 40 percent. In order to maximize on-street parking utilization and minimize additional off-street parking spaces on project sites, on-street parking supply may be counted toward the total parking requirements on the site. This strategy would allow commercial developers who wish to not provide the minimum required parking spaces to claim adjacent on-street parking spaces. The spaces may be offered for free or in exchange for a set of contributions fees to the City. This program is similar to an in-lieu parking program in that that it allows developers to substitute the required off-street parking with on-street parking spaces in exchange for a fee. Potential Benefits: Efficient use of on-street parking spaces; reduce parking foot prints; generate potential revenue from (in-lieu) parking fees from developers for the use of on-street parking spaces. Potential Costs: Administration costs. Feasibility: Most of the City s existing on-street parking spaces are significantly underutilized except for the areas near the two BART stations. Therefore, this strategy would be effective for the developments in the San Pablo Avenue Midtown area, where the average on-street parking occupancy is very low. Implementation of supporting parking management strategies such as carsharing services, innovative bike-friendly site design, and increased bicycle parking requirements would enhance the feasibility. Examples: Redwood City requires developments in designated areas in Downtown to provide new streets where they are needed to improve pedestrian and bike access, as well as to distribute automobile trips in an efficient manner. In return, the City allows new on-street parking spaces provided on these new streets to be counted toward the minimum parking requirements for the adjacent property. Reference: Redwood City, Downtown Precise Plan (2011) City of Mountain View, Downtown Precise Plan (2004) City of Pasadena, Central District Specific Plan (2004) Page 39 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

42 5.7 CarShare Services Description: Carsharing services provide a fleet of vehicles available to members of a carsharing group. A membership fee costs approximately $50 to $100 a year, and the rental rates are based on a per-hour ($5 to $10 a hour) or per-mile basis (e.g., $0.35 per mile). The rental rates typically include insurance, fuel, and maintenance costs. A group membership to carshare services could be offered to all future TOD residents, free or paid by a portion of HOA dues or by the developer. As supporting strategies, BART and the City should provide carshare pods in a convenient walking distance from TODs, most likely in the BART parking lots, to discourage car ownership for residents and to allow BART patrons to use them for the remaining leg of their trip. Currently, there are three carshare pods are available in the El Cerrito Plaza BART station parking lot and none in the El Cerrito del Norte BART station. Depending on the projected demand in the future TODs, the number of carshare service could be expanded in both BART stations and other parts of the City. Potential Benefits: Discourage car ownership and usage; help ensure the success of unbundled parking strategy. Potential Costs: Depending on the number of carshare pods to be provided in each BART station parking lot, there would be a minimal loss of BART parking spaces. Feasibility: A group membership to carshare services could be offered to all residents free or at a substantially discounted price. The TMA could negotiate the terms with carshare service providers. 5.8 Bicycle and Pedestrian-Friendly Site Design and Aggressive Bicycle Parking Requirements Description: Project sites are situated in close proximity (some are immediately adjacent) to the Ohlone Greenway, a Class III designated bike path. An innovative site design that allows convenient and safe bike and pedestrian access from the Ohlone Greenway to the project site (e.g., sufficient lighting and improved streetscapes) would encourage walking and bike usage. In addition, the City may consider adopting more aggressive bicycle parking requirements. The City's current planning code requires 1 bicycle parking space to be provided for every 4 housing units (longterm) and 1 bicycle parking space for every 20 housing units (short-term). These bicycle parking requirements could be increased to promote enhanced bike amenities on the project site (e.g., 1 per 2 housing units). Potential Benefits: Provide convenient access via bike or walking. Potential Costs: None. Feasibility: More effective when combined with aggressive bike parking requirements to enable shuffling as needed during off-peak hours and upon patron return. Page 40 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

43 5.9 Credit Bicycle and Motorcycle Parking Description: Bicycle parking spaces may be counted toward the off-street parking requirements. Potential Benefits: Reduce vehicle footprints and encourage bicycle usage. Potential Costs: None. Feasibility: This strategy is more effective when combined with innovative, bicycle-friendly site design which promotes bicycle usage (Section 4.13). Example: The City of Hayward provides a credit for 1 vehicle parking space in exchange for each 4 bicycle spaces or 2 motorcycle parking spaces provided Transportation Demand Management Programs Description: Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs are designed to reduce the number of vehicle trips generated. TDM programs emphasize alternative commuting options, such as public transit, private shuttle services, biking, walking, and carpooling. A designated TDM coordinator would be in charge of helping people plan their trips using alternative modes of transportation, coordinating with and promoting 511 Regional Rideshare, promoting TDM programs, etc. By policy, the City of El Cerrito may require developments to establish TDM programs as part of conditions of approval for new development. Potential Benefits: Encourage the use of alternative modes of transportation. Potential Costs: No additional costs if TMA is established (Section 4.1). TMA staff could serve the role of a TDM coordinator. Feasibility: While this strategy is most effective for large-employer-based developments, in the case of TODs in El Cerrito, which consists mostly of residential uses, the TMA may implement selective TDM programs that cater to residential uses, such as assisting people with 511 Rideshare programs, ensuring safe pedestrian and bike access to each development site, etc Establish a Transportation Management Association Description: A Transportation Management Association (TMA) is a non-profit, membership based organization that provides transportation services for its participating members. They are generally public-private partnerships, consisting primarily of area businesses and or residents with local government support. For a mixed-use district, TMAs are typically funded through HOA dues or fees paid by the residents and business members. TMAs provide a variety of resources for local residents and business owners to encourage efficient use of transportation and parking resources. For example, TMA staff could implement Transportation Demand Management (TDM) programs (see Section 4.15); provide parking brokerage services to help residents and businesses share, trade, and lease parking spaces; produce and distribute user information; coordinate enforcement services; monitor parking problems, etc. Potential Benefits: Efficient implementation of the proposed parking management strategies. Page 41 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

44 Potential Costs: TMA operation costs Feasibility: The annual operating cost of a TMA would be approximately $115,000 with one full-time staff person or $220,000 with two staff persons. These costs are expected to be paid by Home Owners Association (HOA) contributions of $5 a month per each household or a membership contribution of $5 per 1,000 square feet (sq. ft.) of commercial use, which would generate annual revenue of approximately $186,130 under the minimum-density scenario or approximately $282,142 under the maximum-density scenario. The initial cost of establishing a TMA may be lower because a part-time (as opposed to a fulltime) TMA staff could sufficiently handle the required workload as long as the number of dwelling units is substantially smaller than the full-buildout condition. Detailed calculation of estimated revenues and operating costs for each strategy is presented in Appendix IV. Instead of establishing an independent TMA, the City may also consider partnering with 511 Contra Costa, which is a TMA serving jurisdictions in Contra Costa County. There are four regional planning committees, each serving the southwest, central, east and west regions. 511 Contra Costa is funded primarily by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District s Transportation Fund for Clean Air, and a half cent sales tax established by voters in Contra Costa offers free bicycle racks and lockers to employers, as well as workshops, training, and consultations to employers and employees on strategies and programs for reducing vehicle trips. Examples: The TMA of San Francisco was established in 1989 as a cooperative effort between the City and County of San Francisco and office building developers in the downtown area to reduce traffic and parking problems. The organization is privately funded and provides various transportation services to more than 45 business members and over 50,000 individual members, including online ride-matching, transit trip planning and referral, surveys, event planning, etc. Another example of a self-sustaining TMA is the Lloyd TMA in the Lloyd District in Portland, Oregon. In 1994, property owners and businesses within the Lloyd District initiated a partnership with the City and the regional transit agency, TriMet, to develop a comprehensive plan for the district which embraces TODs and resists urban sprawl. The Lloyd District Partnership Plan calls for several innovative transportation and parking strategies and the creation of Lloyd TMA as a local, non-profit business organization that would act as both a forum and catalyst to implement the Lloyd District Partnership Plan. The Lloyd TMA provides transportation programs and services to business owners; assists employees with commute options, and participates in advocacy at the local, regional, and state level on behalf of Lloyd District business members. Its operating costs are paid by revenues generated from on-street parking meters, and the sales of transit passes through the PASSport program. The PASSport program requires participating employers to purchase discounted annul transit passes for all qualified employees at their work site. The TMA coordinates all sales of the PASSport in the district and receives three percent of the total sales as a commission, which is used to fund the TMA operation. In order to provide an incentive for businesses to sell these transit passes, TriMet and the Lloyd TMA negotiated a partnership that linked the number of net new employee transit passes sold in the district to the provision of new transit service to the district. This program has significantly contributed to commuters mode change to transit and also has resulted in the addition of three new bus lines to the Lloyd District. References: Todd Litman, Parking Management Best Practices, Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2006) Rick Williams, Memorandum Re: Lloyd District Regional Center Plan and Progress, Rick Williams Consulting (2006) Lloyd District Transportation Management Association, Page 42 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

45 Martha Bianco, Evaluation of the Lloyd District Parking Programs: The Impacts of Parking Pricing and Transportation Management Association Programs in a High-Density, Mixed-Used District (1999) 5.12 Peer-to-Peer CarSharing Description: Peer-to-Peer CarSharing services allow an existing car owner to make their vehicle available for use to other drivers in their area in exchange for payment. The business model is similar to carshare services (Section 4.4) except that a fleet of carshare vehicles is replaced by the vehicles from participating owners. Potential Benefits: Encourage car shedding. Potential Costs: Incur administration costs. Feasibility: This strategy requires mass participation to be effective. The TMA could potentially facilitate and negotiate the terms with a San Francisco-based company, Getaround, and launch a pilot program in El Cerrito. Examples: While this program has long been widely popular in Europe, it has only recently been introduced to the U.S. market in the City of San Francisco and some northeastern cities (e.g., Boston and New York). A San Francisco-based company, Getaround recently launched its service for the residents of San Francisco. Getaround uses a web interface ( and mobile applications to facilitate person-to-person car rental. They offer a product called The Getaround Carkit, which enables keyless entry to a converted vehicle through the ability of a driver or renter to unlock a vehicle with a smartphone. Rental rates start at approximately $3 per hour including insurance costs, and owners can earn up to $10,000 a year. Reference: Getaround, (2011) The San Francisco Business Times, Peer-to-Peer car sharing startups cut in, August 5, Provide EcoPass for Residents Description: An EcoPass is a transit pass offered at a discount to a user based on a group rate. To make the program financially viable, the program would require a commitment from the residents to purchase, through an HOA, a set number of passes each month. The Alameda-Contra Costa Transit District (AC Transit) offers an Easy Pass program for residential communities where property managers can bulkpurchase transit passes for their residents at deeply discounted rates. The EasyPass program offers unlimited AC Transit service on local and Transbay routes to qualified residential communities and employers. Pricing for the EasyPass program ranges from $43 to $121 per person each year, depending on the number of participants and the level of transit services provided in the area. This represents a significant reduction in price compared to a fare of $80 a month for a 31-day pass. BART does not currently offer group discount passes; therefore, the TMA should work with the agency to initiate a pilot program for the study. Potential Benefits: Increase transit ridership; provide additional amenities and incentives for prospective tenants or buyers to not own a car. Page 43 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

46 Potential Costs: Increased administration costs, and cost of EcoPass subsidies if needed. Feasibility: Since AC Transit already has a program which allows residential communities with 100 or more units to apply for discounted transit passes (i.e., EasyPass), the proposed developments in El Cerrito (2,586 3,789 dwelling units) could easily apply for should apply for this program. BART does not currently offer group discount passes; the feasibility of this strategy is uncertain at this time. Examples: Numerous communities in the San Francisco Bay Area participate in AC Transit s Easy Pass program and other similar programs offered by local transit agencies. As of August 2010, the residents of Fourth & U Apartments in the City of Berkeley are offered an AC Transit Easy Pass at the annual price of $89 per person. The Pass is valid on all AC Transit services (including local and Transbay) for unlimited rides. References: AC Transit, Easy Pass Program for Residential Communities, Free BART Parking for Carpool and Vanpool Vehicles Description: BART currently provides preferential parking spaces to carpool/vanpool vehicles and charges a daily fee of $1, which is the same rate as SOVs. These spaces can be offered for free as an additional incentive to carpool or vanpool. While the SOV parking lot is usually full by 8:00 a.m., the carpool/vanpool parking lot is approximately half full by 10 a.m. (and full by noon), according to the 2008 BART survey. Depending on the projected demand, carpool/vanpool parking supply may be increased. Potential Benefits: Reduce SOV access to BART; encourage carpool/vanpool usage. Potential Costs: Loss of parking revenue (approximately $1,000/year per space) depending on the number of free carpool/vanpool parking spaces to be offered; increased enforcement and administration costs. Feasibility: Loss of parking revenue would be offset by the increased SOV parking rates. The effectiveness of this strategy is likely to be modest, and will depend on the price differential between the SOV and carpool/vanpool parking fees Attended Parking Description: Attended parking employs the service of a parking attendant who organizes efficient parking based on arrival and departure times. Unlike valet parking, where a valet parks a vehicle on arrival and retrieves the vehicle on departure, attended parking relies on organized parking queues. Drivers typically park and retrieve their own vehicles. Parking attendants in the garage would instruct patrons to park on a certain level and in tandem based on their planned return time. Attendants would retain keys to each vehicle to enable shuffling as needed during off-peak hours and upon patron return. Potential Benefits: Increased parking capacity on site by up to 35 percent 12 ; added security for patrons and their vehicles. 12 MacArthur BART Station Access Feasibility Study, Fehr and Peers (2008) Page 44 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

47 Potential Costs: Increased parking costs; increased administration costs; inconvenience to drivers. Feasibility: Estimated cost of approximately $101,000 for hiring two parking attendants on site could be paid by the increased parking revenue. Examples: Attended parking has been employed at Pleasant Hill and Richmond BART stations. Attended parking has significantly increased capacity in the parking facilities by up to 45 percent Summary The parking management strategies presented above are intended to reduce parking demand. Some of these strategies are designed to complement one another and have to be implemented together to be most effective. For example, an unbundled parking strategy would be feasible and highly effective when convenient carshare services and other bicycle and pedestrian-friendly amenities are present. It is also noted that some strategies would be more effective than others, and implementation priorities should be also considered based on feasibility and cost-effectiveness. Table 25 presents the summary of the parking management strategies in the order of implementation priority and effectiveness on reducing parking demand. Table 25 Summary of Parking Management Strategies Proposed Parking Strategies Priority Effectiveness 1. Unbundled Parking High High Hour Paid Parking High High 3. Charge BART Patrons for On-Street Parking High High 4. Increase BART Parking Fee High High 5. Establish Joint Powers Association High High 6. Allow On-Street Parking to Meet Off-Street Parking Requirements High Moderate 7. CarShare Services High Moderate 8. Innovative Site Design and Requirements to Promote Bike Usage High Low-Moderate 9. Credit Bicycle and Motorcycle Parking High Low-Moderate 10. Transportation Demand Management Program High Moderate 11. Establish a Transportation Management Association High Moderate 12. Peer-to-Peer CarSharing Moderate Low 13. EcoPass for Residents Low-Moderate High 14. Free Parking for Carpool/Vanpool Low Low 15. Attended Parking Low Low Page 45 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

48 6.0 CONCLUSIONS The City of El Cerrito s two BART stations serve as critical gateways for regional commuters. This has resulted in significant parking shortages in the BART stations and surrounding neighborhoods. On the other hand, the rest of El Cerrito provides a typical auto-oriented suburban streetscape where large and often underutilized surface parking lots adjoin a single land use. This unbalance of parking demand and supply exists throughout the City. In order to successfully implement TODs, it is essential that the City consider the relationship between the current parking requirements and the low parking occupancy conditions and how other cities promote TOD, and then develop a set of requirements and strategies that would facilitate the proposed TODs. A review of the City s current parking codes and the parking demand survey indicate that the City s minimum parking requirements exceed the level of parking demand, thus resulting in excess parking supply and low parking occupancy. Such parking codes also diminish the financial feasibility of future TOD projects due to increased costs of constructing parking facilities. CHS Consulting recommends that the City considers reducing its minimum parking requirements to reflect a realistic level of parking needs, which is approximately 20 percent less than the required number of parking spaces under the existing codes. These new requirements would reduce development costs while not causing parking impacts. It is also essential that the City invests in parking management tools which aim to reduce parking demand and avoid parking impacts rising from potential shortages of parking spaces. CHS Consulting recommends 15 parking management strategies that are intended to address the existing parking issues surrounding the two BART stations and to reduce parking demand throughout the City. These strategies would contribute significantly for the success of TODs. As these strategies are implemented, the City should also consider establishing in a subsequent phase criteria for the maximum parking allowable to further reduce parking footprints in the City. Page 46 El Cerrito Parking Study Final Report November 28, 2011

49 APPENDIX I PARKING SURVEY DATA

50 El Cerrito Del Norte BART Station Area

51 B A Y M E T R I C S ON-STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT EL CERRITO PARKING SURVEY SURVEY DATE: May 19, 2011 DAY: THURSDAY LOCATION EL CERRITO DEL NORTE AREA SURVEY TIME: 10:00 AM CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: WD-ON-10AM 1. On Wall Avenue a. West of San Pablo Av b. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St EL CERRITO DEL NORTE AREA On-Street Parking Summary Space Occupied Space Occupied top 11 9 top 5 3 Space Occupied % bottom 9 5 bottom On Wall Avenue % 2. On Knott Avenue a. West of San Pablo Av b. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St c. between Kearney St & Key Blvd d. between Key Blvd & Junction Av 2. On Knott Avenue Location Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied % top 0 0 top 6 2 top 3 3 top 4 2 bottom 4 7 bottom 3 2 bottom 6 7 bottom On Cutting Blvd % 3. On Cutting Blvd a. between I-80 EB On-Ramp & Peerless A b. between Peerless Av & San Pablo Av c. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St d. between Kearney St & Key Blvd 4. On Hill Street Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied % top 0 0 top 0 0 top 0 0 top bottom 0 0 bottom 0 0 bottom 0 0 bottom On Blake Street % e. between Key Blvd & Junction Av f. between Junction Av & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 6. On Eastshore Blvd top 5 5 left % bottom 4 4 right On Peerless Avenue 4. On Hill Street % a. between San Pablo Av & Lexington Av b. between Lexington Av & Liberty St c. between Liberty St & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 8. On San Pablo Avenue top 0 0 top top % bottom 0 0 bottom 6 5 bottom On Kearney Street 5. On Blake Street % a. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St b. between Kearney St & Lexington Av c. between Lexington Av & Liberty St d. between Liberty St & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 10. On Lexington Avenue top 3 0 top 5 2 top 10 8 top % bottom 6 0 bottom 3 0 bottom 9 7 bottom On Liberty Street 6. On Eastshore Blvd 7. On Peerless Avenue % a. between Potrero Av & Hill St a. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 12. On Elm Street left 0 0 left % right right On Key Blvd 8. On San Pablo Avenue % a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd c. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av d. between Knott Av & Wall Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 14. On Junction Avenue left 15 5 left 0 0 left 5 4 left % right 0 0 right 0 0 right 0 0 right On Kearney Street 10. On Lexington Avenue Overall a. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av b. North of Wall Av a. between Blake St & Hill St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Space Occupied % left 5 5 left 7 5 left % right 8 7 right 8 6 right 0 2 S U R V E Y D A T A SUMMARY 11. On Liberty Street 12. On Elm Street a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Key Blvd a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd Legend: Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 6 7 left left 22 9 left 10 7 No Parking right 23 6 right right 18 2 right XXX # of Spaces are estimated 13. On Key Blvd by length a. between Elm St & Liberty St b. between Liberty St & Cutting Blvd c. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av d. North of Knott Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 15 5 left left left 13 9 right 13 8 right 8 6 right right On Junction Avenue a. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av b. between Knott Av & Morris St c. between Morris St & Hagen Blvd d. between Hagen Blvd &Conton Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 14 6 left 6 1 left left 14 6 right right 5 1 right 16 4 right 11 3

52 B A Y M E T R I C S ON-STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT EL CERRITO PARKING SURVEY SURVEY DATE: May 19, 2011 DAY: THURSDAY LOCATION EL CERRITO DEL NORTE AREA SURVEY TIME: 11:00 AM CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: WD-ON-11AM 1. On Wall Avenue a. West of San Pablo Av b. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St EL CERRITO DEL NORTE AREA On-Street Parking Summary Space Occupied Space Occupied top 11 9 top 5 5 Space Occupied % bottom 9 9 bottom On Wall Avenue % 2. On Knott Avenue a. West of San Pablo Av b. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St c. between Kearney St & Key Blvd d. between Key Blvd & Junction Av 2. On Knott Avenue Location Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied % top 0 0 top 6 2 top 3 3 top 4 2 bottom 4 7 bottom 3 1 bottom 6 7 bottom On Cutting Blvd % 3. On Cutting Blvd a. between I-80 EB On-Ramp & Peerless A b. between Peerless Av & San Pablo Av c. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St d. between Kearney St & Key Blvd 4. On Hill Street Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied % top 0 0 top 0 0 top 0 0 top bottom 0 0 bottom 0 0 bottom 0 0 bottom On Blake Street % e. between Key Blvd & Junction Av f. between Junction Av & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 6. On Eastshore Blvd top 5 5 left % bottom 4 4 right On Peerless Avenue 4. On Hill Street % a. between San Pablo Av & Lexington Av b. between Lexington Av & Liberty St c. between Liberty St & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 8. On San Pablo Avenue top 0 0 top top % bottom 0 0 bottom 6 5 bottom On Kearney Street 5. On Blake Street % a. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St b. between Kearney St & Lexington Av c. between Lexington Av & Liberty St d. between Liberty St & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 10. On Lexington Avenue top 3 2 top 5 2 top 10 7 top % bottom 6 3 bottom 3 0 bottom 9 5 bottom On Liberty Street 6. On Eastshore Blvd 7. On Peerless Avenue % a. between Potrero Av & Hill St a. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 12. On Elm Street left 0 0 left % right right On Key Blvd 8. On San Pablo Avenue % a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd c. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av d. between Knott Av & Wall Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 14. On Junction Avenue left 15 7 left 0 0 left 5 0 left % right 0 0 right 0 0 right 0 0 right On Kearney Street 10. On Lexington Avenue Overall a. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av b. North of Wall Av a. between Blake St & Hill St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Space Occupied % left 5 5 left 7 5 left % right 8 7 right 8 6 right 0 0 S U R V E Y D A T A SUMMARY 11. On Liberty Street 12. On Elm Street a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Key Blvd a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd Legend: Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 6 7 left left 22 6 left 10 7 No Parking right 23 5 right right 18 3 right XXX # of Spaces are estimated 13. On Key Blvd by length a. between Elm St & Liberty St b. between Liberty St & Cutting Blvd c. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av d. North of Knott Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 15 7 left left left 13 8 right right 8 7 right right On Junction Avenue a. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av b. between Knott Av & Morris St c. between Morris St & Hagen Blvd d. between Hagen Blvd &Conton Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 14 7 left 6 1 left 24 9 left 14 6 right right 5 1 right 16 2 right 11 1

53 B A Y M E T R I C S ON-STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT EL CERRITO PARKING SURVEY SURVEY DATE: May 19, 2011 DAY: THURSDAY LOCATION EL CERRITO DEL NORTE AREA SURVEY TIME: 12:00 PM CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: WD-ON-12PM 1. On Wall Avenue a. West of San Pablo Av b. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St EL CERRITO DEL NORTE AREA On-Street Parking Summary Space Occupied Space Occupied top 11 8 top 5 4 Space Occupied % bottom 9 9 bottom On Wall Avenue % 2. On Knott Avenue a. West of San Pablo Av b. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St c. between Kearney St & Key Blvd d. between Key Blvd & Junction Av 2. On Knott Avenue Location Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied % top 0 0 top 6 2 top 3 3 top 4 2 bottom 4 7 bottom 3 2 bottom 6 7 bottom On Cutting Blvd % 3. On Cutting Blvd a. between I-80 EB On-Ramp & Peerless A b. between Peerless Av & San Pablo Av c. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St d. between Kearney St & Key Blvd 4. On Hill Street Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied % top 0 0 top 0 0 top 0 0 top bottom 0 0 bottom 0 0 bottom 0 0 bottom On Blake Street % e. between Key Blvd & Junction Av f. between Junction Av & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 6. On Eastshore Blvd top 5 7 left % bottom 4 4 right On Peerless Avenue 4. On Hill Street % a. between San Pablo Av & Lexington Av b. between Lexington Av & Liberty St c. between Liberty St & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 8. On San Pablo Avenue top 0 0 top top % bottom 0 0 bottom 6 5 bottom On Kearney Street 5. On Blake Street % a. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St b. between Kearney St & Lexington Av c. between Lexington Av & Liberty St d. between Liberty St & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 10. On Lexington Avenue top 3 3 top 5 3 top 10 8 top % bottom 6 3 bottom 3 2 bottom 9 5 bottom On Liberty Street 6. On Eastshore Blvd 7. On Peerless Avenue % a. between Potrero Av & Hill St a. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 12. On Elm Street left 0 0 left % right right On Key Blvd 8. On San Pablo Avenue % a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd c. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av d. between Knott Av & Wall Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 14. On Junction Avenue left 15 4 left 0 0 left 5 0 left % right 0 0 right 0 0 right 0 0 right On Kearney Street 10. On Lexington Avenue Overall a. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av b. North of Wall Av a. between Blake St & Hill St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Space Occupied % left 5 4 left 7 5 left % right 8 7 right 8 6 right 0 0 S U R V E Y D A T A SUMMARY 11. On Liberty Street 12. On Elm Street a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Key Blvd a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd Legend: Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 6 7 left left 22 5 left 10 6 No Parking right 23 7 right right 18 3 right XXX # of Spaces are estimated 13. On Key Blvd by length a. between Elm St & Liberty St b. between Liberty St & Cutting Blvd c. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av d. North of Knott Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 15 8 left left left 13 5 right right 8 7 right right On Junction Avenue a. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av b. between Knott Av & Morris St c. between Morris St & Hagen Blvd d. between Hagen Blvd &Conton Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 14 5 left 6 1 left left 14 4 right right 5 1 right 16 4 right 11 2

54 B A Y M E T R I C S ON-STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT EL CERRITO PARKING SURVEY SURVEY DATE: May 19, 2011 DAY: THURSDAY LOCATION EL CERRITO DEL NORTE AREA SURVEY TIME: 1:00 PM CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: WD-ON-1PM 1. On Wall Avenue a. West of San Pablo Av b. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St EL CERRITO DEL NORTE AREA On-Street Parking Summary Space Occupied Space Occupied top 11 8 top 5 2 Space Occupied % bottom 9 7 bottom On Wall Avenue % 2. On Knott Avenue a. West of San Pablo Av b. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St c. between Kearney St & Key Blvd d. between Key Blvd & Junction Av 2. On Knott Avenue Location Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied % top 0 0 top 6 1 top 3 3 top 4 1 bottom 4 6 bottom 3 1 bottom 6 7 bottom On Cutting Blvd % 3. On Cutting Blvd a. between I-80 EB On-Ramp & Peerless A b. between Peerless Av & San Pablo Av c. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St d. between Kearney St & Key Blvd 4. On Hill Street Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied % top 0 0 top 0 0 top 0 0 top bottom 0 0 bottom 0 0 bottom 0 0 bottom On Blake Street % e. between Key Blvd & Junction Av f. between Junction Av & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 6. On Eastshore Blvd top 5 7 left % bottom 4 5 right On Peerless Avenue 4. On Hill Street % a. between San Pablo Av & Lexington Av b. between Lexington Av & Liberty St c. between Liberty St & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 8. On San Pablo Avenue top 0 0 top top % bottom 0 0 bottom 6 4 bottom On Kearney Street 5. On Blake Street % a. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St b. between Kearney St & Lexington Av c. between Lexington Av & Liberty St d. between Liberty St & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 10. On Lexington Avenue top 3 3 top 5 3 top 10 8 top % bottom 6 3 bottom 3 3 bottom 9 3 bottom On Liberty Street 6. On Eastshore Blvd 7. On Peerless Avenue % a. between Potrero Av & Hill St a. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 12. On Elm Street left 0 0 left % right right On Key Blvd 8. On San Pablo Avenue % a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd c. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av d. between Knott Av & Wall Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 14. On Junction Avenue left 15 2 left 0 0 left 5 0 left % right 0 0 right 0 0 right 0 0 right On Kearney Street 10. On Lexington Avenue Overall a. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av b. North of Wall Av a. between Blake St & Hill St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Space Occupied % left 5 3 left 7 5 left % right 8 7 right 8 5 right 0 0 S U R V E Y D A T A SUMMARY 11. On Liberty Street 12. On Elm Street a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Key Blvd a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd Legend: Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 6 7 left left 22 4 left 10 6 No Parking right 23 7 right right 18 3 right XXX # of Spaces are estimated 13. On Key Blvd by length a. between Elm St & Liberty St b. between Liberty St & Cutting Blvd c. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av d. North of Knott Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 15 9 left left left 13 4 right right 8 8 right 14 6 right On Junction Avenue a. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av b. between Knott Av & Morris St c. between Morris St & Hagen Blvd d. between Hagen Blvd &Conton Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 14 3 left 6 1 left left 14 3 right right 5 2 right 16 4 right 11 2

55 B A Y M E T R I C S ON-STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT EL CERRITO PARKING SURVEY SURVEY DATE: May 19, 2011 DAY: THURSDAY LOCATION EL CERRITO DEL NORTE AREA SURVEY TIME: 2:00 PM CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: WD-ON-2PM 1. On Wall Avenue a. West of San Pablo Av b. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St EL CERRITO DEL NORTE AREA On-Street Parking Summary Space Occupied Space Occupied top 11 6 top 5 2 Space Occupied % bottom 9 6 bottom On Wall Avenue % 2. On Knott Avenue a. West of San Pablo Av b. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St c. between Kearney St & Key Blvd d. between Key Blvd & Junction Av 2. On Knott Avenue Location Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied % top 0 0 top 6 2 top 3 3 top 4 1 bottom 4 6 bottom 3 4 bottom 6 6 bottom On Cutting Blvd % 3. On Cutting Blvd a. between I-80 EB On-Ramp & Peerless A b. between Peerless Av & San Pablo Av c. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St d. between Kearney St & Key Blvd 4. On Hill Street Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied % top 0 0 top 0 0 top 0 0 top bottom 0 0 bottom 0 0 bottom 0 0 bottom On Blake Street % e. between Key Blvd & Junction Av f. between Junction Av & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 6. On Eastshore Blvd top 5 5 left % bottom 4 4 right On Peerless Avenue 4. On Hill Street % a. between San Pablo Av & Lexington Av b. between Lexington Av & Liberty St c. between Liberty St & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 8. On San Pablo Avenue top 0 0 top top % bottom 0 0 bottom 6 5 bottom On Kearney Street 5. On Blake Street % a. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St b. between Kearney St & Lexington Av c. between Lexington Av & Liberty St d. between Liberty St & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 10. On Lexington Avenue top 3 0 top 5 2 top 10 7 top % bottom 6 0 bottom 3 1 bottom 9 3 bottom On Liberty Street 6. On Eastshore Blvd 7. On Peerless Avenue % a. between Potrero Av & Hill St a. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 12. On Elm Street left 0 0 left % right right On Key Blvd 8. On San Pablo Avenue % a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd c. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av d. between Knott Av & Wall Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 14. On Junction Avenue left 15 5 left 0 0 left 5 0 left % right 0 0 right 0 0 right 0 0 right On Kearney Street 10. On Lexington Avenue Overall a. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av b. North of Wall Av a. between Blake St & Hill St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Space Occupied % left 5 3 left 7 3 left % right 8 6 right 8 6 right 0 0 S U R V E Y D A T A SUMMARY 11. On Liberty Street 12. On Elm Street a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Key Blvd a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd Legend: Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 6 6 left left 22 3 left No Parking right 23 9 right right 18 2 right XXX # of Spaces are estimated 13. On Key Blvd by length a. between Elm St & Liberty St b. between Liberty St & Cutting Blvd c. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av d. North of Knott Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 15 5 left left left 13 8 right right 8 7 right 14 5 right On Junction Avenue a. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av b. between Knott Av & Morris St c. between Morris St & Hagen Blvd d. between Hagen Blvd &Conton Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 14 4 left 6 1 left left 14 5 right right 5 2 right 16 6 right 11 2

56 B A Y M E T R I C S ON-STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT EL CERRITO PARKING SURVEY SURVEY DATE: May 20, 2011 DAY: FRIDAY LOCATION EL CERRITO DEL NORTE AREA SURVEY TIME: 12:00 AM CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: WD-ON-12AM 1. On Wall Avenue a. West of San Pablo Av b. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St EL CERRITO DEL NORTE AREA On-Street Parking Summary Space Occupied Space Occupied top 11 4 top 5 5 Space Occupied % bottom 9 4 bottom On Wall Avenue % 2. On Knott Avenue a. West of San Pablo Av b. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St c. between Kearney St & Key Blvd d. between Key Blvd & Junction Av 2. On Knott Avenue Location Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied % top 0 0 top 6 6 top 3 1 top 4 2 bottom 4 1 bottom 3 3 bottom 6 1 bottom On Cutting Blvd % 3. On Cutting Blvd a. between I-80 EB On-Ramp & Peerless A b. between Peerless Av & San Pablo Av c. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St d. between Kearney St & Key Blvd 4. On Hill Street Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied % top 0 0 top 0 0 top 0 0 top 12 8 bottom 0 0 bottom 0 0 bottom 0 0 bottom On Blake Street % e. between Key Blvd & Junction Av f. between Junction Av & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 6. On Eastshore Blvd top 5 4 left % bottom 4 4 right On Peerless Avenue 4. On Hill Street % a. between San Pablo Av & Lexington Av b. between Lexington Av & Liberty St c. between Liberty St & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 8. On San Pablo Avenue top 0 0 top 10 1 top % bottom 0 0 bottom 6 3 bottom On Kearney Street 5. On Blake Street % a. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St b. between Kearney St & Lexington Av c. between Lexington Av & Liberty St d. between Liberty St & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 10. On Lexington Avenue top 3 0 top 5 6 top 10 1 top % bottom 6 0 bottom 3 5 bottom 9 1 bottom On Liberty Street 6. On Eastshore Blvd 7. On Peerless Avenue % a. between Potrero Av & Hill St a. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 12. On Elm Street left 0 0 left % right 12 0 right On Key Blvd 8. On San Pablo Avenue % a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd c. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av d. between Knott Av & Wall Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 14. On Junction Avenue left 15 0 left 0 0 left 5 0 left % right 0 0 right 0 0 right 0 0 right On Kearney Street 10. On Lexington Avenue Overall a. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av b. North of Wall Av a. between Blake St & Hill St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Space Occupied % left 5 0 left 7 1 left % right 8 3 right 8 1 right 0 0 S U R V E Y D A T A SUMMARY 11. On Liberty Street 12. On Elm Street a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Key Blvd a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd Legend: Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 6 2 left 20 2 left 22 7 left 10 3 No Parking right right 14 5 right 18 2 right 11 0 XXX # of Spaces are estimated 13. On Key Blvd by length a. between Elm St & Liberty St b. between Liberty St & Cutting Blvd c. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av d. North of Knott Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 15 5 left 12 3 left 17 1 left right 13 9 right 8 2 right 14 6 right On Junction Avenue a. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av b. between Knott Av & Morris St c. between Morris St & Hagen Blvd d. between Hagen Blvd &Conton Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 14 7 left 6 3 left left 14 6 right 16 9 right 5 1 right 16 7 right 11 4

57 Parking Turnover Survey 10:30 AM 11:00 AM 11:30 AM WALL AVENUE WALL AVENUE WALL AVENUE 1 P793 1 P D 2 20D 2 3 X670 3 O D957 5 D957 5 D957 6 B583 6 B JOE 7 JOE P115 7 JOE P KNOTT AVENUE KNOTT AVENUE KNOTT AVENUE CUTTING AVENUE CUTTING AVENUE CUTTING AVENUE HILL STREET HILL STREET HILL STREET 1 F301 1 F301 1 F301 2 New Car 2 2 X New Car H444 7 H444 7 H444 8 B V778 9 V778 9 V BLAKE STREET BLAKE STREET BLAKE STREET Legend: Legend: Legend: Indicates an empty space Indicates an empty space Indicates an empty space xxx Indicates an occupied space xxx Indicates an occupied space xxx Indicates an occupied space containing a different car containing a different car containing a different car No Parking xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same car still occupies the space since 10:30 AM car still occupies the space since 10:30 AM Not a space No Parking xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same car still occupies the space since 11:00 AM Not a space No Parking Not a space

58 12:00 PM 12:30 PM 1:00 PM WALL AVENUE WALL AVENUE WALL AVENUE L448 2 L448 2 L G U U U017 5 D957 5 D957 X587 5 D957 X587 6 A041 X866 6 A041 X JOE P115 7 JOE P115 7 JOE P316 9 F291 9 F291 9 W T T T KNOTT AVENUE KNOTT AVENUE KNOTT AVENUE CUTTING AVENUE CUTTING AVENUE CUTTING AVENUE HILL STREET HILL STREET HILL STREET 1 F301 1 F B N H444 7 H444 7 H BLAKE STREET BLAKE STREET BLAKE STREET Legend: Legend: Legend: Indicates an empty space Indicates an empty space Indicates an empty space xxx Indicates an occupied space xxx Indicates an occupied space xxx Indicates an occupied space containing a different car containing a different car containing a different car xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same car still occupies the space since 10:30 AM car still occupies the space since 10:30 AM car still occupies the space since 10:30 AM xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same car still occupies the space since 11:00 AM car still occupies the space since 11:00 AM car still occupies the space since 11:00 AM xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same car still occupies the space since 11:30 AM car still occupies the space since 11:30 AM car still occupies the space since 11:30 AM No Parking xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same car still occupies the space since 12:00 PM car still occupies the space since 12:00 PM Not a space No Parking xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same car still occupies the space since 12:30 PM Not a space No Parking Not a space

59 1:30 PM 2:00 PM 2:30 PM WALL AVENUE WALL AVENUE WALL AVENUE L448 E729 2 L448 2 L448 T G916 3 G YR S183 5 D957 5 D D J C044 7 JOE 7 JOE 7 JOE 8 8 B538 8 B KNOTT AVENUE KNOTT AVENUE KNOTT AVENUE CUTTING AVENUE CUTTING AVENUE CUTTING AVENUE HILL STREET HILL STREET HILL STREET 1 Y856 1 Y856 1 Y856 2 F U274 3 F U N U417 6 U417 7 H444 7 H444 7 H444 8 B130 8 T992 8 T R BLAKE STREET BLAKE STREET BLAKE STREET Legend: Legend: Legend: Indicates an empty space Indicates an empty space Indicates an empty space xxx Indicates an occupied space xxx Indicates an occupied space xxx Indicates an occupied space containing a different car containing a different car containing a different car xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same car still occupies the space since 10:30 AM car still occupies the space since 10:30 AM car still occupies the space since 10:30 AM xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same car still occupies the space since 11:00 AM car still occupies the space since 11:00 AM car still occupies the space since 11:00 AM xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same car still occupies the space since 11:30 AM car still occupies the space since 11:30 AM car still occupies the space since 11:30 AM xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same car still occupies the space since 12:00 PM car still occupies the space since 12:00 PM car still occupies the space since 12:00 PM xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same car still occupies the space since 12:30 PM car still occupies the space since 12:30 PM car still occupies the space since 12:30 PM xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same car still occupies the space since 1:00 PM car still occupies the space since 1:00 PM car still occupies the space since 1:00 PM No Parking xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same car still occupies the space since 1:30 PM car still occupies the space since 1:30 PM Not a space No Parking xxx Consecutive spaces indicate the same car still occupies the space since 2:00 PM Not a space No Parking Not a space

60 B A Y M E T R I C S ON-STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT EL CERRITO PARKING SURVEY SURVEY DATE: May 21, 2011 DAY: SATURDAY LOCATION EL CERRITO DEL NORTE AREA SURVEY TIME: 10:00 AM CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: SAT-ON-10AM 1. On Wall Avenue a. West of San Pablo Av b. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St EL CERRITO DEL NORTE AREA On-Street Parking Summary Space Occupied Space Occupied top top 5 5 Space Occupied % bottom 9 7 bottom On Wall Avenue % 2. On Knott Avenue a. West of San Pablo Av b. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St c. between Kearney St & Key Blvd d. between Key Blvd & Junction Av 2. On Knott Avenue Location Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied % top 0 0 top 6 5 top 3 0 top 4 2 bottom 4 3 bottom 3 4 bottom 6 2 bottom On Cutting Blvd % 3. On Cutting Blvd a. between I-80 EB On-Ramp & Peerless A b. between Peerless Av & San Pablo Av c. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St d. between Kearney St & Key Blvd 4. On Hill Street Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied % top 0 0 top 0 0 top 0 0 top 12 0 bottom 0 0 bottom 0 0 bottom 0 0 bottom On Blake Street % e. between Key Blvd & Junction Av f. between Junction Av & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 6. On Eastshore Blvd top 5 0 left % bottom 4 0 right On Peerless Avenue 4. On Hill Street 0 0 #DIV/0! a. between San Pablo Av & Lexington Av b. between Lexington Av & Liberty St c. between Liberty St & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 8. On San Pablo Avenue top 0 0 top 10 7 top % bottom 0 0 bottom 6 2 bottom On Kearney Street 5. On Blake Street % a. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St b. between Kearney St & Lexington Av c. between Lexington Av & Liberty St d. between Liberty St & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 10. On Lexington Avenue top 3 0 top 5 3 top 10 5 top % bottom 6 0 bottom 3 0 bottom 9 3 bottom On Liberty Street 6. On Eastshore Blvd 7. On Peerless Avenue % a. between Potrero Av & Hill St a. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 12. On Elm Street left 12 1 left % right 12 6 right On Key Blvd 8. On San Pablo Avenue % a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd c. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av d. between Knott Av & Wall Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 14. On Junction Avenue left 15 8 left 0 0 left 5 0 left % right 0 0 right 0 0 right 0 0 right On Kearney Street 10. On Lexington Avenue Overall a. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av b. North of Wall Av a. between Blake St & Hill St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Space Occupied % left 5 0 left 7 0 left % right 8 3 right 8 3 right 0 0 S U R V E Y D A T A SUMMARY 11. On Liberty Street 12. On Elm Street a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Key Blvd a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 6 3 left 20 3 left left 10 5 right right 14 4 right 18 2 right On Key Blvd a. between Elm St & Liberty St b. between Liberty St & Cutting Blvd c. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av d. North of Knott Av Legend: Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 15 3 left 12 2 left 17 3 left 13 5 No Parking right 13 7 right 8 3 right 14 5 right 0 0 XXX # of Spaces are estimated 14. On Junction Avenue by length a. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av b. between Knott Av & Morris St c. between Morris St & Hagen Blvd d. between Hagen Blvd &Conton Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 14 4 left 6 3 left left 14 2 right 16 7 right 5 1 right 16 6 right 11 5

61 B A Y M E T R I C S ON-STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT EL CERRITO PARKING SURVEY SURVEY DATE: May 21, 2011 DAY: SATURDAY LOCATION EL CERRITO DEL NORTE AREA SURVEY TIME: 2:00 PM CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: SAT-ON-2PM 1. On Wall Avenue a. West of San Pablo Av b. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St EL CERRITO DEL NORTE AREA On-Street Parking Summary Space Occupied Space Occupied top 11 8 top 5 3 Space Occupied % bottom 9 7 bottom On Wall Avenue % 2. On Knott Avenue a. West of San Pablo Av b. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St c. between Kearney St & Key Blvd d. between Key Blvd & Junction Av 2. On Knott Avenue Location Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied % top 0 0 top 6 3 top 3 5 top 4 2 bottom 4 4 bottom 3 3 bottom 6 4 bottom On Cutting Blvd % 3. On Cutting Blvd a. between I-80 EB On-Ramp & Peerless A b. between Peerless Av & San Pablo Av c. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St d. between Kearney St & Key Blvd 4. On Hill Street Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied % top 0 0 top 0 0 top 0 0 top 12 6 bottom 0 0 bottom 0 0 bottom 0 0 bottom On Blake Street % e. between Key Blvd & Junction Av f. between Junction Av & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 6. On Eastshore Blvd top 5 0 left % bottom 4 3 right On Peerless Avenue 4. On Hill Street 0 0 #DIV/0! a. between San Pablo Av & Lexington Av b. between Lexington Av & Liberty St c. between Liberty St & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 8. On San Pablo Avenue top 0 0 top 10 5 top % bottom 0 0 bottom 6 2 bottom On Kearney Street 5. On Blake Street % a. between San Pablo Av & Kearney St b. between Kearney St & Lexington Av c. between Lexington Av & Liberty St d. between Liberty St & Elm St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 10. On Lexington Avenue top 3 0 top 5 0 top 10 7 top % bottom 6 1 bottom 3 0 bottom 9 3 bottom On Liberty Street 6. On Eastshore Blvd 7. On Peerless Avenue % a. between Potrero Av & Hill St a. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 12. On Elm Street left 12 0 left % right 12 2 right On Key Blvd 8. On San Pablo Avenue % a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd c. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av d. between Knott Av & Wall Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 14. On Junction Avenue left left 0 0 left 5 0 left % right 0 0 right 0 0 right 0 0 right On Kearney Street 10. On Lexington Avenue Overall a. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av b. North of Wall Av a. between Blake St & Hill St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Space Occupied % left 5 3 left 7 4 left % right 8 0 right 8 0 right 0 0 S U R V E Y D A T A SUMMARY 11. On Liberty Street 12. On Elm Street a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Key Blvd a. between Blake St & Hill St b. between Hill St & Cutting Blvd Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 6 5 left 20 3 left 22 4 left 10 4 right right 14 2 right 18 2 right On Key Blvd a. between Elm St & Liberty St b. between Liberty St & Cutting Blvd c. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av d. North of Knott Av Legend: Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 15 4 left 12 2 left 17 7 left 13 9 No Parking right 13 4 right 8 3 right 14 2 right 0 0 XXX # of Spaces are estimated 14. On Junction Avenue by length a. between Cutting Blvd & Knott Av b. between Knott Av & Morris St c. between Morris St & Hagen Blvd d. between Hagen Blvd &Conton Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 14 5 left 6 3 left left 14 2 right 16 9 right 5 1 right right 11 5

62 B A Y M E T R I C S OFF - STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT El Cerrito Parking Survey SURVEY DATE: May 19, 2011 DAY: THURSDAY LOCATION El Cerrito Del Norte Area SURVEY TIME: 10:00 AM CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: WD-OFF-10AM S U R V E Y D A T A A. Between I-80 & San Pablo Avenue El Cerrito Del Norte Area 1. Just North of Wall Av 2a. between Wall Av & Knott Av McDonald's McDonald's (Mira Vista's Lot) 1. General Lot Space Occupied Space Occupied Total Space Occupied % % 2b. between Wall Av & Knott Av Mira Vista Tire & Brake Trevino's (Mexican Food) Launderland & Fried Chicken Honda Dealer (Customer Parking) 2. BART Lot Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Total Space Occupied % % 3. between Knott Av & Cutting Blvd Bay Tackle & Outlet Food Mard Freeway Motel Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Overall Total 4. between Cutting Blvd & Hill St Space Occupied % Church chicken Jack in the Box Del Norte Market Place (Walgreen) % Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied between Hill St & Bake St Legend: Orchard Supply Hardware NEK Insurance Space Occupied Space Occupied General Lot BART Lot Lot under construction B. Between San Pablo Avenue & BART Track 1. between Wall Av & Knott Av 2. btn Knott Av & Cutting Blvd 3. btn Cutting Blvd & Hill St 4. between Hill St & Blake St Del Norte Place (Uncle's Wong) BART Lot (II) BART Lot (III) Safeway (under construction) Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied (279) Just South of Blake St Liquor Store Space Occupied 7 2 C. Between BART Track & Key Blvd 1. btn Knott Av & Cutting Blvd 2. btn Cutting Blvd & Hill St BART LOT (I) BART Lot (IV) BART Garage Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Tel: (510) Fax: (510)

63 B A Y M E T R I C S OFF - STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT El Cerrito Parking Survey SURVEY DATE: May 19, 2011 DAY: THURSDAY LOCATION El Cerrito Del Norte Area SURVEY TIME: 11:00 AM CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: WD-OFF-11AM S U R V E Y D A T A A. Between I-80 & San Pablo Avenue El Cerrito Del Norte Area 1. Just North of Wall Av 2a. between Wall Av & Knott Av McDonald's McDonald's (Mira Vista's Lot) 1. General Lot Space Occupied Space Occupied Total Space Occupied % % 2b. between Wall Av & Knott Av Mira Vista Tire & Brake Trevino's (Mexican Food) Launderland & Fried Chicken Honda Dealer (Customer Parking) 2. BART Lot Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Total Space Occupied % % 3. between Knott Av & Cutting Blvd Bay Tackle & Outlet Food Mard Freeway Motel Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Overall Total 4. between Cutting Blvd & Hill St Space Occupied % Church chicken Jack in the Box Del Norte Market Place (Walgreen) % Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied between Hill St & Bake St Legend: Orchard Supply Hardware NEK Insurance Space Occupied Space Occupied General Lot BART Lot Lot under construction B. Between San Pablo Avenue & BART Track 1. between Wall Av & Knott Av 2. btn Knott Av & Cutting Blvd 3. btn Cutting Blvd & Hill St 4. between Hill St & Blake St Del Norte Place (Uncle's Wong) BART Lot (II) BART Lot (III) Safeway (under construction) Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied (279) Just South of Blake St Liquor Store Space Occupied 7 1 C. Between BART Track Key Blvd 1. btn Knott Av & Cutting Blvd 2. btn Cutting Blvd & Hill St BART LOT (I) BART Lot (IV) BART Garage Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Tel: (510) Fax: (510)

64 B A Y M E T R I C S OFF - STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT El Cerrito Parking Survey SURVEY DATE: May 19, 2011 DAY: THURSDAY LOCATION El Cerrito Del Norte Area SURVEY TIME: 12:00 PM CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: WD-OFF-12PM S U R V E Y D A T A A. Between I-80 & San Pablo Avenue El Cerrito Del Norte Area 1. Just North of Wall Av 2a. between Wall Av & Knott Av McDonald's McDonald's (Mira Vista's Lot) 1. General Lot Space Occupied Space Occupied Total Space Occupied % % 2b. between Wall Av & Knott Av Mira Vista Tire & Brake Trevino's (Mexican Food) Launderland & Fried Chicken Honda Dealer (Customer Parking) 2. BART Lot Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Total Space Occupied % % 3. between Knott Av & Cutting Blvd Bay Tackle & Outlet Food Mard Freeway Motel Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Overall Total 4. between Cutting Blvd & Hill St Space Occupied % Church chicken Jack in the Box Del Norte Market Place (Walgreen) % Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied between Hill St & Bake St Legend: Orchard Supply Hardware NEK Insurance Space Occupied Space Occupied General Lot BART Lot Lot under construction B. Between San Pablo Avenue & BART Track 1. between Wall Av & Knott Av 2. btn Knott Av & Cutting Blvd 3. btn Cutting Blvd & Hill St 4. between Hill St & Blake St Del Norte Place (Uncle's Wong) BART Lot (II) BART Lot (III) Safeway (under construction) Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied (279) Just South of Blake St Liquor Store Space Occupied 7 4 C. Between BART Track Key Blvd 1. btn Knott Av & Cutting Blvd 2. btn Cutting Blvd & Hill St BART LOT (I) BART Lot (IV) BART Garage Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Tel: (510) Fax: (510)

65 B A Y M E T R I C S OFF - STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT El Cerrito Parking Survey SURVEY DATE: May 19, 2011 DAY: THURSDAY LOCATION El Cerrito Del Norte Area SURVEY TIME: 1:00 PM CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: WD-OFF-1PM S U R V E Y D A T A A. Between I-80 & San Pablo Avenue El Cerrito Del Norte Area 1. Just North of Wall Av 2a. between Wall Av & Knott Av McDonald's McDonald's (Mira Vista's Lot) 1. General Lot Space Occupied Space Occupied Total Space Occupied % % 2b. between Wall Av & Knott Av Mira Vista Tire & Brake Trevino's (Mexican Food) Launderland & Fried Chicken Honda Dealer (Customer Parking) 2. BART Lot Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Total Space Occupied % % 3. between Knott Av & Cutting Blvd Bay Tackle & Outlet Food Mard Freeway Motel Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Overall Total 4. between Cutting Blvd & Hill St Space Occupied % Church chicken Jack in the Box Del Norte Market Place (Walgreen) % Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied between Hill St & Bake St Legend: Orchard Supply Hardware NEK Insurance Space Occupied Space Occupied General Lot BART Lot Lot under construction B. Between San Pablo Avenue & BART Track 1. between Wall Av & Knott Av 2. btn Knott Av & Cutting Blvd 3. btn Cutting Blvd & Hill St 4. between Hill St & Blake St Del Norte Place (Uncle's Wong) BART Lot (II) BART Lot (III) Safeway (under construction) Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied (279) Just South of Blake St Liquor Store Space Occupied 7 0 C. Between BART Track Key Blvd 1. btn Knott Av & Cutting Blvd 2. btn Cutting Blvd & Hill St BART LOT (I) BART Lot (IV) BART Garage Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Tel: (510) Fax: (510)

66 B A Y M E T R I C S OFF - STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT El Cerrito Parking Survey SURVEY DATE: May 19, 2011 DAY: THURSDAY LOCATION El Cerrito Del Norte Area SURVEY TIME: 2:00 PM CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: WD-OFF-2PM S U R V E Y D A T A A. Between I-80 & San Pablo Avenue El Cerrito Del Norte Area 1. Just North of Wall Av 2a. between Wall Av & Knott Av McDonald's McDonald's (Mira Vista's Lot) 1. General Lot Space Occupied Space Occupied Total Space Occupied % % 2b. between Wall Av & Knott Av Mira Vista Tire & Brake Trevino's (Mexican Food) Launderland & Fried Chicken Honda Dealer (Customer Parking) 2. BART Lot Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Total Space Occupied % % 3. between Knott Av & Cutting Blvd Bay Tackle & Outlet Food Mard Freeway Motel Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Overall Total 4. between Cutting Blvd & Hill St Space Occupied % Church chicken Jack in the Box Del Norte Market Place (Walgreen) % Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied between Hill St & Bake St Legend: Orchard Supply Hardware NEK Insurance Space Occupied Space Occupied General Lot BART Lot Lot under construction B. Between San Pablo Avenue & BART Track 1. between Wall Av & Knott Av 2. btn Knott Av & Cutting Blvd 3. btn Cutting Blvd & Hill St 4. between Hill St & Blake St Del Norte Place (Uncle's Wong) BART Lot (II) BART Lot (III) Safeway (under construction) Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied (279) Just South of Blake St Liquor Store Space Occupied 7 0 C. Between BART Track Key Blvd 1. btn Knott Av & Cutting Blvd 2. btn Cutting Blvd & Hill St BART LOT (I) BART Lot (IV) BART Garage Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Tel: (510) Fax: (510)

67 B A Y M E T R I C S OFF - STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT El Cerrito Parking Survey SURVEY DATE: May 20, 2011 DAY: FRIDAY LOCATION El Cerrito Del Norte Area SURVEY TIME: 12:00 AM CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: WD-OFF-12AM S U R V E Y D A T A A. Between I-80 & San Pablo Avenue El Cerrito Del Norte Area 1. Just North of Wall Av 2a. between Wall Av & Knott Av McDonald's McDonald's (Mira Vista's Lot) 1. General Lot Space Occupied Space Occupied Total Space Occupied % % 2b. between Wall Av & Knott Av Mira Vista Tire & Brake Trevino's (Mexican Food) Launderland & Fried Chicken Honda Dealer (Customer Parking) 2. BART Lot Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Total Space Occupied % % 3. between Knott Av & Cutting Blvd Bay Tackle & Outlet Food Mard Freeway Motel Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Overall Total 4. between Cutting Blvd & Hill St Space Occupied % Church chicken Jack in the Box Del Norte Market Place (Walgreen) % Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied between Hill St & Bake St Legend: Orchard Supply Hardware NEK Insurance Space Occupied Space Occupied General Lot BART Lot Lot under construction B. Between San Pablo Avenue & BART Track 1. between Wall Av & Knott Av 2. btn Knott Av & Cutting Blvd 3. btn Cutting Blvd & Hill St 4. between Hill St & Blake St Del Norte Place (Uncle's Wong) BART Lot (II) BART Lot (III) Safeway (under construction) Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied (279) Just South of Blake St Liquor Store Space Occupied 7 1 C. Between BART Track Key Blvd 1. btn Knott Av & Cutting Blvd 2. btn Cutting Blvd & Hill St BART LOT (I) BART Lot (IV) BART Garage Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Tel: (510) Fax: (510)

68 B A Y M E T R I C S OFF - STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT El Cerrito Parking Survey SURVEY DATE: May 21, 2011 DAY: Saturday LOCATION El Cerrito Del Norte Area SURVEY TIME: 10:00 AM CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: SAT-OFF-10AM A. Between I-80 & San Pablo Avenue El Cerrito Del Norte Area 1. Just North of Wall Av 2a. between Wall Av & Knott Av McDonald's McDonald's (Mira Vista's Lot) 1. General Lot Space Occupied Space Occupied Total Space Occupied % % 2b. between Wall Av & Knott Av Mira Vista Tire & Brake Trevino's Mexican Food Fried Chicken & Launderland Honda Dealer (Customer Parking) 2. BART Lot Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Total Space Occupied % % 3. between Knott Av & Cutting Blvd Footwear & Bay Tackle Outlet Super Stop Food Mart Freeway Motel Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Overall Total 4. between Cutting Blvd & Hill St Space Occupied % Church chicken Jack in the Box Del Norte Market Place % Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied between Hill St & Bake St Legend: Orchard Supply Hardware Farmers Insurance Space Occupied Space Occupied General Lot BART Lot Lot under construction B. Between San Pablo Avenue & BART Track 1. between Wall Av & Knott Av 2. btn Knott Av & Cutting Blvd 3. btn Cutting Blvd & Hill St 4. between Hill St & Blake St Del Norte Place (Uncle's Wong) BART Lot (II) BART Lot (III) Safeway (under construction) Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied (387) Just South of Blake St Liquor Store Space Occupied 7 5 C. Between BART Track Key Blvd 1. btn Knott Av & Cutting Blvd 2. btn Cutting Blvd & Hill St BART LOT (I) BART Lot (IV) BART Garage Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied S U R V E Y D A T A SUMMARY Tel: (510) Fax: (510)

69 B A Y M E T R I C S OFF - STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT El Cerrito Parking Survey SURVEY DATE: May 21, 2011 DAY: Saturday LOCATION El Cerrito Del Norte Area SURVEY TIME: 2:00 PM CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: SAT-OFF-2PM A. Between I-80 & San Pablo Avenue El Cerrito Del Norte Area 1. Just North of Wall Av 2a. between Wall Av & Knott Av McDonald's McDonald's (Mira Vista's Lot) 1. General Lot Space Occupied Space Occupied Total Space Occupied % % 2b. between Wall Av & Knott Av Mira Vista Tire & Brake Trevino's Mexican Food Fried Chicken & Launderland Honda Dealer (Customer Parking) 2. BART Lot Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Total Space Occupied % % 3. between Knott Av & Cutting Blvd Footwear & Bay Tackle Outlet Super Stop Food Mart Freeway Motel Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Overall Total 4. between Cutting Blvd & Hill St Space Occupied % Church chicken Jack in the Box Del Norte Market Place % Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied between Hill St & Bake St Legend: Orchard Supply Hardware Farmers Insurance Space Occupied Space Occupied General Lot BART Lot Lot under construction B. Between San Pablo Avenue & BART Track 1. between Wall Av & Knott Av 2. btn Knott Av & Cutting Blvd 3. btn Cutting Blvd & Hill St 4. between Hill St & Blake St Del Norte Place (Uncle's Wong) BART Lot (II) BART Lot (III) Safeway (under construction) Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied (279) Just South of Blake St Liquor Store Space Occupied 7 3 C. Between BART Track Key Blvd 1. btn Knott Av & Cutting Blvd 2. btn Cutting Blvd & Hill St BART LOT (I) BART Lot (IV) BART Garage Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied S U R V E Y D A T A SUMMARY Tel: (510) Fax: (510)

70 San Pablo Avenue Mid Section

71 B A Y M E T R I C S ON - STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT El Cerrito Parking Survey SURVEY DATE: May 19, 2011 DAY: THURSDAY LOCATION San Pablo Avenue Midsection SURVEY TIME: 12:00 PM (Along San Pablo Av & Kearney St btn Blake St & Lincoln Av) CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: WD-ON-STREET S U R V E Y D A T A SUMMARY 1A. Along San Pablo Avenue (South Bound) Segment Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied a. between Blake St & Potrero Av b. between Potrero Av & Cypress Av c. between Cypress Av & Carlos Av d. between Carlos Av & Madison Av 1. Along San Pablo Avenue Left 15 4 Left 8 5 Left 10 1 Left 7 4 Space Occupied % % e. between Madison Av & Jefferson Av f. between Jefferson Av & Alameda Av g. betweenn Alameda Av & Bayview Av h. betweenn Bayview Av & Wenk Av Left 5 1 Left 10 8 Left 5 2 Left Along Kearney Street i. between Wenk Av & Orchard Av j. between Orchard Av & Tehama Av k. between Tehama Av &Burlingame Av l. between Burlingame Av &Plumas Av Space Occupied % Left 8 7 Left 8 4 Left Left % m. between Plumas Av & Sutter Av n. between Sutter Av & Santa Cruz Av n. btn Santa Cruz Av & Huntington Av 0. between Huntington Av & Panama Av Left 6 3 Left 7 0 Left 5 3 Left Btn San Pablo Av & Kearney St Space Occupied % p. between Panama Av & Sacramento Av q. between Sacramento Av to Fresno Av r. between Fresno Av & Columbia Av s. between Columbia Av & Van Fleet Av % Left 5 3 Left 6 1 Left 6 3 Left 2 0 t. between Van Fleet Av & San Jose Av u. between San Jose Av & Lincoln Av Left 10 1 Left 5 2 Overall 1B. Along San Pablo Avenue (North Bound) Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Space Occupied % a. between Blake St & Potrero Av b. between Potrero Av & Madison Av c. between Madison Av & Manila Av d. between Manila Av & Schmidt Ln % Right 4 0 Right 26 4 Right 22 1 Right 19 5 e. between Schmidt Ln & Portola Dr f. between Portola Dr & Moeser Ln g. betweenn Moeser Ln & Waldo Av h. betweenn Waldo Av & Stockton Av Right 12 6 Right 10 2 Right Right 17 8 i. between Stockton Av & Eureka Av j. between Eureka Av & Lincoln Av Right 15 7 Right Along Kearney Street a. between Blake St & Potrero Av b. between Potrero Av & Madison Av c. North of Manila Av ( Off-Street) d. between Manila Av & Schmidt Ln Legend: Location Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied No Parking Left Left Left 0 Left 23 7 Right 9 0 Right Right 0 Right XXX # of Spaces are estimated by length e. betweenn Moeser Ln & Waldo Av f. betweenn Waldo Av & Stockton Av g. between Stockton Av & Eureka Av h. between Eureka Av & Lincoln Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Left Left Left Left 13 2 Right 21 8 Right Right 25 7 Right Between San Pablo Avenue & Kearney Street a. On Blake Street b. On Potrero Avenue c. On Madison Avenue d. On Manila Avenue Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied top 3 0 top 0 0 top 0 0 top 0 0 bottom 6 0 bottom 0 0 bottom 5 3 bottom 0 0 e. On Schmidt Lane f. On Portola Drive g. On Moeser Lane h. On Waldo Avenue Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied top 8 3 top 0 0 top 0 0 top 6 2 bottom 5 1 bottom 0 0 bottom 5 0 bottom 7 2 i. On Stockton Avenue j. On Eureka Avenue k. On Lincoln Avenue Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied top 4 4 top 0 0 top 6 2 bottom 5 4 bottom 5 3 bottom 0 0 Tel: (510) Fax: (510)

72 B A Y M E T R I C S ON - STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT El Cerrito Parking Survey SURVEY DATE: May 21, 2011 DAY: Saturday LOCATION San Pablo Avenue Midsection SURVEY TIME: 12:00 PM (Along San Pablo Av & Kearney St btn Blake St & Lincoln Av) CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: SAT-ON-STREE S U R V E Y D A T A SUMMARY 1A. Along San Pablo Avenue (South Bound) Segment Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied a. between Blake St & Potrero Av b. between Potrero Av & Cypress Av c. between Cypress Av & Carlos Av d. between Carlos Av & Madison Av 1. Along San Pablo Avenue Left 15 0 Left 8 5 Left 10 6 Left 7 2 Space Occupied % % e. between Madison Av & Jefferson Av f. between Jefferson Av & Alameda Av g. betweenn Alameda Av & Bayview Av h. betweenn Bayview Av & Wenk Av Left 5 2 Left 10 7 Left 5 0 Left Along Kearney Street i. between Wenk Av & Orchard Av j. between Orchard Av & Tehama Av k. between Tehama Av &Burlingame Av l. between Burlingame Av &Plumas Av Space Occupied % Left 8 0 Left 8 6 Left Left % m. between Plumas Av & Sutter Av n. between Sutter Av & Santa Cruz Av n. btn Santa Cruz Av & Huntington Av 0. between Huntington Av & Panama Av Left 6 2 Left 7 1 Left 5 3 Left Btn San Pablo Av & Kearney St Space Occupied % p. between Panama Av & Sacramento Av q. between Sacramento Av to Fresno Av r. between Fresno Av & Columbia Av s. between Columbia Av & Van Fleet Av % Left 5 5 Left 6 3 Left 6 6 Left 2 1 t. between Van Fleet Av & San Jose Av u. between San Jose Av & Lincoln Av Left 10 1 Left 5 0 Overall 1B. Along San Pablo Avenue (North Bound) Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Space Occupied % a. between Blake St & Potrero Av b. between Potrero Av & Madison Av c. between Madison Av & Manila Av d. between Manila Av & Schmidt Ln % Right 4 1 Right 26 0 Right 22 1 Right 19 0 e. between Schmidt Ln & Portola Dr f. between Portola Dr & Moeser Ln g. betweenn Moeser Ln & Waldo Av h. betweenn Waldo Av & Stockton Av Right 12 8 Right 10 0 Right Right 17 6 i. between Stockton Av & Eureka Av j. between Eureka Av & Lincoln Av Right 15 9 Right Along Kearney Street a. between Blake St & Potrero Av b. between Potrero Av & Madison Av c. North of Manila Av ( Off-Street) d. between Manila Av & Schmidt Ln Legend: Location Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied No Parking Left 12 3 Left 21 3 Left 0 0 Left 23 3 Right 9 2 Right 11 9 Right 0 0 Right 35 4 XXX # of Spaces are estimated by length e. betweenn Moeser Ln & Waldo Av f. betweenn Waldo Av & Stockton Av g. between Stockton Av & Eureka Av h. between Eureka Av & Lincoln Av Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Left Left Left Left 13 7 Right Right Right 25 0 Right Between San Pablo Avenue & Kearney Street a. On Blake Street b. On Potrero Avenue c. On Madison Avenue d. On Manila Avenue Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied top 3 0 top 0 0 top 0 0 top 0 0 bottom 6 5 bottom 0 0 bottom 5 0 bottom 0 0 e. On Schmidt Lane f. On Portola Drive g. On Moeser Lane h. On Waldo Avenue Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied top 8 1 top 0 0 top 0 0 top 6 2 bottom 5 5 bottom 0 0 bottom 5 1 bottom 7 3 i. On Stockton Avenue j. On Eureka Avenue k. On Lincoln Avenue Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied top 4 4 top 0 0 top 6 2 bottom 5 5 bottom 5 5 bottom 0 0 Tel: (510) Fax: (510)

73 B A Y M E T R I C S OFF - STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT El Cerrito Parking Survey SURVEY DATE: May 19, 2011 DAY: Thursday LOCATION El Cerrito Midsection SURVEY TIME: 12:00 PM CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: WD-OFF S U M M A R Y A. Along West Side of San Pablo Avenue B. Along East Side of San Pablo Avenue Overall Space Occupied % Space Occupied % Space Occupied % % % % A. Along West Side of San Pablo Avenue S U R V E Y 1. btn Blake St & Potrero Av 2. btn Potrero Av & Madison Av 3. btn Carlos Av & Madison Av 4. btn Madison Av & Jefferso5. btn Alameda Av & Bayview Av Chevron Gas Station Del Norte Plaza Carrows Restaurant US Post Office Eskaton Housing Parking Lot Midas Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied btn Bayview Av & Wenk Av 7. btn Wenk Av & Orchard Av 8. btn Orchard Av Tehama Av 9. btn Tehama Av & Burlingame Budget Truck Rental Terrace Inn & Suites Nibs Restaurant Salon Car Lot (Lock) Smog Check Auto Shop Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied D A T A 10. btn Burlingame Av & Plumas 11. btn Sutter Av & Santa Cr12. btn Santa Cruz & Huntington Big O Tirees Budget Inn Cleaner Eisenberg MD Inc. Car Lot (Lock) Little Hong Kong Restaurant Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied btn Huntington &Panama Av 14. btn Panama Av & Sacramento 15. btn Sacramento & Fresno Av 16. btn Fresno Av & Columbia Av Warehouse Jack in the Box El Cerrito Natural Grocery Abbey Carpet Music Store Dance Studio Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied btn Columbia Av & Van Fleet 18. btn Van Fleet Av & San Jose 19. btn San Jose & El Dorado St Creatures Pet Clinic Car Lot (Lock) Car Lot (Lock) Car Lot (Lock) Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied B. Along East Side of San Pablo Avenue 1. btn Blake St & Potrero Av 2. btn Potrero Av & Madison Av Liquor Store Oliver Plumbing Denny"s Concert Printing Shop St John School Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied btn Madison Av & Manila Av 4. btn Manila Av &Schmidt Ln Bank of the West Abbey Pet Hospital Big 5 Sporting City Hall Parking Police Station Parking El Cerrito City Hall Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied btn Schmidt Ln & Portola Dr 6. btn Portola Dr & Moeser Ln El Cerrito DMV Parking Lot Tap Plastics Marshalls Da Vista El Cerrito Moeser Lane Shopping Center Best Gas Station Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied btn Moeser Ln & Waldo Av 8. btn Waldo Av & Stockton Av 9. btn Stockton Av & Eureka Av Jay Yee Center Exchange Ball Chiropractic Center Bank of America Cerrito Galleria (Subway) Yuet Foo Restaurant Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied btn Eureka Av & Lincoln Av Guitar Center & Lighting Lot Yummy Chinese Restaurant Reality Auto Metrics (Lock) Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Tel: (510) Fax: (510)

74 B A Y M E T R I C S OFF - STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT El Cerrito Parking Survey SURVEY DATE: May 21, 2011 DAY: Saturday LOCATION El Cerrito Midsection SURVEY TIME: 12:00 PM CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: SAT-OFF S U M M A R Y A. Along West Side of San Pablo Avenue B. Along East Side of San Pablo Avenue Overall Space Occupied % Space Occupied % Space Occupied % % % % A. Along West Side of San Pablo Avenue S U R V E Y D A T A 1. btn Blake St & Potrero Av 2. btn Potrero Av & Madison Av 3. btn Carlos Av & Madison Av 4. btn Madison Av & Jefferson 5. btn Alameda Av & Bayview Av Chevron Gas Station Del Norte Plaza Carrows Restaurant US Post Office Eskaton Housing Parking Lot Midas Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied btn Bayview Av & Wenk Av 7. btn Wenk Av & Orchard Av 8. btn Orchard Av Tehama Av 9. btn Tehama Av & Burlingame Budget Truck Rental Terrace Inn & Suites Nibs Restaurant Salon Car Lot (Lock) Smog Check Auto Shop Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied btn Burlingame Av & Plumas 11. btn Sutter Av & Santa Cruz 12. btn Santa Cruz & Huntington Big O Tirees Budget Inn Cleaner Eisenberg MD Inc. Car Lot (Lock) Little Hong Kong Restaurant Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied btn Huntington &Panama Av 14. btn Panama Av & Sacramento 15. btn Sacramento & Fresno Av 16. btn Fresno Av & Columbia Av Warehouse Jack in the Box El Cerrito Natural Grocery Abbey Carpet Music Store Dance Studio Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied btn Columbia Av & Van Fleet 18. btn Van Fleet Av & San Jose 19. btn San Jose & El Dorado St Creatures Pet Clinic Car Lot (Lock) Car Lot (Lock) Car Lot (Lock) Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied B. Along East Side of San Pablo Avenue 1. btn Blake St & Potrero Av 2. btn Potrero Av & Madison Av Liquor Store Oliver Plumbing Denny"s Concert Printing Shop St John School Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied btn Madison Av & Manila Av 4. btn Manila Av &Schmidt Ln Bank of the West Abbey Pet Hospital Big 5 Sporting City Hall Parking Police Station Parking El Cerrito City Hall Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied btn Schmidt Ln & Portola Dr 6. btn Portola Dr & Moeser Ln El Cerrito DMV Parking Lot Tap Plastics Marshalls Da Vista El Cerrito Moeser Lane Shopping Center Best Gas Station Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied btn Moeser Ln & Waldo Av 8. btn Waldo Av & Stockton Av 9. btn Stockton Av & Eureka Av Jay Yee Center Exchange Ball Chiropractic Center Bank of America Cerrito Galleria (Subway) Yuet Foo Restaurant Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied btn Eureka Av & Lincoln Av Guitar Center & Lighting Lot Yummy Chinese Restaurant Reality Auto Metrics (Lock) Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Tel: (510) Fax: (510)

75 El Cerrito Plaza BART Station Area

76 B A Y M E T R I C S ON - STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT EL CERRITO PARKING SURVEY SURVEY DATE: May 19, 2011 DAY: THURSDAY LOCATION EL CERRITO PLAZA AREA SURVEY TIME: 12:00 PM CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: WD-ON 1. On Fairmount Avenue El Cerrito Plaza Area a. between San Pablo Ave & Kearney St b. between Kearney St & Lexington Av c. between Lexington Av & Liberty St d. between Liberty St & Richmond St On-Street Parking Summary Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied top 2 0 top 4 4 top 2 2 top Space Occupied % bottom 1 0 bottom 6 5 bottom 13 2 bottom On Fairmount Ave e. between Richmond St & Everett St f. between Everett St & Norvell St % Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied top 4 2 top On Central Avenue bottom 4 4 bottom % 2. On Central Avenue 3. On Lincoln Avenue a. between San Pablo Ave & Kearney St b. between Kearney St & Lexington Av c. between Lexington Av & Liberty St d. between Liberty St & Richmond St % Location Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied top 4 4 top 7 5 top 4 5 top On San Pablo Avenue bottom 5 3 bottom 9 7 bottom 4 5 bottom % e. between Richmond St & Everett St f. between Everett St & Norvell St 5. On Kearney Street Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied % top 6 4 top 8 1 bottom 0 0 bottom On Lexington Avenue % 3. On Lincoln Avenue a. between San Pablo Ave & Kearney St b. between Kearney St & Lexington Av c. between Lexington Av & Liberty St d. between Liberty St & Elm St 7. On Liberty Street Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied % top 6 2 top 8 1 top 7 0 top 5 2 bottom 0 0 bottom 8 5 bottom 10 9 bottom On Willow Street % e. between Elm St & Richmond St f. between Richmond St & Everett St g. between Everett St & Norvell St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 9. On Oak Street top 7 2 top 6 2 top % bottom 7 7 bottom 7 8 bottom On Elm Street 4. On San Pablo Avenue % a. between Lincoln Ave & Central Ave b. between Central Ave & Fairmount Ave c. between Fairmount Ave & Carlson Blvd d. south of Carlson Blvd Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 11. On Richmond Street left 14 5 left 15 8 left 12 4 left % right right right 6 2 right On Everett Street 5. On Kearney Street 6. On Lexington Avenue % a. between Lincoln Ave & Central Ave b. between Central Ave & Fairmount Ave a. between Lincoln Ave & Central Ave b. between Central Ave & Fairmount Ave Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 13. On Norvell Street left left left left % right right right right On Coronado Street 7. On Liberty Street % a. between Lincoln Ave & Willow St b. between Willow St & Central Ave c. between Central Ave & Fairmount Ave Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 15. On Tahoe Place left 7 5 left 15 4 left % right 9 11 right right On Victoria Street 8. On Willow Street 9. On Oak Street 10. On Elm Street % a. between Liberty St & Oak St b. between Elm St & Richmond St a. between Willow St & Central Ave a. between Lincoln Ave & Willow St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 17. On Behrens Street top 7 2 top 7 3 left 15 9 left % bottom 7 7 bottom 10 9 right right On Richmond Street Overall a. between Lincoln Ave & Willow St b. between Willow St & Central Ave c. between Central Ave & Fairmount Ave Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Space Occupied % left left left % right 10 3 right 11 4 right On Everett Street 13. On Norvell Street Legend: a. between Lincoln Ave & Central Ave b. between Central Ave & Fairmount Ave a. between Lincoln Ave & Central Ave b. between Central Ave & Fairmount Ave Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied No Parking left left left left right 21 7 right 15 8 right 21 5 right 22 7 XXX # of Spaces are estimated by length 14. On Coronado Street 15. On Tahoe Place 16. On Victoria Street a. between Fairmount Ave & Tahoe Place a. between Coronado St & Victoria St a. between Fairmount Ave & Tahoe Place Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 16 5 top 8 1 left 15 2 right 14 4 bottom 12 3 right On Behrens Street a. between Fairmount Ave & C St b. between C St & B St c. between B St & Brighton Ave Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 14 6 left 9 5 left right 17 7 right 7 2 right 18 6 SURVEY DATA SUMMARY

77 B A Y M E T R I C S ON - STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT EL CERRITO PARKING SURVEY SURVEY DATE: May 21, 2011 DAY: SATURDAY LOCATION EL CERRITO PLAZA AREA SURVEY TIME: 12:00 PM CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: SAT-ON 1. On Fairmount Avenue El Cerrito Plaza Area a. between San Pablo Ave & Kearney St b. between Kearney St & Lexington Av c. between Lexington Av & Liberty St d. between Liberty St & Richmond St On-Street Parking Summary Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied top 2 2 top 4 3 top 2 0 top 19 5 Space Occupied % bottom 1 0 bottom 6 5 bottom 13 3 bottom On Fairmount Ave e. between Richmond St & Everett St f. between Everett St & Norvell St % Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied top 4 0 top On Central Avenue bottom 4 1 bottom % 2. On Central Avenue 3. On Lincoln Avenue a. between San Pablo Ave & Kearney St b. between Kearney St & Lexington Av c. between Lexington Av & Liberty St d. between Liberty St & Richmond St % Location Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied top 4 4 top 7 5 top 4 3 top On San Pablo Avenue bottom 5 5 bottom 9 6 bottom 4 4 bottom % e. between Richmond St & Everett St f. between Everett St & Norvell St 5. On Kearney Street Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied % top 6 2 top 8 0 bottom 0 0 bottom On Lexington Avenue % 3. On Lincoln Avenue a. between San Pablo Ave & Kearney St b. between Kearney St & Lexington Av c. between Lexington Av & Liberty St d. between Liberty St & Elm St 7. On Liberty Street Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied % top 6 0 top 8 0 top 7 0 top 5 2 bottom 0 0 bottom 8 2 bottom 10 5 bottom On Willow Street % e. between Elm St & Richmond St f. between Richmond St & Everett St g. between Everett St & Norvell St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 9. On Oak Street top 7 3 top 6 1 top % bottom 7 1 bottom 7 1 bottom On Elm Street 4. On San Pablo Avenue % a. between Lincoln Ave & Central Ave b. between Central Ave & Fairmount Ave c. between Fairmount Ave & Carlson Blvd d. south of Carlson Blvd Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 11. On Richmond Street left 14 3 left 15 6 left left % right right right 6 6 right On Everett Street 5. On Kearney Street 6. On Lexington Avenue % a. between Lincoln Ave & Central Ave b. between Central Ave & Fairmount Ave a. between Lincoln Ave & Central Ave b. between Central Ave & Fairmount Ave Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 13. On Norvell Street left 25 6 left left left % right right right right On Coronado Street 7. On Liberty Street % a. between Lincoln Ave & Willow St b. between Willow St & Central Ave c. between Central Ave & Fairmount Ave Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 15. On Tahoe Place left 7 2 left 15 4 left % right 9 6 right 11 6 right On Victoria Street 8. On Willow Street 9. On Oak Street 10. On Elm Street % a. between Liberty St & Oak St b. between Elm St & Richmond St a. between Willow St & Central Ave a. between Lincoln Ave & Willow St Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied 17. On Behrens Street top 7 1 top 7 2 left 15 3 left % bottom 7 4 bottom 10 3 right 19 6 right On Richmond Street Overall a. between Lincoln Ave & Willow St b. between Willow St & Central Ave c. between Central Ave & Fairmount Ave Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Space Occupied % left 11 3 left 10 4 left % right 10 6 right 11 5 right On Everett Street 13. On Norvell Street Legend: a. between Lincoln Ave & Central Ave b. between Central Ave & Fairmount Ave a. between Lincoln Ave & Central Ave b. between Central Ave & Fairmount Ave Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied No Parking left left left left 20 7 right 21 3 right 15 9 right 21 7 right 22 3 XXX # of Spaces are estimated by length 14. On Coronado Street 15. On Tahoe Place 16. On Victoria Street a. between Fairmount Ave & Tahoe Place a. between Coronado St & Victoria St a. between Fairmount Ave & Tahoe Place Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left top 8 1 left 15 3 right 14 5 bottom 12 2 right On Behrens Street a. between Fairmount Ave & C St b. between C St & B St c. between B St & Brighton Ave Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied Location Space Occupied left 14 6 left 9 2 left right 17 7 right 7 4 right 18 6 SURVEY DATA SUMMARY

78 B A Y M E T R I C S PARKING TURNOVER (LICENSE PLATE SURVEY) SUMMARY PROJECT: El Cerrito Parking Survey SURVEY DATE: 5/19/2011 SURVEY DAY: Thursday LOCATION: El Cerrito Plaza Area SURVEY TIME: 8:00 AM CITY: El Cerrito FILE: TO-8AM Legend: XXX Indicates an empty space Indicates an occupied space containing a different car No Parking Not a space 1. Along Lincoln Avenue a. between BART track & Elm St b. between Elm St & Richmont St b. between Richmont St & Everett St d. between Everett St & Norvell St A384 L927 U238 O654 E016 N317 C740 2 S008 R411 G857 R531 S522 3 F320 C359 G271 4 U781 J286 S523 S092 5 K018 6 H152 V T Along Willow Street 3. Along Central Avenue a. between Elm Street & Richmont St a. btn BART track & Richmont St b. between Richmont St & Everett St c. between Everett St & Norvell St S136 C739 2 A481 J354 E B1 4 T360 5 E334 6 V313 7 L N Along Fairmont Avenue 5. Along Tahoe Place a. btn BART track & Richmont St b. between Richmont St & Everett St c. between Everett St & Norvell St a. between Coronado St & Victoria St C685 E299 N960 C859 C C048 C830 N112 3 L033 H T951 4 Z409 D893 12RE P675 8 U298 9 R M W Z L

79 6. Along Elm Street 7. Along Richmond Street a. between Lincoln Av & Willow St a. between Lincoln Av & Willow St b. between Willow St & Central Av c. between Central Av & Fairmont J152 M003 P196 F Z657 2 Y881 L639 L410 W390 V982 K300 B355 3 NEW CAR D P219 X612 4 N T930 3BRE U787 B V599 T U415 Y925 7 A104 M R131 H967 W545 9 G005 R050 J161 N U A L704 R155 H P N H G166 S F Z DYG 19 Y Along Everett Street 9. Along Norvell Street a. between Lincoln Av & Central Av b. between Central Av & Fairmont a. between Lincoln Av & Central Av b. between Central Av & Fairmont G967 W062 U533 J363 H185 W U F179 H065 H744 Z722 T347 3 T360 F692 R737 L347 C516 F908 4 J693 P P450 V819 BYND X947 J990 5 M470 G960 Y260 C815 G205 L104 MOTOCYCLE 6 P917 S L615 B536 7 H732 T126 E599 G748 K745 AW44 8 E753 G439 W526 B634 W554 9 N311 A576 D R812 U819 H C911 P823 A H249 D525 N H230 W L492 A414 G N887 U910 H T450 H C N898 G023 Z396 W NEW CAR A X292 P N Along Coronado Street 11. Along Victoria Street 12. Along Behrens Street a. between Fairmount & Tahoe a. between Fairmount & Tahoe a. between Fairmount & B Street b. South of B Street T311 R937 H221 P G159 S929 2 N677 X435 N V762 L198 3 V359 G631 U842 P146 C K314 4 R731 S198 G243 A836 D M579 4BET A733 6 B282 T018 R106 7 YBRD CITS 8 RNLT 9 W S H354 B V711 S968 L Z618 U V865 L N E

80 B A Y M E T R I C S PARKING TURNOVER (LICENSE PLATE SURVEY) SUMMARY PROJECT: El Cerrito Parking Survey SURVEY DATE: 5/19/2011 SURVEY DAY: Thursday LOCATION: El Cerrito Plaza Area SURVEY TIME: 1:00 PM CITY: El Cerrito FILE: TO-1PM Legend: XXX XXX Indicates an empty space Indicates an occupied space containing a different car Consecutive spaces indicate the same car still occupies the space since 8:00 AM No Parking Not a space 1. Along Lincoln Avenue a. between BART track & Elm St b. between Elm St & Richmont St c. between Richmont St & Everett St d. between Everett St & Norvell St L927 R814 O654 E016 N317 R S008 G857 R531 X470 X F320 C359 G271 Z625 H282 F Y932 S523 S092 L379 V S105 K018 P958 N H093 H152 V L603 C N T Along Willow Street 3. Along Central Avenue a. between Elm Street & Richmont St a. btn BART track & Richmont St b. between Richmont St & Everett St c. between Everett St & Norvell St P783 S136 D A481 J354 E S297 B T360 C E334 F V L N Along Fairmont Avenue 5. Along Tahoe Place a. btn BART track & Richmont St b. between Richmont St & Everett St c. between Everett St & Norvell St a. between Coronado St & Victoria St C048 C N960 C859 C C048 Y772 C830 N M328 H438 F Z409 D893 12RE P J R M W

81 6. Along Elm Street 7. Along Richmond Street a. between Lincoln Av & Willow St a. between Lincoln Av & Willow St b. between Willow St & Central Av c. between Central Av & Fairmont J152 P196 F Z Y881 L639 L410 W390 V982 B355 H D M196 V F T930 3BRE U787 B V599 T424 D U E612 Y A104 E822 92B N R127 H967 W545 D G005 R050 J161 N U A848 L L704 G686 H P N796 29A G166 S F Z DYG Y H Along Everett Street 9. Along Norvell Street a. between Lincoln Av & Central Av b. between Central Av & Fairmont a. between Lincoln Av & Central Av b. between Central Av & Fairmont G967 Y037 U533 J363 Z F592 K613 H065 H744 R737 W995 YTLS 2 3 E504 X831 F692 L347 C516 F J693 P P450 V819 BYND X947 A M470 G960 C X248 J535 MOTOCYCLE 5 6 W612 P917 N E790 V818 B H732 E599 G748 K745 W852 AW E753 G439 W526 B634 WUMP T193 B NEW CAR A576 G R812 C740 V360 H Z871 P823 A599 L T232 D525 N548 H H230 W328 JN548 A R720 A414 G899 M N887 M927 H T450 U R G487 A693 Z396 W N203 A935 F J766 X292 P N Along Coronado Street 11. Along Victoria Street 12. Along Behrens Street a. between Fairmount & Tahoe a. between Fairmount & Tahoe a. between Fairmount & B Street b. South of B Street T900 T311 R937 H221 P540 T472 G N677 X435 N V762 L V359 C391 H221 C245 S C476 S198 J736 R808 D BET 2477 A B282 T018 R R YBRD F260 CITS D A478 F G S457 L D V711 W Z V865 L M E

82 B A Y M E T R I C S PARKING TURNOVER (LICENSE PLATE SURVEY) SUMMARY PROJECT: El Cerrito Parking Survey SURVEY DATE: 5/19/2011 SURVEY DAY: Thursday LOCATION: El Cerrito Plaza Area SURVEY TIME: 4:00 PM CITY: El Cerrito FILE: TO-4PM Legend: XXX XXX XXX Indicates an empty space Indicates an occupied space containing a different car Consecutive spaces indicate the same car still occupies the space since 8:00AM Consecutive spaces indicate the same car still occupies the space since 1:00 PM No Parking Not a space 1. Along Lincoln Avenue a. between BART track & Elm St b. between Elm St & Richmont St c. between Richmont St & Everett St d. between Everett St & Norvell St Y932 L927 R814 N317 R222 S008 R531 X470 X F320 C359 G271 Z625 H282 F939 S523 S092 L379 V943 S105 K018 P N Along Willow Street 3. Along Central Avenue H093 H152 V038 L603 C385 N510 T807 a. between Elm Street & Richmont St a. btn BART track & Richmont St b. between Richmont St & Everett St c. between Everett St & Norvell St K477 S136 D473 A481 J354 E681 S127 B422 T360 V313 N Along Fairmont Avenue 5. Along Tahoe Place a. btn BART track & Richmont St b. between Richmont St & Everett St c. between Everett St & Norvell St a. between Coronado St & Victoria St C685 U298 N960 C859 C C048 Y772 C830 N112 L033 H Z409 D893 12RE P675 J298 R022 M863 W238 L

83 6. Along Elm Street 7. Along Richmond Street a. between Lincoln Av & Willow St a. between Lincoln Av & Willow St b. between Willow St & Central Av c. between Central Av & Fairmont A009 C314 J Y881 L639 L410 V982 C150 B355 W H590 D K300 M A T930 3BRE G442 B V599 T424 D103 H681 U403 N650 T E612 Y A104 M105 E822 92B1 N337 R127 H967 D571 W545 D842 G005 R050 N864 U315 L704 G686 H P787 Z657 G166 S Along Everett Street 9. Along Norvell Street a. between Lincoln Av & Central Av b. between Central Av & Fairmont a. between Lincoln Av & Central Av b. between Central Av & Fairmont G967 H077 J363 Z NEW CAR F592 E504 H065 H744 R737 W995 YTLS 8564 F179 X831 F692 L347 C516 F908 J693 P154 P450 V819 BYND X947 L856 M470 D X248 J535 MOTOCYCLE W612 P917 N D840 W314 B536 H732 T126 E599 G748 K745 W852 AW E753 G439 W526 B634 WUMP T193 F486 G413 W554 R812 V360 D P823 A599 L871 T232 D525 N548 H907 H230 JN548 A843 R720 A414 G899 M672 N887 L999 M927 H932 H R571 G487 A693 Z396 W299 N203 A935 F683 NEW CAR X292 P221 N873 L239 3DYG Y837 H Along Coronado Street 11. Along Victoria Street 12. Along Behrens Street a. between Fairmount & Tahoe a. between Fairmount & Tahoe a. between Fairmount & B Street b. South of B Street T900 T311 R937 H221 P540 T472 G159 N677 X435 N V762 L198 V359 C391 H221 C245 L729 K314 C476 S BET 2477 A733 B282 T018 V R106 YBRD F260 CITS A478 B W R270 U452 G903 R746 S V711 Z618 L833 V M414 E727 D015

84 B A Y M E T R I C S OFF - STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT El Cerrito Parking Survey SURVEY DATE: May 19, 2011 DAY: Thursday LOCATION El Cerrito Plaza Area SURVEY TIME: 12:00 PM CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: WD-OFF S U R V E Y D A T A SUMMARY A. El Cerrito Plaza (South of Fairmount Av to County Line & East of San Pablo Av to BART Track) a. Bounded by Evelyn Av, Plaza b. South Lot (Trader Joe's) c. West Lot (See's Candy, Bed d. West Lot (Romano's Macaroni El Cerrito Plaza Area Drive, Track & County Line Bath and Beyond) Grill ) Off-Street Parking Summary Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied A. El Cerrito Plaza Total e. Central Lot (West of Lucky, f. Central Lot (North of Petco, g. North Lot (Tire Store) h North Lot (South of Starbuck, Space Occupied % Ross ) JoAnn) T Mobile) % Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied B. El Cerrito Plaza Area Total i. North Lot (AT & T, j. North Lot (Dream World) k. Central Lot (Panda Expresss, l. West Lot (Barne & Noble) Space Occupied % H&R Block ) Pasta Pomodoro) % Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied C. BART Lot Total m. West Lot (Pier 1 Import) n. West Lot (Chase Bank) o. West Lot (Mechanic Bank) p. Wells Fargo Bank Space Occupied % % Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied B. South on El Dorado Street - Lincoln Avenue Overall 1. btn El Dorado St - Lincoln Av & Central Av Total Rob's Automobile Sunrise Cleaners, Ba Le Deli L & L Chinese Restaurant Wen Wu, Pacific East Medical Space Occupied % Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied % CONSTRUCTION 16 7 Speed Oil Change KFC Burger King BART Lot (B) Legend: Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Business Lot 2. btn Central Av & Fairmount Av BART Lot Cerrito Theater Therapy Vacuum World Liquors Store Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Nation's Restaurant Quality Turn-up ACE Hardware Store Fairmount Auto Service Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied BART Lot (A) BART Lot (C) Auto Repair Shop Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied South of Fairmount ACE Employee Parking Lot Mattress Discounters & Kragen Payless Peet's Coffee & Tea Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Tel: (510) Fax: (510)

85 B A Y M E T R I C S OFF - STREET PARKING OCCUPANCY SURVEY SUMMARY PROJECT El Cerrito Parking Survey SURVEY DATE: May 21, 2011 DAY: Saturday LOCATION El Cerrito Plaza Area SURVEY TIME: 12:00 PM CITY: EL CERRITO FILE: SAT-OFF S U R V E Y D A T A SUMMARY A. El Cerrito Plaza (South of Fairmount Av to County Line & East of San Pablo Av to BART Track) a. Bounded by Evelyn Av, Plaza b. South Lot (Trader Joe's) c. West Lot (See's Candy, Bed d. West Lot (Romano's Macaroni El Cerrito Plaza Area Drive, Track & County Line (Farmers Market - use 32 space) Bath and Beyond) Grill ) Off-Street Parking Summary Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied A. El Cerrito Plaza Total e. Central Lot (West oflucky, f. Central Lot (North of Petco, g. North Lot (Tire Store) h North Lot (South of Starbuck, Space Occupied % Ross ) JoAnn) T Mobile) % Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied B. El Cerrito Plaza Area Total i. North Lot (AT & T, j. North Lot (Dream World) k. Central Lot (Panda Expresss, l. West Lot (Barne & Noble) Space Occupied % H&R Block ) Pasta Pomodoro) % Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied C. BART Lot lock Total m. West Lot (Pier 1 Import) n. West Lot (Chase Bank) o. West Lot (Mechanic Bank) p. Wells Fargo Bank Space Occupied % % Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied B. South on El Dorado Street - Lincoln Avenue Overall 1. btn El Dorado St - Lincoln Av & Central Av Total Rob's Automobile Sunrise Cleaners, Ba Le Deli L & L Chinese Restaurant Wen Wu, Pacific East Medical Space Occupied % Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied % CONSTRUCTION 16 3 Speed Oil Change KFC Burger King BART Lot (B) Legend: Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Business Lot 2. btn Central Av & Fairmount Av BART Lot Cerrito Theater Therapy Vacuum World Liquors Store Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Nation's Restaurant Quality Turn-up ACE Hardware Store Fairmount Auto Service Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied BART Lot (A) BART Lot (C) Auto Repair Shop Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied South of Fairmount ACE Employee Parking Lot Mattress Discounters & Kragen Payless Peet's Coffee & Tea Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Space Occupied Tel: (510) Fax: (510)

86 APPENDIX II Residential Parking Permit Zone

87

88

89

90

91 APPENDIX III Best Practice Examples Presentation to City Council on July 18, 2011

92 El Cerrito Parking Study July 18,

93 Parking Study Overview Survey Existing Conditions Assess Future Parking Needs Best Practices Research Research best practice examples to identify potential ti transportation t ti and parking management strategies Develop Strategies to Manage Future Parking Demand 27

94 Case Studies City Transit Oriented Development Rail Service Citywide Population Area (sq. mi.) Allowable Density in TOD El Cerrito Hayward 1) El Cerrito del Norte BART Station Area* Heavy Rail 24, max height 2) San Pablo Avenue Corridor* (BART) 70 du/acre 3) El Cerrito Plaza BART Station Area* FAR=2 1) Downtown Hayward BART Station Area, 2) South Hayward BART Station/ Mission Blvd* Northern California Heavy Rail (BART) 144, max height 100 du/acre Oakland 1) Rockridge BART Station Area/ College Ave 2) MacArthur BART Transit Village* Heavy Rail (BART) 391, max height FAR=4.5 Mountain View Downtown Mountain View Heavy Rail (Caltrain) 74, du/acre FAR=1.85 Redwood City Downtown Redwood City Heavy Rail (Caltrain) 77, story max height No limit on residential density Southern California Pasadena Old Pasadena Light Rail (Metro) 137, max height 87 du/acre FAR=3 Portland Lloyd District Light Rail 584, max height (MAX) FAR=12 *Planned TOD

95 Summary of Transportation & Parking Strategies

96 City of Hayward TOD Case Studies: Hayward Downtown TOD South Hayward BART Station/ Mission Boulevard TOD (planned) Area Type (MTC Handbook): City Center/Urban Neighborhood (Downtown Hayward)

97 Downtown Hayward Core Area Hayward BART Station - 4,900 average weekday riders - 2 BART Lines min headway during peak - 1,437 parking spaces Bus Connection - 16 bus routes (AC Transit) Allowable Density Allowable Density - 65 du per acre max height

98 Downtown Hayward Overview Core Area Plan (1992) High density housing Revitalization of B Street commercial corridor Connection to the Hayward BART Station and civic buildings. Development elopment Highlights Atherton Place: 83 units (1995) City Hall Parking Structure and B Street Marketplace (1999) Pinnacle City Centre Apartments: 192 units (2000) City Walk: 77 townhomes (2003) Renaissance Walk: 46 condos (2004) Studio Walk: 70 lofts (2005) Grand Terrace Apartments: 235 townhouses Cinema Place (2007) Cannery Area residential developments: 850 units (2008) City Walk Townhomes Hayward City Hall

99 Parking Management Strategies 1. Reduced Parking near Transit Land Use Standard Near Transit Residential 1.5 to 2 per unit 1 per unit Office 1 per 200 gsf 1 per 230 gsf Retail 1 per 200 gsf 1 per 230 gsf 2. Shared Parking Up to 25% reduction in parking requirements for land uses with different peak parking patterns 3. Reduced Parking Space Size Standard d parking stall widths may be reduced d by 6 inches. Public garage in downtown Hayward 4. In-Lieu Payment Payments to the City in lieu of satisfying minimum parking requirements for non-residential uses. The fee is used to fund municipal parking facilities. 5. TDM Program Up to 20% reduction in parking requirements with the provision of a TDM Plan 6 Credit for Bicycle & Motorcycle Parking 6. Credit for Bicycle & Motorcycle Parking 4 bicycle or 2 motorcycle parking spaces = 1 vehicle parking

100 Downtown Hayward Today 38% of commuters take BART or AC Transit, six times the rate among general Hayward population (2006 Resident Survey). More than 50% said downtown Hayward is their primary shopping destination for their daily needs. Drive-alone trips to Hayward BART Station decreased by 6% from 55% to 49% (1998 & 2008 BART Station Profile Study) Walk trips to Hayward BART Station more than doubled from 10% to 22%. Carpool and vanpool trips to Hayward BART Station increased from 3.7% to 7%.

101 South Hayward BART/Mission Boulevard Concept Plan Area South Hayward BART Station - 3,300 average weekday riders - 2 BART Lines min headway during peak - 1,077 parking spaces Bus Connection - 6 bus routes (AC Transit) Allowable Density Allowable Density du per acre - 7 stories max height

102 South Hayward BART/ Mission Boulevard South Hayward BART/Mission Boulevard Design Concept Plan (2007) Transit-oriented development around South Hayward BART Station and along Mission Boulevard Allows for the highest density in the area for properties in closest proximity to the BART Station ( units per acre with ground floor retail) A community park near BART Station South Hayward BART/Mission Boulevard Plan

103 Parking Management Strategies (Proposed) 1. Reduced Parking near Transit Land Use Standard Station Area/Mission Blvd Residential 1 to 2 per unit per unit Retail 1 per gsf 1 per 315 gsf Office 1 per 250 gsf 1 per 315 gsf 2. Commercial Parking Benefit District Install meters in commercial areas and adjust rates to create 15% vacancy on each block. Dedicate parking revenue to public improvements where it is collected 3. Residential Parking Benefit District i t Similar to Residential Permit Parking District, but allows commuters to pay to use surplus on-street parking in residential areas. Return parking revenues to the neighborhood to fund public improvements. 4. TDM Program 4. TDM Program Invest meter revenues to support TDM Programs (e.g., transit pass, carpool, vanpool programs, etc)

104 Parking Management Strategies cont d 5. Universal Transit Passes Using the fund collected from parking revenue, provide free transit passes to employees and residents (e.g., South Hayward BART Affordable Family and Senior Housing Project offers free AC Transit EasyPass for more than half of the units) 6. Parking Cash Out Require employers to offer their employees the option to cash out their parking subsidy. 7. Unbundled Parking Require new office and residential developments to unbundle the full cost of parking from the cost of the housing or commercial space. 8. Carsharing Program Require developers to pay into a carshare start-up fund, and or partially or fully to subsidize operation costs.

105 City of Oakland TOD Case Studies: Rockridge BART Station Area/ College Avenue MacArthur BART Station Transit Village (planned) Area Type (MTC Handbook): City Center/Urban Neighborhood

106 Rockridge BART Station/ College Avenue Area Rockridge BART Station - 4,840 average weekday riders - 1 BART Line - 15-min headway during peak parking spaces Bus Connection - 3 bus routes (AC Transit) Allowable Density Allowable Density -FAR=2-35 max height

107 Rockridge BART Station/ College Avenue Overview Rockridge BART Station Area/ College Avenue Commercial Corridor Primarily residential neighborhood with a commercial core. Vibrant retail corridor organically grown around BART Station More than 80 restaurants, cafes and upscale retail stores with $10 million in annual sales. BART parking facility is leveraged to attract visitors to the retail corridor 37% of BART patrons walk to the station 39% of BART patrons drive alone to the station College Avenue in Oakland

108 Parking Management Strategies 1. Shared use of BART Parking BART parking demand typically peaks during weekday periods, where as the retail center generates most parking demand on weekend. Therefore, BART parking lot serves as an informal shared parking facility for the nearby retail uses. 2. Carsharing Since 2006, Rockridge BART Station provides carshare pods for ZipCar and City Carshare services. Rockridge BART Station Parking Lot

109 MacArthur BART Station Transit Village MacArthur BART Station - 7,800 average weekday riders - 3 BART Lines - 6-min frequency during peak - 32% Drive, 15% Transit, 35% Walk (2008) Bus Connection - 7 bus routes (AC Transit) Allowable Density - 82 du per acre - 6 stories max height

110 MacArthur BART Station Transit Village Overview Redevelopment Plan for the MacArthur BART Station Transit Village (2008) Redevelop blighted parking lot and underutilized sites surrounding the BART Station Enhanced access to the BART Station Public transit connections Development Highlights (Proposed) 675 units of high-density multi-family housing 20% affordable rental and 80% market rate residential 34,000 sq. ft. of ground-floor neighborhood serving retail 5,000 sq. ft. of community space Replace 300 of 600 existing BART parking spaces Up to 675 residential parking spaces (1 space per dwelling unit) MacArthur BART Station Transit Village

111 Parking Management Strategies (Proposed) 1. TOD Zoning Overlay Land Use Standard S-15 Zone Residential i 1 to 2 per unit 0.5 per unit Retail 1 per 200 to 450 gsf None 2. Residential Parking Benefit District A portion of Residential Parking Permits could be sold to BART patrons on a monthly basis. This revenue could be used to pay for RPP capital and operating costs. 3. Unbundled Parking When the building units are sold or leased, the parking spaces would be rented or sold separately from building space. 4. Market Rate BART Parking Parking spaces would be priced at $5 a day. The revenue would be used to pay for attended parking Hour Metered Parking In order to accommodate additional BART patrons parking, approximately forty 10-hour metered parking spaces would be provided on the streets immediately adjacent to the station area. The revenue could be used for improvements in the neighborhood. 45

112 Parking Management Strategies cont d 6. Remote Parking Remote parking facilities allow use of shared and less costly parking facilities within close proximity of BART Station to accommodate peak parking demand (e.g., church) 7. Transit Discounts for Carpool & Vanpoolers BART patrons commuting via carpool or vanpool may receive subsidized transit passes. 8. Attended Parking Parking attendant would retain keys to each vehicle so that he or she can organize efficient parking by shuffling the parked cars as needed during off-peak hours and upon patron return. This strategy is expected to increase the parking supply by up to 35 percent. 9. Carsharing Membership Carshare membership ($50/year) will be included as part of HOA dues for all residential units in the Transit Village. 10. Village Resident EcoPass Lite An EcoPass, a transit pass offered at a discounted group rate, would be offered to residents. 11. TDM Coordinator The residential community in the Transit Village would have a designated TDM Coordinator who would be responsible for implementing and managing the parking and TDM programs.

113 City of Mountain View Transit Service: Heavy rail (Caltrain), Light rail and bus (VTA) Private shuttles TOD Case Study: Downtown Mountain View Area Type (MTC Handbook): Transit Neighborhood

114 Downtown Mountain View Mountain View Caltrain Station - 3,300 average weekday riders - 15-minute headway during peak parking spaces Bus Connection - 4 bus routes (VTA) - 4 private shuttles Allowable Density - 50 du per acre - FAR=1.85

115 Downtown Mountain View Overview Downtown Precise Plan (1998, updated 2004) Castro Street is the functional and symbolic center of the community Create an active and attractive pedestrian environment Moderate density development near transit Reduce parking demand in downtown Provide adequate and well-located parking within downtown Centennial Plaza in downtown Mountain View VTA light rail connection to Mountain View Transit Center (1991)

116 Parking Management Strategies 1. Reduced Parking Requirements Land Use Standard Downtown Retail 1 to 180 gsf 1 per 300 gsf Office 1 per 300 gsf 1 per 333 gsf 2. Transit District Mountain View provides a Transit District i t ( T Zone) overlay zone, which h allows properties zoned for industrial or commercial use within 2,000 feet of a rail transit station for mixed uses, higher FAR and up to 20% reduction in parking requirements. 3. In-Lieu Payment The City allows developers to pay a one-time fee in lieu of providing the minimum required parking spaces ($26,000 per space). So far, these inlieu fees have been used to construct two public parking garages in downtown Mountain View. 4. Flexible Zones Castro Street was reconfigured from a 4-lane arterial to a 3-lane pedestrian-oriented street. Flexible zones convert the curbside parking lane to patio space for an outdoor café or as curbside parking. Flexible Street in downtown Mountain View.

117 Parking Management Strategies cont d 5. Shared Parking The City code allows shared parking for nonresidential uses if the uses generate parking demands d during different times of day. 6. Parking Exemptions Ground floor uses in the central downtown area are exempt from any parking requirements except for restaurants and administrative offices which are required to pay 50% of in-lieu fees. 7. Innovative Parking Design The City constructed a 400-space parking garage in downtown which features 14,000 sq. ft. of ground floor retail space, window-like openings with metal work and electricity-generating solar panels. Passageway to parking structure in the back Parking garage in downtown Mountain View

118 Redwood City Transit Service: Heavy rail (Caltrain), Local Bus (SamTrans), Private Shuttle TOD Case Study: TOD Case Study: Downtown Redwood City

119 Downtown Redwood City Redwood City Caltrain Station - 2,000 average weekday riders - 15-min frequency during peak parking spaces Bus Connection - 10 bus routes (SamTrans) - 1 private shuttle Allowable Density - No restriction on residential density - 12 stories max height

120 Downtown Redwood City Overview Civic improvements (1980s and 1990s) Downtown Area Plan (2000) Downtown Precise Plan (2011) Development Highlights Transit-oriented destinations for cultural activities (e.g., outdoor concerts, movie complex, etc) City Center Plaza Apartments: 139 affordable units with ground-floor restaurants Franklin Street Apartments: 206 units (2002) Montgomery Village 20-screen movie theater with 85,999 sq. ft. of groundfloor restaurant and retail (2006) Le Coeur de la Ville: 21 affordable townhomes Franklin Street Apartment Free outdoor concert in downtown

121 Parking Management Strategies 1. Variable Market Rate pricing The City eliminated time-limits for on-street parking completely and installed meters on all on-street parking spaces in downtown. The city staffs are required to survey and adjust rates annually, to allow 15% vacancy in each block. 2. Parking Benefit District All parking meter and permit revenue is deposited into the Parking Fund. These monies are used only for expenses related directly to the maintenance and operation of the Downtown parking 3. Reduced Parking Requirement Land Use Standard Downtown Residential 2 per unit 0.75 to 1.5 per unit Retail 1 per 200 gsf 1 per 166 gsf (single-use) or 1 per 333 gsf (shared) 4. Parking Maximum For properties located in the Downtown Parking Zone, maximum parking requirements are the same as the minimum requirements for commercial uses, and twice the minimum requirements for residential uses.

122 Parking Management Strategies cont d 5. On-Street Parking Credits New on-street parking spaces proposed in the Downtown Precise Plan may be counted toward the minimum parking requirement for the adjacent property. 6. In-Lieu Fee The City allows property owners in the Downtown Precise Plan Area to make a one-time payment ($10,000 per space) in lieu of satisfying parking requirements for all new development projects. In-lieu parking fess are used exclusively to make available additional parking spaces for public use within the downtown parking zone. 7. Unbundled Parking In multi-family residential buildings or complexes, parking spaces should be leased or sold separately from the rental or purchase fees for dwelling units. 8. Shared Parking Bonus All shared parking spaces are counted as two parking spaces toward the fulfillment of the minimum requirement.

123 Downtown Redwood City Today "Parking is now easier to find in prime areas, and parking in lots, garages and side streets is better utilized. Thanks to the new system our prime parking areas are less crowded despite the presence of more people and cars. So, while some folks might not like having to adapt, we would have been worse off had we done nothing." Dan Jack, Downtown Development Coordinator for Redwood City, October 2008 Downtown Redwood City

124 Pasadena, California Transit Service: Light rail (Metro), Local/express bus (5 different transit operators) TOD Case Study: Old Pasadena Character: Pasadena s s urban core with a major commercial corridor and mixed-uses

125 Old Pasadena TOD Memorial Park Station & Del Mar Station - 6-min headway during peak Bus Connection - Metro Local (6 routes) - Metro Rapid (2 routes) - Foothill Transit (2 routes) - LADOT (1 route) - Pasadena Area Rapid Transit (5 routes) Allowable Density - 87 du per acre - 90 max height

126 Old Pasadena Overview Old Pasadena Redevelopment Plan (1983) Pasadena General Plan (1994) Central District i t Specific Plan (2004) Compact, multi-use environment Shared parking Pedestrian-friendly environment Historic preservation Development Highlights Holly Street Village Apartments: 374 units with ground floor office and retail (1994) Archstone del Mar Station 347 units (2004) The Raymond Renaissance: 50-unit mixed use (2010) Westgates Apartment Pasadena 842 units (2009) DeLacey Place: 30 units (2009) Archstone Del Mar Residential Development

127 Parking Management Strategies 1. Parking Pricing In 1993, the City eliminated free on-street parking and installed meters over 650 on-street parking spaces in Old Pasadena. As of 2011, the price is $1.25 per hour except for fringe area where the rate is $0.75 per hour. 2. Parking Benefit District The revenue generated from metered parking (approximately $1.2 million a year) is reinvested back to the downtown to pay for amenities that can attract customers to downtown, such as cleaning the sidewalks, planting street trees, street lights, etc. 3. Reduced Parking Requirement for TOD Land Use Standard ¼ mile from Light Rail Station Residential 2 per unit 1 to 1.5 per unit Office 1 per 333 gsf 1 per 416 gsf 4. Parking Maximum For properties located within ¼ mile from a light rail station, maximum parking requirements are the same as the minimum requirements for non-residential uses, and 25% more of the minimum for residential uses.

128 Parking Management Strategies cont d 5. Credit Parking Zoning City allows developers to claim parking spaces in a public parking facility as a substitution for providing required off-street parking spaces. Developers pay the City an annual fee of $127 a space. This program is different from in-lieu program that there has to be physical parking spaces to be substituted. 6. Public Parking Facilities The revenue generated from credit parking zoning helped to fund public parking structures. The public parking structures provide 90 minutes for free and $2 per hour thereafter. Schoolhouse Block Parking Facility:

129 Old Pasadena from 2003 to 2008 Property values increased 86%, compared to 58% citywide. Sales increased 112%, compared to 39% citywide. Weekend visitors increased 35% with 35,000 to 40,000 visitors each weekend. Residential units increased 250%. Old Pasadena in the Past and Today

130 Portland, Oregon Transit Service: Light rail (MAX by TriMet), Local bus (TriMet) TOD Case Study: Lloyd District: Character: High-density commercial and residential district located east of downtown Portland

131 Lloyd District Light Rail Service -4 Stations - 3 MAX Lines min headway during peak Bus Connection - 10 routes (TriMet) Allowable Density -FAR= max height

132 Lloyd District Overview Lloyd District Partnership Plan (1994) Motivated Public Private Partnership Set clear mode split goals for commute trips Improved transit service to the area Improved amenities for biking and walking Created Lloyd Transportation Management Association Developed a plan for installing parking meters Established a private funding program through a formation of Business Improvement District Included Marketing Plan Lloyd District in Portland, Oregon

Provide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.

Provide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs. 8 The City of San Mateo is a highly desirable place to live. Housing costs are comparably high. For these reasons, there is a strong and growing need for affordable housing. This chapter addresses the

More information

Parking Challenges and Trade-Offs

Parking Challenges and Trade-Offs Parking Challenges and Trade-Offs What is the best way to balance competing interests and priorities while updating the City s off street parking regulations? Updating off street parking regulations can

More information

2015 Downtown Parking Study

2015 Downtown Parking Study 2015 Downtown Parking Study City of Linden Genesee County, Michigan November 2015 Prepared by: City of Linden Downtown Development Authority 132 E. Broad Street Linden, MI 48451 www.lindenmi.us Table of

More information

Transit Oriented Development - Trip Generation & Mode Split in the Portland Metropolitan Region

Transit Oriented Development - Trip Generation & Mode Split in the Portland Metropolitan Region Transit Oriented Development - Trip Generation & Mode Split in the Portland Metropolitan Region Michael Lapham Portland State University March 2001 Table of Contents Introduction... 3 T.O.D. Definition..3

More information

6. Review of Property Value Impacts at Rapid Transit Stations and Lines

6. Review of Property Value Impacts at Rapid Transit Stations and Lines 6. Review of Property Value Impacts at Rapid Transit Stations and Lines 6.0 Review of Property Value Impacts at Rapid Transit Station April 3, 2001 RICHMOND/AIRPORT VANCOUVER RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT Technical

More information

Therese Trivedi, ABAG ; Migi Lee, CHS Deliverable 5 Final Report

Therese Trivedi, ABAG ; Migi Lee, CHS Deliverable 5 Final Report AECOM 150 Chestnut Street San Francisco, CA 94111 www.aecom.com 415 955 2800 tel 415 788 4875 fax Memorandum To Lori Trevino, Redevelopment Manager City of El Cerrito Pages 65 CC Subject Therese Trivedi,

More information

From Policy to Reality

From Policy to Reality From Policy to Reality Updated ^ Model Ordinances for Sustainable Development 2000 Environmental Quality Board 2008 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Funded by a Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Sustainable

More information

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY

GENERAL PLAN UPDATE SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY Background There are a total of 14 specific areas that are being reviewed as part of the update of the General Plan. Requests to review these areas came from

More information

AN ORDINANCE REGULATING AND CONTROLLING SHARED PARKING IN THE CITY OF MADISON, MISSISSIPPI March 22, 2006

AN ORDINANCE REGULATING AND CONTROLLING SHARED PARKING IN THE CITY OF MADISON, MISSISSIPPI March 22, 2006 AN ORDINANCE REGULATING AND CONTROLLING SHARED PARKING IN THE CITY OF MADISON, MISSISSIPPI March 22, 2006 Introduction Cumulative parking requirements for mixed-use occupancies or shared facilities may

More information

Appendix B: Housing Element Sites Inventory and Detailed Analysis

Appendix B: Housing Element Sites Inventory and Detailed Analysis Appendix B: 2015-2023 Housing Element Sites Inventory and Detailed Analysis Redwood City General This page intentionally left blank. Redwood City General Site Identifier Assessor Parcel Number General

More information

MEMORANDUM. Trip generation rates based on a variety of residential and commercial land use categories 1 Urban form and location factors the Ds 2

MEMORANDUM. Trip generation rates based on a variety of residential and commercial land use categories 1 Urban form and location factors the Ds 2 MEMORANDUM Date: September 22, 2015 To: From: Subject: Paul Stickney Chris Breiland and Sarah Keenan Analysis of Sammamish Town Center Trip Generation Rates and the Ability to Meet Additional Economic

More information

4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR

4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR 4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL MIXED-USE PROJECTS This chapter presents standards for residential mixed-use projects in the Ashland-Cherryland Business District and the Castro Valley Central Business

More information

COMMUNITY BENEFIT REQUIREMENTS & IMPACT FEES FOR DEVELOPMENTS IN VARIOUS CITIES

COMMUNITY BENEFIT REQUIREMENTS & IMPACT FEES FOR DEVELOPMENTS IN VARIOUS CITIES COMMUNITY BENEFIT REQUIREMENTS & IMPACT FEES FOR DEVELOPMENTS IN VARIOUS CITIES Prepared by Office of Mayor Tom Bates Current Requirements for Projects in Berkeley Downtown* Under Consideration for Projects

More information

UrbanFootprint Place Types. Urban Mixed Use. Urban Residential. Urban Commercial. Residential 1% SF Large Lot 0%

UrbanFootprint Place Types. Urban Mixed Use. Urban Residential. Urban Commercial. Residential 1% SF Large Lot 0% Urban Mixed Use Residential 18% SF Large Lot 0% Employment 16% SF Small Lot 0% Mixed Use 45% Townhome 0% Open Space/Civic 21% MultiFamily 100% Intersections per mi 2 200 Office 80% Average Floors 23 Retail

More information

Draft Strategy Plan Concepts. CAC Meeting #9

Draft Strategy Plan Concepts. CAC Meeting #9 Downtown San Leandro Transit-Oriented Development Strategy Draft Strategy Plan Concepts Discussion & Conclusions CAC Meeting #9 23 January 2007 Land Use Plan & Specific Areas New mixed-use districts Context-sensitive

More information

4 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX

4 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX 4 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX 5221-5227 COLUSA AVENUE, RICHMOND, CA 94804 OFFERED AT $849,000 SHAWN WILLIS 925.988.0502 Shawn@IPSrealestate.com INCOME PROPERTY SERVICES A.G. 1343 LOCUST STREET, SUITE 205 WALNUT

More information

GETTING IT BUILT: OVERCOMING THE IMPLEMENTATION BARRIERS TO SMART GROWTH

GETTING IT BUILT: OVERCOMING THE IMPLEMENTATION BARRIERS TO SMART GROWTH GETTING IT BUILT: OVERCOMING THE IMPLEMENTATION BARRIERS TO SMART GROWTH February 15, 2014 New Partners for Smart Growth Dena Belzer Challenges to Implementing Smart Growth The Typical Smart Growth Vision

More information

Approval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement and Compact Public Hearing

Approval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement and Compact Public Hearing Planning, Program Development and Real Estate Committee Item IV - B March 13, 2014 Approval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement and Compact Public Hearing Washington Metropolitan Area Transit

More information

Technical Report 7.1 MODEL REPORT AND PARKING SCENARIOS. May 2016 PARKING MATTERS. Savannah GA Parking Concepts PARKING MATTERS

Technical Report 7.1 MODEL REPORT AND PARKING SCENARIOS. May 2016 PARKING MATTERS. Savannah GA Parking Concepts PARKING MATTERS Savannah GA Parking Concepts PARKING MATTERS A Strategic Plan for Parking + Mobility in Savannah PARKING MATTERS Technical Report 7.1 MODEL REPORT AND PARKING SCENARIOS Prepared for the Chatham County-Savannah

More information

APARTMENT MARKET SUPPLY AND DEMAND DATA. Prepared March 2012 PAGE 1

APARTMENT MARKET SUPPLY AND DEMAND DATA. Prepared March 2012 PAGE 1 APARTMENT MARKET SUPPLY AND DEMAND DATA Prepared March 2012 PAGE 1 SUMMARY OF MARKET CONDITIONS Inventory According to the 4 th quarter 2011 MFP report on the San Jose metro apartment market, the inventory

More information

How to get your city off its parking addiction Downtown Glendale s story

How to get your city off its parking addiction Downtown Glendale s story How to get your city off its parking addiction Downtown Glendale s story Michael Nilsson, AICP Mobility Planner City of Glendale October 19, 2010 Glendale Location and Regional Context Burbank Burbank

More information

Approval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement

Approval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement Planning, Program Development and Real Estate Committee Item IV- A October 10, 2013 Approval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information

More information

Transit Oriented Communities Affordable Housing Incentive Program Guidelines (TOC Guidelines)

Transit Oriented Communities Affordable Housing Incentive Program Guidelines (TOC Guidelines) Transit Oriented Communities Affordable Housing Incentive Program Guidelines (TOC Guidelines) Implementing Section 6 of Measure JJJ, approved by the voters in November 2016, and added to Los Angeles Municipal

More information

Five Year Implementation Plan

Five Year Implementation Plan FINAL Five Year Implementation Plan FY 2007/08 FY 2011/12 Prepared for: April 2008 Table of Contents Five Year Implementation Plan FY 2007/08 FY 2011/12 I. Introduction...I-1 A. Organization... I-2 II.

More information

An implementation document is forthcoming. - A1-1 -

An implementation document is forthcoming. - A1-1 - OFF-STREET PARKING GUIDELINES FOR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS APPROVED BY SPECIAL EXCEPTION IN THE ROSSLYN-BALLSTON AND JEFFERSON DAVIS METRO CORRIDORS 12/01/2017 This is a draft of the guidelines

More information

DEPARTURE OF PARKING & LOADING STANDARDS DPLS-333

DEPARTURE OF PARKING & LOADING STANDARDS DPLS-333 The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division 301-952-3530 Note: Staff reports can be accessed at www.mncppc.org/pgco/planning/plan.htm.

More information

Arch-Laclede s Landing Station

Arch-Laclede s Landing Station Arch-Laclede s Landing Station This station profile describes existing conditions around the Arch-Laclede s Landing MetroLink Station. This is one of a set of profiles for each of the MetroLink System

More information

RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 02/19/2019 AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business

RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 02/19/2019 AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business RANCHO PALOS VERDES CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: 02/19/2019 AGENDA REPORT AGENDA HEADING: Regular Business AGENDA DESCRIPTION: Consideration and possible action to receive and file a report on Senate Bill

More information

TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE

TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE INTRODUCTION Using the framework established by the U.S. 301/Gall Boulevard Corridor Regulating Plan (Regulating Plan),

More information

forwarddallas! Development Code Amendments Approach Quality of Life Committee Briefing June 11, 2007

forwarddallas! Development Code Amendments Approach Quality of Life Committee Briefing June 11, 2007 1 forwarddallas! Development Code Amendments Approach Quality of Life Committee Briefing June 11, 2007 2 Project Background The forwarddallas! Comprehensive Plan provides the foundation and launching pad

More information

VI. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY

VI. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY VI. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY POLICY ISSUE Examine residential density regulations, looking at the potential for lowering densities and the impact on the City s Housing Element of the General Plan. BACKGROUND

More information

RE: Transportation Overview Youth Services Bureau Housing First Hub for Youth 2887 Riverside Drive

RE: Transportation Overview Youth Services Bureau Housing First Hub for Youth 2887 Riverside Drive TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Jasmine Tranter c/o Wes Richardson, Youth Services Bureau (YSB) Paul Tétreault, P. Eng., MCIP, MUP; Emmett Proulx, EIT RE: Transportation Overview Youth Services

More information

LAKE MERRITT STATION AREA PLAN

LAKE MERRITT STATION AREA PLAN LAKE MERRITT STATION AREA PLAN Emerging Plan Open House Summary October 2011 2 1 Introduction The City of Oakland, Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), and the Peralta Community College District, through a grant

More information

Appendix A: Guide to Zoning Categories Prince George's County, Maryland

Appendix A: Guide to Zoning Categories Prince George's County, Maryland Appendix A: Guide to Zoning Categories Prince George's County, Maryland RESIDENTIAL ZONES 1 Updated November 2010 R-O-S: Reserved Open Space - Provides for permanent maintenance of certain areas of land

More information

Draft for Public Review. The Market and Octavia Neighborhood Plan

Draft for Public Review. The Market and Octavia Neighborhood Plan Draft for Public Review The Market and Octavia Neighborhood Plan San Francisco Planning Department As Part of the Better Neighborhoods Program December 00 . Housing People OBJECTIVE.1 MIXED-USE RESIDENTIAL

More information

PUBLIC NOTICE* Studies Requested: Parking analysis. Other Required Permits: Building Permit, Site Development Permit

PUBLIC NOTICE* Studies Requested: Parking analysis. Other Required Permits: Building Permit, Site Development Permit C I T Y O F T A C O M A Planning & Development Services Department 747 Market St, Rm 345 Tacoma, WA 98402 PUBLIC NOTICE* Date of Notification: 1/15/2019 Application Received: 12/03/2018 Application Complete:12/07/2018

More information

Background and Purpose

Background and Purpose DRAFT MEMORANDUM To: From: Perkins+Will James Musbach and Rebecca Benassini Subject: Affordable Housing Need and Supply, Downtown Concord Specific Plan, addendum to Existing Conditions Report; EPS #121118

More information

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AGENDA ITEM I-1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Council Meeting Date: June 3, 2014 Agenda Item #: I-1 INFORMATIONAL ITEM: Update on Multi-City Affordable Housing Nexus Study and Impact Fee Feasibility

More information

Impact Fee Nexus & Economic Feasibility Study

Impact Fee Nexus & Economic Feasibility Study Impact Fee Nexus & Economic Feasibility Study Stakeholder Working Group November 12, 2015 Urban Economics Oakland Impact Fee Stakeholder Working Group November 12, 2015 INTRODUCTIONS 1 Agenda Introductions

More information

Using Performance Measures to Improve Parking Policies & Livability

Using Performance Measures to Improve Parking Policies & Livability Using Performance Measures to Improve Parking Policies & Livability UTCM Conference Performance Measures for Livable Communities Valerie Knepper Metropolitan Transportation Commission SF Bay Area 7 Million

More information

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION March 2018- FINAL DRAFT SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS This report

More information

Economic Effects of the New Housing Industry in the Sacramento Region

Economic Effects of the New Housing Industry in the Sacramento Region Economic Effects of the New Housing Industry in the Sacramento Region 2016 RESEARCH REPORT, KEY FINDINGS BACKGROUND This Research Study, conducted by New Economics & Advisory, evaluates the impacts of

More information

CONNECTING ARLINGTON S POLICY FRAMEWORK TO THE RESIDENTIAL PARKING WORKING GROUP

CONNECTING ARLINGTON S POLICY FRAMEWORK TO THE RESIDENTIAL PARKING WORKING GROUP CONNECTING ARLINGTON S POLICY FRAMEWORK TO THE RESIDENTIAL PARKING WORKING GROUP Contents Arlington County Development and Growth Goals... 1 Master Transportation Plan Policies Related to Multi Family

More information

Survey of Bay Area Cities Parking Requirements: Summary Report

Survey of Bay Area Cities Parking Requirements: Summary Report MTC Smart Growth Technical Assistance: Reform Campaign Survey of Bay Area Cities Requirements: Summary Report Prepared by Dyett & Bhatia April 11, 2012 MTC Smart Growth Technical Assistance: Reform Campaign

More information

We thank you for the opportunity to provide our services, and we look forward to discussing the report with you at your earliest convenience.

We thank you for the opportunity to provide our services, and we look forward to discussing the report with you at your earliest convenience. 565 East Swedesford Road, Suite 300 Wayne, PA 19087 Office: 610.995.0260 Fax: 888.502.5726 www.walkerparking.com Mr. Maury Stern Partner Road & Washington, LLC c/o Insight Property Group 4601 N Fairfax

More information

PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT OF OFF-STREET PARKING PROPOSAL CITY OF OAKLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT OCTOBER 2015

PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT OF OFF-STREET PARKING PROPOSAL CITY OF OAKLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT OCTOBER 2015 PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT OF OFF-STREET PARKING PROPOSAL CITY OF OAKLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT OCTOBER 2015 1. Downtown Parking Minimums Problem: The current regulations do not prescribe a minimum amount of required

More information

Transit Oriented Development Right Sizing TODs. & Travel. GB Arrington. TCRP Report 128 Effects of TOD on Housing, Parking,

Transit Oriented Development Right Sizing TODs. & Travel. GB Arrington. TCRP Report 128 Effects of TOD on Housing, Parking, Transit Oriented Development Right Sizing TODs & Travel GB Arrington arrington@pbworld.com 1 TCRP Report 128 Effects of TOD on Housing, Parking, & Travel 1 Agenda TOD & Travel Parking Puzzle Latest TOD

More information

Parking Management Strategies

Parking Management Strategies Parking Management Strategies Background: The growing interest nationwide in parking policies is linked to the emergence of smart growth and creation of more livable communities. Conventional parking policies

More information

R E S O L U T I O N. B. Development Data Summary

R E S O L U T I O N. B. Development Data Summary R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the Prince George s County Planning Board has reviewed DPLS-333 requesting a Departure from Parking and Loading Standards for 19 parking spaces in accordance with Subtitle

More information

APPENDIX B RESIDENTIAL DENSITY

APPENDIX B RESIDENTIAL DENSITY APPENDIX B RESIDENTIAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DENSITY - SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY Policy Issue Examine specific areas of the City to determine appropriate residential densities. Public comments have expressed

More information

City of New Rochelle. Article XIV Proposed Off-Street Parking and Loading Amendments. Section & 126

City of New Rochelle. Article XIV Proposed Off-Street Parking and Loading Amendments. Section & 126 Article XIV Proposed Off-Street Parking and Loading Amendments -125 & 126 DRAFT FOR REVIEW - November 4, 2015 PURPOSES 125 ARTICLE XIV SECTION 331-125. PURPOSES [Note: At the end of 331-125 add the following:]

More information

Creative Approaches to Land Acquisition

Creative Approaches to Land Acquisition 2007 Legislative Session Review CALIFORNIA TRANSIT ASSOCIATION JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2008 Creative Approaches to Land Acquisition Result From Creative Approaches to Land Acquisition It should not surprise anyone

More information

Downtown Parking Strategy. Final Report

Downtown Parking Strategy. Final Report Downtown Parking Strategy Final Report Submitted to the City of New Westminster December 2, 2013 PROJECT DELIVERABLE CONTACT PERSON AND TITLE: PROJECT TITLE: Downtown Parking Strategy BUSINESS ADDRESS:

More information

PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Category Descriptions and Rules Amended March 17, 2009 (Ordinance 09-17) Amended March 16, 2010 (Ordinance 10-18) Amended October 26, 2010

More information

per unit Live/Work 1 per unit None mentioned. MF 1 2 bdrms. MF 2+ bdrms* (Transit Oriented MU District) Single Unit, Two Unit, Multi Unit &

per unit Live/Work 1 per unit None mentioned. MF 1 2 bdrms. MF 2+ bdrms* (Transit Oriented MU District) Single Unit, Two Unit, Multi Unit & TABLE 2 BAY AREA PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND EXCEPTIONS, BY CITY Benicia 26,997 Housing type Berkeley 112,580 Housing type 1.0 per unit or 1.0 per Number of units in 1,000 1,200 sf development El Cerrito

More information

Managing demand for parking with limited supply

Managing demand for parking with limited supply Managing demand for parking with limited supply Demand for parking exceeds curb supply in many permit areas. The existing program inadequately manages this demand, particularly from residents and businesses

More information

PLANNING COMMISSION WILLIAMSBURG, VIRGINIA WORK SESSION AGENDA Wednesday, May 23, 2012

PLANNING COMMISSION WILLIAMSBURG, VIRGINIA WORK SESSION AGENDA Wednesday, May 23, 2012 PLANNING COMMISSION WILLIAMSBURG, VIRGINIA WORK SESSION AGENDA Wednesday, May 23, 2012 The meeting will be called to order in the third floor Conference Room (Room 310), Williamsburg Municipal Building,

More information

City of South San Francisco Page 1 of 5

City of South San Francisco Page 1 of 5 City of South San Francisco P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA Legislation Text Report regarding the Housing Standing Committee recommendation to consider selecting either

More information

MONTGOMERY COUNTY RENTAL HOUSING STUDY. NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT June 2016

MONTGOMERY COUNTY RENTAL HOUSING STUDY. NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT June 2016 MONTGOMERY COUNTY RENTAL HOUSING STUDY NEIGHBORHOOD ASSESSMENT June 2016 AGENDA Model Neighborhood Presentation Neighborhood Discussion Timeline Discussion Next Steps 2 WORK COMPLETED Socioeconomic Analysis

More information

North Hanley Station. o Flower Valley Shopping Center o Cross Keys Shopping Cente #49 North Lindbergh MetroBus

North Hanley Station. o Flower Valley Shopping Center o Cross Keys Shopping Cente #49 North Lindbergh MetroBus North Hanley Station This station profile describes existing conditions around the North Hanley MetroLink Station. This is one of a set of profiles for each of the MetroLink System s 37 light rail stations.

More information

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT REZONING CASE: RZ-16-001 REPORT DATE: March 8, 2016 CASE NAME: Trailbreak Partners Rezoning PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: March 16, 2016 ADDRESSES OF REZONING PROPOSAL: 5501

More information

Zoning Code Amendments Completed and Proposed. November 2009 COMPLETED CODE AMENDMENTS. Parking Regulations Effective Sept 28, 2009 Ordinance No.

Zoning Code Amendments Completed and Proposed. November 2009 COMPLETED CODE AMENDMENTS. Parking Regulations Effective Sept 28, 2009 Ordinance No. Zoning Code Amendments Completed and Proposed COMPLETED CODE AMENDMENTS Amendment/Issue Parking Regulations Effective Sept 28, 2009 Ordinance No. 1454 Residential Density in Planned Developments Effective

More information

Upcoming Apartment Projects with No On-Site Parking Frequently Asked Questions June 2012

Upcoming Apartment Projects with No On-Site Parking Frequently Asked Questions June 2012 Upcoming Apartment Projects with No On-Site Parking Frequently Asked Questions June 2012 Recent proposals to construct apartment buildings with no on-site parking along many of Portland s commercial streets

More information

Affordable Housing Incentives. Regional TOD Advisory Committee June 15, 2018

Affordable Housing Incentives. Regional TOD Advisory Committee June 15, 2018 Affordable Housing Incentives Regional TOD Advisory Committee June 15, 2018 August 2, 2017 GTC: Affordable Housing Incentives Strategy 17: Leverage Market Value through Incentives for Affordability Technical

More information

A DJUSTMENTS. A. Zoning Permits Required: Use Permit to construct a dwelling unit, as required by BMC Section 23D

A DJUSTMENTS. A. Zoning Permits Required: Use Permit to construct a dwelling unit, as required by BMC Section 23D Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION AUGUST 14, 2008 2421 Ninth Street Use Permit 05-10000084 to construct a two-story 1,766 sq. ft., detached dwelling unit at the

More information

SANTA ROSA IMPACT FEE PROGRAM UPDATE FINAL REPORT. May Robert D. Spencer, Urban Economics Strategic Economics Kittelson & Associates

SANTA ROSA IMPACT FEE PROGRAM UPDATE FINAL REPORT. May Robert D. Spencer, Urban Economics Strategic Economics Kittelson & Associates SANTA ROSA IMPACT FEE PROGRAM UPDATE FINAL REPORT May 2018 Robert D. Spencer, Urban Economics With: Strategic Economics Kittelson & Associates City of Santa Rosa Impact Fee Program Update TABLE OF CONTENTS

More information

Scenario Planning with Envision Tomorrow

Scenario Planning with Envision Tomorrow Scenario Planning with Envision Tomorrow w w w. f r e g o. c o m What is Envision Tomorrow? Suite of planning tools: Analysis Tools Prototype Builder Return on Investment (ROI) model Scenario Builder Extension

More information

DRAFT Plan Incentives. Part A: Basic Discount

DRAFT Plan Incentives. Part A: Basic Discount DRAFT 2030 Plan Incentives July 26, 2006 Part A: Basic Discount In order for a development to be eligible for any 2030 Land Resource Management Plan Discounts it must be located in the Urban Corridor and

More information

COMMERCIAL ELEMENT AND CODE ENFORCEMENT

COMMERCIAL ELEMENT AND CODE ENFORCEMENT COMMERCIAL ELEMENT AND CODE ENFORCEMENT The Commercial Element identifies and describes the existing characteristics that are desired by the neighborhood. The existing conditions will determine appropriate

More information

2016 National Meeting Association of Administrators of the Interstate Compact on Adoption and Medical Assistance

2016 National Meeting Association of Administrators of the Interstate Compact on Adoption and Medical Assistance 2016 National Association of Administrators of the Interstate Compact on Adoption and Medical Assistance AAICAMA :: Connected - Collaborative - Concerned VENUE INFORMATION March 21-22, 2016 Endowment Center,

More information

DRAFT REPORT. Residential Impact Fee Nexus Study. June prepared for: Foster City VWA. Vernazza Wolfe Associates, Inc.

DRAFT REPORT. Residential Impact Fee Nexus Study. June prepared for: Foster City VWA. Vernazza Wolfe Associates, Inc. DRAFT REPORT Residential Impact Fee Nexus Study June 2015 prepared for: Foster City VWA Vernazza Wolfe Associates, Inc. Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 4 Introduction... 4 Background... 4 Report

More information

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 12-REZ-27 Morris Branch Town Council Public Hearing January 24, 2013

Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 12-REZ-27 Morris Branch Town Council Public Hearing January 24, 2013 Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 12-REZ-27 Morris Branch Town Council Public Hearing January 24, 2013 REQUEST To amend the Town of Cary Official Zoning Map to rezone approximately 9.0

More information

14812 EAST 14 TH. Urban Infill Redevelopment Multifamily Commercial SAN LEANDRO CALIFORNIA OFFERING MEMORANDUM. SA-3 Zoning ±0.

14812 EAST 14 TH. Urban Infill Redevelopment Multifamily Commercial SAN LEANDRO CALIFORNIA OFFERING MEMORANDUM. SA-3 Zoning ±0. 14812 EAST 14 TH SAN LEANDRO CALIFORNIA OFFERING MEMORANDUM Urban Infill Redevelopment Multifamily Commercial SA-3 Zoning ±0.72 Acres DISCLAIMER STATEMENT This Offering Memorandum ( Memorandum was prepared

More information

4001 NE Halsey Street

4001 NE Halsey Street FOR SALE Hard to find stand alone building in the heart of the Hollywood District Features OFFICE SIZE 5,764 SF LOT SIZE 10,650 SF PARKING 18 off-street spaces ACCESS Immediate I-84 access YEAR BUILT 1970

More information

Community Workshop #1 October 15, Redwood City. Regulatory Approaches to Implementing a Community Benefits Program

Community Workshop #1 October 15, Redwood City. Regulatory Approaches to Implementing a Community Benefits Program Community Workshop #1 October 15, 2014 Redwood City Regulatory Approaches to Implementing a Community Benefits Program Workshop Overview Opening Remarks Workshop Objectives Community Benefits Programs

More information

Regional Development Impact Fee Joint Powers Agency

Regional Development Impact Fee Joint Powers Agency Adopted August 27, 2008 Updated October 28, 2009 CHAPTER 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction and Background In 2006, the Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC) initiated an update to the Regional

More information

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING, HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT Planning Division

DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING, HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT Planning Division DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING, HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT Planning Division #1 Courthouse Plaza, 2100 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 700 Arlington, VA 22201 TEL 703.228.3525 FAX 703.228.3543 www.arlingtonva.us

More information

Downtown Stations: 8 th & Pine and Convention Center

Downtown Stations: 8 th & Pine and Convention Center Downtown Stations: 8 th & Pine and Convention Center This station profile describes existing conditions around two MetroLink Stations in Downtown St. Louis, the 8 th & Pine and Convention Center Stations.

More information

4.13 Population and Housing

4.13 Population and Housing Environmental Impact Analysis Population and Housing 4.13 Population and Housing 4.13.1 Setting This section evaluates the impacts to the regional housing supply and population growth associated with implementation

More information

4533 NORTH AVENUE, SAN DIEGO, CA 92116

4533 NORTH AVENUE, SAN DIEGO, CA 92116 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4533 NORTH AVENUE, SAN DIEGO, CA 92116 TABLE OF CONTENTS PROPERTY OVERVIEW 3 PROPERTY LOCATION 4 NEIGHBORHOOD DESCRIPTION 6 COMPARABLE SALES 7 RENTAL SURVEY 9 APARTMENT INVESTMENT INFORMATION

More information

Land Use Impacts of BRT

Land Use Impacts of BRT Land Use Impacts of BRT Commuter Choice Workshop BRT Session Part II January 18, 2012 Victoria Perk, Senior Research Associate Cheryl Thole, Senior Research Associate National Bus Rapid Transit Institute

More information

DANA POINT TOWN CENTER PARKING PLAN

DANA POINT TOWN CENTER PARKING PLAN DANA POINT TOWN CENTER PARKING PLAN Presented by Patrick Siegman November 18, 2013 Picture Source: Flickr user Trader Chris Agenda 1. Introduction (5 minutes) 2. Commission & Public Input (20 minutes)

More information

2130 WOOLSEY PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS Woolsey Berkeley, CA Asking Price: $1,015,000

2130 WOOLSEY PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS Woolsey Berkeley, CA Asking Price: $1,015,000 2130 WOOLSEY 2134 Woolsey Berkeley, CA 94705 For more information contact: 00681476 PROPERTY HIGHLIGHTS Asking Price: $1,015,000 Unique Split City Lot - Six Units Total - Four Unit front property in Berkeley

More information

REZONING GUIDE. Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application. Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3. Return completed form to

REZONING GUIDE. Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application. Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3. Return completed form to COMMUNITY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REZONING GUIDE Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3 Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION* PROPERTY OWNER(S) REPRESENTATIVE** CHECK IF POINT

More information

FREE STANDING RETAIL BUILDING ON MAJOR RETAIL THOROUGHFARE

FREE STANDING RETAIL BUILDING ON MAJOR RETAIL THOROUGHFARE SONOMA BLVD (21,650 ADT) FREE STANDING RETAIL BUILDING ON MAJOR RETAIL THOROUGHFARE REDEVELOPMENT/OWNER-USER OPPORTUNITY VALLEJO, CA SONOMA BLVD (21,650 ADT) 5,500 SF BUILDING IN A CVS AND 99 CENT ONLY

More information

COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE zones COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES. Zoning By-law PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT DIVISION

COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE zones COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES. Zoning By-law PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT DIVISION Zoning By-law 05-200 COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE zones PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DEPARTMENT DIVISION CONTENTS CONTEXT... 1 URBAN HAMILTON OFFICIAL PLAN... 2 COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES...

More information

RATE STUDY IMPACT FEES TRANSPORTATION

RATE STUDY IMPACT FEES TRANSPORTATION RATE STUDY FOR IMPACT FEES FOR TRANSPORTATION CITY OF SHORELINE, WASHINGTON April 24, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...1 1. STATUTORY BASIS AND METHODOLOGY...5 2. ROAD SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT COSTS

More information

CHAPTER NORTH LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN

CHAPTER NORTH LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN North Lake Specific Plan 17.34.010 CHAPTER 17.34 - NORTH LAKE SPECIFIC PLAN Sections: 17.34.010 - Purpose of Chapter 17.34.020 - Purposes of SP-1 (North Lake Specific Plan) Overlay District 17.34.030 -

More information

S C O T T OFFERING MEMORANDUM 3265 EL CAMINO REAL PALO ALTO CALIFORNIA

S C O T T OFFERING MEMORANDUM 3265 EL CAMINO REAL PALO ALTO CALIFORNIA OFFERING MEMORANDUM C A R E L i c e n s e # 0 1 2 7 1 9 1 2 Disclaimer: The information contained herein has been obtained from sources deemed reliable but has not been verified and no guarantee, warranty

More information

CIVIC CENTER PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT AREA (PDA) RESPONSES TO COMMUNITY QUESTIONS

CIVIC CENTER PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT AREA (PDA) RESPONSES TO COMMUNITY QUESTIONS CIVIC CENTER PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT AREA RESPONSES TO COMMUNITY QUESTIONS August 29, 2013 INTRODUCTION This document presents a list of questions that have been raised by the community on the topic of the

More information

Density: The project takes advantage of a very small lot by building 12 well-designed homes, consisting of one-, two- and three-bedroom homes.

Density: The project takes advantage of a very small lot by building 12 well-designed homes, consisting of one-, two- and three-bedroom homes. 95 Brady Street San Francisco, CA 94103 415 541 9001 info@sfhac.org www.sfhac.org Mr. Keith Cich, CEO Pacific Rim Partners 1730 Solano Avenue Berkeley, CA 94707 Ref: 1900 Mission Street Mixed-Use Development

More information

Offering Memorandum 12 Units

Offering Memorandum 12 Units Offering Memorandum 12 Units 1765 Cedar Avenue, Long Beach, CA 90813 Presented by: John Mociak Senior Investment Associate, BRE #01708711 830 South Sepulveda Boulevard, Suite 200 El Segundo, CA 90245 Office:

More information

Planning Commission Agenda Item

Planning Commission Agenda Item Planning Commission Agenda Item TO: THRU: FROM: Chair Glasgow and Members of the Planning Commission Anna Pehoushek, AICP Assistant Community Development Director Jennifer Le Principal Planner SUBJECT

More information

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019 DEVELOPMENT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME Springhill Village Subdivision Springhill Village Subdivision LOCATION 4350, 4354, 4356, 4358,

More information

Land Development Update

Land Development Update PROJECTS UNDER CONSTRUCTION Land Development Update Commercial & Residential Projects Winter 2017-18 Creekside at 17 Address: 675 Creekside Way Location: Creekside Way, south of Hamilton Avenue. Description:

More information

$895,000 4 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX OFFERED AT SHAWN WILLIS INCOME PROPERTY SERVICES A.G.

$895,000 4 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX OFFERED AT SHAWN WILLIS INCOME PROPERTY SERVICES A.G. 4 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX 3309-3315 BARRETT AVENUE, RICHMOND, CA 94805 OFFERED AT $895,000 SHAWN WILLIS 925.988.0502 Shawn@IPSrealestate.com INCOME PROPERTY SERVICES A.G. 1343 LOCUST STREET, SUITE 205 WALNUT

More information

Route 6 Corridor Study Bristol Planning Commission Meeting #1. May 25, 2016 FITZGERALD & HALLIDAY, INC. Innovative Planning, Better Communities

Route 6 Corridor Study Bristol Planning Commission Meeting #1. May 25, 2016 FITZGERALD & HALLIDAY, INC. Innovative Planning, Better Communities Route 6 Corridor Study Bristol Planning Commission Meeting #1 May 25, 2016 FITZGERALD & HALLIDAY, INC. Innovative Planning, Better Communities Today s Agenda 1. Introductions 2. Study overview Scope Schedule

More information

Kane County. Division of Transportation. Technical Specifications Manual for Road Improvement Impact Fees Under Kane County Ordinance #07-232

Kane County. Division of Transportation. Technical Specifications Manual for Road Improvement Impact Fees Under Kane County Ordinance #07-232 Kane County Division of Transportation Technical Specifications Manual for Road Improvement Impact Fees Under Kane County Ordinance #07-232 Table of Contents Section 1: Introduction to the Impact Fee and

More information

Planning Commission Report

Planning Commission Report Planning Commission Report To: From: Subject: Planning Commission Planning Commission Meeting: February 18, 2015 Tony Kim, Acting Special Projects Manager Beth Rolandson, AICP, Principal Transportation

More information

Adaptive Reuse Ordinance Effective 12/20/01

Adaptive Reuse Ordinance Effective 12/20/01 Adaptive Reuse Ordinance Effective 12/20/01 The following excerpts of the Planning and Zoning Code are related to the Adaptive Reuse Projects in the Los Angeles downtown areas. The Planning and Zoning

More information