Planning Commission Agenda Item
|
|
- Erica Matthews
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Planning Commission Agenda Item TO: THRU: FROM: Chair Glasgow and Members of the Planning Commission Anna Pehoushek, AICP Assistant Community Development Director Jennifer Le Principal Planner SUBJECT PUBLIC HEARING: An Ordinance amending Chapter of the Orange Municipal Code to modify the City s Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements for Multi-Family Residential Uses. SUMMARY The City Council expressed an interest in updating parking requirements for multi-family residential land uses, noting concern that the City s parking requirements may be insufficient and out-of-date. The City retained a parking Consultant (Walker Parking) to evaluate multi-family residential parking demand characteristics in the City, with the goal of right sizing parking requirements such that new multi-family development projects are neither substantially under- or over-parked. This staff report presents the parking study s findings and staff recommendations. Staff proposes an amendment to Chapter of the Orange Municipal Code that would increase multi-family parking requirements in some circumstances, applying parking requirements on a sliding-scale based on development size, bedroom count, and the type of parking proposed. The Ordinance also amends the Code to allow tandem parking in multi-family developments subject to Minor Site Plan Review and clarifies the definition of a bedroom for purposes of calculating parking requirements. RECOMMENDED ACTION Adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. PC entitled: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER OF THE ORANGE MUNCIPAL CODE TO MODIFY THE CITY S OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REQUIREMENTS FOR MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES
2 Page 2 AUTHORIZATION/GUIDELINES Orange Municipal Code Section establishes procedures by which the Planning Commission reviews ordinance amendments and makes recommendations to the City Council. PUBLIC NOTICE Public notice of the proposed Ordinance Amendment was published in the Orange City News newspaper on September 7, Because of the citywide applicability of the proposed Municipal Code changes, no single property was posted. Hearing notices were posted at City Hall and Library posting locations. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Categorical Exemption: The proposed Ordinance Amendment is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per State CEQA Guidelines Section (Class 5, Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations) because it involves a modification to a citywide development standard related to required parking. It does not involve a specific site, development project, or focused geographic area, does not change permitted land use or density and does not otherwise result in a physical change that could cause an impact to the environment. Further, parking is not considered an impact to the environment under CEQA. Nothing further is warranted or required to comply with CEQA. There is no public review required for an exemption. PROJECT BACKGROUND Background The City s Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements were last updated comprehensively in 1995 in conjunction with a comprehensive update to the Zoning Ordinance. In addition, a targeted update was completed in At that time, the City Council expressed concerns about the adequacy of the parking requirements and parking space dimensions. Based on Planning Commission and City Council direction, the 2008 Ordinance updated parking requirements for single-family residential, multi-family residential, auto repair and gas stations, and churches. The designation of special status parking spaces on commercial property, parking space dimensions, and use of wheel stops were also addressed in the 2008 Ordinance Amendment (as well as a follow up Ordinance Amendment approved in 2009). At that time, multifamily residential parking requirements were increased by 0.2 spaces per unit. More recently, in late 2016, the City Council reviewed and approved a number of multi-family residential projects including the MBK Homes project on Orange-Olive Road, the Olsen project on Washington Avenue, and the Glassell Townhomes project. During deliberations for these projects, Council again expressed concern that the number of parking spaces required by Code seemed too low.
3 Page 3 At the same time, the City had a number of applications in the pipeline for large higher-density multi-family projects in the City s mixed use zones, with some applicants requesting a reduction in the City s required number of parking spaces. For example, the AMLI project on The City Drive was granted a variance for parking based on a site-specific parking utilization study and counts of similar multi-family projects (including large apartment complexes on West Chapman Avenue built in the 2005-era) that appeared to be appropriately parked. These 2005-era projects were built to Code, but at a lower parking rate than currently applies (due to the 2008 increase in the multi-family residential parking requirement as described above). At the November 9, 2016 Council meeting, the City Council requested that staff review the multifamily residential parking standards and bring back a Code amendment to adjust the standards as appropriate. The City retained a parking Consultant (Walker Parking Inc.) to assist in studying multi-family parking demand characteristics in Orange, with the goal of right sizing the standards such that new development is neither substantially under- or over-parked. This staff report presents the parking study s findings and staff s recommended changes to the City s parking code. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed Draft Ordinance (refer to Attachment 1a of this report) modifies Orange Municipal Code (OMC) Table A, Required Number of Parking Spaces for Residential Uses, by restructuring the multi-family parking standards to reflect a sliding-scale approach based on a proposed development s size, bedroom count, and the type of parking proposed. Increases over current parking requirements are proposed for smaller development projects (i.e. projects with 3 to 50 units), and also larger developments (greater than 50 units) if dedicated enclosed parking is proposed (as opposed to pooled open parking). The Draft Ordinance also clarifies the definition of a bedroom for purposes of calculating parking requirements. It also amends Section of the Code to allow tandem parking in multi-family development projects subject to Minor Site Plan Review. APPLICATION(S) REQUESTED/ REQUIRED FINDINGS Ordinance Amendment: The City is proposing an Ordinance Amendment to amend the Off-Street Parking and Loading Standards contained in Chapter of the OMC. Required Findings: Although there are no required findings for an Ordinance Amendment since it is considered a legislative action, per OMC Section the Planning Commission shall address the following in its Resolution recommending approval of an Ordinance Amendment to the City Council: Reasons for the recommendation. The relationship of the proposed amendment to the General Plan. Environmental determination. These items are addressed in the attached Resolution.
4 Page 4 ANALYSIS/STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES Issue 1: Adequacy of the City s Multi-family Residential Parking Ratios Orange s parking standards have not been comprehensively updated since 1995, as a component of a larger comprehensive Zoning Code update. Over time, Orange s demographics, car ownership patterns, mode of travel and other such characteristics have shifted. Based on census data, a majority of households in Orange are two car households at 41%, with one car households at 27%, three car households at 18%, four car households at 10% and zero car households at 4%. Further, Census data shows that the vast majority of Orange residents at 81% drive alone to work, with carpool, bike, walk, public transportation and working from home making up the remainder. This data indicates that although transportation trends may be changing based on demographics, new technologies, and greater opportunities for car sharing and transit, car ownership rates are still high and single occupancy auto travel is still the primary mode of transportation in Orange and in similarly-situated cities in Orange County as a whole. Parking Study Findings The City retained Walker Parking Inc. to evaluate multi-family residential parking demand characteristics in the City and make recommendations as to appropriate changes to parking standards. Walker performed weekend and weekday parking utilization counts at 13 housing developments in Orange representing a range of project sizes, product types, ages and locations. They also presented information comparing Orange s parking standards to industry standards and adopted standards from surrounding cities. Comparison to Other Cities Standards & Industry Standards As shown in Table 1 below, Walker found that in general Orange s standards tended to be lower than the average of comparable Orange County cities for studio, 1-, 2-, and 3+ bedroom units. Although lower than the average, Orange s standards are within the range of standards applied by other cities. Table 1 also shows that Orange s parking standards are higher than industry standards such as those developed by the Urban Land Institute, Institute of Traffic Engineers, and National Parking Association. This is not surprising, given that industry standards may be based on limited data points and reflect a broader geographical perspective than local standards would. Although consistency with standards from other cities should not be a deciding factor in staff s opinion, this comparison is useful as a benchmark.
5 Page 5 Comparables Municipalities Industry Research and Publications Table 1- Orange Standards vs. Surrounding Cities and Industry Standards City Studio 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom s 3+ Bedrooms Guest (Studio) Guest (1 Bedroom) Guest (2 Bedrooms) Guest (3+ Bedrooms) Tandem Parking Allowed? Anaheim Yes Brea No Fullerton No Garden Grove No Santa Ana No Tustin No Yorba Linda Yes Costa Mesa No Newport Beach Yes Average , Orange No Walker SPM ULI ITE NPA Notes: Walker SPM- Walker Shared Parking Model. ULI- Urban Land Institute. ITE- Institute of Traffic Engineers. NPA- National Parking Association. Survey Data & Field Observations Based on survey data from parking counts in Orange, Walker found that the observed peak parking demand ratios ranged from 0.74 to 1.75 parking spaces per bedroom with the weighted average number of spaces per bedroom at Recognizing that there was considerable variation in on-theground conditions, Walker did not see evidence of grossly under-parked conditions, particularly at newer larger multi-family developments. Based on field data and professional experience, Walker advised that the City s minimum parking requirements appear on average adequate, being neither too high or too low. However, Walker felt that required parking could be increased for larger multifamily units, particularly for 3+ bedroom units, which is not addressed in the existing Code. Table 2- Observed Parking Demand Per Bedroom Weighted Average 0.94 spaces 50 th Percentile 1.0 spaces Although there is a perception that the City s multi-family parking requirements are inadequate, this may be in part due to observed parking conditions at older apartment developments either not built to current Code standards and/or where multiple families or adults are sharing small units and generating a higher parking demand than was planned for at the time. This condition has not yet proven to be the case in more recently constructed multi-family complexes that are built to current Code and rented or sold at market prices. Based on field observations and experience, Walker also noted the following parking trends: the first and second bedroom of a unit tend to generate greater parking demand than additional bedrooms;
6 Page 6 parking demand per unit tends to decrease as the number of units in a development increases (meaning larger developments tend to require less parking per unit than their smaller counterparts); and the type of parking provided (for example a shared unenclosed pool of parking versus private garages) has an effect on parking demand as well, because of the tendency of residents to use private garages for something other than parking. Parking Study Recommendations Because Walker believes that the City s standards are overall adequate, Walker did not recommend increasing the minimum parking requirements overall. However, they did recommend increasing the parking requirement for multi-family residential uses with 3 and 3+ bedrooms. They also suggested the City could provide greater flexibility in its Code by adopting a sliding scale approach that better reflects the observed effects of development size, bedroom count, and shared open parking versus private garage parking. Walker also recommended that the City change the Code to: apply the multi-family parking standards to duplexes, requiring more parking for duplexes with higher bedroom counts; allow for tandem parking; count dens or other similar rooms as bedrooms for parking purposes; and count driveways toward parking supply. Lastly, Walker made recommendations related to on-street parking management through in-lieu fees and/or street parking regulations. They also suggested adding in the flexibility to reduce parking requirements when certain policies are met, such as density or affordability goals or for example when bike or car sharing amenities are provided at a site. The Parking Study in its entirety is included as Attachment 3 to this report. Consultant Recommended Parking Ratios Table 3 shows the City s existing multifamily parking standards. Table 3- Existing Code Required Multi-Family Parking Ratios Land Use Parking Requirements Studio 1.2 One Bedroom 1.7 Multifamily Two Bedroom 2.0 Residential (3 units or Three or More Bedrooms 2.4 more) Of the above requirements a minimum of one space per unit shall be covered. A minimum of 0.2 spaces per unit shall be provided as easily accessible and distinguishable guest parking in addition to the required parking for each unit.
7 Page 7 Based on the parking study s findings, Walker recommends the following changes to the required multi-family parking ratios: Reducing the existing parking requirements by 0.1 for smaller multi-family developments (3 to 50 units) and by 0.2 spaces per unit for larger multi-family developments (51+ units) if unenclosed parking is proposed (for example, parking structure, surface parking or open carports, as opposed to enclosed private garages). Increasing the existing parking requirement for a 3 bedroom unit by 0.2 spaces per unit for small and large developments if enclosed (private garage) parking is proposed. If unenclosed parking is proposed, the existing parking requirement for a 3 bedroom unit is reduced by 0.1 spaces for small developments and reduced 0.2 spaces for large developments. Adding a new standard for units with more than three bedrooms requiring 0.3 to 0.5 additional spaces (depending on development size and parking type) for each additional bedroom beyond 3 bedrooms. These recommendations are reflected in Table 4 below which shows Walker s recommended parking ratios. Multifamily Residential (3 units or more) Table 4- Consultant-Recommended Required Parking Ratios Development Size 3 units to 50 units If unenclosed resident parking is provided (parking structure, surface parking lot(s), carports): Studio 1.1 One Bedroom 1.6 Two Bedroom 1.9 Three Bedrooms 2.3 three 0.4 If enclosed resident parking is provided: Studio 1.2 One Bedroom 1.7 Two Bedroom 2.0 Three Bedrooms 2.6 three 0.5 Development Size 51+ Units If unenclosed resident parking is provided (parking structure(s), surface parking lot(s), carports): Studio 1.0 One Bedroom 1.5 Two Bedroom 1.8 Three Bedrooms 2.2 three 0.3 If enclosed resident parking is provided: Studio 1.2 One Bedroom 1.7 Two Bedroom 2.0 Three Bedrooms 2.6 three 0.5 A minimum of 0.2 spaces per unit shall (with a minimum of two guest spaces in a multi-family development) be provided as easily accessible and distinguishable guest parking in addition to the required parking for each unit.
8 Staff Alternative Parking Ratios and the Proposed Ordinance Amendment Planning Commission Staff Report Page 8 Staff reviewed the Consultant s findings and recommendations. In light of the fact that the parking study s findings did not show a gross mismatch between observed parking demand and existing Code requirements, while also considering the concerns expressed by the Council that existing parking requirements are too low, staff is providing an alternative set of standards for approval. The Staff Alternative maintains a conservative approach to Code changes opting to carry forward the small incremental changes proposed by Walker, maintaining Walker s suggested numerical relationship between the proposed parking ratios for each development type, but not reducing existing parking requirements in any development category. Rather, minimum parking requirements stay the same, with increases to parking requirements proposed for smaller developments (which tend to have higher per bedroom demand), and larger developments if enclosed parking is proposed (based on the fact that developments with enclosed garages tend to have higher demand per bedroom due to the tendency of some occupants to use private garages for something other than parking). This Staff Alternative is shown in Table 5 below and is reflected in the proposed Draft Ordinance included as Attachment 1a and 1b to this report. Multifamily Residential (3 units or more) Table 5- Staff Alternative Required Parking Ratios Development Size 3 units to 50 units If unenclosed resident parking is provided (parking structure, surface parking lot(s), carports): Studio 1.3 One Bedroom 1.8 Two Bedroom 2.1 Three Bedrooms 2.5 three 0.4 If enclosed resident parking is provided: Studio 1.4 One Bedroom 1.9 Two Bedroom 2.2 Three Bedrooms 2.8 three 0.5 Development Size 51+ Units If unenclosed resident parking is provided (parking structure(s), surface parking lot(s), carports): Studio 1.2 One Bedroom 1.7 Two Bedroom 2.0 Three Bedrooms 2.4 three 0.3 If enclosed resident parking is provided: Studio 1.4 One Bedroom 1.9 Two Bedroom 2.2 Three Bedrooms 2.8 three 0.5 A minimum of 0.2 spaces per unit shall (with a minimum of two guest spaces in a multi-family development) be provided as easily accessible and distinguishable guest parking in addition to the required parking for each unit. A summary table comparing multifamily parking ratios from the existing Code, the Consultant s recommendations and the Staff alternative is provided as Attachment 2 to this report.
9 Page 9 Staff Recommendation Ultimately, establishing development standards like parking requirements is a local policy decision that takes into consideration quantitative analysis, industry trends, as well as qualitative local community goals related to neighborhood character and quality of life. Based on the parking study s findings and previous concerns expressed by Council, Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Draft Ordinance to the City Council. As an alternative, the Planning Commission may opt to recommend the Consultant s Recommended parking ratios or other changes to the Ordinance as the Commission deems appropriate. Issue 2: Clarification of a bedroom for Parking Requirement Purposes Chapter 17.04, Definitions, of the Code currently defines bedroom very broadly as any habitable room other than a bathroom, kitchen, dining room or living room. A strict application of this definition would mean that every other type of room in a home would be counted as a bedroom for parking purposes. This broad definition coupled with buyer preferences for rooms such as offices, playrooms, family rooms, dens, lofts, etc. in new today s residential developments has resulted in the Planning staff making judgment calls as to whether or not to count a room as a bedroom for parking purposes on a case by case basis and with limited guidance or authority in the Code. Past practice has been to rely on how such other rooms are labeled on submitted floor plans and litmus tests such as whether or not a room has a door or a closet. The Consultant recommended, and staff concurs, that a clarification of when a bedroom is counted as a bedroom for parking purposes is needed to address this issue. The Draft Ordinance (Attachment 1a to this report) clarifies that rooms that provide an unobstructed opening 7 feet wide or greater in at least one wall shall not be counted as a bedroom for purposes of calculating required number of parking spaces. Staff believes this focus on the openness of a room as the primary criteria for determining its likelihood to be used as a bedroom is reasonable and appropriate. Rooms with large openings in at least one wall are less likely to be used as bedrooms due to the very limited privacy they provide. On the other hand, this focus on openness will allow residential developers the flexibility to provide open non-bedroom spaces desired by today s homebuyers, without having to provide additional parking as though those spaces were being used additional bedrooms. Issue 3: Tandem Parking The existing parking Code does not allow for tandem parking. In light of the fact that Orange is a built-out City with future multi-family residential development likely taking the form of infill development or redevelopment of small under-utilized properties, tandem parking is a residential development trend staff expects to see more frequently in residential products. As such, the Consultant recommends and staff concurs that it is desirable for the City to allow tandem parking in certain circumstances.
10 Page 10 The Draft Ordinance (Attachment 1a to this report) proposes to allow tandem parking if the tandem parking spaces are assigned to the same residential unit and subject to Minor Site Plan Review. Staff believes this approach is reasonable and appropriate because it allows a request for tandem parking to be approved at the Community Development Director level, so long as the request is consistent with Site Plan Review findings which speak to compatibility with surrounding neighborhoods, compliance with City development standards and the provision of safe and adequate vehicular and pedestrian access. Issue 4: Other Parking Study Recommendations Not Carried Forward by Staff Staff carried forward most but not all of the parking study recommendations. The Planning Commission may wish provide feedback on these items as appropriate. Regarding driveways, Walker noted that the existence of driveways in a development provided functional parking spaces for residents beyond required garage parking and also had an effect on observed counts because of a tendency by some to use driveways as parking spaces while using garage spaces for something else. Staff did not carry forward Walker s recommendation for counting driveways as required parking spaces because driveways are required primarily for singlefamily residential uses (not multi-family residential) where garage spaces are desirable, and also because driveway parking would block access to required garage spaces, which staff did not feel was advisable. The City may want to consider whether or not certain residential product types should be required to have driveways, though staff recommends this analysis be conducted as part of the larger comprehensive parking code update which is currently underway. Staff also did not carry forward Walker s recommendations for 1) greater on-street parking management through the use of parking in-lieu fees or additional regulations such as permit parking, 2) reduced parking requirements for projects that meet City goals such as density or affordable housing goals, or 3) for projects that provide bike or car-sharing amenities. Staff believes affording greater flexibility to reduce parking requirements is not consistent with the City s goals of providing adequate parking, nor has the City been interested in pursuing additional fees, active onstreet parking enforcement or permit parking in the past. Lastly, Staff did not carry forward Walker s recommendation to increase the parking requirement for duplex residential uses by parking them more similar to multi-family residential i.e. based on bedroom count. Staff did not see any evidence that the existing Code requirements for duplexes (one covered and one uncovered parking space) were inadequate and opted to leave the requirement as is at this time. The City may want to consider whether or not duplexes should be required to provide additional parking spaces as bedroom count increases, though staff recommends this analysis be conducted as part of the larger comprehensive parking code update which is currently underway.
11 Page 11 ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission is advisory to the City Council for Zoning Ordinance Amendments. Ordinances are not reviewed by advisory bodies such as the Streamlined Multi-Disciplined Accelerated Review Team (SMART) or the Design Review Committee (DRC). ATTACHMENTS/EXHIBITS Attachments to Report: 1. Planning Commission Resolution No. PC a. Draft Ordinance Amendment (redlined) b. Draft Ordinance Amendment (clean) 2. Comparison Table- Existing Code vs. Consultant Recommended and Staff Proposed Parking Ratios 3. Parking Study for the City of Orange Multi-Family Residential Parking Standards Update, prepared by Walker Parking Inc., dated April 13, 2017 N:\CDD\PLNG\Ordinance Amendments\Parking Code Update_MultiFamily Residential (2017)\PC\PC_Rpt9_18_2017.doc
Planning Commission Agenda Item
Planning Commission Agenda Item TO: THRU: FROM: Chair Glasgow and Members of the Planning Commission Anna Pehoushek Assistant Community Development Director Robert Garcia Senior Planner SUBJECT PUBLIC
More informationPlanning Commission Agenda Item
Planning Commission Agenda Item TO: THRU: FROM: Chair Glasgow and Members of the Planning Commission Anna Pehoushek Assistant Community Development Director Kelly Christensen Ribuffo Associate Planner
More informationPlanning Commission Agenda Item
Planning Commission Agenda Item TO: THRU: FROM: Chair Glasgow and Members of the Planning Commission Anna Pehoushek Assistant Community Development Director Vidal F. Márquez Assistant Planner SUBJECT PUBLIC
More informationPlanning Commission Agenda Item
Planning Commission Agenda Item TO: THRU: FROM: Chair Glasgow and Members of the Planning Commission Anna Pehoushek Assistant Community Development Director Kelly Christensen Ribuffo Associate Planner
More informationSTAFF REPORT. Meeting Date: April 25, 2017
Meeting Date: April 25, 2017 Agency: City of Belmont Staff Contact: Damon DiDonato, Community Development Department, (650) 637-2908; ddidonato@belmont.gov Agenda Title: Amendments to Sections 24 (Secondary
More informationSUBJECT Changes to Accessory Dwelling Unit, Parking, Accessory Structure and Nonconforming Parking Regulations in the Zoning Ordinance
REPORT To the Redwood City Planning Commission From Planning Staff February 21, 2017 SUBJECT Changes to Accessory Dwelling Unit, Parking, Accessory Structure and Nonconforming Parking Regulations in the
More informationZoning Administrator. Agenda Item
Zoning Administrator Agenda Item June 12, 2013 TO: THRU: FROM: Rick Otto Zoning Administrator Leslie Aranda Roseberry Planning Manager Chad Ortlieb Senior Planner SUBJECT PUBLIC HEARING: VARIANCE NO. VAR
More informationStaff recommends the City Council hold a public hearing, listen to all pertinent testimony, and introduce on first reading:
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 16, 2018 SUBJECT: INITIATED BY: MULTI-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS ZONE TEXT AMENDMENTS: AMEND MINIMUM DENSITY REQUIREMENTS FOR R3 AND R4 DISTRICTS; AMEND THE DENSITY BONUS
More informationCOLDSTREAM (PC-1) INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PLAN
COLDSTREAM (PC-1) INCLUSIONARY HOUSING PLAN A. Overview The proposed affordable housing strategy for PC-1 has evolved over time to reflect changes in the marketplace, including the loss of redevelopment
More informationARTICLE 40 AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS
ARTICLE 40 AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS Section 4000: Purpose. This section establishes policies which facilitate the development of affordable housing to serve a variety of needs within the City.
More informationORDINANCE NO
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SANTA CRUZ AMENDING TITLE 24 OF THE SANTA CRUZ MUNICIPAL CODE, THE ZONING ORDINANCE, BY AMENDING CHAPTER 24.16 PART 3, DENSITY BONUS PROVISIONS FOR RESIDENTIAL UNITS BE IT ORDAINED
More informationPUBLIC OPEN HOUSE September 19, 2018
PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE September 19, 2018 Board 1 BACKGROUND Council direction was given to develop a The is looking at new housing in mature and recent communities, as outlined in the City of Winnipeg s planning
More informationSB 1818 Q & A. CCAPA s Answers to Frequently Asked Questions Regarding SB 1818 (Hollingsworth) Changes to Density Bonus Law
SB 1818 Q & A CCAPA s Answers to Frequently Asked Questions Regarding SB 1818 (Hollingsworth) Changes to Density Bonus Law - 2005 Prepared by Vince Bertoni, AICP, Bertoni Civic Consulting & CCAPA Vice
More informationPlanning Commission Report
Planning Commission Report To: From: Subject: Planning Commission Planning Commission Meeting: February 18, 2015 Tony Kim, Acting Special Projects Manager Beth Rolandson, AICP, Principal Transportation
More informationPlanning Commission Report
cjly City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (370) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: April 28, 2016 Subject: Project
More information8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District
8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District The purpose of this district is to provide for residential development in the form of single detached dwellings. Dwelling, Single Detached Home Business,
More informationCity of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
City of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: May 15, 2017 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor and Council Paul Benoit, City Administrator Consideration of the 2 nd Reading of Ordinance 731 N.S. - Amending Division
More informationAgenda Re~oort PUBLIC HEARING: PROPOSED ADJUSTMENTS TO INCLUSIONARY IN-LIEU FEE RATES
Agenda Re~oort August 27, 2018 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council THROUGH: Finance Committee FROM: SUBJECT: William K. Huang, Director of Housing and Career Services PUBLIC HEARING: PROPOSED ADJUSTMENTS
More informationDate: September 17, 2018 Meeting Date: October 5, Progress Update on the 2018 Regional Parking Study Household Survey
To: From: Raymond Kan, Senior Planner, Regional Planning 5.4 Date: September 17, 2018 Meeting Date: October 5, 2018 Subject: Progress Update on the 2018 Regional Parking Study Household Survey RECOMMENDATION
More informationBoard Meeting Handout ACCOUNTING FOR CONTINGENCIES September 6, 2007
PURPOSE Board Meeting Handout ACCOUNTING FOR CONTINGENCIES September 6, 2007 At today s meeting, the Board will discuss whether to add to its technical agenda a project considering whether to revise the
More informationCity of Tacoma Planning and Development Services
Agenda Item D-3 City of Tacoma Planning and Development Services To: Planning Commission From: Elliott Barnett, Planning Services Division Subject: Affordable Housing Planning Work Program (Phase 3) Meeting
More informationCity of Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of January 14, 2013
City of Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of January 14, 2013 Chairman Williams called to order the workshop of the Lake Elmo Planning Commission at 7:00pm COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Fliflet, Obermueller,
More informationThe Student Housing Conundrum Balancing Need with Community Implications
The Student Housing Conundrum Balancing Need with Community Implications Georgia Planning Association Fall Conference 2018 September 6, 2018, 2:00 3:15 PM Moderator: Dana Johnson, Director Cobb County
More informationNew Zoning Ordinance Update. Presentation to the Mayor and Aldermen City of Savannah August 16, 2018
New Zoning Ordinance Update Presentation to the Mayor and Aldermen City of Savannah August 16, 2018 Discussion Background Benefits of NewZO Zoning Conversion Inclusion of Parking Matters Study Public Comment
More informationCITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G.2 STAFF REPORT August 5, Staff Contact: Fred Buderi (707)
CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G.2 STAFF REPORT August 5, 2008 Staff Contact: Fred Buderi (707) 449-5307 TITLE: REQUEST: RECOMMENDED ACTION: OPPORTUNITY HOUSE EMERGENCY SHELTER RELOCATION
More informationAffordable Housing Bonus Program. Public Questions and Answers - #2. January 26, 2016
Affordable Housing Bonus Program Public Questions and Answers - #2 January 26, 2016 The following questions about the Affordable Housing Bonus Program were submitted by the public to the Planning Department
More informationWe thank you for the opportunity to provide our services, and we look forward to discussing the report with you at your earliest convenience.
565 East Swedesford Road, Suite 300 Wayne, PA 19087 Office: 610.995.0260 Fax: 888.502.5726 www.walkerparking.com Mr. Maury Stern Partner Road & Washington, LLC c/o Insight Property Group 4601 N Fairfax
More informationTechnical Report 7.1 MODEL REPORT AND PARKING SCENARIOS. May 2016 PARKING MATTERS. Savannah GA Parking Concepts PARKING MATTERS
Savannah GA Parking Concepts PARKING MATTERS A Strategic Plan for Parking + Mobility in Savannah PARKING MATTERS Technical Report 7.1 MODEL REPORT AND PARKING SCENARIOS Prepared for the Chatham County-Savannah
More informationORDINANCE NO City Attorney Summary
ORDINANCE NO. 2882 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GARDEN GROVE APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. A-017-2017 AMENDING PORTIONS OF TITLE 9 (ZONING CODE) AND REPEALING CHAPTER 5.85 OF THE GARDEN GROVE
More informationPlace Type Descriptions Vision 2037 Comprehensive Plan
Place Type Descriptions Vision 2037 Comprehensive Plan The Vision 2037 Comprehensive Plan establishes a range of place types for Oxford, ranging from low intensity (limited development) Rural and Natural
More informationA. Land Use Designations: General Plan: LDR Low Density Residential Zoning: R-1H Single Family Residential - Hillside Overlay
Z O N I N G A D J U S T M E N T S B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION FEBRUARY 26, 2015 1229 Oxford Street Use Permit #UP2014-0009 to 1) add a 1,171 square-foot third story which would result
More informationCHAPTER SECOND UNITS
CHAPTER 22.5. SECOND UNITS SECTION 6425. PURPOSE. Second units are a residential use that provide an important source of housing. The purpose of this Chapter is to: 1. Increase the supply and diversity
More informationWALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT
WALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STUDY SESSION STAFF REPORT AGENDA: December 3, 2014 ORIGINATED BY: Community and Ecomic Development Department ITEM: 4d Day/Date/Time Place Project Name Application
More informationINTRODUCTION TO HOUSING LDC AMENDMENTS
INTRODUCTION TO HOUSING LDC AMENDMENTS August 6, 2018 BACKGROUND The City is participating in a regional affordable housing initiative Staff presented the City s overall strategy at the March 2018 MPB
More informationDRAFT Inclusionary Housing Survey. Prepared for San Francisco s Technical Advisory Committee
DRAFT Inclusionary Housing Survey Prepared for San Francisco s Technical Advisory Committee San Jose Background San Jose s current inclusionary housing ordinance passed in January of 2012 and replaced
More informationCompatible-Scale Infill Housing (R-2 Zones) Project
Project Scope: A targeted amendment to the regulations for building bulk/height in the R-2 zones. Objectives: Allow more housing opportunities in the R-2A, R-2D, and R-2M zones, while ensuring the height
More informationORDINANCE NO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ORDINANCE NO. 04768 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA * * * * * * AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 22.5 (SECOND UNIT ORDINANCE) OF DIVISION VI, PART ONE (ZONING REGULATIONS) OF
More informationFinal Draft Ordinance: Matrix
1. # Topic Title And Description Dry Sewer olicy Use table footnote 48 revised to include a reference to exemptions in K 17.460.0. Allow properties within an Urban Growth Area, that are too far from sewer,
More informationAGENDA BILL. Agenda Item No. 6(C)
AGENDA BILL Agenda Item No. 6(C) Date: May 16, 2017 To: El Cerrito City Council From: Margaret Kavanaugh-Lynch, Development Services Manager Subject: Update Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations ACTION REQUESTED
More informationSTATE OF CALIFORNIA AUTHENTICATED ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL. State of California GOVERNMENT CODE. Section 65915
STATE OF CALIFORNIA AUTHENTICATED ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL State of California GOVERNMENT CODE Section 65915 65915. (a) When an applicant seeks a density bonus for a housing development within, or for
More informationCommunity Advisory Committee (CAC) Meeting #7 West Anaheim Youth Center May 26, 2016
Community Advisory Committee (CAC) Meeting #7 West Anaheim Youth Center May 26, 2016 1 Project Team City: David Belmer Planning and Building Director Jonathan Borrego, AICP Planning Services Manager Gustavo
More informationMake No Small Plans: Innovative Western Planned Communities. 10:00 11:10 a.m. Friday, April 22, 2005 Sturm College of Law
THE ROCKY MOUNTAIN LAND USE INSTITUTE CONCURRENT SESSION Make No Small Plans: Innovative Western Planned Communities 10:00 11:10 a.m. Friday, April 22, 2005 Sturm College of Law Moderator: Darcie White
More informationThe Zoning Committee voted 4-2 to APPROVE this petition.
Rezoning Petition 2016-T001 Zoning Committee Recommendation August 9, 2016 REQUEST SUMMARY OF PETITION PETITIONER AGENT/REPRESENTATIVE COMMUNITY MEETING STATEMENT OF CONSISTENCY Text amendment to Sections
More informationCounty Survey. results of the public officials survey in the narrative. Henry County Comprehensive Plan,
Introduction During the planning process, a variety of survey tools where used to ensure the Henry County Comprehensive Plan was drafted in the best interests of county residents and businesses. The surveys
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT APPLICATION: Ordinance No. 2017-04 AGENDA ITEM: PH-2 PREPARED BY: Sheri Bermejo Planning Division Manager MEETING DATE: June 14, 2017 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 2017-04 Planning
More informationWALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. AGENDA: July 6, 2016 ITEM 4b.
WALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Attachment 3 AGENDA: July 6, 2016 ITEM 4b. ORIGINATED BY: COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING PROJECT NAME APPLICATION TYPE APPLICATION
More informationCITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT
DATE: March 22, 2016 CITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Jan Di Leo, Planner (805) 773-7088 jdileo@pismobeach.org THROUGH:
More informationAndrew P. Powers, City Manager. Mark A. Towne, Community Development Director
TO: FROM: Andrew P. Powers, City Manager Mark A. Towne, Community Development Director DATE: May 30, 2017 SUBJECT: Municipal Code Amendment relating to Accessory Dwelling Units (MCA 2016-70540) RECOMMENDATION:
More informationCommunity Open House March 8, 2017
Community Open House March 8, 2017 MEETING OBJECTIVE Provide an overview of the project Gain public insight and feedback on problems associated with slot home development Continue public engagement 03.08.17
More information4 LAND USE 4.1 OBJECTIVES
4 LAND USE The Land Use Element of the Specific Plan establishes objectives, policies, and standards for the distribution, location and extent of land uses to be permitted in the Central Larkspur Specific
More informationDRAFT Plan Incentives. Part A: Basic Discount
DRAFT 2030 Plan Incentives July 26, 2006 Part A: Basic Discount In order for a development to be eligible for any 2030 Land Resource Management Plan Discounts it must be located in the Urban Corridor and
More informationSANTA CRUZ COUNTY ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT ADU BASICS
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT ADU BASICS JUNE 2018 Use this guide with its companion documents Santa Cruz County ADU Basics and ADU Design Guide and the resources provided at sccoplanning.com/adu
More informationCity of Brea PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION
Agenda Item 9. City of Brea PLANNING COMMISSION COMMUNICATION TO: FROM: Honorable Chair and Planning Commission Jennifer A. Lilley, AICP, City Planner DATE: 06/27/2017 SUBJECT: PRECISE DEVELOPMENT NO.
More informationZoning Code Amendments Completed and Proposed As of September 2014
Zoning Code Amendments Completed and Proposed As of September 2014 PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENTS High Priority Amendment/Issue Comments Exterior Lighting Standards Section 26-503 establishes states that exterior
More informationCommunity Development
Community Development STAFF REPORT Planning Commission Meeting Date: 12/5/2016 Staff Report Number: 16-101-PC Public Hearing: Consider Zoning Ordinance Amendments Relating to Secondary Dwelling Units Recommendation
More informationMARKHAM. Comprehensive Zoning By-law Project. Markham Zoning By-law Consultant Team
City of MARKHAM Task 4B: Review & Assessment of Minor Variances Comprehensive Zoning By-law Project Markham Zoning By-law Consultant Team Gladki Planning Associates, R. E. Millward and Associates, Woodfield
More informationLand Development Code Update Workgroup AGENDA
Land Development Code Update Workgroup AGENDA Thursday, September 27, 2012 2:00 PM 4:00 PM Pinellas County Strategic Planning & Initiatives 310 Court Street, Clearwater, Florida 33756 ~ (727) 464-8200
More informationORDINANCE NO
ORDINANCE NO. 08-2017 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF FREMONT AMENDING VARIOUS CHAPTERS OF FREMONT MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 18 (PLANNING AND ZONING) FOR CONFORMITY WITH STATE LAWS PERTAINING TO DENSITY BONUS,
More informationBunker Hill Part II Urban Design. Specific Plan. Case No. CPC SP TABLE OF CONTENTS
Bunker Hill Part II Urban Design Specific Plan Case No. CPC-2011-684-SP TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 7. Section 8. Section 9. Section 10.
More informationCarver County AFFORDABLE HOUSING UPDATE
Carver County AFFORDABLE HOUSING UPDATE July 2017 City of Chaska Community Partners Research, Inc. Lake Elmo, MN Executive Summary - Chaska Key Findings - 2017 Affordable Housing Study Update Chaska is
More informationNOTICE OF MEETING AND AGENDA FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF SPRINGVILLE, UTAH... JANUARY 23, 2018
NOTICE OF MEETING AND AGENDA FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF SPRINGVILLE, UTAH............................ JANUARY 23, 2018 Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission will hold a public meeting
More informationROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM JEFF ALLRED CITY MANAGER DATE JUNE 9 2015 6 SUBJECT MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT 15 02 AMENDING CHAPTERS 17 04 AND 17 72 OF TITLE
More informationPRESERVATION ORDINANCE COMPARISON. october
PRESERVATION ORDINANCE COMPARISON october A comparison of the City of Winter Park s preservation ordinance, policies and incentives to selected municipalities 2013 PRESERVATION ORDINANCE COMPARISON Background
More information25 Leonard Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 25 Leonard Avenue - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report Date: March 8, 2017 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Toronto and East York
More informationGOVERNMENT CODE SECTION
1 of 18 9/7/2013 10:51 AM GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65915-65918 65915. (a) When an applicant seeks a density bonus for a housing development within, or for the donation of land for housing within, the jurisdiction
More informationComment Letter No December 15, Merritt 7 840). assess the. impact of. should be
December 15, 2010 Financial Accounting Standards Board Attn: Technical Director File Reference No. 1850-100 401 Merritt 7 P.O. Box 5116 Norwalk, CT 06856-5116 Via e-mail to director@fasb.org Re: File Reference
More informationCPC CA 3 SUMMARY
CPC-2009-3955-CA 2 CONTENTS Summary Staff Report Conclusion 3 4 7 Appendix A: Draft Ordinance A-1 Attachments: 1. Land Use Findings 2. Environmental Clearance 1-1 2-1 CPC-2009-3955-CA 3 SUMMARY Since its
More informationLOT AREA AND FRONTAGE
LOT AREA AND FRONTAGE Lot Area & Frontage for the R2.1 Zone Lot Area & Frontage for the R2.4 Zone Minimum Lot Minimum Lot Zone Area Width R2.1 700 sq m 18 m R2.4 600 sq m 16 m Lot Area means the total
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting March 17, 2007 DATE: March 8, 2007 SUBJECT: Request to Advertise Public Hearings on Amendments to Section 25B. C-O Rosslyn Commercial Office
More information70 Parker Hill Avenue Development. 70 Parker Hill Avenue Mission Hill. Application for Small Project Review Submitted to the
70 Parker Hill Avenue Development 70 Parker Hill Avenue Mission Hill Application for Small Project Review Submitted to the Boston Redevelopment Authority 1 70 Parker Hill Avenue, Mission Hill Application
More informationMARKHAM. City of. Comprehensive Zoning By-law Project. Task 4b. Review and Assessment of Minor Variances
Appendix E City of MARKHAM ra ft Comprehensive Zoning By-law Project Task 4b. Review and Assessment of Minor Variances D January 22, 2014 Markham Zoning By-law Consultant Team Gladki Planning Associates,
More informationMINUTES CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION STUDY SESSION
MINUTES CITY OF NORTH LAS VEGAS SPECIAL PLANNING COMMISSION STUDY SESSION CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: STAFF PRESENT: VERIFICATION: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 at 6:00 P.M. Aliante Library Meeting Room 2400 Deer
More informationSalem HNA and EOA Advisory Committee Meeting #6
Salem HNA and EOA Advisory Committee Meeting #6 Residential Land Policies Employment Land Policies Policy Discussions with the Committee Outcome of today s meeting Direction from this Committee on proposed
More informationCharlottesville Planning Commission, Neighborhood Associations & News Media
CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE A World Class City Department of Neighborhood Development Services City Hall Post Office Box 911 Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 Telephone 434-970-3182 Fax 434-970-3359 www.charlottesville.org
More informationDEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING, HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT Planning Division
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING, HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT Planning Division #1 Courthouse Plaza, 2100 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 700 Arlington, VA 22201 TEL 703.228.3525 FAX 703.228.3543 www.arlingtonva.us
More informationBUSINESS PROPERTY THE REAL VALUE OF. New Minnesota law gives appraisers a way to establish minimum compensation in eminent domain cases
THE REAL VALUE OF BUSINESS PROPERTY New Minnesota law gives appraisers a way to establish minimum compensation in eminent domain cases BY JOHN SCHMICK Real estate markets are dynamic in nature, constantly
More informationSUBJECT: Impact Fees Annual Report DATE: November 9, 2017
0f THE 01T \ AK I. '«Ni CITY OF OAKLAND fj()y 2 I PH 5j AGENDA REPORT TO: Sabrina B. Landreth City Administrator FROM: William Gilchrist Director, PBD SUBJECT: Impact Fees Annual Report DATE: November
More informationORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Ventura, State of California, ordains as follows: Section 1
ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE VENTURA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AMENDING DIVISION 8, CHAPTER 1.1, ARTICLE 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, AND 11 OF THE VENTURA COUNTY ORDINANCE CODE, COASTAL ZONING ORDINANCE PERTAINING
More informationSUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CENTRAL PARK VILLAGE BREA ENTITLEMENT DOCUMENTS FOR A PROPOSED MIXED USE PROJECT AT W.
City of Brea Agenda Item: 18 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Date: July 17, 2012 TO: FROM: Honorable Mayor and City Council City Manager SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF CENTRAL PARK VILLAGE BREA ENTITLEMENT DOCUMENTS
More informationAFFORDABLE HOUSING STREAMLINED APPROVAL PURSUANT TO SENATE BILL 35 AND PLANNING DIRECTOR BULLETIN #5 INFORMATIONAL PACKET
1650 MISSION STREET, #400 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 www.sfplanning.org AFFORDABLE HOUSING STREAMLINED APPROVAL PURSUANT TO SENATE BILL 35 AND PLANNING DIRECTOR BULLETIN #5 INFORMATIONAL PACKET California
More informationTHE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA
THE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA Tuesday, June 20, 2017 Fourth-Floor Council Chambers 3:30 p.m. County-City Building, South Bend, IN PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Rezonings: A. A combined
More information2016 Census Bulletin Changing Composition of the Housing Stock
Metro Vancouver s Role Every five years, the Census of Canada provides benchmark data that is instrumental in analyzing and evaluating local government planning policies and services. Representing member
More informationCreative Approaches to Moderate Density Filling the Missing Middle on Cape Cod
Creative Approaches to Moderate Density Filling the Missing Middle on Cape Cod Second Public Presentations Falmouth Eastham/Orleans October 23, 2018 November 8, 2018 Project Introduction: Community Resiliency
More informationPUBLIC. Public Notification. June. 11, 2013, about. invitation. 25, 2013 Community. Open House. approximately 89. Public Responsee. or unspecified).
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Planning Current Planning - Rezoning 333 East 11th Avenue (275 Kingsway) PUBLIC CONSULTATION SUMMARY DRAFT NOTE: Includes all comments received up until November 1, 2013
More informationARTICLE 3: Zone Districts
ARTICLE 3: Zone Districts... 3-1 17.3.1: General...3-1 17.3.1.1: Purpose and Intent... 3-1 17.3.2: Districts and Maps...3-1 17.3.2.1: Applicability... 3-1 17.3.2.2: Creation of Districts... 3-1 17.3.2.3:
More informationOceanside Zoning Ordinance
Oceanside Zoning Ordinance 3006 Accessory Dwelling Units (1992 and Redevelopment Zoning Ordinance) Amendments Article 42 Accessory Dwelling Units (1986 Zoning Ordinance) New [Strike-thru = Deleted language,
More informationRESIDENTIAL VACATION RENTALS
RESIDENTIAL VACATION RENTALS WHAT IS A RESIDENTIAL VACATION RENTAL? A residential vacation rental is the renting of a house, apartment, or room for a period of less than thirty days to a person or group
More informationAccessory Dwelling Units
Planning & Building Department 3675 Mt. Diablo Boulevard, Suite 210 Lafayette, CA 94549-1968 Tel. (925) 284-1976 Fax (925) 284-1122 http://www.ci.lafayette.ca.us Accessory Dwelling Units 6-560 Purpose
More informationRESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (Amended 11/13/14; 6/9/16; 10/13/16) PART I. R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
ARTICLE X. RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (Amended 11/13/14; 6/9/16; 10/13/16) PART I. R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT Section 108: Purpose This district is designed to accommodate single family detached
More informationCITY OF SANTA ROSA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 APPLICANT FILE NUMBER MJP
ITEM NO. 9 CITY OF SANTA ROSA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 PROJECT TITLE Yogurt Time Center ADDRESS/LOCATION 3093 Marlow Road ASSESSOR S PARCEL
More informationTASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE
TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE INTRODUCTION Using the framework established by the U.S. 301/Gall Boulevard Corridor Regulating Plan (Regulating Plan),
More informationPlanning & Transportation Commission Staff Report (ID # 8862)
Planning & Transportation Commission Staff Report (ID # 8862) Report Type: Action Items Meeting Date: 2/14/2018 Summary Title: Title: From: Affordable Housing (AH) Combining District Draft Ordinance PUBLIC
More informationBriefing Book. State of the Housing Market Update San Francisco Mayor s Office of Housing and Community Development
Briefing Book State of the Housing Market Update 2014 San Francisco Mayor s Office of Housing and Community Development August 2014 Table of Contents Project Background 2 Household Income Background and
More informationSTAFF REPORT SAUSALITO CITY COUNCIL
STAFF REPORT SAUSALITO CITY COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 11, 2018 AGENDA TITLE: LEAD DEPARTMENT: Introduction of Ordinances to Add Sausalito Municipal Code Section 10.44.085, and to amend Table 10.22-1,
More informationATLANTA ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE
CITY OF ATLANTA ZONING ORDINANCE QUICK FIXES In 2015 the City of Atlanta selected a team of consultants to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the City s Zoning Ordinance, including a review of the ability
More informationSenate Bill No CHAPTER 928. An act to amend Section of the Government Code, relating to housing.
Senate Bill No. 1818 CHAPTER 928 An act to amend Section 65915 of the Government Code, relating to housing. [Approved by Governor September 29, 2004. Filed with Secretary of State September 30, 2004.]
More informationSPECIAL REGULAR MEETING OF CITY COUNCIL AGENDA
LIVE WEBCAST: Please note Regular Meetings, Public Hearings, Open Council Workshops and some Special Meetings of City Council are streamed online and are accessible through the City s website at http://www.newwestcity.ca
More informationM E M O. September 14, 2017 Agenda Item #4. Planning Commission. David Goodison, Planning Director
September 14, 2017 Agenda Item #4 M E M O To: From: Planning Commission David Goodison, Planning Director Re: Preliminary review of an application for a mixed-use development proposed for 870 Broadway
More informationCOUNTY OF SAN MATEO Inter-Departmental Correspondence Planning and Building. Steve Monowitz, Community Development Director
COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Inter-Departmental Correspondence Planning and Building Date: December 2, 2016 Board Meeting Date: January 10, 2017 Special Notice / Hearing: Newspaper Notice Vote Required: Majority
More informationImplementation: Revenue and Leases
Implementation: Revenue and Leases Agenda Ref 12B FASB/IASB Joint Board Meeting June 19, 2018 This presentation has been prepared for discussion at a public meeting of the International Accounting Standards
More information