REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento"

Transcription

1 REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA PUBLIC HEARING December 10, 2015 To: Members of the Planning and Design Commission Subject: 1567 Santa Ynez Tentative Map (P15-050) A request to subdivide a 0.15 acre parcel into two parcels to allow the two existing single family homes to be located on separate parcels in the Single-Unit Dwelling (R-1) zone. This proposal requires a Tentative Map and Site Plan and Design Review with deviations for lot size, lot dimensions, setbacks, and lot coverage. A. Environmental Determination: Exempt per CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) - No Significant Effect; B. Tentative Map to subdivide one 0.15 parcel into two parcels in the Singleunit Dwelling (R-1) zone; C. Site Plan and Design Review with deviations to reduce the minimum lot size from 6,200 square feet to 3,720 square feet for Parcel 1 which is a corner lot and to reduce the minimum lot size from 5,200 square feet to 2,680 square feet for Parcel 2 which is an interior lot; D. Site Plan and Design Review with deviations to reduce the minimum lot depth from 100 feet to feet and to reduce the minimum lot depth from 100 feet to 40 feet for Parcel 2; E. Site Plan and Design Review with deviations to allow 51.7% lot coverage on Parcel 2 where the maximum lot coverage is 50% for structures under a total of 2,500 square feet.; and F. Site Plan and Design Review with deviations to reduce the minimum front yard setback from 20 feet to 9 feet, the minimum interior side yard setback from 5 feet to 3 feet, and the rear yard setback from 15 feet to 5 feet for the existing home on Parcel 2. Location/Council District 1567 Santa Ynez Way, Sacramento Assessor s Parcel Number: Council District 3 1

2 1567 Santa Ynez Tentative Map (P15-050) December 10, 2015 Aerial and Zoning Map 2

3 Recommendation: Staff recommends the Commission approve the request based on the findings and subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1. The Commission has final approval authority over items A-F above, and its decision is appealable to City Council. At the time of the writing of this report, the project is considered noncontroversial. Contact: Elise Gumm, LEED AP BD+C, Associate Planner, (916) ; Evan Compton, Senior Planner, (916) ; Applicant: Klima Land Surveys; c/o: Kris Klima, (916) , 3430 Sophia Way, Sacramento, CA Owner: Summary Eric Zacharias & Sandra Zacharias 4317 F ST, Sacramento, CA The applicant is requesting to subdivide a 0.15 acre parcel into two parcels to allow the two existing single family homes to be located on separate parcels in the Single-Unit Dwelling (R-1) zone. After subdividing the property, each lot will contain one dwelling unit. The project does not involve any new construction at this time. The entitlements necessary for the project include a tentative map and site plan and design review with deviations for lot size, lot dimensions, lot coverage, and setbacks. Table 1: Project Information General Plan designation: Traditional Neighborhood Low Density Design Review District: Citywide Existing zoning of site: Single-Unit Dwelling (R-1) zone Existing use of site: Two Detached Single Family Homes Property area: Approximately 0.15 acres Background Information The project site was developed in 1968 and there is no recent history of any prior planning entitlements. The Planning and Development Code includes development standards for parcels in the R-1 zone. The proposed project requires approval from the Planning and Design Commission because some of the deviations requested are more than a 50% reduction of the standard requirement as stated in Section (B)(1). Public/Neighborhood Outreach and Comments Staff routed the proposal to neighborhood groups and associations including: East Sacramento Chamber of Commerce, East Sacramento Improvement Association, East Sac Give Back, and East Sacramento Preservation. Staff also mailed the public hearing notice to property owners within a 300 foot radius from the subject site. At the time of writing this report, staff has not received any objections to the project. 3

4 Environmental Considerations The project consists of subdividing one 0.15 acre parcel into two parcels at a location in which infrastructure is available. The Community Development Department, Environmental Planning Services Division has reviewed this project and determined that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) - No Significant Effect. The activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA in that the proposed new lot line to separate the existing single family homes will not change or modify the characteristics of the neighborhood or create any impacts to the environment. Policy Considerations General Plan The 2035 General Plan Update was adopted by City Council on March 3, The 2035 General Plan s goals, policies, and implementation programs define a roadmap to achieving Sacramento s vision to be the most livable city in America. The site is designated in the General Plan as Traditional Neighborhood Low Density, which provides for single-family detached dwellings, single-family attached dwellings (e.g., duplexes, triplexes, townhomes), accessory second units, limited neighborhood-serving commercial on lots two acres or less, compatible public, quasi-public, and special uses. The project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and is compatible to the neighborhood in the vicinity. Some of the goals and policies supported by this project are: Goal LU 4.1 Neighborhoods Promote the development and preservation of neighborhoods that provide a variety of housing types, densities, and designs and a mix of uses and services that address the diverse needs of Sacramento residents of all ages, socio-economic groups, and abilities. Staff finds that the proposed project promotes diversity in housing types and densities to address the housing needs for residents. Policy LU Small-lot Single Family Development Within areas designated Traditional Neighborhood, the City shall allow single family homes on existing parcels of 6,400 square feet or less. Staff finds that the creation of smaller lots to accommodate the existing detached, single family homes will provide new ownership opportunities in the neighborhood while maintaining adequate yard areas and onsite parking. Given that the two single family homes have been in place since the late 1960 s, the neighborhood character will not be affected by the subdivision of the property. 4

5 Project Design Tentative Map Map Design: The project involves a proposed subdivision of a 0.15 acre parcel into two parcels. The proposed new property line results in the creation of two parcels for the two existing homes. Parcel 1 will be 40 feet wide by 93 feet in depth and the minimum size for a corner lot is typically 62 feet by 100 feet. Parcel 2 will be 67 feet wide by 40 feet in depth and the minimum size for an interior lot is 52 feet by 100 feet. The proposed new lots are similar to the lotting pattern of other corner lots which also were further subdivided in the neighborhood. Each lot will be adequately sized for a single family home and the necessary improvements. Findings On November 18, 2015, the Subdivision Review Committee, with all ayes, voted to recommend approval of the proposed Tentative Map, subject to conditions of approval found in Attachment 1. In evaluating tentative maps, the Commission is required to make the following findings: 1. None of the conditions described in Government Code section exist with respect to the proposed subdivision as follows: a. The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan, all applicable community and specific plans, Title 16 of the City Code, and all other applicable provisions of the City Code; b. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan, all applicable community and specific plans, Title 16 of the City Code, and all other applicable provisions of the City Code; c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development; d. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development; e. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; f. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; 5

6 g. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. 2. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan, all applicable community and specific plans, Title 16 of the City Code, and all other applicable provisions of the City Code (Gov. Code ). 3. The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into the existing community sewer system will not result in a violation of the applicable waste discharge requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Board, Central Valley Region, in that existing treatment plants have a design capacity adequate to service the proposed subdivision (Gov. Code ). 4. The design of the proposed subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities (Gov. Code ). 5. The City has considered the effect of the approval of this tentative subdivision map on the housing needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources (Gov. Code ). Staff finds that the tentative map is consistent with the policies of the General Plan and Title 16 of the City Code. The site is physically suitable for the existing homes; the size of the new parcels and the existing improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife and their habitat, and the design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use, of, property within the proposed subdivision. The project will not overly burden the sewer system, nor will it preclude future passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities. Height, Setbacks, and Lot Coverage Table 2A and 2B provide height, setback, and lot coverage standards for the R-1 zone: Table 2A: Development Standards (Parcel 1 Corner Lot) Required Proposed Deviations Lot Depth 100 feet feet Yes, 6.65 feet Lot Width 62 feet 40 feet (Existing) No Lot Size 6,200 Sq.Ft. 3,720 Sq.Ft. Yes, 2,480 Sq.Ft. Front Setback Average of adjacent Existing No homes Street-side Setback 12.5 feet 9.6 feet (Existing) No Interior yard 5 feet 5 feet (Existing) No Setback Rear yard Setback 15 feet 17 feet No Lot Coverage 40% or 2,500 Sq.Ft., which is greater* 2,500 Sq.Ft., 35% No 6

7 Table 2B: Development Standards (Parcel 2 Interior Lot) Required Proposed Deviations Lot Depth 100 feet 40 feet Yes, 60 feet Lot Width 52 feet 67 feet No Lot Size 5,200 Sq.Ft. 2,680 Sq.Ft. Yes, 2,520 Sq.Ft. Front Setback 20 feet 9 feet Yes, 11 feet Interior yard 5 feet 14.7 feet No Setback (alley) Interior yard 5 feet 3 feet Yes, 2 feet Setback Rear yard Setback 15 feet 5 feet Yes, 10 feet Lot Coverage 40% or 2,500 Sq.Ft., which is greater* 2,500 Sq.Ft., 51.7% Yes, +1.7% *Or 2,500 square feet, whichever is greater provided it does not to exceed 50% With the subdivision of the parcel, the front setback for Parcel 2 will be 9 feet instead of 20 feet, the rear setback will be 5 feet instead of 15 feet, and the interior setback will be 3 feet instead of 5 feet. Although the existing structure is less than 2,500 square feet, the lot coverage exceeds the 50% maximum by 1.7% and therefore deviations are required. There are no changes to the existing footprints of the buildings however, the subdivision of the parcel triggers the proposed setback and lot coverage deviations. Staff has reviewed the proposed deviations and finds that the project is acceptable since it will provide additional home ownership opportunities in an established neighborhood, each home will continue to have public street frontage, and both properties have adequate yard areas and onsite parking. In evaluating site plan and design review proposals of this type, the Commission is required to make the following findings: 1. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development are consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan or transit village plan, in that the proposed development is consistent with general plan goals and policies within the Traditional Neighborhood Low Density designation in that the project provides housing ownership opportunities in an established neighborhood. 2. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of proposed development are consistent with all applicable design guidelines and with all applicable development standards or, if deviations from design guidelines or development standards are approved, the proposed development is consistent with the purpose and intent of the applicable design guidelines and development standards in that the proposed project does not include any exterior modifications to the dwelling units and maintains the same character of the neighborhood. 7

8 3. The proposed development is consistent with the single family residential design principles and the proposed deviations are consistent with the purpose and intent of the applicable design guidelines and development standards, in that the proposed project will maintain the existing character and quality of this neighborhood, consistent with the goals of the design principles. 4. All streets and other public access ways and facilities, parking facilities, and utility infrastructure are adequate to serve the proposed development and comply with all applicable design guidelines and development standards; The project has been analyzed by City departments and it is determined that all streets and other public access ways and facilities, parking facilities, and utility infrastructure are adequate to serve the proposed development and comply with all applicable design guidelines and development standards. 5. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development are visually and functionally compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed development is visually and functionally compatible with the surrounding neighborhood in that the project will provide ownership singledwelling units that are compatible in size and height to the neighborhood in the vicinity. 6. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development are not detrimental to the public health, safety, convenience, or welfare of persons residing, working, visiting, or recreating in the surrounding neighborhood and will not result in the creation of a nuisance, in that no new use or new construction is proposed 7. The proposed development is not detrimental to the public health, safety, convenience, or welfare of persons residing, working, visiting, or recreating in the surrounding neighborhood and will not result in the creation of a nuisance in that the project maintains public street frontage for each lot and provides onsite parking for each dwelling. Recommendation Staff recommends the Commission approve the request based on the findings and subject to the conditions listed in Attachment 1. The project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan, and the project site is already developed so there will be no changes visible from the neighborhood perspective. Furthermore, the project will provide additional home ownership opportunities in an established neighborhood, each home will continue to have public street frontage, and both properties have adequate yard areas and onsite parking. 8

9

10 ATTACHMENT 1 PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1567 SANTA YNEZ TENTATIVE MAP (P15-050) 1567 SANTA YNEZ WAY, SACRAMENTO, CA Findings of Fact A. Environmental Determination: Exemption: Minor Land Divisions (15315) Based on the determination and recommendation of the City s Environmental Planning Services Manager and the oral and documentary evidence received at the hearing on the Project, the Planning and Design Commission finds that the Project is exempt from review under the following sections of the CEQA Guidelines: Section 15061(b)(3) - No Significant Effect. The activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA in that the proposed new lot line to separate the existing single family homes will not change or modify the characteristics of the neighborhood or create any impacts to the environment. B. Tentative Map to subdivide one 0.15 parcel into two parcels in the Single-unit Dwelling (R-1) zone is approved based on the following findings: 1. None of the conditions described in Government Code section exist with respect to the proposed subdivision as follows: a. The proposed map is consistent with the General Plan, all applicable community and specific plans, Title 16 of the City Code, and all other applicable provisions of the City Code; b. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the General Plan, all applicable community and specific plans, Title 16 of the City Code, and all other applicable provisions of the City Code; c. The site is physically suitable for the type of development; d. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development; e. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; f. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems; 10

11 g. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. 2. The proposed subdivision, together with the provisions for its design and improvement, is consistent with the General Plan, all applicable community and specific plans, Title 16 of the City Code, and all other applicable provisions of the City Code (Gov. Code ). 3. The discharge of waste from the proposed subdivision into the existing community sewer system will not result in a violation of the applicable waste discharge requirements prescribed by the California Regional Water Quality Board, Central Valley Region, in that existing treatment plants have a design capacity adequate to service the proposed subdivision (Gov. Code ). 4. The design of the proposed subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities (Gov. Code ). 5. The City has considered the effect of the approval of this tentative subdivision map on the housing needs of the region and has balanced these needs against the public service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental resources (Gov. Code ). C-F Site Plan and Design Review with deviations for lot size, lot dimensions, lot coverage, and setbacks are approved based on the following findings: 1. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development are consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan or transit village plan, in that the proposed development is consistent with general plan goals and policies within the Traditional Neighborhood Low Density designation in that the project provides housing ownership opportunities in an established neighborhood. 2. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of proposed development are consistent with all applicable design guidelines and with all applicable development standards or, if deviations from design guidelines or development standards are approved, the proposed development is consistent with the purpose and intent of the applicable design guidelines and development standards in that the proposed project does not include any exterior modifications to the dwelling units and maintains the same character of the neighborhood. 3. The proposed development is consistent with the single family residential design principles and the proposed deviations are consistent with the purpose and intent of the applicable design guidelines and development standards, in that the proposed project will maintain the existing character 11

12 and quality of this neighborhood, consistent with the goals of the design principles. 4. All streets and other public access ways and facilities, parking facilities, and utility infrastructure are adequate to serve the proposed development and comply with all applicable design guidelines and development standards; The project has been analyzed by City departments and it is determined that all streets and other public access ways and facilities, parking facilities, and utility infrastructure are adequate to serve the proposed development and comply with all applicable design guidelines and development standards. 5. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development are visually and functionally compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed development is visually and functionally compatible with the surrounding neighborhood in that the project will provide ownership single-dwelling units that are compatible in size and height to the neighborhood in the vicinity. 6. The design, layout, and physical characteristics of the proposed development are not detrimental to the public health, safety, convenience, or welfare of persons residing, working, visiting, or recreating in the surrounding neighborhood and will not result in the creation of a nuisance, in that no new use or new construction is proposed. 7. The proposed development is not detrimental to the public health, safety, convenience, or welfare of persons residing, working, visiting, or recreating in the surrounding neighborhood and will not result in the creation of a nuisance in that the project maintains public street frontage for each lot and provides onsite parking for each dwelling. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL B. Tentative Map to subdivide one 0.15 parcel into two parcels in the Single-unit Dwelling (R-1) zone is hereby approved subject to the following conditions: NOTE: These conditions shall supersede any contradictory information shown on the Tentative Map approved for this project (P15-050). The design of any improvement not covered by these conditions shall be to City standard. The applicant shall satisfy each of the following conditions prior to filing the Parcel Map unless a different time for compliance is specifically stated in these conditions. Any condition requiring an improvement that has already been designed and secured under a City Approved improvement agreement may be considered satisfied at the discretion of the Department of Public Works 12

13 The City strongly encourages the applicant to thoroughly discuss the conditions of approval for the project with their Engineer/Land Surveyor consultants prior to City Planning and Design Commission approval. The improvements required of a Tentative Map can be costly and are completely dependent upon the condition of the existing improvements. Careful evaluation of the potential cost of the improvements required by the City will enable the applicant to ask questions of the City prior to project approval and will result in a smoother plan check process after project approval: GENERAL: All Projects B1. Pay off existing assessments, or file the necessary segregation requests and fees to segregate existing assessments. B2. Show all continuing and proposed/required easements on the Final (Parcel) Map. PUBLIC WORKS B3. Construct standard subdivision improvements as noted in these conditions pursuant to section of the City Code. All improvements shall be designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. Improvements required shall be determined by the city. The City shall determine improvements required for each phase prior to recordation of each phase. Any public improvement not specifically noted in these conditions or on the Tentative Map shall be designed and constructed to City standards. This shall include street lighting and the repair or replacement/reconstruction of any existing deteriorated curb, gutter and sidewalk adjacent to the subject property per City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. B4. The design and placement of walls, fences, signs and Landscaping near intersections and driveways shall allow stopping sight distance per Caltrans standards and comply with City Code Section (25' sight triangle). Walls shall be set back 3' behind the sight line needed for stopping sight distance to allow sufficient room for pilasters. Landscaping in the area required for adequate stopping sight distance shall be limited 3.5' in height. The area of exclusion shall be determined by the Department of Public Works. B5. City Code A requires residential driveways to be at least 20-ft in length. The applicant shall apply for and obtain a driveway variance permit for the existing site driveway along P Street per City standards to the satisfaction of the Department of Public Works. SMUD B6. Dedicate a 5-ft public utility easement along north property line of Parcel 2 for overhead and underground facilities. 13

14 SASD B7. Developing this property may require payment of Regional San sewer impact fees. Regional San sewer impact fees shall be paid prior to issuance of building permits. For questions pertaining to Regional San sewer impact fees, please contact the Fee Quote Desk at (916) DOU B8. The applicant shall grant and reserve easements as needed for water, drainage and sanitary sewer facilities, and for surface storm drainage, at no cost at or before the time of sale or other conveyance of any parcel or lot. A note stating the following shall be placed on the Final Map: Reciprocal easements for utilities, drainage, water and sanitary sewer facilities, and surface storm drainage shall be granted and reserved, as necessary and at no cost, at or before the time of sale or conveyance of any parcel shown in this map. B9. Per City Code Section, , multiple water services to a single lot or parcel may be allowed if appropriate DOU Development Review and Field staff have reviewed the proposed number of taps and associated location and have no issues or concerns. Any new water services (other than fire) shall be metered. Excess services shall be abandoned to the satisfaction of the DOU. (Note: If the existing water service is serving Parcel 1 and Parcel 2, the applicant will be required to separate services.) ADVISORY NOTES The following advisory notes are informational in nature and are not a requirement of this Tentative Map: B10. If unusual amounts of bone, stone, or artifacts are uncovered, work within 50 meters of the area will cease immediately and a qualified archaeologist shall be consulted to develop, if necessary, further mitigation measures to reduce any archaeological impact to a less than significant effect before construction resumes. A note shall be placed on the final improvement plans referencing this condition. B11. Developer to contact SMUD new services SMUD (7683) for any new services. B12. Developer to comply with SMUD requirements; i.e. panel size/location, clearances from SMUD equipment, transformer location and service conductors. B13. Any necessary future SMUD facilities located on the customer s property may require a dedicated SMUD easement. This will be determined prior to SMUD performing work on the customer s property. 14

15 B14. The proposed project is located in a shaded X zone, on the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), defined as areas of 0.2% annual chance flood; areas of 1% chance flood with average depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 1% annual chance flood. Accordingly, the project site lies in an area with no requirements to elevate or flood proof. C-F Site Plan and Design Review with deviations for lot size, lot dimensions, lot coverage, and setbacks are approved subject to the following conditions: C-F 1. With this approval, Parcel 2 shall not exceed 52% lot coverage, and shall maintain a side yard setback of 3 feet, a rear yard setback of 5 feet, and a front yard setback of 9 feet. Parcel 1 shall be at least 93 feet in depth and 3,720 square feet in size. Parcel 2 shall be at least 40 feet in depth and 2,680 square feet in size. Any modification and/or additions to the site are subject to additional planning review and additional entitlements may be required. 15

16 1567 Santa Ynez Tentative Map (P15-050) December 10,

CITY OF SACRAMENTO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 300 Richards Blvd, 3rd Floor, Sacramento, CA 95811

CITY OF SACRAMENTO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 300 Richards Blvd, 3rd Floor, Sacramento, CA 95811 CITY OF SACRAMENTO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING ADMINISTRATOR 300 Richards Blvd, 3rd Floor, Sacramento, CA 95811 ACTION OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR On Thursday, September 14, 2017, the Zoning

More information

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA,

City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA, City of Sacramento City Council 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA, 95814 www.cityofsacramento.org 24 Meeting Date: 7/12/2011 Report Type: Public Hearing Title: 500 Eleanor Avenue Two-Unit Development (P10-083)

More information

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814-2671 www.cityofsacramento.org 3 PUBLIC HEARING December 10, 2015 To: Members of the Planning and Design Commission

More information

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814-2671 www.cityofsacramento.org 4 PUBLIC HEARING June 25, 2015 Members of the Planning Commission Subject: Greenfair

More information

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento Members of the Planning and Design Commission: REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814-2671 PUBLIC HEARING January 26, 2017 3 Subject: Sutter Park

More information

City of Sacramento Development Services Department. City of Sacramento Development Services Department

City of Sacramento Development Services Department. City of Sacramento Development Services Department Transportation/Circulation: T-1. Prior to the approval of plans or building permits, the project proponent shall pay a fair share for Central City traffic improvements as identified by City of Sacramento

More information

Prepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner

Prepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING January 27, 2016 Prepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a Tentative Parcel

More information

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA ZONING ADMINISTRATOR REPORT

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA ZONING ADMINISTRATOR REPORT COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO CALIFORNIA ZONING ADMINISTRATOR REPORT For the Agenda of: May 4, 2016 To: From: Subject: Supervisorial District(s): Zoning Administrator Department of Community Development PLNP2015-00222.

More information

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT November 20, 2015

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT November 20, 2015 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT November 20, 2015 PROJECT: Acquistapace Tentative Parcel Map HEARING DATE: December 7, 2015 STAFF/PHONE: Dana Eady, (805) 934-6266 GENERAL INFORMATION

More information

RESOLUTION NO. B. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City; and

RESOLUTION NO. B. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City; and RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA ROSA RECOMMENDING TO CITY COUNCIL REZONING TO MODIFY THE EXISTING POLICY STATEMENT AND ADOPT THE BAY VILLAGE HOMES DEVELOPMENT

More information

Planning Commission Staff Report August 6, 2015

Planning Commission Staff Report August 6, 2015 Commission Staff Report August 6, 2015 Project: Capital Reserve Map File: EG-14-008A Request: Tentative Parcel Map Location: 8423 Elk Grove Blvd. APN: 116-0070-014 Staff: Christopher Jordan, AICP Sarah

More information

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.3 AGENDA TITLE: A public hearing to consider a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, Rezone, Tentative Subdivision Map, Abandonment

More information

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council DATE: May 7, 2018 FROM: PREPARED BY: SUBJECT: Matthew Bronson, City Manager A. Rafael Castillo, AICP, Senior Planner Cassandra Mesa, Building

More information

PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT

PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DATE: TO: Hearing Officer SUBJECT: Minor Variance #11876 LOCATION: APPLICANT: ZONING DESIGNATION: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: CASE PLANNER: STAFF

More information

812 Page Street. Item 10 June 21, Staff Report

812 Page Street. Item 10 June 21, Staff Report Item 10 Department of Planning & Development Land Use Planning Division Staff Report 812 Page Street Tentative Map #8355 to allow condominium ownership in a five (5) unit project with four (4) residential

More information

MEMORANDUM. TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

MEMORANDUM. TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: BY: PLANNING COMMISSION TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR MATTHEW DOWNING, ASSISTANT PLANNER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP CASE NO. 14-002; SUBDIVISION

More information

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814-2671 www.cityofsacramento.org 5 PUBLIC HEARING September 8, 2016 To: Members of the Planning and Design Commission

More information

TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. For the meeting of January 11, Agenda Item 6C. Zone X (Minimal Flood Hazard Area)

TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. For the meeting of January 11, Agenda Item 6C. Zone X (Minimal Flood Hazard Area) TOWN OF SAN ANSELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT For the meeting of January 11, 2016 Agenda Item 6C Owner/Applicant: Daniel and Jacqueline Olson Project Address: 321 Greenfield Avenue Assessor s Parcel

More information

Planning Department 168 North Edwards Street Post Office Drawer L Independence, California 93526

Planning Department 168 North Edwards Street Post Office Drawer L Independence, California 93526 Planning Department 168 North Edwards Street Post Office Drawer L Independence, California 93526 Phone: (760) 878-0263 FAX: (760) 8782-2712 E-Mail: inyoplanning@inyocounty.us AGENDA ITEM NO.: 4 (Action

More information

Operating Standards Attachment to Development Application

Operating Standards Attachment to Development Application Planning & Development Services 2255 W Berry Ave. Littleton, CO 80120 Phone: 303-795-3748 Mon-Fri: 8am-5pm www.littletongov.org Operating Standards Attachment to Development Application 1 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT

More information

Supplemental Application Form Request for a Waiver of Development Standards via Density Bonus

Supplemental Application Form Request for a Waiver of Development Standards via Density Bonus County of Sacramento Office of Planning and Environmental Review (PER) 827 7 th Street, Room 225 Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 874-6141 Supplemental Application Form Request for a Waiver of Development Standards

More information

CITY OF RIO VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

CITY OF RIO VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: January10, 2018 CITY OF RIO VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM #4.2 PREPARED BY: Lamont Thompson, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Vesting Tentative Tract No. 2017-001: To consider

More information

APPROVED CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 25, 2017

APPROVED CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 25, 2017 CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OCTOBER 25, 2017 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER Chair Blair called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM. 2. ROLL CALL Commission Present: Blair, Cox, Lagomarsino,

More information

RESOLUTION NO. FILE NO. PT14-047

RESOLUTION NO. FILE NO. PT14-047 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE APPROVING A VESTING TENTATIVE MAP TO SUBDIVIDE ONE (1) LOT INTO NINE (9) LOTS FOR RESIDENTIAL USES, AND ONE (1) LOT FOR COMMON USES ON

More information

RESOLUTION NO xx

RESOLUTION NO xx Attachment 10 RESOLUTION NO. 2015-xx A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 35679 (PA07-0084) FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE 1,529,498 SQUARE

More information

Planning Commission Report

Planning Commission Report Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 458-1140 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: September 27, 2012 Subject: 366 North Rodeo

More information

1. The reason provided for the opposing votes was that the two commissioners wanted something else to be developed on their parcel.

1. The reason provided for the opposing votes was that the two commissioners wanted something else to be developed on their parcel. Agenda Item #6.2 SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING - APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION DENYING THE APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION

More information

Prepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner

Prepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING September 13, 2017 Prepared by: Casey Kempenaar, Senior Planner REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a Tentative

More information

4.2 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS

4.2 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS 4.2 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS A. Purpose: To define regulations and standards for each residential zoning district in the City. The following sections identify uses, regulations, and performance standards

More information

Accessory Dwelling Unit Permit

Accessory Dwelling Unit Permit PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 411 Main Street (530) 87-6800 P.O. Box 3420 Chico, CA 527 Application No. APPLICATION FOR Accessory Dwelling Unit Permit Applicant Information Applicant Street Address Daytime

More information

APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR Tentative Parcel or Subdivision Maps

APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS FOR Tentative Parcel or Subdivision Maps CITY OF EL CERRITO Community Development Department Planning and Building Division 10890 San Pablo Avenue, El Cerrito, CA 94530 (510) 215-4330 FA (510) 233-5401 planning@ci.el-cerrito.ca.us APPLICATION

More information

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 18, 2015

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 18, 2015 Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA 94559-0660 (707) 257-9530 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 18, 2015 AGENDA ITEM 7.B. PL15-0052 PM, GASSER

More information

Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)

Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) Community Development Department Planning Division 14177 Frederick Street PO Box 8805 Moreno Valley, CA 92552-0805 (951) 413-3206 Fax (951) 413-3210 Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) Completed Project Application

More information

L L O T DESIGN GUIDELINES. Appendices

L L O T DESIGN GUIDELINES. Appendices S M AL L L O T DESIGN GUIDELINES Appendices APPENDIX A VENICE SPECIFIC PLAN VERIFICATION The community of Venice has a refined set of small lot guidelines that are based on the Venice Coastal Specific

More information

PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ALBANY, COUNTY

PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ALBANY, COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 0-0 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ALBANY, COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP TO CREATE A PARCEL AT

More information

WALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. AGENDA: July 6, 2016 ITEM 4b.

WALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. AGENDA: July 6, 2016 ITEM 4b. WALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Attachment 3 AGENDA: July 6, 2016 ITEM 4b. ORIGINATED BY: COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING PROJECT NAME APPLICATION TYPE APPLICATION

More information

Policy and Standards for Public Local Residential Streets And Private Streets

Policy and Standards for Public Local Residential Streets And Private Streets Appendix A City of Toronto Development Infrastructure Policy & Standards Policy and Standards for Public Local Residential Streets And Private Streets November 2005 Policy and Standards For Public Local

More information

CITY OF SANTA ANA ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AGENDA JANUARY 16, :30 A.M.

CITY OF SANTA ANA ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AGENDA JANUARY 16, :30 A.M. CITY OF SANTA ANA ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AGENDA JANUARY 16, 2019 10:30 A.M. CITY HALL ROSS ANNEX Conference Room 1600 20 Civic Center Plaza, Santa Ana, California Lisa Storck Legal Counsel Verny Carvajal

More information

Initial Project Review

Initial Project Review Pierce County Department of Planning and Land Services, 2401 South 35th Street, Tacoma, WA (253) 798-7037 Initial Project Review Major Amendment to Preliminary Plat: Hawks Ridge Division 1 Application

More information

CHAPTER 26 PLANNING AND ZONING ARTICLE VII. MOBILE HOMES AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLE (RV) PARKS. Recreational Vehicle (RV) Park Development Standards

CHAPTER 26 PLANNING AND ZONING ARTICLE VII. MOBILE HOMES AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLE (RV) PARKS. Recreational Vehicle (RV) Park Development Standards CHAPTER 26 PLANNING AND ZONING ARTICLE VII. MOBILE HOMES AND RECREATIONAL VEHICLE (RV) PARKS. Section 26-VII-1. Section 26-VII-2. Section 26-VII-3. Section 26-VII-4. Section 26-VII-5. Purpose Permitted

More information

RESOLUTION NO. P15-07

RESOLUTION NO. P15-07 RESOLUTION NO. P15-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA APPROVING MASTER CASE 15-035, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 15-002, TO ALLOW FOR THE SALES OF LIQUOR AND SPIRITS WITHIN

More information

Key Provisions in Chart: Zones Floor Area Ratio Setbacks Parking Approval Timeframe Owner Occupancy Lot Size Fees HCD Oversight Amnesty Program

Key Provisions in Chart: Zones Floor Area Ratio Setbacks Parking Approval Timeframe Owner Occupancy Lot Size Fees HCD Oversight Amnesty Program Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Comparative Chart Current State Standards City of Santa Barbara Santa Barbara County City of Goleta City of Carpinteria Proposed State Legislation This chart was created to

More information

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT August 30, 2007

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT August 30, 2007 SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT August 30, 2007 PROJECT: Detrana Entry Gates HEARING DATE: October 22, 2007 STAFF/PHONE: Sarah Clark, (805) 568-2059 GENERAL INFORMATION Case No.:

More information

EL DORADO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT VARIANCE

EL DORADO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT VARIANCE EL DORADO COUNTY PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING ADMINISTRATOR STAFF REPORT Agenda of: April 18,2018 Item No.: Staff: 5.a. Emma Carrico VARIANCE FILE NUMBER: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: V17-0003/La

More information

ORDINANCE NO P 39a/12-16(klk)

ORDINANCE NO P 39a/12-16(klk) ORDINANCE NO. 1265 AN URGENCY ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIMI VALLEY FOR Z-S-731, AMENDING PORTIONS OF TITLE 9 OF THE SIMI VALLEY MUNICIPAL CODE RELATED TO SECOND DWELLING UNITS TO BRING

More information

AGENDA CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE TUESDAY OCTOBER 23, :00 P.M. CITY HALL WEST CONFERENCE ROOM A VALLEY BOULEVARD

AGENDA CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE TUESDAY OCTOBER 23, :00 P.M. CITY HALL WEST CONFERENCE ROOM A VALLEY BOULEVARD AGENDA CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE TUESDAY OCTOBER 23, 2018 CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON AMY WONG CITY PLANNER JASON C. MIKAELIAN CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL TODD MORRIS

More information

Planning Commission Staff Report October 2, 2014

Planning Commission Staff Report October 2, 2014 Commission Staff Report October 2, 2014 Project: Stathos Cove Request: Rezone and Tentative Subdivision Map File: EG-14-001 Location: North side of Elk Grove Boulevard, approximately 1,800 feet west of

More information

CITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES

CITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES Development Services Department Planning and Permitting Adopted August 15, 2005 SMALL LOT SINGLE FAMILY HOME GUIDELINES A. Purpose and Applicability.

More information

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA SUBDIVISION REPORT DOCKET NO: ES-89-15-PF SUMMARY NO: COUNCIL DISTRICT 2 Paul D. Johnston COUNCIL AT LARGE: A Chris Roberts B Elton M. Lagasse ADVERTISING

More information

PC Agenda Packet. ROLL CALL Commission Members: Blair, Cox, Duncan, Lagomarsino, Middleton, Schaefer, Weiland

PC Agenda Packet. ROLL CALL Commission Members: Blair, Cox, Duncan, Lagomarsino, Middleton, Schaefer, Weiland AGENDA November 14, 2018-7:00 PM CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING City Hall Council Chambers 6360 Fountain Square Drive, Citrus Heights, CA 1. 11-14-18 PC Agenda Packet Documents: 11-14-18

More information

Rapid City Planning Commission

Rapid City Planning Commission Rapid City Planning Commission Initial Planned Development Overlay Project Report March 9, 2017 Item #15 Applicant Request(s) Case # 17PD007 Initial Planned Development Overlay to allow a residential development

More information

Jack & Eileen Feather (PLN030436)

Jack & Eileen Feather (PLN030436) MIKE NOVO ZONING ADMINISTRATOR COUNTY OF MONTEREY STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. 030436 A. P. # 008-462-008-000 In the matter of the application of Jack & Eileen Feather (PLN030436) FINDINGS & DECISION

More information

Medical Marijuana Special Exception Use Information

Medical Marijuana Special Exception Use Information Medical Marijuana Special Exception Use Information The Special Exception Use information below is a modified version of the Unified Development Code. It clarifies the current section 5:104 Special Exceptions

More information

DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING. Recommendation Report. Central Area Planning Commission. Case No.: CEQA No.: Incidental Cases: Related Cases:

DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING. Recommendation Report. Central Area Planning Commission. Case No.: CEQA No.: Incidental Cases: Related Cases: DEPARTMENT OF CITY PLANNING WtoEl Recommendation Report Central Area Planning Commission Case No.: CEQA No.: Incidental Cases: Related Cases: Date: August 23, 2016 Time: After 4:30 p.m.* None Place: Los

More information

APPLICATION PROCESSING. CHECK WITH STAFF - Development Services Staff will explain the requirements and procedures to you.

APPLICATION PROCESSING. CHECK WITH STAFF - Development Services Staff will explain the requirements and procedures to you. PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONE 1810 E. HAZELTON AVENUE, STOCKTON CA 95205 BUSINESS PHONE: (209) 468-3121 Business Hours: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Monday through Friday) STEP 1 STEP 2 FEE FORM DEED SERVICES APPLICATION

More information

EXHIBIT F RESOLUTION NO.

EXHIBIT F RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE CITY OF BURBANK TO APPROVE PROJECT NO. 17-0001385 FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT AND AMENDING PROJECT NUMBER 2005-112 APPROVED UNDER RESOLUTION

More information

ATTACHMENT A: FINDINGS

ATTACHMENT A: FINDINGS ATTACHMENT A: FINDINGS 1.0 CEQA FINDINGS 1.1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORTS Findings pursuant to public resources code Section 21081 and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Sections 15090

More information

TOWN OF EASTCHESTER BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING BOARD APPLICATION PACKAGE SUBDIVISIONS

TOWN OF EASTCHESTER BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT PLANNING BOARD APPLICATION PACKAGE SUBDIVISIONS TOWN OF EASTCHESTER BUILDING AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT 40 Mill Road (914) 771-3317 building@eastchester.org Eastchester, NY 10709 (914) 771-3322 Fax www.eastchester.org TABLE OF CONTENTS PLANNING BOARD APPLICATION

More information

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report TO: Zoning Administrator FROM: Reviewed by: Sergio Klotz, AICP, Assistant Development Services DirctJ. o ~ Prepared by: Laura Stokes, Housing Coordinator I Assistant

More information

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact:

Action Recommendation: Budget Impact: City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form Garner Stoll Submitted By 2018-0144 Legistar File ID 4/17/2018 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only N/A for Non-Agenda Item 3/22/2018 Submitted Date Action

More information

STAFF REPORT. Meeting Date: April 25, 2017

STAFF REPORT. Meeting Date: April 25, 2017 Meeting Date: April 25, 2017 Agency: City of Belmont Staff Contact: Damon DiDonato, Community Development Department, (650) 637-2908; ddidonato@belmont.gov Agenda Title: Amendments to Sections 24 (Secondary

More information

Final Plats for Major Residential and Commercial Subdivisions Checklist

Final Plats for Major Residential and Commercial Subdivisions Checklist Project Name: : This form is a checklist of Zoning Ordinance requirements for major residential and commercial subdivision plats to assist the applicant in their submittal. It is not intended to be a comprehensive

More information

Article Optional Method Requirements

Article Optional Method Requirements Article 59-6. Optional Method Requirements [DIV. 6.1. MPDU DEVELOPMENT IN RURAL RESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENTIAL ZONES Sec. 6.1.1. General Requirements... 6 2 Sec. 6.1.2. General Site and Building Type Mix...

More information

Prepared by: Nick Lagura, Associate Planner

Prepared by: Nick Lagura, Associate Planner CITY OF CITRUS HEIGHTS PLANNING DIVISION STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING May 25, 2016 Prepared by: Nick Lagura, Associate Planner REQUEST The applicant requests approval of a Tentative Parcel

More information

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814-2671 www. CityofSacramento.org 6 PUBLIC HEARING October 11, 212 To: Members of the Planning and Design Commission

More information

All of the following must be submitted before the Planning Department can process the application:

All of the following must be submitted before the Planning Department can process the application: CITY OF WEST COVINA PLANNING DEPARTMENT Instructions for filing for a Conditional Use Permit All of the following must be submitted before the Planning Department can process the application: 1. Application

More information

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Bosshardt Appeal of Planning and Development Denial of Land Use Permit 06LUP

SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Bosshardt Appeal of Planning and Development Denial of Land Use Permit 06LUP SANTA BARBARA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Staff Report for Bosshardt Appeal of Planning and Development Denial of Land Use Permit 06LUP-00000-00245 Deputy Director: Zoraida Abresch Staff Report Date: October

More information

MINOR SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COUNTY OF MONTEREY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

MINOR SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COUNTY OF MONTEREY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA MINOR SUBDIVISION COMMITTEE COUNTY OF MONTEREY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. 05010 In the matter the application GIANNINI FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP (PLN040273) APN# 113-071-006-000 FINDINGS & DECISION

More information

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 3

City of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 3 City of Fayetteville, Arkansas 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 Legislation Text File #: 2018-0144, Version: 1 ADM 18-6094 (AMEND UDC 164.19/ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS): AN

More information

Parkland-Spanaway-Midland LUAC - Agenda

Parkland-Spanaway-Midland LUAC - Agenda 1. 6:30 P.M. Parkland-Spanaway-Midland LUAC - Agenda Documents: 8 2 17 PSMAC Agenda.pdf 2. Parkland-Spanaway-Midland LUAC Initial Project Review Documents: Lincoln Court PP IPR PSMAC-RJ.pdf Department

More information

REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION City of Sacramento

REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION City of Sacramento REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION City of Sacramento 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814-2671 Honorable Members of the Planning Commission STAFF REPORT February 14, 2008 Subject: Santos Halfplex. A request

More information

ARTICLE FIVE FINAL DRAFT

ARTICLE FIVE FINAL DRAFT ARTICLE FIVE 021218 FINAL DRAFT Sec. 503.6 Open Space Preservation Option Open Space Preservation Option Open Space Preservation developments may be approved in the AR, R-1, R-2 and R-3 zoning districts,

More information

Planning Commission Report

Planning Commission Report cjly City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (370) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: April 28, 2016 Subject: Project

More information

TOWNSHIP OF ALGOMA COUNTY OF KENT, MICHIGAN. Minutes of a regular meeting of the Township Board of the Township of Algoma, Kent

TOWNSHIP OF ALGOMA COUNTY OF KENT, MICHIGAN. Minutes of a regular meeting of the Township Board of the Township of Algoma, Kent Site Plan No. 0410 --- TOWNSHIP OF ALGOMA COUNTY OF KENT, MICHIGAN Minutes of a regular meeting of the Township Board of the Township of Algoma, Kent County, Michigan, held in the Algoma Township Hall,

More information

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM. Santa Barbara County Planning Commission

COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM. Santa Barbara County Planning Commission COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: HEARING DATE: RE: Santa Barbara County Planning Commission Florence Trotter-Cadena, Planner III North County Development Review October

More information

BUILDING AN ADU GUIDE TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS PLANNING DIVISION

BUILDING AN ADU GUIDE TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS PLANNING DIVISION BUILDING AN ADU GUIDE TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS PLANNING DIVISION 1 451 S. State Street, Room 406 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5480 P.O. Box 145480 CONTENT 04 OVERVIEW 08 ELIGIBILITY 11 BUILDING AN ADU Types

More information

(a) Commercial uses on Laurel Avenue, abutting the TRO District to the

(a) Commercial uses on Laurel Avenue, abutting the TRO District to the 32X Zoning Code 150.36 TRANSITIONAL RESIDENTIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT. (A) Intent and purpose. (1) It is the intent of the Transitional Residential Overlay District (hereinafter referred to as the "TRO District")

More information

REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: NOVEMEBER 22, 2016

REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: NOVEMEBER 22, 2016 REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION V.B. EBBE VIDERIKSEN, APPLICANT (PROJECT PLANNER: SIJIFREDO M. FERNANDEZ JR.) Consideration of a one-year Time Extension for Tentative Tract No. 18560 to subdivide

More information

Sterling Meadow Subdivision

Sterling Meadow Subdivision Sterling Meadow Subdivision Proposal: A pre-application conference was held on November 7, 2017, with the applicant and City staff to discuss the development. The applicant took staff s recommendations

More information

NONCONFORMITIES ARTICLE 39. Charter Township of Commerce Page 39-1 Zoning Ordinance. Article 39 Nonconformities

NONCONFORMITIES ARTICLE 39. Charter Township of Commerce Page 39-1 Zoning Ordinance. Article 39 Nonconformities ARTICLE 39 NONCONFORMITIES SECTION 39.01. Intent and Purpose It is recognized that there exists within the districts established by this Ordinance lots, structures, sites and uses which were lawful prior

More information

Chapter SPECIAL USE ZONING DISTRICTS

Chapter SPECIAL USE ZONING DISTRICTS Chapter 20.20 Sections: 20.20.010 Urban Transition (U-T) Zoning District 20.20.020 Planned Development (P-D) Zoning Districts 20.20.010 Urban Transition (U-T) Zoning District A. Purpose. The purpose of

More information

CHAPTER SUBDIVISION MAPS

CHAPTER SUBDIVISION MAPS CHAPTER 19.66 SUBDIVISION MAPS SUBDIVISION MAPS 19.66 Section Page 19.66.010 Purpose... IV-56 19.66.020 Application... IV-57 19.66.030 Exclusions... IV-57 19.66.040 Effect of Annexation... IV-57 19.66.050

More information

Planning Commission Staff Report July 7, 2016

Planning Commission Staff Report July 7, 2016 Commission Staff Report July 7, 2016 PROJECT: FILE: REQUEST: LOCATION: Lent Ranch Marketplace Lots I and J EG-16-008 Conditional Use Permit, Tentative Parcel Maps Southwest and southeast corners of Kammerer

More information

A DJUSTMENTS. A. Zoning Permits Required: Use Permit to construct a dwelling unit, as required by BMC Section 23D

A DJUSTMENTS. A. Zoning Permits Required: Use Permit to construct a dwelling unit, as required by BMC Section 23D Z O N I N G A DJUSTMENTS B O A R D S t a f f R e p o r t FOR BOARD ACTION AUGUST 14, 2008 2421 Ninth Street Use Permit 05-10000084 to construct a two-story 1,766 sq. ft., detached dwelling unit at the

More information

1.0 REQUEST. SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Coastal Zone Staff Report for Vincent New Single-Family Dwelling & Septic System

1.0 REQUEST. SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Coastal Zone Staff Report for Vincent New Single-Family Dwelling & Septic System SANTA BARBARA COUNTY ZONING ADMINISTRATOR Coastal Zone Staff Report for Vincent New Single-Family Dwelling & Septic System Hearing Date: February 26, 2007 Supervisorial District: First Staff Report Date:

More information

Community Development Department 333 Broadalbin Street SW, P.O. Box 490 Albany, OR 97321

Community Development Department 333 Broadalbin Street SW, P.O. Box 490 Albany, OR 97321 SUMMARY Community Development Department 333 Broadalbin Street SW, P.O. Box 490 Albany, OR 97321 STAFF REPORT Application for Tentative Partition Plat Review Planning File PA-06-17 Phone: 541-917-7550

More information

TENTATIVE MAP INFORMATION SHEET

TENTATIVE MAP INFORMATION SHEET TENTATIVE MAP INFORMATION SHEET GENERAL INFORMATION This information sheet explains how your Tentative Map application will be processed, what fees you must pay, and what plans you must submit. If you

More information

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4238

RESOLUTION NUMBER 4238 RESOLUTION NUMBER 4238 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING: (1) TENTATIVE MAP AND STREET VACATION 05-0112 (COUNTY MAP NO. 33587)

More information

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019 DEVELOPMENT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME Springhill Village Subdivision Springhill Village Subdivision LOCATION 4350, 4354, 4356, 4358,

More information

13-2 SUBDIVISION PLANS AND PLATS REQUIRED EXCEPTIONS Subdivision Plats Required To be Recorded

13-2 SUBDIVISION PLANS AND PLATS REQUIRED EXCEPTIONS Subdivision Plats Required To be Recorded ARTICLE XIII SUBDIVISIONS 13-1 INTENT AND PURPOSE 13-1-1 Intent: It is the intent of the County Commission through the adoption of this Article to more fully avail itself of the power granted under 17-27-601

More information

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 06/07/2012

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 06/07/2012 PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 06/07/2012 APPLICATION NO. CODE SECTION REQUIRED PROPOSED VARIANCE ZV-2009-03300 Variance

More information

A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR December 13, 2017 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE ROOM 3:00 p.m. Members of the public who wish to discuss an item should fill out a speaker identification

More information

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT COUNTY OF SAN MATEO PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: October 20, 2016 TO: FROM: Zoning Hearing Officer Planning Staff SUBJECT: Consideration of a Non-Conforming Use Permit, pursuant to Sections 6135

More information

1. APPLICANT: The City of Overland Park is the applicant for this request.

1. APPLICANT: The City of Overland Park is the applicant for this request. 8. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - ZRR 2590 - Residential Neighborhood District 1. APPLICANT: The City of Overland Park is the applicant for this request. 2. REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is

More information

MEMORANDUM. TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR

MEMORANDUM. TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR MEMORAND MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: BY: PLANNING COMMISSION TERESA McCLISH, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR MATTHEW DOWNING, PLANNING MANAGER SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. 17-005; LOCATION

More information

Proposed Overland Park Kansas Ordinance RE-1 Residential Estates Community

Proposed Overland Park Kansas Ordinance RE-1 Residential Estates Community 18.171 RE-1 Residential Estate Community 18.171.010 Statement of intent. The zoning of property as RE-1, (Residential Estates Community, 1 dwelling unit per Gross acre density), is intended to provide

More information

Affordable Housing Plan

Affordable Housing Plan Affordable Housing Plan CORDOVA HILLS SPECIAL PLANNING AREA 1 Proposed Project Conwy LLC is the master developer ( Master Developer ) of that certain real property in the County of Sacramento ( County

More information

REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION City of Sacramento

REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION City of Sacramento REPORT TO PLANNING COMMISSION City of Sacramento 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814-2671 7 PUBLIC HEARING September 13, 2012 To: Members of the Planning Commission Subject: Downtown and Vine (P12-029)

More information

CHAPTER 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS

CHAPTER 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS 9-14-1 9-14-1 CHAPTER 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS SECTION: 9-14-1: Purpose 9-14-2: Governing Provisions 9-14-3: Minimum Area 9-14-4: Uses Permitted 9-14-5: Common Open Space 9-14-6: Utility Requirements

More information

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

Composition of traditional residential corridors. Page 1 of 7 St. Petersburg, Florida, Code of Ordinances >> PART II - ST. PETERSBURG CITY CODE >> Chapter 16 - LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS >> SECTION 16.20.060. CORRIDOR RESIDENTIAL TRADITIONAL DISTRICTS

More information