Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No. 4

Transcription

1 Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No. 4 Project Number: Planning Commission Hearing Date: Board of County Commissioners Hearing Date: PRC /9/214 at 6: p.m. 1/28/214 at 1: a.m. Case Manager: Case Technician: Michael Weaver Ann DeHerrera Applicant: Brookfield Residential (Colorado) nc. CHRS BREMNER 188 NVERNESS DRVE WEST, SUTE 15 ENGLEWOOD, CO Owner: BROOKFELD RESDENTAL (COLORADO) NC NVERNESS DRVE WEST, SUTE 15 ENGLEWOOD, CO 8112 Representative: Location: 671 Pecos ST Parcel Number: Request: 1) Final Development Plan (FDP) to allow 127 lots on approximately 21.1 acres in the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; 2) Major Subdivision (Preliminary/Final Plat) to create 127 lots on approximately 21.1 acres in the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; and 3) Subdivision mprovement Agreement (SA) for Filing No. 4. Planning Commission HEARNGS Board of County Commissioners Date: Action: 1/9/214 Date: Action: 1/28/214 Date: Action: Date: Action: Review for Tracking: Map Updated by: Approved By: Date: Date: Date:

2 LEG Ef\JD * Special 2D ning Condions Sctir:'n Hurnbrs -+- Railroad -- Majo r Water --- Zo ni ng Line Sections Zoning [ istricts.1 A2 A3 R E R l A R l C R 2 R 3. RA M H >.j c o G:;] C l O C.2 [.'» e 3 ea. C r;--l 1 3 Q PL eo Al [ta p j O p U O(P ) p i"o.:!;j.ttrport t-.bise Overlay Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4 PRC214-9 For display purposes onlv. ollio\.\c> l";ol1 7 ntlll_l :' t la :1; ":.;: 1:.1; 1:. 11; ; """ : ':')1 t. G r. 11t:, ), '." t. a::. "" :.. ; : ;' ; : oltt fe'lt:,,:,: n3'o'.

3 LEG Er.. J D * Special Zb ning Conditions -+-- Railroa d -- 1',,1ajor \JVater --- Zo ni ng Un Sections Zoning [l isl:ricts Al A2 A3 R E R-l-A R-l-C R-2 R-3 R-4 M-H L-:::-. CoO C-l O C-2 C-3 C-4. C-5 1 rc..,cj CO. PL Ai DlA. P-U-D P-U-D(P) j:.:"::.:.:'';j.arport ) i Overla \' Midtown at Clear Creek Filing NO.4 PRC214-9 F or display purposes only. 1) <f.' t a(); p;> ll l; '.!;.!,l n: ''11.t-:Gr.: gp ' p:,h.a :: tllj t 1 ; :r 1: 1:> :1 " 1.1

4 LEC::;E[\)D :;(:'tion NlJmbrs -- F:3ilroad --- Zi:rnin!,J Lirr! ZOllin<) [ i rl i<::t s Al F:-E F:-l A R- l-c F:-2 F:'::: F:-4 r,.. l- H D C-D G::±J C-l D C-2 c ::: C-4 Coo,1,2 ::: c: o PL [ [A, P- U-[ P-U-D(P) 1{:':::'.: i:l.airport t,b i:=..:: O\(rla v h'lidto'nn at Clear Creek Filing Jo. 4 PRC2-14..o9 r \., 1\ to,,) t 'n,)(''! b )' 11. ' litl1 : lit)' G. W;'H }..,' :.. :: 'rll : t-:- ; l :' h lllt r.:.)x: n o,(

5 Residential Residentiaf Residential LEGEND * Special ZDning Conditions Section Numbers Railroa d --- Major \Mter _.- Zo ni ng Line _ A-l Sections Zoning Districts _ A-2 A-3 R-E R-l-A R-l-C R-2 R-3 R-4 =-:.. M-H ['::'-:_::,;;1 COo G:l C-l O C-2 [',:,::::':=::] C-3 i C-4. C >2 co. PL A O OlA.... p-u-o p-u- O(P) 1t::::.::';j.lirport Noise Overlay Pllllcs and Open Space Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4 PRC214-9 For display purposes only, n ; rn) t rl,<(11 ':- '; 1;1; ; 'tt fo,,-.(13(1 '; ':: o at-/ G C gr-:-' p. 'A' t < Un e'. t= jla.!t.: 1 t; ax! 13G-,

6 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNNG AND DEVELOPMENT ADAMS COUNTY ---i'-'mu-; STAFF REPORT Board of County Commissioners October 28, 214 CASE No.: PRC214-9 CASE NAME: Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4 Owner's Name: Brookfield Residential Applicant's Name: Brookfield Residential Applicant's Address: 188 nverness Drive West, Suite 15, Englewood, co Location of Request: SW of 68 th Avenue & Pecos Street Nature of Request: 1) Final Development Plan (FDP) to allow 127 lots on approximately 21.1 acres n the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; 2) Major Subdivision (Preliminary/Final Plat) to create 127 lots on approximately 21.1 acres in the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; and 3) Subdivision mprovement Agreement (SA) for Filing No.4. Site Size: +/ acres (Overall site: 183 acres +/-) Zone District: Proposed Use: Existing Use: Hearing Date(s): Planned Unit Development (P-U-D) Residential Vacant PC: October 9,214/6: pm Boec: October 28,214/1: am Hearing Location: Adams County Government Center Public Hearing Room, 443 Report Date: October 1, 214 S. Adams County Parkway, Brighton, Colorado 861 Case Manager: Michael Weaver t'\w, Staff Recommendation: PC Recommendation: Approval with 2 Findings of Fact and 4 Notes Approval with 2 Findings of Fact and 4 Notes SUMMARY OF APPLCATON The applicant is requesting 1) a Final Development Plan (FDP) to allow 127 lots on approximately 21.1 acres in the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; 2) a Major Subdivision (Preliminary/Final Plat) to create 127 lots on approximately 21.1 acres in the P-U-D,

7 Planned Unit Development zone district; and 3) a Subdivision mprovement Agreement (S1A) for Filing No.4. The area is zoned P-U-D, Planned Unit Development, which is a form of a customized zone district. The objective of a Planned Unit Development is to establish an area of land, controlled by one or more landowners, to be developed under unified control or unified plan of development for a number of dwelling units and land uses, the plan for which does not correspond in lot size, bulk, or type of use, density, lot coverage, open space, or other restriction to the existing land use regulations. The P.U.D. documents as approved by the Bacc may waive or modify specifications, standards and requirements of the County's Development Standards and Regulations, such as site area, density, setbacks, height restrictions, improvement standards and related requirements that would by otherwise applicable to a particular zone district or land use, if such waiver or modification furthers the objectives of the P.U.D. regulations. The Final Development Plan (FDP) is the site-specific development plan which describes and establishes the type and intensity of uses for a specific parcel or parcels of land. The FDP includes a final subdivision plat. Each future phase of Midtown will have its own FDP that will adhere to the parameters and guidelines established in the most recent PDP. The future land use map designates this area as Urban Residential. Urban residential areas are designated for single and multiple-family housing, typically at urban densities of one dwelling per acre or greater. These areas are intended to provide for development of residential neighborhoods with a variety of housing types, with adequate urban services and transportation facilities. Urban residential areas may include supporting neighborhood commercial uses designed to serve the needs of nearby residents. The entire Midtown at Clear Creek development area is comprised of approximately 183 acres. The site is about % mile south of U.S. Highway 36, about mile north of-76, about % mile east of the future RTD light rail station to be located at Federal Boulevard and 7 th Avenue, and about % mile west of The subject site is bordered by Clear Creek and industrial land to the south, existing residential to the north, and vacant land to the east and west. Pecos Street bisects the site. Three future RTD light rail stations will be located within 1 mile of Midtown; combined with close access to the aforementioned highways, the Midtown community has convenient access to important transport corridors in metro Denver. The Filing #4 area is approximately 21.1 acres in size located in the western portion of the larger Midtown development area, west of Pecos Street and to the west of Filings #1, #2 and #3. The north-south streets of Fern Drive, Morrison Drive, and Warren Drive are the principal streets in this Filing, and Morrison Drive provides a connection to W. 68 th Avenue. W. 67 th Avenue and W. 67 th Drive are the main east-west streets. Alleys will playa key role in providing access to garages in the rear of the 4 townhomes and 54 of the 87 single-family dwellings in Filing #4, thereby allowing the homes to front public streets and/or landscaped tracts. The other 33 singlefamily dwellings will be front-loaded with the garage facing the street. Crestview Water and Sanitation District has indicated it has the capacity to serve this site. The site is also within the Southwest Adams County Fire Protection District.

8 Midtown is envisioned as an infill neighborhood development with a traditional street design that incorporates alley loaded garages. t is planned as a mixed-use community that will invigorate this part of Southwest Adams County. ncorporated into the community will be a local commercial area, a variety of residential home types and a system of open space, parks and trails. The approved PDP includes a ±43-acre park / open space area, and a ±5-acre school site. This request is consistent with the Overall Development Plan (ODP) and the Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan (PDP). The ODP and the Second Amendment to the PDP allow for a maximum of 1,68 residential units with an overall density of approximately 8.9 dwelling units per acre. The density of Midtown Filing No.4 is approximately 6. dwelling units per acre. The plan for Midtown Filing No.4 provides continuity by extending the block structure, vehicular circulation and landscape treatment of Filings #1, #2 and #3. Landscaped tracts provide amenities that will connect to future phases of the Midtown development. Housing Types & Designs Midtown Filing #4 includes five different home types listed below: Single Family Detached / Rear-Loaded Cottage Homes: Consists of homes designed for residents who want a lower amount of outdoor space to maintain and are on lot with rear alleyloaded garages. Sizes of residences vary in width and depth. Size of homes range from 1,65 to 2,85 square feet. There will be 18 Rear-Loaded Cottage Homes in Filing #4. Single-Family Detached / Green Court Homes: Consists of homes designed for young families or first-time buyers and are on lots with detached, rear alley-loaded garages or automobile courtyards. Sizes of residences vary in width and depth. Size of homes range from 1,65 to 2,85 square feet. There will be 3 Green Court Homes in Filing #4. Single-Family Detached / Front-Loaded Homes: Consists of homes designed for residents who desire a small private yard. Sizes of residences vary and will have front-loaded garages. Size of homes range from 1,8 square feet to 2,2 square feet. There will be 33 Front-Loaded Homes in Filing #4. Single-Family Attached / Townhome or Duplex Home: Consists of multiple residences that share one or two walls with an adjoining home. Sizes of residences vary in square footage. Size of homes range from 1,2 square feet to 1,4 square feet. There will be 4 Townhome units in Filing #4. Single-Family Detached / Tea Light Home: Consists of homes designed for young families or first-time buyers and are on lots with detached, rear alley-loaded garages or automobile courtyards. Sizes of residences will vary in width and depth. Size of homes range from 1,21 square feet to 1,356 square feet. There will be 6 Tea Light Homes in Filing #4. The Architectural Design Guidelines allow for incorporation of a variety of architectural styles from contemporary to more regional styles such as craftsman or prairie. All detached residences will have a covered porch. Single-family detached homes will have a maximum height of 45 feet.

9 All builders and homeowners are required to go through the Design Review Committee, and the County will not approve a building permit until approval has been granted from the DRC. Parking The parking plan accommodates a minimum of 2.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit overall. The internal local street system is designed to work in concert with the private alleys. Alleys will be used to access garages and parking for most of the homes. Each rear-loaded home will have a minimum of two off-street parking spaces. Parallel parking is not permitted on dead-end alleys; on other alleys, parallel parking between the garage and alley is permitted where space permits. All homes have access to on-street parking along the local streets. There are approximately 543 parking spaces provided for the 87 single-family detached lots and the 4 single-family attached lots in the Filing #4 area (213 on-street parking spaces and 33 garage and alley parking spaces), for approximately 4.28 parking spaces per dwelling unit in Filing #4. Common Areas The Filing #4 area includes streetscape landscape areas, landscape tracts, an open space trail, a 1.6-acre neighborhood park, and a.7-acre linear promenade. n addition, there is a temporary detention pond for stormwater runoff for the portion of Filing #4 that is tributary to the pond. Once the ultimate detention pond is constructed with Filing #6, this temporary pond and associated infrastructure will be removed. Open space tracts, the neighborhood park and the linear promenade will be maintained by the Clear Creek Station Metropolitan District. Tree lawns will be installed by the builder and maintained by adjacent homeowners. Private home landscapes will be installed by the homeowner or builder and maintained by the homeowner. Adams County will not be responsible for operation and maintenance of parks and open space. The Clear Creek Station Metropolitan District will be responsible for the enforcement of landscape maintenance requirements. A Design Review Committee will review private open space design for compatibility. The homeowner will be responsible for removal of snow, ice, debris or other obstructions from the detached sidewalk in front of their residences. Lot Characteristics Typical Filing #4 lot sizes range from 1,421 square feet to 7,561 square feet for the 127 lots in this area. All front, side and rear setbacks will be consistent with the Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan. There will be both single-family attached and single-family detached homes in Filing #4. Side Yard Use Easements are granted along common side lot lines only on detached single-family home lots. Side Yard Use Easements occur from front property line to rear property line and extend from the Grantor's building foundation to the lot line between the Grantor's and Grantee's parcels. Filing #4 Timeline The estimated length of time for full build-out of the Filing #4 area of Midtown is four years. Subdivision mprovement Agreement The Adams County Development Standards and Regulations require a Subdivision mprovement Agreement (SA) to be approved, per Section The agreement shall address the manner

10 and timing of the completion of all subdivision improvements and the responsibility for payment of the costs of all subdivision improvements. On June 24,214, the Adams County BOCC approved a pre-plat SA for Midtown Filing No.4 prior to approval of the Final Development Plan and Final Plat application. This approval was granted to allow the developer to begin construction of certain public improvements for street construction, dry utilities, storm drainage and other site improvements prior to final plat approval and at the Developer's risk. The current application for the Final Development Plan and Final Plat includes an Addendum to the above referenced SA for Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4. This Addendum outlines the Developer's obligation for landscape installation, landscape ownership and maintenance, and Public Land Dedication (PLD) fees for schools and parks for this phase of the development. This filing has a number of tracts that will be commonly owned and maintained. The SA and the Addendum to the SA describe the maintenance responsibilities and ownership areas for the Developer, the County and the Metro District. The exhibit for the Addendum to the SA depicts areas that will be maintained privately (tree lawns, etc.). The Metro District will own andlor maintain the remaining common areas. The exact tracts of land owned andlor maintained by each entity are outlined in the Addendum to the SA for Midtown Filing No.4. REFERRAL AGENCY COMMENTS The Colorado Division of Water Resources, in a letter dated September 3, 214, notes that the estimated water and landscape irrigation requirement for the 127 proposed lots within Filing #4 will be acre-feet of water per year, and that the Crestview Water and Sanitation District will serve Midtown and has a contract in place with Denver Water to obtain treated water on demand. The Division opines that the proposed water supply is adequate and can be provided without causing injury. The Applicant takes note of this comment. The Colorado Geological Survey, in a letter dated September 2,214, notes that the Filing 4 area, provided that the expansive soil and potential shallow groundwater conditions are addressed prior to construction, does not present any geologic hazards or development constraints that would preclude the proposed use and density. The Applicant's geotechnical engineers and construction material consultants, Cesare, nc., note that the preliminary geotechnical study of Midtown at Clear Creek recommended the sub-excavation, moisture treatment, and the recompact treatment of clay soils to eight feet below the lowest foundation level for structures and to a depth of five feet below roadways. This was done under the observation of a Cesare field technician. During sub-excavation, groundwater was not observed by the field technician and so is not likely to present a concern. Perimeter drains for individual structures may be required and are determined from lot specific investigations by the geotechnical engineer for the homebuilder. Xcel Energy, in a letter dated August 22, 214, notes that the Developer must contact Xcel and complete the application process for any new natural gas or electric service, or modification to

11 existing facilities, and that all utilities should be located prior to construction. The Applicant takes note of this comment. The Tri-County Health Department, in a letter dated August 22, 214, states that it has no comments. The Applicant takes note of this comment. The City of Westminster, in a letter dated August 21, 214, states that it has no comments. The Applicant takes note of this comment. The West Adams Soil Conservation District, in a letter dated August 15,214, recommends that the temporary detention pond area be seeded and maintained with grass to pre-empt the possibility of invasive and noxious weeds and dust. The District advises against the inclusion of any Ash trees due to the spreading ofthe Ash Borer, and recommends,that the Applicant consider the mature size of trees when placing them so that residents in 2 years do not have to contend with invading roots or branches. The Applicant notes that seeding of the temporary detention pond will be provided, that it has removed all Ash and Cottonwood trees from the plans, and that there will be soil amendments to help prevent iron deficiencies in Maple trees. Also, Evergreen trees will be included in the Metro District maintenance program to help ensure their health and longevity. Richard and Naomi Dekker 6851 Huron Street Denver, CO 8221 CTZEN COMMENTS The Dekker's "demand that the 'Special District' designation be removed from the property known as Midtown at Clear Creek," and that Brookfield should mow the property slated for the future school site. The Applicant states it is unfortunate that the Deckers do not support the design of the Midtown community; however, the construction and implementation of Midtown homes and open spaces meet the requirements of the Midtown at Clear CreekPUD documents. PLANNNG COMMSSON UPDATE This case was heard on October 9,214 by the Planning Commission, which recommended approval in a unanimous decision (7-). There were no citizen comments during the public hearing. The Planning Commission did not have any concerns with the applicants' request. STAFF RECOMMENDATON This proposal is consistent with the Overall Development Plan and the Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan. The Filing #4 FDP area includes four types of single-family detached homes and one type of single-family attached townhomes, with a collection of styles and square footage ranges available, and maintains the traditional neighborhood concept with its grid form and rear-loaded product types and the inclusion of open space tracts and landscaped

12 tree lawns. Staff supports the mixed-use pedestrian-friendly environment fostered by Filing #4, and recommends approval ofthe requests, with the following recommended Findings of Fact. RECOMMENDED FNDNGS OF FACT 1. The preliminary plat is consistent with the Adams County Comprehensive Plan and any available area plan. 2. The preliminary plat is consistent with the purposes of these standards and regulations. 3. The preliminary plat is in conformance with the subdivision design standards and any approved sketch plan. 4. The applicant has provided evidence that a sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality, and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards. 5. The applicant has provided evidence that a public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, adequate evidence indicating that such system complies with state and local laws and regulations. 6. The applicant has provided evidence to show all areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions, have been identified by the applicant and the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with such conditions. 7. The applicant has provided evidence that adequate drainage improvements comply with these standards and regulations. 8. The overall density of development within the proposed subdivision conforms to the zone district density allowances. 9. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the surrounding area, harmonious with the character of the neighborhood, not detrimental to the immediate area, not detrimental to the future development of the area, and not detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the County. The proposed subdivision has established an adequate level of compatibility by: a. ncorporating natural physical features into the development design and providing sufficient open spaces considering the type and intensity of use; b. ncorporating site planning techniques to foster the implementation of the County's plans, and encourage a land use pattern to support a balanced transportation system, including auto, bike and pedestrian traffic, public or mass transit, and the cost effective delivery of other services consistent with adopted plans, policies and regulations of the County;

13 c. ncorporating physical design features in the subdivision to provide a transition between the project and adjacent land uses through the provision of an attractive entryway, edges along public streets, architectural design, and appropriate height and bulk restrictions on structures; d. ncorporating identified environmentally sensitive areas, including but not limited to, wetlands and wildlife corridors, into the project design; and e. ncorporating public facilities or infrastructure, or cash-in-lieu, reasonably related to the proposed subdivision so the proposed subdivision will not negatively impact the levels of service of the County services and facilities. 1 O. The final plat is consistent and conforms to the approved preliminary plat. 11. The final plat is in conformance with the subdivision design standards. 12. The applicant has provided evidence that a sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality, and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards. 13. The applicant has provided evidence that a public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, adequate evidence indicating that the system complies with state and local laws and regulations. 14. The applicant has provided evidence to show all areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions, have been identified by the applicant and the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with such conditions. 15. The proposed or constructed drainage improvements are adequate and comply with these standards and regulations. 16. Adequate public facilities or infrastructure, or cash-in-lieu, for impacts reasonably related to the proposed subdivision have been constructed or financially guaranteed through cash-in-lieu or a subdivision improvements agreement so the proposed subdivision will not negatively impact the levels of service of the County. 17. The FDP is in general conformity with the Adams County Comprehensive Plan and any applicable area plan. 18. The FDP conforms to the P.U.D. standards. 19. The FDP is consistent with any approved PDP for the property. 2. The FDP construction plans meet the requirements of these standards and regulations and have been approved by the Director of Public Works, all infrastructure and utility providers, Tri County Health Department, and all other referral agencies. Recommended Notes to the Applicant:

14 1. The Addendum to the Subdivision mprovement Agreement (SA) with Midtown LLC shall be executed concurrently to the approval of the Final Plat and Final Development Plan. No permits shall be issued for Filing #4 until the Addendum to the SA is executed. 2. The applicant shall include "no parking" signage on all fire lanes. 3. The applicant shall place stakes on the z-lots and provide final as-built surveys of the homes measured from the finished exterior wall to the lot line with building permit applications. 4. All applicable building, zoning, health, engineering, and fire codes shall be adhered to with this request. Staff Recommendation: Approval with 2 Findings of Fact and 4 Notes pc Recommendation: Approval with 2 Findings of Fact and 4 Notes

15 -- ADAMS COUNTY ;1.1.1.» Planning and Development Department 443 South Adams County Parkway, 1st Flam; Suite W2A Brighton, CO PHON E FAX MEMORANDUM To: From: Subject: Board of County Commissioners Michael Weaver, Planner - Economic Development Midtown Filing No.4 / Case # PRC214-9 Date: October 28,214 f the Board of County Commissioners does not concur with the Planning Commission and Staff recommendation of Approval, the following findings may be adopted as part of a decision of Denial: ALTERNATVE RECOMMENDED FNDNGS 1. The preliminary plat is inconsistent with the Adams County Comprehensive Plan and any available area plan. 2. The preliminary plat is inconsistent with the purposes ofthese standards and regulations. 3. The preliminary plat is not in conformance with the subdivision design standards and any approved sketch plan. 4. The applicant has not provided evidence that a sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality, and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards. 5. The applicant has not provided evidence that a public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, adequate evidence indicating that such system complies with state and local laws and regulations. 6. The applicant has not provided evidence to show all areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions, have been identified by the applicant and the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with such conditions. 7. The applicant has not provided evidence that adequate drainage improvements comply with these standards and regulations.

16 8. The overall density of development within the proposed subdivision does not conform to the zone district density allowances. 9. The proposed subdivision is incompatible with the surrounding area, not harmonious with the character of the neighborhood, detrimental to the immediate area, detrimental to the future development of the area, and detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the County. The proposed subdivision has not established an adequate level of compatibility by: a. ncorporating natural physical features into the development design and providing sufficient open spaces considering the type and intensity of use; b. ncorporating site planning techniques to foster the implementation of the County's plans, and encourage a land use pattern to support a balanced transportation system, including auto, bike and pedestrian traffic, public or mass transit, and the cost effective delivery of other services consistent with adopted plans, policies and regulations of the County; c. ncorporating physical design features in the subdivision to provide a transition between the project and adjacent land uses through the provision of an attractive entryway, edges along public streets, architectural design, and appropriate height and bulk restrictions on structures; d. ncorporating identified environmentally sensitive areas, including but not limited to, wetlands and wildlife corridors, into the project design; and e. ncorporating public facilities or infrastructure, or cash-in-lieu, reasonably related to the proposed subdivision so the proposed subdivision will not negatively impact the levels of service of the County services and facilities. 1 O. The final plat is inconsistent and does not conform to the approved preliminary plat. 11. The final plat is not in conformance with the subdivision design standards. 12. The applicant has not provided evidence that a sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality, and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards. 13. The applicant has not provided evidence that a public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, adequate evidence indicating that the system complies with state and local laws and regulations. 14. The applicant has not provided evidence to show all areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions, have been identified by the applicant and the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with such conditions. 15. The proposed or constructed drainage improvements are inadequate and do not comply with these standards and regulations. 16. Adequate public facilities or infrastructure, or cash-in-lieu, for impacts reasonably related to the proposed subdivision have not been constructed or financially guaranteed

17 through cash-in-lieu or a subdivision improvements agreement so the proposed subdivision will negatively impact the levels of service of the County. 17. The FDP is not in general conformity with the Adams County Comprehensive Plan and any applicable area plan. 18. The FDP does not conform to the P.D.D. standards. 19. The FDP is inconsistent with any approved PDP for the property. 2. The FDP construction plans do not meet the requirements of these standards and regulations and have not been approved by the Director of Transportation, all infrastructure and utility providers, Tri-County Health Department, and all other referral agencies.

18 CERTFCATE OF POSTNG PUBLC NOTCE CASE O. PBGl91'1-Q=rx?Cj f\:.' O{'1 N POSTNG DATE '1/''l HEARNG DATEp«&' loi2w( A PUBLC HEARNG HAS BEEN SET BY ADAMS COUNTY?c-u o1".p- r:. oe' lx"tjol"'"-t...% pie ,.., /11 1m. cpt!j)'ijwtdy J.. Oem. j.. & r ll R rw...j limit Jl.wt H:Of ipk A;:<,1'aJ 1) NeJK c:,w ".;}!q. <P,.!",...'1) 6"' f1u,.).,.. crp.:k D ' to e,l. f. cl op t't".,. byc'"" u... dmic;fj"a :\\f\j.. b Ln...:cc.,t.w.bi.r.c E'-'ls!,b/f locaed AT APPROXMATH\,: 1 ills WLl8: A PUBl.lC HF.ARNG. ANY NTERESTED PARTF.S '1.Y "'\TEND,\:>;D BE HEARD., Michael Weaver, do hereby certify that posted the property at 671 Pecos Street on September 19, 214 in accordance with the requirements of the Adams County Zoning Regulations Michael Weaver

19 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNNG AND DEVELOPMENT ADAMS COUNTY STAFF REPORT Planning Commission October 9, 214 CASE No.: PRC214-9 CASE NAME: Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4 Owner's Name: Brookfield Residential Applicant's Name: Brookfield Residential Applicant's Address: 188 nverness Drive West, Suite 15, Englewood, CO Location of Request: SW of 68 th Avenue & Pecos Street Nature of Request: 1) Final Development Plan (FDP) to allow 127 lots on approximately 21.1 acres the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; 2) Major Subdivision (PreliminarylFinal Plat) to create 127 lots on approximately 21.1 acres in the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; and 3) Subdivision mprovement Agreement (SA) for Filing No.4. Site Size: +/ acres (Overall site: 183 acres +/-) Zone District: Proposed Use: Existing Use: Hearing Date(s): Planned Unit Development (P-U-D) Residential Vacant PC: October 9, 214 / 6: pm BOCC: October 28,214/1: am Hearing Location: Adams County Government Center Public Hearing Room, 443 S. Adams County Parkway, Brighton, Colorado 861 Report Date: September 22, 214 Case Manager: Michael Weaver /VA" Staff Recommendation: Approval with 2 Findings of Fact and 4 Notes SUMMARY OF PREVOUS APPLCATONS On July 8, 214, in Case # PRC214-1, the BOCC approved Filing No.3 of the development, consisting of 1) Final Development Plan (FDP) to allow 64 lots on approximately acres in the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; 2) Major Subdivision (Preliminary/Final Plat) to create 64 lots on approximately acres in the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; and 3) Subdivision mprovement Agreement (SA) for Filing No.3.

20 On July 8, 214, in Case # PUD213-1, the BOCC approved Second Amendment to the approved Preliminary Development Plan (PDP). On December 9, 213, in Case # PRC213-11, the BOCC approved Filing No.2 of the development, consisting of 1) a Final Development Plan (PUD) to allow 65 lots on approximately 7.19 acres in the PUD zone district, and 2) a Major Subdivision (Final Plat) to create 65 lots on approximately 7.19 acres ofland in the PUD zone district. On January 7, 213, in Case # RCU212-31, the BOCC approved a request to rezone approximately acres from R-4, Residential, C-5, Commercial, and PL, Public Lands to Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.). On July 25, 212, in Case # PRC212-1, the BOCC approved Filing No.1 of the development, consisting of 1) Amendment to the approved Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD-P) / Preliminary Development Plan (PDP); 2) Major Subdivision (Final Plat) to create 156 lots on approximately 26.4 acres; and 3) Final Development Plan (PUD) to allow 156 lots. On February 25, 28, in Case # PRJ27-24, the BOCC approved 1) Major Subdivision (Preliminary Plat) to allow approximately 825 lots on approximately 18 acres in the C-5, Commercial, R-4, Residential, and PL, Public Land Zone Districts and; 2) Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD-P) to allow a mixed-use development with a maximum of 1,68 dwelling units consisting of a minimum of 43 acres for park and open space, approximately 43 single-family detached units, approximately 39 attached multi-family units, a maximum of 315 apartment units, approximately 1 condominiums, approximately 1 acres of commercial/mixed use and an additional 186 attached multi-family units ifthe proposed commercial area is not developed. On March 14, 27, in Case # PRJ26-23, the BOCC approved an 1) Overall Development Plan (ODP) with mixed-use consisting of approximately 1,68 singlefamily homes, single-family attached homes, condominiums, and/or apartments, and/or townhouses, approximately 13.5 acres of commercial use, and a minimum of 47 acres of parks and open space; and 2) Rezoning approximately 191 acres from Preliminary PUD (P-PUD), 1-2, and -, ndustrial to C-5, Commercial, R-4, Residential, and PL, Public Land. SUMMARY OF APPLCATON The applicant is requesting 1) a Final Development Plan (FDP) to allow 127 lots on approximately 21.1 acres in the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; 2) a Major Subdivision (Preliminary/Final Plat) to create 127 lots on approximately 21.1 acres in the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; and 3) a Subdivision mprovement Agreement (SA) for Filing No.4. 2

21 The area is zoned P-U-D, Planned Unit Development, which is a form of a customized zone district. The objective of a Planned Unit Development is to establish an area of land, controlled by one or more landowners, to be developed under unified control or unified plan of development for a number of dwelling units and land uses, the plan for which does not correspond in lot size, bulk, or type of use, density, lot coverage, open space, or other restriction to the existing land use regulations. The P.U.D. documents as approved by the BOCC may waive or modify specifications, standards and requirements of the County's Development Standards and Regulations, such as site area, density, setbacks, height restrictions, improvement standards and related requirements that would by otherwise applicable to a particular zone district or land use, if such waiver or modification furthers the objectives of the P.U.D. regulations. The Final Development Plan (FDP) is the site-specific development plan which describes and establishes the type and intensity of uses for a specific parcel or parcels of land. The FDP includes a final subdivision plat. Each future phase of Midtown will have its own FDP that will adhere to the parameters and guidelines established in the most recent PDP. The future land use map designates this area as Urban Residential. Urban residential areas are designated for single and multiple-family housing, typically at urban densities of one dwelling per acre or greater. These areas are intended to provide for development of residential neighborhoods with a variety of housing types, with adequate urban services and transportation facilities. Urban residential areas may include supporting neighborhood commercial uses designed to serve the needs of nearby residents. The entire Midtown at Clear Creek development area is comprised of approximately 183 acres. The site is about % mile south of U.S. Highway 36, about 1'2 mile north of 1-76, about % mile east of the future RTD light rail station to be located at Federal Boulevard and 7 th Avenue, and about % mile west of-25. The subject site is bordered by Clear Creek and industrial land to the south, existing residential to the north, and vacant land to the east and west. Pecos Street bisects the site. Three future RTD light rail stations will be located within 1 mile of Midtown; combined with close access to the aforementioned highways, the Midtown community has convenient access to important transport corridors in metro Denver. The Filing #4 area is approximately 21.1 acres in size located in the western portion of the larger Midtown development area, west of Pecos Street and to the west of Filings #1, #2 and #3. The north-south streets of Fern Drive, Morrison Drive, and Warren Drive are the principal streets in this Filing, and Morrison Drive provides a connection to W. 68 th Avenue. W. 6ih Avenue and W. 6ih Drive are the main east-west streets. Alleys will playa key role in providing access to garages in the rear of the 4 townhomes and 54 of the 87 single-family dwellings in Filing #4, thereby allowing the homes to front public streets andlor landscaped tracts. The other 33 singlefamily dwellings will be front-loaded with the garage facing the street. Crestview Water and Sanitation District has indicated it has the capacity to serve this site. The site is also within the Southwest Adams County Fire Protection District. Midtown is envisioned as an infill neighborhood development with a traditional street design that incorporates alley loaded garages. t is planned as a mixed-use community that will invigorate this part of Southwest Adams County. ncorporated into the community will be a local 3

22 commercial area, a variety of residential home types and a system of open space, parks and trails. The approved PDP includes a ±43-acre park / open space area, and a ±5-acre school site. This request is consistent with the Overall Development Plan (ODP) and the Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan (PDP). The ODP and the Second Amendment to the PDP allow for a maximum of 1,68 residential units with an overall density of approximately 8.9 dwelling units per acre. The density of Midtown Filing No.4 is approximately 6. dwelling units per acre. The plan for Midtown Filing No.4 provides continuity by extending the block structure, vehicular circulation and landscape treatment of Filings #1, #2 and #3. Landscaped tracts provide amenities that will connect to future phases of the Midtown development. Housing Types & Designs Midtown Filing #4 includes five different home types listed below: Single Family Detached / Rear-Loaded Cottage Homes: Consists of homes designed for residents who want a lower amount of outdoor space to maintain and are on lot with rear alleyloaded garages. Sizes of residences vary in width and depth. Size of homes range from 1,65 to 2,85 square feet. There will be 18 Rear-Loaded Cottage Homes in Filing #4. Single-Family Detached / Green Court Homes: Consists of homes designed for young families or first-time buyers and are on lots with detached, rear alley-loaded garages or automobile courtyards. Sizes of residences vary in width and depth. Size of homes range from 1,65 to 2,85 square feet. There will be 3 Green Court Homes in Filing #4. Single-Family Detached / Front-Loaded Homes: Consists of homes designed for residents who desire a small private yard. Sizes of residences vary and will have front-loaded garages. Size of homes range from 1,8 square feet to 2,2 square feet. There will be 33 Front-Loaded Homes in Filing #4. Single-Family Attached / Townhome or Duplex Home: Consists of multiple residences that share one or two walls with an adjoining home. Sizes of residences vary in square footage. Size of homes range from 1,2 square feet to 1,4 square feet. There will be 4 Townhome units in Filing #4. Single-Family Detached / Tea Light Home: Consists of homes designed for young families or first-time buyers and are on lots with detached, rear alley-loaded garages or automobile courtyards. Sizes of residences will vary in width and depth. Size of homes range from 1,21 square feet to 1,356 square feet. There will be 6 Tea Light Homes in Filing #4. The Architectural Design Guidelines allow for incorporation of a variety of architectural styles from contemporary to more regional styles such as craftsman or prairie. All detached residences will have a covered porch. Single-family detached homes will have a maximum height of 45 feet. All builders and homeowners are required to go through the Design Review Committee, and the County will not approve a building permit until approval has been granted from the DRC. 4

23 Parking The parking plan accommodates a minimum of 2.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit overall. The internal local street system is designed to work in concert with the private alleys. Alleys will be used to access garages and parking for most of the homes. Each rear-loaded home will have a minimum of two off-street parking spaces. Parallel parking is not permitted on dead-end alleys; on other alleys, parallel parking between the garage and alley is permitted where space permits. All homes have access to on-street parking along the local streets. There are approximately 543 parking spaces provided for the 87 single-family detached lots and the 4 single-family attached lots in the Filing #4 area (213 on-street parking spaces and 33 garage and alley parking spaces), for approximately 4.28 parking spaces per dwelling unit in Filing #4. Common Areas The Filing #4 area includes streetscape landscape areas, landscape tracts, an open space trail, a 1.6-acre neighborhood park, and a.7-acre linear promenade. n addition, there is a temporary detention pond for storm water runoff for the portion of Filing #4 that is tributary to the pond. Once the ultimate detention pond is constructed with Filing #6, this temporary pond and associated infrastructure will be removed. Open space tracts, the neighborhood park and the linear promenade will be maintained by the Clear Creek Station Metropolitan District. Tree lawns will be installed by the builder and maintained by adjacent homeowners. Private home landscapes will be installed by the homeowner or builder and maintained by the homeowner. Adams County will not be responsible for operation and maintenance of parks and open space. The Clear Creek Station Metropolitan District will be responsible for the enforcement of landscape maintenance requirements. A Design Review Committee will review private open space design for compatibility. The homeowner will be responsible for removal of snow, ice, debris or other obstructions from the detached sidewalk in front of their residences. Lot Characteristics Typical Filing #4 lot sizes range from 1,421 square feet to 7,561 square feet for the 127 lots in this area. All front, side and rear setbacks will be consistent with the Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan. There will be both single-family attached and single-family detached homes in Filing #4. Side Yard Use Easements are granted along common side lot lines only on detached single-family home lots. Side Yard Use Easements occur from front property line to rear property line and extend from the Grantor's building foundation to the lot line between the Grantor's and Grantee's parcels. Filing #4 Timeline The estimated length oftime for full build-out of the Filing #4 area of Midtown is four years. Subdivision mprovement Agreement The Adams County Development Standards and Regulations require a Subdivision mprovement Agreement (SA) to be approved, per Section The agreement shall address the manner and timing of the completion of all subdivision improvements and the responsibility for payment of the costs of all subdivision improvements. 5

24 On June 24, 214, the Adams County BOCC approved a pre-plat SA for Midtown Filing No.4 prior to approval of the Final Development Plan and Final Plat application. This approval was granted to allow the developer to begin construction of certain public improvements for street construction, dry utilities, storm drainage and other site improvements prior to final plat approval and at the Developer's risk. The current application for the Final Development Plan and Final Plat includes an Addendum to the above referenced SA for Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4. This Addendum outlines the Developer's obligation for landscape installation, landscape ownership and maintenance, and Public Land Dedication (PLD) fees for schools and parks for this phase of the development. This filing has a number of tracts that will be commonly owned and maintained. The SA and the Addendum to the SA describe the maintenance responsibilities and ownership areas for the Developer, the County and the Metro District. The exhibit for the Addendum to the SA depicts areas that will be maintained privately (tree lawns, etc.). The Metro District will own andlor maintain the remaining common areas. The exact tracts of land owned andlor maintained by each entity are outlined in the Addendum to the SA for Midtown Filing No.4. REFERRAL AGENCY COMMENTS The Colorado Division of Water Resources, in a letter dated September 3, 214, notes that the estimated water and landscape irrigation requirement for the 127 proposed lots within Filing #4 will be acre-feet of water per year, and that the Crestview Water and Sanitation District will serve Midtown and has a contract in place with Denver Water to obtain treated water on demand. The Division opines that the proposed water supply is adequate and can be provided without causing injury. The Applicant takes note of this comment. The Colorado Geological Survey, in a letter dated September 2,214, notes that the Filing 4 area, provided that the expansive soil and potential shallow groundwater conditions are addressed prior to construction, does not present any geologic hazards or development constraints that would preclude the proposed use and density. The Applicant's geotechnical engineers and construction material consultants, Cesare, nc., note that the preliminary geotechnical study / Midtown at Clear Creek recommended the sub-excavation, moisture treatment, and the recompact treatment of clay soils to eight feet below the lowest foundation level for structures and to a depth of five feet below roadways. This was done under the observation of a Cesare field technician. During sub-excavation, groundwater was not observed by the field technician and so is not likely to present a concern. Perimeter drains for individual structures may be required and are determined/rom lot specific investigations by the geotechnical engineer for the homebuilder. Xcel Energy, in a letter dated August 22, 214, notes that the Developer must contact Xcel and complete the application process for any new natural gas or electric service, or modification to existing facilities, and that all utilities should be located prior to construction. The Applicant takes note of this comment. 6

25 The Tri-County Health Department, in a letter dated August 22, 214, states that it has no comments. The Applicant takes note of this comment. The City of Westminster, in a letter dated August 21,214, states that it has no comments. The Applicant takes note of this comment. The West Adams Soil Conservation District, in a letter dated August 15,214, recommends that the temporary detention pond area be seeded and maintained with grass to pre-empt the possibility of invasive and noxious weeds and dust. The District advises against the inclusion of any Ash trees due to the spreading of the Ash Borer, and recommends that the Applicant consider the mature size of trees when placing them so that residents in 2 years do not have to contend with invading roots or branches. The Applicant notes that seeding of the temporary detention pond will be provided, that it has removed all Ash and Cottonwood trees from the plans, and that there will be soil amendments to help prevent iron deficiencies in Maple trees. Also, Evergreen trees will be included in the Metro District maintenance program to help ensure their health and longevity. STAFF RECOMMENDATON This proposal is consistent with the Overall Development Plan and the Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan. The Filing #4 FDP area includes four types of single-family detached homes and one type of single-family attached townhomes, with a collection of styles and square footage ranges available, and maintains the traditional neighborhood concept with its grid form and rear-loaded product types and the inclusion of open space tracts and landscaped tree lawns. Staff supports the mixed-use pedestrian-friendly environment fostered by Filing #4, and recommends approval of the requests, with the following recommended Findings of Fact. 7

26 RECOMMENDED FNDNGS OF FACT 1. The preliminary plat is consistent with the Adams County Comprehensive Plan and any available area plan. 2. The preliminary plat is consistent with the purposes of these standards and regulations. 3. The preliminary plat is in conformance with the subdivision design standards and any approved sketch plan. 4. The applicant has provided evidence that a sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality, and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards. 5. The applicant has provided evidence that a public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, adequate evidence indicating that such system complies with state and local laws and regulations. 6. The applicant has provided evidence to show all areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions, have been identified by the applicant and the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with such conditions. 7. The applicant has provided evidence that adequate drainage improvements comply with these standards and regulations. 8. The overall density of development within the proposed subdivision conforms to the zone district density allowances. 9. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the surrounding area, harmonious with the character of the neighborhood, not detrimental to the immediate area, not detrimental to the future development of the area, and not detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the inhabitants ofthe area and the County. The proposed subdivision has established an adequate level of compatibility by: a. ncorporating natural physical features into the development design and providing sufficient open spaces considering the type and intensity of use; b. ncorporating site planning techniques to foster the implementation of the County's plans, and encourage a land use pattern to support a balanced transportation system, including auto, bike and pedestrian traffic, public or mass transit, and the cost effective delivery of other services consistent with adopted plans, policies and regulations of the County; c. ncorporating physical design features in the subdivision to provide a transition between the project and adjacent land uses through the provision of an attractive entryway, edges along public streets, architectural design, and appropriate height and bulk restrictions on structures; d. ncorporating identified environmentally sensitive areas, including but not limited to, wetlands and wildlife corridors, into the project design; and 8

27 e. ncorporating public facilities or infrastructure, or cash-in-lieu, reasonably related to the proposed subdivision so the proposed subdivision will not negatively impact the levels of service of the County services and facilities. 1. The final plat is consistent and conforms to the approved preliminary plat. 11. The final plat is in conformance with the subdivision design standards. 12. The applicant has provided evidence that a sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality, and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards. 13. The applicant has provided evidence that a public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, adequate evidence indicating that the system complies with state and local laws and regulations. 14. The applicant has provided evidence to show all areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions, have been identified by the applicant and the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with such conditions. 15. The proposed or constructed drainage improvements are adequate and comply with these standards and regulations. 16. Adequate public facilities or infrastructure, or cash-in-lieu, for impacts reasonably related to the proposed subdivision have been constructed or financially guaranteed through cash-in-lieu or a subdivision improvements agreement so the proposed subdivision will not negatively impact the levels of service of the County. 17. The FDP is in general conformity with the Adams County Comprehensive Plan and any applicable area plan. 18. The FDP conforms to the P.U.D. standards. 19. The FDP is consistent with any approved PDP for the property. 2. The FDP construction plans meet the requirements of these standards and regulations and have been approved by the Director of Public Works, all infrastructure and utility providers, Tri County Health Department, and all other referral agencies. Recommended Notes to the Applicant: 1. The Addendum to the Subdivision mprovement Agreement (SA) with Midtown LLC shall be executed concurrently to the approval of the Final Plat and Final Development Plan. No permits shall be issued for Filing #4 until the Addendum to the SA is executed. 2. The applicant shall include "no parking" signage on all fire lanes. 9

28 3. The applicant shall place stakes on the z-lots and provide final as-built surveys of the homes measured from the finished exterior wall to the lot line with building permit applications. 4. All applicable building, zoning, health, engineering, and fire codes shall be adhered to with this request. Staff Recommendation: Approval with 2 Findings of Fact and 4 Notes 1

29 CASE ANALYSS Preliminary Plat 1. The preliminary plat is consistent with the Adams County Comprehensive Plan and any available area plan. Yes. 2. The preliminary plat is consistent with the purposes of these standards and regulations. Yes. 3. The preliminary plat is in conformance with the subdivision design standards and any approved sketch plan. Yes. 4. The applicant has provided evidence that a sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality, and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards. Yes. 5. The applicant has provided evidence that a public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, adequate evidence indicating that such system complies with state and local laws and regulations. Yes. 6. The applicant has provided evidence to show all areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions, have been identified by the applicant and the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with such conditions. Yes. 7. The applicant has provided evidence that adequate drainage improvements comply with these standards and regulations. Yes. 8. The overall density of development within the proposed subdivision conforms to the zone district density allowances. Yes. 9. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the surrounding area, harmonious with the character of the neighborhood, not detrimental to the immediate area, not detrimental to the future development of the area, and not detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the County. The proposed subdivision has established an adequate level of compatibility by: a. ncorporating natural physical features into the development design and providing sufficient open spaces considering the type and intensity of use; b. ncorporating site planning techniques to foster the implementation of the County's plans, and encourage a land use pattern to support a balanced transportation system, including auto, bike and pedestrian traffic, public or mass transit, and the cost effective delivery of other services consistent with adopted plans, policies and regulations of the County; c. ncorporating physical design features in the subdivision to provide a transition between the project and adjacent land uses through the provision of an attractive entryway, edges along public streets, architectural design, and appropriate height and bulk restrictions on structures; 11

30 d. ncorporating identified environmentally sensitive areas, including but not limited to, wetlands and wildlife corridors, into the project design; and e. ncorporating public facilities or infrastructure, or cash-in-lieu, reasonably related to the proposed subdivision so the proposed subdivision will not negatively impact the levels of service of the County services and facilities. Yes. Final Plat 1. The final plat is consistent and conforms to the approved preliminary plat. Yes. 11. The final plat is in conformance with the subdivision design standards. Yes. 12. The applicant has provided evidence that a sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality, and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards. Yes. 13. The applicant has provided evidence that a public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, adequate evidence indicating that the system complies with state and local laws and regulations. Yes. 14. The applicant has provided evidence to show all areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions, have been identified by the applicant and the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with such conditions. Yes. 15. The proposed or constructed drainage improvements are adequate and comply with these standards and regulations. Yes. 16. Adequate public facilities or infrastructure, or cash-in-lieu, for impacts reasonably related to the proposed subdivision have been constructed or financially guaranteed through cash-in-lieu or a subdivision improvements agreement so the proposed subdivision will not negatively impact the levels of service of the County. Yes. Final Development Plan (FDP) 17. The FDP is in general conformity with the Adams County Comprehensive Plan and any applicable area plan. Yes. 18. The FDP conforms to the P.U.D. standards. Yes. 19. The FDP is consistent with any approved PDP for the property. Yes. 2. The FDP construction plans meet the requirements of these standards and regulations and have been approved by the Director of Public Works, all infrastructure and utility providers, Tri County Health Department, and all other referral agencies. Yes. 12

31 CTZEN COMMENTS Richard and Naomi Dekker 6851 Huron Street Denver, CO 8221 The Dekker's "demand that the 'Special District' designation be removed from the property known as Midtown at Clear Creek," and that Brookfield should mow the property slated for the future school site. The Applicant states it is unfortunate that the Deckers do not support the design of the Midtown community; however, the construction and implementation of Midtown homes and open spaces meet the requirements of the Midtown at Clear Creek PUD documents. Adams County Building Safety Division: None Adams County Code Compliance Division: None Adams County Sheriff's Office: None COUNTY AGENCY COMMENTS Adams County Parks & Community Resources Department: None Adams County Transportation Department: Drainage ssues Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA FRM Panel #81C584H revised March 4,27. According to the above reference, the site does not appear to be located in a designated Flood Hazard Area. A Floodplain Use Permit will not be required. The site is in the MS4 Permitted Area, if the project disturbs more than an acre Adams County will require a copy of the Storm Water Management Plan and a copy ofthe state CDPS permit. Right-Of-Way For any comments concerning Right-Of-Way or boundary issues contact John Wolken with the Right-Of-Way division. Construction Site construction and drainage plans have been reviewed and approved by Adams County Transportation Department. The County has also executed a "pre-plat" SA and issued an onsite grading and drainage permit so that construction could begin before a plat was approved. Access Case # PUD213-1O, Midtown at Clear Creek Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan, passed by the BOCC on July 8, 214: o Condition Precedent #6: Upon written notice from the Adams 13

32 County Transportation Department, a traffic study shall be completed by the applicant and submitted for review by the County. The County will then be able to determine the exact time when the traffic signals shall be installed by the applicant / Metropolitan District located at the intersection of West 68 th Avenue and Pecos Street and at the intersection of West 67 th Avenue and Pecos Street. According to the above referenced PUD case condition, the applicant is required to complete a traffic study upon written request from the Transportation Department. Written notice was sent to the applicant during the week of August 18 th, 214. The applicant should be required to fulfill this requirement prior to scheduling of the BOCC hearing. REFERRAL AGENCY COMMENTS Responding with concerns: Colorado Division of Water Resources Colorado Geological Survey Southwest Adams County Fire Protection District West Adams Soil Conservation District Xcel Energy Responding without concerns: City of Westminster Tri-County Health Department Notified but not responding / Considered a Favorable Response: Adams County Fire Protection District Colorado Agriculture Ditch Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Colorado Department of Transportation Colorado Division of Mining Reclamation and Safety Colorado Division of Wildlife Comcast Crestview Water and Sanitation District Goat Hill Neighborhood Group Hyland Hills Park and Recreation District Mapleton School District # 1 Metro Wastewater Reclamation District North Pecos Water & Sanitation District Perl Mack Neighborhood Group Qwest Communications Regional Transportation District Urban Drainage and Flood Control District United States Post Office US EPA Westminster School District #5 14

33 -- ADAMS COUNTY Planning and Development Department 443 South Adams County Parkway, 1st Floor, Suite W2A Brighton, CO PHON E fax MEMORANDUM To: From: Subject: Planning Commission Michael Weaver, Planner - Economic Development Midtown Filing No. 41 Case # PRC214-9 Date: October 9,214 f the Planning Commission does not concur with the Staff recommendation of Approval, the following findings may be adopted as part of a decision of Denial: ALTERNATVE RECOMMENDED FNDNGS 1. The preliminary plat is inconsistent with the Adams County Comprehensive Plan and any available area plan. 2. The preliminary plat is inconsistent with the purposes of these standards and regulations. 3. The preliminary plat is not in conformance with the subdivision design standards and any approved sketch plan. 4. The applicant has not provided evidence that a sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality, and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards. 5. The applicant has not provided evidence that a public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, adequate evidence indicating that such system complies with state and local laws and regulations. 6. The applicant has not provided evidence to show all areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions, have been identified by the applicant and the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with such conditions. 7. The applicant has not provided evidence that adequate drainage improvements comply with these standards and regulations. 8. The overall density of development within the proposed subdivision does not conform to the zone district density allowances.

34 9. The proposed subdivision is incompatible with the surrounding area, not harmonious with the character of the neighborhood, detrimental to the immediate area, detrimental to the future development of the area, and detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the County. The proposed subdivision has not established an adequate level of compatibility by: a. ncorporating natural physical features into the development design and providing sufficient open spaces considering the type and intensity of use; b. ncorporating site planning techniques to foster the implementation of the County's plans, and encourage a land use pattern to support a balanced transportation system, including auto, bike and pedestrian traffic, public or mass transit, and the cost effective delivery of other services consistent with adopted plans, policies and regulations of the County; c. ncorporating physical design features in the subdivision to provide a transition between the project and adjacent land uses through the provision of an attractive entryway, edges along public streets, architectural design, and appropriate height and bulk restrictions on structures; d. ncorporating identified environmentally sensitive areas, including but not limited to, wetlands and wildlife corridors, into the project design; and e. ncorporating public facilities or infrastructure, or cash-in-lieu, reasonably related to the proposed subdivision so the proposed subdivision will not negatively impact the levels of service of the County services and facilities. 1 O. The final plat is inconsistent and does not conform to the approved preliminary plat. 11. The final plat is not in conformance with the subdivision design standards. 12. The applicant has not provided evidence that a sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality, and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards. 13. The applicant has not provided evidence that a public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, adequate evidence indicating that the system complies with state and local laws and regulations. 14. The applicant has not provided evidence to show all areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions, have been identified by the applicant and the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with such conditions. 15. The proposed or constructed drainage improvements are inadequate and do not comply with these standards and regulations. 16. Adequate public facilities or infrastructure, or cash-in-lieu, for impacts reasonably related to the proposed subdivision have not been constructed or financially guaranteed through cash-in-lieu or a subdivision improvements agreement so the proposed subdivision will negatively impact the levels of service of the County.

35 17. The FDP is not in general conformity with the Adams County Comprehensive Plan and any applicable area plan. 18. The FDP does not conform to the P.U.D. standards. 19. The FDP is inconsistent with any approved PDP for the property. 2. The FDP construction plans do not meet the requirements of these standards and regulations and have not been approved by the Director of Transportation, all infrastructure and utility providers, Tri-County Health Department, and all other referral agencies.

36 REJ)U\ND,/ Engineering Great Places 8 South Lincoln Street, #26 Littleton, CO 8122 Office: (72) November 27,213 Matt Emmens Adams County - Public Works 443 South Adams County Parkway 1 51 Floor, Suite W2B Brighton, CO 861 Re: Midtown at Clear Creek - Filing 4 - Submittal tem F - Letter of Explanation Final Plat Dear Mr. Emmens, Below is a summary of the various questions required to be included in the Letter of Explanation for the Midtown at Clear Creek Filing 4 Final Plat submittal. 1. The final plat is consistent and conforms to the approved preliminary plat. Filing No.4 of the Midtown at Clear Creek project is consistent and in general conformance with the Preliminary Plat prepared for the project. 2. The final plat is in conformance with the subdivision design standards. The final plat is in conformance with the Amended Preliminary Development Plan (APDP) for the Midtown at Clear Creek project. Subdivision design standards not covered within the APDP follow Adams County design standards. 4. The applicant has provided reasonable evidence that a sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards. Filing No.4 of the Midtown at Clear Creek community is located within the Crestview Water & Sanitation District. Please refer to the attached Will Serve letter from Crestview with regards to adequate water service. 5. The applicant has provided reasonable evidence that a public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, adequate evidence that the system complies with state and local laws and regulations. Filing No.4 of the Midtown at Clear Creek community is located within the Crestview Water & Sanitation District. Please refer to the attached Will Serve letter from Crestview with regards to adequate public sewage disposal services. 6. The applicant has provided reasonable evidence to show all areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions, have been identified by the applicant and the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with such conditions.

37 Midtown at Clear Creek - Filing Four SUBMTTAL TEM C WRTTEN EXPLANATON Midtown at Clear Creek is acre Master Planned Community, officially termed a Planned Unit Development (PUD) in Adams County Colorado. The site is located southeast and southwest of Pecos Street at 68 th Avenue. The new community is approved for a mix of uses including single-family detached homes, townhomes, multi-family homes and mixed-use commercial-retail. The PUD was originally approved in 28 and amended in 212 and 214 for 1,68 dwelling units, a 5-acre school site, 6.7-acres of commercial mixed use and a variety of open spaces including an approximately 43 acre park. This Final Development Plan Filing Four is an extension of the concept submitted and approved in earlier phases and proposes 127 dwelling units on 21.1 acres. Front-loaded and alley loaded single family homes are seamlessly mixed adjacent to townhomes to create a traditional neighborhood community. The open space improvements in this FDP include an active park for residents currently quoined, "Home Plate Park" and a linear greenway that connects Home Plate Park through Filing 6 to the 43-acre park on the western edge of the community. The proposal meets the Codes and Standards set forth by the PUD and Adams County to create a quality development. This conformance is as follows: 1. The FOP is in general conformity with the Adams County Comprehensive Plan and any applicable area plan. The Filing Four area is on the west side of Pecos Street, south of 68 th Avenue and west of Filing Two and proposed Filing Three. Filing Four will consist of single family detached front-loaded homes, single family detached rear-loaded homes, and attached townhome alley-loaded homes. Primary access to the Filing Four FDP area is West 67 th Avenue, Larsh Drive, and Morrison Drive. The proposed plan continues the general character, block structure and circulation established in Filing One, Filing Two, Filing Three, and associated approved plans. The Midtown at Clear Creek Filing Four plan continues to implement the master plan developed for Midtown and remains consistent with the approved Overall Development Plan (ODP), Preliminary Development Plan (PDP), Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan and Adams County development standards and regulations. 2. The FOP conforms to the P.U.O. standards. The Midtown at Clear Creek Filing Four FDP conforms to PUD standards. Topics are addressed in detail in the Midtown at Clear Creek Filing Four FDP Narrative sections; A. Explanation of the Characteristics of the PUD; B. Explanation of the Potential mpact on the Surrounding Area, C. Contemplated intensity and Density of Land Use; D. Number, Type, and Size of Buildings or Units, F. Circulation and Road Patterns and G. Ownership and Maintenance of Common Areas.

38 3. The FDP is consistent with any approved PDP for the property. The proposed Midtown at Clear Creek Filing Four FOP is generally consistent with the approved Overall Development Plan (ODP) approved Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) and Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan for this project which allows a maximum of 1,68 residential dwelling units. 4. The FDP construction plans meet the requirements of these standards and regulations and have been approved by the director of Public Works, all infrastructure and utility providers, Tri-County Health Department, and all other referral agencies. The FOP construction plans are designed to meet the standards included in the approved Preliminary Development Plan (PDP), the Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan, or will meet County standards where specific variables are not addressed. The PDP conditions of approval and comments from referral agencies have been considered in the design of the FOP elements. During the review and approval process for this Midtown Filing Four FOP, all necessary requirements will be met and approved by all County departments and other referral agencies.

39 - 7TH AVE :: - ;: "- LEGEND FLNG QTY. FOUR 1.. UNTTYP. Z ;:l =Q -' - v:l j -.. ri P '\ Z Vl Z = f-< TOWNHOME REAR-LOADED HOME FRONT-LOADED HOME TOTAL LOTS 68TH AVE. FUTURE PARK PROPOSED SCHOOL STE FLNG Two AREA )-.,- t:i Cl ::r: j PHASE ONE AREA FUTURE PHASE AREA ) :.J, WEST 67TH AVENUE TEMPORARY DETENTON POND FLNG THREE AREA FLNG FOUR CONCE PTUAl STE PLAN JULY 1, 214 Brookfield Residential NOR,KS DESGN '-- 2' TRAL CORRDORAND LANDSCAPE BUFFER ir NORTH SCALE: 1"=1'

40 _mm MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK N THE COUNTY OF ADAMS, COLORADO PLANNED UNT DEVELOPMENT - FNAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FLNG FOUR LAND OWNERS Midtown, LLC 1B8lnvemess Dr, Sle. 15 Englewood, CO, B112 Contact Chris Bremner 33-7() APPLCANT Midtown, LLC 1B8lnverness Dr. ste. 15 Engood, CO, 8112 Contact Chris Bremner 33-7() PREPARERS ENGNEER: Redland BODO South Lilcoln Stree Suite 26, utteton, CO 8122 Ccntact: Mike Pieischmann PREPARERS PlANNER: Norris Design 111 Bannock Streel Denver, CO 824 Ccnlact Mach Blad< Case Numbec PRC214-9 SheelTtie COVER SHEET Sheet Number 1 OF 24 Brookfield Residential.... o..... 'CCo co.m1.. CERTFCATE OF OWNERSHP Midtown, LLC being the owner of Midtown al Clear Cree, ocaled in the Counly of Adams, Slale 1 Colorado, hereby submillhis Planned Una Deuelopmenl Rnal Developmeni Pn and agrees 1 pertorm under the terms noted hereon. at LEGAL DESCRPTON. Legal DescrlpUon UDTO'M' AT CLEAR CREEK. FLt..G NO 4 A'AACB.rs: DCJ.ALlC#l.".. E ND (#A tclqllll!qfdc.n'.gno..l.u A 'A!::::vn::..o.. :OQXOlO4OS ln 1J.tiiar eo.j!.rtyctdt<.uu a1'::e.lto.reo 'NHN 1'lfE:a.wrrDl: CS ne CUARTER QFSECTON 4 TOV'tNSHP3SOUTH..... nedm_,q". UERVAN Q).JtlT"'Gf' ADAt.1S STATEOF VCNTY MAP M NOUU5 DEsGN --..t- 111 Brorm. SlrM o.r-. Cocado824 Pl:) F ee E:Otn 4N'H2.utbA OJG2f'AC::A.11lA1SiiClJAJt1:, UO'e 1.iSS. Siale:'- -' COJny:...: A PARCEL OF LANO BENG All. OF TRACT OF r.1dto'm' AT a.ear CREE'r< HLNG NO 2 AS RECORDED AT RECEPTON NO 2131 N THE RECORDS OF THE A[),,MS COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFlCE. TOGETHER VVlTHA PORTON OFTHE fjorth HALF OF THE SOUT-'A ST CUARTER OF SECTON 4, TOWNSHP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 66 WO:ST OFTHE SXTH PRNCPAL MERDAN COUNTY OF ADAro'oS STATE OF COLORAOO BEJ.)G C'r.y: ' The forgng instrumenl was acknowledged before me this day of 2. COMENCNG AT THE SOUTH SXTEENTH CORNER OF SAD SECTON 4AND CONSDERNG THE SOUTH LNE OF THE NORHMEST CU,l,RTER DFTHE SOUT-M ST QUARTER OF SAD SECTON 4 TOBEARSOUTH9 5S26 EAST. A DSTANCE OF FEET ALL BEARNGS HEREON ARE REFERENCED ''O f lofs1\e... NolaryPublic, THENCE ALONG SAD SOUTH LNE, SOUTH es'ss'26" EAST. A asrae OF 133 «J FEET TO THE TOF 11&-... My commission",""" _ THENCE OEP,,RTNG s.t.d SOUTH LNE NORTH '1534" EAST. A DSTANCE OF 3 21 FEET THENCE SOUTH " EAST A DSTANCE OF 2S3.JS FEET BOARD OF COUNTY COMMSSONERS APPROVAL Approved by he Adams Counly Beard 1 Cornmissn"" this day of -..:2O_. Chair CERTFCATE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER This Final Deuopmenl Plan was filed for record in the Office of the Adams Counly Clerk and Recorder in he Stale ofc<>orado al m. on the_day of 2 County Clerk and Recorder By. _ The Preliminary Developmenl Plan was filed lor record in the Office of the Adams Ccunly Clerk and Recorder in he Slale of Colorado on the day 1 2 Fi No., Map No., Reception No ADDTONS AND DELETONS The fobowing Additions and Deeons in the PUD were made by the Board of County Commissioners al the time of approval. THENCE NORTH "113'34'" EAST A DSTANCE OF m.13 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 89"43'2' EAST, A D5T,,NCE OF26. FEET TO A PONT ON THE NESTERL Y BOUNDAR'' OF SAD MDTOVV AT CLEAR CREEK FLNG N'" THENCE ALONG SAD WESTERLY BOUNDARY THE FOLLOWNG THRTEEN (13) COURSES 1) SOUTH "16"34" v.est. A DSTANCE OF 57. FEET 2) SOUTH 119"43'2!"" EAST. A DSTANCE OF FEET, 3) SOUTH "115"34"WEST. A DSTANCE OF 1(lg.17 FEET 4) SOUTH eg"43 26" EAST. A DSTANCE OF S7 FEET, 5) NORTH "115')4' EAST A CilSTAOCE OF 25.5 FEET 6) SOUTH 89"43'2" E,l,ST A DSTANCE OF 8S FEET 1) SOUTH "16'34- AEST, A DSTANCE OF 272 FEET B) SOUTH! 9'43"2 EAST A DSTANCE OF FEET TO THE BEGNNt..G OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHli'lESTERL'' HAVNG A RADUS OF 25. FEET Q EASTERL Y ALO Sll.D CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45"'"' AN ARC LENGTH OF FEET 1) TANGENT TO SADCURVE. NORTH 4S'16"34" EAST A DSTANCE OF FEET: 11) SOUTH 44'43"26" EAST A DSTANCE OF FEET TO THE BEGNNNG OF A TAENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY HAV A RADUs OF 76 so FEET, 12) SOUTHEASTERL'' ALONG SAD CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45"". AN ARC LEt..GTH 61 5 FEET. 13) TANGENT TO SADCURVE. SQUTHBQ 4:ntJ'" EAST. A OSTANCEOF 13M1 FEET TOAPONTON THEWESTERL''RGHT-OF-WA'' OF LARSH DRVE AS SHOWN ON MDTOVo.'N AT CLEAR CREEK-FL NG NO. 1 PLAT CORRECTON AS RECORDED AT RECEPTON NO 213()()()5SS7151N [) RECORDS THENCE ALONG SAD WESTERLY RGHT -OF-W,,Y. SOUTH 16"J.4" WEST. A DSTANCE OF 21S,52 FEET TO A PONT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE PREUMNAR''FlNAL PLAT OF MDTOv'N AT CLEAR CREEJ<-FLNG NO,.J AS RECORDED AT RECEPTON NO, N SAD RECORDS, 1) OEP,,RTNG SAD WESTERL '' RGHT.wAY. NORTH W43'2- v.e5r. A DSTANCE OF 13S Sl FEET TO THE BEGNNNG OF,, T,,t..GENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHE,,STERLY HAVNG A RADUS OF 7aso FEET, 2) SOUTHlM:STE'RLY ALONG S,,O CURVE THROUGH,, CENTR,,LANGLE OF 'OO'OO",l,N,,RC LENGTH OF FEET 3) TANGENT TO SAD CURVE SOOTH 45'15"l4"VllEST, A [)STANCE OF FEET TO THE BEGNNNG OF A TANGBT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY " re..5 U1, 4)SOUTHWESTE'RL'' ALONGSAO CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45'ocroo-,l,NARC LENGTH OF61 6S FEET 5) TANGENT TO SAD CURVE SOUTH OO' 16'34"WO:ST A DSTANCE OF 59 9 FEET 15) NORTH &9'43"215" MET A DSTANCE OF54,5O FEET n SOUTH " " AEST" A DlST,,NCE OF 57 FEET 6) SOUTH M1"4J'lf;- EAST A DSTANCE OF FEET Q) SOUTH -16")4" WEST. A DSTANCE OF 135.OQ FEET TO A PONT ON THE SOUTH LNE OF THE NORTH'EST QUARTER OF THE SOU1'-!AEST QUARTER CF SAD SECTON 4 SHEET NDEX-PUD-FDP SHEET t CCNER SHEET SHEET 2: WRmEN NARRATVE SHEET 3: WRTEN NARRATNE SHEET 4: SDE YARD USE EASENT DL4GRAUS SHEET5 S/TEPLAN SHEET 61 LANDSCAPE STE PLAN SHEET 1: LANDSCAPE STE PLAN SHEET 8: LANDSCAPE STE PLAN SF_EU.STE"""" SHEET 1 LANDSCAPE STE PLAN SHEET11 LANDSCAPESTEPLAN!k!ET1:. u..st!ev>' SHEET 13: LANDSCAPE tmallaton AND MANTENANCE SHEET 14 LANDSCAPE TYPCALS 9!m lclalol!c>p lee LA SHEET 16: LANDSCAPE PLANT LsT SHEET 17: ARCHTECTURAL STANDARDS SHEET 18: ARCHrrECTl.ru STANDARDS SHEET 19: ARCHTECTlJRAL STANCVl.RDS SHEET 2: DETAilS SHEET 21: DETALS SHEET Z2: DETAU.S SHEET 23: DETALS SHEET 24: DETALS w a: u a: <t: W -' U z S o o ssue Dale 12/23/213 STAFF REVEW Approved as to form by: Director 1 Planning and Deuelopment CounlyAttorney CONTANNG AN AREA OF 2 75ACRES, (1lO:l &:5J SQUARE FEEl) MORE OR LESS. Fi Number: Map Number: Receplioo Nu -:m"' be-: r: ' Revision Oale 3/ /23/214 6/ /31214 NOTFOR CONSTRUCTON

41 SleetTiHe NARRATVE WAlDEN NARRATVE Sheet Number A. Explanation or the ChariCtBr1stics of the PUD The Fiing Four Fila{ Development Plan (FOP) area al Midtown at Clear Creek is comprised of approximately acres, cons;sling of single family residential homes and a ±1.5-acre neighbomaod park. The Filing Four CW"ea is located on the wesl side of Pecos Street, generally soulh of Wesl671h Place and west of Rling Two and Filing Three, and easl of Fern Drive. Primary access to the Filing Four FOP area is from West 66th Avenue, West 67th Avenue, West 67th Pla:;,e, Larsh Drive and MOrTison Drive. The Rling Four area is an extension of the estaboshed block structure, vehicular circulation and landscape treatment in Filings One, Two and Three. B. Potentiallmpaclor Proposed Mitgation on the Sum>unding Am This Fling FO.r AlP is gef1o(aiy "",,;stent wilh the approved Second Amendment to the Prei mi",",! Development P"". The COl'ete t.1idlown at C1ear Creek PUD is comprised 1 proxinately OCfe ncocpo<aled inlo the overal community vision is a local corrmerci mixelkse al'8a, a va'ialy of residential home ypes and a system of open space, parks ",d as which includes a dedicaled, open spaoelnalaal park area. As future transit / rail opportlxliijes are implemented by RD and the FasTracks programs, the communily will have even more convenient access to major transportation corridors in the Denver Metro Area. Existing residential neighbors 1 the north wiu be met by enhanced landscaped edges, single family residences and a proposed school. Access poinls located along 68th Avenue (Larsh Drive and Morrison Drive) have been minimized to help denect traffic flon from the existing neighborhoods located north of the site. Open space for Filing Four includes landscaped tree lawns, a neighborhood park, and open space tracts. C. Contemplated ntensity nd Oonslty 1 Land Uso Single Family AttachedlTawnhome or Dupler; Horne Coosisll 1 mul1e residences thai share one (1) or two (2) walls with an aqolnlng nome. Sizallo 1 residences vary in square footage. Refer to Architectural Detail on Sheet 18, Single Family DetachedlT", Ught Home Conslsb of homes designed for young families or first-time buyel3 and alll on lots with detached, rear aley-loaded garages or automobile ccu1'fo'dl. Situ 1 r" 'Wll ttnry in width and depth. Refer to Architectural Detail E on Sheet 19. E. Provisions for Plrking and Open Space The parng plan shall accommodate a minimum of 2.5 parki spaces per dwelling unil overall. OMtreel parng is permitted on allocal streets in the F, i Foor area. The internal local street system is designed kj work in conoert with the private atieys. Aleys wig be used to access garages ilod pa-king for most of the homes in the cortltv.jni. 11 wide alleys are for passenger vehicle and garbage trt k ao:ess only, and allow for alley-accessed garages. Rre access alleys are for passenger vehicle, garbage truck access, and fire access only, ;nj allow for aey-accessed garages. Front-loaded homes may have shared or private driveways. n order ( maintain access to all private garages, no parking is permitted on shared driveways. This concept creates a street scene that is not dominated by garages and reduces drivew cuts. Each rear-loaded home and rear-loaded townhome will provide a minimum of two (2) off street parking spaces. Rear-loaded homes without shared driveways are permitted one (1) additional parallel parking spa::e between he garage and paved alley surface on a driveway pad, when lot width permits. No parallel parking beman garage and paved alley in fire ao:ess alleys. Fronl.Joaded homes will provide t.<j (2) off-streel parking spaces. All homes have access to on-slreet parking aloog the local streets. Type and Allocation of All Uses ncluding Pennitted Uses, Uses Pennitted Aftar Amendment to the PUD and Prohibitad Uses The design inlent for Midtown at Clear Creek is 1 create a mixed use infill community that includes a variely of home types. The RUng Four FOP area will include single family detached homes and single family attached townhomes.ln keeping with the Traditional Neighborhood Development concept, the Filing Four area layout has a grid form and includes rear-loaded and fronl-loaded product types. The Filing Four area also includes open space tracts and landscaped tree lawns. J. location and Types of landscaping nd Maintenance Provisions The approved Midtown at Cte... Creek PUD includes a va- of parks and open spaces sltalegical located hroughout tho comnv.jnity. The Filing Fot.r area includes streelscape landscape areas, open space (fail conidors. passive limdscape recreation are"'. and "" active park. Landscape acts are proposed to be mntained by the Metropolitan District. This filing includes a :1.5 acre centrally located neighbortlood park on the east side of Rling Four. The neighborhood park will be maintained and developed by the Metro District. Adams County is not responsible for operation and maintenance of parks and open space. The neighborhood park improvements include a plaza, a water feature, active recreation areas, playground, native landscaping, pedestrian amenities and pathways. K. Description of Building envelopes ncluding Square Footage andlor Number of Units, Minimum Building Setback(s), Height, and General External Charlcteristics 2F24 Brookfield Residential '&!"","",-o..w.. SW'SO E... CO. 112 ""..., AB NoWS lfsgn - 111Br.l'lClt:tStM!.-. Cokndolll24 P F33..89Z.ttll6 _ oom The Fling Four area coosists iots. The proposed densi and land coverage is consistent with the approved Second Amendmenl to the Preliminary Development Plan for the Midtown at Clea- Creek PUD. Per tho appro\led ODP for Midtown at Clear Creek, the overall oomber of allowable residential units is 1,68, with a gross densi of proximalely 6.7 dwelling Lf1its 1 acre. This maximum overall residential unit count may also include the commerciaifmixed-use area [n it is not developed wilh relail uses) and lhe S-acre school sile Uf il is nol developed as school uses and reverts 1 residential uses). Based on planned build-oul, the Midtown community will provide open space areas consistent with this type of urban infill development and exceeds the Adams County standards for open space requirements. D. Number, Type, and Sz8 of Buildings and/or Units 127 lois are proposed in the Filing Four FOP and the corresponding Final Plat. Five home types are proposed in the Fjing Four FOP, refer to Sheets 17,18 and 19 for picals. Varying home types and lot sizes pr<wide a range of alfordability and ilestyles. The homes in Ring Foor are based on home types fully described in the pro v ed Second Amendment 1 the Preliminaly Development Plan. The following are the home types proposed for F,"9 Foor: $""" F.m/v _... la_e.a..., Kome Consists of homes desigled for residents who want a lower ajoolt of outdlor space to maintain and ale 115 with rear alley-kladed garagas. Sizes of residences vary in witfh and depth. Refer to An:hiloclural D.tail A on Sheet 17. F. Clrcul.tion.nd Ro.ad Patterns The vehicula- road pattem for the Midtown corrvtulity wil integrate tho oxisting and propo9od roadw1f( systems. The Fiing FO.r AlP area w inctude access to Pecos S.. via West 671h Avenue and comoctioos 1 68th AVenue through Morrison Drive, Larsh Drive and Raritan Drive. A signalized intersoctoo at West 671h Avenue (when warrants are met) is planned to move motorists through the central West 67th Avenue corridor and away from the existing neighborhood along 68th Avenue. An streets meet the standards included in the approved PDP and Second Amendment 1 the Preliminary Developmenl Plan. Biking s permittedin all public streets and on the S' concrete trail in Tract P. Bike parking is provided in the neighborhood park. G. Ownerlhlp nd Maintenanci of Common Ar.. s!oj1 common areas will be maintained by the Metro Dislrict. The Metro District is responsible for the enforcemenl of landscape mainlenance requirements. Through the Melropolitan District, a ORC (Design Review Committee) wil review privata open space design for coftllatibilily. Private klt owners sha be responsible for the maintenance of the. properly as well as adjacent r8e lawn areals). Mnlenance of the.. ta.vn shall be the primal'/ responsil ii 1 the homeownef under the requirements of the Metro Oistrictc.:ovena'lls. H. Type, Location, Exampl 1 Copy nd Construction 1 Signs There are 127 singt.. fari residential lots included in his FOP. Setbacks are based on those incwed in the Second Amendment to the Preliminal'/ Development Plan. Sheets 17, 16 and 19 of this FOP ft.r1her desai>eslot and bojlci standards. Standards stated in the Second Amendment 1 the Preiminary Development Plan for MMltown wid awty 1 future FOPs. Typical Fili1g Four 11 sizes range between 1,421sf to 7,561sf. These are anticipated ranges and actual lots may be constructed that fall siighdy oulside of this estimated range to respond to final design of homes. Architeclural design allows lor incorporation of a variety of architectural styles from contemporary to more regional styles such as Craftsman or Prairie. Please refer to Sheeis 17, 16 and 19. Architectural Standards in his FOP, he architectural standard sheets included in the approved Second Amendment to the Preliminary Devek>pment Plan, and!he Design GuMlelines. All communi development on the property should comp wilh these standards when they are adopted by the Design Reew Commitlee. ::.::: w ::: U ::: «W -' U «:z: S o o Single Family DetachedlGreen Court Homt Consists or hol'tle5 designed for young famijim or 6rst-Ume buyers and are on lois with detached, mar atley garages or aulom::bikl eourtyards Sizes of residences wia vary in width and depth. Refer to ArchitecbJral Dstail B on Sheet 17. Single Family DdachedJFront loaded Home Consists of homes designed for residenll who de.lire a small private yard. Sizes of residences witt vary and witt have rrool-loaded garagaa. Reter 1 ArctilecbJral Details C on Sheet 17. Entry monuments at Midtown are located at key intersections and crossings. f monumentation and signage is proposed in Filing Four, a subsequenl signage plan may be submitted if required by Adams County. Monumenls are primarily constructed of concrets, metar, and brick. Monuments wal be a maximum of 6' tall and 6' wide. Monuments may be internally illuminated or have accent landscape lighting. ssue Date Revision Date NOHOR CONSTRUCTON

42 SheetTiUe NARRATVE WRTEN NARRATVE L Covenants '" bolmpo d on the PUD Architeclural and landscape degn guidelines have been developed for Midlown. AD builders and homeowners will be required to go tlvough the Design Review Committee (ORC). The County shall not approve a building perm unti DRC approval is obtained. Development standards for setbacks, unit 1 lot configurations, and other controlling provisions have been included in the approved Second Amendment 1 the Prelininary D8\lalopment Plan and this FOP. M. Additional Controls luch.. n An:hltllclunll Control Commilloo of. Property OWner's Association The community will have a Metro District that will aeate a Design Review Comnittee (ORC) that will enforce design standarns through Declaration of Ease... nts and Masler Architeclural and Maintenance Standards for Midtown. AU architeclural styles of proposed buildings shad require approvat by the Design Review Committee (DRC) overseen by lhe Metro District and shad be consistenl with the design guidelines for this community, subject to planning director approval for overall architecturar intent. N. Utilization and location of any Outdoor Signage AU proposed marketing temporary slgnage will be submitted for approval and meet County signage standards and ordinances. O. Utifity Sorvlce. Crestview Water and Sanitation Disict has ndicated that they have adequate capability to serve this property.. th both water and sanitary sewer. Xcet Energy wid provide gas and electric services to the property. Appropriate easements for associated improvements and utility lines are included on the Final Plat for Filing Four. P. Estimated Time T.blolar Development The estimaled lenglh of i... for build-out of the Filing Four area of Midlown is four (4) year beginning Sum... r 214. Full build",ut for the Midlown neighborhoods is approximately five (5) to lifteen (15) years. Q. Any other Pertinent Facto", Concemlng tho Development Southwest Adams County Fire District wid service Midtown property west of Pecos Street, induding the Fing Four /lea R. Definitions Loaded L Rear Loaded : A garage wilh the vehicular door access located onto an alley localed at the rear (or sometimes side) of the lot. Front Loaded Garage: A garage with the vehicular OOor access located onlo street Right of W Jocated al the front or side of the lol n shared driveway instances, garage door opening may face side of lot Side Yard Use Easements are hereby granted along all common side 11line5 within atl detached home lots. Side Yard Use Easemenls: Side Yard Use Easements extend from!he Grantor's building foundation to the wi line between the Granlors and Grantee's parcels, thai shal be granted to the easement Grantee per the restrictions ouuined below. Refer to Figures 1 and 2 on Sheet 4 for a graphic representation of the Side Yard Use Easement. The following restrictions apply to the Side Yard Use Easements: a Easement Grantee shad have full access and enjoyment of the easement including construction of improvements, use, and maintenance of the space included in the easement. Fences and walls used as privacy screens may not encroach into the front and rear selback. mprove... nls including but not limited to decks, pa6os, landscaping, walls, fences, rails, furniture and similar elements are permitted within the defined side yard use easement Decks, patios and walls, other hell privacy screens, in excess of 3O-inches in height (as measured from finished grade) are not permitted in side yard use easements. Only landscaping, hardscape, and irrigation improverrents are permitted within front and rear setbacks. Side Yard Use Easement procedwes and policies shal be managed by the Clear Creek Sta6n Metropolitan District No.1. No improvements may be implemenled at the detnment of the Gr,",o. abitity to maintain their home. b. Side Yard Use Easemenls are permitted on detached nge family lois only. c. All improvements by Grantee loealed within the Side Yard Use Easement shad be maintained by the easement Grantee. d. Easement Granlor is ensured of access within this easement for maintenance and repair of the principal structure ocaled on he easement Grantor's 11 and for no other purpose. The Design Review Committee of he Clear Creek Station Melropoliloo District No.1 approves all plot plans before authorizing applicaon to Adams Counly for issuance of building permil For issue resolution the Clear Creek Station Metropolitan District No.1 is granted access into this easement. e. All principal structures, including garages, owned by easement Granlor shall be maintained by easement Grantor. 1. Side setbacks may be reduced to no less than 3' as measured from the finished materiat of the exlerior walt 1 he property Une. When reduced 1 less than 5' as measured from the finished material of the exterior wah to the property line, the then current BC and/or Re code requirements and amendments within the governing municipality wig be enforced with regard to exterior wall fire-resistant rating and minimum fire-separation distance requirements. g. Grantee shall nol aller finished grade and/or drainage patterns on the Grantor's property without the wrilten approval of the Design Review Committee. Definitions: Easement Grantor: the lot owner granting side yard area to adjacent lot owner for use. Easement Grantee: he 11 owner gaining side yard area from adjacenllol owner ror use. Shared Driveway Easements: Shared Driveway Easemenl are dedicated by the Filing no. 4 Final Plat for the access and maintenance of a shared driveway. The following restrictions apply to the shared driveway easement: a. Shared Driveway Easemenls are permitted on single-famity lots specified on his pial documenl. b. Shared Dnv8Wa)l Easemenls are permitted to ensure access to each driveway. c. No vehicles at any 6... shall be placed or parked within the shared driveway easemenl Vehicles shah be parked within the garage or on-street, nol impeding normal vehicular use of the shared driveway. d. Affected 11 owners shaillogether maintain the said shared driveway in a manner consistent with safe vehicular use, to include snowpowing, resurfacing, repair, Cld or other improvements or repairs as nece. mpl'o'lements shall be performed or contracted for upon consensus of the owners of said lois. f a consensus cannot be reached between lot owners then the CCSMD.. U be the deciding party. The lot owners shall be equally, jointly, and severally liable for the cost 1 all necessary and conditional maintenance of said shared driveway. e. No driveway improvements may alter finish grade arld/or drainage patterns withoul the written approval of the design review committee, in accordance with a pol ptan as approved by Adams County. No driveway improvemenl or repair may be made withoul the approval by the design review corrvnittee. S. Phasing: The Filing Four FOP area for Midtown at Ctear Creek consists of 127 nge fartily detached residential lots, various landscape tracts ar1d a neighborhood park. The residen6a1lots are planned to be constructed in one (1) phase. Lois generally south of Wesl67th Place and northeast of the intersection of Fern Drive are included in phase one. Alticipaled phase areas are genera! and subject to change. Tract is a temporary detention pond required for the construction of Rling Four. Refer 1 the Construction Drawings for temporary see<ing. A plat amendment.. n not be provided to subdivide this tracl into lots. The ultimate development for Tract will be shown as a part of Filing Six. Sheet Number 3F24 Brookfield Residential.. "... ""1l "".'" 5jJ5 NO\US DoSK;N S1JMt Dnrm. Cc*ndo P !fi F :,.::: W W ::: U ::: «w --' u z $: o o ssue Dale 12/23/213 Revision Date / /3/214 9/3/214 NOHOR CONSTRUCTON

43 Sheet Title FGURE 1 -lypcal SDE YARD USE EASEMENT LAYOUTS T't'PCAL SDE YARD USE EASEMENT: PUBLC STREET TRACT STREET r=l1on REAR SlOG. SETBACK oj ii '" PROPERTY UNE LOTC. 6'UTUTY EASEMENT SDE" YARD USE EASEMENT 'NDTHVARJES -(TYP.) T't'PCAL PASSVE LOT NO SDE YARD USE EASEMENT:,,"'DE VARDF.\L1C STREET TRACT EASEllElT STREET BETWEEN 1' MN, FRONT LOTS A & B BULDNG SETBACK LOTA. = 6'UnUTY EASEMENT NO SDE VAROUSE EASEMENT BETWEEN.OTSA&B VTY V uie LOTB. VLrn FOt.t.A11ON S'MlN. REAR BLDG. SETBACK PROPERTY UNE SCALE: N. T.S. SDE YARD USE EASEMENT DAGRAMS Sheet Number 4F24 -- lmm... Cif.WOdSll.SD E...,...,CO, , Brookfield Residential -.,-"...,-"'-,:-- bd NoUUS Df5GN L-..""'-' 111B1r1nociSl-Nl Oenr.otr,CdorD8324 P33lm..166 F3389' FGURE 2 - Z-SHAPED LOT SDE YARD USE EASEMENT LAYOUTS T't'PCAL SDE YARD USE EASEMENT: PUBLC STREET TRACT FOR FRONT LOADED PRODUCT (S.V.u. ) SDE YARD USE EASEMENT WlDTHVARlES REFER TO $DE YARD USE EASEMENT NOTES ON SHEET 3. TYPCAL PASSVE LOT NO SDE YARD USE EASEMENT: PUBLC STREET TRACT FOR FRONT LOADED PRODUCT 1' "'u. REAR NO SDE YARD USE S'UTUTY BULDNG SETBACK EASEMENT BETWEEN LOTSAU W w ::: () ::: «w -l () z S o - o ssue Oat. 1Z FRONT BlDG. SElBACK 1 SDEWALK tmltenance EASEMEHT 1't.UN. FRO/T BlDG. NO SlOE Y ARC USE EASBtENT BETWEEN LOTS A & 8 L '1 SDEWALK MtTENANCE EASfUENT Revision Date 3/24/214 4/ /3/214 9/3/214 STREET STREET SCALE: N. T.S. NOTFOR CONSTRUCTON

44 SMell1l1e STE PLAN C FUTURE PARK ) AREA Sheet Number 5F24 Brookfield Residential,&!_o..'ft.. S._15O ;a"" FlrruRe:PHASE) AREA &nnoc Sh.t. Cc*ndolOZl)4 P3!lUS F J3..BSa11116 ( LEGEND B G MDTOWN PROPERTY BOUNDARY FUNGFOURAREA DEVELOPMENT AREA FLNG FOUR LOT BREAKDOWN!') FLNG FOUR PARKNG COUNT MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK STE PLAN - CONTEXT MAP SCHOOL C FUTURE) AREA W. 66TH AVE '.- NORTH SCALE: 1"= 4' :: :::J u.. (.!) <: :J w u:: a:: u <: a:: '««w c[ ---' U - t- <: «lj.j Q Z o...j S lj.j,: Q :::>...J -- '" u «'" u:: «LOT TYPE SNGLE FAMLY DETACHED J;Dt.OT ft.q..f.t.mu"d(' GREEN COURT SNGLE FAMLY DETACHED FRONT -LOADED LOT SNGLETAM'" Y Al'T7.o-e) TOMELOT r.1cl:m&'yofta4lo TEAUGHTLOT QUANTTY rem L MCUPiG.a.T8 roo»ernl. u f\c, lottype lletalls 2 ntesearetieanljcw'atbllotbaemoowns F-W. PROOVCT Wll Sf PROVllEnAT nme Of 6Ul.l!«; 'ElMT DESCRPTON SEFAMllYOETACHE D leaa-toaded.gree COT... NO TE,t, UGHTlOTS SEF"' MLYDET"'CHE O FRONT-lo.o.OEDLOT SEF"'Ml.YATTACHED TOWNME.OT QUANTTY 1SPACES NtT 66 SPACES (2 SPACES PER UNT) 12DSPACES (JSPACESPERUNT) PARKCOONTexa.WESORVEWAYPARKlNGfOR SREDDFWAY!. 2 THROFARDlGSP-'CEBEHOO(W<ACCf>O!t.v y_".,..... u.w ONPAl.tm.. 1..C/OoUl...:.,.1. 1'NJJC«M''l.U:!GfUliOJlll.' GCUODo,...-._MOO1C»e) lsluc.. flung FOUR AREA ENLARGEMENT 1 1m.. NORTH SCALE: 1"= 2' "'" ssue Dale 12/23/213 Revision Date /23/214 6/ /3/214 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTON

45 KEY SheelTiUe LANDSCAPE STE PLAN TRAL DESGN WLL BE CONTNUED WTH FUTURE FDP FOR ADJACENT AREA '" '" "" ",.... '" '"... '" ;...:... i... '" '" '" '" L '" '", '" t ", '" '",--... "'..... '" '" TRACT (2) + LEGEND MATCHLNE E:3 E3 E3 PROPER1Y LNE ROAD CENTERLNE ALLEY CENTERLNE c:=j EASEMENT STORM SEWER E:::J,.'-... BULDER! WATERLNE SANTARY SEWER CANOPY TREE BY HOMEOWNER CANOPY TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE +.. EVERGREEN TREE. EVERGREEN SHRUB 1ft ORNAMENTAL GRASS '8 DECDUOUS SHRUB '-N PERENNAL -_..._-_.. c:::::::j c::::::::j c:::=j ANNUALS SOD DRYLAND SEED WETLAND SEED CRUSHER FNES CONCRETE STAMPED CONCRETE BRCK PAVERS 1 ENHANCED PAVNG PLANTS ARE labelbl ACCORDNG TO VARE1Y USNG TALC FONT. REFER TO SHEET 16 FOR LANDSCAPE PLANT LST. NOTES: 1. ALL LANDSCAPE AREA SHAll BE RRGATED WTH AUTOMATC RRGATON SYSTEM 2. REFER TO CONSTRUCTON DRAWNGS FOR TEMPORARY SEEDNG 3. HOUSNG PRODUCT VARETES: Sheet Number 6F24 Brookfield Residential... e... = Banr!Ocl;Street Onver.Cobatlo824 P F33.B _.Ofit.design_com w W ::: gj lj.. (!) it (J <: ::: q:: w «it --' - (J - «Z Q g S...J 12 o 8 lu ': Q 'Z -- =>...J o q:: <: '" - ;5 lj.. < ssue Dat SFD REAR-lOADED LOT PRODUCT SFD GREEN COURTLOT PRODUCT [TYP.) SFD FRONT -loaded LOT PRODUCT SFA TOWNHOME LOT PRODUCT [TYP.) SFD TEA LGHT LOT PRODUCT [TYP.). j... i NORTH SCAL E: 1'= 3' Revision Dale J J NOTFOR CONSTRUCTON

46 --_ =-.. 68TH AVENUE.., _ SGHT 1RANGlES, lyp, SheelTie LAt.lJSCAPE STE PlAN snool Number 7F24 Brookfield Residential -1U-...Dr.w..t!/a.,'5l E...,CO,1112 ROAD CENTERL lyp. WATER UNE, TYP..!_. STORf.4 SEWER,... i-<::-----== ( FUTURE SCHOOL STE ) - S CONCRETE WALK, TYP. S TlREE LAWN, TYP. S 1REE LAWN, TYP. "'-.../ REFER TO FLNG 2 DEVELOPME PLAN FOR 1REE LAWN AND PlANTNG LEGEND f.4atchlne E:3 E3 E3 PROPERTY LNE ROm CENTERLNE ALlEY CELlNE CJ EASEMENT STORM SEWER E3 WATERLNE SANTARY SEWER Y CANOPY 1REE BY BULDER HOMEOWNER CANOPY1REE ORNAMOO AL 1REE + + EVERGREEN 1REE D EVERGREEN SHRUB cp ORNAME AL GRASS <6 DECDUOUS SHRUB,. PERENNAl. 1jh!'«lOWS D<s1GN a..oct Sh«ew-, O*ndoQ2lM P BG FlOU92.U88 - ANNUALS 1::, :::::,,:::,,::::":,1 SOD NSTALLED N A FUTURE PHASE PARKNG f+ii COUS NCLUDED N THS FLNG DRYLAND SEED CJ WETlAND SEED CRUSHER FNES CONCRETE c:::j STAMPED CONCRETE BRCK PAVERS ENHANCED PAVNG Pl..AUTS ARE LABa EO ACCORDNG TO VARETY USNG TALC FO. REFER TO SHEET 16 FOR LANDSCAPE PLA LST. NOTES: 1. ALL LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL BE RRGATED WTH AUTOf.4ATC RRGATON SYSTEM 2. REFER TO CONS1RUCTON DRAWNGS FOR TEMPORARY SEEDNG 3. HOUSNG PRODUCT VARETES: z S o - o ssue Dalo 12/ SFD REAR-lOADEO LOT PRODUCT (TYP.) SFD GREEN COURTLOT PRODUCT (TYP.) SFO FRO-lOADED LOT PRODUCT SFA TOWNHOME LOT PRODUCT (TYP.) SFD TEA LGHT LOT PRODUCT (TYP.) o :JJ OJ! NORTH SCALE: 1': 3' Revision Dale 3124/214 4/23/ /214 NOTFOR CONSTRUCTON

47 -,--.- -W.l...-! _... KEY Sheel THe LANDSCAPE STE PLAN STORM SEWER, TYP. --./'--- 52'& --.f-- 36'-6' 36'-6" --t--- 52'-6" 18 LEGEND t.1atchlne E:3 E3 E3 c:::=j PROPERTY LNE ROAD CENTERLNE ALLEY CENTERLNE EASEMENT STORM SEWER E3 Y- WATERLNE SANTARY SEWER CANOPY TREE BY BULDER HOMEOWNER "- CANOPY TREE ORNAMENTAl TREE + + EVERGREEN TREE EVERGREEN SHRUB if;> ORNAMENTAL GRASS C() DECDUOUS SHRUB Sl'eel Number BOF25 Brookfield Reskk!na "".:k... 11t... =.rt'q'...- R.E)LAN )... -.:= _._ ]} NoUUS DfSGN -" 11lBarlnod:Stwt Derrm, Cobab 824 pm F B6 _n.com.- PERENNAl ANNUALS SOD DRYLAND SEED STORU SEWER, TYP. WETLAND SEED CRUSHER FNES r=j CONCRETE STAMPED CONCRETE BR1C](PAVERS 1 ENHANCED PAVNG P\.ANlS ARE LAl3aEO ACCORO!iG 1 VARETY USNG TALC FONT. REFER TO SHEET 16 FOR LANDSCAPE PLANT LST. NOTES: 1. ALL LANDSCAPE AREA SHAll BE RRGATED WTH AUTOt.1A nc RRGA non SYSTEM 2. REFER TO CDNSTRucnON DRAWNGS FOR TEMPORARY SEEDNG 3. HOUSNG PRODUCT VARETES: z s: o o ssue Dalo 12/23/213 a SFD REAR-LOADED LOT PRODUCT SFD GREEN COURTLOT PRODUCT (TYP.) SFD FRONT -LOADED LOT PRODUCT SFA TOWNHOME LOT PROOUCT SFD TEA LGHT LOT PRODUCT (TYP.) NORTH SCALE: 1'= 3' Revision Data /23/214 6/ /31214 NDTFOR CONSTRUCTON

48 KEY SheeTii!e LANDSCAFE STE PLAN ShoelNurrller _ 9F24 Brookfield Residen tial L--.O"'... U...""... ROAD CENTERLNE, TYP. n-f LEGEND MATCHLNE E:3 E3 E3 PROPERTY LNE ROAD CENTERLNE ALLEY CENTERLNE c=j EASEMENT STORM SEWER 1-- -j WATERLNE SANTARY SEWER CANOPY TREE BY BULDER HOMEOWNER CJ? CANOPY TREE ORNAMENTAL 11REE + + EVERGREEN TREE E EVERGREEN SHRUB (fo ORNAMENTAL GRASS '8 DECDUOUS SHRUB. PERENNAl.. ANNUALS 1:::::::;;:::;;::::::1 SOD DRYLAND SEED c=:j WETlAND SEED CRUSHER FNES CJ CONCRETE STAMPED CONCRETE BRlCK PAVERS ENHANCED PAVNG PlANTS ARE LASEl.ED iccooooo TO VARETY USNG TALC FONT. REFER TO SHEET 16 FOR LANDSCAFE PlANT LST. NOTES: 1. ALL landscafe AREA SHALL BE RRGATED WTH AUTOMATC RRGATON SYSTEM 2. REFER TO CONSTRUCTON DRAWNGS FOR TEMPORARY SEEDNG 3. HOUSNG PRODUCTVARE1lES: SFD REAR-lOADED LOT PROOUCT [TYP.) SFD GREEN COURTLOT PRODUCT [TYP.) SFD FRONT-lOADED LOT PRODUCT SFA TOWNHOMELOTPROOUCT [TYP.) <S> SFD TEA LlGHTLOT PRODUCT [TYP.) MODUlAR BLOCK RETANNG WALL. REFER TO DETAL 2N SHEET 23 AND CVL CONSTRUCTON DOCUMENTS. 3" :"' NORTH SCALE: 1'= 3' JLJ 111 Bnnod; S1rell "'-. Cc*qdoa24 P33.t F S15 _a.n ssuo Dale 12123/213 Revision Dale NOTFOR CONSTRUCTON

49 SHEET 7 r 4' '-5' KEY LEGEND MATCHUNE E::3 PROPERTY LNE ROAD CENTERLNE E3 E3 ALLEY CENTERLNE c=j EASEMENT STORM SEWER E::3 WATERLNE SANTARY SEWER?- CANOPY TREE BY BULDER HOMEOWNER CANOPY TREE ORAMElTAL TFlEE + + EVERGREEN TREE J EVERGREEN SHRUB tp ORNAMENTAL GRASS '6 DECDUOUS SHRUB "'#/1> PERENNAL c::::::::j ANNUALS SOD DRYLAND SEED c:=j WETLAND SEED '". CRUSHER FNES CJ CONCRETE STAMPED CONCRETE &g&\1xl BRCK PAVERS ENHANCED PAVNG PLANTS ARE l.ass.ed ACCORDNG TO VARETY USNG TALC FONT. REFER TO SHEET 16 FOR LANDSCAPE PLANT LST. NOTES: 1. All.l.MOSCAPE AREA SHAll. BE RRGATED WTH AUTOMATC RRGATON SYSTEM 2. REFER TO CONSTRUCTON DRAWNGS FOR TEMPORARY SEEDNG 3. HOUSNG PRODUCT VARETES: SFD REAR WADED LOT PRODUCT SFD GREEN COURTLOT PRODUCT (TYP.) sm FRONT -loaded LOT PRODUCT [TYP.) SFA TOWNHOMELOT PRODUCT sm TEA LGHT LOT PRODUCT (TYP.) o '" "" ;;. i NORTH SCALE: 1"= 3' SheetTHa LANDSCAPE STE PLAN Sheol NU!T'bo, 1 OF 24 Brookfield Residential lu... Or. W....,SO E.CO.aol1Z»>.71G-t81l R.E.9LAN) /f... '-,.., _._.. _,,1 BaMD;l;Smt o.rw.,., CobM:J 824 PJ3.B92.,,66 F33.B :>:::: w w :: o :: «w -' o «z S o o :2! Revision ate 3/24/214 4/23/214 6/ /3/214 NOTFOR CONSTRUCTON

50 ft -4' KEY Shoellille LANDSCAPE STE PlAN Sheel Nu""", 11 OF "" e.r--t al.11u...,..., Brookfield Residential LEGEND L F):3JlNA. = MEm" ". FOR TREE.'.' WNAND i / :'PlAm"NG -f, (FLNG 3 "\ AREA RE:MDTOWN FLNG 3 FNAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN.!, ; C MODUlAR BLOCK RETANNG WALL, REFER TO DETAL 2 ON SHEET 23 AND CVL CONSTRUCTON DOCUMENTS. TRAL DESGN CONTNUED N RUNG 3, DEVElOPMOO PlAN J FLNG 3 "'\ AREA J MATCHLNE E:3 E3 E:3 PROPERTY LNE ROAD CEm"ERLNE ALLEY CEm"ERLNE c=j EASEMEm" STORM SEWER WATERLNE SANTARY SEWER CANOPY TREE BY BULDER! HOMEOWNER CANCPYTREE ORNAldOOAl TREE + + EVERGREEN TREE g!) EVERGREEN SHRUB cp ORNAMENTAL GRASS '8 DECDUOUS SHRUB,. PERENNAl ANNUALS J::,;:, 1/:",:::] SOD [:=J DRYLAND SEED c=j WETLAND SEED CRUSHER FNES c=j CONCRETE STAMPED CONCRETE BRCK PAVERS 1 ENHANCED PAVNG PlANTS ARE la6aed Ac:CORDlNG 1 VARETY USNG TALC FONT, REFER TO SHEET 16 FOR LANDSCAPE PLANT LST. NOTES: 1. ALL laooscape AREA SHAlL BE RRGATED WTH AUTOMATC RRGATON SYSTEM 2, REFER TO CONSTRUCTON DRAWNGS FOR TEMPORARY SEEDNG 3. HOUSNG PRODUCT VARETES: SFD REAR-lOADED LOT PRODUCT (TYP.) SFD GREEN COURTLOT PRODUCT (TYP.) SFD FROm"-lOADED LOT PRODUCT SFA TDWNHOME LOT PRODUCT (TYP.) SFD TEA LGHT LOT PROCUCT (TYP.) o 3 '". i NORTH SCALE: 1"= 3' -- t 11 s.mod\ SrM Dtww,CcDD24 PX3.89Z.,,116 fj ::.::: w W :: a:: u.. (!) cr: t) <: :: «w -' t) l- <: UJ Q. Z g $: O UJ,,;.- Q 'Z => -.1 <:( <: '" u: 1=1. 12/23/213 Revision Date /23/214 6/ /3/214 NOTFOR CONSTRUCTON

51 KEY Sheel Tide LANDSCAPE STE PLAN Sheel Nurrber 12 OF 24 BKE RACK ( FLNG 2 AREA "\ RE: MDTOWN FlUNG 2 FNAL'; DEVELOPMENT PLAN W. 67TH PLACE LEGEND Brookfield R"sldential 1&Mnnoo.Woollill 15 Entt-R.COaQl1l..., R.E.f)LAN) : BKE RACKS,.alP -SKY W. 66TH PLACE ( FLNG 3 AREA RE: MDTOWN FlUNG 3 FNAL ) DEVELOPMENT PLAN.f / >' MATCHLNE E:3 E3 E3 PROPERTY LNE ROAD CENTERLNE ALLEY CENTERLNE c=j EASEMENT STORM SEWER E::J WATERLNE SANTARY SEWER CANOPY TREE BY BULDER! HOMEOWNER CANOPY TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE + + EVERGREEN TREE -- EVERGREEN SHRUB d> ORNAAENTAL GRASS "8 DECOUCUS SHRUB PERENNAL ANNUALS [:::::::::::::::::::1 SOD DRYLAND SEED c=j WETLAND SEED ["1m CRUSHER FNES CONCRETE c=j STAMPED CONCRETE &?S1 f{mj BRCK PAVERS 1 ENHANCED PAVNG. PLANTS ARElASELEOACCORDNG TO VARETY USNG TAUC FONT. REFER TO SHEET 16 FOR LANDSCAPE PLANT LST. NOTES: 1. ALL LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL BE RRGATED WTH AUTOMATC RRGATlON SYSTEM 2. REFER TO CONSTRUCTON DRAWNGS FOR TEMPORARY SEEDNG 3. HOUSNG PRODUCT VARETlES: SFD REAR-LOADED LOT PRODUCT SFD GREEN COURTLOT PRODUCT (TYP.) SFD FRONT -LOADED LOT PRODUCT SFA TOWN HOME LOT PRODUCT (TYP.) SFD TEA LGHT LOT PRODUCT (TYP.) 111 a-ooctstm. e!ly',coqlcb82l)4 P3:J3e F ,.,. w ::: <.) ::: «w -' <.) z o t O ssue Date 12/ Revision Dale 3124/214 4/23/214 ;; NORTH 6// /214 NOTFOR CONSTRUCTON

52 TYPCAL LOT - LANDSCAPE NSTALLATON AND MANTENANCE REQUREMENTS FRONT-LOAD CONDTON REAR-LOAD CONDTON TOWNHOME CONDTON... Sheet Title LANDSCAPE NSTALLATON AND MANTENANCE Sheet Number 13 OF 24 Brookfield R""ldC!lltlal =:.,.. q iit..-.o._ill. at R-EDLAND 5jJJ NoiUUs DESGN :""-""- l/w//-/h lqc",,1uf lldlstrml ""11Pr. Cubl6;)24 P33.a F33,a wwwigj"lcolt\ FRONT-LOAD TYPCAL SHARED DRVEWAY FRONT-LOAD TYPCAL CORNER LOT (4) TYPCAL LOT (4) LOT ADJACENT TO ALLEY TYPCAL CORNER TOWNHOME TEA LGHT CONDTON LEGEND E3 PROPERTYL1NE LANDSCAPE AREA TO BE NSTALLED BY BULDER OR HO.1EOWNER AND MANTANED BY f-omeowner 1M LANOSCAPEARE.-. TO BE N.ST.o.LLED BY BUilDER AND W.NTALNED BY rklmeowner CORNER LOT TYPCAL LOT LOT ADJACENT TO ALLEY TYPCAL LOT - LANDSCAPE AREA DEFNTONS LANDSCAPE NSTALLED BY HOMEOWNER FRONT-LOAD CONDTON SDEYARD USE EASEMENT TO BE NST... LlED BY BULDERORHO,1EOWNER.o.NO 4'CO"' SDEYARDUSEEASEJENTTOBELt-ST... LLEDBY8ULDEROR AOJACENT HO.1EOWNER AND W,NT... NEO BY ADJACENT HQLAEOWNER LANDSCAPE... REATO BE NSTALLED BY BULDER... ND JA,NTANED BY DSTRCT SOLD FENCOO TO BE NSTALLED B'f BULDER,.lrANTAHED BY HO.EOWNER OPEN FEt NG TO EE NSTALLED BY BULDER UlfOTANEO BY HQUEOWNER REAR-LOAD CONDTON LEGEND PROPERTYUNE STREETSDEVARD saud FENCNG TO BE NSTALLED BY BLLDER t.la.ntaned BY HQLAEOWNER OPEN FENCNG TO BE NSHLLED BY BLA LDER. UANTANED BY HO.1EOWNER GENERAL NOTES: 1. SOLD FENCNG, SEE DETAL 2, SHEET 2 N THS DOCUMENT. 2, OPEN FENCNG, SEE DETAL 1, SHEET 2 N THS DOCUMENT_ 3. DRC MAY APPROVE LANDSCAPE SCREENNG AS ALTERNATVE TO SOLD AND OPEN FENCNG OPTONS_ 4. SFD GREEN COURT HOMES SHALL HAVE THE SAME LANDSCAPE NSTALLATON, MANTENANCE AND LANDSCAPE AREA DEFNTONS FOR ALL SDE YARD USE EASEMENTS AND LANDSCAPE NSDE THE PROPERTY LNES. 5. GREEN COURT LANDSCAPE WLL BE MANTANED BY THE METRO DSTRCT. TEA LGHT CONDTON w ::: : ::) L1- CD <= U <= ::: "t: «--. w Q --' U - - <= «UJ Q Z o S --.l i'2 UJ g - Q => --. '" '-' :::;; ««u:: ssue Date 12/ FRONT-LOAD TYPCAL SHARED DRVEWAY FRONT-LOAD TYPCAL CORNER LOT (4) M 1'\ TYPCAL LOT (4) LOT ADJACENT TO ALLEY... CORNER LOT TYPCAL LOT !p1 t\., LOT ADJACENT TO 6"LLEY 3 6 i' SCALE: 1"= 3' Revision Date / NOTFOR CONSTRUCTON

53 LANDSCAPE TYPCALS LANDSCAPE NSTAlLED BY HOMEOWNER 1---; FRONT-LOAD CONDmON f"l::====1 1, FRONT-LOAD TYPCAL SHARED DRVEWAY FRONT-LOAD TYPCAL REAR-LOAD CONDTON FRONT LOAD KEARLOAD RECURED QUANTTES BY LOT TYPE AND LOCATON REQURED QUANTneS BY LOT TYPE AND LOCATON REQURED QUANTTeS BY REAR LOAD LOT1YPCAL LOT TYPE AND LOCA non 35' ' LOT ADJACENT TO 4' + CORNER LOT TVPCALlOT CORNER LOT TYPCAL LOT LOT1YPCAL ALlEY LOT TYPCAL UATERAL TYPCAL lot MATERAL ORNAMENTAL TREE Q FRONT sde FRONT FRONT YARD 'LlE ALLEY YARD YARD YARD ORNAMENTAL TREE LEGEND PROPERTYt..WE SOUDfENCltG ORNAMENT A.. TREE EVERGREEN SHRUB ORNAMENTAl GRASS OEC!DUOUSSHRUB CORNER TYPCAL LOT (5) LOT ADJACENT LOT (5) TO AlLEY NOTE: REFER TO PLAN SHEETS FOR TREE AND TREE LAWN LOCATONS. THEY ARE LOCA'TD AT AFPROXMATELY 4' ON CENTER WTH SOME EXCEPTONS FOR DRVEWAY AND ALLEY CURB CUTS AND LGHT POLE POSTONS. 'LJ.EY MATER"l VNES PERENNAl. SOD ROCK MULCH CRUSHER FN:S FRONT SDE FRONT FRONT YARD 'LJ.EY ALlE YARD YARD YARD ORNAMENTAllREE,,,, LOT ADJACENT TO ALlE ALlE, ShoelTiUe LANDSCAPE TYPCALS Sheet Number 14 OF 24 Brookfield Residential ""- 1&1,,--.. o..w..,5 E...,.... CO.1D112 R.E.!)LANO ;' " (...,..., ""'..._._,-"'...,...-"'-...;-- HE NoWS DESGN Brnoct sn.t.-.. CcbJdo 82D4 P3D3.! i6 FlOl U16 _,Um EVERGREEN SHRUB 3 EVERGREEN SHRUB DECDUOUS SKlUB 3 DEClUOOSstflfAl , ORtwaENTAlGRASSES 3 ORNALENTAlGRASSES, P RENNALS PERENNALS, 9 V1NES, VNES 1 2 1, SOD NONE SOD NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE SEE SHEET 13 FOR FRONT YARD AREA DAGRAM FRONTLOAD LOT TYPCAL TEA LGHT CONDTON CORNER LOT TYPCAL LOT SEE SHEET 13 FOR FRONT YARD, ALLEY AND SDE YARD LANDSCAFE AREA DAGRAM 35'- 39.9' LOT TYPCAL LOT ADJACENT TO ALLEY " o 1 3 SCALE: 1 '= 3' LEGEND E3 E---3 E:3 Q cp Ob 6 NOTES: 1. MATERAL S NSTALLED BY BULDER OR HOMEOWNER AND MANTANED BY HOMEOWNER. 2, PRVATE YARD TO BE NSTALLED AND MANTANED BY HOMEOWNER. 3. LOTS MAY REQutRE ADDTONAL OR REDUCED PLANTNG, SUBJECT TO DRC AFPROVAL. 4. TOWNHOME LANDSCAPE TO BE NSTALLED BY BULDER AND MANTANED BY DSTRCT. 5. SFO GREEN COURT HOMES SHALL HAVE THE SAME LANDSCAFE REQUREMENTS AS HOMES THAT FRONT AND SDE ON LOCAL STREETS. MNMUM LANDSCAPE REQUREMENTS PROPERTY LJE SQLDFENCtJG OPEN FENCNO ORNA TAJ.. TREE MRGREEN U B ORNAMENTAl GRASS DECDUOUS S- RUB VNES PEREfJNAL SOD ROCK t.1l1lch CRUSHER FNES EVERGREEN SHRUB 2 3 2, 3 OECl)U()lSSftlS , 2 ORNAUENTAl GAASSES 3 2 J 2 3 PE RENWS ", " " 3, V1"'S, SOD NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE NONE SEE SHEET 13 FOR FRONT YARD, ALLEY AND SDE YARD LANDSCAPE AREA DAGRAM 4'+ LOT TYPCAL REQURED QUANTTTlES BY LOT TYPE AND LOCATON TEA LGHT LOT TYPCAL CORNER LOT TYPCAl LOT LOT ADJACENT TO ALlE... TER1AL FR<lNT SDE FRONT FRONT YARD AlLEY YARD YARD ALlE YARD ORNAAENTAL TREE EVERGREEN SHRUB DECDUOUS SHRUB, , ORNAMENTAl GRASSES PERENNALS,, 9 VNES, 2 1, sao NONE NONE NONE, NOTE: TYPCAL LOTS FRONTNG RGHT OF WAY REQURE 3' TURF AREA REFER TO PLAN SHEETS FOR TREE AND TREE LAWN LOCATONS. THEY ARE LOCA'TD AT APPROXMATELY 4' ON CENTER WTH SOME EXCEPTONS FOR DRVEWAY AND ALLEY CURB CUTS AND LGHT POLE POSTONS. 2 J NONE ALlE 4 NONE ::.::: w :: () :: «w -' ()!;: z S o t O ssue Dale 12/23/213 Revision Date / / 3 /214 9/3/214 NOTFOR CONSTRUCTON

54 Sheet Title LANDSCAPE TREE LAWN TYPCALS - OPTON LANDSCAPE NSTALLED BY HOMEOWNER OR BULDER REFER TO SHEETS 6 THROUGH 12 FOR STREET TREE LOCATONS LANDSCAPE TREE LAWNS FRONT-LOAD CONDTON REAR-LOAD CONDTON TEA LGHT CONDTON Sheet Number 15 OF 24 r f'! i Brookfield lesld""tia.t\,... a.q oo..ud '""- 111Ba<lncd:.SLn:el CORNER LOT TYPCAL LOT LOT ADJACENT TO ALLEY DMwer, CoUado eo PJ3.B92,1166 FJ _.norr<sodlosign.o)tll FRONT-LOAD TYPCAL SHARED DRVEWAY FRONT-LOAD TYPCAL CORNER LOT (2) OPTON 1: 1. HOME OWNER OR BULDER TO PLANT SOD N TREE LAWN. N GROUND RRGATON REQURED FOR SOD. 2.. SFD GREEN COURT HOMES THAT SDE ON A LOCAL STREET SHALL BE REQURED TO PLANT SOD N THE TREE LAWN ADJACENT TO THER PROPERTY. LANDSCAPE N THE GREEN COURT WLL BE NSTALLED AND MANTANED BY THE METRO DSTRCT 3. REFER TO PLAN SHEETS FOR TREE AND TREE LAWN LOCATONS. THEY ARE LOCATED AT APPROXMATELY 4' ON CENTER WTH SOME EXCEPTONS FOR DRVEWAY AND ALLEY CURB CUTS AND LGHT POLE POSTONS. LANDSCAPE TREE LAWN TYPCALS - OPTON 2(61 LANDSCAPE NSTALLED BY HOMEOWNER OR BULDER REFER TO SHEETS 6 THROUGH 12 FOR STREET TREE LOCATONS FRONT-LOAD CONDTON r------; i! 1! FRONT-LOAD TYPCAL SHARED DRVEWAY FRONT-LOAD TYPCAL REAR-LOAD CONDTON CORNER LOT (5) OPTON 2: 1. MNMUM 2 PLANTS PER 1 LNEAR FEET. REQURED VARETY: MNMUM 1 EVERGREEN SHRUB, 2 SMALL DECDUOUS SHRUBS, AND 2 GRASSES. 2.. MNMUM 1 ACCENT BOULDER PER HOME. 3. TREE LAWNS TO BE MULCHED WTH 314' WASHED RVER GRAVEL(BLACK) OR CRUSHER FNES (TAN), RVER GRAVEL(BLACK) TO BE APPLED AT 3' -4' DEPTH OVER WEED CONTROL FABRC. CRUSHER FNES (TAN) TO BE APPLED AT 4' DEPTH COMPACTED OVER WEED CONTROL FABRC. 4. SOD REQURED FOR CORNER LOT TREE LAWNS ALONG FRONT AND A MNMUM OF 4' MEASURED FROM FACE OF CURB ALONG SDE TREE LAWN. 5. SFD GREEN COURT HOMES THAT SDE ON A LOCAL STREET SHALL BE REQURED TO NSTALL AND MANTAN LANDSCAPE N THE TREE LAWN ADJACENT TO THER PROPERTY. LANDSCAPE N THE GREEN COURT SHALL BE NSTALLED AND MANTANED BY THE METRO DSTRCT. 6. REFER TO PLAN SHEETS FOR TREE AND TREE LAWN LOCATONS, THEY ARE LOCATED AT APPROXMATELY 4' ON CENTER WTH SOME EXCEPTONS FOR DRVEWAY AND ALLEY CURB CUTS AND LGHT POLE POSTONS. MNMUM LANDSCAPE TREE LAWN REQUREMENTS TYPCAL LOT TYPCAL LOT LOT ADJACENT TO ALLEY LOT ADJACENT TO ALLEY TEA LGHT CONDTON GENERAL NOTES: CORNER LOT TYPCAL LOT LEGEND E3 PRQPERTYLNE E---"l SOUDFENCNG E::J Q OPEN FENCNG ORNAMENT A... TREE EVERGREEN SHRUB cp ORNAMENTAL. GRASS DECDUOUS SHRUB 8 VNES lml:lll PERENNlAL. t:ii:::::::j r,:",,;ill t::;;'c'l SOD ROCKM\JlGH GRUSHERFNES LOT ADJACENT TO ALLEY 1. SOLD FENCNG, SEE DETAL 2, SHEET 2 N THS DOCUMENT. 2, OPEN FENCNG, SEE DETAL 1, SHEET 2 N THS DOCUMENT. 3. MATERAL S NSTALLED BY HOMEOWNER OR BULDER AND S MANTANED BY HOMEOWNER. 4. HOMEOWNER MAY NSTALL ONE 4' WDE CONCRETE WALK N TREE LAWN. 5, PRVATE LOT OWNERS SHALL BE RESPONSBLE FOR THE MANTENANCE OF THER PROPERTY AS WELL AS ADJACENT TREE LAWNS AND LANDSCAPE TRACTS. TOWNHOME LANDSCAPE TO BE NSTALLED BY BULDER AND MANTANED BY THE DSTRCT.. " 6J SCALE: 1"= 3' u.. (9 <:: :><:: ;) w W u.. :: U <:: :: '««w -' U - f- <:: «UJ Q Z o S - UJ >' - a -1 '«<:: '" u: ssue Date Revision Date NOHOR CONSTRUCTON

55 LANDSCAPE PLANT LST SYM, COMMON NAME DECDUOUS CANOPY TREES ABM BOA EOA ELM Gll MP KCT NRO SHA WHB AUTUMN BLA.ZE MAPLE BUR OAK ENGLSH OAK FRONTER ELM GREENSPRE LNDEN MPERAL HONEYlOCUST KENTUCKY COFFEETREE, ESPRESSO NORTHERN RED OAK SHADEMASTER HONEYlOCUST WESTERN HACKBERRY EVERGREEN TREES AUP CBS PON PN COJ SKY AUSTRAN PNE COLORADO 8lUE SPRUCE PONDEROSA PNE PNON PNE COLOGREEN JUNPER SKYROCKET JUNPER DECDUOUS ORNAMENTAL TREES BOTANCAL NAME ACER X FREEMAN 'JEFFERSRED' QUERCUS MACROCARPA QUERCUS ROBUR ULMUS X 'FRONTER' TLA CORDATA 'GREENSPRE' GlEDTSA TRACANTHOS NERMS 'MPERAL' GYMNOCLADUS DOCUS 'ESPRESSO' QUERCUS RUBRA GlEDTSA TRACANTHOS NERMS 'SHADEMASTER' CELTS OCCDENTALS PNUS NGRA PCEA PUNGENS PNUS PONDEROSA PNUS EDULS JUNPERUS SCOPUlORUM 'COlOGREEN' JUNPERUS VRGNANA 'SKYROCKET SZE &COND, (UNLESS OTHERWSE NOTED) 2112"CAL B&8 2112"CAL 8&8 2112"CAL B&B 2 112" CAL, 8&B 2112"CAL B&8 2112" CAL B&B 2112" CAL, 8&8 2112" CAL, B&B 2112" CAL, 8&8 2112" CAL B&8 8'-1' HT, MN. B&B (SEE PLANS) 8'-1 HT. MN. 8&B (SEE PLANS) 8'-1' HT. MN. B&B (SEE PLANS) 6'-8' HT. MN. 8&B (SEE PLANS) 6' HT. MN B&B 6' HT. MN B&B ABS AUTUMN 8RlLiANCE SERVCE8ERRY AMELANCHER X GRANDFlORA 'AUTUMN 8RllLiANCE' 8' CLUMP, 8&B HWM PATERN PERFECT MAPLE ACER TATARCUM 'PATERN PERFECT' 8' CLUMP, B&8 LTC JAPANESE TREE LLAC SYRNGA RETCULATA 8' CLUMP, 8&8 CHP CHANTCLEER PEAR PYRUS CAllERYANA 2"CAl., B&B EOC ENGLSH COLUMNAR OAK QUERCUS R8UR 'FASTGATA' 2" CAL., 8&8 PRF RADANT CRABAPPLE MALUS 'RADANT' 2"CAL. B&B WHT WASHNGTON HAWTHORN CRATAEGUS PHAENOPYRUM 2"CAl.: B&8 DECDUOUS SHRUBS APL APACHE PLUME FAllUGA PARADOXA #S CONTANER 8MS BLUE MST SPREA CARYOPTERS X CLANDONENSS #S CONTANER CP8 CRMSON PYGMY 8AR8ERRY 8ER8ERS THUNBERG 'ATROPURPUREA NANA' #S CONTANER DRS DWARF RUSSAN SAGE PEROVSKA ARTPLCFOLA 'LiTlE SPRE' #S CONTANER FAL FLOWERNG ALMOND PRUNUS GLANDUlOSA 'ROSEA' #S CONTANER FL FNE LNE BUCKTHORNE RHAMNUS FRANGULA 'RON WilLAMS' #S CONTANER GCE GROUND COTONEASTER COTONEASTER HORZONTALS PERPUSlllUS #S CONTANER GlS GRO low SUMAC RHUS ARAMATCA 'GROW-lOW' #S CONTANER HC8 HANCOCK CORAL8ERRY SYMPHORCARPOS X CHENAUlTl 'HANCOCK' #S CONTANER KNO KNOCK OUT ROSE - RED ROSA X 'RADRAZZ' #S CONTANER KNS SUNNY KNOCK OUT ROSA X 'RADSUNNY' #S CONTANER MCK MCKAY'S WHTE POTENTlLA POTENTlLA FRUTCOSA 'MCKAY'S WHTE' #S CONTANER MKl MSS KM LLAC SYRNGA PATULA 'MSS KM' #S CONTANER Mll LmE leaf MOCKORANGE PHLADELPHUS MCROPHYllUS #S CONTANER NMP NEW MEXCO PRVET FORESTERA NEOMEXCANA #S CONTANER PBS PAWNEE BUTES SAND CHERRY PRUNUS 8ESSEY 'PAWNEE 8UTTES' #S CONTANER PPY RDW PYGMY PEASHRUB DWARF BA8Y BLUE RAB81TBRUSH CARAGANA PYGMAEA CHRYSOTHAMNUS NAUSEDSUS NAUSEOUS 'DW. BLUE' #S CONTANER lis CONTAiNER RTD RED TWG DOGWOOD CORNUS SERCEA '8A1lEY' '/S COTiiNER ggm= SB8 SilVER 8UFFAlOBERRY SHEPHERDA ARGENTEA SGB SPANSH GOLD BROOM CYTSUS PURGAN 'SPANSH GOLD' SlF SilVER FOUNTAN BUTERFL Y BUSH 8UDDLEA AL TERNFOLA 'ARGENTEA' ls CONTANER TLS THREE-lEAF SUMAC RHUS TRlO8ATA #SCONTANER YFC YELLOW FLOWERNG CURRANT R8ES AUREUM 115 CONTANER YTD YELLOW TWG DOGWOOD CORNUS SERCEA FLAVRAMEA.tS COTANER EVERGREEN SHRUBS BCH BLUE CHP JUNPER JUNPERUS HORZONTALS 'BLUE CHP' #S CONTANER BNS BRDS NEST SPRUCE PCEA ABES 'NDFORMS' #S CONTANER BRJ BROADMOOR JUNPER JUNPERUS SA81NA 'BROADMOOR' #SCONTANER GSP GLOBE SPRUCE PCEA PUNGENS 'GlOBOSA' #S CONTANER CJ CEE BLUE JUNPER JUNPERUS HORZONTALS 'MONBER' #S CONTANER T'Y VORY TOWER YUCCA YUCCA FLAMENTOSA 'VORY TOWER' #S CONTANER MAN PANCHTO MANZANTA ARCTOSTAPHYLOS X COLORADOENSS #S CONTANER MTA TANNENBAUM MUGO PNE PNUS MUGO 'TANNENBAUM' #S CONTANER MUG MOPS MUGO PNE PNUS MUGO 'MOPS' #S CONTANER RHM R.H. MONTGOMERY SPRUCE PCEA PUNGENS 'R.H. MONTGOMERY' #S CONTANER GRASSES AVG BLUE AVENA GRASS HELCTOTRCHON SEMPERVRENS #1 CONTANER BGG BLUE GRAMA GRASS BOUTELOUA GRACllUS #1 CONTANER 8SG THE BLUES LmE BlUESTEM GRASS SCHZACHYRUM SCOPARUM THE BLUES' #1 CONTANER FRG KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS CALAMAGROSTS X ACunFlORA 'KARL FOERSTER' #1 CONTANER GSR SHENANDOAH SWTCH GRASS PANCUM VRGATUM 'SHENANDOAH' #1 CONTANER HMS HEAVY METAL SWTCH GRASS PANCUM VRGATUM 'HEAVY METAL' #1 CONTANER KFG KOREAN FEATHER REED GRASS CALAMAGROSTS 8RACHYTRCA #1 CONTANER NSO NORTHERN SEA OATS CHASMANTHUM LATFOLUM #1 CONTANER PAH HARDY PAMPAS, PLUME GRASS ERANTHUS RAVENNAE l :CONTANER GROUNDCOVER VNES ENG VRGNA CREEPER PARTHENOCSSUS QUNQUEFOLA ENGElMANNl #1 CONTANER ETV CLEMATS ETOLE VOlETE (BLUE) CLEMATS HY8RD #1 CONTANER FST CLEMATS FRAGRANT STAR (WHTE) CLEMATS HYBRD #1 CONTANER GH GOLD FLAME HONEYSUCKLE loncera HECKROT #1 CONTANER HH HAll'S HONEYSUCKLE loncera JAPONCA 'HAlLiANA' #1 CONTANER SYM, COMMON NAME BOTANCAL NAME SZE & COND, PERENNALS AJS BES CFl CJT CLR CMT CTU DDY DSD ElV GAl HBJ HOV PY J8G LAM MY PR PLP POM SS SSH VAL WBF AUTUMN JOY SEDUM SEDUM X 'AUTUMN JOY' 8LACK-EYED SUSAN RUD8ECKA FUlGDA VAR. SUlLiVANT 'GOlDSTURM' CONEFLOWER ECHNACEA PURPUREA JETHRO TUll COREOPSS C. GRANDFlORA 'JETHRO TUll' ROCKY MOUNTAN COLUMBNE AQUllEGA HYBRD WALKER'S low CATMNT NEPETA FMSSEN 'WALKER'S low' CANDYTUFT 18ERS SEMPERVRENS STELLA D'ORO DAYLl Y HEMEROCALLS 'STELLA D'ORO' SNOW LADY SHASTA DASY leucanthemum X SUPER8UM 'SNOW LADY' ENGLSH MUNSTEAD LAVENDER LAVANDULA ANGUSTFOLA 'MUNSTEAD' 8URGUNDY BLANKET FLOWER GALLARDA X GRANDFlORA 'BURGUNDY' HMALAYAN BORDER JEWEL POlYGONUM PERSCARAAFFNS 'HMALAYAN BORDER JEWEL' VAREGATED HOSTA H. UNDULATA MEDOVAREGATA YEllOW CE PLANT DELOSPERMA NUBGENUM JOHNSON'S BLUE! CRANESBlll GERANUM GERANUM X 'JOHNSON'S BlU LAMB'S EAR STACHYS BVZANTNA MOONSHNE YARROW ACHLLEA X 'MOONSHNE' MSSOUR ENNG PRMROSE OENOTHERA MACROCARPA PNElEAF PENSTEMON RED PENSTEMON PNFOLUS WNECUPS (POPPY MALLOW) CALLRHOE NVOlUCRATA SNOW-N.sUMMER CERASTUM TOMENTOSUM SUNSET HYSSOP AGASTACHE RUPESTRS RED VAlERAN JUPTER'S BEARD CENTRANTHUS RU8ER GAURA WHRLNG 8UTERFLES GAURA LlNDHEMER SEED AND SOD MXES TURF GRASS BLEND: SOD COMMON NAME 9 11 BLUEGRASS-FESCUE BLEND 98lUEGRASS 1 FESCUE DRYLAND SEED MX 8Y ARKANSAS VALLEY SEED CO ( ), OR APPROVED EQUAL COMMON NAME COMMON WHEATGRASS SLENDER WHEATGRASS MEADOW FESCUE PUBESCENT WHEA TGRASS HARD FESCUE CANADA BLUEGRASS NDANGRASS SDEOATS GRAMA 8lUEGRAMA SWTCHGRASS BOTANCAL NAME TRTCUM AESTVUM ElYMUS machycaulus SSP_ machycaulus FESTUCA PRA TENSS AGROPYRON TRCHOPHORUM FESTUCA BRPLA POA COMPRESSA SORGHASTRUM NUTANS BOUTELOUA CURTPENDULA BOUTElOUA GRACLS PANCUM VRGATUM (UNLESS OTHERWSE NOTED) % OF TOTAL LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS ARE TO RECEVE ORGANC SOil PREPARATON AT A MNMUM OF 5. CU.YRDS1,OOOSF, UNLESS OTHERWSE NOTED N THE TECHNCAL SPECRCATONS. 2. SHRU8 8EDS ARE TO BE MULCHED WTH 3' MN.. DEPTH 314' ANGULAR ROCK MULCH OR CRUSHER FNES OVER SPECFED GEOTEXTllE WEED CONTROL FABRC. NO WEED CONTROL FABRC S REQURED N PERENNAL AREAS. 3. SHRUB BEDS ARE TO BE CONTANED BY ETHER 3116' MN. THCK METAL EDGER OR SPADE DUG EDGER. EDGER S NOT REQURED WHEN ADJACENT TO CURBS OR WALKS. 4. THE CONTRACTOR S RESPONSBLE FOR THE COST TO REPAR UTUTES, ADJACENT LANDSCAPE, PUBLC AND PRVATE PROPERT'Y THAT S DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR OR THER SUBCONTRACTOR'S OPERATONS DURNG NSTALLATON OR DURNG THE SPECFED MANTENANCE PEROD. CALL FOR unut'y locatons PROR TO ANY EXCAVATON. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHAll REPORT ANY DSCREPANCY N PLAN VS. FELD CONDTONS MMEDATELY TO THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATVE, PROR TO CONTNUNG WTH THAT PORTON OF WORK. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL 8E RESPONS8lE FOR THE REPAR OF ANY OF THER TRENCHES OR EXCAVATONS THAT SETTLE. 7. DO NOT DSTURB THE EXSTNG PAVNG, LGHTNG, LANDSCAPNG. OR RRGATON THAT EXSTS ADJACENT TO THE STE UNLESS OTHERWSE NOTED ON PLAN. S. THE CONTRACTOR S RESPONSBLE FOR VERFYNG ALL PLANT QUANTTES. QUANTTES REPRESENTED GRAPHCALLY TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER LABELS. 9. CALL FOR UTLlT'Y locatons PROR TO BEGNNNG CONSTRUCTON. THE UTLTES SHOWN HEREON CONTAN ONLY GENERAL NFORMATON AS TO THER DESCRPTON, NATURE, AND GENERAL locaton. CONTRACTOR S RESPONSBLE FOR THE cosno REPAR ANY UTUTES OR EXSTNG STE FEATURES DAMAGED DUE TO CONSTRUCTON ACTVTES. 1. LANDSCAPE AREAS SHAll BE WATERED 8Y AN UNDERGROUND, AUTOMATC RRGATON SYSTEM AND SHALL PROVDE 1% COVERAGE TO All AREAS. TOTAL 1% 9% 1% 1% %OFTOTAL 2% 15% 1% 1% 1% 1% 8% 7% 5% 5% TOTAL 1% #1 CONTANER #1 CONTANER #1 CONTANER #1 CONTANER #1 CONTANER #1 CONTANER #1 CONTANER #1 CONTANER #1 CONTANER #1 CONTANER #1 CONTANER #1 CONTANER #1 CONTANER #1 CONTANER #1 CONTANER #1 CONTANER #1 CONTANER #1 CONTANER #1 CONTANER #1 CONTANER #1 CONTANER #1 CONTANER #1 CONTANER #1 CONTANER PlSACRE , , ,5 3 lbs. ShBBtnUe LANDSCAPE PLANT LST Sheet Number 16F24 Brookfield Rl>SldenliDi. b.,... r:.... 1a:,..nl -R.EDLANO :.--= _ noc:;Stree\ o-er,coorado824 P:Kl3.S FJ _.rorrit-deslgn.com :::<:: w ::: () ::: «w -' () z S o... o ssue Date 12123/213 Revision Date NOT FOR CONSTRUCTON

56 MDTOWN ARCHTECTURE CHARACTER MDTOWN WLL PROVDE A 'FRESH ARCHTECTURAL CHARACTER' FOR FRONT RANGE RESDENTAL. HARNESSNG OUR 'FREE-RANGE SPRlr, THE TRADTONAL CRAFTSMAN, PRARE AND FARMHOUSE ROOTS, WLL EVOLVE NTO 'FRESH Sn'LE' EXPRESSONS FOR THE NEW NEGHBORHOOD. SMPLE FORMS, RCH COLORS, AND ARTFUL DETALS WLL COMBNE TO CREATE AFFORDABLE AND DSTNCTVE HOMES, ADDNG 'ZESr TO THE STREET SCENE APPEAL. SQUARE FOOTAGE RANGE HOUSNG PRODUCT SQUARE FOOTAGE SNGLE FAMLY DETACHED B5 SF REAB-lOADED HOME,-, SQUARE FOOT RANGES ARE NTENDED TO ENCOMPASS A MAJORn' OF HOMES N EACH HOUSNG PRODUCT n'pe, A MNMAL AMOUNT OF HOMES MAY VARY FROM DEFNED RANGES DURNG FURTHER ARCHTECTURE DESGN DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTON. She.tTiHe ARCHTECTURAL STANDARDS Sheet Number 17 OF 24 THE FOLLOWNG ARE THE PRODUCTn'PES PROPOSED N THS FOP. n'pcal PRODUCT MAGE AND PLAN VEW ARE REPRESENTATON OF ARCHTECTURE CHARACTER AND FORM, FNAL ARCHTECTURE MAY VARY. LOT LAYOUT S CONCEPTUAL AND GARAGE ORENTATON MAY VARY. TYPCAL PRODUCT SNGlEfAMLY ATTACHED 1,2-1,4 SF TOWNHOME SN::HED 1,21-1,356SF Brookfield Residential 1 Or.W... So. 15 COMl112 """'"" R-E)LAND /""t'_r;"_,-,...,...,.,.- -''''-''-- EB NoRJUs DEsiGN """'" a.modr.SU... Dtrw... CelmdulCl2Oo4 P "e6 F ! PLAN VEW (TYPCAL) J lif'!t -::::J.---Ln_b_._...""' M*t"J' _ TD(-.1wl TOGn;i{f);L1 :,,::: W w n:: u n:: «w -' U «z S o o ssue Dale 12/23/213 Revision Dale SNGLE FAMLY DETACHED REAR-LOADED COTTAGE HOME SNGLE FAMLY DETACHED GREEN COURT HOME SNGLE FAMLY DETACHED FRONT-LOADED HOME o 3 6 1"-1 SCALE: 1"= 3' 3124/214 4/23/214 6/ /3/214 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTON

57 MDTOWN ARCHTECTURE CHARACTER SQUARE FOOTAGE RANGE MDTOWN WLL PROVDE A 'FRESH ARCHTECTURAL CHARACTER' FOR FRONT RANGE RESDENTAL. HARNESSNG HOUSNG PRODUCT OUR 'FREE-AANGE SPRT', THE TRADTONAL CRAFTSMAN, PRARE AND FARMHOUSE ROOTS, WLL EVOLVE NTO 'FRESH STYLE' EXPRESSONS FOR THE NEW NEGHBORHOOD. SMPLE FORMS, RCH COLORS, AND ARTFUL DETALS SNGLE FAMlL Y DETACHED WLL COMBNE TO CREATE AFFORDABLE AND DSTNCTVE HOMES, ADDNG 'ZEST' TO THE STREET SCENE APPEAL. REAR-LOADED HOME SNGLE F71MlLY DETACHED THE FOLLOWNG ARE THE PRODUCT TYPES PROPOSED N THS FDP. TYPCAL PRODUCT MAGE AND PLAN VEW GREEN COURT HOME ARE REPRESENTATON OF ARCHTECTURE CHARACTER AND FORM, FNAL ARCHTECTURE MAY VARY. LOT LAYOUT SNGLHAMllYDoACH_oD S CONCEPTUAL AND GARAGE ORENTATON MAY VARY, C FRONT-LOADED HOME TYPCAL PRODUCT SNGlE FAMLY ATACHED D TOWNHOME SN"'r"l'ttu SQUARE FOOT RANGES ARE NTENDED TO ENCOMPASS A MAJORTY SQUARE FOOTAGE OF HOMES N EACH HOUSNG PRODUCT TYPE. A MNMAL AMOUNT OF HOMES MAY VARY FROM DEFNED RANGES DURNG FURTHER 1,65-2,85 SF ARCHTECTURE DESGN DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTON. 1,65-2,85 SF 1,8-2,2 SF 1,2-1,4 SF 1,21-1,356 SF , Sh Title ARCHTECTURAL STANDARDS Sheet Number lb OF 24 Brookfield Residential Unvo...",Or.W.d5lo 15 E...,, CG.1112 ""..., R.QD...".....""' ,.."",."... >,,,:--- Jm NOrJU,5 DEsiGN,-,.'''''' 111a.Jnod:.Srwet Derwfi,CcDmo924 P F (48l-t±:t:'i'"".J-..;M. -- PLAN VEW (TYPCAL) ::.::: w W :: u.. <: t.) <: :: <:( w «it -' t.) l- f- <: «UJ Z 5: S...Jei UJ>' - Q!z :=>...JO <:( <:'" u: ssue Date SNGLE FAMLY ATTACHED TOWN HOME i '...:6 1 SCALE: 1'= 3' Revision Date NOTFOR CONSTRUCTON

58 Sheel TiH. ARCHTECTURAL STANDARDS Sheel NLJnber 19 OF 24 Brookfield Residential 1UDt.W.,U" CO GREEN C.QURT ELEVATONS GARDENA 2 Bedrooms, 2 J 12 Bathrooms, lalft Guestroom TOTAL: 121 s.f. MAR1GO.D 3 Bedrooms. 2 1 :! Bathrooms, Small loft TOTAL: 1349 s.f. SNAPDRAGOl\ 3 Bedrooms, 2 t 12 Bathrooms. Small loft TOTAL: 1356 s.f. SNi\l'DRi\GON NOfrrM Elv:... TON(rACS(; SlREOT) JJJ5 NOU\S Do5tGN lBtwcQSrM o.n.w, Cokndo 8C2C6 PJW'i2.1t1!6 FJJJ! TYPCAL PLAN VEW FRONTNG ON R.O.w. MDTOWN ARCHTECTURE CHARACTER C.... MD in." Stll.'"'H l!a...:;"..:x.; le'\cjn(1 G_) SQUARE FOOTAGE RANGE Alley widlh varies Pat.llel parking spaces aowed when alley is 13' wide arx seel goes hrough. (p.) Land"""", Trealmenl (varies) Two Car Garage (Minimum) MDTOWN WLL PROVDE A 'FRESH ARCHTECTURAL CHARACTER' FOR FRONT RANGE RESDENTAL. HARNESSNG OUR 'FREE-RANGE SPRr. THE TRADTONAL CRAFTSMAN. PRARE AND FARMHOUSE ROOTS, WLL EVOLVE NTO 'FRESH STYLE' EXPRESSONS FOR THE NEW N8GHBORHOOO. SMPLE FORMS, RCH COLORS. AND ARTFUl. DETALS WLL COMBNE TO CREATE AFFORDABLE AND DSTNCTVE HOMES, ADDNG 'ZESr TO THE STREETSCENE APPEAL. TYPCAL PRODUCT MAGE AND PLAN VEW ARE REPRESENTATONAL OF ARCHTECTURE CHARACTER AND FORM, FNAL ARCHTECTURE MAY VARY. LOT LAYOUT S CONCEPTUAL AND GARAGE ORENTATON MAY VARY, HOUSNG PRODUCT SQUARE FOOTAGE SNGLE FAMLY DETACHED REAR LOADED HOME 1,65-2,65 SF S:rED 1,65 2,85 SF SNGLE FAMLY OETACHED FRONT-lOADED N\X.t: :WU;OACH8l 1,8 2,2 SF 1,2-1,1\ SF s m;: 1,21-1,356 SF SQUARE FOOT RANGES ARENTOOEO TO ENCOMPASS A MAJORTY OF HOMES N EACH HOUSNG PRODUCT TYPE. A MNMAL AMOUNT OF HOMES MAY VARY FROM DEFNED RANGES DURNG FURTHER ARCHTECTURE DESGN DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTON. W W ::: (,) ::: «w -' (,) «z S o o ssue.,. Fronl y.rd (p.) 12/23/213 VARES L VARES ESNGL;FAMLY DETACHED TEA LGHT HOME General Notes: 1. Typical Front, Side and Rear lot localions.please refer to the Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Pla1 for nlnimum setbcr;:ks. 2...! SCALE: 1"= 2' Revision Dale / /3/214 9/3/214 NOTFOR CONSTRUCTON

59 Sheel Tde DETALS o 2' X 6' STANED ROUGH SAWN CD 2' X 4' STANED ROUGH SAWN o 6's;s ROUGH SAWN o i LDED WRE 3' VNE PLANTNG, SEE MNMUM _""r.'\ LANDSCAPE REQUREMENTS, "CES \!J LANDSCAPE TYPCAlS FOR STREET PLANTNG REQUREMENTS _Ejllllllilllmilil[=:_J\uHted M afc 'P'lg... mrndtdt2i ir.. 2'-' CD OPEN FENCNG - WELDED WRE FENCE LANDSCAPE TREATMENT VARES FENCNG MAY BE CONTNUOUS OR N NTERVAlS TO OPEN VEWS 1!. TRAL TYPCAL " ',' / '.()' --..1'---'.:1' LANDSCAPE TREATMENT VARES Jt opoa lll1d- W'l li:1fo. "!ftl This ".BC1 m'bd wallell'ecls ANfSHED GRADE FRONT BACK iijd encourages a mol'll social and close knit community. Typical btplanling designs require the use oillines in «d!f to eslabsh thevegellll!dillingwallppl!!l'ilncedi!!sired brlheopenwekledwi'el'ente.lols requiting Open Fencing-Welded Wire Fente and vines shan be mainlained by homeowner, see landscape ns!alaon ilnd Mainlenance Requi'emenlson sheetb and VARES MNMUM 2'.()' landscape Design Guidenes. Open Fencing-Welded Wire Fence and vines in open splce nc!s shal be malnl2llinedby district SCALE: 112' -1' 'W HEGHT \... VARES FLNG FOUR -,. ;z.;;"";;"...j;.:.l4- RESDENTAl LOTS '\ 1'.()' TRAL SHOULDER l SCAlE: 1/4' = 1'.()' FRONT -:=:':;;-: 5'.()' ==========--=-- SLOPE CONCRETE TO DRAN AWAY FROM POST 1'.()' SOLD FENCE - HORZONTAL WOOD FENCE o 2' X 4' SMOOTH SAWN CD 1'X4'FACA <2) 4'X4'POST o l' X 4' ROUGH SAWN o 2' X 4' SMOOTH SAWN CD l' X 6' ROUGH SAWN CD 2'X4' o 2'X6'SMOOTHSAWN CD CONCRETE 4'-Y,'ROCK NOTES: 1. ALL LUMBER SHAll BE NO.1 SELECT, CEDAR, AND SHA.l8E SOUD, STRAGHT, FREE FROM KNOTS, SPLTS, SHAKES, & DSCOLORATON. All NALS, FASTENERS AND OTHER HARDWARE SHAlL BE HOT DPPED GALVANZED. NALS SHAlL BE SHANK. SCALE:1/l x l' CD CONCREnE RETANNG WALL WTH BOARD FORMED FNSH. ALL EXPOSED FACES SHALL HAVE A BOARD FORMED RNSH CD 'HTE R:S MULCH BED OR <2) :+:;OL PER o b!:r GEOTECH NOTES: 1. REFER TO STRUCTURAL CONSTRUCTON DRAWNGS FOR STRUCTURAL DETALS OF THS WALL. 2, REFER TO CVL CD'S FOR WAlL aevatons. 3. TOP OF WAlL aevaton SHALL BE CONSSTENT. 4. DRC MAY APPROVE EQUAl FOR RETANNG WALL. o CONCRETE BOARD FORMED RETANNG WALL SCAlE: l' = 1'.()' Sheal Number 2 OF 24 Brookfield Residential 11Dr.W...., 5 e... CO,1112."..., AD NOUUS DEsiGN R.9LANJ) "O&.1nodr.strw DtnvM,Cc*ndDB24 PJ F3.1!2.118 w W ::: _..c:um!5 u. (!) it () <: ::: "( «1t w () - «- Z $ 8 -J UJ >.- Q 'Z ::> -J O <: '" - i'5 u. <c ssue Date 12/23/213 Revision Date /23/214 6/ /3/214 NOTFOR CONSTRUCTON

60 _UD' She.Titl. DETALS CD MDTOWN STREET SGNAGE 113 SLAB THCKNESS!-<--_..._-.-:_ 4 NOTES: 1.SiGN COPY COLOR, DMENSONS, TYPE PER ADAMS COUNTY STANDARDS. 2. SGN HEGHTS PER ADDAMS COUNTY AND COOT STANDARDS t!'w aev, VARES --"' ;'--- 3' CLEAR o CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE - STREETSCAPE SCALE: NTS BOMANTE STAMPED CONCRETE BOMANTE PATERN: RUNNNG BOND BRCK PATERN OR APPROVED EQUAL. RUNNNG BOND PATERN (2) ALWAYS SET AT 2' FROM TRUE NORTH COLOR: TO MATCH NTERSTATE BRCK (MOJAVE BRCK) COLOR EXSnNG ON STE TOOLED CONTROL JONT, DEPTH CD SHALL BE )S OF THE THCKNESS OF THE SLAB. Yo' RADUS ON EDGES CD SON JONT, WHERE NDTED ON 17'\ CONCRETE RElNFORCED WTH 6' X 6' '-'-' WOVEN WRE FABRC (WWF) COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE AS CD RECOMMENDED BY GEOTECH"CAL REPORT. o COMPACTED SUBGRADE SCALE: 3' = 1 '-)' As recommended by Darin Duran at Cesare nc: Pedestrian Pavers 1-1.5" of sand base 4" of aggregate (beneath sand) Subgrade compacted to 95% of maximum dry density 35 determined by ASTM 698 within to 2 percent of optimum moisture content. The aggregate base course should consist of COOT Class 6 and be compacted to a minimum of 95% of modified Proctor density as determined by ASTM D1557. Sheel NOO'ber 21 OF 24 (2) r4;:;tej:k (MOJAVE), 1/1' GAPSlYP. Brookfield RUNN>G 8M) P,,1lERN Residential lrmao-..o.,,-....,.. ALWAYS SET AT 2' FROM TRUE e... NORTH AS NDCATED BY THE HATCH PATERN ON THE PLANS. - COQ112 CROWN BRCK PAVNG N MEDANS SO THERE S...,.-.-_..,-"'...,.,"''''-,-- APPROXMATELY A 4% SLOPE TO THE CURB. WASHED SAND SrnlNG BED CD 1'-1,5' DEPTH, PER GEOTECH RECOMMOOA nons '" AGGREGATE 4' DEPTH, PER GEOTECH RECOMMEi'()ATONS 17'\ PREPARE SUBGRADE PER '-'-' GEOTECH RECOMMENDATONS PAVESTONE EDGEPRO PAVER CD M OR o AMENDED TOPSOL ) SOD o CURB AND GUTER SCALE: 3' = 1'-1)' 5315 _DfSGN --- UOls.nnocl5t'M..-. Cdondo B24 pme: Fmll92.l186 SAND SET BRCK PAVERS - PEDESTRAN a:: rj\ (16)12'DAHOLESMN, AT / ALL LOW PONTS..J-"""""""' :::::C:.:::.:.7: / LONGTUDNAL / SECTON OF EDGER AT LOW PONT (2) FNSHED GRADE - TOP OF SOD THATCH LAYER AND TOP OF MULCH OR CRUSHER FNES SHALL BE FLUSH WTH TOP OF EDGER CD TURF THATCH ) :ER (4) SUBGRADE CD METAL EDGER - DRLL (16) 112' DA. HOLES l' D.C. MN. AT ALL LOW PONTS DR POORLY DRANNG AREAS N ORDER TO ENSURE ADEQUATE DRANAGE o EDGER STAKE NOTES: ERE SHALL BE NO EXPOSED SHARP 1 JAGGED EDGES. 2. EDGER SHALL BE SET AS STRAGHT AS POSSBLE, ANY BENDS OR KNKS WHERE EDGER S SUPPOSED TO FOLLOW A STRAGHT LNE WLL BE REJECTED. 3. EDGER CORNERS SHALL BE AS TGHT AS POSSBLE. 4, CONTRACTOR SHALL NSTALL STAKES AS REQURED BY THE MANUFACTURER. :::> u.. (!J <: W w u.. a::: u <: a::: "f; «w it...j U t- f-- <: «LU Z 8 -J UJ,: -- Q!z => -J O "f; <: - i'5 :2: u. < ssue Dale Revision Date.Jr.:.=..:.:...:=-===-=::.:...:...:::.:::..!,;= SC ="AL-::- E:"".,... =.." '-).,.,. ' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTON

61 Sheel'lid. DETALS Sheal Number 22 OF 24 2X CONTANER WDTH PRUNE All DEAD OR DAMAGED WOOD PROR TO PLANTNG CD SPECFED MULCH AMENDED SOL N PLANTNG BED o PER SPECFCATONS. TLL SOL TO A DEPTH OF EGHT NCHES. CD FNSH GRADE (TOP OF MULCH) NOTE: 'i:"'iiroken OR CRUMBLNG ROOT-BALLS Will BE REJECTED 2. CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN NOTTO DAMAGE THE SHRUB OR ROOT-BALL WHEN REMOVNG T FROM TS CONTANER 3. ALL JUNPERS SHOULD BE PLANTED SO THE TOP OF THE ROOT-BALL OCCURS ABOVE THE FNSH GRADE OF THE MULCH LAYER 4. DG PLANT PT TWCE AS WDE AND HGH AS THE CONTANER CD SPECFED MULCH o NgET!NG BED TllED o CENTER OF PLANT WHEN PLANTED ON A CURVE ORENT ROWS TO FOLLOW THE LONG AKS OF AREAS WHERE PLANTS ARE MASSED. Brookfield Residential 1118"'--tr,WnlSo 15 CO.al12 """""" R,E DlP.N ) ; D 111 s.nxt. strw\ o.w., Corndo 8Q24 P3Ol.892.1e6 f 'J3 892.ll86 _.oom G) SHRUB PLANTNG SCALE: 1-112' = 1'-{)' PERENNAL PLANT LAYOUT SCALE: l' = \'-{)' PRUNNG NOTES: 1. ALL PRUNNG SHALL COMPLY WTH ANS A3 STANDARDS. 2. DO NOT HEAVLY PRUNE THE TREE AT PLANTNG. PRUNE ONLY CROSSOVER LMBS, CO-OOMNANT LEADERS AND BROKEN BRANCHES. SOME NTEROR TWGS AND LATERAL BRANCHES MAY BE PRUNED. HOWEVER, DO NOT REMOVE THE TERMNAL BUDS OF BRANCHES THAT EXTEND TO THE EDGE OF THE CROWN. STAKNG NOTES: 1. STAKE TREES PER FOLLOWNG SCHEDULE, THEN REMOVE AT END OF FRST GROWNG SEASON. FOLLOWS: 1.1 q' CALPER SZE - MN. 1 STAKE ON SDE OF PREVALNG WND (GENERALLY N.W. SDE) ' -:r CALPER SZE - MN. 2 STAKES - ONE ON N.W. SDE, ONE ON S.W. SDE (OR PREVALNG WND SDE AND 1BO' FROM THAT SDE) 1.3 3' CALPER SZE AND LARGER - 3 STAKES PER DAGRAM 2. WRE OR CABLE SHALL BE MN. 12 GAUGE, TGHTEN WRE OR CABLE ONLY ENOUGH TO KEEP FROM SLPPNG. AllOW FOR SOME TRUNK MOVEMENT. NYLON STRAPS SHALL BE LONG ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE H' OF GROWTH AND BUFFER ALL BRANCHES FROM WRE. CD PLACE MN_l- PVC PPE AROUND GROMMETED NYLON STRAPS EACH WRE: EXPOSED WRE SHALL BE MAX. 2' EACH SDE GAlVANZED WRE, MN. 12 GAUGE CABLE - TWST WRE o 6 FT. UNTREATED WOOD POST ONLY TO KEEP FROM SLPPNG. (MN. 1.5' DAMETER). ALL SHALL BE DRVEN OUTSDE ROOTBALL 4-6' HGH WATER SAUCER N AND N UNDSTURBED SOL. NON-TURF AREAS. CD TREE WRAP TO BE NSTALLED ONLY FROM OCTOBER 1 THROUGH APRL 3. (DECDUOUS ONLy) o PLANT TREE SO THA TFRST ORDER MAJOR ROOT S 1'-2' ABOVE RNAL L 6 :NDMMUM 2% (BY VOLUME) ORGANC MATERAL WATER THOROUGHLY WHEN 2 FT. STEELT -POST. ALL SHALL BE DRVEN BELOW GRADE AND OUTSDE ROOTBALL N MM;D DO NOT PLACE MULCH N UNDSTURBED SOL. PLACE SOL AROUND ROOT BALL CONTACT WTH TREE TRUNK :y S;eTA'k (RNSHED GRADE REFERENCES TO FLL ALL AR POCKETS TOP OF MULCH).. PLACE ROOT BALL ON o 1:1 SLOPE ON SDES OF PLANTNG UNDSTURBED SOL TO PREVENT HOLE. SETTLEMENT. ::.::: w ::: U ::: «w -' U «z S o - o ssue Date 12/23/213 TREE PLANTNG DETAL SCALE: NTS Revision Date / /3/214 9/3/214 NOTFOR CONSTRUCTON

62 SMeTiie DETALS Sheol_ 23 OF 24 CD ROPDWAY CD CONCRETE CURB CD 2" DAMETER DRANAGE HOLES o COMPACED SUBGRADE CD PlANT MATERiAl (RE: PLANS) CD MULCH NOTES: 1. LARGE MODULAR BLOCK RETANNG WALL SYSTEM OR APPROVED EQUAL 2. MANUFACTURER TO SUBMT DETALED DRAWNG AND STRUCTURAL DESGN PROR TO CONSTRUCTON. 3. REFER TO CML CONSTRUCTON DOCUMENTS FOR WALL ELEVATONS. 4. LARGE MODULAR BLOCK RETANNG WALL S ONLY SPECFED FOR USE N THE RUNG FOUR FOP N TRACT P. REFER TO CML CONSTRUCTON DOCUMfNTS FOR FURTHER DETALS. Brookfield Residential... '.'>."""'Q ""CO.112 R.E.)LAND ;- - oo.:::...:.- r- 15..} _D<s1CN... _- toblmoc:tsn.t o-wr.c-..8q24 P33J9Z.t1e6 F:mJS SELEVATON G) MULCH BED AT LOW PONT ADJACENT TO CURB 7 6,"1' '." ,1'1'-1. -U F- Ro Rl R. 't l;: 5 -.R, < "' NOTE: F JURSDCTON DOES NOT AlLOW CORE DRLLNG, USE MULCH BED AT LOW PONT PDJACENT TO CURB (OPTON 2) DETAL SCAlE: 1" = 1'." LARGE MODULAR BLOCK RETANNG WALL CD ROPDWAY CD CONCRETE GUTTER CD CONCRETE CURB o 6RlNE OF DRANAGE CD 1j" COBBLE MULCH CD ATERPROOF (2) MULCH <D SUBGRPDE NOT TO SCALE W w :: u. (!) < < :: "( w «it -'... f- «:a: Z Q, 8 S O -1 8 UJ,.: f- Q!Z => -J o "( < '" it ssue Date MULCH BED AT LOW PONT ADJACENT TO CURB SCAlE: 1" - 1'." Revision Dale 3124/214 4/ /3/214 9/3/214 SELEVATON S SECTON A-A' 12/23/213 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTON

63 SheelTiU. DETALS She.l Number 24F24 Brookfield Resid... tial... M"",",,-Dr.W."So.tSO &,--",CO,8"2 Rf,)AND / " ,-- -'..._,--,.,- -- "Ola.u.ockS1rwt D.wtl',CaoradolO24 P33.B! f33jl8z 'j', FLOOR PLAN NTS f41 CONCEPlUAL PERSPECTVE VEW '.../ NT5 MDTOWN UMP ROOM AT WATER FEATURE PARK DENVER,COLORADO... OANEL H. O'BREN ARCHTECT 'fbo 7Z56G33$2 t'o'ba.!:reet DENVER COLORADO A1. :..:: w!5 u.. (!) it w :: U :: <:( <X: it w --' U - - <X: Z &: i.. it i ssue Data PUMP ROOM DETAL - NOT TO SCALE Ra'iioion Data NOTE: FLOOR PAN AND CONCEP"TUAl. PERSPECT1VEVlEW ARE REPRESENTATONAl. OF ARCHTEC"TURE CHARACTER AND FORM, FNAl. ARCHTEC"TURE MAY VARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTON

64 ayn MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK PREUMNARY / FNAL PLAT FLNG NO. 4 CASE A REPLAT OF TRACTS D-F, MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK-FUNG NO. 2 AND A PORTON OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTON 4, TOWNSHP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SXTH PRNCPAL MERDAN, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO OWNERSHP AND DEDCATON CERTFCATE PNa. A A PARCEL or LAND BENG AU or lracts E AND F' OF' MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK-FlUNG NO, 2 AS RECORDED AT RECEPTON NO. 21JOOO14695 N THE RECORDS OF 1HE ADAMS COUNTY CL RK AND RECORDER'S OFFCE: LOCAlED WTHN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF nt SOUTHWEST QUARlER OF SECTON... TOWNSHP 3 SOUTH, RANCE 58 'WEST OF THE SXTH PRNOPAL WERDAN, COUNTY OF' ADAus" STAlE OF' CCl.ORADO, SHEET 1 OF 8 OWNERSHP AND DEDCATON CERTFCATE-CONTNUED' AS TO, TRACTS D. E AND F, f.4dtown AT CLEAR CREEK nung NO. 2 BY: D.. AR CREEl( STATON W TROPa.JTAN DlSlRCT NO =., AS "'1.E NO. PRC214-9 CONTANNG AN AREA or Q.2Q6 ACRE. ( SQUARE FUT), E OR LEss. PNa. A PARCn Of land BENG AU Of TRACT Of..:TO" AT a.. AR CREEK-FlUNG NO. 2 AS RECORDED AT RECfJlTlON NO. 21,)146" fri 'the R:E, M J,l) COUNTY Q. fbc Ml RCe.r'S OfFU. i'ocxnttr.. TH A PORTON CE THE TH KAlF rs 1HE OLNnDt or!&cnon... 1'OM&iP j SCUl)l. twa 68 WEST «1l SX1H PRtC1PAl. MERlDtAN, COUNTY rl sr.4le 17 CCUtADO BE!C worce- palt'nc:ta.n!ly ESCRBa AS TO..L.OtG CCltADQG AT THE SOUTH SlX'T[ HTH CORNER OF SAD s[cllon 4 AND CCNSOERfKC 1HE SOUTH UN[ OF THE HORn'ftEST QUARTER OF' lhe SOUTH t':st OUAR1[R OF SAO SECTON 4 TO B AR SOUTH '2fi' EAST, A OCSTAH(X Of 13J7.Z1 ren. All. BEARNGS HEREON ARE Rcm TO THS \.ME; THENC : ALONG SAD SOUlH UN[,. SOUTH 89"5.5'26' EAST, A DSTANCE OF 1334 FEET TO THE PQNT C6 THENCE DEPARTNG SAJD 5111 UNE. NORTH '6'34' EAST, A otstance or FEET: lhence SOUTH ei'47'4," EAST, A DtSTANCE or FtET; THENCE NORTH '6'34' EAST, A DSTANCE OF 629,13 FEET; STAYr or- coulraoo ) COJNTY (E -F THE foregong PlAT AND DEltCAllCN WAS ACKNOVl. DC(D BEF'CR ME 'MS DAY OF -comc--sr-a-lon- "'D"'S1RlCT=;-llO.=--=-'---- AS NOTARY POaUC MY ca.... 1SSK)N EXPRES: MY ADDRESS S: Wli($$ WY AJ./) Cf'JlC,q $[A.! NOTARY PUBUC (E CLDR THENCE NORTH 851'43'26"' WEST, A DSTANC[ OF FET: THENCE NORTH '5'34"' EAST, A DSTANCE OF' 51, FET; THENCE SOUTH 89"43"26 EAST, A DSTANCE or 25. FEET 1 A PONT ON THE TERLY BOUNDARY OF SAD MDTOWN AT CL AR CM:Dc; f1urr,o: He. "l; THENCE ALONG SAD WESTERLY BOUNDARY THE FClU.O'MNG THRTEEN (13) COURSES: 1)SOUTH '5'34- WEST, /. DfSTANCE Of 57. feet; 2) SOUTH 89'43'26- EAST, A DSTANCE or F!ET; J) SOUlH "16'34- WEST, A DSTANCE OF 19,17 f'eet; -4) SOUTH 89'4;5'26 EAST, A DlSTANCE or!l1. fuy; 5) NORTH 16'34- EAST, A otstance or 25.OS feet; 6) SOUTH 89'4.l'26"' EAST, A otst Of &5. FrrT; 7) SOUTH '6'34" WEST. A DSTANCE OF 272. FtET; 8) SOUTH 89'43'26"' EAST, A DlSTANCt 1' 2:4.!;1 f'ttj fo n«: (f A T,u,lWO CJR\C CQiCAvt HOff1HW[S1DtL'' HAtoM A RADtLtS a:- 25. FEET; 9) EASTERLY ALONG SAD CURVE THROUGH A CENTRM. ANGi. Of 45''"', AN ARC l NGTH or 19,53 feet; ld)lancent TO SAD CURVE, NORTH 4!i'S'34- EAST, A DSTANCE Of i2,i7 FEET: 11)SOUTH 44'43'26"' EAST, A DSTANCE OF' reet TO THE BEQNNNG or A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY HAVNG A RADUS Of 7a.5 FEET; 12)SOUlHEASlERLY ALONG SAD CURVE THROUGH A CENlRAL ANG. or 45''-, AN ARC L NGlH Of F!ET; 1J)TANGENT TO SAD CURVE, SOUTH eg'4j'2s" EAST. A DSTANCE OF FEET TO A PONT ON THE 'lleslerly RGttT-OF-WAY OF LARSH DRVE AS SHOWN ON MDTOWN AT a.ear CRED<-FlLNG NO. 1 PLAT CORRECTON AS RECORDED A1 RECEPTON NO N SAD RECORDS; THENCE ALONG SAtD WESTERLY RGHT-OF-WAY, SOUTH OO1S'34- WEST, A DSTANCE OF feet TO A PONT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY or THE PREUMNARY/FlNAl.. PLAT or MtDTO'M- A1 CLEAR CREEK-FlUNG NO. J AS RECORD D AT RECEPllON NO , N SAD RECORDS; THENCE ALONG 1l NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF' SAD "DTO AT CLEAR CREEK flung NO. 3 THE FOlJ.O'MNG NNE (9) COURSES: 1)DEPARTlNG SAD WlESTERL Y RtGH-or-WAY, NORTH 89'43'28" '1 ST, A DlSTANCE or 19 f'[[t TO 1HE BEClNNlNG OF A, TANGDiT CURVE CONCA\/[ SOOlM ASTrRlY HAWfG A RADUS OF FEET; 2) SOUT1iVl STERl Y ALONG SAlO CURVE 1HROJGH A COlRAL ANGL. Of 45'', AN ARC LEHGTH OF eu55 ft T; 3) To\HGENT TO SAJO CURVE. SOUlH '6'34"' WEST, A DtSTAHCE Of 61l.46 net 1 THE 8EGftNNG Of /. TANtOn CURVE CQ\CA EAS1[Rl Y HAVMC A RADUS Of 78.5 FEET; 4) SOU1WflESTERL Y ALONG SAD CURVE lhr'cx)gh A CENlRAL ANGll or 45''". AN ARC ldtcth Of 51.e FE4T; 5) TANGENT TO 5AK) CURVE, SOUTH '16'"'' WEST, A DlSTANC or 651. FEET: 6) NORTH 89'43'26"' WEST. A OSTANCE Of.54,.5 FET; 7) SOUTH '5'34"' WEST, A DSTANCE OF 57, FET; 8) SOUTH 89'4,3'26"' EAST, A DlSTANc[ or 24,74 F'E:ET; 9) SOUlH '5'34"' VlEST, A DSTANCE or 1lS.9 F'ErT TO A PONT ON THE SOUTH UNE Of' THE: NQRniW[ST OUARTR or THE SOUTH'llEST OUARTER OF SAD SECTON 4; THENCE ALONG SAJO SOUTH UNE, NORTH Bi'$5'2t!i WEST A DfSTANCE OF Si9,34 FEET TO THE PONT t:: 8[CfotoaritG, CONTAlNNG AN AREA or 2.75 ACRES, (SOJ",e5J SQUARE FrrT).... ORE OR LEss. PNtCnS A NfD B H.\WfG /. cowaned M A OF 2UM8 ACRES. ( SQUAR RET). Ct less. HAS BY THESE PRESENTS LAD OUT, PLA TED AND SUBO\1DED lhe SA"'E NTO LOTS, SlREETS AND EASEMENTS AS SHO.,.. OH lhls PlAT UNDER THE NArofE AND STYlE Of MlDlOWN AT a. Nt aedc-fmc NO. 4 AND DO HEREBY GRANT TO THE COUNTY or ADMtS. STAlE OF CCl.ORADO, FOR THE USE OF lhe PUBUC, THE STREETS AND 1HER PUBlC WA'rS AND LANDS HEREON SHO'W\, AND THE EASEUENTS AS SHQWt.L. FOR PUBUC UTl.lTY, CA8.. TV AND DETENTON POND AREAS, FlOOOWAY AND FlOOOPl..AN UWlS. ORAHAGE AND OTHER PUBUC PURpOSES AS DElERMJNED BY THE COONTY a AOAtotS. AAZTEC DA TE Of' PREPARATON:,.., C"".Lll OJ) '" SCALE: N/_ C ONSULTANTS, NC. '!':_ AzTec Proj. No H E E T t F' 8 VCNTY MAP NOT TO SCALE OWNERSHP AND DEDCATlON CERTlflCATE CONTlNUED' AS TO: THE PORTON Of THE NORTH HalF Of THE SOUTHWEST OUARTER Of SECTON 4 EXECUTED nils _ DAY Cf' AD.. 2_ BY: "'OTCMM,. U.C --NA", AS------'",n ACKNQW WGfMFNT B'': MDTOWN U.C, A COLORADO UMTED UABUlY COMPANY STATE OF COLORADO ) COUNTY a )OS ) THE foregong Pl"T.AHD DEDCAiON WAS ACKNO'M..EDGED BEfORE lot[ THS DAY or A.D. 21", BY AS or MroTO'WN, ue, A cct.orado U..nm UASUTY COMPANY. NOTARY PVeUC MY COtorMSSDH EXARES: MY AOORESS S: WTNESS... HAND MD OfFClAL SEAL.; NOTARY PVBUC ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND ACCEPTANCE BY CLEAR CREEK STATON METROPOLTAN DSTRCT NO 1, AS DlSlRlCT ""NAGER OF CLEAR CREEK STAllON oelropoltan DtS1RCT NO.1. 'toi HAS AN ADDRESS or 1Be NVERNESS DRVE w. SUTE 1.5, ENGl WOOO. co HER B'f AC<NO'M. DGE AND ACCEPT THE DEDlCA11ON. GRANT, SALE,. REWS( AND CON\lEYANCE OF' MANTENANCE EASEWENTS AS SHOM- 'MTHN lot 24, BlOCK 3. LOTS 2S1. 3, Jl. J2. 33, "'. J 38, 37 AND 38, BLOCK " AND THE RETANNG WAll. EASEUENlS AS SHOWN WTHN LOTS 35., JG, BlOCK ;, or MJTtMrf AT alm CRfDC - F.NJ NO. 4. COUNTY or ADAMS, STAlE Of' COlORADO DtSTRCT MANAGER OA1 : DtREl< S.... """ c:q..ol,\oo 1JCOtt$fl) P'ROftS'SMlNAl L»D. P,l,..S... for,..., CW iow.t f$ Utrc a»6...t..utrs. Nt.. SOOO 5.. 1JoCOi.H $11tt1. 'it 21 umn"". co. 81U (33) """16 NOTC[: ACCORDNG 1 COlORADO LAW YOO MUST CCUUENCE ANY LEGAL AClK» BA \Nal ANY OEFECT N THS SURVEY WllHlN THREE 'r ARS AF1ER YOU nrst DSCOVERED SUOt DEFECT, N NO E\OlT YAY ACTON BASED UPON ANY DEFECT N THS SUR' ( BE COWWENCED YORE lhan ld '1tARS ntot.l THE DAlE Of' THE C[RmCATlON 9tOWN HEREON. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND ACCEPTANCE BY CRESTVEW WATER AND SANTATON DSTRCT.. AS DS1RCT MANAGtR OF' CRESTYEW WAlER AND SANTATON OSTR1CT, 'MilCH HAS AN ADDRESS OF 7145 toarposa SlREET, OEN\ R, co B221, HEREBY ACKNOVUDGE AND ACCEPT THE DEDCATON, GRANT, So'oLE, RBlS : AND CONVEYANa: OF NON-EXCWSl...-E UTUTY EASEMENTS ACROSS AJ. OF' 'TRACTS N AND G AMD WATER EASEMENTS AS SHOWN Wln-N TRACTS,, L. P AND Q Of W1OMt AT a AR CJU)( - F.* *1.... COUNTY OF AOAWS, STAlE or COLORADO. 8 DATE: DSTRCT WoNACER PLANNNG COMMSSON APPROVAL APPRO,{J) BY THE ADAWS COUNTY Pl..AHH«: CCllASSON THS DAY OF U 214. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMSSONERS APPROVAL APPRMD BY THE ADAWS COUNTY BOARD OF CSSlONERS THS DAY OF' D 214. CL ERK AND RECORDER'S CERTfiCATE THS FNAL PLAT WAS F'l.ED FOR RECORD N THE OfFCE OF THE ADAMS COUNTY Cl RK AND R CQimER,.. THE STATE OF COlORADO, AT M. ON 1M.[ DAY OF ",-D., CClUHTY Q. RtC AND RECORDER BY, "'DEPU=1Y:;------

65 MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK PRELMNARY / FNAL PLAT CASE NO. FLNG NO. 4 PRC214-9 A REPLAT OF TRACTS D-F, MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK-FLNG NO.2 AND A PORTON OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTON 4, TOWNSHP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SXTH PRNCPAL MERDAN, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 2 OF B NOTES (CONT.l 1. BEARNGS ARE BASED ON THE SOUTH LNE OF' THE NORTHWEST QUARTER Of THE SOUTHWEST ClUARTER OF SEClJON 4, TO'M9P J SOUTH. RANGE 68 WEST OF' THE SXTH PRNCPAL MERDAN AS MONUMENTED AT THE SOUTH SXTEENTH CORNER OF' SAD SECTON 4 BY A.3-1/" ALUMNU CAP STAoiPED r>ls n:ss, AND AT THE SOUTHWEST SXTEENTH CORNER OF SAD SECTON BY A 1-1/2" ALUMNUM CAP STAMPED -PLS 171r. SAD UNE BEARS SOUTH 89"55'26- EAST, A DSTANCE OF' 1J37.21 FEET. L. 1k[ PCOC't CF '11't ty RtOUR S TH... T AoCUs SHAU. f1'oyti D TO!JJ. 5lRW DRANAGE FACLTES TO... SSURE OPOtAlONAL C/tPAa'Un' fs 11' MD"- TC PROPCm'!iHAl. B( FOR THE AAlNTEN"NCE OF ALL DlWNM:t ro\clutu" fn!1ijib.(:i PtP[.S, CU., owom.s. f't"qie:s. trt"qrjj.uc YC OE1tN'ACf.j B LDCAltD ttl 'THtrt.NC) U'Nl. SS 8't 'THE D YfiOl';l,N r DiT. -nuz WlGl roal lc U, i\hla,n 'ta:c FACUJJ[S. 1Joft COUHTY HA.\'E 'T ' Fft.Q{T tdc DTtR SAD 1...'Jfn FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE Of' OPERATONS AND WlOW+:f. JJ. SUCli ANC CDST5 MJ. 9('...s:scsstO TO 'THE' PR'CPCt1"i' - J. ANY PERSON WHO KNO'MNGLY REMOVES OR KNOWNGLY CAUSES TO BE REMOVED ANY PUBliC LAND SURVEY MONUMENT, AS DEFNED BY SECTON JB-5.l-13 (1B), C.R.S., OR CONTROl CORNER, AS DEFNED N SECTON (6), C.R.s., OR A RESTORATON OF' ANY SUCH MONUMENT OR WHO KNOWNGLY REMOVES OR KNOWNGLY CAUSES TO BE REMOVED ANY BEARNG TREE KNOWNG SUCH S A BEARNG REE OR OTHER ACCESSORY, AS DEFNED BY SEClON (1), C.R.S., EVEN F SAD PERSON HAS 11lE TO THE LAND ON 'MilCH SAlD MONUMENT OR ACCESSORY S LOCATED, COMMTS A ClASS 2 MSDEMEANOR UNLEss. PROR TO SUCH REMOVAL, SAD PERSON HAS CAUSED A COLORADO PROFESSONAL LAND SURVEYOR TO ESTABUSH AT LEAST TWO WTNESS CORNERS OR REFERENCE MARKS FOR EACH SUCH MONUMENT OR ACCESSORY REMOVED AND HAS FLED OR CAUSED TO BE FLED A MONUMENT RECORD PURSUANT TO ARlCLE S3 OF' i'tle 3E, C.R.S. 4. AZTEC CONSULTANTS, NC. HAS REUED UPON THE PROPERTY NFORMAilON BNDER ORDER NUMBER ",BC739S137 PREPARED BY LAND TTLE GUARANTEE COMPANY, EfFECTVE DATE OCTOBER.3, 213 AT 5: P.M., FOR OWNERSHP AND FOR THE PURPOSE OF' SHO'MNG RECORDED EASEMENTS AND RGHTS-Of-WAY ACROSS THESE PREMSES. THS SURVEY AND PLAT DOES NOT CONSilTUTE A ltle SEARCH BY AZTEC CONSULTANTS, NC., TO DETERMNE O'NNERSHP OR APPUC",BLE EASEMENTS AND RGHTS-Of-WAY. 5, DSTANCES ON THS PLAT ARE GROUND DSTANCES EXPRESSED N U.s. SURVEY FEET AND DECMALS THEREOF. A U.s. SURVEY FOOT S DEFNED AS EXACn. Y 12/3937.lElERS FOOT WDE UTUTY EASEMENTS AS SHOWN HERE ON, ARE DEDC",TED FOR ELECTRC, GAs, TELEVSON CABLE, AND TEL.ECOMMUNCATONS FACUTlES, THE HOME OWNER SHAll. BE RESPONSBLE FOR ALL MANTENANCE WTHN THE EASEMENT EXCEPT THAT PORlON MTHN THE PRVATE AU Y TRACT WHERE APPUCABLE. THE PRVATE ALLEY TRACTS WLL BE MANTANED BY ClEAR CREEK STATON.lETROPOUTAN DSTRCT NO.1. THESE UTiUTY EASEMENTS ARE FOR THE BENEF1T OF THE APPLCABLE UTUTY PROVDERS FOR THE NSTALLATON, MANTENANCE. AND REPLACEMENT OF ELECTRC, GAs. 1EL.EVlSlON CABLf AND TELECotAMUNCAilONS FACUilES (DRY UTUilES). UTLTY EASEMENTS ARE HEREBY GRANTED WTHN ANY ACCESS EASEMENTS AND PRVATE STREETS AND ALLEYS N THE SUBDVSON. PERMANENT STRUCTURES. MPROVEMENTS, OB. CTS. BULDNGS, WE1.1.5, WATER.tETERS AND OTHER OBJECTS THAT MAY NTERFERE WTH THE UTLTY FAClUilES OR USE THEREOF' (NTERFERNG OBJECTS) SHALL NOT BE PERt.4TTED WTHN S,\tO UilLTY EASEAENTS AND THE UTUTY PROVDERS. AS GRANTEES. MAY REMOVE NTERFERNG OBJECTS AT NO COST TO GRANTEE, NCLUDNG. WTHOUT Ll.lTATlON, VEGETAilON. WET UTUTES (W",TER, SANTARY SEWER, AND/OR STORM SEWER) SHAll. CROSS DRY UilUT'!' EASEMENTS AT NEAR RGHT ANGlES. 7. THE a.ear CREEK STATON METROPOLTAN DSTRCT NO 1 ("CCSMD,) S RESPONSBLE FOR THE ENFORCEMENT OF' LANDSCAPE.lANTENANCE REQUREMENT'S. THROUGH CCSotD, A DRC (DESGN REVEW COWMlnEE) WLL REVEW PRVAlE OPEN SPACE DESGN FOR COMPAilBlUTY. PRVATE LOT OWNERS SHAll BE RESPONSBLE FOR THE MANTENANCE OF THER PROPERTY AS WELL AS ADJACENT TREE LAWN AREA(S). MANTENANCE OF THE TREE LAWN AND LANDSCAPE TR",CT BETWEEN FRONT PROPERTY LNE AND STREET SHALL BE THE PRMARY RESPONSBUTY OF THE HOMEOWNER UNDER THE REQUREMENTS OF THE CCSMD COVENANTS. THE COUNTY, TS SUCCESSOR OR ASSGNS SHAll BE RESPONSBLE FOR MANTANNG ALL LOCAL STREETS. HOMEOWNER OF LAND ABUTlNG A CONSTRUCTED PUBUC RGHT-Of-WAY S RESPONSlBL. FOR MANTENANCE OF CURB, GUnER, AND SDEWALK ALONG THE RGHT-Of-WAY ABUTTlNG HS PROPERTY NCLUDNG SNOW REMOVAL FOR PEDESTRAN ACCESS. 8. BASED ON A GRAPHCAl. REPRESENTATON OF FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) FLOOD NSURANCE RATE MAP (FRM) MAP NO, 81C5B4H WTH AN EFF'ECilVE DATE OF' MARCH 5, 27 THE SUBJECT PROPERT'!' UES WTHN ZONE X, BENG DEFlNED AS OTHER AREAS... DElERt.tNED TO BE OUTSDE THE.2X ANNUAL CHANCE flood. 9 A SHARED DRVEWAY EASEMENT S HEREBY DEDCATEO BY THS PLAT (AS SHOWN) FOR THE ACCESS AND MANTENANCE OF' A SHARED DRVEWAY. THE FOlLOWNG RESTRCTONS APPLY TO THE SHARED DRVEWAY EASEMENT: A. SHARED DRVEWAY EASEMENTS ARE PERMTTED ON SlNGi. -FAMLY LOTS SPECFED ON THS PLAT DOCUMENT. B. SHARED DRVEWAY EASE.lENTS ARE PERMTTED TO ENSURE ACCESS TO EACH DRVEWAY. C. NO VEHJQ.ES AT ANY ilme SHA1l.. BE PLACED OR PARKED WTHN TliE SHARED DRVEWAY EASEMENT. \t'eh1cl.es SHAll. BE PARKED WTHN THE GARAGE OR ON-STREET. NOT MPEDNG NORMAL VEHCULAR USE OF THE SHARED DRVEWAY. D. AFFECTED LOT OWNERS SHAll TOGETHER MANTAN THE SAD SHARED DRVEWAY N A MANNER CONSSTENT WTH SAFE VEHCULAR USE, TO NCLUDE SNOWPlOWlNG, RESURFACNG. REPAR, AND OR OTHER otprovement5 OR REPARS AS NECESSARY. MPROVEMENTS SHAll. BE PERFORMED OR CONTRACTED FOR UPON CONSENSUS OF THE OWNERS OF' SAD LOTS, F A CONSENSUS CANNOT BE REACHED BE1v.E:EN LOT O'NNERS THE CCSMD WLL BE THE DECDNG PARTY. THE QMolERS SHAlL BE EQUALLY, JONn.Y, AND SEVERALLY LABLE FOR THE COST OF ALL NECESSARY AND CONOlilONAL.lANTENANCE OR ANY NEEDED REPARS OF SAD SHARED DRVEWAY. E. NO DRVEWAY MPROVEotENTS MAY AlTER FNSH GRADE AND/OR DRANAGE PAnERNS WTHOUT THE '6RTTEN APPROVAL Of THE DESGN REVEW COMMlnEE, N ACCORDANCE WTH A PlOT PLAN AS APPROVED BY ADAotS COUNTY. F. NO DRVEWAY MPROVEMENT OR REPAR MAY BE MADE WTHOUT THE APPROVAl By THE DESGN REVEW COMMTTEE,. 1. SDE YARO USE EASE.lENTS ARE HEREBY GRANTED ALONG All. COMt.4N SDE LOT UNES WTHN AU. DETACHED HOME LOTS, SDE YARD USE EASEMENTS OCCUR FROM FRONT PROPERTY LNE TO REAR PROPERTY LNE AND EXTEND FROM THE GRANTOR'S BULDNG FOUNOA TlON TO THE LOT LNE BETWEEN THE GRANTOR'S AND GRANTEE'S PARCELS THAT SHAll. BE GRANTED TO THE EASEMENT GRANTEE PER THE RESTRCTONS OUn.NEO eaow. REFER TO FGURE ON SHEET 3 FOR A GRAPHC REPRESENTAilON OF THE SDE YARD USE EASE.tENT. THE FOLl.OWlNG RESTRCilONS APPlY TO THE SDE YARD USE EASE.lENTS: A. EASEt.4ENT GRANTEE SHAll HAVE FULL ACCESS AND ENJOYMENT OF THE EASEMENT NCLUDNG CONSTRUCTON OF MPROVEt.4ENTS. USE, ANO otantenance OF THE SPACE NClUOED N THE EASE.lENT. F'ENCES AND WAL1.S USED AS PRVACY SCREENS day NOT ENCROACH NTO THE FRONT ANO REAR SE1BACK. otprovet.4ents NClUDNG BUT NOT LMTED TO DECKS. PATos, LANDSCAPNG, WALl.S, FENCES, RALS. FURNTURE AND SdLAR EJ...Et.1ENTS ARE PERt.lTTED WTHN THE DEFNED SDE YARD USE EASEMENT. DECKS. PAilOS AND WAl..l.S. OTHER THAN PRVAcY SCREENS. N EXCESS Of 3-NCHES N HEGHT (AS MEASURED FROM FNSHEO GRADE) ARE NOT PERt.4Tm N SDE YARD USE EASE.lENTS. ONLY LANDSCAPNG, HAROSCAPE, AND RRGATON MPROVEMENTS ARE PERMTTED WTHN FRONT AND REAR SETBACKS. SDE YARO USE EASEMENT PROCEDURES AND POUCES SHALL BE MANAGED BY THE CLEAR CREEK STATON METROPOlTAN DSTRCT NO.1. NO MPROVEMENTS otay BE MPLEUENTED AT THE DETRMENT OF THE GRANTOR'S ABUTY TO MANTAN THER HOLtE. B SlOE YARD USE EASEMENTS ARE PER.lTTm ON DETACHEO SNGLE FAMLY LOTS ONLY. C, All. MPROVEt.4ENTS BY GRANTEE LOCATED WTHN THE SDE YARD USE EASEMENT SHAll BE MANTANED BY THE EASEUENT GRANTEE. D. EASEMENT GRANTOR S ENSUREO OF ACCESS WTHN THS EASEMENT FOR MANTENANCE AND REPAR OF THE PRNCPAL STRUCTURE LOCATED ON THE EASEMENT GRANTOR'S LOT AND FOR NO OTHER PURPOSE. 'THE DESGN REVEW COMMlnEE OF THE ClEAR CREEK STAilON.lETROPOlTAN DSTRCT NO.1 APPROVES All. PLOT PlANS BEFORE AUTHORZNG APPUCA ilon TO ADAMS COUNTY FOR SSUANCE OF BULDNG PERMT. FOR SSUE RESOlUTON THE CLEAR CREEK STATON METROPOLTAN OSTRCT NO.1 S GRANTED ACCESS NTO THS EASEt.4ENT. E. ALL PRNCPAl... STRUCTURES, NCLUDNG GARAGES, OWNED BY EASEAENT GRANTOR SHAll BE MANTANED BY EASEMENT GRANTOR, F. SDE SETBACKS MAY BE REDUCED TO NO LESS THAN J' AS MEASURED FRe».! THE FNSHED MATERAL OF THE EXTEROR WALl. TO THE PROPERTY LNE. WHEN REDUCED TO LESS THAN 5' AS MEASURED FROM THE FNSHED MATERAL OF THE EXTEROR WALL TO THE PROPERTY LNE, THE THEN CURRENT BC AND/OR RC CODE REQUREMENTS AND AMENDMENTS WTHN THE GOVERNNG.lUNClPAUTY Wll. BE ENFORCED WTH REGARD TO EXTEROR WAll. FRE-RESSTANT RAilNG AND MNMUM FRE-SEPARATON DSTANCE REQUREMENTS. G. GRANTEE SHAlL NOT ALTER FNSHED GRADE AND/OR DRANAGE PATTERNS ON THE GRANTOR's PROPERTY WTHOUT THE TlEN APPROVAl Of THE DESGN REVEW COt.4MTTEE DEFNTONS: EASEMENT GRANTOR: THE LOT OWNER GRANilNG SDE YARD AREA TO ADJACENT LOT OWNER FOR USE EASEMENT GRANTEE: THE LOT OWNER GANNG SDE YARD AREA from ADJACENT LOT OWNER FOR USE 11. THS PLAT S SUBJECT TO AN ENVRONMENTAL COVENANT AS RECORDED AUGUST 1, 27. UNDER RECEPTON NO, A NON-EXCLUSVE UTlUT'!' AND DRANAGE EASEMENT OVER AlL OF TRAClS G AND N S HEREBY GRANTED TO ADAotS COUNTY AND CRESTVEW WATER AND SANTAilQN DSTRCT FOR THE PURPOSE OF' ACCESSNG, NSPECilNG, MANTANNG. AND REPARNG PRVATE DRANAGE AND UilUT'!' FACUlES. 13. A NON-EXCLUSVE ACCESS AND WATER EASEMENT OVER THE WAlER EASEMENTS AS SHOYt'N 'MTHN TRACTS,, L., P AND Q OF MD AT CLEAR CREEK - flung NO.4 S HEREBY GRANTED TO THE ADJACENT LOT OWNERS AND CRESiVlEW WATER ANO SANTAilON DSlRlCT FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCESSNG, NSPECTNG, MANTANNG, AND REPARNG PRVATE WATER FACUTES N THE E\-(NT THE CLEAR CREEK STAilON MElROPOUTAN DSTRCT NO. 1, ns SUCCESSORS, AND ASSGNS FALS TO SAilSFACTORLY MANTAN OR REPAR SAD FAClUilES, THE ABOVE MENilONED ADJACENT LOT OWNERS ARE GRANTED ACCESS ACROSS THE ENllRETY OF THE ABOVE MENTONED lracts FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCESSNG, NSPECTNG, dantannc, AND REPARNG PRiVATE WATER FACLTES. 14. All. PRVATE STORM SEWER AND AREA DRAN SYSTEMS THAT ORGNATE WTHN A PRVATE LOT OR PRVATELY OWNED lract AND OUlFAU. TO A PUBliC STORM SEYlER DRAN LOCATED WTHN THE PUBUC RGHT-Of-WAY, ARE TO BE OWNED AND MANTANED BY THE CLEAR CREEK STAllON METROPQ.JTAN DSTRCT NO. 1. THE OWNERSHP AND.lANTENANCE RESPONSBUTES FOR THESE PRVATE STORot SEWERS SHAll. BE UP TO AND NCWDNG THE CONNECilON PONT TO THE PUBUC STORM SEWER WTHN THE PUBUC RGHT-Of-WAY. THE CLEAR CREEK STATON.tETROPOUTAN DSlRlCT NO.1 TS SUCCESSORS OR ASSGNS SHALl. SECURE APPUCABlE PERMTS FOR WORK WTHN THE ADAMS COUNTY RGHT-OF-WAY WHENEVER MANTENANCE S WTHN THE PUBUC RGHT-Of-WAY. 15. ALTERNG OF GRADE OR ORANAGE PATTERNS ANY'M-tERE WTHN THS SUBOVSON MUST BE APPROVEO BY ADAMS COUNTY N ACCORD WTH THE CURRENn.Y APPliCABLE DRANAGE PLAN THEREN ON FLE DEVELOPER AND OWNERS ACKNOWLEDGE THAT PROPERTY N PROXt.4TY TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF' THS SUBOVlSlON S DEDCATED AND USED FOR RALROAD PURPOSES. THAT RALROAD OPERAllONS MAY CREAlE NOSE, 'BRA.TlONS. EMSSONS, AND ODORS AT ANY TME AND THAT THE N1ENSTY OF RAtROAD OPERATONS N THE future S MPOSSlBL TO PREDCT FOOT WDE SDEWALK MANTENANCE EASEMENlS (S.ot.E,) AS SHOWN HEREON. ARE HEREBY GRANTED TO ADAUS COUNT'!' FOR ACCESS Of SlDEWA.LKS HOMEOWNER OF LAND ABUTTNG A CONSlRUCTEO PUBUC RGHT-Of-WAY S RESPONSBlE FOR MANTENANCE OF THE SDEWAlK ALONG THE RGHT-Of-WAY ABUTNG HS PROPERlY. 1a. 5-FOOT WDE SDEWALK AND DRANAGE MANTENANCE EASEMENT (S,D.M.E.) AS SHOYtN HEREON, ARE HEREBY DEDCAlED TO ADAMS COUNTY AND THE CLEAR CREEK STAilON MElROPOUTAN DSTRCT NO, 1 (CCSMD) FOR ACCESS OF SDEWALKS ANO THE CCSMD DRANAGE NFRASTRUCTURE. HOMEOVtNER OF LAND ABUTTNG A CONSTRUCTED PUBUC RGHT-Of-WAY OR SDEWALK S RESPONSBLE FOR MANTENANCE OF THE SDEWALK ALONG THE RGHT-OF-WAY OR SDEWALK ABUTTNG HS PROPERTY. CCSMD S RESPONSBlE FOR MANTENANCE OF' THE STORM DRANAGE PPE ADJACENT TO THE SDEWALK. HOMEOWNER S RESPDNSlBLE FOR All. PRVATE STORM DRANAGE PPES WTHN HS PROPERT'!' FROM THE PONT Of CONNECilON TO THE CCSWD STQRot DRANAGE PPE.. ra =i:"'':' :: AAZTEC ''' -'' '' ' '"!'' DATE OF' SCALE: CONSULTANTS, NC. (. f_ AzTec Froj. No5461J-13 PREPARATON: SHE E T "fa OF B

66 BLOCK 1 MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK PREUMNARY / FNAL PLAT CASE NO. FLNG NO. 4 PRC214-9 A REPLAT OF TRACTS D-F, MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK-FLNG NO.2 AND A PORTON OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTON 4, TOWNSHP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SXTH PRNCPAL MERDAN, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 3 OF B TYPCAL SDE YARD USE EASEMENT: TYPCAL SDE YARD USE EASEMENT: PUBUC STREET TRACT FOR FRONT LOADED PRODUCT ADDRESS TABLE :::l:1l: YARO USE """"" '---H (S.Y.UE.) DEY""ROUSE """"'" MDTHVARES ReFBi TO NOT'E D BLOCK 1 BLOCK 2.(TYPJREFER TO NOTE 1. TYPCAL PASSVE LOT NO S.Y.U.E,: :-::... PU8UC STREET TRACT = LOTs... ae "to'1' UNE BLOCK 2 TYPCAL PASSVE LOT NO S.Y.U.E.: PUBLC STREET TRACT FOR FRONT LOADED PRODUCT {r::- TRACT SUMMA.RV TABLE OWNERSHP & TRACT AREAS.F.<' AREAA.C.±, USE MANTENANCE A PRVATE AllEY/ACCESS CCSMD NO.1 B 2,21.51 PRVATE AlLEY/ACCESS eesmono. l C 4,61.16 PRVATE AlL Y/AeCESS CCSMO NO. 1 D LS/ORANAGE/PA CCSMD NO. 1 E PRVATE ALLEY/ACCESS ecsmono. l F 1,287.3 PRVATE ALLEY/ACCESS CCSMO NO. 1 G 7,952 D.183 PRVATE AUEY/ACCESS/DE/UE CCSMONO.! H 2.21 JJ5l PRVATE AUEY/ACCESS CCSMONO. l, 9, LS/DRANAGE/PA ecsmd NO. 1 J 2,21.51 PRVATE ALLEY/ACCESS CCSMD NO, PRVATE ALL Y/ACCESS CCSMD NO. 1 L LS/DRANAGE/PA CCSMD fow. l M S PRVATE ALLEY/ACCESS ecsmo NO. 1 N 9, PRVATE AllEY/ACCESS/DE/UE CCSMD NO LS/DRANAGE/PA CCSMD NO. 1 p LS/DRANAGE/PA CCSMD NO. 1 Q LS/DRANAGE/PA CCSMONO. l TOTAL TRACT AREA 293, CCSMD NO.1 CLEAR CREEK STATON TOTAl lot AREA METROPOLTAN DSTRCT NO. 1 ROW DEDCAnON (NTERNAL STREETS) 192, LS/DRANAGE/PA. LANDSCAPE, DRANAGE, PEDESTRAN ACCESS ROW DEDCATON W. 68TH AVE.' DE MJNAG W1iMDn TOTAL ROW TO BE DE..DCATED 192, UE'" UTLlY EASEMENT TOTAL STE AREA 916, ADDRESS TABLE BLOCK 3 BLOCK 3 BLOCK 4 BLOCK 4 LOT ADDRESS LOT ADDRESS LOT ADDRESS LOT ADDRESS MORRSON DR MORRSON DR FERN DR MORRSON DR W. 67TH DR MORRSON DR FERN DR MORRSON DR W. 67TH DR WARREN DR. 215 W. 67TH DR, 672 MORRSON DR WARREN DR. 67 MORRSON DR MORRSON DR MORRSON DR MORRSON DR MORRSON DR MORRSON DR MORRSON DR S 672 FERN DR MORRSON DR MORRSON DR MORRSON DR. 67 FERN DR. 669 FERN DR MORRSON DR FERN DR FERN DR FERN DR FERN DR FERN DR. LOT ADDRESS LOT ADDRESS LOT ADDRESS LOT ADDRESS MORRSON DR WARREN DR MOR\SON DR FERN DR FERN DR W. 67TH DR B WARREN DR W. 66TH PL WARREN DR WARREN DR MORRSON DR FERN DR FERN DR W. 67TH DR WARREN DR W. 66TH PL WARREN DR WARREN DR MORRSON DR FERN DR FERN DR W. 67TH DR WARREN DR W. 66TH PL MORRSON DR WARREN DR FERN DR FERN DR FERN DR S1 W. 67TH DR. 4 67:36 WARREN DR WARREN DR MORRSON DR W. 66TH AVE FERN DR FERN DR FERN DR. 2 67SS WARREN DR. S 6728 WARREN DR WARREN DR WARREN DR W. 66TH AVE MORRSON DR FERN DR. 6 67S8 FERN DR S7 WARREN DR WARREN DR WARREN DR WARREN DR W. 66TH AVE MORRSON DR MORRSON DR. 7 67S6 FERN DR S9 WARREN DR WARREN DR W. 66TH AVE WARREN DR. 3S 268 W. 66TH AVE MORRSON DR MORRSON DR W. 67TH PL W. 67TH PL WARR N DR WARREN DR WARREN DR WARREN DR W. 66TH AVE W. 66TH AVE WARREN DR WARREN DR W.66THAVE W. 66TH AVE MORRSON DR MORRSON DR MORRSON DR MORRSON DR W. 67TH PL WARREN DR W. 67TH PL W. 66TH PL WARREN DR W. 66TH AVE MORRSON DR MORRSON DR W. 67TH PL WARREN DR W. 67TH PL WARREN DR W. 66TH AVE W. 67TH PL W. 67TH PL MORRSON DR W. 67TH P WARREN DR W. 67TH DR WARREN DR., W. 67TH DR WARREN DR. FCA AND ON BEHAlf OF AAZTEC DA.TE OF M1-" s... ' '-26 Lltt.to.. C... Wlz::z PREPARATON: Fur. (JOJ)7U-M SCALE: N. CONSULTANTS NC. 'n: (HJ)71""... AZTEC CONSULTANTS, NC. AzTec Proj. No.54B1.l-1J, SHE E T J OF B "'loa;.ailldb...m

67 MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK FLNG PRELMNARY / FNAL PLAT A REPLAT OF TRACTS D-F, MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK-FLNG NO, 2 CASE NO. NO. 4 PRC214-9 AND A PORTON OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTON 4, TOWNSHP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SXTH PRNCPAL MERDAN, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 4 OF 8 N69'43'26"W :... :',: NW 1/ 4 SW 1/4 SEC. 4, T.3S., R.B8W., 6TH P.M. === '41"E 293,35' TRACT = == ::.,::.#.,..,,: "... ;.. v PONT Of BEGNNNG w,., ;"... z 569'4)"26"[ ZO.G9 589'43'26 E C 26.' :l 1'l <=l WEST Z TlACTl 1'l r:. U 14 " " 1S " Q " " """'.. 1> 1S. " Z en Pl :::s WEST 68TH AVENUE = c;;;oe&=-- L3 WEST 67TH PL, " ":t-...j 1 " " Z1 2l ::r:,?;x f :'r.; '.. ;. t' {,.:;.,{:J.,,"t.,Pt." 11 TRACT l' s..b NW 1/4 S'f 1/4 4 SM"S5'2& t3.31,.2"' BASS Of BEARNGS.--U. t=!:j1 i... = 't=-= " - N- -'.,.. j NE 1/4 SW Y. SEC. 4...J lji- T.3S.. R.68W., BTH P.M. L _..,. o 1 ", ' 1BST 88TH AVE. N+4'43'2S W 4.85' R1it'ffl/:r 'lracrr f'jlilnara AR CJiUJ(flltCM2 2 VACAWSf 1}Spur PARCO.. O DlCATED RGHT-Of-WAY t.l ORRLSON OR s.f..296 AC.»'/lifJl;f O!ENr NfC N(J. 11JrmJ615JJ FOOJfJf.r7RAcrr f)fo/jn Ar am Q!!'"./'C..,;, 6r llts lvl NtJ9V16"W Jf1;' 43'26"W2U.. 3' PARCEL B OETAL A SCALE:,'",eo' RECOVERED P.LS.S CORNER STAMPED AS NOTED SET NO 5 REBAR WTH ORANGE Pl.ASl'C CAP STAr.4PED AZTEC PlS 86 4 ' lme TABlE LNE, DRECTON " L NC1l-l NB9'43'2S-w 57. ' L2 SOO., S'.:s,, -W 57' L3 SB9' 4,:5'2S"E 27S59' L' SOO' S'34"W 19,17' L5 SB9'4.l'2S E 57 ' LS NOO" S'34- E 255' L7 S89'43'26"E 85 ' L8 S89'4J'2S"E 2<157' L9 N45'1S'3 4-E 92.97' LlO 5 44'43'26- E 72.96' o. 1EST 67TH P. L S89'''3'26"E ' Y " if; f Ll2 SOO'1ts'3" 'W 275,52'... too,... L13 N89'4J'ZS"W lj59' L1< S4S.,S'J4'W S84S' L15 SOO"S'J4-W 69,9' Ll. N89'43' Zs'W 545' W SOO1S',34-W 57' Ll8 589'43'26"E 2474' L19 SOO1 S'34'W 1359' CURVE TABLE CURve: DELTA RAOUS, e1 45"'- 25' ' 9.5:3" e2 45''- 785' 5165' e3 45"'' 785' 61.65' F'OR AND ON BEHALF OF' 1 e, 45''- 78' 6165' AZlEe CONSULTANTS. NC.... AAzTEC...!e 1t _" M".. : ll CONSULTANTS NC., --.,_...- A,Tee- PrO} ND5B'J- J,.. Qq lo."", O" TE OF PREPARATON; SCALE; SHE E T 4 F 13

68 MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK FLNG NO. PRELMNARY / FNAL PLAT A REPLAT OF TRACTS D-F, MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK-FlUNG NO.2 AND A PORTON OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTON 4, TOWNSHP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SXTH PRNCPAL MERDAN, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 5 OF 8 SEE SHEET 4 OF 8 w. 67TH PLACE WEST 67TH PLACE (57' WTOE PUBLC ROW) REC, NO o U.E. s.',u. LEGEND DENOTES CENTER UNf CONTROL... ONUAENTS 1 BE SET AS A REQUREMENT ;OF! fnal ACCEPTANCE OF' ROJ.OWAY BY AD... S COUNTY. R(SPONSBUTY TO ARR"'''''CE SETTlNG Of CEN1[R UNE CONlROl oonuoent RESTS 'MlH "'DlOWN. LtC OR TS SUCCESSOR OR ASSiGN. SO NO., REBAR Wn-t 1_1/4 6 ORANGE PlASTC CAP STAMPED "AZTEC PLS J8f54- RECOVERED NO. 5 REBAR WTH 1-1/ "- ORANGE PLASTC CAP STAWPED "AZTEC PLS J864" VTlUTY EASEW(NT Z' SlDEWAJ( WA1NlDMNCE (A$ oent S.O.o.E. 5' SlD WALK ok DRANAGE.,AN'TNANCE EASEMENT W,E. CO)... s.d' 5.D(.?ll WATER EASEMENT RADAL BEARNG RGHT-Of-WAY SlOE YARD USE EASE!rllOfT (5 NOTE flo ON SHEET 2) SHARED DR\, WAY (A$DoENT (SEE NOTE t9 ON SHEET 2) LNE TABlE lh', DRECTON LENGTH L5 589'.43'26-( S7. L6 Noo"6'34-( 2SS' L21 $16'J4'W 1.' L36 N89'<1.l'2S-W 1<'5.26' L39 SOO'S'J4-W 1' '" NB9-4J'2S W 18J' L<4 S6'JO'56-W B.JS- LO. N8!i'4:3'2S-W 2.33" U i T T

69 OWN AT CLEAR CREEK PRELMNARY / FNAL PLAT A REPLAT OF TRACTS D-F, MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK-FLNG NO.2 AND A PORTON OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTON 4, TOWNSHP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SXTH PRNCPAL MERDAN, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE SHEET 6 OF 8 WEST 67TH PLACE (57' WlDE PUBLC ROW) REC. NO <f';',' '(;,:-!.'r.. '1' ;:4.'..'. \. ;:' -'ti\"j ", o U,E SM.E. LEGEND CASE NO. O. 4 PRC OF COLORADO DENOTES CENTER LNE CONTROl t.4dnuu(nts TO BE SET AS A REOUREMENT FOR FNAL ACCEPTANCE or ROAOWAY BY AOAtr.4S COUNTY. RESPONSlBUTY' TO ARRANGE 5EniNG OF CENTER UNE CONTROl MON taaent RESTS WTH MDTOWN, ltc OR TS SUCCESSOR OR ASSGN. SET NO, 5 REBAR MTH 1-1/4" ORANG( PLASTC CAP STAMPEO -AZTEC PLS 3864" RECOJERED NO. REBAR WTH 1-1/4" ORANGE PlASTC CAP STAMPED "AZTEC PlS 3664" UTLTY EASEMENT 2' SDEWALK MANTENANCE EASEo4ENT S t.4,e S' SDEWALK &: DRANAGE t.4antenanc( EASEt.1ENT WL WA. lrr E.4.SEt.4ENT ) RADAL BEARNG RGHT-Of-WAY SDE YARD ug: ASB.l[Hf (scr 1«):( flo ON SHEET 2) SHARED ORVEWAY EASEt.4ENT (SEE NOTE,9 ON SHEET 2) X) i>. '" E-< 1>'1 1>'1 ::r: ('Jl 1>'1 1>'1 ('Jl i - -1, /-.,. /, \.. -. \,. n... J.! 8 zz,,,,'" 67TH PLACE (57' WlO[ PUBLC ROW) REC.,NO_ 245 CUR'olt.: DELTA RADUS LENGTH C1 45"'' 25' 196.3' C5 45'O()'oo", 45.' ' UNE TABLE UNE, DRECllQN LENGTH L5 589'4.:s'25"[ 57' L6 NOQ16',34"E 255' LS 569'4J'26"[ 2457' LS2 589'4.3'26"[ ' m L55 L56 LS7 L58 L59 589'4)'26"E ' 589'43'26"E 1796' 589'43'26-[ 1751' N"5'16'3""E 1J9 8' N4 4'4J'26"W 1.' 51fi'J4"W 55C)' TRACTQ 151,359 SF 1.4 AC 'LJ.-! i i FOR AND ON BEHALF' Of AZTEC CONSULTANTS. NC, TRACT 9,37 Sf.214 AC SEE SHEET 8 OF B

70 UHE TABl M PREUMNARY / FNAL PLAT LNG CASE NO. NO. 4 PRC214-9 A REPLAT OF TRACTS D-F, MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK-FLNG NO.2 AND A PORTON OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTON 4, TOWNSHP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SXTH PRNCPAL MERDAN, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO UNE TABlE LNE DRECTON L NG1H UNE, ORECTlON LENGTH LNE, L21 SOO1S'34-W 1' L3' S89'43'26-e: 34,42' L'7 L23 N6T54'S'"E 6,95' L3. $89'43'26'( 3263' L.B L2' S4S1S'34"W 53,SO' L37 SOO15'34"W 1' L25 S4516'J,4"W.. e 62' UB NSg'4J'2S'W '4526' L5 L '26"[ 166S' L3' SOO1S'34"W 1' L51 L28 S22"J'26'E 5, 51 " N8S '4J'26"W '-47.46' L63 L2' $89'43'26"( 1(l' '" '" S6S'3Q'S6'W 8.38' L6' " N661 1'26'[ 816' "2 NB9 '4'26'W 844' L65 '" S6g'4J'26"( 12-13' L'3 N89'.J'2S'W 1,63' L66 L32 N6S'11'2fiT 816' L4' S6S"JO'S& 8.J8' LJ3 N59"25'1 W 672' l45 5'6'J4"W 1,' L3' 559"25'1"E 672' L46 S89'4J'26"( " UNE TABLE DRECTON 589"43'26"( LENGTH ' N7'15'5S"E 6. 8 N7'lS'S5 "E 6.s:r 589"51'4"[ S891'4'E 2575' $89'43'26"E 148.'" 589'.\13'26"( 1448' 1_ u "l!g N89'4Y26'W 23.37' "- Zw p::o il,r;. NS9'43'26'W ' p::j i :; 1 i r.: e; P::u "lj m zit r.: w P::o p::;< co FOR AND ON BEHAlF OF AZTEC CC»tSUlTAHTS, NC. i \ o UL S.d,E. LEGEND DENOTES CENTER LNE CONTROl WONUt.lENTS TO BE SET AS A REOUREoENT FOR FNAL ACCEPTANCE Of ROADWAY BY ADAlo45 COUNTY. RESPONSBLTY TO ARRANGE SETTNG OF' CENTtR LNE CONTROL MONUMENT RESTS WTH MDTOWN, LLC OR TS SUCCESSOR OR ASSGN.. SET NO.5 REBAR WTH 1-1/4 ORANGE PLASTC CAP STAMPED -AZTEC PlS 3864" Ul1L1TY EAS.MENT 2" SOEAL( MANTENANCE EASEMENT S.O,W.E. 5' SDEWAll( a: OR,,NAC( WMNTENANCE E,,S4ENT WATER EASOENT R,,OAl BEARNG RGHT-Of-WAY MANTENANC[ EASfM[NT SDE YARD USE EASEWENT (SEE NOTE flo ON SHEET 2) TRACT SF AC ---[J' rZ52279rr,:;;;.[ ,:...<-;., '!-?;:--.s,;!.":..!::... :-::'i :r,:";"':.s S LNE W V. g'ss'26"! BASS OF BEAR1NGS :;,',::L,"<Y ;J::;;zr. 1'::'1 ;.'t AAZTEC "'...'".....' Ut1... c.a l: n...;(lc.l)71;).m -",glh..._ CONSULTANTS NC. P..:p&l)'Jl-M AlTee Pro N :1

71 MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK PRELMNARY / FNAL PLAT FLNG CASE NO, NO. 4 PRC214-9 A REPLAT OF TRACTS D-F, MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK-FLNG NO.2 AND A PORTON OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTON 4, TOWNSHP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SXTH PRNCPAL MERDAN, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 8 OF 8 TRACTQ 61,359 SF '.49 AC. o "l,m,b i ZZ ::; oj LNE TABLE LNE, DRECTON LENGTH L23 N67'54'5'"E 695' L24 N57'54'5'"E n l 17' i' L52 S89'43'26"E 17677' L53 589'4:5'26"E g L54 N16')4"E 144' '" L55 589'43'26"E 1795' :r: 5' L56 589'4:5'26"[ 175.1' g :{"" L59 SOO'16'34"W 55 oct "iii L6D S4443'26'E 13267' L51 N4S'16'34'E 1' L62 N89'43'26"W 1' L67 SOO'1S'34"W 1,' L6B N89'43'26'W 3275' L69 NB9'43'Z6"W 5225' CURVE TABL CURVE' DELTA RADUS LENGTH C6 145"'-, 3' 2356' C7 145"'', 1 DO' J 785' WEST 66TH AVENUE (57' WDE PUBLC ROW) LEGEND DENOTES CENTER LNE CDNlROl MONU.4ENTS TO BE SET AS A M C;J DYC:JTESE CONTROl. MONUMENT RESTS 11TH MDTOWN, U.C OR TS SUCCESSOR OR ASSGN, RECOVEREO NO.5 REBAR WTH 1-1/4" ORANGE PlASTC CAP STAMPED "AZTEC PLS 3664" U.E UTlLllY EASEMENT S M.E. 2' SDEWALK MANTENANCE EASWENT S-D.M.E. 5' SDEWALK &: DRANAGE MANTENANCE EASEl.4ENT W.E. WATER EASEMENT M.E. MANTENANCE EASEMENT R.W.E. RETANNC WAU EASEMENT SOE. ES: 2)SE EASEMENT (SEE NOTE,1 AE)WAY EASEl.4ENT (SEE NOTE,9 i FOR AND ON BEHALF OF AZTEC CONSULTANTS, NC. DATE OF PREPARATON: SCALE: SHEET 8 OF 8

72 ADAMS COUNTY.liu:"..; MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK Subdivision mprovements Agreement Addendum MidtownLLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing NO.4 Case No. PL T214-15, which is part of Case No. PRC214-9 ADDENDUM TO SUBDVSON MPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT WTH MDTOWN LLC, CASE NO., WHCH S PART OF CASE NO.,MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK FLNG NO.4 THS ADDENDUM ("Addendum") is made and entered into by and between the County of Adams, State of Colorado, hereinafter called "County," and Midtown LLC, 188 nverness Drive WesL Suite 15. Englewood. Colorado 811 2, hereinafter called "Developer," and collectively referred to hereinafter as the "parties." This amended agreement ("Agreement") supplements and amends the previous subdivision improvement agreement of the parties made and entered into on or about June 24,214. WlTNESSET: WHEREAS, Developer is the owner of real property in the County of Adams, State of Colorado, as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and by this reference made a part hereof. WHEREAS, This Addendum to the Subdivision mprovements Agreement is an addendum to the existing "Midtown Subdivision mprovements Agreement with Midtown LLC for Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4, Case No. PRC214 9 that was approved by the BoCC on the 24th day of June, 214 and recorded at Reception No. ("Original Agreement") and by this reference made a part hereof. WHEREAS, All provisions and conditions agreed to within the Original Agreement shall continue in full force and affect, subsequent to the execution of this Addendum, unless expressly amended hereby. WHEREAS, The Developer desires to phase development of the Property in a single phase (Filing 4) in order to facilitate the overall development of the Property. WHEREAS, t is provided by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners ("BoCC"), County of Adams, that where designated the Developer shall have entered into a written agreement with the County to install public and/or prjvate improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties hereto promise, covenant, and agree as follows:. Engineering Services. Developer shall furnish, at its own expense, all engineering and other services in connection with the design and construction of the improvements described and detailed and agreed to within the Original Agreement. 2. Design Services. Developer shall furnish, at its own expense, all engineering, design, and other services in connection with the design and construction of the public improvements and landscaping as described and detailed on Exhibit "E" attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. 3. Drawings and Estimates. The Developer shall furnish drawi.ngs and cost estimates for all improvements described and detai led on Exhibit "E" for approval by the County. Same shall be subject to modification based on the approved fmal plat. Any such modifications shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish a final statement of installation cost to the County. 4. Construction. Developer shall furnish and construct, at its own expense and in accordance with drawings and materials approved by the County, the landscaping described and detailed on Exhibit "E". 5. Time for Completion. Landscaping or county approved best management practice ("BMPs") shall be installed according to the terms of this Addendum and those terms agreed upon in the Final Development Plan. Landscaping or approved BMPs shall be adjacent to Page 1 of 18

73 Subdivision mprovements Agreement Addendum MidtownLLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4 Case No. PLT214-J5, which is part of Case No. PRC214-9 eacll rcsidential lot prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy ("C/O") for that lot. Landscaping in open space tracts must be completed within the "construction completion date" appearing in Exhibit "E', 12/ 1/217. A C/O may be requested by Developer or Developer's designce and issued by the County in its sole discretion upon a showing of good cause why final landscaping cannot be installed, but in no event shall a CO be issued prior to the installation of temporary BMPs in the interim offmallandscaping. The County may for good cause grant an extension of time for completion of any part or all of improvements appearing on said Exbibit "E". Any extension oftime shall be in written form only. 6. Guarantee of Compliance. The Developer shall submit bonds as collateral for the items listed in Exhibit "E". Said collateral is releasable only by the County, to guarantee compliance with this agreement, which includes twenty percent (2%) to cover administration and five percent (5%) per year for the term of the Addendum to cover inflation. Said collateral shall be in the amount of $594,49.18 for the common area landscaping tracts, tree lawns, and Neighborhood Park located in the following areas: West 67 th Place, West 67 th Drive, Fern Drive, Morrison Drive, Warren Drive, West 66 th Avenue, West 66 th Place, Tract Q, Tract D, Tract, Tract L, Tract G, Tract N, and Tract P. Upon completion of said landscaping constructed according to the terms of this Addendum, the collateral shall be released upon approval of the Planning Director and a resolution by the BoCC. Completion of said landscaping shall be determined solely by the COWlty, and a reasonable parl of said collateral may be retained to guarantee maintenance of public improvements for a period of one year from the date of completion. Pinal landscape installation, including 'final landscape layout and plant count shall be generally consistent with the FDP. C/O may be granted for lots located adjacent to landscaping areas in accordance with the following restrictions: A. Single Family lots: CO will be granted to single family detached lots on a lot to lot basis. Landscaping installation or submission and approval by the County of an interim landscaping plan, "BMPs' [or single family lots, must occur prior to being granted C/O. Completion of said landscaping sball be determined solely by the County. A Performance Landscaping Dond Agreement shall be entered into between Adams County and the Home Builder/Applicant if an interim landscaping plan will be utilized. A sample Performance Bond Agreement for landscaping is included as Exhibit "F". B. Townhome Lots: C/O will be granted to final TownllOme structure or on a unit by unit basis. Walks located in open space tracts adjacent to lot and necessary to provide access must be provided prior to C/O. Final landscaping or interim landscape plan, "BMPs," must be installed in adjacent landscape tracts andlor tree lawn prior to receiving C/O. Landscaping on private lot or submission and approval by the County of an interim landscaping plan, "BMPs" for single attached lots, must occur prior to being granted CO. A Performance Landscaping Bond Agreement may be necessary for interim landscaping on private lots. A Performance Landscape Bond shall be entered into between Adams County and the Home Builder / Applicant if an interim landscaping plan will be utilized. A sample Performance Bond Agreement for landscaping is included as Exhibit "F". 7. Acceptance and Maintenance of Public mprovements. All improvements designated "public" on Exhibit "B" shall be public facilities and become the property of the County or other public agencies upon acceptance. Upon preliminary acceptance of improvements within a phase as described in Exhibit "B", the County may issue a Certificate of Occupancy for parcels within the accepted phase. Developer or Developer's designee(s) may submit applications for building permits (subject to compliance, in each case, with all other requirements therefore including but not limited to fire district approval and paved surfaces adjacent to the lot) prior to preliminary acceptance of the improvements required by this Agreement. n no event shall C/O be issued until the public improvements for such phase as described in Exhibit "B" have achieved preliminary acceptance by the County. No building permits may be issued prior to Preliminary Acceptance and final approval of that filing. 8. Ownership and Maintenance of Landscaping and Public mprovements. The Clear Creek Station Metropolitan District No.1 ("CCSMD") is responsible for the enforcement of landscaping maintenance requirements. Through CCSMD, a DRC (Design Review Committee) will review private open space design for compatibility. Private lot owners shall Page 2 of 18

74 Subdivision mprovements Agreement Addendum MidtownLLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4 Case No. PLT214-15, which is part of Case No. PRC214-9 be responsible for the maintenance of their property as well as adjacent tree lawn area(s), unless otherwise noted on Exhibit "E". The CCSMD covenants shall include enforcement provisions to ensure that all common areas will be adequately maintained. CCSMD shall provide a guarantee for the long-term maintenance and care of open space and other large tracts in Filing 4. CCSMD shall be responsible for providing adequate funding to ensure maintenance and annual monitoring of the property for the life of the project. The CCSMD covenants shall include enforcement provisions to ensure that all common areas will be adequately maintained. n the event that common areas are not sufficiently maintained by private property owners, CCSMD shall utilize mechanisms enforceable by the covenants until such time the only remaining option is for CCSMD to take over maintenance responsibilities, at which point CCSMD shall take over maintenance responsibilities of these common areas. Maintenance of the District tree lawns and open spaces depicted in the maintenance diagrams included in Exhibit "E", including Tracts L,, D, Q, N, G, and P in Filing No.4, shall be by the CCSMD. All local streets within the limits of the street right-of-way shall be dedicated to Adams County. The adjacent property owner is responsible for maintenance of concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, and tree lawn within the street right-of-way. The Metropolitan District shall be responsible for any decorative paving or pavers within typical asphalt paving section of street. The County and its Successors and Assigns will be responsible for maintaining all local streets. Homeowners of land abutting a constructed public right-of-way are responsible for snow removal for pedestrian access. Developer shall pay $594,49.18 to fulfill the landscaping bond requirement for Filing No.4. f the Developer has not fulfilled the agreed to landscaping requirements prior to the construction completion date in Exhibit "E", the County may proceed with actions to use the bond to install landscaping improvements within Filing No.4. After the completion of the second year of the life of the bond, the County may cash the bond if the Developer has not fulfilled the landscaping bond by installing landscaping improvements within Filing No Public Land Dedication ("PLD") Fees. The estimated PLD fee for the entire Midtown development is $1,98,351.. The exact PLD obligations will be calculated when a final plat application for each phase is submitted. The PLD fee for Filing No.4 is $161, The Developer shall submit bonds for these fees as collateral. This is based on the current understanding that the Developer will ultimately dedicate land to a district or other entity as approved by Adams County and pay for park construction costs. Additionally, the bond for the schools portion of the PLD fee is submitted based on the Developer's stated intent to dedicate five (5) acres of land within the development to Mapleton School District. Negotiations between Developer and Mapleton School District are ongoing but not yet finalized as of the time of Filing No.4. The bonds will have an expiration date as specified below. f the PLD obligations have not been fulfilled as specified below, the County will cash the bonds and no future credits or refunds of these fees will be available. School and Parks Update (a) School. Per the approved Second Amendment to the PDP, Developer is willing to dedicate five (5) acres to Adams County to be dedicated to Mapleton School District (the "School District") within a future filing. The Developer is in ongoing negotiations with the School District in connection with a proposal to meet the School District's needs for a K-8 Performance and Arts School located in the Midtown subdivision. Accordingly, the Developer has proposed the dedication of a parcel of property in Filing 6 of the Midtown subdivision to the School District in exchange for which the aforementioned five (5) acre school site in parcel would be released back to Developer for residential use. n either event, the outcome will result in an offset against the cash in-lieu owed to the School District. Developer shall provide a surety bond to the County in the amount of $81, in order to satisfy the Schools portion of the PLD requirements for Filing No.4. This bond shall expire on December 9,217 (12/9/217). After December 9, 216 (12/9/216), the County Page 3 of 18

75 Subdivision mprovements Agreement Addendum Midtown LLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4 Case No. PL 1'214-15, which is part of Case No. PRC214-9 may cash the bond if the Developer has not fulfilled the PLD requirements by dedicating the minimum five (5) acre site within Filing 6. (b) Parks. Arcadis and Brownfield Partners have been engaged for environmental cleanup efforts on the former facility parcel, which are ongoing. Upon the completion of the cleanup, Developer proposes to construct a 43-acre.park as depicted in tbe Second Amendment to the PDP. The park will be fully designed and developt:d by the CCSMD in coordination with adjacent districts or other entities as approved by Adams County. Upon completion of the parl< development the 43-acres will be turned over to a district or other entity selected by CCSMD and approved by Adams County for operations lind maintenance. f the selected district or other entity approved by Adams County chooses not to engage in an agreement with the CCSMD to take over maintenance and operations, then CCSMD will maintain the park. n light of Developer's proposal to dedicate a 2-acre neigbborhood park within the Property, and a 43-acre park to a CCSMD selected district, Developer sball provide surety bonds in favor of the County until the parks are constructed. Such bonds and the ultimate construction of the parks would offset any Neighborhood Park PLD cash-in-lieu fees for earlier phases. f any Neighborhood Park PLD fees for each phase are not covered by the park acreage to be dedicated, then cash-in-lieu for the difference shall be paid to the County at the time of submittal of a final plat application for that phase. 2.3 Acres of the Filing Four area is proposed as a portion of the 2.54 Acre Neighborhood Park obligation; refer to open space diagram included as a part of Exhibit "E" for location. Developer shall provide a surety bond to the County in the amount of $1,133. in order to satisfy the balance of the Neighborhood Parks Public Land Dedication requirement for Filing No.4. This bond shall expire on December 9, 218 (12/9/218). After December 9, 217 (12/9/217), the County may proceed with actions to cash the bond if the Developer has not yet fulfilled the Neigllborhood Parks PLD requirements for Filing No. 4 by dedicating neighborhood parks land in fmure fi lings. f cashed, the money from this bond shall be held in an account by the County subject to the requirements of Section 5-5 of the Adams County Development Standards and Regulations. The planned 43-acre park shall be credited toward the Developer's Neighborhood Park PLD requirements. The County has not yet determined whether any credit will be given toward Regional Park PLD requirements. As suoh, the Developer shall pay $69, cash-in-lieu to fulfill the Regional Park PLD requirement for Filing No Plat Corrections and PUD Amendment. The Developer acknowledge thal au setbacks shall be consistent with those depicted within the development standards of the approved and amended Preliminary Development Plan. Developer agrees to meet Building Safety and fle district requirements. 11. Successors and Assigns. This Addendum sball be binding upon the heirs, executors, personal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Developer, and shall be deemed a covenant running with the real property as described in Exhibit "A" of the Original Agreement. 12. Metropolitan Districts. Notwithstanding any provision hereof to the contrary and in furtherance of Section 11, Developer shall have the right to assign certain of its obligations and responsibilities hereunder to CCSMD or another special or metropolitan district created for the purpose of constructing, operating andlor maintaining public and private improvements. The County acknowledges that in 27 the County approved a consolidated Service Plan for CCSMD together with the Clear Creek Station Metropolitan District Nos. 2 and 3 (collectively, the "Districts"), and that it is specifically contemplated that one or more of the Districts may undertake and complete financing, development and construction of any or all of the mprovements defined under Section 15 or as described elsewhere in this Agreement, subject to a maximum mill levy of fifty (5) mills in connection therewith, as adjusted per Section Vrr(C) of the Service Plan. Notice of any such assignment shall be given to the County at least 3 days prior to such assignment in accordance with Section 14 Page 4 of 18

76 Subdivision mprovements Agreement Addendum MidtownLLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No. 4 Case No. PLT214-15, which is part of Case No. PRC214-9 hereof. Any such assignment shall not be made without the express written consent of the County. Such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Said notice shall contain the effective date of such assignment. 13. Special Provisions. This Agreement shall constitute the entire Agreement between the parties. No subsequent amendment hereto shall be valid unless made in writing and executed by the parties hereto provided. 14. Notice. Any notice that may be given under the terms of this Agreement shall be made in writing, and shall be deemed made upon personal service or upon mailing by United States Mail, postage prepaid, to the other party, and unless amended by written notice, to the Following: DEVELOPER MidtownLLC 188 nverness Drive West, Suite 15 Englewood, Colorado 8112 Attn: Richard Dengler (33) ADAMS COUNTY Planning and Development 443 S. Adams County Parkway Brighton, CO Attn: Abel Montoya (72) Transportation Department 443 S. Adams County Parkway Brighton, CO Attn: Matthew Emmens (72) mprovements. Reference Original Agreement dated June 24, 214. Public mprovements are listed in Exhibit "B". Location ofmprovements are shown in Exhibit "D". 16. Landscaping and Dedication. The undersigned Developer hereby agrees to provide the following landscaping. Landscaping. Designate separately each public and private improvement. Filing No.4 - Developer Cost: Landscaping associated with common area landscaping tracts, tree lawns, and Neighborhood Park open spaces located in the following areas; West 67 th Place, West 67'h Drive, Fem Drive, Morrison Drive, Warren Drive, West 66 th Avenue, West Place, Tract Q, Tract D, Tract, Tract L, Tract G, Tract N, and Tract P. See Exhibit "E" for description, estimated quantities and estimated construction costs. The landscaping shall be constructed in accordance with all County requirements and specifications in accordance with the approved plans, this Addendum and time schedule as indicated in Exhibit "E". Page 5 of 18

77 Subdivision mprovements Agreement Addendum MidtownLLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4 Case No. PLT214-15, which is part of Case No. PRC214-9 Midtown LLC. By: Clear Creek Station Metropolitan District ("CCSMD") By: The foregoing in tmm \( was acknm (edged before me this day of -k..a1 bu-, 214, by Q.sh ky ;)l1eddeo. My commission expires: <-/...-/ 4- _---L...:'-- _ Address: Jill BEDORE NOTARY PUBLC STATE OF COLORADO OT/RY D 21(4(Jl6eGG M'f Cot.!.!lSSOH EJ('t\ S _L. 218 Notary PbiiC APPROVED BY resolution at the meeting of -', 214. Collateral to guarantee compliance with this Addendum and construction of public and private landscaping shall be required in the amount of: $594,49.18 No construction permits or building permits shall be issued until said collateral is furnished in the amount required and in a form acceptable to the Board of County Commissioners. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMSSONERS ADAMS COUNTY, COLORADO Clerk of the Board Chair Page 6 of 18

78 Subdivision mprovements Agreement Addendum MidtownLLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4 Case No. PLT214-15, which is part of Case No. PRC214 9 EXHBT A LEGAL DESCRPTON MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK - FLNG NO.4 PARCEL A A PARCEL OF LAND BENG ALL OF TRACTS E AND F OF MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK FLNG NO. 2 AS RECORDED AT RECEPTON NO N THE RECORDS OF THE ADAMS COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFCE; LOCATED WTHN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTON 4, TOWNSHP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SXTH PRNCPAL MERDAN, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO. CONTANNG AN AREA OF.296 ACRE, (12,888 SQUARE FEET), MORE OR LESS. PARCELS A PARCEL OF LAND BENG ALL OF TRACT D OF MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK-FLNG NO. 2 AS RECORDED AT RECEPTON NO N THE RECORDS OF THE ADAMS COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFCE, TOGETHER WTH A PORTON OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTON 4, TOWNSHP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SXTH PRNCPAL MERDAN, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO BENG MORE PARTCULARLY DESCRBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCNG AT THE SOUTH SXTEENTH CORNER OF SAD SECTON 4 AND CONSDERNG THE SOUTH LNE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAD SECTON 4 TO BEAR SOUTH 89 55'26" EAST, A DSTANCE OF FEET, ALL BEARNGS HEREON ARE REFERENCED TO THS LNE; THENCE ALONG SAD SOUTH LNE, SOUTH 89 55'26" EAST, A DSTANCE OF FEET TO THE PONT OF BEGNNNG; THENCE DEPARTNG SAD SOUTH LNE, NORTH 16'34" EAST, A DSTANCE OF FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 47'41 " EAST, A DSTANCE OF FEET; THENCE NORTH 16'34" EAST, A DSTANCE OF FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 43'26" WEST, A DSTANCE OF FEET; THENCE NORTH 16'34" EAST, A DSTANCE OF 57. FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 43'26" EAST, A DSTANCE OF 26. FEET TO A PONT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAD MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK FLNG NO.2; THENCE ALONG SAD WESTERLY BOUNDARY THE FOLLOWNG THRTEEN (13) COURSES: 1) SOUTH 16'34" WEST, A DSTANCE OF 57. FEET; 2) SOUTH 89 43'26" EAST, A DSTANCE OF FEET; 3) SOUTH 16'34" WEST, A DSTANCE OF FEET; 4) SOUTH 89 43'26" EAST, A DSTANCE OF 57. FEET; 5) NORTH 16'34" EAST, A DSTANCE OF 25.5 FEET; 6) SOUTH 89 43'26" EAST, A DSTANCE OF 85. FEET; 7) SOUTH 16'34" WEST, A DSTANCE OF 272. FEET; Page 7 of 18

79 Subdivision mprovements Agreement Addendum Midtown LLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4 Case No. PLT214-15, which is part of Case No. PRC ) SOUTH 89 43'26" EAST, A DSTANCE OF FEET TO THE BEGNNNG OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHWESTERLY HAVNG A RADUS OF 25. FEET; 9) EASTERLY ALONG SAD CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45 '", AN ARC LENGTH OF FEET; 1) TANGENT TO SAD CURVE, NORTH 45 16'34" EAST, A DSTANCE OF FEET; 11) SOUTH 44 43'26" EAST, A DSTANCE OF FEET TO THE BEGNNNG OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY HAVNG A RADUS OF 78.5 FEET; 12) SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAD CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45 '", AN ARC LENGTH OF FEET; 13) TANGENT TO SAD CURVE, SOUTH 89 43'26" EAST, A DSTANCE OF FEET TO A PONT ON THE WESTERLY RGHT-OF-WAY OF LARSH DRVE AS SHOWN ON MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK-FLNG NO. 1 PLAT CORRECTON AS RECORDED AT RECEPTON NO N SAD RECORDS; THENCE ALONG SAD WESTERLY RGHT-OF-WAY, SOUTH 16'34" WEST, A DSTANCE OF FEET TO A PONT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THE PRELMNARY/FNAL PLAT OF MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK-FLNG NO.3 AS RECORDED AT RECEPTON NO , N SAD RECORDS; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY AND WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAD MDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK FLNG NO. 3 THE FOLLOWNG NNE (9) COURSES: 1) DEPARTNG SAD WESTERLY RGHT-OF-WAY, NORTH 89 43'26" WEST, A DSTANCE OF FEET TO THE BEGNNNG OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHEASTERLY HAVNG A RADUS OF 78.5 FEET; 2) SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAD CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45 '", AN ARC LENGTH OF FEET; 3) TANGENT TO SAD CURVE, SOUTH 45 16'34" WEST, A DSTANCE OF FEET TO THE BEGNNNG OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE EASTERLY HAVNG A RADUS OF 78.5 FEET; 4) SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG SAD CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 45 '", AN ARC LENGTH OF FEET; 5) TANGENT TO SAD CURVE, SOUTH 16'34" WEST, A DSTANCE OF 69.9 FEET; 6) NORTH 89 43'26" WEST, A DSTANCE OF 54.5 FEET; 7) SOUTH 16'34" WEST, A DSTANCE OF 57. FEET; 8) SOUTH 89 43'26" EAST, A DSTANCE OF FEET; 9) SOUTH 16'34" WEST, A DSTANCE OF FEET TO A PONT ON THE SOUTH LNE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAD SECTON 4; THENCE ALONG SAD SOUTH LNE, NORTH 89 55'26" WEST A DSTANCE OF FEET TO THE PONT OF BEGNNNG. CONTANNG AN AREA OF 2.75 ACRES, (93,853 SQUARE FEET), MORE OR LESS. PARCELS A AND B HAVNG A COMBNED AREA OF ACRES, (916,741 SQUARE FEET), MORE OR LESS. Page 8 of 18

80 Subdivision mprovements Agreement Addendum MidtownLLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4 Case No. PLT which is part of Case No. PRC214-ooo9 EXlUBTB Please reference approved Filing FoW" Subdivision mprovement Agreement for Exhibit B, Public mprovements EXRRTTC Please reference approved Filing Four Subdivision mprovement Agreement for Exhibit C, Phasing Exhibit EXR11UTD Please reference approved Filing Four Subdivision mprovement Agreement for Exhibit D, Public vs. Private mprovements Page 9 of1s

81 - Fill ng 4 L an d scape- W 67'h P ace LANDSCAPE TEM DESCRPTON EXHBT E Subdivision mprovements Agreement Addendum MidtownLLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No. 4 Case No. PL 1'214 15, which is part of Case No. PRC QNlY. UNTCOST/UNTTOTAL COST Trees by District or builder 8 EA. $4. $ 32. Sod Tree Lawn wi soil prep and irrigation (DisLrlct & builder) S.F $1.32 $ 2,53.92 $ Tolal $ F ill ng4 - L an d scape - W 67 th D rive. LANDSCAPE TEM DESCRPTON QNTY.UNTCOST/UNTTOTAL COST Trees by District or builder 11 EA. $4. $ 4.4. Sod Tree Lawn w soil prop Bnd urigallqn (Oi.hla & bulldar) 3.86 SF S $ Total S Fillna 4 - Landscape - Fern Drive LANDSCAPE TEM DESCRPTON QNTY. UNT COST/UNT TOTAL COST Trees by District or builder 31 EA. $4. $ 124. Sod Tree Lawn wi soil prep and irrigalion (District & builder) 7.62 S.F. $1.32 $ 1,34.64 $ Tolal $ Filln Landscape - Morrison Drive LANDSCAPE TEM DESCRPTON QNTY. UNT COST/UNT TOTAL COST Trees by District or builder 24 EA. $4. $ 9,6. Sod Tree Lawn wi soil prep and rrigation (District & bulldor) S,F $1.32 $ 7428,96 $ Total $ Fllln" 4 - Landscape - Warren Drive LANDSCAPE item DESCRPTON QNTY.UNTCOST/UNT TOTAL COST Trees by District or builder 29 EA. $4, $ Sod Tree Lawn wi soli erne and rriqbim {District & bullderl S.F. $1.32 8,49.24 $ Total $ Fling 4 - L an d scape - W.66 h Avenue LANDSCAPE TEM DESCRPTON QNTY.UNTCOST/UNT TOTAL COST Trees by District or builder 7 EA $4. $ 2,8. Sod Tree Lawn wi soil eree snd rnasuon!dislricl!j, builder) 1,39 S.F $1.32 $ 1,834,8 $ Total $ Page 1 of18

82 Subdivision mprovements Agreement Addendum MidtownLLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4 Case No. PL 1'214-15, which is part of Case No. PRC214-9 Filing 4 - Landscaoe - W. 66 Place LANDSCAPE TEM DESCRPTON Trees by District or builder QNTY. UNT COST/UNT TOTAL COST 5 EA. $4. $ 2. Sod Tree Lawn 1'// soli orao and rrl.1;on (District & buudor) S.F $1.32 $ Filing 4 - Landscape - Tract Q - Part A. LANDSCAPE $ Total S TEM DESCRPTON QNTY. UNT COST/UNT TOTAL COST HARDSCAPE Trees! ca nl!. Bvolllreen and ornamental) 58 EA. $4. $ 23,2. Sod wi soil re l2 and irrigation 2,23 S.F $1.32 $ Planting bed wi amendment and [!ant material 11,817 SF $2.56 $ $ 79, TEM DESCRPTON QNTY. UNT COST/UNT TOTAL COST Concrete walks and l2aving S.F $2.5 $ 45,627.5 Fibar or approved eoual plav surface 384 SF $2. $ Filing 4 - Landscaoe - Tract Q - Part B. LANDSCAPE $ Total $ TEM DESCRPTON QNTY. UNT COST/UNT TOTAL COST HARDSCAPE Trees (canopy, evergreen and ornamentan 17 EA. $4. $ 68. Sod wi soil orep and irri!lation S.F $1.32 $ 9, Planting bed w amendment and olant material 653 S.F. $2.56 $ $ 31, TEM DESCRPTON QNTY. UNT COST/UNT TOTAL COST Concrete walks and pavlnq 2,32 S.F $2.5 $ 58. $ 58. Total $ Filing 4 - Landscape - Tract D LANDSCAPE TEM DESCRPTON QNTY. UNT COST/UNT TOTAL COST HARDSCAPE Trees (canopy. eve/llreen and ornamental) 1 EA. $4. $ 4. Sod wi soli prep and irriaation 3975 S,F. $1.32 $ Plantina bed w amendment and olant material 258 S.F. $2.56 $ $ 15,851.8 TEM DESCRPTON QNTY. UNT COST/UNT TOTAL COST Concrete walks and pavina S.F $2.5 $ $ Total S 34,233.8 Page of 18

83 Subdivision mprovements Agreement Addendum MidtownLLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4 Case No. PLT214-15, which is part of Case No. PRC214-9 Fii ng 4 - Landscape - T rac t LANDSCAPE TEM DESCRPTON Trees (C<lnop. "velgreen and ornamental} Sod w soli oreo and rrlqation PlanUna bed wi amendment and olant male rial HARDSCAPE TEM DESCRPTON Concrete walks and paving QNTY. UNT COSTfUNT TOTAL COST 8 EA. $4. $ S.F $1.32 $ S.F $2.56 $ $ ONTY. UNT COST/UNT TOTAL COST 296 S.F. $2.5 $ S L Total $ Filing 4 - Landscape - Tract L LANDSCAPE TEM HARDSCAPE TEM DESCRPTON Trees (canopy. evcfareon and ornamenlal) Sod w soil (!re(! and irrigation Planting bed w amendment and (!ant material DESCRPTON Concrete walks and paving QNTY. UNT COST/UNT TOTAL COST 1 EA $4. S S.F $1.32 $ S.F. $2.56 $ 8, $ 18, QNTY. UNT COST/UNT TOTAL COST S.F $2.5 $ $ Total $ Fill ng 4- Lan d scape - T ract G LANDSCAPE TEM DESCRPTON Planlll1gbed Y-J amendment and ];!ant material QNTY. UNT COST/UNT TOTAL COST 1,86 S.F. $2.56 $ $ Filing 4 - Landscape - Tract N LANDSCAPE TEM DESCRPTON Planting bed w amendment and plant material QNTY. UNT COST/UNT TOTAL COST 1 86 SF $2.56 $ $ Page 12 of 18

84 Subdivision mprovements Agreement Addendum MidtownLLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4 Case No. PLT214 15, which is part of Case No. PRC214 9 Filina 4 - Landscape - Tract P LANDSCAPE TEM DESCRPTON Trees {canopy, evergreen and ornamentalj UpriQht EverQreen Shrubs Sad w soil prep and irrigation Planting bed w amendment and plant material Native Seed w soli creparalion HARDSCAPE TEM DESCRPTON Concrete walks and pavinq QNTY. UNT COST/UNT TOTAL COST 52 EA. $4. $ EA. $115. $ S.F. $1.32 $ S.F. $2.56 $ SF. $.25 $ $ 54> QNTY. UNT COST/UNT TOTAL COST 1527 S.F. $2.5 $ $ 26,317.5 Total $ SUMMARY DEVELOPER COST - SUB-TOTAL 2% ADMNSTRATON 5% PER YEAR NFLATON 5% PER YEAR NFLATON YEAR TWO 5% PER YEAR NFLATON YEAR THREE $ $ $ $ $ TOTAL $ $594,49.18 collateral includes twenty percent (2%) to cover administration and five percent (5%) per year for the term of the Addendum to cover inflation. Construction Completion Date December 1,217 nitial,.,,i",,_.fdeve O Page 13 ofls

85 FUTURE PHASE' AREA AREA EXHBT _ OPEN SPACE TRACT AND TREE LAWN BY DSTRCT TREE LAWN BY DSTRCT TREE LAWN BY BULDER HOMEOWNER FLNG TWO AREA.,,,/ NOTE: TREE LAWNS ADJACEHT TO FRONT LOADED HOMES MAY VARY M DRVEWAY LOCATONS ARE DElERMNED FLNG TWO AREA :' "J W. 87TH PLACE. w z o w Q. /

86 _ OPEN SPACE TRACT AND TREE LAWN BY DSTRCT TREE LAWN BY DSTRCT TREE LAWN BY BULDER HOMEOWNER NOlE: TREE LAWNS AD.ACENT TO FRONT" LOADED HOMES MAY VAK'! M DRNEWAY LOCA11ONS ARE DE'TEWNED MDTOWN FLNG FOUR SCALE: l' :1' ' NOTES: LANDSCAPE AREAEXHBT SHEETL2 DRAWN BY; NORRS DESGN DATE: TRACT FLNG THREE '\ AREA i '" '- FlUNG THREE ) AREA t'

87 (' FUTURE PHASE '" '- AREA.,) MDTOWN FLNG FOUR SCALE: l ' =2'-' NOTES: landscape AREA EXHBT DATE: OPEN SPACE TRACT AND TREE LAWN BY DSTRCT... :.,.. ""'.. \ FlUNG 4 OPEN SPACE ACREAGE - OPEN SPACE TRACT ACREAGE TRACTD.2 TRACT.2 TRACTL.3 TRACr Q 1.6 TOTAL: 2.3

88 Subdivision mprovements Agreement Addendum MidtownLLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4 Case No. PL T214-15, which is part of Case No. PRC214-9 EXHBTF MDTOWN SNGLE FAMLY DETACHED HOME LANDSCAPE PERFORMANCE BOND AGREEMENT TEMPLATE This Performance Bond Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into this _ day of 21_, by and between the County of Adams, State of Colorado, by and through its Department of Planning and Development, ("County") and ("Applicant"). WHEREAS, the Applicant is holder of a Certificate of Occupancy (certificate of occupancy; building permit, etc.), Applicant hereby tenders to the County a cash/surety bond as collateral deposit in the sum of $6,2. ("Collateral") per home, to be held by the Adams County Treasurer until such time as the following conditions have been satisfied: Completion of the required landscaping as specified in the corresponding Final Development Plan for property located, PN #. The bond shall include all costs for labor and materials to install living landscaping on the property at the aforementioned address. Multiple properties may be bonded for in one agreement. Applicant should attach exhibit including all addresses and PN#S applicable. Total Collateral $ _ n order for Applicant to obtain a timely return of the Collateral, the Conditions must be satisfied no later than n the event the Applicant fails to satisfy the conditions to the satisfaction of the County by the date specified herein, Property owner/applicant hereby gives the County and/or its authorized agent permission to enter onto the Property to perform the work necessary to complete the conditions. Expenses for any work performed pursuant to this paragraph shall be funded by the Collateral, and property Owner/Applicant shall reimburse the county for any expenses not satisfied by the Collateral. Any Collateral not utilized by the County for completion of the conditions pursuant to this paragraph shall be returned to the Property Owner/Applicant. By signing below, Applicant agrees to abide by the terms of this Agreement. Applicant Adams County Planning and Development Page 17 of18

89 Subdivision mprovements Agreement Addendum MidtownLLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4 Case No. PLT214-15, which is part of Case No. PRC214-9 MDTOWN SNGLE FAMLY ATTACHED HOME LANDSCAPE PERFORMANCE BOND AGREEMENT TEMPLATE This Performance Bond Agreement ("Agreemenr) is entered into this _ day of 2C by and between the County of Adams, State of Colorado, by and through its Department of Planning and Development, ('County") and ("Applicant"). WHEREAS, the Applicant is holder of a Certificate of Occupancy (certificate of occupancy; building permit, etc.), Applicant hereby tenders to the County a cash /surety bond as collateral deposit in the sum of $ ("Collateral") per home, to be held by the Adams County Treasurer until such time as the following conditions have been satisfied: Completion of the required landscaping as specified in the corresponding Final Development Plan for property located, PN # The bond shall include all costs for labor and materials to install living landscaping on the property at the aforementioned address. Multiple properties may be bonded for in one agreement Applicant should attach exhibit including ali addresses and PN#s applicable. Total Collateral S. n order for Applicant to obtain a timely retum of the Collateral, the Conditions must be satisfied no later than n the event the Applicant fails to satisfy the conditions to the satisfaction of the County by the date specified herein, Property owner/applicant hereby gives the County and/or its authorized agent permission to enter onto the Property to perform the work necessary to complete the conditions. Expenses for any work performed pursuant to this paragraph shall be funded by the Collateral, and property Owner/Applicant shall reimburse the county for any expenses not satisfied by the Collateral. Any Collateral not utilized by the County for completion of the conditions pursuant to this paragraph shall be returned to the Property Owner/Applicant. By signing below, Applicant agrees to abide by the terms of this Agreement. Applicant Adams County Planning and Development Page 18 of 18

90 LANTZ ASSOCATES, LLC W 72nd Cir Arvada, Co fax Freg1Jl@fQ!JlglLl! Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Midtown at Clear Creek 68 th Ave and Pecos St The intersection of 68 th Ave at Pecos St does not meet any of the traffic volume warrants for the installation of a traffic signal according to the 29 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Traffic Counts were taken on August 28,214. n analyzing the traffic volumes, four separate warrants are considered. This analysis is for an intersection with two or more lanes on the major street (pecos St) and two or more lanes on the minor street (68 th Ave). The speed limit on Pecos St at 68 th Ave is 35 mph. Because the speed limit is not greater than 4 mph, the warrant analysis is based upon the 1% condition. The MUTCD also states that right tum volumes on the minor street should be removed from the warrant analysis based upon engineering judgment. The EB right turn has a separate SB lane on Pecos to turn into so the majority of the EB right turns were removed from the analysis. Based upon the previous counts and the projections in the traffic study, the EB right turn volumes are 6-8% of the total EB volumes. Thus the EB volumes were reduced by 6%. The WB right turns are only 1-15% of the total WB volumes so the WB volume was only reduced by 1%. Warrant 1, Eight - Hour Vehicular Volume Condition A -1% This condition considers the total volume of traffic. The warrant is met when the total volumes on the major street equal or exceed 6 vehicles per hour and the number of vehicles on the highest approach of the minor street equal or exceed 2 vehicles for the same 8 hours. This warrant is not satisfied for any hours. Condition B -1% This considers the condition where traffic on the major street is so heavy that traffic on the minor street suffers excessive delay. The warrant is met when the total volumes on the major street equal or exceed 9 vehicles per hour and number of vehicles on the highest approach of the minor street equal or exceed 1 vehicles for the same 8 hours. This warrant is only satisfied for of the required 8 hours. September 2,214

91 Page 2 Traffic Signal Warrant Study Midtown at Clear Creek Brookfield Residential Warrant 2, Four - Hour Vehicular Volume This condition considers the highest 4 hours of traffic. The warrant is met when volumes on the major street and vehicles on the minor street fall above certain levels shown in a curve in the MUTCD for four hours. This warrant is not satisfied for any hours. Warrant 3, Peak Hour This condition considers the highest hour of traffic. The warrant is met when volumes on the major street and vehicles on the minor street fall above certain levels shown in a curve in the MUTCD during a peak hour. This warrant is not satisfied for any hours. None of the warrants are met at this intersection. A traffic signal installation is not recommended at 68 th and Pecos at this time based upon this study. The traffic volumes and the Warrant Summaries are included along with this report. 68th Ave at Pecos St Traffic Signal Warrant Study TME Pecos St Major Street NB SB TOTAL 12 1am t lpm , am th Ave Minor Street EB WB HGH , Number of Houll War,ant e Mel 1A 612 a Warrants 1B 2 3 9/1 Per Chart Per Chart X 1 September 2,214 LANTZ ASSOCATES

92 Page 3 Traffic Signal Warrant Study Midtown at Clear Creek Brookfield Residential 68th Ave and Pecos St Figure 4C-1. Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume 5 --,----r ' '----r r---,---, MNOR STREET r HGHER VOLUME APPROACH VPH 115' 1 f t t--=t+====j:5:= 8' MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES VEHCLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note: 115 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 8 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. 68th Ave and Pecos St Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour 6 MNOR STREET HGHER- VOLUME APPROACH - VPH ""... '" V... to-.. 2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES t... i" i'-.... '> l(2 OR MORE,NES i 1 LAi E K LANE & 1 LANE... i"""-... '<... r """-t> r-- r--. r-- 15' 1' MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES VEHCLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note: 15 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 1 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. September 2,214 LANTZ ASSOCATES

93 Page 4 Traffic Signal Warrant Study Midtown at Clear Creek Brookfield Residential 67 th Ave and Pecos St The intersection of 67 th Ave at Pecos St does not meet any of the warrants for the installation of a traffic signal according to the 29 MUTCD. Traffic Counts were taken on August 28, 214. n analyzing the traffic volumes, four separate wall'ants are considered. This analysis is for an intersection with two or more lanes on the major street (pecos S t) and two or more lanes on the minor street ( 67 th Ave). The speed limit on Pecos 8t at 67 tl1 Ave is 35 mph. Because the speed limit is not greater than 4 mph, the warrant analysis is based upon the 1% condition. The MUTCD also states that right turn volumes on the minor street should be removed from the warrant analysis based upon engineering judgment. The EB right turn volumes are approximately 7% of the total EB volumes. Because there is not a dedicated acceleration lane, the EB volumes have only been reduced by 3%. Warrant 1, Eight - Hour Vehicular Volume Condition A -1% This condition considers the total volume of traffic. The warrant is met when the total volumes on the major street equal or exceed 6 vehicles per hour and the number of vehicles on the highest approach of the minor street equal or exceed 2 vehicles for the same 8 hours. This warrant is not satisfied for any hours. Condition B -1% This considers the condition where traffic on the major street is so heavy that traffic on the minor street suffers excessive delay. The warrant is met when the total volumes on the major street equal or exceed 9 vehicles per hour and number of vehicles on the highest approach of the minor street equal or exceed 1 vehicles for the same 8 hours. This warrant is not satisfied for any hours. Warrant 2, Four - Hour Vehicular Volume This condition considers the highest 4 hours of traffic. The warrant is met when volumes on the major street and vehicles on the minor street fall above certain levels shown in a curve in the MUTCD for four hours. This warrant is not satisfied for any hours. Warrant 3, Peak Hour This condition considers the highest hour of traffic. The warrant is met when volumes on the major street and vehicles on the minor street fall above certain levels shown in a curve in the MUTCD during a peak hour. This warrant is not satisfied for any hours. None of the warrants are met at this intersection. A traffic signal installation is not recommended at 67 th and Pecos at this time based upon this study. The traffic volumes and the Warrant Summary are included along with this report. September 2,214 LANTZ ASSOCATES

94 Page 5 Traffic Signal Warrant Study Midtown at Clear Creek Brookfield Residential 67th Ave at Pecos St Traffic Signal Warrant Study TME 12-1am pm 1, am NB Pecos St Major Street 5B TOTAL lh AvG Minor S treet EB WB HGH S Number olhour warrant s Mot 1A 6/2 Warrants 1B PorChnrt PorC.hart 67th Ave and Pecos st Figure 4C-1. Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume 5,---,----,----,---,----,----,---,----,----,---,----, 4 r r_---- MNOR STREET 3 r----r+---r_--+_-- HGHER VOLUME APPROACH _---r---+= _-- VPH 1 L t t--== ' MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES VEHCLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note: 11 S as tbe lower threshold volume for a minor-street approac Wflh wo or more lanes and 8 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with one lane. September 2,214 LANTZ ASSOCATES

95 Page 6 Traffic Signal Warrant Study Midtown at Clear Creek Brookfield Residential 67th Ave and Pecos 8t 6 5 MNOR STREET 4 HGHER VOLUME 3 APPROACH - VPH '-... Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour r--... r--.. ' , <' 2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES " "- f' (2 OR MORE JNES '> r f' r-. t> / LAJ.E 1 LANE & 1 LANE "- 15" r--- r r-- 1 1" MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES VEHCLES PER HOUR (VPH) "Note: 15 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 1 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. Conclusion This warrant study analysis shows that the intersection of 68 th Ave and Pecos St and the intersection of 67 th Ave and Pecos St do not meet any of the warrants in the MUTCD for the installation of a traffic signal at this time. Therefore a traffic signal installation is not recommended at either location based upon the traffic volumes. The volumes on 68 th Ave are only about 5% of those necessary for the installation of a traffic signal, thus the recommendation in the February 214 Traffic Study update that the signal won't likely be warranted until the completion of Phase 4 (Filing 4) is still valid. Sincerely yours, Fred Lantz, PE September 2,214 LANTZ ASSOCATES

96 All Traffic Data Services, nc 966 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge,CO Page 1 Site Code: 1 Station 1: 1 W 68TH AVE WO PECOS ST Start 28-Aug-1 Time Thu 12: AM 1: 2: 3: 4: 5: 6: 7: 8: 9: 1: 11: 12: PM 1: 2: 3:' 4: 5: 6: 7: 8: 9: 1: 11: Total AM Peak Vol. PM Peak Vol. Grand Total ADT EB : : ADT 1,836 MDT 1,836

97 All Traffic Data Services, nc 966 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge,CO Page 1 Site Code: 2.5 Station D: 2.5 W 68TH AVE EtO PECOS ST Start Time 12: AM 1 : 2: 3: 4: 5: 6: 7: 8: 9: 1: 11: 12: PM 1: 2: 3: 4: 5: 6: 7: 8: 9: 1: 11: Total AM Peak Vol. PM Peak Vol. Grand Total 28-Aug-1 Thu WB o 1 o : 26 15: ADT ADT 285 MDT 285

98 All Traffic Data Services, nc 966 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge,CO Page 1 Site Code: 3.5 Station 1: 3.5 PECOS ST N/O W 68TH AVE Start Time 12: AM 1 : 2: 3: 4: 5: 6: 7: 8: 9: 1: 11: 12: PM 1: 2: 3: 4: 5: 6: 7: 8: 9: 1: 11: Total AM Peak Vol. PM Peak Vol. Grand Total 28-Aug-1 Thu S : : ADT ADT 9,42 MDT 9,42

99 All Traffic Data Services, nc 966 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge,CO Page 1 Site Code: 4 Station D: 4 PECOS ST S/O W 68TH AVE Start Time 12: AM 1: 2: 3: 4: 5: 6: 7: 8: 9: 1: 11: 12: PM 1: 2: 3: 4: 5: 6: 7: 8: 9: 1: 11: Total AM Peak Vol. PM Peak Vol. Grand Total 28-Aug-1 Thu NB : : ADT ADT 1,489 MDT 1,489

100 All Traffic Data Services, nc 966 W 44th Ave Wheat Ridge,CO Page 1 Site Code: 5 Station 1: 5 W 67TH AVE WD PECOS ST Start Time 12: AM 1: 2: 3: 4: 5: 6: 7: 8: 9: 1: 11: 12: PM 1: 2: 3: 4: 5: 6: 7: 8: 9: 1: 11: Total AM Peak Vol. PM Peak Vol. Grand Total 28-Aug-1 Thu EB : 4 17: ADT ADT 426 MDT 426

101 68th Ave at Pecos St Traffic Signal Warrant Study Pecos St TME Major Street NB SB TOTAL 12-1am pm am th Ave Minor Street EB WB HGH Number of Hours Warrant is Met Warrants 1A 1B 2 6/2 9/1 Per Chart X 1 3 Per Chart LANTZ ASSOCATES August 214

102 68th Ave and Pecos 8t 5 Figure 4C-1. Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume MNOR STREET HGHER- VOLUME APPROACH- VPH ' 1 6' MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES VEHCLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note: 115 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 8 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.

103 68th Ave and Pecos St MNOR STREET HGHER- VOLUME APPROACH - VPH Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour 6 " " '" '" 2 / > 2 1 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES /2 OR MORE LANES & 1 LANE "'---. t? V1 LANE & 1 LANE!--. r i""' <: r ' 1' MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES VEHCLES PER HOUR (VPH) 'Note: 15 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 1 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.

104 67th Ave at Pecos St Traffic Signal Warrant Study Pecos St TME Major Street NB SB TOTAL 12-1am pm am th Ave Minor Street EB WB HGH 1 a 1 a a a a a 1 a 1 3 a 3 9 a 9 28 a a a a 28 2 a 2 16 a a a a a a 13 6 a 6 8 a 8 6 a 6 6 a 6 1 a 1 Number of Hour Warrant is Met Warrants 1A 1B 2 6/2 9/1 Per Chart 3 Per Chart LANTZ ASSOCATES August 214

105 67th Ave and Pecos St 5 Figure 4C-1. Warrant 2, Four-Hour Vehicular Volume 4 MNOR STREET 3 HGHER VOLUME APPROACH - 2 VPH 1 115' r--t r--=p+::$ 8' MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES VEHCLES PER HOUR (VPH) "Note: 115 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 8 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane.

106 67th Ave and Pecos St MNOR STREET HGHER- VOLUME APPROACH- VPH " Figure 4C-3. Warrant 3, Peak Hour '- " '"... '" V 2 OR MORE LANES & 2 OR MORE LANES k:,2 OR MORE LA,NES "> i 1 LAiE "" r'-... KNE&1 LANE... r--- r--- r-- "- r-- "-' MAJOR STREET-TOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES VEHCLES PER HOUR (VPH) "Note: 15 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with two or more lanes and 1 vph applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor-street approach with one lane. 15' 1'

107 SARE, NC. Grq/rr:""C /lgl/ltlfs :1 ColfJtrllct/tll Mil/trials C,,"sll/ants September 4,214 Ms. Jill Carlson, C.E.G. Colorado Geological Survey 15 llinois Street Golden, CO 841 Subject: Response to CGS Comments Filing 3 Preliminary and Final Plat FDP, and SA case Number PRC214-9 Midtown at Clear Creek Adams County, Colorado Project No Dear Ms. carlson: This letter presents our response to comments produced by Colorado Geological Survey (CGS) regarding the Midtown at Clear Creek subdivision in Adams County, Colorado. A preliminary geotechnical study the Midtown at Clear Creek Subdivision was conducted by Cesare, nc. (Cesare) and a report of findings and recommendations was issued July 2, 212. The extent of the study encompassed the location of Filings 3 and 4. Our borings indicate the subsoils, in general, consist of clay with sand, to sandy clay overlaying alluvial sands and gravels. The clayey soils encountered exhibited a moderate to very high swelling potential and we provided recommendations designed to reduce the potential negative impacts of the swelling soils on proposed structures and infrastructure. t was recommended that the moderate to very high swelling clays be sub-excavated, moisture treated, and recompacted beneath structures and roadways. The depth of SUb-excavation was to the top of the alluvial sands and gravels or 8 feet below the lowest foundation level for structures, whichever was less, and to a depth of 5 feet below roadways. Observations were conducted on a fulltime basis by a Cesare field technician to determine that the fill was placed in accordance with specifications. During SUb-excavation, groundwater was not observed by the field technician and so is not likely to present a concern. Perimeter drains for individual structures maybe required and are determined from lot specific investigations by the geotechnical engineer for the homebuilder. 718 South Alton Way, Building B e Centennial, Colorado 8112 $ Phone Fax

108 CESARE. NC. Please contact us with any questions or comments regarding this information. Sincerely, CESARE, NC. MSG/ksm Darin R. Duran, P.E. Principal, Geotechnical Engineering Manager cc: Ms. Julia Summers, Brookfield Residential ( only) Mr. Mike Pietschmann, Redland ( only) Midtown at Clear Creek Filing 3 Letter

109 c:....:l' SARE, NC. GeQfeclmlcal lgln & COls/mellolt MateritW., Cmf&ullullts PRELMNARY GEOTECHNCAL STUDY Midtown at Clear Creek, Phases 2 and 3 Adams County, Colorado Report Prepared for: Mr. Nolan Donley Brookfield Residential 188 nverness Drive West, Suite 15 Englewood, Colorado 8112 Project No July 2, South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Phone Fax

110 - -' u SARE, NC. GUJc"nlctll Eflglrtttrs & CoSlrUt:tiofl MQ(tr!au COSu/liul/S PRELMNARY GEOTECHNCAL STUDY Midtown at Clear Creek, Phases 2 and 3 Adams County, Colorado Report Prepared for: Mr. Nolan Donley Brookfield Residential 188 nverness Drive West, Suite 15 Englewood, Colorado 8112 Project No July 2,212 Report Prepared by: Report Reviewed by: tu u" Kenneth M. Murphy ( Staff Engineer Darin R. Duran, P.E. Principal, Geotechnical Engineering Manager Midtown at Clear Creek Phases 2 and 3 Report doc

111 CESARE, NC.. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PURPOSE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTON STE CONDTONS NVESTGATONS LA.BORATORY TESTNG SUBSURFACE CONDTONS PREVOUS STUDES GEOTECHNCAL CONCERNS... 3 B.l HEAVE , " GEOTECHNCAL RECOMMENDATONS OVEREXCAVATON PAVEMENTS STRUcruRES ,..., , , FOUNDATONS FLOORS UNDERGROUND UTLmES..., EXCAVATONS , FLL PLACEMENT , , SURFACE DRANAGE B SUBSURFACE DRANAGE B.l STRUcruRES SESMC STE CLASSFCATON AND PARAMETERS PAVEMENT SECTON THCKNESS WATER SOLUBLE SULFATES CONCLUSONS GEOTECHNCAL RSK LMTATONS TABLE LOCATED WTHN TEXT TABLE 2. Pavement Section Thickness Recommendations TABLE SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS TABLE 1 FGURES STE PLAN AND BORNG LOCATONS..., FGURE 1 LOGS OF BORNGS (NCLUDES KEY TO SYMBOLS) FGURE 2 CONTOUR MAP OF DEPTH OF EXPANSVE CLAy FGURE 3 APPENDX LABORATORY TEST RESULTS APPENDX A Midtown at Clear Creek Phases 2 and 3 Report ii

112 1. PURPOSE CESARE, NC. This report presents results of a preliminary geotechnical study for Phases 2 and 3 of the Midtown at Clear Creek development located south of the intersection of Pecos Street and 68th Avenue in Adams County, Colorado. The study was made to determine the suitability of the site for the proposed development and to provide preliminary geotechnical recommendations for planning and cost estimating purposes. Factual data gathered during the field and laboratory work is summarized in Table 1, Figures 1 through 3, and Appendix A. Our opinions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the data generated during this field investigation, previous studies, laboratory testing, and our experience with other projects near the subject site. 2. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTON Details of the proposed development were unavailable at the time of this study. We assumed that the development will be similar to Phase 1 with construction of residential units, light commercial structures and asphalt roadways with concrete curb and gutters and concrete alleys. Entrances to the site will likely be along 68th Avenue and along Pecos Street. A site plan is shown on Figure 1. We assumed that overlot grading will be required with fills of up to 4 feet, and that fill materials will be generated from sources within the project boundaries. 3. STE CON DTONS Phase 2 and Phase 3 are located southwest and southeast, respectively, of the corner of Pecos Street and 68th Avenue in unincorporated Adams County. Phase 2 is generally rectangular in shape and is generally bordered by 68th Avenue to the north, Phase 1 and Pecos Ave to the east, commercial properties to the south, and vacant land to the west. Phase 3 is generally triangular in shape and is bordered by 68th Avenue to the north, Clear Creek to the south and Pecos Street to the west. Older, single-family residential units with basements are located north of 68th Avenue. Existing topography of the overall area (Phases 1, 2 and 3) would be considered relatively flat, with a general slope down to the southeast. Maximum elevation differences of about 3 feet and 4 feet are present in Phase 2 and Phase 3, respectively. Vegetation consists of native grass and weeds. There is a reservoir about 1,4 feet south of the southern boundary of Phase 2. A pond and drainage leading towards Clear Creek are located south of the central portion of Phase 3. No bedrock outcrops were observed at, or in close proximity of, the site. 4. NVESTGATONS Ten borings (B-1 through B-1) were drilled in Phase 1 for Cesare, nc. (Cesare) Project No Subsurface conditions in Phase 2 were investigated by drilling eight borings (B-11 through B-18) to depths of 34 to 39 feet. Six borings (B-19 through B-24) were drilled in Phase 3 to depths of 24 to 39 feet. The locations of the borings for all phases are indicated in Figure 1. The borings were advanced using 4-inch diameter, continuous-flight augers or 6-inch diameter hollow-stem augers. At frequent intervals, samples of the subsoils were taken using a California sampler, which is driven into the soil by dropping a 14-pound hammer through a free fall of 3 inches. The California sampler has a 2.S-inch outside diameter by 2-inch inside diameter. The procedure to drive the sampler into the soil is known as a penetration test. The number of blows required for the sampler to penetrate 12 inches gives an indication of the consistency or relative density of the Midtown at Clear Creek Phases 2 and 3 Report

113 CESARE, NC. soils encountered. Results of the penetration tests and depths of sampling are presented on the Log of Borings, Figure 2 with the Key to Symbols. Bulk samples were collected from auger cuttings in the upper 5 feet of selected borings. 5. LABORATORY TESTNG Samples were returned to the laboratory where they were visually classified and testing assigned to specific samples to evaluate pertinent engineering properties. The laboratory tests included 19 swell/consolidation tests to evaluate the effect of wetting and loading on the in situ soils and four remolded swell/consolidation tests to evaluate the effect of wetting and loading on moisture conditioned and recompacted soils. The samples were loaded to an assumed overburden pressure of 1 pounds per square feet (pst) per foot of depth, with a minimum load of 4 psf, before inundating with water. The remolded samples were loaded to 5 psf before inundation. One standard Proctor test was conducted to determine the moisture/density relationship of the nearsurface clay soils. Grain size analysis and Atterberg limits were conducted on a sample of each soil type encountered, and on the Proctor sample. Water soluble sulfate content was measured in three samples of the near-surface clay soil. Natural moisture content and density measurements were made on four samples. A summary of the laboratory testing results is presented in Table 1. Detailed results are presented in Appendix A. 6. SUBSURFACE CONDTONS Our borings indicate the subsoils generally consist of sandy clay overlying Silty, clayey sand, and sand with silt and gravel over sandstone and claystone bedrock. The sandy clay is very stiff to very hard, fine to medium grained, medium plasticity, slightly moist to moist and light brown to brown in color. The clay may contain gravel in the upper 4 feet. The silty, clayey sand is medium dense to dense, fine to coarse grained, low to medium plasticity, slightly moist to very moist and brown in color. This sand can contain gravel. The sand with silty clay and gravel is medium dense to very dense, fine to coarse grained, nil to low plasticity, slightly moist to wet and brown in color. Clay fill containing concrete and asphalt debris was encountered in the upper 12 feet of Boring 2. The overlaying clay layer is about 3 feet to 24 feet thick in Phase 2 and about feet to 23 feet thick under the Phase 3 site, with an average layer thickness of about 8 feet in both phases. For the 18 samples of clay tested for swell/consolidation, 15 samples swelled, with swell potentials ranging between.1 percent and 1. percent. The average swell potential for these tests was 4.5 percent. Three of the 18 clay samples consolidated between.2 percent and.9 percent. One sample of the underlying clayey sand was tested for swell/consolidation. The sample consolidated 3.3 percent. Groundwater was encountered at the time of drilling. Within Phase 2, groundwater was encountered at depths of 21 feet to 27 feet. Within Phase 3, groundwater was not encountered in three borings; in the three other borings, groundwater was encountered at depths of 14 feet to 26 feet. The borings were checked about three days after drilling and the holes were found to have caved. A more complete description of the subsoils encountered in the borings is provided in Figure Midtown at Clear Creek Phases 2 and 3 Report

114 CESARE, NC. These observations represent conditions at the time of field exploration and may not be indicative of other times or other locations. Groundwater can be expected to fluctuate with various seasonal, irrigation and weather conditions. 7. PREVOUS STUDES Previous studies of the site include a study by A.G. Wassenaar, nc. (Wassenaar) (Project No. 127) for David Weekly Homes. The Wassenaar study included 14 borings drilled to depths of up to 3 feet. The Wassenaar borings indicated 4 to 9 feet of very stiff, silty, sandy, slightly calcareous, and slightly moist to moist, brown clay. Laboratory testing indicated that the clay possessed swell potentials of up to 8 percent at loads of 1, psf. The average depth of this material was about 6 feet with an average swell potential of 3.8 percent for those samples that swelled. One sample consolidated up to 5 percent. The underlying clayey sand had swells of up to 6.4 percent with an average swell of 1.8 percent. Ground Engineering Consultants, nc. (Ground) conducted a subsurface study in 26. The study addressed Phases 1, 2, and 3 and explored the site with 17 borings, drilled to depths of 1 to 25 feet and 14 test pits, excavated to depths of 3 to 11 feet. Ground noted that the subsurface materials generally consisted of 1 to 3 inches of topsoil overlying native sands, silts and clays. Ground encountered bedrock at depth of 7 to 12 feet near the southeastern portion of the site. Ground performed four swell/consolidation tests, with two samples resulting in swells.8 and 6.9 percent and two samples resulting in consolidation of.1 and 1. percent. A swell potential study for Midtown at Clear Creek Phase 1 was conducted by Cesare (Project No ). The study included ten borings drilled to 15 feet below the existing ground surface. The borings encountered 3 feet to 9 feet of sandy clay over silty/clayey sand and silty sand with gravel. Swell tests were conducted under approximate overburden pressure. Swell potentials up to 13.6 percent were measured in samples of the upper clay layer. Three samples of clayey sand consolidated between.5 percent and 6. percent. 8. GEOTECHNCAL CONCERNS 8.1 Heave The primary geotechnical concern at the site is the swell potential of the surficial sandy clays. These materials are stable at their existing moisture contents but upon wetting will cause heaving and cracking of structures, pavements and flatwork founded on, or within, this material. Our testing and analysis conducted for this study indicates that if these materials become wetted, the estimated free field heave potential for most of the site is over 3 inches, with a maximum calculated free field heave of 8.8 inches. Some moisture increase is inevitable after site development as a result of covering the soils and reducing the natural evaporation of the soil. Additional wetting can occur as a result of irrigation and/or improper drainage. The risk of movement can be reduced, but not eliminated, by overexcavating the potentially expansive materials and replacing with non-expansive materials, or recompacting the native soil at higher moisture contents than currently exist. To estimate the reduction in risk that may be achieved by recompacting the existing soil, we performed swell tests on remolded samples from a Midtown at Clear Creek Phases 2 and 3 Report

115 CESARE, NC. composite sample of near-surface soils from Borings 12 and 14. Four samples were compacted to about 98 percent to 1 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM 698) maximum dry density at moisture contents ranging from.1 percent to 2.5 percent above the optimum moisture content. The samples were loaded to a pressure of 5 psf and inundated. The results indicate the swell potentials of the existing sandy clays can be reduced to less than 1 percent at moisture contents of 2 percent above optimum or greater. 9. GEOTECHNCAL RECOMMENDATONS 9.1 OVEREXCAVATON We recommend that hazards associated with the expansive clay be reduced by overexcavating, moisture conditioning, and recompacting these materials to various depths. This treatment will reduce the permeability and swell potential, reducing the risk of differential heave and providing more uniform support conditions. Overexcavation should be applied to broad areas and not be limited to small irregular parcels. Overexcavated soil should be compacted to 95 percent of standard Proctor (ASTM 698) maximum dry density at 1 percent to 3 percent over the optimum moisture content. The depth of treatment is discussed in the following sections. Existing clay fill containing debris, such as that encountered in B-2, may be used as controlled fill, provided that organic materials are removed and that asphalt and concrete inclusions can be broken into 2-inch or smaller pieces. f this is not feasible, organic material and larger inclusions should be removed. f it is not feasible to remove the debris from the fill, the fill should be excavated and removed from the site Pavements Adams County follows the Pavement Design Standards & Construction Specifications of the Metropolitan Government Pavement Engineering Council (MGPEC) for design of pavement systems to be maintained by the County. The roadways on site will typically be residential with design speeds of less than 35 miles per hour. According to Table of the 21 version of the MGPEC standards, the roadways will require moisture treatment and recompaction to a depth of 4 feet beneath the pavement section in Phase 2, and 6 feet beneath the pavement section in Phase 3. The upper 3 feet of subgrade in Phase 2 and the upper 5 feet of subgrade in Phase 3 will require overexcavation, moisture treatment, and recompaction. The bottom foot of subgrade in each phase should be scarified, moisture conditioned, and recompacted in place. We recommend the upper 8 inches of the pavement subgrade be moisture conditioned to to 2 percent above optimum moisture content for stability during paving. The subgrade treatment should extend to back of curb or to back of sidewalk if the sidewalk is attached or adjacent to the curb and gutter. The alleyways may be maintained by a metro district or privately. We recommend that these roads also be constructed in accordance with COOT and MGPEC specifications Structures Actual depths of overexcavation should be determined from the geotechnical engineer of record for the individual structures. For planning purposes we recommend that the entire depth of the moderate to very high swelling sandy clays be overexcavated, moisture treated and recompacted. The bottom foot of overexcavation may be scarified, moisture conditioned, and recompacted in Midtown at Clear Creek Phases 2 and 3 Report

116 CESARE, NC. place. Estimated depths of the swelling soils, based on data generated during this study and previous studies, are indicated in Figure 3. These depths should be assumed to be approximate and actual depths should be verified by building specific borings and in the field during overexcavation. Overexcavation should extend a minimum of 1 feet beyond any building footprint. 9.2 FOUNDATONS Either shallow foundations, such as conventional spread footings or footing pads or straight-shaft piers drilled into bedrock will be adequate foundation systems for most structures on site. Shallow foundations are likely in areas where there is an adequate thickness of compacted fill with swell potential below 2 percent, when tested at 1, psf. Piers should be used in areas with higher swell potential. We recommend foundation investigation at individual building sites after final grading and the final locations of the building sites have been identified. 9.3 FLOORS Suitable floor systems include structural floors and concrete slab-on-grade floors. Structural floors are likely for all structures with expansive material (greater than 2 percent when tested at a load of 1, psf) within 12 feet of floor slab elevation. Slab-on-grade floors may be adequate if founded on low to non-expansive soils providing that expansive clay and claystone bedrock do not exist within 12 feet of the bottom of slab elevation. 9.4 UNDERGROUND UTLTES The corrosion potential of the subsoils around underground pipelines should be investigated prior to the selection of pipe types. The corrosion potential of the subsoils can be evaluated by conducting field resistivity test and determination of the sulfate and chloride concentrations and ph value of the subsoils. A qualified corrosion engineer should then be consulted to evaluate the corrosion potential. Utilities are usually constructed beneath the roadways. Compaction of the trench backfill can have a Significant effect on the life and serviceability of the pavement. We recommend trench backfill be placecl in accordance with local specifications. The placement and compaction of fill should be observed and tested by a representative of our office. 9.5 EXCAVATONS Conventional earthmoving equipment should be adequate to excavate soils. Site development will change both existing slopes and groundwater conditions that can create conditions causing unstable slopes. Permanent cut and fill slopes should not exceed 15 feet in height and be no steeper than 4H: 1 V. Temporary slopes in overexcavation areas should be no steeper than l.sh:1v. Temporary or permanent slopes which are steeper or taller than the above recommendations should be evaluated on an individual basis Midtown at Clear Creek Phases 2 and 3 Report

117 CESARE, NC. Groundwater may be encountered during overexcavation and grading. This may result in soft conditions or seepage if the groundwater is within 3 feet of the bottom of the excavation or cut. f soft conditions or seepage is observed in cuts during grading, we should be contacted to evaluate the stability of the excavations or cuts on an individual basis. All excavations should be properly sloped and/or braced and local and federal safety codes should be observed. Slopes and other stripped areas should be protected against erosion. 9.6 FLL PLACEMENT Our testing indicates placing the on-site, sandy clay fill to a density of 95 percent or greater at 1 to 3 percent above optimum moisture content according to standard Proctor (ASTM 698) will reduce the swell potential of the subgrade materials to about 1 percent or less. The soil materials should be placed in 6-inch maximum, loose lifts and methodically compacted. The fill material should be thoroughly mixed to achieve the highest practical level of moisture conditioning during fill placement. Utilization of a heavy construction disc is typically the most effective means of achieving thorough mixing and moisture conditioning of the fill material. Difficulty placing, mixing, and compacting the material may be experienced due to the high moisture requirements. Representative samples of compacted fill should be tested for swell potential. Swell potential for overexcavated and recompacted fill should be less than 2 percent when wetted under a pressure of 5 psf. The placement and compaction of fill should be observed on a full time basis by a qualified geotechnical technician or engineer. Off-site material considered for structural fill should be tested and approved by a member of our firm prior to hauling to the site. 9.7 SURFACE DRANAGE Performance of the development will be Significantly influenced by the surface drainage. When developing an overall drainage scheme, considerations should be given to individual building locations and fills. Drainage should be placed in such a manner that surface runoff is directed quickly away from the building foundations and fills and is not allowed to pond adjacent to the buildings, inside yards, behind fills, or over pavements. Setting foundation levels as high as possible above curb lines will aid in the rapid removal of surface runoff. f surface drainage between preliminary development and construction is neglected, performance of the roadways and buildings foundations can be poor. When considering landscaping for common areas or around individual areas, we recommend the use of vegetation or landscaping which requires very little initial or long-term watering. Use of bubbler or trickier-type irrigation systems should be discouraged. 9.8 SUBSURFACE DRANAGE Due to the presence of silty sand and gravel in the subsurface, in our opinion, interceptor drains are not necessary along segments of the anticipated area of subexcavation. However, if groundwater is encountered in the outer walls of the open excavation we should be consulted for recommendations Midtown at Clear Creek Phases 2 and 3 Report

118 CESARE, NC STRUCTURES The relatively impermeable clay materials at the surface indicate that subdrains may be required for below grade construction. Development of the site may adversely affect groundwater conditions, raising the level of the water table where impervious clayey subsoils exist. Depressions in the surface of the clay, such as below grade excavation, often permit groundwater or surface water to drain into these areas. The clayey soils, which are relatively impervious, may trap this water creating local "perched" groundwater problems around the structure. A subsurface drainage system will likely be recommended for any below grade areas, such as crawlspaces and basements. Consideration should be given to establishing the lowest floor level as high as possible. Subdrains will likely not be necessary for at or above grade areas. 9.9 SESMC STE CLASSFCATON AND PARAMETERS Based on available data gathered from the test borings, we estimate that the appropriate site classification per the 29 nternational Building Code (29 BC) is site class C (very dense soil and soft rock). The USGS Java Ground Motion Parameter Calculator ( indicates that the appropriate mapped spectral acceleration values, 55 and 51, are.22g and.57g, respectively. 9.1 PRELMNARY PAVEMENT SECTON THCKNESS Preliminary pavement thickness design was performed for Phase 1 by Cesare and results were issued in a report titled Preliminary Pavement Thickness Design Study (Cesare report No A, dated June 8, 212). Pavement section thickness recommendations for Phases 2 and 3 are anticipated to be similar to those for Phase 1 and are presented below in Table 2. TABLE 2. Preliminary Pavement Section Thickness Recommendations Aggregate Lime- Recompacted Hot Mix mport Onsite Base Treated Lime.. Treated oncrete Option Asphalt Fill Fill Course Subgrade Subgrade (in.) tin.) (in.) in.) (in.) (in.) (in.) WATER SOLUBLE SULFATES We performed three tests to determine the water soluble sulfate content of the near-surface soils. The tests were performed per the Colorado Department of Transportation procedure (CDOT 231-1). Our tests indicate that the water soluble sulfate ion content is negligible in the near-surface Midtown at Clear Creek Phases 2 and 3 Report

119 CESARE, NC. soils. Additional testing should be performed for final design where concrete will be exposed to the on-site soils. 1. CONCLUSONS Based on our assessment, the site appears suitable for the proposed development providing proper studies and engineering designs are conducted for final development. Variations in subsoil conditions not indicated by the borings are likely. The results expressed in this report are intended to be preliminary in nature and should not be used for final design of foundation systems, floor slabs, pavements, or other construction considerations. We recommend detailed site and project-specific studies be conducted for roadways and structures. 11. GEOTECHNCAL RSK The concept of risk is an important aspect of any geotechnical evaluation. The primary reason for this is that the analytical methods used by geotechnical engineers are generally empirical and must be tempered by engineering judgment and experience. Therefore, the solutions or recommendations presented in any geotechnical evaluation should not be considered risk-free and, more importantly, are not a guarantee that the interaction between the soils and the structures, flatwork and pavements will perform as predicted, desired, or intended. The potential heave estimates presented in the preceding sections constitute our best estimate based on the information generated during this and previous evaluations, and our experience in working with these conditions. 12. LMTATONS The professional judgments expressed in this report meet the standard care of our profession. The borings drilled for this study were located to obtain a reasonably accurate picture of underground conditions for preliminary design purposes. Variations frequently occur from these conditions, which are not indicated by the borings. The geotechnical engineer in charge of this project is not a mold prevention consultant; none of the services performed in connection with this study were designed or conducted for the purpose of mold prevention Midtown at Clear Creek Phases 2 and 3 Report

120 (l) SS "C"C "C "C "C"C (l),,, 2 Dlblli)!l!g.g:... :::l :::l C' gg. :::l"""" a.:::t :::T D D D.., ttlttl V...!<OC' W C' :;' 1... :;' 1 i., " fl Q f FGURE 1 Site Plan

121 /12 24/12 28/12 21/12 37/ / /12 21/12 37/12 34/12 41/ Q) Q) U..5.c. -c.. Q) C 41/ /11 2/ :r 2 2 ::i" SO/6 28/ , / CD "C -"T1 (1) CD ir iw : : )f; NOTES: 45/12 indicates 45 blows with a 14D-pound hammer falling 3 inches were required to drive a modified California barrel sampler 12 inches. CLENT; Brookfleld Residential DATE: PROJECT: Midtown Phase 2 & 3 JOB NO.:. D12.84 DESCRPTON: Logs of Borings FGURE; 2

122 S / Of9 21/ ; Q) LL..5.s:::.. Q) 17/ ( :) <D "S /12 =r :r - "T1 CD SO <D son 516 Bounce / NOTES: indicates 45 blows with a 14-pound hammer falling 3 inches were required to drive a modified California barrel sampler 12 inches. CLENT: Brookfield Residential DATE: PROJECT: Midtown Phase 2 & 3 JOB NO.: DESCRPTON: Logs of Borings FGURE: 2

123 SO/ Q) Q) LL.S; -Co Q) Q CD "'C 5/1 514 SOlS -::r 2 2 3' -"'T CD CD Bounce NOTES: 45/12 indicates 45 blows with a 14-pound hammer falling 3 inches were required to drive a modified California barrel sampler 12 inches. CLENT: Brookfield Residential DATE:. 6/ PROJECT: Midtown Phase 2 & 3 JOB NO.: DESCRPTON: Logs of Borings FGURE: 2

124 Symbol FT ' l ''''illi EJ Description TOPSOL - Clay, sandy and silty, fine to medium grained (sand), low to medium placticity, slightly moist to moist, root structures, brown (Cl; A-6 to A-7). CLAY, sandy and silty with occasional gravel in the upper 4 feet, hard to very hard, fine grained (sand), medium plasticity, slightly moist to moist, porous, calcareous, trace mica, light brown to brown (Cl; A-7-6). SAND, clayey to silty, medium dense to dense, fine to coarse grained with occasional gravel, low to medium plasticity, slightly moist to very moist, brown (SC; A-6). SAND, clean to silty/clayey with occasional small clay nodules, medium dense to very dense, fine to coarse grained, slightly moist to wet, brown (SM-SC; A-2-4). SAND, clean to silty, with gravel and cobbles, occasional small clay nodules, medium dense to very dense, fine to coarse grained, slightly moist to wet, brown (SP to SM; A-1 to A-2). SANDSTONE, silty, very hard, fine to coarse grained, slightly moist to moist, brown to blue (SP to SM). CLAYSTONE, silty and sandy, very hard, low plasticity, slightly moist to moist, brown (Cl). KEY TO SYMBOLS Symbol Description m Fll - CLAY, sandy, stiff to hard, finegrained to coarse-grained (sand), with concrete and asphalt debris, low plasticity, slightly moist to moist, brown (Cl). Misc. Symbols Water table during drilling Notes: 1. Exploratory borings were drilled on April 19, 24 and 27, 212 using 4-inch diameter solid-stem augers and 6-inch diameter hollow-stem augers. 2. Boring locations were recorded by Cesare, nc. using GPS coordinates. 3. Groundwater was encountered at the time of drilling. About 3 days after drilling, it was found that the holes had caved above the groundwater level. 4. These logs are subject to the limitations, conclusions, and recommendations in this report. Project No

125 LEGENP: - Approximate contour interval for depths in feet 8-1 Approximate location of bore hole Approximate alignment of Phase 1 boundary NOES;. 1. Contours should be considered approximate. o 4() Actual depths should be verified in the field. 3. Boring B-1 to 8-1 data from Cesare Project No Overexcavation in the vicinity of Boring 8-2 is due to the existence of undocumented fill. FGURE 3 Midtown at Clear Creek Phases 2,. 3 Contour Map of Depth to Bottom of Expansive Soil PROJECT NO

126 APPENDX A Laboratory Test Results

127 ESARE, NC. GMJmial Engllleer,. & CUl/,llrttr llol Ml",;'" Cll.m/l(/', GRADATON PLOT - SOL & AGGREGATE Project Number: 12.84, Brookfield Residential Date: 15-May-12 Project Name: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase 2 & 3 Technician: ;J:-;;.;..,C,;-;u;.;;;;yL.pe..;;r;.;;;;s---- Lab D Number: 1227:..;13--:--::- Reviewer: ---.;K.;.;....;.M..;.;u;;.;.rj;;;ph;.;.,y Sample Location:,-=:H:::o:..::'e#.:.:...=.:12:=...:::;at::...4',;""",;",-:-:- Description: CLAY, sandy, light brown AASHTO M 145 Classification: A-7-6 Grouplndex: 2_2 Unified Soil Classification System -...;"";;,,...;;...;;...- (ASTM D 2487): _(..:C:..::L:...L)_..:S..::a.;:,,;.nd,;;,;.y&,...;;..;;le..::a.;:,,;.n..:c.;:,,;.la;.&.y _ \D iii 'iii v M V L'1... N C/ tn N &, G. c:i c:i ci ci ci ci N... ; M" > D. M... Z zz z z z z z Z G. 1 iii,,,,,,,,,,,,, r--r- 9 "- -'" 2" ,,,,, ",,, 8, '\., 1", '!\.,,,, 3/4",,,,,,,, 1/2". 7, 3/8", #4 1,, j 1,,,,,,, #8,..., 1 #1 1 ::16 ra,,, #16 99 E,,,, L #3, 'a, j,,..t's #4 94,,,...,, #5 89, " t- 1 z #1,...,,, 8 11'1 # '14,,, f,,,,,,, Q. 1 Moisture (M) & Density (D),, M,%: 1.4 D pef: j 3,, 1-1-,,,,, H - t,, i, i, 2 i LL 47!, PL 11,,,,,,,,,, P !-H- 1-1-,1,, l- t,,,,,,,,,, n '" 8... n "' n 8 r.:,,; 1"1..,... c::i 1"1 N!!i ::i c:i NN...:i...,i d c::i '" Cl c::i SEVE SZE, mm 718 South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax Gradation Q N D6 D3 DlO Cu Cc D C

128 @ESARE, NC. GeolOl'llh'u/ Ellgill uvrs. Cmwn/crloll MaL'riill e'lllimlltrllt>' GRADATON PLOT - SOL &. AGGREGATE Project Number: 12.84, Brookfield Residential Date: ---=-15--,-:-M_a... y-_1_2 Project Name: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase 2 & 3 Technician: J. Cuypers Lab D Number: Reviewer: :K:'7.--: M :-:-'-ur... p'7'h-y----- Sample Location:-:-H:-oT"le-#7.'"1:-:7=-a--:t--:g=-;" Description: SAND, light brown AASHTO M 145 Classification: A-l-b Group ndex: 1 Unified Soil Classification System ---"--- (ASTM D 2487): ---lo.(s_p_-_s_m... )'---P_o_o_rl...-g... r_a_de_d_s_a_n_d_w---'it_h...;.s_ilt-'-- y cu C N C \D in 'iii "<t- co V) "<t- Ll... N 1/1 Ln <l- N Co cu tel,...; ; > a. -- V) V) z zz z z z z z z cu in , 1 ; , l""- 1 r-.; 9 r j-... 2" -l-.. - :\ 1-1.5" 1 8, 1", /4" 1/2" ,, 1 3/8" 7 98,, 1 1 # ,,, } - - i- - H- ---,- - 1\ rr #8... #1 ::16 9 ra " E, 1 1, # , #3,, "C,, #4 37 5, 1, 1, 1... #5 18 1, 1 t!j i -;-: - ' z 1 # i, 1 1, 1, # :: S! Moisture em) & 3 2 1,,,, 1, Density (D), t 1 1 1, 1 +i ,, D, pcf: 1 ' \ 1 1 M,%: , LL NV ' , ,, 1, 1 1 "- PL NP '\,l P NP t. - 1,, r-- D , 1 1,,, - :1. d,, D n D :.,; ::i... MO.., \D... M... n.....,... n \D ", d M <'oj d N'i...:i,...i d d d d "! d Cu 4.6 SEVE SZE, mm Cc South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax Gradation

129 1-'.... SARE, NC. Geo/ecllllicol Elgllleer. & COlls/rllc/ion i\jalrlrinl.\ COl/rllllOllS GRADATON PLOT - SOL &. AGGREGATE Project Number: 12.84, Brookfield Residential Date: 15=--=-M:.::a.Ly--=1.=2---- Project Name: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase 2 & 3 Technician: --=J..;...,.;;;C.;;,uy"'p;.::e::.; rs=--- Lab D Number:..:.1:::227:...:1::;5...,...,:_: Reviewer: ---=.;K:.:..,.;..;M.;;.ur;.E:p:.:.;hJ...y Sample Location.:..:, H,:.::o:;.:le#.::.2;...1..:::a.!...t.::.9' Description :..::S:::..A::.,N:.::D';.L,..::c::.::la:.Ly..:::eLy AASHTO M 145 Classification: _...:..A;:.,.-.;;,6 Grouplndex:_l_ Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM 2487): _..lo.(-=s-=c:...)_...;:c;.;.;la;;.ly-=e;.y-=s.=an;.;.;d v o z o... zz \... o z M V Ln z z z 1,-- rt-rr,-r-'-'----,rt-r r-----,rt-r-'r------' 14-t-: ii---4:,-h:-+:---+: : ---: o... o z o N o Z 1+_i, i'----'--_+'_++_--_+' --- _+_ tt=t=t:t:!:=j:--:--h:ttijtit: -t-4---, j==t=l: =t===jl:fttj=tj=j: ==t===t=j:===ttt:j=tj=j==t===t====:j i-_+-t- -:;...+ot :_+yt.i+--+--'""t1f- -ti--:::;_.tj:;t::.;..:i -l+-l+-l+-t-t-.;. '"' : ;_.tt::; l+-l+_l+.;.:t _l+_-_-:..-+4-_-_-_-_-_-:l f'\.., 7 %tt:;;.t;.:f.r 1+_}-i i'_+ - +{----{- {. f--f-+---l '---.;.. ' -l-: : - -f----- ' t i' 6 +"+-+-i4i- 1--ft_ +'-+-+--!lf! _+_+t:4===t= ===t :t:s;t::::t:::t:::t::::::: E ra, t ++4+_+,,--,-l l-+-l---<\ , -+-l-+----_ l.a,, '\ o.t.t+j;::!t,.t,'-1t i..ojt :.t1t:'=-t-=-t.-=-1.'4::..-=--=--=-:tt.ttt-:.'-1 :+---:-..; -""\.-J =--=-tt't4t-=-1-=--=-t-=-:.4:.-=--=--=--=--=l 1+++-r :- -- H :,1-f '-+----i-+++i i- + i-: : f-- - H- l- - ;-.:i--i---\.'\l- :" : i! ', 1 1,, 1 +++H, --+_--" l-+l,+-l l U14Q. i ",. f '.., i 1 r ll-4--i-41 -l H' f u l r!:ttt=t=t==:t===ti=t.ttj=tl--l--+-+-ll----:-+++ ".t---t--t,-i._h--+_--4_ l-_+--_ l * , t :- H- 1- :! : -l-i- -.-l---4: t+++ +-: _+ : --: :tt=t:==t=j:i-----':, : +---i--:'--_+++: --_4--_ ttt1t.1tt., :.t:;'--f ;.. ':.:.:.tl-.++:it-! -+-i-+1--_f.;.:t:::1:t::::t-11h.+...: ;t-.+-"4'+--1-i ----t o----1h.+-.j.;,.t!-tj"tj...,, ", 1 t+++ -' --' r' -l-_ _rtl--+_--4' l f' - 1- ':- H ltl- - - t H t-+-- f---l- +---l " 1 1 2" 1.5" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 1 3/8" 96 #4 88 #8 #1 82 #16 79 #3 #4 65 #5 56 #1 44 #2 37. Moisture (M) & Density (D) M %: 4.5 Dpcf: LL 25 PL 1 P 15 D6 SEVE SZE, mm Cu Cc 718 South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax Gradation

130 GRADATON PLOT - SOL & AGGREGATE Project Number: 12.84, Brookfield Residential Date: ---.::1s-=-M...;;a;;.,ly-=.:12 Project Name: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase 2 & 3 Technician: ---.,;J....;Cu;.Ly,/;;,pers----- Lab D Number: -71;:::;.2""27;,..,:1:;,:6::-:---,-=- Reviewer: --..;.K.;.;...;.M...;u;.;.r&;.;ph...;;y Sample Location :-: Ho':;le'=""#.;;;.24:_' "a..:..t...;4-' -:":"': --:--:-- Description: SAND, clayey, with gravel, brown AASHTO M 145 Classification: A-2-4 Group ndex: () Unified Soil Classification System -..;;.;;...;;;;...:...- (ASTM 2487): _..3..(-=S-=C:...)_=C::.;;la;:.Jyr...;:e;.Ly...;:s_=a.;.;;n.;;;.d...;;.wit;;:.h;.;.gif..:r...;:a;..:.v.;;;.el <;to z o... zz \D... o z 1 TT_r_r,,--,,rrTO.,,--r-,'---.-rrr,,-;-,-,---.--on,rT-r-r-.r ' i \\-t- --,lt +4'--+, _+'+---+-,--H+, _r_r_ t=t=:- - \'+-;- : --ii:i--_r:-l-rh--hh ;i-t--t_;-:_+_--_r:-t-h-+--+-;:+ +_--+-- i!--h: H--+-t-H--+-\-4i ' 1-i , H-r++-, \rf.,i---1, -;H, r+-+,-r-;,r+----,-r-+-tr-+---r- : -rh, ; ' " _rf-_t.,--,*,rr,--+,--,-r+1-+-,--. r+-t-t---- '-J. t H-+-;+' -+-;' : 4 : -P_1 i'r_+--t_;_ ' ---_r',- rr-r4i-t'rr--r--_+ +' ---rrn'-+_1---_ l : H--pjd;'H---i- ' H--++-t_+l'-l-+' --ii'i--_r' o... o z ---r'-(-h--r4-1--l+--t----+' ----rn'-+-+--t--l------, HrH-+-:_;- i:_4lt, --,-*,H_+4,--+,-----1,-(-H-+4-+',,r--+--+, --Hr.,_+_+_4_ _r+_,-+,,--,i--*,h-+4,--+,---4,-rh-+4-+,+-,,--+--+'--hr., rr+, -+, -+-, -+--+,-+--,++4--H, --, ---+,--+---i------; HrH-+-H,-!, '-!,-4,- : H-+4,H---!-, : : '_+-----t---- o N o Z 2" 1.5" 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #8 en c. a. 'if #1 54 #16 48 #3 #4 34 #5 3 #1 24 #2 2.2 Moisture (M) & Density (D) M, %: 2.9, pct: LL 22 PL 12 P 1 U o... " g d... SEVE SZE, mm <> "1 <> o '" d <>... o Cu Cc 118 South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax Gradation

131 _ SARE, NC. GJ/Qdmh 'Q (;"gllle"rs & CO/,s/rue/OJ' Maleriuls COSU/S GRADATON PLOT - SOL & AGGREGATE Project Number: 12.84, Brookfield Residential Date:...=;23:;",-..;"May--=1.:: Project Name: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase 2 & 3 Technician: OR = Lab D Number: Reviewer: K_. _M_u... p_r hy'-- -=.-= Sample Location:TH-12 at to 5', and TH-14 at to 5' Description: CLAY, sandy, brown AASHTO M 145 Classification: A-7-6 Group ndex: ;..;;,...;;...;;...- Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D 2487): _... (...:C:..::L:...<)'--...:L;;;.;e:..::a;.;.;n...:c;.;.;la;;..lyw=it;;;.;;h-=s-=a;;;.;;nd G C N C \ iii. v co M V 11'1... N N co G c:i > :.. Ln,...; ;... ci N ;:;, M... Z zz z z z z z z G 1 iii,,, i,,,...,, -.-,,,,,"", 9 '\. --l t= 2",, -{- ", ' j- -.. '"--'- 1.5" r r r,,,, 8, '\. 1",,, r r r r '\ r 3/4" 1 <--,,,,,,, 1/2" 1, r j, 3/S" 1 7,,, r, r #4 1 r r,, r r - - r r,, r r,, #S #1 99 :l6 E #16 98, r.,,, #3,,,,,,, " #4 94 O,,,... #5 91,,, r CD ---, z #1 83 ;;,,,,,,, # ,, if,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Density (D) 3,, M %: 4.3!- -1-, ,,, D pef:! 2,,,, LL 42 1,, r-.-- PL 13,,,,,,,,, 1 a '- -{-, D6,,,, D "' 8 DlO r-:!!l ::l... MO... "1... d M N d.,: NN...,...:t d d d "'! d Cu SEVE SZE, mm Cc Moisture (M) & P South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax Gradation

132 ASfM/ AASHTO Compaction Test Procedure Designation: ASfM D 698 (Standard) Method: A i!ksare, NC. GeQucbrrirQ/ E"gmeers & ConS1Tucnon Maurials C1k,u/lanB Laboratory Maximum Dry Unit Weight (Density): 14. pet Laboratory Optimum Moisture Content (OMC): 17. / L U n. Z 1\ 1\ 1 w C 1,\ 1,\... 1., :z: Zero Air Void Curves \, Curves of 1% Saturation for Sp.G. - w Equal to: - 3: 2.55,2.6, 2.65, 2.7, 2.75, 2.8 l- - :; Z :::;, 95. X: 1)1 C 9., 17. 1,\ 1\ 1,\ WATER CONTENT - PERCENT OF DRY MASS 1 Elev. or - Sample location LL Pl P Soil Description & Classification Moisture/Density Relationship (Proctor) Test Depth ft #2, TH-12 at to 5', o to 5' Project Number: 12.84, Brookfield Residential and TH-14 at to Visual: CLAY, sandy, brown Project Name: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase 2 & 3 5' AASHTO: A-7-6 (18) Drawn By: PAY Tested by: RAZ/MlB (Cl) lean day with Checked By: K. Murphy Date: 25-May-12 USCS: sand Date: 4-Jun-12 lab D: Rev. 3/ South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Phone Fax Proctor

133 _ s.. SARE, NC. '{ieolljl:lmicul e"s i",, r. '* COnlrllclio" ltlfl:rl,, ', CO//$/,"nrs 5 Swell Consolidation Plot 4 3 K Swell Upon Wetting 2-1'1"- 1 \ Q... C C) o - r-- " :6:i 1 : 'C.-. ft i' ' -1 c Sample nundated - V, C U -2,... -! ell ' -5 ' , 2,1 1, 1,, Applied Pressure (psf) : Sample Lab D Number: Dry Moisture nundation Volume Swell Sample Depth Density Content Pressure Change Pressure Location (feet) Sample Description (pcf) (Dfo) (psf) (Dfo) (psf) Hole 11 4' CLAV, sandy, brown ,1 Client: Brookfield Residential Project No.: Project: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase 2 & 3 Figure: South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax Swell Plot Primary xlsx

134 5ESARE, NC. Geotecl11;'("ut Ellgineers &: ('fllls'clil}1j.,tc"';n',t; CO$ ttllil1j(, 7 6 Swell Consolidation Plot 1\ Swell Upon Wetting 5 '" 4. i' "' c :t:i 1 - ra :E r\ ' U ---r-- -\..._.._ i\ c :- u / - // 'i -2 Sample nundated. -3 \ , 1 1 1, 1, 1, Applied Pressure (psf) Sample Lab D Number: Dry Moisture nundation Volume Swell Sample Depth Density Content Pressure Change Pressure Location (feet) Sample Description (pet) (Ofo) (pst) (Ofo) (pst) Hole 11 9' CLAY, sandy, brown , Client: Brookfield Residential Project No.: Project: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase 2 8t 3 Figure: South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax Swell Plot Primary xlsx

135 :! SARE, NC. GCt)fl!J" ",rll l e " sllle.tjr.f &: tjl.'fll'{' ;1l 1",.,1tf.rllll... C rnumlltluf. ' Swell Consolidation Plot '\ - Swell Upon Wetting \ \ 5 \, 4 - \ 3 c \, +i 2 :2 "' \ ' 1 - n C u f \t - -1 'i -2 Sample nundated - V \, i i\ ! 1 1 1, 4.6 1, 1, Applied Pressure (psf),,, r, Sample Lab D Number: Dry Moisture nundation Volume Swell Sample Depth Density Content Pressure Change Pressure Location (feet) Sample Description (pcf) (Ofo) (psf) (Ofo) (psf) Hole 12 l' CLAY, sandy, brown ,6 Client: Brookfield Residential Project No.: Project: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase 2 & 3 Figure: South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax Swell Plot Primary 12269S.xlsx

136 ; &:,1 "t SARE, NC. '(leo/eel",','u! Ellgl"eers & C(mslmaioll i1m.. r/lls Crmsll"'ts 5, 4 - Swell Consolidation Plot 3 - Swell Upon Wetting \ c 2 "- " :c r"-i'o ra t :E... ' -1 r-... en "'oi'o... c _----- _ u Sample nundated - r-f-/ - Qj \... _ , \ \ , 1, 1, Applied Pressure (psf) Sample Lab D Number: Dry Moisture nundation Volume Swell Sample Depth Density Content Pressure Change Pressure Location (feet) Sample Description (pet) (1) (pst) (1) (pst) Hole 12 9' CLAY, sandy, brown ,5 Client: Brookfield Residential Project No.: Project: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase 2 &. 3 Figure: South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax Swell Plot Primary xlsx

137 SARE, NC. Geotecl",iL'ol Ellllill l!tjr. & CO$'":lioll Materh,'.' CU.<lifllllts 5 Swell Consolidation Plot c...,... :t:i R :2 ' -1 "- V C u "-... r-. ':-. " -'i :-. -3 () -4 """" Sample nundated J, V \ Consolidation Upon Wetting -5 ' , 1, 1, Applied Pressure (psf) Sample Lab D Number: Dry Moisture nundation Volume Swell Sample Depth Density Content Pressure Change Pressure Location (feet) Sample Description (pet) (Ofo) (pst) (Ofo) (pst) Hole 12 19' CLAY, sandy, brown ,9 -.2 N/A Client: Brookfield Residential Project No.: Project: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase 2 8t 3 Figure: South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax SweliPlot Primary

138 SARE, NC. rlfp ' Geolecl,"lt:al e"cillecr.+; & COS/'W.'tioll J"'"ter;,,/.f; COllsn/urnt" 5 Swell Consolidation Plot a -C o - Sample nundated \ - "' i""' :E ' -1 c u Qi -3 tn -4 CJnsolidation Upon Wetting / l/ , 1, 1, Applied Pressure (psf) Sample Lab D Number: Dry Moisture nundation Volume Swell Sample Depth Density Content Pressure Change Pressure Location (feet) Sample Description (pet) (Ufo) (pst) (Ufo) (pst) Hole 13 4' SAND, clayey, brown N/A Client: Brookfield Residential Project No.: Project: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase 2 & 3 Figure: South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax Swell Plot Primary 12269B.xlsx

139 . ' ' H ;,hsare, NC. Geotechllh'al e"lfineers d: Ctnlslrlu:;"f J1ft/ferlal.". C():r",unt.\' 7 Swell Consolidation Plot ::e -c 4 '<; Swell Upon Wetting 2 '\ :c... fa i'r... :2 "S 1 "- V c u... o " :- - " 'i '\ fn V -2! \.../ , Sample nundated -. ff. UU 1 1 1, 1, 1, \ Applied Pressure (psf),,,,, Sample Lab D Number: Dry Moisture nundation Volume Swell Sample Depth Density Content Pressure Change Pressure Location (feet) Sample Description (pet) (Ofo) (pst) (Ofo) (pst) Hole 14 l ' CLAY, sandy, brown ,4 Client: Brookfield Residential Project No.: Project: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase 2 & 3 Figure: South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax SweliPlot Primary

140 , ESARE, NC. a '!)l'c,llh'll e ng llleers &: C(J''''lrll(''lio" lulter';(lls COfl/U,tftlno' - 1 1\ " c o - r--- :c -- Swell Consolidation Plot \ Swell Upon Wetting '\ '\ \ fa - :E, ' -1 C u Qj :r: -3 til Sample nundated - V r--v i\ \ , , 1, 1, Applied Pressure (psf) Sample Lab D Number: 1227 Dry Moisture nundation Volume Swell Sample Depth Density Content Pressure Change Pressure Location (feet) Sample Description (pet) COlo) (pst) (%) (pst) Hole 14 9' CLAY, sandy, brown ,5 Client: Brookfield Residential Project No.: Project: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase 2 & 3 Figure: South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax SweliPlot Primary 1227.xlsx

141 rrt T 1\.,_ SARE, NC. GeJ(<lt:/mlt'ul eug;"':"',. & C<m.wr"';Jf/ "'... ' ;L. CU/Sllllt/.,' 7 Swell Consolidation Plot Swell Upon Wetting 1\ c 1 ra - '" " r'\. \T\ :2 "6 () C "'!!!t' U - Sample nundated Jf '" l/ 'i -2-3, Ul ' - l\ 1 1 1, 1, 1, Applied Pressure (pst),,,,,,,, ' 2 [ Sample Lab D Number: Dry Moisture nundation Volume Swell Sample Depth Density Content Pressure Change Pressure Location (feet) Sample Description (pet) (%) (pst) (%) (pst) Hole 15 l' CLAY, sandy, brown ,2 Client: Brookfield Residential Project No.: Project: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase 2 & 3 Figure: South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax SweliPlot Primary 12271

142 T T,FfGE:SARE, NC. Ql1.O/cr ltll/(j Ellgineers &: C(//rtlf: liojl j"u /t,.ill/ CVls"llttll(S 7 6 S 4 - Swell Consolidation Plot,\1- Swell Upon Wetting [\ 1,.." r-. "'l"- 3 \ - \ 2,... c 1 \ :c ns :'5! ' - ;f""'l _..._ C u -1,... Sample nundated - / - : Qj -2 3 tn -3! \ 1 1 1, 1, 1,, Applied Pressure (psf) \ : :. 1\ \ Sample Lab 1 Number: Dry Moisture nundation Volume Swell Sample Depth Density Content Pressure Change Pressure Location (feet) Sample Description (pet) (%) (pst) (Ufo) (pst) Hole 16 4' CLAY, sandy, brown ' 7,2 Client: Brookfield Residential Project No.: Project: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase 2 & 3 Figure: South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax Swell Plot Primary xlsx

143 ..J :Jjr-h'l:.:L ft;:=.:,!t., BglriHl! t.: 7 Swell Consolidation Plot c 1 :,c; R :2 ' --- well ) c -- r-.. U... - 'i -2 Sample nundated :t fn V! -3 Upon Wetting "" '\ -4 - \ \ ,:>UU 1 1 1, 1, 1, :,! : Applied Pressure (psf) "r"o Sample Lab D Number: Dry Moisture nundation Volume Swell Sample Depth Density Content Pressure Change Pressure Location (feet) Sample Description (pcf) (Ofo) (psf) (Ofo) (psf) Hole 16 14' CLAY, sandy, silty, brown ,4.1 1,5 Client: Brookfield Residential Project No.: Project: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase 2 & 3 Figure: South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax Swell Plot Primary 12274

144 ,. 1 1 r:e - T ESARE, NC. e"'' Ellgi1leers & /l1/ :.rltllell/1 M(e rill' C"""'U(fMS 7 Swell Consolidation Plot Q 2 '\ c ',i:i 1 :5! ' - Swell Upon Wetting '\ 4 n C ;A u -1 /... - 'i -2 U) \. -- Sample nundated - V , 1, 1, Applied Pressure (psf) Sample Lab D Number: Dry Moisture nundation Volume Swell Sample Depth Density Content Pressure Change Pressure Location (feet) Sample Description (pcf) (%) (psf) (%) (psf) Hole 17 4' CLAY sandy, brown Client: Brookfield Residential Project No.: Project: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase 2 & 3 Figure: South Alton WaY Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax Swell Plot Primary 1227S.xlsx

145 ,- -' - -! SARE, NC. "iel" eclt"1c:ol/:,,.. ng/u4."tcr.f> &: CO.,"" ''''-';'''' J\!ult.;rlll',' OJ.yuJltlllf... 7 Swell Consolidation Plot :) 2 -c ;:; 1 V :S! ' n t---. 1'\ c u 'i -2 1/ Consolidation Upon Wettln - Ul -3 1\ ' -4 'i; r- Sample nundated , 1, 1, Applied Pressure (psf) Sample Lab D Number: Dry Moisture nundation Volume Swell Sample Depth Density Content Pressure Change Pressure Location (feet) Sample Description (pcf) (Ofo) (psf) (Ofo) (psf) Hole 18 l' CLAY, sandy, brown N/A Client: Brookfield Residential Project No.: Project: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase 2 &. 3 Figure: South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax Swell Plot Primary 12276

146 iesare, NC. GC'!oll!c/ulll:ll e llgillee,."..' &: Co". t " C;'J l ftlu.le.r'ifrl.t; CUl.. llltwlts 5 Swell Consolidation Plot 4 3 Swell Upon Wetting f\ - 1 '-' c 2-1'....., - ) o -... :c r--. ra :E r-;... --r-..._- -_...- \ ' U c v U Sample nundated r-y... i\ - Qi == ", \, t, -.:,;)VV 1 1 1, 1, 1, Applied Pressure (psf),,,,, Sample Lab 1 Number: Dry Moisture nundation Volume Swell Sample Depth Density Content Pressure Change Pressure Location (feet) Sample Description (pet) (%) (psf) (%) (psf) Hole 18 9' CLAY, sandy, brown ,5 Client: Brookfield Residential Project No.: Project: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase 2 & 3 Figure: South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax Swell Plot Primary 12277

147 1 -.SARE, NC. Geoteclllli.'ol ElgiTlet!r,,' < COlstrllctioll Maralill.' COl/sll/.",t. Swell Consolidation Plot 11 '\ Swell Upon Wetting 1 9 " 8 - \ 7 -, 6 r\ \ C 4 3 R :9 ' 2 n,,, :::e C 1 u... - GJ -, / v -2 sai P,e nundated f\ \ -3, 1-4 :, , :, -7,/UU 1 1 1, 1, 1, Applied Pressure (psf) - \ Sample Lab D Number: Dry Moisture nundation Volume Swell Sample Depth Density Content Pressure Change Pressure Location (feet) Sample Description (pet) (%) (pst) (%) (pst) Hole 19 4' CLAY, sandy, brown ,7 Client: Brookfield Residential Project No.: Project: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase 2 & 3 Figure: South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax Swell Plot Primary 1227B.xlsx

148 ei:sare, NC. G COft/ch,,/,.'.,( e'f ';1 t:;,, r. & C()lstruct/Ol J't,lfefi(lls CO.'U,lttlt,t.'i 7 Swell Consolidation Plot Swell Upon Wetting \ , C :ti ra 1 :E ' a en C "l! " u V - Sample nundated - 'i -2 - ::! U) r"- 'l f- \ \ , 1 1 1, 1, 1, Applied Pressure (psf) Sample Lab 1 Number: Dry Moisture nundation Volume Swell Sample Depth Density Content Pressure Change Pressure Location (feet) Sample Description (pet) (Ofo) (pst) (Ofo) (pst) Hole 19 14' CLAY, sandy, brown , , Client: Brookfield Residential Project No.: Project: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase Figure: South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax Swell Plot Primary 12279

149 ...L.L B SARE, NC. 'fj"o/l'cllllil'ul e llg/"!cr.f & Con trllc,/rm "''''"r/lrls ''''''Wl/ants Swell Consolidation Plot '\ - Swell Upon Wetting \ ""'' i' -::=e o -C o "' :2 " n C o U... =; Ul , :: : sa Ple nundated _=+V_"''' -+-!t-+--l j-j ''' '" "\ \t ", i-----j._---+-_ f_f\ +!.:\:::==:=::::. : H H r-+++++H H-+H i---1--h-h-h+----l f-++h- -7 ;uuu 1 1 1, 1, 1, Applied Pressure (psf) Sample Lab D Number: Dry Moisture nundation Volume Swell Sample Depth Density Content Pressure Change Pressure Location (feet) Sample Description (pcf) (Ofo) (pst) (Ofo) (pst) Hole 21 4' CLAY, sandy, light brown , Client: Brookfield Residential Project No.: Project: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase 2 & 3 Figure: South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax SweliPlot Primary 12271

150 ...L.tf lesare ;&, NC. (leolvt:/lllicnf H.Til< C" & QS,rllC,ol l/llfer/1.< COS/"111'" - ""'l!t c -2 Sample nundated - :c -3 :E ' -4 1ft c -5 u Gi -7 tn -8 Swell Consolidation Plot i- Swell Upon Wetting '\.. i"r--. i'oo - - / \ \ \ \ 1t \ -9 \ \ , 'U 1 1 1, 1, 1, Applied Pressure (psf) Sample Lab 1 Number: Dry Moisture nundation Volume Swell Sample Depth Density Content Pressure Change Pressure Location (feet) Sample Description (pcf) (%) (pst) (%) (pst) Hole 22 4' CLAY, sandy, light brown , Client: Brookfield Residential Project No.: Project: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase Figure: South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax Swell Plot Primary xlsx

151 ....L SARE, NC. f-;eolec//<' Engineers & Con../rllt"ion Muteyiul. COS/ltlnts 7 Swell Consolidation Plot 6 5 '\ - \ Swell Upon Wetting """' 4-3 -c 1\ 2 RJ :5! \ ' 1 U c t, u a r--. 'i r-- ] U) -2 - Sample nundated - V -3 \ -4 \ -5, 1 1 1, 1, 1, \ Applied Pressure (psf) Sample Lab D Number: Dry Moisture nundation Volume Swell Sample Depth Density Content Pressure Change Pressure Location (feet) Sample Description (pet) (%) (pst) (%) (pst) Hole 23 l ' CLAY, silty, sandy, brown to white , Client: Brookfield Residential Project No.: Project: Midtown at Clear Creek, Phase 2 &. 3 Figure: South Alton Way, Building B Centennial, Colorado Rev. 3/12 Phone Fax SweliPlot Primary

152 CRfsrV/EW WAfER & ANMnON D)RfCT Mike Pietschmann 3 East Mineral Ave. Suite 2 Littleton, CO 8122 March 24,211 Re: Water and Sanitary Sewer Service, Midtown at Clear Creek To Whom t May Concern: Please be advised that Crestview Water and Sanitation District is willing to provide water and sanitary sewer service to the proposed Midtown at Clear Creek Project, West 68 th Avenue and Pecos Street in Adams County, Colorado that is currently within the Crestview bolmdaries. Crestview would be willing to consider providing water andlor sanitary sewer service to other areas of the project currently outside the Crestview service area boundaries if these services cannot be provided by another district and Crestview could reasonably provide them and the owner/deve1per included the property into the Crestview District. t will be necessary for the land owner/developer to install adequate water and sanitary sewer mains in accordance with District Rules and Regulations and engineering requirements. The land owner/developer is responsible for all engineering studies and plan development costs. All water and sewer mains and appurtenances shall be installed at the land owner/developer's expenses and deeded free and clear to the District prior to the issuance of any water or sewer taps. Current connection fees can be provided by contacting our office. f you have any questions or require additional information, please contact our office. Sincerely, r. f,/j(} i. (V U(J!/ (l,vv'-' (/<! elt[uc./ William R. Roecker District Manager 7145 Mariposa P.O. Box Denver, Colorado fox

153 SOUTHWEST ADAMS COUNTY FRE PROTECTON DST. #2 FRE PREVENTON BUREAU 3365 West 65th Avenue Denver, Colorado 8221 (33) Fax: (33) REDLAND 8 Lincoln St. Suite 26 Littleton, Colorado 8122 Mike Pietschmann Plans were reviewed for Midtown at Clear Creek: Filing 4 Construction Drawings. Plans are approved with the following comments: Fire lane NO Parking, signage will be provided at location described on the plans and the Fire Department reserves the right to require additional signs when needed. Address signage shall be approved for emergency responders and meet the requirements of Adams County. Fire hydrants and roadways shall be constructed and maintained before construction above ground has started. Please contact this office if you have any questions Sincerely, ;7. Gary Fletcher Fire Marshal Southwest Adams County Fire Protection District

154 (l Xcel Energy 646 W. 6th Av&. Arvada. CO. 8.3 April 15, 211 Brookfield Residential Attn: Nolan Donley 188 nverness Drive West Suite 15 Englewood, Co 8112 Re: Will serve letter for Midtown at Clear Creek Dear Mr. Donley. n accordance with our tariffs filed with and approved by the Colorado Public Utilities Commission, Gas and Electric: facilities can be made available to serve your project at W. 68 lh Ave. & Pecos st. Service will be provided after engineering is completed, payment is received, any easements are signed and construction can be completed. We will have better information available after design has been completed as to a scheduled inservice date. f can be of further assistance, please contact me at Sincerely, tlo.. A.J,-r>..A.--.-.</l.o Barbara Everard Planner NMR

155 School mpact Analysis Midtown at Clear Creek - Filing Four Final Development Plan and Final Plat July 9,214 Student Generation Calculations The proposed Midtown at Clear Creek Filing Four Final Development Plan includes the following general estimate for student generation. Student quantities for Filing Four are based on 87 single family detached residential units and 4 town home units. Midtown at Clear Creek - Student Generation Calculations Student *P/HH: Persons per House Hold *S/HH: Students per House Hold ncluded in the overall Midtown at Clear Creek master plan is an approximately 5-acre school site. Future use and development is to be determined by the needs of the Mapleton School District. Existing Mapleton School District Schools: Mapleton schools located nearest the site include: Adventure Elementary at Western Hills (K-6), Welby Montessori (PK-6), Valley View (K-8), New America Charter School (9-12) and Global Leadership Academy (K-12) & Mapleton Early College (9-13). These schools cover the entire age range of students; however the School District has a progressive approach to education and has a somewhat open enrollment option for families. Students will potentially have options for choosing their school(s). Below is a full listing of schools in the District and their locations: Academy High School (9-12) 897 York Street Thornton, CO Achieve Academy at Bertha Heid (PK-8) 91 Poze Blvd. Thornton, CO Mapleton Expeditionary School of the (7-12) 898 York Street Thornton, CO Meadow Community School (PK-8) 915 Monroe Street Thornton, CO

156 Adventure Elementary at Western Hills (PK-6) 77 Delta Street Denver, CO Clayton Partnership School (K-8) 897 York St. Thornton, CO Colorado Connections Academy Online K Explore Elementary (PK-6) 241 Poze Blvd. Thornton, CO Global Leadership Academy (PK-12) 748 Conifer Road Denver, CO Mapleton Early College High School (9-13) 898 York St. Thornton, CO 8229 Phone: (33) Monterey Community School (PK-8) 221 McElwain Blvd. Denver, CO North Valley School for Young Adults 899 York St. Thornton, CO Valley View (K-8) 66 West 7th Avenue Denver, CO Welby Montessori School (PK-6) 12 E. 78th Avenue Denver, CO York nternational School (K-12) 92 York Street Thornton, CO

157 Michael Weaver From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Ben Dahlman Tuesday, September 3,21411 :52 AM Michael Weaver Sue Bauserman SA for Midtown Hi Michael, have the three bonds for the Midtown 4 addendum to the SA. have one for Neighborhood Park for $1,133., School for $81, and landscaping for $594, look forward to receiving the signed SA for our files. Ben Benjamin Dahlman Assistant Finance Director j\d;jrns county Govcrnrnf'nt bdahlman@adcogov.org Please consider the environment before printing this . 1

158 .. COLORADO Division of Water Resources Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street, Room 821 Denver, CO 823 September 3, 214 Michael Weaver Adams County Planning and Development Transmission via RE: Midtown at Clear Creek Filing 4 Case No. PRC214-9 Part of the SW 14 Sec. 4, ns, R68W, 6th P.M. Water Division 1, Water District 7 Dear Mr. Weaver, We have reviewed the supplemental information provided to this office on August 25, 214 regarding the above referenced referral; we responded to the original referral request on August 2, 214. The Applicant is proposing to subdivide a portion of the Midtown at Clear Creek Planned Unit Development, to be known as Midtown at Clear Creek Filing 4. Filing 4 will consist of 127 dwelling units on approximately 21.1 acres. Water Supply Demand The applicant indicates that the estimated domestic water requirement for the 127 proposed units within Filing 4, which includes household uses and lawn irrigation, will be acrefeet of water per year, or.55 acre-feet per unit. An additional 5.8 acre-feet of water will be used for the irrigation of parks and open space each year, bringing the total water demand for the subdivision to acre-feet per year. Source of Water Supply The proposed water source is the Crestview Water and Sanitation District ("District"). A letter from the District, dated August 25, 214, indicates that Midtown at Clear Creek Filing 4 is within the current District boundaries and states the District's willingness to serve Filing 4. The District is contracted with the Denver Water Department ("Denver Water") and obtains treated water on demand pursuant to Denver Water Distributor Contract No A. We consider Denver Water to be a reliable water supplier. t appears that numerous monitoring wells have been drilled in the area. The applicant should be aware that all wells abandoned during the development process must be plugged and 1313 Sherman Street, Room 821, Denver, CO 823 P F

159 PRC214-9 September 3, 214 Page 2 of 2 abandoned in accordance with Rule 16 of the Water Well Construction Rules and Well Abandonment Reports must be completed and submitted to our office for each abandoned well. State Engineer's Office Opinion Based upon the above and pursuant to Section (1 )(h)(l) and Section (1 )(h)(), CR.S., it is our opinion that the proposed water supply is adequate and can be provided without causing injury to decreed water rights so long as all existing exempt wells are re-permitted or plugged and abandoned as outlined above. Our opinion that the water supply is adequate is based on our determination that the amount of water required annually to serve the subdivision is physically available, based on current conditions. Our opinion that the water supply can be provided without causing injury is based on our determination that the amount of water that is legally available on an annual basis for the proposed uses is greater than the annual amount of water required to supply existing water commitments and the demands of the proposed subdivision. Should you have any questions, please contact Karlyn Armstrong of this office...,...,..s_incerey)j Joanna Williams Water Resource Engineer JMW/kaa ec: Subdivision File Sherman Street, Room 821, Denver, (823 P F

160 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES DVSON OF WATER RESOURCES August 2, 214 John W. Hickenlooper Governor Mike King Executive Director Dick Wolfe, P.E. Director/Slate Engineer Michael Weaver Adams County Planning and Development Transmission via RE: Midtown at Clear Creek Filing 4 Case No. PRC214-9 Part of the SW Y. Sec. 4, T3S, R68W, 6 th P.M. Water Division 1, Water District 7 Dear Mr. Weaver: We have reviewed the above referenced proposal to subdivide a portion of the Midtown at Clear Creek Planned Unit Development, to be known as Midtown at Clear Creek Filing 4. Filing 4 will consist of 127 dwelling units on approximately 21.1 acres. Estimated water requirements were not provided for this development. Prior to further review a water supply plan must be submitted. Details of necessary information to be included in the subdivision water supply plan can be found on Attachment A of the Updated Memorandum Regarding Subdivisions, available online at The application materials nclude a letter from Crestview Water and Sanitation District ("District") ndicating that the District s willing to provide water to the portion of the Midtown at Clear Creek ProJect that s within ts senlce boundaries. Any water supply plan for Filing 4 should clarify what portion of Filing 4la within the District's boundaries and whether an additional water source will be required. The applicant should be aware that section (3)(b)(), C.R.S. requires that the cumulative effect of all wells in a subdivision be considered when evaluating material injury to decreed water rights. Therefore. any existing exempt wells within Filing 4 must be re-permitted pursuant to a decreed augmentation plan, or must be plugged and abandoned since the provisions of Section , C.R.S., which allowed for issuance of the well permit, will no longer apply. Since insufficient information was provided, we cannot comment on the potential for injury to existing water rights or the adequacy of the proposed water supply under the provisions of Section (1)(h)(), C.R.S. f you or the applicant has any questions regarding this matter, please contact Kar1yn Armstrong of this office. JMWlkaa Subdivision File Sincerely, ;J '. Joann Williams, P.E. Resource Engineer' Office of the State Engineer 1313 Sherman Street, Suite 818. Denver, CO 823. Phone: Fax:

161 COLORADO GEOLOGCAL SURVEY Physical address: th Street Mailing address: 15 llinois Street Golden, Colorado 841 Phone September 2, 214 Michael Weaver Adams County Planning & Development Department 443 S. Adams County Parkway, Suite W2A Brighton, CO Subject: Location: NY2 SWY4 Section 4, SEY4 NEY4 and NEY4 SEY4 Sec. 5, T3S, R68W, 6 th P.M , Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4 - Preliminary and Final Plat, FDP, and SA Case Number PRC214-9; Adams County, CO; CGS Unique No. AD-15-3 Karen Berry Acting State Geologist Dear Mr. Weaver: Colorado Geological Survey has reviewed the above-referenced preliminary and final plat, FDP, and SA referral. understand the applicant proposes to create 127 single family lots on approximately 21 acres within the Midtown at Clear Creek PUD. With this referral, received a Written Explanation (unsigned, undated), a Conceptual Site Plan (Brookfield ResidentiallNorris Design, July 1,214), a set of eight PreliminarylFinal Plat drawings (AzTec Consultants, November 26,213, last revised July 1,214), and a set of25 PUD-FDP Filing 4 plans (Norris Design, December 23, 213, last revised June 3, 214). CGS previously reviewed the overall Midtown at Clear Creek project at the preliminary plat and PUD-P phase of development; our comments were provided in a letter dated November 9, 27. As part of our original Midtown at Clear Creek referral response, we reviewed a Subsurface Exploration Program and Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation (Ground Engineering, October 26,26). No new geologic, geotechnical or environmental information has been submitted to CGS, so our previous comments remain valid: 1. Soil engineering properties and foundation design. According to available geologic mapping (Surficial Geologic Map of the Denver lox 2 Quadrangle, D.W. Moore, et a, USGS Miscellaneous Field Studies Map MF , 21, scale 1 :25,), the southern portion of the site is underlain by alluvial deposits consisting of sand, silt, clay and gravel. The northern portion of the site is underlain by loess (wind-deposited fine sands and silts). Potentially highly expansive Denver Formation claystone bedrock was encountered in several of Ground's borings at depths that could impact foundation design and performance. One of Ground's tested soil samples exhibited high swell of 6.9% when wetted under a 1 psf load, indicating that expansive soils will need to be addressed prior to design and construction. Ground's geotechnical report contains appropriate preliminary recommendations for foundation design and construction. Once site grading is complete, additional, site-specific geotechnical investigations will be needed on each lot to better characterize soil engineering properties such as expansion/consolidation potential, density, strength and allowable bearing pressures. This information, along with information about seasonal depths to groundwater, will be needed to design individual foundations, floor systems, foundation perimeter drains and pavements, and to determine each lot's suitability for a basement or crawl space, if desired. AD-15-3 _ Midtown at Clear Creek Filing 4.docx 1:55 AM, 9/21214

162 Michael Weaver September 2, 214 Page 2 of2 2. Groundwater and perched water. Ground discusses the presence of shallow groundwater and perched water on pages 7 and 14 of their geotechnical report. agree that, because of very shallow groundwater and/or perched water conditions associated with Little Dry Creek near the southwestern corner of Filing 4, basements may not be feasible on all proposed lots unless area grades are raised sufficiently to maintain an adequate separation between excavations for structures and anticipated maximum water levels, or an interceptor drain is constructed. This will need to be evaluated further before full-depth basements can be considered feasible on this site. Provided the expansive soil and potential shallow groundwater conditions are addressed prior to construction, the Filing 4 area does not present any geologic hazards or development constraints that would preclude the proposed use and density. Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this project. f you have questions or require additional review, please call me at (33) , or carlson@mines.edu. Sincerel Jillarlson, C.E.G. Engineering Geologist AD-15-3_1 Midtown at Clear Creek Filing 4.docx 1:55 AM, 9/2/214

163 (l SM Xcel EnergY PUBLC SERVCE COMPANY Right of Way & Permits 1123 West 3r<l Avenue Denver, Colorado 8223 Telephone: Facsimile: August 22, 214 Adams County Department of Planning and Development 443 South Adams County Parkway 1 5t Floor, Suite W2A Brighton, CO Attn: Re: Michael Weaver Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4, Case # PRC214-9 Public Service Company of Colorado (PSCo) has reviewed the plans for Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4. The property owner/developer/contractor must contact the Builder's Call Line at and complete the application process for any new natural gas or electric service, or modification to existing facilities. t is then the responsibility of the developer to contact the Designer assigned to the project for approval of design details. Additional easements may need to be acquired by separate document for new facilities. As a safety precaution, PSCo would like to remind the developer to call the Utility Notification Center at to have all utilities located prior to any construction. f you have any questions about this referral response, please contact me at (33) Donna George Contract Right of Way Referral Processor Public Service Company of Colorado

164 Tri.. County Health Department August 22, 214 Michael Weaver Adams County Planning and Development 443 South Adams County Parkway 1 51 Floor Suite W2A Brighton, CO RE: Midtown at Clear Creek Filing NO.4 PRC214-9 TCHD Case # 3251 Dear Mr. Weaver: Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed application for the Midtown at Clear Creek Filing NO.4 to allow 127 lots on approximately 21.1 acres for: 1. Final Development Plan 2. Preliminary/Final Plat 3. Subdivision mprovement Agreement for Filing NO.4 Tri-County Health Department (TCHD) staff reviewed earlier applications for this development and at this time has no new comments. Please feel free to contact me at (72) or at wbrown@tchd.org if you have any questions on TCHD's comments. Sincerely, Warren S. Brown, P.E. Public Health Engineer CC: Sheila Lynch, Monte Deatrich, TCHD Serving Adams, Arapahoe and Douglas Counties T S. Willow Dr., Suite 1..,. Greenwood Village, CO ,

165 Michael Weaver From: Sent: To: Subject: Stephens, Michelle Thursday, August 21, 214 7:31 AM Michael Weaver PRC 214-9: Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4 (REF 14-2) Hi Michael, Please note that the City of Westminster Planning Division has no comments related to case no. PRC 214-9: Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4. Thank you for including us in this review. Michelle Stephens, ACP Senior Planner City of Westm inster

166 West Adams Conservation District 57 West Bromley Lane Brighton CO 863 Michael Weaver Adams County Planning and Development Re: PRC214-9-Clear Creek Filing #4 August 1S, 214 Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on this development plan. t appears from the diagram that there will be a temporary retention pond. How temporary is this expected to be? Two of our main focuses are on invasive and noxious weeds and blowing dust. We urge that this area, as well as any future phase areas, school site and park be seeded and maintained with grass to pre-empt the possibility of both. t appears that the majority of the soil in this proposed development is of the slower water absorbing Platner series, which are suitable for cultivation of vegetation, but depending on the type, can have issues of moderate to high shrinkage and swelling, presenting an issue of support for foundations. We note that you have chosen a wide variety of landscaping plant material, much of it low water using. The choice of a Bluegrass-Fescue blend can be a good one for this area, depending upon which variety of water-wise Bluegrass is in the mix. The trees-for Deciduous Canopy, we would advise that you discard the inclusion of any Ash due to the spreading of the Ash Borer. Lanceleaf Cottonwoods, though fast growing, also consume a lot of water, and when they reach mature height, are subject to breakage. Maples can be subject to iron deficiency. Evergreens-keep in mind the various insects that are currently attacking pines and spruces and factor in the issue of maintaining their health. t is very important that the mature size of trees be considered in their placement so residents 2 years from now do not have invading roots or branches. Should you need further information, Adams County Extension has experts available to help. Again, thank you for the opportunity to review this plan. Sincerely, Rosalie Everson Secretary/Treasurer For the Board of Supervisors of the West Adams Conservation District

167 Adams County Transportation Department Referral Case Comments Date: August 15,214 Referral Case: Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4 Case Number: PRC214-9 Document Number: Drainage ssues Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA FRM Panel #81C584H revised March 4, 27. According to the above reference, the site does not appear to be located in a designated Flood Hazard Area. A Floodplain Use Permit will not be required. The site is in the MS4 Permitted Area, if the project disturbs more than an acre Adams County will require a copy of the Storm Water Management Plan and a copy of the state CDPS permit. Right-Of-Way For any comments concerning Right-Of-Way or boundary issues contact John Wolken with the Right-Of-Way division. Construction Site construction and drainage plans have been reviewed and approved by Adams County Transportation Department. The County has also executed a "pre-plat" SA and issued an onsite grading and drainage permit so that construction could begin before a plat was approved. Access Case # PUD213-1, Midtown at Clear Creek Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan, passed by the BOCC on July 8, 214: Condition Precedent #6: Upon written notice from the Adams County Transportation Department, a traffic study shall be completed by the applicant and submitted for review by the County. The County will then be able to determine the exact time when the traffic signals shall be installed by the applicant / Metropolitan District located at the intersection of West 68 th Avenue and Pecos Street and at the intersection of West 6ih Avenue and Pecos Street. According to the above referenced PUD case condition, the applicant is required to complete a traffic study upon written request from the Transportation Department. Written notice was sent to the applicant during the week of August 18 th, 214. The applicant should be required to fulfillthis requirement prior to scheduling of the BOCC hearing.

168 Jeffery A. Maxwell, PE, PTOE DRECTOR August 15, ADAMS COUNTY Transportation Department Engineering Services 443 South Adams County Parkway 1st Floor, Suite W2B Brighton, CO PHONE FAX Chris Bremner Senior Development Manager Brookfield Residential (Colorado) nc. 188 nverness Drive West Suite 15 Englewood, CO 8112 RE: Midtown at Clear Creek - Updated Traffic Study Dear Mr. Bremner, The Adams County Transportation Department requests that your organization, Brookfield Residential (Colorado) nc, have a revision to the traffic impact study prepared for the Midtown at Clear Creek Development. This request is being made in accordance with the Conditions Precedent #6 of the approved Midtown at Clear Creek Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan (Case #PUD213-1O): Condition Precedent #6: Upon written notice from the Adams County Transportation Department, a traffic study shall be completed by the applicant and submitted for review by the County. The County will then be able to determine the exact time when the traffic signals shall be installed by the applicant / Metropolitan District located at the intersection of West 68 th Avenue and Pecos Street and at the intersection of West 67 th A venue and Pecos Street. f you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to call or me at your convemence. Sincerely, Matt Emmens, PE Engineer Adams County Transportation Department Eva J. Henry DSTRCT 1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMSSONERS Charles "Chaz" Tedesco DSTR let 2 Erik Hansen DSTRCT 3

169 Michael Weaver From: Sent: To: Subject: Matthew Emmens Monday, September 29,2143:38 PM Michael Weaver; an Cortez RE: Midtown 4 - Morrison Drive Michael, The traffic study says that moving the school site will not affect the traffic flow on 68 th ; and does not discuss a need for turn lanes. Sincerely, Matt Emmens Adams County Government Transportation Department 443 South Adams County Parkway list floor, Suite W2B Brighton, CO J; Please consider the environment before printing this . From: Michael Weaver Sent: Monday, September 29, 214 1:28 PM To: Matthew Emmens; an Cortez Subject: Midtown 4 - Morrison Drive Matt and/or an, n your respective review of Midtown Filing 4 and the traffic study results, do you feel there is any need for turn lanes from Morrison Drive onto 68 th Avenue, or for any turn lanes from 68 th Avenue onto Morrison Drive? We want to make sure Midtown's design of Morrison Drive will be sufficient to handle traffic from the future school site in addition to the homes that will be built. Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks, Michael Michael Weaver, Aep Plalll1er - Economic Development Adams County Planning and Development Department 443 South Adams County Parkway 1st Floor, Suite W2A Brighton, CO

170 Michael Weaver From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Naomi Dekker Sunday, August 24,2143:44 PM Michael Weaver Amanda. Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.4 PRC214-9 Midtown at Clear Creek should lose their "Special District" designation. The original plot plan called for 1,1 to 1,2 units when Carma was developing the project. However, since Brookfield bought the property, they appealed to Adams County, and received approval from them, to increase the unit count to over 1,4, as well as increasing the commercial space while reducing the space for each lot, resulting in many homes being in violation of the nternational Building Code (lbc) and nternational Residential Code. Also, Midtown at Clear Creek wished to build a charter school as part of the development, and originally planned to build this school on the southeast corner of the property. However, now Brookfield "donated" some of the most polluted part of the Midtown property to Adams County School District 5 at the northwest corner of the property. We brought this to the attention of the Adams County School District 5 officials at the "neighborhood meetings" but we were totally disregarded. We also pointed out that the proposed charter school would be less than one-half mile from the existing F.M. Day elementary at 7th and Pecos. We complained that since the property was under the Adams County "Special District" designation, neither Carma nor Brookfield has mowed the property, exposing the existing neighborhoods to greater fire danger. When this property was owned by Mrs Deter, Adams County required that she mow the entire property. However, Adams County School District 5 did have time to mow the private property at 981 West 68th Avenue on June 24,214 at 3:2 pm. Furthermore, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad sent a letter to Adams County recommending against Midtown being built so close to their railroad tracks. Therefore, we recommend that since Brookfield, and David Weekley Homes, have not developed the property as previously approved March 12, 27 PRJ26-23, and have since built homes that are in violation of the nternational Building Code and the nternational Residential Code, and whereas the originally proposed 1,1 to 1,2 units has been increased to over 1,4, and whereas have proposed to build an unnecessary charter school on polluted land, and whereas they have not complied with Adams County law to mow the property, and whereas Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad have recommended that the property is too close to their railroad tracks for safety, we hitherto demand that the "Special District" designation be removed from the property known as Midtown at Clear Creek, and be made to adhere to the original plot plan. Richard and Naomi Dekker Huron - Adams County - Colorado 1