Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No. 5

Transcription

1 Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No. 5 Project Number: Planning Commission Hearing Date: Board of County Commissioners Hearing Date: PRC /13/214 at 6: p.m. 12/9/214 at 1: a.m. Case Manager: Case Technician: Michael Weaver Ann DeHerrera Applicant: Brookfield Residential CHRIS BREMNER 188 INVERNESS DRIVE WEST, SUITE 15 ENGLEWOOD, CO Owner: BROOKFIELD RESIDENTIAL INVERNESS DRIVE WEST, SUITE 15 ENGLEWOOD, CO 8112 Representative: Location: CO Parcel Number: Request: Request for 1) Final Development Plan (FDP) to allow 96 lots on approximately acres in the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; 2) Major Subdivision (Preliminary/Final Plat) to create 96 lots on approximately acres in the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; and 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) for Filing No. 5. Planning Commission HEARINGS Board of County Commissioners Date: Action: 11/13/214 Date: Action: 12/9/214 Date: Action: Date: Action: Review for Tracking: Map Updated by: Approved By: Date: Date: Date:

2 LEGEND * Special Zoning Conditions 3 Section Numbers --+- Railroad -- Major Water _.- Zoning Line Sections I::.::::.:.::; 1 Arport No ise Over1a y D hcorpomed keas Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.5 PRC214O " N A For display purposes only. Till m<ll t mad!! ponll \)(1H Mams COl ItyGIC grolp '1:1 a"iliits 1 II;PO" 11111\> 1:) r l$ acel lao{

3 LEGEND * Special Zoning Conditions,: Section Numbers Railroad -- Major Water _.- Zo ni ng Line Sections I> :::: :.::: l.llirport NJise Overlay o ncorpor<rted keas Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.5 H PRC214-CJ6' N ) For display purposes only. n " m", t mad! pnh)ie 1I e P.d;n, ':;N It, G E; grolp, Wlbl a"lm, 1 11 'PO It bllltit:o r l$ aceliao,.-

4 LEGEND * Special Zo ning Conditions : Section Numbers -+-- Railroa d -- Major Water _.- Zo ni ng Line _ AI Seaions Zoning Districts A2 A3 R.E R-I-A R-I-C R-2. R-4 ::-;'::: M-H H:"::';:l COo m C - I c::::j C-2 k,:::::::-i C-3 " C-4. C-5 I f.:.:: ::::l 2 _ 3. PL f";:;l CO AI D DlA. P-U-D P-U-D(P) r::::::: 1 Airport Noise Overlay Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.5 \\ PRC214-Qt For display purposes only. n Is m<p t ma po"b!! b,,' lh,6,d<lh ':Olltv'Gt:: grol p. 'Ii I bl a;hrn. 1 HPOIbllll, "br l$ <llxii<io,.

5 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT ADAMS COUNTY 4i.ii.itgi',; Board of County Commissioners December 9, 214 CASE No.: PRC CASE NAME: Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.5 Owner's Name: Brookfield Residential Applicant's Name: Brookfield Residential Applicant's Address: 188 Inverness Drive West, Suite 15, Englewood, CO 8112 Location of Request: SE of 68 th Avenue & Pecos Street Nature of Request: 1) Final Development Plan (FDP) to allow 96 lots on approximate1 y 17.4 acres III the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; 2) Major Subdivision (Preliminary/Final Plat) to create 96 lots on approximately 17.4 acres in the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; and 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) for Filing No.5. Site Size: +/ acres (Overall site: 183 acres +/-) Zone District: Proposed Use: Ex isting Use: Hearing Date(s): Planned Unit Development (P-U-D) Residential Vacant PC: November 13, 214 / 6: pm BOCC: December 9, 214/1: am Hearing Location: Adams County Government Center Public Hearing Room, 443 Report Date: November 24,214 S. Adams County Parkway, Brighton, Colorado 861 Case Manager: Michael Weaver vj Staff Recommendation: PC Recommendation: Approval with 2 Findings of Fact and 4 Notes Approval with 2 Findings of Fact and 4 Notes SUMMARY OF APPLICATION The applicant is requesting 1) a Final Development Plan (FDP) to allow 96 lots on approximately 17.4 acres in the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; 2) a Major Subdivision (Preliminary/Final Plat) to create 96 lots on approximately 17.4 acres in the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; and 3) a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) for Filing No.5.

6 The area is zoned P-U-D, Planned Unit Development, which is a form of a customized zone district. The objective of a Planned Unit Development is to establish an area of land, controlled by one or more landowners, to be developed under unified control or unified plan of development for a number of dwelling units and land uses, the plan for which does not correspond in lot size, bulk, or type of use, density, lot coverage, open space, or other restriction to the existing land use regulations. The P.U.D. documents as approved by the BOCC may waive or modify specifications, standards and requirements of the County's Development Standards and Regulations, such as site area, density, setbacks, height restrictions, improvement standards and related requirements that would by otherwise applicable to a particular zone district or land use, if such waiver or modification furthers the objectives of the P.U.D. regulations. The Final Development Plan (FDP) is the site-spcific development plan which describes and establishes the type and intensity of uses for a specific parcel or parcels of land. The FDP includes a final subdivision plat. Each future phase of Midtown will have its own FDP that will adhere to the parameters and guidelines established in the most recent PDP. The future land use map designates this area as Urban Residential. Urban residential areas are designated for single and multiple-family housing, typically at urban densities of one dwelling per acre or greater. These areas are intended to provide for development of residential neighborhoods with a variety of housing types, with adequate urban services and transportation facilities. Urban residential areas may include supporting neighborhood commercial uses designed to serve the needs of nearby residents. The entire Midtown at Clear Creek development area is comprised of approximately 183 acres. The site is about % mile south of U.S. Highway 36, about Yz mile north ofi-76, about % mile east of the future RTD light rail station to be located at Federal Boulevard and 7 th Avenue, and about % mile west of The subject site is bordered by Clear Creek and industrial land to the south, existing residential to the north, and vacant land to the east and west. Pecos Street bisects the site. Three future R TD light rail stations will be located within 1 mile of Midtown; combined with close access to the aforementioned highways, the Midtown community has convenient access to important transport corridors in metro Denver. The Filing #5 area is approximately 17.4 acres in size located in the eastern portion of the larger Midtown development area, east of Pecos Street. Osage Street and Mariposa Court are the principal north-south streets in this Filing, and W. 66 th Avenue and W. 6ih Avenue are the main east-west streets. Alleys will playa key role in providing access to garages in the rear of the 84 of the 96 single-family dwellings in Filing #5, thereby allowing the homes to front public streets and/or landscaped tracts. The other 12 single-family dwellings will be front-loaded with the garage facing the street. The North Pecos Water and Sanitation District has indicated it has the capacity to serve this site. The site is also within the Adams County Fire Protection District. Midtown is envisioned as an infill neighborhood development with a traditional street design that incorporates alley loaded garages. It is planned as a mixed-use community that will invigorate this part of Southwest Adams County. Incorporated into the community will be a local

7 commercial area, a variety of residential home types and a system of open space, parks and trails. The approved PDP includes a ±43-acre park / open space area, and a ±5-acre school site. This request is consistent with the Overall Development Plan (ODP) and the Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan (PDP). The ODP and the Second Amendment to the PDP allow for a maximum of 1,68 residential units with an overall density of approximately 8.7 dwelling units per acre. The density of Midtown Filing No.5 is approximately 5.5 dwelling units per acre. The plan for Midtown Filing No.5 provides continuity by extending the block structure, vehicular circulation and landscape treatment of the previous filings. Landscaped tracts provide amenities that will connect to future phases of the Midtown development. Housing Types & Designs Midtown Filing #5 includes two different home types listed below: Single Family Detached / Rear-Loaded Cottage Homes: Consists of homes designed for residents who want a lower amount of outdoor space to maintain and are on lots with rear alleyloaded garages. Sizes of residences vary in width and depth. Size of homes range from 1,65 to 2,85 square feet. There will be 84 Rear-Loaded Cottage Homes in Filing #5. Single-Family Detached / Front-Loaded Homes: Consists of homes designed for young families who desire a small private yard. Sizes of residences vary and will have front-loaded garages. Size of homes range from 1,8 square feet to 2,2 square feet. There will be 12 Front Loaded Homes in Filing #4. The Architectural Design Guidelines allow for incorporation of a variety of architectural styles from contemporary to more regional styles such as craftsman or prairie. All detached residences will have a covered porch. Single-family detached homes will have a maximum height of 45 feet. All builders and homeowners are required to go through the Design Review Committee, and the County will not approve a building permit until approval has been granted from the DRC. Parking The parking plan accommodates a minimum of 2.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit overall. The internal local street system is designed to work in concert with the private alleys. Alleys will be used to access garages and parking for most of the homes. Each rear-loaded home will have a minimum of two off-street parking spaces. Parallel parking between the garage and alley is permitted where space permits. All homes have access to on-street parking along the local streets. There are approximately 443 parking spaces provided for the 96 single-family detached lots in the Filing #5 area (167 on-street parking spaces and 276 garage and alley parking spaces), for approximately 4.61 parking spaces per dwelling unit in Filing #5. Common Areas The Filing #5 area includes streetscape landscape areas and landscape tracts. In addition, there is a temporary detention pond for stormwater runoff for the portion of Filing #5 that is tributary to the pond. Once the ultimate detention pond is constructed with Filing #7, this temporary pond and associated infrastructure will be removed. Open space tracts will be maintained by the Clear

8 Creek Station Metropolitan District. Tree lawns will be installed by the builder and maintained by adjacent homeowners. Private home landscapes will be installed by the homeowner or builder and maintained by the homeowner. Adams County will not be responsible for operation and maintenance of parks and open space. The Clear Creek Station Metropolitan District will be responsible for the enforcement of landscape maintenance requirements. A Design Review Committee will review private open space design for compatibility. The homeowner will be responsible for removal of snow, ice, debris or other obstructions from the detached sidewalk in front of their residences. Lot Characteristics Typical Filing #5 lot sizes range from 2,56 square feet to 4,875 square feet for the 96 lots in this area. All front, side and rear setbacks will be consistent with the Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan. There will only be single-family detached homes in Filing #5. Side Yard Use Easements are granted along common side lot lines on detached single-family home lots. Side Yard Use Easements occur from front property line to rear property line and extend from the Grantor's building foundation to the lot line between the Grantor's and Grantee's parcels. Filing #5 Timeline The estimated length of time for full build-out of the Filing #5 area of Midtown is seven years. Subdivision Improvement Agreement The Adams County Development Standards and Regulations require a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) to be approved, per Section The agreement shall address the manner and timing of the completion of all subdivision improvements and the responsibility for payment of the costs of all subdivision improvements. On November 6, 214, the Adams County BOCC approved a pre-plat SIA for Midtown Filing No.5 prior to approval of the Final Development Plan and Final Plat application. This approval was granted to allow the developer to begin construction of certain public improvements for street construction, dry utilities, storm drainage and other site improvements prior to final plat approval and at the Developer's risk. The current application for the Final Development Plan and Final Plat includes an Addendum to the above referenced SIA for Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.5. This Addendum outlines the Developer's obligation for landscape installation, landscape ownership and maintenance, and Public Land Dedication (PLD) fees for schools and parks for this phase of the development. This filing has a number of tracts that will be commonly owned and maintained. The SIA and the Addendum to the SIA describe the maintenance responsibilities and ownership areas for the Developer, the County and the Metro District. The exhibit for the Addendum to the SIA depicts areas that will be maintained privately (tree lawns, etc.). The Metro District will own and/or maintain the remaining common areas. The exact tracts of land owned and/or maintained by each entity are outlined in the Addendum to the SIA for Midtown Filing No.5.

9 REFERRAL AGENCY COMMENTS The Colorado Division of Water Resources, in a letter dated October 1, 214, notes that the North Pecos Water and Sanitation District will serve Filing #5 and has a contract in place with Denver Water to obtain treated water on demand, and that the water supply can be provided without causing injury. The Division also notes that any existing exempt production wells within Filing #5 must be re-permitted pursuant to a decreed augmentation plan, or must be plugged and abandoned in accordance with Rule 16 of the Water Well Construction Rules. Well Abandonment Reports must be completed and submitted to the Division of Water Resources for each abandoned well. The Applicant takes note of this comment. The Colorado Geological Survey, in a letter dated October 3, 214, notes that the Filing 5 area, provided that the expansive soil and potential shallow groundwater conditions are addressed prior to construction, does not present any geologic hazards or development constraints that would preclude the proposed use and density. The Applicant's geotechnical engineers and construction material consultants, Cesare, Inc., note that the preliminary geotechnical study of Midtown at Clear Creek recommended the sub-excavation, moisture treatment, and the recompact treatment of clay soils to eight feet below the lowest foundation level for structures and to a depth of jive feet below roadways. This was done under the observation of a Cesare jield technician. During sub-excavation, groundwater was not observed by the jield technician and so is not likely to present a concern. Perimeter drains for individual structures may be required and are determinedfrom lot specific investigations by the geotechnical engineer for the homebuilder. Xcel Energy, in a letter dated October 3, 214, requests that in this and subsequent Midtown filings that at a minimum Midtown maintain the easement widths utilized in the previous Midtown filings, so as to maintain consistency throughout the development. In addition, the Developer must contact Xcel and complete the application process for any new natural gas or electric service, or modification to existing facilities, and that all utilities should be located prior to construction. The Applicant takes note of this comment. The Tri-County Health Department, in a letter dated October 3, 214, states that it has no comments. The Applicant takes note of this comment. The City of Westminster, in correspondence dated September 17, 214, states that it has no comments. The Applicant takes note of this comment. None CITIZEN COMMENTS PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE This case was heard on November 13, 214 by the Planning Commission, which recommended approval in a unanimous decision (7-). There were no citizen comments during the public hearing. The Planning Commission did not have any concerns with the applicants' request.

10 STAFF RECOMMENDATION This proposal is consistent with the Overall Development Plan and the Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan. The Filing #5 FDP area includes two types of single-family detached homes and maintains the traditional neighborhood concept with its grid form and rearloaded product types and the inclusion of open space tracts and landscaped tree lawns. Staff supports the mixed-use pedestrian-friendly environment fostered by Filing #5, and recommends approval of the requests, with the following recommended Findings of Fact. RECOMMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The preliminary plat is consistent with the Adams County Comprehensive Plan and any available area plan. 2. The preliminary plat is consistent with the purposes of these standards and regulations. 3. The preliminary plat is in conformance with the subdivision design standards and any approved sketch plan. 4. The applicant has provided evidence that a sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality, and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards. 5. The applicant has provided evidence that a public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, adequate evidence indicating that such system complies with state and local laws and regulations. 6. The applicant has provided evidence to show all areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions, have been identified by the applicant and the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with such conditions. 7. The applicant has provided evidence that adequate drainage improvements comply with these standards and regulations. 8. The overall density of development within the proposed subdivision conforms to the zone district density allowances. 9. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the surrounding area, harmonious with the character of the neighborhood, not detrimental to the immediate area, not detrimental to the future development of the area, and not detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the County. The proposed subdivision has established an adequate level of compatibility by:

11 a. Incorporating natural physical features into the development design and providing sufficient open spaces considering the type and intensity of use; b. Incorporating site planning techniques to foster the implementation of the County's plans, and encourage a land use pattern to support a balanced transportation system, including auto, bike and pedestrian traffic, public or mass transit, and the cost effective delivery of other services consistent with adopted plans, policies and regulations of the County; c. Incorporating physical design features in the subdivision to provide a transition between the project and adjacent land uses through the provision of an attractive entryway, edges along public streets, architectural design, and appropriate height and bulk restrictions on structures; d. Incorporating identified environmentally sensitive areas, including but not limited to, wetlands and wildlife corridors, into the project design; and e. Incorporating public facilities or infrastructure, or cash-in-lieu, reasonably related to the proposed subdivision so the proposed subdivision will not negatively impact the levels of service of the County services and facilities. 1. The final plat is consistent and conforms to the approved preliminary plat. 11. The final plat is in conformance with the subdivision design standards. 12. The applicant has provided evidence that a sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality, and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards. 13. The applicant has provided evidence that a public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, adequate evidence indicating that the system complies with state and local laws and regulations. 14. The applicant has provided evidence to show all areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions, have been identified by the applicant and the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with such conditions. 15. The proposed or constructed drainage improvements are adequate and comply with these standards and regulations. 16. Adequate public facilities or infrastructure, or cash-in-lieu, for impacts reasonably related to the proposed subdivision have been constructed or financially guaranteed through cash-in-lieu or a subdivision improvements agreement so the proposed subdivision will not negatively impact the levels of service of the County. 17. The FDP is in general conformity with the Adams County Comprehensive Plan and any applicable area plan. 18. The FDP conforms to the P.U.D. standards. 19. The FDP is consistent with any approved PDP for the property.

12 2. The FDP construction plans meet the requirements of these standards and regulations and have been approved by the Director of Public Works, all infrastructure and utility providers, Tri County Health Department, and all other referral agencies. Recommended Notes to the Applicant: 1. The Addendum to the Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) with Midtown LLC shall be executed concurrently to the approval of the Final Plat and Final Development Plan. No permits shall be issued for Filing #5 until the Addendum to the SIA is executed. 2. The applicant shall include "no parking" signage on all fire lanes. 3. The applicant shall place stakes on the z-lots and provide final as-built surveys of the homes measured from the finished exterior wall to the lot line with building permit applications. 4. All applicable building, zoning, health, engineering, and fire codes shall be adhered to with this request. I Staff Recommendation: Approval with 2 Findings of Fact and 4 Notes I Ipc Recommendation: Approval with 2 Findings of Fact and 4 Notes I I I

13 -,,- ADAMS COUNTY 'i "'I;,, I.; Planning and Development Department 443 South Adams County Parkway, 1st Floor, Suite W2A Brighton, CO PHON E FAX MEMORANDUM To: From: Subject: Board of County Commissioners Michael Weaver, Planner II - Economic Development Midtown Filing No.5 / Case # PRC Date: December 9,214 If the Board of County Commissioners does not concur with the Planning Commission and Staff recommendation of Approval, the following findings may be adopted as part of a decision of Denial: ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDED FINDINGS 1. The preliminary plat is inconsistent with the Adams County Comprehensive Plan and any available area plan. 2. The preliminary plat is inconsistent with the purposes of these standards and regulations. 3. The preliminary plat is not in conformance with the subdivision design standards and any approved sketch plan. 4. The applicant has not provided evidence that a sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality, and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards. 5. The applicant has not provided evidence that a public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, adequate evidence indicating that such system complies with state and local laws and regulations. 6. The applicant has not provided evidence to show all areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions, have been identified by the applicant and the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with such conditions. 7. The applicant has not provided evidence that adequate drainage improvements comply with these standards and regulations.

14 8. The overall density of development within the proposed subdivision does not conform to the zone district density allowances. 9. The proposed subdivision is incompatible with the surrounding area, not harmonious with the character of the neighborhood, detrimental to the immediate area, detrimental to the future development of the area, and detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the County. The proposed subdivision has not established an adequate level of compatibility by: a. Incorporating natural physical features into the development design and providing sufficient open spaces considering the type and intensity of use; b. Incorporating site planning techniques to foster the implementation of the County's plans, and encourage a land use pattern to support a balanced transportation system, including auto, bike and pedestrian traffic, public or mass transit, and the cost effective delivery of other services consistent with adopted plans, policies and regulations of the County; c. Incorporating physical design features in the subdivision to provide a transition between the project and adjacent land uses through the provision of an attractive entryway, edges along public streets, architectural design, and appropriate height and bulk restrictions on structures; d. Incorporating identified environmentally sensitive areas, including but not limited to, wetlands and wildlife corridors, into the project design; and e. Incorporating public facilities or infrastructure, or cash-in-lieu, reasonably related to the proposed subdivision so the proposed subdivision will not negatively impact the levels of service of the County services and facilities. 1 O. The final plat is inconsistent and does not conform to the approved preliminary plat. 11. The final plat is not in conformance with the subdivision design standards. 12. The applicant has not provided evidence that a sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality, and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards. 13. The applicant has not provided evidence that a public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, adequate evidence indicating that the system complies with state and local laws and regulations. 14. The applicant has not provided evidence to show all areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions, have been identified by the applicant and the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with such conditions. 15. The proposed or constructed drainage improvements are inadequate and do not comply with these standards and regulations. 16. Adequate public facilities or infrastructure, or cash-in-lieu, for impacts reasonably related to the proposed subdivision have not been constructed or financially guaranteed

15 through cash-in-lieu or a subdivision improvements agreement so the proposed subdivision will negatively impact the levels of service of the County. 17. The FDP is not in general conformity with the Adams County Comprehensive Plan and any applicable area plan. 18. The FDP does not conform to the P.D.D. standards. 19. The FDP is inconsistent with any approved PDP for the property. 2. The FDP construction plans do not meet the requirements of these standards and regulations and have not been approved by the Director of Transportation, all infrastructure and utility providers, Tri-County Health Department, and all other referral agencies.

16 CERTIFICATE OF POSTING THIS WILL BE" PUBLlC HEARING. ANY INTERESTED PARTIES MAY ATTEND AND BE HEARD. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION CONTACT: -Hl,.)".o" W,.al,l" I, Michael Weaver, do hereby certify that I posted the property at 671 Pecos Street on October 17,214 in accordance with the requirements of the Adams County Zoning Regulations Michael Weaver

17 ii' DEPARTMENT ADAMS COUNTY '9.1 1;,.,... + OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Planning Commission November 13,214 CASE No.: PRC CASE NAME: Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.5 Owner's Name: Applicant's Name: Brookfield Residential Brookfield Residential Applicant's Address: 188 Inverness Drive West, Suite 15, Englewood, CO 8112 Location of Request: SE of 68 th Avenue & Pecos Street Nature of Request: 1) Final Development Plan (FDP) to allow 96 lots on approximately 17.4 acres m the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; 2) Major Subdivision (Preliminary/Final Plat) to create 96 lots on approximately 17.4 acres in the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; and 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) for Filing No.5. Site Size: +/ acres (Overall site: 183 acres +/-) Zone District: Proposed Use: Existing Use: Hearing Date( s): Planned Unit Development (P-U-D) Residential Vacant PC: November 13,214/6: pm BOCC: December 9,214/1: am Hearing Location: Adams County Government Center Public Hearing Room, 443 Report Date: October 27,214 S. Adams County Parkway, Brighton, Colorado 861 Case Manager: Michael Weaver \AW Staff Recommendation: Approval with 2 Findings of Fact and 4 Notes SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS APPLICATIONS On October 28, 214, in Case # PRC214-9, the BOCC approved Filing No.4 of the development, consisting of 1) Final Development Plan (FDP) to allow 127 lots on approximately 21.1 acres in the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; 2) Major Subdivision (Preliminary/Final Plat) to create 127 lots on approximately 21.1 acres in the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; and 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) for Filing No.4.

18 On July 8, 214, in Case # PRC214-1, the BOCC approved Filing No.3 of the development, consisting of 1) Final Development Plan (FDP) to allow 64 lots on approximately acres in the P-lJ-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; 2) Major Subdivision (Preliminary/Final Plat) to create 64 lots on approximately acres in the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; and 3) Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) for Filing No.3. On July 8, 214, in Case # PUD213-1, the BOCC approved the Second Amendment to the approved Preliminary Development Plan (PDP). On December 9, 213, in Case # P RC213-11, the BOCC approved Filing No.2 of the development, consisting of 1) a Final Development Plan (PUD) to allow 65 lots on approximately 7.19 acres in the PUD zone district, and 2) a Major Subdivision (Final Plat) to create 65 lots on approximately 7.19 acres ofland in the PUD zone district. On January 7, 213, in Case # RCU212-31, the BOCC approved a request to rezone approximately acres from R-4, Residential, C-5, Commercial, and PL, Public Lands to Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.). On July 25, 212, in Case # PRC212-1, the BOCC approved Filing No. I of the development, consisting of 1) Amendment to the approved Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD-P) / Preliminary Development Plan (PDP); 2) Major Subdivision (Final Plat) to create 156 lots on approximately 26.4 acres; and 3) Final Development Plan (PUD) to allow 156 lots. On February 25, 28, in Case # PRJ27-24, the BOCC approved 1) Major Subdivision (Preliminary Plat) to allow approximately 825 lots on approximately 18 acres in the C-5, Commercial, R-4, Residential, and PL, Public Land Zone Districts and; 2) Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD-P) to allow a mixed-use development with a maximum of 1,68 dwelling units consisting of a minimum of 43 acres for park and open space, approximately 43 single-family detached units, approximately 39 attached multi-family units, a maximum of 315 apartment units, approximately 1 condominiums, approximately 1 acres of commercial/mixed use and an additional 186 attached multi-family units if the proposed commercial area is not developed. On March 14, 27, in Case # PRJ26-23, the BOCC approved an 1) Overall Development Plan (ODP) with mixed-use consisting of approximately 1,68 singlefamily homes, single-family attached homes, condominiums, and/or apartments, and/or townhouses, approximately 13.5 acres of commercial use, and a minimum of 47 acres of parks and open space; and 2) Rezoning approximately 191 acres from Preliminary PUD (P-PUD), 1-2, and 1-1, Industrial to C-5, Commercial, R-4, Residential, and PL, Public Land. 2

19 SUMMARY OF APPLICATION The applicant is requesting 1) a Final Development Plan (PDP) to allow 96 lots on approximately 17.4 acres in the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; 2) a Major Subdivision (Preliminary/Final Plat) to create 96 lots on approximately 17.4 acres in the P-U-D, Planned Unit Development zone district; and 3) a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) for Filing No.5. The area is zoned P-U-D, Planned Unit Development, which is a form of a customized zone district. The objective of a Planned Unit Development is to establish an area of land, controlled by one or more landowners, to be developed under unified control or unified plan of development for a number of dwelling units and land uses, the plan for which does not correspond in lot size, bulk, or type of use, density, lot coverage, open space, or other restriction to the existing land use regulations. The P.U.D. documents as approved by the BOCC may waive or modify specifications, standards and requirements of the County's Development Standards and Regulations, such as site area, density, setbacks, height restrictions, improvement standards and related requirements that would by otherwise applicable to a particular zone district or land use, if such waiver or modification furthers the objectives of the P.U.D. regulations. The Final Development Plan (FDP) is the site-specific development plan which describes and establishes the type and intensity of uses for a specific parcel or parcels of land. The FDP includes a final subdivision plat. Each future phase of Midtown will have its own FDP that will adhere to the parameters and guidelines established in the most recent PDP. The future land use map designates this area as Urban Residential. Urban residential areas are designated for single and multiple-family housing, typically at urban densities of one dwelling per acre or greater. These areas are intended to provide for development of residential neighborhoods with a variety of housing types, with adequate urban services and transportation facilities. Urban residential areas may include supporting neighborhood commercial uses designed to serve the needs of nearby residents. The entire Midtown at Clear Creek development area is comprised of approximately 183 acres. The site is about % mile south of U.S. Highway 36, about Yz mile north ofi-76, about % mile east of the future RTD light rail station to be located at Federal Boulevard and 7 th Avenue, and about % mile west ofi-25. The subject site is bordered by Clear Creek and industrial land to the south, existing residential to the north, and vacant land to the east and west. Pecos Street bisects the site. Three future R TD light rail stations will be located within 1 mile of Midtown; combined with close access to the aforementioned highways, the Midtown community has convenient access to important transport corridors in metro Denver. The Filing #5 area is approximately 17.4 acres in size located in the eastern portion of the larger Midtown development area, east of Pecos Street. Osage Street and Mariposa Court are the principal north-south streets in this Filing, and W. 66 th Avenue and W. 6ih Avenue are the main east-west streets. Alleys will playa key role in providing access to garages in the rear of the 84 of the 96 single-family dwellings in Filing #5, thereby allowing the homes to front public streets and/or landscaped tracts. The other 12 single-family dwellings will be front-loaded with the garage facing the street. 3

20 The North Pecos Water and Sanitation District has indicated it has the capacity to serve this site. The site is also within the Adams County Fire Protection District. Midtown is envisioned as an infill neighborhood development with a traditional street design that incorporates alley loaded garages. It is planned as a mixed-use community that will invigorate this part of Southwest Adams County. Incorporated into the community will be a local commercial area, a variety of residential home types and a system of open space, parks and trails. The approved PDP includes a ±43-acre park / open space area, and a ±5-acre school site. This request is consistent with the Overall Development Plan (ODP) and the Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan (PDP). The ODP and the Second Amendment to the PDP allow for a maximum of 1,68 residential units with an overall density of approximately 8.7 dwelling units per acre. The density of Midtown Filing No.5 is approximately 5.5 dwelling units per acre. The plan for Midtown Filing No.5 provides continuity by extending the block structure, vehicular circulation and landscape treatment of the previous filings. Landscaped tracts provide amenities that will connect to future phases of the Midtown development. Housing Types & Designs Midtown Filing #5 includes two different home types listed below: Single Familv Detached / Rear-Loaded Cottage Homes: Consists of homes designed for residents who want a lower amount of outdoor space to maintain and are on lots with rear alleyloaded garages. Sizes of residences vary in width and depth. Size of homes range from 1,65 to 2,85 square feet. There will be 84 Rear-Loaded Cottage Homes in Filing #5. Single-Family Detached / Front-Loaded Homes: Consists of homes designed for young families who desire a small private yard. Sizes of residences vary and will have front-loaded garages. Size of homes range from 1,8 square feet to 2,2 square feet. There will be 12 Front Loaded Homes in Filing #4. The Architectural Design Guidelines allow for incorporation of a variety of architectural styles from contemporary to more regional styles such as craftsman or prairie. All detached residences will have a covered porch. Single-family detached homes will have a maximum height of 45 feet. All builders and homeowners are required to go through the Design Review Committee, and the County will not approve a building permit until approval has been granted from the DRC. Parking The parking plan accommodates a minimum of 2.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit overall. The internal local street system is designed to work in concert with the private alleys. Alleys will be used to access garages and parking for most of the homes. Each rear-loaded home will have a minimum of two off-street parking spaces. Parallel parking between the garage and alley is permitted where space permits. All homes have access to on-street parking along the local streets. There are approximately 443 parking spaces provided for the 96 single-family detached lots in the Filing #5 area (167 on-street parking spaces and 276 garage and alley parking spaces), for approximately 4.61 parking spaces per dwelling unit in Filing #5. 4

21 Common Areas The Filing #5 area includes streetscape landscape areas and landscape tracts. In addition, there is a temporary detention pond for stormwater runoff for the portion of Filing #5 that is tributary to the pond. Once the ultimate detention pond is constructed with Filing #7, this temporary pond and associated infrastructure will be removed. Open space tracts will be maintained by the Clear Creek Station Metropolitan District. Tree lawns will be installed by the builder and maintained by adjacent homeowners. Private home landscapes will be installed by the homeowner or builder and maintained by the homeowner. Adams County will not be responsible for operation and maintenance of parks and open space. The Clear Creek Station Metropolitan District will be responsible for the enforcement of landscape maintenance requirements. A Design Review Committee will review private open space design for compatibility. The homeowner will be responsible for removal of snow, ice, debris or other obstructions from the detached sidewalk in front of their residences. Lot Characteristics Typical Filing #5 lot sizes range from 2,56 square feet to 4,875 square feet for the 96 lots in this area. All front, side and rear setbacks will be consistent with the Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan. There will only be single-family detached homes in Filing #5. Side Yard Use Easements are granted along common side lot lines on detached single-family home lots. Side Yard Use Easements occur from front property line to rear property line and extend from the Grantor's building foundation to the lot line between the Grantor's and Grantee's parcels. Filing #5 Timeline The estimated length of time for full build-out of the Filing #5 area of Midtown is seven years. Subdivision Improvement Agreement The Adams County Development Standards and Regulations require a Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) to be approved, per Section The agreement shall address the manner and timing of the completion of all subdivision improvements and the responsibility for payment of the costs of all subdivision improvements. On November 6, 214, it is anticipated that the Adams County BOCC will approve a pre-plat SIA for Midtown Filing No.5 prior to approval of the Final Development Plan and Final Plat application. This approval, should it be granted, would allow the developer to begin construction of certain public improvements for street construction, dry utilities, storm drainage and other site improvements prior to final plat approval and at the Developer's risk. The current application for the Final Development Plan and Final Plat includes an Addendum to the above referenced SIA for Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.5. This Addendum outlines the Developer's obligation for landscape installation, landscape ownership and maintenance, and Public and Dedication (PLD) fees for schools and parks for this phase of the development. This filing has a number of tracts that will be commonly owned and maintained. The SIA and the Addendum to the SIA describe the maintenance responsibilities and ownership areas for the 5

22 Developer, the County and the Metro District. The exhibit for the Addendum to the SIA depicts areas that will be maintained privately (tree lawns, etc.). The Metro District will own and/or maintain the remaining common areas. The exact tracts of land owned and/or maintained by each entity are outlined in the Addendum to the SIA for Midtown Filing No.5. REFERRAL AGENCY COMMENTS The Colorado Division of Water Resources, in a letter dated October 1, 214, notes that the North Pecos Water and Sanitation District will serve Filing #5 and has a contract in place with Denver Water to obtain treated water on demand, and that the water supply can be provided without causing injury. The Division also notes that any existing exempt production wells within Filing #5 must be re-permitted pursuant to a decreed augmentation plan, or must be plugged and abandoned in accordance with Rule 16 of the Water Well Construction Rules. Well Abandonment Reports must be completed and submitted to the Division of Water Resources for each abandoned well. The Applicant takes note of this comment. The Colorado Geological Survey, in a letter dated October 3, 214, notes that the Filing 5 area, provided that the expansive soil and potential shallow groundwater conditions are addressed prior to construction, does not present any geologic hazards or development constraints that would preclude the proposed use and density. The Applicant's geotechnical engineers and construction material consultants, Cesare, Inc., note that the preliminary geotechnical study of Midtown at Clear Creek recommended the sub-excavation, moisture treatment, and the recompact treatment of clay soils to eight feet below the lowest foundation level for structures and to a depth of five feet below roadways. This was done under the observation of a Cesare field technician. During sub-excavation, groundwater was not observed by the field technician and so is not likely to present a concern. Perimeter drains for individual structures may be required and are determinedfrom lot specific investigations by the geotechnical engineer for the homebuilder. Xcel Energy, in a letter dated October 3, 214, requests that in this and subsequent Midtown filings that at a minimum Midtown maintain the easement widths utilized in the previous Midtown filings, so as to maintain consistency throughout the development. In addition, the Developer must contact Xcel and complete the application process for any new natural gas or electric service, or modification to existing facilities, and that all utilities should be located priidr to construction. The Applicant takes note of this comment. The Tri-County Health Department, in a letter dated October 3, 214, states that it has no comments. The Applicant takes note of this comment. The City of Westminster, in correspondence dated September 17, 214, states that it has no comments. The Applicant takes note of this comment. 6

23 STAFF RECOMMENDATION This proposal is consistent with the Overall Development Plan and the Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan. The Filing #5 FDP area includes two types of single-family detached homes and maintains the traditional neighborhood concept with its grid form and rearloaded product types and the inclusion of open space tracts and landscaped tree lawns. Staff supports the mixed-use pedestrian-friendly environment fostered by Filing #5, and recommends approval of the requests, with the following recommended Findings of Fact. 7

24 RECOMMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The preliminary plat is consistent with the Adams County Comprehensive Plan and any available area plan. 2. The preliminary plat is consistent with the purposes of these standards and regulations. 3. The preliminary plat is in conformance with the subdivision design standards and any approved sketch plan. 4. The applicant has provided evidence that a sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality, and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards. 5. The applicant has provided evidence that a public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, adequate evidence indicating that such system complies with state and local laws and regulations. 6. The applicant has provided evidence to show all areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions, have been identified by the applicant and the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with such conditions. 7. The applicant has provided evidence that adequate drainage improvements comply with these standards and regulations. 8. The overall density of development within the proposed subdivision conforms to the zone district density allowances. 9. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the surrounding area, harmonious with the character of the neighborhood, not detrimental to the immediate area, not detrimental to the future development of the area, and not detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the County. The proposed subdivision has established an adequate level of compatibility by: a. Incorporating natural physical features into the development design and providing sufficient open spaces considering the type and intensity of use; b. Incorporating site planning techniques to foster the implementation of the County's plans, and encourage a land use pattern to support a balanced transportation system, including auto, bike and pedestrian traffic, public or mass transit, and the cost effective delivery of other services consistent with adopted plans, policies and regulations of the County; c. Incorporating physical design features in the subdivision to provide a transition between the project and adjacent land uses through the provision of an attractive entryway, edges along public streets, architectural design, and appropriate height and bulk restrictions on structures; d. Incorporating identified environmentally sensitive areas, including but not limited to, wetlands and wildlife corridors, into the project design; and 8

25 e. Incorporating public facilities or infrastructure, or cash-in-lieu, reasonably related to the proposed subdivision so the proposed subdivision will not negatively impact the levels of service of the County services and facilities. 1 O. The final plat is consistent and conforms to the approved preliminary plat. 11. The final plat is in conformance with the subdivision design standards. 12. The applicant has provided evidence that a sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality, and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards. 13. The applicant has provided evidence that a public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, adequate evidence indicating that the system complies with state and local laws and regulations. 14. The applicant has provided evidence to show all areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions, have been identified by the applicant and the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with such conditions. 15. The proposed or constructed drainage improvements are adequate and comply with these standards and regulations. 16. Adequate public facilities or infrastructure, or cash-in-lieu, for impacts reasonably related to the proposed subdivision have been constructed or financially guaranteed through cash-in-lieu or a subdivision improvements agreement so the proposed subdivision will not negatively impact the levels of service of the County. 17. The FDP is in general conformity with the Adams County Comprehensive Plan and any applicable area plan. 18. The FDP conforms to the P.U.D. standards. 19. The FDP is consistent with any approved PDP for the property. 2. The FDP construction plans meet the requirements of these standards and regulations and have been approved by the Director of Public Works, all infrastructure and utility providers, Tri County Health Department, and all other referral agencies. 9

26 Recommended Notes to the Applicant: 1. The Addendum to the Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) with Midtown LLC shall be executed concurrently to the approval of the Final Plat and Final Development Plan. No permits shall be issued for Filing #5 until the Addendum to the SIA is executed. 2. The applicant shall include "no parking" signage on all fire lanes. 3. The applicant shall place stakes on the z-lots and provide final as-built surveys of the homes measured from the finished exterior wall to the lot line with building permit applications. 4. All applicable building, zoning, health, engineering, and fire codes shall be adhered to with this request. Staff Recommendation: Approval with 2 Findings of Fact and 4 Notes 1

27 CASE ANALYSIS Preliminary Plat 1. The preliminary plat is consistent with the Adams County Comprehensive Plan and any available area plan. Yes. 2. The preliminary plat is consistent with the purposes of these standards and regulations. Yes. 3. The preliminary plat is in conformance with the subdivision design standards and any approved sketch plan. Yes. 4. The applicant has provided evidence that a sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality, and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards. Yes. 5. The applicant has provided evidence that a public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, adequate evidence indicating that such system complies with state and local laws and regulations. Yes. 6. The applicant has provided evidence to show all areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions, have been identified by the applicant and the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with such conditions. Yes. 7. The applicant has provided evidence that adequate drainage improvements comply with these standards and regulations. Yes. 8. The overall density of development within the proposed subdivision conforms to the zone district density allowances. Yes. 9. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the surrounding area, harmonious with the character of the neighborhood, not detrimental to the immediate area, not detrimental to the future development ofthe area, and not detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the County. The proposed subdivision has established an adequate level of compatibility by: a. Incorporating natural physical features into the development design and providing sufficient open spaces considering the type and intensity of use; b. Incorporating site planning techniques to foster the implementation of the County's plans, and encourage a land use pattern to support a balanced transportation system, including auto, bike and pedestrian traffic, public or mass transit, and the cost effective delivery of other services consistent with adopted plans, policies and regulations of the County; c. Incorporating physical design features in the subdivision to provide a transition between the project and adjacent land uses through the provision of an attractive entryway, edges along public streets, architectural design, and appropriate height and bulk restrictions on structures; 11

28 d. Incorporating identified environmentally sensitive areas, including but not limited to, wetlands and wildlife corridors, into the project design; and e. Incorporating public facilities or infrastructure, or cash-in-lieu, reasonably related to the proposed subdivision so the proposed subdivision will not negatively impact the levels of service of the County services and facilities. Yes. Final Plat 1. The final plat is consistent and conforms to the approved preliminary plat. Yes. 11. The final plat is in conformance with the subdivision design standards. Yes. 12. The applicant has provided evidence that a sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality, and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards. Yes. 13. The applicant has provided evidence that a public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, adequate evidence indicating that the system complies with state and local laws and regulations. Yes. 14. The applicant has provided evidence to show all areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions, have been identified by the applicant and the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with such conditions. Yes. 15. The proposed or constructed drainage improvements are adequate and comply with these standards and regulations. Yes. 16. Adequate public facilities or infrastructure, or cash-in-lieu, for impacts reasonably related to the proposed subdivision have been constructed or financially guaranteed through cash-in-lieu or a subdivision improvements agreement so the proposed subdivision will not negatively impact the levels of service of the County. Yes. Final Development Plan (FDP) 17. The FDP is in general conformity with the Adams County Comprehensive Plan and any applicable area plan. Yes. 18. The FDP conforms to the P.U.D. standards. Yes. 19. The FDP is consistent with any approved PDP for the property. Yes. 2. The FDP construction plans meet the requirements of these standards and regulations and have been approved by the Director of Public Works, all infrastructure and utility providers, Tri County Health Department, and all other referral agencies. Yes. 12

29 CITIZEN COMMENTS None Adams County Building Safety Division: None Adams County Code Compliance Division: None Adams County Sheriff's Office: None COUNTY AGENCY COMMENTS Adams County Parks & Community Resources Department: None Adams County Transportation Department: Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA FIRM Panel #81C584H revised March 4, 27. According to the above reference, the site does not appear to be located in a designated Flood Hazard Area. A Floodplain Use Permit will not be required. The site is in the MS4 Permitted Area, if the project disturbs more than an acre Adams County will require a copy of the Storm Water Management Plan and a copy of the state CDPS permit. Site construction and drainage plans have been reviewed and are ready for approval by the Adams County Transportation Department. Adams County Treasurer's Office: The taxes for the pertinent parcels are current; therefore, we have no negative input regarding this request. 13

30 Responding with concerns: Colorado Division of Water Resources Colorado Geological Survey Xcel Energy Responding without concerns: City of Westminster Tri-County Health Department REFERRAL AGENCY COMMENTS Notified but not responding / Cons'idered a Favorable Response: Adams County Fire Protection District Colorado Agriculture Ditch Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Colorado Department of Transportation Colorado Division of Mining Reclamation and Safety Colorado Division of Wildlife Comcast Crestview Water and Sanitation District Hyland Hills Park and Recreation District Mapleton School District # 1 Metro Wastewater Reclamation District North Pecos Water & Sanitation District Perl Mack Neighborhood Group Qwest Communications Regional Transportation District Southwest Adams County Fire Protection District Urban Drainage and Flood Control District United States Post Office US EPA West Adams Soil Conservation District Westminster School District #5 14

31 -ii- ADAMS COUNTY Planning and Development Department 443 South Adams County Parkway, 1st Floor, Slute W2A Brighton, CO PHON E FAX MEMORANDUM To: From: Subject: Planning Commission Michael Weaver, Planner II - Economic Development Midtown Filing No.5 / Case # PRC214-ll Date: November 13,214 If the Planning Commission does not concur with the Staff recommendation of Approval, the following findings may be adopted as part of a decision of Denial: ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDED FINDINGS 1. The preliminary plat is inconsistent with the Adams County Comprehensive Plan and any available area plan. 2. The preliminary plat is inconsistent with the purposes of these standards and regulations. 3. The preliminary plat is not in conformance with the subdivision design standards and any approved sketch plan. 4. The applicant has not provided evidence that a sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality, and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards. 5. The applicant has not provided evidence that a public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, adequate evidence indicating that such system complies with state and local laws and regulations. 6. The applicant has not provided evidence to show all areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions, have been identified by the applicant and the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with such conditions. 7. The applicant has not provided evidence that adequate drainage improvements comply with these standards and regulations. 8. The overall density of development within the proposed subdivision does not conform to the zone district density allowances.

32 9. The proposed subdivision is incompatible with the surrounding area, not harmonious with the character of the neighborhood, detrimental to the immediate area, detrimental to the future development of the area, and detrimental to the health, safety, or welfare of the inhabitants of the area and the County. The proposed subdivision has not established an adequate level of compatibility by: a. Incorporating natural physical features into the development design and providing sufficient open spaces considering the type and intensity of use; b. Incorporating site planning techniques to foster the implementation of the County's plans, and encourage a land use pattern to support a balanced transportation system, including auto, bike and pedestrian traffic, public or mass transit, and the cost effective delivery of other services consistent with adopted plans, policies and regulations of the County; c. Incorporating physical design features in the subdivision to provide a transition between the project and adjacent land uses through the provision of an attractive entryway, edges along public streets, architectural design, and appropriate height and bulk restrictions on structures; d. Incorporating identified environmentally sensitive areas, including but not limited to, wetlands and wildlife corridors, into the project design; and e. Incorporating public facilities or infrastructure, or cash-in-lieu, reasonably related to the proposed subdivision so the proposed subdivision will not negatively impact the levels of service of the County services and facilities. 1. The final plat is inconsistent and does not conform to the approved preliminary plat. 11. The final plat is not in conformance with the subdivision design standards. 12. The applicant has not provided evidence that a sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality, and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards. 13. The applicant has not provided evidence that a public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, adequate evidence indicating that the system complies with state and local laws and regulations. 14. The applicant has not provided evidence to show all areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or requiring special precautions, have been identified by the applicant and the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with such conditions. 15. The proposed or constructed drainage improvements are inadequate and do not comply with these standards and regulations. 16. Adequate public facilities or infrastructure, or cash-in-lieu, for impacts reasonably related to the proposed subdivision have not been constructed or financially guaranteed through cash-in-lieu or a subdivision improvements agreement so the proposed subdivision will negatively impact the levels of service of the County.

33 17. The FDP is not in general conformity with the Adams County Comprehensive Plan and any applicable area plan. 18. The FDP does not conform to the P.U.D. standards. 19. The FDP is inconsistent with any approved PDP for the property. 2. The FDP construction plans do not meet the requirements of these standards and regulations and have not been approved by the Director of Transportation, all infrastructure and utility providers, Tri-County Health Department, and all other referral agencies.

34 R.E9ND./ Engineering Great Places 8 South Lincoln Street, #26 Littleton, CO Office: (72l I August 14, 214 Matt Emmens Adams County - Public Works 443 South Adams County Parkway 1 st Floor, Suite W2B Brighton, CO 861 Re: Midtown at Clear Creek - Filing 5 - Submittal Item F - Letter of Explanation Final Plat Dear Mr. Emmens, Below is a summary of the various questions required to be included in the Letter of Explanation for the Midtown at Clear Creek Filing 5 Final Plat submittal. 1. The final plat is consistent and conforms to the approved preliminary plat. Filing NO. 5 of the Midtown at Clear Creek project is consistent and in general conformance with the Preliminary Plat prepared for the project. 2. The final plat is in conformance with the subdivision design standards. The final plat is in conformance with the Preliminary Development Plan (PDP), Amendment 2, for the Midtown at Clear Creek project. Subdivision design standards not covered within the Amended PDP follow Adams County design standards. 3. The applicant has provided reasonable evidence that a sufficient water supply has been acquired in terms of quantity, quality and dependability for the type of subdivision proposed, as determined in accordance with the standards set forth in the water supply standards. Filing No.5 of the Midtown at Clear Creek community is located within the North Pecos Water & Sanitation District. Please refer to the attached Will Serve letter from North Pecos with regards to adequate water service. 4. The applicant has provided reasonable evidence that a public sewage disposal system has been established and, if other methods of sewage disposal are proposed, adequate evidence that the system complies with state and local laws and regulations. Filing NO.5 of the Midtown at Clear Creek community is located within the North Pecos Water & Sanitation District. Please refer to the attached Will Serve letter from North Pecos with regards to adequate public sewage disposal services. 5. The applicant has provided reasonable evidence to show all areas of the proposed subdivision, which may involve soil or topographical conditions presenting hazards or

35 REJ2LA,ND,/ requiring special precautions, have been identified by the applicant and the proposed uses of these areas are compatible with such conditions. Throughout the PDP, Amended PDP and FOP processes, soils, topographical and/or environmental conditions have been brought to the attention of the County as well as the surrounding community through neighborhood meetings. Based on the studies prepared, there is adequate evidence supporting the development of this community. Any additional remediation efforts required within the boundaries of Filing No.5 will be identified in soil management plans. 6. The proposed or constructed drainage improvements are adequate and comply with Adams County's standards and regulations. The proposed drainage system for Filing No.5 of Midtown at Clear Creek proposes improvements that will account for runoff generated by the development of the project as well as existing runoff from the Subdivision to the north that are tributary to the project. Please refer to the Level III Final Drainage Study prepared for Filing No.5, which illustrates the proposed drainage improvements for this Filing of Midtown. 7. Significant cultural, archaeological, natural/historical resources and unique landforms will be reasonably protected in accordance with resources inventory provisions of these standards and regulations. No significant cultural, archaeological, natural/historical resources and unique landforms will be protected in accordance with resources inventory provisions of these standards and regulations. 8. Adequate public facilities or infrastructure, or cash-in-lieu, for impacts reasonably related to the proposed subdivision have been constructed or financially guaranteed through cash-in-lieu or a subdivision improvements agreement so the proposed subdivision will not negatively impact the levels of service of the County. A Subdivision Improvement Agreement (SIA) for Filing No.5 of the Midtown at Clear Creek project is included with this submittal and will reasonably support the cost of construction for public infrastructure to be constructed for Filing No.5. Please refer to the SIA submitted with the Filing NO.5 FOP and Final Plat for more information. Sincerely, - Michael Pietschmann, P.E., LEED AP Principal

36 Midtown at Clear Creek - Filing Five SUBMITTAL ITEM C WRITTEN EXPLANATION Midtown at Clear Creek is acre Master Planned Community, officially termed a Planned Unit Development (PUD) in Adams County Colorado. The site is located southeast and southwest of the intersection of Pecos Street and 68 th Avenue. The new community is approved for a mix of uses including single-family detached homes, townhomes, multi-family homes and mixed-use commercial-retail. The PUD was originally approved in 28 and amended in 212 and 214 for 1,68 dwelling units, a 5-acre school site, 6.7-acres of commercial Imixed use and a variety of open spaces including an approximately 43 acre park. This Filing Five Final Development Plan is an extension of the concept submitted and approved in earlier phases and proposes 27 dwelling units on 59.4 acres. Front-loaded and alley loaded single family homes are seamlessly mixed together to create a traditional neighborhood community. The open space improvements in this FOP for Midtown residents include an active park north of 67 th Avenue that will house the mail room for the east side of the community and also play spaces for children of varying ages. A trail connection to the Little Dry Creek trail is included as a part of the development for Filing Five. The land uses for Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 1, Block 11 will be proposed in a future Final Development Plan. The proposal meets the Codes and Standards set forth by the PUD and Adams County to create a quality development. This conformance is as follows: 1. The FOP is in general conformity with the Adams County Comprehensive Plan and any applicable area plan. The Filing Five area is on the east side of Pecos Street, south of 68 th Avenue. Filing Five will consist of single family detached front-loaded homes and single family detached rear-loaded homes. Primary access to the Filing Five FOP area is taken from West 67 th Avenue, West 68 th Avenue, Navajo Street and Mariposa Street. The proposed plan continues the general character, block structure and circulation established in previously approved Filings. The Midtown at Clear Creek Filing Five plan continues to implement the master plan developed for Midtown and remains consistent with the approved Overall Development Plan (ODP), Preliminary Development Plan (PDP), Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan and Adams County development standards and regulations. 2. The FOP conforms to the P.U.O. standards. The Midtown at Clear Creek Filing Five FOP conforms to PUD standards. Topics are addressed in detail in the Midtown at Clear Creek Filing Five FOP Narrative sections; A. Explanation of the Characteristics of the PUD; B. Explanation of the Potential Impact on the Surrounding Area, C. Contemplated intensity and Density of Land Use; D. Number, Type, and Size of Buildings or Units, F. Circulation and Road Patterns and G. Ownership and Maintenance of Common Areas.

37 3. The FDP is consistent with any approved PDP for the property. The proposed Midtown at Clear Creek Filing Five FOP is generally consistent with the approved Overall Development Plan (ODP) approved Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) and Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan for this project which allows a maximum of 1,68 residential dwelling units. 4. The FDP construction plans meet the requirements of these standards and regulations and have been approved by the director of Public Works, all infrastructure and utility providers, Tri-County Health Department, and all other referral agencies. The FOP construction plans are designed to meet the standards included in the approved Preliminary Development Plan (PDP), the Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan, or will meet County standards where specific variables are not addressed. The PDP conditions of approval and comments from referral agencies have been considered in the design of the FOP elements. During the review and approval process for this Midtown Filing Five FOP, all necessary requirements will be met and approved by all County departments and other referral agencies.

38 MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK - FILING NO. 5 PRELIMINARY / FINAL PLAT A REPLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 11 AND TRACT S, MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK-FlUNG NO. 1 PLAT CORRECTION AND A PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO CASE NO. PRC OWNERSHIP ANP PEPlCA]ON CFR]ElCAIF- SHEET 1 OF 8 AU...1 BY M'S( twa' nc: u w.vrswn 1H Y ARE 1) O'M RS OF A PAACQ. " u.n) L.YINC'" me- OUARttJt ti fit"cnqn... 1"D'IIItl9tP J SOUTH, RANGE 68 '«ST OF ntt SI:ICtH PRN:IP... COUKTY OF #odaiis, ST" Tt ot CCA.ORAOQ,. BEING MORE PARl1ClA..ARL'f ClBaI9a) AS rclu.d\ll$: A.. PAACEl. (F...u. OF un l. acoc: n AN) Al L. Of' lrac1 s.. 1iItO Ao" Q..[NI: CRaX- F'II..HC ttq. 1 PLIo' 'ncit AS FltcamE:D Al lt[c[p1lqt'ii NO.. 21 CI nc: R:.COIotO$ " 'nil: ccunt't a..trk N«J R omc:r fo(i('ltf[x 'MlW A, POInICIIiI nc HAlT Of 1'H( WU'1'H(.AST UAA:1'[R OF.5I:C1)(IH....) fdittt RANCt ea M:ST rx M.-rH H....aoIlWt. CClJNT't CE.tDAWS. STAT[ ri CCII...Of:tAOO. ace YOIt pnt'fic'u..»l\.y D SCJtetO A$ 'l..l.i!& CCIM:)ICaIO... 1 'n : c:ontjt- SOJl1t!lfM CORNER OF SAID SECTION ", AS MONJM[)Ilm BY A.3-1/. " AL1.UMJM CNI' S1.AW(D "'PU 1l51,.., A UMENT BOX DK:E 1HE CENlER QUAAl[R ::: =- rr51 :-o!(;n:2;. : ;.e:6:s: USED N nus OCDtIPTKIr. Tl1DfC[ N...CNC lift: SIOU1M LJi( CI THE NORl1-IWEST QUARTER Of THE SOIJTHEAST WARltR Of SAm $E.ClO4... SOU1'H ao'stlr UST, A DISTANCE Of 5O..N FrrT 1 A PaNT ON 11iE EASltRl Y IlKiMf-Of--'4fA'" OF PECOS SlR[[T AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 357 AT PAGE 33, IN SAl) R COROS AND ntr: P1WofT rz; 'f!i'mp THEHC[ OEPARTJNG SAID SOUlH ute,.&.long SAID EASlERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND THE EASlERLY RIGHT-Of-WAY UHE AS OESCftIBED IN BOOK 357 AT PAGE J'lJ ANO BOOK 3658 AT PAC( 687, IN SAIO RECOROS. NORTH ''15" EAST, A OISTANt( r:x: 5S2.sa FEET: THENCE DEPARTING SAID EASltRl Y RIGHT-OF-WAY line, SOUTH 451]7 55- EAST, A IXSTANCE OF 25.2 rr T; THENCE SOUTH 89'43'26" EAST, A. CNSTANCE OF 17S-151 FEET: ACKNOWl EPGEMENT ANP ACCEPTANCE BY ClEAR CREEK STA]ON METROPOLITAN PISTRICT NO 1 I. AS OISlRtCT WANAGER Of a..e.ar CREEK STATlON WETROPOUTAN ots1rict NO. 1. 'M-tcH HAS AN AOOR SS Of 188 INVERNESS W, SUITE 'so. ENCtiWOOD. co 8'11 2. HEREBY ACKHO'M.fDC[ AND Ata:PT THE OEDICAllON, GRAHT. S4L.E, REWIS[ AND CONV[YANC[ or THE RRlGAlJOH WAIN EASEloIENT AS SHD'MoI WITHIN TRAct A. LOT 1 AND 15 BLOCK 1 OF YlDlQiIIrII AT a NI aiidc - furio NO. S. COUNTY OF ADAMS. STAlE Of COLORADO DISTRICT MANAGER DAlE: THENCE NORTH 84'33'32- E...sT, A DISTANCE or 9 34 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'43'26- U\ST, A DISTANCE OF 29.7 FEET; Tli NCE SOUTli ""4.1'26- EAST, A OISiANCE OF mt: "THE:Ha: SOOTH 89'43'26" (AST, A DISTANCE Of 37. F"fn; THENCt SOUTH "16'- WEST, A CNSTANC( Of mt; THENCt SOlJTH 89'4:5'26- EAST, A DISTANCE Of',gS- F'EET; THENCE SOUTH "16'34- WEST, A DISTANCE Of 181.4J FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY 8UNDARY Of THAT PARca OF land AS DESCRIBED IN B<XJt( 22 AT PACE 5M, IN S RECCROS; It HCE AlC»\JG SAIO SOUTHERlY BOONDARY, NORTH &9'Sr3r WEST, A otstance Of FU:T TO A. POINT ON THE EAS1!Rl. Y BClUN[)ARY Of SAID LOT " BlOCK 11: THENCE AlONG THE EASTERlY BOUNDARY Of SAID LOT 1, BlOCK 11 AND THE EASTERlY BOUNDARY r:x: SAID TRACT S, SOUTH '',5- WEST. A DISTANCE Of FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID TRACT S; THENCE AlCNO 'fti[ SCIUTHDtlY LK CF SAtD TIAC1 Sr. HOImf MOST "'" "lst. It. ti!ist,ytce OF reet TO M y OF SAaO 1R}.CT S JJe,.. PONT K [AS'T(J!L,y RtGHT-OF-WAY UN( or PlCOS SllIE T AS tlddti3eo 1M BOOiC 3$13 A1 PACF;.9, f4 $AI) RE()O':Q THENCE ALONG SAID EASTIRLY RIGHT-Of-WAY, NORTH OC)'OO'1S" EAST. A DiSTANCE Of J1S-,55 reet TO THE fwit or 'f1i't'tm?" CONTAINING AN AREA Of ACRES, (756,11 SQUARE feet), WORE OR less. ttas 8Y li SE PRtS!NTS laid OUT, P\.AlltO AHO H IN to LOTS. smttt$ AHD t.uoitnls AS ON Tte$ P\,A'T lh[ Wt.U( AHD SfYlE OP AT Q1AA. CII: O(-I'I"NC NO. 5 IWJ tdfln' GIWIT TO '1)t[ C:OUNtY Of AOA.W:s. ST4'1't OF CD.OIUDO. '"'* M US( ( THE P'tJBUC. 'THt snt:f:els NG Onto. F'\i!UQ WAYS AWJ I,.\H'I)S I'f)tt()N SHC:IItIN. NG 'n u.sdifnfs AS. rtir PUBUt U1lJ1Y. 1V,., OtTOlTlOH PQhD AAUS. n.ooowal r\.qclcpuin \MlS. DRAINAGE AND OTHER PUBliC PURPOSES AS DEl'ERUINED 8Y THE COUIliTY OF ADAMS. OWNER' AS TO IRACT S MlpmWN AT CLEAR CREEK-ElLING NO 1 pi AT BY: Cl AR CREf)( STAllON lejr()p()utah DIS1R)CT NO ;N"'.. "",--- --AS ;n"1t.e= ACKNQ'M f()gfyfnt STATE Of' COLORADO COUNTY OF L...1 THE FOREGOING PlAT OEDICATlDN WAS ACKHO'M..IDGED BEFORE we THIS _ DAY OF -CR-''''-ST-'-1IQN- irc:jy "DI"'S'IR1CT==NQ"".""'-- AS ClEAR NOTARY PUBlIC MY COIrIoINISSION EXPIRES; WYS NOT TO SCALE OWNER' AS TO I OT 1 BLOCK 11 MlpmWN AT CLEAR CREEK flung NO PLAT CQRRECTION AND THAT portion Of THE NORTH HAL f Of THE SOUJHEAST OUARTER Of SECDON 4 EXECUlUl THIS DAY or D.. 2_ BY: MIDTOWN, lic --NT.', ,nnl BY; WIOTOWN, LLC --N.. T.' S ;atur "'CKNQM fpg BAfH1 BY; WIDl'OMoI LLC. A CQ..ORADC> UUllED UASlUTY CCWPANY $TA'1t Of' CCIC...IlI'UDO ) )SS COUNTY OF...) THE FOREGOING PLAT AND DEDlCA"nON WAS ACKNOVA. DGED B FOR[ WE THIS _ DAY Of' -""-"""'--. U.-C.-AABM I Tm UAilUTY CQIIPA)4Y':' '" NOTARY PUBUC MY COWWISSION EXPIRES: MY ADDRESS IS; 'MTNESS MY HANO AND OfFICIAL S AI..: DOt(X s. _ C'Cl.MADO UCD($ D land P.Ls' 3864,,il fs.1nc. U1lL co (33) 71>-'... N1'JIX.: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW YOU IroIUST C<:IWWENC[ ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SUR'tIEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AnER YOU FIRST DISCOVERED SUCH DEFECT. IN NO \fent MAY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COWMENcm MORE THAN 'T[H YEARS F'ROM THE DATE OF 1HE CERTlfICA non SHOWN HEREC»l ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ANP ACCEPTANCE BY PISTRICT I. AS OtSTRICT MANAGER Of NORTH PECOS WATER AND SANITATION DISTRICT. MilCH HAS AN ADDRESS OF 69 NORTH PECOS STREET DENVER, co HEREBY ACKNO'M.EDGE N J ACCEPT THE DEDICATION. GRANT. SALE. REtoIfSE AND CON\IEYAHCE Of EXCt.USlVE UTlJTY EASD,IENTS WITHIN TRACTS B, C, E. H AND I; THE WATER EASE\lENTS WITHIN TRACTS C AND G OF MIDTO'MII AT CLEAR CREEl( - FlUNG NO. 5, COUNTY Of ADAMS, STAlE Of COLORADO" DtSTRlCT WANAGER DATE: PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL APPRO\IED BY THE ADAMS COUNTY PLANNING C(l,4W1SS1ON THIS DAY OF D 214. BOARP OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVAL APPRO'II O BY THE ADNIS COUNTY BOARD Of COMWSSIONERS THIS DAY Of A.D WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFIClAJ.. SEAl.:: NOTARY PUBLIC NOTARY P\JBUC PREPARATION: 214-1C)..()1 COUNTY DATEOFE===::===jE=j==t=tE===:===i==t=±3 SHe e T 1 F I DATE BY at:: NO. REVISION DATE BY «SCAI.., tva BY: ND[PU = CLERK TY ;;;-- AND ---- RECORDER c\ ERK ANP RECORPER'S CER]FlCAIT THIS FJrrfAl PLAT WAS FlL D F'OR RECORD IN THE OfFICE or THE ADAWS COUNTY Cl RK AND RECORDER,I\I THE STAlE OF COLORADO, AT -Yo ON THE DAY OF ---A.D., 214. REC P"nON NO.

39 MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK - FILING NO. 5 PRELIMINARY / FINAL PLAT A REPLAT OF LOT 1. BLOCK 11 AND TRACT S. MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK-FILING NO. 1 PLAT CORRECTION AND A PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4. TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 66 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO CASE NO. PRC BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE 'A ST UNE Of' THE NORTHYIEST QUARTER (1f THE SOUn AST QUAR1!R or SECTION 4. TCMNSHIP.3 $OU1H. RANGE 58 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRlNClPJ\l t.f(ridian AS MONUNENl[[) AT TliE c:enler QUARTER CORNER OF" SAID SECTION... BY A.3-1/4 ALUMINUIoI CAP IN A I.!ONUI.tENT BOX. STALIPED -PlS 26664", AHD AT THE CENTER-SOOTH SlXl'E[).IlH CORNER OF SAID SEellON BY A 3-1/4" AlUWINUt.t CAP IN A WONIJt«NT BOX. SToUFED 23$19", SAID UNE BEARS SOUTH '"15". A DISTANCE OF 1J FtrT. 2. J:: ::",CAP5cr"J.:AKAIKT '::TO",OR...w.CZ racii..i'ms 1NQ.LQN'c. INI..CT5. P'H$. ClA\'Dt CitANHIlS,. fi'tms. I S1RUC:1'UIRtS. ANQ. CltmnlCW aa$n$ UlCAtrD OJI 1lOll.AHn IN,.C'$$ "COnD".,.,. TlC fje\iollptoioit. 9tOU.D 'the IINl rail.. 1O.wtn r... oun S. nil" c:ojtm $'W.I.. ka\c 1ttE j TO (NO s.rwd L.tHO rtir THE SOLE PURPO'S Of OPtRA'TKIIS lui) Ail.. SUCH OD$'T"S 'fi'iu. at ASSESSED TO lm Pf'(()pOif"t QWo.ICRS.. J. ANY PERSON MtO KNOWINGlY RElfOi.'ES I<NQWINQ.Y CAUSES TO BE REWOVED ANY PIJ8l.JC L.AHO SIJR\' Y MONUWENT, AS EFlNED BY SEC1lON (1B), C.R.S., OR CONlROl CORNER, AS DEFlNED IN SECllON (6), c.r-s., OR A RESTORATION Of' ANY SUCH MONUt.lENT OR 'MiD knowingly R WOVES OR KNO'MN(iLY CAUSES TO BE REI.tO ANY BEARING lree KNOWING SUCH IS A BEARING TREE OlHER ACCESSORY. c:::.'ropd!dfd ':ru:'ya.wdhas 4. CO!oiSU.TNlTs. INc.. HAS REUEO UPON 11 PIOP'CIn'Y WlIOIhI BDOfJt CRO('R, NUWBER A&l:1O-oYr.!I f'repnttd 8Y \Nq) mu: =.,rcol":,:"':8yrt= CCN:MoT!\J\Irs.!He.. TO (lit N"P'UCA8lL [A.$[I.I[Hj$ AND RIGHTS-OF-WAY. 5. DtSTAHCES OH lhts PLAT AAE GROUND DlSTANC S EXPRE55m IN u.s, SURV[Y FrET AND DECI.4AlS "THEREOF. A U.s. SURVEY root IS OEFlNEO AS EXACtlY 12/3937 WETERS. 6.:';Wf.:U=I[AU XtUttIJCAAlt AULY'tRACt im-oe APPI..ICAStL 1Ht: A1'[ AUJ.Y TlI"AC1S 1MIlLB(: II/JNT In' Q. AR CRtOC' SiA"IIiOtf WCTIlfJ!I'C\I1Ml ' r NO. I. -n.gc U1I.JTY' tasdclts All. foit 1Ht!IOro1T or THC, UTlJ'T'I' 'lldf:8s ror 'DC IN$TAU,.o\ TOt. UAItf1'OIJ.HC:.tM:I :=":J:A)lJ)Ao\ll :ru: CB.E-cn. IaOU.... tor MCTr1eS AWO OMJI oe:ul1 T """.' not UllIf'r' r ACUna. (lilt US[ 'n«jt[of" CINTtJlf'tRl CB.l'Gt51.$MiW, NOT II( PDNI1ttD "In.; SW U1lUf't tasoooi1'$.tic 1lt[ U1VTY PR'CMOfJtS..tS VA.'t t C Cil.;U!f$ AI NO cost TO fwittt. titljolqlt UUITJo.-noH. COnort.. lict UTlJ'TiU,."ttR. $AHlTAAY SDiDr., JU)/tIl $1MW S IIo:) 5HAJJ. artcs:s t*v UTUN EASDIDJt$ oil! T pent 1 AHCil..ES,. 7. THE ClEAR otto( SlA'IlIDeI/ WETROPOUTAN DtS1RtCT NO. 1 (") IS RESP6B\.[ FOR lhe ENFORCDlENT Cf I..ANI)SCAPE MAINttNANCE UIRDI)IIt5r.. 1i«)JCH cc:::swd, A ORe REVIEW COIoMTTtt) Wl.l. REEW PRrVAlE OPEN SPACE OESK>N F'OR co,ipanea..ttv. Pltt\fATE lot aimos BE ror DE W,QiltN C6 IlOl P$I.OPDtT'i iifitu. j\$, AD.IACOff m E. 'WN $). MAHlDI4NC[ cr M lru,... A.t.ID L lrjtct' 8(l"tiI'[:(M ntdwt UN( AHD S11IU.t 9t:ALL 9t Dlt FFRIWARY N CF 1Ht HiI)IoII(QIWIIC'R tim)tii: 'Dft. R[OI.MDoIOIlS: OF 'TlC (IC:$Wl) COw;Jr,l4NfS,. or ijte TJItt la""'" Ai.CWC earw It Co TRACt IoHD "TRACT [: tn I'Ufe HI). $ 'WI..L 8( J,U,lNTAHl) 8Y 1Mr CCSIIo. ru.-e NO.. 5 laact A SKAU. IE: 111E AR1 JY f# THe. It.OJ.I,.CI)fl \JNDflI 1tI[ fttol.iflold(t$ OF' l1c- c::c9oid C TltAC1' A 5HAU et CONStm)It 'tiiiilh cma IMM1' TARDS \11111tUJi THr WDTOWl APPRD.. m BY I<lW.t$ eounty PI".f.JMNG ctvc.tlpw[nt DtPT. Tt CDUH'N. IT$ Sl.ICCtSSOIt 11 ASSQ($ SHAU. BE FOR waintan:nc AU.. ldc'.al snarrs.. ccu.ctt'oft SlREETS AND ARTERIAL STII tts (, 18TH A\DUE D ncos STREET). tqi 11 LAND ABU'rnMCi A CONS"ntUOTtO PV!IUC IitICKt-Qf-W.AY ts JI SPOItSIa[ fat UMi1OU.HC[ OF JR8... AHD SIDEWALK nt 1UOiT-('f'-w"v HIS SNOW Rt»AI.. rdr P'O:JCS ACCEss. 6. A II'ON A.(';C:(S$ AND DRAINAGE [AS..ot1.IoU fs' TR.ACtS It. e. t.. L... tot ND P IS HEREBY CRAN'ruJo 1 ADA'oCS CQnITY rq!l DC fi! 1W$'ttt..c. MP PtbVAJ! OfI'JJN.t.ct f-':cljl13 N 'w'oft 1)iE LN4) QIIMJt. 1l'S suca:ssoas. AHD 'AU to SAWACTC:eIl.:( wantiiin Oft Fl PAIR SAC) F'4OU'I1(S. 1f TIC: UHI) WtG DO S HOl ':.=:: A'r:1l[JR= WAO:Tn "=:C[ OR RtPAItS' AA COWP!..(TU) Cl1 THE COUNTY IN ORDER TO AU.OW THE L»I) 'M.I(Jt SIJfnCIOiT TI&i[ lq WANlMl OR UP,.. SAID FAClUTIES. lhoranwjooof("no;x. D FlNED AS aother AREAS _ DETERMINED TO DC flut$io( M (US AiltlVM. c:t1.ucc 1'\. AHO It II(JfTICIN I.LS.".'" ICHE: At. I(iHC DEflNfJ) AS SPECI.Al Floro HAZARO NlEAS (SfHAS) Sl$. cr 1 If4MAf1Q4 8"r 11C II; Ni ou.nc:[ n.oco" SA.O toe At uwrts,c SH<lYItI HEREOH. 1. A SHARED DRIVEWAY EASEMENT IS HEREBY OEDICAltD BY THIS PLAT (AS SHO) FOR THE ACCESS AND MAINlENANCE OF' A SHARED DRIVEWAY. 1HE FOLLOWING REStRICTIONS APPLV 1 THE Sf-iAR O DRIVEWAY EASEJ.4D1T: A. SHAAm DRlV WAY EASEWfNTS AA PERlITlED OH SlNCl[-f'AWD..'" Lars SPECI'lED (J'<I THIS PlAr OOCI.Jt.IEHT. B. SHARED DRIVEWAY EASEtoIENT5 ARE PERUITTEO TO ENSURE Acass TO EACH ORI'vEW"'Y. C. NO IoUiIa..fS AT ANY TIME SHALl BE PLACED DR PARt<El) MTHIN nte SHARED DRlVEW"'Y E... OIT. VEHICLES SttAU. BE PARKED WITHIN THE G... R... c:e: OR ON-S'TREET, NOT IWP OING NORMAL VEHICULAR USE or nte SHARED DRIVEWAY. D.a.I'1'[C!"rtD to1 SI-W.L roc::t'nt R M. s,a"o 5KARt'D AY.. '" \owi\o' CC»&S1INT filtf SAlt \OICUUJt US. TO INCWDC. AQHC. Jt[PAIt, 1iMO/Off OnG JS OR RtP.AIItS AS HtcES$ARt "PRO\W(.Iffli, BE POtrOf!W:ttll ()R c:omtac11xi,at Of 1HI: C7MfC.R1i Of' $Alp lots.,.. AI CCIN!.OISUS CAHHOT at ataoc LOT CF ::'IIC (J1IU.'1. "1I.v, NlO v LL* rtlft'th[' COST or Eo NO DRlVEW... y IMPROVEMENTS MAY AllIR FlNISH MADE AND/OR DRAlN... GE PATTERNS WlTHOVT THE WRITTEN APPfK)VAl OF TliE DESIGN REVIEW CClIAITTEE. IN ACODRDANCE 'MTH... PlOT PlAN AS BY AD... s CClUWTY. F'. NO ORI'YEWAY IoIPROIJEWDIT OR R P... Y BE "ADE WlTliOUT 1HE APPROVAl BY 1HE ClESIQI w ca.lmltte!:. 11. SlOE YARD USE EASEMENTS ARE HEREBY GRANTED ALONG AU. COUMON SIDE LOT lines WlTliIN All DETAct D HOWE L1S. SHEET 2 OF B NOTES (CONTINUED) 11. CONllNUED,._ O. EASEMENT GRANTOR IS ENSURED OF... CCESS WI'THIN THIS EASEUENT F'OR MAINTENANCE AND REP"II? OF THE PRINCIPAl SlRUClURE LOCAlEO ON THE EASEIrAENT GRANTOR'S LOT AHD FOR NO OntER PURPOSE. THE OESO\I REEW UITlII. or THE a..ear CRUX STATIOtoI METROPOlITAN DtSTRICT NO.1 APPROY S ALl P1..T PLANS BETOR AUTHORIZJNG AF'PLICA'OON TO AD... ws COUNTY F'OR ISSUANCE or 9UIl..DING PEfIWIT. F ISSUE ESOC..UTlON THE Cl AR CREEl( Sl... non w:tropoutah DISTR1CT NO. 1 IS GRANTED ACC $ INTO ntis EASEIotOH... "'LL PRINCtPAL STRUCTURES,. INCLUDING GARAGES, OWNED BY EASEIoIENT CRANTDR SHALl BE MAlNT... INED BY EASEMENT GRANTOR, F'. SIDE SETBAC113 ""''I' 1St i1t OUC[t) TO NO I.DS nta.n Y A$"YCASUtsD J1IlOW 1rI[ rm9 D wa'i"titw, or lhe EXTERIOR WAU. TO THE PROPERlY UNE. 'M-iEN REDuCED TO LESS THAIoj 5' AS J'lfOM n< f'ms.h D "'A'fDb"t1. CE" Ittr; EXmItOR WAU.. to J'Ht LH:. TtiE 'Tl- N CURRENT IBC ANJ/OR IRC COO( REQUIREMENTS AND... ENOtoIENlS...,... nc ICIPAIJ1Y 1iIIU. e ' c:td """ R(C,A,ItD TO.AU.. nr -RE5JSTANT RATING AND WIN.IIoIUU FlR -SEPARATIOH DtSTAHCt EQUftMENTS. G. CR... NTEE SHALl.. N1 AllIR FINISHED GRADE AND/OR DRAINAGE PATTERNS ON nt CRANTOR'S PROPERTY 'MTHouT THE WRITTEN APPROVAL Of" THE DESIGN RE'-1EW COt.4MITTE! OEFINlllONS: EASDtDiI' GRAHTDR: THE LOT OWNER AIojllNG SIDE YARD AREA TO ADJACENT LOT OWNER FOR USE. EAS8IDfT GRNmE: Tt LOT OWNER c.ajning SlOE YARD AREA FR()t,j... DJl.CENT LOT OWNER FOR US(., 12. A c..u5m:...ccess A.iC... TtR (;.SOff;tff OVER lhe WATER E"'ENT SHOWN Wlmlll'TRACt C tte:... rot EAStMon!DtOiIIIIN \IfITliIN TRACT G Of MIDTOWN... T =le"7i:g:;lo ===;A::'. A'tGs ro\l.s TO S4AC"ClM."wAlHlAIN OR RtF'oUIl D FAOUllE5. 1J. AU. "",A'IE S1'OIN SOIDt AAO... OR.-..: TDoI5 lha1 1[ _ lj9.i A PAIvTt t.1 OR.PRI'tm...'Y mam NIO ClQ'n"AU. 1 PUBUt SJOI(W snot w"... tcc:rit1'(l.uts$ll;'j:n P\BJC =;;or;:e "'A= 'eug": ott SkAIJ. stcurt,fippucaa.t POM 'OR.oAK' 1lIl'M)l Ttt(!\D.wS 14. WEST &&TH "'VENUE WILL NOT CONNECT TO PECOS STREET. 15. A PORllON OF 'THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED MTHIN THIS PLAT IS SU8JECT 1 A BLANKET SEEP WATER RDlEOIAliON SYSlEIoI EASEMENT AS RECORDED UNDER REC. NO 2?Oooo , THE PROPERlY DESCRIBED WITHIN THIS PLAT IS SUB. CT TO BLANKET E... SEIoIENTS AS DESCRIBED IN OECl..ARATION Of EASEtr.4ENTS AND ","'STU ARCHITECTURAl ANO IoIAINlENANCE ST.'.NOAROS F'OR IoIlOlOWN, RECORDED UNDER REC. NO. 21JOOOOM254. sa; YNIO. vst: tis:o.oets o:::ant fllow non: P'It()P(.Rl't L.IC 1 PR't.ftRlY t..r NlO D:1DO F'ROW TliE GRANTOR'S BUIl.l)JNC FOUNDATION 1 'DIE lot UI[ tit CAAWq's Af.O $ p tw4t. :5H.ALL er: CRAHn.'D TO M EASalENT GRANTEE PER THE RESlRICllONS anuwm en,*- M1tR to OUAI&. ON SKtT 1 ' 1 At C'W'HIC fiidiftoii)rta'iich QJf lht SitE '(AltO US[ EASEM NT. THE FClU.OWlNG RESlRICTIONS APPI.. Y TO TliE SIDE YARD USE EASEMENTS: A. EASEMENT GRANTEE StiAU. HA'w FULL. ACCESS AND ENJOYMENT or TliE EASEMENT INCLUDING CONSlRUCllON r:k 1UPRENTS,. USE, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SPACE INClL.OED IN nte EASOtENT. FENCES... ND WAllS usm... S PRIVACY SCREENS WlIST ee OUTSIDE FRONT AND REAR.stta1oCl(. INQ.UOItoIO BUT 1+1 I.JWI1tl) to OCcxs. PAnos. -AUS., f'dicts. AAU.. 1\IR[ N() SIWI&.!UI' n.doi[nj's AM P.tRwmm,"1)( lhc. CI(11N[D :au yaao us: :. lxocs.. PA1lQS NIO WNJ.S.. ODitt P8JV;,cy -.c rxetss Of DC T A.It #ritol PDtWIntO. OILy c. N4) IRRICATOi Y )(B ARt P(JrI.IITlU) _TlIH rrohl AHO IltJA sttimqc$. soc YMQ ust.a.$gi(mt AHO $W.L Bt w.ah'a«o I 1»'E c::i. AR ClIDC. sr,al1c»1 ME'TROPOUTAN DISTRICT NO.1. NO IMPROVEMENTS MAY BE IMPLEMENTED AT lhe DETRlMEN1 or THE CRANTOR'S ASlUTY 1 MAINTAIN THEIR HOW" B. 51 TARO USE EASEMENTS ARr PERMITIED ON DETACtED SINGlE F... IlY LOTS DNLT. C. AU. "'TS BY GRAH1EI LOCAlED WITHIN fl SlOE yar/) USE EASDIENT 9W..1. BE YAlNTAINED BY lhe [ASElo6 HT GRANTEE. OA.TE OF PREP... RATION, N/A SHEET 2 OF I

40 / MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK - FILING NO. 5 PRELIMINARY / FINAL PLAT A REPLAT OF LOT 1. BLOCK 11 AND TRACT S. MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK-flUNG NO. 1 PLAT CORRECTION AND A PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4. TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN. COUNTY OF ADAMS. STATE OF COLORADO CASE NO. PRC 214- SHEET 3 OF 8 C 1/4 CORNER SECTION.. RECOVERED NO, 6 REBAR 3-1/.. ALUMINUM CAP STAIo4PED opts 2B664" I IN A MONUMENT BOX fuwlth I! S45'7'55"E 25.2' 589'43'26"E N64<J3' 3Z"E! I ' 9.34' I a I I 1;: '26"E 29.7' WEST 67TH AVENUE 544'43'26"E 21.21' 589'43'26"E 37.' b co.,j '" p;...!'> rn '" r u '.. )ii '" NW 1/ 4 SE 1/4 SEC. 4 T3S, R6BW, 6TH PM 5B9'43'26"E 195.'.1 + o LEGEND RECOvt:REO P,LS S. CORNER S1AWPED AS NOTED.' STAJM> t) PLS VJ SET HO, REBAR 'MTH ORANG( P\..AS11C CAP STAWPEO '"AZl[C PlS 386"- RECOVERED NO. 5 R BAR Yt'ITH 1-1/2-... LUMINUM CAP STAMPED -OiICHESTER PlS 773S'. 2 RECO'Y RED NO. 5 REBAR WITH 1-1/.- YELLOW PlASTIC CAP.J RECOIlERED NO.5 REBAR WITH 1-1/." ORANGE PL... STlC CAP STAMPED "AZTEC PLS J864 TRACT SUMMARY TABLE OWNERSHIP & TRACT AREA (S.'.±) AREA (A.C'±) USE MAINTENANCE A /DRAINAGE/PA CCSMONO. l B PRIVATE ALLEY/ACCESS/ UTILITY CCSMOND. 1 C PRIVATE ALLEY/ACCESS/UTILITY CCSMO NO S.234 PRIVATE ALlEV/ACCESS/UTILITY CCSMOND. 1 E ls/drainage/pa (CSMD NO. 1 F LS/DRAINAGE/PA CCSMO NO. 1 G LS/DRAINAGE/PA CCSMO NO. 1 TOTAL TRACT AREA 235, ((SMO NO, 1 ClEAR CREEK STATION TOTAlLDT AREA :115, METROPOLITA.N DISTRICT NO 1 ROW DEDICATION (INTERNAL STREETS) TOTAL ROW TO BE DED ICATED LS/DRAINAGE/PA = LANDSCAPE, DRAINAGE. PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TOTAL SITE AREA 756, j Ii 1\ I I ==' ="+-Y)I \ PAIlTIY'AOf 11 NfMTH9i'(Wl"'YG4Il!DI5 SOf)(I, p,f{f 19 NB9'S738 W 1.85 /PMT ty Jt O rsl1 Z1 NM 1H lii'owiihr " 8(;( 1. PA(I 11 -L 5 1/4 CORNER SECTION.. RECOVERED NO, 6 REBAR 'I!lI1H 3-l/'" ALUMINU'" CAP :!t"'fu r IN \ WOHUWOIT &OX I I I ) SW 1/4 SE 1/4 SEC. 4 T3S. R6BW, 6TH PM '" I AAZTEc",, &,... CONS ULTANTS INC... m'a""'''' FaR ANIJ (J( 8 HALF (Y A2ffC CtJNSIJlTANlS. INC _ DATE OF PREPARA non:, Un""..., c... ad.. 1IiI112 PW_r. (lii3)71j-18'jii f-1oo'.. J'-s:(J1J)71l-nr.n _. ;oi.i-«ge... k.., AzTec: 1'nIJ. NCI 548"-4Z S HEET J F,

41 MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK - FILING NO. PRELIMINARY / FINAL PLAT A REPLAT OF LOT 1. BLOCK 11 AND TRACT S. MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK-FlUNG NO, 1 PLAT CORRECTION AND A PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4. TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH. RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL.' +.7 SM,E. ROW MERIDIAN. COUNTY OF ADAMS. STATE OF COLORADO CASE NO. PRe 214- SHEET 4 OF 8 ill.effj). RECOVERED P.LS.S. CORNER STAh4PED AS NOTED RECOVERED.. 5..m.tR *' 2'- REO PI.,.I.SDt CAP ST.\\PEQ -*1.$ SET BRASS TAG STAMPED PLS J864-2' WIDE STREET UAINT'ENANCE EASEMENT UE U. DENOTES C NlER UNE CONTROl ho4nuents TO BE SET AS A REQUIREMENT FOR FIN.&.!.. ACCEPTANCE Of ROAOwA'( BY ADAMS COUNTY RESPONSlBlUTY TO AAAANCE S rnng Of C(NTER LINE CON1li:OL MONUIolENT RESTS WITH tr.!ioto'm'.!, LLC OR ITS SU CC(SSOR OR ASSIGN. UTlUlY EASEt.lENT 'fl.lert SIDE YARD USE S{UjE EASEMENT (SEE NOTE 111 ON SHEET 2) S.O.E. /.] SHARED DRIV'EWA Y EASEMENT (SEE NOTE,' ON SHEET 2) 5 roll h'1lj llv B IIAlfff glfc CI1ISVI.TANTS, IIIC m I S89'43'26"E ' N84'3'32'E 9.' 589'43:.26"E 29.7' WEST 67TH AVENUE (VARIABLE WIDTH PUBLIC ROW) S44'43'26"E 21.21' S89'4.,3'26"E 37.' '43'26"E ' I J SEE SHEET 6 OF B SEE SHEET 6 OF 6 AAzTEC JOOMl'"A""<1,..., lin"',,,.. C.. lorad..!ioln f'honc:(jiil)1l3-.1m CONSULTANI5. INC.!:'.c:':-.! b.'''' AzTec Pro). NaSoWD-t1. OA.n: OF PREPARA11ON: $CAl. SHEET.4 F I r.. o r... '" :>: 'fl '" rn

42 MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK-FILING NO. PRELIMINARY / FINAL PLAT A REPLAT OF LOT I, BLOCK 11 AND TRACT S, MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK-flUNG NO, 1 PLAT CORRECTION AND A PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO CASE NO. PRC 214- SEE SHEET 4 OF 1 SHEET 5 OF '43'26" 29 or $4-4'43'2S"E \(21,21' 589'4J'26"E 37,'.... tlto.! l s." WEST 66TH PLACE L., 4:r.25 E 685.' (57' "'DE public ROW) :;r-- SEE SHEET 7 OF 8 + V.L S.M,E., ROW WE., RECOVERED P.L.S.S. CORNER STAMPED AS NOTED UUlilY [A5(wENT 2' WlDE S'TREET W""WTENANCt EASEUENT RIGHT-Of-WAY. A TtJt EASEMENT LECEND S.!Y::f r :TT 2),] r:t;,oori;: E:rE) DENOTES CENTER UNE CONTROL WONUI.1ENTS TO BE SET AS " REQUIR[W[NT F'OR FlNAl Aca:PT ANC[ Of ROADWAY 8'1 AOAIotS COUNTY. RESPONSIBIUTY TO ARRANGE SET'TIIIG Of CENTER lme CONTROL I.IONUMENT RESTS WITH MIDTOWN. u.c OR ITS SUCCESSOR OR ASSIGN. AAZTEC -... _,A. """r.(jcij)7ll-18'j8.., Link"' C... IIO).2! (tl CONSULTANTS INC. "1: (]«I) 7-111!n Mca.II.. k AzTec,L. No S4all--42 few AND 11 BEHAJ.f!T AIl[C crjiislll rants. INC DATE OF PREP_,""", SHEET 5 F

43 MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK-FILING PRELIMINARY / FINAL PLAT NO. 5 S 1/4 CORNER SECTION.. RECOVERED NO 6 REBAR Wlnt J-1/.&. A1..t.MNuw CAP Si.wp[J) Pl.S l&ou' 1N"' ''' '''f1&l)x 214-'1-1 scale SHEET 6 F II

44 MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK-FILING NO. PRELIMINARY / FINAL PLAT A REPLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 11 AND TRACT S, MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK-FILING NO. 1 PLAT CORRECTION AND A PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO CASE NO. PRC 214- SHEET 7 OF 8 5 CD... SEE SHEET 5 OF B.1 I WEST 66TH PLACE L,,,, I 4I.26"E 686' (57' v.1de PUBLIC ROW) rs[ S[ I ihflatif{) LINE TABLE LINE BEARING LENGlIi L44 N89'43'26'W '.' L5, NOO'6'34"E 39.49' 589'43'26"E 195.' TRACT E Sf.814 AC +.' RECOVERED P.LS.S. CORNER STAIr,4PED AS NOltD RECOVERED NO. 5 REBAR WITH 1-1/2 CAP STAWPED CHICHESTER PlS 7735" ALUIwIINUI.tI CENOTES CENTER l ine CONTROL LtONUMENlS 1 BE SET AS A REQUIREMENT for FlNAL ACCEPTANC[ Of' ROADWAY BY AOAIrdS COUNTY. RESPONSletLlTY TO ARRANGE SEmNG OF CENTER LINE CONl'ROL t.4qnument RESTS WITH tr.4idtown. Lie OR ITS SUCCESSOR OR ASSIGN, U.E. UTlt..lTY EAS(N[NT S.M.. 2' WIDE STREET W"INlEN"NC( (-'SOIENT (NR) ROW NON-RADIAL RIGHT-Of-WAV S.1:E. SIDE YARD USE (AS[MENT _. (SEE NOTE 111 ON SHE T 2) :p:. SHARED DR1VEWA'( EASEWENT./2 (SEE NOTE 11 ON SHEET 2) i AAZTEC "'..,A.L..., urt..,iuii,c... _un n..._ (le171j Pu:(lCJ)71l-1tM ril CONSULTANTS INC. """. IoftI:e.JtIllallbt"lllll AzT6C Pro). No..:S4fJ13-42 rof( AN!) CW BfHALr ty AZTEC CONSIJIJANT! I/C DATE Of PREPARATION:: SHEET 7 OF

45 MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK - FILING NO. 5 PRELIMINARY / FINAL PLAT A REPLAT OF LOT 1, BLOCK 11 AND TRACT S, MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK-FlUNG NO. 1 PLAT CORRECTION AND A PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 6B WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO SHEET 8 OF 8 "" 4;,: : 'U:!W,:: 3::E8, rr'-;':'.(;r % or- :'! :'l('t?t'.s!ve :_':':Tf,Q ': v.f :..,-,,,"_,", F'i!.. 'R;'.'::'1 I.. t''''' r /' ADDRESS TABLE BLOCK 1 LOT ADDRESS WT 1 X 1 X 2 X 2 X 3 X 3 X X X 5 X 5 X 6 X X 7 X 7 X X X 9 X X I. X 1 X 11 X 11 X 12 X 12 X 13 X 13 X " X " X 15 X 15 X 16 X 16 X 17 X 17 X 18 X 18 X,. X X " 2. X 2<l X X 23 X 2' X 25 X 26 X 27 X 28 X 29 X 3 X 31 X 32 X BLOCK 2 BLOCK 3 BLOCK 4 ADDRESS LOT ADDRESS LOT I ADDRESS 1 X 1 X 2 X 2 Ix 3 X 3 X X Ix 5 X 5 X 6 X 6 X 7 X 7 X X X 9 X X 1 X I. X 11 X 11 X 12 X 12 X 13 X " X 15 X 16 X 17 X,. X,. X 2 X 21 X X 2' X 2S X 2Il 27 X 2. X 2. X 3 X 31 X 32 X FlY! AND CW BfHAJ.F IT AZffC CfJVSIJf. TANTS. INC DATE OF... AAATlOIO SHEET, F "

46 MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK IN THE COUNTY OF ADAMS, COLORADO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FILING FIVE LAND OWNERS Midtown, LLC. 1681nvemess Dr. Sle. 15 Englewood, CO, 8112 Contact: Chris Bremner 33-7&-9451 APPLICANT PREPARERS PREPARERS Midtown, LLC. ENGINEER: PLANNER: 188 Inverness Dr. Ste. 15 Redland Norris Design Englewood, CO, ODO South Lincoln Street, Suite 26, 111 Bannock Street Contact: Chris Bremner Littlelon, CO 8122 Denver, CO Contact: Mike Pietschmann Conlact: Milch Black <; Case Number: Sheet TiUe COVER SHEET Sheet Number 1 OF 23 Brookfteld Res!de-ntial _--''''-:'1II11._ EC1!C112 """"" CERTIFICATE OF OWNERSHIP Midtown, LLC, being the owner of Midtown at CIe", Creek, located in the County of Adams, Siale 1 Colorado. hereby submit this Pl<Yllled Unit Development- Final Development Plan and agrees to perfojm under the k!rms noted hereon. OWNffi: LEG.AL DESCRIPTION A PAACELQF LAN{) 9Et.lGALl Of LOT 1 BlOCj( 11 ANOAll OF TRACT S IoIIOTov.N... T CLEAR CREEI<-FLN3 NO 1 PLAT CORRECTION AS RECORDED... T F! CEPTION WIJtJOClO:5S576 OF THE I<ECOROS OF THE ADAMS COUNTY ClEAt<: ANORECOROER'S OPFICE TOGETI-EA WITH A PORTON OF THE v.est HALOF THESOUTHEA.ST Ol.U\R'TEROf SCCTON. TIP lsouth, RANGE IS8WEST Of TJ-iE SOITHPRWC;IPAt IERDAN COUml'Of AOAI.t$ ST... TE OF COLDRAOO BEING WORE PARTCULARLl DESCRI8EDA$FOllOW$ COMIoIENCt.lG AT THE CENTER-SOUTH SIXTEENTH OF SAIOlSECTION 4 AS MONU!IIE""EO BY A J..1I<r ALU-...rUII4 CAP STAIotPEO PLS 23S1!1"" t.i A IoIONUIoIIENT BOX IM-IEIliCE THE CENTER OUARTER CORNER OF SAD SECTION 4 WONUIoIIENTEO BY A J..l/<r..llUMINUIoII CAP STAIoIPED -PlS :l. 1'1/ A MONUIoIIENl BOX BEJoRS NORTH OO"OO'lS EAST, A DIS TANCE Of n2 as FEET FOFIIrofING THE s,.,sis OF BEARtJGS USED 1'1/ THIS DESCRIPTION: VICINllY MAP he NOIWS DfSIeN -- 11Dlea-..oclSnet DMveo, CoblIdD!Kl24 1' E FXI).89l 111!6 _.lloi'foom THENCE ALONe THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH'JIJEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST OUA"'TER OF s-.io SECTION -4 SOUTH 89-5T'3B" EAST A DISTANCE O so CON FEET TOA POINT ON THEEASTEALY RIGHT.,QF-WAY lne PECOS STRE8" AS DESCRIBED IN 91( 3S7AT PAGE)oo IN SAiO s" RECOFlo.s... NO THe POIII.IT OF BEGINNING, County: THENCE DEPARTING SAIO SOUTH LINE ALONG $AIO EASTERLY RIGHT-oF-W... y LINE Ai'K) TE EASTERLY RIGHT-oF.WAY LINE AS DESCRIBED IN 81( 3:51 AT PAGE 313 AND BOOI(365! AT PAGE 587, JN SAID RECORDS NORTH '"- EAST.... OJST,o,II.ICEOF 5!i26& FEET: The forgoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day 1 2 " THEII.ICE DEPARTING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT.,QF-WAY LINE SOUTH 5-1'55 ' EAST A DIST... NCE OF 25 2 FEET THENCE SOUTH 9-4'26" EAST... DJSTANCEOF FEET' Nolary Public, My convnission expires: Tl-tENCE SOJTH 44'43'26' EAST, A DlST.a. f'oce OF FEET THENC SOUTI-I5'43'26" EJoST, A DlSTAOF 31 FEET BOARD OF COUNlY COMMISSIONERS APPROVAL Approved by the Adams County Board of Convrissioners this da; ot 2O_" Chair CERTIFICATE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER This Fhal Development Plan was filed for record in the Office of the Adams County Clerk and Recorder in the State of Colorado at m. on the day of 2O - County Clerk and Recorder By Depu: The Prelirrinary- Devek>pment Pla'l was filed for record in the Office of the Adams County Clerk and Recorder in the Stale of Colorado on the day of 2 Fie No,, Map No,, Receplion ADDITIONS AND DELETIONS The Iolowing Additions and Deletions in the PUD were made by the Board of COLrlty Commissioners at the Hme of approval. Tl-l NCESOUTI-lOO'1S':W\.\ ST A DtST.a.t«:eOF J6.4 & FEET_ TI-IENC1: SOiJTHOO'16J.-'WEST ADI5T'-'NCEOF lllt.jfeet TOA POINT '" THE SOUfHEftlY8UNOA.RY OF THAT PARCEL OF LANOASO SCI'IBEO IN BOOt< 22AT PAGE 586, "SAll RECORDS I'l-IENCE ALONG 51<1 SOUTI- Rl Y BOUNQARY J,IORTI-I WS1'3!I'WEST A OISTANCE OF S26 FEET ToA POWT ow TliE EASTER!.. Y BOUNOAFll' OF SAIO LOT1, BLOCI(11 nc!icf"'.1'i<d.sj'i/oi'saolcf kooc ll.sq ""'!VIt..,or$lU)lu.cTI.IOIl.. IIC"O:tI"'lI.Ur '" DISTANCE OF:!OJ FEET TO THE SOUTI-fE,t,STERL Y CORNER OF SAID TRACT S THENCE ALONG TI-IE SOUTHeRLY LINE OF SAID TRACT S NORTH &!l's7 38' WEST... CIST... NCE OF 621 e5 FEET TO THE SOUTHWES1ERL Y CORNER Of SAIO TRACT S AND A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF PECOS STREET... S DESCRIBED IN BOOK AT PAGE 4 IN SAID RECORDS: TIo<ENCEALONC SAID EASTERLY RJGHT.,QF_WAY NORTH OO-ocrl" EAST, A DJSTA-'K:E OF 315 5S FEET TO TIo<E POIfIIT OFBEGWNING COII.ITAININD AN AREA OF 17 J59ACRES 5611 SOUARE FEET) MORE OR LESS SHEET INDEX-FOP I f SCALE: 1"= 1 MILE SHEET 1: COVER st-eet SHEET2: 'NRITIEN NARRATIVE SHEET3: WRITIEN ti'.rrative SHEET 4: SITE PlAN SHEET 5: LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN SHEET 6: LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN SHEET 7: LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN SHEET II: LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN SHEET 9: LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN SHEET 1: LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN SHEET 11: LANDSCAPE SITE PlAN SHEET 12: LANDSCAPE INSTALlATION AND IAAINTENAE SHEET 13: LANDSCAPE lypicals SHEET 14: LANDSCAPE lree LAWNS SHEET 15: LAI-l)SCAPE PlANTUST SHEET f6: LANDSCAPE PlANT USi SH ET 11: ARCtiTECTURAl STANDARDS SHEET 18: DETAIlS SHEET i9: DETAILS SHEET 2: DETAIlS SHEET 21: DETAILS SHEET 22: IIIONlIMENT DETAILS SHEET 23: Ji'ONUNENT DETAils W w a::: (,) a::: «w <:...J <:( (,) --.I Q t- «<: f- <{ cr: li.j..j Z S --.I >-- I-- ::::l r- Z li.j- QlL --J{!l (fj <:(<: ::;; -- <{ <::J u:u: <{ Issue Date t4 Revision Date STAFF REVIEW Approved as to furm by: OrOdDr 1 PlanrinQ and Developmenl County Attorney Fie Numbec -: Map Nurrber:= -! Reception Number: / 29 / / 3 / NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

47 ",<.",-, _:.-... SheetTiUe NARRATIVE WRITIEN NARRATIVE A. EJoplanation of the Charac:1eristic:s of the PUC The Filir.g Five Final Development Plan (FDP) area at Midtown at Clear Creek is comprised of approximately 17,359 acres, consisting of 96 singte family residential homes. The intent of the Filing FNe FOP is 1 entitle single-family detached residential homes at Midtown. This FOP is located on the east side of Pecos Street, south of 67th Avenue, and west of Mariposa Court. Pri access 1 this FOP ea is from West 67th Avenue. The Filing Five area is an e)(tension of the established block structure, vehicular circulation and landscape treatment approved and constructed in Phase One, Filing Two, Filing Three, and proposed in Fi6ng Four. B. Potential impact or Proposed Mitigation on the SLml)undmg Area This FDP is generally consistent with the approved Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan. The oomplete Midtown at Clear Creek PUD is comprised of approximately acres. Incorporated into the overall community vision is a local commercial J mixed-use area, a variety of residential home types and a system of open space, parks and trails which includes a dedicated ±e open space/natural park area. A portion of the school land dedication characterized as the School District Fiekl Site may be located within the 43 Me park. Future use and development is to be delerrrined by the needs or the Mapleton School District in accordance with the terms agreed upon with Midtown LLC. As future transit / rail opportunities are implemented by RID and the Fast Tracks programs, the community will have even more convenient access to major transportation corridors in the Denver Metro Area, C. Conl2mplated Inlensity and Density of Use This FOP consls of 96 single fami delached lois. The proposed densi and land coverage is consistent with the approved Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan for the Midtown at Clear Creek PUD. Per the approved PDP for Midtown at Clear Creek, the overall number of ahowable residential units is 1,68, with a gross density of approximately 8.7 dwelling units per acre. This maximum overall residenai unit count may also include the commercial/rnixed-use Cll"ea Of it is not deveklped with retail uses) and the S-acre school site (if it is not developed as school uses and reverts 1 residenai uses). Based on planned buik:l-out, the Midtown community wi. provide open space areas consistent with this type of urban infill development and exceeds the Adams County standards for open space requirements D. Number, Type, and Size of Buitdings andlor Units 96 single family residenallots are proposed in the Filing Five FOP <rid corresponding Final Pial. Two home pes are proposed in Ihe Filing FNe FOP, refer 1 Sheel17 for 11 typicals. Varying home types and lot sizes provide a range of affordability and lifestyles. The homes in the FiHng Five FDP are based on home types fully described in the approved Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan. The following are the home types proposed in the Fing Five FOP: Single Family Detached Re.. -looded Collage Home Consists of homes designed for resideflts who want a lower amount of outdoor space Ie maintain and are on lots with rear allevao:d garages. Sizes of residences vary in width and depth. Refer to Detail A on Architectural Slandards Sheet 17. Slngle F...,... ft\.ho". Consists of homes designed for young families desiring a small private yard. Sizes of residences win vary and are on lots with tronl-kladed garages Reter to Detail B on Architectural Stanctaros Sheet 17 E. Provisions tor Parking The parking plan sh.. accommodate a minimum of 2.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit overall. Overal quanti of parking spaces in this FDP exceed this minimum pafking requiremenl On-street parking is permitted on all local streets in this FOP except for the hammerhead at the end of W. 66th Avenue. The intemallocal street system is designed to work in concert with the private alleys. Alleys 'Nil be used to access garages and parking for most of the homes in the community. t3-foot wide alleys are for passenger vehicles and garbage truck access only, and allow for alley-accessed garages Front-loaded homes will have shared driljeways. In order to maintain access to all private gars, no parking is permitted on shared (i"iveways. This concept creates a screet scene that is not dominated by garages and reduces driveway cuts. Front-kladed homes win provide l\iiio (2) off-street pcii"king spaces, Each rear-loaded home will provide a minimum of two (2) off-street parking spaces Rear-loaded homes without shared driveways are permitted one (1) additional paralel parking space between the garage and paved alley surface on a driveway pad, when lot width pennits. Parallel parking is not allowed between the garage and paved alley in fire access alleys. AU homes have access to on-street parking on local streets. F. Cin:ulation and Road Patlems To help ensure a pedestrian-friendly environment, the planned circulation pattems allow for distribution and disbursement of internallraffic through the developmenl The vehicular road pattern for the Midtown community wiu integrale the existing and proposed roadway systems. A signalized intersecon at West 67th Avenue (when warrants are met) is planned to move motorists through the central West 67th Avenue corridor and inlay from the exisng neighborhood along 68th AVenue. All streets meet the standards included in the Second Amendment to the Preliminal)l Development Plan. G. Ownership and Maintenance of Common Areas All common areas wib be maintained by the Metro District The Metro District is responsible for the enforcement of landscape maintenance requirements. Through the Metropolitan District, a DRC (Design Review Committee) wiu review private open space design for compatibility. Private lot owners shall be responsible for the maintenance of their property as wei as adjacent tree lawn area(s). Maintenance of the cree Lawn and landscape tract between front property fine and street shan be the primary responsibility of the homeowner under the requirements of the Metro District covenants. H. Type, Location, EJoampies of Copy and Construction of Signs Entry Monuments at Midtown are located at key intersections and crossings. This FDP includes entry monumentation at the intersections of west 67th Avenue & Pecos Street and the West 67th AVenue median. Monuments are primarily constructed of concrete, metal, steel, and aluminum. Monuments may depict Midtown logo, Midtown name and/or adjacent street name. Monuments may be internaly iuuminated or hcwe accent landscape lighting. Refer to Sheets of this FDP for monumentation design standards. Type and Allocation of AnUses Including Permitled Uses, Us.. Pennitled After Amendment td the PUC and Prohibited Uses The design intent for Midtown at Clear Creek is to create a mixed use infill community that includes a variety of home pes. This FOP area includes only single family detached homes. In keeping with the Traditional Neighborhood Development concept, the Filing Five FDP area layout has a grid form and indudes rear-loaded CII"ld fronl-loaded product pes This FDP also includes open space tracts and landscaped tree lawns. J. ldcation and Types of Landscaping and Ma;ntenance Provisions The approved Midtown at Clear Creek PUD includes a variety of parks and open spaces stralegicat; located throughout Ihe comrnuni. This FOP includes streetscape en:! associated la1dscape tracts. Landscape Tracts are proposed to be maintained by the Metropolitan District. K. Description of Building Envelopes Including Square Footage and/or Number of Units, Minimum Building Setback(s), Height, and General EJotemai Characteristic:s Buik:ling setbacks ere based on development standards included in the Preliminary Development Plan (POP) arxi Second Amendment to the Preliminary Development Plan. Sheet 17 of this FDP lurther describes lot and building standards. Typical lot sizes for this FDP range between 2,56 sf. to 4,875 sf. These are anticipated ranges and actual lots may be constructed that fall slightly outside of this estimaled range to respond to final design of homes. Architectural design aiklws for incorporation of a varie of architectural styles from contemporary to more regional styles such as craftsman or prairie. Please refer to Sheet 17, Architectural Standards in this FDP, the architectural standard sheets included in the approved Preiininary Developmenl Plan (PDP) documenl, Second Amendmenllo the Preliminary Devek:lpment Plan, and the Design Guidelines, All community development on the property should comply with these standards when they are adopted by the Design Review Committee. L Covenants to be Imposed on the PUD Architectural and landscape design guidelines hcl-le been deljeloped for Midtown All builders and homeowners wiy be rired to go through the Design Review Committee (DRC). The Coun shal nol approye a building perml unnt DRC approval oblained. Development standards for setbacks, unit /Iot configurations, arid other controhing provisions hiwe been induded in the approved PDP, Second Amendment to the Preliminary Deveklpment Plan and this FDP. M. Additional Controls such as an Architectural Control Committee of a Property Owner's Association The community will have a Metro District that w1 create a Design Review Committee (DRC) that wid enforce design standards through Declaration of Easements and Master Architectural and Maintenance Standards for Midtown. All architectural styles of proposed buildings shall require approval by the Design Re... iew Committee overseen by the Metro District and shall be consistent with the design guidelines for this community, subject to planning director approval for overad afchitectural intent. N. Utilization and Location of any Outdoor Signage All proposed markeng I temporary signage w1 be submitted for approval and meet County signage standards and ordinances. O. Utility Services Crestview Water and Sanitation Distnct and North Pecos Water and Sanitation Oiscrict have indicated they have adequate capability to serve this property with both water and sanitary sewer. Xcel Energy w1 provide gas and electric services to the property. Appropriate easements for associated improvements and utility lines are included on the Fing Five Subdivision Final P1at Sheel Number 2F23 Brookfield ,... CO.!IIl1'2 Residentia! '"'" ""... <:--- j5j} NoIWSIlESIC.N -.elu.-_ '1'SIreeI..CcbadoB24 P33.1! F33B _.l'iilfiii.odesn.cu11 ::.::: w :: :: w «-.J < <t it I- «I- < Z LU S...J r- LU- all...j{9 -- <t< U::U:: <=:i Issue Date 2/27/214 Revision Date a «oc...j I- Z en :; «a «4/14/214 OS/29/214 OB/19/214 1/3/214 1/2/214 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

48 Sheet TitJe NARRATIVE WRITIEN NARRATIVE P. Estimated TIme T abte for Oeve6pment The estimated length of time for build-out of the Fing Five FDP area or Midtown is sellen (7) lear beginning Fall 214. Full build-oul for the Midlown neighborhoods is appro'imale five (5) 1 fifteen (15) lears. Q. Any other Pertinent FKto Concerning the Devetopment Southwest Adams County Fire District will service Midtown property east or Pecos Street, including the Filing Five FOP area. R. Definitions Loaded L Rea{ Loaded : A garage with the vehicular door access located onto an alley located al the rear (or sometimes side) of the lot. Z-Shaped!:QlLine: A side lot line dividing adjacent residential lots that has a jog, resulting in a 'Z shaped' lot line. Z-shaped lot lines apply to a variation of Single Family Detached Homes with front or side-kjaded garages (See a-chitecture standards on Sheet 17 for a diagrammatic depiction). The homes are commonly paired which creates efficiency of design to anew a shared driveway configuration. Homes wi. meet side-lot setback requirements to all portions of the 11 line. SIdo_'""Y tio'_.. no """J'",,,,,"""""om"'_ material of the exterior wall \ the property line. When reduced to less than 5' as measured from the finished material 1 the exlef'ior w" to Ihe property line, the then current IBC andior IRC code requirements and amendments within the governing municipality wi. be enforced with regard to exterior wai fire-resistant rating and minimum fire-separation distance requirements. g. Grantee shall not alter finished grade and/or drainage patterns on the Grantor's property without the written approval of the Design Review Committee. Definitions: Easement Granlor: the lot owner granting side yard area to adjacent lot owner for use. Easement Grantee: the klt owner gaining side yard area from adjacent lot owner for use. Shared Driveway Easements: Shared Driveway Easement a-e dedicated by the Fmng no. 5 Final Pial for the access and malnlencl"lcel 1 a shared drweway. The fonowing restrictions apply to the shared driveway easement: a. Shared Driveway Easements are permitted on sing}e-family lots specified on this pial document..c. No vehides at 8I1y lime shah be placed or parked within the shared liiveway easemenl Vehicles shall be parked within Ihe garage or on-street, not impeding normal vehicular use of the shared driveway d. Affected lot owners shah together maintain the said shared driveway in a manner consistent with safe vehicular use, to include snowplowing, resurfacing, repair, and or other improvements or repairs as necessary. Improvements shall be performed or contracted for upon consensus of the owners of said lots. If a consensus cannot be reached between lot owners then the CCSMD win be the deciding p. The 11 owners sila" be equaly, jointly, and severally liable for the cos! of all necessary and conditional maintenance of said shared driveway, e_ No driveway improvements mcpf ater finish grade and/or drainage patterns without the written approval of the design review committee, in accordance with a piol plan as approved by Ad"", County. No driveway improvement or repair may be made without the approval by Ihe design review committee. s. SIaging: The residential Jots in this FDP are planned to be constructed in one (1) stage. Sheet Number 3F 23 Brookfteld Residential CO. I'J1' R..!2J) i:nn!f. Ccb3do BIl24 P F _.I1OfIe-design.eom Front Loaded Garage: A garage with Ihe vehicular door access Iocaled onlo street Right of W located at the front or side of the lot. In shared driveway instances, garage door opening may face side of lot b. Shared Driveway Easements are permitted to ensure access to each driveway. Refer to the Construction Drawings for seeding a::ijacent to detention pond in Tracl E. Side Ya-d Use Easements are hereby granted along all comroon side lot lines within all delached home lois. Side Van! Use E.sements: Side y... d Use Easements occur from front property line to rear property line and extend from the Grantor's building foundation to the klt line between the Gri:lltor's and Grantee's par that shall be granted to the easement Grantee per the restrictions outlined below. Refer to Figure 1 and 2 for a graphic representation of the Side Yard Use Ement The fohowing restrictions app to the Side Yard Use Easements: a. Easement Gra"ltee shall have full access and enjoyment of the easement including construction of improvements, use, and maintenance of the space included in the easement. Fences and wads used as privacy screens may not encroach into the front and rear setback. Improvements including but not limiled to decks, patios, landscaping, walls, fences, rails, furniture and simil... elements are permitted within the defined side yarn use easement. Decks, patios and walls, other than privacy screens, in excess of 3O-inches in height (as measured from finished grade) are not permitted in side yard use easements. Only landscaping, hardscape, and irrigation improvemenls are permitted within front and rear setbacks. Side Yard Use Easement procedures and policies shall be managed by the Clear Creek Station Metropolitan District. No improvements may be implemented at the detriment of the Granlor's ability to maintain their home. b. Side Yard Use Easements are permitted on detached single farni lots only. c. All improvements by Grantee Iocaled within the Side Yard Use Easement sh.,. be maintained by the easemenl Graltee. d. Easement Grantor is ensured of access within this easement for maintenaflce and repair of the principal structure located on the easement Gri:lllor's lot and for no other purpose. The Design Review Committee of the Clear Creek Station Metropolitan District approves all plot plans before authorizing appcation to Adams County for issucwlce of building permit. For issue resolution the Clear Creek Station Metropolitan District is granted access into this easemenl e. All principal structures, including garages, owned by easement Grantor shall be maintained by easement Grantor. FIGURE t - TYPICAL SIDE YARD USE EASEMENT LAYOUTS TYPICAl P.o.sslVELOTl NO SIOEYARO LISE "'"'''' LeU:::ST1'lEETITRACT FIGURE 2 -Z-SHAPED LOT SIDE YARD USE EASEMENT LAYOUTS - r.ell.udii!e'i l PlB..JCsTRE TITRACT FOR FRONTLOAD8JPROOliCT TVPI:AL PA.5S/\I!: LOTI NO SKlEYARtl USE EASEMENT PlJBLICSTREETIT FOR frohtloadeoprodijct W W ::: ::: «w <: -..J q:: -..J Q f-- «I- JssueDate <: «Z LU a:: --' [ S -..J >" I-... ell LU- Z ::J -..Jt!> -- q::<: en U:U: <::J :::;; «« Revision Date 4/ / /214 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

49 DI. I HkA GII'P' Sheel Title SITE PLAN Sheet Number 4F23 ( FUTURe PARK ) AREA. Brookfield Residenti:a1 l!111o.w..is"i =1IIl1U -... PH.O.SE ONe De...-. CoI;:oaw P:lOOB ](JO.,Y'U.llln. FUTURE ) PHASE AREA LEGEND 8 MIDTOWN PROPERTY BOUNDARY LIMIT OF WORK IN THIS FDP DEVELOPMENT AREA LOT SUMMARY """- LOT TYPE J.flQI,!I '"'...,.., FRONT_LOADED LOT "'... TOTAL QUANTITY 1 f-iolising\larietie REFER TOS<EH 17FORLOTT'lPE PARKING COUNT DESCRIPTION QUANTITY "" " RE.!oRdOADEO LOT -- J1Jttl.: 1 PRKING COUNT EXCLUDES DRIVEWAY PARKI FOR SI-IAREDDRIVEWAYS t.1)iii.".:ttfjoolrclid.(iii., ON1J ' ALLEYS 1"1., I \ f- w "' f- oo oo MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK SITE PLAN - CONTEXT MAP 6 :. 7 ::: 19, W "- 18 W. 66TH PLACE f- 17 W 9@ w "' f- oo W 2 (') : oo NORTH UMITOF WORJ< f- ::J "' : oo "- ir : :; (J.so, 2CV - i SCALE: 1"= 1' I i NORTH SCALE: 1"= 4<)' ::.::: w ::: ::: <{ W <...J "( ri I- <{ I- < Z LU S -J r- all LU- -JCD -- "«<::::i U:U: Issue Date Revision Date a <t: c:: 4/14/ a ---' a >-- f- Z :::J a Cf) :2 <t: <t: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

50 ... _-. KEY SheetTiffe LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN w a: Iii In o U W (L < til w :::c In SIGHT DISTANCE TRIANGlES,1YP. - n I II LEGEND MATCHLINE E::3 PROPER1Y LINE E3 ROAD CENTERLINE 1---) AlLEY CENTERLINE c=j EASEMENT STORM SEWER E3 WATER LINE \ SANITARY SEWER CANOPY TREE BY BUILDER I HOMEOWNER CANOPY TREE ORNAMENTAl TREE EVERGREEN TREE EVERGREEt-I SHRUB ORNAMENTAl GRASS cf'.tpo ifj",.- PEREPIfIAl AAt.JI.W.S SOD c::::::::j CJ c=j DRYLAND SEED ROCK MULCH WI? ) PLAY AREA c=j c=:;::] CRUSHER FINES BRICK PAVERS I ENHANCED PAVING CONCRETE PLANTS ARE LABELED ACCORDING TO VARlffi USING ITAliC FONT. REFER TO SHEETS 15 & 16 FOR LAt-IDSCAPE PLANT LIST. NOTES: 1, AlL LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM 2. STREET TREE LAYOUT AND QUANTITIES MAY VARY AS FRONT LOAD GARAGE LOCATIONS ARE DETERMIt-iED. 3, HOUSING PRODUCT VARIETIES: SFD REAR-lOADED LOT PRODUCT SFD FRONT-lOADED LOT PRODUCT ;; r NORTH SCALE: 1'= 3'... j Sheet Number 5 OF 23 Brookfield Residential l!11! Or._SlLI!i) C9112 R..ENO./ f.."... ( "',.",... "'...,-- _DESIGN H99 I- -- D.rwe1', CcbadDIIIl24 P3Ol i FlIXl W w rr: rr: «w <:...J <:( it f- «I- <: Z UJ S -J I- all UJ- a u -J{!} - <:(<: <::J u::u:: Issue Date Revision Date a <{ Ir a --' a u :.: I- Z ::J en :::;;; <{ <{ 41/ lijf2f 21' NOT FO R CONSTRUCTION

51 KEY Sheer Title LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN Sheet Number 6F 23 ST- ' 2 on I- w 3 W ::I: CI) 18 o o '"!'... fii..!il j;!!i "" _.., SHEET 9 T r- l- W W ::I: CI) LEGEND MATCHLINE E::3 PROPERTY LINE ROAD CENTERLINE E3 E3 c:::=j ALLEY CENTERLINE EASEMENT STORM SEWER E3 WATERLINE \ SANITARY SEWER CANOPY TREE BY BUILDER I HOMEOWNER CANOPY TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE EVERGREEN TREE EVERGREEN SHRUB -" ORNAMENTAL GRASS rp'b iri.. "'- PERENNIAL ANNUALS c::=:j SOD c::j DRYLAND SEED ROCK MULCH c::=:j PLAY AREA WW I CRUSHER FINES c::j BRICK PAVERS I ENHANCED PAVING %] EJ CONCRETE, PLANTS ARE LABELED ACCORDING TO VARIETY USING ITALIC FONT. REFER TO SHEETS 15 & 16 FOR LANDSCAPE PlANT LIST NOTES: 1. ALL LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM 2. STREET TREE LAYOUT AND QUANTITIES MAY VARY AS FRONT LOAD GARAGE LOCATIONS ARE DETERMINED. 3. HOUSING PRODUCT VARIETIES: 8FD REAR WADED LOT PRODUCT SFD FRONT WADED LOT PRODUCT. j NORTH SCALE: 1'= 3'... r,.-... CO.1e111 Brookfield Residential 1l.._!!II R.ENO,.-..., ,-,..-...,- '''''--: NaUUsDEsK'oH BamockS1!eo!l Qerp,.ef, Cctndo!124 P FJ _rar5-design.mm y:, UJ UJ :: a::: <{ UJ...J <:(..,J U Q f- Z LU S Q <:( - :::J U::U:: IsStJe Date a «tr: -' u ;.: t- Z ::J u LU- C)lJ....,J<!l «a «2/27/214 Revision Date en :; 4 / 14 / 214 OS /29/214 8 / 19 / 214 1/3/214 1{2(214 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

52 KEY Sheet Title LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN TIT i=lf Sheet Number 7 OF 23 < I- W W :E: en 15 _--J ' +I. ;;.,.. ed 9,.. ' STORM SEWER. TYP. 1'1, l LEGEND MATCHLINE E:3 E3 E3 1 o 1 PROPERTY LINE ROAD CENTERLINE ALLEY CENTERLINE EASEMENT E3 STORM SEWER WATER LINE SANITARY SEWER /. \ CANOPY TREE BY Qi BUILDER I HOMEOWNER CANOPY TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE EVERGREEN TREE EVERGREEN SHRUB ORNAl.IENTAI. GAASS ca:po c:a:fb I n"l!luous slflue PEREINAL ANNUALS SOD c::::::::j c::::::::j DRYLAND SEED ROCK MULCH PLAY AREA VSJ CRUSHER FINES c::::::::j fili2ll BRICK PAVERS I ENHANCED PAVING EJ CONCRETE PLANTS ARE LABELED ACCORDING TO VARIETY USING ITALIC FONT. REFER TO SHEETS 15 & 16 FOR LANDSCAPE PLANT LIST, NOTES: 1. ALL LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM 2, STREET TREE LAVOUT AND QUANTITIES MItY VARY AS FRONT LOAD GARAGE LOCATIONS ARE DETERMINED. 3, HOUSING PROOUCT VARIETIES: SFD REAR-lOADED LOT PRODUCT SFD FRONT-lOADED LOT PROOUCT ;; i.- jj-_j NORTH SCAL : j"= 3' Brookfield Residential '''Or._sas co.lid1'j R.!) --- IIOl 8arlncdSt:eet '.-,- -'''-'''''-- _1lESIC.H 53]}. CcbiJCIII:fI4O( P3.892I166 FlIl3l _.cun ::.::: w a::: l) a::: < w --1 l) Z S o I o Issue Date (J2 / Revision Date 4/14/214 OS / 29/214 8 / 19 / 214 1/3/214 1/2/214 NOT FOR CONSTR UCTION

53 KEY Sheet Tje LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN Sheet Number 8F23 Brookfield Residentia! leiidr._slli5ii 1Il"1 43'-' 43'-" 49'-' 2 :3 53'-' 53'-6" 39'-'..... P(.:\6.. ::::::: ::::::::::: T;ci G' : : :1:.. :. : B...»eli, S-P6Ii. ' '. -: -: -: -: '2O! :-:-: l"qj9a : :-:-2 -:. :. :-.' :- :.: '-.-_.P'<;J, ,;.-.-, 'vp' up GENERAL NOTES: I. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY SHALL BE OBTAINED BY SEPARATE DOCUMENTS... I LEGEND MATCHLINE E3 E3 c::::=j PROPERTY LINE ROAD CENTERLINE ALLEY CENTERLINE EASEMENT STORM SEWER E3 WATERLINE E:;l /' SANITARY SEWER CANOPY TREE BY \ BUILDER (HOMEOWNER CANOPY TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE EVERGREEN TREE "+.".'. EVERGREEN SHRUB <ft:po,-- ORNAMENTAL GRASS rp'b D'EC1DlJOUS SHRUB PERENNIAL c=j ANNUALS SOD DRYLAND SEED a c=j ROCK MULCH [,@,;' I PLAY AREA CRUSHER FINES c=j BRICK PAVERS ( k?..% ENHANCED PAVING r::::=:j CONCRETE PLANTS ARE LABELED ACCORDING TO VARIETY USING ITALIC FONT. REFER TO SHEETS 15 & 16 FOR LANDSCAPE PLANT LIST. NOTES: 1. ALL LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM 2, STREET TREE LAYOUT AND QUANnnES MAY VARY AS FRONT LOAD GARAGE LOCATIONS ARE DETERMINED. 3, HOUSING PRODUCT VARIEnES: SFD REAR-lOADED LOT SFD FRONT -loaded LOT PRODUCT o 3IJ NORTH SCALE: 1"= 3' R.-?9 "':::;;:''''':::7:'':'=':'-''' ED 111BannoO. Deffler,CcbadoB24- P33B9: Fm.B eom L.U L.U rr: rr: -< L.U <:...J «-J Q I- -< I- <: «a:: Z LU..J S Q!..l -J I- r Z :J LU- all!..l -J<!> en - «<: <:=:i «U::U:: «Issue Date Revision Date 2 I 27 I t OBI /2/214 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

54 SHEET "'...!!I 81',2' ' 32' 32' CD.!.?' lj:j ''''WHIT. 49'-' <11-6' '-6" 49'-6" -"""'1'-- '!r-6' --.ti-- 43'-' U) i $3'..\' L I 39,-O' $3'-6"--J i7cj ':' --:..,\(;.'.:.. '.-'"-':-,",, -= -.' '\..,; V./ '-6' '-' - --./ '-6' ls'-!i' u.. I- u «'" 1-, 12 32' o I W W :J: en WATERLINE, TYP, PROPERTY LINE GENERAL NOTES: 1. TEf.tPORARY CONS"TRUCTION EASEf.tENTS OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY SHALL BE OBTAINED BY SEPARATE DOCUMENTS. KEY T IT i!=t f- II'- LEGEND MATCHLINE f- c.. tl 1 11 E:3 PROPERTY LINE E3 ROAD CENTERLINE [----1 ALLEY CENTERLINE E:J EASEMENT STORM SEWER E3 WATERLINE SANITARY SEWER / \ CANOPY "TREE BY BUILDER I HCf.tEOWNER CANOPY "TREE ORNAf.tENT AL "TREE EVERGREEN TREE EVERGREEN SHRUB ORNAf.tENT AL GRASS o.:tpo a:;cfb DECIDUOUS SHRUB #11- PEllENNIAL ANNUALS E:J SOD E:J W? 1 E:J.. c:::=.j DRYLAND SEED ROCK MULCH PLAY AREA CRUSHER FINES BRICK PAVERS I ENHANCED PAVING CONCRETE PLANTS ARE LABELED ACCORDING TO VARIETY USING ITALIC FONT, REFER TO SHEETS 15 & 16 FOR LANDSCAPE PLANT LIST, NOTES: 1. ALL LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM 2, S"TREET TREE LAYOUT AND QUANTITIES MAY VARY AS FRONT LOAD GARAGE LOCATIONS ARE DETERMINED, 3. HCUSING PRODUCT VARIETIES: SFD REAR-WADED LOT SFD FRONT -loaded LOT PRODUCT Sheet Title LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN Sheet Number 9 OF 23 Brookfietd Residential _DEsK;>t "",, Banncd.snet Deme<, Cobao:mSJ2D4. P3a F:J31!!! _..IXI'TI W w n::: n::: «w < --1 '«--.I Q I- a «t- «o cr: Z S r5 a -' a tl --.I I- r- Z ::J UJ- a au.. tl --.It!> - CJ) «U:U: «Issue Dale 2/ Revision Date 4/14/214 OS/29/214 8/19/214 1/3/214 1/2/214 NORTH NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

55 " _-- 15 T ar ' L EXISTING 44' mail TO REMAIN SHEET ,.--s-r I 6' UTILITY 4' EASEMENT 13; 7'''' ----_,1 o 32 tj <{ : t ' ::----- /"' / /'-- / /' I / 1"1 / / ' / / 5'CONCRETE WALK, TYP, PROPERTY LINE GENERAL NOTES: 1. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY SHALL BE OBTAINED BY SEPARATE DOCUMENTS, KEY I.LI... III r-- LEGEND MATCHLINE E3 1 1'1 PROPERTY LINE ROAD CENTERLINE 1--:-3 ALLEY CENTERLINE c::=j EASEMENT STORM SEWER E3 WATERLINE / " SANITARY SEWER CANOPY TREE BY BUILDER I HOMEOWNER :. CANOPY TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE EVERGREEN TREE EVERGREHI SHRUB ORNAMENTAL GRASS cft::po dyjb DECIDUOUS SRRUB,-- PERENNiAl W%1j ANNUALS c=j SOD c::::;] DRYLAND SEED ROCK MULCH c=j PLAY AREA WI I CRUSHER FINES c=j BRICK PAVERS I ENHANCED PAVING f.;;$??j EJ CONCRETE PLANTS ARE LASaED ACCORDING TO VARIETY USING ITALIC FONT. REFER TO SHEETS 15 & 16 FOR LANDSCAPE PLANT LIST. NOTES: 1. ALL LANDSCAPE AREA SHAlL BE IRRIGATED WITH AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM 2. STREETTREE LAYOUT AND QUANTITIES MAY VARY AS FRONT LOAD GARAGE LOCATIONS ARE DETERMINED, 3, HOUSING PRODUCT VARIETIES: SFD REAR-lOADED LOT SFD FRONT -loaded LOT PRODUCT NORTH SCALE: 1 '= 3' Sheet Tide LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN Sheet Number 1 OF 23 Brookfield ResloeFltizd " =.1m112..,.--- -"'"",-, "'''''''--,, Banno:d.S1ree4 Oerwer, CoDado!24- P Sfi F-nl _.fx)ti1 w c::: c::: «w <::...J <:( --J Q I- «I- a <:: «:: Z LU -' u s --J ;,: I- Z :::J t- LU- cu.. u --J<!l en <:(<:: :::;: - <::::J «a U::U:: «Issue Date Revision Date 4/14/ / /3/214 1/2/214 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

56 KEY Sheel Tie LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN Sheet Number 11 OF Brookfiekt Resi<!ential UwrOFWORK EXISTING mail , ,./ --- /./---- / / _./ /./ TO REMAIN \. --- TEMPORARY DETENTION POND AREA REFER TO CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR TEMPORARY SEEDING GENERAL NOTES: 1. TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY SHALL BE OBTAINED BY SEPARATE DOCUMENTS. LEGEND MATCHLINE E=:3 PROPERTY LINE ROAD CENTERLINE E3 E3 ALLEY CENTERLINE c=j EASEMENT STORM SEWER E3 WATERLINE SANITARY SEWER / \ CANOPY TREE BY BUILDER I HOMEOWNER \. CANOPY TREE ORNAMENTAL TREE EVERGREEN TREE EVERGREEN SHRUB '-' cfo:po ORNAMENTAL GRASS rz«yb,.- PERENNIAL ANNUALS c=j SOD c=j c=j DRYLAND SEED ROCK MULCH PLAY AREA CRUSHER FINES BRICK PAVERS I ENHANCED PAVING EZJ CONCRETE PLANTS ARE LABELED ACCORDING TO VARIETY USING ITALIC FONT. REFER TO SHEETS 15 & 16 FOR LANDSCAPE PLANT LIST. NOTES: 1. ALL LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM 2. STREETTREE LAYOUT AND QUANTITIES MAY VARY AS FRONT LOAD GARAGE LOCATIONS ARE DETERMINED. 3. HOUSING PRODUCT VARIETIES: SFD REAR-lOADED LOT SFD FRONT-lOADED LOT PRODUCT a 3iJ '" NORTH SCALE: 1"= 3' 1 111BanoockStreel e,caioradd8ci24 PJ3892.'166 F:J3B _.JlOIris..Oesign.ecrn W W ::: ::: w...j «<: '«... I- «<: Z UJ Q I- «II::...J S Q U... ;.: f- Z :::J... LU- all u... t!> en - '«<: <:=:i «U:U: «Issue Date 2/27/214 Revision Date 4/14/214 5/ 2M 214 OB/19/214 1/3/214 1/2/214 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

57 TYPICAL LOT - LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FRONT-LOAD CONDITION REAR-LOAD CONDITION NJ.S, Sheel Title LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE Sheet Number 12 OF Brookfield RlOSid""tial r:a.._... JJB NOAAISDfSK'.N --- Denvef,Coiofado8Cl24 PJro892,,1166 FJroB _.norrrs.-oosigncom FRONT-LOAD TYPICAL SHARED DRIVEWAY FRONT-LOAD TYPICAL CORNER LOT TYPICAL LOT LOT ADJACENT TO ALLEY LEGEND E3 PROPERTYUNE LANOSCAPEAREA TO BE INSTALLED BY BUR-OER OR HOMEOWNER AND W,INTAINEOBY f-iom'eowner LANDSCAPEAREATOBEINSTALLEDBYBUK.DER"NOfMINTAINEDBYHQMEOWNER SIIlEYARO USE JI,seMENT TO 8E INSTALLED BY BUILDEROA HOMEOWNERANO WINTAINEDBYHOtM:OWNER SIDEYAAD USE E.'ISEMENTTO BE INSTALLED BY Bl1ILDERORAOJ"CENT HOMEOWNER "NO ItAAINTAINED BY '&'OJACENT HOMEOWI<JER LANDSCAPEARE,I,TOBE If.lSTALLED BY6UOERANO IliAINTAINEO BY DISTRICT TYPICAL LOT - LANDSCAPE AREA DEFINITIONS LANDSCAPE INSTALLED BY HOMEOWNER FRONT-LOAD CONDITION N. IS LEGEND E3 """''''... '"'AO I'llll:lll... [j J IIJIIIIIIII) TJlfI.w "...,"Tt".D E:::3 efioi'tjcii()111 /o.u.m"'ii'ii&!m!il"",,"adcli'io\iiitovi E3 IICL'ITOQlN!uw"o"aACP,,""''''''UG'''ro.eWllP ::.::: w W ::: ::: «w < --l <:(...J Q f- «I- < Z lu S...J r- lu- eu.....j<!l -- <:«<::=:i U::U:: Issue Date 2/27/214 D «:: --' u t- Z ::::J u en :2 «D «FRONT-LOAD TYPICAL SHARED DRIVEWAY FRONT LOAD TYPICAL CORNER LOT \ TYPICAL LOT LOT ADJACENT TO ALLEY GENERAL NOTES: 1. OPEN FENCING. SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET 18 IN THIS DOCUMENT. 2. SOLID FENCING, SEE DETAIL 2. SHEET 18 IN THIS DOCUMENT. 3. DRC MAY APPROVE LANDSCAPE SCREENING AS ALTERNATIVE TO SOLID AND OPEN FENCING OPTIONS. Revision Date 4/14/214 OS/29/214 8/19/214 1/3/214 1/2/214 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

58 Sheet Title FRONT-LOAD LOT TYPICAL MATERIAL TYPICAL LOT FRONT V... RD ORNAMENTAL TREE -EVERGREEN SHRUB DECIDUOUS SHRUB ORNAMENTAL GRASSES J PERENNIALS, VINES SOD J J 1 NONE REQUIRED QUANTITIES BY lot TYPE AND LOCATION I LANDSCAPE TYPICALS LANDSCAPE INSTALLED BY HOMEOWNER FRONT-LOAD CONDITION I I r----- I LEGEND E3 PRDPEFl.TY UNE E=::3 E---j O ORNAMENTAL CfE) if> c)b Cf'fN roo.g SOLID FENCING TREE EVERG'EENSH.U' ORNAMENTAL GRASS DECIDUOUS SHRUB &. VINES 'L---- 1:.:..:::::::::::::1 r'''' OD'-- ; :q,:g ROCK MULCH t,v-:-:, CRUSHER FINES LANDSCAPE TYPICALS Sheet Number 13 OF 23 Brookfield Residential 1!11!o.. _SlLl5Il =,111" R-.t: Demt ',CoIaadcB24 P3B FJ , SEE SHEET 12 FOR FRONT YARD LANDSCAPE AREA DEFINITIONS REAR-LOAD 32' - 39,9' LOT TYPICAL REQUIRED QUANTITIES BY LOT TYPE MID LOCATION CORNER LOT TYPICAL LOT lot AD.lJiCENT TO AllEY FRONT-LOAD TYPICAL SHARED DRIVEWAY FRONT-LOAD TYPICAL FRONT I ALLEY SlOE FRONT FRONT JAATERlAl AlLEY ALLEY YARD YARD YARD YARD ORNAMENTAL TREE I 1 a D EVERGREEN SHRUS 2 D J 2 D J 2 REAR-LOAD CONDITION DECIDUOUS SHRUB I 1 J, I 1 J ORNAMENTAlGAASSES J 2 4 J 2 J 4 PERENNIALS, a D 9 D VINES I, 2 1 D, D SOD NONE..,NE NONE NONE NONE..,NE NONE SEE SHEET 12 FOR FRONT YARD, ALLEY AND SIDE YARD LANDSCAPE AREA DEFINITIONS REAR-LOAD 4' + LOT TYPICAL CORNER LOT REQUIRED QUANTITIES BY LOT TYPE AND LOCATION TYPICAL lot LOT ADJACENT TO AlLEY MATERIAL FRONT SlOE FRONT FRONT ALLEY YARD AlLEY YARD YARD YARD AlLEY ORNAMENTAL TREE 1 \ I a D EVERGREEN SHRUB 2 a J 2 1 J 2 OECIDUOUS SHRUB 2, J ) CORNER LOT TYPICAL LOT LOT ADJACENT TO ALLEY NOTES:,_ MATERIAL IS INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED BY HOMEOWNER_ 2, PRIVATE YARD TO BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED BY HOMEOWNER, 3, LOTS MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL OR REDUCED PLANTING, SUBJECT TO DRC APPROVAL. ::.:: w «w -1 <::( < c[ I- a «I- < «:: Z lij a S -' Q a...j ;.: I- r- Z ::::> lij- Qu.. a...jt9 en -- <::«::. <::J «U:U: «.AlGAASSES J 2 4 J > J 4 PERENNIALS 1 a 1 a 11 a Issue Date 2/27/214 VINES 1 a J I D 1 D SOD NONE..,NE NONE NONE NONE..,NE NONE SEE SHEET 12 FOR FRONT YARD, ALLEY AND SIDE YARD LANDSCAPE AREA DEFINITIONS MINIMUM LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS N.T.S_ Revision Date 4/14/214 OS/29/214 8/19/214 1/3/214 1/2/214 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

59 Sheet Title LANDSCAPE TREE LAWN TYPICALS - OPTION 1 LANDSCAPE INSTALLED BY HOMEOWNER REFER TO SHEETS 5 THROUGH 11 FOR STREET TREE LOCATIONS FRONT-LOAD CONDITION r-----, I I ' I 1 I I I :, I i REAR-LOAD CONDITION 71 1\ LEGEND E3 PROPERTY LINE E::J OPEN FENCING Emj SOLIOFEf.JCING ORNAMENTAL 3 rp c5 8 VINES TREE EVERGREEN SHRUB ORNAMENTAL GRASS DECIDlJOUSSHRU9 PERENNIAL 1-:::::::-:::1 SOD R"l'(:: [,::\;:,'.; 1 ROCK MULCH CRUSHERFW'JES LANDSCAPE TREE LAWN Sheet Number 14 OF 23 Brookfield Resldentiai 5jB NOIUUS _"' DESIGN o CoUadoJB2D4 P F W#NI nottls-desisn rom FRONT-LOAD TYPICAL SHARED DRIVEWAY FRONT-LOAD TYPICAL CORNER LOT TYPICAL LOT LOT ADJACENT TO ALLEY OPTION 1: 1. HOMEOWNER TO PLANT SOD IN TREE LAWN. IN GROUND IRRIGATlON REQUIRED FOR SOD. LANDSCAPE TREE LAWN TYPICALS - OPTION 2 LANDSCAPE INSTALLED BY HOMEOWNER REFER TO SHEETS 5 THROUGH 11 FOR STREET TREE LOCATIONS FRONT-LOAD CONDITION FRONT-LOAD TYPICAL SHARED DRIVEWAY FRONT-LOAD TYPICAL MINIMUM LANDSCAPE TREE LAWN REQUIREMENTS REAR-LOAD CONDITION CORNER LOT TYPICAL LOT LOT ADJACENT TO ALLEY OPTION 2: 1. MINIMUM 2 PLANTS PER 1 LINEAR FEET. REQUIRED VARIETY: MINIMUM 1 EVERGREEN SHRUB. 2 SMALL DECIDUOUS SHRUBS, AND 2 GRASSES. 2. MINIMUM 1 ACCENT BOULDER PER HOME. 3. TREE LAWNS TO BE MULCHED WITH 314' WASHED RIVER GRAVEL(BROWN) OR CRUSHER FINES (TAN). RIVER GRAVEL(BROWN) TO BE APPLIED AT 3' -4' DEPTH OVER WEED CONTROL FABRIC. CRUSHER FINES (TAN) TO BE APPLIED AT 4" DEPTH COMPACTED OVER WEED CONTROL FABRIC. 4. SOD REQUIRED FOR CORNER LOT TREE LAWNS ALONG FRONT AND A MINIMUM OF 4' MEASURED FROM FACE OF CURB ALONG SIDE TREE LAWN. 1\ GENERAL NOTES: 1. OPEN FENCING, SEE DETAIL 1, SHEET 181N THIS DOCUMENT. 2. SOLID FENCING, SEE DETAIL 2, SHEET 181N THIS DOCUMENT. 3. MATERIAL IS INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED BY HOMEOWNER. 4. HOMEOWNER MAY INSTALL ONE 4' WIDE CONCRETE WALK IN TREE LAWN. 5. PRIVATE LOT OWNERS SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THEIR PROPERTY AS WELL AS ADJACENT TREE LAWNS AND LANDSCAPE TRACTS. N.T.S. W w :: :: <t: W < --l "t: -J Q f- I- <t: < «a::...j Z LU S Q U -J ;,: I- Z ::J r- LU- all u -J<.9 en -- "t:< ::;; <:J «U:U: «Issue Date Revision Date / /214 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

60 LANDSCAPE PLANT LIST SYM. COMMON NAME DECIDUOUS CANOPY TREES ABM FFH WHB APA PMA GBI IMP SHA KCT LAN lpt BOA EOA NRO GLl ELM AUTUMN BlAZE MAPlE FRANS FONTAINE HORNBEAM WESTERN HACKBERRY AUTUMN PURPLE ASH PATMORE GREEN ASH GINKGO IMPERIAL HONEYlOCUST SHADEMASTER HONEYlOCUST KENTUCKY COFFEETREE, ESPRESSO LANCElEAF COTIONWOOD london PLANETREE BUR OAK ENGLISH OAK NORTHERN RED OAK GREENSPIRE LINDEN FRONTIER ELM EVERGREEN TREES SKY COJ CBS PIN AUP PeN SKYROCKET JUNIPER COLOGREEN JUNIPER COlORADO BLUE SPRUCE PINON PINE AUSTRIAN PINE PONDEROSA PINE DECIDUOUS ORNAMENTAL TREES BOTANICAL NAME ACER X FREEMANII 'JEFFERSRED' CARPINUS BETULUS 'FRANS FONTAINE' CEl TlS OCCIDENTALIS FRAXINUS AMERICANA 'AUTUMN PURPLE' FRAXINUS PENNSYlVANICA?ATMORE' GINKGO BllOBA (MALE VARITlES ONLY) GlEDITSIA 1RIACANTHOS INERMIS 1MPERIAl' GlEDITSIA 1RIACANTHOS INERMIS 'SHADEMASTER' GYMNOCLADUS DIOICUS 'ESPRESSO' POPULUS X ACUMINATA PLATANUS ACERIFOllA 'BlOODGCOD' QUERCUS MACROCARPA QUERCUS ROBUR QUERCUS RUBRA TlLlA CORDATA 'GREENSPIRE' ULMUS X 'FRONTIER' JUNIPERUS VRGlNlANA 'SKYROCKET JUNIPERUS SCOPUlORUM 'COlOGREEN' PICEA PUN GlENS PINUS EDULIS PINUS NIGRA PINUS PONDEROSA SIZE & CONDo (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) 2112" CAL. B&B 2112" CAL. B&B 2112" CAL. B&B 2112" CAL. B&B 2112" CAL. B&B 2112" CAL. B&B 2 112" CAL. B&B 2112" CAL. B&B 2112" CAL. B&B 2112" CAL. B&B 2112" CAL. B&B 2112" CAL. B&B 2112" CAL. B&B 2 112" CAL. B&B 2112" CAL. B&B 2112" CAL. B&B 4'KT. MIN 4' KT. MIN S' HT. MIN 5'HT. MIN S' HT. MIN S' HT. MIN HWM PATIERN PERFECT MAPLE ACER TATARICUM 'PATIERN PERFECT' S' CLUMP, B&B ABS AUTUMN BRilLIANCE SERVICEBERRY AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFlORA 'AUTUMN BRilLIANCE' 8' CLUMP, B&B WHT WASHINGTON HAWTHORN CRATAEGUS PHAENOPYRUM Z'CAL" B&B PRF CHP RAIDIANT CRABAPPLE CHANTlClEER PEAR MALUS 'RADIANT' PYRUS CAllERYANA 2" CAL., B&B 2" CAL.. B&B EOC ENGLISH COLUMNAR OAK QUERCUS ROBUR 'FASTIGIATA' 2" CAL., B&B LTC JAPANESE TREE LILAC SYRINGA RETICULATA 8' CLUMP, B&B DECIDUOUS SHRUBS CPB CRIMSON PYGMY BARBERRY BERBERIS THUNBERGII 'A1ROPURPUREA NANA' #5 CONTAINER SlF SILVER FOUNTAIN BUTIERFlY BUSH BUODlEIA AlTERNIFOLIA 'ARGENTEA' #5 CONTAINER BMS BLUE MIST SPIREA CARYOPTERIS X ClANDONENSIS #5 CONTAINER FRB FERNBUSH CHAMAEBATIARIA MlllEFOLIUM #5 CONTAINER ROW DWARF BABY BLUE RA8BITBRUSH CHRYSOTHAMNUS NAUSEOSUS NAUSEOUS 'DW. BLUE' #5 CONTAINER GeE GlROUND COTONEASTER COTONEASTER HORIZONT AI.JS PERPUSllLUS #5 CONTAINER SGB SPAIoISH GClD BROOM CYTISUS PURGAN 'SPANISH GOLD' #5 CONTAINER APl APACHE PLUME FALLUGIA PARAIDOXA #5 CONTAINER DRS DWARF RUSSIAN SAGE PEROVSKIA ARTIPLlCIFOllA 1.lmE SPIRE' #5 CONTAINER MCK MCKAY'S WHITE POTENTILLA POTENTIlLA FRUTlCOSA 'MCKAY'S WHITE' #5 CONTAINER PBS PAWNEE BUTTES SAND CHERRY PRUNUS BESSEYI 'PAWNEE BUTIES' #5 CONTAINER 'RON WIULIAMS' #5 CONTAINER #5 CONTAINER FU TLS FINE LINE BUCKTHORNE THREE-I.EAF SUMAC RHAMNUS FRANGULA RHUS 1RILOBATA YFC YELLOW FLOWERING CURRANT RIBES AUREUM KNO KNOCK OUT ROSE RED ROSA X 'RAIDRAll #5 CONTAINER #5 CONTAINER #5 CONTAINER #5 CONTAINER HCB HANCOCK CORALBERRY SYMPHORICARPOS X CHENAUL Til 'HANCOCK' #5 CONTAINER KNS SBB SUNNY KNOCK OUT SilVER BUFFAlOBERRY ROSA X 'RADSUNNY' SHEPHERDIA ARGENTEA MKl MISS KIM LILAC SYRINGA PATULA 'MISS KIM' #5 CONTAINER PGl PRESIDENT GREVY LILAC SYRINGA VULGARIS?RESIDENT GREVY' #5 CONTAINER EVERGREEN SHRUBS BRJ BROAID.. GOR JUNIPER JUNIPERUS SABINA 'BROAIDMOOR' #5 CONTAINER BCH BLUE CHIP JUNIPER JUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS 'BLUE CHIP' #5 CONTAINER GLS GLOBE SPRUCE PICEA PUNGENS 'GLOBOSA' #5 CONTAINER MAN PANCHITO MANZANITA ARCTOSTAPHYLOS X COlORAIDOENSIS #5 CONTAINER MUG MOPS MUGC PINE PINUS MUGO 'MOPS' #5 CONTAINER IrY NORY TOWER YUCCA YUCCA FILAMENTOSA WORY TOWER' #5 CONTAINER RHM R.H. MONTGOMERY SPRUCE PICEA PUNGENS RH. MONTGCMERY' #5 CONTAINER ICJ ICEE BLUE JUNIPER JUNIPERUS HORIZONTALIS 'MONBER' #5 CONTAINER GRASSES FRG KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GlRASS CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFlORA 'KARL FOERSTER' #1 CONTAINER KFG KOREAN FEATHER REED GlRASS CALAMAGROSTIS BRACHYTRICA #1 CONTAINER SSG THE BLUES L1TIlE BLUESTEM GRASS SCHIZACHYRIU" SCOPARIUM 'THE BLUES' #1 CONTAINER AVG BLUE AVENA GRASS HELICT1RICHON SEMIPERVIRENS #1 CONTAINER GSR SHENANDOAH SWITCH GRASS PANICUM VIRGATUM 'SHENANDOAH' #1 CONTAINER MfG '-'EXICAN FEATHER GlRASS NASSELLA (STIPA) TENUISSIIM HMS HEAVY!.IETAl SWITCH GRASS PANICU.. VIRGATUM 'HEAVY METAL' #1 CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER PAH HARDY PAMPAS, PLUME GRASS ERIANTHUS RAVENNAE #1 CONTAINER GROUNDCOVER I VINES BOS BOSTON rvy PARTHENOCISSUS 1RICUSPIDATA #1 CONTAINER GH GOLDFLAME HONEYSUCKLE LONICERA HECKROTTlI #1 CONTAINER HH HAUL'S HONEYSUCKLE LONICERA JAPONICA 'HALLIANA' #1 CONTAINER ENG VIRGINIA CREEPER PARTHENOCtSSUS Ql.IINQUEFOllA ENGEL.. ANNII #1 CONTAINER ETV CLEMATIS ETOILE VIOLETTE (BLUE) CLEMATIS HYBRID #1 CONTAINER FST CLEMATIS FRAGIRANT STAR (WHITE) CLEMATIS HYBRID #1 CONTAINER COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SIZE & CONDo PERENNIALS AJS BES CFl CJT CMT DDY DSD ElV GAl HBJ IPY JBG LAM MY PIR PlP POM SIS SSH VAL WBF HOB HOV AUTUMN YJY SEDUM SEDUM X 'AUTUMN YJY' BLACK.fYED SUSAN RUDBECKIA FUlGIDA VAR. SULLIVANTlI 'GCLDSTURI.f CONEFLOWER ECHiNACEA PURPUREA JETHRO TULl COREOPSIS C. GlRANDIFlORA 'JETHRO TUlL' WALKER'S LOW CATMINT NEPETA FAASSENII 'WALKER'S low' STELLA D'ORO DAYLIlY HEMEROCALLIS 'STELLA D'ORO' SNOW LADY SHASTA DAISY leucanhiemum X SUPERBUM 'SNOW LADY' ENGLISH MUNSTEAID LAVENDER LAVANDULA ANGUSTlFOLIA 'MUNSTEAID' BURGUNDY BLANKET FLOWER GAILLARDIA X GlRANDIFLORA 'BURGUNDY' HIMALAYAN BORDER JEWEL POLYGONUM PERSICARIAAFFINIS 'HIMALAYAN BORDER JEWEL' YEllOW ICE PLANT DElOSPERMA NUBIGENUM JOHNSON'S BLUEI CRANESBlll GERANIUM GERANIUM X 'JOHNSON'S BLUE' LAMB'S EAR STACHYS BYZANTINA MOONSHINE YARROW ACHILLEA X 'MOONSHINE' MISSOURI EVENING PRIMROSE OENOTHERA MACROCARPA PINELEAF PENSTEMON RED PENSTEMON PlNIFOLIUS WINECUPS (poppy MALLOW) CALLIRHOE INVOlllCRATA SNOWI>I-SUMMER CERASTIUM TOMENTOSUM SUNSET HYSSOP AGAST ACHE RUPESTRIS RED VALERIAN! JUPITER'S BEARD CENTRANTHUS RUSER GAUAN WHIRLING BUTIERFLIES GAURA L1NDHEIMERI BLUE GIANT HOSTA H. SIEBOLDIANA 'ELEGANS' VARIEGATED HOSTA H UNDULATA MEDIOVARIEGATA (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) #1 CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER #1 CONTAINER Sheet rifle LANDSCAPE PLANT LIST Sheet NumbfN 15 OF 23 Brookfiekt Residential "'''''''_._:_...,-.., hd NOIWSDESICN B11mcJc;.sr Drrwe1,CcDDImD4 PXI3.892.tt66 W W :: :: <{ W <:...J '«c[ I- <{ f- a <: «:: Z UJ a...j a S...J I- Z I- UJ- ::J au.. a...j<'!> en - '«<: ::; <::J «a U::U:: «Issue Dale 2/27/214 Revision Date 4/14/214 OS / 29 / 2t4 8 / 19 / / 3 / / 2/ 214 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

61 Sheet Tit1e SEED AND SOD MIXES TURF GRASS BLEND: SOD COMMON NAME 9!l 11 BLUEGRASS-fESCUE BLEND 9!l BLUEGRASS 1 FESCUE DRY LAND SEED MIX BY ARKANSAS VALLEY SEED CO (B77-9!l7-3337), OR APPROVED EaUAL COMMON NAME COMMON WHEATGRASS StEI\OER WHEATGRASS MEADOW FESCUE PUBESCENT WHEATGRASS HARD FESCUE CANADA BLUEGRASS INDIAN GRASS SIDEOATS GRAMA BlUE GRAMA SWITCHGRASS WET AREA SEED MIX COMMON NAME CANADA WILD RYE SLENDER WHEATGRASS SAND BLUESTEM SIDEOATS GRAMA PRAIRIE SANOREED SWITCHGRASS SAND DROPSEED ANALOGUE SEDGE AWL FRUIT SEDGE INLAND SAL TGRASS CALIFORNIA POPPY BOTANICAL NAME TRITlCU'-4 AESTIVUI.4 El YMUS TRACHYCAUlUS SSP.1RACHYCAULUS FESTUCA PRATENSIS AGROPYRON TllICHmlORW FESTUCA BREVlPILA POA COI.4PRESSA SCRGHASTRUM NUTANS BOUTELDUA CURTIPENDULA BOUTELOUA GRACILIS PANICUM VIRGATUM SCIENTIFIC NAME (EL YMUS CANADENSIS) (EL YMUS TRACHYCAULUS SSP. TRACHYCAlA.US) (ANDROFOGON HALLlI) (BOUTELOUA CURTIPENDUlA) (CALAMOVILFA LONGIFOLIA) (panicum VIRGA TUM) (SPOROBOLUS CRVPTANDRUS) (CAREX SIMULATA) (CAREX STiPATA) (DISTICHLIS SPICATA) (ESCHSCHOLZIA CALIFORNICA) % OF TOTAL 1% 9!l% 1% TOTAL 1% % OF TOTAL 2% 15% 1% 1% 1% 1% B% 7% 5% 5% TOTAl. 111 [, " ' -'J PLSlACRE bCBS: % OF TOTAL 21% 14% 21% 14% 7% 6% 1% 1% 1% 7% 7% PLS PER ACRE 3. LBS 2. LBS 3. LBS 2. LBS 1.LBS.75 LBS O.OS LBS.1 LBS.1 LBS 1. LBS tolbs rotal 1% 14 LBS I ACRE WETLAND PLUGS - 4" PLUGS COMMON NAME I SCIENTIFIC NAME SWITCHGRASS (panicum VIRGATUM), BIG BLUESTEM (ANDROFOGON GERARDII) EASTERN RED COLUMBINE (AQUILEGIA CANADENSIS), TORREY'S RUSH (JUNCUS TORREYI) D ROCKY MOUNTAIN IRIS (IRIS MISSCURIENSIS), BALTIC RUSH (JUNCUS SAL TICUS) PRAIRIE CORD GRASS (SPARTINA PECTINATA) LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE ORGANIC SOIL PREPARATION AT A MINIMUM OF 5. CU.YRDSll,OIJOSF, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED IN THE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS. 2. SHRUB BEDS ARE TO BE MULCHED WITH :r MIN. DEFTH 314' ANGULAR ROCK MlA.CH OR CRUSHER FINES OVER SPECIFIED GEOTEXTILE WEED CONTROL FABRIC. NO WEED CONTROL FABRIC IS REOUIRED IN PERENN IAL AREAS. 3. SfflUB BEDS ARE TO BE CONTAINED BY EITHER 3116' MIN. THCK METAL EDGER OR SPADE DUG EDGER. EDGER IS NOT REaUIRED WHEN ADJACENT TO CURBS OR WALKS. 4. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COSTTO REPAIR UTILITIES. ADJACENT LANDSCAPE. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PROPERTY THAT IS DAMAGED BY THE CONTRACTOR OR THEIR SUBCONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS DURING INSTALLATION OR DURING THE SPEC IFIED MAINTIENANCE PERIOD. CALL FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. 5. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPORT ANY DISCREFANCY IN PLAN VS. FIEUD CONDITIONS IMMEDIATELY TO THE OWNER'S REFRESENTATIVE. PRIOR TO CONTINUING WITH THAT PORTION OF WORK. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE REFAIR OF ANY OF THEIR TRE NCHES OR EXCAVATIONS THAT SEmE. 7. NOT DISTURB THE EXISTING PAVING, LIGHTING, LANDSCAPING, OR IRRIGATION THAT EXISTS ADJACENT TO THE SITE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLAN. B. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING ALL PLANT auantitles. QUANTITIES REPRESENTED GRAPHICALLY TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER LABELS. 9. CALL FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. THE UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON CONTAIN ONLY GENERAL INFORMATION AS TO THEIR DESCRIPTION, NATURE. AND GENERAL LOCATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COST TO REPAIR ANY UTILITIES OR EXISTING SITE FEATURES DAMAGED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 1. LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED BY AN UfllERGROUND, AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND SHALL PROVIDE 1% COVERAGE TO ALL AREAS. ls'oc LAfllSCAPE PLANTUST Sheet Number 16 OF 23 Brookfiekt Residential '--"' =.11) :- '-"-'-'" -, Sl'eet _1lUIC.I'+ HJ9, 1IQ24 PJ f3ld.a _1DIl W W :: :: <{ w <: -' '«cr I- <{ I- <: Z UJ r S..,J a «a --' a u I- Z l- au.. UJ- => a u..,j(!) en - '«<: i.i:i.i: <:=:i ::. ««Jssue Date Rev;sjon Date /29/ / 19 / 214 1/3/ NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

62 "'v. -",_<:_._ Sheet Title MIDTOWN ARCHITECTURE CHARACTER SQUARE FOOTAGE RANGE ARCHITECTURAL STANDARDS MIDTOWN WILL PROVIDE A 'FRESH ARCHITECTURAL CHARACTER' FOR FRONT RANGE RESIDENTIAL, HARNESSING OUR 'FREE-RANGE SPIRlr, THE TRADITIONAL CRAFTSMAN, PRAIRIE AND FARMHOUSE ROOTS, WILL EVOLVE INTO 'FRESH STYLE' EXPRESSIONS FOR THE NEW NEIGHBORHOOD. SIMPLE FORMS, RICH COLORS, AND ARTFUL DETAILS WILL COMBINE TO CREATE AFFORDABLE AND DISTINCTIVE HOMES, ADDING 'ZESr TO THE STREET SCENE APPEAL. THE FOLLOWING ARE THE PRODUCT TYPES PROPOSED IN THIS FOP. TYPICAL PRODUCT IMAGE AND PLAN VIEW ARE REPRESENTATION OF ARCHITECTURE CHARACTER AND FORM, FINAL ARCHITECTURE MAY VARY, LOT LAYOUT IS CONCEPTUAL AND GARAGE ORIENTATION MAY VARY, HOUSING PRODUCT SQUARE FOOTAGE SINGLE FAMILY DETJ\CHED REAR LOADED HOME 1,65 2,85 SF smg(fl6 1,8 2,2 SF SQUARE FOOT RANGES ARE INTENDED TO ENCOMPASS A MAJORITY OF HOMES IN EACH HOUSING PRODUCT TYPE. A MINIMAL AMOUNT OF HOMES MAY VARY FROM DEFINED RANGES DURING FURTHER ARCHITECTURE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT AND CONSTRUCTION. Sheel Number 17 OF 23 Brookfield Residential TYPICAL PRODUCT IMAGE --.->,-,.'''"'''' 5j55 NOIWS DESK.N IL.-_ 111a...oodostr1!l!t Oerweo,CoItiradD824?3389'Z.1166 FXI389Z.1181i _.IIOITs-design PLAN VIEW (TYPICAL) N.T.S. W W ::: ::: «w <: -1 <;( -J Q f- «I- <: D <: a: Z UJ -' tj S -J f- ::::J UJ- Z r- all. tj -J(!) en - <;(<: ::;: <:=:i <: D U::U:: <: Issue Date Revision Dare SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED REAR-LOADED COTTAGE HOME SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED FRONT-LOADED HOME 4/14-/ t4-8/19/ t NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

63 Sheet Title DETAILS flnlshed GR.AIlE 4'-3' FRONT K CD OPEN FENCING - WELDED WIRE FENCE o CONCRETE BOARD FORMED RETAINING WALL 2'-6' CD 2' X 6' STAINED ROUGH SAWN CD 2' X4" STAINED ROUGH SAWN ) 'E S;ED ROUGH SAWN CD CZ"gLELDED WIRE 3 VINE PLANTING, SEE MINIMUM " DE'" LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, FACE' \.V LANDSCAPE TVPICALS FOR STem PLANTING REQUIREMENTS WekiedWreFencingisinterH:edasan open and nnsparenllenc:e style. This tansparerq minmizes street wai effects and entolnges a mo social and dose knitcorrrnunity, TypicallrJtpSnngdesigns requi'elhe useohlinesinctderldestabiish Ihe \legelaled wing wal appeil"a/1ce desired for Ihe open welded wi'e fence. lois requrilg Open F encing-wekied w..& Fence andllinessnalbemaintaioedby hcmeowner, see landscape InstaIaIion and Maintenance Requi'emenls on sheet 8 and Landscape Design Gu. Open Fencing-WeldedWireFenand\linesin open space b"a.;t; shal be maintained by dqid. SCALE: 112' = l' CD CONCRETE RETAINING WALL WITH BOARD FORMED FINISH. ALL EXPOSED FACES SHALL HAVE A BOARD FORMED FINISH CD 'RHTEHR RFE MULCH BED OR ) :i:;;oil PER CD 6!;R GEOTECH NOTES: 1, REFER TO STRUCTURAL CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS FOR STRUCTURAL DETAILS OF THIS WALL. REFER TO CIVIL CD'S FOR WALL ELEVATIONS, 3. TOP OF WALL ELEVATION SHALL BE CONSISTIENT. 4. ORC MAV A1PPROVE EQUAL FOR RETAINING WALL. SCALE: l' = f,j)'!i r ': "'O 'C' ---')< 5'-O' FIlotIT - CD 2' X 4' SMOOTH SAWN CD 1'X4'FACIA ) 4'X4'POST CD l' X 4' ROUGH SAWN CD 2' X 4' SMOOTH SAWN CD l' X 6' ROUGH SAWN (1) 2'X4' CD 2' X 6' SMOOTH SAWN CD CONCRETE Jl::::::::::::::::======:glj=:::V 4"-Y,'ROCK SLOPE CONCRETE TO DRAIN AWAY FROM POST SOLID FENCE - HORIZONTAL WOOD FENCE NOTES: 1. ALL LUMBER SHALL BE NO.1 SELECT, CEDAR, AND SHALL BE SOLID, STRAIGHT, FREE FROM KNOTS, SPLITS, SHAKES, & DISCOLORATION. ALL NAILS, FASTENERS AND OTHER HARDWARE SHALL BE HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED. NAILS SHALL BE SHANK. SCALE: 112' = l' Sheet Number 1B OF 23 Brookfield Resldentiai R-!? ,-"' "'--,-- SSE NoIWSDEsK.l< ---- Dl!nver,Cdvrado82!l4 P fi FJ3.B92.11B6 _.!:Om ::.:: w :: :: w <: -.J «c[ t- o I- a <: «:: LU Z -' S Q U r-... I- z :::J LU- au.. u... (!) en - «<: :< <:=:i «a U:U: «Issue Date 2/27/214 Rev;sionDate 4/1"' 214 OS /29/214 8/19/214 1/3/214 1/2/214 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

64 Sheel Tille DETAILS CD MIDTOWN STREET ENHANCED PAVING - VEHICULAR 3 NOTES: ;:---sign COPY COLOR, DIMENSIONS, TYPE PER ADAMS COUNTY STANDARDS. 2, SIGN HEIGHTS PER ADAMS COUNTY AND COOT STANDARDS S ruv. VARIES f----"'----.t/'--./''--- 3' CLEAR SCALE: NTS BOMANITE STAMPED CONCRETE BOMANITE PATIERN: RUNNING BOND BRICK PATIERN OR APPROVED EQUAL, RUNNING BOND PATIERN CD ALWAYS SET AT 2' FROM TRUE NORTH COLOR: TO MATCH INTERSTATE BRICK (MOJAVE BRICK) COLOR EXISTING ON SITE SEALING COMPOUND, EXPANSION CD JOINT & EXPANSION JOINT FILLER, WHERE NOTED ON PLANS. '" CONCRETE REINFORCED WITH 6' X 6' \V WOVIEN WIRE FABRIC (WWF) COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE AS CD RECOMMENDED BY GEOTECHNICAl. REPORT, COMPACTED SUBGRADE TO 95% o PROCTOR DENSITY SCALE: 3' - I '.(f' 4" of aggregate Ibeneath sand) Subgrade compacted to 95% of ma)(imum dry density as determined by ASTM 698 within o to 2 percent of optimum moisture content. The aggregate base course should consist of CDOT Class 6 and be compacted to a minimum of 95% of modified Proctor density as determined by ASTM BRICK PAVERS - PEDESTRIAN o METAL EDGER DETAIL (16) II2'DIA.HOLESMIN.AT / ALL LOW POINTS "":::=--"'=":-:.:.=:::.:;- :---"'S.t / LONGITUDINAL I SECTION OF EDGER AT LOW POINT ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE Sheel Number 19 OF 23 CD ::;R4; T:T :RKK (MOJAVE), 1116' GAPS TYP. Brookfield RUNNING BONO PATIERN ALWAYS SET AT 2' FROM TRUE NORTH AS INDICATED BYTHE HATCH PATIERN ON THE PLANS, CROWN BRICK PAVING IN MEDIANS SO THERE IS APPROXIMATELY A 4% SLOPE TO THE CURB. WASHED SAND SmlNG BED CD 1' 1.5' DEPTH, PER GEOTECH RECOMMENDATIONS o 4r:O:itNS CD IONS PAVESTONE EDGEPRO PAVER o 6 M OR W'NW,pCNes\one.com CD AMENDED TOPSOIL o SOD CD CURB AND GUTIER SCALE: 3' = 1'' (2) :!D;;OD MULCH OR CRUSHER FINES SHALL BE FLUSH WITH TOP OF EDGER CD TURF THATCH o :A;I:ER CD SUBGRADE o I;:r;;.gRIIi LOW POINTS OR POORLY DRAINING AREAS IN ORDER TO ElNSURE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE CD EDGER STAKE NOTES: ;:----'iheire SHALL BE NO EXPOSED SHARP I JAGGED EDGES. EDGER SHALL BE SET AS STRAIGHT AS POSSIBLE, ANY BENDS OR KINKS WHERE EDGER IS SUPPOSED TO FOLLOW A STRAIGHT LINE WILL BE REJECTED, 3. EDGER CORNERS SHALL BE AS llght AS POSSIBLE. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL STAKES AS REQUIRED BY THE MANUFACTURER. SCALE: I' = 1'' Residential rz,l) joo P m fme W W ::: ::: <l: w --l <: '«cr f- a I- <l: <: «: Z UJ a S --' Q a () -.J >-- I- Z :::J t- UJalL () a -.J{!) en - '«<: ::;: <:=:i «U::U:: «Issue Dale 2/ Revision Date 4 / 14/214 OS /29/214 8 / 19 / /3 / /2 / 214 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

65 Sheel TiVe DETNLS Sheet Number 2D OF 23 2XCONTNNER WIDTH PRUNE All DEAD OR DAMAGED WOOD PRIOR TO PlANTING CD SPECIFIED MULCH AMENDED SOIL IN PLANTING BED CD PER SPECIFICATIONS. TILL SOIL TO A DEPTH OF EIGHT INCHES. o FINISH GRADE (TOP OF MULCH) NOTE: 1.8ROKEN OR CRUMBLING ROOT.lJALLS WILL BE REJECTED 2. CARE SHOULD BE TAKEN NOT TO DAMAGE THE SHRUB OR ROOT BALL WHEN REMOVING IT FROM ITS CONTAINER 3. ALL JUNIPERS SHOULD BE PLANTED SO THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL OCCURS ABOVE THE FINISH GRADE OF THE MULCH LAYER 4. DIG PLANT PIT TWICE AS WIDE AND HIGH AS THE CONTAINER -./' O,C, SPACING CD SPECIFIED MULCH CD git!ng BED TILLED o CENTER OF PLANT WHEN PLANTED ON A CURVE ORIENT ROWS TO FOLLOW THE LONG AXIS OF AREAS WHERE PLANTS ARE MASSED. Brookfield Residential.--:..."" CO.IIl11Z t9 JJJ) _DUKiI< arlncd.,CoIori!do824 PXO FJ3E G) SHRUB PLANTING o ROOT EW..L DWAffiR TREE PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: 1 112' -1'-lJ' PRUNING NOTES: 1. ALL PRUNING SHALL COMFLY WITH ANSI A3 STANDARDS. 2. DO NOT HEAVILY PRUNE THE TREE AT PLANTING. PRUNE ONLY CROSSOVER LIMBS, CO-DOMINANT LEADERS AND BROKEN BRANCHES, SOME INTERIOR TWIGS AND LATERAL BRANCHES MAY BE PRUNED. HOWEVER, DO NOT REMOVE THE TERMINAL BUDS OF BRANCHES THAT EXTEND TO THE EDGE OF THE CROWN. STAKING NOTES: 1. STAKE TREES PER FOLLOWING SCHEDULE, THEN REMOVE AT END OF FIRST GROWING SEASON. FOLLOWS: ' CALIPER SIZE MIN. 1 STAKE ON SIDE OF PREVAILING WIND (GENERALLY N.W. SIDE) 1.2. H' 3' CALIPER SIZE MIN. 2 STAKES ONE ON N.W. SIDE, ONE ON S.W. SIDE (OR PREVAILING WIND SIDE AND 18' FROM THAT SIDE) ' CALIPER SIZE AND LARGER 3 STAKES PER DIAGRAM 2. WIRE OR CABLE SHALL BE MIN. 12 GAUGE, TIGHTEN WIRE OR CABLE ONLY ENOUGH TO KEEP FROM SLIPPING. ALLOW FOR SOME TRUNK MOVEMENT. NYLON STRAPS SHALL BE LONG ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE H' OF GROWTH AND BUFFER ALL BRANCHES FROM WIRE. PERENNIAL PLANT LAYOUT CD PLACE MIN. r PVC PIPE AROUND EACH WIRE. EXPOSED WIRE SHALL BE MAX 2' EACH SIDE CD 6 FT. UNTREATED WOOD POST (MIN. 1.5' DIAMETER). ALL SHALL BE DRIVEN OUTSIDE ROOTBALL AND IN UNDISTURBED SOIL. o : R: 6T:LLED THROUGH APRIL 3. (DECIDUOUS ONLY) o DNEOoR;II;, ABOVE FINAL GRADE. o elmmiig:' DO NOT PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK (FINISHED GRADE REFERENCES TOP OF MULCH). CD GROMMETED NYLON STRAPS CD N6ELINWE ONLY TO KEEP FROM SLIPPING. FW:sSAUCER :6i:DMIMUM 2% (BY VOLUME) ORGANIC MATERIAL. WATER THOROUGHLY WHEN BACKFILLING ;;LBgT OUTSIDE ROOTBALL IN UNDISTURBED PLACE SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL FIRMLY, DO NOT COMPACT OR TAMF. SmLE SOIL WITH WATER TO FILL ALL NR POCKETS. SCALE: NTS SCALE: l' = 1'-lJ' W W ::: () ::: «w <:...J <;( () c[ f- a «I- <: «n: Z UJ a --' a S --.I > r- z r- UJaLL a --.I(!) - (fj <;(<: <::J «U:U: «Issue Date 2/27/214 Revision Date 4/14/214 OS/29/214 8/19/214 1/3/ /214 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

66 Sheet Tille DETAILS CD ROADWAY o CONCRETE CURB CD 'Z' DIAMETER DRAINAGE HOLES o COMPACTED SUBGRADE CD =ATERPROOF CD PlAl'ITt.tA TERIAl (RE: PLANS) o MUlCH Sheet Number 21 OF ) -,-- 11D1BilrnlckSlr.t,...,C'*-ia1Kl2D4 P33.89Z.l"I , NOTE: IF JURISDICTION DOES NOT ALlOW CORE DRIlLING, USE MUlCH BED AT LOW POINT ADJACENT TO CURB (OPTION 2) DETAIL CD MULCH BED AT LOW POINT ADJACENT TO CURB SCAlE: l' = 1'.' CD ROADWAY o CONCRETE GUTTER CD CONCRETE CURB o ::runeofdralnage CD 1 to COBBLE MUlCH CD ATERPROOF o r.tulch CD SUBGRADE w a::: u a::: <{ w <:...J u it!;( Z l- e -< a::...j S (.) --J I- Z IU- au... (.) - --J<!l Ul :; c( U:U: e c( S ElEVAllON S SECTION A-A' MULCH BED AT LOW POINT ADJACENT TO CURB SCAlE: 1 = 1'. Issue Date OZIZl I 2Ut4 _Date fu11412vu Ut4 OBI t912ut I 2CJ14 1/21214 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

67 Sheet Title MONUMENT DETAILS Sheet Number 22 OF 23 Brookfietd Residentia! r =w,q -- CONTINUOUS WELDS GROUND SMOOTl-l, ENTIRE DISPLAY TO BE FINISHED TO MATCH DISTRESSED FAUX BLACKENED STEEL --- jjb ' D<sI"" Oerwtf,Calcr.!dcB24 PJ389: F lifi';'n.nqcom 1/2" THICK FCO ALUMINUM LETTERS PAINT TO MATCH (ISTffESSEO FAUX BLACKENED STEEL ' 1" 13'11"'h" m levanon" SOUTH FACE "auatlttty1sign"ty?e"a-' DETAIL OF STENCILED IE ROUTED LEITERS ALUMINUM FABRICATED STRUCTURE W/BLACKENED MILL FINISH WI SATIN GRAFFITI RESISTANT CLEAR COAT. 4' 7';';" 4'-7'h" ';'-fh" -Sf; : -: ",'," BEVELED OPEN END.. ; 1',1" 4' THICK PRECAST CONCRETE SLABS (SEE ENGINEERING DRAWINGS) _ -;:::-==:-;-====--.! WELEVATION.:. EAST FACE ej $IDE ElEVATION, SOUlli FACE QUANTITY: 1 SIGN TYPE AI SEE ENGNEERED DRAN1NGS FOR STRUCTURE AND CONS1 Rue'nON DETAJL.S FCO TiNG BY OTHERS ovan1li'y:fsig.'l''rype'ai W w a: a: «w <..J "'I: -.J Q f- «I- < Z UJ Q S -.J r- Qll.. UJ- -.J<!l - "'1:< <=:i U:U: «:: -' U > f- Z :::J u en :::< ««MONUMENT A MONUMENT SIGNS DRAWN BV VESCO SCALE: NTS Issue Date Revision Date NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

68 Sheet Tille I.AONUMENT DETAILS (2) 1i4" THICK EXTERIOR GRADE CLEAR ACRYLIC PANELS DIGITALLY PRINT ED 2ND SURFACE DIRECTLY TO CLEAR ACRYLIC TO MATCH PMS 1225C AND 3 FORM CHROMA. (1) 5.'16' THICK EVO-LiTE ILLUMINATED PANEL LED ILLUMINATION SANDWICHED BETWEEN ACRYLlC_ \ECURE ACRYLIC Wi 3115" CLEAR ACRYLIC FR.6,ME1ENCLOSURE. f-3' r-t Sheet Number 23 OF 23 Brookfield Residential... _ _._-.- - R.EN D,- JJE lBomaclLSlreet, CoIc:ndcMl:2f)ol PJ38!12.116f. FJ3e _.a;m, m ELEVATION - SIDE QUANTITY: (5 TOTAL) SIGNS - SIGN TYPE C1 LED LIGHT PANEL SANDWICHED BETWEEN CLEAR ACRYLIC PANELS AND ENCLOSED lvi 3116" CLEAR - ACRYLIC FRAME,...,,,,os,J:,-BLOCK / EllClOSEDSIG '.. r CAllINET (,- PERFORATED... I AlUMINUM PANa PROVIDE StOPE AS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE! DRAINAGE. o W PLAN VIEW m._e_v?n..:!?.._ OUANTITY: (5 TOTAL) SIGNS - SIGN TYPE C1 / / CLEAR ACRYLIC PANELS LED LIGHT PANEL SANDWICHED BETWEEN CLEAR ACRYLIC PANELS AGGREGATE POLISHED CONCRETE WALL (BY OTHERS) ALUMINUM FABRICATED STRUCTURE Wi BLACKENED MU FINISH BACKSiDE TO ILLUMiNATE THRU TYPEel SEE ENGINE::RiNG RA '! I NGS FOR STHUC=UHE =OO"7jt.GAND CC-\S=RLCTION [>ftails l' -'112'.-----, w c::: () c::: «<:: w ---1 () it I- a «f- <:: «::: Z UJ a..j a u S...J I- Z ::J... UJeLL a u...j(!) en <:: :2 - <:::J ««U:U: Issue Date 2/27/214 MONUMENTB MONUMENT SIGNS DRAWN BY YESCO SCALE: NTS Revision Date 4 / 14/214 OS / 29 / 214 OB / 19 / / 3 / /2/ 214 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

69 Subdivision Improvements Agreement Midtown LLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing 5 Case No PRC SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the County of Adams, State of Colorado, hereinafter called "County," and Midtown LLC, hereinafter called "Developer." WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer is the owner of real property in the County of Adams, State of Colorado, as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and by this reference made a part hereof. WHEREAS, it is provided by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners ("BoCC"), County of Adams, that where designated the Developer shall have entered into a written agreement with the County to install public and/or private improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties hereto promise, covenant, and agree as follows: 1. Acceptance of Risk. Acceptance of this agreement by the County is to allow for construction of the improvements described and detailed in Exhibit "B" only. Developer acknowledges that execution of this agreement does not include, imply or guarantee entitlement of the subject parcel, approval of a final plat and/or creation of lots or a subdivision, the issuance of building permits or the final acceptance ofthe improvements constructed under this agreement. In the event that the final plat is not approved, and/or the improvements or any portion of the improvements described in Exhibit "B" are not accepted, the Developer agrees to rehabilitate the site, or areas of the site that are not approved or accepted, including but not limited to removing, at its own expense, the improvements or any portion of the improvements not approved. 2. Engineering Services. Developer shall furnish, at its own expense, all engineering and other services in connection with the design and construction of the improvements described and detailed on Exhibit "B" attached hereto, and by this reference made a part hereof. All construction plans and engineering reports prepared by the Developer in connection with the design and construction of the improvements described and detailed on Exhibit "B" shall be approved by the County. 3. Dl'nwings lind Estim ates. The Developer shall ful'ilish drawing <md co t estimates for all improvements described and detailed on Exhibit "B" for approval b the County. arne shall be subject to 1l1dilication based on the approved final pial. Any such modifications shall be the sole responsibility of the Developer. Upon requcslthc Developer shall furnish one set of "as built" drawings and a final statement of construction costs to the County. 4. Construction. Developer shall furnish and construct, at its own risk, and at its own expense and in accordance with drawings and materials approved by the County, the improvements described and detailed on Exhibit "B". 5. Time for Completion. Improvements shall be completed according to the terms of this agreement within "construction completion date" appearing in Exhibit "8". In no event shall any Filing Five building permit be issued prior to the completion of all required improvements described and detailed on Exhibit "B". A temporary pond is proposed as a part of the Mass Grading Plans, which has been bonded for as a part of the Erosion Control Permit and is a required improvement in order to receive Preliminary Acceptance for Filing Five. The temporary pond will be removed and replaced with the permanent pond improvements proposed as a part of future Filing Seven. Permanent improvements to the temporary pond will be required if the Filing Seven permanent pond is not completed by December 31,217. These permanent improvements to the pond have been bonded for as a part of the Erosion Control Permit. The County may for good cause grant extension of time for completion of any part, or all, of the improvements appearing on said Exhibit "B". Any extension of time shall be in written form only. The Developer shall be in default of this agreement if the improvements are not completed within the "construction completion date." 6. Guarantee of Compliance. Developer shall furnish to the County a cash escrow deposit or other acceptable collateral, releasable only by the County, to guarantee compliance with this agreement. Said collateral shall be in the total amount of One Million Five Hundred Forty six Thousand, Five Hundred Eleven Dollars and Sixty Three Cents. ($1,546,511.63), which includes twenty percent (2%) for administration and five percent (5%) per year for the term Page 1 of 12

70 Subdivision Improvements Agreement MidtownLLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing 5 Case No. PRC of the Agreement to guarantee construction and installation of the improvements described herein, in compliance with this agreement. Upon approval of the final plat, completion of said improvements constructed according to the terms of this agreement, and preliminary acceptance by the BoCC, the collateral shall be released. Completion of said improvements shall be determined solely by the County, and a reasonable part of said collateral may be retained to guarantee maintenance of public improvements for a period of one year from the date of completion. 7. Accounting. Developer shall fully account to the County for all costs incurred in the construction of any public improvements in which the County is participating, and the books and records of Developer relating to such public improvements shall be open to the County at all reasonable times for the purpose of auditing or verifying such costs. 8. Acceptance and Maintenance of Public Improvements. All improvements designated "public" on Exhibit "B" and graphically shown on Exhibit "D" shall be public facilities and become the property of the County or other public agencies after approval ofthe final plat and upon final acceptance of the improvements. During the period of one year from and after the acceptance of public improvements, the Developer shall, at its own expense, make all needed repairs or replacement due to defective materials or workmanship that, in the opinion of the County, shall become necessary. If, within ten days of written notice to the Developer from the County requesting such repairs or replacements, the Developer has not undertaken with. due diligence to make the same, the County may make such repairs or replacements at the Developer's expense. In the case of an emergency such written notice may be waived. 9. Successors and Assigns. This agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, personal representatives, successors, and assigns of the Developer, and shall be deemed a covenant running with the real property as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 1. Improvements and Dedication. The undersigned Developer hereby agrees to provide the following improvements, and to dedicate described property. A. Improvements. Designate separately each public and private improvement. Public Improvements: Public Improvements in Filing Five shall include all roadway improvements (curb & gutter, sidewalk, pavement, storm sewer, street lights, signage and grading) for 66 th Avenue, 66 th Place, 67 th Avenue, Osage Street and Mariposa Court in accordance with the approved Construction Plans prepared by the Developer. See Exhibit "B" for description, estimated quantities and estimated construction costs. The improvements shall be constructed in accordance with all County requirements and specifications in accordance with the approved plans and preliminarily accepted prior to the construction completion date indicated in Exhibit "B". B. Public dedication of land for right-or-way purposes or other public purpose. Upon approval of the final plat for the development known as MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK FILING 5 by the Board of County Commissioners, the Developer hereby agrees to convey by warranty deed to the County of Adams the following described land for right-of-way or other public purposes: 66 th Avenue, 66 th Place, 67 th Avenue, Osage Street and Mariposa Court Page 2 of 12

71 Subdivision Improvements Agreement MidtownLLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing 5 Case No. PRC MidtownLLC By: Ashley Snedden, Chief Financial Officer The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of -' 214 by, My commission expires: _ Address: Notary Public APPROVED BY resolution at the meeting of., 214. AITEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADAMS COUNTY, COLORADO Clerk of the Board Chairman Page 3 of 12

72 Subdivision Improvements Agreement Midtown LLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing 5 Case No. PRC EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL Of LAND BEING ALL Of LOT 1, BLOCK 11 AND ALL OF TRACT S, MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK FILING NO. 1 PLAT CORRECTION AS RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO Of THE RECORDS Of THE ADAMS COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFfiCE TOGETHER WITH A PORTION Of THE WEST HALF Of THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER Of SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY Of ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS follows: COMMENCING AT THE CENTER-SOUTH SIXTEENTH CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4, AS MONUMENTED BY A 3-1/4" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED "PLS 23519", IN A MONUMENT BOX WHENCE THE CENTER QUARTER CORNER Of SAID SECTION 4 MONUMENTED BY A 3-1/4" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED "PLS 28664", IN A MONUMENT BOX, BEARS NORTH ' '15" EAST, A DISTANCE Of 1324_85 feet forming THE BASIS Of BEARINGS USED IN THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE Of THE NORTHWEST QUARTER Of THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER Of SAID SECTION 4, SOUTH 89'57'38" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 5. FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-Of-WAY LINE OF PECOS STREET AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 357 AT PAGE 33, IN SAID RECORDS AND THE POINT Of BEGINNING; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE, ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-Of-WAY LINE AND THE EASTERLY RIGHT-Of-WAY LINE AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 357 AT PAGE 313 AND BOOK 3658 AT PAGE 687, IN SAID RECORDS, NORTH ''15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-Of-WAY LINE, SOUTH 45'7'55" EAST, A DISTANCE Of 25.2 feet; THENCE SOUTH 89' 43'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF FEET; THENCE NORTH 84'33'32" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 9.34 feet; THENCE SOUTH 89'43'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 29.7 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 44'43'26" EAST, A DISTANCE Of feet; THENCE SOUTH 89'43'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 37. feet; THENCE SOUTH '16'34" WEST, A DISTANCE OF FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'43'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 195, feet; THENCE SOUTH '16'34" WEST, A DISTANCE Of feet TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY Of THAT PARCEL Of LAND AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 22 AT PAGE 586, IN SAID RECORDS; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY, NORTH 89' 57'36" WEST, A DISTANCE Of feet TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 1, BLOCK 11; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY Of SAID LOT 1, BLOCK 11 AND THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY Of SAID TRACT S, SOUTH ''15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER Of SAID TRACT S; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE Of SAID TRACT S, NORTH 69'57'38" WEST, A DISTANCE Of FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER Of SAID TRACT S AND A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF WAY LINE Of PECOS STREET AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 3513 AT PAGE 49, IN SAID RECORDS; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-Of-WAY, NORTH ' '15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF feet TO THE POINT Of BEGINNING; CONTAINING AN AREA Of ACRES, (756,17 SQUARE FEET). MORE OR LESS. Page 4 ofl2

73 Subdivision Improvements Agreement Midtown LLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing 5 Case No. PRC EXHIBIT B Midtown Filing Five, Public Improvements DESCRIPTION GRADING ICut to Fill (Estimated 15, Import) Isuippings (Topsoil) QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE SUBTOTAL 11,5 CY $ 2.1 $ 24, CY '$ 2.3 $ I GRADfNGSUBTOTAL S 68,816. W. 67TH AVE flung F1VE DESCRIPTION STORM DRAINAGE 18" RCP ( 8' depth) 24" RCP ( 8' depth) 36" RCP (-8' depth) 4' Dia Manhole 51 Dia Manhole 6' Dia Manhole 5' Type 'R' Inlet 1' Type 'R'lnlet QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE ; SUBTOTAL 43 LF $ 47.6 $ LF $ $ LF $ 14. $ 1,8, I EA $ 1,68, $ 1,68, 2 EA $ 2,778,29 $ 5, EA $ 3,. $ 9,. 2 EA $ 3,66.29 $ 7,32.58 I EA $ 5,38.52 $ 5,38.52 I STORM DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL $ 63,27.48 STREETS - LOCAL CONCRITE DESCRIPTION 6" Vertical Curb and Gutter (2' Pan) Subgrade Prep - Concrete Walks 5' Concrete Walk (Street, Entrance, Crosswalk) Mid-Block Handicap Ramp Curb Return wi Handicap Ramp (15' Radius) Alley Curb Cut I Approach 8 1 Concrete Cross pan PAVING Subgrade Prep' Street Asphalt (FuU depth 6" section) Adjust Manhole to Grade Adjust Valves to Gade Sweep Streets S IGN,\ OE St"'tl Sigrl$ and Bamcades DR Y UTILITIES treet Ught (Local) QUANTITY UNIT UNIT I)RlCE UllTOTAL 2,358 LF $ 16. $ 37,728 1,255 SY $.72 $ ,255 SY $ $ EA $ 48. $ 1,92. 8 EA $ 8. $ 6,4. 3 EA $ 1,2. $ 3,6, I EA $ 2,4. $ 2, SY $ 8. $ 4, TONS $ 68. $ 81, EA $ 455. $ 4,55. 9 EA $ 2. $ I,SOO.OO 3,578 SY $.16 $ EA $ 688. $ 1,32. I STREET SUBTOTAL $ 235,946,3 <) EJ\ S 6.> , STREET S UBTOT AL S 57,6. I WEST 67TH A VENUE TOTAL S 356, Page 5 of 12

74 Subdivision Improvements Agreement Midtown LLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing 5 Case No. PRC W.66TIfPL FlLINGFIVE DESCRIPTION rr EE rs LOCAL CONCRITE 6" Vertical Curb and Guller (2' Pan) Subgrnde Prep' Concrete Walks 5' Concrete Walk (Street, mtrance, Crosswalk) Curb Return wi Handicap Ramp (15' Radius) Alley Cum Cut I Approach 8' Concrete CrosspUJl PAVING SlIbgrnde Prep Street Asphalt (FuJI depth 6" section) Adjust Manhole to Grade Adjust Valves to Grade Sweep Streets SIGNAGE Street Signs and Barricades DRY l'lliti ES Street Lil!ht (Local) QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE SUBTOTAL 1, LF SY SY $ $ $ $ $ $ 18, , EA $ 8. ' $ 3, , ,268 2 EA EA SY TONS EA EA SY EA $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ , $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ '15, , I STREET SUBTOTAL S $ 6,4. $ STREET SUBTOTAL S 12,8. I WEST 66TH PLACE TOTAL S 171,3H.54 I Page 6 of 12

75 Subdivision Improvements Agreement Midtown LLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing 5 Case No, PRC W,66THAVE. FILING FIVE DESCRIPTION STORM DRAINAGE 18" RCP (-11' depth) 24" RCP (-8' depth) 36' RCP ( 8' depth) 42" RCP ( 8' depth) 6' Dia Manhole BoxBa,e Manhole 5' Type 'R' Inlet 1' Type 'R' Inlet Type 'C' Inlet QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRlCE SUBTOTAL LF LF LF LF $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 4, ,8. 22, EA $ 3.. S 12, EA EA EA EA $ $ $ $ , $ $ $ $ 6, ,66, I STORM DRA INAGE SUBTOTAL S 72, DESCRlPTION STREITS - LOCAL irqncrel'e RelIDval of existing curb cut on Pecos Street Replace 6" Vertical Curb on Peco, Street 6" Vertical Curb and Gutter (2' Pan) Subgrnde Prep - Concrete Walks 5' Concrete Walk (Street) Alley Curb Cut I Approach PAVING Suugrudc Prep Street Asphalt (F"II deptll - 6" section) Adju<l Manhole to Grade Adjust Valves to Grade Sweep Streets SIGNAGE Street Signs, and Bamcades Oft" UfILTfIES Street Light (Local) QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRlCE SUBTOTAL 2 SF $ 6. $ 1,2. 3 LF, $ 16. $ 48. 1,921 LF $ 16. $ 3, SY,$.72 $ SY $ $ 33, EA $ 1.2. $ 2,4. 4,164 SY S 8. S TONS S 68. $ 81, EA S 455. S 6,37, 6 EA $ 2. $ ,575 SY $. 16 $ 572. I EA $ 688. $ 688. I STREET SUBTOTAL $ 19, EA $ 6,4. 19,2. STREET SUBTOTAL I WEST66THAVENUETOTAL S 181, I Page 7 of 12

76 Subdivision Improvements Agreement Midtown LLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing 5 Case No. PRC OSAGE STREET FILING FlVE DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE SUBTOTAL STORM D IAINAGE 124" RCP (-8' depth) k Dia Manhole 46 LF $ $ 33,414.4 I EA $ 2, ; $ 2, STORM DRAINAGESUBTOTAL. $ 36, DESCRIPTION STR f.i."s - LOCAL CONCRETE 6" Vertical Curb and Gutter (2' Pan) S"bgmdc l>rep - Concrete Walks 5' Concrete Walk (Street) Curb Return wi Handicap Ramp (15' Radius) Alley Curb Cut I Approach 8 1 Concrete Crosspan PAViNG Subgrade Prep Street Asphalt (Full depth 6" section) Adjllst Manhole to Grade Adjllst Valves to Grade :SWC"P Streets SIGNAGE Street Signs and Barricades DRY ljfllltl Street Light (Local) QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE SUBTOTAL 667 LF $ 16. $ SY S.72 S 294,48 49 SY $ $ 14, EA $ 8. $. 2 EA $ 1.2. $ 2,4. I EA $ 2,4. $ 2,4. 3,533 SY $ 8. $ 28, TONS $ 68. $ 32, EA $ 455. $ EA $ 2. $ 8 1,413 SY $. 16 $ EA $ 688. $ 2, STREET S UBTOT AL $ 95,19.99 EA $ 6, STREET SUBTOTAL $ 12,8. I OSAGE STREET TOTAL $ I Page 8 of 12

77 Subdivision Improvements Agreement Midtown LLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing 5 Case No. PRC MARIPOSA cr. FILING FlVE STORM DRAINAGE 124" RCP ( 8' depth) Is' Dia Manhole DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE S UBTOT AL I 46 LF $ 33,419. I EA $ $ 2, I STORM DRAINAGE SUBTOTAL $ DESCRIPTION STREETS - LOCAL CONCRETE 6" Vertical Curb and Gutter (2' Pan) Subgrade Prep - Concrete Walks S' Concrete Walk (Slreel) AU.)' Curb Cut I Appruuch 8' Concrete Cross POll PAVING Subgrade Prep - Street ASl'halt (Fu ll depth - 6" section) Adjust Manhole to Grade Adjust Valves to Q-ade Sweep Streets SIGNAGE Street Signs and Barricades QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE SUBTOTAL 667 LF $ 16. : $ 1, SY $.72 $ SY $ $ EA $ 1,2. $ 2,4. I EA $ 2.4. $ 2,4, 3,533 SY $ 8. $ 28, TONS $ 68, $ 32, EA $ 455. $ EA $ 2. $ 8. 1,413 SY $.16 $ 226,8 5 EA $ 688. $ I STREET SUBTOTAL $ 95, EA $ 6,4. $ 12,8. STREET SUBTOTAL $ I MARIPOSA COURT TOTAL $ 144, I The below cost to be bonded with Filing Five SIA: FlUNG FIVE SUB-TOTAL ADDITIONAL 2% ADMfNISTRA TION 5% fnfla TION PER YEAR 5% INFLA TION PER YEAR TWO I FILING 5 TOTAL $ 1, $ 233,788,61 $ 7, ,64341 $ J,546, Page 9 of 12

78 Subdivision Improvements Agreement Midtown LLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing 5 Case No. PRC The below costs were previously bonded for with Erosion Sediment Control Permit number CSI214-4 Temporary Sediment Pond Outfall 1 8" PVC Riser Pipe Lf $ $ ;24" RCP Storm Sewer LF $ $12, :24" Flared End Section EA $1, $ ' Diameter Manhole EA $3,. 2 $6,. 5 Outlet Structure/Mlcropool EA $16,453.24' 1 $16, Forbay EA $17, $17, Rlprap (Spillway) CY $ $5, Rlprap (Outlet) CY $ $ Concrete Trail Remollal SY $ $ Concrete Trail Replacement SY $53.32; 23 $1, Subtotal - Temporary Sedl.rnent Pond Otfall ' $63,46.4 Contingency (1% of Subtotal- Temporary Sediment Pond Outfall) $6,346.4 Total - Temporary Sediment Pond Outfall $69,86.44 Filing Five - Construction Completion Date: December 31,216 Initials or signature of' Developer:, Page 1 of 12

79 Subdivision Improvements Agreement Midtown LLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing 5 Case No. PRC EXHIBIT C MIDTOWN FILING 5 EXHIBITC IIHF.Fr 1 OF 1 Page II of 12

80 Subdivision Improvements Agreement Midtown LLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing 5 Case No. PRC EXHIBIT D Public vs. Private - I., i=d---- C-ln 1 =---.- \ " e!i s 1:! I--- I I, I I I :/' ' I' I!I. II f-- ': f= == r.lll----i I\. I,.. 'II : : 1/ f-- Iii ;" G 1:' G ---g=,...( II g1. I ' ' I, I ;;;. I m. I I..!',' r-:-i. I, l :: :=...-:::;-..=:--::= I _ I -...A-: T =314 MIDTOWN FILING 5 - EXHIBIT D.!!!!l!L R.EDlANO.,.. :::.. ::::":::,.:;;" PRIVATE I PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS 8H!ET -,.. " ".,._,...- SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT 1 OF 1 ADAMS COUNTY CO Page 12 of 12

81 -'L ADAMS COUNTY.,tiS-, ' ",.; MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK Subdivision Improvements Agreement Addendum MidtownLLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.5 Case No. which is part of Case No. ADDENDUM TO SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT WITH MIDTOWN LLC, CA E NO., WHICH IS PART OF CASE NO.., MlOTOWN AT CLEAR C REEK FILING NO.5 THIS ADDENDUM ("Addendum") is made and entered into by and between the County of Adams, State of Colorado, hereinafter called "County," and Midtown LLC, 188 Inverness Drive West, Suite 15, Englewood, Colorado 8112, hereinafter called "Developer," and collectively referred to hereinafter as the "parties." This amended agreement ("Agreement") supplements and amends the previous subdivision improvement agreement ofthe parties made and entered into on or about,214. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer is the owner of real property in the County of Adams, State of Colorado, as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto, and by this reference made a part hereof. WHEREAS, This Addendum to the Subdivision Improvements Agreement is an addendum to the existing "Midtown Subdivision Improvements Agreement with Midtown LLC for Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.5, Case No. that was approved by the BoCC on the --:-:--=--" 214 and recorded at Reception No. ("Original Agreement") and by this reference made a part hereof. WHEREAS, All provisions and conditions agreed to within the Original Agreement shall continue in full force and affect, subsequent to the execution of this Addendum, unless expressly amended hereby. WHEREAS, The Developer desires to phase development of the Property in a single phase (Filing 4) in order to facilitate the overall development of the Property. WHEREAS, It is provided by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners ("BoCC"), County of Adams, that where designated the Developer shall have entered into a written agreement with the County to install public and/or private improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties hereto promise, covenant, and agree as follows: 1. Engineering Services. Developer shall furnish, at its own expense, all engineering and other services in connection with the design and construction of the improvements described and detailed and agreed to within the Original Agreement. 2. Design Services. Developer shall furnish, at its own expense, all engineering, design, and other services in connection with the design and construction of the public improvements and landscaping as described and detailed on Exhibit "E" attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. 3. DI'1lwi.ngs Rnd Estimates. The Developer shall furnish drawings and cost estimates for all improvements described and detailed on Exhibit "E" for approval by the County. Same shall be sl1ject to modification based on the approved final pial. AllY such modifications shall be the sole rcspon ibility of the Developer. Upon request, the Developer shall furnish a final statement of installation cost to the County. 4. Construction. Developer shall furnish and construct, at its own expense and in accordance with drawings and materials approved by the County, the landscaping described and detailed on Exhibit "E". 5. Time for Completion. Landscaping or county approved best management practice ("BMPs") shall be installed according to the terms of this Addendum and those terms agreed upon in the Final Development Plan. Landscaping or approved BMPs shall be adjacent to Page I of 12

82 MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK Subdivision Improvements Agreement Addendum Midtown LLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing NO.5 Case No.. which is part of Case No, each residential lot prior 1' issuance of a Ccrtificatc of Occupancy ('ClO ) for that lol. Land caping in open space tracts must be completed within the "constructi.on completion dale' appearing in Exhibit 'r:; ' 12{1/217. A C/O may be request d by Developer or Developer's designee and issued by the ounty in its sole discretion upon a showing of good cau e why final landscaping cannot be illstalled but in no event shall a C/O be issued prior to the installation of temporary BMPs in the interim of linallandscaping. The COunty may for good cause grant an exlension of time for completion of any part or all of improvements appearing 11 said Exhibit "E', Anyextcn ion ortime shall be in written torm only. 6. Guarantee of Compliance. The Developer shall submit bonds as collateral for the items listed in Exhibit "E". Said collateral is releasable only by the County, to guarantee compliance with this agreement, which includes twenty percent (2%) to cover administration and five percent (5%) per year for the term of the Addendum to cover inflation. Said collateral shall be in the amount of $217,19.18 for the common area land caping tract, tree lawns, and eighborhood Park located in the following area': West 67 tl ' Avenue Osage trcet, Mariposa Court, West 66,11 Place, W. 66'h Avenue, Tract A Tract E. Tract P and Tract O. Upon completion of aid landscaping constructed according to the terms of' this Addendum the collateral shall be released upon approval of the Planning Director and a resolution by the BoCC. Completion of said land caping shall be determined solely by the County and a reasonable part of said collateral may be retained to guarantce mllintenance of public improvcments for a period or one year rro111 the date of completion. Final landscape in tallation, including final land cape layout and plant. count shall be generally consistent with the FOP. C/O may be granted (or lot located adjacent to land 'caping areas in accordance with the following re trictions: i\. Single Family lots: / will be granted to single family detached lot on a lot to lot basis. Landscaping in tallation or submis ion and aj proval by the ounty of an interim landscaping plan. ' BMP "ror ingle family lots must occllr prior to being granted C/O. Completion of said landscaping shall bc dctermined solely by the ounty. A Performance Landscaping Bond Agreement shlll1 be entered into between Adams County and the Home Builder/Applicant if an interim land 'eaping plan will b utilized. A sam pic Performance Bond Agrecment for landscaping i included as Exhibit "F'. 7. Acceptance and Maintenance of Public Improvements. All improvements designated "public" on Exhibit "B" shall be public facilities and become the property of the County or other public agencies upon acceptance. Upon preliminary acceptance of improvements within a phase as described in Exhibit "B", the County may issue a Certificate of Occupancy for parcels within the accepted phase. Developer or Developer's designee(s) may submit applications for building permits (subject to compliance, in each case, with all other requirements therefore including but not limited to fire district approval and paved surfaces adjacent to the lot) prior to preliminary acceptance of the improvements required by this Agreement. In no event shall C/O be issued until the public improvements for such phase as described in Exhibit "B" have achieved preliminary acceptance by the County. No building permits may be issued prior to Preliminary Acceptance and final approval of that filing. 8. Ownership and Maintenance of Landscaping and Public Improvements. The Clear Creek Station Metropolitan District No. I ("CCSMD") is responsible for the enforcement of landscaping maintenance requirements. Through CCSMD, a DRC (Design Review Committee) will review private open space design for compatibility. Private lot owners shall be responsible for the maintenance of their property as well as adjacent tree lawn area(s), unless otherwise noted on Exhibit "E". The CCSMD covenants shall include enforcement provisions to ensure that all common areas will be adequately maintained. CCSMD shall provide a guarantee for the long-term maintenance and care of open space and other large tracts in Filing 4. CCSMD shall be responsible for providing adequate funding to ensure maintenance and annual monitoring of the property for the life of the project. The CCSMD covenants shall include enforcement provisions to ensure that all common areas will be adequately maintained. In the event that common areas are not sufficiently maintained by private property owners, CCSMD shall utilize mechanisms enforceable by the covenants until such time the only remaining option is for CCSMD to take over maintenance Page 2 of 12

83 MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK Subdivision Improvements Agreement Addendum Midtown LLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No. 5 Case No. which is part of Case No. responsibilities, at which point CCSMD shall take over maintenance responsibilities of these common areas. Maintenance of the District tree lawns and open spaces depicted in the maintenance diagrams included in Exhibit HE", shall be by the CCSMD. All local streets within the limits of the street right-of-way shall be dedicated to Adams County. The adjacent property owner is responsible for maintenance of concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk, and tree lawn within the street right-of-way. The Metropolitan District shall be responsible for any decorative paving or pavers within typical asphalt paving section of street. The County and its Successors and Assigns will be responsible for maintaining all local streets. Homeowners of land abutting a constructed public right-of-way are responsible for snow removal for pedestrian access. Developer shall pay $217,19.18 to fulfill the landscaping bond requirement for Filing No.5. If the Developer has not fulfilled the agreed to landscaping requirements prior to the construction completion date in Exhibit HE", the County may proceed with actions to use the bond to install landscaping improvements within Filing No.5. After the completion of the second year of the life of the bond, the County may cash the bond if the Developer has not fulfilled the landscaping bond by installing landscaping improvements within Filing No Public Land Dedication ("PLD") Fees. The estimated PLD fee for the entire Midtown development is $1,98,351.. The exact PLD obligations will be calculated when a final plat application for each phase is submitted. The PLD fee for Filing No.5 is $188, The Developer shall submit bonds for these fees as collateral. This is based on the current understanding that the Developer will ultimately dedicate land to a district or other entity as approved by Adams County and pay for park construction costs. Additionally, the bond for the schools portion of the PLD fee is submitted based on the Developer's stated intent to dedicate five (5) acres of land within the development to Mapleton School District. Negotiations between Developer and Mapleton School District are ongoing but not yet finalized as of the time of Filing No.5. The bonds will have an expiration date as specified below. If the PLD obligations have not been fulfilled as specified below, the County will cash the bonds and no future credits or refunds of these fees will be available. School and Parks Update (a) School. Per the approved Second Amendment to the PDP, Developer is willing to dedicate five (5) acres to Adams County to be dedicated to Mapleton School District (the "School District") within a future filing. The Developer is in ongoing negotiations with the School District in connection with a proposal to meet the School District's needs for a K-8 Performance and Arts School located in the Midtown subdivision. Accordingly, the Developer has proposed the dedication of a parcel of property in Filing 6 of the Midtown subdivision to the School District in exchange for which the aforementioned five (5) acre school site in parcel I would be released back to Developer for residential use. In either event, the outcome will result in an offset against the cash in-lieu owed to the School District. Developer shall provide a surety bond to the County in the amount of $71, in order to satisfy the Schools portion of the PLD requirements for Filing No.4. This bond shall expire on December 9, 217 (12/9/217). After December 9, 216 (12/9/216), the County may cash the bond if the Developer has not fulfilled the PLD requirements by dedicating the minimum five (5) acre site within Filing 6. (b) Parks. Arcadis and Brownfield Partners have been engaged for environmental cleanup efforts on the former facility parcel, which are ongoing. Upon the completion of the cleanup, Developer proposes to construct a 43-acre park as depicted in the Second Amendment to the PDP. The park will be fully designed and developed by the CCSMD in coordination with adjacent districts or other entities as approved by Adams County. Upon completion of the park development the 43-acres will be turned over to a district or other entity selected by CCSMD and approved by Adams County for operations and maintenance. If the selected Page 3 of 12

84 MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK Subdivision Improvements Agreement Addendum Midtown LLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No 5 Case No. which is part of Case No. district or other entity approved by Adams County chooses not to engage in an agreement with the CCSMD to take over maintenance and operations, then CCSMD will maintain the park. In light of Developer's proposal to dedicate a 2-acre neighborhood park within the Property, and a 43-acre park to a CCSMD selected district, Developer shall provide surety bonds in favor of the County until the parks are constructed. Such bonds and the ultimate construction of the parks would offset any Neighborhood Park PLD cash-in-lieu fees for earlier phases. If any Neighborhood Park PLD fees for each phase are not covered by the park acreage to be dedicated, then cash-in-lieu for the difference shall be paid to the County at the time of submittal of a final plat application for that phase. Developer shall provide a surety bond to the County in the amount of $7, in order to satisfy the Neighborhood Parks Public Land Dedication requirement for Filing No.5. This bond shall expire on December 9, 218 (12/9/218). After December 9, 217 (12/9/217), the County may proceed with actions to cash the bond if the Developer has not yet fulfilled the Neighborhood Parks PLD requirements for Filing No. 5 by dedicating neighborhood parks land in future filings. If cashed, the money from this bond shall be held in an account by the County subject to the requirements of Section 5-5 of the Adams County Development Standards and Regulations. The planned 43-acre park shall be credited toward the Developer's Neighborhood Park PLD requirements. The County has not yet determined whether any credit will be given toward Regional Park PLD requirements. As such, the Developer shall pay $46,36.22 cash-in-lieu to fulfill the Regional Park PLD requirement for Filing No Plat Corrections and pun Amendment. The Developer acknowledges that all setbacks shall be consistent with those depicted within the development standards of the approved and amended Preliminary Development Plan. Developer agrees to meet Building Safety and fire district requirements. II. Successors and Assigns. This Addendum shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, personal representatives, successors and assigns or the Developer, and shall be deemed a covenant running with the real property as described in Exhibit "A" of the Original Agreement. 12. Metropolitan Districts. Notwithstanding any provision hereof to the contrary and in furtherance of Section 11, Developer shall have the right to assign certain of its obligations and responsibilities hereunder to CCSMD or another special or metropolitan district created for the purpose of constructing, operating and/or maintaining public and private improvements. The County acknowledges that in 27 the County approved a consolidated Service Plan for CCSMD together with the Clear Creek Station Metropolitan District Nos. 2 and 3 (collectively, the "Districts"), and that it is specifically contemplated that one or more of the Districts may undertake and complete financing, development and construction of any or all of the Improvements defined under Section 15 or as described elsewhere in this Agreement, subject to a ma;dmum mill levy of fifty (5) mills in connection therewith, as adjusted per Section VII(C) of the Service Plan. Notice of any such assignment shall be given to the County at least 3 days prior to such assignment in accordance with Section 14 hereof. Any such assignment shall not be made without the express written consent of the County. Such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Said notice shall contain the effective date of such assignment. 13. Special Provisions. This Agreement shall constitute the entire Agreement between the parties. No subsequent amendment hereto shall be valid unless made in writing and executed by the parties hereto provided. 14. Notice. Any notice that may be given under the terms of this Agreement shall be made in writing, and shall be deemed made upon personal service or upon mailing by United States Mail, postage prepaid, to the other party, and unless amended by written notice, to the Following: Page 4 of 12

85 MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK Subdivision Improvements Agreement Addendum MidtownLLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing NO.5 Case No.. which is part of Case No. DEVELOPER MidtownLLC 188 Inverness Drive West, Suite 15 Englewood, Colorado 8112 Attn: Richard Dengler (33) \ ADAMS COUNTY Planning and Development 443 S. Adams County Parkway Brighton, CO Attn: Abel Montoya (72) Transportation Department 443 S. Adams County Parkway Brighton, CO Attn: Matthew Emmens (72) Improvements. Reference Original Agreement dated. Public Improvements are listed in Exhibit "B". Location ofimprovements are shown in Exhibit "D". 16. Landscaping and Dedication. The undersigned Developer hereby agrees to provide the following landscaping. Landscaping. Designate separately each public and private improvement. Filing No.5 - Developer Cost: Landscaping as ociated with common area landscaping tracts, tree lawns, and Neighborhood Park open spaces located in the following areas; West 67 th Avenue, Osage Street, Mariposa Court, West 66 th Place, W. 66 th Avenue, Tract A, Tract E, Tract F and Tract G. See Exhibit "E" for description, estimated quantities and estimated construction costs. The landscaping shall be constructed in accordance with all County requirements and specifications in accordance with the approved plans, this Addendum and time schedule as indicated in Exhibit "E'. Page 5 of 12

86 MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK Subdivision Improvements Agreement Addendum Midtown LLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.5 Case No., which is part of Case No. Midtown LLC. By: Ashley Snedden, Chief Financial Officer Clear Creek Station Metropolitan District ("CCSMD") By: Chris Bremner, Senior Development Manager The fore.going instrument was acknowledged before me this day of -' 2 14, by. My commission expires: _ Address: Notary Public APPROVED BY resolution at the meeting of -', 214. Collateral to guarantee compliance with this Addendum and construction of public and private landscaping shall be required in the amount of: $217,19.18 No construction permits or building permits shall be issued until said collateral is furnished in the amount required and in a form acceptable to the Board of County Commissioners. ATIEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADAMS COUNTY, COLORADO Clerk ofthe Board Chair Page 6 of 12

87 MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK Subdivision Improvements Agreement Addendum Midtown LLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.5 Case No. which is part of Case No. EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK- FILING NO.5 A PARCEL OF LAND BEING ALL OF LOT 1, BLOCK 11 AND ALL OF TRACT S, MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK FILING NO. 1 PLAT CORRECTION AS RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO OF THE RECORDS OF THE ADAMS COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE CENTER-SOUTH SIXTEENTH CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4, AS MONUMENTED BY A 3-1/4" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED "PLS 23519", IN A MONUMENT BOX WHENCE THE CENTER QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4 MONUMENTED BY A 3-1/4" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED "PLS 28664", IN A MONUMENT BOX, BEARS NORTH ''15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF FEET FORMING THE BASIS OF BEARINGS USED IN THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 4, SOUTH 89'57'38" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 5.N FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF PECOS STREET AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 357 AT PAGE 33, IN SAID RECORDS AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE DEPARTING SAID SOUTH LINE, ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AND THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 357 AT PAGE 313 AND BOOK 3658 AT PAGE 687, IN SAID RECORDS, NORTH ''15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, SOUTH 45'7'55" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 25.2 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'43'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF FEET; THENCE NORTH 84'33'32" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 9.34 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'43'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 29.7 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 44'43'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'43'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 37. FEET; THENCE SOUTH '16'34" WEST, A DISTANCE OF FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'43'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 195. FEET; THENCE SOUTH '16'34" WEST, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 22 AT PAGE 586, IN SAID RECORDS; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY, NORTH 89'57'38" WEST, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 1, BLOCK 11; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 1, BLOCK 11 AND THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT S, SOUTH ''15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID TRACT S; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT S, NORTH 89'57'38" WEST, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID TRACT S AND A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF WAY LINE OF PECOS STREET AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 3513 AT PAGE 49, IN SAID RECORDS; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY, NORTH ''15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING AN AREA OF ACRES, (756,17 SQUARE FEET), MORE OR LESS. Page 7 of 12

88 MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK Subdivision Improvements Agreement Addendum Midtown LLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing NO.5 Case No. which is part of Case No. EXHIBITB Please reference approved Filing Four Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Exhibit B. Public Improvements EXHIBITC Please reference approved Filing Four Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Exhibit C. Phasing Exhibit EXHlBITD Please reference approved Filing Four Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Exhibit D. Public vs. Private Improvements Page 8 of 12

89 MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK Subdivision Improvements Agreement Addendum Midtown LLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No. 5 Case No., which is part of Case No EXHIBITE Filing 5 - Landscape - W. 67 th Ave LANDSCAPE ITEM DESCRIPTION Trees by District or builder Sod Tree Lawn IMedian wi soil prep and irriqation (District & builder) QNTY. UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL. COST 5 EA $4. $ 2,. 14,385 S.F. $1.32 $ 18,988.2 $ 38,988.2 I Total $ Filing 5 - Landscape - Osage Street LANDSCAPE ITEM DESCRIPTION Trees by District or builder QNTY. UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL. COST 14 EA. $4. $ 56. Sod Tree Lawn wi soil prop and irrigation (District & builder) 3469 SF $1.32 $ 4,579.8 Filing 5 - Landscape - Mariposa Court LANDSCAPE $ 1,179.8 I Total $ 1,179.8 ITEM DESCRIPTION QNTY. UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL COST Trees by District or builder 1S EA. $4. $ 6,. Sod Tree Lawn wi solll"ep and Irrigation (Disllfa & ollllde,) 3,462 S.F $1.32 $ 4, Filing 5 - Landscape - W. 66 th Place LANDSCAPE $ I Total $ ITEM DESCRIPTION QNTY. UNITCOSTIUNIT TOTAL. COST Trees by District or builder 24 EA. $4. $ 9,6. Sod Tree Lawn wi soil prep and irrigation (District & builder) 5,575 SF $1.32 $ 7,359. Filing 5 - Landscape - W, 66 Ih Avenue LANDSCAPE $ 16,959. I Total $ ITEM DESCRIPTION QNTY.UNITCOST/UNIT TOTAL COST Trees by District or builder 36 EA $4. $ 144. Sod Tree Lawn wi soil prep and irrigation (District & builder) 8.22 SF. $1.32 $ 1,589.4 $ I Total $ Page 9 of 12

90 MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK Subdivision Improvements Agreement Addendum Midtown LLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No. 5 Case No., which is part of Case No. Filing 5 - Landscape - Tract A. LANDSCAPE ITEM DESCRIPTION Trees (canopy, evergreen and ornamental) Sad wi soil prep and irrigation PlantinQ bed wi amendment and plant material HARDSCAPE ITEM DESCRIPTION Concrete walks to homes QNTY. UNIT COST/UNIT TOTAL COST 16 EA $4, $ 6,4, 5,224 S.F. $1.32 $ 6.895, S.F. $2.56 $ 6,75.72 $ QNTY. UNIT COST/UNIT TOTAL COST 533 S.F. $2.5 $ $ 1,332.5 ltotal $ Filing 5 - Landscape - Tract E. LANDSCAPE ITEM DESCRIPTION Temporary seeding for temporary pond included in Erosion Control Permit QNTY. UNIT COST/UNIT TOTAL COST F'II I ng 5 - Landscape - T ract F. LANDSCAPE ITEM DESCRIPTION Trees (canopy, evergreen and ornamenlal) Native Seed wi soil preparation Filing 5 - Landscape - Tract G. LANDSCAPE ITEM DESCRIPTION Trees (cenopy, evergreen and ornamenlal) Sad wi soil prep and irrigation Native Seed wi soil preparation Planting bed wi amendment and plant material QNTY. UNIT COST/UNIT TOTAL COST 1 EA. $4. $ 4.. 7,994 SF. $.25 $ l Total $ QNTY. UNIT COST/UNIT TOTAL COST 43 EA $4. $ S.F. $1.32 $ 1, SF. $.25 $ 6,763. 3,879 S.F. $2.56 $ 9,93.24 I Total $ SUMMARY DEVELOPER COST - SUB-TOTAL 2% ADMINISTRATION 5% PER YEAR INFLATION 5% PER YEAR INFLATION YEAR TWO I $ 164, $ $ $ 1, TOTAL $ $217,19.18 collateral includes twenty percent (2%) to cover administration and five percent (5%) per year for the term of the Addendum to cover inflation. Construction Completion Date: December I, 217 Initials or signature of Developer: _ Page 1 of 12

91 E U 'I") _ c =-...J o...c (.J..] E -g --l z. U "" :.= o..-< 45 tl: 25. 1i gee U._ U E-. 5' ;; «.- «" 1 z:8 u Z > ::l _" boo o8 f- 3:z <- 9 2:.- '" '" 2: U Co FUTURE PHASE AREA - t=:jt=j I = =, I I I.. I " ; I \ Blpet I -,..- I - BLOCK2 I r I I,., I I W. 66TH PlACE. II 2,, - I II W. 67TH AVENUE "...,. : Ii. I 1 :;:: " I I 1 I BLOCK 2 I II " I 11 - TREE LAWN BY DISTRICT TREE LAWN BY BUILDER' HOMEOWNER OPEN SPACE TRACT AND TREE LAWN BY DISTRICT NOTE: TR LA1M'IS..wJAt:.ENT TO FRONT LOADED HOMES MAY VARY AS DR!VEW"Y LOCATIONS ARE. DETERMtNED N ' o " on '".. MIDTOWN FILING FIVE

92 MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK Subdivision Improvements Agreement Addendum Midtown LLC Midtown at Clear Creek Filing No.5 Case No., which is part of Case No. EXHIBITF MIDTOWN SINGL.E FAMILY DETACHED HOME L.ANDSCAPEPERFORMANCEBONDAGREEMENTTEMPL.ATE This Performance Bond Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into this _ day of 21_, by and between the County of Adams, State of Colorado, by and through its Department of Planning and Development, ("County") and ("Applicant"). WHEREAS, the Applicant is holder of a Certificate of Occupancy (certificate of occupancy; building permit, etc.), Applicant hereby tenders to the County a cash/surety bond as collateral deposit in the sum of $6,2. ("Collateral") per home, to be held by the Adams County Treasurer until such time as the following conditions have been satisfied: Completion of the required landscaping as specified in the corresponding Final Development Plan for property located PIN #. The bond shall Include all costs for labor and materials to Install living landscaping on the property at the aforementioned address. Multiple properties may be bonded for In one agreement. Applicant should attach exhibit including all addresses and PIN#s applicable. Total Collateral $ In order for Applicant to obtain a timely return Of the Collateral, the Conditions must be satisfied no later than _ In the event the Applicant fails to satisfy the conditions to the satisfaction of the County by the date specified herein, Property owner/applicant hereby gives the County and/or its authorized agent permission to enter onto the Property to perform Ihe work necessary to complete the conditions. Expenses for any work performed pursuant to this paragraph shah be funded by the Collateral. and property Owner/Applicant shall reimburse the county for any expenses not satisfied by the Collateral. Any Collateral not utilized by Ihe County for compleuon of the conditions pursuant to this paragraph shall be returned to the Property Owner/Applicant. By signing below, Applicant agrees to abide by the terms of this Agreement. Applicant Adams County Planning and Development Page 12 of 12

93 (l Xcel Energy 546 W. 6 th Ave. Arvada. CO. 83 April Brookfield Residential Attn: Nolan Donley 188 I nverness Drive West Suite 15 Englewood. Co 8112 Re: Will serve letter for MIdtown at Clear Creak Dear Mr. Donley, In accordance with our tariffs flied with and approved by the Colorado Public Utilities Commission, Gas and Electric facilities can be made available to serve your project at W. 68 th Ave. & Pecos St. Service will be provided after engineering is completed, payment is received; any easements are signed and construction can be completed. We will have better information available after design has been completed as to a scheduled inservice date. If I can be of further assistance, please contact me at Barbara Everard Planner NMR

94 NORTHPECO 'V.r\TER & A.NITATKON DISTRICT 69 Pecos Stl'eet Denver, Colorado 8221 (33) Fax (33) October 212 Redland c/o Mike Pietchmann 8 South Lincoln Street, Suite 26 Littleton, CO 8122 Re: Water and Sanitary Sewer Will Serve West side of Midtown at Clear Creek project Mr. Pietchmann, Please be advised that North Pecos Water & Sanitation District (NPWSD) will provide water and sanitary sewer service to the proposed area for the west side of the Midtown at Clear Creek project; providing that 1. The plans for the west side of the Midtown at Clear Creek project are submitted to and approved by the North Washington Department Fire Marshall. 2. Once the plans for the project have been approved by the Fire Marshall, the plans are submitted to NPWSD for review by the District Manager and District Engineer. At this time all applicable review fees are to be paid to NPWSD. 3. Once NPWSD has approved the plans and proper applications and licenses are completed, plans will be submitted to Denver Water for review. At this time, any applicable review fees are to be paid to Denver Water. It will be necessary for the land owner and/or developer to install water and sanitary sewer mains in accordance with the approved plans. The land owner andlor developer are responsible for all costs associated with the engineering and development of the property. In addition, the property owner and/or developer are responsible for any costs associated with any engineering studies that are conducted. All water mains, sanitary sewer mains and appurtenances shall be installed at the land owner and/or developers expense. All easements must be conveyed to the District prior to the issuance of any water and/or sanitary sewer taps can be made. If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact the District office. Sincerely, Russell Traska, District Manager North Pecos Water & Sanitation District

95 .. Land Title Guarantee Company CUSTOMER DISTRIBUTION Date: August 15, 214 Our Order Number: ABC Property Address:MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK FILING NO.5 BROOKFIELD RESIDENTIAL Attn: CAROLE DODERO 188 INVERNESS DR WEST #15 ENGLEWOOD, CO 8112 If you have any inquiries or require further assistance, please contact Commercial Title Dept Phone:

96 1. Definition of Terms Property Information Binder CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS The following terms when used in this Binder mean: (a) "Land": The land described. specifically or by reference, in this Binder and improvements affixed thereto which by law constitute real property; (b) "Public Records"; those records which impart constructive notice of matters relating to said land; (c) "Date": the effective date; (d) "the Assured": the party or parties named as the Assured in this Binder, or in a supplemental writing executed by the Company; (e) "the Company" means Old Republic National Title Insurance Company, a Minnesota stock company. 2. Exclusions from Coverage of this Binder The company assumes no liability including cost of defense by reason of the following: (a) Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; taxes and assessments not yet due or payable and special assessments not yet certified to the Treasurer's office. (b) Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. (c) Title to any property beyond the lines of the Land, or title to streets, roads, avenues, lanes, ways or waterways on which such land abuts, or the right to maintain therein vaults, tunnels, ramps, or any other structure or improvement; or any rights or easements therein unless such property, rights or easements are expressly and specifically set forth in said description. (d) Mechanic's lien(s), judgment(s) or other lien(s). (e) Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters: (a) created, suffered or agreed to by the Assured; (b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records as of the Date, but known to the Assured as of the Date; or (c) attaching or creating subsequent to the Date. 3. Prosecution of Actions (a) The Company shall have the right at its own costs to institute and prosecute any action or proceeding or do any other act which in its opinion may be necessary or desirable to establish or confirm the matters herein assured; and the Company may take any appropriate action under the terms of this Binder, whether or not it shall be liable thereunder and shall not thereby concede liability or waive any provision hereof. (b) In all cases where the Company does not institute and prosecute any action or proceeding, the Assured shall permit the Company to use, at its option, the name of the Assured for this purpose. Whenever requested by the Company, the Assured shall give the Company all reasonable aid in prosecuting such action or proceeding, and the Company shall reimburse the Assured for any expense so incurred. 4. Notice of Loss - Limitation of Action A statement in writing of any loss or damage for which it is claimed the Company is liable under this Binder shall be furnished to the Company within sixty days after such loss or damage shall have been determined, and no right of action shall accrue to the Assured under this Binder until thirty days after such statement shall have been furnished, and no recovery shall be had by the Assured under this Binder unless action shall be commenced thereon with two years after expiration of the thirty day period. Failure to furnish the statement of loss or damage or to commence the action within the time herinbefore specified, shall be conclusive bar against maintenance by the Assured of any action under this Binder. 5. Option to Pay, Settle or Compromise Claims The Company shall have the option to pay, settle or compromise for or in the name of the Assured any claim which could result in loss to the Assured within the coverage of this Binder, or to pay the full amount of this Binder. Such payment or tender of payment of the full amount of the Binder shall terminate all liability of the Company hereunder. Copyright American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this form is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. All other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association.

97 6. Limitation of Liability - Payment of loss (a) The liability of the Company under this Binder shall be limited to the amount of actual loss sustained by the Assured because of reliance upon the assurances herein set forth, but in no event shall the liability exceed the amount of the liability stated on the face page hereof. (b) The Company will pay all costs imposed upon the Assured in litigation carried on by the Company for the Assured, and all costs and attorneys' fees in litigation carried on by the Assured with the written authorization of the Company. (c) No claim for loss or damages shall arise or be maintainable under this Binder (1) if the Company after having received notice of any alleged defect, lien or encumbrance not shown as an Exception or excluded herein removes such defect, lien or encumbrance within a reasonable time after receipt of such notice, or (2) for liability voluntarily assumed by the Assured in settling any claim or suit without written consent of the Company. (d) All payments under this Binder, except for attorney's fees as provided for in paragraph 6(b) thereof, shall reduce the amount of the liability hereunder pro tanto, and no payment shall be made without producing this Binder or an acceptable copy thereof for endorsement of the payment unless the Binder be lost or destroyed, in which case proof of the loss or destruction shall be furnished to the satisfaction of the Company. (e) When liability has been definitely fixed in accordance with the conditions of this Binder, the loss or damage shall be payable within thirty days thereafter. 7. Subrogation Upon Payment or Settlement Whenever the Company shall have settled a claim under this Binder, all right of subrogation shall vest in the Company unaffected by any act of the Assured, and it shall be subrogated to and be entitled to all rights and remedies which the Assured would have had against any person or property in respect to the claim had this Binder not been issued. If the payment does not cover the loss of the Assured, the Company shall be subrogated to the rights and remedies in the proportion which the payment bears to the amount of said loss. The Assured, if requested by the Company, shall transfer to the Company all rights and remedies against any person or property necessary in order to perfect the right of subrogation, and shall permit the Company to use the name of the Assured in any transaction or litigation involving the rights or remedies. 8. Binder Entire Contract Any action or actions or rights of action that the Assured may have or may bring against the Company arising out of the subject matter hereof must be based on the provisions of this Binder. No provision or condition of this Binder can be waived or changed except by a writing endorsed or attached hereto signed by the President, a Vice President, the Secretary, an Assistant Secretary or other validating officer of the Company. 9. Notices. Where Sent All notices required to be given the Company and any statement in writing required to be furnished the Company shall be addressed to it at 4 Second Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 5541, (612) Arbitration Unless prohibited by applicable law, either the Company or the insured may demand arbitration pursuant to the Title Insurance Arbitration Rules of the American Arbitration Association. ANTI-FRAUD STATEMENT: Pursuant to CRS (6)(a), it is unlawful to knowingly provide false, incomplete or misleading facts or information to an insurance company for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the company. Penalties may include imprisonment, fines, denial of insurance and civil damages. Any insurance company or agent of an insurance company who knowingly provides false, incomplete, or misleading facts or information to a policyholder or claimant for the purpose of defrauding or attempting to defraud the policyholder or claimant with regard to a settlement or award payable from insurance proceeds shall be reported to the Colorado division of insurance within the department of regulatory agencies. This anti-fraud statement is affixed and made a part ofthis policy. Issued through the Office of: LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY 333 E 1ST AVE #6 DENVER, CO r777 John E. Freyer, President OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a Stock Company 4 Second Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota ) Mark Bilbrey, President ctib.caver.edt Rande Yeager, Secretary

98 Land Title Guarantee Company Representing Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Order Number: ABC PROPERTY INFORMATION BINDER Policy Number: PIB Liability: $5,. Fee: $5. Subject to the exclusions from coverage, the limits of liability and other provisions of the Conditions and Stipulations hereto annexed and made a part of this Binder, OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY a Corporation, herein called the Company, GUARANTEES BROOKFIELD RESIDENTIAL Herein called the Assured, against loss, not exceeding the liability amount stated above, which the assured shall sustain by reason of any incorrectness in the assurance which the Company hereby gives that, according to the public records as of August 8,214 at 5: P.M. 1. Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in: LOWER CLEAR CREEK DITCH COMPANY, A COLORADO NON-PROFIT CORPORATION AND THE COLORADO AGRICULTURAL DITCH COMPANY, A COLORADO NON-PROFIT CORPORATION, AS TO THOSE PORTIONS OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN INSTRUMENTS RECORDED JUNE 27, 1889 IN BOOK A22 AT PAGE AND FEBRUARY 16, 1915 IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 18Q; CLEAR CREEK STATION METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NO.1, AS TO TRACT S, MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK - FILING NO.1 PLAT CORRECTION; AND MIDTOWN LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, FORMERLY KNOWN AS CARMA WESTMINSTER, LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, AS TO THE REMAINDER 2. The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this Binder is: AFEE SIMPLE 3. The land referred to in this Binder is situated in the State of Colorado, County of Adams, described as follows: A PARCEL OF LAND BEING ALL OF LOT 1, BLOCK 11 AND ALL OF TRACT S, MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK-FILING NO. 1 PLAT CORRECTION AS RECORDED AT RECEPTION NO OF THE RECORDS OF THE ADAMS COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE TOGETHER WITH A PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 3 SOUTH, RANGE 68 WEST OF THE SIXTH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

99 " Land Title Guarantee Company Representing Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Order Number: ABC PROPERTY INFORMATION BINDER Policy Number: PIB COMMENCING AT THE CENTER QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4 MONUMENTED BY A 3-1/4" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED "PLS 28664", IN A MONUMENT BOX, WHENCE THE CENTER-SOUTH SIXTEENTH CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4, AS MONUMENTED BY A 3-114" ALUMINUM CAP STAMPED "PLS 23519", IN A MONUMENT BOX. BEARS SOUTH '15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF FEET FORMING THE BASIS OF BEARINGS USED IN THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE SOUTH 69 16'24" EAST, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF WEST 68TH AVENUE AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 3658 AT PAGE 687, IN SAID RECORDS AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 3658 AT PAGE 687 AND BOOK 3999 AT PAGE 531, SOUTH 89 48'22" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1, FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED UNDER RECEPTION NO , IN SAID RECORDS; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THE FOLLOWING TEN (1) COURSES: 1) DEPARTING SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY, SOUTH 38 21'59" EAST, A DISTANCE OF FEET; 2) SOUTH 51 23'53" EAST, A DISTANCE OF FEET; 3) SOUTH 76 3'38" EAST, A DISTANCE OF FEET; 4) SOUTH 13 1'31" WEST, A DISTANCE OF FEET; 5) SOUTH 48 37'29" WEST, A DISTANCE OF FEET; 6) SOUTH 79 1'35" WEST, A DISTANCE OF FEET; 7) SOUTH 58 45'32" WEST, A DISTANCE OF FEET; 8) SOUTH 54 3'23" WEST, A DISTANCE OF FEET; 9) SOUTH 27"17'19" WEST, A DISTANCE OF FEET; 1) SOUTH 39 46'32" WEST, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 73 AT PAGE 186, IN SAID RECORDS; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTHERLY BOUNDARY, NORTH 89 59'6" WEST, A DISTANCE OF

100 land Title Guarantee Company Representing Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Order Number: ABC PROPERTY INFORMATION BINDER Policy Number: PIB FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE, SOUTH 5'55" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 85. FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST SIXTEENTH CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 4, SOUTH 7'15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF FEET; THENCE DEPARTING SAID EAST LINE, SOUTH 89 52'45" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 3. FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LIPAN STREET, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF THAT PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 22 AT PAGE 586, IN SAID RECORDS; THENCE DEPARTING SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY, NORTH 89 57'38" WEST, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO A POINT ON THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 1, BLOCK 11; THENCE ALONG THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 1, BLOCK 11 AND THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT S, SOUTH '15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID TRACT S; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID TRACT S, NORTH 89 57'38" WEST, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF SAID TRACT S AND A POINT ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PECOS STREET AS DESCRIBED IN BOOK 3513 AT PAGE 49, IN SAID RECORDS; THENCE ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF PECOS STREET AS DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 3513 AT PAGE 49, AND ALSO DESCRIBED IN BOOK 357 AT PAGE 33, BOOK 357 AT PAGE 313 AND BOOK 3658 AT PAGE 687, IN SAID RECORDS, NORTH '15" EAST, A DISTANCE OF FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY AS DESCRIBED IN SAID BOOK 3658 AT PAGE 687, NORTH 45 5'57" EAST, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, 4. The following documents affect the land: 1) EXISTING LEASES AND TENANCIES, IF ANY. 2) TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN ARTICLES OF AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE COLORADO AGRICULTURAL DITCH AND MILL COMPANY AND WILLIAM S. ADAMS RECORDED MAY 23,1874 IN BOOK A2 AT PAGE ) TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND GRANTED IN WARRANTY DEED RECORDED MARCH 15, 1961 IN BOOK 897 AT PAGE

101 Land Title Guarantee Company Representing Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Order Number: ABC PROPERTY INFORMATION BINDER Policy Number: PIB ) TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTIONS RECORDED SEPTEMBER 24, 1974 IN BOOK 1955 AT PAGES 32.6., 3.3Z AND m. 5) TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN ZONING HEARING DECISION RECORDED JANUARY 23, 1987 IN BOOK 3264 AT PAGE ) TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH IN THE CRESTVIEW PRELIMINARY PUD PLAN RECORDED JUNE 26, 1987 UNDER RECEPTION NO. B ) ANY TAX, LIEN, FEE, OR ASSESSMENT BY REASON OF INCLUSION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY IN THE HYLAND HILLS PARK AND RECREATION DISTRICT, AS EVIDENCED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 15, 1987, IN BOOK 3367 AT PAGE ) TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN ZONING HEARING DECISION RECORDED MAY 7, 1991 IN BOOK 3775 AT PAGE ) TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN UNDERGROUND FACILITIES INFORMATION FILING RECORDED MARCH 15, 1993 IN BOOK 438 AT PAGE 11. 1) TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND GRANTED IN CONVEYANCE OF EASEMENTS RECORDED SEPTEMBER 1, 1995 IN BOOK 458 AT PAGE 562, SEPTEMBER 6, 1995 IN BOOK 4582 AT PAGE 531 AND OCTOBER 6, 1995 IN BOOK 463 AT PAGE ) TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND GRANTED IN EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 17, 21 UNDER RECEPTION NO. C ) TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN ZONING HEARING DECISIONS RECORDED MARCH 28, 27 UNDER RECEPTION NO , MAY 9, 27 UNDER RECEPTION NO AND MARCH 21, 28 UNDER RECEPTION NO ) TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN ENVIRONMENTAL COVENANT RECORDED AUGUST 1, 27 UNDER RECEPTION NO ) TERMS, RESERVATIONS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS, EASEMENTS AND ANY "REVERSIONS" AS SET FORTH IN SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AUGUST 2, 27 UNDER RECEPTION NO

102 Land Title Guarantee Company Representing Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Order Number: ABC PROPERTY INFORMATION BINDER Policy Number: PIB NOTE: PART OF PARCEL 3 HEREIN, REFERENCED AS SECOND PARCEL (REVERSION PARCEL) ON PAGE 8 OF SAID DEED. 15) TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND GRANTED IN GROUNDWATER EASEMENT RECORDED AUGUST 2, 27 UNDER RECEPTION NO ) TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND GRANTED IN SEEP WATER REMEDIATION SYSTEM EASEMENT RECORDED AUGUST 2, 27 UNDER RECEPTION NO ) TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND GRANTED IN LIMITED ACCESS AGREEMENT AND EASEMENT RECORDED AUGUST 21, 27 UNDER RECEPTION NOS AND ) TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN CERTIFICATION OF NOTICE TO MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS RECORDED JANUARY 25, 28 UNDER RECEPTION NO AND APPLICANT'S CERTIFICATION THERETO RECORDED JANUARY 25,28 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 2Q.Q ) ANY TAX, LIEN, FEE, OR ASSESSMENT BY REASON OF INCLUSION OF SUBJECT PROPERTY IN THE CLEAR CREEK STATION METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NO.2, AS EVIDENCED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED OCTOBER 31, 212 UNDER RECEPTION NO CLEAR CREEK STATION METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NOS. 1-3 DISCLOSURE RECORDED NOVEMBER 18, 213 UNDER RECEPTION NO ) EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE DEVELOPMENT PLAN MAPS RECORDED AUGUST 16, 212 UNDER RECEPTION NOS AND , APRIL 24, 213 UNDER RECEPTION NO AND JULY 18, 214 UNDER RECEPTION NO ) EASEMENTS, CONDITIONS, COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, RESERVATIONS AND NOTES ON THE PLAT OF MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK - FILING NO.1 RECORDED AUGUST 16, 212 UNDER RECEPTION NO AND MIDTOWN AT CLEAR CREEK - FILING NO.1 PLAT CORRECTION RECORDED JUNE 27, 213 UNDER RECEPTION NO RATIFICATION AND CONFIRMATION RECORDED JULY 26,213 UNDER RECEPTION NOS AND ) TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION APPROVING A SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT RECORDED AUGUST 27, 212 UNDER RECEPTION NO ) TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN

103 Land Title Guarantee Company Representing Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Order Number: ABC PROPERTY INFORMATION BINDER Policy Number: PIB ZONING RESOLUTIONS RECORDED SEPTEMBER 6, 212 UNDER RECEPTION NO AND SEPTEMBER 12, 212 UNDER RECEPTION NO ) TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN NOTIFICATION, RELEASE AND DECLARATION OF USE RESTRICTIONS RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 212 UNDER RECEPTION NO ) TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS TO "ANY EASEMENTS CREATED AS PER SECTION 6, AS SET FORTH IN THE DECLARATION OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR MIDTOWN, A PLANNED COMMUNITY RECORDED OCTOBER 3, 212 UNDER RECEPTION NO AND TERMINATIONS THERETO RECORDED JUNE 27, 213 UNDER RECEPTION NOS AND AND JULY 26, 213 UNDER RECEPTION NO THE TERMINATIONS SUBJECT TO SECTION 15.2(B) OF SAID DECLARATION. 26) TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN MEMORANDUM REGARDING A CONSOLIDATED RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CLEAR CREEK STATION METROPOLITAN DISTRICT NOS. 1-3 CONCERNING THE IMPOSITION OF A DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT FEE, GENERAL OPERATIONS FEE, WORKING CAPITAL FEE AND ADMINISTRATIVE SETUP FEE RECORDED OCTOBER 22, 212 UNDER RECEPTION NO ) TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS SET FORTH AND GRANTED IN EASEMENT AGREEMENT FOR DRAINAGE RECORDED MARCH 28, 213 UNDER RECEPTION NO ) TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, BURDENS AND OBLIGATIONS AS SET FORTH IN SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT RECORDED MAY 1, 213 UNDER RECEPTION NO AND AMENDMENTS RECORDED MAY 21, 213 UNDER RECEPTION NO AND MARCH 2, 214 UNDER RECEPTION NO , AND RESOLUTIONS THERETO RECORDED MAY 28, 213 UNDER RECEPTION NO , JUNE 7, 213 UNDER RECEPTION NO , OCTOBER 15, 213 UNDER RECEPTION NO AND MARCH 2, 214 UNDER RECEPTION NO ) ANY RIGHTS OR INTERESTS OF THIRD PARTIES WHICH EXIST OR ARE CLAIMED TO EXIST IN AND OVER THE PRESENT AND PAST BED, BANKS OR WATERS OF CLEAR CREEK UPON SUBJECT PROPERTY AS SET FORTH ON THE PLAT RECORDED JUNE 27, 213 UNDER RECEPTION NO ) RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, WHICH DO NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, BUT OMITTING ANY COVENANTS OR RESTRICTIONS, IF ANY, BASED UPON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, FAMILIAL STATUS, MARITAL STATUS, DISABILITY, HANDICAP, NATIONAL ORIGIN, ANCESTRY, OR SOURCE OF INCOME, AS SET FORTH IN APPLICABLE STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT SAID COVENANT OR RESTRICTION IS PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, AS CONTAINED IN DECLARATION OF