BUILDING CODE COMMISSION
|
|
- Loren McDowell
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Ruling No Application No BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Article of Regulation 403, as amended, (the Building Code). AND IN THE MATTER OF an application by Dan Einwechter, Challenger Motor Freight Inc., to determine whether the lower floor of the subject building qualifies as a ground floor when considering the definitions for grade and first storey as specified in Article of the Building Code at Challenger Motor Freight, 300 Maple Grove Road, City of Cambridge, Ontario. APPLICANT RESPONDENT PANEL PLACE Dan Einwechter Challenger Motor Freight Inc. Cambridge, Ontario Larry Simonato Chief Building Official City of Cambridge Tony Chow, Chair Susan Friedrich Gary Burtch Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING February 17, 2005 DATE OF RULING February 17, 2005 APPEARANCES Robert Dyck Robert Dyck Architect & Engineer Inc. Kitchener, Ontario Agent for the Applicant Hardy Bromberg Deputy Chief Building Official City of Cambridge Designate for the Respondent
2 - 2 - RULING 1. Particulars of Dispute The Applicant has received a permit under the Building Code Act, 1992, and is constructing an office building at Challenger Motor Freight, 300 Maple Grove Road, Cambridge, Ontario. The subject building is a Group D office building, having a building area of 2,351 m 2. The building is comprised of non-combustible construction and is equipped with a sprinkler and fire alarm system. The construction in dispute involves the determination of the height of the building, specifically, whether the lowest level of the building can be considered the basement as opposed to the first storey. The dispute has arisen as a result of differing interpretations regarding the calculation of grade, which will then dictate whether a basement is present. If a basement is present then the floor assembly above the basement would be required to provide a minimum 45 minute fire resistance rating. The Applicant is basing his calculations for grade on the area of the footprint of the lowest level of the building. Two sides of this level are situated above grade, while the other two sides are underground with approximately 4 m above the finished floor. The issue with respect to grade calculation results from the fact that the second level of the building extends beyond the footprint of the lowest level. If calculating grade based on the footprint of the building on the ground level (above the first level), the calculation would result in the lowest level being considered a basement. 2. Provisions of the Building Code in Dispute Defined Terms (1) The words and terms in italics in this Code have the following meaning for the purposes of this Code, and where indicated, the following meaning for the purposes of the Act as well. First storey means the storey with its floor closest to grade and having its ceiling more than 1.8 m above grade. Grade means the average level of proposed or finished ground adjoining a building at all exterior walls. 3. Applicant s Position The Agent for the Applicant submitted that subject structure is a Group D office building, having a building area of 2,351 m 2 and a height of 3 storeys. He also submitted that the lowest level of the building has a smaller footprint than the second and third levels, which extend beyond the lower level at ground level. It is the determination of the average grade based on the exterior walls, which has precipitated this dispute and brought the parties to the Commission. In the application submitted, the Agent contended that the average grade should be calculated using the perimeter of the lowest level of the building. Using this approach, as is detailed in the average grade calculation submitted by the Agent, the average grade was calculated to be m. It was submitted that the ceiling of the lowest level is m below the finish floor level of
3 - 3 - the upper floor. Carrying this theory through to its conclusion, in order for the lowest level to qualify as the first storey, its ceiling is required to be 1.8 m above the adjoining average grade. The average grade, using the Agent s calculation approach, was determined to be m m minus m (for the ceiling of the lowest level) equals m, which is more than the requirement of 1.8 m. The Agent maintained that the lowest level therefore qualifies as the first storey of the subject building and, there would be no requirement to construct the floor assembly over the lowest level as a fire separation with a 45 minute fire resistance rating. The Agent presented a diagram of the subject building which detailed the layout and the grade plan. He drew attention to the fact that the lowest level of the building is approximately 930 m 2 while the next level up is approximately 2,323 m 2. He explained how he had determined the average grade using the perimeter of the lowest level and based on that calculation, he concluded that the subject building should be considered a 3 storey building. The Agent stated that the real concern is the spread of fire from the lowest level to the level above. He speculated that the grade could have been lowered around the building in order to have the numbers work for the determination of average grade but contends that this would not make the building any safer. The Agent described the occupancy of the lowest level as being offices, meeting rooms and a cafeteria. He added that there are a number of means of egress directly to the outside from this level. He explained the reason for not wanting to provide the floor assembly with a rated fire separation is that the owner wants the look of open ceilings and open steel joists in this building. The Agent suggested that the building should be considered a 3 storey building, and therefore the fire separation would not be required to have a 45 minute rating but rather the separation could be unrated. He noted that the building is fully sprinklered. In summation, the Agent reiterated that they could adjust the grade around the building such that the lowest level could be considered the first storey, but he stressed that this would not make the building any safer. He went to say that there are many access points for the Fire Department and that two of the four walls are completely exposed. He asked the Commission to look favourably upon their proposal. 4. Respondent s Position The Designate for the Respondent submitted that the subject structure is a Group D office building, having a building area of 2,351 m 2 and a height of two storeys. The Designate submitted that, based on his calculations, the building, in his opinion, is two storeys with a basement and therefore, the floor assembly above the lowest level is required to have a minimum 45 minute rated fire separation. The Designate submitted that based on his calculations, the average grade around the perimeter of the building area was determined to be m and the elevation of the lower level ceiling was determined to be m. This means the average grade, as measured around the building area is 1.21 m below the ceiling of the lower level. Therefore, it is the opinion of the Designate that the subject building is considered a two storey building with a basement. The Designate stated that the average grade should be calculated using the finished ground adjoining a building at all exterior walls. As such, the calculation of average grade, according to the Designate, should be determined using the entire building exterior which is adjacent to grade. It is the opinion of the Designate that using this approach for calculating average grade, the subject building is considered a two storey building with basement.
4 - 4 - The Designate concluded by reiterating that the lowest level of the subject building, in his view, is considered a basement that should be subject to the applicable construction requirements for a basement, including the requirement of a 45 minute rated fire separation for the floor assembly above. 5. Commission Ruling It is the Decision of the Building Code Commission that the lowest floor of the subject building does not qualify as the first storey when considering the definitions for grade and first storey as specified in Article of the Building Code at Challenger Motor Freight, 300 Maple Grove Road, Cambridge, Ontario. 6. Reasons i) Grade is calculated based on the average level of proposed or finished ground adjoining the building at all exterior walls and establishes the second level of this building as the first storey.
5 - 5 - Dated at Toronto this 17 day in the month of February in the year 2005 for application number Tony Chow, Chair Susan Friedrich Gary Burtch
BUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 05-13-1027 Application No. 2005-05 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Sentences 3.1.3.2.(2)
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No.: 10-29-1265 Application No.: B-2010-24 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Clause 3.4.4.2.(2)(f)
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 02-43-898 Application No. 2002-46 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Sentences 3.2.1.1.(4),
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 08-03-1177 Application No. 2007-26 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Articles 3.4.4.1.,
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 03-14-912 Application No. 2003-05 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Clause 10.1.1.2.(1)(a)
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 09-03-1215 Application No. B-2009-01 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF with Sentences 3.3.1.3.(9)
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 08-04-1178 Application No. B-2007-47 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND AND IN THE MATTER OF Sentence 3.2.9.2.(1)
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 04-33-988 Application No. 2004-28 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Sentence 3.4.6.3.(2)
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 09-10-1222 Application No. 2009-07 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Article 3.1.2.1 and
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 03-21-919 Application No. 2003-20 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Sentence 3.8.3.3. (5)
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No.03-10-908 Application No. 2003-06 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Sentences 3.3.1.8.(1)
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 01-30-823 Application # 2001-04 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24 (1) of the Building Code Act, 1992. AND IN THE MATTER OF Article 3.2.9.1. of Regulation 403, as amended
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 09-05-1217 Application No. 2009-03 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Article 3.3.1.15. and
More informationCOUNCIL ORDER No
SAFETY CODES COUNCIL #000, 0665 Jasper Avenue N.W., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T5J 389 Tel: 780430099 I 888430099 Fax: 78044534 I 88844534 www.safetycodes.ab.ca COUNCIL ORDER No. 005443 BEFORE THE BUILDINGTECHNICALCOUNCIL
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling # 01-20-813 Application # 2001-23 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24 (1) of the Building Code Act, 1992. AND IN THE MATTER OF Article 9.5.2.1. and Clause 3.8.1.1.(1)(c) of Regulation
More informationSecondary Suites Changes between the 2006 ABC and the 2014 ABC Requirements
Secondary Suites Changes between the 2006 ABC and the 2014 ABC Requirements Alberta Building Code 2006 Alberta Building Code 2014 Change 9.37.2. Construction 9.37.2.1. Height of Rooms and Spaces 1) The
More informationSCHEDULE A TO BY-LAW NUMBER (Amended by By-law ) CLASSES OF PERMITS AND PERMIT FEES
SCHEDULE A TO BY-LAW NUMBER 2010-24 (Amended by By-law 2016-40) CLASSES OF PERMITS AND PERMIT FEES 1. Except where a minimum flat fee is indicated for the Occupancy Classification or Type of Construction,
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 03-52-950 Application No. 2003-55 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Article 1.1.3.2. of
More informationELIGIBILITY DECISION OF THE CHAIR OF THE WEATHERTIGHT HOMES TRIBUNAL
[2013] NZWHT AUCKLAND 13 UNDER the Weathertight Homes Resolution Services Act 2006 IN THE MATTER of a reconsideration of the Chief Executive s decision under section 49 CLAIM NO. 6990 to 7013: 24 unit
More informationA001 DEMOLITION SITE PLAN A001 1:300 ADDITION DICKINSON DRIVE INGLESIDE, ONTARIO CATHOLIC DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF EASTERN ONTARIO
DEMOLITION SITE AS NOTED No J.V.D. A001 1:300 0 10.0 m 50 m J.J. 2016-04-25 A001 ACAD FILE/FICHIER: 1619-A001.DWG SITE 1:300 No J.V.D. J.J. A002 A002 1:300 0 10.0 m 50 m 2016-04-20 ACAD FILE/FICHIER: 1619-A002.DWG
More informationNEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE Division of Building Standards and Codes One Commerce Plaza - 99 Washington Ave Albany, NY 12231
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE Division of Building Standards and Codes One Commerce Plaza - 99 Washington Ave Albany, NY 12231 Phone: (518) 474 4073 Fax: (518) 486 4487 www.dos.ny.gov Email: info@dos.ny.gov
More informationPROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER section 45(12), subsection 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended (the "Act")
Court Services 40 Orchard View Blvd Telephone: 416-392-4697 Toronto Local Appeal Body Suite 211 Fax: 416-696-4307 Toronto, Ontario M4R 1B9 Email: tlab@toronto.ca Website: www.toronto.ca/tlab DECISION AND
More informationCALGARY ASSESSMENT REVIEW BOARD DECISION WITH REASONS
CALGARY ASSESSMENT REVIEW BOARD DECISION WITH REASONS In the matter of the complaints against the property assessments as provided by the Municipal Government Act, Chapter M-26, Section 460, Revised Statutes
More informationHomeowners Guide to Accessory Dwelling Units
Homeowners Guide to Accessory Dwelling Units Applicable to Buildings in existence AFTER July 14, 1994 In accordance with Zoning By law 2010 050 and the Ontario Building Code 2012 Town of Bradford West
More informationTOWN OF WILMINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF FINDINGS WILMINGTON, VERMONT 05363
TOWN OF WILMINGTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD FINDINGS OF FACT AND STATEMENT OF FINDINGS WILMINGTON, VERMONT 05363 A request for a permit was made to the Board by: James Barnes of Hermitage Inn Real Estate
More information320 Bay Street TORONTO ONTARIO. Tracy Macdonald Vice President,
320 Bay Street TORONTO ONTARIO LEASING 5 154 SF - OCCUP 320 BAY STREET In 1992, after many years of research into the correct fixtures and materials of the original construction era, the restoration of
More informationVANCE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS
VANCE COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS The Vance County Board of Adjustments met at a regular and duly advertised meeting on October 15, 2015 at 4:00 p.m. in the Commissioners Meeting Room of the Vance County
More information2015 IBC Allowable Heights and Areas
2015 IBC Allowable Heights and Based on the 2015 International Building Code (IBC ) Course Description This seminar addresses the key issues of the 2015 International Building Code (IBC ) Chapter 5 regarding
More informationRegional District of Nanaimo Secondary Suite Program
Regional District of Nanaimo Secondary Suite Program Secondary suites are recognized for the important role they play in providing affordable housing in the region. They also provide many benefits to homeowners,
More information1014 Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario. Quad (King & Brant) Inc.
ISSUE DATE: April 16, 2007 DECISION/ORDER NO: 1014 Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario PL060421 Floyd Prager, Morton Prager, 1170480 Ontario Ltd. and the City of Toronto
More informationLONDON LIFE INSURANCE CO. ASSESSOR OF AREA 9 -- VANCOUVER. Supreme Court of British Columbia (A872713) Vancouver Registry
The following version is for informational purposes only, for the official version see: http://www.courts.gov.bc.ca/ for Stated Cases see also: http://www.assessmentappeal.bc.ca/ for PAAB Decisions SC
More informationAssessment Appeals Committee
Assessment Appeals Committee DETERMINATION OF AN APPEAL UNDER Section 16 of The Municipal Board Act and Section 246 of The Municipalities Act Appeal Number: AAC 2015-0115 Date and Location: February 23,
More informationRental License Revocation Resolution No
July 20, 2015 DATE REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION 3Q AGENDA ITEM ORIGINATING DEPT. AGENDA ITEM CITY ADMINISTRATOR APPROVAL Community Development Horatius Williams 1lE Rental License Revocation Resolution No.
More informationConcord Township Zoning Commission Administrative Building 6385 Home Road Delaware, Ohio 43015
Concord Township Zoning Commission Administrative Building 6385 Home Road Delaware, Ohio 43015 Meeting Minutes August 19, 2014 Call To Order Chair, Connie Resanovich, called the meeting to order. Roll
More informationACCESSORY APARTMENTS OLDER THAN FIVE YEARS
ACCESSORY APARTMENTS OLDER THAN FIVE YEARS INCLUDED: LIST OF REQUIREMENTS SAMPLE DRAWINGS Planning & Development Services Tel. 905-683-4550 Fax. 905-686-0360 TOWN OF AJAX 65 Harwood Ave South Ajax ON L1S
More informationTORONTO MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 797, TENANT SUPPORT GRANT PROGRAM. Chapter 797 TENANT SUPPORT GRANT PROGRAM
797-1. Definitions. TORONTO MUNICIPAL CODE Chapter 797 TENANT SUPPORT GRANT PROGRAM 797-2. Eligible groups; basic grant for landlord applications. 797-3. Eligible groups; basic grant for tenant applications.
More informationUNDERSTANDING DEVELOPER S DECISION- MAKING IN THE REGION OF WATERLOO
UNDERSTANDING DEVELOPER S DECISION- MAKING IN THE REGION OF WATERLOO SUMMARY OF RESULTS J. Tran PURPOSE OF RESEARCH To analyze the behaviours and decision-making of developers in the Region of Waterloo
More information130 - General Regulations for Residential Zones and Uses Only
Page 130-1 130 - General Regulations for Residential Zones and Uses Only 130.01 Accessory s and Structures (1) An accessory building or structure shall not be used as a dwelling. (2) An accessory building
More informationChair and Members of Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel. A0596/16TEY Yonge St New 5 Storey Non-residential Building
Armando Barbini Planning and Permit Services Inc Armando Barbini 30 Brixham Terrace Toronto, On, M3M 2S1 (647) 991-3657 abarbini@rogers.com To: From: Chair and Members of Committee of Adjustment Toronto
More information22 POTENTIAL ONTARIO BUILDING CODE AMENDMENTS FOR MID-RISE WOOD FRAME BUILDINGS UP TO SIX STOREYS
Clause No. 22 in Report No. 9 of Committee of the Whole was adopted, without amendment, by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on May 15, 2014. 22 POTENTIAL ONTARIO BUILDING
More informationDate: May 8, Chair and Members Planning and Housing Standing Committee
Date: May 8, 2013 To: Re: Chair and Members Planning and Housing Standing Committee Council Directive #: S2011-04-11/3 St. John s Municipal Plan Amendment Number 96, 2011 St. John s Development Regulations
More informationFOR SALE 5 STOREY COMMERCIAL BUILDING 247 SPADINA AVENUE (DOWNTOWN WEST) TORONTO OPPORTUNITY
FOR SALE 5 STOREY COMMERCIAL BUILDING (DOWNTOWN WEST) TORONTO OPPORTUNITY An excellent opportunity for a User/Investor to purchase a 5 storey Commercial building in Downtown West, on Spadina Avenue between
More informationFOR SALE OR LEASE INDUSTRIAL BUILDING WITH DEVELOPMENT SITES 999 WILLOW GROVE ST HACKETTSTOWN, NEW JERSEY
INDUSTRIAL BUILDING WITH DEVELOPMENT SITES 999 WILLOW GROVE ST HACKETTSTOWN, NEW JERSEY AVAILABLE FOR SALE :: HACKETTSTOWN :: NEW JERSEY 12.5 Acres site with acreage for 2 potential development sites 2
More informationAN BINSE LUACHÁLA VALUATION TRIBUNAL. AN tacht LUACHÁLA, 2001 VALUATION ACT, Delaney, Locke, Thorpe Partnership. and. Commissioner of Valuation
Appeal No. VA11/5/138 AN BINSE LUACHÁLA VALUATION TRIBUNAL AN tacht LUACHÁLA, 2001 VALUATION ACT, 2001 Delaney, Locke, Thorpe Partnership APPELLANT and Commissioner of Valuation RESPONDENT RE: Property
More informationPurpose. Scope. Stairway Identification Signs. Emergency Evacuation and Stairwell Signage Requirements
TOWN OF BRIGHTON Office of the Fire Marshal 2300 Elmwood Avenue Rochester, New York 14618 (585) 784-5220 Office (585) 784-5207 Fax Emergency Evacuation and Stairwell Signage Requirements The intent of
More informationMAPLE GROVE PLANNING COMMISSION May 26, 2015
MAPLE GROVE PLANNING COMMISSION CALL TO ORDER A meeting of the Maple Grove Planning Commission was held at 7:00 p.m. on at the Maple Grove City Hall, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Chair Colson called the
More informationWhat would a tenant look for in a rental unit? What can you provide?
Landlord Information Session November 16, 2016 Landlords: Looking Out for Your Investment What would a tenant look for in a rental unit? What can you provide? Plumbing, heating, electricity & appliances
More informationRegarding the issue of a notice to fix for variations to consented building work to a new house at 234 Lake Road, Hauraki
Determination 2012/070 Regarding the issue of a notice to fix for variations to consented building work to a new house at 234 Lake Road, Hauraki 1. The matters to be determined 1.1 This is a determination
More informationINFORMATION GUIDE SECOND DWELLING UNITS BUILDING CODE BASICS
INFORMATION GUIDE SECOND DWELLING UNITS BUILDING CODE BASICS Prepared by: Community Development Standards Branch Town of Innisfil www.innisfil.ca June 2016 Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Ontario Building
More informationPROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER section 45(12), subsection 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended (the "Act")
Court Services 40 Orchard View Blvd Telephone: 46-392-4697 Toronto Local Appeal Body Suite 2 Fax: 46-696-4307 Toronto, Ontario M4R B9 Email: tlab@toronto.ca Website: www.toronto.ca/tlab DECISION AND ORDER
More informationFreedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (EIR) Decision notice
Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (EIR) Decision notice Date: 8 March 2016 Public Authority: Address: The Land Registry Trafalgar House 1 Bedford Park Croydon
More informationDemolition of Three Heritage Properties in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District - 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue
REPORT FOR ACTION Demolition of Three Heritage Properties in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District - 5, 7, and 9 Dale Avenue Date: January 30, 2018 To: Toronto Preservation Board Toronto and
More informationHIGH-RISE BUILDING INVENTORY FORMS (B.I.F.) PRODUCTION AND APPROVAL
HIGH-RISE BUILDING INVENTORY FORMS (B.I.F.) PRODUCTION AND APPROVAL Only a person authorized by the Los Angeles Fire Department shall approve High-rise Building Inventory Forms. All individuals authorized
More informationOntario Municipal Board Order PL issued on June 2, 2015 and Order PL issued on April 1, 2016 CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW (OMB)
Authority: Ontario Municipal Board Order PL141224 issued on June 2, 2015 and Order PL141244 issued on April 1, 2016 CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW 530-2018(OMB) To amend former City of North York By-law 7625 in
More informationPROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 45(12) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended (the "Act")
Court Services 40 Orchard View Blvd Telephone: 416-392-4697 Toronto Local Appeal Body Suite 211 Fax: 416-696-4307 Toronto, Ontario M4R 1B9 Email: tlab@toronto.ca Website: www.toronto.ca/tlab DECISION AND
More informationCalifornia Building Code
Height and Area Provisions in the California Building Code Dennis Richardson, P.E., C.B.O., CASp Western Coast Manager American Wood Council The Wood Products Council is a Registered Provider with The
More informationCHRISTINA THE PACKAGE INCLUDES HOME WITH LOT $529,000
THE CHRISTINA HOME WITH LOT STARTING @ $529,000 The Christina model is our newest offering, and has quickly become our fastest selling model to date. Customization meets affordability and function, and
More informationThe Corporation of Delta COUNCIL REPORT Regular Meeting. File No.: In-ground Basement Survey for Neighbourhood Zoning Areas
F.10 The Corporation of Delta COUNCIL REPORT Regular Meeting To: Mayor and Council File.: P08-17 From: Community Planning & Development Department Date: May 14, 2012 In-ground Basement Survey for Neighbourhood
More informationSTAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Residential Demolition Application 350-352 Sheppard Avenue East Date: November 1, 2012 To: From: Wards: Reference Numbers: North York Community Council Director of Toronto
More informationDispute Resolution Services
Dispute Resolution Services Page: 1 Residential Tenancy Branch Office of Housing and Construction Standards A matter regarding York Hotel Inc. and Torrent Real Estate Inc. and Parkdale Enterprises and
More information1. Request amendment to Subarea C to allow multifamily use area
Cantera Apartments at Riverview west Warrenville, IL 9 Apr 2018 Amendment request 1. Request amendment to Subarea C to allow multifamily use area Variances requested 1. Commercial center use a. Required
More informationOmbudsman Toronto Enquiry Report. Enquiry into the City of Toronto's Handling of a Building Permit for Construction of a House.
Ombudsman Toronto Enquiry Report Enquiry into the City of Toronto's Handling of a Building Permit for Construction of a House May 15, 2018 Complaint Summary 1. Mr. L complained to Ombudsman Toronto. He
More informationRepresentatives from Build Toronto and City Real Estate will be in attendance at the meeting to present their review.
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 11. Property Redevelopment Feasibility Report Date: October 24, 2016 To: From: Toronto Public Library Board City Librarian SUMMARY At the meeting on September 21, 2015, the
More informationLINN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. Jean Oxley Public Service Center nd Street SW, Cedar Rapids, Iowa. MINUTES Monday, November 23, 2015
LINN COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Jean Oxley Public Service Center 935 2 nd Street SW, Cedar Rapids, Iowa MINUTES Monday, I. QUORUM DETERMINED: The meeting was called to order at 6:30 p.m. by Chairperson
More informationToronto - Financial Core
Toronto - Financial Core 50 Bay Street Operating Costs: $9.41 Realty Taxes: $8.73 Hydro: Included Total: $18.14 1400 11,695 $26.50 April 1, 2009 Perimeter offices, boardroom, open area, kitchen, high end
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF EAST GWILLIMBURY BY-LAW 2016-
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF EAST GWILLIMBURY BY-LAW 2016- TO GOVERN THE ISSUANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OF BUILDING AND DEMOLITION PERMITS, AS WELL AS AN ADDENDUM TO THE CORPORATE CODE OF CONDUCT Whereas
More informationc 211 Hotel Fire Safety Act
Ontario: Revised Statutes 1970 c 211 Hotel Fire Safety Act Ontario Queen's Printer for Ontario, 1970 Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/rso Bibliographic Citation
More informationBUILDING GUIDELINE MEASUREMENT. Appraisal Institute of Canada 403 ~ 200 Catherine Street Ottawa, Ontario K2P 2K9
BUILDING 403 ~ 200 Catherine Street Ottawa, Ontario K2P 2K9 www.aicanada.ca 1 9 3 8 2 0 1 3 www.icecanada.ca Table of Contents Introduction...3 Example 1 ~ One Storey... 4 Example 2 ~ One and One-Half
More informationAN BINSE LUACHÁLA VALUATION TRIBUNAL. AN tacht LUACHÁLA, 2001 VALUATION ACT, and. Commissioner of Valuation
Appeal No. VA16/3/012 AN BINSE LUACHÁLA VALUATION TRIBUNAL AN tacht LUACHÁLA, 2001 VALUATION ACT, 2001 Lidl Ireland APPELLANT and Commissioner of Valuation RESPONDENT In Relation to the Issue of Quantum
More informationFOR SALE 5 STOREY COMMERCIAL BUILDING 247 SPADINA AVENUE (CHINATOWN), TORONTO OPPORTUNITY
FOR SALE 5 STOREY COMMERCIAL BUILDING (CHINATOWN), TORONTO OPPORTUNITY The subject property provides an excellent opportunity to purchase a 5 storey, commercial building located just south of the busy
More information24-story, Class A Office Building Climate Control LEED Gold Certified Fire Life Safety Large, Efficient Floor Plates Elevators Ample Ceiling Height
BUILDING FEATURES 24-story, Class A Office Building with classic design that can be customized to meet the needs of growing businesses LEED Gold Certified for best-in-class energy and environmental strategies
More informationCentral Alberta Regional Assessment Review Board
Central Alberta Regional Assessment Review Board Decision# CARB 0263-513/2012 Roll 678015006 CENTRAL ALBERTA REGIONAL ASSESSMENT REVEIW BOARD DECISION HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 17, 2012 PRESIDING OFFICER:
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. GRAHAME PLAUNT and KENNETH L.W. BOLAND. - and - Proceeding Under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE Court File No. 08-CV-42639 CP BETWEEN: GRAHAME PLAUNT and KENNETH L.W. BOLAND Plaintiffs - and - RENFREW POWER GENERATION INC. Defendant Proceeding Under the Class Proceedings
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
STATE OF IDAHO County of KOOTENAI ss FILED AT O'clock M CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT Deputy IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KOOTENAI VERIZON
More informationNo July 27, P.2d 939
Printed on: 10/20/01 Page # 1 111 Nev. 998, 998 (1995) Schwartz v. State, Dep't of Transp. MARTIN J. SCHWARTZ and PHYLLIS R. SCHWARTZ, Trustees of the MARTIN J. SCHWARTZ and PHYLLIS R. SCHWARTZ Revocable
More informationVALUATION OF PROPERTY. property. REALTORS need to keep in mind first, that the Occupational Code limits what
VALUATION OF PROPERTY I. INTRODUCTION REALTORS are often asked for their opinion on the value of a particular piece of property. REALTORS need to keep in mind first, that the Occupational Code limits what
More informationHOUSE BILL lr3175 A BILL ENTITLED. Residential Real Property Inspection and Disclosure Mold
N HOUSE BILL lr By: Delegates Branch, Barve, and Jones Introduced and read first time: February 0, 00 Assigned to: Rules and Executive Nominations A BILL ENTITLED 0 0 AN ACT concerning Residential Real
More informationProperty: Guardsman Tony Downes House, 5 Manchester Road, Droylsden M43 6SF
Norfolk House 7 Norfolk Street Manchester M2 1DW T: +44 (0)8449 02 03 04 F: +44 (0)161 956 4009 04B710303/ES09 29 th September 2017 Greater Manchester Pension Fund Guardsman Tony Downes House 5 Manchester
More informationBEDFORD HIGHWAY
FOR SALE A DIVISION OF KELLER WILLIAMS SELECT REALTY 1091-1095 BEDFORD HIGHWAY BEDFORD, NOVA SCOTIA MULTI-FAMILY 16 UNITS + 2 COMMERCIAL GRANVILLE LANDING APARMENTS TOM GERARD, SIOR, CCIM Real Estate Advisor
More information4. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW PUBLIC MEETINGS
TOWNSHIP OF CRAMAHE PUBLIC MEETING DATE: MARCH 8, 2016 TIME: PLACE: 6:45 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS Page 1. CALL TO ORDER at 6:45 pm 2. RECORDING EQUIPMENT Members of the Public are to advise the Clerk of the
More informationDate: May 8, Chair and Members Planning and Housing Standing Committee
Date: May 8, 2013 To: Re: Chair and Members Planning and Housing Standing Committee Council Directive #: S2011-04-11/3 St. John s Municipal Plan Amendment Number 96, 2011 St. John s Development Regulations
More informationReal Estate Council of Ontario DISCIPLINE DECISION
Real Estate Council of Ontario DISCIPLINE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO THE REAL ESTATE AND BUSINESS BROKERS ACT, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 30, Sch. C BETWEEN: REGISTRAR UNDER
More informationDECISION AND ORDER INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND. Decision Issue Date Tuesday, March 06, 2018
Court Services 40 Orchard View Blvd Telephone: 416-392-4697 Toronto Local Appeal Body Suite 211 Fax: 416-696-4307 Toronto, Ontario M4R 1B9 Email: tlab@toronto.ca Website: www.toronto.ca/tlab DECISION AND
More informationASSESSMENT REVIEW BOARD. The City of Edmonton JASPER AVENUE Assessment and Taxation Branch
ASSESSMENT REVIEW BOARD Churchill Building 10019 103 Avenue Edmonton AB T5J 0G9 Phone: (780) 496-5026 NOTICE OF DECISION NO. 0098 101/11 CVG The City of Edmonton 1200-10665 JASPER AVENUE Assessment and
More informationACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS Category: Residential Construction Revised: [Paul L. Scarlett], Director Responsible Bureau Sections: Development Services Center 1900 SW Fourth Avenue Portland, OR 97201 503-823-7310
More informationLAW OFFICES TESLER & SANDMANN MEMORANDUM
LAW OFFICES TESLER & SANDMANN PETER B. SANDMANN PAULINE H. TESLER CERTIFIED FAMILY LAW SPECIALIST STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Gary Friedman, President Peter B. Sandmann SUBJECT: 341 Sunset
More informationDecision Issue Date Monday, January 29, PROCEEDING COMMENCED UNDER subsection 45(1) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.
Court Services 40 Orchard View Blvd Telephone: 416-392-4697 Toronto Local Appeal Body Suite 211 Fax: 416-696-4307 Toronto, Ontario M4R 1B9 Email: tlab@toronto.ca Website: www.toronto.ca/tlab DECISION AND
More informationAppendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017
Appendix1,Page1 Urban Design Guidelines DRAFT September 2017 Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses Appendix1,Page2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Urban Design Objectives 1 1.3 Building
More information40 Moccasin Trail and 50 Green Belt Drive - OMB
REPORT FOR ACTION 40 Moccasin Trail and 50 Green Belt Drive - OMB Date: March 21, 2017 To: City Council From: City Solicitor Wards: Ward 34 SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to request further direction
More informationTownhouse and Low-Rise Apartment Guidelines Project. Planning and Growth Management Committee. Chief Planner and Executive Director, City Planning
PG8.12 STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Townhouse and Low-Rise Apartment Guidelines Project Date: October 20, 2015 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Planning and Growth Management Committee Chief Planner
More informationIs the Apartment in my House Legal?
Is the Apartment in my House Legal? The apartment in your house is either LEGAL or ILLEGAL. It is legal if: A Building Permit for the apartment has been issued. AND The apartment has been maintained in
More informationGovernment Management Committee. P:\2011\Internal Services\Fac\Gm11008Fac- (AFS 10838)
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Old City Hall Future Uses Date: April 14, 2011 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Government Management Committee Chief Corporate Officer Ward 27, Toronto Centre Rosedale P:\2011\Internal
More informationCommittee of Adjustment Case File Number: STE 31 CO, STE 31 MV, STE 31 MV
Toronto Local Appeal Body 40 Orchard View Blvd, Suite 211 Telephone: 416-392-4697 Toronto, Ontario M4R 1B9 Fax: 416-696-4307 Email: tlab@toronto.ca Website: www.toronto.ca/tlab DECISION AND ORDER Decision
More informationThe Fire Code: An Overview for Tenants FEDERATION OF METRO TENANTS ASSOCIATIONS
The Fire Code: An Overview for Tenants FEDERATION OF METRO TENANTS ASSOCIATIONS Contents 3 THE 4 IMPORTANT BASEMENT 7 UNDERSTANDING 8 LAW ROLE OF THE FIRE PREVENTION OFFICE PROVISIONS OF THE FIRE CODE
More informationAndraus high-rise, Sao Paulo, Brazil, February 1972
Andraus high-rise, Sao Paulo, Brazil, February 1972 Of the 450 rescued, 350 were lifted off the roof by a fleet of 11 helicopters over a period of 4 hours 100 were saved at the 14th storey level using
More information2.1 Alarm Source How was the alarm reported? UCT 911/ Phone, ERS, Class-3, BARS, Verbal.
SIZE-UP CHAPTER 2 December 7, 2013 1. INTRODUCTION Size-up begins with the receipt of the alarm and continues until the fire is under control. It is an ongoing process that may require modification as
More informationMasshouse Plot 3, Land at Masshouse Lane/Park Street, Masshouse Plaza, City Centre, Birmingham, B5
Committee Date: 21/08/2014 Application Number: 2014/02950/PA Accepted: 07/05/2014 Application Type: Full Planning Target Date: 06/08/2014 Ward: Nechells Masshouse Plot 3, Land at Masshouse Lane/Park Street,
More informationRegistration of the Premises in 2D Cadastral System in Poland
Registration of the Premises in 2D Cadastral System in Poland Marcin Karabin Ph.D. Warsaw University of Technology Faculty of Geodesy and Cartography Department of Cadastre and Land Management Polish cadaster
More information(Council) upon the application of the Civic League of Greater. New Brunswick (League) for an Order prohibiting the Township of
STATE OF NEW JERSEY COUNCIL ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING Docket No. In the Matter of the ) CIVIC LEAGUE OF GREATER NEW BRUNSWICK, ) Objector, Civil Action v. ) OPINION EDISON TOWNSHIP, a municipal corporation
More informationOntario Energy Board Decision on Installation of Smart Sub-Metering Systems in Rental Residential Buildings
STAFF REPORT INFORMATION ONLY Ontario Energy Board Decision on Installation of Smart Sub-Metering Systems in Rental Residential Buildings Date: September 29, 2009 To: From: Wards: City Council General
More information