BUILDING CODE COMMISSION
|
|
- Melina Spencer
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Ruling No Application No BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Article and of Regulation 403/06, as amended, the Building Code. AND IN THE MATTER OF an application by James Doubt, J.E. Doubt Associates Inc., for the resolution of a dispute with Ted Marecak, Chief Building Official, City of Belleville, to determine whether the proposal to classify the accessories display area and the all terrain vehicle, motorcycle and small engine equipment showroom, which will form part of a new addition to the existing motor vehicle sales and service building, as a Group F, Division 2 major occupancy, provides sufficiency of compliance with Article and of the Building Code at West City Honda, 670 Dundas Street West, R.R.2, Belleville, Ontario. APPLICANT RESPONDENT PANEL PLACE James Doubt J.E. Doubt Associates Inc Coburg, ON Ted Marecak Chief Building Official City of Belleville Tony Chow, Chair Alison Orr Mina Tesseris Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING June 4, 2009 DATE OF RULING June 4, 2009 APPEARANCES Jon Winton Leber / Rubes Inc. Toronto, ON Agent for the Applicant Brett Forestell Deputy Chief Building Official City of Belleville, ON Designate for the Respondent
2
3 RULING 1. Particulars of Dispute The Applicant has applied for a permit under the Building Code Act, 1992, to construct an addition to an existing vehicle dealership at West City Honda, 670 Dundas Street West, R.R.2, Belleville, Ontario. The existing building is a 1267 m², single storey, and is comprised of a service area, offices and a car showroom. The one storey addition is intended to extend the building horizontally by 733 m² in building area. The building addition will contain a service area, sales office, accessory display area, and a vehicle showroom for such items as all terrain vehicles, motorcycles and small engine equipment. The accessory and display area is expected to occupy approximately 674m² of the total floor area. The building is comprised of noncombustible construction and is not equipped with a sprinkler system, standpipe system or a fire alarm system but is equipped with a monitored security system incorporating fire detection devices. The dispute centers on the major occupancy classification of the addition. Both the Applicant and the Respondent agree that the proposed addition will contain more than one major occupancy and further, agree that the proposed addition will contain Group F, Division 2 and Group D occupancies. However, the Applicant s position is that the accessory display area and showroom should be classified as a Group F, Division 2 major occupancy, while it is the Respondent s position that the subject area should be classified as a Group E major occupancy. 2. Provisions of the Building Code in Dispute Classification of Buildings (1) Except as permitted by Articles to , every building or part of it shall be classified according to its major occupancy as belonging to one of the Groups or Divisions described in Table (2) A building intended for use by more than one major occupancy shall be classified according to all major occupancies for which it is used or intended to be used Multiple Major Occupancies (1) Except as permitted by Articles and , in a building containing more than one major occupancy, the requirements of this Subsection for the most restricted major occupancy contained shall apply to the whole building. 3. Applicant s Position It is the Applicant s position that the building contains a combination of Group D and Group F, Division 2 major occupancies and that the Group D portion of the building includes the sales/administrative office portions of the building and that the Group F, Division 2 portion of the building includes the vehicle showroom, accessories display area and vehicle service shops. The Agent for the Applicant stated that the principal concern to the Applicant, with respect to classifying the showroom and accessory display spaces as a Group F, Division 2 major occupancy or E major occupancy, is that a Group F Division 2 classification would not require the building to be sprinklered as a result of its increased building area. The Agent submitted that the vehicle showroom and accessory display area is not a mercantile,
4 Group E major occupancy, as mercantile occupancies contain substantial quantities of retail goods, displayed in high density arrangements with moderately high occupant loads. On the contrary, motor vehicle showrooms do not have the same high fire loads or high occupant load characteristics as mercantile occupancies and therefore, do not require same levels of fire protection. The Agent submitted that based on Sentence (1) of the Building Code using 3.7 m²/person as per Table , the occupant load of the building showroom and accessory display area would be 182 persons for a mercantile occupancy. The Agent claimed that although the Building Code does not provide an occupant load factor for automobile showrooms 182 person occupant load is excessive for the intended use and that an occupant load of 72 persons for a showroom is more realistic based on the office occupant load factor of 9.3 m²/person, as purchases require the assistance of a sales person and sales offices are provided for a limited quantity of staff. The Agent argued that a Group F, Division 2 occupancy for the showroom and display areas is a reasonable classification as contents are displayed in a manner that is not representative of the high combustible loads of a retail or department store. The showroom will contain samples of vehicles, power equipment and accessories that are available for purchase with accessory displays are expected to carry a limited quantity of apparel, for example: jackets, shirts, helmets, and gloves. The Agent submitted that the sample vehicles and equipment displayed are in new condition, stationary, contain no fuel, have disconnected batteries to reduce spark ignition potential and are not operated within the showroom. As a result, the risk of fire in the vehicle showroom is considered to be less that of a storage garage (F-3 occupancy) or a repair garage (F-2 occupancy), where vehicles are under individual control, in operation, contain fuel, may be in poor condition or may be undergoing service. The Agent argued that as per Appendix note A (1) of the 2005 National Building Code of Canada includes salesrooms as both Group F, Division 2 and 3 major occupancies rather than Group E mercantile and therefore, an automobile dealer s showroom is consistent with this use. The Agent further argued that the Ontario Office of Fire Marshal s standard fire incident reporting system used to collect fire incident data utilizes the alphabetical occupancy classification system of the Ontario Building Code and specifically, identifies motor vehicle sales and motor vehicle parts, accessory sales as Group F industrial occupancies rather than Group E mercantile occupancy. In summary, the Agent stated that it was the Applicant s position that neither the building addition nor the existing building are required to be sprinklered because the showroom and display areas are classified as a Group F, Division 2 major occupancy. 4. Respondent s Position The Designate for the Respondent submitted that Article of the Ontario Building Code states, a building intended for use by more than one major occupancy shall be classified according to all major occupancies for which it is used or intended to be used. He stated that the proposed addition to the building is to be used by Honda Power Products for the sales and servicing of products such as: motorcycles, all terrain vehicles, marine, lawn and garden power equipment, generators, water pumps and snow blowers. The Designate described the existing building s uses are motor vehicle sales, parts and apparel sales and motor vehicle repair garage.
5 He therefore, claimed that the subject building would contain Group F, Division 2, Group D and Group E, major occupancies. The Designate explained that when determining the classification of the building according to Sentence (1) of Division B of the Building Code, the corresponding Appendix note was also referenced and reviewed. The Appendix advised that to ensure correct classification, refer to the definitions for each occupancy in Part 1, of Division A. The Designate stated that when reviewing the occupancy definitions for Group D, Group E, and Group F2 in the Building Code, it was evident that the extended building would contain all of the above occupancies, including Group E, mercantile occupancy. The Designate referring to Division A of the Building Code, stated that mercantile occupancy is defined as the occupancy or use of a building or part of a building for the displaying or selling of retail goods, wares or merchandise, and as such, the use of the accessories display area and the small engine showroom are considered a Group E, mercantile occupancy. Further, the Designate argued that as per Sentence (1) of Division B of the Building Code which states, Except as permitted by Articles and , in a building containing more than one major occupancy, the requirements of this Subsection for the most restricted major occupancy contained shall apply to the whole building that when determining the building size and construction relative to occupancy, the Group E building classification is the most restricted major occupancy and would therefore, require the building to be sprinklered. The Designate also pointed out that although the 2005 National Building Code of Canada included the term salesroom as both a Group F, Division 2 and 3 major occupancy the Ontario Building Code listed salesroom as a group F, Division 2 or 3 major occupancy until 1997, when it was removed from the list. The Designated concluded that the removal of this term from the Group F, Division 2 or 3 occupancy category was intentional for the purpose of more accurately reflecting the many possible combination of uses that could be applicable to a salesroom occupancy. 5. Commission Ruling It is the Decision of the Building Code Commission that the proposal to classify the accessories display area and the all terrain vehicle, motorcycle and small engine equipment showroom, which will form part of a new addition to the existing motor vehicle sales and service building, as a Group F, Division 2 major occupancy, does not provide sufficiency of compliance with Article and of the Building Code at West City Honda, 670 Dundas Street West, R.R.2, Belleville, Ontario. 6. Reasons i) Article of Division B of the Building Code states, (1) every building or part of it shall be classified according to its major occupancy as belonging to one of the Groups or Divisions described in Table and (2) A building intended for use by more than one major occupancy shall be classified according to all major occupancies for which it is used or intended to be used. The Commission heard that the parties were in agreement that the proposed addition will contain more than one major occupancy and further, agreed that the proposed addition would contain Group F, Division 2 and Group D occupancies. However, the parties were not in agreement that the display area and showroom be classified as a Group E major occupancy.
6 Division A, Part 1 of the Building Code defines Mercantile occupancy as the occupancy or use of a building or part of a building for the displaying or selling of retail goods, wares or merchandise. Based on the evidence, drawings and testimony of the parties and the definition of a mercantile occupancy as described in the Building Code, it is the Commission s opinion that the proposed building addition will contain a Group E major occupancy where merchandise will be displayed and sold. ii) Sentence (1) of Division B of the Building Code states, Except as permitted by Articles and , in a building containing more than one major occupancy, the requirements of this Subsection for the most restricted major occupancy contained shall apply to the whole building. In this case, the most restricted major occupancy contained in the building is the Group E major occupancy and therefore, the construction requirements for a Group E major occupancy apply to the building.
7 Dated at Toronto this 4 th day in the month of June in the year 2009 for application number Tony Chow, Chair Alison Orr Mina Tesseris
BUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 08-04-1178 Application No. B-2007-47 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND AND IN THE MATTER OF Sentence 3.2.9.2.(1)
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 05-13-1027 Application No. 2005-05 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Sentences 3.1.3.2.(2)
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 08-03-1177 Application No. 2007-26 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Articles 3.4.4.1.,
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No.: 10-29-1265 Application No.: B-2010-24 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Clause 3.4.4.2.(2)(f)
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 09-03-1215 Application No. B-2009-01 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF with Sentences 3.3.1.3.(9)
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 01-30-823 Application # 2001-04 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24 (1) of the Building Code Act, 1992. AND IN THE MATTER OF Article 3.2.9.1. of Regulation 403, as amended
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 02-43-898 Application No. 2002-46 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Sentences 3.2.1.1.(4),
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 05-06-1020 Application No. 2004-74 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Article 1.1.3.2 of
More informationCOUNCIL ORDER No
SAFETY CODES COUNCIL #000, 0665 Jasper Avenue N.W., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T5J 389 Tel: 780430099 I 888430099 Fax: 78044534 I 88844534 www.safetycodes.ab.ca COUNCIL ORDER No. 005443 BEFORE THE BUILDINGTECHNICALCOUNCIL
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No.03-10-908 Application No. 2003-06 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Sentences 3.3.1.8.(1)
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling # 01-20-813 Application # 2001-23 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24 (1) of the Building Code Act, 1992. AND IN THE MATTER OF Article 9.5.2.1. and Clause 3.8.1.1.(1)(c) of Regulation
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 04-33-988 Application No. 2004-28 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Sentence 3.4.6.3.(2)
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 03-14-912 Application No. 2003-05 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Clause 10.1.1.2.(1)(a)
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 09-05-1217 Application No. 2009-03 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Article 3.3.1.15. and
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 03-21-919 Application No. 2003-20 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Sentence 3.8.3.3. (5)
More informationPART. Building Planning. Chapter 3: Building Use Chapter 4: Construction Types Chapter 5: Building Size Chapter 6: Special Uses and Considerations
PART II Building Planning Chapter 3: Building Use Chapter 4: Construction Types Chapter 5: Building Size Chapter 6: Special Uses and Considerations 29 CHAPTER 3 Building Use Buildings are used in different
More informationSECTION REQUIREMENT PROPOSAL. An E-Employment sign district may contain a wall sign provided the sign shall only be erected at the first storey.
STAFF REPORT FIRST PARTY SIGN VARIANCE Appeal by Pattison Sign Group of the Decision of the Chief Building Official for Two First Party Sign Variances With Respect to a First Party Sign Proposal on the
More informationNo person shall within any General Commercial (C3) Zone use any lot or erect, alter or use any building or structure except as specified hereunder:
5.22 GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C3) ZONE No person shall within any General Commercial (C3) Zone use any lot or erect, alter or use any building or structure except as specified hereunder: 5.22.1 Uses Permitted
More informationOntario Municipal Board Decision issued July 28, 2014 and Orders issued December 4 and 17, 2015 in Board File No. PL CITY OF TORONTO
Authority: Ontario Municipal Board Decision issued July 28, 2014 and Orders issued December 4 and 17, 2015 in Board File No. PL131305 CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW No. 673-2016(OMB) To amend Chapters 304, 320
More informationCONSTRUCTION PERMIT FEE SUMMARY
DRU SILEY DIRECTOR OF PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 216/529-6634 DIVISION OF HOUSING AND BUILDING 12650 DETROIT AVENUE LAKEWOOD, OHIO 44107 216/529-6270 FAX 216/529-5930 Website: www.onelakewood.com MICHAEL MOLINSKI,
More informationCHAPTER CC (COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL) ZONE
CHAPTER 17.143 CC (COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL) ZONE Section Title Page 17.143.010 Purpose 1 17.143.020 Permitted Uses 1 17.143.030 Conditional Uses 3 17.143.040 Approval Standards for Conditional Uses 3 17.143.050
More information2014 Alberta Building Code Classifications of Buildings and the Types of Occupancies Allowed within Buildings
Classification of Buildings Buildings are classified (e.g. Group D, E, A, B, F, etc.) by the building designer to allow specific types of occupancies (e.g. offices, restaurants, gyms, etc.), however not
More informationPP Course # Instructor Information. Patrick Vandergriff 35 Cottonwood Canyon Road La Luz, NM
Instructor Information PP Course #15788 Patrick Vandergriff 35 Cottonwood Canyon Road La Luz, NM 88337 1-575-430-8752 pvandergriff@codeconsult.org 1 Detailing of Mixed Occupancy Structures within the 2018
More informationAPPLICATION TO SELL FIREWORKS Schedule B to By-law See Part 2 (attached) for further information.
APPLICATION TO SELL FIREWORKS Schedule B to By-law 600-05 See Part 2 (attached) for further information. LICENCE FEE: $100.00 (Annual Fee which expires December 31 st ) Legal & Legislative Services Department
More information2012 IBC Mixed Occupancies
Accreditation 2012 IBC Mixed Occupancies Based on the 2012 International Building Code (IBC ) The International Code Council has been accredited as an Authorized Provider by the International Association
More informationA001 DEMOLITION SITE PLAN A001 1:300 ADDITION DICKINSON DRIVE INGLESIDE, ONTARIO CATHOLIC DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF EASTERN ONTARIO
DEMOLITION SITE AS NOTED No J.V.D. A001 1:300 0 10.0 m 50 m J.J. 2016-04-25 A001 ACAD FILE/FICHIER: 1619-A001.DWG SITE 1:300 No J.V.D. J.J. A002 A002 1:300 0 10.0 m 50 m 2016-04-20 ACAD FILE/FICHIER: 1619-A002.DWG
More information2015 IBC Allowable Heights and Areas
2015 IBC Allowable Heights and Based on the 2015 International Building Code (IBC ) Course Description This seminar addresses the key issues of the 2015 International Building Code (IBC ) Chapter 5 regarding
More informationSUMMARY. July 24, 2006
SUMMARY QUESTION: Is a motor vehicle dealership responsible for collecting and remitting: 1) Florida sales tax applicable to a down payment made under a motor vehicle lease; 2) Florida sales tax applicable
More informationi) Draft Plan of Subdivision 19T-98V10 has been registered,
1030) 1. The following provisions shall apply to all lands zoned with the holding symbol (H) as shown on Schedule E-1126", until the holding symbol (H) is removed pursuant to Subsection 36(4) of the Planning
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 03-52-950 Application No. 2003-55 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Article 1.1.3.2. of
More informationORDINANCE NO ORDINANCE TO AMEND AN ORDINANCE CODIFIED IN THE CODE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF NUTLEY, CHAPTER 272, ENTITLED CONSTRUCTION CODES, UNIFORM
ORDINANCE #3348 INTRODUCED BY: COMMISSIONER THOMAS J. EVANS INTRODUCED ON: AUGUST 16, 2016 PUBLISHED: AUGUST 25, 2016 PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPTION: SEPTEMBER 20, 2016 PUBLISHED: SEPTEMBER 29, 2016 ORDINANCE
More information1. Standards for planned shopping business centers shall be as follows: Shopping Center Standards. Type Characteristics Size
Sec. 4-6.69 Planned Unit Development Business (PUD-B). a. Definition: A planned, multi-use development classified as either a neighborhood, community, or regional shopping business or Waterfront Urban
More informationOntario Municipal Board Order issued October 22, 2014 in Board File No. PL CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No (OMB)
Authority: Ontario Municipal Board Order issued October 22, 2014 in Board File No. PL130888 CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW No. 1083-2014(OMB) To amend former City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 438-86 with respect
More informationE. Maintain and preserve the character of the community and residential neighborhoods; and
822 HOME OCCUPATIONS 822.01 PURPOSE Section 822 is adopted to: A. Encourage economic development in the County by promoting home occupations; B. Reduce vehicle miles traveled by providing opportunities
More informationCHAPTER 1321 Permit and Inspection Fees
CHAPTER 1321 Permit and Inspection Fees 1321.01 General building permit fees. 1321.02 Heating, ventilating, air conditioning and refrigeration permit fees. 1321.03 Plumbing and sewer permit fees. 1321.04
More informationCITY COUNCIL AGENDA: JUNE 21, 2005 PUBLIC HEARING
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA: JUNE 21, 2005 PUBLIC HEARING TITLE: SOURCE: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 4-2005 - PROPOSED FAMILY ARCADE TO BE LOCATED AT 841 WEST HENDERSON AVENUE (PORTERVILLE PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER) COMMUNITY
More informationCITY OF REEDLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1733 NINTH STREET REEDLEY, CA (559) , EXT. 222
CITY OF REEDLEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1733 NINTH STREET REEDLEY, CA 93654 (559) 637-4200, EXT. 222 HOME OCCUPATION PERMIT APPLICATION NO. Filing Fee: $ (Non-refundable) Date received: Received
More informationBUILDING DIVISION SIMPLIFIED BUILDING PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE January 01st, 2019 to December 31st, 2019
How to Calculate Permit Fees: To calculate the mit fee required at the time of application the following is used 1. Determine which Class of Work is applicable 2. Determine the Area of Work (i.e. project
More informationSCHEDULE A TO BY-LAW NUMBER (Amended by By-law ) CLASSES OF PERMITS AND PERMIT FEES
SCHEDULE A TO BY-LAW NUMBER 2010-24 (Amended by By-law 2016-40) CLASSES OF PERMITS AND PERMIT FEES 1. Except where a minimum flat fee is indicated for the Occupancy Classification or Type of Construction,
More informationDelay Attribution Board Floor 8 1 Eversholt Street London NW1 2DN. Performance Data Accuracy Code
Delay Attribution Board Floor 8 1 Eversholt Street London NW1 2DN Performance Data Accuracy Code CONTENTS CONTENTS... 2 PERFORMANCE DATA ACCURACY CODE... 3 1 Definitions... 3 2 Aims... 4 3 Effects of the
More informationARTICLE 94. PD 94. Unless otherwise stated, the definitions and interpretations in Chapter 51 apply to this
ARTICLE 94. PD 94. SEC. 51P-94.101. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY. PD 94 was established by Ordinance No. 15580, passed by the Dallas City Council on August 17, 1977. Ordinance No. 15580 amended Ordinance No. 10962,
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MEETING DATE: 19 January 2017 APPLICANT: South Salt Lake City PROJECT NUMBER: T-17-002 REQUEST: APPLICANT: PREPARED BY: Recommendation to the South Salt Lake City Council
More informationPermit fees shall be calculated based on the formula given below, unless otherwise specified in this schedule:
CLASSES OF PERMITS AND PERMIT FEES 1. CALCULATION OF PERMIT FEES FOR CONSTRUCTION: (6) Permit fees shall be calculated based on the formula given below, unless otherwise specified in this schedule: Permit
More informationTOWNSHIP OF MOORESTOWN ORDINANCE NO
TOWNSHIP OF MOORESTOWN ORDINANCE NO. 4-2018 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MOORESTOWN AMENDING CHAPTER 180 ENTITLED ZONING TO REVISE THE ZONING MAP OF THE TOWNSHIP OF MOORESTOWN FOR BLOCK 4801, LOT 12,
More informationTruckee Development Code User s Guide TOWN OF TRUCKEE. A. Introduction...3. B. Organization of the Development Code 3
TOWN OF TRUCKEE Development Code User s Guide A. Introduction...3 B. Organization of the Development Code 3 I. Development Code Enactment and Applicability.3 II. Zoning Districts and Allowable Land Uses....4
More informationdeems it advisable to amend By-Law No , as amended, of Township of Kingston;
Clause 1, Report No. 63,2000 BY-LAW NO. 2000-144 A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW NO. 76-26 RESTRICTED AREA ZONING BY-LAW OF THE FORMER TOWNSHIP OF KINGSTON, (SITE SPECIFIC - 780 DEVELOPMENT DRIVE - TO PERMIT
More informationGroupe d Etudes UTILISATEURS WAGONS Studiengruppe WAGENVERWENDER Study Group WAGON USERS
Groupe d Etudes UTILISATEURS WAGONS Studiengruppe WAGENVERWENDER Study Group WAGON USERS Amendments and additions to the GCU: Appendix 9, Proposal 1 Title and text: link with UIC 471-2, Technical Transfer
More informationSCHEDULE A. Permit fees shall be calculated based on the formula given below, unless otherwise specified in this schedule:
SCHEDULE A CLASSES OF PERMITS AND PERMIT FEES 1. CALCULATION OF PERMIT FEES FOR CONSTRUCTION: (6) Permit fees shall be calculated based on the formula given below, unless otherwise specified in this schedule:
More informationNew Comprehensive Zoning
New Comprehensive Zoning By-law Project Phase 2: Strategic Directions Development Services Committee June 14, 2016 Task 1: Guiding Principles and Parameters & Trends and Issues in Zoning 1. Drafting of
More informationCALGARY ASSESSMENT REVIEW BOARD DECISION WITH REASONS
CALGARY ASSESSMENT REVIEW BOARD DECISION WITH REASONS In the matter of the complaint against the property assessment as provided by the Municipal Government Act, Chapter M-26, Section 460, Revised Statutes
More informationBY-LAW NO BUILDING BY-LAW
BY-LAW NO. 4-99 BUILDING BY-LAW The Council of the town of Rothesay, under authority vested in it by Section 59 of the Community Planning Act, R.S.N.B. (1973) Chapter C-12, and amendments thereto, enacts
More informationAPPENDIX B - SCHEDULE OF FEES * Code Section CHAPTER 6 ADVERTISING. Description
APPENDIX B - SCHEDULE OF FEES * Cross reference Businesses, ch. 26; taxation, ch. 94. Code Section CHAPTER 6 ADVERTISING Description 6-34 License fee for sound amplification device, per day CHAPTER 10
More information1349 S Huron St, Ypsilanti, MI 48197
SPECTACULAR OFFICE SETTING 1349 S Huron St, Ypsilanti, MI 48197 Listing ID: 30171622 Status: Active Property Type: For Sale Type: Executive Suites, High-Tech Size: 15,265 SF Sale Price: $1,600,000 Unit
More informationC O N F I D E N T I A L
00320540000001 Bexar Appraisal District COMMON ACCT.# PID: RETURN COMPLETED RENDITION BY 1 APRIL 2018 NAME OF BUSINESS (DBA) AND LOCATION OF PROPERTY: IF OUT OF BUSINESS GIVE DATE (OPTIONAL) C O N F I
More informationMETHODOLOGY GUIDE VALUING LANDS IN TRANSITION IN ONTARIO. Valuation Date: January 1, 2016
METHODOLOGY GUIDE VALUING LANDS IN TRANSITION IN ONTARIO Valuation Date: January 1, 2016 August 2017 August 22, 2017 The Municipal Property Assessment Corporation (MPAC) is responsible for accurately assessing
More informationJ IJ S RECEIVED RECOMMENDATION APPLICATION
Th J IJ STAFF REPORT Committee of Adjustment Application Date: Thursday, February 1 1, 2016 To: Chair and Committee Members of the Committee of Adjustment Etobicoke York Panel i?rom: Director, Community
More informationCity of High Point Development Fee Schedule
City of High Point Development Fee Schedule Effective August 3, 2015 BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of High Point, North Carolina that pursuant to the provisions of NCGS 160A-414 and Section
More informationExtracts from the National Building Code of Canada
3) The number of lamps connected to a single unit equipment shall not result in a load in excess of the watts output rating marked on the equipment for the emergency period required by the National Building
More informationProposed Framework for Multi-Residential Rental Property Licence. Tenant Issues Committee Licensing and Standards Committee
TD3.3 STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Proposed Framework for Multi-Residential Rental Property Licence Date: May 3, 2016 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Tenant Issues Committee Licensing and Standards
More informationSPECIAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE MINUTES Wednesday February 17, :00 p.m. Town Council Chambers Page 1
Page 1 Procedural Note: Revised February 17, 2016 Special Planning and Development Committee Minutes as approved by Motion 16-GC-087 (Addition of items 5-11 under Public Meetings). 1. CALL TO ORDER Committee
More informationBYLAWS. Mariner ridge VIS3920. Adopted May 28, Division 1 Duties of Owners, Tenants, Occupants and Visitors
BYLAWS Mariner ridge VIS3920 Adopted May 28, 2001 Payment of strata fees Division 1 Duties of Owners, Tenants, Occupants and Visitors 1. (1) An owner must pay strata fees on or before the first day of
More informationPlanning&Development Fee Standards
Comprehensive Schedule Standards Payment Due s for applications and plan reviews are due with the submission of the application or plan. In accordance with the city's Development Ordinance, no action shall
More informationACCESSORY APARTMENTS OLDER THAN FIVE YEARS
ACCESSORY APARTMENTS OLDER THAN FIVE YEARS INCLUDED: LIST OF REQUIREMENTS SAMPLE DRAWINGS Planning & Development Services Tel. 905-683-4550 Fax. 905-686-0360 TOWN OF AJAX 65 Harwood Ave South Ajax ON L1S
More informationWALLER COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT MASS APPRAISAL REPORT APPRAISAL YEAR 2018
WALLER COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT MASS APPRAISAL REPORT APPRAISAL YEAR 2018 ADDENDUM TO WCAD REAPPRAISAL PLAN FOR 2017 AND 2018 WALLER COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal
More informationBuilding Permit Fees below include $30 Zoning Filing fee and $4 State Education and Training fee, unless noted otherwise.
CITY OF PITTSBURGH DEPARTMENT OF PERMITS, LICENSES, AND INSPECTIONS 200 Ross Street, Suite 320, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 phone (412) 255-2175, fax (412) 255-2974 2016 FEE SCHEDULE PERMITS AND LICENSES Effective
More informationCALGARY ASSESSMENT REVIEW BOARD DECISION WITH REASONS
Page 1 of5.. carb 2866/2011-P- CALGARY ASSESSMENT REVIEW BOARD DECISION WITH REASONS In the matter of the complaint against the property assessment as provided by the Municipal Government Act, Chapter
More informationenter into land leases; 2. donate land; or 3. provide land at below market value.
4.4-1 Date: 2016/06/07 To: Chair and Members of Planning and Development Committee From: Edward R. Sajecki, Commissioner of Planning and Building Originator s files: CD.06.AFF Meeting date: 2016/06/27
More informationHomeowners Guide to Accessory Dwelling Units
Homeowners Guide to Accessory Dwelling Units Applicable to Buildings in existence AFTER July 14, 1994 In accordance with Zoning By law 2010 050 and the Ontario Building Code 2012 Town of Bradford West
More informationFor use by Principal Authority. Township of Georgian Bay (Name of municipality, upper-tier municipality, board of health or conservation authority)
SEPTIC Application for a Permit to Construct or Demolish This form is authorized under subsection 8(1.1) of the Building Code Act. For use by Principal Authority Application number: Permit number (if different):
More informationCentral Alberta Regional Assessment Review Board
Central Alberta Regional Assessment Review Board REGIONAL ASSESSMENT REVIEW BOARD DECISION HEARING DATE: October 17, 2013 PRESIDING OFFICER: A. KNIGHT BOARD MEMBER: V. KEELER BOARD MEMBER: R. SCHNELL BETWEEN:
More informationACCESSORY USE PERMIT APPLICATION
TOWN OF CARY Submit to the Development Customer Service Center, P.O. Box 8005, Cary, NC 27512 Planning Department Planning Department Contact: (919) 469-4046 Fee: $50.00 For office use only: Method of
More informationTHAT this Committee of Adjustment meeting come to order at 7:00 pm.
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES October 5, 2011-7:00 PM Council Chamber Administration Centre, Minesing Present: Gregory J. Barker Cor Kapteyn Tami Kitay Robert McClung Gerald Sullivan Also Present: Laura
More informationWoldingham Association
Regulation 18 Sites Consultation Representation Representation on the 2016 Regulation 18 Sites Consultation for the Tandridge Local Plan Part 1 from the Submitted to Tandridge District Council on 20 Dec
More informationASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
2018 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY COST APPROACH A summary of the methods used by the City of Edmonton in determining the value of residential and non-residential properties valued using the cost approach in
More informationReal Estate Council of Ontario DISCIPLINE DECISION
Real Estate Council of Ontario DISCIPLINE DECISION IN THE MATTER OF A DISCIPLINE HEARING HELD PURSUANT TO THE REAL ESTATE AND BUSINESS BROKERS ACT, 2002, S.O. 2002, c. 30, Sch. C BETWEEN: REGISTRAR UNDER
More informationCOMMERCIAL BUSINESS GUIDE
BUILDING AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Licensing & Code Compliance Division 18400 MURDOCK CIRCLE PORT CHARLOTTE, FL 33948 www.charlottecountyfl.com/bcs To exceed expectations in the delivery of public
More informationCALGARY ASSESSMENT REVIEW BOARD DECISION WITH REASONS
Page1 of5 CALGARY ASSESSMENT REVIEW BOARD DECISION WITH REASONS In the matter of the complaint against the property assessment as provided by the Municipal Government Act, Chapter M-26, Section 460, Revised
More informationAbout This Report. Risk Id: 32 NC CHURCH ST CHARLOTTE NC
About This Report The Property Details Report provides comparative building analytics, key attributes of the building, along with photos and aerial imagery of the building, and other important information
More informationCommittee of Adjustment Agenda. Meeting Date: Monday January 9, 2017 Woodstock City Hall, Council Chambers Regular Session: 7:00 PM
Committee of Adjustment Agenda Meeting Date: Monday January 9, 2017 Place: Woodstock City Hall, Council Chambers Regular Session: 7:00 PM Chair: Tom Rock 1. Declaration of Conflict Of Interest 2. Approval
More informationDispute Resolution Services Residential Tenancy Branch Ministry of Housing and Social Development
Dispute Resolution Services Residential Tenancy Branch Ministry of Housing and Social Development Decision Dispute Codes: OPF FF Introduction This Dispute Resolution hearing was convened to deal with the
More informationCITY OF BELLEVILLE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES
CITY OF BELLEVILLE PLANNING ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES September 4, 2018 A Regular Meeting of the Belleville Planning Advisory Committee was held in the City Hall Council Chamber on the above date
More informationDuties of Surveyors under Statutory Conventions and Codes
(Sept 2007) (Rev.1 Mar 2012) (Rev.2 June 2016) Duties of Surveyors under Statutory Conventions and Codes 1. Preamble 1.1. The provisions of the statutory conventions and codes define in general terms the
More informationDispute Resolution Services
Dispute Resolution Services Page: 1 Residential Tenancy Branch Office of Housing and Construction Standards A matter regarding York Hotel Inc. and Torrent Real Estate Inc. and Parkdale Enterprises and
More informationFOR SALE 5 STOREY COMMERCIAL BUILDING 247 SPADINA AVENUE (DOWNTOWN WEST) TORONTO OPPORTUNITY
FOR SALE 5 STOREY COMMERCIAL BUILDING (DOWNTOWN WEST) TORONTO OPPORTUNITY An excellent opportunity for a User/Investor to purchase a 5 storey Commercial building in Downtown West, on Spadina Avenue between
More informationSECTION 6 COMMERCIAL ZONES
No person shall hereafter use any lands nor erect, alter, enlarge or use any building or structure in a Commercial Zone except in accordance with the provisions of this Section and of any other relevant
More informationCity of Sanibel Planning Department
City of Sanibel Planning Department STAFF REPORT Planning Commission Meeting July 9, 2013 Agenda Item: No. 7 a. Subject: Commercial Redevelopment Kickoff Discussion by the Planning Commission At the June
More informationAuthority: Ontario Municipal Board Decision/Orders issued August 1, 2014, January 23, 2015 and May 15, 2015 in Board File No. PL CITY OF TORONTO
Authority: Ontario Municipal Board Decision/Orders issued August 1, 2014, January 23, 2015 and May 15, 2015 in Board File No. PL140007 CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW No. 586-2015(OMB) To amend former City of North
More information4. INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW PUBLIC MEETINGS
TOWNSHIP OF CRAMAHE PUBLIC MEETING DATE: MARCH 8, 2016 TIME: PLACE: 6:45 PM COUNCIL CHAMBERS Page 1. CALL TO ORDER at 6:45 pm 2. RECORDING EQUIPMENT Members of the Public are to advise the Clerk of the
More informationFREESTANDING RETAIL BLDG WITH US 1 FRONTAGE
FREESTANDING RETAIL BLDG WITH US 1 FRONTAGE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Many possible uses for this free standing building with 5,164 square feet under air plus a 1,859 square foot outdoor deck. Great US 1 visibility
More informationApplication for a Permit to Construct or Demolish This form is authorized under subsection 8(1.1) of the Building Code Act.
Application for a Permit to Construct or Demolish P10 This form is authorized under subsection 8(1.1) of the Building Code Act. Application number: For use by Principal Authority Permit number (if different):
More informationScarborough Community Council Item SC32.3, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on July 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 30, 2018 CITY OF TORONTO
Authority: Scarborough Community Council Item SC32.3, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on July 23, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 30, 2018 CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW 1277-2018 To amend former City of Scarborough
More informationAuthority: Toronto and East York Community Council Item 26.9, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on October 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2013 CITY OF TORONTO
Authority: Toronto and East York Community Council Item 26.9, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on October 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2013 CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW No. 1710-2013 To amend former City of Toronto
More informationNEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF CODES AND STANDARDS OFFICE OF STATE AND LOCAL CODE INSPECTIONS ELEVATOR SAFETY UNIT
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF CODES AND STANDARDS OFFICE OF STATE AND LOCAL CODE INSPECTIONS ELEVATOR SAFETY UNIT [ ] NEW or [ ] TRANSFER OF OWNER {CHECK ONE} Registration Number
More informationCentral Alberta Regional Assessment Review Board
Central Alberta Regional Assessment Review Board Decision# CARB 0263-513/2012 Roll 678015006 CENTRAL ALBERTA REGIONAL ASSESSMENT REVEIW BOARD DECISION HEARING DATE: OCTOBER 17, 2012 PRESIDING OFFICER:
More informationHalifax Water Rate Pricing and Stormwater Management Programs. March 4 th, 2013
Halifax Water Rate Pricing and Stormwater Management Programs March 4 th, 2013 Real Property Association of Canada One University Avenue, Suite 1410 Toronto, Ontario Canada M5J 2P1 www.realpac.ca T: (416)
More informationValuing Diamonds in the Rough: Utilizing Highest and Best Use Valuation Principles in a Mass Appraisal Environment
Valuing Diamonds in the Rough: Utilizing Highest and Best Use Valuation Principles in a Mass Appraisal Environment Topics of Discussion Revaluation of a former industrial district at the height of a building
More informationAPPLICATION. Airport Hazard In ETJ - one- and two family dwelling $100 Airport Hazard in ETJ anything other than one- and twofamily
APPENDIX D. FEE SCHEDULE Section A. Schedule of Development Fees. APPLICATION FEE BUILDING PERMITTING, PLAN REVIEW, INSPECTIONS Permit Application fee (all new construction, additions and substantial alterations)
More informationAgenda Item 11: Revenue and Non-Exchange Expenses
Agenda Item 11: Revenue and Non-Exchange Expenses David Bean, Anthony Heffernan, and Amy Shreck IPSASB Meeting June 21-24, 2016 Toronto, Canada Page 1 Proprietary and Copyrighted Information Agenda Item
More informationOff Highway Vehicle (OHV) Use on Creeks
The County of Wetaskiwin is committed to ensuring that OHV use is done in a safe and responsible manner. Part of that commitment includes addressing land use issues that may arise from time to time without
More informationORDINANCE NO
ORDINANCE NO. 99-300 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BIG BEAR LAKE, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 90-187 AND AMENDING THE DEVELOPMENT CODE TO REVISE SECTION 86.0201
More information