BUILDING CODE COMMISSION
|
|
- Sheena Perkins
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Ruling No Application No BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Sentences (4), (2), (3) and (4) of Regulation 403, as amended by O. Reg. 22/98, 102/98, 122/98, 152/99, 278/99, 593/99, 597/99, 205/00 and 283/01 (the Ontario Building Code ). AND IN THE MATTER OF an application by David MacDonald, Facilities Manager, Coca-Cola Bottling Co., for the resolution of a dispute with Brenda Campbell, Chief Building Official, City of Brampton, to determine whether the viewing walkway, having an area of 207 m 2, is a mezzanine which provides sufficiency of compliance with Sentences (4), (2), (3) and (4) of the Ontario Building Code or whether it is considered to be a storey which must be meet the construction requirements for a storey in a building having a Group F, Division 3 occupancy classification at the Coca-Cola Bottling Company, 15 Westcreek Boulevard, Brampton, Ontario. APPLICANT RESPONDENT PANEL PLACE David MacDonald, Facilities Manager Coca-Cola Bottling Co. Brampton, Ontario Brenda Campbell Chief Building Official City of Brampton Michael Steele, Vice-Chair John Guthrie Robert De Berardis Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING December 12 th, 2002 DATE OF RULING December 12 th, 2002 APPEARANCES Randy Brown Randal Brown & Associates Toronto, Ontario Agent for the Applicant Lillyan McGinn Manager of Plans and Permits City of Brampton Designate for the Respondent
2 -2- RULING 1. The Applicant David MacDonald, Facilities Manager, Coca-Cola Bottling Co., has received a building permit under the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended, and has constructed an industrial building at the Coca-Cola Bottling Company, 15 Westcreek Boulevard, Brampton, Ontario. 2. Description of Construction The Applicant has constructed a Coca-Cola bottling facility having a Group F, Division 3 occupancy classification. The structure has a building area of 51,900 m 2 according to the Applicant or 53, m 2 according to the Respondent. It is two storeys in building height and comprised of noncombustible construction. The building is equipped with sprinkler and fire alarm systems. The northern area of the building has two levels of offices and a mezzanine which is open to the plant below. The upper level of offices and mezzanine, having a combined area of 5,705 m 2, exceeds 10% of the building area and has, therefore, been constructed as a storey, having a two hour fire resistance rating and meeting the exiting requirements for second storey construction. The item particular to this dispute involves the construction of a viewing walkway intended for use by tour groups for viewing the bottling production area below. The walkway has an area of 207 m 2 and measures m (278 ft) long by 2.44 m (8 ft) wide. One end of the walkway is adjoined to the second storey floor area, however, the walkway itself has been constructed as a 10% mezzanine. A one hour fire-resistance rating to the underside of the walkway will be provided including the supporting columns and beams. Three egress facilities leading off the walkway have been provided. Two of the egress stairs lead to the plant floor below and a third leads onto the second storey at the west end of the walkway by way of the connection to this level. 3. Dispute The issue at dispute between the Applicant and Respondent is whether the viewing walkway can be considered to be a mezzanine which provides sufficiency of compliance with Sentences (4), (2), (3) and (4) of the Ontario Building Code (OBC) or whether it must be constructed to the same standards as the second storey to which it is adjoined.. Sentence (4) provides that, with exceptions not applicable here, a mezzanine need not be considered as a storey in calculating building height provided that the aggregate area of the mezzanine is not greater than 10% of the area of the storey or suite in which it is located. The subject viewing walkway, having an area of 207 m 2, is less than 10% of the of the building area. One end of this feature, however, forms an 8 m wide connection with the second storey of the structure. Further, Sentences (2), (3) and (4) outline the egress requirements for mezzanines. Clause (d) of Sentence (2) stipulates that, except for mezzanines within a dwelling unit, every mezzanine that is not required to terminate at a vertical fire separation as set out in Article is to have two egress facilities located so that one would provide egress should the other become inaccessible in suites where the floor area is sprinklered and the travel distance to an egress doorway is more than 25 m.
3 -3- Moreover, Sentence (3) provides that if the room or suite in which the mezzanine is located is permitted to have one egress doorway, the travel distance is to be measured from any point on the mezzanine to that doorway. In the alternative, where more than one doorway is required, travel distance is measured from any point on the mezzanine to the nearest egress facility. In addition, as specified in Sentence (4) where the space below the mezzanine is enclosed, an egress facility from the mezzanine shall not lead into the enclosed space. The subject viewing platform, if considered to be an independent feature relative to the second storey construction, is less than 500 m 2 in area. For the purposes of Sentence (2) it would not be required to terminate at a fire separation. Also, according to the Applicant, a 45 m travel distance can be achieved from any point on the viewing walkway using one of the three egress facilities provided. As noted above, two of these egress facilities lead to the production level where exits are then provided at 60 m intervals around the perimeter of the building. A third egress facility is also provided, leading through the second storey from the walkway connection to that floor area. In respect to these construction requirements, it should be noted that the Respondent takes the position that the viewing walkway is an extension of the existing second storey and is, therefore, required to meet the same construction standards and exiting requirements as mandated for a storey in an F3 occupancy. 4. Provisions of the Ontario Building Code Sentence Exceptions in Determining Building Height (4) Except as required by Sentence (5), a mezzanine shall not be considered as a storey in calculating building height and need not conform to Sentence (3) provided the aggregate area of the mezzanine floor is not more than 10% of the area of the (a) (b) the suite in which it is located, where there is more than one suite in the storey, or the storey in which it is located, in all other cases. (See A (3) in Appendix A.) Sentence Egress Doorways (2) Except for a mezzanine within a dwelling unit, every mezzanine that is not required to terminate at a vertical fire separation in Article shall have 2 egress facilities placed in such a manner that one facility could provide egress from the mezzanine if the other facility becomes inaccessible to the occupants of the mezzanine due to a fire which might originate in the room or suite in which the mezzanine is located where (a) the occupancy of the mezzanine, room or suite is classified as Group F, Division 1, (b) the mezzanine is intended for an occupant load of more than 60 persons, (c) in a floor area that is not sprinklered, (i) the area of a mezzanine is more than the value in Table A., or (ii) the travel distance to an egress doorway or an egress facility is more than the value in Table A., or (d) in a floor area that is sprinklered, (i) the travel distance to an egress doorway or an egress facility is more than 25 m (82 ft), or
4 -4- (ii) the area of the mezzanine is more than the value in Table B. (3) For the purpose of Clause (2)(c) and Clause 2(d), (a) if the room or suite in which the mezzanine is located is permitted to have one egress doorway, the travel distance is measured from any point on the mezzanine to that doorway, or (b) if the room or suite in which the mezzanine is located is required to have more than one egress doorway, the travel distance is measured from any point on the mezzanine to the nearest egress facility leading from the mezzanine. (4) Except for a mezzanine which is not considered as a storey in calculating building height in Sentence (4), where the space below a mezzanine is enclosed, an egress facility from the mezzanine shall not lead into the enclosed space. (See Article for exits requirements.) 5. Applicant s Position The Agent for the Applicant described the feature in dispute as a viewing platform which, in his opinion, can be viewed as a mezzanine. He explained that the primary function of this platform will be to allow visitors to tour the plant and view the production area below. It would be used periodically for school field trips and other such educational tours. The Agent advised that a maximum of 36 people would be permitted to use the walkway at any one time and that children must be a minimum of 10 years old to participate in the tour. Conditions to this effect will be included in an approved Fire Safety Plan. In respect to the construction of the walkway the Agent advised that this is an intermediate floor assembly for which the reduced requirements of a 10% mezzanine apply. The walkway will be provided with a one hour fire resistance rating and the two required egress facilities are provided from the mezzanine level. While noting that one end of the walkway is connected to the second storey he stated that there is nothing in the Code which would prohibit that connection. He considers it to be more of a convenience connection and further noted that a third means of egress is provided as a result. In addition, the Agent advised that the building is provided with a single stage fire alarm system and that manual pull stations would be provided at the three egress points from the mezzanine. In summation, the Agent argued that the platform should be viewed as a mezzanine which provides sufficiency of compliance with the associated Code requirements. 6. Respondent s Position The Designate for the Respondent submitted that the initial building permit for this facility was issued in Since that time 26 permits have been issued at various stages of construction. A final occupancy permit has still not been issued however, the building is fully operational and several partial occupancy permits have been approved. The Designate submitted that, in her opinion, the feature in question must be considered as an extension to the second storey of the building, consequently requiring a two hour fire-resistance rating and conforming with the exit provisions of Section 3.4. She based this conclusion on the fact that the
5 -5- viewing platform is an addition to, and continuation of, the second floor area by virtue of the narrow connection at the end of the walkway. The Designate advised that, in her opinion, the intent of the building code is not to consider parts of a continuous floor area distinctly and separately for the purpose of determining less restrictive construction requirements, egress and other life safety measures. It is entirely another matter when considering a separate floor area. Indeed, there are numerous separate mezzanine floor areas within the Coca Cola plant which are not considered a storey as they are less than 10% of the building area and thus conform to Sentence (4). Those mezzanines differ, she stated, because they are separate and distinct floor areas. In summation, the Designate submitted that the aggregate area of the north mezzanine, upper level offices and the subject viewing platform is considered to be a part of the second storey. She argued that various areas of this storey cannot be considered separately for the purposes of determining less restrictive requirements for the fire resistance rating of the floor assembly, egress from the floor area and life safety requirements. 7. Commission Ruling It is the decision of the Building Code Commission that the as-constructed viewing walkway is considered to be a mezzanine that will provide sufficiency of compliance with Sentences (4), (2), (3), and (4) of the Ontario Building Code at the Coca-Cola Bottling Company, 15 Westcreek Boulevard, Brampton, Ontario. 8. Reasons i) Notwithstanding the narrow connection to the second storey, the viewing walkway functions as a mezzanine. ii) iii) The occupant load is restricted in accordance with the approved Fire Safety Plan. Additional directional exit signs are to be provided to identify alternate egress routes from the mezzanine.
6 -6- Dated at Toronto this 12th day in the month of December in the year 2002 for application number Michael Steele, Vice-Chair John Guthrie Robert De Berardis
BUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No.: 10-29-1265 Application No.: B-2010-24 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Clause 3.4.4.2.(2)(f)
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No.03-10-908 Application No. 2003-06 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Sentences 3.3.1.8.(1)
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 04-33-988 Application No. 2004-28 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Sentence 3.4.6.3.(2)
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 08-03-1177 Application No. 2007-26 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Articles 3.4.4.1.,
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 08-04-1178 Application No. B-2007-47 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND AND IN THE MATTER OF Sentence 3.2.9.2.(1)
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 03-21-919 Application No. 2003-20 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Sentence 3.8.3.3. (5)
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 01-30-823 Application # 2001-04 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24 (1) of the Building Code Act, 1992. AND IN THE MATTER OF Article 3.2.9.1. of Regulation 403, as amended
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 09-03-1215 Application No. B-2009-01 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF with Sentences 3.3.1.3.(9)
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 05-06-1020 Application No. 2004-74 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Article 1.1.3.2 of
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 05-13-1027 Application No. 2005-05 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Sentences 3.1.3.2.(2)
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 09-05-1217 Application No. 2009-03 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Article 3.3.1.15. and
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling # 01-20-813 Application # 2001-23 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24 (1) of the Building Code Act, 1992. AND IN THE MATTER OF Article 9.5.2.1. and Clause 3.8.1.1.(1)(c) of Regulation
More informationCOUNCIL ORDER No
SAFETY CODES COUNCIL #000, 0665 Jasper Avenue N.W., Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T5J 389 Tel: 780430099 I 888430099 Fax: 78044534 I 88844534 www.safetycodes.ab.ca COUNCIL ORDER No. 005443 BEFORE THE BUILDINGTECHNICALCOUNCIL
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 03-14-912 Application No. 2003-05 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Clause 10.1.1.2.(1)(a)
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 09-10-1222 Application No. 2009-07 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Article 3.1.2.1 and
More information2015 IBC Allowable Heights and Areas
2015 IBC Allowable Heights and Based on the 2015 International Building Code (IBC ) Course Description This seminar addresses the key issues of the 2015 International Building Code (IBC ) Chapter 5 regarding
More informationSecondary Suites Changes between the 2006 ABC and the 2014 ABC Requirements
Secondary Suites Changes between the 2006 ABC and the 2014 ABC Requirements Alberta Building Code 2006 Alberta Building Code 2014 Change 9.37.2. Construction 9.37.2.1. Height of Rooms and Spaces 1) The
More informationE1-12: Final Decision AS
BCAC COMPILATION OF GROUP A E1-12: Final Decision AS 202, 1006 (New), 1007 (New), 1014.3, 1015, 1020.1, 1021 (IFC [B] 1006 (New), 1007 (New), 1014.3, 1015, 1020.1, 1021) Proponent: Charles S. Bajnai, Chesterfield
More informationNEW ACCESSIBILITY CHANGES
NEW ACCESSIBILITY CHANGES TO THE ONTARIO BUILDING CODE An outline of the accessibility changes made to the Ontario Building Code by Ontario Regulation 368/13. May 9, 2014 OAA CONFERENCE Continuing Education
More informationThe following information is required at submission. Complete submissions can be processed within 10 business days.
Building Permit Requirements Temporary Tent Town of Innisfil Building Services (CDSB) 2101 Innisfil Beach Road Innisfil, Ontario L9S 1A1 705-436-3710 A building permit is required for a tent or group of
More informationSCHEDULE A TO BY-LAW NUMBER (Amended by By-law ) CLASSES OF PERMITS AND PERMIT FEES
SCHEDULE A TO BY-LAW NUMBER 2010-24 (Amended by By-law 2016-40) CLASSES OF PERMITS AND PERMIT FEES 1. Except where a minimum flat fee is indicated for the Occupancy Classification or Type of Construction,
More information(2) Determining Occupant Loads for the Operation of a Building (The Alberta Fire Code)
(d) (e) (f) (g) (h) if emergency lighting is required if exit signs are required if additional requirements apply for high buildings the type of hardware required on exit and access to exit doors the required
More informationOntario Municipal Board Order issued October 22, 2014 in Board File No. PL CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No (OMB)
Authority: Ontario Municipal Board Order issued October 22, 2014 in Board File No. PL130888 CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW No. 1083-2014(OMB) To amend former City of Toronto Zoning By-law No. 438-86 with respect
More informationSection 9.5. Design of Areas, Spaces and Doorways
f):.-"> ~Ontario 2012 Building Code Compendium 9.5.1.5. 9.4.4.5. Reserved 9.4.4.6. Walls Supporting Drained Earth (See Appendix A.) Except where constructed in accordance with Section 9.15., walls supporting
More informationERRATA AND REVISIONS MEASURES FOR FIRE SAFETY IN HIGH BUILDINGS
National Research Council Canada Conseil national de recherches Canada Associate Committee on the NATIONAL BUILDING CODE of Canada Comite associe du CODE NATIONAL DU BATIMENT du Canada Ottawa ERRATA AND
More informationNEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE Division of Building Standards and Codes One Commerce Plaza - 99 Washington Ave Albany, NY 12231
NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF STATE Division of Building Standards and Codes One Commerce Plaza - 99 Washington Ave Albany, NY 12231 Phone: (518) 474 4073 Fax: (518) 486 4487 www.dos.ny.gov Email: info@dos.ny.gov
More information215 Ingraham Street (A2 & A3) 211 Ingraham Street (A4 & A5) Brooklyn NY Johnson Avenue Brooklyn NY THE1896.
THE1896.COM STAGE ENTRANCE 215 Ingraham Street (A2 & A3) 211 Ingraham Street (A4 & A5) Brooklyn NY 11237 MAILING ADDRESS & ART STUDIO ENTRANCE 592 Johnson Avenue Brooklyn NY 11237 T 718.451.6531 E the1896@gmail.com
More informationTHIS CHECKLIST HAS BEEN AMENDED TO INCLUDE ONLY LEVEL ONE CRITERIA AS REQUESTED BY TIR REAL PROPERTY. As such it does not form a complete Checklist.
Nova Scotia Building Accessibility Checklist Note OTE THIS CHECKLIST HAS BEEN AMENDED TO INCLUDE ONLY LEVEL ONE CRITERIA AS REQUESTED BY TIR REAL PROPERTY. As such it does not form a complete Checklist.
More informationOntario s 2012 Building Code Barrier-Free Design Amendments Ontario Regulation 332/12 Amended by O. Regs. 368/13 and 191/14
Ontario s 2012 Building Code Barrier-Free Design Amendments Ontario Regulation 332/12 Amended by O. Regs. 368/13 and 191/14 Notice: This E Learning module is intended for general information purposes only.
More informationCITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No (OMB)
CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW No. 999-2011(OMB) To amend Chapters 320 and 324 of the Etobicoke Zoning Code with respect to certain lands located on the north side of Lake Shore Boulevard West, west of Park Lawn
More informationDATE: 4/24/12 PRESENT AT SITE: Aaron Lobas, Daniel Imlay - URS JOB NAME: Cuyahoga County Huntington Park Garage JOB NUMBER:
HUNTINGTON PARK GARAGE ASSESSMENT May, 2012 APPENDIX A Closed Parking Space Report OBSERVATION REPORT DATE: 4/24/12 PRESENT AT SITE: Aaron Lobas, Daniel Imlay - URS JOB NAME: Cuyahoga County Huntington
More informationThe New NYC Building Code Chapter 11 Accessibility. New York City Department of Buildings. Technical Affairs. Keith Wen, R.A. Copyright Materials
The New NYC Building Code Chapter 11 Accessibility New York City Department of Buildings Technical Affairs Keith Wen, R.A. Copyright Materials This presentation is protected by US and International Copyright
More informationBuilding Permit Requirements New / Enlarged Openings
Building Permit Requirements New / Enlarged Openings Building Permit Application The following information is required at submission. Incomplete applications cannot be accepted. Required Documents & Plans
More informationA001 DEMOLITION SITE PLAN A001 1:300 ADDITION DICKINSON DRIVE INGLESIDE, ONTARIO CATHOLIC DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF EASTERN ONTARIO
DEMOLITION SITE AS NOTED No J.V.D. A001 1:300 0 10.0 m 50 m J.J. 2016-04-25 A001 ACAD FILE/FICHIER: 1619-A001.DWG SITE 1:300 No J.V.D. J.J. A002 A002 1:300 0 10.0 m 50 m 2016-04-20 ACAD FILE/FICHIER: 1619-A002.DWG
More informationOntario Municipal Board Decision issued July 28, 2014 and Orders issued December 4 and 17, 2015 in Board File No. PL CITY OF TORONTO
Authority: Ontario Municipal Board Decision issued July 28, 2014 and Orders issued December 4 and 17, 2015 in Board File No. PL131305 CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW No. 673-2016(OMB) To amend Chapters 304, 320
More informationSUBJECT: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 4853 Thomas Alton Boulevard
Page 1 of Report PB-100-16 SUBJECT: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications for 4853 Thomas Alton Boulevard TO: FROM: Development and Infrastructure Committee Planning and Building Department
More informationChair and Members of Committee of Adjustment Toronto and East York Panel. A0596/16TEY Yonge St New 5 Storey Non-residential Building
Armando Barbini Planning and Permit Services Inc Armando Barbini 30 Brixham Terrace Toronto, On, M3M 2S1 (647) 991-3657 abarbini@rogers.com To: From: Chair and Members of Committee of Adjustment Toronto
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF EAST GWILLIMBURY BY-LAW 2016-
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF EAST GWILLIMBURY BY-LAW 2016- TO GOVERN THE ISSUANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OF BUILDING AND DEMOLITION PERMITS, AS WELL AS AN ADDENDUM TO THE CORPORATE CODE OF CONDUCT Whereas
More informationCopyright 2013, Queen s Printer for Ontario
Contact Information Building Code Information Officer, George Brown College BuildingCode@GeorgeBrown.ca 416-415-5000x6725 http://ce.georgebrown.ca/buildingcodeinformation This course is based on the Building
More informationAPPLICATION OF SECTION 3.8 OF THE 2012 ONTARIO BUILDING CODE FOR: BARRIER-FREE AUDIT OF SENECA COLLEGE NEWNHAM CAMPUS TORONTO, ONTARIO
APPLICATION OF SECTION 3.8 OF THE 2012 ONTARIO BUILDING CODE FOR: BARRIER-FREE AUDIT OF SENECA COLLEGE NEWNHAM CAMPUS TORONTO, ONTARIO Prepared by: Rita Cherniavskaya & Elias Frechette Technical Consultants
More informationINFORMATION GUIDE SECOND DWELLING UNITS BUILDING CODE BASICS
INFORMATION GUIDE SECOND DWELLING UNITS BUILDING CODE BASICS Prepared by: Community Development Standards Branch Town of Innisfil www.innisfil.ca June 2016 Contents 1. Introduction... 1 2. Ontario Building
More informationTHE CITY OF VAUGHAN BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER WHEREAS the matters herein set out are in conformity with the Official Plan of the Vaughan Planning
THE CITY OF VAUGHAN BY-LAW BY-LAW NUMBER 088-2013 A By-law to amend City of Vaughan By-law 1-88. WHEREAS the matters herein set out are in conformity with the Official Plan of the Vaughan Planning Area,
More informationORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
ORDINANCE NO. 2032 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO SECTIONS 10.04.030, 10.12.010, 10.12.030, 10.60.040 AND 10.84.120 OF THE MANHATTAN
More information22 POTENTIAL ONTARIO BUILDING CODE AMENDMENTS FOR MID-RISE WOOD FRAME BUILDINGS UP TO SIX STOREYS
Clause No. 22 in Report No. 9 of Committee of the Whole was adopted, without amendment, by the Council of The Regional Municipality of York at its meeting held on May 15, 2014. 22 POTENTIAL ONTARIO BUILDING
More informationDiscuss the history of fires that resulted in much of the development of codes related to means of egress. Review mean of egress terminology
Discuss the history of fires that resulted in much of the development of codes related to means of egress Review mean of egress terminology Discuss 8 Elements to an Effective Means of Egress. Modern code
More informationToronto and East York Community Council Item TE6.1, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on June 10, 11 and 12, 2015 CITY OF TORONTO
Authority: Toronto and East York Community Council Item TE6.1, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on June 10, 11 and 12, 2015 CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW No. 1173-2015 To amend Zoning By-law No. 569-2013,
More informationThe New NYC Building Code Chapter 10 Means of Egress. New York City Department of Buildings. Technical Affairs. Fatma M. Amer, P.E.
The New NYC Building Code Chapter 10 Means of Egress New York City Department of Buildings Technical Affairs Fatma M. Amer, P.E. Copyright Materials This presentation is protected by US and International
More informationPresentation By. Chris Poujol. Jeffery Rodriguez. James Rigley
Means of Egress Presentation By Chris Poujol Jeffery Rodriguez James Rigley Table of Contents I. Means of Egress Definition II. History III. NYC Building Code IV. General Requirements IX. Exit Signs X.
More informationBuilding Permit Requirements Deck
Building Permit Requirements Deck NOTE TO APPLICANTS: Please check with the Zoning Plans Examiner of the Building Division to determine whether the proposed deck is permitted on the property in accordance
More informationBuilding Code Extracts from the National Building Code of Canada 2010
3.2.6. Additional Requirements for High Buildings (See Appendix B.) Building Code 3.2.6.1. Application This Subsection applies to a building a) of Group A, D, E or F major occupancy classification that
More informationPermit fees shall be calculated based on the formula given below, unless otherwise specified in this schedule:
CLASSES OF PERMITS AND PERMIT FEES 1. CALCULATION OF PERMIT FEES FOR CONSTRUCTION: (6) Permit fees shall be calculated based on the formula given below, unless otherwise specified in this schedule: Permit
More informationRegional District of Nanaimo Secondary Suite Program
Regional District of Nanaimo Secondary Suite Program Secondary suites are recognized for the important role they play in providing affordable housing in the region. They also provide many benefits to homeowners,
More informationPP Course # Instructor Information. Patrick Vandergriff 35 Cottonwood Canyon Road La Luz, NM
Instructor Information PP Course #15788 Patrick Vandergriff 35 Cottonwood Canyon Road La Luz, NM 88337 1-575-430-8752 pvandergriff@codeconsult.org 1 Detailing of Mixed Occupancy Structures within the 2018
More informationBuilding Permit Requirements
Building Permit Requirements Below Grade Entrance NOTE TO APPLICANTS: Please check with the Zoning Plans Examiner of the Building Division to determine whether the below grade entrance is permitted in
More informationThe UBBL Applications of Fire Safety Provisions
The UBBL Applications of Fire Safety Provisions Atriums Open Structures and Corridors Fire Appliance Access Ar Chong Lee Siong APAM MIFireE MIArbs PAM-IFEM SEMINAR 2016 ATRIUMS UBBL clause 137 UBBL clause
More informationAnacortes, WA. 718 commercial ave. FOR lease. 2,320 +/- sf retail space in a 10,820 +/- sf building. Located in historic downtown Anacortes
718 commercial ave Anacortes, WA FOR lease 2,320 +/- sf retail space in a 10,820 +/- sf building Located in historic downtown Anacortes Frontage on Commercial Ave alongside four other retail spaces Zoned
More informationCITY OF MOUNT PLEASANT ORDINANCE NO. 1017
CITY OF MOUNT PLEASANT ORDINANCE NO. 1017 AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND SECTIONS 152.004 AND 152.007 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES FOR THE CITY OF MOUNT PLEASANT TO ADOPT PROVISIONS OF THE 2012 INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY
More information2012 IBC Mixed Occupancies
Accreditation 2012 IBC Mixed Occupancies Based on the 2012 International Building Code (IBC ) The International Code Council has been accredited as an Authorized Provider by the International Association
More information2.2 72ND STREET STATION ENTRANCE ALTERNATIVES
Chapter 2: Entrance Alternatives 2.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the alternatives that are evaluated in this Supplemental Environmental Assessment (EA) for the 72nd Street Station and 86th Street
More information8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District
8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District The purpose of this district is to provide for residential development in the form of single detached dwellings. Dwelling, Single Detached Home Business,
More informationSedro woolley, WA 720 MURDOCK ST. FOR sale. 14,500 +/- sf office building with 8,500 +/- sf unfinished basement space on 0.
720 MURDOCK ST Sedro woolley, WA FOR sale 14,500 +/- sf office building with 8,500 +/- sf unfinished basement space on 0.27 +/- AC Former City Hall built in 1930 Located in the Downtown Sedro Woolley core
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF INGERSOLL BY-LAW NO
THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWN OF INGERSOLL BY-LAW NO. 13-4720 Being a By-Law to provide for regulating and governing of property boundary fences in the Town of Ingersoll. WHEREAS subsection 5(3) of the Municipal
More informationHousing Issues Report Shoreline Towers Inc. Proposal 2313 & 2323 Lake Shore Boulevard West. Prepared by PMG Planning Consultants November 18, 2014
Housing Issues Report Shoreline Towers Inc. Proposal 2313 & 2323 Lake Shore Boulevard West Prepared by PMG Planning Consultants November 18, 2014 PMG Planning Consultants Toronto, Canada M6A 1Y7 Tel. (416)
More informationThe Corporation of the TOWN OF MILTON
Report to: From: Chair & Members of the Administration & Planning Standing Committee Troy McHarg, Town Clerk Date: June 18, 2012 Report No. ES-024-12 Subject: Streamlining of Municipal Processes Town-Owned
More informationBuilding Permit Requirements Back Flow Prevention Device
Building Permit Requirements Back Flow Prevention Device NOTE TO APPLICANT: The following application information applies to new buildings and building retrofits for all occupancies other than for a house
More informationA Brief Overview of the New BOMA Measurement Standards for Lawyers Jan. 20, 2011 By William B. Tracy, MBA, NCARB
1) The BOMA Standard for measuring Floor Area in Office Buildings a) Commonly called The BOMA Standard b) Voluntary ANSI consensus standard since 1915 i) Multiple reincarnations (1) To stay relevant to
More informationSection Low Density Residential (R1) Land Use District
(1) Application This section applies to the District designated as Low Density Residential (R1) on the Land Use District Map, Schedule A, of this Bylaw. Additional requirements are outlined in the Established
More informationBUILDING CODE COMMISSION
Ruling No. 03-52-950 Application No. 2003-55 BUILDING CODE COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF Subsection 24(1) of the Building Code Act, S.O. 1992, c. 23, as amended. AND IN THE MATTER OF Article 1.1.3.2. of
More informationTENANT DESIGN MANUAL UPDATED AUGUST 2015
TENANT DESIGN MANUAL UPDATED AUGUST 2015 PROJECT OVERVIEW JCPenny Nordstrom Macy s Lord & Taylor Sears WOODFIELD MALL 2 PROJECT OVERVIEW The largest shopping center in the state of Illinois and one of
More informationVestibule Requirement Intent
[2003 IECC, 2006 IECC, 2003 IBC, 2006 IBC, 90.1-2001, 90.1-2004] Vestibule Requirement Intent Page 1 of 14 The primary intent behind the requirement for a vestibule is to reduce infiltration into a space
More informationCONTENTS. Introduction. Technical Terms. Requirements of good Staircase. Dimensions of step. Types of steps. Classification of Staircase
STAIRCASE Introduction CONTENTS Technical Terms Requirements of good Staircase Dimensions of step Types of steps Classification of Staircase INTRODUCTION Stairs is a set of steps which give access from
More informationExtracts from the National Building Code of Canada
3) The number of lamps connected to a single unit equipment shall not result in a load in excess of the watts output rating marked on the equipment for the emergency period required by the National Building
More informationAuthority: Toronto and East York Community Council Item 26.9, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on October 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2013 CITY OF TORONTO
Authority: Toronto and East York Community Council Item 26.9, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on October 8, 9, 10 and 11, 2013 CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW No. 1710-2013 To amend former City of Toronto
More informationS U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A
S U B D I V I S I O N A N D D E V E L O P M E N T A P P E A L B O A R D A G E N D A Wednesday, 9:00 A.M. March 15, 2017 Hearing Room No. 2 Churchill Building, 10019-103 Avenue NW, Edmonton, AB Hearing
More informationACCESSORY APARTMENTS OLDER THAN FIVE YEARS
ACCESSORY APARTMENTS OLDER THAN FIVE YEARS INCLUDED: LIST OF REQUIREMENTS SAMPLE DRAWINGS Planning & Development Services Tel. 905-683-4550 Fax. 905-686-0360 TOWN OF AJAX 65 Harwood Ave South Ajax ON L1S
More informationSCHEDULE A. Permit fees shall be calculated based on the formula given below, unless otherwise specified in this schedule:
SCHEDULE A CLASSES OF PERMITS AND PERMIT FEES 1. CALCULATION OF PERMIT FEES FOR CONSTRUCTION: (6) Permit fees shall be calculated based on the formula given below, unless otherwise specified in this schedule:
More information9 Hanna Ave Establishment of Public Lane System
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 9 Hanna Ave Establishment of Public Lane System Date: February 18, 2010 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Toronto and East York Community Council Director, Community Planning,
More informationAuthority: Etobicoke York Community Council Item 25.2, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on April 6, 2009 Enacted by Council: April 30, 2009
Authority: Etobicoke York Community Council Item 25.2, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on April 6, 2009 Enacted by Council: April 30, 2009 CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW No. 501-2009 To amend Chapters 320
More informationSTAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Request for approval of variances from the former City of Scarborough Sign By-law No. 22980, as amended, for three additional facial signs, related to the building, at 4675
More informationDRS RWANDA STANDARD. Code of practice for fire safety. of building. Part 5: Exit requirements and personal hazard.
RWANDA STANDARD DRS 186-5 Seconde dition Code of practice for fire safety of building Part 5: Exit requirements and personal hazard Reference number DRS 186-5: 2018 RBS yyyy CD RS 186-5:2013 ii Error!
More informationApplication for a Permit to Construct or Demolish This form is authorized under subsection 8(1.1) of the Building Code Act.
Application for a Permit to Construct or Demolish P10 This form is authorized under subsection 8(1.1) of the Building Code Act. Application number: For use by Principal Authority Permit number (if different):
More informationBackground: 5 th Edition (2014) Florida Building Code, Building
Issue DS 2017-019. The petitioner Robert C Shumake of Shumake Architecture is seeking a declaratory statement on whether FBC 1029.1 require an emergency escape and rescue opening from sleeping units located
More information3. Miscellaneous Instructions and Definitions.
Last page revision- March 31st, 1999 TEXAS ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS (TAS) TAS Table of Contents 3. Miscellaneous Instructions and Definitions. 3.1 Graphic Conventions. Graphic conventions are shown in Table
More informationCITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No
Authority: Toronto and East York Community Council Item 13.10, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on March 5, 6 and 7, 2012 and MM26.23, moved by Councillor McConnell, seconded by Councillor Milczyn,
More informationCITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No
Authority: Toronto and East York Community Council Item 18.7, as adopted by City of Toronto Council on October 2, 3 and 4, 2012 Enacted by Council: November 29, 2012 CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW No. 1631-2012
More informationPLANS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE FIRE DEPARTMENT BEFORE SUBMITTING TO OUR OFFICE FOR REVIEW.
CITY OF CRANSTON TENT PERMIT PROCEDURE PLANS MUST BE APPROVED THE FIRE DEPARTMENT BEFORE SUBMITTING TO OUR OFFICE FOR REVIEW. WE ARE ALLOWED 15 BUSINESS DAYS TO PROCESS YOUR PERMIT. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS
More informationMSC Guidelines for Review of Means of Escape (Subchapter H)
S. E. HEMANN, CDR, Chief, Hull Division Purpose The purpose of the Plan Review Guideline is to provide the submitter with general guidance and information for the preparation and submission of Means of
More informationSECTION 10: COMMERCIAL AND MIXED USE ZONES
10.5a MIXED USE MEDIUM DENSITY PEDESTRIAN FOCUS (C5a) ZONE Explanatory Note: The C5a Zone is typically located along pedestrian oriented streets where permitted commercial and residential uses create an
More informationSample Questions for Paper 1 Statutory Controls in Building Works
1. One of the purposes of usable floor space in building plan submissions is for determining Ans. : A A. the area of the refuse chamber. B. the provision of sanitary fitments. C. the area within a flat,
More informationUrban Design Brief 6233, 6237, 6241 and 6245 Main Street, Stouffville Pace Savings and Credit Union June 15, 2012
Pace Savings and Credit Union June 15, 2012 1.0 Introduction 3 2.0 The Proposal 4 3.0 Site and Development Context 5 4.0 Planning Background 7 5.0 Design Rationale 8 5.1 Limited Opportunities 5.2 Overall
More information2018 CSBC / 2018 CSFSC Part III. Chapter #10. Means of Egress. Table of Contents. Based on the 2015 IBC and the 2015 IFC.
2018 CSBC / 2018 CSFSC Part III. Chapter #10. Means of Egress. Table of Contents. Based on the 2015 IBC and the 2015 IFC. October 23, 2018 Section 1001. Administration. See Section 107.2.3 for Egress Drawing
More informationBUILDING DIVISION SIMPLIFIED BUILDING PERMIT FEE SCHEDULE January 01st, 2019 to December 31st, 2019
How to Calculate Permit Fees: To calculate the mit fee required at the time of application the following is used 1. Determine which Class of Work is applicable 2. Determine the Area of Work (i.e. project
More informationPermit Application Requirements Boiler Replacement
Permit Application Requirements Boiler Replacement Required Documents & Plans The following information is required at submission. Incomplete applications cannot be accepted 1. Completed building permit
More informationOntario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario
ISSUE DATE: April 24, 2009 PL090103 Ontario Municipal Board Commission des affaires municipales de l Ontario IN THE MATTER OF subsection 45(12) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended Applicant:
More informationSuite Permission. Suites complying with shall be permitted to be used to meet the corridor access requirements of
Categorical Waiver Available: 5. Suites Sections 18/19.2.5 of the 2000 LSC requires every habitable room to have an exit access door leading directly to an exit access corridor; allows for exit access
More informationOntario Municipal Board Order issued on February 25, 2005 in Board File Nos. PL and PL CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No.
Authority: Ontario Municipal Board Order issued on February 25, 2005 in Board File Nos. PL030066 and PL030681 CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW No. 735-2014(OMB) To amend Chapters 320 and 324 of the Etobicoke Zoning
More informationRetail Boutique Retail Boutique Retail Boutique Retail Boutique
THE SHOPS AT 1 GATEWAY BOULEVARD RETAIL INMATION Retail Boutique Retail Boutique Retail Boutique Retail Boutique RETAIL Retail Space from 1,000 sf to retail pads up to 25,500 sf Unique opportunity to brand
More informationOntario Municipal Board Decision issued June 19, 2014 and Order issued January 30, 2015 in Board File No. PL CITY OF TORONTO
Authority: Ontario Municipal Board Decision issued June 19, 2014 and Order issued January 30, 2015 in Board File No. PL120328 CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW No. 780-2016(OMB) To amend former City of Toronto Zoning
More informationAttachment 2: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment (Amends By-law No ) CITY OF TORONTO. BY-LAW No. XXX- 2017
Attachment 2: Draft Zoning By-law Amendment (Amends By-law No. 569-2013) Authority: Toronto and East York Community Council Item No. adopted by City of Toronto Council on, 2017 CITY OF TORONTO BY-LAW No.
More informationLANGSTAFF ROAD REGIONAL ROAD 7 INTERCHANGE WAY HIGHWAY 407 JANE STREET CITY OF TORONTO. Development Planning Department
LANGSTAFF ROAD HIGHWAY 400 WESTON ROAD REGIONAL ROAD 7 HIGHWAY 407 JANE STREET Context Location Map STEELES AVENUE WEST Document Path: N:\GIS_Archive\s\OP\OP.18.014\OP.18.014_PublicHearing_ContextLocationMap.mxd
More information