LOG NUMBERS. Approve No Recommendation Barb Mock. Further Processing Planni ng

Transcription

1 LOG NUMBERS MANAGEMENT ROUTING: TO: n/c Aaron G. Reardon Brian Pa Clay White EXECUTIVE RECOMMENDATION: Planning & Dev. Serv. ~-^- Approve No Recommendation Barb Mock Further Processing Planni ng Requested By Frank Slusser 4/23/ / Executive Office Signature CEO Staff Review Received at Council Office DOCUMENT TYPE: ^ BUDGET ACTION GRANT ]^ APPLICATION Emergency Appropriation ORDINANCE Supplemental Appropriation Amendment to Ord. # Budget Transfer PLAN CONTRACT: X OTHER New Amendment DOCUMENT / AGENDA TITLE: A motion concerning the County Council's position on a proposed petition method annexation to the city of Arlington BRBO12O12 Star Annexati on. - - APPROVAL AUTHORITY: --- I X ' SCC NORMAL ExPDD TS X URGENT 0^/\DC NE[)ATG 05/17/12 PURPOSE: To consider the city of Arlington's proposal to annex the Star area. I: rea The city of Arlington submitted a Notice of Intention to the Boundary Review Board for a 60 percent petition method annexation of the Star area. The proposed Star Annexat ion is approximately acres and is located east of State Route 9 near the intersection with 172nd Street NE. It is located within the southeastern portion of the Arlington Urban Growth Area. The assessed valuation of the annexation area is $2,872,200. There are a total of eleven tax parcels with 8 residences and a population of 10 persons. The county land use designations for the annexation area are Urban Commercial. Urban Medium Density Residential, and Urban Low Density Residential The city of Arlington is proposing land use designations of General Commercial and Residential High Density for the area. Based on county review, PDS concludes that the sub ject annexation proposal is consistent with the applicable statutory provisions governing municipal annexat ions. It furthers the GMA goal and CPP policy that cities should be the primary providers of urban services. Both the county and the city designate this area for urban commercial and urban residential development. The 45-day review period on the proposed annexation will expire on May 17, Comments were received from Public Works, Parks, Finnnne, and the Auditor. The recommendation to the County Council from PDS is to riot oppose the annexat ion and not invoke the jurisdiction of the Boundary Review Board.

2 REVENUE: FUND, AGY, ORG, REV, SOURCE CURRENT YR 2ND YR 1ST 6 YRS TOTAL 0 Snohomish County Budget and Finance responded that the annexation proposal would have a minimal financial impact on the county budget. There would be minimal impact to revenue sources including sales tax, real estate excise tax, road ovy. SWM feas, permit fees, parko, and grants. There would be minimal impact to expenses. There are no county surface water or parks facilities in the area. ^^,/ ' '' ^ ^ ^,/ ' ' - RE / - - Analyst,,, Administrator -- Recommend Approval CONTRACT INFORMATION: ORIGINAL CONTRACT # CONTRACT PERIOD: ORIGINAL Start End AMENDMENT Start End /P I -.ltle: AMOVNI AMOUNT $ (City/State only): RISK MANAGEMENT COMMENTS Yes No PROSECUTING /\[TY'&9lDFORM: Yes ^^^^ OTHER DEPARTMENTAL REVIEW / COMMENTS: The Notice of Intention for the proposed annexation was circulated to the follow i ng County Departments and other agencies: Assessor, Auditor, District Court, Emergency Management, Finonce, Human Semioes, Parks, Planning and Development Services, Property Management, Public Works, Sheriff, Superior Court, Puget Sound Energy, and SnoPaoQ11, Comments were received from Public Works, Parks, Finance and the Auditor. They are included in the report along with Planning and Development Services comments. ^

3 SNOHOMISH COUNTY COUNCIL Snohomish County, Washington MOTION NO CONCERNING THE COUNTY COUNCIL'S POSITION ON A PROPOSED PETITION METHOD ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ARLINGTON BRB STAR ANNEXATION WHEREAS, Snohomish County has received notice of a proposal from the City of Arlington to annex approximately acres of land located southeast of the City of Arlington and within the Arlington Urban Growth Area; and further described in Washington State Boundary Review Board for Snohomish County (hereinafter "Boundary Review Board") File No. BRB ; and WHEREAS, the proposed annexation is subject to Snohomish County Code Section , and RCW , 35A and.120,.180, and.300, ,.060 and.070, ,.170 and.180, and 36.70A.020,.110 and.210; and WHEREAS, the annexation is consistent with most of the factors and objectives of the Boundary Review Board, County Codes, and other applicable statutes governing the review of annexation actions. The proposed annexation is consistent with adopted Countywide Planning Policies and the county's Growth Management Act (GMA) Comprehensive Plan, as set out in a Planning and Development Services staff report dated April 23, 2012, which is attached and incorporated herein as Attachment A; and WHEREAS, the area proposed for annexation is included in the Urban Growth Area for the City of Arlington; and WHEREAS, the City and County adopted a Master Annexation Interlocal Agreement in September 1999, that includes the area proposed for annexation; and WHEREAS, RCW requires that decisions of the Boundary Review Board be consistent with the GMA; NOW, THEREFORE, ON MOTION, 1. The Snohomish County Council does not oppose the annexation and will not invoke the jurisdiction of the Boundary Review Board. 2. The Council Clerk is directed to forthwith file this Motion with the Boundary Review Board, together with a copy of the Planning and Development Services Memo dated April 23, A!., t ri

4 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 3000 Rockefeller Avenue, M/S #604 Everett, WA (425) FAX (425) I M II ka tea 11 0 I Pill TO: FROM: Brian Sullivan County Council Chair Clay White(, Director, Planning and Development Services DATE: April 23, 2012 SUBJECT: City of Arlington - Star Annexation, BRB # The following report summarizes issues and information regarding the city of Arlington's proposed annexation of the Star area. The report addresses factors and objectives that the Boundary Review Board (BRB) must consider in evaluating the annexation proposal. Those factors and objectives are considered because, if the county council chooses to invoke BRB jurisdiction, those would be the considerations that the BRB would take into account, and only matters related to the factors and objectives could be used to support any county council position regarding the annexation at the BRB. Therefore, they are the logical basis for the decision as to whether or not to invoke BRB jurisdiction. The report also reviews consistency with applicable comprehensive plans and the Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs), impacts as required under Snohomish County Code (SCC), and comments submitted by Snohomish County departments and other public agencies regarding the proposed annexation. This report is provided pursuant to SCC , and Revised Code of Washington (RCW) , 35A and.120, The 45-day review period to invoke BRB jurisdiction for the proposed annexation will expire on May 17, Page 1 of 10

5 I I'll [c3 :fy :t i.i! lii'.i it tu9i1 lit] The city of Arlington has submitted a Notice of Intention (NOI) to the Boundary Review Board for a 60 percent petition method annexation of the Star area. The proposed Star Annexation is approximately acres and is located east of State Route 9 on both the north and south sides of 172nd Street NE. The Star Annexation is located within the southeastern portion of the Arlington Urban Growth Area (UGA). The assessed valuation of the annexation area is $2,872,200. There are a total of eleven tax parcels with 8 residences and a population of 10 persons. The county land use designations for the annexation area are Urban Commercial, Urban Medium Density Residential, and Urban Low Density Residential. The city of Arlington is proposing land use designations of General Commercial and Residential High Density for the area. II. County Department/External Agency Review The NOI for the proposed Star annexation was circulated for review to county departments and agencies. Comments were received from the Auditor, Finance, Parks, and Public Works. Comments, including those from Planning and Development Services (PDS), have been incorporated into the staff report under the relevant sections. PDS requested that county departments and external agencies evaluate the annexation proposal against the factors and objectives in RCW and.180 that the BRB must assess when considering an annexation. As required by SCC , fiscal, departmental, and countywide impacts were considered. The proposal was also reviewed for consistency with the Growth Management Act (GMA), CPPs, and other local plans. Review material for the proposed annexation was sent to the following departments and agencies: Assessor Auditor District Court Emergency Management Finance Human Services Parks Planning and Development Services Property Management Public Works Sheriff 9I1I ]imlei1niil [ IT17.x! [1 ii.i F ii 1PT I Puget Sound Energy SnoPac911 Emergency Communications Ills] Ui Hi! Ii1k.] Ill. Analysis of Impacts i Local Plans Page 2 of 10

6 !1t! plan under RCW jfri$yaw must plan) (Comprehensive (Countywide Growth I. RCW 36.70A.1 1O(4) and both state that it is the Legislature's intent that cities are to be the primary provider of urban services and that counties are the unit of government most appropriate to provide regional governmental services. 2. The city of Arlington has provided sufficient documentation in its Notice of Intention for the proposed annexation and in its adopted comprehensive plan to demonstrate that it has the capability to provide an adequate range of utilities and urban services to the subject area. 3. The city of Arlington and Snohomish County have an adopted Master Annexation Interlocal Agreement that was approved in September The agreement addresses GMA land use, transfer of project and permitting, records transfer, roads and transportation and surface water. 4. Snohomish County and the city of Arlington have both adopted comprehensive plans under the authority of RCW 36.70A (GMA). Under both plans, the annexation area is identified as urban commercial and residential and in Arlington's UGA, intended to be eventually annexed to the city. 5. The annexation proposal is consistent with the Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs). The proposal allows for the transition of unincorporated areas to incorporated areas within the UGA, capital facilities planning and the timely and coordinated extension of urban services which is supported by the following CPP policies: JP-6 - The County and cities shall develop comprehensive plan policies and development regulations that provide for the orderly transition of unincorporated Urban Growth Areas (UGAs) to incorporated areas in UGAs. Mutual agreements may be utilized to address governance issues and expedite the transition. DP-5 - The County and cities shall adopt comprehensive plans and development regulations (RCW 36.70A.040). In Urban Growth Areas (UGAs), such plans and regulations shall: rr Page 3 of 10

7 unincorporated territory within its UGA or Municipal UGA (MUGA) to which the city has determined it is capable of providing urban services at some point in the future, via annexation. When amending its comprehensive plan, the County shall give substantial consideration to the city's adopted plan for its UGA or MUGA. Likewise tlee affes^ d v!+y che'-.i1 give substantial cons1deration to the County's adopted plan for the same area. However, nothing in this policy shall limit the authority of the County to plan for and regulate development in unincorporated territory for as long as it remains unincorporated, in accordance with all applicable county, state and federal laws. Similarly, nothing in this policy shall limit the authority of cities to plan for territory in and adjacent to their current corporate limits and to regulate development in their current corporate limits, in accordance with all applicable city, county, state and federal laws. PS-1 Jurisdictions should support cities as the preferred urban service providers. B. The following comments relate to RCW Factors to be considered by the Boundary Review Board. The comments listed below describe how the factors apply to this annexation, elaborating on those topics within each factor that are particularly relevant to this annexation. BRB factors contained in RCW incorporate 1997 amendments that provide for integrated consideration of the GMA and related GMA implementation statutes: Factor 1. Population and territory; population density; land area and land uses; comprehensive plans and zoning, as adopted under chapter 35.63, 35A.63, or RCW; comprehensive plans and development regulations adopted under chapter 36.70A RCW; applicable service agreements entered into under chapter or RCW; applicable interlocal annexation agreements between a county and its cities; per capita assessed valuation; topography, natural boundaries and drainage basins, proximity to other populated areas; the existence and preservation of prime agricultural soils and productive agricultural uses; the likelihood of significant growth in the area and in adjacent incorporated and unincorporated areas during the next ten years; location and most desirable future location of community facilities. Snohomish County and the city of Arlington have both adopted comprehensive plans under the authority of RCW 36.70A (GMA). Under both plans, the annexation area is identified as urban commercial and urban residential and in Arlington's UGA, intended to be eventually annexed to the city. ii. The city of Arlington and Snohomish County have an adopted Master Annexation Interlocal Agreement that was approved in September iii. If any road or public right-of-way covered by a franchise ordinance is incorporated into the limits of any city or town, the franchise granted shall terminate as to any road or public right-of-way within the corporate limits of Page 4 of 10

8 such city or town; but the franchise shall continue as to County roads and public right-of-way not incorporated into a city or town. iv. There are no SWM facilities in the annexation area and no pending SWM projects. There are no known county easements associated with drainage, but all easements, known or unknown, must be transferred to the city upon a..s iexcieioi 1. Factor 2. Municipal services; need for municipal services; effect of ordinances, governmental codes, regulations and resolutions on existing uses; present cost and adequacy of governmental services and controls in area; prospects of governmental services from other sources; probable future needs for such services and controls; probable effect of proposal or alternative on cost and adequacy of services and controls in area and adjacent area; the effect on the finances, debt structure, and contractual obligations and rights of all affected governmental units. i. The county is not a full municipal service provider. The city of Arlington is a provider of urban municipal services as identified under RCW 36.70A. ii. The city of Arlington has provided sufficient documentation in its NOI for the proposed annexation and in its adopted comprehensive plan to demonstrate that it has the capability to provide an adequate range of utilities and urban services to the subject area. iii. SWM revenues and programs in the calendar year of annexation (2012) will not be affected. The annexation will reduce annual SWM revenues in the years 2013 to 2021, from the current $1,195.49, to about $ to $ for bond debt payment, depending on the amount of road in-kind service credit allowed on bond debt payment service charges. SWM programs in 2013 and beyond will be adjusted accordingly. After the bond debt is retired, anticipated in 2021, the remaining portion of SWM service charges for bond debt collection (about $ to $292.27) will end. iv. Snohomish County Budget and Finance responded that the annexation proposal would have minimal financial impact on the county budget. The annexation will have no impact or minimal impact to each of the following revenue sources: sales tax, real estate excise tax, road levy, permit fees, parks fees, parks mitigation fees, grants, animal control, District Court fines, emergency management, or Sheriff's Office. The annexation is expected to have minimal impact to county expenses as well. There are no county surface water or parks facilities in the annexation area. Factor 3. The effect of the proposal or alternative on adjacent areas, on mutual economic and social interests, and on the local governmental structure of the county. There were no comments applicable to factor 3. Page 5 of 10

9 The proposed annexation area is within the Arlington UGA, and would include all of the remaining contiguous unincorporated urban area in the UGA at this location. The proposed annexation area is adjacent to the city of Arlington to the west, and will bring the city boundary out to a currently discontiguous incorporated island to the east. Therefore, the proposed annexation would further this objective. Objective 7 e o of boundaries, f of o of ^, Use of p hysic al VWe A::aQ:: ^ includi ng, ^ e not n limited :: t bodies v: water, highways and land contours. The proposed annexation would further this objective by using the existing Arlington UGA boundary and parcel lines/road right-of-way as northern and southern boundaries. 91 St Ave NE forms the eastern boundary in the south part of the proposed annexation area. The city is adjacent to the proposed annexation area to the west, as well as part of the east boundary. Objective 3. Creation and preservation of logical service areas. The proposed annexation furthers this objective by annexing an area that is within the Arlington UGA and is contiguous to the city limits to the west and the UGA boundary to the north, east and south. The proposed annexation will bring the city boundary out to a currently discontiguous incorporated island to the east. Because the area is within the Arlington UGA, the city is the logical provider of urban services. Therefore, this annexation creates a logical service area. Objective 4. Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries. The proposed annexation does not create an abnormally irregular boundary. The proposed annexation will bring the city boundary out to the UGA boundary, so that there will be no unincorporated urban area remaining that is contiguous to the proposed annexation. In addition, it will connect the city to the currently discontiguous incorporated island to the east of the proposed annexation. Therefore, the proposed annexation would further this objective. Objective 5. Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of incorporations of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban areas. This objective does not apply to the proposed annexation. Objective 6. Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts. This objective does not apply to the proposed annexation. Objective 7. Adjustment of impractical boundaries. The proposed annexation would create a practical boundary. The proposed annexation will bring the city boundary out to the UGA boundary, so that there will be no unincorporated urban area remaining that is contiguous to the proposed annexation. In addition, it will connect the city to the currently discontiguous incorporated island to the east of the proposed annexation. Therefore, the proposed annexation would further this objective. Objective 8. Annexation to cities or towns of unincorporated areas, which are urban in character. Page 6 of 10

10 The proposed annexation would further this objective to the extent that it is within the Arlington UGA and designated in both the city and county comprehensive plans for urban levels of development. Objective 9. Protection of designated agricultural and rural resource lands. This objective does not apply to the proposed annexation as it does not contain ^4::.G:::, n::o o r is it adjacent to to, any l/resource l ands s+ ^ agricultural or rural/ ^^^ : ^^.a::d. t I ID II Total assessed value, and impacts upon comprehensive plans, transportation systems, utility plans. a. The proposed Star Annexation is approximately acres and is located within the southeastern portion of the Arlington UGA. The Notice of Intention states that the assessed valuation of the annexation area is $2,872,200. There are a total of eleven tax parcels with 8 residences and a population of 10 persons. The area is not built out to the zoned densities. The county land use designations for the annexation area are Urban Commercial, Urban Medium Density Residential, and Urban Low Density Residential. The city of Arlington is proposing land use designations of General Commercial and Residential High Density for the area. b. The proposal would have minimal impact on the transportation system/utility plans as the road rights-of-way in the annexation area include only small portions of 172 nd St NE and 91 St Ave NE, and future utilities serving the area would be provided by the city. c. If any road or public right-of-way covered by a franchise ordinance is incorporated into the limits of any city or town, the franchise granted shall terminate as to any road or public right-of-way within the corporate limits of such city or town; but the franchise shall continue as to County roads and public right-of-way not incorporated into a city or town r -' 1X11 - Page 7 of 10

11 V. Conclusions would also potentially respond pre-annexation. After annexation, the city of Arlington Police will be responsible for calls in this area. b. Snohomish County Budget and Finance responded that the annexation proposal would have minimal financial impact on the county mpact to budget. of The annexation will have no impact or minimal i ^_s _v each e;: the t:e: following revenue..e. nuc sources: sales tax re ^ e.r t.. ^r.1 a., estate excise tax, road levy, permit fees, parks fees, parks mitigation fees, grants, animal control, District Court fines, emergency management, or Sheriff's Office. The annexation is expected to have minimal impact to county expenses as well. There are no county surface water or parks facilities in the annexation area. Based on county review, PDS concludes that the subject annexation proposal is consistent with the applicable statutory provisions governing municipal annexations. This conclusion has been reached by comprehensively reviewing the annexation against the applicable BRB factors and objectives, County Codes, and other applicable statutes and determining, overall, that the relevant factors and objectives that the BRB must consider would be advanced by the annexation. The recommendation to the Council from PDS is to not oppose the annexation and not invoke the jurisdiction of the Boundary Review Board. Attachments: Exhibit A, Map of the Proposed Star Annexation Exhibit B, Map of the Vicinity of the Proposed Star Annexation cc: Brian Parry, Executive Director Barb Mock, Manager, PDS Frank Slusser, Senior Planner, PDS Will Hall, AICP, Legislative Analyst Page 8 of 10

12 0 4., 0 a, P^.

13 14 1 Page 10 of 10

14 PLEASE RETURN YOUR COMMENTS TO: Frank Slusser, PDS MIS #604 BY: April 16, 2012 TO: DATE: April 2, 2012 REPLY: YES FILE NO: SUBJECT: City of Arlington Proposed Star Annexation MESSAGE: Enclosed for your review and comment is the City of Arlington Proposed Star Annexation (BR-13 No ). Please return your comments to Snohomish County's Planning and Development Services Department as noted above. Your comments must be received by April 16, Marsha n, Chief TkFr imww Use additional pages if necessary.

15 NOTICE OF INTENTION COVER SHEET Washington State 3000 Rockefeller, MIS #409 Boundary Review Board Everett, WA for Snohomish County As required by RCW 36.93, a Notice of Intention is hereby submitted for proposed annexation. Name of jurisdiction: City of Arlington Name of proposal: Star Annexation Proceedings were initiated under authority of RCW 35A By: (X) Petition Method: Identify which petition method you are using; i.e. 60% or double majority (owners of a majority of the acreage/majority of the registered voters residing in the area). () Election Method: number of qualified electors in area to be annexed or formed of above figure represented by signers. Is assumption of existing indebtedness to be required? Yes Will simultaneous adoption of comprehensive plans be required? No Name each governmental unit having jurisdiction: within the boundaries of the proposal: City of Arlington Snohomish County Snohomish PUD The following other persons (attorneys, etc.) shall receive communication regarding proposal. Ron Thomas (proponent representative) Special purpose district means any sewer district, water district, fire protection district, drainage improvement district, drainage and diking improvement district, flood control zone district, irrigation district, metropolitan park district, drainage district, or public utility district engaged in water distribution. Signatures on petition 3 Residences in area 8 Population of area 10 Acreage Square miles.08 sq. mi. Present Sewers N/A Water City of Arlington Roads Snohomish County Fire Dist. City of Arlington (Fire Dist.21) Police Snohomish County Sheriff Growth Potential Limited (As-is large lot residential due to lack of sewer) Assessed valuation $2,872,200 Topography Slopes and drains west with some wetlands. Current district boundaries and adjacent roads: Adjacent roads: 172 nd Street NE/SR 9 Proximity to other districts, cities, etc. Less than 1 mile to City of Marysville city limits Proposed City of Arlington City of Arlington City of Arlington City of Arlington (Fire Dist. 21) City of Arlington RHD (high density) and GC (general commercial) zoning $50 Filing Fee Notice of Intention (with attachments) Perimeter legal (follow outside boundary) Assessor and Vicinity Maps Petition Resolution of Intent Petitioner (Spokesperson): Ron Thomas Address: NE Novelty Hill Rd, Ste B221 #237 Redmond, WA Phone: Initiator (Distri, Representative Address/Phone: File No Filed effectively this

16 I IT '0 0 v UZ, Z' I IF*I II.] i cji 1.1 Name of City, Town, or Special Purpose District: City of Arlington. 1.2 Action Sought: Annexation. (If water or sewer extension outside corporate limits, state the size of water line N/A, size of sewer lines N/A) 1.3 Reason for seeking action: Petition by property owners. 1.4 Briefly describe the proposal: This is a proposal to annex approximately acres to the City of Arlington, located near the intersection of 172nd Street NE / SR 531 and SR 9. Approximately acres are owned by the proponents. There are a total of eleven tax parcels, some which are vacant and others containina sinale-familv residences and miscellaneous outbuildings. 1.5 Method used to initiate the proposed action: 60% Petition Method. 1.6 State statute under which action is sought: RCW 35A FACTORS THE BOARD MUST CONSIDER Please respond to the Factors the Board must consider as outlined in RCW armes Please provide the following information: Proposed Area i I Existing Entity Existing 20 Year Projection Existing 20-Year Projection 10 People i;; 17,926 People 30,500 People 8 Residences 340 Reside ^ces 6,221 Residences 11,500 Residences 0 Businesses 5 Businesses 848 Businesses 1,272 Business s What source is the basis for these projections? Adopted Comprehensive Plan, SCT Growth Monitoring Report, OFM 2007 Population Determination, and permit and business license data. \\arlington\city\communitydevelopment\planning\current Planning\ACT IVE PROJECTS\Star Annexation PLN \NOI Star docx Page 1 of 7

17 CITY OF ARLINGTON STAR ANNEXATION NOTICE OF INTENT Assessed valuation of the proposed area of existing entity $ , Existing land use of the proposed area: There are eight single-family residences, three manufactured homes, two vacant properties and other miscellaneous outbuildings located within the proposed annexation area Existing land use of the area surrounding the proposal: North: unincorporated single family low density; East: unincorporated single family low density; South: unincorporated single family low density; West: incorporated residential uses Is there residential, commercial, or industrial development that will be associated with this proposal? Yes If yes, describe any projects being considered or proposed: ijg has been applied for yet, but the proponents have stated they want to build both commercial center (parcel immediately south of l72) and high density residential uses (three contiguous parcels south of commercial) If the proposal is approved, will any changes in either the land use, zoning, or the Comprehensive Plan designations be required within the next 18 months: NO Has the proposed area been the subject of a land use action by Snohomish County? No. If so, please list the file number(s) and explain: N/A a. Snohomish County Comprehensive Plan designation for the proposed area: Urban Commercial, Urban Low Density Residential, Urban Moderate Density Residential. b. For surrounding areas: North: Rural Residentiai-5; East: Rural Residential-5, (City - Public/Semi-Public); South: Rural Residential-5; West: (City - General Commercial) Does your jurisdiction have an adopted Comprehensive Plan? Date adopted: December 2005; updated January Describe your proposal's significance to the adopted Comprehensive Plan: a. This property abuts the current City limits on the west and is located at the intersection of two state highways; SR531 and SR 9 to the west. The City of Arlington's current Comprehensive Plan identifies this area as General Commercial and High Density Residential a. Snohomish County zoning for the proposed area: PCB, LDMR, R-7 ' 200 b. For surrounding areas: North: Rural Residential-5; East: Rural Residential-5, (City - Public/Semi-Public); South: Rural Residential-5; West: (City - General Commercial) Has any portion of this area been previously reviewed by the Boundary Review Board? Not within the last 5 years. List the BRB file: N/A Describe the topography, drainage basins, and natural boundaries which are included in the area of the proposal and how each affects land use, accessibility, and potential development: The property slopes and drains to the west with several wetland areas. The area geology is glacial till limiting infiltration of stormwater. There is a stream that bisects a portion of the area. The area is approximately 50% forested with the balance in dnox\ Page 2 of 7 nuydeveiopmenupiannmgxcumamplanningwctrvepnojectsxstarannexation puw2o118o47vv0 Star

18 CITY OF ARLINGTON STAR ANNEXATION NOTICE OF INTENT pasture or residential use. There are five single-family residences, three manufactured homes, two vacant properties and other miscellaneous outbuildings. The property is surrounded by both vacant property and low-density residential on all sides. The City's 520 water reservoir is located along the east border of the proposed area. Any environmental impacts of new development would be identified and avoided or mitigated during the development process through the requirements of Arlington's land use code, which includes the City's SEPA and Critical Areas regulations Is the proposed area within the Snohomish County Interim Urban Growth Area? No, but it is within the Arlington UGA. 2.2 Municipal Services Name the existing service purveyors in the proposed area: Water: Private water system/well Wastewater Treatment: Septic Fire: City of Arlington under contract with Fire District 21 Police: Snohomish County Sheriff School: Arlington School District Library: Sno-Isle Water Service Is the proposed area within the future water service area of your jurisdiction according to the Snohomish County Coordinated Water System Plan: Yes. If not, please explain: Is the area included in your adopted Water System Plan? Yes. If not, please explain: I t is included in the 2004 WSP, and in the 2011 WSP, which is awaiting final approval Water treatment plant or well that will serve this area: The city will require the developer to connect to the City's water system; the City's cross connection control requirements, including premise isolation and well decommissioning, would need to be met Current capacity and percentage used of this facility: The current water system capacity and percent used is as follows: System Capacity-Peak Day System Capacity-Avg Day Current Demand-Peak Day Current Demand-Avg Day 4.9 MGD 5.0 MGD 2.4 MGD (48% of peak day capacity) 1.2 MGD (23% of avg day capacity) Projected water treatment plant or well capacity required by proposal: Less than 0.1% of peak and average day capacities a. Will increased capacity or other improvements become necessary if proposal is approved? City of Arlington Municipal Water System capacity improvements would be required. The owner could be responsible for infrastructure improvements, if required. \\arlington\city\communitydevelopment\planning\current Planning'ACTIVE PROJECTS\Star Annexation PLN \NOI Star docx\ Page 3 of 7

19 CITY OF ARLINGTON STAR ANNEXATION NOTICE OF INTENT b. Describe these improvements and how they will be financed: The property owner would be responsible for covering costs for City of Arlington water service, including construction costs, connection fees, and tap-in fees Does your jurisdiction have an updated State Board of Health approved Water System Plan? Yes, the City has a DOH approved Water Comp Plan approved in 2010; the 2011 WSP Update is completed and awaiting final approval Wastewater Management According to the Snohomish County Wastewater Management Plan, which future service area includes the proposal? None. If not in your jurisdiction, please explain: Will be in the Arlington service area at the time of annexation Does your jurisdiction have a current DOE wastewater discharge permit? Y es a. Does your jurisdiction have a current NPDES permit? Yes b. Please explain any violations of the current NPDES permit in the past 18 months: There were no violations within the past 18 months Wastewater treatment plant serving this area: City of Arlington Water Reclamation Facility Current capacity and percentage used of this facility: Current capacity of the Water Reclamation Facility is 2.7 million gallons per day (MGD) and is currently operating at approximately 40% capacity Projected wastewater treatment plant capacity required by proposal: Less than 1/10% a. Will increased capacity or other improvements become necessary if the proposal is approved? Yes, there will be needed improvements to the collection system to accommodate growth in this annexation area. b. Describe these improvements and how they will be financed: The City is currently performing a study to determine the exact capacity improvements needed in the sewer collection system, the estimated cost of these improvements, and the appropriate way to appropriate the cost burden among all new connections. It has been City policy that new growth bear the cost for system improvements necessary to accommodate new growth Other Municipal Services Describe the service changes that will occur if the proposal is approved: Water and wastewater manaaement will be orovided by the City of Arlinaton. Storm sewer services, as detailed in the Stormwater Comprehensive Plan, will be provided by the City of Arlington. Police services will change from the SnoCo Sheriff to City of Arlington Police. Public Works and Planning services will switch from SnoCo to City of Arlington. The City will provide fire service. \\arlington\city\communitydevelopment\planning\current Planning\ACTIVE PROJECTS\Star Annexation PLN \NOI Star docx\ Page 4 of 7

20 CITY OF ARLINGTON STAR ANNEXATION NOTICE OF INTENT a. Does your jurisdiction have a current Capital Improvement/Development Plan? Y8S b. Is this proposal included in this plan? Yes Describe the effect your jurisdiction's ordinances, governmental codes, regulations, and resolutions will have on existing uses in the proposed area: The property will be developed to urban standards. Properties will be zoned General Commercial and Residential High Density. There are several existing residences located within the RHD zone, with a residence located in the GC zone. Residences within RHD will be permitted outright, while those within the GO zone will be legal nonconforming Are annexation covenants being required for this proposal? No Describe the prospects of governmental services from other sources: None required Describe the probable future needs for services and additional regulatory controls in the area: None beyond the normal services onovid8d by the City or that the AdiOqtDO Municipal Code controls Describe the probable effect of the proposal on the oost, adequacy of senvicee, and controls: a. In the proposed area: Any increase in public costs or service provision will be offset by the increased tax base and/or fees charged for such services. b. In the adjacent area: None. 2.2'4.8 Describe the effect of the proposal on the finances, debt structure, contractual obligations and rights of all affected governmental units: There will be a loss of property taxes for Snohomish County, and a gain for the City of Arlington. The property will become liable for their proportionate share of City of Arlington indebtedness. II 'li 3.1 Describe the effect of the proposal on adjacent areas: Snohomish County will no longer be responsible for any services in this area; this task will be transferred to the City of 3.2 Describe the effect of the proposal on mutual economic and social interests: Annexation and extension of municipal services in this area will allow residents (who already consider themselves to be Arlington citizens) to receive services and representation from Arlington, run for office, and legally be a part of the community to which they belong. 3.3 Describe the effect of the proposal on the local governmental structure of the county: None. \\arlington\city\communitydevetopment\p!anning\currentptanning\activepmojsctsxsta,aonexadon PLN2O1 OO47xvO Star unux Pogo5ofr

21 UTY OF ARLINGTON STAR ANNEXATION NOTICE OF INTENT 4.1 Describe the environmental review process completed for the proposed action: Annexations are exempt from SEPA (WAC (6)(d)). However, general environmental impacts of growth in this area were analyzed in the City of Arlington's SEPA documents for its Comprehensive Plan. Specific environmental impacts of specific development applications will be analyzed at the time of permit application. 5.1 Describe how the proposal is consistent with the Growth Management Act (ROW 36.70A): Annexation of this property contributes to fulfilling the City of Arlington's obligation to allow compact urban growth within its UGA. OBJECTIVES OF THE BOUNDARY REVIEW BOARD Describe fully which objectives of ROW this proposal meets and which objectives this proposal does not meet. Give your reasons for each of the objectives chosen. 6.1 Preservation of natural neighborhoods and communities: This property abuts the current City limits to the northwest and west and consists of eleven parcels of land, which will be used for commercial development and high density residential. The surrounding area to the west are parcels recently annexed that will be used for commercial development. Single-family residences are located to north, east, and south, with some vacant parcels. There is residential development to the northwest. The property owners of 4 parcels proposed for annexation and the adjacent residents and property owners would consider themselves citizens of Arlington and most closely related to the City Arlington. 6.2 Use of physical bounda[kas, including but not limited to bodies of water, highways, and nu land contours: 91st Ave. NE to the east. 6.3 Creation and preservation of logical service areas: This property is within the City of Arlington service area and near no other. 6.4 Prevention of abnormally irregular boundaries: No abnormally irregular boundaries are formed by the annexation. 6.5 Discouragement of multiple incorporations of small cities and encouragement of incorporation of cities in excess of ten thousand population in heavily populated urban areas: Not applicable, as there is not the population base here to incorporate. 6.0 Dissolution of inactive special purpose districts: Not applicable, as there are no inactive special purpose districts. 6.7 Adjustment of impractical boundaries: This annexation is within the City's UGA. The City is not attempting to adlust impractical boundaries with this annexation. Page 6 of 7 nmqvcurrantpianningwctwepnojsctd\starannexation PLw2O1 1OO47vvO Star

22 CITY OF ARLINGTON STAR ANNEXATION NOTICE OF INTENT 6.8 Incorporation as cities or towns or annexation to cities and towns of unincorporated areas which are urban in character: Though not currently urban in nature, this property will be able to develop to urban general commercial and residential standards once it is annexed. 6.9 Protection of agricultural and rural lands which are designated for long-term productive agricultural and resource use by a Comprehensive Plan adopted by the County legislative authority: This property has not been identified or designated by the County as long-term, productive agricultural land, nor is it shown as such on their Resource Lands Map. I certify that the above is true and accurate and that I am an official or employee of tfa governmental jurisdiction seeking boundary change action or the proponent for t incorporation S formation. Signature of this form Printed Name of Person Completing this Notice: Title: Telephone No.: Mailing Address: Todd Hall Associate Planner thal l@arlin gtonwa.gov 238 N. Olympic Avenue Arlington, WA \\artngton\city\communityoevelopment\planntng\current Planning\ACTIVE PROJECTS\Star Annexation PLN \NOI Star docx\ Page 7 of 7

23 Snohomish County Cindy Portmann County Assessor UncaHjefle Chief Deputy M/S # Rockefeller Ave. Everett. WA (425) CERTIFICATE OF SUFFICIENCY FAX (425) I, Chris Huyboom, Snohomish County Deputy Assessor, in accordance with the requirements of RCW 35A , hereby certify that the Petition for the City of Arlington, Star Annexation File No. PLN submitted to the Assessor on March 2, 2012 is signed by the owners of property comprising 62J3% of the total assessed value within the area described in the petition, according to the records of the Snohomish County Assessor. The determination of sufficiency was begun on March 22, Dated this 22nd day of March Deputy Assessor

24 ANNEXATION NAME STAR ANNEXATION File No. PLN TO: City Council of the City of Arlington 238 North Olympic Avenue Arlington, Washington WE THE UNDERSIGNED, being the owners of not less than 60% in value, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, of the real property described on the reverse, or any portion thereof, lying contiguous to the City of Arlington, Washington, do hereby petition that such territory be annexed to and made a part of the City of Arlington, Washington under the provisions of RCW 35A , et. seq., and any amendments thereto, of the State of Washington, The territory proposed to be annexed is within Snohomish County, Washington and is described on Exhibit "A" (legal description) attached herein. WHEREFORE the undersigned respectfully petition the Honorable City Council and ask: a) That appropriate action be taken to entertain this Petition, fixing a date for a public hearing, causing notice to be published and posted specifying the time and place of such hearing and inviting all persons interested to appear and voice approval or disapproval of such annexation; and b) That following such hearing, and subsequent to approval by the Snohomish County Boundary Review Board, if such is convenient, the City Council determine by ordinance that such annexation shall be effective and that property to be annexed shall become a part of the City of Arlington, Washington subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force, including a Comprehensive Plan to become effective upon annexation if the same is provided pursuant to RCW 35A The undersigned hereby petition the Arrington City Council to annex the property described in Exhibit "A" attached herein into the City of Arlington, with that property assuming the proportionate share of the City's bonded Indebtedness and assuming the land use designation of General Commercial and High Density Residential in the Comprehensive Plan and zoning designation of General Commercial and High Density Residential in the Arlington Municipal Code Official Zoning Map in accordance with the requirements of the City Council of said City, as noted in the minutes of entry of the records of the City Council meeting. This Petition is accompanied and has attached herein as Exhibit "B" a diagram that outlines the boundaries of the property sought to be annexed. These pages are a group of pages containing an identical text and prayer intended by the signers of this Petition to be presented and considered as one Petition and may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Petition. 1. Annexation of area described in Exhibits "A" and "B;" and 2. Assumption of a proportionate share of indebtedness of the City of Arlington; and 3. Assumption of the City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan and the Unified Development Code and Official Zoning Map land use designations and zoning districts for the subject area. 1. Sign your name as you sign on legal documents; married women sign "Mary D. Jones" not "Mrs. John D. Jones." 2. Only property owners should sign. 3. The signature of a record owner, as determined by the records of the County Auditor, shall be sufficient without the signature of his or her spouse. 4. In case of mortgaged property, the signature of the mortgagor shall be sufficient, without the signature of his or her spouse. 5. In the case of property purchased on contract, the signature of the contract purchaser, as shown by the record County Auditor, shall be deemed sufficient without the signature of his or her spouse. 6. Any officer of a corporation owning land within the area involved who is duly authorized to execute deeds or encumbrances on behalf of the corporation, may sign on behalf of such corporation, and shall attach to the Petition a certified excerpt from the bylaws of such corporation showing such authority. 7. When property stands in the name of a deceased person or any person for whom a guardian has been appointed, the signature of the executor, administrator, or guardian, as the case may be, shall be equivalent to the signature of the owner of the property. 8. Payment for circulating Petition is prohibited by law. WARNING: Every person who signs this Petition with any other than his true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these Petitions, or signs a Petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a Petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein false statement shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Owner's Printed Name Address Phone Tax Account Signature (Street, City, County, Zip) Number Date / -c ^jorn 550 West C St. Ste 1470 t ' /(_ / San Diego, CA "T. r 1 I Two Union Square, Suite u625t30?03$t Union St, Seattle, WA ltadingtonkeity\communitydevelopment\planning\current PlanninglACTIVE PROJECTS/Star Annexation PLN Wnnex60%petltion.doc iii ;2)1 /12

25 60% PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON ANNEXATION NAME STAR ANNEXATION File No. PLN TO: City Council of the City of Arlington 238 North Olympic Avenue Arlington, Washington WE THE UNDERSIGNED, being the owners of not less than 60% in value, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, of the real property described on the reverse, or any portion thereof, lying contiguous to the City of Arlington, Washington, do hereby petition that such territory be annexed to and made a part of the City of Arlington, Washington under the provisions of RCW 35A , et. seq., and any amendments thereto, of the State of Washington. The territory proposed to be annexed is within Snohomish County, Washington and is described on Exhibit "A" (legal description) attached herein. WHEREFORE the undersigned respectfully petition the Honorable City Council and ask: a) That appropriate action be taken to entertain this Petition, fixing a date for a public hearing, causing notice to be published and posted specifying the time and place of such hearing and inviting all persons interested to appear and voice approval or disapproval of such annexation; and b) That following such hearing, and subsequent to approval by the Snohomish County Boundary Review Board, if such is convenient, the City Council determine by ordinance that such annexation shall be effective and that property to be annexed shall become a part of the City of Arlington, Washington subject to its laws and ordinances then and thereafter in force, including a Comprehensive Plan to become effective upon annexation if the same is provided pursuant to RCW 35A The undersigned hereby petition the Arlington City Council to annex the property described in Exhibit "A" attached herein into the City of Arlington, with that property assuming the proportionate share of the City's bonded indebtedness and assuming the land use designation of General Commercial and High Density Residential in the Comprehensive Plan and zoning designation of General Commercial and High Density Residential in the Arlington Municipal Code Official Zoning Map in accordance with the requirements of the City Council of said City, as noted in the minutes of entry of the records of the City Council meeting. This Petition is accompanied and has attached herein as Exhibit "8" a diagram that outlines the boundaries of the property sought to be annexed. These pages are a group of pages containing an identical text and prayer intended by the signers of this Petition to be presented and considered as one Petition and may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Petition. PRAYER OF PETITION: 1. Annexation of area described in Exhibits "A" and "B;" and 2. Assumption of a proportionate share of indebtedness of the City of Arlington; and 3. Assumption of the City of Arlington Comprehensive Plan and the Unified Development Code and Official Zoning Map land use designations and zoning districts for the subject area. INSTRUCTIONS TO SIGNERS AND VOLUNTEER SOLICITORS 1. Sign your name as you sign on legal documents; married women sign "Mary D. Jones" not "Mrs. John D. Jones." 2. Only property owners should sign. 3. The signature of a record owner, as determined by the records of the County Auditor, shall be sufficient without the signature of his or her spouse. 4. In case of mortgaged property, the signature of the mortgagor shall be sufficient, without the signature of his or her spouse. 5. In the case of property purchased on contract, the signature of the contract purchaser, as shown by the record County Auditor, shall be deemed sufficient without the signature of his or her spouse. 6. Any officer of a corporation owning land within the area involved who is duly authorized to execute deeds or encumbrances on behalf of the corporation, may sign on behalf of such corporation, and shall attach to the Petition a certified excerpt from the bylaws of such corporation showing such authority. 7. When property stands in the name of a deceased person or any person for whom a guardian has been appointed, the signature of the executor, administrator, or guardian, as the case may be, shall be equivalent to the signature of the owner of the property. 8. Payment for circulating Petition is prohibited by law. WARNING: Every person who signs this Petition with any other than his true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these Petitions, or signs a Petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a Petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein false statement shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Owner's Printed Name Address Phone Tax Account Signature (Street, City, County, Zip) Number Date Keith Horp West C St. Ste ,_,,""` San Diego, CA s _.. E BELOW Two Union Square, Suite GO, " " 601 Union St. Seattle, WA X st Ave NE Frank Tanis Arlington, WA *LAUREN JASSNY, CHIEF CREDIT OFFICER OF THE COMMERCE BANK OF WASHINGTON, N.A., SOLE MEMBER OF TCB PROPERTY ASSOCIATES, LLC \\arlington\city\communitydevelopment\planning\current Planning\ACTIVE PROJECTS\Star Annexation PLN \Annex60%petition.doc th:211112

26 60% PETITION FOR ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ARUNGTON, WASHINGTON ANNEXATION NAME STAR ANNEXATION File No. plwum/no*r TO: City Council of the City of Arlington 238 North Olym pic Avenu e _ ~,..-- ~_n WE THE UNDERSIGNED, being the owners of not less than 60% in value, according to the assessed valuation for general taxation, of the real property described on the reverse, or any portion thereof, lying contiguous to the City of Arlington, Washington, do hereby petition that such territory be annexed to and made a part of the City of Arlington, Washington under the provisions of RCW 35A , et. seq., and any amendments thereto, of the State of The sd to be annexed is within Snohomish County, Washington and is described on Exhibit "A" (legal description) attached herein. WHEREFORE the undersigned respectfully petition the Honorable City Council and ask: a) That appropriate action be taken to entertain this Petition, fixing a date for a public hearing, causing notice to be m/ posted specifying the time and place of such hearing and invitingall persons interested to appear and voice approval or disapproval of such annexation; and N That following such hearing and subsequent to approval by the Snohomish ish C Boundary Review Board, if such is convenient, the City Council determine by ordinance that such annexation shall be effective and that property to be annexed shall become a part of the City w Arlington, Washington to its laws and ordinances then and thereafte in force including Comprehensive Plan to become effective upon annexation x the same m provided pursuant toeowus^.14.xoo. The o i ed h b mo he Arli City Council the property described in Exhibit "A" attached herein into the City of Arlington, with that property assuming the proportionate share of the City's bonded indebtedness and assuming the land use designation of General Commercial and High Density Residential in the Comprehensive Plan and zoning designation of General Commercial and High Density Residential in the Arlington Municipal Code Official Zoning Map in accordance with the requirements of the City Council of said City, as noted in the minutes of entry of the records of the City Council meeting. This Petition is accompanied and has attached herein as Exhibit "B" a diagram that outlines the boundaries of the property sought to be annexed. These pages are a group of pages containing an identical text and prayer intended by the signers of this Petition to be presented and considered as one Petition and may be filed with other pages containing additional signatures which cumulatively may be considered as a single Petition. PRAYER OF PETITION: I. Annexation of area described in Exhibits "A" and "B;" and 2. Assumption of a proportionate,xapominuouteo^eosmmonitymamnom^;onu 3. Assumption of the City of Arlington Co x ive Plan and the Unified Development Code and Official Zoning Map land use designations and zoning districts for the subject area. INSTRUCTIONS TO SIGNERS AND VOLUNTEER SOLICITORS /. Sign you name as you sign on lega documents; married women sign 'Mary D. Jones" not "Mrs. John D. Jones." 2. Only properly owners should sign. 3. The signature of a record owne as determined by the records of the County Auditor, shall be sufficient witho t the signature of his or her spouse. 4. In case of mortgaged property, the signature of the mortgagor shall be sufficient, without the signature of his or her spouse. s. in the case of property purchased on contract, the s e contract purchaser, as shown by the record County Auditor, shall be deemed sufficient without the signature of his or her spouse. s. Any offic r of a corporation owning land within the area involved who is dul authorized to execute deeds or encumbrances on behalf of the corporation may sign on behalf of such co ration, and shall attach to the Petition a certified excerpt from the bylaws of such corporation showing such authority. 7. When property stands in the name of a deceased person or any person for whom a guardian has been appointed, the signature of the executor, administrator, or guardian, as the case may be, shall be equivalent to the signature of the owner of the 8. Payment for circulating Petitio is prohibited bylaw. WARNING: Every person who signs this Petition with any other than his true name, or who knowingly signs more than one of these Petitions, or signs a Petition seeking an election when he is not a legal voter, or signs a Petition when he is otherwise not qualified to sign, or who makes herein false statement shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Owner's Printed Name Address Phone Tax Account Signature. pmeet,nity.c"""*zw, Number Date =t,s A4t 2 ^... taengr\cily\commuatyoeveopmenttannnffcusent,an"*nmcnv5pnojsormstarxnn =oon,ln2m1oo4rm"ne,63mnet«=.doc

27 RESOLUTION NO A RESOLUTION REGARDING THE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY KNOWN AS THE STAR ANNEXATION WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Arlington has reviewed the proposed annexation of property known as the Star Annexation; and WHEREAS, on January 23, 2012, the City Council held a meeting to schedule a future meeting to consider the 10% Petition for Annexation on the Star Annexation; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public meeting on February 6, 2012, and accepted the 10% Petition for Annexation and allowed the proponent to circulate the 60% Petition for Annexation; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a public hearing on March 5, 2012, to hear testimony concerning the annexation of the properties within the proposed annexation area; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the staff report concerning the annexation; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes annexation of the property with adoption of the city's Land Use Designation of General Commercial and High Density Residential pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan and a Zoning Designation of General Commercial and High Density Residential is appropriate and achieves the goals of the GMA; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that the annexation of the property is financially feasible, is appropriate under the Growth Management Act (GMA), and is in the best interests of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to have the issue of the proposed annexation considered by the Snohomish County Boundary Review Board as expeditiously as possible, in the interests of the citizens of the City of Arlington and the residents and business owners of the annexation area; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON, WASHINGTON, AS FOLLOWS: City staff is hereby directed to prepare and submit a Notice of Intention to Annex the property described in the Star Annexation petition, together with the supporting materials and information required by law, to the Snohomish County Boundary Review Board forthwith. The properties included in the annexation are described in the legal description (Exhibit A) and as shown on the vicinity map (Exhibit B). RESOLUTION NO

28 3. The properties silali have the land use designations and zoning designations 'is shown on Exhibits C & D, respectively. 4. The properties included M the annexation shall assume their proportionate share of the City's indebtedness. of March APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Arlington this 19th day *rn- Barbara Tolbert, Mayor Attest:./ r. KristT3anhield, City Clerk Approved as to form: JIe,ityAttorney RESOLUTION NO

29 THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 31 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., LYING EASTERLY OF THE WESTERLY MARGIN OF 89TH AVENUE N.E. AND ITS SOUTHERLY EXTENSION; TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 31 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., LYING EASTERLY OF THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF STATE ROUTE 9; EXCEPT THAT PORTION LYING NORTH OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF STATE ROUTE 9 AND FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER; THENCE EAST, PARRALEL WITH SAID NORTH LINE, FEET; THENCE NORTH, PERPENDICULAR WITH SAID NORTH LINE, 5.00 FEET; THENCE EAST, PARRALEL WITH SAID NORTH LINE, FEET; THENCE NORTH, PERPENDICULAR WITH SAID NORTH LINE, FEET, TO SAID NORTH LINE AND THE TERMINUS OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED LINE; AND TOGETHER WITH THAT PORTION OF NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 31 NORTH, RANGE 5 EAST, W.M., LYING WESTERLY OF THE EASTERLY MARGIN OF 91ST AVENUE N.E.;

30 EXHBITB IU-2rrthSt-NFSU-5S S Maps and CIS data are distributed "AS-IS" without warranties of any kind, either express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of suitability for a particular purpose or use. Map data are compiled from a variety of sources which a may contain errors and users who rely upon the information do so at their own risk. Users agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Arlington for any and all liability of any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the data or the use of the data presented in the maps. Airport Streets Off ramps parcelsc LIP selection Rail line Arlington_UGA N Rest area ENTEr'! Interstate. State Routes City Limits D UGA - Major Roads Primary Roads City ofarlington tir Annexation Scale: File: Date: 1 inch = 477 feet Star Annex_8.5x ,mxd 09/26/11 Cartographer: TH

31 38E`t -\ 182ND ST NE EY1]WT, RLMD rn z w a LU I, m CO LU ft d 0 W Z LU Q S N N 0 car rn LU LU Maps and GIS data are dislrbuted "AS-IS" wkhout warranfes of any kind, either express or implied, including but not invited to warranties at suitebitty for a particular purpose or use. Map data are compiled from a variety of sources which may contain errors and users who rely upon the information to teal their awn risk. Users agree to indemnity, defend, and hold harmless the City ofarlington for any and a9 liability of any nature analog out of or resoling 'turn the lack of accuracy or osrrec1ne05 of Ih a data, or rho con of the data presented in the maps. Land Use E71 RLMD = Low to Moderate Density Residential GC = General Commercial P/SP = Public/Semi-Public RHD = High Density Residential Proposed Star Annexation D City of Arlington UGA DCitof Arlington Public ROW

32 182ND ST NE EX}WITU W z w Q rn w z w 2 I Y t. J l ^N^is^^ Maps and GI& data are distributed 'AS-IS" without warranties of any kind, either express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of suitabi ty fora particular purpose or use,. Map data are sompfed from a variety of sources which may contain errors and users who rety upon the information do so at their awn risk. Usere agree to Indemnify, defend, and held harmless the City of Arington far any and aq gabifity of any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness ofth a data, orthe use of dte data presented in the maps. Zoning RLMD = Low to Moderate Density Residential GC = General Commercial P/SP = Public/Semi-Public RHD = High Density Residential El Proposed Star Annexation ' - City of Arlington UGA city of Arlington Public ROW

33 CERTIFICATE OF RESOLUTION I, Kristin Banfield, City Clerk of the City of Arlington, Washington (the "City"), do hereby certify that the attached is a full, true and correct copy City of Arlington Resolution No , passed by the Arlington City Council at their regular meeting on March 19, 2(' / - r I?it L Kristin Banfield, City Clerk Dated this 20th day of March, 2012.

34 i QUARTER ' SECTION _1 TOWNSHIPN.W.B.L RANGEE.W.M _-- ^ 1-i A prods If th, S f lsh C t A e«or.. O/^i

35 I QUARTERJ SECTION_ +, TOWNSHIP N.W e I. -- RANGE E.WM J -- -.A ea _ i pmdu of the Snol nm1s1, Caunty 4sssors Uff._. hlnp pmdurej on Iuly?2, _ ;rj 3e C ti..., j I a-oa, o,e o, x-n,e.,«. ^ ; es 4e, I. r r q E?} 00 ti '.aoaa k j 1 ^ oox i o-on coor a^ sooa I ^ _. W.,,...«x.axs 1_.. i <rn^v if

36

37 Maps and GIS data are distributed 'AS-IS" without warranties of any kind, either express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of suitability for a particular purpose or use. Map data are compiled from a oanety of sources which may contain errors and users who rely upon the information do Sc at their own risk. Users agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Arlington for any and all liability of any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the data, or the use of the data presented in the maps. Zoning RLMD = Low to Moderate Density Residential Proposed 1 t' Star rj Annexation City ni GC = General Commercial Scale: File: P/SP =Public/Semi-Public 1 inch = 600 feet CityZoning8.5x11.mxd J Proposed Star Annexation City of Arlington City of Arlington UGA Public ROW Date Cartographer 12/19/2011 kdk

38 Clty Limits gt Urban Growfn Area 4 H ^ s ^nle nianwa ys -- Pnma7 Roatls -- Rat411ne APD 5ubdmtods 'A/Pp Safe ry ZOnes Land Use SR = Surburban Residential n RLMD = Low to Moderate Density Residential RMD = Moderate Density Residential RHD = High Density Residential '. OTRD = 01d Town Residential District ] NC = Neighborhood Commercial OTBD -1 = Old Town Business District 1 OTBD - 2 = Old Town Business District 2 L OTBD -3 = Old Town Business District 3 GC = General Commercial HC = Highway Commerc=.al j BP = Business Park LI = Light Industrial GI = General Industrial P/SP = Public/Semi-Public MS = Medical Services r AF =Aviation Flightline N y^ ^Y Contract Rezone TOR Overlay Zone -i MPN = Master Planned Neighborhood Overlay Zone Coordinated Water Service Area Future Planning Area THIS IS A COPY OF THE OFFICIAL LAND USE MAP OF THE CITY OF ARLINGTON. WHICH WAS ADOPTED AS PART OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON 5 DECEMBER 2005 PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO >^'4YlG i...,. Margaret L rson Mayor Kristin Bonfield City Clerk City of Arlington Land Use. Map Scale 1 inch = 3,500 feet Pile..'... Date LandUse 8.5x11 _ 11.mxd 12/20/2011 mw^ =no

39 a I UMDR A04. ULDR RR/5BASIC UCOM CITY 77y7LDR ULDR ULDR R R/5 Maps and GIS data are distributed "AS-IS" without warrantes of any kind, either express or implii including but not limited to warranties of suitability for a particular purpose or use. Map data are compiled from a variety of sources which may contain errors and users who rely upon the information do so at their own risk. Users agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City ofarlington for any and all liability of any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the data, or the use of the data presented in the maps. County Land Use [_] Proposed Star Annexation City of Arlington UCOM - Urban commercial City of Arlington UGA ULDR - Urban low density S. Public ROW UMDR - Urban medium density res. RR/5 - Rural res, 5 acres RR/5BASIC - Rural res, 5 acres basic 12/19/2011 Iii Proposed Star Annexation

40 B LDMR R-7,200 R-5 PCB City R R-7,200 LDMR R I I R-7200 R-5 I I Maps and GIS data are distributed "AS-IS" without warranties of any kind, either express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of suitability for a particular purpose or use. Map data are compiled from a variety of sources which may contain errors and users who rely upon the information do so at their own risk. Users agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City of Arlington for any and all liability of any nature arising out of or resulting from the lack of accuracy or correctness of the data, or the use of the data presented in the maps. Proposed Star Annexation County Zoning fl Proposed StarAnnexatio Snohomish County City of Arlington Zon ll IF fl R-5 - Rural, 5 acres R Rural 7, 200 sq ft j R-9,600 -Rural 9,600 sq ft City of Arlington UGA Scale: File: Public ROW 1 inch = 500 feet SnoCoZoning8.5x1 1.mxd LDMR - Low density multiple res. Date: cartographer: PCB - Planned community business 12/19/2011 kdk