Minutes. Planning, Design and Development Committee Committee of the Council of The Corporation of the City of Brampton.

Transcription

1 Minutes Planning, Design and Development Committee Committee of the Council of The Corporation of the City of Brampton February 7, 2011 Members Present: Members Absent: Regional Councillor P. Palleschi Wards 2 and 6 (Chair) City Councillor V. Dhillon Wards 9 and 10 (Vice-Chair) Regional Councillor J. Sanderson Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor G. Miles Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor S. Hames Wards 7 and 8 Regional Councillor J. Sprovieri Wards 9 and 10 City Councillor G. Gibson Wards 1 and 5 City Councillor J. Hutton Wards 2 and 6 City Councillor B. Callahan Wards 3 and 4 Regional Councillor E. Moore Wards 1 and 5 (vacation) Staff Present: Planning, Design and Development Department J. Corbett, Commissioner, Planning, Design and Development A. Smith, Director, Planning Policy and Growth Management D. Kraszewski, Director, Planning and Land Development Services M. Won, Director, Engineering and Development Services K. Walsh, Director, Community Design, Parks Planning and Development P. Aldunate, Development Planner D. VanderBerg, Central Area Planner Corporate Services Department K. Pfuetzner, Legal Counsel E. Evans, Deputy Clerk C. Urquhart, Legislative Coordinator

2 The meeting was called to order at 7:05 p.m., and adjourned at 9:00 p.m. After due consideration of the matters placed before this Committee, the members beg leave to present its report as follows: Item Recommendation A. PDD Approval of Agenda B. Conflicts of Interest C. Consent D1. PDD Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Brampton Northeast Shopping Centres Limited SmartCentres Southeast corner Bramalea Road and Mayfield Road Ward 9 (File C05E17.002) D2. PDD Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw Glen Schnarr and Associates Inc Ontario Ltd., William Hewson, and Canada Ltd., 174, 178, 180 and 184 Queen Street East North side of Queen Street between Centre Street and Kennedy Road Ward 1 (File C01E06.053) E1. PDD Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw Gagnon Law Urban Planners Ltd. Medallion Developments Inc. 64 and 70 Bramalea Road North of Steeles Avenue East and West side of Bramalea Road (File C04E01.007) (See Item F1) F1. PDD Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Gagnon Law Urban Planners Ltd. Medallion Developments Inc. 64 and 70 Bramalea Road North of Steeles Avenue East and West side of Bramalea Road (File C04E01.007) (See Item E1) G1. PDD Vales of Humber Secondary Plan (Area 50) Ward 10 (File P26 S50) G2. PDD City of Brampton Response to the City of Vaughan s New Official Plan (File G65) H. Committee of Adjustment Reports I. Building and Zoning Reports Page 2 of 19

3 J. Community Design - Parks Planning and Development Reports K1. PDD Subdivision Assumption McVean Estates Subdivision Registered Plan 43M-1610 North of Castlemore Road between Goreway Drive and McVean Drive Ward 10 (File C08E13.006) K2. PDD Subdivision Assumption Cottrelle Part F Subdivision Registered Plan 43M-1696 North of Castlemore Road between Airport Road and Goreway Drive Ward 10 (File C07E11.006) L. Minutes M. Other/New Business/Unfinished Business N1. PDD List of Referred Reports Planning, Design and Development Committee. O. Deferred Matters P. Notice of Motion Q1. PDD Resolution - Ministry of Transportation Southern Highways Program (File G65) Q2. PDD Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw Gagnon Law Urban Planners Ltd. Medallion Developments Inc. 64 and 70 Bramalea Road North of Steeles Avenue East and West side of Bramalea Road (File C04E01.007) (See Items E1/F1) R. Question Period S. Public Question Period T. Closed Session U. PDD Adjournment Regional Councillor P. Palleschi, Chair _ Page 3 of 19

4 A. Approval of the Agenda PDD That the agenda for the Meeting of February 7, 2011, be approved, as amended as follows: To add the following: Re: Item D1 Correspondence from Randy Neilson, Bramalea Christian Fellowship, Bramalea Road North, Brampton, dated February 7, Re: Item E1/F1. Delegations: 3. Neil Davis, Davis Webb, 24 Queen Street East, Brampton, behalf of the applicant 4. Amin Sajun, Par-Pak Ltd., 26 Victoria Crescent, Brampton 5. Leo Gauthier, 33 Athlone Avenue, Brampton 6. Marielle Manning, 15 Albion Crescent, Brampton 7. Al Franklin, 1 Avondale Boulevard, Brampton 8. Joe Hart, 16 Avondale Boulevard, Brampton Q 2. Correspondence from Sajjad Ebrahim, Par-Pak Ltd., 26 Victoria Crescent, Brampton, dated February 7, Note: Later in the meeting, on a 2/3 majority vote, the following delegations were added re Item E1/F1: 4. Amin Sajun, Par-Pak Ltd., 26 Victoria Crescent, Brampton 5. Leo Gauthier, 33 Athlone Avenue, Brampton 6. Marielle Manning, 15 Albion Crescent, Brampton 7. Al Franklin, 1 Avondale Boulevard, Brampton 8. Joe Hart, 16 Avondale Boulevard, Brampton B. Conflicts of Interest - nil C. Consent * The following items listed with an asterisk (*) were considered to be routine and non-controversial by the Committee and were approved at one time Page 4 of 19

5 (G 2, K 1, K 2, N 1, Q 1) Item G 1 was removed from Consent D. Statutory Public Meeting Reports D 1. Report from K. Ash, Manager, Development Services, and P. Aldunate, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated January 5, 2011, re: Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Brampton Northeast Shopping Centres Limited SmartCentres Southeast corner Bramalea Road and Mayfield Road Ward 9 (File C05E17.002). Members of the public did not wish to address Committee on this item. PDD That the report from K. Ash, Manager, Development Services, and P. Aldunate, Development Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated January 5, 2011, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of February 7, 2011, re: Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Brampton Northeast Shopping Centres Limited SmartCentres Southeast corner Bramalea Road and Mayfield Road Ward 9 (File C05E17.002) be received; and, 2. That correspondence from Randy Neilson, Bramalea Christian Fellowship, Bramalea Road North, Brampton, dated February 7, 201, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of February 7, 2011, re: Application to Amend the Zoning By-law Brampton Northeast Shopping Centres Limited SmartCentres Southeast corner Bramalea Road and Mayfield Road Ward 9 (File C05E17.002) be received; and, 3. That staff be directed to report back to the Planning, Design and Development Committee with the results of the public meeting and a staff recommendation, subsequent to the completion of the circulation of the application and a comprehensive evaluation of the proposal. D 2. Report from A. Taranu, Manager, Urban Design and Public Buildings, and D. VanderBerg, Central Area Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated January 5, 2011, re: Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Glen Schnarr and Associates Inc Ontario Ltd., William Hewson, and Canada Ltd., 174, 178, 180 and 184 Queen Street East North side of Queen Street between Centre Street and Kennedy Road Ward 1 (File C01E06.053) Page 5 of 19

6 Jason Afonso, Glen Schnarr and Associates Inc., presented the proposal to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a mixed-use development which includes office, commercial and residential uses at the subject site. He provided details of the surrounding land uses, and the characteristics of the property. Two concept plans have been submitted, one with a 15 storey building with only office uses, and the second with a 20 storey building with office and residential uses. He indicated that 550 parking spaces will be available. David VanderBerg, Central Area Planner, provided details of the current land use designation for the subject lands and confirmed that an amendment to the Official Plan and Zoning By-law is required to facilitate the proposal. He confirmed that the applicant has submitted several studies in support of the proposal which is still under review and available to the public for viewing. Staff has also requested the applicant to provide a Heritage Impact Assessment. All the studies and the comments that are provided at this meeting will be evaluated and a future recommendation report will be presented to Committee. Ian Douglas, 160 Queen Street East, Brampton, stated that the proposal for a 15 or 20 storey building is incompatible for the subject site. He was concerned about the impact on existing traffic volume given that there will be at least an additional 550 cars accessing to and from the site. He expressed concerns with respect to the impact on the Brampton Cemetery lands. He felt that a building in such proximity to the cemetery should be more pleasant. Staff confirmed that the concerns raised at the meeting will be addressed in the recommendation report which will be presented to Committee at a future date. PDD That the report from A. Taranu, Manager, Urban Design and Public Buildings, and D. VanderBerg, Central Area Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated January 5, 2011, to the Meeting of February 7, 2011, re: Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Glen Schnarr and Associates Inc Ontario Ltd., William Hewson, and Canada Ltd., 174, 178, 180 and 184 Queen Street East North side of Queen Street between Centre Street and Kennedy Road Ward 1 (File C01E06.053) be received; and, 2. That staff be directed to report back to the Planning, Design and Development Committee with the results of the public meeting and a staff recommendation, subsequent to the completion of the circulation of the application and a comprehensive evaluation of the proposal Page 6 of 19

7 E. Delegations/Presentations E 1. Delegations, re: Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning Bylaw Gagnon Law Urban Planners Ltd. Medallion Developments Inc. 64 and 70 Bramalea Road North of Steeles Avenue East and West side of Bramalea Road (File C04E01.007) (See Item F1). 1. Shirley Franklin, 1 Avondale Boulevard, Brampton 2. Michael Gagnon, Gagnon and Law Urban Planners Ltd., 21 Queen Street East, Brampton 3. Neil Davis, Davis Webb, 24 Queen Street East, Brampton, on behalf of the applicant 4. Amin Sajun, Par-Pak Ltd., 26 Victoria Crescent, Brampton 5. Leo Gauthier, 33 Athlone Avenue, Brampton 6. Marielle Manning, 15 Albion Crescent, Brampton 7. Al Franklin, 1 Avondale Boulevard, Brampton 8. Joe Hart, 16 Avondale Boulevard, Brampton Item F1 was brought forward and dealt with at this time. Dan Kraszewski, Director, Planning and Land Development Services, advised that the subject application is before the Ontario Municipal Board. He provided an overview of the proposal and stated that based on staff's evaluation, the proposal meets the intensification criteria in the Official Plan to support high density residential development, as the location is along a Primary Intensification Corridor and its proximity to the Bramalea Gateway Mobility Hub. The technical studies submitted demonstrate that the scale, design and character of the development is compatible with the existing development. The proposed height and density are consistent with the intensification policies and other policy directions. Mr. Kraszewski explained that the issues raised by residents at the public meeting are addressed in the report and the amending zoning by-law will ensure that the development is implemented as proposed and that details will be addressed through the site plan approval process. Shirley Franklin, 1 Avondale Boulevard, Brampton, advised that her home is located directly behind the proposed building. She noted her objection to the proposal. She has not yet seen the plans that are being presented for approval. She felt that her concerns expressed at the public meeting regarding potential noise, building height, density, shadow impact, increased traffic, and privacy have not been addressed. She considers the proposal to be an 'eyesore' and questioned whether residents will be compensated for the loss of value for their property. She also expressed concerns with respect to the notification process for this meeting and stated that the meeting should have been advertised in the local newspaper. She expressed interest in attending the Ontario Municipal Board (OMB) hearing on the matter Page 7 of 19

8 Amin Sajun, Par-Pak Ltd., 26 Victoria Crescent, Brampton, advised that Par-Pak is located west of the proposed development and employs over 500 people. He stated that they are in negotiations with Medallion Developments regarding noise mitigation and suggested that a decision on the proposal be deferred for a month to resolve the issue. He requested that they be allowed the opportunity to further address the matter at the OMB if the negotiations with the applicant cannot be resolved in a satisfactory manner. He noted that a written submission was provided with their comments. Neil Davis, Davis Webb, 24 Queen Street East, Brampton, on behalf of the applicant, stated that Par-Pak did not attend the public meeting that was held on this application and their concerns regarding noise were only expressed recently. He advised that the noise mitigation matter is being handled by engineers and expressed the opinion that Committee should not be expected to intervene in this issue. He stated that the Province has mandated intensification and agreed with staff comments that the proposal is consistent with the intensification policies of the Official Plan. He commented that the proposed building can be constructed to ensure compatibility with the existing community. Leo Gauthier, 33 Athlone Avenue, Brampton, expressed understanding for the residents on Avondale Boulevard who would be impacted by the subject proposal. He commented that properties will be devalued and traffic volume will increase due to the proposed high density. Marielle Manning, 15 Albion Crescent, Brampton, expressed concerns regarding access to the proposed site and questioned whether there are any plans for road improvements to accommodate the additional traffic that the proposed development would generate. She commented that the existing high rise apartment building is not rented to capacity and questioned what purpose this building would serve. She wondered how the nearby industrial units feel about the proposal and whether they have expressed concerns. She believes that existing property values will be reduced and questioned whether taxes would be lowered. AI Franklin, 1 Avondale Boulevard, Brampton, commented that the area residents were advised that there would be no change to the subject site after the original building was constructed. He expressed concerns regarding the traffic impact on Bramalea Road. At present, he has difficulty getting out of his driveway and feels the roads cannot accommodate any additional traffic. He believes that the proposed intensification is inappropriate for the site and the area residents deserve better. Joe Hart, 16 Avondale Boulevard, Brampton, said that the impression he was getting at the meeting was that a decision has already been made on the proposal. He referenced the Heart Lake proposal in which the OMB made the decision and speculated whether it would be same for this development Page 8 of 19

9 Committee discussion on this matter included the following: o Provincial Growth Plan legislation on intensification and recognition that the subject proposal is a result of the legislation o whether there are any benefits to residents regarding the number of parking spaces per unit being proposed o the appropriateness of the proposal at this location and the impact on existing residents given the scale, design and character of the proposal o possibility of an amendment to Provincial policies to have regard to existing residents in a community where properties may be devalued by this type of intensification o improvements and enhancements to Bramalea Road to reduce the impact of the proposal on residents o acknowledging that the decision on the subject application rests with Ontario Municipal Board o suggestion that the report be received and the staff recommendations not be approved With respect to the concerns and comments raised by Committee and delegations, staff explained that based on a complete Planning analysis, the proposal meets the intensification criteria contained in the recently adopted Official Plan to support high density residential development. On the issue of parking, staff is satisfied that the parking rates adopted for the residential and retail components of the proposal are acceptable. Improvements and enhancements to Bramalea Road and the surrounding area will be undertaken to reduce the impact on residents as outlined in the staff recommendation. Staff confirmed that the amending zoning by-law will ensure that the development is implemented as proposed and that details will be addressed through the site plan approval process. With respect to the Ontario Board Hearing, staff explained the process and clarified that a hearing date has not yet been scheduled. On the issue of notifying the residents that the report was being presented today, staff advised that a meeting notice was sent to all residents who spoke at the public meeting and those who requested to be kept informed. A motion was put forward to receive the staff report and not approve the staff recommendations. This motion was voted on and lost. The following motion was considered: PDD That the report from K. Ash, Manager, Development Services, Planning, Design and Development, dated January 7, 2011, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of February 7, 2011, re: Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Gagnon Law Urban Planners Ltd. Medallion Developments Inc Page 9 of 19

10 64 and 70 Bramalea Road North of Steeles Avenue East and West side of Bramalea Road (File C04E01.007) be received; and, 2. That the applications be endorsed in principle and staff be authorized to appear before the Ontario Municipal Board in support of these applications to amend the Official Plan, Zoning By-law, and Site Plan approval, subject to the conditions set out in Recommendations 3 through 7; 3. That prior to the adoption of the official plan amendment and enactment of the amending zoning by-law, the Urban Design Brief prepared by Gagnon & Law Urban Planners Ltd., in association with Page & Steele IBI Group Architects and Alexander Budrevics & Associates Limited shall be finalized to the satisfaction of the Director, Community Design, Parks Planning and Development Division; 4. That prior to the adoption of the official plan amendment and enactment of the zoning by-law, the application shall receive development cap allocation for the 254 residential units; 5. That prior to the adoption of the official plan amendment and enactment of the zoning by-law, a functional servicing report shall be finalized to the satisfaction of the City and the Region of Peel; 6. That prior to the adoption of the official plan amendment and the enactment of the amending zoning by-law, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City, which shall include the following: 6.1 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a site development plan, landscaping, grading and storm drainage plan, elevation and cross section drawings, a fire protection plan, and engineering and servicing plans shall be in accordance with the approved Urban Design Brief and shall be approved by the City, and appropriate securities shall be deposited with the City, to ensure implementation of these plans in accordance with the City s site plan review process; 6.2 The applicant shall pay all applicable Regional, City and educational development charges in accordance with respective development charges by-laws; Page 10 of 19

11 The applicant shall grant easements to the appropriate authorities as may be required for the installation of utilities and municipal services to service the lands; The applicant shall pay cash-in-lieu of parkland dedication in accordance with the Planning Act and City Policy or make other arrangements to the satisfaction of the City for this payment; The applicant shall be responsible for all road improvements along Bramalea Road that may be deemed necessary by the City which shall include, but not be limited to, exclusive turning lanes, centre median islands and pedestrian improvements. All costs associated with these road improvements shall be at the applicant s expense; Arrangements satisfactory to the City and the Region of Peel for the provision of all matters and works relating to residential waste collection and disposal; The applicant shall agree to implement the approved Design Brief; The applicant shall comply with the architectural control policies of the City; The owner shall agree to supply, install and maintain a central mail facility (mailroom with lock panel) for the provision of mail service to the apartment suites within this development proposal to the satisfaction of Canada Post; The owner shall agree to contribute financially to the following works: a) Upgrading the kill strip (build a sidewalk) on the west side of Bramalea Road south of Steeles Avenue, across the Bramalea frontage to the first entrance to the GO station site; b) Tree planting along the boulevard on the west side of Bramalea Road from the subject property to the GO station site, at a size of approximately 70 mm calliper and 15 metres on centre; and, c) Upgrading the kill strip/sidewalk along the entire frontage of the subject property Page 11 of 19

12 6.11 The owner agrees to design and construct improvements within Barclay s Buffer, north of the property, coincidentally with the construction In recognition of the TTMP and if supported by an Environmental Assessment, the owner agrees to not object to and gratuitously dedicate, when requested by the City, a 2.5 metre road widening across the entire frontage of the subject lands at both 64 and 70 Bramalea Road to the City; and, 7. That the subject application be approved and staff be directed to prepare the appropriate documents for the consideration of City Council, subject to the following conditions: 1. The City of Brampton Official Plan be amended to redesignate the lands located at 64 and 70 Bramalea Road from Office to Residential permitting a density of 342 units per net residential hectare and a floor space index of The Avondale Secondary Plan Area 20 be amended to include site specific policies with respect to density, urban design and improvements to surrounding infrastructure within the current, Mixed Use Commercial/High Density Residential designation on the subject property. That only in conjunction with an apartment dwelling a maximum of 750 square metres of commercial shall be permitted. 3. The subject properties at 64 and 70 Bramalea Road shall be rezoned with the following provisions: (a) The lands shall only be used for the following purposes: (1) an Apartment Dwelling (2) only in conjunction with an apartment dwelling, the following uses to a maximum combined gross commercial floor area of 750 square metres: i) a retail establishment; ii) iii) a personal service shop; a bank, trust company or finance company; Page 12 of 19

13 iv) an office, other than the office of a physician, dentist or drugless practitioner; v) a dry cleaning and laundry distribution station; vi) a dining room restaurant; and a convenience restaurant not including a drive through facility vii) a printing or copying establishment; viii) a custom workshop; and, ix) a recreation facility. (3) Purposes accessory to other permitted purposes. (b) Shall be subject to the following requirements and restrictions: (1) Minimum Lot Area: 1.8 hectares; (2) Minimum Lot Width: 167 metres; (3) Minimum Lot Depth: 100 metres; (4) Minimum Front Yard Depth: 17 metres; (5) Minimum Interior Side Yard Width: i) to the southerly side yard: 13 metres ii) to the northerly side yard: a) 15 metres where the maximum building height is 19 metres b) 21 metres where the maximum building height is 25 metres c) 35 metres where the maximum building height is 39 metres d) 42 metres where the maximum building height is 45 metres (6) Minimum Rear Yard Depth: 18.5 metres; Page 13 of 19

14 (7) Maximum Floor Space Index: 2.73; (8) Parking spaces shall be provided as follows: i) 1.0 spaces for each dwelling unit; ii) 0.2 visitor spaces for each dwelling unit; and, iii) 20 spaces for retail. (9) Minimum Landscaped Open Space: 30% of the lot area; (10) A minimum 3.0 metre wide landscaped open space area shall be provided along the easterly property boundary except at approved access locations; (11) Maximum Number of Units: 614 units; (12) Maximum floor area per dwelling unit: i) 47 square metres for a one bedroom unit; ii) 70 square metres for a two bedroom unit; iii) 84 square metres for a three bedroom unit. (13) Maximum Building Height: 14 storeys for the northerly building and 19 storeys for the southerly building; and, (14) Maximum Lot Coverage: 20 percent. (c) For the purposes of the amending by-law, 64 and 70 Bramalea Road shall be treated as one lot. 8. That the following delegations to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of February 7, 2011, re: Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Gagnon Law Urban Planners Ltd. Medallion Developments Inc. 64 and 70 Bramalea Road North of Steeles Avenue East and West side of Bramalea Road (File C04E01.007) be received: Page 14 of 19

15 1. Shirley Franklin, 1 Avondale Boulevard, Brampton 2. Neil Davis, Davis Webb, 24 Queen Street East, Brampton, on behalf of the applicant 3. Amin Sajun, Par-Pak Ltd., 26 Victoria Crescent, Brampton 4. Leo Gauthier, 33 Athlone Avenue, Brampton 5. Marielle Manning, 15 Albion Crescent, Brampton 6. Al Franklin, 1 Avondale Boulevard, Brampton 7. Joe Hart, 16 Avondale Boulevard, Brampton. F. Development Team Reports F 1. Report from K. Ash, Manager, Development Services, Planning, Design and Development, dated January 7, 2011, re: Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Gagnon Law Urban Planners Ltd. Medallion Developments Inc. 64 and 70 Bramalea Road North of Steeles Avenue East and West side of Bramalea Road Ward 8 (File C04E01.007) (See Item E 1). Dealt with under Delegation E 1, Recommendation PDD G. Policy Planning Reports G 1. Report from D. Waters, Manager, Land Use Policy, and K. Poad, Policy Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated January 5, 2011, re: Vales of Humber Secondary Plan (Area 50) Ward 10 (File P26 S50). A motion was introduced to amend the staff recommendation to add the following clause: "That staff be directed to meet with the Area Councillors and the Landowners Group representatives to discuss refining the block plan prior to the open house with the residents and stakeholders with regards to the location of Executive and Executive Transition Housing Designations and the location and number of roundabouts. The following motion was considered: PDD That the report from D. Waters, Manager, Land Use Policy, and K. Poad, Policy Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated January 5, 2011, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of February 7, 2011, re: Vales of Humber Secondary Plan (Area 50) Ward 10 (File P26 S50) be received; and, Page 15 of 19

16 2. That staff be directed to undertake public consultation in the form of an open house on the preliminary block plan concept before the end of the first quarter of 2011; and, 3. That staff be directed to proceed to a statutory public meeting following the open house to present a draft official plan amendment to implement a secondary plan and Stage 1 block plan approval; and, 4. That staff be directed to meet with the Area Councillors and the Landowners Group representatives to discuss refining the block plan prior to the open house with the residents and stakeholders with regards to the location of Executive and Executive Transition Housing Designations and the location and number of roundabouts. * G 2. Report from J. Given, Manager, Growth Management and Special Policy, and D. Balasal, Policy Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated January 18, 2011, re: City of Brampton Response to the City of Vaughan s New Official Plan (File G65). PDD That the report from J. Given, Manager, Growth Management and Special Policy, and D. Balasal, Policy Planner, Planning, Design and Development, dated January 18, 2011, to the Meeting of February 7, 2011, re: City of Brampton Response to the City of Vaughan s New Official Plan (File G65) be received; and, 2. That staff be directed to continue to work with the Region of York and the City of Vaughan regarding the implementation of corridor protection policies pertaining to the GTA West Corridor and urban design issues for Vaughan s employment lands fronting Highway 50, and report back to Council as appropriate. H. Committee of Adjustment Reports - nil I. Building and Zoning Reports - nil J. Community Design - Parks Planning and Development Reports - nil Page 16 of 19

17 K. Engineering and Development Services Reports * K 1. Report from M. Won, Director, Development Engineering Services, Planning, Design and Development, dated January 19, 2011, re: Subdivision Assumption McVean Estates Subdivision Registered Plan 43M-1610 North of Castlemore Road between Goreway Drive and McVean Drive Ward 10 (File C08E13.006). PDD That the report from M. Won, Director, Development Engineering Services, Planning, Design and Development, dated January 19, 2011, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of February 7, 2011, re: Subdivision Assumption McVean Estates Subdivision Registered Plan 43M-1610 North of Castlemore Road between Goreway Drive and McVean Drive Ward 10 (File C08E13.006) be received; and, 2. That the McVean Estates Subdivision Registered Plan 43M-1610 be forwarded to City Council for assumption by the City, once all departments have provided clearance for assumption by the City. * K 2. Report from M. Won, Director, Development Engineering Services, Planning, Design and Development, dated January 19, 2011, re: Subdivision Assumption Cottrelle Part F Subdivision Registered Plan 43M-1696 North of Castlemore Road between Airport Road and Goreway Drive Ward 10 (File C07E11.006). PDD That the report from M. Won, Director, Development Engineering Services, Planning, Design and Development, dated January 19, 2011, to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of February 7, 2011, re: Subdivision Assumption Cottrelle Part F Subdivision Registered Plan 43M-1696 North of Castlemore Road between Airport Road and Goreway Drive Ward 10 (File C07E11.006) be received; and, 2. That the Cottrelle Part F Subdivision Registered Plan 43M-1696 be forwarded to City Council for assumption by the City, once all departments have provided clearance for assumption by the City Page 17 of 19

18 L. Minutes - nil M. Other/New Business/Unfinished Business - nil N. Referred Matters * N 1. List of Referred Reports Planning, Design and Development Committee. PDD That the List of Referred Reports Planning, Design and Development Committee to the Planning, Design and Development Committee Meeting of February 7, 2011 (File P45GE) be received. O. Deferred Matters - nil P. Notice of Motion - nil Q. Correspondence * Q 1. Correspondence from the Region of Peel dated January 21, 2011, re: Resolution - Ministry of Transportation Southern Highways Program (File G65). PDD That the correspondence from the Region of Peel dated January 21, 2011, to the Meeting of February 7, 2011, re: Resolution - Ministry of Transportation Southern Highways Program (File G65) be received. Q 2. Correspondence from Sajjad Ebrahim, Par-Pak Ltd., 26 Victoria Crescent, Brampton, dated February 7, 2011, re: Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Gagnon Law Urban Planners Ltd. Medallion Developments Inc. 64 and 70 Bramalea Road North of Steeles Avenue East and West side of Bramalea Road (File C04E01.007) (See Items E1/F1) Page 18 of 19

19 PDD That the correspondence from Sajjad Ebrahim, Par-Pak Ltd., 26 Victoria Crescent, Brampton, dated February 7, 2011, to the Meeting of February 7, 2011, re: Application to Amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Gagnon Law Urban Planners Ltd. Medallion Developments Inc. 64 and 70 Bramalea Road North of Steeles Avenue East and West side of Bramalea Road (File C04E01.007) be received. R. Councillors Question Period S. Public Question Period S 1. Marielle Manning, 15 Albion Crescent, Brampton, referenced Committee's comments on a previous application regarding the ward Councillors meeting with Medallion Development and area residents to resolve issues. She questioned why this has not happened with the subject application. Committee suggested that the ward Councillors for this application arrange to meet with Medallion and the residents to discuss their concerns. T. Closed Session - nil U. Adjournment PDD That the do now adjourn to meet again on Monday, February 28, 2011 at 1:00 p.m. or at the call of the Chair Page 19 of 19