M E M O R A N D U M A G E N D A. Rock Hill Planning Commission. July 11, 2017

Transcription

1 TO: FROM: RE: M E M O R A N D U M Rock Hill Planning Commission Eric S. Hawkins, AICP, Planner III Meeting Agenda DATE: July 5, 2017 The Rock Hill Planning Commission will hold its regularly scheduled monthly meeting Tuesday, July 11, 2017, 6:00 PM, City Hall Council Chambers, 155 Johnston Street. The public hearing portion of the meeting can be viewed online at Please feel free to call me at regarding any item on the following agenda. Thank you. A G E N D A Rock Hill Planning Commission July 11, 2017 Pledge of Allegiance 1. Approval of minutes of June 6, 2017, meeting. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS 2. Hold public hearing and consider a recommendation to City Council on petition M by First Baptist Church Rock Hill to rezone approximately 2.42 acres at 1831 Springsteen Road from Residential Development District II (RD-II) in York County to Office and Institutional (OI). The subject property is proposed to be annexed into the City of Rock Hill. Tax parcel * 3. Hold public hearing and consider a recommendation to City Council on petition M by Rock Hill School District 3 of York County to rezone approximately 0.68 acres at 426 and 430 East Black Street from Multi-Family Residential-15 (MF-15) to Office and Institutional (OI). Tax parcels & -004.* 4. Hold public hearing and consider a recommendation to City Council on petition M by Dennis Hampton, Cityview Builders, to rezone approximately 1.29 acres at 507 East Main Street from Master Plan-Residential to Amended Master Plan- Residential (MP-R). The proposed rezoning will establish a completely new Master Plan for the property. Tax parcel * T:\PLANNING\DEVSVC\WORKING FILES\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\P C\2017\2017-PC07\ _PCAGENDA.DOC PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 155 JOHNSTON STREET, P.O. BOX ROCK HILL, SC ,

2 Planning Commission Agenda July 11, 2017 Page 2 NEW BUSINESS 5. Consideration of a request by MDV Engineering, LLC for Major Site Plan approval for Tru Hotel at Antrim Business Park. (Plan # )** 6. Consideration of a request by Greens of Rock Hill LLC for Major Site Plan approval for Riverwalk Inline Retail. (Plan # )** - DEFERRED AT REQUEST OF APPLICANT 7. Consideration of a request by Ayer Design Group for Major Site Plan approval for Rock Hill Buick GMC. (Plan # )** 8. Other Business. 9. Adjourn. * The Planning Commission makes a recommendation to City Council on these items. Recommendations made at this meeting are tentatively scheduled for consideration by City Council on August 14. City Council agendas are posted on the City website ( on the Friday prior to each meeting. Please contact Eric Hawkins at or eric.hawkins@cityofrockhill.com with any questions. ** The Planning Commission makes the final decision on these items.

3 Heckle Main Planning Commission Agenda Items City of Rock Hill, SC Planning Commission July 11, 2017 Sutton Mt Gallant Hwy 21 Old York India Hook 77 Celanese 6 I-77 York Herlong Cherry Main Anderson Dave Lyle McConnells Heckle 3 4 Albright Anderson I-77 Ogden Mt. Holly Saluda Legend River City Limits Map Not Drawn To Scale # Agenda Item ESH 06/30/17

4 Planning Commission City of Rock Hill, South Carolina June 6, 2017 A regular meeting of the Planning Commission was held Tuesday, June 6, 2017, at 6:00PM in City Council Chambers, City Hall, 155 Johnston Street, Rock Hill, South Carolina. MEMBERS PRESENT MEMBERS ABSENT STAFF PRESENT Tom Roper, Duane Christopher, Gladys Robinson, Georgia Thomas, Randy Graham Justin Smith, Shelly Goodner Eric Hawkins, Dennis Fields, Bill Meyer, Leah Youngblood 1. Approval of minutes of the May 2, 2017, meeting. Mr. Christopher made a motion to approve the minutes from the April 4, 2017, meeting. Dr. Robinson seconded, and the motion passed unanimously by a vote of 5-0 (Smith and Goodner absent). 2. Hold public hearing and consider a recommendation to City Council on petition T by Rock Hill City Council to amend the Zoning Ordinance affecting Article 4: Use Regulations and Article 10: Definitions & Rules for Interpretation, in relation to breweries and brewpubs. Mr. Meyer presented the staff report. Mr. Roper asked how the proposed size limits relate to the size of Legal Remedy Brewing. Mr. Meyer stated that the limits are about twenty-five percent larger than Legal Remedy. Legal Remedy has about 2,500-2,800 square feet outdoors and the proposed ordinance allows up to 3,000. Mr. Roper asked if there were any known legal issues surrounding zoning of these types of uses. He stated that he had heard of a few ongoing legal issues in Charlotte. Mr. Meyer answered that he did not think the issues were related to zoning, but rather regulatory issues with size. Ms. Thomas asked if these brewpubs were chains or independent locations. Mr. Meyer stated that most of them are smaller individual businesses. Ms. Thomas asked if the downtown area was a good location for these types of uses. Mr. Meyer stated that the downtown area could be tricky since most of the locations require a loading area. Mr. Christopher asked if the Conditional Use Permits (CUP) required approval by the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Meyer answered that the Zoning Board would only approve those locations that required a special exception and that a CUP was a staff level approval. CUP s are required for uses that have use specific standards. Mr. Graham asked if the proposed allowance of 3,000 square feet of outdoor area was enough room. Mr. Meyer answered that any larger of an area may have a larger impact on the neighboring uses. A larger user at that point may want to be labeled as an extended hours restaurant or bar, or find a larger property that would allow for a larger use. There were no further questions or comments. Mr. Christopher presented the motion to recommend to City Council approval of the proposed amendments. Ms. Thomas seconded, and the motion carried unanimously by a vote of 5-0 (Smith and Goodner absent).

5 Planning Commission Minutes June 6, 2017 Page 2 3. Other Business. a. Overview of Zoning Ordinance Update Project Ms. Youngblood gave an overview of the zoning ordinance update Project, including expected dates of meetings and workshops. b. Election of Officers Mr. Christopher made a motion to keep the same elected officers, Dr. Robinson seconded, and the motion passed unanimously by a vote of 5-0 (Smith and Goodner absent). 4. Adjourn. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 6:30PM.

6 Staff Report to Planning Commission M Meeting Date: July 11, 2017 E First Baptist Church Rock Hill is requesting to amend the official zoning map of the City of Rock Hill by rezoning approximately 2.42 acres of property and adjacent right of way located at 1831 Springsteen Road from Residential Development District II (RD-II) in York County to Office & Institutional (OI). Tax Map Number (insert aerial photo) Reason for Request: This property is proposed to be annexed into the City of Rock Hill. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed SF-2 zoning. SEE ATTACHED REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION

7 Case No. M Rezoning Analysis-Report to Planning Commission Meeting Date: July 11, 2017 Location: 1831 Springsteen Road, Tax Map # Site Area: Request: Use: Owner/Applicant: Approximately 2.42 acres. Annex property into the City and rezone from Residential Development District II (RD-II) in York County to Office and Institutional (OI). Single-family residential. First Baptist Church Rock Hill 481 Hood Center Drive Site Description The subject property is the location of a single-family residence. It is located on the east side of the City and fronts on Springsteen Road. Surrounding uses include single-family residential, multi-family residential, and undeveloped property in residential and commercial zoning districts. The adjoining property to the rear is also owned by First Baptist Church Rock Hill. Proposal This annexation was initiated by the City. The current owner signed an annexation agreement in 2014 and an annexation petition in May at the City s request. The property is served by City water and is subject to annexation at the City s discretion. Annexation of properties contiguous to the City promotes greater efficiency in City services and reduces jurisdictional issues. The owner plans to convert the house to serve as part of the church in the future and requested Office an Institutional zoning. Existing Zoning District Summary Residential Development District II (RD-II)- The Residential Development II District is designed to permit a variety of residential uses and variable densities based on the characteristics of the uses. Areas so designated are deemed suited to and with market potential for the uses. This designation is applied principally to undeveloped areas where unit and density flexibility will not adversely impact existing residential subdivisions, and where the housing market can be sufficiently broad and flexible to meet the various demands for housing. Permitted uses include single-family dwellings, schools, horticulture and some agricultural interests, neighborhood and community parks, churches, duplexes, multi-family dwellings, child care centers, nursing homes, and mobile home subdivisions. Proposed Zoning District Summary Office and Institutional (OI)- The OI district is established to provide a wide variety of professional and business offices and institutions proximate to residential and more intense business districts so as to satisfy the City s demand for services. These regulations are designed to encourage the formation and continuance of a quiet, compatible, and uncongested environment for offices intermingled with residential and institutional uses. This district is different from the other business districts in that Retail Sales and Services uses are generally prohibited. Some limited retail uses may be allowed as a conditional or special exception use, subject to specific standards, and provided the primary purpose is to serve the office workers in

8 Rezoning Analysis-Report to Planning Commission M Page 2 the district. Community facilities and religious institutions are also allowed. Live/work dwellings may be included at densities of eight (8) units an acre. RELATIONSHIP TO PUBLIC PLANS Focus 2020 Comprehensive Plan This parcel is within the Suburban Neighborhood Character Area. This character area is dominated by single family residential subdivisions. The vision for this area is to better connect neighborhoods as well as integrate and mix land uses in a more pedestrian and bicycle-friendly way. Conclusion The proposed OI zoning is generally consistent with the Focus 2020 Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Staff hereby certifies that the required public notification actions have been completed as follows: June 23: Rezoning notification signs posted on subject property. June 23: Rezoning notification postcards sent to 31 property owners within 300 of the subject property. June 24: Planning Commission public hearing advertisement published in The Herald. Public Feedback No comments received to date. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff Assessment The proposed zoning is consistent with the adjoining OI zoning. It is consistent with the City s Land Use Plan and is compatible with surrounding uses. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the proposed Office and Institutional (OI) zoning. Attachments Annexation Map Rezoning Map To see the applications submitted for this case, go to: Staff Contact: Eric S. Hawkins, AICP, Planner III eric.hawkins@cityofrockhill.com

9

10

11 Staff Report to Planning Commission M Meeting Date: July 11, 2017 E Rock Hill School District 3 is requesting to amend the official zoning map of the City of Rock Hill by rezoning the properties and adjacent right-of-way located at 426 & 430 East Black Street from Multi-Family 15 (MF-15) to Office & Institutional (OI). Tax Map Numbers & -004 (insert aerial photo) Reason for Request: The rezoning is proposed to make the zoning consistent with the adjacent property, before they are combined. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed MP-R zoning. SEE ATTACHED REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION

12 Case No. M Rezoning Analysis-Report to Planning Commission Meeting Date: July 11, 2017 Location: 426 and 430 East Black Street & Tax parcels & Site Area: Request: Use: Owner/Applicant: Approximately 0.68 acres. Rezone property from Multi-Family Residential-15 (MF- 15) to Office and Institutional (OI). Parking lot. Rock Hill School District 3 (Brian Vaughan) Site Description The subject property is the location of a gravel parking lot that serves the adjoining Central Child Development Center. It is located just east of downtown and fronts on East Black Street. Surrounding uses include single-family residential, multi-family residential, office, and school in residential and commercial zoning districts. Proposal The applicant is in the process of improving the parking lot and they plan to combine this property with the adjoining parcel that contains Central Child Development Center. In order to avoid the creation of a split-zoned parcel, the property needs to be rezoned before the parcels are combined. Existing Zoning District Summary Multi-Family-15 (MF-15)- Although originally established to allow a wide range of medium to high-density housing types, it is the intent of this Ordinance that the MF-15 district be phased out over time by not allowing new rezonings to the MF-15 district after October 12, In order to avoid creating nonconforming uses, and to allow properties that have this zoning district to develop with specific uses, the district continues to allow single-family detached, single-family attached, multi-family, and a few other specified uses. Proposed Zoning District Summary Office and Institutional (OI)- The OI district is established to provide a wide variety of professional and business offices and institutions proximate to residential and more intense business districts so as to satisfy the City s demand for services. These regulations are designed to encourage the formation and continuance of a quiet, compatible, and uncongested environment for offices intermingled with residential and institutional uses. This district is different from the other business districts in that Retail Sales and Services uses are generally prohibited. Some limited retail uses may be allowed as a conditional or special exception use, subject to specific standards, and provided the primary purpose is to serve the office workers in the district. Community facilities and religious institutions are also allowed. Live/work dwellings may be included at densities of eight (8) units an acre.

13 Rezoning Analysis-Report to Planning Commission M Page 2 RELATIONSHIP TO PUBLIC PLANS Focus 2020 Comprehensive Plan These parcels are within the Old Town Character Area and East Town Redevelopment Area. Old Town is characterized by a mix of uses at higher densities. New development should be set up close to the road, well connected to the existing fabric, and focused on improving the bicycle and pedestrian environment. Infill and redevelopment is encouraged in this character area. The East Town Redevelopment Area has been slated for further study. Because a detailed study has not been completed at this time, development should defer to the Old Town Character Area. Conclusion The requested rezoning is generally consistent with the Focus 2020 Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Staff hereby certifies that the required public notification actions have been completed as follows: June 23: Rezoning notification signs posted on subject property. June 23: Rezoning notification postcards sent to forty property owners within 300 of the subject property. June 24: Planning Commission public hearing advertisement published in The Herald. Public Feedback One letter in support of request received by staff. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff Assessment The proposed zoning is consistent with the adjoining OI zoning. It is consistent with the City s Land Use Plan and is compatible with surrounding uses. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the rezoning. Attachments Rezoning Map To see the applications submitted for this case, go to: Staff Contact: Eric S. Hawkins, AICP, Planner III eric.hawkins@cityofrockhill.com

14 N O D T W N ORANGE ST G C CONFEDERATE AV MAIN ST O I M P - R Legend M General Commercial (GC) Multi-Family Residential (MF-15) Office and Institutional (OI) Downtown (DTWN) BLACK ST Master Planned- Residential (MP-R) Neighborhood Office (NO) Subject Property O I Zoning Data CONFEDERATE AV FLINT ST SPRUCE ST M F Current: MF-15 Proposed: OI µ Feet Planning & Development Department City of Rock Hill 07/11/17

15

16 Staff Report to Planning Commission M Meeting Date: July 11, 2017 E Dennis Hampton, Cityview Builders, is requesting to amend the official zoning map of the City of Rock Hill by amending the Master Plan-Residential (MP-R) zoning on approximately 1.29 acres of property located at 507 East Main Street. Tax Map Number (insert aerial photo) Reason for Request: The rezoning is proposed in order to establish a completely new Master Plan for the property. Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of the proposed MP-R zoning. SEE ATTACHED REPORT FOR MORE INFORMATION

17 Case No. M Rezoning Analysis-Report to Planning Commission Meeting Date: July 11, 2017 Location: 507 East Main Street, Tax parcel Site Area: Approximately 1.29 acres. Request: Establish a new Master Plan for the property that will replace the existing Master Plan. Proposed Development: Applicant: Owner: Single-family residential. Dennis Hampton Rock Hill, SC Rock Hill Economic Development Corporation Site Description/Background The subject property is undeveloped and was rezoned in accordance with the Renaissance Square Master Plan in The Renaissance Square Master Plan included fourteen townhomes served by an alley (see attached). A motel was located on the property for many years until it was demolished in It is located just east of Downtown and fronts on East Main Street, Spruce Street, and Gladstone Court. Surrounding uses include single-family residential and office in residential and commercial zoning districts. The property is located in the Old Town area. Development Proposal The applicant is requesting the rezoning in order to establish a new Master Plan for the property. The proposal includes seven detached single-family residences served by an alley to the rear. The houses will be constructed in a style that is compatible with the style of the existing houses along Main Street (see attached elevation drawings). The houses will be two stories with detached garages and/or parking pads to the rear. Eight additional parking spaces are proposed on the northeast corner of the property. The following alternate development standards are proposed: 36.5-foot minimum lot width. Other than lot width, the proposal meets the minimum lot area (5,000 square feet) and maximum density (8 units per acre) of the SF-8 district. The smallest lot is 5,900 square feet and the density is 5.4 units per acre. Due to the small size of the site, no common open space is proposed. Common open space areas are not provided in many subdivisions in Old Town and this would result in larger yards for each unit. Reduction of the buffer along the rear of the property from ten feet to five feet. A six-foot tall solid fence will be provided along the rear property line. The proposed development standards are detailed in the attached Master Plan Terms & Conditions document.

18 Rezoning Analysis-Report to Planning Commission M Page 2 Existing/Proposed Zoning District Summary Master Planned Residential District (MP-R)- The purpose of the MP-R district is to provide a mix of residential uses using innovative and creative design elements, while at the same time providing an efficient use of open space. Limited commercial uses will be allowed in the MP-R district to serve the needs of the residents in the development (unless it can be demonstrated that community serving commercial/retail is justified). RELATIONSHIP TO PUBLIC PLANS Focus 2020 Comprehensive Plan This property is within the Old Town Character Area and East Town Redevelopment Area. Old Town contains a mix of uses at higher densities. Buildings should be set up close to the street, block lengths are short, and connectivity is crucial. Infill and redevelopment is encouraged in this character area as well as improving the bicycle and pedestrian environment. The East Town Redevelopment Area is an area that has been identified for further study. No detailed study has been completed at this time, so design standards default to the Old Town Character Area. Conclusion The requested replacement of the Renaissance Square Master Plan with the East Towne Village Master Plan is generally consistent with the City of Rock Hill Focus 2020 Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Staff hereby certifies that the required public notification actions have been completed as follows: June 23: Rezoning notification signs posted on subject property. June 23: Rezoning notification postcards sent to 57 property owners within 300 of the subject property. June 24: Planning Commission public hearing advertisement published in The Herald. Public Feedback No comments received to date. Neighborhood Meeting A neighborhood meeting was held on June 21, A summary of the meeting has not been submitted. STAFF COMMENTS Outstanding Issues

19 Rezoning Analysis-Report to Planning Commission M Page 3 There are several outstanding staff comments that need to be addressed. Most of these comments are largely technical in nature and are shown in the attached Terms and Conditions document and Plan Review Comments. However, a few issues of a more substantive nature remain outstanding that staff hopes to discuss further with the applicant before the Planning Commission meeting: 1. The Zoning Ordinance limits the size of accessory structures, such as garages, to 600 square feet or less per parcel. The applicant has indicated in the past that he would prefer for the garages to be larger than this, but that is not indicated in the Terms and Conditions, and staff has concerns that larger garages on each lot would cause the development to look out of scale with the surrounding area. 2. The alley must be private. The latest version of the Terms and Conditions states that it would be public. 3. A homeowners association must be formed in order to maintain common elements of the project including the fence, off-street parking, alley, buffer, and on-site drainage. 4. We have suggested to the applicant that it would be of benefit to add a street tree island at each corner of Main Street and stripe on-street parking spaces there, but that concept has not been incorporated into the plans yet. Staff believes that this would help make the community feel more intimate, help alleviate any concerns the neighborhood may have about where guests might park, and would serve as a traffic calming device for a community that will have the homes built close to the road. Additionally, the applicant needs to provide a summary of the neighborhood meeting. We have requested that as well and hope to have it before the Planning Commission meeting. RECOMMENDATIONS Staff Assessment The proposed MP is less intense than the MP that is currently in place. It is compatible with the surrounding property and consistent with the City s Comprehensive Plan and Land Use Plan. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends approval of the rezoning, provided that the unresolved issues are resolved before this goes forward to City Council for consideration. Attachments Rezoning Map Renaissance Square Master Plan Proposed Master Plan Terms and Conditions

20 Rezoning Analysis-Report to Planning Commission M Page 4 Proposed House Elevation Drawings Proposed Garage Floor Plans Plan Review Comments To see the applications submitted for this case, go to: Staff Contact: Eric S. Hawkins, AICP, Planner III eric.hawkins@cityofrockhill.com

21 G C N O M SPRUCE ST M P - R OLD HIGH CT Legend General Commercial (GC) Multi-Family Residential (MF-15) Office and Institutional (OI) M F - 1 Neighborhood Office (NO) Master Planned- Residential (MP-R) Subject Property GLADSTONE CT G C Zoning Data Current: MP-R Proposed: MP-R O I MAIN ST STONEWALL AV µ Feet M F Planning & Development Department City of Rock Hill 07/11/17

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29 East Towne Village Master Plan Terms & Conditions Case #M For office use only I: Administration II: A. Effect of Zoning Ordinance: The Rock Hill Zoning Ordinance serves as the foundation of regulations applying to the project. Due to the size, complexity, and environmental and physical constraints associated with the project, the Master Plan (MP) Terms and Conditions are set forth in this document. This document, used in conjunction with the attached exhibits, constitutes the approved plan for the project. The development of this area is regulated by the RHZO, except as specifically amended in this document or exhibits. B. Status of Exhibits: The Master Plan and other attached exhibits to this document are specifically designed to reflect the overall design intent, as well as required elements and commitments defined for the project. No inadvertent detail or graphic not clearly specified on the exhibits is intended to contradict the specific requirements of the RHZO, as applied based on the terms of this document. The Master Plan and other attached exhibits are intended to be conceptual in nature, with civil and construction drawings submitted and reviewed according to the process set forth in the RHZO for individual buildings and other project components as the overall Plan is developed. C. Order of Control: In the case of a contradiction, the order of control is: 1) the Master Plan Terms and Conditions, 2) the Master Plan or other exhibits where specific details have been called out, 3) the RHZO (if amended after the creation of this document, then the Amended version of the RHZO applies), and 4) the Master Plan or other exhibits for general items that have not been specifically called out. Project Description A. Brief Project Narrative: Development of seven single family residential houses with detached two-car garages. The storm water treatment/detention aspect of the development will be addressed by hydrodynamic separators (Crystal Stream Structures) in the alley, along the Northern portion of the property. Vehicular access to the properties will be provided through a private alley along the rear of the lots., which is a public road with 20' Right-of-Way. B. Location: 507 E. Main Street, Parcel ID: C. Size: 1.29 Acres D. Proposed Use: 7 single family residential houses with detached two-car garages. E. Densities/Intensities: The density will be approximately 5.43 units-per-acre. F. Dimensional Standards: 1. Minimum Lot Area: Acre 2. Minimum Lot Width: 36.50' Date 1 of 3 Comment [HE1]: Show in square feet.

30 III: 3. Minimum Setbacks: Front: 20' Side: 3' Side from Spruce Street and Gladstone Court: 8' Rear: 5' Accessory Structure Side/Rear: 5' 4. Max. Lot Coverage (Impervious Surface): 44% 5. Maximum Height: 30 feet Development Standards A. Off-Street Parking and Loading Primary access to the house lots will be provided by a rear alleyway (15,5' with, 1.5' valley ribbon curbs, Right-of-Way width 20'). Alley will be configured for two-way traffic. The alley will be designed to meet the local/subdivision road section and materials specifications and meet RHZO Article 6 and 7 alley standards, with exceptions that it will not taper to 12-ft in width within 20-ft of street intersections due to the proposed alley's relatively short length. The proposed project will exceed RHZO parking requirements by providing 19'x22' driveways and two-car garages for each unit. On-street parking is currently permitted along East Main Street and may be formalized by striping parking spaces. 8 community spaces will be provided beyond the alley, in the Northeastern corner of the property. B. Landscaping Streetscape vegetation/trees shall be planted along all street frontages. Tree species and spacing pattern will be compatible with yards of nearby homes in the historic district and will not encroach into sight distance areas. A 5' buffer yard will be maintained along the northern property line adjacent to the Old High Court neighborhood. Landscaping plans will be submitted for City review at time of construction plan submittal, pending more extensive analysis regarding required LID stormwater site/landscape features. C. Environmentally Sensitive Areas Project will feature structural stormwater water quality devices (Crystal Stream Structures) and oversized underground pipes. D. Open Space The quantity of open space will meet or exceed the 10% old Town space requirement. The development will not provide any formally designated "Common active recreation areas"open space. E. Design Standards See attached elevation drawings. Comment [HE2]: It looks like more than 3 can be provided (if dashed lines on plan represent 3 ). If it needs to be 3, confirm that 6 building separation is feasible to comply with building code. Comment [HE3]: Is this the max lot coverage for each lot? Comment [HE4]: No open space is shown on the plan. Comment [HE5]: Provide justification for this. Date 2 of 3

31 IV: Attachments MP Master Plan Proposed Building Elevations Date 3 of 3

32

33

34

35

36 East Towne Village- Plan Review Comments P. 1 of 1 Review of: Status: Project: Master Plan-Residential Not Approved East Towne Village Plan # Review Comments Inspections: Approved. Zoning: Not approved. 1. Add information listed on Preliminary Plat checklist (see attached) to the plan so it can serve as both the Master Plan and Preliminary Plat. Otherwise the plan will need to go back to the Planning Commission for Preliminary Plat approval at a future meeting. 2. Revise label on alley curb to say "Ribbon Curb" instead of "Valley Curb". 3. Note the minimum front, side, and rear setbacks. Also note minimum setback between garage and edge of alley. 4. The alley can either be within the common area that will be owned by the HOA or it can cross over the back of all the lots. There should be a common access easement associated with the alley instead of a right-of-way. 5. Increase the buffer along the rear to 10'. 6. Note that the fence along the rear of the property will be a 6' high solid fence. 7. The drive aisle behind the community parking spaces needs to be at least 22' wide. Parking spaces can be reduced to 19' deep. 8. Show paving and revise the curb line to go around the community parking spaces. 9. Identify areas counted as open space on the plan. 10. Note that the zoning of the property is Master Plan-Residential. 11. Number the lots and show the area of each lot. Infrastructure-Roadway: Not approved. 1. The terms and conditions need to be specific to this project. Remove any sections that do not apply. Generally, you use a base zoning district and you only need to list which aspects of that zoning you are wanting to modify. 2. The dimensions for the road do not match the detail. The detail is the standard used for alleys. 3. The site will only have one crystal stream structure and it should be located adjacent to the junction box. Infrastructure-Water & Sewer: Conditional. 1. There are existing easements internal to the site that will need to be abandoned. Infrastructure-Stormwater: Approved. Infrastructure-Landscape: Not approved. Need landscape plan with preliminary plat. Utilities-Electrical: The existing 10' utility easement must remain along all road frontage.

37 Planning Commission Staff Report July 11, 2017 ~ Agenda Item #5 Project Name: Plan Type: Tru Hotel at Antrim Business Park Major Site Plan Plan Number: Tax Map Number: Location: Developer: 800 Galleria Blvd. Amtran, Inc. P.O. Box 4619 Rock Hill, SC Project Contact: MDV Engineering (Michael Newman) 215 Johnston Street Rock Hill, S.C. (704) Land Use Information Type: Hotel (Commercial) Zoning: GC (General Commercial) Land Area: 4.2 acres Proposal Parking The vacant site is located on Galleria Blvd., south of Dave Lyle Blvd. and the Wingate Inn. The proposal is to build a four (4) story, 46,968 square foot hotel with approximately 106 rooms. The applicant has asked for an administrative adjustment of two feet (2) because the height of the hotel exceeds the height limitations outlined in Table (B)(1) of the RHZO. The Planning and Development Director is allowed to adjust the height by up to 20% using an administrative adjustment and believes that the potential request would be approved. The amount of parking being provided exceeds 125% of the minimum amount of required parking, however, the applicant has provided an alternative parking plan demonstrating that more parking is needed. The applicant has asked to provide parking at a rate of one (1) space per guest room, per the company s corporate standard as well as an additional 14 spaces. The applicant will also be required to provide bike parking at a rate of one (1) space per 50 parking spaces provided and has indicated that all parking requirements will be met.

38 Tru Hotel at Antrim Business Park July 11, 2017 Page 2 Streets Pedestrian Access Landscaping Special Notes: Recommendation: Attachments: The proposed development will be served by Galleria Blvd. The existing sidewalk along Galleria Blvd. will be sufficient for the proposed development and additional sidewalk will not need to be provided at this time. There is internal pedestrian access throughout the site. Landscaping will be required to be provided and will be reviewed at the civil construction plan stage. There are outstanding staff comments that need to be addressed (see attached). These comments are editorial in nature and are not likely to result in substantial changes to the proposed layout. Staff recommends approval of the Major Site Plan subject to staff comments. Major Site Plan Plan Review Comments T:\Planning\DEVSVC\Working Files\BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS\P C\2017\2017-PC07\TRU Hotel at Antrim Business Park\TruHotelatAntrimBusinessPark.MSPReport.doc

39

40 Tru Hotel at Antrim Business Park- Plan Review Comments P. 1 of 2 Review of: Status: Project: Major Site Plan Not Approved Tru Hotel at Antrim Business Park Plan # Review Comments Inspections: Not Approved 1) Please provide an AutoTurn or similar swept patch analysis for the fire lane on all sides of the building. The template must be a 46' Fire apparatus. 2) The proposed FDC does not appear to comply with the following: 2015 SCFC Visible location. Fire department connections shall be located on the street side of buildings, fully visible and recognizable from the street or nearest point of fire department vehicle access or as otherwise approved by the fire chief. Note Details consisting of but not limited to Fire apparatus access, Fire hydrant and Fire Department Connection type and location, accessibility, Knox Box location, first floor elevation relative to the rim elevation of the next upstream manhole in the public sewer, Grease interceptor type and location and other pretreatment requirements, basic building code compliance items that surface prior to building plan submission etc. will be reviewed at the Civil Plan review phase. These two items above appear to warrant attention at this time. Zoning: Not Approved This project must be approved by the City of Rock Hill's Planning Commission as the building square footage exceeds 20,000 sq. ft. The Planning Commission will hear and decide on the Major Site Plan at its July 11, 2017 meeting in City Council Chambers located at 155 Johnston Street at 6:00 p.m. 1. The GC zoning district allows a maximum building height of 45 feet in which a maximum 25% increase is allowed through an administrative adjustment. This adjustment would be granted during the civil construction plan stage. Staff feels confident that the adjustment would be granted considering the height of other buildings in the area as well as the proposed building's proximity to the interstate. 2. Provide pervious to impervious surface calculation. 3. Staff has decided that the sidewalk along Galleria Blvd. will not need to be constructed as a part of the hotel development. In this case, it is ok to note the continuation as being "with future development". 4. Galleria Blvd. is spelled incorrectly. 5. The awnings shown in the TRU Hotel brand brochure may not be internally lit creating a "glow" effect as shown; however, a wash of the awnings may be acceptable. Infrastructure-Roadway: Approved Infrastructure-Water & Sewer: Conditional If the intent is to subdivide the parcel in the future, then the sewer line will need to be installed and permitted as a public extension and extend to each parcel (building) as necessary. Even if the intent at this time is for the property to stay under one ownership and the sewer line to function as a service line, the line should still be constructed in accordance with City Public Extension standards and include a 30' private sanitary sewer easement. Therefore, if future development requires a subdivision of property, at least the sewer and easement corridor width will meet City standards and allow for a smoother conversion of sewer ownership from private to public, if necessary. Infrastructure-Stormwater: Not Approved 1. The through drainage system extending from Galleria Blvd. should be revised, as follows: a. Show a curb inlet at tangent of new entrance, convert existing curb inlet into a manhole, and show new inlet connecting to converted MH.

41 Tru Hotel at Antrim Business Park- Plan Review Comments P. 2 of 2 b. Realign new through drainage storm line to connect at existing manhole and run down center of drive isle and abandon or remove portion of existing storm line running under proposed landscape island. This will allow storm line to be shifted away from landscape island areas. c. Provide a "20' Storm Drainage Easement" for through drainage by pass system, from Galleria to outfall at I-77 ROW. 2. The internal drainage system needs to be adjusted to avoid landscape islands, where possible. 3. Add the following note to the plan: Stormwater mitigation measures shall be implemented in accordance with City of Rock Hill Infrastructure requirements, for water quality and quantity, including temporary controls for the land disturbance phase and permanent measures for post-construction. Post-development peak flow rates shall be limited to the pre-development 2, 10, 25 & 100yr 6hr and 10yr 24hr (SCS Type ii distributions)." 4. If the stormwater pond is to mitigate runoff from current and future phases, please place a note on the plan stating such and show storm stub to serve future phase. 5. Please show the existing watershed outlet point on the plan and label accordingly. Is it an inlet within the I-77 ROW? Where does it drain? Across I-77? 6. Show a "Private Storm Drainage Easement" for the proposed detention pond. 7. It is recommended for the Design Engineer to submit a revised detention Infrastructure-Landscape: Conditional There are several +/- 10" diameter oak trees along the northern property line that appear to belong to the adjacent owner - Wingate Hotel. Locate these trees on the survey and represent them on all site plans along with protection measures. Forming parking lot islands around them might go a long way toward saving them. Otherwise, the construction process would likely result in the loss of the trees. They would have to be replaced - inch for inch. The storm-water catch basin located outside the curb - the lower right of the subject property and just east of the proposed SS manhole - shift the inlet to the west along the proposed new curb and discharge directly into the basin. Eliminate the outlet pipe thru the planter. Shift the next inlet across the drive aisle onto the curb immediately adjacent to the basin to clear the smaller corner landscape island. Delete two storm-water catch basins in the lawn areas between the building and the parking lot curb on the northeast and northwest corners of the proposed building area. Sheet flow toward the parking lot as all other building perimeter areas. Set spot elevations to emphasize positive drainage away from the building foundation toward the pavement. Set the building FFE to accommodate sheet flow over the curb. Utilities-Electrical: Not Approved Transformer needs to be in a different location. A 20' easement and swimming pool prevents us from installing our feeder to the current location. An easement sheet will need to be added and updated once the final electric route is determined. Coordinate with York Electric Co-op to resolve conflicts with their facilities

42 Planning Commission Staff Report July 11, 2017 ~ Agenda Item #7 Project Name: Plan Type: Rock Hill Buick GMC Major Site Plan Plan Number: Tax Map Number: Location: Owner: 500 Galleria Blvd LLC Chevrolet Way Estero FL Project Contact: Land Use Information Development Proposal Parking Streets Pedestrian Access Chad Chastain Ayer Design Group, LLC Type: Automobile Sales and Automobile Repair Zoning: MP-C Land Area: 9.46 acres The proposed development includes a 23,932 square foot auto dealership building, and associated parking and inventory areas. The applicant is proposing 67 required customer parking spaces, which meets city code requirements, and over 300 inventory parking spaces for vehicle sales. The site plan also includes an expansion area in the rear for future inventory expansion. The applicant is showing some tandem parking spaces in the rear, which are allowed by City Code, however the tandem parking to the southwest will need to be revised. A comment has been added in Staff s review comments to address this issue. The proposed development will be served primarily off of Galleria Boulevard, however there are two existing drive connections that will be used between the Nissan Dealership to the south, and the apartment buildings to the north. Sidewalks exist along Galleria Blvd, and the site plan includes a pedestrian connection into the site as required by code.

43 Rock Hill Buick GMC July 11, 2017 Page 2 Special Notes: Recommendation: Attachments: There are outstanding comments from the Zoning, Water & Sewer, Stormwater, Landscaping, Traffic, and Utilities Divisions. While these comments will need to be addressed, they are editorial in nature and are not likely to result in substantial changes to the proposed layout. Staff recommends approval of the Major Site Plan subject to staff comments. Major Site Plan Conceptual Elevations Plan Review Comments

44

45 $#&#>%&2&/#&(%&'$)2/&*' $#7 &8 %$'$09 :;-8:8% :;-<:;;;1$. 3335($.&/5#!!()&*+#,-$.&/0 %%(!/0(%$'/0/(#&1&#$&!'/0#!(1&%/01&%22$$0'!/$'2!2!#'/$'2&'/'/(($2)$.&//$%%$&'$%% #!!'%$30/$!)$'2!/42&*/0&'#%2&'*#!()&*!5 &/2$3&'*$)'!(!2#2&'3!%!&'($3&!3&' (&//&!'!1$.&/5&/!'2(!'6/5#$%/$/ /$2$4$%&2!'!&*&'$%2$3&'*/5 4 $!'/ # "!#! # " $ $ %&' -,&+*.(')/'!!"#!"#$ C-8- /01(++"%(01 89$%%&$A%425!#B&%%0@- <??-< 8 '&%$':4%:4$%%?;DEF:D &% %&'()%&*+,' =

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

47 $#&#>%&2&/#&(%&'$)2/&*' $#7 &8 %$'$09 :;-8:8% :;-<:;;;1$. 3335($.&/5#!!()&*+#,-$.&/0 %%(!/0(%$'/0/(#&1&#$&!'/0#!(1&%/01&%22$$0'!/$'2!2!#'/$'2&'/'/(($2)$.&//$%%$&'$%% #!!'%$30/$!)$'2!/42&*/0&'#%2&'*#!()&*!5 &/2$3&'*$)'!(!2#2&'3!%!&'($3&!3&' (&//&!'!1$.&/5&/!'2(!'6/5#$%/$/ /$2$4$%&2!'!&*&'$%2$3&'*/5 4 $!'/ 8.! /(#&4 %&' -,&+*.(')/' /(#&4!"#!"#$ C-8- /01(++"%(01 89$%%&$A%425!#B&%%0@- <??-< < <=.! /(#&4 &% 2)*&(/& 2/'/4*)&(0.$ *&.5*0)(3*. =

48 Rock Hill Buick GMC - Plan Review Comments P. 1 of 1 Review of: Status: Project: Major Site Plan Not Approved Rock Hill Buick GMC Plan # Review Comments Zoning: Not approved 1) This item requires approval by the City of Rock Hill Planning Commission. The item has been scheduled for the July 11th Planning Commission meeting. 2) Tandem style parking spaces for inventory cars must be located behind the building. Currently the spaces on the southern property line would not be allowed. Alternatively, you may have a row of parking across a 22 foot drive isle along the service drive. 3) The code allowed inventory spaces to be 8x18', while required customer/employee spaces must be 9x19' Please show dimensions of parking spaces, and if different, please show which spaces are required spaces and which are inventory spaces. Infrastructure-Water & Sewer: Not Approved 1) Show how the site is planned to access water and sewer. Infrastructure-Stormwater: Not Approved 1) Show preliminary storm drain layout. 2) Water quality must be provided. Peak management can be waived but non-erosive conveyance of stormwater to the creek must be demonstrated. Show intent on plans. 3) Ensure design accounts for ultimate build out. Infrastructure-Landscaping: Conditional 1) Awaiting a Site landscape plans to be developed. Landscape and lighting plans to be submitted together and overlaid on the utility plan in gray scale Utilities: Not Approved 1) No trees are allowed in utility easement. Shrubbery is allowed but must maintain required clearances. 2) Coordinate the electric utility design and installation with Ron (803) , Ron.Passmore@cityofrockhill.com 3) Submit proposed transformer location. Transformer must be on level ground 10' from any above ground structure, 5' from any below ground structure, within 10' of paved access point, and 5' behind curbing or have protective bollards installed as needed. 4) Civil Construction Drawings must show conduit crossings for power and communication lines. The conduit must be schedule 40 PVC Gray Pipe. The conduits must extend beyond the road ROW & into the electrical easement on both sides of the road, and include conduit sizes, quantities, & depths. Coordinate with the City's assigned project engineer and Comporium's Engineering Department at A note must be placed on the plans indicating that the developer will provide and install the conduit crossings. 5) Existing electric facilities must be located and shown on the drawings. 6) Additional easement will be required once electric route is determined. Traffic: Conditional 1) As part of the master plan for the overall development, the developer is responsible for providing east bound dual left turn lanes along Dave Lyle Blvd at Galleria Blvd. The intent is for the existing gore area to be repurposed to an additional left turn lane. This improvement should be made prior to the opening of the Buick GMC site.