Stockton Manor Elevations

Transcription

1 Left Elevation Front Elevation Right Elevation Rear Elevation Stockton Manor Elevations 3834 Sq. Ft. 50'-0" x 53'-0" Stonebrook 02/03/2015

2 Left Elevation Front Elevation Right Elevation Rear Elevation Stockton Low Country Elevations 3834 Sq. Ft. 50'-0" x 53'-0" Stonebrook 02/03/2015

3 Left Elevation Front Elevation Right Elevation Rear Elevation Stockton Craftsman Elevations 3834 Sq. Ft. 50'-0" x 53'-0" Stonebrook 02/03/2015

4 VYDAS Z. REKASIUS LAKE ZURICH ILLINOIS

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21 Form LP 202..RECE June 2010 Illinois Uniform Limited Partnership Act Restated Certificate of Limited Partnership Secretory or Stale Dep8llm6nt 01 Business Set'Vicl.ls Llmiled Uabill1y Division 501 S. Second St, RIll. 357 Plelise type or prinl clearly. F.ILED Sprlnglieltf, IL This space JOf use by Secrelary 01 Slal9. FiHng FIle: 5150 A.,.,rOvtd: 1.21 I.lAtH " CorrespondenCe regarding li11s filing will be to Paymtlnt must be ma{je by check L JeSSE WHITS payable to Secretary of State. the registered agel'll of lhe Umiled Partnership un reoretaav OF STATE Please do not send cash. less e sen addressed, &Iamped 9nvulope Is InclUded. 1. Limited Partnership Name:...>.I-UJ...'-- +--_-'-, 2. Address of office at which records required by Section 11" will be kept:' SlTeel Adcltsss (p,o, 1'00. alone il unac~lable.) 3. Date of filing initial Certificate of Limited Partnership: 4.' Federal Employer Identification Number (F.E.l.N.): City. 5lale. ZIP 5. Registered Agent: 1llirl.Oi!i..G.orpa,r:aUtmJlJmu~ImlJ~ l_--~_-_ NAm, Registered Office:.m.tLAl:l1al..ste:ifUli&Q[LOri'ia. --:-_---,,...-- I- Streel Address (p.o, Sox alone is unacceplable.) j Chy. Siale, ZIP, 1 6. Stale alilhe provisions and changes that amend the existing Certificate of LImited P rtnership:. (Attach additional sheets of this size if more space Is needed.). The sole change to.the existing limited partnership agreement is to add the Federal Employ r Identl~callon Number. I I I! " Prirled on rvcyc!ed paper. Prinled by authority 01 the St$\S 01 li"no;5. Augusl20tO C LP 15.7 i i

22 Form LP 202-RECE The following signatures are required:., alleast one General Partner on record or all General Panners on record if changing the desi9nali0:1 of t;-,~ Limited Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership; \ I all new General Partners; and : all Dissociated Genera! Partners. :! The undersigned affirms, under penalties ofpe~ury. that the facts stated herein are trtje, correct and complete. "Da1ed;ll~..c=: 2. Dated: Monlh, Day, a, II lawrence J Dugan, VP of Orleans Homebuilders. Inc. Name and Tilla {type or print) re N\l11\8 and Trtlo (Iy\>< or prinl) spfe member of RHGP. II C G P pf the parjoarsbip General Part""r Name if a corporallon or olher entity General Part09r Name" COipO alloro 01 ~Ih(" enlity, I 3. Dated: ---~-:--c:-::--:-: Dated: Month, Day. Yoar Month. Day, ar SignBlure..' I. Nume and l1!1e (Iype or priol). Name and lltie 11)I1,or prinl). General Panner Nllme ~ corporation or other enlily General Partner Name if cnrp.lion or (jihq, enl ity Signatures must be in black ink on an original docu ent. : Carbon copy, photocopy or rubber stamp signatu es may only be used on.conformed copies. op- 00 '''''~... ".",'"-"'"..s,,,. ",...""..",." - '"' -1"' 'S.,

23 File Number S To all to whom these PresentS Shall Come, Greeting: I, Jesse White, Secretary ofstate ofthe State ofillinois, do hereby certify that I am the keeper ofthe records ofthe Department of Business Services. I certify that ATTACHED HERETO IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY, CONSISTING OF 2 PAGE(S), AS TAKEN FROM THE ORIGINAL ON FILE IN THIS OFFICE FOR ORLEANS RHIL,.LP. In Testimony Whereof, I hereto set my hand and cause to be affixed the Great Seal of the State of Illinois, this 1ST day of FEBRUARY A.D Authentication #: Authenticate at: SECRETARY OF STATE

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45 LP/LLLP/LLP/RLLP - FILE DETAIL REPORT Page 1 of 1 1/29/2015 LP/LLLP FILE DETAIL REPORT Entity Name ORLEANS RHIL, LP File Number S Status ACTIVE Entity Type LP/LLLP Type of LP/LLLP DOMESTIC File Date 05/23/2006 Jurisdiction IL Agent Name Agent Street Address ILLINOIS CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY 801 ADLAI STEVENSON DRIVE Agent Change Date 05/23/2006 Designated Office 3333 STREET RD, SUITE 101 BENSALEM PA Agent City SPRINGFIELD Duration PERPETUAL Agent Zip Annual Report Filing Date 01/07/2015 Return to the Search Screen Purchase Certificate of Existence (One Certificate per Transaction) BACK TO CYBERDRIVEILLINOIS.COM HOME PAGE

46 STONEBROOK SUBDIVISION Units 1 and 2 DRAFT ORDINANCES PETITION 27-14

47 This page has intentionally been left blank.

48 Draft Ordinance No. Gxx-15 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PSFR1 PLANNED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO. G43-05 (Stonebrook Subdivision Corron Road Tracts 1,6,11,12,13) WHEREAS, the territory herein described has been annexed to the City of Elgin and originally classified in the PSFR1 Planned Single Family Residence District under Ordinance No. G43-05; and WHEREAS, written application has been made to amend PSFR1 Planned Single Family Residence District Ordinance No. G43-05 to permit additional single-family models constructed with street-facing forward-oriented garages on certain lots within Stonebrook Subdivision Units 1 and 2; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Elgin, Illinois, adopted a Comprehensive Plan and Design Guidelines on February 9, 2005 through ordinance G18-05; and WHEREAS, adopted comprehensive plan requires that new single family homes in planned residential developments be constructed with street-facing garages that are designed and oriented to be recessed behind the main residential façade; and WHEREAS, the new single-family models will be constructed with street-facing garages that will be designed and oriented to be in front of the main residential façade thereby requiring a departure from the requirements of the comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, after due notice in the manner provided by law the Planning & Zoning Commission conducted public hearings concerning said applications and has submitted its written findings and recommendations; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Elgin, Illinois, has reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Planning & Zoning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS: Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Elgin hereby adopts the Findings of Fact, dated May 4, 2015, and the recommendations made by the Community Development Department and the Planning & Zoning Commission, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference as Exhibit A. Section 2. That Ordinance No. G43-05 entitled An Ordinance Classifying Newly Annexed Territory in the PSFR1 Planned Single Family Residence District (Stonebrook

49 Subdivision 901 and 1000 Corron Road Tracts 1,6,11,12,13), passed April 13, 2005, be and is hereby amended only as set forth in this ordinance by amending Section G.13, entitled Supplementary Conditions through the addition of Subparagraph d to read as follows: d. New home models constructed with street-facing garages shall be allowed to extend in front of the main residential façade for a distance no greater than six (6) feet on Lots 53-61, 66-74, 75-85, 86-89, , 12, , , , 168 and Parcel 25 within Unit 1; and Lots 62-65, , , and within Unit 2 of Stonebrook Subdivision. be and is hereby granted subject to the following conditions: 1. Substantial conformance with the Petitioner s Application, Statement of Purpose, Consent and Disclosure and attachments dated January 29, Substantial conformance with the house plan exhibits prepared by Orleans Homes dated February 3, 2015, for each model proposed as follows: a. Fordham (Two-story) 2,810 square feet (58-0 x41-0 ) containing the Homestead, Manor, Low Country and Craftsman elevation options. b. Prescott (Two-story) 2,927 square feet (50-0 x41-8 ) containing the Manor, Low Country and Craftsman elevation options. The Homestead elevation option will not be permitted for construction within Units 1 and 2 of Stonebrook. c. Essex (Two-story) 3,321 square feet (50-0 x41-0 ) containing the Homestead, Manor, Low Country and Craftsman elevation options. d. Stirling (Two-story) 3,369 square feet (50-0 x52-0 ) containing the Manor, Low Country and Craftsman elevation options. The Homestead elevation option will not be permitted for construction within Units 1 and 2 of Stonebrook. e. Stockton (Two-story) 3,384 square feet (50-0 x53-0 ) containing the Homestead, Manor, Low Country and Craftsman elevation options. 3. Substantial conformance with the Final Plat of Subdivision for Stonebrook Unit No. 1 recorded on March 14, A final plat of subdivision for Unit 2 will need to be approved prior to construction of homes within such unit. 4. Substantial conformance with the ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey for Stonebrook Units 1 and 2 (referenced as Parcels 1 and 2 within such survey), prepared by Terra Technology Land Surveying, Inc., and dated April 17, Substantial conformance with the Stonebrook Preliminary Plat Exhibit D and detailed Sheet 2 of 4 encompassing Units 1 and 2, prepared by Land Vision Inc., dated January 7, The departure shall be restricted to the 110 lots within Units 1 and 2 of Stonebrook Subdivision specifically Lots 53-61, 66-74, 75-85, 86-89, , 12, , , , 168 and Parcel 25 within Unit 1 as referenced within the Final Plat for - 2 -

50 Stonebrook Unit No. 1; and specifically Lots 62-65, , , and within Unit 2 as referenced within the Stonebrook Preliminary Plat Exhibit D. 7. Homes with a garage forward orientation will be allowed on no more than 33 lots (30%) within Units 1 and 2 of Stonebrook Subdivision. 8. Prior to the issuance of any additional building permits the developer or authorized agents will be required to complete all subdivision improvements within the Subdivision as outlined within the Permit Availability Letter prepared by the Community Development Department and dated August 4, Compliance with all applicable codes and ordinances. Section 3. That except as amended herein, the use and development of the Subject Property shall be controlled pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. G In the event of any conflict between this ordinance, which expressly includes those documents detailed within Section 2 and the allowances and departures described and provided thereon, and Ordinance No G43-05, this ordinance and associated documents shall control and prevail. Section 4. That this ordinance shall be full force and effect immediately after its passage in the manner provided by law. David J. Kaptain, Mayor Presented: Passed: Vote: Yeas Recorded: Published: Nays: Attest: Kimberly A. Dewis, City Clerk - 3 -

51 Draft Ordinance No. Gxx-15 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PSFR2 PLANNED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO. G23-06 (Stonebrook Subdivision Corron Road Tract 22) WHEREAS, the territory herein described has been annexed to the City of Elgin and originally classified in the PSFR2 Planned Single Family Residence District under Ordinance No. G23-06; and WHEREAS, written application has been made to amend PSFR2 Planned Single Family Residence District Ordinance No. G23-06 to permit additional single-family models constructed with street-facing forward-oriented garages on certain lots within Stonebrook Subdivision Units 1 and 2; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Elgin, Illinois, adopted a Comprehensive Plan and Design Guidelines on February 9, 2005 through ordinance G18-05; and WHEREAS, adopted comprehensive plan requires that new single family homes in planned residential developments be constructed with street-facing garages that are designed and oriented to be recessed behind the main residential façade; and WHEREAS, the new single-family models will be constructed with street-facing garages that will be designed and oriented to be in front of the main residential façade thereby requiring a departure from the requirements of the comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, after due notice in the manner provided by law the Planning & Zoning Commission conducted public hearings concerning said applications and has submitted its written findings and recommendations; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Elgin, Illinois, has reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Planning & Zoning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS: Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Elgin hereby adopts the Findings of Fact, dated May 4, 2015, and the recommendations made by the Community Development Department and the Planning & Zoning Commission, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference as Exhibit A. Section 2. That Ordinance No. G23-06 entitled An Ordinance Classifying Newly Annexed Territory in the PSFR2 Planned Single Family Residence District (Stonebrook

52 Subdivision 901 and 1000 Corron Road Tract 22), passed March 22, 2006, be and is hereby amended only as set forth in this ordinance by amending Section G.13, entitled Supplementary Conditions through the addition of Subparagraph d to read as follows: d. New home models constructed with street-facing garages shall be allowed to extend in front of the main residential façade for a distance no greater than six (6) feet on Lots 53-61, 66-74, 75-85, 86-89, , 12, , , , 168 and Parcel 25 within Unit 1; and Lots 62-65, , , and within Unit 2 of Stonebrook Subdivision. be and is hereby granted subject to the following conditions: 1. Substantial conformance with the Petitioner s Application, Statement of Purpose, Consent and Disclosure and attachments dated January 29, Substantial conformance with the house plan exhibits prepared by Orleans Homes dated February 3, 2015, for each model proposed as follows: a. Fordham (Two-story) 2,810 square feet (58-0 x41-0 ) containing the Homestead, Manor, Low Country and Craftsman elevation options. b. Prescott (Two-story) 2,927 square feet (50-0 x41-8 ) containing the Manor, Low Country and Craftsman elevation options. The Homestead elevation option will not be permitted for construction within Units 1 and 2 of Stonebrook. c. Essex (Two-story) 3,321 square feet (50-0 x41-0 ) containing the Homestead, Manor, Low Country and Craftsman elevation options. d. Stirling (Two-story) 3,369 square feet (50-0 x52-0 ) containing the Manor, Low Country and Craftsman elevation options. The Homestead elevation option will not be permitted for construction within Units 1 and 2 of Stonebrook. e. Stockton (Two-story) 3,384 square feet (50-0 x53-0 ) containing the Homestead, Manor, Low Country and Craftsman elevation options. 3. Substantial conformance with the Final Plat of Subdivision for Stonebrook Unit No. 1 recorded on March 14, A final plat of subdivision for Unit 2 will need to be approved prior to construction of homes within such unit. 4. Substantial conformance with the ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey for Stonebrook Units 1 and 2 (referenced as Parcels 1 and 2 within such survey), prepared by Terra Technology Land Surveying, Inc., and dated April 17, Substantial conformance with the Stonebrook Preliminary Plat Exhibit D and detailed Sheet 2 of 4 encompassing Units 1 and 2, prepared by Land Vision Inc., dated January 7, The departure shall be restricted to the 110 lots within Units 1 and 2 of Stonebrook Subdivision specifically Lots 53-61, 66-74, 75-85, 86-89, , 12, , , , 168 and Parcel 25 within Unit 1 as referenced within the Final Plat for - 2 -

53 Stonebrook Unit No. 1; and specifically Lots 62-65, , , and within Unit 2 as referenced within the Stonebrook Preliminary Plat Exhibit D. 7. Homes with a garage forward orientation will be allowed on no more than 33 lots (30%) within Units 1 and 2 of Stonebrook Subdivision. 8. Prior to the issuance of any additional building permits the developer or authorized agents will be required to complete all subdivision improvements within the Subdivision as outlined within the Permit Availability Letter prepared by the Community Development Department and dated August 4, Compliance with all applicable codes and ordinances. Section 3. That except as amended herein, the use and development of the Subject Property shall be controlled pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. G In the event of any conflict between this ordinance, which expressly includes those documents detailed within Section 2 and the allowances and departures described and provided thereon, and Ordinance No G23-06, this ordinance and associated documents shall control and prevail. Section 4. That this ordinance shall be full force and effect immediately after its passage in the manner provided by law. David J. Kaptain, Mayor Presented: Passed: Vote: Yeas Recorded: Published: Nays: Attest: Kimberly A. Dewis, City Clerk - 3 -

54 Draft Ordinance No. Gxx-15 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PSFR2 PLANNED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO. G44-05 (Stonebrook Subdivision Corron Road Tracts 3,7,17 and 23) WHEREAS, the territory herein described has been annexed to the City of Elgin and originally classified in the PSFR2 Planned Single Family Residence District under Ordinance No. G44-05; and WHEREAS, written application has been made to amend PSFR2 Planned Single Family Residence District Ordinance No. G44-05 to permit additional single-family models constructed with street-facing forward-oriented garages on certain lots within Stonebrook Subdivision Units 1 and 2; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Elgin, Illinois, adopted a Comprehensive Plan and Design Guidelines on February 9, 2005 through ordinance G18-05; and WHEREAS, adopted comprehensive plan requires that new single family homes in planned residential developments be constructed with street-facing garages that are designed and oriented to be recessed behind the main residential façade; and WHEREAS, the new single-family models will be constructed with street-facing garages that will be designed and oriented to be in front of the main residential façade thereby requiring a departure from the requirements of the comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, after due notice in the manner provided by law the Planning & Zoning Commission conducted public hearings concerning said applications and has submitted its written findings and recommendations; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Elgin, Illinois, has reviewed the findings and recommendations of the Planning & Zoning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ELGIN, ILLINOIS: Section 1. That the City Council of the City of Elgin hereby adopts the Findings of Fact, dated May 4, 2015, and the recommendations made by the Community Development Department and the Planning & Zoning Commission, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference as Exhibit A. Section 2. That Ordinance No. G44-05 entitled An Ordinance Classifying Newly Annexed Territory in the PSFR2 Planned Single Family Residence District (Stonebrook

55 Subdivision 901 and 1000 Corron Road Tracts 3,7,17 and 23), passed April 13, 2005, be and is hereby amended only as set forth in this ordinance by amending Section G.13, entitled Supplementary Conditions through the addition of Subparagraph d to read as follows: d. New home models constructed with street-facing garages shall be allowed to extend in front of the main residential façade for a distance no greater than six (6) feet on Lots 53-61, 66-74, 75-85, 86-89, , 12, , , , 168 and Parcel 25 within Unit 1; and Lots 62-65, , , and within Unit 2 of Stonebrook Subdivision. be and is hereby granted subject to the following conditions: 1. Substantial conformance with the Petitioner s Application, Statement of Purpose, Consent and Disclosure and attachments dated January 29, Substantial conformance with the house plan exhibits prepared by Orleans Homes dated February 3, 2015, for each model proposed as follows: a. Fordham (Two-story) 2,810 square feet (58-0 x41-0 ) containing the Homestead, Manor, Low Country and Craftsman elevation options. b. Prescott (Two-story) 2,927 square feet (50-0 x41-8 ) containing the Manor, Low Country and Craftsman elevation options. The Homestead elevation option will not be permitted for construction within Units 1 and 2 of Stonebrook. c. Essex (Two-story) 3,321 square feet (50-0 x41-0 ) containing the Homestead, Manor, Low Country and Craftsman elevation options. d. Stirling (Two-story) 3,369 square feet (50-0 x52-0 ) containing the Manor, Low Country and Craftsman elevation options. The Homestead elevation option will not be permitted for construction within Units 1 and 2 of Stonebrook. e. Stockton (Two-story) 3,384 square feet (50-0 x53-0 ) containing the Homestead, Manor, Low Country and Craftsman elevation options. 3. Substantial conformance with the Final Plat of Subdivision for Stonebrook Unit No. 1 recorded on March 14, A final plat of subdivision for Unit 2 will need to be approved prior to construction of homes within such unit. 4. Substantial conformance with the ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey for Stonebrook Units 1 and 2 (referenced as Parcels 1 and 2 within such survey), prepared by Terra Technology Land Surveying, Inc., and dated April 17, Substantial conformance with the Stonebrook Preliminary Plat Exhibit D and detailed Sheet 2 of 4 encompassing Units 1 and 2, prepared by Land Vision Inc., dated January 7, The departure shall be restricted to the 110 lots within Units 1 and 2 of Stonebrook Subdivision specifically Lots 53-61, 66-74, 75-85, 86-89, , 12, , , , 168 and Parcel 25 within Unit 1 as referenced within the Final Plat for - 2 -

56 Stonebrook Unit No. 1; and specifically Lots 62-65, , , and within Unit 2 as referenced within the Stonebrook Preliminary Plat Exhibit D. 7. Homes with a garage forward orientation will be allowed on no more than 33 lots (30%) within Units 1 and 2 of Stonebrook Subdivision. 8. Prior to the issuance of any additional building permits the developer or authorized agents will be required to complete all subdivision improvements within the Subdivision as outlined within the Permit Availability Letter prepared by the Community Development Department and dated August 4, Compliance with all applicable codes and ordinances. Section 3. That except as amended herein, the use and development of the Subject Property shall be controlled pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance No. G In the event of any conflict between this ordinance, which expressly includes those documents detailed within Section 2 and the allowances and departures described and provided thereon, and Ordinance No G44-05, this ordinance and associated documents shall control and prevail. Section 4. That this ordinance shall be full force and effect immediately after its passage in the manner provided by law. David J. Kaptain, Mayor Presented: Passed: Vote: Yeas Recorded: Published: Nays: Attest: Kimberly A. Dewis, City Clerk - 3 -

57 STONEBROOK SUBDIVISION Units 1 and 2 TRANSCRIPTS PETITION 27-14

58 Transcript of PETITION 27-14: STONEBROOK SUBDIVISION Date: May 4, 2015 Case: CITY OF ELGIN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION PLANET DEPOS Phone: Fax: Internet: Worldwide Court Reporting Interpretation Trial Services

59 1 1 BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION 2 OF THE CITY OF ELGIN x 5 In Re: : 6 Request for Annexation, : No Stonebrook Subdivision, : 8 Units 1 and 2; Property : 9 Located at 901 and : Corron Road. : x HEARING 15 Elgin, Illinois Monday, May 4, :02 p.m Job No.: 75392A 22 Pages: Reported by: Melanie L. Humphrey-Sonntag, 24 CSR, RDR, CRR, CCP, FAPR

60 PETITION 27-14: STONEBROOK SUBDIVISION CONDUCTED ON MONDAY, MAY 4, Hearing held at the location of: ELGIN CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5 Second Floor, North Tower Dexter Court 7 Elgin, Illinois (847) Before Melanie L. Humphrey-Sonntag, a Certified 14 Shorthand Reporter, Registered Diplomate Reporter, and 15 a Notary Public in and for the State of Illinois PLANET DEPOS - CHICAGO AREA REALTIME

61 PETITION 27-14: STONEBROOK SUBDIVISION CONDUCTED ON MONDAY, MAY 4, PRESENT: 2 ROBERT SILJESTROM, Chairman 3 KAREN BEYER, Member 4 JAY COX, Member 5 BETH A. KRUGER, Member 6 LORETTA REVESZ, Member 7 8 ALSO PRESENT: 9 CHRISTOPHER J. BECK, Assistant Corporation 10 Counsel 11 MARC MYLOTT, Community Development Director 12 DENISE MOMODU, Associate Planner 13 SAROSH SAHER, Senior Planner 14 DAVE WADEN, Senior Planner PLANET DEPOS - CHICAGO AREA REALTIME

62 PETITION 27-14: STONEBROOK SUBDIVISION CONDUCTED ON MONDAY, MAY 4, P R O C E E D I N G S 2 CHAIRMAN SILJESTROM: Good evening, 3 everyone. The time is 7:02 and the Chair calls this 4 meeting to order. 5 Secretary, please call the roll. 6 MR. SAHER: Ms. Karen Beyer. 7 MEMBER BEYER: Present. 8 MR. SAHER: Mr. Jay Cox. 9 MEMBER COX: Present. 10 MR. SAHER: Mr. Corey Dixon. 11 (No response.) 12 MR. SAHER: Ms. Beth Kruger. 13 MEMBER KRUGER: Here. 14 MR. SAHER: Mr. Anthony Pedote. 15 (No response.) 16 MR. SAHER: Ms. Loretta Revesz. 17 MEMBER REVESZ: Here. 18 MR. SAHER: Chair Robert Siljestrom. 19 CHAIRMAN SILJESTROM: Here. 20 Do we have a quorum, sir? 21 MR. SAHER: Yes, we do. 22 CHAIRMAN SILJESTROM: Next item on the 23 agenda is the approval of the minutes of 24 April the 6th, PLANET DEPOS - CHICAGO AREA REALTIME

63 PETITION 27-14: STONEBROOK SUBDIVISION CONDUCTED ON MONDAY, MAY 4, * * * * * 2 CHAIRMAN SILJESTROM: Moving ahead, the next 3 item on our agenda is something called the Chairman's 4 statement. 5 Again, on behalf of members of the 6 Commission, City staff, and our ever-efficient court 7 reporter, I want to extend a warm welcome to all of 8 you in the audience. We will do our best tonight to 9 accommodate your needs and your desires. 10 And now to get down to the business of the 11 evening, I'm going to give a quick summary of the 12 agenda. And this is for the people here but also for 13 those at home who are watching this on television. 14 First of all, we have something called a 15 final plat approval that's the Bowes Creek Country 16 Club. They have an addition that they want to start 17 building on. 18 Secondly, we have a couple of annexation 19 issues at 901 and 1000 Corron Road in Stonebrook 20 subdivision. You'll hear about that. 21 We have a request for a cell phone tower at 22 the Moose Lodge on South McLean Boulevard. They will 23 present their package. 24 We have a request from a church up at PLANET DEPOS - CHICAGO AREA REALTIME

64 PETITION 27-14: STONEBROOK SUBDIVISION CONDUCTED ON MONDAY, MAY 4, Church Road to add some additional educational 2 facilities. 3 We have then a request for a vacant building 4 on South McLean Boulevard to have a new arrangement -- 5 tenant arrangement. We'll hear that. 6 And, finally, we have what's called a map 7 amendment, and that's -- involves an auto dealership 8 on East Chicago Street which is changing hands, and 9 they need some additional support and modifications of 10 the existing ordinance for their new building. 11 Having said all that, there is a very 12 important legal necessity. Anybody in the audience 13 tonight who wishes to address any of these petitions 14 must now be sworn in with the court reporter. No 15 exceptions. 16 The only exception are those of you who are 17 officers of the court, and you know who you are. 18 Please, if you want to speak, stand up, get 19 sworn in with this good lady right here. 20 (Witnesses sworn.) 21 CHAIRMAN SILJESTROM: Okay. First item on 22 our agenda tonight is Item No , Bowes Creek 23 Country Club. 24 * * * * * PLANET DEPOS - CHICAGO AREA REALTIME

65 PETITION 27-14: STONEBROOK SUBDIVISION CONDUCTED ON MONDAY, MAY 4, CHAIRMAN SILJESTROM: Okay. Moving ahead, 2 next item on the agenda is our Petition No involving the Stonebrook subdivision, and I think, 4 Mr. Saher, that was your petition. 5 MR. SAHER: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 6 CHAIRMAN SILJESTROM: Would you give us a 7 summary and introduce the Petitioner. 8 MR. SAHER: Yes. I would be happy to. 9 This evening we have a request from Orleans 10 Homes, RHIL, a limited partnership, requesting 11 approval to develop 110 single-family homes within 12 Units 1 and 2 of Stonebrook subdivision. 13 Some of the homes that they are proposing 14 have designs with garage-forward orientation. As 15 such, properties with this orientation do not conform 16 to the existing guidance provided in the comprehensive 17 plan and design guidelines, and, as such, they require 18 a departure from this requirement. 19 Orleans Homes is looking at this point to 20 develop Units 1 and 2. This was part of Stonebrook 21 that was originally annexed into the city in 2005 by 22 B & B and, for quite a while, had sat without any 23 development. Orleans Homes is picking up Units 1 24 and 2 and proposes to restart the development at this PLANET DEPOS - CHICAGO AREA REALTIME

66 PETITION 27-14: STONEBROOK SUBDIVISION CONDUCTED ON MONDAY, MAY 4, time. 2 As you may recall, Ryland Homes had picked 3 up, in 2007, the easterly portion of Stonebrook 4 subdivision, was before you about a month or so ago to 5 modify that portion of the subdivision, as well. 6 To be more specific, this evening Orleans 7 Homes is providing five new models, out of which two 8 models, the Prescott and the Stirling, are the ones 9 that have street-faced forward-oriented garages. They 10 are requesting that these garages be allowed based on 11 the fact that they will not exceed 6 feet from the 12 front elevation of the house and will also be provided 13 with and designed with a number of architectural 14 enhancements in order to compensate for the 15 garage-forward design and thereby diminish its impact 16 on the street. 17 This evening we have Steve Atchison, who is 18 available to make a brief presentation on their 19 proposal. 20 Steve. 21 CHAIRMAN SILJESTROM: Sure. 22 I see in my notes that I should have asked 23 you if you have information of proper notice. 24 MR. SAHER: Yes, we do. PLANET DEPOS - CHICAGO AREA REALTIME

67 PETITION 27-14: STONEBROOK SUBDIVISION CONDUCTED ON MONDAY, MAY 4, CHAIRMAN SILJESTROM: And how about 2 interested parties? 3 MR. SAHER: At this time we don't have any. 4 CHAIRMAN SILJESTROM: Thank you. 5 Sir, would you introduce yourself and be 6 sure that the court reporter understands your name, 7 and then the floor is yours. 8 MR. ATCHISON: Thank you. 9 My name is Steve Atchison. That's 10 A-t-c-h-i-s-o-n. I am the president of Orleans Homes 11 here in the Chicago market. And thank you for your 12 time tonight. 13 What I have up on the board here is a quick 14 presentation for you and what it is that we're truly 15 looking for. 16 As you see, we have -- as was mentioned, we 17 have five plans that we're looking to overall 18 introduce into the community. Three of the five plans 19 do meet a lot of the requirements -- or do meet the 20 requirements that the City is looking for with regard 21 to the garage setback. Two of the plans do not. 22 The first plan that I'm going to show you 23 here is our Essex plan. This was one out of the three 24 that does meet it. From the floor plan here, you can PLANET DEPOS - CHICAGO AREA REALTIME

68 PETITION 27-14: STONEBROOK SUBDIVISION CONDUCTED ON MONDAY, MAY 4, see how the garage is recessed back from the front of 2 the house, there in the drawing to the right, as well 3 as recessed back from the front porch. 4 Here are some side elevations that will give 5 you an idea, and these are just some of the different 6 elevations. In each of the different floor plans, 7 we're going to be offering a total of four different 8 elevations that will go along with each floor plan 9 with the exception of the Stirling and of the 10 Prescott, which, in that situation, we're only going 11 to offer three out of the four elevations. 12 This is our second model. This is the 13 Fordham. This plan here also meets the City's 14 requirements as far as a recessed, set back garage. 15 As we're looking at this floor plan here, you can see 16 how the garage is recessed back from the front porch, 17 again, to the floor plan drawing there on your 18 right-hand side. 19 This is a view of the sides and the rears 20 and the front elevation. Again, one out of the four 21 different elevations that are being offered. That's 22 the second elevation, third elevation. And fourth 23 elevation. 24 This is the Prescott now. As we look at the PLANET DEPOS - CHICAGO AREA REALTIME

69 PETITION 27-14: STONEBROOK SUBDIVISION CONDUCTED ON MONDAY, MAY 4, Prescott, this is one of the plans that does not meet 2 the setback requirement. 3 As we take a look here, you can see, again, 4 in the drawing to the right, what we have here is we 5 have a front garage, a two-car garage that was 6 essentially flush with the front porch. Okay? 7 As communicated, we are making some 8 elevation changes to the front in order to enhance the 9 garage component itself, either through windows and 10 some of the different criteria that the City has 11 allowed before in the past. 12 And then we'll show you some modifications 13 here, also, that -- when we're proposing a third-car 14 garage to this plan -- how that third-car garage will 15 also be recessed back for the second car, but I'll get 16 to that in a second. 17 Again, the elevation, one out of the three 18 different elevations, front, sides, and rears. 19 Second elevation. Our third elevation. 20 Okay. 21 And this is getting to the Stirling. This 22 is another -- one of the plans that is not currently 23 meeting the setback requirements of the two-car garage 24 to the face of the home. PLANET DEPOS - CHICAGO AREA REALTIME

70 PETITION 27-14: STONEBROOK SUBDIVISION CONDUCTED ON MONDAY, MAY 4, As you see there to the right, again, this 2 garage front is coming out in front of the front 3 porch. Again, not a very dominant garage, but 4 certainly it is coming forward in front of the living 5 space in front of the porch. 6 Again, the first of three elevations, front, 7 sides, and rears. 8 Elevation 2. And Elevation 3. 9 This is the fourth and final plan. This is 10 the Stockton. This plan here does, indeed, meet the 11 requirements. 12 One of the things that you can see just by 13 looking at the front elevation is that, even though 14 some of the plans are matching the setback 15 requirements, you can see that we are keeping garage 16 doors that are looking consistent between all the 17 plans. One of the things is that, on a garage door, 18 that it looks like there are two separate garage doors 19 entering each garage stall. 20 You can see this here on this elevation again, where this plan may meet the setback 22 requirements, we are doing it to make sure that this 23 garage door will be and look similar to all the other 24 garage doors within the community on the other PLANET DEPOS - CHICAGO AREA REALTIME

71 PETITION 27-14: STONEBROOK SUBDIVISION CONDUCTED ON MONDAY, MAY 4, two plans. 2 Here you can see the recessed garage from 3 the living space there on the drawing to the right. 4 Elevation 1 out of the four, Elevation 2, Elevation 3, 5 and Elevation 4. 6 When we originally submitted, one of the 7 things we neglected to do was to show the third-car 8 option on the two -- on the two floor plans that did 9 not meet the requirements. Again, the Prescott and 10 the Stirling. 11 So here what we wanted to do is -- it's kind 12 of hard to see -- it doesn't look dark enough. But 13 this is just kind of showing you, on the right-hand 14 side here, just the garage component of the front 15 elevation. 16 In the drawing to the left, you can see how 17 the third-car garage is set back just over a foot I want to say it's a foot and 8 inches -- set back 19 from the front-car garage which, again, is one of the 20 requirements of a third-car, so this is trying to show 21 exactly how that third-car would be set back from the 22 two-car. 23 You can also see that the rooflines, as well 24 as -- we've tried to break up the overall component of PLANET DEPOS - CHICAGO AREA REALTIME

72 PETITION 27-14: STONEBROOK SUBDIVISION CONDUCTED ON MONDAY, MAY 4, this elevation with different rooflines that run in 2 opposite directions. 3 This is the second plan. This is the 4 Stirling showing the third-car option. Again, very 5 similar, sitting back -- just over a foot back from 6 the two-car garage and, again, very similar type of 7 architecture that we designed into the roof to, again, 8 change the roofline directions and the way that the 9 roof is running over the third-car garage to break up 10 the overall elevation and the predominance of the 11 garage facing -- the garage facing towards the street 12 type of elevation. 13 That's all I have for our presentation, and 14 I'm free to answer any questions you may have. 15 CHAIRMAN SILJESTROM: Well, let's see what 16 members of the Commission might have in the way of 17 questions. 18 Mr. Cox, your turn first. Mr. Atchison will 19 be at your disposal. 20 MEMBER COX: I don't have any questions for 21 Mr. Atchison. 22 I did actually want to sort of -- for the 23 listeners at home, maybe -- ask staff to kind of 24 comment what about the 2005 comprehensive plan would PLANET DEPOS - CHICAGO AREA REALTIME

73 PETITION 27-14: STONEBROOK SUBDIVISION CONDUCTED ON MONDAY, MAY 4, typically discourage this kind of garage-forward 2 concept. 3 And I think it's been pretty clearly stated 4 in the packet what is being done to compensate for it, 5 but just to kind of give a little bit of background 6 for the citizens at large why we typically don't want 7 to do this and what's being done. 8 MR. SAHER: Typically what the comprehensive 9 plan requires is that garages be set back or recessed 10 from the front elevation of the house; in the best 11 sense, 10 feet back from the front elevation. 12 However, an allowance is given to garages to 13 come up to 2 feet back from the front elevation when 14 there is substantial architecture on the garage or if 15 there is a forward-front porch or any other 16 architectural enhancement to the main house which 17 tends to diminish the effect that a garage moving 18 closer to the street has on the street. 19 In this particular case, the Applicant wants 20 to place the garage in front of the main elevation, 21 and so with the architectural enhancements, the effect 22 of a garage facade on the street is greatly 23 diminished. 24 The reason that we've had these guidelines PLANET DEPOS - CHICAGO AREA REALTIME

74 PETITION 27-14: STONEBROOK SUBDIVISION CONDUCTED ON MONDAY, MAY 4, in the comprehensive plan from 2005 is because, up 2 until that time, 2005, there was a predominance of 3 residential architecture being designed where the 4 garage created the primary facade of the building 5 because it was the most forward of the house, so much 6 so that the street, the block, and perhaps the 7 neighborhood was defined by rows and rows of garage 8 doors. 9 And so to mitigate that effect, staff had 10 placed these guidelines in the comprehensive plan 11 since 2005, particularly with all of the far west 12 development that had begun to take place at that time, 13 and as a result of which we have seen neighborhoods 14 change to a more favorable character based on the fact 15 that these guidelines have been followed very well. 16 MEMBER COX: Thank you. 17 CHAIRMAN SILJESTROM: Ms. Kruger, your 18 thoughts, your comments, your questions for 19 Mr. Atchison. 20 MEMBER KRUGER: My only comment is the two 21 options with the forward-facing garage is that you've 22 really done a nice job with the detail of the rest of 23 the house to make it so the garage wasn't so dominant. 24 So I like the way you did that. PLANET DEPOS - CHICAGO AREA REALTIME

75 PETITION 27-14: STONEBROOK SUBDIVISION CONDUCTED ON MONDAY, MAY 4, MR. ATCHISON: Wonderful. Thank you. 2 CHAIRMAN SILJESTROM: Ms. Revesz, your turn. 3 MEMBER REVESZ: I see no issue with the way 4 the garages are in this development, but we've had -- 5 this is like the third one in the past few months. 6 Are we considering looking at this in the 7 next comprehensive plan, to make changes? 8 MR. MYLOTT: Yes, ma'am. 9 MEMBER REVESZ: Okay. Thank you. 10 CHAIRMAN SILJESTROM: Ms. Beyer, your 11 comments, your thoughts. 12 MEMBER BEYER: No questions. Thank you. 13 CHAIRMAN SILJESTROM: Is there anyone in the 14 audience who wishes to comment on this petition? 15 (No response.) 16 CHAIRMAN SILJESTROM: Anyone at all? 17 (No response.) 18 CHAIRMAN SILJESTROM: Let the record show 19 that no one appeared. 20 Thank you, Mr. Atchison. 21 MR. ATCHISON: Thank you. 22 CHAIRMAN SILJESTROM: Mr. Saher, will you 23 give us a quick summary and then tell us what staff's 24 posture is with regard to this particular petition. PLANET DEPOS - CHICAGO AREA REALTIME

76 PETITION 27-14: STONEBROOK SUBDIVISION CONDUCTED ON MONDAY, MAY 4, MR. SAHER: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. 2 I'd also like to mention that staff 3 evaluated the third-garage option that the developer 4 had proposed to us. This was indicated to us after 5 your packets had been sent out to you, but we 6 evaluated them and found that they meet the 7 requirements of the comprehensive plan and don't 8 require a departure. 9 Staff also wants to additionally mention 10 that the developer is also proposing side-load garages 11 to all of their proposed models, which completely meet 12 the requirements of the comprehensive plan, which is 13 why we have not brought that up at this point. 14 In light of that, staff makes a 15 recommendation for approval of this petition based on 16 the conditions contained in your packet dated May 4th, Staff believes that approval of this 19 petition will allow a dormant development to restart 20 and be developed with new single-family homes. 21 CHAIRMAN SILJESTROM: Thank you, sir. 22 The Chair then will entertain a motion on MEMBER REVESZ: I move to recommend that the PLANET DEPOS - CHICAGO AREA REALTIME

77 PETITION 27-14: STONEBROOK SUBDIVISION CONDUCTED ON MONDAY, MAY 4, City Council approve Petition subject to the 2 conditions outlined within our packet and to adopt as 3 the findings of the Commission those findings also 4 provided in our packet. 5 MEMBER COX: Second. 6 CHAIRMAN SILJESTROM: Further discussion? 7 (No response.) 8 CHAIRMAN SILJESTROM: Thoughts, comments, 9 questions for Mr. Saher? 10 (No response.) 11 CHAIRMAN SILJESTROM: Secretary, please call 12 the roll. 13 MR. WADEN: Ms. Beyer. 14 MEMBER BEYER: Yes. 15 MR. WADEN: Mr. Cox. 16 MEMBER COX: Yes. 17 MR. WADEN: Ms. Kruger. 18 MEMBER KRUGER: Yes. 19 MR. WADEN: Ms. Revesz. 20 MEMBER REVESZ: Yes. 21 MR. WADEN: Chairman Siljestrom. 22 CHAIRMAN SILJESTROM: Yes. 23 That will be our recommendation to City 24 Council. PLANET DEPOS - CHICAGO AREA REALTIME