ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT"

Transcription

1 ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM JEFF ALLRED CITY MANAGER DATE JUNE SUBJECT MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT AMENDING CHAPTERS AND OF TITLE 17 OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO REGULATIONS FOR NONCONFORMING USES STRUCTURES LOTS AND PARKING FACILITIES SUMMARY MCA 1502 is a City initiated amendment to revise Title 17 Zoning of the Rosemead Municipal Code to modify several regulations for nonconforming uses structures lots and parking facilities It was originally drafted for the purpose of allowing the addition of new conforming residential structures on R1 and R2 lots that include existing legal nonconforming structures However upon hearing written and oral testimony at the duly noticed and advertised public hearing on April the Planning Commission directed staff to eliminate the proposed standards regarding residential expansions on properties with existing legal nonconforming structures and the item was continued to the meeting of May After final discussion at the May meeting the Commission adopted Planning Commission Resolution No 1504 recommending that the City Council ADOPT Ordinance 951 approving revised MCA 1502 and amending Title 17 Zoning of the Rosemead Municipal Code without the proposed standards allowing the addition of new residential structures on properties with existing legal nonconforming structures Ordinance 951 maintains all other proposed text in the amendment that is intended to improve the clarity and intent of the existing nonconforming standards Ordinance 951 also proposes to eliminate the term and definition of bachelor apartment from Chapter as the term is no longer accepted by the California Department of Housing and Community Development The Planning Commission staff reports meeting minutes and Planning Commission Resolution No 1504 are included in this report as Attachments A B C D and E respectively MAYOR S COMMENTS Since the May Planning Commission meeting the Mayor has discussed the course of this project with staff The Mayor asked that staff note that she is in favor of the original proposed language that was eliminated by the Planning Commission and would ITEM NUMBER F

2 City Council Report June Page 2 of 6 like that the Council reconsider it as an option The residential exception that was originally proposed is outlined below B Addition of new structures on R1 and R2 lots where nonconforming residential structures exist R1 and R2 lots may be expanded with additional residential units or related accessory structures provided that the additional structures comply with the development standards and requirements of this Zoning Code Such expansion shall be processed pursuant to the standards set forth in Chapter Minor Exceptions if the following findings can be made 1 The proposal includes all necessary work to eliminate any hazard or safety problem on an existing structure as required by the Building Official or by an officer of the City charged with protecting the public safety in order to correct an unsafe condition 2 The proposal includes the necessary work to maintain or improve the aesthetic appearance or architectural viability of the existing nonconforming structures onsite 3 The legal nonconforming residential unit s that exist onsite are solely nonconforming due to minimum residential unit floor area setbacks building separation building height entry treatment height and second story architectural standards 4 The legal nonconforming residential accessory structure proposed to remain onsite are solely nonconforming due to driveway width turning radius minimum stall size setbacks or landscaping 5 No previous discretionary permit has been approved for the subject site and 6 The subject lot does not require the approval of a Design Review entitlement for proposed dwelling unit size or increase in building pad or front yard elevation It is the Mayor s opinion that if the residential exception is adopted it could be reviewed within a year of its adoption to determine if it created any unintended consequences Staff Recommendation It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions 1 Conduct the noticed public hearing and receive public comment 2 APPROVE the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts Attachment F finding that the project will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and 3 As recommended by the Planning Commission introduce for First Reading by title only Ordinance No 951 Attachment G approving MCA 1502 and amending Chapters and of title 17 of the City of Rosemead Municipal Code

3 City Council Report June Page 3 of 6 relating to regulations for Nonconforming Uses Structures Lots and Parking Facilities ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION An Initial Study of Environmental Impacts was prepared recommending the adoption of a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA guidelines the Initial Study and Negative Declaration are included in this report as Attachment F The Initial Study is an environmental analysis of the proposed Municipal Code Amendment to determine if the proposed revisions to the Zoning Code will have potentially significant effects on the environment This study found that there are no potentially significant environmental impacts that could occur with the adoption of the proposed amendments A Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration was distributed for a 20day public review and comment period between March and April If the Council is inclined to approve this project the Council must make findings of adequacy with the environmental assessment and approve the Negative Declaration BACKGROUND The legal basis for all land use regulation is the police power of the City to protect the public health safety and welfare of its citizens The Building Code Zoning Code and Subdivision Ordinance are the primary regulatory tools used to accomplish these goals The City takes great care when preparing new ordinances to minimize the creation of nonconformities if possible However as the community s vision for its built environment evolves and changes revision to the City s regulations use requirements setbacks height limitations etc will inevitably result in the creation of nonconforming uses structures and lots To ensure that a community s adopted vision and goals are fully accomplished regulatory provisions are put in place to deal with nonconforming structures uses and lots and to require them to be replaced or made conforming over time A legal nonconforming structure use or lot is caused by a governmental action that changes the Zoning Code the Zoning Map or the Subdivision Ordinance All legal nonconforming structures uses or lots were lawfully established under the codes at the time but due to the adoption of a new ordinance or map revision the property no longer conforms to the standards As a general rule nonconforming regulations presume that a nonconformity is detrimental to the long term public interest health safety morals or welfare and that the nonconformity needs to be brought into conformance over time The intent and practice of most legal nonconforming ordinances is to allow nonconformities to continue until the end of their economic life when they are voluntarily replaced with a conforming structure use or lot In addition it is typical for nonconforming regulations to limit changes on premises which would give permanency to or expand such nonconformities The Comprehensive Zoning Code Update adopted by City Council on October included revised standards intended to be business friendly and not detrimental to the economic vitality of the community while providing a process to eliminate nonconforming uses especially as they become detrimental to a neighborhood The current code

4 City Council Report June Page 4 of 6 includes provisions to allow beautifying improvements to legal nonconforming structures including interior alterations repairs and maintenance and some enlargements subject to the Minor Exception application process However the current code also sets a limitation that as long as a nonconforming use building or structure exists upon any lot no new use building or structure may be established Although this limitation is standard in most cities nonconforming use and structure ordinances it has led a number of Rosemead residents to inquire about requests for Zone Variances to allow them to retain existing nonconformities and expand the property with additional single family residential units on parcels large enough for more than one unit These requests have not been submitted with completed applications as it is nearly impossible to make the required findings since there are no special circumstances to warrant such Zone Variance approval In response to such residential project requests staff prepared MCA 1502 which was first presented to the Planning Commission on April The amendment included revised language to improve the clarity of the existing nonconforming standards and it also proposed to allow the expansion of R1 and R2 lots with new conforming structures subject to both the existing density limitations and the Minor Exception application process During the April Planning Commission hearing the Commission received public comment and discussed the purpose and intent of the City s existing legal nonconforming ordinance The Commission also expressed their concern for ensuring that the community s adopted vision and goals are fully accomplished The Planning Commission unanimously voted to continue this item and asked staff to eliminate proposed text that would allow the addition of conforming structures on R1 and R2 lots that are developed with legal nonconforming residential structures At the May Planning Commission meeting the Commission unanimously adopted Resolution No recommending that the City Council approve the Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts for the revised MCA 1502 Both the original MCA 1502 dated April and revised MCA dated May have been included in this report as Attachments H and I respectively ANALYSIS Ordinance 951 maintains the new rules for the extent to which nonconforming structures and uses may continue to be used expanded or replaced to protect the health safety and welfare of all residents and to continue ongoing improvement of the City Furthermore in accordance with the Planning Commission direction the residential exceptions that were in included in the April 6 draft have been eliminated The following is an outline of the key elements of the proposed Ordinance The redlinestrikeout version of proposed MCA 1502 has been attached as Attachment T A final edited version is included in proposed Ordinance 951 Attachment G Section Establishment of Nonconforming Status is proposed to reinforce the property owner s responsibility to provide evidence to the City to justify the establishment of nonconforming rights For example this would include completing a Los Angeles County building record search and submitting original permit documents for structures that were built prior to the City s incorporation

5 City Council Report June Page 5 of 6 Existing standards were regrouped into Section Nonconforming uses Section Nonconforming structures Section Residential Exceptions to improve overall organization for ease of finding applicable code regulations Municipal Code Amendment adds text to clarify that any use that was authorized by an approved discretionary permit but is not allowed by the current Zoning Code is nonconforming and may only continue in compliance with the original discretionary permit conditions of approval Section Legal Nonconforming Structures was expanded to allow any building that was approved with a discretionary permit the possibility of expanding subject to the Minor Exception application process Lastly Municipal Code Amendment also proposes to eliminate the term and definition of bachelor apartment from Chapter as it is outdated and the definition is no longer accepted by the California Department of Housing and Community Development Municipal Code Requirements Article 6 Chapter of the Rosemead Municipal Code sets forth the procedures and requirements for Municipal Code Amendments Section sets forth the following findings that must be met A The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan Municipal Code Amendment is consistent with the Rosemead General Plan Land Use Goals and Policies It proposes to amend the Rosemead Municipal Code to delete outdated terms modify existing regulations and introduce regulations applicable to legal nonconforming uses and structures The code amendment establishes limitations on legal nonconforming uses and structures that were previously approved by a discretionary entitlement In conformance with Land Use Goal 1 Maintain stable and attractive single family residential neighborhoods proposals to add additional dwelling units on residentially zoned lots will continue to be required to bring the existing nonconformities into conformance with current Zoning Code standards B The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest health safety convenience or welfare of the City and The public necessity convenience and general welfare will be served by the adoption of the revised legal nonconforming regulations The revised regulations will continue to encourage the City s ongoing improvement by limiting the extent to which nonconforming structures and uses may continue to be used expanded or replaced while improving the health safety and welfare of all residents Several standards are proposed to ensure that the proposed amendment does not adversely impact the City and its residents Municipal Code Amendment adds language to clarify that any use that was approved by a discretionary permit and has become legal nonconforming

6 City Council Report June Paoe 6 of 6 may only continue to exist within the terms and conditions of approval of the subject permit Furthermore the amendment maintains existing standards that improve and protect residential neighborhoods Proposals to expand residential lots with additional dwelling units will be required to eliminate and correct existing nonconformities before additional residential units can be added to the property C The proposed amendment is internally consistent with other applicable provisions of the Zoning Code Municipal Code Amendment 1502 proposes delete outdated terms modify existing regulations and introduce regulations applicable to legal nonconforming uses and structures for the purpose of improving clarity The proposed municipal code amendment ensures and maintains internal consistency with all other applicable provisions of the Zoning Code PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS Pursuant to California Government Code Section this public hearing notice has been published in at least one 1 newspaper of general circulation within the local agency as the number of owners of real property within 300 feet of the project site is greater1000 Lastly this notice is also posted in five 5 public locations specifying the availability of the application plus the date time and location of the public hearing LEGAL REVIEW The attached Ordinance No 951 has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney Prepared by Sheri Bermejo City Planner Submitted by dull Michelle Ramirez Community Development Director ATTACHMENTS Attachment A Planning Commission Staff Report dated April Attachment B Planning Commission Staff Report dated May Attachment C Planning Commission Meeting Minutes dated April Attachment D Planning Commission Draft Meeting Minutes dated May Attachment E Planning Commission Resolution 1504 dated May Attachment F Initial Study and Negative Declaration Attachment G Ordinance 951 Attachment H MCA as submitted to Planning Commission on April Attachment I MCA Relating only to Chapter as submitted to Planning Commission on May

7 ROSEMEAD PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TO HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE ROSEMEAD PLANNING COMMISSION FROM PLANNING DIVISION DATE APRIL SUBJECT MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT 1502 AMENDING CHAPTERS AND OF TITLE 17 OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO REGULATIONS FOR NONCONFORMING USES STRUCTURES LOTS AND PARKING FACILITIES Summary Municipal Code Amendment consists of a City initiated amendment to revise Title 17 Zoning of the Rosemead Municipal Code to modify existing regulations for nonconforming uses structures lots and parking facilities The code amendment proposes to establish new development regulations for legal nonconforming uses that were approved by a discretionary entitlement It also requires a Minor Exception application process for the addition of conforming structures on R1 and R2 lots that are developed with legal nonconforming residential structures The purpose of the amendment is to encourage the City s continuing improvement by limiting the extent to which nonconforming structures and uses may continue to be used expanded or replaced while improving the health safety and welfare of all residents without creating an economic hardship for individual property owners or business owners Lastly Municipal Code Amendment 1502 proposes to eliminate the Zoning term and definition of bachelor apartment from Chapter as it is outdated and the definition is no longer accepted by the California Department of Housing and Community Development Environmental Determination An Initial Study of Environmental Impacts was prepared recommending the adoption of a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA guidelines the Initial Study and Negative Declaration are attached to this report as Exhibit A The Initial Study is an environmental analysis of the proposed Municipal Code Amendment to determine if the proposed revisions to the Zoning Code will have potentially significant effects on the environment This study found that there are no potentially significant environmental impacts that could occur with the adoption of the proposed amendments ATTACHMENT A

8 Planning Commission Meeting April Paae 2 of 4 A Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration was distributed for a 20day public review and comment period between March and April If the Commission is inclined to recommend approval of this project the Commission must make findings of adequacy with the environmental assessment and recommend that the City Council approve the Negative Declaration Staff Recommendation It is recommended that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions Return to the Planning Commission at a date certain with a resolution recommending the City Council approve these changes Modify the proposed changes and return to the Planning Commission at a date certain for further discussion and deliberation Continue to work on the proposed changes and return to the Planning Commission at a date uncertain or Such other direction as the Commission finds appropriate Background The legal basis for all land use regulation is the police power of the City to protect the public health safety and welfare of its citizens The Building Code Zoning Code and Subdivision Ordinance are the primary regulatory tools used to accomplish these goals The City takes great care when preparing new ordinances to minimize the creation of nonconformities if possible However as the community s vision for its built environment evolves and changes revision to the City s regulations use requirements setbacks height limitations etc will inevitably result in the creation of nonconforming uses structures and lots To ensure that a community s adopted vision and goals are fully accomplished regulatory provisions are put in place to deal with nonconforming structures uses and lots and to require them to be replaced or made conforming over time A legal nonconforming structure use or lot is caused by a governmental action that changes the Zoning Code the Zoning Map or the Subdivision Ordinance All legal nonconforming structures uses or lots were lawfully established under the codes at the time but due to the adoption of a new ordinance or map revision the property no longer conforms to the standards As a general rule nonconforming regulations presume that a nonconformity is detrimental to the longterm public interest health safety morals or welfare and that the nonconformity needs to be brought into conformance over time The intent and practice of most legal nonconforming ordinances is to allow nonconformities to continue until the end of their economic life when they are voluntarily replaced with a conforming structure use or lot In addition it is typical for nonconforming regulations to limit changes on premises which would give permanency to or expand such nonconformities The Comprehensive Zoning Code Update adopted by City Council on October included revised standards intended to be business friendly and not detrimental to the economic vitality of the community while providing a process to eliminate nonconforming uses especially as they become detrimental to a neighborhood The current code includes provisions to allow beautifying improvements to legal ATTACHMENT A

9 Planning Commission Meeting April Page 3 of 4 nonconforming structures including interior alterations repairs and maintenance and some enlargements subject to the Minor Exception application process However the current code also sets a limitation that as long as a nonconforming use building or structure exists upon any lot no new use building or structure may be established Although this limitation is standard in most cities nonconforming use and structure ordinances it has led a number of Rosemead residents to inquire about requests for Zone Variances to allow them to retain existing nonconformities and expand the property with additional singlefamily residential units on parcels large enough for more than one unit These requests have not been submitted with completed applications as it is nearly impossible to make the required findings since there are no special circumstances to warrant such Zone Variance approval Analysis Municipal Code Amendment 1502 proposes several revisions for the purpose of addressing constraints on current residential property owners that limit the full use of their property It also sets new rules for the extent to which nonconforming structures and uses may continue to be used expanded or replaced to protect the health safety and welfare of all residents and to continue ongoing improvement of the City The following is an outline of the key elements of the proposed Ordinance The redlinestrikeout version of proposed MCA 1502 has been attached as Exhibit B A final edited version is attached as Exhibit C Section Establishment of Nonconforming Status is proposed to reinforce the property owner s responsibility to provide evidence to the City to justify the establishment of nonconforming rights For example this would include completing a Los Angeles County building record search and submitting original permit documents for structures that were built prior to the City s incorporation Existing standards were regrouped into Section Nonconforming uses Section Nonconforming structures Section Residential Exceptions to improve overall organization for ease of finding applicable code regulations Section Residential Exceptions would allow residential R1 Single Family Residential and R2 Light Multiple Residential lots to be expanded with new conforming structures subject to the existing Minor Exception application process Necessary work to eliminate any hazard or safety problem on an existing structure andor improve the aesthetic appearance or architectural viability of any existing nonconforming structures onsite would also be required for project approval Municipal Code Amendment adds text to clarify that any use that was authorized by an approved discretionary permit but is not allowed by the current Zoning Code is nonconforming and may only continue in compliance with the original discretionary permit conditions of approval Section Legal ATTACHMENT A

10 Planning Commission Meeting April Pape 4 of 4 Nonconforming Structures was expanded to allow any building that was approved with a discretionary permit the possibility of expanding subject to the Minor Exception application process Lastly Municipal Code Amendment 1502 also proposes to eliminate the term and definition of bachelor apartment from Chapter as it is outdated and the definition is no longer accepted by the California Department of Housing and Community Development Municipal Cade Requirements Article 6 Chapter of the Rosemead Municipal Code authorizes the Planning Commission to consider and recommend proposed Municipal Code Amendments to the City Council It also sets forth the procedures and requirements for Municipal Code Amendments Section sets forth the following findings that must be met A The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan B The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest health safety convenience or welfare of the City and C The proposed amendment is internally consistent with other applicable provisions of the Zoning Code The Planning Commission should discuss Commission feels they are or are not met during the public hearing each of the findings and the reasons the Staff will be available to assist as necessary PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS Pursuant to California Government Code Section this public hearing notice has been published in at least one 1 newspaper of general circulation within the local agency as the number of owners of real property within 300 feet of the project site is greater 1000 Lastly this notice is also posted in five 5 public locations specifying the availability of the application plus the date time and location of the public hearing Prepared by Submitted by Sheri Bermejo City Planner Michelle Ramirez Community Development Director EXHIBITS A Initial Study and Negative Declaration B UnderlineStrikeout version of proposed MCA C Final Edited version of proposed MCA 1502 ATTACHMENT A

11 ROSEMEAD PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT TO FROM HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE ROSEMEAD PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING DIVISION DATE MAY SUBJECT MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT 1502 AMENDING CHAPTERS AND OF TITLE 17 OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO REGULATIONS FOR NONCONFORMING USES STRUCTURES LOTS AND PARKING FACILITIES Summary Municipal Code Amendment consists of a City initiated amendment to revise Title 17 Zoning of the Rosemead Municipal Code to modify existing regulations for nonconforming uses structures lots and parking facilities The code amendment proposes to establish new development regulations for legal nonconforming uses that were approved by a discretionary entitlement The purpose of the amendment is to encourage the City s continuing improvement by limiting the extent to which nonconforming structures and uses may continue to be used expanded or replaced while improving the health safety and welfare of all residents without creating an economic hardship for individual property owners or business owners Lastly Municipal Code Amendment 1502 proposes to eliminate the Zoning term and definition of bachelor apartment from Chapter as it is outdated and the definition is no longer accepted by the California Department of Housing and Community Development On April the Planning Commission continued this item to the May Commission meeting and asked staff to bring back a resolution supporting the amendment with the omission of proposed standards which would allow the addition of conforming structures on R1 and R2 lots that are developed with legal nonconforming residential structures The revised MCA 1502 has been included in this report as Exhibit A Environmental Determination An Initial Study of Environmental Impacts was prepared recommending the adoption of a Negative Declaration of Environmental Impacts in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA guidelines the Initial Study and Negative Declaration are attached to this report as Exhibit B The Initial Study is an environmental analysis of the proposed Municipal Code Amendment to determine if the ATTACHMENT B

12 Planning Commission Meeting May Page 2 of 4 proposed revisions to the Zoning Code will have potentially significant effects on the environment This study found that there are no potentially significant environmental impacts that could occur with the adoption of the proposed amendments A Notice of Intent to Adopt a Negative Declaration was distributed for a 20day public review and comment period between March and April If the Commission is inclined to recommend approval of this project the Commission must make findings of adequacy with the environmental assessment and recommend that the City Council approve the Negative Declaration Staff Recommendation Based on the analysis and findings contained in this report it is recommended that the Planning Commission ADOPT Resolution No 1504 with findings Exhibit C a resolution recommending that the City Council APPROVE the Negative Declaration and ADOPT Ordinance No 935 Exhibit D amending Title 17 Zoning of the Rosemead Municipal Code Background The Comprehensive Zoning Code Update adopted by City Council on October included revised standards intended to be resident friendly and not detrimental to the economic vitality of the community while providing a process to eliminate nonconformities especially as they become detrimental to a neighborhood The current code includes provisions to allow beautifying improvements to legal nonconforming structures including interior alterations repairs and maintenance and some enlargements subject to the Minor Exception application process On April a City initiated municipal code amendment was proposed to allow exceptions to the nonconforming standards for R1 Single Family Residential and R2 Light Multiple Residential properties Specifically the amendment proposed at the April Planning Commission Meeting included text that would allow the addition of conforming structures on R1 and R2 lots that are developed with legal nonconforming residential structures through the City s existing Minor Exception process During the public hearing the Commission received public comment and discussed the purpose and intent of the City s existing legal nonconforming ordinance The Commission also expressed their concern for ensuring that the community s adopted vision and goals are fully accomplished The Planning Commission unanimously voted to continue this item and asked staff to eliminate proposed text that would allow the addition of conforming structures on R1 and R2 lots that are developed with legal nonconforming residential structures The Planning Commission staff report dated April and meeting minutes are attached as Exhibits E and F respectively Analysis The revised text of Municipal Code Amendment 1502 maintains the new rules for the extent to which nonconforming structures and uses may continue to be used expanded or replaced to protect the health safety and welfare of all residents and to continue ongoing improvement of the City Furthermore in accordance with the Planning Commission direction the draft have been eliminated residentialie that were in included in the April 6 ATTACHMENT T

13 Planning Commission Meeting May Page 3 of 4 The following is an outline of the key elements of the proposed Ordinance The redlinestrikeout version of proposed MCA 1502 has been attached as Exhibit A A final edited version is attached as Exhibit G Section Establishment of Nonconforming Status is proposed to reinforce the property owner s responsibility to provide evidence to the City to justify the establishment of nonconforming rights For example this would include completing a Los Angeles County building record search and submitting original permit documents for structures that were built prior to the City s incorporation Existing standards were regrouped into Section Nonconforming uses Section Nonconforming structures Section Residential Exceptions to improve overall organization for ease of finding applicable code regulations Municipal Code Amendment adds text to clarify that any use that was authorized by an approved discretionary permit but is not allowed by the current Zoning Code is nonconforming and may only continue in compliance with the original discretionary permit conditions of approval Section Legal Nonconforming Structures was expanded to allow any building that was approved with a discretionary permit the possibility of expanding subject to the Minor Exception application process Lastly Municipal Code Amendment 1502 also proposes to eliminate the term and definition of bachelor apartment from Chapter as it is outdated and the definition is no longer accepted by the California Department of Housing and Community Development Municipal Code Requirements Article 6 Chapter of the Rosemead Municipal Code authorizes the Planning Commission to consider and recommend proposed Municipal Code Amendments to the City Council It also sets forth the procedures and requirements for Municipal Code Amendments Section sets forth the following findings that must be met A The proposed amendment is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan Municipal Code Amendment 1502 is consistent with the Rosemead General Plan Land Use Goals and Policies It proposes to amend the Rosemead Municipal Code to delete outdated terms modify existing regulations and introduce regulations applicable to legal nonconforming uses and structures The code amendment establishes limitations on legal nonconforming uses and structures that were previously approved by a discretionary entitlement In conformance with Land Use Goal 1 Maintain stable and attractive single family residential neighborhoods proposals to add additional dwelling units on residentially zoned lots will continue to be required to bring the existing nonconformities into conformance with current Zoning Code standards ATTACHMENT B

14 Planning Commission Meeting May Page 4 of 4 B The proposed amendment will riot be detrimental to the public interest health safety convenience or welfare of the City and The public necessity convenience and general welfare will be served by the adoption of the revised legal nonconforming regulations The revised regulations will continue to encourage the City s ongoing improvement by limiting the extent to which nonconforming structures and uses may continue to be used expanded or replaced while improving the health safety and welfare of all residents Several standards are proposed to ensure that the proposed amendment does not adversely impact the City and its residents Municipal Code Amendment 1502 adds language to clarify that any use that was approved by a discretionary permit and has become legal nonconforming may only continue to exist within the terms and conditions of approval of the subject permit Furthermore the amendment maintains existing standards that improve and protect residential neighborhoods Proposals to expand residential lots with additional dwelling units will be required to eliminate and correct existing nonconformities before additional residential units can be added to the property C The proposed amendment is internally consistent with other applicable provisions of the Zoning Code Municipal Code Amendment 1502 proposes delete outdated terms modify existing regulations and introduce regulations applicable to legal nonconforming uses and structures for the purpose of improving clarity The proposed municipal code amendment ensures and maintains internal consistency with all other applicable provisions of the Zoning Code PUBLIC NOTICE PROCESS Pursuant to California Government Code Section this public hearing notice has been published in at least one 1 newspaper of general circulation within the local agency as the number of owners of real property within 300 feet of the project site is greater 1000 Lastly this notice is also posted in five 5 public locations specifying the availability of the application plus the date time and location of the public hearing Prepared by Submitted by Sheri Bermejo City Planner Michelle Ramirez Community Development Director EXHIBITS A Final UnderlineStrikeout version of proposed MCA 1502 B Initial Study and Negative Declaration C Planning Commission Resolution No D Draft Ordinance 951 E Planning Commission Staff Report dated April F Draft Planning Commission Meeting Minutes dated April G Final Edited version of proposed MCA 1502 ATTACHMENT B

15 Minutes of the PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING April The regular meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order by Chair Eng at700 pm in the Council Chambers 8838 E Valley Boulevard PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Tang INVOCATION ROLL CALL Chair Eng Commissioners Herrera Lopez Tang and Chair Eng ROLL CALL OF OFFICERS PRESENT City Attorney Murphy Community Development Director Ramirez City Planner Bermejo and Commission Secretary Lockwood 1 EXPLANATION OF HEARING PROCEDURES AND APPEAL RIGHTS City Attorney Greg Murphy explained the procedure and appeal rights of the meeting 2 PUBLIC COMMENTS FROM THE AUDIENCE None 3 PUBLIC HEARINGS A MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT AMENDING CHAPTERS AND OF TITLE 17 OF THE CITY OF ROSEMEAD MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO REGULATIONS FOR NONCONFORMING USES STRUCTURES LOTS AND PARKING FACILITIES Municipal Code Amendment consists of a City initiated amendment to revise Title 17 Zoning of the Rosemead Municipal Code to modify existing regulations for nonconforming uses structures lots and parking facilities The code amendment proposes to establish new development regulations for legal nonconforming uses that were approved by a discretionary entitlement It also requires a Minor Exception application process for the addition of conforming structures on R 1 and R2 lots that are developed with legal nonconforming residential structures The purpose of the amendment is to encourage the City s continuing improvement by limiting the extent to which nonconforming structures and uses may continue to be used expanded or replaced while improving the health safety and welfare of all residents without creating an economic hardship for individual property owners or business owners Lastly Municipal Code Amendment proposes to eliminate the Zoning term and definition of bachelor apartment form Chapter as it is outdated and the definition is no longer accepted by the California Department of Housing and Community Development STAFF RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission take one of the following actions Return to the Planning Commission at a date certain with a resolution recommending the City Council approve these changes Modify the proposed changes and return to the Planning Commission at a date certain for further discussion and deliberation Continue to work on the proposed changes and return to the Planning Commission at a date uncertain or Such other direction as the Commission finds appropriate ATTACHMENT C

16 City Planner Bermejo presented staff report and a power point presentation Community Development Director Ramirez explained that this request came about because staff has received a number of requests from applicants whereas the size of their properties would allow two 2 units on the site but because they have one unit that is legal nonconforming they cannot add the second unit She added staff did research with surrounding cities to find out what they are doing and unfortunately there is no norm on how any City is handling this so staff determined what would be best for our City She explained that any addition would have meet today s code Chair Eng asked the Planning Commission if there were any questions or comments for staff Commissioner Lopez asked if a home was built in 1951 and you moved into the City in 1976 where would those records be found to make sure it was built to code Community Development Director Ramirez replied you would go to the Building Division to access those records Commissioner Lopez asked if the City would have records of homes built in 1951 Community Development Director Ramirez replied if not then they would have to go to the County to obtain those records Commissioner Lopez asked if the County does not have any records on the property then what would happen in that scenario Community Development Director Ramirez stated either the City or the County of Los Angeles should have some type of records Commissioner Lopez asked if this will hamper residents that have older homes that have not been rebuilt in the last twentyfive 25 years Community Development Director Ramirez replied no typically they are able to find the records She added they just may not be able to find the records for all the additions because they may have not been done legally Commissioner Herrera asked if this will apply to the setbacks and everything else Community Development Director Ramirez replied yes it applies to the new home Commissioner Lopez asked if the second home will have a size limit Community Development Director Ramirez replied it is based on the FAR of the whole lot Commissioner Tang asked if the Zoning term of bachelor apartment is eliminated will there be a replacement term for it or has it been updated City Planner Bermejo replied no and explained that the term is outdated and the term studio is used now which is what is used in the City s Zoning Code She explained the reason they are eliminating it is because it talks about the relationship of individuals to a unit Commissioner Herrera referred to a covenant in the title and that it be rented to a family member and asked if it would be considered a duplex at this time 11

17 City Planner Bermejo explained for example if you had a lot in the R1 zone the R1 density is that you get a single family home for each6000 square feet of lot area She stated there are some lot areas that are out there that have square feet so they could potentially come in and put in two 2 full fledge dwelling units and put two 2 single family homes on them Community Development Director Ramirez stated they can be rentals Commissioner Tang asked but they cannot be subdivided into a flag lot Community Development Director Ramirez replied that is correct Commissioner Tang asked regardless if it is a flag lot or not Community Development Director Ramirez replied a flag lot would not meet the requirements Chair Eng stated Commissioner Tang s question was if the lot is large enough to be subdivided can they still do it Community Development Director Ramirez replied no this is not a subdivision this is two 2 units on one lot and it would remain that way Chair Eng asked if the number of units permitted on a lot is based on zoning so if it is an R1 it is one unit with a granny unit by statue City Planner Bermejo replied typically that is how most cities regulate zoning R1 but Rosemead allows more than one 1 on an R1 lot and will have to meet the lot area requirement Community Development Director Ramirez stated the granny unit that Chair Eng has referred to is dwelling unit and that is different from what is being discussed this evening the second Chair Eng asked if a property owner would like to build an additional second dwelling on their property it will not be permitted because of the City s existing Zoning Code due to the legal nonconforming situation of the lot City Planner Bermejo replied due to structures on their lot or use Chair Eng stated if the Amendment is approved and this moves forward which will allow the addition for lots that are large enough to accommodate the second unit and the applicant will be able to go through a Minor Exception process to apply for that She asked if that will change because under the General Plan there are a certain number of units per acre City Planner Bermejo explained if there is a lot that is vacant today that is R1 and has square feet you can put two 2 units on it She added what is triggering the Code Amendment is that there is a provision in the Zoning Code that states as long as you have a legal nonconforming building use or structure on a lot you can essentially maintain it you can go through a Minor Exception process to add to those legal nonconforming structures but you cannot put on a new structure even if it is conforming there is that provision that limits it Chair Eng stated so the City is trying to remove that obstacle City Planner Bermejo stated if the Planning Commission desires to remove that obstacle for property owners in the R1 and R2 zones and it is only affecting those two 2 zones planning staff has worked with the legal nonconforming ordinance to adjust it to allow that process She explained the way they did that is to create the Minor ATTACHMENT C

18 Exception application process and tied to that the property owner submits an application they have to verify that they have contacted their neighboring neighbors and there is a list of code requirements to verify add conditions to improve the buildings on site so they are architecturally pleasing and there are standards that are put there to remove any type of hazards Chair Eng asked if the Minor Exception process is at staff level approval City Planner Bermejo replied that the application is noticed to the adjacent property owners and goes to the Community Development Director she has the ability to have it addressed at the Planning Commission level if this happens the Planning Commission may have approve it or have the City Council address it if necessary She added that is the process for all applications notjust the Minor Exception applications Community Development Director Ramirez stated to answer Chair Eng s question it is approved by hear at a level staff Commissioner Tang asked if the condition to improve the existing structure architecturally pleasing is a condition that is required if you build the second unit or is that the discretion of the Community Development Director City Planner Bermejo replied there are a lot of other Zoning Code standards in general in R1 and when you add structures then all the other buildings are addressed Community Development Director Ramirez explained that staff would not make them bring it into conformity if that is Commissioner Tang s question It is still a legal nonconforming structure and it would stay that way Commissioner Tang asked if it is a 1950 s home that is existing on the lot and they want to build a second unit that will look brand new but is not in harmony would the City make them look similar Community Development Director Ramirez replied structurally they would not make them do anything but they could be required to paint andor landscape if it needed City Attorney Murphy stated when the Minor Exception process started it was initially because of side yard setbacks and a few other issues but primarily set backs He stated the way the City Ordinance reads with legal nonconforming structures you could not really upgrade or update a home make it modern add a family room add a second story if the house was into the current setback He continued that some of the current setbacks for some properties are pretty wide and there was also some buildings done under the County where they allowed houses to be very close to lot lines so staff had been bringing a number of items to the Planning Commission for Variances He stated legal got to a point where they had to tell staff they could no longer support Variances because one of the requirements for a Variance is that it is a unique circumstance He stated they found so many circumstances in so many residential properties that they said we can t go to the Planning Commission and say this is unique we have to find a different path He stated staff created the Minor Exception process modeled on things they were able to find in other cities and apply the Minor Exception process to certain building standards and property development standards that the time the ordinance went into effect were the ones that seemed to be more affected by the update of the code He stated side yard set backs singlestory homes of unusual height and setbacks in the back yard where the garages are up against property lines are the reasons and now we are seeing a different type of issue He stated the new issue is where the existing unit is out of conformity and staff has not taken a position one way or another on this He stated when staff brought the original ordinance to the Planning Commission they brought this as a recommendation that this be adopted as part of the major Zoning Code overhaul this is brought to the Planning Commission as a policy decision He explained as a Commission do they want to recommend to the City Council that the Minor Exception process be expanded based on another kind of development constraint or do they not want to make that recommendation He added so do you want to say no you can t add a second unit because it is the policy of the City that we need to start bringing everything into conformity or do you want to say this ATTACHMENT C

Planning Commission Report

Planning Commission Report cjly City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (370) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: April 28, 2016 Subject: Project

More information

CITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

CITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT DATE: March 22, 2016 CITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: HONORABLE CHAIR AND MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Jan Di Leo, Planner (805) 773-7088 jdileo@pismobeach.org THROUGH:

More information

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 3, 2018 Subject: Prepared by: Initiated by: 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance Jon Biggs, Community Development Director City Council Attachments:

More information

BEVERLY HILLS AGENDA REPORT

BEVERLY HILLS AGENDA REPORT BEVERLY HILLS Meeting Date: June 8, 2015 Item Number: i To: From: Subject: AGENDA REPORT Honorable Mayor & City Council Susan Healy Keene, AICP, Director of Community Development Ryan Gohlich, Assistant

More information

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report TO: Zoning Administrator FROM: Reviewed by: Sergio Klotz, AICP, Assistant Development Services DirctJ. o ~ Prepared by: Laura Stokes, Housing Coordinator I Assistant

More information

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Joel Rojas, Development Services Director ~ )P

City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Joel Rojas, Development Services Director ~ )P 10/17/2017 F1b TO: FROM: SUBMITTED BY: City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ~n Siegel, City Manager Joel Rojas, Development Services Director ~ )P PREPARED

More information

Planning Commission Report

Planning Commission Report ~BER~9 Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 458-1140 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: April 10, 2014 Subject: 1801 Angelo

More information

MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY OF HAYDEN, KOOTENAI COUNTY, IDAHO. September 17, 2018

MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY OF HAYDEN, KOOTENAI COUNTY, IDAHO. September 17, 2018 MINUTES OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CITY OF HAYDEN, KOOTENAI COUNTY, IDAHO September 17, 2018 Regular Meeting: 5:00 PM Council Chambers Hayden City Hall, 8930 N. Government Way, Hayden, ID 83835

More information

Planning Commission Report

Planning Commission Report Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: August 12, 2013 Subject: 1184 Loma Linda Drive

More information

DRAFT PARK COUNTY US HIGHWAY 89 SOUTH EAST RIVER ROAD OLD YELLOWSTONE TRAIL ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS

DRAFT PARK COUNTY US HIGHWAY 89 SOUTH EAST RIVER ROAD OLD YELLOWSTONE TRAIL ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS Formatting: Changes recommended by the Board and accepted by the County Commission are formatted in RED: Changes made by the Park County Commission are formatted in YELLOW highlight: and changes made by

More information

STAFF REPORT. Meeting Date: April 25, 2017

STAFF REPORT. Meeting Date: April 25, 2017 Meeting Date: April 25, 2017 Agency: City of Belmont Staff Contact: Damon DiDonato, Community Development Department, (650) 637-2908; ddidonato@belmont.gov Agenda Title: Amendments to Sections 24 (Secondary

More information

The provisions herein are designed to accomplish this intent in a way that:

The provisions herein are designed to accomplish this intent in a way that: 6. A. PURPOSE The intent of this chapter is to provide for the continuation and, under appropriate circumstances, elimination of existing uses of property that do not conform to the requirements of this

More information

Planning Commission Report

Planning Commission Report Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 458-1140 FAX. (310) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: September 27, 2012 Subject: 366 North Rodeo

More information

City of Brisbane Agenda Report

City of Brisbane Agenda Report City of Brisbane Agenda Report TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and City Council Community Development Director via City Manager Proposed Ordinance No. 626 (Zoning Text Amendment RZ-2-18) - Zoning Text

More information

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Approved by City Manager: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: OCOTBER 14, 2013 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS ISIDRO FIGUEROA, PLANNER CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2013-1385 AND

More information

TOWNSHIP OF SADDLE BROOK PLANNING BOARD

TOWNSHIP OF SADDLE BROOK PLANNING BOARD TOWNSHIP OF SADDLE BROOK PLANNING BOARD Following are the minutes of the Saddle Brook 's regular meeting, held on Tuesday, July 21, 2015. 1. FLAG SALUTE 2. ROLL CALL: Councilman Camilleri, Mr. Compitello,

More information

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707) Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA 94559-0660 (707) 257-9530 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT July 7, 2016 AGENDA ITEM #6.C. PL16-0038 HEXA PERSONAL

More information

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Quality Services for a Quality Community

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Quality Services for a Quality Community ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Quality Services for a Quality Community MEMBERS Brian Laxton Chair Caroline Ruddell Vice Chair Konrad Hittner Patrick Marchman Eric Muska John Robison Travis Stoliker Alternate

More information

TOWN OF DUCK PLANNING BOARD REGULAR MEETING. October 9, The Planning Board for the Town of Duck convened at the Duck Meeting Hall on Wednesday,

TOWN OF DUCK PLANNING BOARD REGULAR MEETING. October 9, The Planning Board for the Town of Duck convened at the Duck Meeting Hall on Wednesday, TOWN OF DUCK PLANNING BOARD REGULAR MEETING October 9, 2013 The Planning Board for the Town of Duck convened at the Duck Meeting Hall on Wednesday, October 9, 2013. Present were: Chair Joe Blakaitis, Vice

More information

AGENDA CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE TUESDAY OCTOBER 23, :00 P.M. CITY HALL WEST CONFERENCE ROOM A VALLEY BOULEVARD

AGENDA CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE TUESDAY OCTOBER 23, :00 P.M. CITY HALL WEST CONFERENCE ROOM A VALLEY BOULEVARD AGENDA CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE TUESDAY OCTOBER 23, 2018 CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON AMY WONG CITY PLANNER JASON C. MIKAELIAN CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL TODD MORRIS

More information

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707) Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA 94559-0660 (707) 257-9530 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT May 7, 2015 AGENDA ITEM# 6.A. PL15-0041 UNIVERSAL

More information

John Hutchinson, Michelle Casserly, Mark Fitzgerald, John Lisko, Chuck Ross, Robert Cupoli, and Manny Fowler

John Hutchinson, Michelle Casserly, Mark Fitzgerald, John Lisko, Chuck Ross, Robert Cupoli, and Manny Fowler PRESENT: ABSENT: John Hutchinson, Michelle Casserly, Mark Fitzgerald, John Lisko, Chuck Ross, Robert Cupoli, and Manny Fowler Phil Greig & Judy Young ALSO PRESENT: Board Attorney Kevin Kennedy and Board

More information

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CHINO HILLS FEBRUARY 5, 2008 REGULAR MEETING

MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CHINO HILLS FEBRUARY 5, 2008 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF CHINO HILLS FEBRUARY 5, 2008 REGULAR MEETING Chairman Braun called the Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Chino Hills to order at 7:00 p.m. ROLL

More information

CITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT

CITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT CITY OF PISMO BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT October 9, 2018 Honorable Chair and Planning Commission City of Pismo Beach California RECOMMENDATION: 1) Approve the revocation of Coastal Development

More information

Present Harmoning Oleson Naaktgeboren: T

Present Harmoning Oleson Naaktgeboren: T CORINNA TOWNSHIP MINUTES BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT / PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION January 13, 2015 7:00 PM Charlotte Quiggle called meeting to order at 7:00 PM on January 13, 2015. Roll Call: Board of Adjustment/Planning

More information

SUBJECT Changes to Accessory Dwelling Unit, Parking, Accessory Structure and Nonconforming Parking Regulations in the Zoning Ordinance

SUBJECT Changes to Accessory Dwelling Unit, Parking, Accessory Structure and Nonconforming Parking Regulations in the Zoning Ordinance REPORT To the Redwood City Planning Commission From Planning Staff February 21, 2017 SUBJECT Changes to Accessory Dwelling Unit, Parking, Accessory Structure and Nonconforming Parking Regulations in the

More information

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Inter-Departmental Correspondence Planning and Building. Steve Monowitz, Community Development Director

COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Inter-Departmental Correspondence Planning and Building. Steve Monowitz, Community Development Director COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Inter-Departmental Correspondence Planning and Building Date: December 2, 2016 Board Meeting Date: January 10, 2017 Special Notice / Hearing: Newspaper Notice Vote Required: Majority

More information

RESOLUTION NO. PC 18-14

RESOLUTION NO. PC 18-14 RESOLUTION NO. PC 18-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUARTE APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 18-02, FOR THE USE AND OPERATION OF AN INDOOR PLAY SPACE, LOCATED AT 1040 HUNTINGTON

More information

CITY OF DERBY MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS REGULAR MEETING January 14, :30 PM MEETING MINUTES

CITY OF DERBY MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS REGULAR MEETING January 14, :30 PM MEETING MINUTES CITY OF DERBY MEETING OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS REGULAR MEETING January 14, 2016 6:30 PM MEETING MINUTES 1. CALL MEETING TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL Pat Baer Jessica Rhein Justin Smith Joe Waugh Van Willis

More information

City of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

City of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT City of Piedmont COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: May 15, 2017 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor and Council Paul Benoit, City Administrator Consideration of the 2 nd Reading of Ordinance 731 N.S. - Amending Division

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 12, 2005 DATE: February 8, 2005 SUBJECT: Request to Advertise public hearings on the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendment to Section

More information

REGULAR MEETING OF LURAY PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 13, 2016

REGULAR MEETING OF LURAY PLANNING COMMISSION APRIL 13, 2016 REGULAR MEETING OF LURAY PLANNING COMMISSION The Luray Planning Commission met on Wednesday, April 13, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. in regular session. The meeting was held in the Luray Town Council Chambers at 45

More information

Staff findings of consistency with the Land Development Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan follow: Request One

Staff findings of consistency with the Land Development Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan follow: Request One City of Panama City Board of Adjustment January 22, 2018 Staff findings of consistency with the Land Development Regulations and the Comprehensive Plan follow: Request One Owner/ Applicant: Michael & Sharon

More information

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 18, 2015

PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 18, 2015 Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA 94559-0660 (707) 257-9530 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT June 18, 2015 AGENDA ITEM 7.B. PL15-0052 PM, GASSER

More information

COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA (707) FAX (707)

COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA (707) FAX (707) COUNTY OF SONOMA PERMIT AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA 95403 (707) 565-1900 FAX (707) 565-1103 MEMO Date:, 1:05 p.m. To: Sonoma County Planning Commission From:

More information

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH [DRAFT] PLANNING COMMISION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 28, 2015

CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH [DRAFT] PLANNING COMMISION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 28, 2015 CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH [DRAFT] PLANNING COMMISION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 28, 2015 A Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Manhattan Beach, California, was held on the 28

More information

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT

CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT Approved by City Manager: CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT DATE: JANUARY 24, 2017 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: HONORABLE MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS TALYN MIRZAKHANIAN, SENIOR PLANNER KRYSTIN RICE, ASSOCIATE PLANNER INTRODUCTION

More information

The Rootstown Township Zoning Commission met in regular session on Tuesday, February 7, 2017, at 7:00 p.m. at Rootstown Town Hall.

The Rootstown Township Zoning Commission met in regular session on Tuesday, February 7, 2017, at 7:00 p.m. at Rootstown Town Hall. The Rootstown Township Zoning Commission met in regular session on Tuesday, February 7, 2017, at 7:00 p.m. at Rootstown Town Hall. Present: Rob Swauger, Chair Absent: Stan Dannemiller Theresa Summers,

More information

VILLAGE OF HINSDALE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES OF THE MEETING October 15, 2014

VILLAGE OF HINSDALE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES OF THE MEETING October 15, 2014 0 0 0 0 VILLAGE OF HINSDALE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MINUTES OF THE MEETING October, 0. CALL TO ORDER Chairman Bob called the regularly scheduled meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals to order on Wednesday,

More information

Planning Commission Application Summary

Planning Commission Application Summary Planning Commission Application Summary Project Name: Ballard Property Rezone Address: 12773 & 12775 South 300 East, 415 East Pheasant View Dr. Current Zoning: RA1 (Residential 40,000 sq. ft. minimum)

More information

DATE: September 18, 2014 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Douglas Spondello, Associate Planner

DATE: September 18, 2014 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Douglas Spondello, Associate Planner DATE: September 18, 2014 TO: FROM: Planning Commission Douglas Spondello, Associate Planner Thank you for the feedback provided at the June 19, 2014 Planning Commission meeting. Staff has revised the proposed

More information

Stenberg Annexation Legal Diagram Exhibit "B" W Subject Property Annexed to the City of Red Bluff VICINITY MAP "1:3:

Stenberg Annexation Legal Diagram Exhibit B W Subject Property Annexed to the City of Red Bluff VICINITY MAP 1:3: Stenberg Annexation Legal Diagram Exhibit "B" W Subject Property Annexed to the City of Red Bluff VICINITY MAP "1:3: ORDINANCE NO. 991 REZONE NO. 210 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 25.13 OF THE RED BLUFF

More information

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento

REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento REPORT TO PLANNING AND DESIGN COMMISSION City of Sacramento 915 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814-2671 www.cityofsacramento.org 9 PUBLIC HEARING December 10, 2015 To: Members of the Planning and Design Commission

More information

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Report / DATE: FEBRUARY 1,2010 TO: FROM: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (CALTECH) ZONE CHANGE FOR THE PARCEL LOCATED AT

More information

All items include discussion and possible action to approve, modify, deny, or continue unless marked otherwise.

All items include discussion and possible action to approve, modify, deny, or continue unless marked otherwise. Storey County Planning Commission Meeting and Public Workshop Agenda Thursday April 18, 2019 6:00 p.m. Lockwood Senior/Community Center 800 Peri Ranch Road, Lockwood, NV Jim Hindle Chairman Jim Collins

More information

LEMOORE PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting AGENDA Lemoore Council Chamber 429 C Street. May 14, :00 p.m.

LEMOORE PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting AGENDA Lemoore Council Chamber 429 C Street. May 14, :00 p.m. LEMOORE PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Meeting AGENDA Lemoore Council Chamber 429 C Street May 14, 2018 7:00 p.m. 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Call to Order and Roll Call 3. Public Comment This time is reserved

More information

CITY AND BOROUGH OF SITKA Planning Commission Minutes of Meeting

CITY AND BOROUGH OF SITKA Planning Commission Minutes of Meeting CITY AND BOROUGH OF SITKA Planning Commission Minutes of Meeting Present: Jeremy Twaddle (Chair), Darrell Windsor (Member), Cheryl Westover (Member), Chris Spivey (Member), Melissa Henshaw (Planner I)

More information

AGENDA COMMITTEE OPENING OF. use. given the. by staff. CHAIRPERSON DALLAS BAKER CITY PLANNER OFFICIAL TODD MORRIS CHIEF BUILDING

AGENDA COMMITTEE OPENING OF. use. given the. by staff. CHAIRPERSON DALLAS BAKER CITY PLANNER OFFICIAL TODD MORRIS CHIEF BUILDING AGENDA CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE CITY OF EL MONTE MODIFICATION COMMITTEE CHAIRPERSON DALLAS BAKER PLANNING COMMISSION CITY PLANNER JASON C. MIKAELIAN CHIEF BUILDING OFFICIAL TODD MORRIS TUESDAY,

More information

ATTACHMENT 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

ATTACHMENT 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ATTACHMENT 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT ~BEVERLY~RLY Planning C Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (010) 285-1141 FA)(. (310) 858-5966 mmission Report

More information

AGENDA FOR THE HEARING EXAMINER

AGENDA FOR THE HEARING EXAMINER AGENDA FOR THE HEARING EXAMINER Tuesday, September 4, 2018 9:00 AM Council Chambers 1. HEARINGS CALLED TO ORDER 2. HEARINGS A. Case # VA18-0016; Address: 5205 Sea Gull Court; Applicant: Robert W Schmid

More information

Butte County Board of Supervisors

Butte County Board of Supervisors Butte County Board of Supervisors PUBLIC HEARING January 12, 2016 Amendments to the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance AG-P5.3 (Agricultural Buffer) and Interim Agricultural Uses Butte County Department

More information

1069 regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) were signed into law; and

1069 regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) were signed into law; and AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AMENDING TITLE 16 OF THE ARROYO GRANDE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW AND ADDITIONALLY ROOFTOP

More information

Chair Brittingham, Vice-Chair Barron, Commissioner Hurt, Commissioner Keith, Commissioner LaRock

Chair Brittingham, Vice-Chair Barron, Commissioner Hurt, Commissioner Keith, Commissioner LaRock City of Calimesa REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Monday, February 12, 2018 6:00 P.M. Norton Younglove Multi-Purpose Senior Center 908 Park Avenue, Calimesa, CA 92320 In compliance with

More information

PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT KELVIN PARKER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER/ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT KELVIN PARKER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER/ZONING ADMINISTRATOR DATE: JUNE 21, 2017 PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS KELVIN PARKER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER/ZONING ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: APPEAL OF HEARING OFFICER S

More information

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter

Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter Agenda Date: 7/5/2017 Agenda Placement: 8A Napa County Planning Commission Board Agenda Letter TO: FROM: Napa County Planning Commission Charlene Gallina for David Morrison - Director Planning, Building

More information

DRAFT PARK COUNTY US HIGHWAY 89 SOUTH EAST RIVER ROAD OLD YELLOWSTONE TRAIL ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS

DRAFT PARK COUNTY US HIGHWAY 89 SOUTH EAST RIVER ROAD OLD YELLOWSTONE TRAIL ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS DRAFT PARK COUNTY US HIGHWAY 89 SOUTH EAST RIVER ROAD OLD YELLOWSTONE TRAIL ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS I. TITLE These regulations and the accompanying map(s) shall be known as, and shall be cited and

More information

City of Newburyport Zoning Board of Appeals October 8, 2013 Council Chambers

City of Newburyport Zoning Board of Appeals October 8, 2013 Council Chambers The meeting was called to order at 7:12 P.M. A quorum was present. 1. Roll Call City of Newburyport Zoning Board of Appeals October 8, 2013 Council Chambers In Attendance: Ed Ramsdell (Chair) Duncan LaBay

More information

AGENDA Wytheville Planning Commission Thursday, January 10, :00 p.m. Council Chambers 150 East Monroe Street Wytheville, Virginia 24382

AGENDA Wytheville Planning Commission Thursday, January 10, :00 p.m. Council Chambers 150 East Monroe Street Wytheville, Virginia 24382 AGENDA Wytheville Planning Commission Thursday, January 10, 2019 6:00 p.m. Council Chambers 150 East Monroe Street Wytheville, Virginia 24382 A. CALL TO ORDER Chairman M. Bradley Tate B. ESTABLISHMENT

More information

Board of Adjustment File No.: VAR February 24, 2014 Page 2 of 7 VICINITY MAP ATTACHMENTS

Board of Adjustment File No.: VAR February 24, 2014 Page 2 of 7 VICINITY MAP ATTACHMENTS Board of Adjustment File No.: VAR2014 0004 February 24, 2014 Page 2 of 7 VICINITY MAP ATTACHMENTS Attachment A: Variance application Attachment B: As-built Attachment C: 1999 Plat Attachment D: Front of

More information

BLUE ASH CITY COUNCIL. October 27, 2016

BLUE ASH CITY COUNCIL. October 27, 2016 Page 1 1. MEETING CALLED TO ORDER A special meeting of the Council of the City of Blue Ash, Ohio, was held on October 27, 2016. Mayor Lee Czerwonka called the meeting to order in the Blue Ash Conference

More information

- CITY OF CLOVIS - REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION

- CITY OF CLOVIS - REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM NO: X-A - CITY OF CLOVIS - REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO: FROM: Clovis Planning Commission Planning and Development Services DATE: March 22, 2018 SUBJECT: Consider Approval Res. 18-,

More information

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AGENDA

ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AGENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PLANNING SERVICES ZONING ADMINISTRATOR AGENDA July 8, 2015 CITY HALL, COUNCIL CHAMBERS 3:00 PM 1. 1455 Veterans Boulevard (Redwood Trading Post) Use Permit application (UP2015-08)

More information

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT

CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM NO. 9.2 CITY OF ELK GROVE CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: A public hearing to consider a Specific Plan Amendment to the Laguna Ridge Specific Plan and a Rezone of approximately 4.14

More information

ARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose.

ARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose. ARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to regulate and limit the development and continued existence of legal uses, structures, lots, and signs established either

More information

Staff recommends the City Council hold a public hearing, listen to all pertinent testimony, and introduce on first reading:

Staff recommends the City Council hold a public hearing, listen to all pertinent testimony, and introduce on first reading: CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING JANUARY 16, 2018 SUBJECT: INITIATED BY: MULTI-FAMILY NEIGHBORHOODS ZONE TEXT AMENDMENTS: AMEND MINIMUM DENSITY REQUIREMENTS FOR R3 AND R4 DISTRICTS; AMEND THE DENSITY BONUS

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Board of Zoning Appeals Agenda Item V-11250-17-UP-2: Meeting of April 19, 2017 DATE: April 14, 2017 APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: LOT AREA: GLUP DESIGNATION: Robert and Tania

More information

ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT

ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT ZONING VARIANCE APPLICATION BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT Project Information Owner/Applicant Information Project Name Name of Owner Street Address Project Address Name of Applicant (if different) Street

More information

PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - CITY OF INVER GROVE HEIGHTS. Tuesday, May 20, :00 p.m. City Hall Chambers Barbara Avenue

PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - CITY OF INVER GROVE HEIGHTS. Tuesday, May 20, :00 p.m. City Hall Chambers Barbara Avenue PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - CITY OF INVER GROVE HEIGHTS Tuesday, 7:00 p.m. City Hall Chambers - 8150 Barbara Avenue Chair Hark called the Planning Commission meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Commissioners

More information

January 22, Contact Chance Sparks, AICP, CNUa, Director of Planning

January 22, Contact Chance Sparks, AICP, CNUa, Director of Planning Zoning Board of Adjustments Agenda Item Report January 22, 2015 Agenda Item F1 Contact Chance Sparks, AICP, CNUa, Director of Planning 512-312-0084 csparks@ci.buda.tx.us SUBJECT: HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING

More information

BRUCE BUCKINGHAM, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR JANET REESE, PLANNER II

BRUCE BUCKINGHAM, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR JANET REESE, PLANNER II CITY OF GROVER BEACH PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: February 15, 2011 ITEM #:-,,3,--_ FROM: BRUCE BUCKINGHAM, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR JANET REESE, PLANNER II SUBJECT: Consideration of an

More information

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Meeting Date: November 2, 2017 Zoning Board of Appeals Case No. 3356 Dr. Alice Moore Apartments Variances Location Aerial I. REQUEST Site is outlined in

More information

MEETING MINUTES January 26, 2015

MEETING MINUTES January 26, 2015 PANAMA CITY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT CITY HALL PANAMA CITY, FLORIDA MEETING MINUTES January 26, 2015 The City of Panama City Appeals Board met in regular session on the above date with the following members

More information

Planning Division Department of Community & Economic Development. Applicant: Volunteers of America: Kathy Bray

Planning Division Department of Community & Economic Development. Applicant: Volunteers of America: Kathy Bray Planning Commission Staff Report Volunteers of America Large Group Home Supportive Housing for Young Men Conditional Use PLNPCM2011-00485 556 South 500 East Hearing date: October 26, 2011 Planning Division

More information

TOWN OF NEW LONDON, NEW HAMPSHIRE

TOWN OF NEW LONDON, NEW HAMPSHIRE TOWN OF NEW LONDON, NEW HAMPSHIRE 375 MAIN STREET NEW LONDON, NH 03257 WWW.NL-NH.COM ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING MINUTES Thursday, July 20, 2017 Town Office Sydney Crook Conference Room 375 Main

More information

Zoning Variation Request Packet

Zoning Variation Request Packet VILLAGE OF GLEN ELLYN Zoning Variation Request Packet Planning & Development Department 535 Duane Street Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 Telephone 630.547.5250 Fax 630.547.5370 X:\Plandev\PLANNING\FORMS\Zoning Variation

More information

RESIDENTIAL VACATION RENTALS

RESIDENTIAL VACATION RENTALS RESIDENTIAL VACATION RENTALS WHAT IS A RESIDENTIAL VACATION RENTAL? A residential vacation rental is the renting of a house, apartment, or room for a period of less than thirty days to a person or group

More information

ARTICLE 2: General Provisions

ARTICLE 2: General Provisions ARTICLE 2: General Provisions 2-10 Intent The basic intent of the Town of Orange s Zoning Ordinance is to implement the goals and objectives of the adopted Town of Orange Comprehensive Plan, hereafter

More information

CPC CA 3 SUMMARY

CPC CA 3 SUMMARY CPC-2009-3955-CA 2 CONTENTS Summary Staff Report Conclusion 3 4 7 Appendix A: Draft Ordinance A-1 Attachments: 1. Land Use Findings 2. Environmental Clearance 1-1 2-1 CPC-2009-3955-CA 3 SUMMARY Since its

More information

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes

Planning Commission Meeting Minutes Okanogan County OFFICE OF PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT 123-5 th Ave. N. Suite 130 - Okanogan, WA 98840 (509) 422-7160 FAX: (509) 422-7349 TTY/Voice Use 800-833-6388 email: planning@co.okanogan.wa.us Planning

More information

Land Use Code Streamlining 2012

Land Use Code Streamlining 2012 City of Tacoma Planning Commission Land Use Code Streamlining 2012 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION August 1, 2012 A. SUBJECT: Streamlining the Land Use Regulatory Code to reduce

More information

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING CITY OF ST. PETE BEACH

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING CITY OF ST. PETE BEACH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING CITY OF ST. PETE BEACH 155 Corey Avenue St. Pete Beach, Florida Wednesday, 11/15/2017 2:00 p.m. Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call 1. Changes to the Agenda Agenda

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of October 20, 2018

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of October 20, 2018 ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item of October 20, 2018 DATE: October 12, 2018 SUBJECT: ZOA-2018-01 Amendments to the Arlington County Zoning Ordinance (ACZO) 16, Nonconformities, specifically

More information

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING MINUTES April 8, 2013

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING MINUTES April 8, 2013 1562 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING MINUTES April 8, 2013 A Regular Meeting of the New Britain Township Board of Supervisors was held on April 8, 2013 at the Township Administration Building, 207 Park Avenue,

More information

TOWN OF WARWICK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FEBRUARY 22, 2010

TOWN OF WARWICK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FEBRUARY 22, 2010 TOWN OF WARWICK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FEBRUARY 22, 2010 Members Present: Mr. Jan Jansen, Chairman Mr. Mark Malocsay, Co-Chairman Mr. Norm Paulsen Attorney Robert Fink Members Absent: Diane Bramich Chairman

More information

MUNICIPALITY OF MONROEVILLE ZONING HEARING BOARD APRIL 5, 2017 MINUTES. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Bob Stevenson.

MUNICIPALITY OF MONROEVILLE ZONING HEARING BOARD APRIL 5, 2017 MINUTES. The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Bob Stevenson. MUNICIPALITY OF MONROEVILLE ZONING HEARING BOARD APRIL 5, 2017 MINUTES The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Bob Stevenson. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND MOMENT OF SILENCE The Pledge of Allegiance

More information

RESOLUTION NO. P15-07

RESOLUTION NO. P15-07 RESOLUTION NO. P15-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SANTA CLARITA APPROVING MASTER CASE 15-035, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 15-002, TO ALLOW FOR THE SALES OF LIQUOR AND SPIRITS WITHIN

More information

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Meeting Date: January 10, 2019 Item #: PZ2019-393 Project Name: Applicant and Owner: Proposed Development: Requests: STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI Dresden Heights Phase

More information

Real Estate Principles Chapter 6 Quiz

Real Estate Principles Chapter 6 Quiz Real Estate Principles Chapter 6 Quiz 1. Which of the following is the general purpose of local building codes? A. Assuring the use of skilled labor in building construction and renovation B. Guaranteeing

More information

LAND USE AND ZONING OVERVIEW

LAND USE AND ZONING OVERVIEW OVERVIEW OF PLANNING POLICIES LAND USE AND ZONING OVERVIEW The Minneapolis Plan for Sustainable Growth and Other Adopted Plans Community Planning and Economic Development Development Services Division

More information

7.20 Article 7.20 Nonconformities

7.20 Article 7.20 Nonconformities Article Nonconformities.01 Intent It is the intent of this ordinance to permit legal nonconforming lots, structures, or uses to continue until they are removed but not to encourage their survival. For

More information

CITY OF MERCED Planning Commission MINUTES

CITY OF MERCED Planning Commission MINUTES CITY OF MERCED Planning Commission MINUTES Merced City Council Chambers Wednesday, December 4, 2013 Vice-Chairperson MACKIN called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m., followed by a moment of silence and

More information

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY Meeting Date: February 1, 2018 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY Subject: Prepared by: 400 Main Street, Proposed Real Estate Office Jon Biggs, Community Development Director Attachment(s): A. Revised

More information

KINGWOOD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. MINUTES May 11, :30 PM

KINGWOOD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT. MINUTES May 11, :30 PM KINGWOOD TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES May 11, 2016 7:30 PM CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by M.L. Haring at 7:31 PM. PRESENT: T. Ciacciarelli ABSENT: L. Frank M.L. Haring J. Laudenbach

More information

MESA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION December 10, 2009 PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES

MESA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION December 10, 2009 PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES MESA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION December 10, 2009 PUBLIC HEARING MINUTES Chairman Justman called to order a scheduled hearing of the Mesa County Planning Commission at 6:03p.m. Secretary Flynn led the

More information

CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 20, 2017 SUBJECT:

CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 20, 2017 SUBJECT: CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING MARCH 20, 2017 SUBJECT: INITIATED BY: APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A REQUEST TO EXPAND AN EXISTING RESTAURANT WITHIN THE EXISTING LOBBY AND ROOFTOP AREA WITH

More information

TOWN OF MOUNT PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS FEBRUARY 22, 2010 MINUTES

TOWN OF MOUNT PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS FEBRUARY 22, 2010 MINUTES TOWN OF MOUNT PLEASANT, SOUTH CAROLINA BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS FEBRUARY 22, 2010 MINUTES Present: Absent: Staff: Charles Moore, chair, Don Gwinnup, Robert Hollings, Saila Smyly, Mason Smith Ann Dovre-Coker

More information

RESOLUTION OF THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY THE TOWN OF FORT MYERS BEACH, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NUMBER VAR Gulf Beach Road pool

RESOLUTION OF THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY THE TOWN OF FORT MYERS BEACH, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NUMBER VAR Gulf Beach Road pool RESOLUTION OF THE LOCAL PLANNING AGENCY THE TOWN OF FORT MYERS BEACH, FLORIDA RESOLUTION NUMBER 2014-002 VAR2013-0005 30 Gulf Beach Road pool WHEREAS, William E. Whitley, authorized agent for Nancie Lumpkins,

More information

Staff presented two options for the Commission to consider recommending to Town Council:

Staff presented two options for the Commission to consider recommending to Town Council: Attendance: Chair Darrell Page; Commissioners: Ann Holland, Scott Burroughs, Steve Clark, Pam Barger, Pam Carter, Michael Aldridge (arrived at 7:39); Hilda Keeney, Planning and Zoning Clerk; Kassie Watts,

More information

ORDINANCE NO. _ _

ORDINANCE NO. _ _ ORDINANCE NO. _2008-08-1385_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIGNAL HILL, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 08-07, A REQUEST TO AMEND CHAPTER 20.41, SP-7, SPECIAL PURPOSE

More information

CITY OF APALACHICOLA ORDINANCE

CITY OF APALACHICOLA ORDINANCE CITY OF APALACHICOLA ORDINANCE 2017-05 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 91-7 WHICH ADOPTS THE CITY OF APALACHICOLA LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE REVISING SECTION II (DEFINITIONS) RELATING TO HISTORIC STRUCTURES,

More information