E D U CATION V I LLAGE PD A M ENDMENT

Transcription

1 NARCOOSSEE RD Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board June 17,2014 Z O N I TEM #7 A D D E N D U M E D U CATION V I LLAGE PD A M ENDMENT Location Map S U M M A RY Owner James L. Zboril Narcoossee Land Holding Two, LLC Applicant Heather Isaacs Tavistock Development Co. Project Planner Colandra Jones Updated: June 16, 2014 Property Location: The subject property is located at west of Narcoossee Road, south of Central Florida Greeneway (SR 417), north of Tyson Road (±220.2 acres, District 1). Applicant s Request: Planned Development (PD) amendment to combine the Education Village PD and Education Commerce Center PD into one PD, and to amend the overall boundary of the consolidated PD to eliminate the Primary Conservation Network (PCN) to west of the subject property. Staff s Recommendation: Approval of the request, subject to the conditions in this report. Subject Site Addendum: This addendum is to amend language for City Planning Condition #9, and Transportation Planning Conditions #1, #7, and #14.

2 Page 2 ZON Education Village PD PD Amendment C O N D ITIONS OF A PPROVAL City Planning 9. PERSONAL STORAGE FACILITIES Personal Storage Facilities shall be allowed within this PD. It will have to meet a minimum 500 foot setback from Narcoossee Road and would not allow for any outdoor storage. A reduced setback of 250 feet from Narcoossee Road may be allowed if LDC Chapter 68 Traditional Design standards are met. Transportation Planning 1. SIGNALIZATION AGREEMENT The party or parties responsible for development on the properties east and west of Narcoossee Road must enter into a signalization agreement with the City for the purpose of establishing proportionate fair share payments for warranted full access traffic signalization, associated with traffic generation attributed to the properties development. 7. WELLER BOULEVARD EXTENSION SEGMENTS 2, 3, & 4 DEDICATION Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy on adjacent properties, the owner/developer shall dedicate the right-of-way for the Weller Boulevard extension (Segments 2, 3, and 4) from its current terminus to the southwest PD boundary line where it is proposed to connect to the Nemours Parkway extension. 14. MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT Prior to, or concurrent with, the recording of the first plat that is adjacent to the 25 ft. upland buffer area along the western boundary of the subject property, the owner/applicant will dedicate a 12 ft. wide multi-use trail easement to the City. The easement may be located within the 25 ft. upland buffer area or such other location within the Planned Development (PD), such that there is a continuous north-south trail corridor through the PD connecting existing or planned trail segments that are part of the City's adopted trail system. The owner/applicant shall provide the City or its designee appropriate temporary construction easements, when and if necessary.

3 Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board June 17,2014 Z O N I TEM #7 E DUCAT I ON V I LLAGE PD A MENDMENT NARCOOSSEE RD Location Map Subject Site S U M M A RY Owner James L. Zboril, Narcoossee Land Holding Two, LLC Applicant Heather Isaacs, Tavistock Development Co. Project Planner Colandra Jones Updated: June 10, 2014 Property Location: The subject property is located at west of Narcoossee Road, south of Central Florida Greeneway (SR 417), north of Tyson Road (±220.2 acres, District 1). Applicant s Request: Planned Development (PD) amendment to combine the Education Village PD and Education Commerce Center PD into one PD, and to amend the overall boundary of the consolidated PD to eliminate the Primary Conservation Network (PCN) to west of the subject property. Staff s Recommendation: Approval of the request, subject to the conditions in this report. Public Comment Courtesy notices were mailed to property owners within 400 ft. of the subject property on June 6, As of the published date of this report, staff has not received any comments from the public concerning this request.

4 Page 2 Z O N ING MAP

5 Page 3 P R O JECT ANALYSIS Project Description The subject site is generally located west of Narcoossee Road, south of Central Florida Greeneway (SR 417), north of Tyson Road and is approximately 220 acres. The site is currently designated Urban Village on the Official Future Land Use Map and is zoned PD. This property is also within the Southeast Orlando Sector Plan. This proposed PD amendment will combine the development programs from the Education Village PD and the Education Commerce Center PD to create the new Education Village PD with an updated and unified development plan for the entire property. This amendment also will amend the boundary of the PD to eliminate the Primary Conservation Network (PCN) located on the west side. The PCN areas are being transferred and incorporated into the Lake Nona DRI/PD through a recent DRI amendment (Case #DRI ) Previous Actions for Education Village PD: May 2004 City Council approved the initial zoning of PD (Case #ZON ) to allow for 500 residential units, a high school, and a park. This project was known as Narcoossee Groves PD. February 2006 City Council approved a PD amendment for the Narcoossee Groves PD (Case #ZON ) which added 10,000 square feet of retail, 20,500 square feet of office, and 75,000 square feet of personal storage to the previously approved development plan. May 2010 City Council approved a PD amendment for Narcoossee Groves by renaming the PD Education Village and allowed for 176 multi-family residential units, 115,000 square feet of office use, 191,400 square feet of civic use, 306 assisted living units, 141,500 square feet of mixed use in addition to the already constructed Lake Nona High School. There is currently some existing development within the Education Village PD. This includes the Valencia College Lake Nona Campus, Lake Nona High School, and Primrose Daycare. There are also projects which have been approved by the Southeast Town Design Review Committee (SETDRC) but have not been constructed yet. Previous Actions for Education Commerce Center PD: February 2006 City Council approved the initial zoning of PD (Case #ZON ) to allow for 450 residential units, 399,500 square feet of retail space and 50,000 square feet of office space. This project was known as Fountains at Narcoossee PD. August 2010 City Council approved a PD amendment for Fountains at Narcoossee by renaming the PD Education Commerce Center and allowed for 106,750 square feet of mixed use, 315,150 square feet of retail and 288 multi-family residential units. There is currently no existing development or Specific Parcel Master Plan (SPMP) approvals on the Education Commerce Center PD. Project Context and Land Use Compatibility The subject property is located in the southeast section of Orlando. Several parcels within the boundary of the subject property are currently developed. This includes Valencia College Lake Nona Campus, Lake Nona High School, and Primrose Daycare. Surrounding future land use designations and existing uses are shown in the table below. The proposed PD will be compatible with the surrounding uses. Table 1 Project Context Future Land Use Zoning Surrounding Use North Urban Village & Conservation PD & C Gas Station, Vacant Land & Wetlands East South Planned Development & Rural Settlement (Orange County) Conservation (City of Orlando) Rural/Agricultural (Orange County) PD & A-2 C (City of Orlando) A-2 (Orange County) KOA Campground, Residential, Vacant Land Wetlands and Vacant land West Conservation C Wetlands Conformance with the GMP The Urban Village future land use designation is assigned to the subject site. According to Future Land Use Element Policy 2.4.4, The Urban Village future land use designation provides for a mixture of land uses and intensities within a development site in order to preserve conservation areas, to reduce public investment in provision of services, to encourage flexible and creative site design and to provide sites for schools, recreation and other public facilities which provide and area-wide benefit to the community. The Urban Village future land use designation is specifically intended to provide a means of streamlining the development review process where a DRI, a Sector Plan, and/or Master Plan, have already fully accounted for the impacts of development.

6 Page 4 P R O JECT ANALYSIS The proposed PD amendment is consistent with the GMP Policies related to the Southeast Orlando Sector Plan, including Future Land Use Element Policy (Urban Village policy), Subarea Policies S.35.2 and S.35.4, along with Goal 4 and its associated goals, objectives and policies. Conformance with the LDC Section of the LDC requires that all rezonings and/or initial zonings be in conformance with any applicable substantive requirements for Chapters 58 through 66 of the LDC. The subject property is with the Southeast Orlando Sector Plan and is therefore required to also conform to Chapter 68 of the LDC which outlines development criteria for the Southeast Sector Plan. PD Planned Development District Section of the LDC identifies the purpose of the PD district as follows: The PD District is intended to provide a process for the evaluation of unique, individually planned developments which are not otherwise permitted in the zoning districts established by Chapter 58. The PD District is to be a voluntary process commenced by an applicant for such zoning designation. The standards and procedures of this district are intended to promote flexibility of design and permit planned diversification and integration of uses and structures, while at the same time retaining in the City Council the absolute authority to establish such limitations and regulations as it deems necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare. The table below depicts the current Education Village and Education Commerce Center PD Development Plans. Education Village PD Education Commerce Center PD Multi-Family Residential 176 du Multi-Family Residential 288 du Office 115,000 sq. ft. Mixed Use 106,750 sq. ft. Civic 191,400 sq. ft. Retail 315,150 sq. ft. Assisted Living Mixed Use 306 du 141,500 sq. ft. High School 1 The chart below depicts the consolidation of both PDs to create a new Education Village PD Development Program. Since the Lake Nona High School is designated Civic on the Southeast Orlando Sector Plan Map, its acreage is not considered part of the Village Center for the purposed of calculating distribution of uses. Parcel Acres Land Use Program Max FAR % of Total Acreage of Entire Development A 39.5 Residential Apartments Assisted Living B 23.4 Civic Valencia College C 56.4 Civic Lake Nona High School 464 du 306 du 255,500 sq. ft D 10.1 Commercial/Retail/Service 88,000 sq. ft 0.20 E 17 Commercial/Retail/Service 148,000 sq. ft F 38 Commercial/Retail/Service Big Box Community Level Retail G 18 Commercial/Retail/Service Intensive Retail Total Residential Commercial/Retail/Service Civic % of Total Acreage of Village Center Designation N/A 19.5 % 27.1% 16% 39.4% High School N/A N/A 420,000 sq. ft ,000 sq. ft du 726,000 sq. ft. 255,500 sq. ft % 56.9% 100% 100%

7 Page 5 P R O JECT ANALYSIS Comparison to Existing and Proposed PD Development Plans If the existing and proposed PD Development plans are compared, the number of residential (which includes the assisted living facility units) remains the same at 770 units. However, the Civic uses increases from 191,400 square feet to 255,500 square feet. There was a Planning Official Determination dated May 12, 2010 (Case #LDC ) which allowed for a conversion of land uses within the development program. That determination allowed a modification by reducing the amount of Office uses from 115,000 square feet to 30,500 square feet and increasing the amount of civic uses from 191,400 square feet to 255,500. Therefore the same amount of Civic uses will be transferred to the new PD. With this conversion, the Commercial/Retail/Service uses for both PDs now is 593,900 square feet. However, with the proposed PD requests 726,000 square feet of Commercial/Retail/Service uses, which is an increase of 132,100 square feet of these uses. Chapter 68 Southeast Orlando Sector Plan In order to be consistent with the Southeast Orlando Sector Plan, specific parcel master plan applications must be reviewed for compliance with LDC Chapter 68, which lays out the detailed development guidelines and standards for the Southeast Plan area. The proposed development will retain the Village Center and Civic designations. The Civic portion of the development is currently developed with Lake Nona High School. According to LDC Section (a) (2), Village Center/Urban Transit Center (VC/UTC District) is described as such: Village Center districts shall be developed as important destinations for each Residential Neighborhood, providing a variety of shops, services, restaurants, and civic facilities that serve the needs of the surrounding neighborhoods. The properties within this subject area which are not currently developed or have approvals shall be required to submit SPMPs to the SETDRC to determine if the development is consistent with LDC Chapter 68. Composition of Land Uses According to Future Land Use Policy 4.1.9, there are detailed guidelines and standards for various Southeast Sector land uses. The chart below outlines the composition of mix requirements for the Village Center land use. It also compares the new consolidated Education Village PD to those standards. The applicant has taken into account the office uses and public parks/green space requirement and is depicted in Note 1 and Note 2 below this chart. Land Use Minimum Land Area Required Maximum Land Area Required Consolidated Education Village PD Residential 25% 40% 27.1% Commercial/Retail/ Service 20% 60% 56.9% Office 10% 25% See Note 1 Public and Civic 10% No Maximum 16% Overall Non-Residential 30% 60% 72.9% Public Parks/Green Space 5% No Maximum See Note 2 Note 1 Office uses are planned to be developed in connection with the development of the commercial, retail, and service uses and are not called out specifically in the overall development plan. Note 2 Considerable area for public gathering and open space is designed into the Valencia College master plan. As development of the PD evolves, other areas set aside for parks/green space will be identified by individual SPMP. As noted in the chart above, the proposed overall non-residential exceeds the maximum land area required by 12.9%. At the time of the adoption of the Education Village and Education Commerce Center PDs, it was noted that satisfaction of the minimum land area requirements was the more important of the standards in Policy It was determined at that time that final composition of mixture of uses would be reviewed by the SETDRC to allow for greater flexibility in the overall development program. Also, Policy was recently amended to allow flexibility in these percentages.

8 Page 6 P R O JECT ANALYSIS Transportation The applicant is requesting with this new development plan note that will allow for the reconsideration of the distribution of land uses provided the net external PM peak hour trip generation of the overall project is not exceeded. This note currently exists in both PDs and is requested to be part of this new unified Education Village PD. According to Transportation Planning review, the subtotal of PM Peak Hour Trips that will be generated is 3,713 vehicles per hour (vph). The existing and approved development generates 592 vph PM Peak Hour Trips. The net balance of PM Peak Hour Trips for the new Education Village PD is 3,121 vehicles per hour. Therefore, the remaining development (which does not have Specific Parcel Master Plans yet) shall not exceed this PM Peak Hour Trip generation of 3,121 vehicles per hour in its mix of land uses. Land Uses Entitlements (*) ITE Land Use Code ITE Trip Generation Manual, 9 th Edition (*) Excluding Lake Nona High School; this has been already constructed. (**) Development impacts using rates for ITE code 820 (Shopping Center). Average Daily Trips (ADT) PM Peak Hour Trips Residential 464 multi-family units 220 3,086 vpd 288 vph Assisted Living 306 units 251 1,135 vpd 83 vph Commercial (retail/services) 726,000 sq. ft. 820 (**) 31,000 vpd (**) 2,693 vph (**) Civic (Valencia State College) 255,500 sq. ft ,024 vpd 649 vph Existing / Approved Development (*) Subtotal 42,245 vpd 3,713 vph Parcel D Primrose School 11,660 sq. ft vpd 144 vph Parcel D (Racetrac) acres 20 Pumps 945 3,256 vpd 270 vph Parcel D (Wendy s) acres 3,400 sq. ft ,687 vpd 111 vph Parcel D (ABC Liquors) acres 10,080 sq. ft. 820 (**) 430 vpd 37 vph Parcel D (Starbucks/Retail) +1.5 acres 10,783 sq. ft. 820 (**) 460 vpd 40 vph Parcel B (Valencia) 80,000 sq. ft ,199 vpd 203 vph Racetrack Average Pass-By Trips (+62%): -2,006 vpd -166 vpd Wendy s Average Pass-By Trips (+42%): -709 vpd -47 vpd Subtotal: 6,181 vpd 592 vph Net Balance: 36,064 vpd 3,121 vph Specific Uses Currently in both the Education Village and Education Commerce Center PDs there are a list of prohibited uses. The applicant is requesting that two of those prohibited uses not be transferred to this new PD. Those uses include automobile washing establishments and personal storage facilities. With the rapid development of residential area within this area, such as Laureate Park, it is believed that these type of uses would be beneficial by serving a need to these nearby residential communities. In terms of personal storage facilities, it will also have to meet a minimum 500 foot setback from Narcoossee Road and would not allow for any outdoor storage.

9 Page 7 A E R IAL PHOTO

10 Page 8 C U R RENT EDUCAT I ON V ILLAGE PD

11 Page 9 C U R RENT EDUCAT I ON COMMERCE CENTER PD

12 Page 10 C O N SOLIDATED PD DEVELOPMENT PLAN

13 Page 11 P R OPOSED CONSOLIDATED PD EXHIBIT

14 Page 12 P R OPOSED CIRCULATION PLAN

15 Page 13 P R OPOSED ROAD CROSS SECTIONS Weller Boulevard (Segment 1 existing) Suttner Avenue & Northern portion of Vickery Place (existing) Andric Lane (a portion existing) Vickery Place (Southern portion existing)

16 Page 14 P R OPOSED ROAD CROSS SECTIONS Weller Boulevard (Segment 2 future) Tagore Place (portion existing)

17 Page 15 P R OPOSED ROAD CROSS SECTIONS Tagore Place (existing)

18 Page 16 F I N DINGS Subject to the conditions contained herein, the proposed PD amendment is consistent with the requirements for approval of the proposed: 1. The proposed PD amendment is consistent with the objectives and policies of the City s adopted Growth Management Plan (GMP); particularly, Future Land Use Element Policy 2.4.4, Subarea Policies S.35.2 and S.35.4, along with Goal 4 and its associated goals, objectives and policies. 2. The proposed PD amendment is consistent with the purpose and intent of the requirements of the Land Development Code. 3. The proposed PD amendment is compatible with the surrounding development and neighborhood pattern. 4. The proposal will not result in demands on public facilities and services that exceed the capacity of such facilities and services since it is subject to Chapter 59 of the City Code, the Concurrency Management Ordinance. Staff recommends approval of the PD amendment subject to the conditions below: C O N D ITIONS OF A PPROVAL City Planning 1. GENERAL CODE COMPLIANCE The proposed project shall be developed consistent with the conditions in this report, the attached development plan, and all codes and ordinances of the City of Orlando, the State of Florida, and all other applicable regulatory agencies. 2. CONCURRENCY All elements and components of this development shall be subject to Chapter 59, the Concurrency Management Ordinance of the City of Orlando. Approval of this application shall not be deemed to provide any vested rights. 3. DEFAULT ZONING DISTRICT For any requirements not specifically addressed in the PD ordinance, the regulations of the Village Center zoning district shall apply. 4. PROHIBITED USES The following uses shall be prohibited: a. Treatment/Recovery Facilities; b. Tattoo, body art or body piercing establishments; c. Fortune telling, tarot card reading, palm reading and psychic services establishments; d. Check cashing facilities (facilities which deal primarily in the issuance of cash advances based upon receipt of future wages, commonly known as "payday loans" or "payday advances."); e. Funeral Home; f. Adult Entertainment; g. Flea Markets; h. Bottle Clubs; i. Car title loan facilities; j. Temporary Labor Facilities; k. Whole Blood Facilities; l. Wholesale/Warehouse; 5. MODIFICATIONS Major modifications to the development plan or standards set forth herein shall follow the amendment procedures for Development Plans as set forth in Chapter 65, Part 2E, LDC. The Planning Official or his designee shall be authorized to permit minor changes to the Development Plan in conformance with the intent and purpose of the GMP and the LDC without further review by the Municipal Planning Board (MPB) or City Council. The changes shall not exceed the maximum standards of the GMP and LDC. 6. ORDINANCE PREPARTION MPB recommendation of the conditions contained herein is subject to review by the City Attorney's Office for legal sufficiency and drafting of implementing documents.

19 Page 17 C O N D ITIONS OF A PPROVAL City Planning (cont.) 7. SOUTHEAST ORLANDO SECTOR PLAN All development shall be reviewed by the SETDRC through the Specific Parcel Master Plan process. All elements and components of this development shall be subject to Chapter 68, the City of Orlando s Southeast Sector Plan, unless otherwise stated or approved by the SETDRC. 8. COMPOSITION OF USES Final composition of mixture of uses would be reviewed by the SETDRC to allow for greater flexibility in the overall development program. The remaining development (which does not have SPMP approval) shall not exceed the PM Peak Hour Trip generation of 2,675 vehicles per hour in its mix of land uses. 9. PERSONAL STORAGE FACILITIES Personal Storage Facilities shall be allowed within this PD. It will have to meet a minimum 500 foot setback from Narcoossee Road and would not allow for any outdoor storage. 10. APPEARANCE REVIEW Appearance Review shall be required to ensure the project is developed in general conformance with the approved building elevations and landscaping as proposed during SPMP review. 11. CONFOFMANCE WITH PD REQUIRED Construction and development of the property shall conform to approved site plans, elevations, and landscaping plans on file with the City Planning Division and all conditions contained in this report, or as modified by the SETDRC, Municipal Planning Board, and/or City Council to be reflected in the PD ordinance. 12. CROSS SECTIONS Revise Section D-D and I-I to include sidewalks on both sides, unless an alternative is provided in the SPMP that provides sufficient pedestrian circulation. 13. TAGORE PLACE Extend Tagore Place in order for Parcel G to meet the street frontage requirement. This can be a private street. Transportation Planning 1. SIGNALIZATION AGREEMENT Before approval of the first SPMP for the combined properties, the party or parties responsible for development on the properties east and west of Narcoossee Road must enter into an agreement with the City for the purpose of establishing proportionate fair share payments for warranted full access traffic signalization, associated with traffic generation attributed to the properties' development. 2. NON MOTORIZED CIRCULATION Each specific SPMP must provide adequate pedestrian and bicycle circulation facilities in accordance with adopted City guidelines and plans. 3. ORANGE COUNTY APPROVAL Any proposed driveway to Narcoossee Road will require Orange County permits and approval. The owner/applicant shall provide a copy of the permits and approval (or letter of intent of approval) from the approving agency to the City of Orlando prior to final permit/construction plans approval. 4. PHASING PLAN Any SPMP application must include a transportation circulation plan serving such development and shall be consistent with the rest of the combined PD properties. 5. INTERNAL ROAD CROSS SECTIONS Cross section design of all internal roadways is subject to review and approval by the SETDRC during the review and approval process for the respective SPMPs. Revisions to the cross-sections shown in the PD my be required as part of SPMP review if needed to accommodate proposed development.

20 Page 18 C O N D ITIONS OF A PPROVAL Transportation Planning (cont.) 6. DRIVE-THROUGH USES Drive-through uses on the combined properties may be approved by the SETDRC, subject to applicable Land Development Code regulations. 7. WELLER BOULEVARD EXTENSION SEGMENTS 2,3 & 4 DEDICATION Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy on adjacent properties, the owner/developer shall record a right-of-way dedication for the Weller Boulevard extension from its current terminus to the southwest PD boundary line. 8. WELLER BOULEVARD EXTENSION SEGMENTS 2,3 & 4 CONSTRUCTION The owner/developer, in coordination with other developers, shall be 100% responsible for the cost of design and construction of Weller Boulevard from its current terminus to the southwest PD boundary line. Segment 2 of the Weller Boulevard extension shall be completed prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy for Parcel A. Segments 3 and 4 of the Weller Boulevard extension shall be completed when Nemours Parkway is extended to this area.. 9. INTERNAL ROADWAYS All internal primary streets and the cross-sections of all internal roadways are subject to review and approval by the SETDRC. 10. NARCOOSSEE ROAD VEHICULAR ACCESS Full vehicular access onto the property shall be consistent with the Narcoossee Road Corridor Access Management Plan. The location of directional vehicular access (right-in / right-out driveways and left-in / left-out median openings) onto Narcoossee Road is subject to review and approval by the City's Transportation Engineer or his/her designee, and shall be consistent with the Narcoossee Road Corridor Access Management Plan. 11. WELLER BOULEVARD TURN LANES If and when Weller Boulevard is extended beyond the PD's western boundary, and when warranted based on traffic increases, the party or parties responsible for development of the project that triggers the need for the improvement shall be fully responsible for the design and construction of an additional eastbound left turn lane at the east approach to Narcoossee Road. 12. VICKREY PLACE TURN LANES When warranted based on traffic increases, the party or parties responsible for the SPMP development project that triggers the need for traffic operations improvement shall be fully responsible for the design and construction of an additional eastbound left turn lane at the Vickery Place eastbound approach to Narcoossee Road. 13. TAGORE PLACE TURN LANES When warranted based on traffic increases, the party or parties responsible for the SPMP development project that triggers the need for traffic operations improvement shall be fully responsible for the design and construction of an additional eastbound left turn lane at the Tagore Place eastbound approach to Narcoossee Road. 14. MULTI-USE TRAIL EASEMENT The owner/applicant is required to dedicate a minimum 12 ft. wide multi-use trail easement; such easement can be shown adjacent to or within the 25 ft. upland buffer area along the entire the western property boundary or can be shown along the entire eastern property line on Narcoossee Road. If shown along the eastern property line on Narcoossee Road., the easement area shall include the area already reserved for on-street sidewalks. Regardless as to where the trail is located, the owner/applicant shall reserve an additional construction easement area for use by the City (or designee) during the construction of such trail. 15. DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR Any solid waste container(s) shall not be located adjacent to any single family houses or directly adjacent to the public street. Dumpsters shall be located to provide a minimum 50 feet of clear backup space and constructed per Orlando Engineering Standards Manual (ESM) requirements, OR documentation shall be provided from the City's Solid Waste Division indicating curb pick-up or other approved arrangement.

21 Page 19 C O N D ITIONS OF A PPROVAL Transportation Planning (cont.) 16. CROSS-ACCESS CORRIDORS The subject property is adjacent to a major thoroughfare, Narcoossee Road. Orlando Land Development Code (LDC), Chapter 61 (Sections ), provides the minimum requirements for cross-access corridors. The combined properties shall provide cross-access easements and/or joint driveways within adjacent developments to ensure that the parking, access and circulation may be easily tied in to create a unified system. 17. PARKING LOT TRAFFIC CONTROL Parking lot traffic control shall be shown per Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards (stop signs, stop bars, "Do Not Enter" signs, pavement arrows, etc.) at internal driving aisle intersections. Stop signs and stop bars shall be shown at all exits from the property. Stop signs and stop bars shall be located in-line and 4 feet behind sidewalks/crosswalks. 18. PEDESTRIAN ACCESS The Specific Parcel Master Plan for each parcel shall show the proposed bicycle and pedestrian circulation system, including general location and dimensions of private rights-of-way and travel surfaces. Bicycle and pedestrian circulation system shall be shown at the time of Specific Parcel Master Plan (SPMP) submittal. 19. PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS The main pedestrian crossing areas between the buildings and the parking areas shall be clearly marked with pavement markings and maintained at all times. 20. ON-SITE SIDEWALK REQUIREMENT Paved pedestrian ways shall be provided from the public sidewalk(s) to the main building entrance(s). 21. HANDICAP RAMPS AT STREET INTERSECTIONS Handicap (HC) ramps shall be constructed at the street intersection(s) and driveway connection(s) to comply with the Americans with Disability Act (ADA). Pedestrian ramps at street corners shall be designed to provide a separate ramp in each direction. 22. DRIVEWAY SIGHT DISTANCE At all project entrances, clear sight distances for drivers and pedestrians shall not be blocked by signs, buildings, building columns, landscaping, or other visual impediments. No structure, fence, wall, or other visual impediment shall obstruct vision between 3 feet and 8 feet in height above street level. The street corner/driveway visibility area shall be shown and noted on construction plans and any future site plan submittals. The applicant shall design site plans as necessary to comply with the street corner visibility requirements (Chapter 60, Sections through Sections ) and the driveways and curbcuts requirements (Chapter 61, Sections through Sections ) of the Orlando Land Development Code (LDC). 23. BIKE PARKING REQUIREMENTS Bicycle parking shall be provided as required in accordance with the standards of Chapter 61, Part 3D of the Orlando Land Development Code, and shall be made available prior to the issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy/Completion for the use being served. Parking facilities that comply with the standards for long-term bicycle parking may also be used to meet the short-term bicycle parking requirements. Covered bicycle parking is encouraged wherever the design of the building or use being served by the bicycle parking facility includes a covered area that could accommodate such facilities either as proposed or through economical redesign. 24. TRANSIT The owner/applicant shall contribute towards the cost and installation of bus shelters on Narcoossee Road; contributions shall be assessed when transit service is available along this roadway. Such contribution is described in LDC Chapter 59, the Mobility Plan, and may be eligible for impact fee credits.

22 Page 20 I N FORMAT IONAL COMMENTS Transportation Impact Fees Any new construction, change in use, addition, or redevelopment of a site or structure shall be subject to a review for Transportation Impact Fees. A Transportation Impact Fee assessment will be done at the time of building permit review. This fee will be calculated based on the proposed building's use and gross square footage, as submitted in the final permit set of plans. Any additional Transportation Impact Fees assessed on this project shall be due prior to building permit issuance. For a copy of the complete ordinance or impact fee rate chart, you may reference our website at: planning/transportation/ifees.htm Any exemptions or credits against the Transportation Impact Fee must be reviewed prior to permit issuance. All Transportation Impact Fee Credits shall be initiated and processed by the Transportation Impact Fee Coordinator. Credit shall be available for the previous use located on the subject site. Police The Orlando Police Department has no objections to the rezoning request for the Education Village PD located west of Narcoossee Rd. and south of SR 417. A full CPTED plan review will be completed as specific detailed plans are submitted to the City. We encourage developers and property owners to incorporate CPTED strategies in their projects in an effort to reduce the opportunity for crime. Contact the Police Department for an electronic copy of a document entitled, "Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design, Your Guide to Creating a Safe Environment". Fire 1. DEPARTMENT ACCESS Every building constructed shall be accessible to fire department apparatus by way of access roadways with all-weather surface of not less than 20 feet of unobstructed width, adequate roadway turning radius, capable of supporting the imposed loads of fire apparatus, and having a minimum vertical clearance of 13 ft. 6 in. [NFPA 1: ] 2. DEPT ACCESS DEAD END A dead-end in the fire department access road in excess of 150' will require an approved turnaround or cul-de-sac. [NFPA 1: ] 3. FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE Be advised that any new construction must adhere to the requirements of the Florida Fire Prevention Code, 2010 Edition, and The City of Orlando Fire Prevention Code. 4. FIRE CODE REVIEW TRC fire code review is preliminary in nature, and is intended to expose or prevent evident design deficiencies with State and City Fire Codes. The design will be reviewed in detail for State and City Fire Code compliance at the time of permit application. 5. FIRE PERMITS REQUIRED Underground main contractor must apply for a Fire permit for the installation or modification of any underground mains serving fire hydrants and/or fire protection systems prior to any installation. If the water distribution system and fire hydrants are located in a right-of-way or recorded easement and owned/installed/maintained by the water purveyor, we will only require installation to the water purveyor's standards for underground components and connections. However, hydrants must be in compliance with hydrant spacing, location, distribution, color coding, and needed fire flow minimums as specified in City Fire Code. Underground main and fire hydrant installations on private property will require an FIR permit and full compliance with NFPA 24. [City Fire Code, Section 24.13(t)(13)] 6. CONSTRUCTION PHASE Please inform contractor that where underground mains and hydrants are to be provided, they shall be installed, completed, and in service prior to storage of combustibles on site. [NFPA 1: ] Fire department access shall be provided at the start of the project and shall be maintained throughout construction. [NFPA 1: ] In all buildings more than one story in height, at least one stairway shall be provided that is in usable condition at all times and that meets the requirements of of the Life Safety Code, NFPA 101. [NFPA 1: ]

23 Page 21 I N FORMAT IONAL COMMENTS Fire (cont.) 7. FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS TO BUILDING A fire department access road shall extend within 50 ft of a single exterior door providing access to the interior of the building. Fire department access roads shall be provided such that any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the first story of the building is located not more than 150 ft (450 ft for sprinkler protected structures) from fire department access roads. [NFPA 1: ] 8. REQUIRED FIRE FLOW All structures must be protected by fire hydrants in accordance with City Fire Code 24.30(f). A determination will be made at the time plans are submitted for permitting. We will need a Required Fire Flow calculation in accordance with the ISO method demonstrating the water distribution system and new/existing fire hydrant(s) can deliver the demand. C O N TACT INFORMAT ION City Planning For questions regarding City Planning review, please contact Colandra Jones at or colandra.jones@cityoforlando.net. Transportation Planning For questions regarding Transportation Planning review, please contact Gus Castro at or gustavo.castro@cityoforlando.net Transportation Impact Fees For questions and information regarding Transportation Impact Fee Rates you may contact Nancy Ottini at (407) or nancy.jurus-ottini@cityoforlando.net Police For questions regarding Orlando Police Department plan reviews, please contact Audra Nordaby at or Audra.Nordaby@cityoforlando.net. Fire For any questions regarding fire issues, please contact Jack Richardson at or at jack.richardson@cityoforlando.net. To obtain plan review status, schedule/cancel an inspection and obtain inspection results, please call PROMPT, our Interactive Voice Response System at Building Plan Review For questions regarding Building Plan Review issues contact Don Fields at (407) or don.fields@cityoforlando.net. R E V IEW/APPROVAL PROCESS NEXT STEPS 1. City Council approves the MPB minutes. 2. Staff forward PD Zoning ordinance request to the City Attorney s Office. 3. First reading of the PD amendment ordinance. 4. Second reading of the PD amendment ordinance.