TOWNSHIP OF OTONABEE-SOUTH MONAGHAN General Committee/Planning Meeting Monday, January 25, 6:00 pm Council Chambers, Keene

Transcription

1 TOWNSHIP OF OTONABEE-SOUTH MONAGHAN General Committee/Planning Meeting Monday, January 25, 6:00 pm Council Chambers, Keene AGENDA: General Committee/Planning Meeting MEETING: Monday, January 25, 6:00 pm Page 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. DECLARATION OF PECUNIARY INTEREST 3. ADDITIONS TO OR DELETIONS FROM THE AGENDA 4. ADOPTION OF AGENDA 5. DELEGATIONS FIRE/EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT/GIS/911/BY-LAW ENF a) DFES New Rescue 2 (Pre-budget approval) b) DFES Repair Pumper 2 c) DFES Turn Out Bunker Gear Clothing - Prebudget approval d) DFES Medical Tiered Response Update 7. FINANCE PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT a) Averton Homes Draft Plan Extension Request b) Cameron - Consent File BTBD /4335 County Road 2 c) CAO - Year End Planning Report d) Clark Consulting - Loucks PPS Review Page 1 of 72

2 Page BY-LAWS a) Planning - Zoning By-law Amendment - Jackson b) Planning - Official Plan Amendment - Loucks 10. CORRESPONDENCE a) Keene General Store - Holiday Openings b) MADD - Request for advertising donation c) Library Board - Vacancy Appointments d) PFAN - Anti Poverty Week 11. INFORMATION a) MEPCO - Municipal Group Pension b) NAV Canada - Peterborough Airport (Tower) - Comments 12. OTHER 13. CLOSED SESSION 14. ADJOURNMENT Page 2 of 72

3 Agenda Item # 6a) Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan Department of Fire and Emergency Services Report To: Municipal Council Submitted By: Fire Chief/CEMC Ted Bryan Date: 01/14/2016 Report Number: DFES Topic: Request for Pre-Budget Approval to Tender for New Rescue 2 Scope: To seek Council approval to pre- budget tender for the scheduled replacement of Rescue #2 in order to take advantage of existing new stock apparatus and avoid major price increases due to the difference in the Canadian/American dollar exchange. Report: 2016 Fire Capital Project #3 In surveying the current market there is an opportunity to take advantage of new stock rescue apparatus 2015/2016. The available units would be priced accordingly and not reflect the current cost increases due to the increase in the exchange rate for American dollars. (Many of the parts items including the chassis are manufactured in the United States) The unit would meet the specifications for the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan that were used for Rescue 4 and Rescue 1. It is anticipated that the purchase price would be very close to the purchase price for Rescue 1 acquired in Cost Estimates: 2014 Rescue 1 Purchase 145, Capital Budget for Rescue 2 replacement 155, Action: Date: 1 DFES New Rescue 2 (Prebudget approval) Page 3 of 72

4 Agenda Item # 6b) Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan Department of Fire and Emergency Services Report To: Municipal Council Submitted By: Fire Chief/CEMC Ted Bryan Date: Report Number: DFES Topic: Request for Pre-Budget approval for the Capital Repair of Pumper #2 Scope: To seek Council approval for the pre-budget repair of Pumper #2. Report: 2016 Fire Capital Project #4 As result of the annual Pump Test and Certification of OSM Pumper #2 it has been noted and recorded that the pumps ability to meet its ULC required load capacity has been declining. It is feared it will not meet its requirement for the 2016 test/certification. The month of February is historically the least busy time and therefore the best time to have the repair completed. Darch Fire Trucks technician has recommended that the pump be repaired to restore it to an acceptable load status. The estimated repair cost is 9, (quote attached) The 2016 Fire Capital Budget Project #4 allotment is $10, We would utilize OSM Reserve Pump #5 during the repair period estimated to take 7 to 10 days. Action: Date: 1 DFES Repair Pumper 2 Page 4 of 72

5 Agenda Item # 6b) Department of Fire and Emergency Services 2010 Annual Report 2 DFES Repair Pumper 2 Page 5 of 72

6 Agenda Item # 6c) Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan Department of Fire and Emergency Services Report To: Municipal Council Submitted By: Fire Chief/CEMC Ted Bryan Date: Report Number: DFES Topic: Request for Pre-Budget approval to order Fire Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Turn Out Bunker Clothing Scope: To seek Council approval for the pre-budget purchase of 6 sets of PPE as set out in the 2016 Fire Capital Budget. Report: 2016 Fire Capital Project # 2 For the past 8 years the Department of Fire and Emergency Services has participated in a purchasing plan for the replacement of Personal Protective Equipment, Firefighting Turnout Gear. The department has purchased 10 sets of Morning Pride Gear each year. In this the 9 th year of the program we have budgeted for (6) sets to fulfill our requirements. This program has allowed the Municipality to meet the requirements of the NFPA Standards and keep our firefighters protected. We require the purchase of the (6) new sets of PPE for new hires that are attending the recruit training starting in January and running to the end of June. Delivery is estimated to be 6 to 8 weeks. I am requesting approval to place the order now in order that delivery will be in time for their practical training Capital Budget allotment $16, Action: Date: 1 DFES Turn Out Bunker Gear Clothing - Prebudget Page 6 of 72

7 Agenda Item # 6d) Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan Department of Fire and Emergency Services Report To: Municipal Council Date: January 25, 2016 Report Number: DFES Submitted By: Fire Chief/CEMC Ted Bryan Topic: To provide an information update to Council on the status of the Medical Tiered Response Agreement between EMS and Fire Services. Scope: At the request of Council, provide a synopsis of events and comments regarding the issues and progress relating to the draft Medical Tiered Response Agreement between the UTM EMS and the LTM Fire Services. Report: The following bullets are a synopsis of the meetings and events regarding the Ministry of Health and Long Term Care (MHLTC) request for a Medical Tiered response Agreement between the Upper Tier Municipal Government (UTM) EMS and the Lower Tier Municipal Government (LTM) Fire Services. The notification to all the Fire Chiefs of the Municipal Fire Departments in Peterborough County resulted in a collaborative effort to ensure all the Councils, CAO s, and Managers are advised and kept in the loop. It has taken considerable time and effort to ensure the draft document is acceptable to all the LTM stakeholders before involving the UTM. It has been repeatedly expressed to all stakeholders throughout this process that the local Fire Chief does not set the level of service for the Municipal Fire Department. This is the sole right of the Municipal Council and all changes require their approval. 1 DFES Medical Tiered Response Update Page 7 of 72

8 Agenda Item # 6d) May 28, 2005, The Medical Tiered Response plan and criteria has existed in the Peterborough County Mutual Aid Plan and worked flawlessly for over ten years. April 8, 2013, Agreement with MHLTC and Peterborough Fire extended the service to fire departments they provide dispatch services for, and outlines the (EMS-TIF) Technology Interoperability Framework program to provide simultaneous dispatch of EMS and Fire. At the time, the LTM Fire Departments were not part of these discussions nor a signatory to the agreement, however this has been a very successful program resulting in Fire providing a much quicker service to the patient in need. Included in the agreement, the MHLTC recognized the Medical Tiered Response Agreement as part of the Peterborough County Mutual Aid Plan; This will further support the need to respond to medical emergencies according to the existing Tiered Response/Mutual Aid Agreements and will automate a currently manual process for incident notification from the ministry s Ambulance dispatch services. August 17, 2015, a letter addressed to the Fire Chief (OSM received August 21, 2015) from MHLTC Rob Acheson, Field Manager Central East Field Office; stating that the current medical response notification procedures will cease 120 days from receipt, should the respective CACC not be in receipt of a copy of an agreement between your department and the UTM for the purposes of medical response. August 27, 2015, a meeting of the PCFCA was held in Keene to discuss the letters received. A survey of Peterborough County Fire Chiefs identified some had not received a letter. The Peterborough County Fire Chiefs discussed the issue and agreed there was a need to ensure all CAO(s) and Council(s) were made aware. Further, it was directed that the PCFCA contact Mr. Acheson and obtain a template agreement that has been accepted across Ontario to use as the base document for the development of Tiered Response Agreement that would meet the requirements of the MHLTC. Note: North Kawartha did not receive their letter until mid-september. October 6, 2015, the PCFCA met to review, discuss, and develop the base agreement in preparation to provide a draft to EMS Director Randy Mellows. The PCFC appointed a sub-committee of PCFCA and requested that Clerk Heather Scott and CAO Pat Kemp participate to assist with the legalese and wording. October 16, 2015, the draft document was forwarded to EMS Director Randy Mellows for his review, comments and suggestions. October 30, 2015, Fire Coordinator Mitchell contacted EMS Director Mellow inquiring on the progress of the EMS review and to advise that the PCFCA would not be available the first two weeks of November to meet. 2 DFES Medical Tiered Response Update Page 8 of 72

9 Agenda Item # 6d) October 31, 2015, EMS Director Mellow responded that he was currently reviewing the document and would be going to County Council for direction. December 07, 2015, Wardens Meeting between the Peterborough County Fire Coordinator D Mitchell and Alternate Fire Coordinator T. Bryan, EMS Director R. Mellow, Warden J. Jones and Committee Member Reeve D. Nelson. The meeting was held to identify, review and resolve issues regarding the Medical Tiered Response Agreement. Mr. Mellow identified that he was the one that initiated and prompted the MHLTC to issue the letters to the Fire Chiefs in the County. He also identified that he was the one that supplied the draft agreement to Rob Acheson when the PCFCA asked the MHLTC for a template. Key items discussed: 1. EMS proposes that there needs to be a separate agreement with the City Fire. 2. EMS Director Mellow expressed his displeasure in not being at the table during all discussions regarding amending the Tiered Response Agreement. Fire Coordinator D. Mitchell stated there was no intent to exclude, however it was important that the 9 Fire Service Stakeholders were in agreement prior to involving EMS. 3. EMS has issue with the Criteria (10 minutes delay for other code 4 responses) - may cause 2,000 extra calls per year for the FD(s) 4. EMS has issues with any reference to the TIF program. 5. It was identified there was a recent adjustment to the response Criteria without EMS consultation. It was also identified that the PCFCA were not aware of a criteria change nor had they discussed this with the CACC or PFD. 6. It was identified that the draft document along with the current Criteria found in the County Mutual Aid plan are very similar. 7. It was directed that the Tiered Response Agreement should proceed and be completed independent of other studies. 8. It was suggested that the EMS Director should review and forward his suggestions and proposed amendments. 9. The PCFCA would then meet and discuss the proposals and prepare to meet with EMS. A meeting is to be then arranged between EMS and the PCFCA to go over any outstanding concerns and hopefully finalize the document. December 12, 2015, it was identified that CACC Lindsay and the PFD in an attempt to resolve some issues with the TIF dispatch to MVC(s) inadvertently, during a trial period, caused Fire to be dispatched to some calls outside of the Tiered Response Criteria. PCFCA were not aware of the temporary trial at the time. 3 DFES Medical Tiered Response Update Page 9 of 72

10 Agenda Item # 6d) December 16, 2015, County Council Meeting, the County EMS proposed that the agreement be put off until they hired a consultant to review the EMS & Fire services and put together a Master Plan for EMS future growth. The County EMS applied to the MHLTC for an extension to the letters of notification that the Fire Service had received. It is my understanding an extension was granted, no notification from the MHLTC or EMS has been received to date. December 24, 2015, EMS Director Mellow provided the draft document/agreement with comments and proposals for change to Fire Coordinator Mitchell. January 6, 2016, PCFCA meeting at PFD to discuss and review the EMS proposals. Heather Scott was present to assist with agreed changes. PFD identified that the City and County will be developing a separate agreement. January 29, 2016, EMS provided as the earliest date to meet with the PCFCA (excluding the PFD) to discuss the Medical Tiered Response Agreement. Moving Forward: Pending the outcome of the meeting the draft agreement will be circulated to the Council(s), CAO(s) and Management for their review with a request for approval. At this time, the normal process for entering into an agreement will be undertaken. Action: Date: January 25, DFES Medical Tiered Response Update Page 10 of 72

11 Agenda Item # 8a) REPORT TO: FROM: Reeve Nelson & Council E.J. Rath, CAO/Director of Planning & Economic Development DATE: January 25, 2016 SUBJECT: Averton (formerly Beaverbrook) Condominium RECOMMENDATION: THAT the C.A.O. be authorized to send a letter to the County of Peterborough advising that the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan has no objection to the three (3) year extension to the draft plan of Condominium approval for Averton Homes (County File no. 15CD-09001) Background The Ontario Municipal Board granted Draft Plan of Condominium, Official Plan and Zoning Amendment approval for the Averton Homes (Otonabee) Inc. (formerly Beaverbrook) development on September 21, The OMB approval provided five years to fulfill the draft plan conditions. A formal request has been filed with the County as the approval authority for a three year extension. Analysis The subject lands are located in Part Lot 20 & 21, Concession 16, Otonabee Ward. The 130 single detached unit condominium would be on the west side of Matchett Line with frontage on the Otonabee River. Due to floodplain and environmental constraints along the waterfront, all 130 units will be internal to the condominium with frontage on private roads. The development includes a common access to the water (boat launch and/or docking) as well as private parkland/open space. The proposed private clubhouse is under review. The condominium will be serviced by private water and wastewater systems which will be subject to a Responsibility Agreement with the municipality as per OMB decision incorporated into the OSM Official Plan. Stormwater will be directed to two stormwater management facilities. The revised proposal includes one primary access from Matchett Line as well as an emergency access. Growth-related costs for the road improvements on Matchett Line and Mahood Road are now included in the development charge calculations for the DC By-law (2015) with construction on the Township roads proposed to be completed by the municipality. Eleanor J. Rath Director of Planning & Economic Development ejrath@osmtownship.ca Averton Homes Draft Plan Extension Request Page 11 of 72

12 Agenda Item # 8a) In 2015, Averton contacted the Township to advise that they were ready to proceed with the next stage of the project. Based on the detailed engineering for the grading, the Developer is now proposing to reconfigure the development. Preconsultation was held with the County as the approval authority and the Township officials involved with the technical review being the Township Solicitor, Township Engineer, Fire Chief, CAO and CBO along with ORCA. The proposed changes will require red line revisions to the draft plan as well as updates to the zoning by-law mapping when the final lot configuration is determined. As the draft plan is OMB approved, the red line revisions will likely require some involvement by the Board. The ZBA will follow the normal Planning Act procedures. Averton anticipates moving forward with the first engineering submission in the spring of Their Planner is also engaged to prepare the revised Planning Justification Report to accompany the draft plan revisions and rezoning application. While it is hoped that the updates to the draft plan and rezoning can be completed prior to the deadline of September 21, 2016, it was agreed that a formal application to extend should be submitted to the County. Council was made aware of the pending request as part of the Nov/Dec 2015 monthly planning report. Budget Implications There are no budget implications associated with the draft plan extension request as the application is to the County. Averton has provided a developer s deposit for the technical review costs and the account is in good standing with the municipality at this time. The usual application fees and deposits will apply at the time of the Zoning By-law Amendment. Notice & Communications The County is responsible for notification under the Planning Act for the draft plan approvals. The Township is responsible for public notification at the time of the rezoning and it is not common to do any public notifications for draft plans in tandem. It has been recommended to Averton that they reach out to the neighbours who made submissions at the time of the prior approvals so that they are aware of the proposed changes well in advance of the formal public meeting. Prepared by: E.J. Rath, CAO Copied to: Justin Malfara, Averton Caitlin Robinson, County of Peterborough Township Solicitor, Township Engineer, Fire Chief & CBO Bev Hurford, ORCA Eleanor J. Rath Director of Planning & Economic Development ejrath@osmtownship.ca Averton Homes Draft Plan Extension Request Page 12 of 72

13 Agenda Item # 8a) January 19, 2016 Eleanor J. Rath, CMO Chief Administrative Officer/Director of Planning & Economic Development Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan P.O Box 70, 20 Third Street Keene, ON K0L 2G0 Re: Averton Homes Draft Plan of Condominium Extension Request Part of Lot 20 & 21, Concession 16 Otonabee Ward Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan County File No. 15CD Dear Ms. Rath: Please find attached correspondence from Mr. Baffta, on behalf of Averton Group, requesting an extension of the draft plan conditions for the above-noted draft plan of condominium. Draft plan approval is set to lapse on September 21, I would ask that you review this request with Council and determine if there is support for the three year extension request. I would ask that you provide me with a response by February 18, 2016, so that I can process this request before County Council. Thank you for your assistance in this regard. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. Yours truly, ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Caitlin Robinson Planner 470 Water Street Peterborough Ontario K9H 3M3 Phone: Toll Free: Averton Homes Draft Plan Extension Request Page 13 of 72

14 Agenda Item # 8a) Averton Homes Draft Plan Extension Request Page 14 of 72

15 Agenda Item # 8b) Severance M e m o To: Members of Council From: E.J. Rath, CAO/ Director of Planning & Economic Development Date: January 25, 2016 Subject: File B3-16 Cameron (Howson) 4435 County Road 2 Property Location: Civic Address: Property Roll No. Con. 1, Part Lot 16, Otonabee Ward 4435 County Road 2 (severed) 4431 County Road 2 (retained) (severed) (retained) Severance Type: Creation of Lot by Correction of Title (aka Technical Severance) Recommendation: THAT, on the basis of the CAO s Report and comments received from Otonabee Conservation at the time of the Environmental Impact Study review, Council approve the creation of a lot as per Consent File B3-16 as it conforms to Section 4.2.1(h) with no Township conditions. Severance Proposal The consent application has been brought forward by Roger Howson on behalf of his clients James and Mae Cameron. Council previously discussed this matter on August 6, 2015 and indicated that the Township would support the proposed application subject to concurrence from the County of Peterborough and Otonabee Conservation that the proposal meets their requirements for a technical severance. Background The Camerons own the 30 acre parcel located at 4435 County Road 2. Since 2013, the owners have been in contact with the Township CAO and CBO regarding the requirements for a building permit in conjunction with the sale of this vacant lot. There has been extensive research conducted to confirm a building envelope on this property within the portion of the lands zoned Rural (approximately 8 acres) in order to meet the requirements of the OSM Zoning By-law including: Eleanor J. Rath, CAO Director of Planning & Economic Development Cameron - Consent File BTBD /4335 County Road 2 Page 15 of 72

16 Agenda Item # 8b) Setbacks from the County Road Setbacks from the licensed gravel pits in the vicinity Setbacks from barns on adjacent lands A GIS map showing the various constraints (excluding MDS) is attached to this report. As the buildable area at is located within ORCA development control area and is subject to the 120 metre setback for the Birdsall Provincially Significant Wetland (PSW), the owners were required to complete an Environmental Impact Study to confirm that a building envelope was available on the lands outside of the wetland and associated setbacks. This EIS was completed in 2015 to the satisfaction of ORCA. (See comments attached including site sketch) On the basis of the preconsultation and EIS, the Cameron s sold the lot but the sale has been unable to close as it was determined that a deed, registered in 1999 to convey the adjoining lands located at 4431 County Road 2 into the sole ownership of Mae Cameron, had been registered in the wrong order by their Solicitor thus inadvertently merging the two adjoining properties. Consent Application for 4435 County Road 2 & 4431 County Road 2 The Township is awaiting the formal circulation of the Consent application for 4435 County Road 2 but, due to the unanticipated delay in receiving County clearance for the application to proceed, have agreed to expedite the Township comments. The application is to unmerge 4435 County Road 2 from the property located at 4431 County Road 2. Official Plan There is no blanket policy for the demerger of properties in Otonabee-South Monaghan. At least once a year, the Township is contacted by a solicitor who has discovered that their client s lands have merged in title at some point of time in the past. The County and the Township have consistently taken the position that all consent applications must qualify for a severance under the Official Plan. Severance for Merged properties The Township Official Plan anticipates that there will be inadvertent mergers. The criteria for a technical severance is set out in OP policy 4.2.1(h) as follows An application for severance involving merged properties which formerly existed as separate and district parcels and that inadvertently merged due to common ownership may be separated to reflect the original lot configuration provided the subject property is still in the same ownership as when such merging occurred, new or additional lots are not being created, and the severance complies with all other policies of this Plan. Eleanor J. Rath, CAO Director of Planning & Economic Development Cameron - Consent File BTBD /4335 County Road 2 Page 16 of 72

17 Agenda Item # 8b) Test 1 Merged properties which formerly existed as separate and district parcels Prior to 1999, 4431 County Road 2 and 4435 County Road 2 existed as separate and distinct parcels. The application passes the first test. Test 2 merged due to common ownership In 1999, the subject properties merged due to common ownership when two deeds were inadvertently registered in the wrong order. The application meets the second test. Test 3 separated to reflect the original lot configuration The consent application proposes to re-establish 4431 County Road 2 and 4435 County Road 2 as they existed prior to The third test is met. Test 4 subject property is still in the same ownership as when such merging occurred The sale of 4435 County Road 2 has not yet occurred due to the merger. The property is therefore in the same ownership as when the inadvertent merger occurred in Test 4 is met. Test 5 new or additional lots are not being created Official Plan defines new development in the same manner as the Provincial Policy Statements. The PPS defines new development as development which requires a planning act application. A consent is a planning act application. The application does not appear to meet this test however, given that it would be impossible for any consent application to be considered under 4.2.1(h) if a consent application were deemed to be a fatal flaw, the test appears to focus on whether the same lot is being recreated and that no additional lots are being created. The lot at 4435 County Road 2 is the same as the prior configuration and no additional lots are being created. This test has been met. Test 6 the severance complies with all other policies of this Plan The final test is whether the severance complies with all other policies of this Plan. Here are the applicable policies: Eleanor J. Rath, CAO Director of Planning & Economic Development Cameron - Consent File BTBD /4335 County Road 2 Page 17 of 72

18 Agenda Item # 8b) OP designation The subject lands both severed and retained are designated both Rural and Environmental Protection. A portion of the EP designation is the Birdsall Provincially Significant Wetland. At 4435 County Road 2, the Rural designation permits a residential use in the northwest corner of the property. Environmental Policies The Township Official Plan does not provide for land severance in the EP designation and sets out requirements in 4.2.1(j) for any application for a severance in an environmentally sensitive area. Consultation with Otonabee Conservation is required to ensure any severance meets the environmental policies of OP Policy The EP designation is based on the mapping of the Birdsall PSW and regionally or locally significant wetlands on immediately adjacent lands The PPS does not permit any new development in a PSW. As Council will recall, there is some flexibility in the new OP with respect to the EP designation. A property owner may carry out a site specific Environmental Impact Study to refine the EP boundaries and/or to determine site specific setbacks from a wetland. Notwithstanding the Rural designation, the developable lands at 4435 County Road 2 are within the 120 metre buffer around the PSW. The building permit inquiry for the proposed a residential use at this location triggered an EIS under OP Policy The EIS was completed by Niblett Environmental Associates dated May 2015 and reviewed by Otonabee Conservation. The ORCA comments dated June 1, 2015 confirm the setback on the property and identified mitigation measures required at the time of construction. In other words, the EIS confirmed that there is a building envelope at 4435 County Road 2 which will accommodate a future residential use outside of the EP designation. The EIS will be used in conjunction with the issuance of any permits (ORCA or Township). Aggregate Setbacks The Official Plan policy requires a 300m setback from any licensed pit. The severed lands are beyond this setback. MDS Setbacks The Official Plan policy requires that new land uses, including the creation of lots, shall comply with MDS. There is a barn on an adjacent property to the north. The County confirmed at the time of the building permit inquiry and again at the time of the preliminary severance review that the MDS setback had been met. Eleanor J. Rath, CAO Director of Planning & Economic Development Cameron - Consent File BTBD /4335 County Road 2 Page 18 of 72

19 Agenda Item # 8b) As the demerger of the lot would not result in any new development within the EP designation and all other setback related OP requirements have been achieved, this test has been met. Frontage on a Public Road Both the severed and retained lands have frontage on County Road 2. The County was consulted at the time of the building permit inquiries regarding an entrance permit and setbacks. No concerns were raised at this location. The application has therefore met all of the tests in the OSM Official Plan for a technical severance. Zoning The Official Plan also provides that new lots must comply with the Zoning By-law. Severed lands The property at 4435 County Road 2 is zoned Rural (RU) and Environmental Protection (EP). The property is approximately 12 hectares in size which exceeds the minimum lot size of 10 hectares in a Rural (RU) Zone. The lot frontage is approximately 230m which exceeds the minimum 90m frontage in a Rural (RU) Zone. Under the OSM Zoning By-law, Section 4.22 lands zoned EP may be used in calculating the minimum lot area and frontage requirements. As the application is for a technical severance and no new development is being proposed in the EP zone, the Township and ORCA have concurred that a ZBA is not required in this instance. The building envelope on the proposed lot is located within the Rural Zone. This building envelope also meets the setback requirements outlined in the General Provisions of the OSM Zoning By-law as follows: MDS setback from adjacent barn setback from wetland (Note: Building envelope is outside of EP zone and EIS setback) (b) setback from County Road setback from Extractive Industrial (ME) Zone (150m) Retained Lands The retained property at 4431 County Road 2 is zoned Rural (RU) and Environmental Protection (EP). The property is approximately 39.5 hectares in size which exceeds the minimum lot size of 10 hectares in a Rural (RU) Zone. Under the OSM Zoning By-law, Section 4.22 lands zoned EP may be used in calculating the minimum lot area and frontage requirements. Eleanor J. Rath, CAO Director of Planning & Economic Development Cameron - Consent File BTBD /4335 County Road 2 Page 19 of 72

20 Agenda Item # 8b) The property has frontage on both County Road 2 and Blezard Line. Technically this is not considered to be a corner lot as there is a triangular shaped parcel at the intersection of the two roads. While the zoning by-law interprets the shorter of the two frontages to be frontage for zoning purposes, sorting out this technicality is not relevant as both frontages well exceed the minimum of 90m frontage in a Rural (RU) Zone. No new development is being proposed on the retained lands. The application has therefore met all of the tests in the Zoning By-law for the severed and retained lands. Conclusion The proposal meets the Township requirements for a Technical Severance under Section 4.2.1(h) No conditions would apply to the consent application. Any building permits issued on the severed lot will be subject to ORCA clearance in accordance with the Environmental Impact Study. Respectfully submitted, Eleanor J. Rath, CMO Director of Planning & Economic Development Eleanor J. Rath, CAO Director of Planning & Economic Development Cameron - Consent File BTBD /4335 County Road 2 Page 20 of 72

21 Agenda Item # 8b) Cameron - Consent File BTBD /4335 County Road 2 Page 21 of 72

22 Agenda Item # 8b) Cameron - Consent File BTBD /4335 County Road 2 Dumb L\?un ~ \ >2 (\, \.;wdb1 Z szoz ba.mvu cm 2 am: 2 Mepunoq puena M 3l. 1 pue ado aaua ugpunq l.?!m Auadmd,to Page 22 of 72

23 Agenda Item # 8b) COUNTY OF PETERBOROUGH MUNICIPAL APPRAISAL FORM APPLICANT: Cameron - Roger Howson Agent LOT: 16, CON.: 1 MUNICIPAL WARD: Otonabee FILE B TBD address: 4431 & 4435 County Road 2, Roll #: and , Island # or other: APPLICATION FOR: Creation of a new lot and Correction of Title RECOMMENDATION: Application conforms to the Official Plan. Severed parcel conforms to the Zoning By-Law. Retained parcel conforms to the Zoning By-Law. The Township recommends this application. If the application is approved, the following conditions are requested: 1. Cash-in-lieu of parkland fee be paid to the Municipality. 2. Rezoning of the severed parcel to the satisfaction of the Municipality. 3. Rezoning of the retained parcel to the satisfaction of the Municipality. 4. Minor Variance for the severed parcel to the satisfaction of the Municipality. 5. Minor Variance for the retained parcel to the satisfaction of the Municipality. 6. Road widening on severed portion, of. Cost to be incurred by the applicant. 7. An Agreement is to be entered into between the Applicant & the Municipality and registered on title at the applicants expense which would. 8. A Merger Agreement is to be entered into between the Transferor, Transferee and Municipality, pursuant to Section 51(26) and Section 53(12) of the Planning Act, R.S.O, 1990, and registered on title to merge the severed parcel with the abutting (or separated) land identified by property roll #, such that these 2 parcels shall be considered as one lot and shall not be dealt with separately OR The solicitor for the applicant is to provide an undertaking, whereby he informs the Committee, in writing, that the lands are being conveyed to an abutting property owner and a merger of title shall take place. 9. Comments: OFFICIAL PLAN: Application conforms to the Township Official Plan policies, Section(s) Severed Parcel: a) Proposed Use: Residential. b) Land Use Designation(s): Rural and Environmental Protection. c) The proposed use is a permitted one. d) Special policies affecting the severed parcel (i.e. OPA): Policies of , and have been met for building envelope in Rural designation. Retained Parcel(s): a) Proposed Use: Agricultural. b) Land Use Designation(s): Rural and Environmental Protection. c) The proposed use is a permitted one. d) Special policies affecting the retained parcel (i.e. OPA): Existing use is non conforming. ZONING BY-LAW: Severed Parcel: a) The severed parcel conforms to the Township Zoning By-Law provisions, Section(s) (Lot Size), (Frontage) and setbacks under 4.23 (MDS), 4.29 (wetland), 4.30(b) (County Road), (Licensed Pit). b) A rezoning is not required for the severed parcel. c) A minor variance is not required for the severed parcel. d) The existing zoning of the severed parcel is: Rural and Environmental Protection. e) The recommended zoning of the severed parcel would be: Rural and Environmental Protection (no change). Retained Parcel(s): a) The retained parcel conforms to the Township Zoning By-Law provisions, Section(s) (lot Size) and (Frontage) No new development proposed. b) A rezoning is not required for the retained parcel. c) A minor variance is not required for the retained parcel. d) The existing zoning of the retained parcel is: Rural and Environmental Protection. e) The recommended zoning of the retained parcel would be: Rural and Environmental Protection (no change). General: a) If the severed and/or retained parcel(s) do not conform to the Zoning By-Law, Council supports a rezoning and/or minor variance. Completed By: E.J. Rath, CAO/Director of Planning & Economic Development Date: January 25, 2016 Amended Date: This document is available in 12 pt. font if required for accessibility. Municipal Appraisal Fo Cameron - Consent File BTBD /4335 County Road 2 Page 23 of 72

24 Agenda Item # 8b) COUNTY OF PETERBOROUGH MUNICIPAL APPRAISAL FORM This document is available in 12 pt. font if required for accessibility. Municipal Appraisal Fo Cameron - Consent File BTBD /4335 County Road 2 Page 24 of 72

25 ... Cameron - Consent File BTBD /4335 County Road 2 Cameron Lot with Constraints Legend Roads < 50,000 PRIV ; Private; PRIV City Arterial City Collector and Local City Owned Unclassified Provincial County Township Water Access Only Outside Roads < 50,000 Major Roads Local Roads First Nations Civic Address Parcel Fabric Parcel First Nations - Canada Lands Rivers Intermittent Provincially Significant Wetlands OSM Zoning Bylaws OSM OP UrbanFringe Page 25 of 72 OSM OP Area of Influence OSM OP Special Policy OSM OP Landuse Hamlet 1: 8, NAD83_CSRS98_UTM_zone_17N Latitude Geographics Group Ltd Meters Notes Existing Residential Shoreline Commercial This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION Employment Areas Aggregate Resource Agricultural Agenda Item # 8b) Permanent Clean Water Act Policies Apply

26 Agenda Item # 8b) COUNTY OF PETERBOROUGH MUNICIPAL APPRAISAL FORM APPLICANT: Cameron, James and Mae - Roger Howson Agent FILE B 3-16 LOT: 16, CON.: 1 MUNICIPAL WARD: Otonabee 911 address: 4431 & 4435 County Road 2, Roll #: and , Island # or other: APPLICATION FOR: Creation of a new lot and Correction of Title RECOMMENDATION: Application conforms to the Official Plan. Severed parcel conforms to the Zoning By-Law. Retained parcel conforms to the Zoning By-Law. The Township recommends this application. If the application is approved, the following conditions are requested: 1. Cash-in-lieu of parkland fee be paid to the Municipality. 2. Rezoning of the severed parcel to the satisfaction of the Municipality. 3. Rezoning of the retained parcel to the satisfaction of the Municipality. 4. Minor Variance for the severed parcel to the satisfaction of the Municipality. 5. Minor Variance for the retained parcel to the satisfaction of the Municipality. 6. Road widening on severed portion, of. Cost to be incurred by the applicant. 7. An Agreement is to be entered into between the Applicant & the Municipality and registered on title at the applicants expense which would. 8. A Merger Agreement is to be entered into between the Transferor, Transferee and Municipality, pursuant to Section 51(26) and Section 53(12) of the Planning Act, R.S.O, 1990, and registered on title to merge the severed parcel with the abutting (or separated) land identified by property roll #, such that these 2 parcels shall be considered as one lot and shall not be dealt with separately OR The solicitor for the applicant is to provide an undertaking, whereby he informs the Committee, in writing, that the lands are being conveyed to an abutting property owner and a merger of title shall take place. 9. Comments: OFFICIAL PLAN: Application conforms to the Township Official Plan policies, Section(s) Severed Parcel: a) Proposed Use: Residential. b) Land Use Designation(s): Rural and Environmental Protection. c) The proposed use is a permitted one. d) Special policies affecting the severed parcel (i.e. OPA): Policies of , and have been met for building envelope in Rural designation. Retained Parcel(s): a) Proposed Use: Agricultural. b) Land Use Designation(s): Rural and Environmental Protection. c) The proposed use is a permitted one. d) Special policies affecting the retained parcel (i.e. OPA): Existing use is non conforming. ZONING BY-LAW: Severed Parcel: a) The severed parcel conforms to the Township Zoning By-Law provisions, Section(s) & 4.22 (Lot Size), (Frontage) and setbacks under 4.23 (MDS), 4.29 (wetland), 4.30(b) (County Road), (Licensed Pit). b) A rezoning is not required for the severed parcel. c) A minor variance is not required for the severed parcel. d) The existing zoning of the severed parcel is: Rural and Environmental Protection. e) The recommended zoning of the severed parcel would be: Rural and Environmental Protection (no change). Retained Parcel(s): a) The retained parcel conforms to the Township Zoning By-Law provisions, Section(s) (lot Size) and (Frontage) No new development proposed. b) A rezoning is not required for the retained parcel. c) A minor variance is not required for the retained parcel. d) The existing zoning of the retained parcel is: Rural and Environmental Protection. e) The recommended zoning of the retained parcel would be: Rural and Environmental Protection (no change). General: a) If the severed and/or retained parcel(s) do not conform to the Zoning By-Law, Council supports a rezoning and/or minor variance. Completed By: E.J. Rath, CAO/Director of Planning & Economic Development Date: January 25, 2016 Amended Date: This document is available in 12 pt. font if required for accessibility. Municipal Appraisal Fo Cameron - Consent File BTBD /4335 County Road 2 Page 26 of 72

27 Agenda Item # 8b) COUNTY OF PETERBOROUGH MUNICIPAL APPRAISAL FORM This document is available in 12 pt. font if required for accessibility. Municipal Appraisal Fo Cameron - Consent File BTBD /4335 County Road 2 Page 27 of 72

28 Agenda Item # 8c) REPORT TO: FROM: Reeve Nelson & Council E.J. Rath, CAO/Director of Planning & Economic Development DATE: January 25, 2016 SUBJECT: Planning Status Report Year End 2015 RECOMMENDATION: THAT Council receive the 2015 Planning Status Year End Report for information; This report is a summary of the Planning related activities during 2015: Official Plan Review 2015 Highlights OSM Official Plan approved by Ontario Municipal Board OSM Official Plan layer in County GIS system for staff use 2016 Workplan Complete review of OP mapping in GIS and launch for public use Official Plan Amendments 2015 Highlights Bellmere Winds OPA/ZBA/Site Plan (Phase 2 OPA No. 1) Technical Review completed and Public Meeting held for OPA/ZBA Planner review and reports on public and agency submissions as well as second Public Meeting pending. Road Improvements pending (Phase 1 and 2 requirement as part of DCs) Public information on country driving tips drafted by Owner for CAO review with revisions pending Loucks OPA/ZBA Trailer Park OPA/ZBA Applications (increase to 160 sites plus 15 cabin/visitor PMT sites plus accessory dwelling OPA No. 2) Technical Review completed and Public Meeting held for OPA and ZBA Lot Addition Consent approved by County for well site and waterfront amenity area (approval pending OPA/ZBA approval) OPA approval pending final planning reports and clearances ZBA pending final revisions including water setbacks and use of agricultural buildings for resort related storage Eleanor J. Rath Director of Planning & Economic Development ejrath@osmtownship.ca CAO - Year End Planning Report Page 28 of 72

29 Agenda Item # 8c) Organics at Bensfort Landfill (OPA/ZBA) Preconsultation for Complete Application(s) for proposed yard waste facility at Bensfort Landfill (OPA/ZBA) Township compensation proposal agreed upon by City Applications pending from County Planning Lowe Cow Island Lots (OPA/ZBA) Reports identified at time of preconsultation are in process Owner has completed Archaeological Study and is awaiting Ministry registration EIS to be finalized and submitted for ORCA review. New Planner assigned due to retirement. Applications pending. Source Protection OPA Mandatory OP policy update to implement Source Protection Plan County Planning is taking the lead to draft OP updates including OSM Initial draft of County OP updates prepared and reviewed in late 2015 Final draft policies anticipated for public consultation in spring 2016 Withers Closed Landfill Site (OPA/ZBA) MOECC has requested that this closed landfill site and 500m buffer be included in the Official Plan as the subject property and surrounding lands would be subject to the D4 guidelines. This status would also result in Hold Zones when the Zoning By-law is updated. Request has been filed by MOECC with County Planning for future OPA. Severance Inquiries The CAO responds to property owners, real estate or purchaser inquiries ( or phone) regarding severance policies. All information is confirmed in writing, generally by and placed on the property file. Upon request, the CAO and/or Township Planner and/or CBO also meet with ratepayers or purchasers to discuss the Official Plan, zoning or severance policies as they apply to their lands. Preliminary Severance Reviews After preconsultation with the Township, the next steps is Preliminary Severance Reviews at the County. Personnel changes at the County resulted in delays in the processing of PSRs. Concerns have been raised that a strict interpretation of certain policies is resulting in negative PSRs reviews, even where applicants have preconsulted with the Township and have been cleared to proceed. This is particularly the case in the Existing Residential designation due to the definition of infilling and an OPA may be required (see note below). Eleanor J. Rath Director of Planning & Economic Development ejrath@osmtownship.ca CAO - Year End Planning Report Page 29 of 72

30 Agenda Item # 8c) The CAO is tracking the following files which have been active and have a high probability of proceeding to consent applications in 2016: Agricultural Lots None expected to proceed Easements None expected to proceed Existing residential Lots (8 lots): 2105 Burnham Line (Wuis 3 infill lots ) Third Line (Johnston Lots 2 infill lots ) Wallace Point Road at Driscoll Road (Foss 3 infill lots ) NOTE: Council direction to review the infill definition in the OP as this appears to be problematic for lands which Council redesignated to Existing Residential for new lots. Farm Consolidations/Surplus Dwelling None expected to proceed Hamlet Residential lots (approx. 10 lots): 35 Arthur Street, Fraserville (O Dette ) Edwards Drive (Johnston ) Edwards Drive and Pinecrest Road (Elliott - 2 lots on Pinecrest, not certain about 2 lots on Edwards Drive ) 1269 Heritage Line (Glen Isle Farms 2 lots ) 3537 Wallace Point Road (Balfour ) 3413 Wallace Point Road (King/Dunford 2015 under review for requirements) Limited Service Residential lots 72 Cow Island (Lowe 2 LSR lots) Lot Additions (5 plus Cow Island lots) 1982/2002 Assumption Road (Malloy Estate ) County Road 2 (Patmore ) Cow Island (Lowe ) 2049 Keene Road (Beasley ) 3177 Old Norwood Road (Herder/Barry ) 1930 River Road (Diamond ) Rural Residential lots in Rural Area (8 lots) 1376 Cloverdale Line (Vivian ) Henderson Line/Knox Road (Cremers ) Hope Mill Road (Clark ) 3195 Knox Road (Dawson ) Lakeside Road (Bested ) 1571 Providence Line (Hollandy ) Eleanor J. Rath Director of Planning & Economic Development ejrath@osmtownship.ca CAO - Year End Planning Report Page 30 of 72

31 Agenda Item # 8c) 1930 River Road (Diamond ) 815 Rahmel Road (Andrews ) Rural Residential lots in Shoreline area (4 lots) Almeara Drive (McConkey 1 infill lot otherwise Plan of Subdivision ) 1708 Matchett Line (Bukala 3 lots ) Technical Severance (1 lot) 4435 County Road 2 (Cameron ) If all of the pending applications were to proceed, there would be 32 new lots created with 10 in the Hamlets and 8 in the Existing Residential settlement areas which is over 50% of the applications. Another 4 lots could be created by consent in the Shoreline areas with another 2 potential lots on Cow Island. Rural Residential lots would present 8 lots or 25% of the new lots. This profile is consistent with the growth management strategy which is directing more residential growth into the existing settlement areas. It is very important that the policies and processes be revisited where necessary to encourage these applications as some requirements are creating unnecessary hurdles for infill opportunities which can be supported by existing infrastructure. Severance Applications 2015 Applications During 2015, the Township processed 13 new consent applications with 3 files closed. 6 new lots were created with 1 in the Shoreline designation and 5 in the Rural designation. All of the new Rural Residential lots required a ZBA as a condition with 4 ZBAs pending at year end. 1 farm consolidation file is open pending ZBA in technical severance pending awaiting County decision in relation ZBA condition 4 lot additions were approved with 3 pending at yearend awaiting ZBAs 1 easement is pending receipt of the reference plan for Township sign off 2014 Applications 9 consent files carried forward from 2014 processed and closed in rural residential lots with 4 of 5 requiring ZBAs 1 easement 2 farm consolidation/surplus dwellings which required ZBAs 1 lot addition with ZBA consent files carried forward from 2013 processed in Rural Residential lots created, both required ZBAs Eleanor J. Rath Director of Planning & Economic Development ejrath@osmtownship.ca CAO - Year End Planning Report Page 31 of 72

32 Agenda Item # 8c) 4 files were lot additions and all required ZBAs 2 lot additions will facilitate future plan of subdivision in Woodview Hamlet 1 lot addition for commercial expansion Hayes/Jan Lau cleared to proceed but copy of merger agreement pending file closure In total, the Township processed 28 consent files in 2015 with 10 files carried forward to files are new lots, with only 1 in the Shoreline designation and the rest being Rural Residential lots. All but 2 of the new lots required ZBAs. 4 of the 10 files carried forward into 2016 are new lots pending ZBAs. 3 of the files processed are farm consolidation/surplus farm dwellings, with 1 file carried forward for ZBA in 2016 lot additions were processed in 2015, all requiring ZBAs and Merger Agreements. 4 of the files have been carried forward to easements were processed in 2015, with 1 pending at year end General Zoning & Development Inquiries The CAO responds to a number of zoning inquiries from property owners, real estate agents and/or appraisers. All zoning information is confirmed in writing, generally by and placed on the property file. Zoning inquiries are also handled by the CBO and Building & Planning Assistant in relation to building-related zoning matters Zoning Files 23 zoning applications processed in 2015 (19 new) 16 associated with a consent applications (6 lots, 8 lot additions, 2 farm consolidations) 1 temporary use by-law 1 secondary dwelling unit 1 to legalize building under construction 2 lift hold applications (1 pending) 2 OPA/ZBA development files (see OPAs both pending at YE) Commercial-related Zoning activities 1 Temporary User By-law for a start-up business co-locating with an existing business 1 ZBA to permit business previously a temporary use 1 clearance for recreational use which may convert to commercial in future Zoning clearances for 3 new businesses and 2 agriculturally-related accessory buildings and 1 school reopening (no ZBAs required, 1 SPA required). 1 lot addition and ZBA to expand existing business (SPA required) 2 pending ZBAs for commercial businesses 1 new (SPA required), 1 converting from agricultural use (SPA to be determined) Eleanor J. Rath Director of Planning & Economic Development ejrath@osmtownship.ca CAO - Year End Planning Report Page 32 of 72

33 Agenda Item # 8c) 1 proposal to expand uses at non-conforming business (did not proceed) 2 pending files to restore commercial zones removed at time of Zoning By-law Update in 2010 (existing business and/or site works not completed to convert to residential) 1 preliminary consultation for major Shoreline development proposal (OPA/ZBA/SPA) 1 consultation for clean fill operation as part of gravel pit operation (SPA) with possible future expansion of business related activities on the property (ZBA and/or SPA) Residential Activities Too many zoning related inquiries to track, usually at time of sale 7 ZBAs for new lots, 2 included rezoning on retained lands 7 ZBAs for residential lot additions, 5 include retained lands and 2 facilitate future subdivision 1 ZBA for surplus farm dwelling, includes rezoning for retained lands. Another one pending at year end. 2 Lift Hold By-laws for multi-residential, 1 processed and 1 pending at year end 1 zoning clearance and 1 ZBA for secondary residential units in Shoreline area. 2 similar ZBAs or minor variances pending. 1 ZBA to legalize an accessory structure under construction without permits with another similar ZBA or MV application pending 2 pending files for reduction in setbacks from Rice Lake and/or lot coverage issues on Shoreline lots (could be processed as ZBAs or MVs) 1 pending ZBA for setback from CP Rail as 60m in Zoning By-law exceeds railway requirements in Rural area 1 zoning clearance for merger of old lots to facilitate building lot 1 zoning clearance for building lot created by merger with closed road Zoning By-law Update Highlights for 2015 The Building & Planning Asst. completed the Office Consolidation for Zoning By-law and is updating the document at the time of each ZBA. Staff is also tracking items to be considered in update including all ZBAs passed or OMB decisions since Oct Zoning is not on County GIS for staff use Goals for 2016: Finish zoning map review and make GIS public Identify zoning updates required from the Township perspective to clarify and ideally simplify zoning requirements in key areas including overlapping requirements, onerous Eleanor J. Rath Director of Planning & Economic Development ejrath@osmtownship.ca CAO - Year End Planning Report Page 33 of 72

34 Agenda Item # 8c) setbacks/lot coverage in some areas, agri-tourism, accessory structures and water setbacks on existing developed lots and existing structures on lot additions Review MVs since Oct 2010 to determine whether to consolidate as exception zones or whether this is another area for zoning updates Update Zoning By-law for farm diversified uses in conjunction with new OMAFRA and MDS guidelines Identify zoning updates for Sourcewater Protection related items Incorporate into Zoning By-law update pending citizen requires such as John McIntyre on Hope Mill Road, Hideaway Cottages and vacant commercial lot in Keene. Consider more flexibility in zoning for multiple units on blocks of infill land, provided that site servicing is addressed and site plan is applied Plans of Subdivision or Condominium There are three active major development files in addition to the OPAs noted above: Averton (formerly Beaverbrook) Condominiums File reactivated in 2015 Red Line revisions and rezoning pending Burnham Meadows Phase 1A under construction with completion of SPS and External Works pending DeMonte Acres, Woodview Applications pending for zoning and plan of subdivision It should also be noted that the McCloskey Industrial Park file lapsed as the owner decided not to renew. Municipal Clearance Requests Green Energy Act The Township processed a number of FIT applications and implemented a new Solar Policy in OSM Council does not support the large scale solar installations (greater than 5 acres and capped the total number of acres to the equivalent of one farm. A large solar proposal by Recurrent was not supported and any other companies considering large scale solar in OSM are now advised of the new policy. The new policy now tracks solar applications. Eleanor J. Rath Director of Planning & Economic Development ejrath@osmtownship.ca CAO - Year End Planning Report Page 34 of 72

35 Agenda Item # 8c) Telecommunication Towers Moratorium lifted on new cell towers as Health Canada requirements have been updated. Bell did not reactivate their 3 cell tower files and these are pending (2 may be going in Hiawatha Territory). 1 new inquiry about cell tower locations was advised of new Public Consultation protocol and need to co-locate on new towers where possible. Fire Station 2 Relocation Study Planning review completed in house and report pending at year end. Development Charges - 1 OMB appeal withdrawn and the other has lapsed - 5 year review completed and new by-law passed with no appeals Prepared by: E.J. Rath, CAO/Director of Planning & Economic Development Meeting Date: January 25, 2016 Eleanor J. Rath Director of Planning & Economic Development ejrath@osmtownship.ca CAO - Year End Planning Report Page 35 of 72

36 Agenda Item # 8d) Planning Report Provincial Policy Statement 2014 Review Township of Otonabee South Monaghan 915 Loucks Road, Part of Lot 9 & 10 Concessions 4 & 5 Otonabee Word CCS Project No December 10, 2015 Prepared for: Janet and Peter Loucks Prepared by: Clark Consulting Services 1. INTRODUCTION Clark Consulting Services on behalf of Peter and Janet Loucks, submitted applications for an Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment to allow an expanded RV Resort on lands located in Part of Lot 9 & 10 Concessions 4 & 5 in In view of the approval of the Provincial Policy Statement effective On April 30, 2014 this report provides a review of the New Provincial Policy Statement and a summary of the supporting documentation prepared and peer reviewed for this project. 2. PROVINCIAL POLICY STATEMENT 2014 In accordance with Section 3 of the Planning Act, a Provincial Policy Statement (PPS) was issued effective April 30, This revised PPS replaces Statements issued in 2005 and The purpose of the PPS is to provide direction on matters of provincial interest related to land use planning and development. In Part IV of the Provincial Policy Statement, the Vision for Ontario s Land Use Planning System is outlined. The Vision is based on encouraging and maintaining strong communities. This Vision reflects the diverse nature of communities and identifies the need for: focused development in settlement areas; efficient development patterns; the protection of natural heritage resources; and the protection of the health and safety of the population. Section V of the PPS contains policies specifically directed towards assisting in the realization of the Vision. These policies are divided into the following categories: Clark Consulting - Loucks PPS Review Page 36 of 72

37 Agenda Item # 8d) 1. Building Strong Healthy Communities 2. Wise Use and Management of Resources 3. Protecting Public Health and Safety 4. Implementation and Interpretation As the subject lands are located in a rural area of the Township of Otonabee South Monaghan section Rural Areas in Municipalities is applicable. Section states: On rural lands located in municipalities, permitted uses are: a) the management or use of resources; b) resource-based recreational uses (including recreational dwellings); c) limited residential development; d) home occupations and home industries; e) cemeteries; and f) other rural land uses. The proposed use is a resource-based recreational use (including recreational dwellings) Recreational, tourism and other economic opportunities should be promoted. The proposed RV Resort is focused on recreational/tourism opportunities afforded by its proximity to Rice Lake. The proposed development will have a recreational focus and complement existing development in the region Development that is compatible with the rural landscape and can be sustained by rural service levels should be promoted. The subject lands are not prime agriculture and do not contain mineral or aggregate resources. The development will be serviced by private water and septic services which are compatible with surrounding development and are appropriate for the area Development shall be appropriate to the infrastructure which is planned or available, and avoid the need for the unjustified and/or uneconomical expansion of this infrastructure. The infrastructure proposed is designed to meet the servicing requirements of the land use as determined through a Hydro-geologic assessment Opportunities to support a diversified rural economy should be promoted by protecting agricultural and other resource-related uses and directing non-related development to areas where it will minimize constraints on these uses. The proposed land use results in diversification of the rural economy through development of a resource-based recreational use that capitalizes on Rice Lake and the rural landscape without negatively impacting agricultural or other resource-related uses. Other PPS policy of relevance are reviewed below: Provincial Policy Statement 2014 Review Page 2 Clark Consulting - Loucks PPS Review Page 37 of 72

38 Agenda Item # 8d) Land Use Compatibility-... Sensitive land uses should be planned to ensure they are appropriately designed, buffered and or separated from each other to prevent or mitigate adverse effects... The proposed land use meets the required setbacks from the existing licenced aggregate pit Sewage, Water and Stormwater- policy related to servicing. Technical reviews have been completed and peer reviewed demonstrating that the proposed servicing is feasible for the proposed development Transportation Systems- policy related to movement of people and goods. A Traffic Study was completed concluding that, with some minor upgrades, the existing road system can accommodate the traffic generated by the proposed land use Wise Use and Management of Resources- including Natural Heritage, Water, Agriculture, Minerals and Petroleum, Mineral Aggregate Resources, Cultural Heritage and Archaeology. The potential impact of the proposed land use on resources has been considered through technical studies, agency reviews and peer reviews. Specifically there are mineral aggregate resources and archaeological resources located on or near the subject lands. Mechanisms have been put in place to ensure these resources are managed and protected. 3.1 Natural Hazards- as related to flood lands Lands adjacent to Rice Lake have been protected with a 30 m buffer identified on the Concept Plan in which no development is permitted. 3. TECHNICAL STUDIES AND PEER REVIEW In addition to the preparation and review of the Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Bylaw applications and development of the refined Concept Plan, a full range of supporting studies have been completed in support of the proposed development. These studies have been submitted to the Township and circulated to the appropriate agencies for review, including peer reviewed as required. Supporting studies include: Hydrogeological Study, Oakridge Environmental Ltd. Stage 1 and 2 Archaeologic/Heritage Assessment, York North Archaeological Services Traffic Impact Assessment, Tranplan Associates Preliminary Stormwater Management Report, Dobri Engineering Ltd. Environmental Impact Study, Oakridge Environmental Ltd. Species at Risk Assessment, Oakridge Environmental Ltd. 4. CONCLUSION Having reviewed the PPS in its entirety, we have concluded that the location adjacent to Rice lake and the designation and zoning subject lands provide an opportunity to focus on recreational and Provincial Policy Statement 2014 Review Page 3 Clark Consulting - Loucks PPS Review Page 38 of 72

39 Agenda Item # 8d) tourism opportunities, and therefore the proposed development is consistent with the policies contained within the PPS. Sincerely; Bob Clark, P.Eng., P.Ag., R.P.P. Saved as: Planning Report Addendum Dec 2015 Provincial Policy Statement 2014 Review Page 4 Clark Consulting - Loucks PPS Review Page 39 of 72

40 Agenda Item # 9a) Lynn Jackson Zoning By-law Pt. Lot 32, Concession 11, Otonabee Ward 47 Division Road Property No ZBA Z19-15 (Consent B62-15) THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF OTONABEE-SOUTH MONAGHAN BY-LAW NO Being a By-law under the provisions of Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended, to amend By-law No , as amended, the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan Comprehensive Zoning By-law, with respect to certain lands located in Part of Lot 32, Concession 11, Otonabee Ward, Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan. WHEREAS By-law No was passed under the authority of Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. P.13, as amended, and regulates the use of land and the use and erection of buildings and structures within the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan; AND WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan conducted a public meeting in regard of the subject application as required by Section 34(12) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, as amended; AND WHEREAS Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, as amended, permits Council to pass an amending Zoning By-law, and the Council of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan deems it advisable to amend By-law No with respect to the lands described in this By-law; AND WHEREAS the matters herein are in conformity with the provisions of the Official Plan of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan, as amended; NOW THEREFORE the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan hereby enacts as follows: 1. By-law No , as amended, is hereby amended as follows: (a) Map No. 1 of Schedule A of By-law No is hereby amended by changing the zone categories of certain lands located in Part of Lot 32, Concession 11, in the geographic Township of Otonabee, as follows: (i) from the Rural (RU) Zone to the Rural Residential (RR) Zone, and (ii) from the Rural (RU) Zone to the Rural-38 (RU-38) Zone, as shown on Schedule A attached hereto and forming part of this By-law Planning - Zoning By-law Amendment - Jackson Page 40 of 72

41 Agenda Item # 9a) (b) Section 5.4 of By-law No , as amended, entitled Special Rural (RU) Zones, is hereby amended by the addition of a new subsection numbered , which shall read as follows: Rural-38 (RU-38) Zone, Part Lot 32, Concession 11 (Otonabee) Notwithstanding any other provisions of this By-law to the contrary, within the Rural-38 (RU-38) Zone the following provisions shall apply: (a) Special Provisions: (i) Minimum lot area: 6.0 hectares. 2. All other provisions of By-law No , as amended, shall apply. 3. This By-law shall become effective on the date that it is passed by the Council of the Corporation of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan, subject to the provisions of Section 34 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, as amended. 4. The Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to proceed with the giving of notice under Section 34(18) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, as amended. READ a first and second time this 25 th day of January, HEAD OF COUNCIL David P. Nelson CLERK Heather Scott READ a third time and finally passed this 25 th day of January, HEAD OF COUNCIL David P. Nelson CLERK Heather Scott Planning - Zoning By-law Amendment - Jackson Page 41 of 72

42 Agenda Item # 9a) Planning - Zoning By-law Amendment - Jackson Page 42 of 72

43 Agenda Item # 9b) OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2 OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWNSHIP OF OTONABEE-SOUTH MONAGHAN LOUCKS PROPERTY 915 LOUCKS ROAD PART OF LOT 9 & 10, CONCESSIONS 4 & 5 OTONABEE WARD TOWNSHIP OF OTONABEE-SOUTH MONAGHAN Prepared For: The Corporation of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan Prepared By: Clark Consulting Services Port Hope, Ontario December 2012 Revised November 2014 Revised November 2015 Revised January Planning - Official Plan Amendment - Loucks Page 43 of 72

44 Agenda Item # 9b) THE CORPORATION OF THE TOWNSHIP OF OTONABEE-SOUTH MONAGHAN BY-LAW NO Being a By-law passed pursuant to the provisions of Sections 17 and 21 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, as amended. The Council of the Corporation of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan, in accordance with the provisions of Sections 17 and 21 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, as amended, hereby enacts as follows: 1. Amendment No. 2 to the Official Plan of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan, consisting of the attached explanatory text and Schedule A, is hereby adopted. 2. The Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to make application to the County of Peterborough for approval of Amendment No. 2 to the Official Plan of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan. 3. The Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to proceed with the giving of notice under Section 17(23) of the Planning Act. 4. This By-law shall come into force and take effect on the day of final passing thereof. Enacted and passed this 25 th day of January, Signed: Reeve, David Nelson Signed: Clerk, Heather Scott CORPORATE SEAL OF MUNICIPALITY Planning - Official Plan Amendment - Loucks Page 44 of 72

45 Agenda Item # 9b) CERTIFICATE AMENDMENT NO. 2 OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWNSHIP OF OTONABEE-SOUTH MONAGHAN The attached explanatory text and Schedule A, constituting Amendment No. 2 to the Official Plan of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan, was prepared by the Council of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan and was adopted by the Council of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan by By-law No in accordance with the provisions of Sections 17 and 21 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, on the 25 day of January, Signed: Reeve, David Nelson Signed: Clerk, Heather Scott CORPORATE SEAL OF MUNICIPALITY This Amendment to the Official Plan of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan, which has been adopted by the Council of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan, is hereby approved in accordance with the provisions of Sections 17 and 21 of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, as Amendment No. 2 to the Official Plan of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan. Date Bryan Weir Director of Planning County of Peterborough Planning - Official Plan Amendment - Loucks Page 45 of 72

46 Agenda Item # 9b) AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWNSHIP OF OTONABEE-SOUTH MONAGHAN TABLE OF CONTENTS ADOPTION BY-LAW PAGE CERTIFICATE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION 2 PART A -- THE PREAMBLE 3 1. Purpose of the Amendment 3 2. Location of the Subject Lands 3 3. Basis of the Amendment 4 PART B -- THE AMENDMENT 5 1. Introductory Statement 5 2. Details of the Amendment 5 3. Implementation and Interpretation 7 SCHEDULE A 8 PART C -- APPENDICES 9 Appendix No. 1 Planning Reports Appendix No. 2 Public Meeting Notices and Minutes Appendix No. 3 Public Comments Appendix No. 4 Agency Review Comments Planning - Official Plan Amendment - Loucks Page 46 of 72

47 Agenda Item # 9b) AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO THE OFFICIAL PLAN OF THE TOWNSHIP OF OTONABEE-SOUTH MONAGHAN INTRODUCTION STATEMENT OF COMPONENTS PART A PART B PART C THE PREAMBLE does not constitute part of this Amendment. THE AMENDMENT, consisting of the following text and Schedule A constitutes Amendment No. 2 to the Official Plan of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan. THE APPENDICES, do not constitute part of Amendment No. 2 to the Official Plan of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan, and contain planning reports, background information and public and agency comments pertaining to this Amendment. SCHEDULE A Planning - Official Plan Amendment - Loucks Page 47 of 72

48 Agenda Item # 9b) PART A -- THE PREAMBLE Only that part of the document entitled PART B -- THE AMENDMENT and the map identified as Schedule A constitutes Amendment No. 2 to the Official Plan of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan. 1. PURPOSE OF THE AMENDMENT The Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan is in receipt of an application to amend the Official Plan of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan. The applicant for the Amendment is Clark Consulting Services, as agent for the owners of the property, Janet Loucks and Peter Loucks. The purpose of the Official Plan Amendment is to amend the Official Plan of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan by amending Section Special Policy to permit a 174-unit trailer camp for park model trailers and occasional-use rental cabins, and to permit the operation of the trailer camp for temporary (seasonal) accommodation within the boundaries of the Special Policy area to be identified on Schedule A of the Official Plan. The Special Policy will also set out site-specific policies concerning the use and operation of the proposed trailer camp. 2. LOCATION OF THE SUBJECT LANDS The Official Plan Amendment applies to lands located in part of Lots 9 and 10, Concessions 4 and 5, in the Otonabee Ward of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan. The municipal address of the property is 915 Loucks Road. The site is located on the north shore of Rice Lake, at the south end of Loucks Road. The subject property includes lands on both the east and west sides of Loucks Road, Loucks Road is an unopened road allowance where it crosses the subject lands. The area affected by the Amendment is approximately 24 hectares. This area includes lands currently the subject of a severance application (County of Peterborough File No. B-66-15), located on the east side of Loucks Road, which is the location of the water access and one of the wells to supply fresh water to the development. The area of the overall property owned by the applicant is approximately 68 hectares. The site of the Official Plan Amendment is currently vacant and is used for pasture. An existing dwelling and accessory buildings are located immediately to the north of the subject lands, on the west side of Loucks Road, on lands that are owned by the applicant. The subject lands are shown on Schedule A of the Amendment Planning - Official Plan Amendment - Loucks Page 48 of 72

49 Agenda Item # 9b) 3. BASIS OF THE AMENDMENT The Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan is in receipt of an application to amend the Official Plan of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan. The owner has also submitted an application to amend Zoning By-law No of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan for the same property. In 2008, the owner applied for an official plan amendment and zoning by-law amendment to permit a 74 unit trailer camp for the temporary (seasonal) accommodation of tourist trailers, tourist vehicles, recreational vehicles, and park model trailers (CSA Z-241 Standard) within the boundaries of the Special Policy area to be identified on Schedule A of the Amendment. Since OPA No. 4 was approved, the business plan for the property was revised and the owners are now proposing to develop a trailer camp which will contain up to 160 park model trailer sites for park model trailers. An additional fourteen sites (for a total of 174 sites) may be developed for either park model trailers or rental cabins for occasional use by visitors. It is intended that the park model trailers may be permanently located on the property but which will only be occupied on a seasonal basis. The trailer camp is not intended to be used for tourist trailers, tourist vehicles, or recreational vehicles. The 24 hectare site that is the subject of the Official Plan Amendment is predominantly designated as Shoreline with a portion designated Shoreline Special Policy Area to reflect OPA No.4, in the Official Plan of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan. Section 5.4 of the Official Plan outlines policies for the Shoreline land use designation. Section lists permitted Commercial uses in the Shoreline designation. Permitted uses include resort complexes, tourist establishments including lodges and rental cabins, trailer camps, marinas, neighbourhood stores, recreational establishments, and similar uses, subject to all applicable policies of the Official Plan. However, Section 5.4.2(b)(iii) indicates that the Shoreline designation recognizes only existing trailer camps and accessory residential uses. The establishment of a new trailer camp within the Shoreline designation requires an amendment to the Official Plan. An amendment to the Official Plan is therefore required to permit the establishment and operation of the proposed park model trailer camp on the subject lands. The proposed Official Plan Amendment No. 2 for the subject lands will have the effect of establishing a Special Policy for the site within the existing Shoreline land use designation. The Shoreline designation will be retained. The Special Policy will permit the establishment and operation of a trailer camp for the temporary (seasonal) accommodation of park model trailers and rental cabins within the boundaries of the Special Policy area and subject to the policies set out in the Amendment Planning - Official Plan Amendment - Loucks Page 49 of 72

50 Agenda Item # 9b) PART B -- THE AMENDMENT 1. INTRODUCTORY STATEMENT All of this part of the document entitled Part B -- THE AMENDMENT consisting of the following text and the attached map designated as Schedule A constitutes Amendment No. 2 to the Official Plan of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan. 2. DETAILS OF THE AMENDMENT The Official Plan of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan is hereby amended as follows: (a) (b) Schedule A, Map No. 9, to the Official Plan of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan, the Land Use Plan, is amended by identifying the boundaries of the lands that are subject to Section of the Official Plan, as shown on Schedule A attached hereto and forming part of this Amendment. Section Special Policy Area Lot 10, Concessions 4 & 5, Otonabee Ward of the Official Plan of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan, is amended as follows: (i) Delete title Special Policy Area and the first paragraph and replace with: Special Policy Area - Lots 9 and Lot 10, Concessions 4 & 5, Otonabee Ward (Loucks OPA No.2) Notwithstanding the provision of Section and any other provision of this Plan to the contrary, the following special policies shall apply to the lands affected by Section as identified on Schedule A of this Plan, located in part of Lots 9 and Lot 10, Concessions 4 and 5, Otonabee Ward. (ii) Delete Section (a), first paragraph, and replace with: In addition to the uses permitted by Section of this Plan, the lands affected by Section may be used for a trailer camp for the temporary (seasonal) accommodation of park model trailers (CSA Z-241) and rental cabins for occasional occupation by visitors, and related uses such as facilities for a resort centre with a camp store, café, office, fitness facilities, vacation rentals sign-in, and one accessory dwelling unit, and a recreation area and recreation facilities Planning - Official Plan Amendment - Loucks Page 50 of 72

51 Agenda Item # 9b) (iii) In Section (a)(ii), delete the words tourist trailer, tourist vehicle, recreational vehicle, or, and add the words or rental cabin after the words park model trailer. (iv) In Section (b), delete the words tourist trailer, tourist vehicle, recreational vehicle, or, and add the words or rental cabin after the words park model trailer. (v) Delete Section (f), second bullet, and replace with: The maximum number of permitted park model trailer sites that may be used for the temporary (seasonal) accommodation of park model trailers (CSA Z-241 Standard). The number shall not exceed 160 sites for park model trailers, plus up to 14 sites (for a total of 174 sites) which may be used for park model trailers or rental cabins for occasional use by visitors. This maximum number of sites shall be identified in the implementing Zoning By-law. (vi) Delete Section (f), third bullet. (vii) Delete all of Section (g), and replace with the following: Holding provisions in accordance with Section 36 of the Planning Act and Section 8.4 of the Official plan shall be applied in the implementing zoning bylaw. The implementing zoning by-law shall identify the conditions to be satisfied prior to the removal of the Holding symbol on a phase by phase basis, and shall include as a minimum the following matters for each phase: A site plan agreement under the provisions of Section 41 of the Planning Act has been approved by the Municipality and registered on title. The Site Plan Agreement shall include the requirement for security fencing around wellheads, protection of the areas identified as having archaeological potential and a storm water management plan acceptable to the Municipality and the Otonabee Region Conservation Authority. A Site Plan Agreement may be implemented based on an approved development phasing plan. The Owner has obtained from the Municipality easements for the private water system, pedestrian walkways, internal roads or other works associated with the trailer camp over the unopened road allowance, as may be required. An Environmental Compliance Approval (ECA) be issued by the approval authority and a copy provided to the Municipality to permit construction and operation of the private sewage works Planning - Official Plan Amendment - Loucks Page 51 of 72

52 Agenda Item # 9b) The owner shall obtain such approvals as may be required for the operation of the private water system, including a Permit to Take Water if required under Section 34 of the Ontario Water Resources Act. The Owner has prepared an implementation plan for wellhead protection measures as outlined in the Hydrogeological and Servicing Assessment, Oakridge Environmental Ltd., November 2012, including an easement arrangement to ensure no fuels or chemicals are stored within 15 metres of the wellhead area and no application of fertilizers or pesticides within 30 metres of the wellhead area. The owner has registered the development with the Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry (MNRF) in accordance with the applicable regulations under the Endangered Species Act, 2007 for Bobolink and Eastern Meadowlark Habitat and has provided proof of registration to the Municipality. The owner shall be responsible for ensuring implementation of the development activities are in compliance with the applicable regulation. 3. IMPLEMENTATION AND INTERPRETATION The implementation and interpretation of Official Plan Amendment No. 2 shall be in accordance with the respective policies of the Official Plan of the Township of Otonabee- South Monaghan Planning - Official Plan Amendment - Loucks Page 52 of 72

53 Agenda Item # 9b) SCHEDULE A Planning - Official Plan Amendment - Loucks Page 53 of 72

54 Agenda Item # 9b) PART C -- THE APPENDICES The following appendices do not constitute part of Amendment No. 2 to the Official Plan of the Township of Otonabee-South Monaghan, but are included as information supporting the Amendment. Appendix No. 1 Planning Reports Appendix No. 2 Public Meeting Notices and Minutes Appendix No. 3 Public Comments Appendix No. 4 Agency Review Comments Planning - Official Plan Amendment - Loucks Page 54 of 72

55 Agenda Item # 9b) APPENDIX NO. 1 PLANNING REPORTS Planning - Official Plan Amendment - Loucks Page 55 of 72

56 Agenda Item # 9b) APPENDIX NO. 2 PUBLIC MEETING NOTICES AND MINUTES Planning - Official Plan Amendment - Loucks Page 56 of 72

57 Agenda Item # 9b) APPENDIX NO. 3 PUBLIC COMMENTS Planning - Official Plan Amendment - Loucks Page 57 of 72

58 Agenda Item # 9b) APPENDIX NO. 4 AGENCY REVIEW COMMENTS Planning - Official Plan Amendment - Loucks Page 58 of 72

59 Planning - Official Plan Amendment - Loucks This is Schedule A of By-law Passed this 25th day of January, 2016 Reeve Clerk... Subject Lands Page 59 of 72 Revised Boundary of Special Policy Area Agenda Item # 9b) Date: November 2015 Z:\1056-Loucks\July 2015 Works\OPA Schedule-November 2015.cdr

60 Agenda Item # 10a) Keene General Store - Holiday Openings Page 60 of 72

61 Agenda Item # 10b) Dear Prospective Advertiser, On behalf of the Board of Directors, Members and Volunteers of MADD Canada, I would like to thank you for your interest in The MADD Message Yearbook. The generosity of community-minded people like you makes it possible for MADD Canada to pursue its much-needed programs including victim support services, educational programs, youth programs and public awareness programs. By placing an advertisement, you will be helping us in our mission to stop impaired driving and to support victims of this violent crime. The magazine will enable us to spread our life-saving messages even further and bring in additional revenues for our programs. Every day in Canada, on average 4 people are killed and another 175 people are injured as a result of alcohol and drug-related crashes. You can help make all the difference in our efforts to save lives. Thank you once again for your interest and support. Sincerely, Dawn Regan Chief Operating Officer MADD Canada Charitable Registration No RR0001 MADD - Request for advertising donation Page 61 of 72

62 Agenda Item # 10b) MADD - Request for advertising donation Page 62 of 72

63 Agenda Item # 10b) MADD - Request for advertising donation Page 63 of 72

64 Agenda Item # 10c) Otonabee South Monaghan Public Library Box 9 Keene, ON K0L 2G0 (705) Fax (705) keene_library@nexicom.net January 21, 2016 Otonabee South Monaghan Council: Re: Library Board Recommendations for Library Board Appointees The OSM Public Library Board recommends Michael Gillespie and Nancy Caron to be appointed by Council to the Library Board. Both appointees live within the township and fulfill the requirements of the Library Board s bylaws requirements. Thank you! Carolanne Nadeau, CEO OSM Public Library "To enrich community life by fostering the joy and love of reading, encouraging life-long learning and providing a welcoming environment for the community. Library Board - Vacancy Appointments Page 64 of 72

65 Agenda Item # 10d) For Immediate Release: January 19, 2016 ANTI-POVERTY WEEK HELD WITH A VIEW TO INSPIRE ACTION Why does poverty exist? What is anti-poverty? What does it mean to be poor? These and other questions will be brought up during Anti-Poverty Week, organized by OPIRG Peterborough and the Peterborough Student Housing Co-op. Events will take place January 23 rd January 29 th at cafes, Sadleir House and Trent University. Food Not Bombs would like to be involved with Anti-Poverty week as a demonstration of the way one Peterborough group is tackling poverty-associated challenges year-round, says Gillian Turnham, of Food Not Bombs Peterborough, We are hoping that this week of events will get new people interested in becoming involved with anti-poverty activism. This week will be dedicated to stimulating dialogue around issues of poverty, poorbashing and stigma-busting, both for those with lived experiences of poverty and those who advocate for anti-poverty. Frankie McGee of the Peterborough Student Housing Co-op says that anti-poverty work is aimed to challenge the root causes of poverty in our communities, provide relief from the immediate effects of poverty on community members, and provide alternatives to for-profit operations that can serve to marginalize and exploit those living in poverty. Events include an introduction to Food Not Bombs; what is needed for food sovereignty; housing injustice; income security and guarantee; living wages; poor bashing and how to break the stigma; poverty and how it affects mental health and class oppression in education. It will also give community members the tools they need to do continued work on anti-poverty, including workshops and discussions on how to do anti-poverty work, what poor-bashing is and why it causes poverty, and letter writing to all levels of government. Fiona White, professor of Concurrent Education at Trent University says that anti-poverty is much more than complex than being against poverty. It is about learning more about poverty issues in such a way that one can both act in the present to make things better for those who are impacted by poverty, and for the future so that one can affect policies and practices that reduce both the scale of poverty and the impact that it has on individuals. Participants include members of the community and members of Food Not Bombs, Active Minds, Nourish, the Basic Income Guarantee Network, the Faculty of Education at Trent University, the Peterborough Poverty Reduction Network, the Revolutionary Student Movement and the Canadian Mental Health Association Haliburton, Kawartha, Pine Ridge. PFAN - Anti Poverty Week Page 65 of 72

66 Agenda Item # 10d) All events are free and open to everybody. Food will be provided at most events and bus fare will be available. For more information, contact OPIRG at or at opirg@trentu.ca ### PFAN - Anti Poverty Week Page 66 of 72

67 Agenda Item # 10d) SCHEDULE JAN 23 RD -29 TH ANTI POVERTY WEEK Opirg Peterborough / Event: Anti-Poverty Week PTBO PFAN - Anti Poverty Week Page 67 of 72

68 ... Agenda Item # 10d) ABOUT This week aims to open up space and dialogue around issues of poverty such as poor-bashing, workers rights, housing rights, food insecurity and intersections of race, gender, sexual orientation, mental health and class in an anti-oppressive manner. Through research, education and action, we hope to bring networks together to continue action against poverty in our communities. *For full event descriptions, visit our event on Facebook SCHEDULE Saturday, JAN 23rd Free Soup at the Farmers Market - Food Not Bombs 8am - 1pm / Peterborough Farmers Market Monday, JAN 25th Poor-bashing Community Dialogue Frankie and Rachelle (Community members) 1pm - 3pm / Black Honey, 217 Hunter St. W Monday Night Meal at Confederation Park - Food Not Bombs 3:30pm - 9pm / Confederation Park Why Food Banks Aren't the Solution - Jesse Whattam 7pm - 9pm / Sadleir House Lecture Hall Tuesday, JAN 26th Cooking on a Dime, Sharing Stories by OPIRG/Community Members 11:30am-2pm / Seeds of Change- 534 George St. N *15 person limit - Please call; or opirgevents@gmail.com to RSVP A Solution that Sticks: The Case for a Basic Income Guarantee Nourish/Basic Income Peterborough Network 2pm-4pm / Lecture Hall at Sadleir House Housing Security and Housing Justice Panel: Peterborough Student Housing Co-op, Community Counselling and Resource Centre, the Affordable Housing Action Committee, The Community Legal Centre 7pm-9pm / Sadleir House PFAN - Anti Poverty Week Page 68 of 72

69 Agenda Item # 10d) Wednesday, JAN 27 th Campus Food Security Report Launch OPIRG Food Security Coordinator 10am - 12pm / Otonabee College 207- Trent University Poverty in Schools - Fiona White, Faculty of Education 4pm-6pm / Hobbs Library, Sadleir House How to Do Anti-Poverty Activism Anti-Poverty Activism and Diane Therrien (City Councillor, member of Peterborough Poverty Reduction Network) 7pm - 9pm / Gzowski College Trent University Thursday, JAN 28 th Class Struggle in the University RSM Peterborough Section 12pm-2pm / LEC Trent University Mental Health and Poverty Panel: OPIRG, Active Minds, Canadian Mental Health Association 3pm-5pm / Gathering Space - Trent University Friday, JAN 29 th Fighting Poverty in Free Market Fashion OPIRG Peterborough (with Theresa Chomko) 5pm-6pm / Lecture Hall at Sadleir House Art/Popular Education event Community members: Jesse Whattam and Frankie McGee 6pm-8pm / Lecture Hall at Sadleir House Letter Writing to Politicians Using Your Voice to Influence Change OPIRG Peterborough (with Meghan Johnny) 11am-1pm / back room at Black Honey café PFAN - Anti Poverty Week Page 69 of 72

70 Agenda Item # 10d) ZINE Station Express yourself! This event has a station with materials where you can write, draw, create poetry and images related to the event or your thoughts on poverty in Peterborough. These can be submitted to any event leader throughout Anti-Poverty Week and will be published as a small zine in February. PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATIONS Anti-Poverty Week PTBO OPIRG Peterborough *Mental health first aid respondent will be available to support you during events that may need support. *Most events will provide a snack, food or tea/coffee *Bus fare will be provided upon / #Anti-povertyWeek #FightInjustice PFAN - Anti Poverty Week Page 70 of 72