-

Transcription

1 August 02, 2017 RWA, Inc - Keisha Westbrook, PE 6610 Willow Park Dr # 200 Naples, FL kwestbrook@consult-rwa.com; tbray@consult-rwa.com RE: Plans & Plat Construction PL The Antilles (Diamond Shores) PPL Dear Applicant: The following comments are provided to you regarding the above referenced project. If you have questions, please contact the appropriate staff member who conducted the review. The project will retain a "HOLD" status until all comments are satisfied. The following comments need to be addressed as noted: Rejected Review: Addressing - GIS Review Reviewed By: Annis Moxam annismoxam@colliergov.net Phone #: (239) Correction Comment 3: On Cover Page- Construction Plan - please correct Parcel ID number to Rejected Review: County Attorney Review Reviewed By: Scott Stone ScottStone@colliergov.net Phone #: (239) Correction Comment 3: General Note #6 refers to a recorded easement. Where is this shown on the plat? UPDATE 7/24/17--If it is a blanket easement over the property, then please add language "This is a blanket easement over the platted property," or something to that effect. Also, if the C.U.E. covers the entire property, then how will you be able to develop the land without vacating the easement? I defer to staff as to whether the easement conflicts with your proposed construction plans. Rejected Review: Engineering Stormwater Review Reviewed By: Storm Gewirtz

2 Phone #: (239) Correction Comment 1: Project is within the miscellaneous coastal basin, with a limited discharge rate of 0.15 cfs/acre. Based on the project area of acres, the maximum discharge rate is 5.27 cfs. Revise plans and calculations as applicable. Rev #2: Comment remains. Per LDC Sec A, all new development and redevelopment projects, shall meet 150% of the water quality volumetric requirements of Section 5.2.1(a) of the Basis of Review for Environmental Resource Permit Applications within the South Florida Water Management District (February 2006). The projects shall also comply with the allowable offsite discharge rates required Ordinance , as amended. Since the site is essentially being completely redeveloped, the stormwater management system needs to be brought up to current code. Correction Comment 4: Per Code of Ordinances (1b), control elevation shall be 50 feet from abutting property lines. Lake #2 is less than 50 feet from the surrounding property line to the west. Revise plans or request exception to this setback requirement per this code section. Rev #2: Comment remains. Per Code of Ordinances (1b), exceptions to the setbacks may be granted if the following criteria are met: installation of proper fencing (minimum six feet chain link), berms, walls or other engineered protective measures for the portion of the property line within 100 feet of the lake. Please revise plans as applicable. Correction Comment 5: Sheet 12 In section C-C, revise sidewalk callout to be 8 feet, not 8 inches. Rev #2: Section C-C was corrected but now the 8" sidewalk appears in Section C1-C1. Please revise accordingly. Correction Comment 11: Cost estimate not reviewed with first submittal. Please provide a revised signed and sealed cost estimate based on review comments and additional review fees as applicable. Rev #2: Please include quantities for the removal of headwall and the new headwall at the entrance, as well as the existing control structure, pipe and headwall in the cost estimate. Please provide an updated signed and sealed cost estimate with additional fees as applicable. Correction Comment 13: Please label the pipe length and size of the elliptical pipe at the entrance on Sheet 6 and/or 7. In addition, please label the pipe length and size between structures 1-21 and 1-22 on Sheet 8. Correction Comment 14: Sheet 12: Section E-E and E1-E1 are showing proposed grading outside of the property. What are the rectangles shown outside of the property line? These areas should be revised to show the proposed site tying into existing ground at the property line. Correction Comment 15: Sheet 12: There are some discrepancies between the Typical Lake Section and the Typical Lake Section w/littoral Shelf. These two sections should have the same low water elevation, break point elevation and bottom of lake elevation. Please revise the sections accordingly.

3 Rejected Review: Engineering Subdivision Review Reviewed By: John Houldsworth Phone #: (239) Correction Comment 1: Name the HOA in the dedication and General Notes. Rev #2 Pending resolution of this comment Correction Comment 2: Provide a DRAFT of the Restrictions and Covenants. Rev #2 Pending resolution of this comment Correction Comment 3: Please complete General Note #4 with Ord. name and number. Rev #2 Pending resolution of this comment Correction Comment 7: The roadway does not meet minimum county standards. Was there an approved deviation? Rev #2 - The minimum Right of Way width in the LDC is 60' see Appendix 'B' - This should be addressed in the PUDA Correction Comment 8: The Title Opinion states that the Owner is Diamond Shores but JMD Developments & Investments, Inc is signing the plat as Owner. Rev #2 Pending resolution of this matter Correction Comment 13: Dedication A.1 should refer to Indies Drive East and Indies Drive West rather than Indies Circle. Correction Comment 14: Plat sheet 4, label the 15' DE from Indies Drive West to Tract LK-2 (south side) Correction Comment 15: Plat Sheet 4, label the Easement from Tract LK-2 to RD-1, either in the Detail or at scale view. Why are there 2 sets of easement lines? Is this also an Access Easement? Rejected Review: Engineering Surveyor Review Reviewed By: Marcus Berman marcusberman@colliergov.net Phone #: (239) Correction Comment 5: Sht1: Please finish Dedication A.

4 Correction Comment 6: Sht1: Please fill in the blank in note #4. REV3: Also, complete note #5 Correction Comment 7: Sht1: Please show the location of the easement on the plat in note #6. REV2: The Grant of Utility Easement to Collier County Water-Sewer District in OR 1148 page 230 is a blanket easement over the Woodlake Condo Phase One boundary which encumbers a large area over the easterly side of the Antilles replat. To construct buildings over this area, a vacation of this utility easement would be in order. Correction Comment 8: Sht2-4: Please show minimum 20 access easement to Tract Lk-1 & LK-2. Correction Comment 9: Sht2: Please label the easement at the SE end of Tract MF-1. Correction Comment 13: When resubmitting, please make sure the plat pdf is legible. There are areas that are to light and some text partially missing. Correction Comment 14: There is text on top of lines that is unreadable. Please check the entire plat and make clearer. Correction Comment 15: Sht1: Please add the attest portion of the County Commission Approval Block. See most recent recorded plat. PB 62 Correction Comment 16: Sht1: Please revised dedication 1.A. to the correct road names. Correction Comment 17: Sht4: Please label the easement from the south end of Tract LK-2 to the roadway. Rejected Review: Engineering Utilities Review Reviewed By: Daniel Roman DanielRoman@colliergov.net Phone #: (239) Correction Comment 4: UO g - Include system narratives including connections, phasing, assumptions, and estimated flows in the Engineer s Report. REV 1 - In the Potable Water and Sanitary Sewer narrative on page 2, the third paragraph indicates that the project is served by an existing 4 County force main connecting to a force main on the east side of Mulberry Lane, but the existing force main serving the property is privately owned and maintained and the 8 PVC County force main to which it connects is on the west side of Mulberry Lane. Revise the narrative accordingly. Rev 3- Comment remains. 4" FM and existing lift station are private. Revise the narrative

5 accordingly. Correction Comment 16: UO The dedication block on the cover sheet of the plat shall contain appropriate language for all County Utility Easements (CUE). REV 1 - In Dedication C.2, change the word herein to in the Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance ( ), as amended,. Rev 3- Please update the dedication to Collier County Water-Sewer District language to the following: 1. That all County Utility Easements (C.U.E.) for potable water, non-potable irrigation water and/or wastewater system(s) or portion(s) thereof and Ingress and Egress rights, where appropriate, are provided to the Collier County Water-Sewer District to operate and maintain potable water, non-potable irrigation water and/or wastewater utility systems or portion(s) thereof within the Platted Area after final conveyance to the CCWSD and, where applicable, to install the CCWSD s connecting utility facilities within such easement(s), with no responsibility for maintenance of the surface easement area; and 2. Applicable potable water, non-potable irrigation water and/or wastewater system(s) or portion(s) thereof constructed within this Platted Area in compliance with the requirements set forth in the Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance ( ), as amended, shall be conveyed to the Board as the Ex-Officio Governing Board of the Water-Sewer District upon acceptance of the additions, extensions and/or improvements required by the Plat. Correction Comment 24: DC Water distribution systems shall be designed so that all systems are located adjacent to, and are accessible from, paved or unpaved roadways so as to allow access for short and long term maintenance, repair, and/or replacement of such system. REV 1 Obtain Utility Deviation approval for the loop connection to the existing 8 PVC water main on Pepper Tree Way to run cross-country rather than along a roadway. Rev 3 - Comment remains. Obtain Utility Deviation approval for the loop connection to the existing 8 PVC water main on Pepper Tree Way to run cross-country rather than along a roadway. Correction Comment 26: DC and Water and force main setbacks (minimum 7.5 ft. setback from centerline of the pipe to residential roadways, curbs and gutters, permanent structures, or plantings not specifically allowed by the ordinance). REV 1 Adjust the alignment or obtain Utility Deviation approval reducing the minimum setback distance from drainage structures. Rev 3 - Setback between some light poles and valley gutters don't meet the minimum 7.5' requirement. Please verify setback or obtain utility deviation. Correction Comment 30: DC New potable water distribution systems shall be designed as looped systems to avoid dead ends. A looped system should have two independent connections off the source main (unless served by a master meter). If two independent connections aren t possible, a stub-out for future development in a location agreed to by the County shall be provided in an

6 easement or ROW to the limits of the project. REV 1 - The loop connection to the 8 PVC water main on Pepper Tree Way relies on a County Utility Easement being granted by FCC Marsh LLC. A temporary construction easement (TCE) will also be necessary since the loop connection will be constructed by this project owner s contractor. If the TCE and CUE cannot be obtained by the time the water distribution system improvements are to be constructed, then the loop connection shall be stubbed out to the property line for future connection by CCPU. Note this on the plans. Alternatively, a Utility Deviation may be sought to omit the loop connection, in which case the hydraulic and chloramine models must be revised accordingly. Rev 3 Per DC New potable water distribution systems shall be designed as looped systems to avoid dead ends. A looped system should have two independent connections off the source main (unless served by a master meter). If two independent connections aren t possible, a stub-out for future development in a location agreed to by the County shall be provided in an easement or ROW to the limits of the project. Since the project is not going to be looped, provide utility deviation for the proposed stub out at Pepper Tree Way. Correction Comment 39: Rev 3 Per DC Show lateral invert elevations at terminal manholes. Provide lateral invert elevation at MH # 1 Correction Comment 40: Rev 3 Provide utility deviation for the proposed 12 lip on the pump footing. Correction Comment 41: Rev 3 If utility deviation is approved for the 12 lip, cloud the changes in the standard utility detail WW-7. Correction Comment 42: Rev 3 Provide calculations for the peaking factor of Correction Comment 43: Rev 3 The layout and size of the CUE for the pump station in the Plat is mismatched with the one proposed in the plans. Please revise size and configuration and resubmit plans and plat as applicable. Correction Comment 44: Rev 3 - Per DC Provide air release assemblies at all high points on transmission mains, where air will not be released through service lines and on both sides of conflict crossings (unless hydraulic analysis demonstrates that air pockets will not accumulate). In cases where reversal of flow is not expected, the air release assembly shall be provided at high points and on the upstream side of conflict crossings. Provide ARV in the water main on both sides of each conflict or confirm thru hydraulic analysis in the Engineer s Report that air pocket will not occur and that the trapped air will be released through the service lines. In case that one ARV is proposed on the upstream side of the conflict, confirm that reversal of flow is not expected. Revise and resubmit plans and Engineer s Report as applicable. Rejected Review: Environmental Review Reviewed By: David Anthony davidanthony@colliergov.net Phone #: (239)

7 Correction Comment 1: Provide the approved PUD. PPL cannot be approved until the PUD has been approved. Additional comments may be forthcoming based upon an approved PUD. Correction Comment 6: Plat Sheet Dedications. Add the following as B.4: TRACT P-1 AS PRESERVE TRACT WITHOUT RESPONSIBILTY FOR MAINTENANCE AND SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF THE DEDICATION IN PARAGRAPH A.9 ABOVE. Please be aware that Section H.1.d requires that all easement conveyance to the County shall include the right of access from existing road right-of-way. Correction Comment 7: Preserve Management Plan. Preserve signage. LDC Section H had been amended in Amend the PMP signage section to read 'Signs identifying the preserve shall be placed at the boundary of the preserve" Correction Comment 8: Please show the target FLUCFCS code of the Preserve on the Preserve Management Plan. Correction Comment 9: Please provide a cross-section for the Preserve tract. Please include a note on the cross-section for the Preserve tract that "All slopes adjacent to the Preserve will be planted with 100% native south Florida vegetation". Rejected Review: Landscape Review Reviewed By: Mark Templeton MarkTempleton@colliergov.net Phone #: (239) Correction Comment 2: Pump and lift stations are required to be screened per section B.4. It appears that the location of the lift station as shown will require the screening shrubs along the front of the lift station to be within the PUE. This will require letters of agreement from the easement holders or the lift station will have to be shifted back so that the required plant material is outside of the PUE. Rev. 2: Shrubs in the front of the pump station are shown outside of the PUE, but there are still some shrubs shown in the PUE to screen the side of the pump station. Please revise to show the shrubs as they were shown in the original submittal and provide the letter from the utility companies. Alternatively, revise the location of the pump station so as the shrubs may be provided behind the PUE as suggested in the original comment. Rejected Review: Transportation Planning Review Reviewed By: Garrett Louviere GarrettLouviere@colliergov.net Phone #: (239) Correction Comment 3:

8 Private Roadways (subdivisions) (LDC ) 8/1/17 Comment: Label for Asphalt type is miss-spelled, shown as Type S-9.5. Please correct to SP-9.5. Please also provide 2 of asphalt for within the 50 ROW. Due to SP-9.5 having a max lift thickness of 1.5, please add the following for the Asphalt call out, (2) 1 lifts of SP-9.5 Asphalt. 4/27/16 Comment: Construction Plans Sheet 12 of 19, the Typical Sections Index does not have a corresponding cross section reference for the profile view on this sheet (corresponding to the Typical Road Section). Correction Comment 5: Additional Comments: 4/27/16 Comment: We are unable to approve PPL application due to the fact that the PUD is not approved for this project at this time. Rejected Review: Zoning Review Reviewed By: Christine Willoughby christinewilloughby@colliergov.net Phone #: (239) Correction Comment 2: Provide the density as allowed by the proposed zoning district. Review #2 Latest draft PUD exhibit states 4.84 dwelling units per acre, not 6.4 as provided. Please revise on your ZDS. Correction Comment 7: The provided plat shows Tract MF-1 where the construction plans show there to be the "North Undisturbed Wetland" - please clarify. The proposed PUD Master Plan shows there to be a preserve at this location also. Please revise to show all plans match the proposed PUD Master Plan. Review # 2 The plat is still showing MF-1 (multi-family) tracts along the north property line this does not match with what the PUD ORD is showing as proposed. Correction Comment 9: Please provide the PUD ordinance and related materials. Once PL is approved, rezoning the property from MH zoning district to RPUD. Additional comments may be forthcoming depending on the approved PUD Ordinance. Correction Comment 10: Coversheet zoning to be updated once PUD Ordinance is approved. Correction Comment 11:

9 The property has a companion project that must be approved prior to approval of this application. PL The following comments are informational and/or may include stipulations: Applicants who are converting a paper submittal to E-Permitting must resubmit complete sets of all plans, signed and sealed, even if they were previously approved on an earlier review. As a reminder, all documents that are required to be signed and sealed must be digitally signed and sealed when submitting through our E-Permitting process. On the cover letter please identify that previous submittals were done through paper and that this submittal is by E-Permitting. Also, identification of the changes in cover letter (ex. See note #23 Civil Plan Sheet 4) improves the efficiency of the resubmittal review. When addressing review comments, please provide a cover letter outlining your response to each comment. Include a response to completed reviews with stipulations. Please be advised that Sections H.1, and B.3.c require that a re-submittal must be made within 270 days of this letter. Stipulations: Provide a copy of SFWMD Permit or permit modification prior to the pre-construction meeting. Stipulations: Utilities: A quit claim deed for the existing County owned and maintained water distribution system must be recorded prior to scheduling the pre-construction meeting. Stipulations: Utilities: Coordinate installation of the plug valve on the existing force main with Wastewater Operations staff. Provide at least 48 hours prior notice of the desired time for the tie-in. Stipulations: The OR Book and Page for the Landscape Buffer Agreement must be filled in on the plat prior to plat recording. jh If you have any questions, please contact me at (239) Sincerely, John Houldsworth Senior Site Plan Reviewer Growth Management Department