LINDEN_SUBS EXPERIMENTAL MAPPING OF LINDEN. Weronika Salach // David Barrero Gonzalez // Klaas Dhaene // Stephan Jud. Linden_subs

Transcription

1 LINDEN_SUBS Experimental MAPPING Weronika Salach // David Barrero Gonzalez // Klaas Dhaene // Stephan Jud EXPERIMENTAL MAPPING OF LINDEN Linden_subs OIKODOMOS DESIGN STUDIO // MARCH 2011 // SINT-LUCAS BRUSSELS WERONIKA SALACH // DAID BARRERO GONZALEZ // KLAAS DHAENE // STEPHAN JUD

2 adelheid hazenpad koetsierweg Center of linden first reading 2

3 adelheid hazenpad koetsierweg first reading 3

4 FIRST IMPRESSIONS ABOUT THE PLOT LAYOUT, PLANNING, STREET LAYOUT AND NATRUE. first reading 4

5 CritiCal REIEW FIRST READING in the first reading of the site, we pointed out three different sites, but while mapping the site, it came clear that they are much more a continuous line of buildings, differented by the presence of the forest than three hard-bordered different sites. We started to define scenarios with simple, clear rules. But as soon as we started drawing, it came clear that there are more, finer, smaller rules needed. Also, some Rules proved themselves of no use, or had the same effect as other ones. 5

6 scenario a ground prices rise 6

7 WE CUT EERY PLOT IN HALF! A1 RULES 7

8 KOETSIERWEG ADELHEID HAZENPAD A1 RULE SCENARIO a rising GROUND PRICES 1 WE CUT EERY PLOT IN HALF! 8

9 HAZENPAD A1 SCENARIO a rising GROUND PRICES RULE 1 WE CUT EERY PLOT IN HALF! 9

10 we divide the plots according to their size! A2 RULES 10

11 KOETSIERWEG ADELHEID HAZENPAD A2 SCENARIO a rising GROUND PRICES RULE 2 WE DEIDE THE PLOTS ACCORDING TO THEIR SIZE 11

12 ADELHEID A2 SCENARIO a rising GROUND PRICES RULE 2 WE DEIDE THE PLOTS ACCORDING TO THEIR SIZE 12

13 we divide the plots larger than 2000 m 2, and allow smaller plots to double their height! A3 RULES 13

14 KOETSIERWEG ADELHEID HAZENPAD A3 SCENARIO a rising GROUND PRICES RULE 3 we divide the plots larger than 2000 m 2, and allow smaller plots to double their height! 14

15 REFERENCE // BUCHNER BRUNDLER (CH) A3 SCENARIO a rising GROUND PRICES RULE 3 we divide the plots larger than 2000 m 2, and allow smaller plots to double their height! 15

16 LARGE-SCALE EFFECTS LINDEN LEUEN A SCENARIO a rising GROUND PRICES 16

17 CritiCal REIEW scenario A it`s all about densification, especially in a way of additional buildings. In intendance, our methods mostly had the effect of new roads to access the new plots. this Scenario about densifying was made in general scale, on the plot scale but not into the scale of the houses itself. This caused always additional building activity as a result, but by regarding the amount of inhabitants, the existing houses could easily be converted to house more people. With a so-grown density, we thought about the implementation of new functions, but without getting precise about which kind fo functions, and where to place them. A 17

18 scenario b ground prices drop 18

19 each 2 ND PLOT ENLAR- GENS ITS GARDEN BY ITS ADJACENT PLOT! B1 RULES 19

20 KOETSIERWEG ADELHEID HAZENPAD B1 RULE SCENARIO b falling GROUND PRICES 1 each 2 ND PLOT ENLARGENS ITSGARDEN BY ITS ADJACENT PLOT! 20

21 ADELHEID B1 RULE SCENARIO b falling GROUND PRICES 1 each 2 ND PLOT ENLARGENS ITSGARDEN BY ITS ADJACENT PLOT! 21

22 we MAKE A LINKED FO- REST OUT OF 50% OF THE PLOTS! B2 RULES 22

23 LEUEN-LINDEN // ENLARGED BLEEKBOS LINDEN LEUEN B2 SCENARIO b falling GROUND PRICES RULE 2 we MAKE A LINKED FOREST OUT OF 50% OF THE PLOTS! 23

24 ADELHEID B2 RULE SCENARIO b falling GROUND PRICES 2 we MAKE A LINKED FOREST OUT OF 50% OF THE PLOTS! 24

25 LINDEN LEUEN B2 RULE SCENARIO b falling GROUND PRICES 2 we MAKE A LINKED FOREST OUT OF 50% OF THE PLOTS! 25

26 WE INEST IN THE IDE- AL SOCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY- HOUSE AND REORGANISE THE SITES WITH PLOTS OF 16 x 26 M! B3 RULES 26

27 KOETSIERWEG ADELHEID HAZENPAD B3 SCENARIO b falling GROUND PRICES RULE 3 WE INEST IN THE IDEAL SOCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY-HOUSE AND REORGANISE THE SITES WITH PLOTS OF 16 x 26 M! 27

28 LINDEN LEUEN B3 SCENARIO b falling GROUND PRICES RULE 3 WE INEST IN THE IDEAL SOCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY-HOUSE AND REORGANISE THE SITES WITH PLOTS OF 16 x 26 M! 28

29 HAZENPAD B3 SCENARIO b falling GROUND PRICES RULE 3 WE INEST IN THE IDEAL SOCIAL SINGLE-FAMILY-HOUSE AND REORGANISE THE SITES WITH PLOTS OF 16 x 26 M! 29

30 We attract gypsies to linden! B4 SCENARIO b falling GROUND PRICES RULE 4 GYPSYFICATION 30

31 CritiCal REIEW SCenariO B in this scenario, the rules caused either a growing or shrinking densification. Also, they led to very different outcomes in contradiction to scenario A, although the scenarios seemed to be quite similar. Whithin the scenarios of a growing forest and a gypsyfication, we remarked the changes in the road-use, as we think that the spatial diversification in the forest-scenario will cause higher speed on the roads, and the gypsies will occupy and use the roads, especially the inner streets in a different way. B 31

32 scenario c TOTAL LOSS OF CONTROL...it all started with a carport... 32

33 each owner enlargens his house as he likes it, but by guarding the plot borders! C1 SCENARIO C total LOSS OF CONTROL RULE 1 each owner enlargens his house as he likes it, but by guarding the plot borders! 33

34 KOETSIERWEG ADELHEID HAZENPAD C1 SCENARIO C total LOSS OF CONTROL RULE 1 each owner enlargens his house as he likes it, but by guarding the plot borders! 34

35 REFERENCE // CASABLANCA (MAR) REFERENCE // CAPE TOWN (SA) C1 SCENARIO C total LOSS OF CONTROL RULE 1 each owner enlargens his house as he likes it, but by guarding the plot borders! 35

36 CritiCal REIEW scenario C for this scenario, we made out three rules which, in the end, caused all either the same results or an unsolvably high amount of furthergoing small regulations. Neverthless, thinking about an uncontrolled growth of the houses proved the single-family-house to be much more adaptive to further needs, i.e. growing number of inhabitants, than you may think in a first way. It also would be imaginable, that in this scenario the use of the plots may change into small businesses... C 36

37 scenario D IMPLEMENTATION OF A NEW FUNCTION 37

38 D IMPLEMENTATION OF A NEW FUNCTION 38

39 IMPLEMENTATION OF A hospital / Sanatory 1_ location 2_ LAYOUT 3_ ORIGINAL INHABITANTS MOING OUT 3_ NICHE SUBURB D1 SCENARIO d implementation OF A NEW FUNCTION HOSPITAL / SANATORY 39

40 5_ INTERNAL TAXI SYSTEM 6_ INTERNAL BUS SYSTEM 7_ RESIDENCE 8_ EXPANDING SUBURB D1 SCENARIO d HOSPITAL / SANATORY implementation OF A NEW FUNCTION 40

41 9_ WEALTHY INHABITANTS 10_ NEED OF PROTECTION <_> PUBLIC ROAD USE D1 SCENARIO d implementation OF A NEW FUNCTION HOSPITAL / SANATORY 41

42 IMPLEMENTATION OF A UNIERSITY CAMPUS 1_ location 2_ FAST BUS LANE TO LEUEN 3_ SPONTANTEOUS BUSINESS 4_ ON-SITE STUDENT HOUSING D2 SCENARIO d UNIERSITY CAMPUS implementation OF A NEW FUNCTION 42

43 5_ PRIATE STUDENT HOUSING D2 SCENARIO d implementation OF A NEW FUNCTION UNIERSITY CAMPUS 43

44 CritiCal REIEW scenario D those scenarios were much more subjective, as we couldn`t make out any rules for them.. They showed a different threatening with the linkage of Linden to Leuven, whereas the Idea of an implemented Campus enforces this linkage, the sanatorium-scenario leads much more to an isolated Island -Solution.. Compared to other scenarios, the changes in this scenario came out just by what we imagined ourselves what would happen, but not following a rule that shows what in such a case would happen. general Conclusion after having examined those four scenarios, it seems that we have to blend them together, and also go further into the scale of houses itself, especially as they are mostly very solid and durable constructions which represent a certain value. 44