RP55 RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP) BYPASSES OF RAICHUR AND BIJAPUR TOWNS TABLE OF CONTENTS

Transcription

1 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Kamataka State Highways RP55 Volume 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS RESETTLEMENT ACTION PLAN (RAP) BYPASSES OF RAICHUR AND BIJAPUR TOWNS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 3 CHAPTER - 1 INTRODUCTION... 5 R &R PLLicy/ENTITLEM ENTSPOLICY/ENTITLEMENTS...5 INTRODUCTION... 6 BIJAPUR... 6 SOCIAL SURVEYS... 7 CUT-OFF DATE FOR TITLE HOLDERS... 8 EXTENT OF IMPACT... 8 PROPOSED M ITIGATION M EASURES:... 8 CHAPTER 2 - BASELINE SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS... 9 SOCIAL IM PACT ASSESSM ENT... 9 RAICHUR... 9 BIJAPUR IMPACTS SOCIAL STRATIFICATION DEMOGRAPHIC AND LITERACY LEVELS OF PROJECT AFFECTED PERSONS PUBLIC CONSULTATION - PROPOSED BYPASS FOR RAICHUR TowN ISSUES MITIGATION MEASURES PUBLIC CONSULTATION- PROPOSED BYPASS FOR BIJAPUR TOWN ISSUES MITIGATION MEASURES: CHAPTER - 3 LAND ACQUISITION AND PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION LANDACQUISITION CONSENTAWARD RAICHUR BIJAPUR PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION CHAPTER 4 - IMPLEMENTATION PLAN IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITY INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS TRAINING AND CAPACITY BUILDING DISTRICT GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE NGO PARTNERSHIP INCOME RESTORATION(IR) TIMING OF RESETTLEMENT IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE BUDGET POVERTY LINE MONITORING AND EVALUATION IMPACT EVALUATION DISCLOSURE OF RAP ANNEXURES (1-5)

2 Kamataka State Highways ABBREVIATIONS APL BPL CAO CPO COI EWS GOI GOK KSHIP LAA NGO PAF PAG PAP PIU PWD RAP R & R ROW SDRC SIA Above Poverty Line Below Poverty Line Chief Administrative Officer Chief Project Officer Corridor of Impact Economically Weaker Section Government of India Government of Karnataka Karnataka State Highways Land Acquisition Act Non-Governmental Organisation Project Affected Family Project Affected Group Project Affected Person Project Implementation Unit Public Works Department Resettlement and Rehabilitation Right of Way Social Development and Resettlement Cell Social Impact Assessment 2

3 Karnataka State Highways EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. The Government of Kamataka is currently implementing the Kamataka State Highways (KSHIP) with the assistance of World Bank funding 2. The construction of bypass at Raichur and Bijapur towns is under consideration for inclusion in KSHIP. 3. The (RAP) of proposed bypass for Raichur and Bijapur towns has been prepared on the basis of provisions contained in the document approved by Government of Kamataka (GOK) entitled: Resettlement and Rehabilitation: Principles and Policy Framework for the Karnataka State Highways. 4. Since it is the construction of new road at Raichur and Bijapur towns, the impact is only on land. Land Acquisition will be done through Land Acquisition Act. The R&R policy provides scope of consent award for payment of compensation amounts on willing-seller-- willing-buyer basis without any pre-conditions. 5. Census and socio-economic survey were conducted for the proposed bypass for Raichur and Bijapur during the months of March to May 2003 and data have been updated in Feb meters width (Corridor of Impact) was considered along the alignment i.e.7.6 and 6.7 km respectively 6. Raichur town: As per census and socio-economic survey, there are 59 PAFs (out of 59 PAFs, S PAFs were not available at the time of the survey). Data on 54 PAFs with 459 PAPs were collected. Of the 54 PAFs, 3 are women headed headed PAFs households. Analysis of survey data shows that 32 families falls under the Below Economic Land Holdings category. Average annual income of families works out to Rs. 82,059. Average land holding is 6.34 acres. The extent of land acquisition from private owners necessary for construction of bypass will be 'acres. The total budget is estimated at Rs crore. 7. Bijapur town: As per census and socio-economic survey, there are 55 PAFs (out of 55 PAFs, 7 PAFs were not available at the time of survey). Data on 48 PAFs with 364 PAPs were collected. Of the 48 PAFs, 3 PAFs are women headed households, 1 PAF is schedule tribe and only one PAF is a squatter. 27 families reported to be Below Economic Land Holdings category 3 families belong to BPL category. In accordance with policy provisions subsistence allowance and other assistances will be calculated on the BPL and Below Economic Land Holdings criteria, if they are resettled and relocated. The assistance value will be decided by the GOK. The extent of land acquisition from private owners necessary for construction of bypass will be acres. The budget estimate works out to Rs crore. 8. There are no archaeological monuments and community assets on the proposed alignment except a shrine in Raichur. 9. Local level public consultations were conducted at Raichur and Bijapur towns for proposed bypasses. 10. The RAP describes the institutional and organisational mechanisms required for the resettlement program. Social Development Resettlement Cell set up by Kamataka PWD-PIU will implement the RAP. The grievance redressal process specifies procedures for registering and addressing complaints including appeal mechanisms and recourse to civil courts. 3

4 Karnataka State Highways 11. The RAP will be implemented over a period of 2 years. Monitoring indicators in terms of physical and financial progress are identified. An impact evaluation by an external agency will be undertaken after the completion of implementation of RAP to assess the changes in the living standards of project affected persons. 12. The Annexure contains the complete socio-economic database of the Project Affected Families. Other documentation regarding proposed bypass is video graphy of proceedings of public consultations. 4

5 Kamataka State Highways CHAPTER - 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Karnataka State Highways (KSHIP) is an initiative of Public Works Department of the Government of Karnataka for Improvement of road network of the State with World Bank assistance. The project is in two phases, Phase I consist of 394kms of upgradation and 848 kms of major maintenance. Phase II consists of 548 kms of upgradation and 429 kms of major maintenance. 1.2 It is also envisaged in the project that new roads should be constructed to bypass six congested towns. These towns are connected by links on the same or different corridors. It was further decided to evaluate the alternative alignments for these bypasses for their preliminary technoeconomic feasibility to best judge their viability prior to the commencement of detailed designs. 1.3 Results of the preliminary techno-economic feasibility evaluations revealed that, out of the six bypasses under consideration, Raichur and Bijapur would be viable with acceptable Internal Rates of Return (IRR) for the chosen analysis period. 1.4 In Raichur town, the considered alignment connects link IA and IB, is the shorter compare to other. The other alignment is long and traverse rocky hillocks and not cost effective. During informal conversation with local residents it was revealed that the alignment considered presently is the best option. In Bijapur, part of ring road alignment has been considered for inclusion in KSHIP. 1.5 This (RAP) is a project specific RAP, which outlines the extent of impacts due to construction bypasses on communities and the mitigation of the potential impacts. Further, it details necessary implementation procedures for resettlement and rehabilitation. This RAP is prepared in accordance with the stipulations and guide-lines provided in Government of Karnataka's document entitled: Resettlement and Rehabilitation:-Principles and Policy Framework for the Karnataka State Highways (GO No.PWD21 CRM Dt , revised vide GO PWD 21 CRM Dt ), and the World Bank Operational Directive R&R policy/entitlements 1.6 The policy emphasizes that adverse impacts should be avoided or minimized. Where it is unavoidable assistance will be provided to improve, or at least restore, incomes and standards of living for project-affected persons. The most direct and immediate impacts associated with Land Acquisition. Mitigation measures are provided through compensation and assistance to households, individuals and groups in accordance with policy provisions. Based on these objectives and principle, GOK has adopted a R&R policy for the project which is consistent with the Bank's OD 4.30 and relevant local laws and acts. The policy describes the approaches for carrying out baseline census and socio-economic surveys, preparation of RAP, consultations, institutional arrangements and monitoring and evaluation procedures. 1.7 In the following, the RAP of the proposed bypass for Raichur and Bijapur towns is presented in four chapters. In Chapterl, introduction to RAP of the proposed bypasses followed by a brief outline of 5 Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

6 Karnataka State Highways the content of social surveys and determination of cut-off date for title-holders is given. chapter 2, Baseline Socio-economic Characteristics deals with the analysis of data collected from PAFs during census and socio-economic survey which facilitates measurement of the extent of social impact on PAFs. These quantitative socio-economic data are supplemented by inputs drawn from the proceedings of the public consultation held with a group of local people with representation from PAFs are used These inputs help in capturing the perceptions of PAFs about the proposed project. Perceptions regarding mitigation measures and options regarding the nature of compensation desired by people gets reflected in the proceedings. Chapter 3 deals with the Land Acquisition Process and payment of compensation. Chapter 4 provides an outline of institutional arrangements and time schedule for implementing RAP and estimated cost for acquiring the land required for the construction of bypass. Relevant Annexures are given at the end of the RAP. Introduction 1.8 The proposed bypass alignment begins at PWD Km stone in limits of Yaramarus revenue village on Raichur - Shaktinagar road (Link IA) north of Raichur town. The alignment moves towards south and bends gradually. The alignment intersects Raichur - Mansalapur road at chainage in the limits of Mansalapur revenue village and Arasinagi road, Major District Road (MDR) at chainage The alignment bends and joins Raichur - Lingasugur road at Km stone 5.2 west of Raichur town. The proposed alignment passes through dry agricultural land falling within 5 revenue villages (Table 1-1) (Figure 1-1). Table 0-1: Land likely to be affected by the proposed bypass coming under revenue villages Bijapur Revenu Vi,as Start Chainage End Chainage Revenue Village's (mtrs.) (mtrs.) Yaramarus, Starting Point (L) Raichur 0.629(L) (L) Mansalapur 2.632(L) (L) 3.195( Eklaspur 3.163(L) (L) Askihal 6.468(L) Bijapur is a district head quarters in northwest part of Kamataka. The proposed bypass alignment begins on Bijapur-Tikota road (link 2A) at PWD km. Stone from this point, the existing kutcha road forms the alignment and moves towards south and bends gradually. After 2.4 kms, intersects Bijapur-Jamnkhandi road (link 3A). Then, the alignment moves towards east on dry land and intersects NH 218 (Bijapur-Bagalkot road at the chainage Further the alignment bends and moves towards east. At the chainage it joins NH-13 southeast of Bijapur town. Table 0-2: Land likely to be affected by the proposed bypass coming under revenue villages 6 Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

7 Kamataka State Highways Revenue Start Chainage Village's End Chainage (mtrs.) (mtrs.) Mahal Baghayath. Starting Point (L) Kasaba Bijapur 6.238(L) 6.240X The proposed bypass for Bijapur town is a part of Ring road. It is evident from the Documents of Revenue Department that the Land Acquisition process is completed from starting chainage (0.000) to of proposed bypass and in the possession of PWD. The PWD has already constructed a road connecting Link 2A and 3A, the same would be upgraded as part of construction of bypass. The Land Acquisition process was completed in 1996 before the policy was adopted to this project. Since the acquired land is traversed by proposed bypass alignment, the landowners are considered as Project Affected Families (PAFs). During the socio-economic survey, these PAFs informed PCC staff that they considered the loss incurred as incommensurate and approached the Court for enhancement of compensation. Litigation is in the Court. The List of Survey No. and extent acquired are given in Annexure 1 in Table It is also evident form the Documents of Bijapur Development Authority (BDA) that the Land Acquisition process of agriculture lands of Survey Nos 491 and 952 located between the chainage to and to of the proposed bypass alignment respectively is completed and the same are in the possession of BDA. The concerned landowners informed PCC staff during socio-economic survey of the proposed bypass alignment that they have filed the cases in Court for enhancement of compensation. The litigation is in the Court As per the Documents of the Revenue Department, the Survey No which is affected by proposed alignment from chainage to is Govt. land (belong to Wakf Board). Two families claimed that they were tenants. As per the Revenue Documents the litigation is pending in Land Tribunal. The RAP for the proposed bypasses of Raichur and Bijapur town has been prepared with a well-defined three-stage process as outlined below: Stage 1 - Social Survey and data Compilation Stage 2 - Data Analysis for Social Impact Assessment Stage 3 - Preparation of a RAP based on the Social Impact Assessment 1.13 The scope of work involved contacting the persons/families who are likely to lose land/other assets abutting the identified road alignment section and carrying out social surveys within horizontal width of 30m, which is considered as the corridor of impact (COI). The basic objective of these surveys was to assess the socio-economic status of the persons and households who are likely to be affected due to the implementation of the proposed bypass. 7 Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

8 Kamataka State Highways Social Surveys 1.14 The following Social Surveys and consultations were carried out for Project Affected Families (PAFs) and Project Affected Persons (PAPs). Each of these components facilitated identification of specific needs of PAFs: * Baseline Census helped in identifying the PAFs * Socio-economic survey (Sample) (SES) helped in identifying income and other livelihood characteristics of PAFs and PAPs * Public Information and Consultations helped in identifying areas of Public participation in Project Implementation The details about the methodology and instruments used are as given in Phase I RAP Report. Cut-Off Date for Title holders 1.15 The cut-off date for title-holders is the date of Notification as per section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act. It is recognised that there will be a margin of error in the census, and any person who was not enumerated but can produce documentary evidence that he/she is rightfully an entitled person will also be included during the joint measurement. After joint measurement, efforts will be made by PIU to trace such respondents for working out their eligibility for entitlements. Extent of Impact 1.16 The properties to be acquired are mainly agricultural lands. There are no impacts of residential structures. Hence the type of loss will be mainly of agricultural land and the extent of land acquisition is high with 30meters of COI for the 7.6 and 6.7 km length of proposed alignment in Raichur and Bijapur towns respectively. In Bijapur, one PAF is loosing shop. In case of another PAF, he is loosing land, which is converted to commercial purpose. Both of them will be dealt with as per the R&R policy provisions. Impact category Raichur Bijapur Loss of agricultural lands (No. of PAFs) Squatter 1 Land Acquisition -Private (in Acres) Land Acquisition - Private trust (in Acres) Proposed road length (in Kms) Proposed mitigation measures: 1.17 Mitigation measures are provided through compensation and assistance to PAFs in accordance with the R&R policy provisions of KSHIP. The following mitigation measures are proposed as per R&R policy of KSHIP to address the adverse impacts due to Land Acquisition for construction of proposed bypasses at Raichur and Bijapur town: * Consent Award or Compensation in accordance LAA. * In case of severance of agricultural land, an additional 25% of total compensation will be paid as severance allowance. 8 Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

9 Karnataka State Highways * Assistance for purchase of income generating assets under economic rehabilitation for vulnerable families, if they are resettled and relocated. * Subsistence allowance for PAFs, if they are resettled and relocated, will be calculated on the BPL criteria. 9 Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

10 Kamataka State Highways CHAPTER 2 - BASELINE SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS Social Impact Assessment 2.1 Social Impact Assessment (SIA) of the proposed bypasses was undertaken as required under the World Bank Operational Directives (O.D) 4.20 and The database for undertaking the SIA exercise in the proposed bypasses based on the census and socio-economic survey-data collected from the Project Affected Families (PAFs) during the months of March to May Both the towns were revisited in February 2004 for collecting additional information and update the data. Total length of the proposed bypass road is 7.6 km in Raichur town and 6.7 km in Bijapur. This section attempts to capture the extent of social impacts based on the data collected during Census and Sample SES on the socio-economic characteristics of the PAFs and their family members Project Affected Persons (PAPs). Raichur 2.2 Data on salient socio-economic and demographic characteristics of the PAFs and PAPs on the proposed bypass alignment indicate that, 54 families with 459 members are likely to be affected. Of the 54 PAFs, 3 were women headed families. Analysis of the data shows that 32 families reported to have Below Minimum Economic Land Holdings (Table 2-1). 3 families having their annual income Below Poverty Line falls under Below Minimum Economic Land Holdings category. Distribution of annual income 19 PAFs falling within Rs 18,000 to 50,000 categories. 59% of PAFs are in Rs 50,000 and above group. Data on income distribution among PAFs are given in Table 2-9 of Annexure 2. Further, of the total PAFs, in 5 cases, the Social Team could collect the details about the affected area and names of owners of the affected area from local village officials. These respondents were not available to collect other socio-economic and demographic information at the time of PCC survey. Hence, the analysis of socio-economic data is restricted to 54 PAFs. However, joint measurement of land acquisition process will determine the land ownership and other impacts. This helps to trace the owners of these 5 PAFs for working out necessary compensation entitlement. On the identified alignment, social survey team did not come across any other community asset getting affected except a small shrine. The total area to be acquired for the construction of the bypass works out to acres. Of this area only 1.33 acre is under the ownership of a private trust. The Land is neither leased out nor encroached upon by others. (Table 2-1 of Annexure 2). 2.3 Agriculture being the dominant avocation in the study region, 48 per cent of PAPs was engaged in cultivation and 6 per cent were reported to be agricultural labourers. The rest were engaged in nonfarm activities. 10 Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

11 Kamataka State Highways Table 2.1: Socio-Economic Characteristics of PAFs and PAPs SI. No. Particulars Magnitude 1. Affected families/persons (no.): PAFs PAPs a) Total number of families b) Women headed families 3 17 c) Below Minimum Economic land 32 holding 2 Sex (Persons ) & Literacy (%) (i)male Literacy (%) 44 (ii)female Literacy(%) 23 3 Social Stratification of PAFs/PAPs General Category Average land holding (acres) 6.34 Marginal farmers (< 2 acres) (%) 4 Small farmers( 2-5 acres) (%) 57 Medium farmers(5-10 acres) (%) 23 Large farmers( 10 acres and 16 above)(%) Av. yield of major crop per acre 6 (Jowar)in quintols 6 Occupation (Workers % age to the total workers)) Cultivators (%) 49 Agricultural Labourers (%) 6 Commerce/Trade (%) 12 Others (%) 35 Total workers (Number ) Propotion of PAFs own farm animals, Agriculture implements No.of PAFs own ox 35 No. of PAFs own Buffaloes 30 No. of PAFs own tractor 16 No. of PAFs own Bullock cart 35 No. of PAFs own pumpset (Agri.) 2 No. of PAFs having LPG connection 59 8 Income (in Rs.) Average annual income of BPL 17, Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

12 Kamataka State Highways Si. No. Particulars Magnitude Average annual income of APL 85,875 Average annual income of families 82,059 BPL cut-off income (Annual) 18, Bijapur 2.4 Data on salient socio-economic and demographic characteristics of the PAFs and PAPs on the proposed bypass alignment indicate that, 48 families with 364 members are likely to be affected. Of the 48 PAFs, 3 are women headed families and 27 families are reported to be below Minimum Economic Land Holdings (Table 2-2). Out of 6 BPL families, 3 families falls under below Minimum Economic Land Holdings category. Women headed families and ST households are part of main stream economy. Distribution of annual income among PAFs indicates that 58% of PAFs are in Rs 50,000 and above income group. Data on income distribution among PAFs are given in Table 2-10 of Annexure 2. Further, of the total PAFs, in 7 cases, the Social Team could collect the details about the affected area and names of owners of these areas from local village officials. These respondents were not available to collect other socio-economic and demographic information at the time of PCC survey. Hence, the analysis of socio-economic data is restricted to 48 PAFs. However, joint measurement of land acquisition process will determine the land ownership and other impacts which helps to trace the owners of these 7 PAFs for working out necessary compensation entitlement. The total area to be acquired for the construction of the bypass works out to acres. Of this area for acres, Land Acquisition process was completed and the affected families have approached Court for enhancement of compensation. (Table 2-2A and 2B of Annexure 2). 2.5 The proposed bypass for Bijapur town is a part of Ring road. It is evident from the Documents of Revenue Department that the Land Acquisition process was completed before policy was adopted to the project from chainage to of proposed bypass and is in the possession of PWD. The PWD constructed road would be upgraded as part of construction of bypass. Hence the landowners whose land has been acquired are considered as PAFs. During the socio-economic survey, these PAFs informed the PCC staff, that they considered the loss incurred as incommensurate, hence they approached the Court for enhancement of compensation. Litigation is in the court. (Details of survey nos. and areas are given in Annexure 1 Table 1). 2.6 It is also evident from the Documents of Bijapur Development Authority (BDA) that the Land Acquisition process of agriculture lands of Survey Nos. 491 and 952 located between the chainage and and between chainage and of the proposed bypass alignment respectively was completed and the same are in the possession of BDA. The concerned landowners informed PCC staff during socio-economic survey of the proposed bypass alignment that they have filed cases in the Court for enhancement of compensation. The litigation is in the court. (Details of survey nos. and areas are given in Annexure 1 Table 2). 2.7 As per the Documents of the Revenue Department, the Survey No which is affected by proposed alignment from chainage to is Government Land (belongs to Wakf Board). 12 Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

13 Karnataka State Highways Two families claimed that they were tenants. pending in Land Tribunal. As per the Revenue Documents the litigation is per cent of PAPs were engaged in commerce/trade and 32 percent in agriculture. (Table 2-2). Table2.2: Socio-Economic Characteristics of PAFs and PAPs SI. No. Particulars Magnitude 1. Affected families/persons (no.): PAFs PAPs a) Total number of families b) Women headed families 3 17 c) Below economic land holding 27 d) Below Poverty Line 3 2 Literacy (i)male Literacy (%) 80 (ii)female Literacy(%) 68 3 Social Stratification of PAFs/PAPs ST 1 5 Others (General) Average Land Holding(Acres) 4.9 Marginal farmers (< 2 acres) (%) 22 Small farmers (2-5 acres) (%) 35 Medium farmers (5-10 acres) (%) 27 Large farmers (1 Oacres and above) 15 Av. yield of major crop per acre 6 (Jowar) in quintals 6 Occupation (Workers % age to the total workers) Cultivators (%) 32 Commerce/Trade (%) 36 Others (%) 32 Total workers (number) 102 Propotion of PAFs own farm animals, Agriculture implements 13 Scott Wilson / CES/ IIIE

14 Karnataka State Highways Impacts SI. No. Particulars Magnitude No. of PAFs own ox 35 No. of PAFs own Buffaloes 33 No. of PAFs own Bullock cart 22 No. of PAFs own Tractor 6 No. of PAFs own pumpset (agri) 15 No. PAFs having LPG gas connection 54 7 Income (in Rs.) Average annual income of APL 1,37,033 families, Average annual income of BPL 12,933 families Average annual income of families 1,21, The impacts are on agricultural land. The land holding categories verses extent of land getting affected due to construction of bypasses at Raichur and Bijapur are given in Table 2-1 of Annexure 2 and Table 2-2A and 2-2B of Annexure 2 respectively. Social Stratification 2.10 Data on social stratification of PAFs of proposed bypass of Raichur town indicate that out of 53 PAFs who furnished complete household socio-economic data, all the PAFs belong to general category and 5 are women headed households (Annexure 2-Table 2-3). In case of women headed households, none of them belong to BPL families and as all these PAFs own agriculture land and are part of the mainstream population, they do not fall into the vulnerable groups In Bijapur town out of 48 PAFs who furnished complete household socio-economic data, 44 PAFs belong to general category and 1 to ST and 3 are women headed households (Annexure 2-Table 2-4). Out of 3 women headed households, two families belong to BPL category and entitled for special assistance envisaged in R&R policy of KSHIP. Demographic and Literacy levels of Project Affected Persons 2.12 Demographic characteristics like age and sex distribution PAF of proposed bypass of Raichur town indicate that, 38% PAPs belong to less than 18 years age-group followed by age-group with 52%. The sex ratio in project area is 908 females for every 1000 males (Annexure 2-Table 2-5) Age and sex distribution of PAF of proposed bypass of Bijapur town indicates that, 40 per cent PAPs belong to less than 18 years age-group, followed by age-group with 52%. The malefemale ratio among PAPs works out 925 females for every 1000 males (Annexure 2 Table 2-6) Another social development indicator is level of education among PAPs. Data shows 35 per cent of PAPs are illiterate, 37 percent are Primary and 21 percent are Secondary. (Annexure 2 Table 2-7). 14 Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

15 Kamataka State Highways In Bijapur, data shows that 29 percent of PAPs are illiterate, 36percent are Primary and 21 percent are Secondary. (Annexure 2-Table 2-8). 15 Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

16 Karnataka State Highways Public Consultations Public Consultation - Proposed Bypass for Raichur Town 2.15 Following the completion of Socio-Economic Survey of Raichur bypass and after identifying the number of families being affected for the entire proposed bypass alignment Social wing of the PCC organised a public consultation at Raichur Town on 28th March Raichur town is both district and taluk head quarters. Project Affected Families (PAFs) expressed their preference to attend the public meeting in the morning. The venue for the public consultation was fixed at the Agriculture Produce Marketing Committee. As per requirement, PAFs were informed about the day, time and venue of the public consultation two days in advance. While the Tahsildar of Raichur Taluk was informed about the public consultation during the Socio-Economic Survey, the services of the village accountants were sought in order to mobilise the PAFs The PCC staff (Social Wing) conducted the discussion. The participants included Project Affected Persons (PAPs) covered under the survey and interested general public The PCC staff briefed the audience about the KSHIP and proposal for bypass under KSHIP and explained the purpose of conducting the public consultation. With this background, the following issues were taken up for discussion and public opinion on these issues was elicited. Issues 2.18 The Socio-Economic issues that were brought up for discussion included Land Acquisition, Compensation Package and the benefits from the Project. (a) Land Acquisition The PAPs expressed that due to traversing of proposed bypass alignment amidst their agriculture land, it gets into two pieces, becomes unfit for cultivation. (b) Compensation People expressed that the quality of the land and type of crop they grow are such that agriculture operations do not require huge investment and physical labour. Since the land is getting affected, it will affect their livelihood. The PAPs were apprehensive about the compensation they would be given by the Government.They expressed their views that compensation should be fair and should be disbursed in time. (c) Livelihood The PAPs suggested that it would be extremely beneficial if the PAPs were given government jobs in lieu of the land lost. 16 Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

17 Kamataka State Highways Mitigation measures a) & b) adequately addresses the benefits to be extend to the Project Affected Persons and has an inbuilt clause that compensation disbursement and benefits are to be disbursed to the PAPs before commencement of civil works. c) Benefits to be extended as per R&R policy and RAP content. There is no scope of providing government jobs to PAFs in KSHIP. PAFs were explained that there is provision to get assistance to purchase income-generating assets under economic rehabilitation provided for BPL families, if they are resettled and relocated. And also explained that during civil works, contractor provide opportunity for local labour. Public Consultation - Proposed Bypass for Bijapur Town 2.19 Following the completion of Socio-Economic survey of Bijapur bypass and after identifying the No.of families being affected, the PCC organised a public consultation at Bijapur on 30th April The venue for the public consultation was fixed at meeting hall of Town Municipality of Bijapur. The PAPs of the proposed bypass alignment were informed about the day, time and venue of the public consultation in advance The PCC staff conducted the discussion. The participants included Staff of Bijapur Urban Development Authority and PIU, KSHIP Sub-Disivion Bijapur, other Govt. officials and project affected persons and members of project affected families The PCC briefed the audience about the KSHIP and explained the purpose of conducting the public consultation. The importance of people's participation was highlighted to those present at the venue. With this background the following issues were taken up for discussion and public opinion. Issues 2.22 The main issues discussed during public consultation were: A. Land Acquisition The PAFs expressed that PWD is going to establish control line once the road is constructed within which structures cannot be constructed. Apart from becoming unviable for agricultural operations many plots where the road traverse amidst the land, the agriculture would not be a productive occupation due to pollution caused by vehicular traffic. Compensation has to be on par with the prevalent market rates. Besides, the PAPs equivocally expressed that the compensation should be disbursed without delay. B. Compensation Package The PAFs preferred the compensation rate to be based on square meters. They also insisted that the compensation should be on par with prevailing open market rate. 17 Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

18 Karnataka State Highways C. Alignment One of the PAFs expressed that at the start point of bypass i.e., intersection point on Bijapur- Jamkhandi road the alignment is on curve which is not technically feasible. Since it is low-lying area, slab drain has to be constructed which is costly and also the alignment adversely affects the land (alignment passes amidst land and cuts into two pieces). If the alignment were straight, it does not involve any cross drainage structure for storm water passage and also the impact on adversely affected land would have been minimized Mitigation measures: a)&b) adequately addresses the benefits to be extended to the Project Affected Persons and has an inbuilt clause that compensation disbursement and benefits are to be disbursed to the PAPs before commencement of civil works. c) The issue has been passed on to the engineering section and also PAP informed that he would be convinced that the considered alignment is also feasible. PCC confirmed that the considered alignment is feasible. Overall response of the PAPs towards the proceedings was cordial. The proceedings of public consultations of Raichur and Bijapur town were videographed Analysis of the feedback from the PAFs during public consultation revealed that their apprehensions and priorities centred round the magnitude of the loss they likely to incur, whether these losses compensated adequately in time and land become unviable pieces which can be considered by PIU during Land Acquisition. The Land Acquisition for proposed bypasses will be through Consent Award. Hence it is possible to consider the several factors those affect the land prices. 1 8 Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

19 Karnataka State Highways CHAPTER - 3 LAND ACQUISITION AND PAYMENT OF COMPENSATION Land Acquisition 3.1 The land required for construction of proposed bypasses in Raichur and Bijapur town will be acquired as per Land Acquisition Act. 3.2 The Land Acquisition Act contains rules for the time required from when people are first notified about the State's intent to acquire the land, to the time people are required to vacate their holdings. 3.3 The normal procedures for land Acquisition under Section 4.1 will be followed in this project. Although the Land Acquisition Act has a provision for emergency acquisition requiring shorter time, this clause will not be invoked unless it is documented that an emergency exists and that it is not possible to follow the normal procedure for Land Acquisition. 3.4 The Land Acquisition Act and R&R policy (specially formulated for this project) provides adequate policy and legal framework to mitigate the adverse impacts of this project. 3.5 The civil works are linked with the completion of land acquisition. It is estimated that acres and acres are required for construction of bypasses at Raichur and Bijapur respectively. The cost estimates have been given in Table 4.2 & 4.3 of Section 4. The minimum time taken for completion of land acquisition is 7 to 9 months assuming that full infrastructure is given and there are no delays. The Land Acquisition process is in different stages in these towns. Consent Award 3.6 The land needed for construction of bypass in Raichur and Bijapur towns will be only through Consent Award. 3.7 Consent award is the amount that the PAP negotiates with the project authorities, for the loss incurred, on a willing buyer-seller basis. Once the amount is agreed upon the PAP cannot move to court for enhancement of the amount. This amount is negotiated between the GOK and the land /structure owner on a mutually agreed price without any preconditions. 3.8 After section 6(1). notification, PAPs will be called for Consent Award. In case, if the PAPs are reluctant to agree with the Consent Award, then General Award will be sought. Though Consent Award reduces lengthy process of Land Acquisition, some statutory steps must be followed. These steps are indicated in Tables 4.1 and 4.2 of Chapter In some cases it may so happen that after acquisition the remaining plot of the titleholder may not be viable. If the remaining land is below 10 guntas (0.25 acre) he will have the option of either keeping the remaining land or getting the replacement value of the entire and, including the remaining unviable piece of land that shall also be acquired by KSHIP. 19 Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

20 Kamataka State Highways Raichur acres of agriculture lands are getting affected due to construction of bypass at Raichur. Joint measurement has been completed and Issue of 4(1) Notification is published. Bijapur 3.11 The extent of land estimated for the construction of bypass at Bijapur town is acres, out of which acres of land has been acquired It is evident from the Documents of Revenue Department that the Land Acquisition process was completed prior to the policy was adapted to the project (from starting chainage (0.000), to of proposed bypass and in the possession of PWD). The PWD has constructed a road, the same would be upgraded as part of construction of bypass, and also the Land Acquisition process was completed at the two pockets (i.e. from chainage of proposed alignment to and to 6.080) for the two Survey No. 491 and 952 on the alignment, which connects NH 218 and NH 13. However, the landowners have approached the court for enhancement of compensation. The Land Acquisition process for proposed bypass alignment, which connects link 3A and NH 218 is in the process of being initiated. Payment of Compensation 3.13 The Land Acquisition Act adequately addresses the problem arised as consequences of LA such as severing of land etc As per R&R policy of KSHIP, there is a provision for additional support to the vulnerable people who have been affected by the loss of agriculture land. The assistance for purchase of income generating assets under economic rehabilitation The PAFs will also be entitled for the subsistence allowance, which will be calculated on the BPL/Minimum Economic Land Holding criteria In case of severance of agriculture land, an additional grant of 25% of the amount will be paid to the titleholder Severance allowance, grant under economic rehabilitation and subsistence allowance will be paid to the titleholder within one month after Land Acquisition. 20 Scott Wilson / CES / II1E

21 Kamataka State Highways Implementation Responsibility CHAPTER 4 -IMPLEMENTATION PLAN. 4.1 It is the responsibility of the PWD to ensure that the RAP is successfully implemented in a timely manner. The implementation schedule will be updated, as more information becomes available. Institutional Arrangements 4.2 The PWD has the overall responsibility of implementing the. Social Development and Resettlement Cell has been established. It is being headed by the Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) drawn from Karnataka Administrative Services who is also incharge of the overall co-ordination of the SDRC, the Environmental Management Plan Implementation Unit and Information Systems. The CAO will co-ordinate with the Engineering Wing and the Project Management Financial System. 4.3 The CAO has been assisted by the Assistant Commissioner, Land Acquisition and Assistant Director, Social Development. In addition, Social Development Officers (SDO) are positioned at the district level for day to day co-ordination and supervision. The tasks of the SDRC are as follows: * The SDRC will establish operational links with other agencies of government involved in projectinduced resettlement. * It will bridge the distance between the project and project-affected persons and communities. * It will provide means and mechanisms for coordinating the delivery of the compensation and assistance to entitled persons. * It will contribute social development perspectives and inputs to on-going project design and implementation by working closely with PCC project planners, contractors and construction supervision consultants. * It will link the project with state government agencies, provide liaison with PWD field units and impacted communities. * It will also engage required training services, oversee a grievance redressal process, actively monitor RAP implementation, and cooperate with planned project evaluations. Training and Capacity Building 4.4 To enhance capabilities, the SDRC staff training would need to cover techniques in conducting participatory rural appraisal for micro-planning, conducting census and socio-economic surveys, dissemination of information, community consultation and progress monitoring and evaluation. District Grievance Redressal Committee 4.5 The district level grievance redressal committees are set up under the chairmanship of the Deputy commissioners to settle the disputes through mediation and reduce litigation. NGO Partnership 4.6 The services of NGO are not required. The impact is on only agriculture land. The Land Acquisition will be done through Land Acquisition Act (LAA). Joint measurement of land to be 21 Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

22 Karnataka State Highways acquired will be taken care of by Joint Measurement. The LAA ensure that the compensation process is prompt and efficient. SDRC has adequate experienced staff to disburse the R& R benefits to be extended to entitle PAFs in time. Income Restoration(IR) 4.7 The focus of income restoration activities is to ensure that the PAPs are able to at least regain their previous living standards. The main category of impacts as a result of construction of bypasses is partial loss of agriculture land or full. The R&R policy of the project provides that those with legal tenure, below poverty line and own below minimum economic land holdings are entitled to be assisted under economic rehabilitation. Hence they will be compensated by way of alternate economic rehabilitation support and training for up-gradation of skills or imparting new skills. Since it is widely recognised that the best option is to allow the PAPs to continue their former occupations majority of the PAPs are agriculturists, the options available under the schemes are sericulture, poultry, animal husbandry etc. Circumstances may not permit or PAP may select to change activities. SDRC will take up Needs Assessment Survey and prepare a plan. The SDRC will explore the possible options in consultation with PAPs and consider the optiona in light of local conditions and opportunities etc. Based on the felt needs of these vulnerable groups, SDRC will be prioritising the activities through people's participation. Further, these options will be tested for their viability of skill, raw material and available appropriate technology. 4.8 Training in skill related activities can be imparted by ITI, LIDKAR, KVIB,KHDC and KSCDC. The economic rehabilitation assistance money will be deposited in bank accounts to be released only for the purchase of income generating assets. 4.9 There are 32 families and 27 families who have land holdings below minimum economic land holding in Raichur and Bijapur respectively, and 3 families fall under the category of BPL in Bijapur. These families will be entitled to be assisted under economic rehabilitation support. Timing of resettlement 4.10 The Land Acquisition process must be completed by the start of civil works. Requisite procedures will be developed by the PIU to carry out resettlement of PAPs. It is advised that the civil works be first initiated for the town where the land acquisition process is completed, the PAPs are received compensation and acquired stretch would be handed over to start work. The implementation schedule for Civil Works needs to be worked out in detail between the Engineering Wing and the SDRC. Any delay in civil works would be expensive for the GOK, as the contractors could go in for escalation and arbitration. Implementation Schedule 4.11 The resettlement program will be co-ordinated with likely timing of civil works. The resettlement process will be completed before the start of civil works. 22 Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

23 Kamataka State Highways 4.12 The RAP implementation schedule along with Land Acquisition process indicating co-ordination is provided in table4-1 and 4-2 for Raichur and Bijapur respectively. No. of days have been worked out tentatively for fulfilling each of the components 23 Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

24 Karnataka State Highways Table 4-1: RAP Implementation Program for Raichur bypass Sl.No. Steps of Land Acquisition Process Dates I. Submission of 4(1) and approval by the Government and Completed Publication in the Gazette 2. Publication of Declaration under Section 6(1) 315' Jan Award En ui r. 15th March Service of notice of award under Sectionl2(2) 30th April Taking of possession of the land after the passing of the 10" May 2005 award and handing over to the PWD 6. Disbursal of severance allowance and assistance under I Oth June 2005 economic rehabilitation 7. Impact evaluation 1" March 2006 Table 4.2: RAP Implementation Program for Bijapur bypass SI.No. Steps of Land Acquisition Process Dates I. Submission of 4(1) and approval by the Completed Government and Publication in the Gazette 2. Publication of Declaration under Section 6(1) 15' March 2005 Budget 3. Award Enquiry. 30th April Service of notice of award under Sectionl2(2) 3 0 F May Taking of possession of the land after the 15"' June 2005 passing of the award and handing over to the PW D 6. Disbursal of severance allowance and assistance 15 th July 2005 under economic rehabilitation 7. Impact Evaluation 1" March While preparing the budget, emphasised on arriving at an estimate of the market value of the land that is being lost. For this, social wing of PCC collected information about the prices (of the land) from multiple sources during the socio-economic survey of proposed bypasses. Expenditure involves Compensation of Land acquisition, Administrative expenses, Subsistence allowances, Monitoring & Evaluation and Contingencies. 24 Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

25 Kamataka State Highways Table 4.3: Unit Cost for different items of Expenditure - Raichur Unit Cost Units Amount Si. No Category (Rs.) (Acres) (Rs.) 1 Agriculture land 2,00, ,02,12,000 (p er acre) 2 Non Agriculture land 3,00, ,99,000 (per acre) 3 Monitoring & Evaluation 8, ,64,000 _per P A F _ 4 Assistance for economic 20,000 per family 32 6,40,000 rehabilitation 5 Severance Allowance 25% of total ,53,000 1,300per Month 6 Subsistence Allowance for a period of ,49,600 Months 7 Community asset - Shrine Lumpsum 10, ,000 Total 1,45,27,600 Contingencies 10% of Total 14,52,760 C o st The total budget works out to be Rs crore for Raichur bypass. Grand Total 1,59,80,360 Table 4.4: Unit Cost for different items of Expenditure - Bijapur Unit Cost Units Amount Sl. No Category (Rs.) (Acres) (Rs.) 1. Agriculture land 7,00, ,62,99,000 (Per acre) 2. Non agriculture land 7,00,000 (Per acre) ,44, Monitoring and 8, ,40,000 Evaluation per PAF 4. Severance Allowance compensation ,74,750 1, Subsistence allowances per Month for a period 30 2,34,000 of 6 Months_ 6. Assistance for 20,000 per family 27 5,40,000 Economic rehabilitation Total 3,47,31,750 Contingencies 10% of Total Cost 34,73, Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

26 Karnataka State Highways The budget estimate works out to Rs crore for Bijapur Bypass. Grand Total 3,82,04,925 Poverty Line 4.14 The Poverty line is calculated at Rs for this project and minimum economic land holding is less than I hectare of irrigated or two hectares of irrigated or equivalent. Monitoring and Evaluation 4.15 The monitoring indicators in terms of physical and financial are identified. The implementation of RAP for bypasses of Raichur and Bijapur will be closely monitored by SDRC and report regularly to the Project Director. RAP implementation will be closely monitored to provide feedback to PIU and SDRC project managers with an effective basis for assessing progress and identifying potential difficulties and problem areas During implementation, the M&E system will perform the following key tasks: a. Administrative monitoring to ensure that implementation is on schedule and that problems are dealt with on a timely basis. b. Impact evaluation to determine that recovery has indeed taken place and, in time, succeeded The indicators for achievement of the objectives under the resettlement and rehabilitation program are of three kinds: a. Process indicators indicating project inputs, expenditures, staff deployment etc b. Output indicators, indicating results in terms of numbers of affected people compensated and resettled, training held, credit disbursement, etc. c. Impact indicators, related to the longer term effect of the project on people's lives The monitoring and evaluation indicators are given below. These are only broad indicators, additions and deletions to these can be made as per requirements. 26 Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

27 Kamataka State Highways MONITORING INDICATORS Physical Indicators Raichur Bijapur Implementation Progress this Cumulative Implementat Progress this Cumulative Target quarter Progress ion Target quarter Progress Land acquired (acres) No, of community asset reestablished No. of commercial1 squatter provided site _ FINANCIAL INDICATORS Raichur Bijapur Implementatio Progress this Cumulative Implementat Progress this Cumulative n Target quarter Progress ion Target quarter Progress No. of Consent Awards Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

28 Kamataka State Highways No, of PAFs BPL: 3 received Minimum Minimum assistance Economic Economic under Land holding: Land economic Ln holding: Ln rehabilitation 32 holding: 27 No. of PAFs Minimum BPL: 3 paid Mionoimu Minimum subsistence Lanold Economic allowance 32 Land 32 holding: Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

29 Karnataka State Highways IMPACT EVALUATION INDICATORS Raichur Bijapur Pre project Baseline End of project Pre project Baseline End of project 1. Avg. land holdings (acres) 2. Occupation(%) Agriculture: 49 Agriculture: 32 Agri. Lab: 6 Agri. Lab: 0 Comm./Trade: 12 Comm./Trade: 36 Others/Services: 35 Others/Services: Average Annual Rs.17, 200(BPL) Rs.12,933(BPL) Income(Rs) Rs.85, 875(APL) Rs.1, 37,033(APL) 4. Average yield of major crop jowar (per 6 6 acre in qtls) 5. Families having LPG connection(%) PAFs own tractor(%) PAFs own pump sets(agri) in %age PAFs own Bullock carts(%) PAFs own oxen (%) Impact Evaluation 4.19 An impact evaluation will be undertaken by an external agency at the completion of implementation RAP. PIU will take steps to identify and appoint an agency at the completion of implementation of RAP. The agency will assess the changes in the living standards of PAPs. Disclosure of RAP: 4.20 The Draft RAP was disclosed to the PAPs and other stakeholders on 12th and 14th October 2004 at Raichur and Bijapur towns respectively for review and comments on the policy in general and adequacy of the mitigation measures in particular. This process brought out the views and expectation of the PAPs as well as their expectations in terms of compensation and assistance from the project in case of adverse impacts. Key findings of disclosure of the Draft RAP indicate full support to the project The Draft RAP was also disclosed at Offices of the Deputy Commissioner, Assistant Commissioner, Tahsildar and copies are made available for the reference to the public at Public Libraries ats Raichur and Bijapur town Minutes of discussion, photographs are given in Annexure Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

30 Karnataka State Highways Annexures ANNEXURE 1 Table-1: List of Survey Numbers and Extent of Land Acquired - Bijapur Village Survey No. Area(Acres and guntas) Mahalbagayath : :1A :1B : : : lB 656-1K 656-ID 656-IE 646: : : : :1A : 1B 650: la+2/ :1+2B Table-2: List of Survey Numbers and Extent of Land Acquired - Bijapur Village Survey No. Area(Acres and guntas) 491:2B: :IB:K :1K : :1B :1B :1B :1 B Scott Wilson CES / IIIE

31 Karnataka State Highways Annexures Annexure - 2 Table 2-1: Impacts - Land Acquisition (Raichur) Land Area PAFs Area Acquired (Acres) (Acres) Upto to to Above Sub Total Land of trust 1.33 Total Table 2-2A: Impacts - Land to be acquired (Bijapur) Land Area PAFs Area Acquired (Acres) (Acres) Upto to to Above Total Table 2-2B: Impacts - Land Acquisition Process Completed (Bijapur) Land Area (Acres) PAFs Area Acquired Land ~~~~~~(Acres) Up to to tolO Above Sub Total Govt. Land 1.25 Community Asset.50 Total Table 2-3: Social Stratification of PAFs and PAPs (Raichur) General Income Women Headed Land Area APL BPL ST not Household PAFs ]APs PAFs PAPs PAFs PAPs Reported PAFs PAPs Upto to too Above o Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

32 Karnataka State Highways Annexures ITotal Table 2-4: Social Stratification of PAFs and PAPs (Bijapur) Land Area APL ral (Acres) APL _BPLnot ST Income Womea Headed Household PAFs PAPs PAFs PAT PAFs PAPs Reported PAFs PAPs Up to to to Above Squatter Total Table 2-5: Distribution of PAPs by Age and Sex (Raichur) Land Area Age <= 18 Age > 18 and <=59 Age > 59 Total (Acres) Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Total Upto to to Above Total Table 2-6: Distribution of PAPs by Age and Sex (Bijapur) Land Area Age <= 18 Age > 18 and <=59 Age > 59 l Total l (Acres) Male Female Male Female Male Female Male Female Total Up to to to Above Total Table 2-7 Distribution of PAPs by Education (Raichur) Land Area Illiterate Primary Secondary (Acres) Higher Others Total Up to to to Above b_ Total l Table 2-8: Distribution of PAPs by Education (Bijapur) 3 Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

33 Karnataka State Highways Annexures Land Area Illiterate Primary Secondary (Acres) Higher Others Total Up to to to Above IO Total Table 2-9: Distribution of PAFs by Income (in Rs.) (Raichur) Land Area Income <= Income >18000 & Income >50000 Income Income (Acres) <=50000 & <= > not Total Upto to to AbovelO Total Table 2-10: Distribution of PAFs by Income (in Rs) (Bijapur bypass) Land Area Income <= Income >18000 & Income >50000 Income Income (Acres) <=50000 & <= > not Total Upto to to Above Squatter Total Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

34 Karnataka State Highways Annexures Taluk: Bijapur Annexure 3: General Identification and Type of Loss (Raichur and Bijapur Bypass) Impact Category: Owner Village/ Town Chainage Q_No SL No of structure OwnerName No. of Type of likely Total Area to be Annual Women Social RTC RTC Name Family loss Holding acquired Income Headed stratifi No Sub Mahal Bhagayath members (Acres) (Acres) House cation Land No. Hold Land BJP/MLB/BPS/01 Basavaraj Bheemappa 20 Agricultural land No General 683 Patil Mahal Bhagayath 506 BJP/MLB/BPS/03 Rangappa Hadapad 3 Commercial No General with Total Loss of Income Mahal Bhagayath 507 BJP/MLB/BPS/04 Shantha Devi Govinda 6 Agricultural land No General 684/1. Karajola. A Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/05 GuruSiddappa Ningana 5 Agricultural land No General 684/1 Dinni I_B Mahal Bhagayath 509 BJP/MLB/BPS/05A Aminabhi 1 Agricultural land 2 No 683/3 Mahal Bhagayath 511 BJP/MLB/BPS/05B Safiya Begaum 7 Agricultural land Yes General 686/1 Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/06 Siddappa 7 Agricultural land No General 643 Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/07 Bhimappa Honnapa 11 Agricultural land No General 644 Uppar Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/08 Joint Owners 12 Agricultural land No General 656/1 Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/09 Ravindra 4 Agricultural land No General 646 Mahal Bhagayath 516 BJP/MLB/BPS/09A Joint Owners 14 Agricultural land No General 646/1 Mahal Bhagayath 517 BJP/MLB/BPS/09B Savareppa 8 Agricultural land No General 646/1 Mahal Bhagayath 518 BJP/MLB/BPS/09C Bhimappa 6 Agricultural land No SC 646/1 Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/010 Tayavva Havappa I. M adar Agricultural land No Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/011I Joint owners 15 Agricultural land No General 648/1 Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/012 Nabhisab Malagi 5 Agricultural land No General 649/1 A, 649/2 A Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/012A Mohamad Ibrahim 5 Agricultural land No General 649 Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/013 Sayed Rasul S. 5 Agricultural land No General 650 B ilag Lagip i: ee_a_i eera 5 Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

35 Kamataka State Highways Annexures Village/ Town Chainage Q_No SL No of structure OwnerName No. of Type of likely Total Area to be Annual Women Social RTC RTC Name Family loss Holding acquired Income Headed stratifi No Sub members (Acres) (Acres) House cation Land No Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/013A Shakeel Ahmad 5 Agricultural land Hold Land No General 650/3 Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/014 Rajashekar Ishwar 5 Agricultural land No General 450 Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/015 Gowda Patil I_I Mallappa Gadigeppa 6 Agricultural land No General Mantri Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/016 Shivanand Patil 6 Agricultural land No General 448 Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/016A Bowrama S. Jugathi 6 Agricultural land No General 448/1 Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/017 M.D. Bilagi 7 Agricultural land No General Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BSP/018 Diwakar.C. Gowdellar 4 Agricultural land No General 471/1 Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/018A Mahadevi P. Pujari 8 Agricultural land No General Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/019 Mallaya.B. Hiremath 10 Agricultural land No General 473 Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/020 Lingavva.R. Biradhar 12 Agricultural land No General 474 Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/021 Abdul Hamid 10 Agricultural land No General 475 Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/022 Mallikarjun.B. Akki 5 Agricultural land No General 431/2 Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/022A Gangadhar.B. Akki 4 Agricultural land No General 431/2 &023 Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/024 Bouravva Muthappa 3 Agricultural land Yes General Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BJP/024A M.A. Mujawar 6 Agricultural land No General 430 Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/025 Ashok Rachiah 12 Agricultural land No General 430 Madrimath Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/025A Gulappa Siddappa 13 Agricultural land No General 430/3 Shattighar I Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/026A Laxmi Bai 4 Agricultural land Yes General 491/1 Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/026B Kamala Bai 5 Agricultural land No General 491/lk Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/026C Yunush Ahmed 3 Agricultural land No General 491/2 Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/027A Shivappa S Agricultural land No General 1032 Mahal Bhagayath 547 BJP/MLB/BPS/027B Mallappa Basalingappa 5 Agricultural land No General 1032 Mahal Bhagayath Nuchi BJP/MLB/BPS/028B Arvind S. Midodmi 0 Agricultural land No - 953/1 Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/028C Laxmi Bai 7 Agricultural land Yes General 953/3 B /IA C I 6 Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

36 Karmataka State Highways Annexures Village/ Town Chainage Q_No SL No of structure OwnerName No. of Type of likely Total Area to be Annual Women Social RTC RTC Name Family loss Holding acquired Income Headed stratifi No Sub members (Acres) (Acres) House cation Land No H old ==Land Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/028D P.G. Parekh 5 Open land No Generall Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/029 Mallappa Nagappa 1 Agricultural land No General 952/1 Savalagi Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/029A Sabji Sab 8 Agricultural land No General Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/029B Galib-Sab Ameen 12 Agricultural land No General Saheb Mujawar Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/029C Abdul Karim Magi Agricultural land No General Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/029D Mainuddin 5 Agricultural land No General 952/1 B/i Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/030 Gouravva 6 Agricultural land Yes General 948/1 Mahal Bhagayath 558 BJP/MLB/BPS/030A Vishwanth Sangan 4 Agricultural land No General 948/1 Gowda Mahal Bhagayath BJP/MLB/BPS/031 Venkoba Venkappa 5 Agricultural land No ST Yadav Kasaba-Bijapur BJP/KSB/BPS/032 Hameed Razaksab 22 Agricultural land No General Sunnewala Kasaba-Bijapur BJP/KSB/BPS/033 Mehaboob Hussain 12 Agricultural land No General 25/3 Badsha_Honnakati I_ I_I_1 1_ 7 Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

37 Kamataka State Highways Raichur and Bijapur Bypasses Taluk: Raichur Impact Category: Owner SI No. No. of Total Area to be Women Social RTC RTC lame Chainage Q No SL No of stucture OwnerName Family Type of likely loss Holding acquired Innuma Hodued statifcaio Neb members (Acres) (Acres) Hold n Land Land 1 Yaramaras RCR/YRS/BPS/0I Faaruk Abba I Agricultural land No General Yaramaras RCRJYRS/BPS/02 Santosh Kotan 29 Agricultural land No General Yaramaras RCRIYRS/BPS/03 Basavaraj 5 Agricultural land No General Raichur RCR/RCR/BPS/04 Sudarshan Gowda E 4 Agricultural land No General 290 Illigere 5. Yaramaras RCRIYRS/BPS/05 Savarappa 5 Agricultural land No General Raichur RCR/RCR/BPS/06 Veeran Gowda 10 Agricultural land No General Raichur RCR/RCR/BPS/07 Ayyappa Thippanna 7 Agricultural land No General 132/1 Chi~tragar _ 8. Raichur RCR/CRRC/BPS/07A Samna ErannaThippanna 5 Agricultural land No General 133/3 9. Raichur RCR/RCR/BPS/07B Venkatswamy Thippanna 17 Agricultural land No General 133/2 ~~~~~Chitragar 10. Raichur RCR/RCR/BPS/07C KCishnappa rappa 9 Agricultural land No General 132 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Ch-iragar _ 11 Raichur RCR/RCR/BPS/08 U. Govindappa 7 Agricultural land No General 12. Raichur RCR/RCR/BPS/09 Iranna 7 Agricultural land No General 140/3 13. Raichur RCR/RCR/BBS/10 Ashamma 6 Agricultural land No General Raichur RCR/RCR/BPS/0 I I Narasappa 7 Agricultural land No General 15. Raichur RCRIRCR/BPS/012 Venkata Reddy 19 Agricultural land No General Raichur RCR/RCR/BPS/013 Chellam Venkappa 8 Agricultural land No General 144/1 17. Raichur RCR/RCR/BPS/014 Hanamant Reddy 4 Agricultural land No General 18. Raichur 467A RCR/RCR/BPS/014V G Rachappa 4 Agricultural land No General 124/A 19. Raichur RCR/RCR/BPS/015 Venkamnma 4 Agricultural land No General 20. Raichur RCR/RCR/BPS/016 Thimma Reddy 8 Agricultural land No General 125/A 21. Raichur RCR/RCR/BPS/016A Ghadwal Narasappa 3 Agricultural land No General 125/B 22. Raichur RCR/RCR/BPS/016B Bolabandi 21 Agricultural land No General 125/C 23. Raichur 472 RCR/RCRIBPS/017 G. Ramappa I Agricultural land No 8 Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE

38 Karnataka State Highways Raichur and Bijapur Bypasses SI No. No. of Total Area to be Women Social RTC RTC ame Chainage Q No SL No of structure OwnerName Family Type of likely loss Holding acquired Annco Hoaded stratificatio No Sub No members (Acres) (Acres) Hold n Land Land 24. Raichur RCR/RCRIBPS/018 Basanna 7 Agricultural land No General 123/I 25. Masalapur RCRIMSUBPS/019A G. Venkamma 4 Agricultural land No General 26. Masalapur RCR/MSVBPS/019B Betappa 5 Agricultural land No General Masalapur RCR/MSLJBPS/20 Bhimanna 12 Agricultural land No General Masalapur RCRIMSL/BPS/021 Aadamma 4 Agricultural land No General Yakalaspur RCR/EKL/BPs/022 Siddappa 8 Agricultural land No General Yakalaspur RCR/EKL/BPS/023 Thayappa 16 Agricultural land No General Yakalaspur RCR/EKUBPS/024 Mariyana 13 Agricultural land No General 32. Yakalaspur RCR/EKL/BPS/025 Savarappa 5 Agricultural land No General Yakalaspur RCR!EKL/BPS/026 Laxman 13 Agricultural land No SC Yakalaspur RCR/EKL/BPS/027 Adiveppa 9 Agricultural land No General Yakalaspur RCRIEKLUBPS/028 Nagayyaswami 6 Agricultural land No General Yakalaspur RCR/YKLJBPS/029 Shankaramma 7 Agricultural land No General Yakalaspur RCR/EKL/BPS/30 Dattu Mahadevan 9 Agricultural land No General Yakalaspur RCR/EKLJBPS/031 Thimma Reddy 10 Agricultural land No General 384/1 39. Yakalaspur RCR/EKL/BPS/032 Muniyappa 10 Agricultural land No General Yakalaspur RCR/EKLIBPS/033 Narasamma 10 Agricultural land No General Yakalaspur RCR/EKLBPS/034 Muniyamma 5 Agricultural land No General Yakalaspur RCR/EKL/BPS/035 Pundalikappa 8 Agricultural land No General Yakalaspur RCR/EKL/BPS/036 Nagappa Jambanna 4 Agricultural land No General 393/2 44. Yakalaspur RCR/EKLJBPS/037 Dodda Parasappa 23 Agricultural land No General 392/2 45. Yakalaspur RCR/EKLJBPS/038 Dodda Veeresh 6 Agricultural land No General 399/1 46. Yakalaspur RCR/EKULBPS/039 G. Eranna 7 Agricultural land No General 400/8 47. Yakalaspur RCR/EKLJBPS/040 Shantamma 6 Agricultural land No General 400/7 48. Yakalaspur RCRIEKL/BPS/041 Hamapanna Narasanna 5 Agricultural land No General 401 Kallolli 49. Yakalaspur RCR/EKLUBPS/042 Dodda Narasanna 7 Agricultural land No General 402/6 50. Yakalaspur RCRPEKIJBPS/043 Thimappa 11 Agricultural land No SC Scott Wilson / CES / IIIE