3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
|
|
- Job Harper
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 3 This Initial Study/Negative Declaration (IS/ND) has been prepared for the Hillsdale Station Area Plan (the Plan) in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Hillsdale Caltrain Station is located in the City of San Mateo, California. The City of San Mateo s preferred location for the station is roughly 300 feet to the north of the existing station along the existing Caltrain right-of-way (ROW) between 28 th and 31 st Avenues. The Plan contains land use, urban design, and circulation goals, policies, and actions to guide investment and development in an area within walking distance of the relocated Hillsdale Caltrain Station. A. Background Since the mid-1990's, the City of San Mateo and its residents have developed and refined a vision for development around the city's major transit stations. This vision for transit-oriented development (TOD) involves fostering the growth of pedestrian-friendly neighborhoods and employment centers in the vicinity of mass transit hubs and weaving them into the existing urban fabric. San Mateo s City Council has already adopted several planning documents that support the community-defined vision for TOD. These include the San Mateo Rail Corridor Transit-Oriented Development Plan, El Camino Real Master Plan, and the Bay Meadows Phase II Specific Plan Amendment. The Hillsdale Station Area Plan presents a significant opportunity to continue this work and promote the development of a TOD neighborhood around the Hillsdale Caltrain Station. The Hillsdale Station Area has been designated a Priority Development Area by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) with the intent of stimulating development that supports regional goals for increased housing near transit, consequently reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by reducing vehicle miles travelled (VMT). 1 1 Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) is a measure of the extent of motor vehicle operation, representing the total number of vehicle miles travelled within a specific geographic area over a given period of time. 3-1
2 B. Project Location and Setting As shown on Figure 3-1, the Hillsdale Station Area (the Plan Area) is adjacent to the Hillsdale Caltrain Station in the City of San Mateo, San Mateo County, California. The Plan Area lies between US Route 101 and Interstate 280, south of State Route 92. El Camino Real bisects the site from the northwest to the southeast. 1. Plan Area Boundaries and Context The Plan Area encompasses approximately 150 acres of land located predominantly to the west of the Caltrain ROW, as shown on Figure 3-2. The Plan Area boundaries have been drawn to generally encompass the area within walking distance of the relocated Hillsdale Caltrain Station; however, the Bay Meadows Phase II project site, which is the subject of a separate specific plan, and the established residential neighborhoods west of Flores and Edison Streets, which have few opportunity sites for development, are not included in the Plan Area. Land uses surrounding the Plan Area include residential neighborhoods to the north and west, the Hillsdale Garden Apartments complex to the south, and the Bay Meadows Phase II project site to the east, across the Caltrain ROW. Additionally, there are existing retail areas along El Camino Real to the north and south of the Plan Area. Bay Meadows Phase II was approved through a Specific Plan Amendment by the San Mateo City Council in 2005 and is expected to be completed by Site Plan and Architectural Review planning applications were approved in 2008 that allow the construction of up to 1,066 residential units; 840,000 square feet of office, commercial, and retail space; and 15 acres of public parkland. Infrastructure construction is currently underway. 2. Caltrain Infrastructure Improvements The Hillsdale Caltrain Station is the anchor of development in the Plan Area. Separate from the proposed Plan, several potential and planned improvements 3-2
3 C I T Y O F S A N M A T E O H I L L S D A L E S T A T I O N A R E A P L A N I S / N D P R O J E C T D E S C R I P T I O N!( San Francisco City of San Mateo!( Fremont Plan Area San Mateo County San Jose!( Miles Source: GillSans Light, 7.5 pt. F I G U R E 3-1 R E G I O N A L L O C A T I O N
4 S. El Camino Real CITY OF SAN MATEO 26th Ave Lula Belle Ln W. 25th Ave Mary Lu Ln 24th Ave Palm Ave E. 25th Ave Delaware St San Mateo Event Center Saratoga Dr Portola Dr Palm Ct Delmar Wy Garfield Ct Palm Pl 27th Ave Juniper St Hacienda St 28th Ave Garfield St 29th Ave Flores St Edison St Bay Meadows Phase II 30th Ave Sylvan Ave Preferred Location for Relocated Hillsdale Station Briar Ln Arbor Ln Louise Ln Hillsdale Park Arrowood Ln Hickory Ln Chestnut Ln 31st Ave Hillsdale Shopping Center Existing Train Station Mc Lellan Ave Curtiss St Winway Cir Edison St Hillsdale Blvd Pacific Blvd Poinsettia Ave Otay Ave 37th Ave Plan Area Boundary 36th Ave San Benito St Oso St Feet San Miguel Wy Railroad FIGURE 3-2 PLAN AREA (EXISTING CONDITIONS)
5 to Caltrain infrastructure are currently being considered. These include the relocation of the station, grade separation of ROW crossings, and electrification of the train system. The relocated Caltrain station would continue to serve as a multi-modal transit hub, housing Caltrain heavy rail commuter train service, Sam-Trans and AC Transit bus service, employment shuttles, and parking for transit patrons in a single, centralized location. Proximity to surrounding commercial, retail, and residential uses, including the Hillsdale Shopping Center and the Bay Meadows development, would enhance ease of access to transit and promote public transportation and walking as viable alternatives to driving. In parallel with station relocation, Caltrain is also considering the grade separation of 31 Caltrain ROW crossings in San Mateo County. Additionally, the ongoing Caltrain Electrification Program would convert a substantial portion of existing Caltrain diesel-powered passenger rail service to electric operation by 2015, thereby increasing service and ridership. In addition to Caltrain service, the Caltrain ROW is currently being evaluated by California s High Speed Rail Authority for High Speed Rail (HSR) service up the Peninsula. This potential service is being evaluated through a series of environmental documents, including program and project level Environmental Impact Statements and Environmental Impact Reports. 3. Existing Uses in the Plan Area Existing land uses in the Plan Area are primarily commercial and residential. El Camino Real is the principal commercial corridor, with a mix of commercial uses in different configurations, ranging from small buildings fronting the street to strip malls with off-street parking. The Hillsdale Shopping Center, a regional commercial attraction, is located at the intersection of El Camino Real and Hillsdale Boulevard. 25 th Avenue is lined on both sides with neighborhood-serving stores and office space. Multi-family residential uses range from the garden-style, multi-family buildings of the Hillsdale Garden Apartment complex in and around the southwestern corner of the Plan Area, 3-5
6 to a variety of duplexes, townhomes, and multi-family homes concentrated in the northern and western portions of the Plan Area. Significant public facilities in the Plan Area include the existing Hillsdale Caltrain Station at Hillsdale Boulevard and El Camino Real, a vacant fire station at 27 th Avenue and Edison Street, and an AT&T central switching building located at the southeast corner of Edison Street and 28 th Avenue. The Caltrain ROW runs north to south along the eastern perimeter of the Plan Area. 4. Transportation and Parking a. Transportation The Plan Area is served by three major regional transit agencies: Caltrain, San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans), and the Alameda Contra Costa Transit District (AC Transit), all of which serve the current Hillsdale Station and would also serve the relocated Transit Center. Caltrain provides commuter heavy rail service between San Francisco and Santa Clara County. Along this line, Hillsdale Station has the seventh highest volume of riders. It is served by 71 trains daily on weekdays and an average of 30 trains daily on weekends. Weekday express trains, called baby bullet trains, make the trip to San Francisco in approximately 25 minutes and to San Jose in about 30 minutes. AC Transit operates a regional Transbay bus route, Line M, connecting Union City and Castro Valley BART stations to Foster City, Menlo Park, and San Mateo. Line M serves Hillsdale Station with 30 minute headways on weekdays and 60 minute headways on weekends. SamTrans operates 10 bus routes connecting the Plan Area to destinations throughout the County, although many of the routes run only once an hour. Figure 3-3 shows transit routes serving the Plan Area. Additionally, seven shuttle services offer connections from Hillsdale Station to employment centers, shopping destinations, and other transit stations in the surrounding area. El Camino Real and Hillsdale Boulevard are the two principal arterials in the Plan Area. El Camino Real has six lanes running roughly north-south 3-6
7 C I T Y O F S A N M A T E O H I L L S D A L E S T A T I O N A R E A P L A N I S / N D P R O J E C T D E S C R I P T I O N LEGEND Source: SamTrans, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. F I G U R E 3-3 T R A N S I T R O U T E S S E R V I N G T H E P L A N A R E A
8 through the Plan Area, while Hillsdale Boulevard is a four-lane roadway which crosses the Caltrain tracks from east to west. The two arterials intersect just south of the existing station. Two collector roads, 28 th Avenue and 31 st Avenue, run west to east in the Plan Area terminating at El Camino Real. Bicycle infrastructure in the Plan Area includes Class III lanes 2 shared with vehicles on 25 th Avenue and Hillsdale Boulevard and 34 bicycle parking spaces at Hillsdale Station. The pedestrian environment features sidewalks, safety lighting, and striped crosswalks served by on-demand signals in the vicinity of the station. Along the principal roadways however, sidewalks are generally 4 to 6 feet wide and there are few trees or amenities to help separate pedestrians from vehicular traffic. b. Parking There are currently 518 parking spaces available to Caltrain riders in four surface parking lots around the existing station. The lots are shown on Figure 3-2. The three lots to the west of the Caltrain ROW are accessed from El Camino Real, while the lot to the east of the tracks is accessed from Hillsdale Boulevard via a cloverleaf-shaped on-ramp. 5. Existing Housing and Population In 2009, there were approximately 1,200 residents in the Plan Area with a median age of 39.7, which is comparable to the median age for the City and County of San Mateo. 3 Average household size in the Plan Area was 2.23 persons, which is also comparable to average household size for the City as a whole. However, the Plan Area had a significantly higher percentage of renters (81.5 percent) than the City of San Mateo as a whole (46.6 percent). At $55,108, the median annual household income for the Plan Area was also sig- 2 Class III Bike lanes are shared lines with sufficient width to accommodate vehicles and bicycles. They are designated only with signs posted to indicate the route. 3 City of San Mateo, Hillsdale Station Area Plan Existing Conditions Report, pages 5-2 to
9 nificantly lower than the median annual household income for the City of San Mateo ($76,362). As described above, housing in the Plan Area is predominantly multi-family units, although there is a range of housing types available, including duplexes, townhomes, apartments, and single-family homes. The exact number of dwelling units currently in the Plan Area is not available; however, based on an average household size of 2.23 persons, it is estimated that there are approximately 550 existing housing units Natural Environment The Plan Area is almost entirely developed, with few green spaces and only a limited number of street trees. Laurel Creek is the most significant natural feature of the Plan Area. It is a channelized watercourse with partially paved banks, and it runs west to east along the southern perimeter of the Plan Area near the Hillsdale Garden Apartment complex. The path of the creek is partially landscaped and includes a footbridge. C. Plan Objectives The Plan identifies the following guiding principles: 1. Promote TOD 2. Enhance Connections and Station Access 3. Encourage Pedestrian-Oriented Development on El Camino Real 4. Ensure Quality Development 5. Improve the Identity of the Station Area 6. Provide a Range of Housing Choices 4 1,227 residents / 2.23 avg. household size = dwelling units. 3-9
10 D. Project Characteristics The Plan establishes a regulatory framework for future development within the Plan Area, integrates the relocated Hillsdale Caltrain Station into existing urban and circulation systems, and develops strong connections to Bay Meadows Phase II and surrounding neighborhoods. Figure 3-4 shows the proposed concept plan, illustrating conceptual buildings that could be constructed consistent with the City of San Mateo s General Plan and zoning designations for parcels within the Plan Area. Actual development under the Plan, however, may differ from the Illustrative Plan as long as it achieves the goals of the Plan and is consistent with City regulations. The principal components of the Plan are described below. 1. Mixed-Use Residential Development The Plan proposes a total of approximately 750 new dwelling units. Approximately half of these units would be concentrated in 3- to 4-story mixeduse buildings lining El Camino Real and 28 th Avenue in the northern part of the Plan Area, as shown on Figure 3-4. Additional housing would be provided in 3- to 4-story multi-family buildings located to the north and south of the relocated Caltrain Station, including housing to the south of Laurel Creek. 2. Circulation and Parking Improvements The Plan proposes a number of improvements to the circulation system with the aim of integrating the relocated station into the surrounding community, improving the pedestrian experience, and providing connections with the adjacent Bay Meadows Phase II development. A new signalized intersection would be created on El Camino Real north of 31 st Street to provide an entrance to the Transit Center and enhance east-west connections in the Plan Area. The new pedestrian crosswalks would be striped and equipped with pedestrian-activated signals or warning lights. The Plan also proposes bus stops in front of the Transit Center on El Camino Real. 3-10
11 C I T Y O F S A N M AT E O S TAT I O N A R E A P L A N I S / N D P R O J E C T D E S C R I P T I O N H I L L S D A L E Ϯϱd, s ^ E D d K KhEdz s Ed Ed Z Ϯϱd, s Eh h^/e ^^ /^dz/ d Ϯ ϳ d, s ^ ^ d Ϯ ϴ d, s &>KZ W E/E^h> ^d d/ke dz E^/d Ed Z Z > ϯ ϭ ^d s z D Kt^ W, ^ // > D /E K,/>>^ > W Z<,/>>^ > ^,KWW/E' Ed Z,/ >> ^ > > hz > Z ϯ ϲ d, > s < s WůĂŶ ƌğă ŽƵŶĚĂƌLJ DŝdžĞĚͲhƐĞΎ ^ƵƌĨĂĐĞ WĂƌŬŝŶŐ džŝɛɵŷő ůăɛɛ / ŝŭğ &ĂĐŝůŝƚLJ džŝɛɵŷő ůăɛɛ /// ŝŭğ &ĂĐŝůŝƚLJ ZĂŝůƌŽĂĚ ZĞƐŝĚĞŶƟĂů WŽĚŝƵŵ WĂƌŬŝŶŐ /ŶƚĞƌŝŽƌ ŽƵƌƚLJĂƌĚ &ƵƚƵƌĞ ůăɛɛ / ŝŭğ &ĂĐŝůŝƚLJ &ƵƚƵƌĞ ůăɛɛ /// ŝŭğ &ĂĐŝůŝƚLJ džŝɛɵŷő ƵŝůĚŝŶŐ ZĞƚĂŝů WůĂnjĂ KƉĞŶ ^ƉĂĐĞ džŝɛɵŷő ůăɛɛ // &ĂĐŝůŝƚLJ džŝɛɵŷő dğŵɖžƌăƌlj ŝŭğ &ĂĐŝůŝƚLJ dƌăŷɛŝƚ ĞŶƚĞƌ ŽƵŶĚĂƌLJ ^ƚƌğğƚɛđăɖğ /ŵɖƌžǀğŵğŷƚɛ &ƵƚƵƌĞ ůăɛɛ // ŝŭğ &ĂĐŝůŝƚLJ EKZd, Ϭ ϭϱϭ ϯϭϭ &ĞĞƚ ΎZĞƚĂŝů Žƌ ŽĸĐĞ ǁŝƚŚ ƌğɛŝěğŷɵăů ĂďŽǀĞ FIGURE 3-4 PROPOSED CONCEPT PLAN
12 The Plan also calls for a new five-story parking structure to be built adjacent to the station building as warranted by Caltrain ridership. The parking structure would provide approximately 600 spaces for the exclusive use of transit riders. The parking structure would include a pedestrian bridge to provide a direct link to the Caltrain platform from the second level of the structure. Pedestrian circulation on El Camino Real would be improved through the provision of wider sidewalks. The existing curb-to-curb width would remain unchanged, but with changes in setbacks of properties fronting onto El Camino Real, a consistently widened sidewalk would be created. Additionally, the median on El Camino Real would be widened and trees would be planted on it. Proposed bicycle circulation improvements include Class III bicycle lanes north and south along Flores and Edison Streets. It would also enhance east-west travel along 28 th and 31 st Avenues to provide additional connections to the residential, office, and commercial uses proposed on the adjacent Bay Meadows Phase II project site through both Class I and Class III routes. Figure 3-4 shows proposed improvements to the circulation system. 3. Neighborhood-Serving Commerce and Retail Buildout under the Plan would result in approximately 10,000 square feet of net new commercial and retail space strategically located near the transit center and along El Camino Real as shown in Figure 3-4. New commercial and retail space would target transit users in addition to serving new residents of the surrounding community. Depending on market conditions, approximately 50,000 square feet of existing service commercial space including automotive repair shops, machinery sales, and warehousing space could be replaced with approximately 60,000 square feet of local retailers and other commuter- and neighborhood-serving stores, over the course of the 20-year Plan horizon. 3-12
13 4. Urban Design Improvements The Plan proposes the redevelopment of parking lots and large blank walls along 31 st Avenue to create a network of pedestrian-scaled storefronts and outdoor cafes. Small plazas are proposed in building setbacks along El Camino Real, where this main commercial thoroughfare intersects with 28 th Avenue, 31 st Avenue, and Hillsdale Boulevard. Outdoor seating, benches, fountains, landscaping, trees, and performance spaces would be provided in the plazas. Design of the plazas would incorporate stormwater management features such as rain gardens, bioswales, and other stormwater best management practices (BMPs). The Plan includes urban design guidelines and standards that would apply to these improvements. 5. Buildout Projections Pursuant to Section of the 2010 CEQA Guidelines, consideration of significant environmental effects should include identification and discussion of changes induced in population distribution, population concentration, and the human use of the land (including commercial and residential development). In order to capture as many significant environmental effects as could reasonably be expected as a result of the project, CEQA analysis typically assumes a reasonably foreseeable level of development, accounting for market forces as well as anticipated public and non-profit investment. For a programmatic evaluation of a land use plan, this entails projecting buildout figures which are then carried through the environmental review process. Projections are based on an evaluation of the Plan Area which identified opportunity sites and calculated net new buildable area by use, subtracting the square footage of buildings that would be expected to be demolished. The number of residential units was derived by assuming 50 dwelling units per acre of residential use, the maximum allowable under current zoning, which may represent the higher end of achievable densities in the Plan Area. This calculation results in a net change of approximately 750 new dwelling units, 10,000 square feet of general commercial uses, a reduction of 50,000 square feet of service commercial uses, and a reduction of 9,000 square feet of restaurant uses. No change in office uses is projected. 3-13
14 These figures are largely market driven, such that demand for the housing units will need to be established in order to support their construction. The market will continue to fluctuate over time, so the buildout figures are not absolute. Population increase was determined by multiplying the number of new residential units by the average household size of 2.23 in the Plan Area in The anticipated population and employment growth in the Plan Area is consistent with the amount of growth anticipated under the General Plan in the area, since there are no proposed changes to the General Plan land use designations, zoning classifications, or maximum permitted building heights, densities, and intensities. The Plan provides additional detail as to how the Plan Area will be developed, but it would not allow more growth than that which is already permitted by the regulations mentioned above. Growth in the Plan Area is concentrated along transit corridors, supporting use of transit, walking, and bicycling as transportation, consistent with the goals of the General Plan as well as the Hillsdale Station Area Plan. This development pattern is expected to minimize potential impacts, such as traffic congestion and air pollution, while supporting regional planning efforts to concentrate development around transit. E. Policy Setting The City of San Mateo General Plan Vision 2030 EIR (Vision 2030 General Plan EIR) was certified by the City Council on October 18, 2010 with adoption of findings and a statement of overriding considerations since the EIR identified significant, unavoidable environmental impacts. The Council then adopted the General Plan to establish a framework for the future growth and development of the City while preserving the high quality of life that San Mateo residents currently enjoy. Additionally, Measure P building height 3-14
15 limits were incorporated into the Vision 2030 General Plan. 5 The City's Zoning Ordinance implements the General Plan through zoning districts and overlay zones, including a TOD zoning district that implements the San Mateo Rail Corridor Transit-oriented Development Plan. Other policy documents that would guide future development in the Plan Area include: the City's Below Market Rate (BMR) Inclusionary Program, Residential Design Guidelines, Sustainable Initiatives Plan (2007), California Building Code (2007), and Green Building Ordinance (2010). F. Implementation Implementation of the Plan would follow a phased process. The City Council would approve the IS/ND and adopt the Plan, as well as associated changes to the General Plan and Zoning Code. Next, Plan implementation would take place in three phases: 1. Prior to Hillsdale Station Relocation: Focus on infill development, and planning for station relocation. 2. Grade Separation and Hillsdale Station Relocation: Grade separations at 25 th, 28 th, and 31 st Avenues and the relocation of the Hillsdale Station. 3. Fill in the Gaps: Complete any remaining parking structures, work with the Hillsdale Shopping Center on enhancements, and improve connectivity between the Transit Center and the rest of the Plan Area. 5 Measure P extends the provisions of Measure H beyond the horizon year Measure P provisions are intended to preserve the suburban character of San Mateo while accommodating continued economic development and increased opportunities for affordable housing construction in the City. 3-15
16 3-16
3 LAND USE. A. Current Land Use
3 This chapter describes existing land uses in the Plan Area and identifies key land use features that relate to the Station Area Plan. It also identifies opportunity sites. A. Current Land Use Existing
More information2 RELEVANT POLICY DOCUMENTS I. CITY-WIDE DOCUMENTS
2 This chapter describes relevant policy documents and regulations that should be considered in the development of the Hillsdale Station Area Plan. The City s General Plan and Zoning Ordinance are described,
More informationCreative Approaches to Land Acquisition
2007 Legislative Session Review CALIFORNIA TRANSIT ASSOCIATION JANUARY/FEBRUARY 2008 Creative Approaches to Land Acquisition Result From Creative Approaches to Land Acquisition It should not surprise anyone
More informationProvide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.
8 The City of San Mateo is a highly desirable place to live. Housing costs are comparably high. For these reasons, there is a strong and growing need for affordable housing. This chapter addresses the
More informationLAKE MERRITT STATION AREA PLAN
LAKE MERRITT STATION AREA PLAN Emerging Plan Open House Summary October 2011 2 1 Introduction The City of Oakland, Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART), and the Peralta Community College District, through a grant
More informationBrunswick Street Apartment Project Introduction
Brunswick Street Apartment Project Introduction 1.0 INTRODCTION 1.1 PROJECT TITLE Brunswick Street Apartment Project 1.2 LEAD AGENCY City of Daly City Economic and Community Development 333 90th Street
More informationGENERAL PLAN UPDATE SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY
GENERAL PLAN UPDATE SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY Background There are a total of 14 specific areas that are being reviewed as part of the update of the General Plan. Requests to review these areas came from
More informationPlan Area and Current Facilities
Plan Area and Current Facilities The Plan Area is bounded by South Delaware Street to the east and Concar Drive to the south (Figure 2.01). Parallel to Concar Drive on the south, SR 92 rises above grade
More informationTown of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-31 Cary Park PDD Amendment (Waterford II) Town Council Meeting January 15, 2015
Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-31 Cary Park PDD Amendment (Waterford II) Town Council Meeting January 15, 2015 REQUEST To amend the Town of Cary Official Zoning Map by amending
More informationBylaw No , being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" DRAFT
Bylaw No. 2600-2016, being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" Urban Structure + Growth Plan Urban Structure Land use and growth management are among the most powerful policy tools at the
More informationMontreal Road District Secondary Plan [Amendment #127, October 9, 2013]
[Amendment #127, October 9, 2013] 1.0 General The following policies are applicable to the Montreal Road District as set out in Schedule 1. 1.1 District Objectives The objective of this Plan is to guide
More informationSection 4 Master Plan Framework
Section 4 Master Plan Framework 4.1 PURPOSE The Master Plan, as an implementation tool of the SPC District, establishes the primary framework for the overall development of the Property. Detailed site
More information4.13 Population and Housing
Environmental Impact Analysis Population and Housing 4.13 Population and Housing 4.13.1 Setting This section evaluates the impacts to the regional housing supply and population growth associated with implementation
More informationJasper 115 Street DC2 Urban Design Brief
Jasper 115 Street DC2 Urban Design Brief Greenlong Construction Ltd. Stantec Consulting Ltd. 2017 Overview The proposed rezoning application supports the development of two mixed-use high-rise buildings
More informationTASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE
TASK 2 INITIAL REVIEW AND ANALYSIS U.S. 301/GALL BOULEVARD CORRIDOR FORM-BASED CODE INTRODUCTION Using the framework established by the U.S. 301/Gall Boulevard Corridor Regulating Plan (Regulating Plan),
More information3.0 Project Description
3.0 Project Description City of Long Beach Shoreline Gateway Project Environmental Impact Report 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 PROJECT LOCATION AND SETTING PROJECT LOCATION The proposed Shoreline Gateway
More informationCOMMUNITY BENEFIT REQUIREMENTS & IMPACT FEES FOR DEVELOPMENTS IN VARIOUS CITIES
COMMUNITY BENEFIT REQUIREMENTS & IMPACT FEES FOR DEVELOPMENTS IN VARIOUS CITIES Prepared by Office of Mayor Tom Bates Current Requirements for Projects in Berkeley Downtown* Under Consideration for Projects
More informationCity of South San Francisco Page 1 of 5
City of South San Francisco P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA Legislation Text Report regarding the Housing Standing Committee recommendation to consider selecting either
More informationVI. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY
VI. RESIDENTIAL DENSITY POLICY ISSUE Examine residential density regulations, looking at the potential for lowering densities and the impact on the City s Housing Element of the General Plan. BACKGROUND
More information2015 Downtown Parking Study
2015 Downtown Parking Study City of Linden Genesee County, Michigan November 2015 Prepared by: City of Linden Downtown Development Authority 132 E. Broad Street Linden, MI 48451 www.lindenmi.us Table of
More informationAPARTMENT BUILDING DEVELOPMENT ST. LAURENT BOULEVARD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TIA SCOPING FORM. Prepared for:
APARTMENT BUILDING DEVELOPMENT 776-784 ST. LAURENT BOULEVARD OTTAWA, ONTARIO TIA SCOPING FORM Prepared for: 1252066 Ontario Inc. 231 Brittany Drive, Suite D Ottawa, ON K1K 0R8 vember 16, 2017 117-664 Scoping.doc
More informationMEMORANDUM Main Concepts
MEMORANDUM DATE February 5, 2016 TO FROM SUBJECT David Bischoff City of Gilroy Bruce Brubaker and Seung Hong, PlaceWorks Draft Alternative Land Use and Circulation Scenarios This memorandum summarizes
More informationDRAFT. Transit Oriented Development Design Guidelines. Introduction. Path Forward
Transit Oriented Development Design Guidelines Introduction Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Design Guidelines are being developed by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) to provide general
More information4.14 Socioeconomics Introduction Environmental and Regulatory Setting Environmental Setting.
4.14 4.14.1 Introduction This section describes the affected environment and environmental consequences related to socioeconomics from operation of the NEPA Alternatives. Sources of information used in
More informationREZONING GUIDE. Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application. Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3. Return completed form to
Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application COMMUNITY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REZONING GUIDE Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3 PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION* CHECK IF POINT OF CONTACT FOR APPLICATION Property
More informationDRAFT COUNCIL POLICY DIRECTION CITY OF PALO ALTO SOUTH OF FOREST AREA COORDINATED AREA PLAN PHASE 2
DRAFT COUNCIL POLICY DIRECTION CITY OF PALO ALTO SOUTH OF FOREST AREA COORDINATED AREA PLAN PHASE 2 City of Palo Alto Department of Planning and Community Environment SOFA PLAN PHASE 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS
More informationARTICLE 3: Zone Districts
ARTICLE 3: Zone Districts... 3-1 17.3.1: General...3-1 17.3.1.1: Purpose and Intent... 3-1 17.3.2: Districts and Maps...3-1 17.3.2.1: Applicability... 3-1 17.3.2.2: Creation of Districts... 3-1 17.3.2.3:
More informationAPPENDIX B RESIDENTIAL DENSITY
APPENDIX B RESIDENTIAL DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DENSITY - SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY Policy Issue Examine specific areas of the City to determine appropriate residential densities. Public comments have expressed
More informationUrban Mobility India 2012 New Delhi. Dr. Adnan Rahman. December, Transportation leadership you can trust.
Urban Mobility India 2012 New Delhi Dr. Adnan Rahman December, 2012 Transportation leadership you can trust. Introduction TOD and real estate prices Financing TOD Conclusions 2 4 A Complex Process Involving
More informationAPPENDIX D: DEFINITIONS
D APPENDIX D: DEFINITIONS Terms used throughout the 2040 Comprehensive Plan should be interpreted using the definitions provided in this appendix. For interpretation of any term not defined, defer to the
More informationApproval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement
Planning, Program Development and Real Estate Committee Item IV- A October 10, 2013 Approval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information
More informationAppendix B: Housing Element Sites Inventory and Detailed Analysis
Appendix B: 2015-2023 Housing Element Sites Inventory and Detailed Analysis Redwood City General This page intentionally left blank. Redwood City General Site Identifier Assessor Parcel Number General
More informationChapter 5: Testing the Vision. Where is residential growth most likely to occur in the District? Chapter 5: Testing the Vision
Chapter 5: Testing the Vision The East Anchorage Vision, and the subsequent strategies and actions set forth by the Plan are not merely conceptual. They are based on critical analyses that considered how
More informationSummary of Presentation and Q&A from January 19, 2016
Parkmerced Vision Update Resident Meeting, Q&A Portion January 19, 2016 Summary of Presentation and Q&A from January 19, 2016 The following is a summary of resident comments and suggestions noted during
More informationCity of Cupertino AB 1600 Mitigation Fee Act Annual & Five Year Report for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2014 & 2015
City of Cupertino AB 1600 Mitigation Fee Act Annual & Five Report for the fiscal years ending June 30, 2014 & 2015 Dept.: Community Development : Below Market Rate (BMR) Housing Mitigation Fee Local Authority:
More information6 NE 130TH STREET STATION TOD POTENTIAL
6 NE 130TH STREET STATION TOD POTENTIAL Key Findings TOD potential for the NE 130th Street Station is limited, primarily because of the predominant single-family development pattern in this area. The two
More informationDowntown Development Focus Area: I. Existing Conditions
Downtown Development Focus Area: I. Existing Conditions The Downtown Development Focus Area is situated along Route 1, south of the train tracks, except for the existing Unilever property. It extends west
More informationDevelopment Program Report for the Alamo Area of Benefit
Julia R. Bueren, Director Deputy Directors Brian M. Balbas, Chief Mike Carlson Stephen Kowalewski Carrie Ricci Joe Yee ADOPTED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON Development Program Report for the Alamo October,
More informationChapter 7 Riverfront District
Chapter 7 Riverfront District Downtown Capital District Master Plan Trenton, New Jersey Riverfront District Trenton will reclaim its connection with the Delaware River to enhance the experience of living,
More informationA 290-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN DOWNTOWN SAN JOSE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GARDEN GATE TOWER SAN JOSE, CA A 290-UNIT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN DOWNTOWN SAN JOSE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Cushman and Wakefield, as exclusive advisor, is pleased to present the opportunity
More informationPLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM
To: From: Agenda Title Planning and Zoning Commission John Hilgers, Planning Director Anna Bertanzetti, Principal Planner Meeting Date Agenda Category Agenda Item # July 13, 2015 Business 4.b 1. Public
More informationCommunity Development
Community Development STAFF REPORT Housing Commission Meeting Date: 7/11/2018 Staff Report Number: 18-013-HC Regular Business: Review and provide feedback on potential amendments to the El Camino /Downtown
More informationPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019 DEVELOPMENT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME Springhill Village Subdivision Springhill Village Subdivision LOCATION 4350, 4354, 4356, 4358,
More informationRezoning Petition Final Staff Analysis May 21, 2018
Rezoning Petition 2017-182 Final Staff Analysis May 21, 2018 REQUEST LOCATION Current Zoning: R-3 (single family) and no zoning (current NC State right-of-way) Proposed Zoning: B-2(CD) (general business,
More informationMEMORANDUM Planning Commission Travis Parker, Planning Director DATE: April 4, 2018 Lakewood Zoning Amendments Housing and Mixed Use
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Travis Parker, Planning Director DATE: April 4, 2018 SUBJECT: Lakewood Zoning Amendments Housing and Mixed Use In August 2017, the Lakewood Development Dialogue process began with
More informationIII. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. PROJECT APPLICANT The project applicant for the 2055 Avenue of the Stars on the Site of the Former St. Regis Hotel project is Avenue of the Stars Associates, LLC (c/o The Related
More informationTable of Contents. Concept Plan Overview. Statement of Compliance with Design Guidelines. Statement of Compliance with Comprehensive Plan
Table of Contents Concept Plan Overview Statement of Compliance with Design Guidelines Statement of Compliance with Comprehensive Plan Developer s Program Market Objective Benefit to Local Businesses Benefit
More informationM-43 CORRIDOR OVERLAY ZONE
ARTICLE 26.00 M-43 CORRIDOR OVERLAY ZONE Section 26.01 Findings A primary function of the M-43 state highway is to move traffic through the Township and to points beyond. As the primary east-west arterial
More information20 Edward Street Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 20 Edward Street Zoning Amendment Application - Preliminary Report Date: January 20, 2015 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Toronto and East York Community Council Director,
More informationGeneric Environmental Impact Statement. Build-Out Analysis. City of Buffalo, New York. Prepared by:
Generic Environmental Impact Statement Build-Out Analysis City of Buffalo, New York 2015 Prepared by: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 METHODOLOGY 2 3.0 EXISTING LAND USE 3 4.0 EXISTING ZONING
More informationChapter URBAN VILLAGE ZONING DISTRICTS
Chapter 20.16 Sections: 20.16.010 Purpose of the Urban Village Zoning Districts 20.16.020 Land Use Regulations for the Urban Village Zoning Districts 20.16.030 Development Standards & Guidelines for the
More informationWESTMINSTER PARK SUBDIVISION
WESTMINSTER PARK SUBDIVISION Engineering Comments: FINAL PLAT COMMENTS (should be addressed prior to submitting the FINAL PLAT for review and/or signature by the City Engineer): A. Provide all of the required
More informationII. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. PROJECT APPLICANT The project applicant for the project is, LLC, located at P.O. Box 1373, Torrance, California 90505. B. PROJECT LOCATION The Proposed Project would include
More informationApproval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement and Compact Public Hearing
Planning, Program Development and Real Estate Committee Item IV - B March 13, 2014 Approval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement and Compact Public Hearing Washington Metropolitan Area Transit
More informationThe Miramar Santa Monica
The Miramar Santa Monica Project Description The Santa Monica Miramar Hotel (the Miramar or the Hotel ) has been an institution in the City of Santa Monica since originally opening on the site in 1920.
More informationLand Use, Transportation, and Infrastructure Committee of the Denver City Council FROM: Scott Robinson, Senior City Planner DATE: March 22, 2018 RE:
Community Planning and Development Planning Services 201 W. Colfax Ave., Dept. 205 Denver, CO 80202 p: 720.865.2915 f: 720.865.3052 www.denvergov.org/cpd TO: Land Use, Transportation, and Infrastructure
More informationS C O T T OFFERING MEMORANDUM 3265 EL CAMINO REAL PALO ALTO CALIFORNIA
OFFERING MEMORANDUM C A R E L i c e n s e # 0 1 2 7 1 9 1 2 Disclaimer: The information contained herein has been obtained from sources deemed reliable but has not been verified and no guarantee, warranty
More informationTown of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 12-REZ-27 Morris Branch Town Council Public Hearing January 24, 2013
Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 12-REZ-27 Morris Branch Town Council Public Hearing January 24, 2013 REQUEST To amend the Town of Cary Official Zoning Map to rezone approximately 9.0
More information1265 Montecito Avenue Mountain View, California
OFFERING MEMORANDUM Mountain View Redevelopment Site 1265 Montecito Avenue Mountain View, California NON-ENDORSEMENT & DISCLAIMER NOTICE NON-ENDORSEMENTS Marcus & Millichap is not affiliated with, sponsored
More informationDRAFT FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY. Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes
Port Credit Local Area Plan Built Form Guidelines and Standards DRAFT For Discussion Purposes 1 Local Area Plan - Project Alignment Overview Directions Report, October 2008 (General Summary Of Selected
More informationPINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
PINELLAS COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Future Land Use Map (FLUM) Category Descriptions and Rules Amended March 17, 2009 (Ordinance 09-17) Amended March 16, 2010 (Ordinance 10-18) Amended October 26, 2010
More information9. REZONING NO Vicinity of the northwest corner of 143 rd Street and Metcalf Avenue
9. REZONING NO. 2002-15 Vicinity of the northwest corner of 143 rd Street and Metcalf Avenue 1. APPLICANT: Andrew Schlagel is the applicant for this request. 2. REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is requesting
More informationGlendale Housing Development Project Plan
Glendale Housing Development Project Plan Draft for Public Review May 29, 2015 Table of Contents I. Introduction... 1 II. Description of Project... 1 A. Boundary of Housing Development Project... 1 B.
More informationDirector, Community Planning, North York District
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 32-50, 52, 55, 56, 59, 60, 62, 65, 66, 70, 72, 76, 80, 85 & 90 Forest Manor Road, 100, 106, 110, 123, 123A, 125 and 130 Parkway Forest Drive, 1751 and 1761 Sheppard Avenue
More information5. Land Acquisition and Displacement
Northern Branch Corridor SDEIS March 2017 5. Land Acquisition and Displacement 5.1. Chapter Overview 5.1.1. Introduction Implementation of the Preferred Alternative would require the acquisition of property
More informationDRAFT -- PROPOSED EXPANSION AND REVISIONS TO DIVISION 24. SPECIAL DISTRICT--COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOODS DISTRICT
DRAFT -- PROPOSED EXPANSION AND REVISIONS TO DIVISION 24. SPECIAL DISTRICT--COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOODS DISTRICT Sec. 28-831. Purpose. The college and university neighborhoods district purposes
More informationCITY OF SANTA ROSA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 APPLICANT FILE NUMBER MJP
ITEM NO. 9 CITY OF SANTA ROSA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT FOR PLANNING COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 PROJECT TITLE Yogurt Time Center ADDRESS/LOCATION 3093 Marlow Road ASSESSOR S PARCEL
More informationFountain District Urban Village
Fountain District Urban Village Planning Commission Work Session June 3, 2010 City of Bellingham, Washington Planning & Community Development Department 1 Fountain District Urban Village Planning City
More informationMEADOWBROOK FLATS SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
MEADOWBROOK FLATS SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION March 26, 2013 Submitted by: Bluestone Land, L.L.C. William N. Park, Manager 1821 Avon St. Suite 200 Charlottesville VA 22902 434-979-2900 wpark@pinnacleconstructionva.com
More informationEnclosed are amended PUD documents for The Grove at Shoal Creek Proposed by
Enclosed are amended PUD documents for The Grove at Shoal Creek Proposed by The Bull Creek Road Coalition (BCRC) was formed in 2012 and is made up of residents in the six neighborhoods surrounding the
More informationLITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY
LITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY JANUARY 2013 CONTENTS 1.0 INTENT & PRINCIPLES...1 2.0 APPLICATION...2 3.0 HOUSING TYPES, HEIGHT & DENSITY POLICIES...3 3.1 LOW TO MID-RISE APARTMENT POLICIES...4
More informationPlanning Justification Report
Planning Justification Report Kellogg s Lands City of London E&E McLaughlin Ltd. June 14, 2017 Zelinka Priamo Ltd. Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. 1.0 2.0 2.1 2.2 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6
More informationCherokee Webster Development, LP. City of Webster, Texas Planned Development No. 3. Proposed Revision No. 4
Cherokee Webster Development, LP. City of Webster, Texas Planned Development No. 3 Proposed Revision No. 4 October 2013 1 Statement of Intent This Revision No. 4 of the Statement of Intent is written in
More informationREPORT Elections Code 9212 Report on Proposed Initiative
REPORT Elections Code 9212 Report on Proposed Initiative Initiative adopting the Vallco Town Center Specific Plan to (1) provide that the Vallco Shopping District Special Area ("Area") contains a mixture
More informationEMERYVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION. Report Date: June 18, 2015 Meeting Date: June 25, 2015
EMERYVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Report Date: June 18, 2015 Meeting Date: June 25, 2015 TO: Emeryville Planning Commission FROM: SUBJECT: LOCATION: APPLICANT: Michael Biddle, City Attorney City
More informationMount Airy Planning Commission March 26, Staff Report
Mount Airy Planning Commission March 26, 2018 Staff Report Special Exception Request Mixed Use Development in CC District Recommendation to Board of Appeals CASE MA-A-18-01 Applicant: Location: Zoning:
More informationDraft Strategy Plan Concepts. CAC Meeting #9
Downtown San Leandro Transit-Oriented Development Strategy Draft Strategy Plan Concepts Discussion & Conclusions CAC Meeting #9 23 January 2007 Land Use Plan & Specific Areas New mixed-use districts Context-sensitive
More information2.1 INTRODUCTION 2.2 BACKGROUND
Chapter 2: Project Alternatives 2.1 INTRODUCTION Two alternatives are evaluated in the 68th Street/Hunter College Subway Station Improvement Project EA. This chapter describes the alternatives considered
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item
PDP-13-00518 Item No. 3B- 1 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item PC Staff Report 2/24/14 ITEM NO. 3B PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR HERE @ KANSAS; 1101 INDIANA ST (SLD) PDP-13-00518:
More informationPROJECT DESCRIPTION STATION 1300
PROJECT DESCRIPTION STATION 1300 Introduction Several principles underpin Greenheart Land Company s design of Station 1300. Primary was to create a community resource: a place where people eat, shop, recreate,
More information6208 Jeanne D Arc Boulevard North. Planning Rationale. Site Plan Control
Site Plan Control Prepared By: NOVATECH Suite 200, 240 Michael Cowpland Drive Ottawa, Ontario K2M 1P6 November / 24 / 2015 Novatech File: 115100 Ref: R-2015-179 November 24, 2015 City of Ottawa 110 Laurier
More information4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR
4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL MIXED-USE PROJECTS This chapter presents standards for residential mixed-use projects in the Ashland-Cherryland Business District and the Castro Valley Central Business
More information2.0 LAND USE FRAMEWORK
Land Use Framework 2.0 LAND USE FRAMEWORK FOLSOM BOULEVARD 2.1 LAND USE OVERVIEW The proposed land uses for Easton Place offer local and regional employment, shopping, and entertainment, highlighting the
More informationCover Letter with Narrative Statement
Cover Letter with Narrative Statement March 31, 2017 rev July 27, 2017 RE: Rushton Pointe Residential Planned Unit Development Application for Public Hearing for RPUD Rezone PL2015 000 0306 Mr. Eric Johnson,
More informationUsing Performance Measures to Improve Parking Policies & Livability
Using Performance Measures to Improve Parking Policies & Livability UTCM Conference Performance Measures for Livable Communities Valerie Knepper Metropolitan Transportation Commission SF Bay Area 7 Million
More informationJanuary 7, Sarah Smith Community Development Director City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN Dear Ms. Smith,
January 7, 2019 Sarah Smith Community Development Director City of Mound 5341 Maywood Road Mound, MN 55364 Dear Ms. Smith, We are pleased to present the enclosed concept plan and requisite attachments
More informationComprehensive Plan Amendment #PLN , Reserve at Cannon Branch (Coles Magisterial District)
COUNTY OF PRINCE WILLIAM 5 County Complex Court, Prince William, Virginia 22192-9201 PLANNING (703) 792-7615 FAX (703) 792-4758 OFFICE Internet www.pwcgov.org Christopher M. Price, AICP Director of Planning
More informationCOUNTY OF ALBEMARLE PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY Project Name: ZMA 2010-00015, Cedar Hill Planning Commission Worksession: February 15, 2011 Public Hearing: Not scheduled Staff: Judith C. Wiegand, AICP
More informationInfrastructure, Development and Enterprise Services
Staff Report To Service Area City Council Infrastructure, Development and Enterprise Services Date Monday, April 9, 2018 Subject Report Number Statutory Public Meeting 671 Victoria Road North Proposed
More informationEXPRESS LANES NORTHERN EXTENSION TECHNICAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 2016
I N T E R S TAT E 3 9 5 EXPRESS LANES NORTHERN EXTENSION R I G H T O F W AY TECHNICAL REPORT SEPTEMBER 2016 INTERSTATE 395 EXPRESS LANES NORTHERN EXTENSION Right of Way Technical Report City of Alexandria,
More informationPlanned Residence District (PR) To review a plan to construct 11 single family homes on approximately 4.01 acres.
STAFF REPORT PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Village Green Municipal Building, Council Chambers 47 Hall Street Wednesday, March 13, 2019 7:00 P.M. 1. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN REVIEW Applicant: Romanelli and
More informationOFFICE BUILDING INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY PALO ALTO DOWNTOWN CALIFORNIA. Actual Site
OFFICE BUILDING INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITY DOWNTOWN PALO ALTO CALIFORNIA Actual Site EXCLUSIVELY MARKETED BY TOM POWER EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT SRS REAL ESTATE PARTNERS 100 Pine Street, Suite 1550 San Francisco,
More informationWESTPORT CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AUTHORIZATION
WESTPORT CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT AUTHORIZATION May 15, 2017 David Brandt, City Manager Aarti Shrivastava, Assistant City Manager Cupertino City Hall 10300 Torres Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014-3202
More informationGeneral Plan. Page 44
VIII. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN NON-RESIDENTIAL LAND USE AREAS POLICY ISSUE Review the City s existing regulations and policies that allow residential land use in non-residential zoning districts. BACKGROUND
More informationRE: Transportation Overview Youth Services Bureau Housing First Hub for Youth 2887 Riverside Drive
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Jasmine Tranter c/o Wes Richardson, Youth Services Bureau (YSB) Paul Tétreault, P. Eng., MCIP, MUP; Emmett Proulx, EIT RE: Transportation Overview Youth Services
More informationAttachment 4. Planning Commission Staff Report. June 26, 2017
Planning Commission Staff Report June 26, 2017 Agenda #: Regular Agenda - 2 Title: Applicant: Request: Location: Existing Zoning: Proposed Use: Staff Planner: The Brands and The Brands West Eagle Crossing
More informationCharlotte LYNX Blue Line Economic Development Impact and Land Use Patterns
Charlotte LYNX Blue Line Economic Development Impact and Land Use Patterns National Governors Association Policy Academy on Shaping a New Approach to Transportation and Land Use Peter Zeiler Economic Development
More informationWest Bullard & Riverside Avenue
Apartment Land for Sale General Plan: Urban Neighborhood Location West Bullard & Riverside Avenue Fresno CA Zoning (Residential Multi-Family) Allows 16-30 units/acre Parcel 1 ±5.13 Acres, $661,700 APN
More informationArticle 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT
Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT this page left intentionally blank Contents ARTICLE 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT DIVISION 3.1 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT DESCRIPTION...3.1-1 Section 3.1.1
More informationChapter 10: Implementation
Chapter 10: Introduction Once the Comprehensive Plan has been adopted by the City of Oakdale, the City can begin to implement the goals and strategies to make this vision a reality. This chapter will set
More information