Millcreek Garden Apartments 395 East 3045 South South Salt Lake, Utah. April 29, Prepared for:

Transcription

1 PRE-DEMOLITION INSPECTION FOR ASBESTOS AND UNIVERSAL, HAZARDOUS, AND TOXIC WASTES Millcreek Garden Apartments 395 East 3045 South South Salt Lake, Utah April 29, 204 Prepared for: Mr. Kyle Kershaw, Director of Finance City of South Salt Lake 220East Morris Avenue South Salt Lake, Utah 845 Prepared by: Reviewed by: John C. Larson, State of Utah DAQ Certification No. ASB-0894 Jon H. Self Asbestos Program Manager State of Utah Company Certification No. 22 IHI Project No. AL EAST WILMINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 8406 TELEPHONE: FAX: SALT LAKE CITY SAN FRANCISCO PHOENIX DENVER SEATTLE

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.0 INTRODUCTION.... Facility Description....2 Scope of Work METHODOLOGY Bulk Sample Collection Bulk Sample Analysis Bulk Sample Results CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION Regulatory Guidance Inaccessible Areas/Materials PROJECT LIMITATIONS... 3 TABLES Table : Material Inspection Summary Table 2: Asbestos Material Disposition Summary APPENDICES Appendix A: Laboratory Analytical Reports Appendix B: Photographic Log of Materials Sampled Appendix C: Asbestos Sampling Locations (Drawing) Appendix D: Universal, Hazardous, and Toxic Wastes Inspection City of South Salt Lake Table of Contents IHI Environmental Millcreek Garden Apartments/Asbestos Inspection Project No. AL47222

3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY From April 5 through April 9, 204, IHI Environmental conducted a pre-demolition inspection of the Millcreek Apartments, located at 395 East 3045 South, South Salt Lake, Utah. Mr. Kyle Kershaw, Director of Finance with the City of South Salt Lake, requested this inspection to identify asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and Universal, Hazardous, and Toxic Wastes materials that need to be addressed before the building is demolished. The following ACM and Universal, Hazardous, and Toxic Wastes materials were identified during this inspection and assessment. ACM Wall system (38,86 square feet) Sink undercoating ( units) Light fixture wire insulation (4 units) Vinyl floor sheeting (250 square feet) Exterior stucco (800 square feet) Universal, Hazardous, and Toxic Wastes Mercury-vapor fluorescent light tubes (24-2-foot, 6 4-foot) Ballasts containing PCBs (32) Mercury-vapor fluorescent light bulbs (7 bulbs) Containers of liquid waste (20) Mercury-containing thermostat (3 units) Refrigeration units containing CFCs (2 A/C units, 2 - refrigerators) Table in this Asbestos Inspection and Assessment Report contains detailed information about the ACM, and Section 2 (Findings) in the Universal, Hazardous, and Toxic Waste Inspection Report contains detailed information about the Universal, Hazardous, and Toxic Wastes. City of South Salt Lake Executive Summary IHI Environmental Millcreek Garden Apartments/Asbestos Inspection Project No. AL47222

4 CONCLUSIONS ACM IHI recommends that a Utah-certified asbestos abatement contractor remove and properly dispose of all the ACM in this building prior to demolition. Universal, Hazardous, and Toxic Wastes Protocols for identification and disposal of hazardous materials have been developed by the Salt Lake County Health Department (SLCHD). These protocols require building owners to identify and remove all Universal, Hazardous, and/or Toxic Wastes from buildings before they are demolished. Disposition of these materials must follow EPA Guidance outlined in 40 CFR 273 (Standards for Universal Waste Management) and 40 CFR 26 and 262 (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act), and Department of Transportation regulations outlined at 49 CFR 73 (Shippers - General Requirements for Shipments and Packaging). As such, IHI recommends that the materials identified during this inspection be removed and disposed of by properly trained and licensed contractors. COST ESTIMATES IHI s cost estimates to remove the ACM and remaining hazardous materials outlined above are: ACM $74,055 Hazardous Materials: $,842 These estimates do not include the costs for asbestos abatement design and management consulting services The report that follows this Executive Summary should be read in its entirety because it includes important information, such as material descriptions and locations, regulatory requirements, and building specific recommended response actions. City of South Salt Lake Executive Summary IHI Environmental Millcreek Garden Apartments/Asbestos Inspection Project No. AL47222

5 .0 INTRODUCTION From April 5 through April 9, 204, IHI Environmental conducted a pre-demolition inspection of the Millcreek Apartments, located at 395 East 3045 South, South Salt Lake, Utah. Bulk samples of suspect asbestos-containing material were collected by Mr. John Larson (State of Utah, Asbestos Inspector Certification Number ASB-0894).. Facility Description The building is a three-story, twelve-unit apartment building. Building size is approximately 2,000 square feet. Construction date is unknown. The construction is wood frame with wood siding and stucco on exterior walls. Interior finishes are gypsum board walls and ceilings with random locations of texturing. Flooring finishes include concrete, carpeting, vinyl floor tile, vinyl floor sheeting, and ceramic tile. The roof area has tar and felt build-up on a wood substrate. The facility s heating system consists of individual gas-fired heating units and wall-mounted refrigerated cooling units..2 Scope of Work The objective of this inspection was to locate, identify, quantify, and document the accessible suspect ACM, universal, hazardous and toxic wastes, and to provide a cost estimate for proper removal. The inspection was limited to accessible surfaces, structures, and mechanical systems with minor destructive sampling of wall cavities and floors. ACM is any material containing more than one percent asbestos, as determined by polarized light microscopy (PLM). 2.0 METHODOLOGY Suspected ACM was identified and characterized in terms of homogeneous areas. A homogeneous area is defined as a single material, uniform in texture and appearance, installed at one time, and unlikely to consist of more than one type or formulation of material. All suspect ACM was touched to determine its friability. Friable ACM, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. City of South Salt Lake IHI Environmental Millcreek Garden Apartments/Asbestos Inspection Project No. AL47222

6 The inspector photographed each homogeneous area sampled. Photographs are included in Appendix B of this report. 2. Bulk Sample Collection Bulk samples were collected from accessible homogeneous areas of suspected ACM for subsequent laboratory analysis to determine actual asbestos content. Sampling was generally conducted in a manner that minimized damage and unsightly marks in the building and did not create a health hazard for building occupants or inspectors. The number of samples collected from each homogeneous area generally followed the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) regulations (see 40 CFR part 763, subpart E), and Utah Division of Air Quality (DAQ) Rules, R (Asbestos), which general follow the AHERA guidelines. Although AHERA regulations do not apply to this property, the AHERA regulations provide the most comprehensive and acceptable guidance for conducting field inspections for ACM. The AHERA regulations require the inspector to collect between three and seven samples of surfacing materials, depending on the size of the homogeneous area. Likewise, inspectors collect enough samples of thermal system insulation and miscellaneous materials to confidently characterize the material s composition. 2.2 Bulk Sample Analysis All bulk samples were analyzed by Dixon Information in Salt Lake City, Utah, using PLM in accordance with the EPA Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials (EPA-600/R-93-6). Dixon is accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) under the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). 2.3 Bulk Sample Results Table identifies all material sample numbers and locations, the homogeneous area number and description, and the quantity of the material. Appendix A includes the analytical reports provided by the laboratory. City of South Salt Lake 2 IHI Environmental Millcreek Garden Apartments/Asbestos Inspection Project No. AL47222

7 3.0 CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION The materials identified in Table 2 contain asbestos. As such, disturbance of these materials in Utah is regulated by EPA, Utah DAQ, and/or OSHA and must be removed by a Utahcertified asbestos abatement contractor prior to the start of any renovation or demolition activities that will disturb them. Table 2 includes the recommended response action. 3. Regulatory Guidance The Environmental Protection Agency, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and the Utah Division of Air Quality regulations define ACM as materials containing more than one percent of asbestos, as determined by PLM. All three agencies regulate ACM in Utah, but only if the material contains more than percent asbestos. If a material contains less than percent, the EPA and Utah DAQ do not regulate removal or disposal. However, activities involving materials containing less than percent asbestos are regulated by OSHA. The OSHA construction regulation pertaining to asbestos (29 CFR 926.0) indicates that any asbestos work including work with materials containing between zero and percent asbestos that has the potential of producing airborne concentrations of asbestos that exceed the permissible exposure limit (PEL) must be performed applying specific precautions outlined in the regulation. 3.2 Inaccessible Areas/Materials Suspect materials that were hidden or inaccessible may not have been characterized by this inspection. Therefore, any material not identified in this report as having been tested should be treated as suspect ACM until it has been sampled by a Utah-certified inspector and analyzed by an accredited laboratory applying EPA methods. 4.0 PROJECT LIMITATIONS This project was performed using, as a minimum, practices consistent with standards acceptable within the industry at this time, and a level of diligence typically exercised by industrial hygiene consultants performing similar services. The procedures used in this investigation attempt to establish a balance between the competing goals of limiting investigative and reporting costs and time, and reducing the uncertainty about unknown conditions. Therefore, because the findings of this report were City of South Salt Lake 3 IHI Environmental Millcreek Garden Apartments/Asbestos Inspection Project No. AL47222

8 derived from the scope, costs, time, and other limitations, the conclusions should not be construed as a guarantee that all hazardous materials have been identified and fully evaluated. IHI s professional opinions are based in part on the interpretation of data from discrete sampling locations that may not represent conditions at non-sampled locations. IHI assumes no responsibility for omissions or errors resulting from inaccurate information, or data, provided by sources outside of IHI or from omissions or errors in public records. Furthermore, it is emphasized that the final decision on how much risk to accept always remains with the client since IHI is not in a position to fully understand all of the client s needs. Clients with a greater aversion to risk may want to take additional actions while others, with less aversion to risk, may want to take no further action. City of South Salt Lake 4 IHI Environmental Millcreek Garden Apartments/Asbestos Inspection Project No. AL47222

9 Material Sample # Table Material Inspection Summary Homogeneous Area Number, Material Description, & Location Lab Result Quantity Sample Location (See Appendix C) M00: Exterior caulking black, pliable random applications around window exterior framing <% Chrysotile <% Chrysotile by point count M002: Stucco tan plaster with aggregate and gray plaster building exterior <% Chrysotile None detected ~20 linear feet Apartment 4, living room window exterior ~800 square feet Ground level, east of the north entry Ground level, east of the north entry, gray plaster substrate <% Chrysotile Ground level, northwest corner M003: Tar paper black under exterior stucco None detected ~800 square feet Ground level, east of the north entry M004: Wood coating black on plywood under exterior wood paneling None detected ~720 square feet Ground level, under exterior paneling above Apartment living room window M005: Asphalt shingles and felt tan storage shed M006: Asphalt shingles and felt black upper-level exterior walls None detected ~250 square feet Storage shed, southwest corner None detected ~800 square feet Above north entry M007: Wall system gypsum board, tape and joint compound building center common areas None detected.2% Chrysotile (joint compound) ~,490 square feet Level, north entry, west side Apartment 3 storage room, northwest corner None detected Level, laundry room, northwest corner None detected Level, north entry ceiling S00: Wall surfacing troweled-on white plaster random locations in the common area None detected ~570 square feet Level, laundry room, north wall and some apartments None detected Apartment 3, living room, north wall

10 Table Material Inspection Summary Material Sample # Homogeneous Area Number, Material Description, & Location Lab Result Quantity Sample Location (See Appendix C) None detected Apartment 6, bathroom ceiling, east end S00: Wall surfacing continued None detected Apartment 8, bathroom ceiling, west end M008: Wall system gypsum board, tape and joint compound throughout apartments.2% Chrysotile (joint compound) <% composite by point count <% Chrysotile (joint compound) <% Chrysotile (joint compound).2% Chrysotile (joint compound).2% Chrysotile (joint compound).2% Chrysotile (joint compound) None detected % Chrysotile (joint compound).2% Chrysotile (joint compound).2% Chrysotile (joint compound).2% Chrysotile (joint compound) <% Chrysotile (joint compound) ~36,696 square feet Apartment, living room, northwest corner Apartment 4, furnace room, south wall at ceiling Apartment 2, bathroom, southwest corner Apartment 3, southeast bedroom, northwest corner Apartment 5, living room, northeast corner Apartment 0, bathroom, northwest corner Apartment 6, furnace room, northwest corner Apartment 7, bathroom, northeast corner Apartment 8, northeast bedroom, northwest corner Apartment 9, living room, southwest corner Apartment, southwest bedroom, southwest corner Apartment 2, furnace room, southeast corner

11 Table Material Inspection Summary Material Sample # Homogeneous Area Number, Material Description, & Location Lab Result Quantity Sample Location (See Appendix C).2% Chrysotile Apartment, kitchen M009: Sink undercoating black all % Chrysotile sinks Apartment 6, kitchen apartment kitchens except Apartment % Chrysotile Apartment 2, kitchen M00: Vinyl floor sheeting green and yellow pattern Apartment, bathroom closet, under tack-strip carpet 60% Chrysotile (backing) ~2 square feet Apartment, bathroom closet M0: Ceramic tile thin-set gray random locations throughout the complex None detected ~800 square feet Apartment, bathroom doorway M02: Vinyl floor sheeting tan Apartment 4, bathroom closet, under tack-strip carpet M03: Floor tile and mastic 2 tan marble with clear mastic Apartment 4, bathroom, exposed M04: Floor tile and mastic 2 off-white with splotches and yellow mastic Apartment 2, bathroom and kitchen 60% Chrysotile (backing) None detected (tile) 60% Chrysotile (sheet vinyl backing) None detected (tile) 60% Chrysotile (sheet vinyl backing) ~2 square feet Apartment 4, bathroom closet, northeast corner ~52 square feet Apartment 4, bathroom center ~4 square feet Apartment 2, bathroom closet None detected Apartment 6, kitchen entry M05: Vinyl floor sheeting beige tile pattern ~68 square feet Apartments 6 and 9, kitchen and bathroom None detected Apartment 9, bathroom None detected Apartment 6, bathroom doorway M06: Vinyl floor sheeting gray tile pattern ~02 square feet Apartment 6 and 8, bathroom and kitchen None detected Apartment 8, kitchen entry

12 Table Material Inspection Summary Material Sample # Homogeneous Area Number, Material Description, & Location Lab Result Quantity Sample Location (See Appendix C) 60% Chrysotile M07: Vinyl floor sheeting tan, large keyhole pattern Apartments 5, 6, 0, and 2, ~48 square feet Apartment 6, bathroom closet (backing) under tack-strip carpet in bathroom closets 60% Chrysotile Apartment 8, bathroom doorway, under (backing) ceramic tile M08: Light fixture wire insulation brown & gray Apartments 5, 9, 0, and bathrooms 65% Chrysotile 4 fixtures Apartment 5, bathroom, east end M09: Vinyl floor sheeting beige under non-acm vinyl floor sheeting, M05, in Apartment 6, kitchen 60% Chrysotile (backing) ~54 square feet Apartment 6, kitchen entry, bottom layer M020: Ceramic tile backer-board gray Apartment 7, kitchen M02: Vinyl floor sheeting beige under M05 in Apartment 9, kitchen, 2 nd layer M022: Vinyl floor sheeting cream and brown pattern under M05 in Apartment 9, kitchen, 3 rd layer None detected ~54 square feet Apartment 7, kitchen entry None detected ~54 square feet Apartment 9, kitchen, 2 nd layer None detected ~54 square feet Apartment 9, kitchen, 3 rd layer None detected Apartment, living room center S002: Ceiling surfacing troweled-on white None detected ~800 square feet Apartment, southwest bedroom, center plaster, streaked Apartment ceilings None detected Apartment, bathroom, center None detected S003: Wall surfacing sprayed-on white plaster None detected (orange peel pattern) Apartment walls ~2,250 square feet Apartment, living room, west wall Apartment, southeast bedroom, west wall None detected Apartment, bathroom, tub partition wall

13 Table Material Inspection Summary Material Sample # Homogeneous Area Number, Material Description, & Location Lab Result Quantity Sample Location (See Appendix C) None detected Apartment, living room window M023: Window caulking white random ~200 linear feet locations on interior windows None detected Apartment 2, northwest bedroom window M024: Vinyl floor sheeting beige, 2 tile pattern Apartment 2, bathroom None detected ~48 square feet Apartment 2, bathroom, center M025: Vinyl floor sheeting backing only Apartment 2, bathroom, under M024 floor sheeting and plywood 60% Chrysotile (backing) ~48 square feet Apartment 2, bathroom, doorway None detected Roof, northwest area M025: Roofing material tar and felt build-up with pea gravel ballast throughout the roof None detected ~4,000 square feet Roof, center None detected Roof, southeast area M025: Roofing tar sealant black roof penetrations None detected ~50 linear feet Roof, northwest round roof penetration

14 Homogeneous Area Number Quantity & Substrate Table 2 Asbestos Material Disposition Summary Assessment Category & Damage Disturbance Potential & Accessibility Recommended Response Actions Abatement Cost M Sq. Ft. - Framework X Low / Continuous 3 $4,800 M007, M008 38,86 Sq. Ft. - Framework X Low / Continuous 3 $66,830 M009 Units Metal X Low/ Periodic 2 $825 M02, M03, M04, M07, M09, M Sq. Ft. Wood and/or Concrete 7 Low / Rarely 2 $,500 M08 4 Units - Metal X Low / Periodic 2 $00 Damage Assessment Categories -Damaged or significantly damaged thermal system insulation ACM 2-Damaged friable surfacing ACM 3-Significantly damaged friable surfacing ACM 4-Damaged or significantly damaged friable miscellaneous ACM 5-ACM with potential for damage 6-ACM with potential for significant damage 7-Any remaining friable ACM or friable suspect ACM X-Not applicable (non-friable surfacing or miscellaneous material) Recommended Response Actions -Regulated ACM (EPA, Utah DAQ, and OSHA) Repair or remove immediately 2-Regulated ACM (EPA, Utah DAQ, and OSHA) Remove prior to disturbance 3-Regulated asbestos material (OSHA only) Remove prior to disturbance

15 Appendix A Laboratory Analytical Reports

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42 Appendix B Photographic Log of Materials Sampled

43 Photograph Exterior view of the apartment facility from the northwest. Photograph 2 Non-ACM window caulking (exterior), homogeneous area M00. Photograph 3 OSHA regulated exterior stucco, homogeneous area M002. Photograph 4 Non-ACM roofing material, homogeneous area M003 and M005. Photograph 5 Non-ACM ceiling surfacing, homogeneous area S00. Photograph 6 OSHA-regulated wall system, homogeneous area M007.

44 Photograph 7 ACM sink undercoating, homogeneous area M009. Photograph 8 Non-ACM tile thin-set, homogeneous area M0. Photograph 9 Non-ACM floor tile, with ACM sheet vinyl backing underneath, homogeneous area M04. Photograph 0 Non-ACM sheet vinyl, homogeneous area M05. Photograph Non-ACM sheet vinyl, homogeneous area M06. Photograph 2 ACM sheet vinyl, homogeneous area M07.

45 Photograph 3 ACM light fixture wire insulation, homogeneous area M08. Photograph 4 ACM sheet vinyl under non-acm sheet vinyl, homogeneous area M09. Photograph 5 Non-ACM ceramic tile backer-board, homogeneous area M020. Photograph 6 Non-ACM sheet vinyl, under non-acm sheet vinyl, homogeneous area M02 and M022. Photograph 7 Non-ACM ceiling surface, homogeneous area S002. Photograph 8 Non-ACM wall surface, homogeneous area S003.

46 Photograph 9 Non-ACM window caulk, homogeneous area M023. Photograph 20 Non-ACM built-up roofing, homogeneous area M026. Photograph 2 Non-ACM tar sealant, homogeneous area M027.

47 Appendix C Asbestos Sampling Locations (Drawing)

48 Explanation FIG. No. 0 Asbestos Sample Number & Location Note: Asbestos Sample Number 7 Taken from 2'x2' Storage Shed Roof Apt. 4 Apt ,3,5 6 5 Apt. Apt Asbestos Sample Locations - First Floor Millcreek Apartment Building Pre-Demolition Asbestos & Universal Hazardous Materials Inspection City of South Salt Lake 395 East 3045 South South Salt Lake 640 Wilmington Avenue Salt Lake City, UT 845 PH. (80) FAX. (80) Utah N AL47222 " = 0' - 0" AL47222.dwg April 204 JCL Project No. Scale: File No. Date: Keith JCL JHS SCALE IN FEET Project Mngr: Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By:

49 Explanation FIG. No. 2 0 Asbestos Sample Number & Location Apt. 8 Apt. 7 Apt. 5 Apt ,39 Asbestos Sample Locations - Second Floor Millcreek Apartment Building Pre-Demolition Asbestos & Universal Hazardous Materials Inspection City of South Salt Lake 395 East 3045 South South Salt Lake 640 Wilmington Avenue Salt Lake City, UT 845 PH. (80) FAX. (80) Utah N AL47222 " = 0' - 0" AL47222.dwg April 204 JCL Project No. Scale: File No. Date: Keith JCL JHS SCALE IN FEET Project Mngr: Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By:

50 Explanation FIG. No. 3 0 Asbestos Sample Number & Location Apt. 2 Apt. Roof Access 5 48 Apt. 9 Apt , Asbestos Sample Locations - Third Floor Millcreek Apartment Building Pre-Demolition Asbestos & Universal Hazardous Materials Inspection City of South Salt Lake 395 East 3045 South South Salt Lake 640 Wilmington Avenue Salt Lake City, UT 845 PH. (80) FAX. (80) Utah N AL47222 " = 0' - 0" AL47222.dwg April 204 JCL Project No. Scale: File No. Date: Keith JCL JHS SCALE IN FEET Project Mngr: Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By:

51 Explanation FIG. No. 4 0 Asbestos Sample Number & Location 58 6 Roof Access Asbestos Sample Locations - Roof Millcreek Apartment Building Pre-Demolition Asbestos & Universal Hazardous Materials Inspection City of South Salt Lake 395 East 3045 South South Salt Lake 640 Wilmington Avenue Salt Lake City, UT 845 PH. (80) FAX. (80) Utah N AL47222 " = 0' - 0" AL47222.dwg April 204 JCL Project No. Scale: File No. Date: Keith JCL JHS SCALE IN FEET Project Mngr: Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By:

52 Explanation FIG. No. 5 OSHA Regulated Exterior Stucco Asbestos-Containing Vinyl Floor Sheeting Apt. 4 Apt. 3 Apt. Apt. 2 Asbestos-Containing Light Fixture Wiring Asbestos-Containing Sink Undercoating Note: OSHA Regulated Wall System Throughout (ceilings & walls) Asbestos-Containing Material Locations - First Floor Millcreek Apartment Building Pre-Demolition Asbestos & Universal Hazardous Materials Inspection City of South Salt Lake 395 East 3045 South South Salt Lake 640 Wilmington Avenue Salt Lake City, UT 845 PH. (80) FAX. (80) Utah N AL47222 " = 0' - 0" AL47222.dwg April 204 JCL Project No. Scale: File No. Date: Keith JCL JHS SCALE IN FEET Project Mngr: Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By:

53 Explanation FIG. No. 6 OSHA Regulated Exterior Stucco Asbestos-Containing Vinyl Floor Sheeting Apt. 8 Apt. 7 Apt. 5 Apt. 6 Asbestos-Containing Light Fixture Wiring Asbestos-Containing Sink Undercoating Note: OSHA Regulated Wall System Throughout (ceilings & walls) Asbestos-Containing Material Locations - Second Floor Millcreek Apartment Building Pre-Demolition Asbestos & Universal Hazardous Materials Inspection City of South Salt Lake 395 East 3045 South South Salt Lake 640 Wilmington Avenue Salt Lake City, UT 845 PH. (80) FAX. (80) Utah N AL47222 " = 0' - 0" AL47222.dwg April 204 JCL Project No. Scale: File No. Date: Keith JCL JHS SCALE IN FEET Project Mngr: Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By:

54 Explanation FIG. No. 7 OSHA Regulated Exterior Stucco Asbestos-Containing Vinyl Floor Sheeting Apt. 2 Apt. Roof Access Apt. 9 Apt. 0 Asbestos-Containing Light Fixture Wiring Asbestos-Containing Sink Undercoating Note: OSHA Regulated Wall System Throughout (ceilings & walls) Asbestos-Containing Material Locations - Third Floor Millcreek Apartment Building Pre-Demolition Asbestos & Universal Hazardous Materials Inspection City of South Salt Lake 395 East 3045 South South Salt Lake 640 Wilmington Avenue Salt Lake City, UT 845 PH. (80) FAX. (80) Utah N AL47222 " = 0' - 0" AL47222.dwg April 204 JCL Project No. Scale: File No. Date: Keith JCL JHS SCALE IN FEET Project Mngr: Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By:

55 Explanation FIG. No. 8 Note: No Asbestos-Containing Materials Identified on Roof Roof Access Asbestos-Containing Material Locations - Roof Millcreek Apartment Building Pre-Demolition Asbestos & Universal Hazardous Materials Inspection City of South Salt Lake 395 East 3045 South South Salt Lake 640 Wilmington Avenue Salt Lake City, UT 845 PH. (80) FAX. (80) Utah N AL47222 " = 0' - 0" AL47222.dwg April 204 JCL Keith Project No. Scale: File No. Date: JCL JHS SCALE IN FEET Project Mngr: Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By:

56 Explanation High Pressure Sodium Vapor Bulb FIG. No. 9 Mercury-Containing Thermostat 2-2' 2-2' Apt. 4 Apt ' 2-4' Apt. 2-4' 2-4' Apt ' ' Mercury-Containing Compact Fluorescent Light Bulbs 4-4' Mercury-Containing Fluorescent Light Tubes 2 Polychlorinated Biphenyl-Containing Light Ballasts Chlorofluorocarbon-Containing Window A/C Unit Chlorofluorocarbon-Containing HVAC Condensing Unit Chlorofluorocarbon-Containing Refrigerator Hazardous Electronic Waste Waste Liquid Containers Used Vehicle Tire Universal Hazardous Material Locations - First Floor Millcreek Apartment Building Pre-Demolition Asbestos & Universal Hazardous Materials Inspection City of South Salt Lake 395 East 3045 South South Salt Lake 640 Wilmington Avenue Salt Lake City, UT 845 PH. (80) FAX. (80) Utah N AL47222 " = 0' - 0" AL47222.dwg April 204 JCL Project No. Scale: File No. Date: Keith JCL JHS SCALE IN FEET Project Mngr: Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By:

57 Explanation High Pressure Sodium Vapor Bulb FIG. No. 0 Mercury-Containing Thermostat 2-2' 5 2-2' Apt. 8 Apt ' Apt. 5 2 Apt ' 2-2' Mercury-Containing Compact Fluorescent Light Bulbs 4-4' Mercury-Containing Fluorescent Light Tubes 2 Polychlorinated Biphenyl-Containing Light Ballasts Chlorofluorocarbon-Containing Window A/C Unit Chlorofluorocarbon-Containing HVAC Condensing Unit Chlorofluorocarbon-Containing Refrigerator Hazardous Electronic Waste Waste Liquid Containers Used Vehicle Tire Universal Hazardous Material Locations - Second Floor Millcreek Apartment Building Pre-Demolition Asbestos & Universal Hazardous Materials Inspection City of South Salt Lake 395 East 3045 South South Salt Lake 640 Wilmington Avenue Salt Lake City, UT 845 PH. (80) FAX. (80) Utah N AL47222 " = 0' - 0" AL47222.dwg April 204 JCL Project No. Scale: File No. Date: Keith JCL JHS SCALE IN FEET Project Mngr: Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By:

58 Explanation High Pressure Sodium Vapor Bulb FIG. No. Mercury-Containing Thermostat Apt ' Apt. 9 3 Roof Access 2-2' Apt. 2-4' Apt. 0 Mercury-Containing Compact Fluorescent Light Bulbs 4-4' Mercury-Containing Fluorescent Light Tubes 2 Polychlorinated Biphenyl-Containing Light Ballasts Chlorofluorocarbon-Containing Window A/C Unit Chlorofluorocarbon-Containing HVAC Condensing Unit Chlorofluorocarbon-Containing Refrigerator Hazardous Electronic Waste Waste Liquid Containers Used Vehicle Tire Universal Hazardous Material Locations - Third Floor Millcreek Apartment Building Pre-Demolition Asbestos & Universal Hazardous Materials Inspection City of South Salt Lake 395 East 3045 South South Salt Lake 640 Wilmington Avenue Salt Lake City, UT 845 PH. (80) FAX. (80) Utah N AL47222 " = 0' - 0" AL47222.dwg April 204 JCL Project No. Scale: File No. Date: Keith JCL JHS SCALE IN FEET Project Mngr: Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By:

59 Explanation High Pressure Sodium Vapor Bulb FIG. No. 2 Mercury-Containing Thermostat Roof Access Mercury-Containing Compact Fluorescent Light Bulbs 4-4' Mercury-Containing Fluorescent Light Tubes 2 Polychlorinated Biphenyl-Containing Light Ballasts Chlorofluorocarbon-Containing Window A/C Unit Chlorofluorocarbon-Containing HVAC Condensing Unit Chlorofluorocarbon-Containing Refrigerator Hazardous Electronic Waste Waste Liquid Containers Used Vehicle Tire Universal Hazardous Material Locations - Roof Millcreek Apartment Building Pre-Demolition Asbestos & Universal Hazardous Materials Inspection City of South Salt Lake 395 East 3045 South South Salt Lake 640 Wilmington Avenue Salt Lake City, UT 845 PH. (80) FAX. (80) Utah N AL47222 " = 0' - 0" AL47222.dwg April 204 JCL Project No. Scale: File No. Date: Keith JCL JHS SCALE IN FEET Project Mngr: Drawn By: Checked By: Approved By:

60 Appendix D Universal, Hazardous, and Toxic Wastes Inspection

61 UNIVERSAL, HAZARDOUS, AND TOXIC WASTE INSPECTION Millcreek Garden Apartments 395 East 3045 South South Salt Lake, Utah April 29, 204 Prepared for: Mr. Kyle Kershaw, Director of Finance City of South Salt Lake 220East Morris Avenue South Salt Lake, Utah 845 Prepared by: Reviewed by: John C. Larson, SL County Pre- Demo Building Inspector PBI-02 Jon H. Self Asbestos Program Manager Project #AL EAST WILMINGTON AVE SALT LAKE CITY UT 8406 TELEPHONE: FAX: SALT LAKE CITY SAN FRANCISCO PHOENIX DENVER SEATTLE

62 TABLE OF CONTENTS.0 INTRODUCTION METHODS FINDINGS CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION COST ESTIMATE PROJECT LIMITATIONS... 3 City of South Salt Lake/Millcreek Apartments Hazardous Materials Inspection IHI Environmental Project No. AL47222

63 .0 INTRODUCTION From April 5 through 9, 204, IHI Environmental conducted a pre-demolition inspection of the Millcreek Apartments, located at 395 East 3045 South, South Salt Lake, Utah. Mr. Kyle Kershaw, Director of Finance with the City of South Salt Lake, requested this inspection so that these materials could be identified and removed before demolition of this building. The following materials were included in the scope of this inspection: batteries pesticides mercury thermostats and lamps PCB light ballasts and oil-containing transformers identified and/or potential hazardous wastes CFC-containing air conditioning units or refrigerators other containerized toxic or special wastes in the building The building is a three-story, twelve-unit apartment building. Building size is approximately 2,000 square feet, and the construction date is unknown. 2.0 METHODS IHI conducted a visual inspection of all accessible areas throughout the building, but did not conduct any destructive inspection to characterize any material. 3.0 FINDINGS The following materials were identified in the building: Material Location* Quantity Mercury-vapor fluorescent light tubes Throughout the building 24 (2 ) 6 (4 ) Est. Removal Cost $35 Ballasts suspected of containing PCBs Mercury-vapor fluorescent light bulbs Throughout the building 32 Units $92 Throughout the building 7 Units $85 City of South Salt Lake/Millcreek Apartments Hazardous Materials Inspection IHI Environmental Project No. AL47222

64 Material Location* Quantity Mercury-containing thermostats CFC-containing refrigeration units Containers of liquid waste Est. Removal Cost Apartments, 4, and 8 3 Units $90 Throughout Random locations throughout 2 Refrigerators 2 A/C Units $, Units $40 Electronic waste Apartments 6 and 0 2 Units $20 Automotive tires Storage closets 3 Units $ CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION The Salt Lake Valley Health Department requires that building owners follow EPA Guidance outlined in 40 CFR 273 (Standards for Universal Waste Management) and 40 CFR 26 and 262 (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act), and Department of Transportation regulations outlined at 49 CFR 73 (Shippers - General Requirements for Shipments and Packaging) for the removal, transport and disposal of these wastes. These protocols require building owners to identify and remove all universal, hazardous, and/or toxic wastes from buildings before they are demolished. As such, IHI recommends that all identified materials be removed and disposed of by properly trained and licensed contractors. 5.0 COST ESTIMATE The estimated cost for the removal, packaging, transportation, and proper waste disposal of the remaining materials is $,842. This estimate does not include fees for design or management consulting services. City of South Salt Lake/Millcreek Apartments Hazardous Materials Inspection IHI Environmental Project No. AL47222

65 6.0 PROJECT LIMITATIONS This Project was performed using, as a minimum, practices consistent with standards acceptable within the industry at this time, and a level of diligence typically exercised by EH&S consultants performing similar services. The procedures used attempt to establish a balance between the competing goals of limiting investigative and reporting costs and time, and reducing the uncertainty about unknown conditions. Therefore, because the findings of this report were derived from the scope, costs, time and other limitations, the conclusions should not be construed as a guarantee that all universal, toxic and/or hazardous wastes have been identified and fully evaluated. Furthermore, IHI assumes no responsibility for omissions or errors resulting from inaccurate information, or data, provided by sources outside of IHI or from omissions or errors in public records. It is emphasized that the final decision on how much risk to accept always remains with the client since IHI is not in a position to fully understand all of the client's needs. Clients with a greater aversion to risk may want to take additional actions while others, with less aversion to risk, may want to take no further action City of South Salt Lake/Millcreek Apartments Hazardous Materials Inspection IHI Environmental Project No. AL47222

66