Department of Planning & Development Services

Transcription

1 Department of Planning & Development Services S T A F F R E P O R T May 13, 2016 CASE NO: PROJECT: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: REQUEST DETAILS: ZA Zoning Change and Site Plan for KLA School On behalf of Mani Jacob, Cooper General Contractors is requesting approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan for KLA School on property described as lot 13R, O. W. Knight No. 899, an addition to the City of Southlake, Tarrant County, Texas, located at 300 Parkwood Drive, Southlake, Texas. Current Zoning: S-P-2 Generalized Site Plan District; Requested Zoning: S-P-2 Generalized Site Plan District. SPIN Neighborhood #9. Cooper GC requests approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan from S-P-2 Generalized Site Plan District to S-P-2 Generalized Site Plan District to develop one single-story building totaling approximately 13,400 square feet on approximately acres. The intended use is day care/preschool with associated play yards and equipment. The site is accessed from Parkwood Drive immediately north of the existing turnaround and also through an existing 30 common access easement with the Calloway s Nursery Property immediately to the north. The proposed S-P-2 regulations for lot 13R are as follows (new additions in red): Lot 13R shall be subject to the development regulations per the City of Southlake Zoning Ordinance No. 480, as amended, Chapter 24, for the B- 1 BUSINESS SERVICE PARK DISTRICT, with the following exceptions: o o A Day Nursery or equivalent child care facility shall be permitted as a stand-alone use that is not associated with any office development. Shade structures shall be allowed as an accessory use to the Child Care facility. Development Regulations: o This property shall be subject to the development regulations for the B-1, BUSINESS SERVICE PARK DISTRICT and all other applicable regulations with the following exceptions: The natural tree cover shall be permitted in lieu of the required 8 screening device adjacent to the single family residential property for Lot 13R.

2 That a 5 Landscape Buffer be allowed in lieu of the required 10 buffer along the west property line, with the landscaping as shown or noted on the Landscape Plan. The AREA OF NO DISTURBANCE shall be maintained in accordance with the City of Southlake s Tree Preservation Ordinance and Landscape Ordinance. Shade Structures shall be membrane-type material. Lot 13R was originally included in the Concept Plan approved by City Council November 20, 2007 (ZA07-108). That plan, which is shown in Attachment C, consisted of a Concept Plan for a single-story office building with surrounding parking and an area of non-disturbance to the south. The applicant for KLA School proposes a building of similar scale with surrounding parking and the same area of non-disturbance as was shown on the approved Concept Plan. No changes are proposed to lot 12R (Calloway s Nursery). Changes or variations to the approved Concept Plan for Lot 13R include: The approved concept plan called for 50 parking spaces; KLA is proposing 48 spaces consistent with requirements for Day Care Centers. The approved use of Lot 13R was for Office; KLA is proposing Day Nursery or Child Care. Approved zoning is S-P-2 with O-1 uses for office; KLA is requesting S- P-2 with B-1 uses to include stand-alone day care use, with shade structures as a permitted accessory use. The shade structures will be membrane type material. The original proposed office building was 12,000 square feet; KLA is proposing a 13,400 square foot building. KLA will use the same access drive from the existing mutual access drive shared with Calloway s Nursery and Whites Chapel Church. KLA has added a drive approach onto the existing Parkwood cul-de-sac. KLA has relabeled the Building Setbacks in the AREA OF NO DISTURBANCE as Landscape Setbacks. KLA requests to keep the 5 Landscape Buffer along the west property line as was approved on the Site Plan in November 200. This is in lieu of the required 10 Landscape Buffer. This request is due to (1) the limitations of the developable area on the site, (2) the need for a substantial retaining wall along the west property line because of over 20 of elevation change across the site, (3) the AREA OF NO DISTURBANCE creates its own buffer. KLA also requests that the landscape requirements along the retaining wall be limited to what is shown on the plan so that plantings that produce large root systems will not undermine the structural integrity of the retaining wall.

3 Current Zoning Proposed Zoning KLA School S-P-2 Generalized Site Plan with O-1 uses S-P-2 with limited B-1 uses Gross Site Acreage Number of Proposed Buildings 1 Proposed Building Area (sf) 13,400 Area of Open Space (sf) / % 88,016 / 68% Area of Impervious Coverage (sf) 54,754 Percentage of Impervious Space Allowed (B-1) / Provided 70% max / 32% Max Building Height 1 story / 24 feet Required Parking ( 35.6.b.1.e) Provided Parking 1 space per 5 students = Total of 40 spaces 48 Spaces The building is a single-story structure clad in brick and stone veneer which meets the Masonry Ordinance and the Residential Overlay. The highest point of the roof peak is 24 feet, though the roof has multiple hips and peaks of varying heights. Public entrance is from the east side of the building near the customer parking and drop off/pick up area as shown on the Pedestrian Access Plan. Employee parking is on the west/rear side of the building. Play areas on the south side of the building include facilities for children of multiple ages. The applicant is requesting through the S-P-2 regulations to allow shade structures with a membrane material in the play area, which are prohibited by right in the Residential Overlay. The natural area which makes up the south half of the property will sit between the Day Care and the Northwood Park R-PUD and is shown as an Area of No Disturbance. The applicant is not proposing a trail or any construction within this area is but is requesting the ability to do limited clearing of underbrush and dead trees as needed ACTION NEEDED: 1. Conduct a public hearing 2. Consider approval of a Zoning Change and Site Plan ATTACHMENTS: (A) Background Information (B) Vicinity Map (C) Plans and Support Information Link to PowerPoint (D) SPIN Meeting Report dated January 12, 2016 (E) Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated May 13, 2016 (F) Surrounding Property Owners Map and Responses STAFF CONTACT: Dennis Killough (817) David Jones (817) BACKGROUND INFORMATION

4 OWNER: APPLICANT: PROPERTY SITUATION: Mani Jacob Cooper General Contractors 300 Parkwood Drive LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 13R, O. W. Knight No. 899 LAND USE CATEGORY: CURRENT ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: HISTORY: Office Commercial S-P-2 Generalized Site Plan District S-P-2 Generalized Site Plan District -February 3, 1998 City Council approved ZA Rezoning and Concept Plan for French Square Office Complex. -October 6, 1998 City Council approved ZA98-058, Site Plan for French Square Office Complex. -October 6, 1998 City Council approved ZA98-083, Plat Showing of Lots 12, 13, and 14, O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition. This plat was never filed. -January of 2000 City Council decided not to extend Parkwood Drive from Byron Nelson Parkway to East Southlake Boulevard (FM 1709). -June 5, 2001 City Council approved a 2-lot plat showing of Lot 12, 13, & 14, O.W. Knight No. 899 Addition. The plat was filed on July 18, November 20, 2007 City Council approved ZA07-108, Zoning Change and Concept/Site Plan for Calloway s Nursery which consisted of a retail nursery on Lot 12R and a single-story office building on Lot 13R. A Site Plan for the office building was never submitted. CITIZEN INPUT: A SPIN meeting was held for this project on January 12, A copy of the report is included as. SOUTHLAKE 2030 PLAN: Consolidated Land Use Plan The Southlake 2030 Comprehensive Plan designates the property as Office Commercial. Surrounding properties are Public/Semi-Public (WC Church and the former Senior Center) and Medium Density Residential (Timarron-Northwood Park). Mobility & Master Thoroughfare Plan The Mobility and Master Thoroughfare Plan shows Parkwood Drive as a

5 local street with variable width right of way. A portion of the existing turnaround currently sits within City-owned property. TRANSPORTATION ASSESSMENT: Pathways Master Plan & Sidewalk Plan The Master Pathways Plan shows Parkwood Dr between Byron Nelson Pkwy and FM 1709 as priority corridor #88. As part of this development, the applicant will extend 4 sidewalk from the northern property boundary to the center of the existing cul-de-sac radius. Traffic Impact The development was found not to meet the traffic impact threshold necessary for a Traffic Impact Analysis. F.M. 1709/Southlake Blvd (16) (Between Byron Nelson and White Chapel) 24hr West Bound (24,299) East Bound (25,189) AM Peak AM (1496)11:45AM 12:45PM Peak AM (2824) 7:15-8:15AM PM Peak PM (2454) 4:45 5:45PM Peak PM (1741)12:45 1:45PM * Based on the 2015 City of Southlake Traffic Count Report Use Sq Ft Vtpd* AM- AM- PM- PM- IN OUT IN OUT Day Care Center (565) 13, * Vehicle Trips Per Day * AM-In, AM-Out, PM-In and PM-Out are peak hour generators on a weekday * Based on the ITE: Trip Generation Manual, 7 th Edition WATER & SEWER: Water There is an existing 12 water line on the east side of Parkwood Dr that will serve this property. Sewer There is an existing 8 sanitary sewer line on the west side of Parkwood Dr that will serve this property. DRAINAGE: TREE PRESERVATION: Drainage from this site will flow to the proposed detention area along the east property line and ultimately to the existing storm sewer system in Parkwood Drive. There is approximately 59% existing tree cover on the site, primarily concentrated on the southern half of the property. Tree Preservation Ordinance 585-D requires that 50% of the existing canopy be preserved. The applicant has submitted a Tree Conservation Plan that shows preservation of 76.2% of existing tree cover. STAFF COMMENTS: Attached is Site Plan Review Summary No. 4, dated May 13, N:\Community Development\MEMO\2016 Cases\008 - ZSP - KLA School Child Care\Staff Report

6 Attachment B ZA Page 1

7 Existing S-P-2 Regulations ZA Page 1

8 ZA Page 2

9 ZA Page 3

10 Narrative and Proposed S-P-2 Regulations ZA Page 4

11 ZA Page 5

12 ZA Page 6

13 ZA Page 7

14 ZA Concept/Site Plan Lot 13R Concept Plan ZA Page 8

15 Proposed Site Plan ZA Page 9

16 ZA Page 10

17 Pedestrian Access and Traffic Management Plan ZA Page 11

18 Proposed Landscaping Plan ZA Page 12

19 Tree Conservation Plan ZA Page 13

20 Proposed Building Elevations ZA Page 14

21 SPIN Report SPIN MEETING REPORT SPIN Item Number: Project Name: SPIN KLA School SPIN Neighborhood: SPIN # 9 Meeting Date: January 12, 2016 Meeting Location: 1400 Main Street, Southlake, TX City Council Chambers Total Attendance: Seventeen (17) Host: Craig Rothmeier, Community Engagement Committee Applicant(s) Presenting: Doug Galloway and Gary Wood City Staff Present: Jerod Potts, Planner I Town Hall Forums can be viewed in their entirety by visiting and clicking on Learn More under Video On Demand; forums are listed under SPIN by meeting date. FORUM SUMMARY Property Situation: 300 Parkwood Dr. Development Details: Applicant mentioned that the current proposal is for a single-story, 13,000 square foot daycare facility and this is the property directly behind Calloway s nursery The applicant noted that when Calloway s was originally developed they purchased the land behind and put a proposed site plan through the City for a 12,000 square foot single-story office structure The applicant mentioned that KLA is a Reggio Emilia school; they value very tactile learning - materials, plants, animals. They offer a number of community outreach programs, and also include a Spanish immersion in the afternoons According to the applicant the outline of the school on the site plan almost mirrors exactly the outline that was previously proposed for the single-story office and the site plan parking is what was already put through as that previously proposed single-story structure The applicant noted that KLA wants to embrace the previously established tree preservation area at the back; their goal would be to have their playground right up ZA Page 15

22 against the building and have a walking trail/nature trail that might meander through it The applicant mentioned they are not proposing changes to the cul-de-sac or to the land owned by the City The applicant mentioned they are proposing a full masonry structure meeting all the City requirements According to the applicant the center would be locally owned Exhibits presented at SPIN: ZA Page 16

23 QUESTIONS / CONCERNS: How many children does this facility expect to take care of? How many cars? ZA Page 17

24 o The site plan notes 200 children, and when they open they will have to apply for a license with the state. The facility was basically designed for this size. Traffic is dispersed, rarely do you see cars stacking trying to get out of the parking lot. There is a 30 foot mutual access to the church that was put in under the original site plan. There is no left turn out of Parkwood onto Southlake Blvd. They will turn right once they get to 1709 and exit out that way There are two Parkwood Drives; could we get the name changed? The utility road behind the banks, I understand that was built and maintained by the City it doesn t have a name Given that the Senior Center is empty now, worried that people will park in that lot and walk up. They will probably cut through the church parking lot too. As far as the nature area and the trail, one of the promises made was that would be preserved. This blocks a lot of sound from Southlake Blvd. o Weren t talking about taking out trees. Think it would be to everyone s benefit to take out dead trees to get rid of opossums and raccoons. May put in a decomposed granite trail that is all-weather Would like some feedback on what the City is going to do with the senior center. What is the depth of the wilderness area? At one point there was some suggestion of a 200 buffer o The original buffer was around 200. Don t have an exact dimension. How many parking spots do you have on the site plan? o Do you feel that many parking spots are sufficient for this facility? o Yes Will there be bus pickup from Rockenbaugh? Do you envision some after school programs as well for this facility? o They will have a small afterschool program. Only have one classroom right now that would probably hold children, 40 children. They would probably have a bus or two. Would like to find the intent of the closed senior center and the open property that sits there The current zoning when Calloway s had that application, was it rezoned for the office building? o It is currently zoned S-P-2, O-1 for an office use I m sure you will have to do a zoning change for this daycare center? o The property itself, they were combined for Calloway s to have the ability to front Southlake. They were going to move there corporate office there at the time. So any use besides a single office would require another SP to be established There will be zoning hearings and everything else o Absolutely Is the cul-de-sac that is currently closed at Parkwood going to remain closed? ZA Page 18

25 o Correct When Calloway s got the petition to make the office building, how many employees were you thinking of having? o We were not involved in that submittal, so I do not know what there employee count was Concerned of the noise level of a playground with 200 kids, is very different from a contained office where people are inside o In childcare I see kids out on the playground. They usually go by class, which usually the class ratios are based on the state regulations for teacher to child ratios. You wouldn t see them out early in the morning. They spend the majority of their time indoors. The age of the children is 3 and 4 year olds Does Calloway s own the preservation area? o Calloway s sold this lot to whoever owns it now So the preservation area wasn t City? o It is part of the approved site plan now Were under the impression the preservation area could not be touched. What are you planning to do with the trees? Having the trail takes away privacy o It was established in the zoning that was created. This client is not proposing taking away trees; there are a few dead ones that should be removed for the healthy trees sake. See the area as a great asset. Would be meandering the trail through existing tree cover That preservation area should be no disturbance. By having a trail you are not preserving the area you are disturbing it Have to address the need to have a daycare. Why daycare? o It is a different learning environment. They have the ability to have bilingual learning. They have very strong beliefs in that tactile learning, adapting to specific needs of that child Could I see what the need is to have a daycare? o The owners went after this site, felt this was a good place for it Why don t they go to a place where there are already buildings? This is a neighborhood. o This was previously zoned when Calloway s was established as an office The access is on Parkwood Drive? o Yeah Has it been considered to close off the senior center parking lot access? So there isn t extra traffic? o We were unaware that it was a utility road that was connecting behind the senior center It seems the design is putting playgrounds on the nature buffers, and I agree the nature trail will destroy the buffer effect. Think your ideas of parking are crazy. When you have 200 kids you are going to have 200 or 400 parents wanting to show up at some event. The people will park in the senior center parking lot and will be coming ZA Page 19

26 through our neighborhood to get there. I think a 12,000 square foot office and a 13,000 square foot daycare are night and day different. Worried about the traffic o If they are having programs at Christmas and things of that nature I would guess the entire center isn t having a program all at one time. If parking was a problem there is additional parking adjacent to Calloway s, there is parking where the church is. I would guess there is parking along Parkwood Drive Little Sunshine has been open for a year now and only 40% full. It is a Reggio Emilia school as well. Have 160 students Are you considering any other areas? o Saw a number of different sites in a number of neighboring cities and they felt very strongly that this was one that not only fit a daycare but specifically fit what they wanted What are the City s plans for Parkwood Drive? Did you say the owners are Southlake residents? o Yes So why aren t they here tonight? o They were unable to be here Can you explain the building line and drainage easement? o Part of the plat, the survey. Cannot put any building in that area, between there and the property line Right now there is a brush and grass, we want it left untouched. If you clean out the underbrush and grass that adds to the noise penetration of that lot o We are not proposing any playground equipment You do have a playground and you haven t given us the outline of the playground so we don t know how far that playground goes into that trail area o Playground equipment comes very late in the design phase Can the area for the zoning application be expanded for the entire neighborhood? (Northwood Park) SPIN Meeting Reports are general observations of SPIN Meetings by City staff and SPIN Representatives. The report is neither verbatim nor official meeting minutes; rather it serves to inform elected and appointed officials, City staff, and the public of the issues and questions raised by residents and the general responses made. Responses as summarized in this report should not be taken as guarantees by the applicant. Interested parties are strongly encouraged to follow the case through the Planning and Zoning Commission and final action by City Council. Blackboard Connect Delivery Results for January 12, 2016 SPIN Meeting ZA Page 20

27 ZA Page 21

28 ZA Page 22

29 SITE PLAN REVIEW SUMMARY : ZA Review No.: Four Date of Review: 05/13/16 Project Name: Zoning Change and Site Plan KLA School Child Care APPLICANT: Doug Galloway OWNERS: Mani Jacob Cooper General Contractors Office at the Park, LLC 1225 E Crosby Road, Suite A Webb Chapel Carrollton, Texas Farmers Branch, Texas Phone: Phone: dgalloway@coopergencon.com mani@beamrealestate.com CITY STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT RECEIVED BY THE CITY ON 05/02/16 AND WE OFFER THE FOLLOWING STIPULATIONS. THESE STIPULATIONS ARE HEREBY MADE CONDITIONS OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL UNLESS SPECIFICALLY AMENDED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR NEED FURTHER CLARIFICATION, PLEASE CONTACT THE APPROPRIATE STAFF MEMBER. David Jones, AICP Principal Planner Phone: (817) djones@ci.southlake.tx.us Planning Review 1. Correct O-1 zoning on all sheets to read S-P-2. In places where S-P-2 with O-1 uses appears, amend to S-P-2 with B-1 uses. List requested zoning on Site Data Summary Table. 2. Move play area that is currently shown within the west bufferyard. 3. Reword permitted uses to make clear the only permitted uses shall be stand-alone day nursery or equivalent child care facility and accessory shade structure. Tree Conservation/Landscape Review kmartin@ci.southlake.tx.us Keith Martin Landscape Administrator Phone: (817) TREE CONSERVATION COMMENTS: 1. The amount to be preserved appears to be incorrect. The preservation calculation is based upon the amount of tree cover being saved and not on the percentage of the site with remaining tree cover. Based on the difference between 59% and 45% it appears the percentage being preserved is approximately 76%. Revise the calculation accordingly. * The existing tree cover is stated to be 59%. If the zoning were proposed straight B-1, the minimum percentage of existing tree cover to be preserved would be 50%. The applicant is Attachment E ZA Page 1

30 proposing to preserve 45% of the total existing tree cover. (See comment #1) * For property sought to be zoned for the Downtown zoning district or a planned development zoning district, including an S-P-1 Site Plan, S-P-2 Site Plan, Transition, Rural Conservation, Planned Unit Development, or Employment Center zoning district, the City Council shall consider the application for a Conservation Analysis or Plan in conjunction with the corresponding development application (as established in Table 1.0). The Planning and Zoning Commission shall review the application and make a recommendation to the City Council regarding the application. The City Council shall approve the Plan or Analysis if the Council finds that the Plan or Analysis provides for the: i. placement of building pads, parking areas, driveways, streets, and utility easements so as to maximize the preservation of environmental features of the property including mature tree stands, natural creeks and ponds, and significant grades; ii. iii. iv. maximizes the preservation of tree cover preservation areas indicated on the Environmental Resource Protection Map; maximizes the preservation of existing tree stands with the potential to buffer residential areas from the noise, glare, and visual effects of nonresidential uses; maximizes the preservation of existing trees, if any, adjoining a natural or man-made drainage creek; v. maximizes the preservation of existing protected trees along rural roadways and other streets as identified and prioritized in the Street Typology designation; and vi. mitigation of altered trees through proposed tree replacement procedures pursuant to this Ordinance. * Please be aware that all existing trees shown to be preserved on the City Council approved Tree Conservation Plan must be preserved and protected during all phases and construction of the development. Alteration or removal of any of the existing trees shown to be preserved on the approved Tree Conservation Plan is a violation of the Tree Preservation Ordinance and the zoning as approved by the Southlake City Council. Please ensure that the layout of all structures, easements, utilities, structures grading, and any other structure proposed to be constructed do not conflict with existing trees intended to be preserved. LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: 1. On the Site Plan and Landscape Plan identify and label all bufferyards. 2. The Required Interior Landscape area is incorrect. The building square footage on the Site Plan is 13,400 square feet. Based on 30% of the building square footage the Required interior landscape area is 4,020 square feet. The Required shrubs, ground cover, and seasonal color calculations are also incorrect. 3. A 10 -C bufferyard is required to be provided along the west property line and 5 -A bufferyard is proposed to be provided. The applicant may choose to provide a more intense bufferyard than the required bufferyard, but not provide a less intense bufferyard than required. * Existing tree credits are proposed to be taken for existing trees within the preserve area of the west, east 2, and south bufferyards. Please ensure that all existing trees that are being taken Attachment E ZA Page 2

31 credit for required landscaping are in healthy condition and can be properly protected and preserved during and after the site construction. Existing tree credits shall only be granted if the tree/s are in healthy condition and all requirements of the Tree Preservation Ordinance have been met as determined at the time of inspection for a Permanent Certificate of Occupancy. * Indicates informational comment. # Indicates required items comment. Steven Anderson, P.E. Civil Engineer Phone: (817) sanderson@ci.southlake.tx.us Public Works/Engineering Review GENERAL COMMENTS: 1. This review is preliminary. Additional requirements may be necessary with the review of civil construction plans. 2. NEW REQUIREMENT: Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Retaining Wall Layout sheet. 3. Retaining walls greater than 4-feet including the footing shall require structural plans prepared by a registered engineer in the State of Texas. Retaining walls shall require a permit from the Building Inspections Department prior to construction. 4. Due to public feedback concerning traffic within the City, be prepared to speak to the traffic this site will generate. * Sight distances shall comply with AASHTO guidelines on adjacent collectors and arterials. EASEMENTS: 1. Provide all necessary easements for water, sanitary sewer and drainage. Easements shall be 15 minimum and located on one lot not centered on the property line. A 20 easement is required if both storm sewer and sanitary sewer will be located within the easement. WATER COMMENTS: 2. Minimum size for water lines is Commercial and industrial developments require fire hydrant spacing of 300 maximum for non-sprinkled buildings or 600 for sprinkled buildings. * The size of the water service tap must match the size of the meter. There are no reducers allowed before the meter on the public side. A one inch meter must have a one inch tap, etc. Attachment E ZA Page 3

32 * Water meters and fire hydrants shall be located in an easement or right of way. * Fire lines shall be separate from service lines. SANITARY SEWER COMMENTS: 4. Add a note: Private sanitary sewer services need a plumbing permit and must be inspected by building inspections prior to burial. DRAINAGE COMMENTS: 1. Differences between pre- and post- development runoff shall be captured in detention pond(s). Proposed detention ponds shall control the discharge of the 1, 10 and 100- year storm events. Please calculate control of the 1-yr storm event. 2. Verify size, shape, and/or location of the detention pond (as depicted on the site/concept/development plan). Any changes to size, shape, and/or location of the proposed pond(s) may require a revision to the concept/site/development plan and may need to be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council. 3. Curb inlet capacity calculation for DA-H indicates use 5-ft length curb inlet. Plan call-out is for a 10-ft length curb inlet. Please clarify. * Discharge of post development runoff must have no adverse impact on downstream properties and meet the provisions of Ordinance No INFORMATIONAL COMMENTS: * Submit 22 x34 civil construction plans and a completed Construction Plan Checklist directly to the Public Works Administration Department for review. Please allow 15 business days for review. The plans shall conform to the most recent construction plan checklist, standard details and general notes which are located on the City s website: * Submit with Civil Construction Plans a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan which outlines pre-construction, construction and post-construction erosion control measures. * A geotechnical report will be required for all private and public roadways. The geotechnical report shall include pavement design parameters for subgrade stabilization. * A right of way permit shall be obtained from the Public Works Operations Department (817) to connect to the City s sewer, water or storm sewer system. * A Developer Agreement may be required for this development and may need to be approved by the City Council prior to any construction of public infrastructure. Construction plans for these improvements must be acceptable to Public Works prior to placing the Developer s Agreement on the City Council agenda for consideration. * Any hazardous waste being discharged must be pretreated per Ordinance No *=Denotes informational comment. Attachment E ZA Page 4

33 Kelly Clements Fire Marshal Phone: (817) Fire Department Review GENERAL COMMENTS: Fire apparatus access needs to be an all-weather surface, asphalt or concrete, a minimum of 24 feet wide with 6 inch red striping that contains 4 inch white lettering that states FIRE LANE NO PARKING every 25 feet, and able to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus. (A minimum of 85,000 pounds GVW) The required backflow protection (double check valve) for the sprinkler system can be located on the riser if the riser is within 100 feet of the water main. If the riser is further than 100 feet from the main, the double check valve shall be in a pit. Riser rooms shall be a minimum of 5 X5 if the double check is not located on the riser, or a minimum of 6 X6 if it is on the riser. (Riser is further than 100 feet, linearly along the pipe, from the City Water Main. Double check valve must be installed in a vault.) General Informational Comments: * No review of proposed signs is intended with this site plan. A separate building permit is required prior to construction of any signs. * This development must comply with Residential Adjacency Overlay Regulations, Section * All lighting must comply with the Lighting Ordinance No. 693, as amended. * All development must comply with the Drainage Ordinance No. 605 and the Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance No. 946, as amended. * Stucco shall only be considered a masonry material when applied using a 3-step process over diamond metal lath mesh to a 7/8th inch thickness or by other processes producing comparable cement stucco finish with equal or greater strength and durability specifications. * Denotes Informational Comment Attachment E ZA Page 5

34 Attachment E ZA Page 6

35 Surrounding Property Owners KLA School SPO Owner Zoning Physical Address Acreage Response # 1. ALLEN, ANDREW RPUD 600 NORTHWOOD CT NR 2. ANDERSEN, MICHAEL RPUD 601 NORTHWOOD CT NR 3. BRONSON, THOMAS A RPUD 506 NORTHWOOD TRL NR 4. BURKE, ROGER RPUD 514 NORTHWOOD TRL NR 5. CALLOWAY'S NURSERY INC SP2 291 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD NR 6. CALLOWAY'S NURSERY INC SP2 300 PARKWOOD DR NR 7. CHOI, JOU-YOUNG RPUD 507 NORTHWOOD TRL O 8. CREST SECURITIES LTD SP2 241 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD NR 9. DRILL FILL AND BILL LP SP2 271 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD NR 10. FRITH, JOHN D SP2 261 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD NR 11. GROSSKOPF, SCOTT RPUD 516 NORTHWOOD TRL NR 12. HERRERA, FELIPE RPUD 510 NORTHWOOD TRL NR 13. HP TEXAS I LLC RPUD 501 NORTHWOOD TRL NR 14. HUSAIN, MUSTAFA RPUD 505 NORTHWOOD TRL NR 15. JOHNSTON, DON A SF1-A 817 PEARL DR NR 16. MCKENZIE, GRAEME A RPUD 508 NORTHWOOD TRL NR 17. MICHAEL A ROSS REVOCABLE NR TRUST RPUD 503 NORTHWOOD TRL OBERDICK, JONATHAN RPUD 502 NORTHWOOD TRL NR 19. PASKVAN, THEODORE RPUD 517 NORTHWOOD TRL O Attachment F ZA Page 1

36 20. PHILIP, ISAAC J SF1-A 821 PEARL DR NR 21. PROVIDENCE BANCSHARES CORP SP2 315 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD NR 22. QIAN, YANLIN SF1-A 819 PEARL DR NR 23. SAHBA, SHAHRIAR RPUD 512 NORTHWOOD TRL NR 24. SAKHONKO, EVGENY RPUD 500 NORTHWOOD TRL NR 25. SCHUMM, ZACHARY RPUD 518 NORTHWOOD TRL NR 26. SOUIMANIPHANN, THONGDAM SF1-A 815 PEARL DR NR 27. SOUTHLAKE, CITY OF CS 307 PARKWOOD DR NR 28. STEEP HOT & PRESS LLC SP2 251 E SOUTHLAKE BLVD NR 29. WHITE'S CHAPEL METHODIST CH CS 185 S WHITE CHAPEL BLVD NR 30. SUPERINTENDENT OF CARROLL ISD NR 31. SUPERINTENDENT OF GRAPEVINE NR COLLEYVILLE ISD 32. SUPERINTENDENT OF KELLER ISD NR 33. SUPERINTENDENT OF NORTHWEST NR ISD Responses: F: In Favor O: Opposed To U: Undecided NR: No Response Notices Sent: Thirty-One (31) Responses Received: Two (2) Opposed Attachment F ZA Page 2

37 Surrounding Property Owner Responses Attachment F ZA Page 3

38 Attachment F ZA Page 4