ANALYSIS of OREGON FARM PROPERTY SALES

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "ANALYSIS of OREGON FARM PROPERTY SALES"

Transcription

1 ANALYSIS of OREGON FARM PROPERTY SALES Published Spring 2018 Lead Author: Dr. Megan Horst, Portland State University, Urban Studies & Planning, Planning Oregon With support from PSU graduate students: Chris De Venicia, PhD student Ansel Carr, Master of Urban Studies student Sarah Baca, Master of Urban Studies Student Andrea Villaroel, former PhD student And feedback from: Access to Land Committee of the Oregon Community Food Systems Network And other anonymous reviewers

2 Table of Contents Overview......p. 2 Statewide Look p. 7 County Specific Analysis..... p. 11 Regional Analysis..... p. 15 Central p. 18 Coastal p. 22 Columbia Gorge......p. 26 Northeastern p. 30. Southeastern p. 34 Southern......p. 38 Willamette Valley......p. 42 *Note that all figures and tables are numbered starting with 1 by section. 1

3 Overview INTRODUCTION Who owns farmland matters, for our agricultural economy and workers, rural and peri-urban communities, environment, food system, and our landscape. This report examines recent changes in ownership of privately owned farm property (including ranch properties) in Oregon. We look at both Exclusive Farm Use zoned properties as well as properties that are receiving special farm properties tax assessment. 1 The 2016 report The Future of Oregon s Agricultural Land 2 shared initial findings from an examination of farm properties purchases in four pilot counties. This report expands on that pilot study by sharing a statewide look, a detailed examination by seven regions, and a brief look at 33 out of 36 counties. 3 Specifically, this report presents data on recent farm property transfers in Oregon in (as recorded by county tax assessors), particularly focusing on the number of properties and acres being transferred, sales prices, and the kinds of buyers that are acquiring land. We focused on this time period because we aimed to avoid the impact of the Recession, and to capture the most recent data possible (this effort was initiated in early 2016). This document provides a lot of summary data, figures, tables and maps. RESEARCH MOTIVATIONS One motivation for this report is the prediction of a massive transfer of farm properties ownership in Oregon, due to an aging farmer population as well as broader changes in agriculture including increasing economic consolidation. Nationally it is widely believed that around 70 percent of all U.S. agricultural land will likely change ownership within the next 20 years. The Future of Oregon s Agricultural Land report noted that in this state, over 10 million acres, or about two thirds of Oregon s agricultural land, will pass to new owners in the next 20 years. How that land changes hands, for how much, who acquires it, and what they do with the land will impact Oregon for generations. This report offers insight into the actors currently buying farm properties. A second motivation for this report is interest in the price of farmland. Farmland prices nationally have been rising, with mixed impacts. On the one hand, people selling farm properties benefit from high prices per property and per acre. On the other hand, those looking to buy farm properties- especially beginning and small-scale, direct market farmers- are concerned about affordability as prices rise. There is also concern that the price of farm properties is climbing too high relative to the amount of income that can be generated by farming. The USDA reports that Oregon farm real estate values rose 5% between , and equaled about $2,300 per acre. The USDA uses different methods for identifying farms and assessing land value than we do in this report. 4 We show that buyers in paid higher sales prices per acre than the USDA reports. 1 Explained in more detail in Methods section. 2 Source: Brekken, C. A., Gwin, L., Horst, M., McAdams, N., Martin, S., & Stephenson, G. (2016). The Future of Oregon's Agricultural Land. Accessed at properties_final.pdf 3 Individual county reporting forthcoming in a subsequent online report. Also, this analysis does not include Multnomah, Klamath, or Umatilla counties. Multnomah is not included due to its more urban landscape. Klamath and Umatilla Counties did not respond to our multiple data requests. 4 Source: USDA. (2017). Land Values 2017 Summary Accessed at The USDA s data on farm properties values comes from the National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) s annual survey of 2

4 The third and final motivation for this report is concern about who is buying Oregon farm properties. Since the mid 1800 s, when land was taken from Native Americans and redistributed to homesteaders, Oregon has been home to mainly locally based family farmers. Relative to other parts of the country, farms are modestly-sized. While preparing this report, we heard speculation and concern that actors like development speculators, investors, large-scale agri-business, non-local entities, and amenity owners are buying farm properties in Oregon. In this report, we present as much information as possible on the entities buying farm properties in Oregon HIGHLIGHTS Visit the following sections for detailed highlights, tables and figures by state, region, and county. Overall, some main patterns and trends we observe include: Number of farm properties sales and acres Statewide, 13,109 farm properties and 1.4 million acres of farm properties were sold in Note that the USDA Census of Agriculture counted 35,439 farms and 16.3 million acres of land in farms in Oregon in 2012, to offer some insight into the proportion of overall farmland being transferred, though these numbers are not directly comparable to our data due to differing definitions. The median size of farm property sold was 20 acres. This might include land not used in farming. It might also not indicate the total farm business size if the farm business in question included multiple parcels. The total number of properties (nearly 2,000) sold in in 2015 was higher relative to years prior. For comparison, there were around 1,100 sales in This might indicate an increased pace in farm property sales. Regionally, the Willamette Valley had the most farm property sales (7,682) of the seven regions. Northeastern Oregon had the most acres sold (about 376 thousand acres), followed by Southeast Oregon (about 324 thousand acres) and the Willamette Valley (290 thousand acres). Price of farm properties Statewide, many farm properties sold for low amounts of money, possibly to family members or similar close connections (in real estate transactions, these are often called non-arm s length transactions). There were 3,574 sales for under $1,000, which we removed from the remainder of the price analysis to focus on arm s length sales. Statewide, the median price per acre of farm properties declined in 2011 compared to 2010, but then increased steadily each year from The statewide median price per acre in 2015 ($12,798) for all farm properties was slightly less than 2010 ($13,482), though up from 2011, 2012, 2013 and Statewide, the median price per acre for EFU-zoned land was $9,841, or about half that of non-efu zoned land ($19,357). Statewide, the median price for all the types of farm properties (EFU-zoned and not, improved and unimproved) was less than the average price, indicating that there are some outliers on the high price end bringing up the average. Statewide, the average price per acre varied depending on parcel size. Generally, smaller farm parcels (under 5 acres) sold for a much greater price per acre than larger farm parcels. USDA-identified farms. In comparison, we obtained recent sales prices from county assessors offices. Thus, our analysis is focused more on actual recent sales. 3

5 Statewide, improved properties cost two to four times as much per acre as non-improved properties. In some regions (Coastal, Columbia Gorge, Northeast, and Southeast), the price per acre was higher for EFU-zoned properties than non EFU-zoned properties. In other regions (Central, Southern, and Willamette Valley), the reverse was true: non-efu zoned properties had a higher price per acre than EFU-zoned properties. Regionally, the median price per acre varied both geographically. The Willamette Valley region had the highest median price per acre overall ($18,683). Southeast Oregon had the lowest median price per acre ($1,711). Among EFU-zoned properties, the Columbia Gorge had the highest median price per acre ($21,155), followed by Willamette Valley ($15,696) and the Coastal region ($11,503). Among non-efu-zoned properties, the Willamette Valley ($36,279) and Central region ($33,046) had the highest median prices per acre. Among improved properties (regardless of zoning), the Willamette Valley region ($24,820) had the highest median price per acre. Among counties, Hood River County ($29,300), Washington County ($25,489), and Lane County ($24,267) had the highest median prices per acre for EFU-zoned land. These same three counties also had the highest median price per acre for non-efu land and improved land. Buyers Out of state buyers are active in buying farm properties around the state. Statewide, out-of-state buyers bought at least 10% of properties and 26% of acres. This is likely an under-count (see Methods for more information). These out-of-state buyers came from a variety of states (leading ones including California, Oregon, Idaho, Texas, Arizona, Utah and Nevada) and a small number came from other countries (including Turkey and Japan). Statewide, individuals were the majority of buyers (71%), and trusts (with or without individuals) accounted for about 8% of buyers. Statewide, corporations bought approximately 40 properties of farm properties annually, shifting ownership of about 6,265 acres of farm properties annually from individuals to corporations. Corporations is a big category, including those buyers identified as companies, corporations, LLC s, INC. s or similar in their title. The category includes family and other kinds of corporations. Statewide, corporations accounted for a little more than 1 out of every 6 sales (about 19%) and over 40% of acreage sales. In other words, corporations bought larger properties. Among the 1,853 corporate buyers statewide in the time period, less than half (805) were corporations with clear connections to agriculture. More than half did not have clear connections to agriculture and instead were involved in real estate/land development/property management, investing, or manufacturing, or other (as determined by authors). Some of the top purchasers in the state by acreage or by price are non-agricultural corporations. Statewide, the top ten buyers in terms of acreage bought nearly 174,000 acres combined. The top ten buyers in terms of price spent over $150 million combined on farm properties. These actors ranged by type and included individuals, trusts, agriculture-related corporations, non-agriculture related corporations (including real estate/land development/property management, as determined by authors), and other. Regionally, the Columbia Gorge region had the highest percentage of properties purchased by outof-state buyers (14%) while the Southeast region had the highest percentage of acres purchased by out-of-state buyers (almost 40%). 4

6 Regionally, the percentage of corporate buyers was highest in the Columbia Gorge (25%) and Central Regions (25%). Corporate buyers bought the most land in in the Central region (59%) and in the Southeast region (46%). METHODS This is a brief summary of the steps of our methods and includes comments on the limitations posed by the data. For more detailed questions, contact report author. Note that our approach differs from approaches used by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). In its Census of Agriculture, the USDA counts all farms as those making at least $1,000 in sales and that respond to the Census. The Census of Agriculture counts land in farms, excluding parts of the property not in farm use. In comparison, we used county assessor land use classifications of farm properties. Note that many farms may be made of multiple parcels or properties. Farm properties may include land that is not farmed (e.g. in use by housing, driving/parking or habitat/conservation). As such, our data is not directly comparable to the USDA. We use the phrase farm property or farm parcel in this report to clarify our focus. 1. We contacted all 36 county assessor s offices in the state of Oregon to request the county sales records for all EFU-zoned farm properties and non-efu zoned farm properties that received farm properties tax assessments, for the time period of We obtained data for 33 out of the 36 state counties (with the exceptions of Multnomah, Klamath, and Umatilla). We paid a fee for most of the counties data. 2. Our records requests included a unique property ID number, maptaxlot information, situs address, property class (which we used to identify improved and unimproved as well as zoning category), sale date, sale type, sale price, acreage, land real market value, improvement real market value, total real market value, grantor (seller), grantee (buyer), and grantee s mailing address. 3. In an attempt to remove non-arms-length transactions, we removed all sales under $1,000 from most of the analysis (though we do report how many sales under $1,000 happened). We selected this cut-off point based on conversations with several agricultural land realtors, and because it appeared to be a logical cut-off point. 4. We meticulously combed the data to delete obvious double entries of the same transaction. However, the distinction was harder to ascertain when parcels were bought and sold more than once during the reference period of We adjusted all sales prices to be in 2015 dollars. 6. We manually categorized sellers and buyers by different types such as Individuals, Trust/LP/Estate, All Corporation Types (this included businesses identified as corporations, companies, LLC s and Inc. s), Fannie Mae or Bank Alone, and Unknown/Other. For All Corporation Types, further refinement was done to distinguish business categories such as Agriculture, Banking/Finance/Mortgage Brokers, Investment Company, Real Estate/Land Development & Property Management, Wholesale/Retail, and Other. When a grantor/grantee was identified as some kind of corporation type, we then conducted a search in the State of Oregon Secretary of State Business Database to assess the appropriate self-reported business category. Additional searches in other databases were employed when corporations where not listed with the Oregon Secretary of State s Business Database. We assigned the buyer to the category we deemed most relevant based on the name and any other information we could find. 7. We also manually categorized buyers as In State, Out of State, and Unknown, based on the mailing address listed for the grantee. We believe this overestimates the number of In State buyers, as many grantees simply use the purchased farm properties as their mailing address. Most counties did 5

7 not record the last legal mailing address for grantees before the finalization of sales. In some cases, mailing addresses were not provided at all. 8. We then analyzed the records by zoning class, property class (comparing improved, which is a land use classification likely meaning the property has a house or other significant infrastructure onsite, to unimproved) and acreage/size. 9. We present descriptive and summary findings statewide and also by regions closely following the seven agricultural regions of Oregon used by the Oregon Department of Agriculture (though with a few differences, because we started with county property tax records). We also share some limited county-specific data. One of the main limitations was our limited ability to analyze owners, including their actual previous residence and more about who they are/the specific kind of organization and business type. Ownership data does not include any information on gender, age, race/ethnicity, income, or other, so we are unable to analyze along those lines. A second limitation is that there is no obvious way to remove nonarm s length transactions, so our analysis likely includes those transactions not typical of the arm s length reality. A third limitation is that we were not able to account for other considerations of farm properties price, like water rights, specific location, soil type, etc. A fourth limitation is the constrained time period, A lot of activity has happened since then, and we are unable to report on that. Finally, the quality and completeness of the data varied by county, and in some counties, did not include complete addresses, creating a barrier for more spatially fine analysis. The data and findings were double-checked by the author and supporting students, but errors may be possible. Future iterations of this research would benefit greatly from a standardized and uniform recordkeeping process implemented across Oregon s 36 counties. This would also enable more ongoing reporting. Next steps could include analyzing by location at a finer scale than by county (e.g. by zipcode) and incorporating additional information about housing, soil class, water rights, etc. However, this would require complete data sets from the counties. Another next step would be to do a follow-up study in future years to track changes. Finally, it would be useful to look into specific buyer types and their impacts. CONCLUSIONS This report provides insight into the transfer of ownership of Oregon farm properties. We hope stakeholders of Oregon s food and agricultural system find it useful. Statewide, we see a brisk pace of farm property sales in the time period. The median price per acre increased from , after an initial decline in (which we suspect was part of a delayed recession impact on farm properties). The 2015 median price per acre was similar to the 2010 price. Average prices per acre across the board were higher than medians, suggesting that individual properties are driving the averages up. We found higher median prices per acre than reported by USDA, suggesting that our methods of tracking actual sales transactions may more accurately reflect the price arms-length buyers experience. The median price per acre was particularly higher in some counties and regions, as mentioned in the summary, compared to others. The median price per acre was higher for smaller properties and improved properties compared to larger unimproved properties. The rising prices might be a barrier for 6

8 beginning farmers, small-scale farmers, and farmers with less resources and looking to live on their farm property. It may also be problematic overall for farmers if farm net incomes continue to be compressed. A lot of actors, including out-of-state actors and corporations, are involved in farm properties sales. There appears to be a shift underway to greater corporate ownership (this may include family corporations). Corporations unrelated to agriculture are also involved in purchasing farm properties, raising questions about the future of the land in farm use. Individuals and trusts (with and without individuals) continue to be the main buyers. Some specific buyers acquired significant amounts of farm properties property and will likely have an influence on the agricultural landscape. Additionally, some buyers spent a lot of money on farm properties purchases and may be influencing the prices in Oregon up. This report hopefully provides information to stakeholders of Oregon s agricultural economy and workers, rural and peri-urban communities, environment, food system, and our landscape, and informs future action on these issues. 7

9 Statewide Look Highlights: Sales and Prices Over 13,000 farm properties and nearly 1.4 million acres of farm properties changed ownership from (Table 1) Over 2,500 farm properties sales were of properties greater than 80 acres, while there were nearly 1,500 sales each from the size categories of 5-10 acres, and acres. (Figure 1) The median acreage was about 20 acres. (Table 1) The total number of farm properties sales increased each year in the period. (Figure 2) More than 1 out of every 4 sales during the reference time period sold for less than $1,000 and were removed from the subsequent state-wide analysis. (Table 1) There were 1,560 annual qualified sales accounting for about 187 thousand acres of land transferred annually. (Table 1) The median price per acre for qualified sales was nearly $11,000, while the average price per acre was over $34,000. (Table 1). The median was the highest in 2010, while the average was the highest in 2014 of the 6 study years (Figure 3). The median ($19,357) and average ($46,249) price for non-efu properties was higher per acre than the median ($9.841) and average ($32,572) for EFU-zoned properties. (Table 1) The average price per acre was higher for smaller properties than larger properties. (Figure 4) Highlights: Buyers Known out of state buyers accounted for about 10% of properties and 26% of acres purchased. (Figure 5) Out of state buyers paid higher average purchase prices than in-state buyers (not pictured). These out-of-state buyers came from a variety of states (leading ones including California, Oregon, Idaho, Texas, Arizona, Utah and Nevada) and a small number came from other countries (including Turkey and Japan). Individuals and trusts/estates/lps together accounted for 79% of farm properties purchased and 54% of acres purchased. Corporations accounted for a little more than 1 out of every 5 sales and over 40% of acres purchased. In other words, corporations are buying larger properties than other buyer types. (Figures 6 & 7) Agriculture-related corporations accounted for 8% of all sales and 24% of acres purchased. Real estate, land development and property management-related corporations accounted for 7% of all sales and 14% of acres purchased. (Figures 6 & 7) Corporations bought approximately 40 properties of farm properties annually, shifting ownership of about 6,265 acres of farm properties annually from individuals to corporations. (Table 1) Agriculture-related corporations accounted for 5 of the top 10 buyers by price and 3 of the top 10 buyers by acreage. (Tables 2 & 3) Table 1. Oregon Region Farm Property Sales ( ) All Farm Property Sales ,109 All Farm Property Acres Transferred ,392,155 Qualified Farm Property Sales (Sales under $1,000 removed from remainder of analysis) 9,365 (3,744) Average Annual Sales 1,560 Total Qualified Acres Sold 1,119,180 Average Annual Acres Transferred 186,530 Median Acreage (Average Acreage) Per Transfer 20 (119) Median (Average) Price Per Acre $10,903 ($34,184) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, Improved $9,841 ($34,249) Median (Average) Per Acre, Unimproved $19,452($32,572) Median (Average) Per Acre, EFU $9,841($31,056) Median (Average) Per Acre, non-efu $19,357($46,249) Average Net Annual Properties Purchased By Corporations from Individuals & Trusts 40 Average Net Annual Acres Purchased by Corporations from Individuals & Trusts 6,265 8

10 Figure 1: Number of Sales by Size Categories Figure 2: Number of Sales Per Year, EFU and non-efu zoned properties 2,000 1,500 1, EFU-zoned properties Non EFU-zoned properties Figure 3: Median and Average Sales price per Acre in 2015 dollars Overall, Per Year $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $ Average Median Figure 4: Average Sales Price Per Acre by lot size, EFU and non-efu zoned proeprties 350, $317, , Average price per acre in 2015 dollars 250, , , , , $192,719 $108,405 $134,696 $112,860 $91,519 $89,297 $67,414 $61,742 $74,612 $49,076 $35,028 $22,228 $23,425 $15,411 $6,845 $4,437 $11,552 $8,252 $6,056 $3,376 $2,829-0 to 1 acre 1 to 2 acres 2 to 3 acres 3 to 4 acres 4 to 5 acres 5 to 10 acres 10 to 20 acres 20 to 40 acres 40 to 60 acres 60 to 80 acres over 80 acres Lot size average price per acre in 2015 dollars EFU average price per acre in 2015 dollars non-efu 9

11 Figure 5: Percentage of Farm Properties and Acres Purchased, by Known Location of Buyer Properties Acres 10% 8% 18% In State 26% 56% Out of State Unknown 82% Figure 6. Percentage and Number of Farm Properties Purchased by Buyer Types 807, 8% 99, 1% 109, 1% Individual Trust/LP/Estate 805, 8% Fannie Mae or Bank Alone Other/Unknown Agriculture 1,853, 19% 113, 1% 87, 1% 20, 0% Banking/Finance/Mortgage Brokers Investment Company 7,041, 71% Manufacturing 692, 7% Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management Wholesale and Retail Other 1, 0% 135, 2% Figure 7: Percentage and Number of Acres Purchased By Buyer Types 9,544, 1% 34,098, 3% 126,378, 11% Individual Trust/LP/Estate Fannie Mae or Bank Alone 280,584, 24% Other/Unknown Agriculture Banking/Finance/Mortgage Brokers 501,601, 43% 497,932, 42% 12,137, 1% 13,381, 1% 2,695, 0% 160,704, 14% Investment Company Manufacturing Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management Wholesale and Retail Other 101, 0% 28,329, 2% 10

12 Table 2. Oregon Top 10 Purchasers by Price ( ) Price Per Acre Columbia Gorge 1 $65,000,000 Greg Te Velde Individual $8,918 2 $13,855,000 Oregon Trail Highway LLC Columbia Gorge Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management $7,300 3 $11,766,936 RBH OREGON LLC Central Other $ 73,470 4 $11,000,000 BLATCHFORD & SON, LLC Northeast Agriculture $2,200,000 5 $ 10,445,105 STAFFORD RANCHES LLC Central Agriculture $33,046 6 $9,900,000 Pueblo Mountain Land Company LLC Southeast Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management 7 $9,500,000 ACMPC OREGON 1 LLC Willamette Valley Agriculture $3,936 8 $ 9,000,000 NOFZIGER TYLER C & JESSICA K Southeast Individual $112,500 9 $ 8,400,000 PROBERT FAMILY RANCHES, LLC Northeast Agriculture $ $8,354,500 BTAZ Nevada LLC Southeast Agriculture $224 $576 Table 3. Oregon Top 10 Purchasers by Acreage ( ) Price Per Acre 1 63,222 acres BTAZ NEVADA LLC Southeast Agriculture $ ,196 acres Pueblo Mountain Land Company LLC 3 14,148 acres Western River Conservancy Southeast Columbia Gorge Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management $576 Other - Conservancy $ ,039 acres Daniel P Wegner Trust, et al. Southeast Trust/LP/Estate $ ,328 acres KREBS WIND LLC Northeast Agriculture $ ,273 acres Neal J Dow Family Limited Partners LP Columbia Gorge Trust/LP/Estate $ ,874 acres PROBERT FAMILY RANCHES, LLC Northeast Agriculture $ ,003 acres HAMILTON RANCH LLC Central Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management 9 8,071 acres BROOKS, KENNETH R & CECILIA B Northeast Individual $ ,820 acres WIKSTROM, CHARLES & CHARLENE $534 Northeast Individual $151 11

13 County Specific Analysis Highlights: Among counties, Hood River County ($29,300), Washington County ($25,489), and Lane County ($24,267) had the highest prices per acre for EFU-zoned properties. These same three counties also had the highest price per acre for non-efu and improved properties. (See all following tables and figures in this section for different versions of this information) Figure 1: Map of Median Price Per Acre of EFU-Zoned Properties, by County Legend Oregon counties Median Price Per Acre $0.00 $ $1, $1, $5, $5, $10, $10, $15, $15, $20, $20, $25, $25, $30, Clatsop Columbia Tillamook Washington Yamhill Clackamas Hood River Wasco Sherman Gilliam Morrow Union Wallowa Polk Marion Lincoln Benton Linn Jefferson Wheeler Grant Baker Crook Lane Deschutes Coos Douglas Harney Malheur Lake Curry Josephine Jackson 12

14 Figure 2: Map of Median Price Per Acre of Non EFU-Zoned Properties, by County Legend Oregon counties MPPA_NonEFU $0.00 $ $1, $1, $5, $5, $10, $10, $20, $20, $40, $40, $60, $60, $100, Clatsop Columbia Tillamook Washington Yamhill Clackamas Hood River Wasco Sherman Gilliam Morrow Union Wallowa Polk Marion Lincoln Benton Linn Jefferson Wheeler Grant Baker Crook Lane Deschutes Coos Douglas Harney Malheur Lake Curry Josephine Jackson 13

15 Table 1: Median Price Per Acre by Region, County, and Property Type Region/ Part of State County Overall EFU Non-EFU Improved Non-Improved Coastal Clatsop $5,957 $4,914 $6,642 $6,642 $2,974 Coos $16,764 $0 $16,764 $16,764 $0 Columbia Gorge Central Northeast Curry $11,205 $11,205 $11,205 $11,205 $11,205 Lincoln $21,717 $23,585 $17,112 $23,794 $4,638 Tillamook $11,601 $9,804 $48,000 $11,601 $13,178 Gillam $447 $439 $539 $784 $285 Hood River $35,137 $29,300 $91,822 $42,477 $21,778 Morrow $2,043 $0 $0 $0 $0 Sherman $1,132 $1,132 $0 $940 $1,264 Wasco $148 $128 $0 $148 $0 Crook $4,095 $4,118 $4,037 $6,200 $1,547 Deschutes $24,310 $18,816 $41,000 $28,709 $10,096 Jefferson $4,371 $4,245 $26,499 $5,247 $2,242 Baker $3,386 $3,030 $12,581 $5,117 $1,791 Grant $1,129 $2,721 $893 $1,629 $798 Union $1,981 $1,896 $4,092 $2,405 $1,594 Wallowa $2,163 $2,285 $1,404 $3,986 $1,004 Wheeler $2,158 $2,302 $2,302 $4,601 $1,516 Southeast Lake $1,523 $1,844 $1,523 $2,500 $1,148 Harney $999 $967 $8,390 $1,666 $556 Malheur $3,517 $3,874 $220 $3,950 $1,955 Southern Douglas $2,815 $0 $2,815 $3,182 $1,909 Willamette Valley Jackson $10,940 $10,125 $18,040 $18,381 $6,625 Josephine $16,980 $13,711 $18,573 $17,000 $12,185 Benton $14,911 $11,871 $37,207 $33,727 $5,990 Clackamas $28,361 $22,724 $55,967 $35,088 $13,404 Columbia $14,948 $15,011 $12,966 $11,296 $30,030 Lane $36,400 $24,267 $57,586 $39,589 $31,579 Linn $8,000 $7,681 $11,034 $12,395 $4,395 Marion $16,669 $17,334 $13,348 $19,795 $5,692 Polk $4,861 $4,899 $4,425 $4,861 $4,641 Washington $37,204 $25,489 $67,497 $42,841 $18,539 Yamhill $20,972 $18,132 $18,132 $26,498 $11,042 14

16 Figure 4: Price Per Acre by Region, County, and Property Type $100,000 $90,000 $80,000 $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 Clatsop Coos Curry Lincoln Tillamook Gillam Hood River Morrow Sherman Wasco Crook Deschutes Jefferson Baker Grant Union Wallowa Wheeler Lake Harney Malheur Douglas Jackson Josephine Benton Clackamas Columbia Lane Linn Marion Polk Washington Yamhill Coastal Columbia Gorge Central Northeast Southeast Southern Willamette Valley Overall EFU Non-EFU Improved Non-Improved 15

17 Regional Analysis Highlights The below findings are about the regions depicted in Figure 1, which loosely follow the 7 agricultural regions of Oregon used by the Oregon Department of Agriculture. In some regions (Coastal, Columbia Gorge, Northeast, and Southeast), the price per acre was higher for EFU-zoned properties than non EFU-zoned properties. In other regions (Central, Southern, and Willamette Valley), the reverse was true: non-efu zoned properties had a higher price per acre than EFU-zoned properties. (Table 1 and Figure 2) Regionally, the median price per acre varied both geographically. The Willamette Valley region had the highest median price per acre overall ($18,683). Southeast Oregon had the lowest median price per acre ($1,711). (Table 1 and Figure 2) Among EFU-zoned properties, the Columbia Gorge had the highest median price per acre ($21,155), followed by Willamette Valley ($15,696) and the Coastal region ($11,503). (Table 1 and Figure 2) Among non-efu-zoned properties, the Willamette Valley ($36,279) and Central region ($33,046)) had the highest median prices per acre. (Table 1 and Figure 2) Among improved properties (regardless of zoning), the Willamette Valley region ($24,820) had the highest median price per acre. (Table 1 and Figure 2) Figure 1: Agricultural Regions of Oregon Used in this Analysis Legend Oregon counties Regions Not included in report Central Coast Columbia Gorge Northeast Southeast Southern Willamette Valley 16

18 Table 1: Median Sales Price Per Acre by Region Overall EFU Non-EFU Improved Non-Improved Central $7,472 $6,506 $33,046 $12,128 $3,185 Coastal $11,355 $11,503 $11,205 $12,352 $5,503 Columbia Gorge $14,297 $21,155 $4,421 $17,292 $9,903 Northeast $2,302 $2,500 $1,528 $3,292 $1,141 Southeast $1,711 $1,833 $757 $2,617 $1,085 Southern $9,065 $5,482 $11,195 $12,310 $5,282 Willamette Valley $18,683 $15,696 $36,279 $24,820 $8,298 Figure 2: Median Sales Price Per Acre by Region $40,000 $35,000 $30,000 $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $0 Central Coastal Columbia Gorge Northeast Southeast Southern Willamette Valley Overall EFU Non-EFU Improved Non-Improved 17

19 Regional Analysis: Central Oregon Highlights: Sales and Prices Over 1,600 properties and over 180 thousand acres of farm properties were transferred in the time period. About a third of all sales during the reference time period were for less than $1,000. (Table 1) The median price per acre for improved farm properties ($12,128) was roughly 3.5 times higher than unimproved farm properties ($3,185). (Table 1) The median price per acre for non-efu farm properties ($33,046) was over 5 times as much as EFU farm properties ($6,506). (Table 1 & Figure 3) The median acreage sold in the region was about 36 acres, while the average was 130 acres. (Table 1) Smaller farm properties have higher median prices per acre than larger properties, with the smallest properties having the highest prices. (Figure 4) The number of farm properties transferred increased each year in the time period. (Figure 2) The median price per acre was highest in 2010 in the time period. (Figure 3) Deschutes County had by far the highest median price per acre for all property types, including EFU ($18,816), non-efu ($41,000), and improved ($28,709). (Figure 8) Highlights: Buyers Most of the buyers had in-state addresses. (Figure 5) Out of state buyers paid higher median purchase prices than in state buyers. (not pictured) Corporations bought approximately 1 property of farm properties annually, shifting ownership of about 1,206 acres of farm properties from individuals to corporations. (Table 1) Corporations accounted for about 1 out of every 4 sales and 3 out of 5 of acres purchases. In other words, corporations bought larger properties than other buyer types. (Figures 6 & 7) Agriculture-related corporations accounted for 3 of the top 10 buyers by price and 5 of the top 10 buyers by acreage. (Tables 2 & 3) Agriculture-related corporations accounted for about 13% of all sales, and 24% of all purchases by acreage. (Figures 6 & 7) Real Estate, etc.-related corporations accounted for about 8% of all sales, and 27% of all sales by acreage. One of the largest buyers by price or acreages were real-estate, etc.-related corporations. (Figures 6 & 7, Tables 2 & 3) Table 1. Central Oregon Farm Property Sales ( ) All Farm Property Sales 1,602 All Farm Property Acres Transferred 182,931 Qualified Farm Property Sales (Sales Under $1,000) 1,117 (485) Average Annual Sales 186 Total Qualified Acres Transferred 145,355 Average Annual Acres Transferred 24,225 Median Acreage (Average Acreage) 36 (130) Median (Average) Price Per Acre $7,472 ($22,052) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, Improved $12,128 ($22,368) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, Unimproved $3,185 ($12,725) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, EFU $6,506 ($45,840) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, non-efu $33,046 ($22,052) Average Net Annual Properties Purchased By Corporations from Individuals & Trusts 1 Average Net Annual Acres Purchased by Corporations from Individuals & Trusts 1,206 18

20 Figure 1: Number of Farm Property Sales by Size Categories, over 160 acres over 80 acres 0ver 40 acres over 20 acres 10 to 20 acres 5 to 10 acres 4 to 5 acres 3 to 4 acres 2 to 3 acres 1 to 2 acres 0 to 1 acres Figure 2: Number of Sales per Year, EFU And Non-EFU EFU Non-EFU Figure 3: Average and Median Sales Price Per Acre Per Year $35,000 $30,000 $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $ Average Median Figure 4: Average Price Per Acre by Size Category, EFU and Non-EFU $90,000 $80,000 $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 0-5 acres 5-10 acres acres acres acres acres 160+ acres EFU Non-EFU 19

21 Figure 5: Percentage of Farm Properties and Acres Purchased, by Known Location of Buyer Properties Acres 15% 14% 10% In State Out of State 9% In State Out of State 75% Unknown 77% Unknown Figure 6: Percentage and Number of Farm Properties Purchased by Buyer Types 88, 8% 7, 1% 8, 1% 11, 1% 13, 1% 2, 0% Individual Trust/LP/Estate Fannie Mae or Bank Alone 88, 8% Other/Unknown Agriculture 285, 25% Banking/Finance/Mortgage Brokers 734, 65% 145, 13% 26, 2% -, 0% Investment Company Manufacturing Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management Wholesale and Retail Other Figure 7: Percentage and Number of Acres Purchased by Buyer Types 641, 0% 11,902, 8% 763, 1% 992, 1% 318, 0% Individual Trust/LP/Estate 7,62 8, 5% Fannie Mae or Bank Alone Other/Unknown 46,425, 32% 85,777, 59% 34,993, 24% 38,687, 27% Agriculture Banking/Finance/Mortgage Brokers Investment Company Manufacturing 3,159, 2% -, 0% Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management Wholesale and Retail Other 20

22 Table 2. Central Oregon Top 10 Purchasers by Price ( ) Price Per Acre 1 $11,766,936 RBH OREGON LLC Other $73,740 2 $10,445,105 STAFFORD RANCHES LLC Agriculture $33,046 3 $7,577,319 HAMILTON RANCH LLC Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management $534 4 $7,111,610 LOYAL LAND LLC Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management $4,487 5 $6,307,401 PLUNKETT, MIKE & EILEEN Individual $78,843 6 $4,792,587 AJ DAIRY LLC Agriculture $8,201 7 $2,600,000 ROSS, ROBERT G JR & NANETTE T Individual $6,295 8 $2,541,291 DESCHUTES LAND TRUST Other - Land Trust $158,831 9 $2,250,000 KNIGHT, PHILIP & PENELOPE Individual $4, $2,175,471 MALOTT MARK & ANN LLC Agriculture $6,818 Table 3. Central Oregon Top 10 Purchasers by Acreage ( ) Price Per Acre 1 17,078 HAMILTON RANCH LLC Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management $ , LLC Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management $ ,574 STAFFORD RANCHES, LLC ET AL Agriculture no sale price 4 6,167 JRS PROPERTIES III LP Investment Company no sale price 5 4,753 KINVILLE, LINDA Individual $13 6 3, RANCH LLC Agriculture $ ,233 KENNEDY MARTIN ANDREW TRUST Trust/LP/Estate $ ,856 FRYER CREEK RANCH LLC Agriculture $408 MILGARD JAMES DBA DESERT CREEK 9 2,760 Agriculture RANCH $ ,418 CIRCLE F RANCHES INC Agriculture $835 $45,000 $40,000 Figure 8: Median Price Per Acre by County and Property Type $35,000 $30,000 $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $0 Crook Deschutes Jefferson Overall EFU Non-EFU Improved Non-Improved 21

23 Regional Analysis: Coastal Region Highlight: Sales and Prices There were 369 farm sales in the time period. (Table 1) About 16%, or roughly 1 out of every 6 sales during the reference time period were for less than $100. (Table 1) The median price per acre for improved farm properties ($12,352) was roughly 2.2 times higher than unimproved farm properties ($ 5,503). (Table 1) The median and average price per acre for EFU farm properties is comparable to that of non-efu farm properties ($9,884). (Table 1) Median acreage in the region was 19 acres compared to 42 for average acreage. (Table 1) The average and median price per acre increased in 2014 and 2015 relative to the previous years. (Figure 3) Smaller farm properties had a higher average price per acre than larger properties. (Figure 4) Lincoln County had the highest median price per acre for both EFU-zoned and improved properties, at over $23,000 per acre. (Figure 8) Highlight: Buyers Individual and trusts accounted for over 90% of farm purchases in (Figures 6 & 7) Corporations bought approximately 1 property of farm properties annually, shifting ownership of about 122 acres of farm properties from individuals to corporations. (Table 1) All Corporation Types purchased farm properties at the highest median purchase price than other buyer types (not pictured). 85% of buyers had in-state addresses (Figure 5) Out of state buyers paid higher median purchase prices per property and acre than in-state buyers (not pictured). Corporations accounted for 7.7% of all sales and 16.6% of acreage sales. In other words, corporations are buying larger properties than other buyer types. (Figures 6 & 7) Real Estate, etc.-related corporations accounted for 2.6% of all sales, and 1.7% of all sales by acreage. (Figures 6 & 7) Corporations not obviously related to agriculture accounted for 6.1% of all sales, and 12.9% of all sales by acreage. (Figures 6 & 7) Table 1: Coastal Region Farm Property Sales ( ) All Farm Property Sales All Acres Transferred ,695 Qualified Farm Property Sales (Sales Under $100) 311 (58) Average Annual Sales 52 Total Qualified Acres Sold 13,068 Average Annual Acres Transferred 2,178 Median Acreage (Average Acreage) per Transfer 18.6 (42) Median (Average) Price Per Acre $11,355 ($32,171) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, Improved $12,352 ($34,446) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, Unimproved $5,503 ($26,862) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, EFU $11,503 ($31,986) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, non-efu $11,205 ($32,291) Average Net Annual Properties Purchased By Corporations from Individuals & Trusts 1 Average Net Annual Acres Purchased by Corporations from Individuals & Trusts

24 Figure 1: Number of Sales by Size Categories, acres 5-10 acres acres acres acres acres 160+ acres Figure 2: Number of Sales Per Year, EFU and non-efu zoned properties EFU zoned properties Non-EFU zoned properties Figure 3: Median and Average Sales price per Acre in 2015 dollars Overall, Per Year $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $ Average Price Per Acre Median Price Per Acre Figure 4: Average Sales Price Per Acre by lot size, EFU and non-efu zoned properties $90,000 $80,000 $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 0-5 acres 5-10 acres acres acres acres acres 160+ acres EFU Non-EFU 23

25 Figure 5: Percentage of Farm Properties and Acres Purchased, by Known Location of Buyer 3% Properties 2% Acres 12% 10% In State Out of State Unknown In State Out of State Unknown 85% 88% Figure 6: Percentage and Number of Farm Properties Purchased by Buyer Types Individual -, 0% Trust/LP/Estate Fannie Mae or Bank Alone 245, 79% 36, 12% 1, 0% 24, 7% 5, 2% 8, 2% 4, 1% 1, 0% 1, 0% 5, 2% 5, 2% Other/Unknown Agriculture Banking/Finance/Mortgage Brokers Investment Company Manufacturing Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management Wholesale and Retail Figure 7: Percentage and Number of Acres Purchased by Buyer Types Individual 2,316, 18% 22, 0% 259, 2% 221, 2% -, 0% Trust/LP/Estate Fannie Mae or Bank Alone Other/Unknown 1,096, 8% Agriculture 2,164, 17% 345, 3% Banking/Finance/Mortgage Brokers 8,307, 63% Investment Company 7, 0% 473, 4% Manufacturing Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management Wholesale and Retail 22, 0% Other 24

26 Table 4. Coastal Region Top 10 Purchasers by Price ( ) Price Per Acre 1 $4,700,000 ANKER, CORNELIUS Individual $10,437 2 $3,850,000 HOGAN, DAVID L & RITA F (C) Trust/LP/Estate $9,842 3 $2,845,000 LAFRANCHI, RON Individual $20,343 4 $2,150,000 COWAN, NEAL BRADLEY & MELODY Individual $8,259 5 $2,000,000 STIMSON LUMBER COMPANY Manufacturing $9,709 6 $1,900,000 DILA DAIRY, INC. Agriculture $5,903 MARIA CONCEPCION FRIAS REVOCABLE 7 $1,900,000 Trust/LP/Estate TRUST $34,907 8 $1,650,000 HINDMAN, SHIRLEY A Individual $22,856 9 $1,612,500 Astoria Wetlands LLC Other $6, $ 1,525,000 NEGLEY, LESLIE NELSON TRSTEE Trust/LP/Estate $18,776 Table 5. Coastal Region Top 10 Purchasers by Acreage ( ) Price Per Acre JACKSON, MADELYN ETAL Individual $1, Warrenton Fiber Company Manufacturing $1, MARSH, JOSEPH B & JEANMARIE Individual $1, HOGAN, DAVID L & RITA F (C) Trust/LP/Estate $10, APCO CURRY PROPERTIES LLC Manufacturing $1, DILA DAIRY, INC. Agriculture $5, COWAN, NEAL BRADLEY & MELODY Individual $8, ANDERSON, WILLIAM R & ROBYN L TRSTEES Trust/LP/Estate $3, Astoria Wetlands LLC Other $6, ANKER, CORNELIUS Individual $15,310 Figure 8: Median Price Per Acre by County $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 Overall EFU Non-EFU Improved Non-Improved $0 Clatsop Coos Curry Lincoln Tillamook 25

27 Regional Analysis: Columbia Gorge Highlights: Sales and Prices There were 474 sales during the time period. (Table 1) 35.6% of all sales during the reference time period were for less than $100. (Table 1) Median prices per acre for improved farm properties ($ 17,292) was roughly 1.7 times higher than unimproved farm properties ($ 9,903). (Table 1) The median price per acre for non-efu farm properties ($69,721) was 3.3 times as much as EFU farm properties ($ 21,155). (Table 1) The median acreage in the region was 19 acres, compared to 372 average acres. (Table 1) Many of the farm properties sold were 10 acres or smaller. (Figure 1) Smaller farm properties had a higher median price per acre than larger properties. (Figure 4) Hood River County had by far the highest median price per acre in all categories, including EFU-zoned ($29,300), non-efu ($91,822) and improved ($42,477). (Figure 8) Highlights: Buyers Corporations bought approximately 3 properties of farm properties annually, shifting ownership of about 100 acres of farm properties from individuals to corporations. (Table 1) Corporations accounted for 1 out of every 4 sales (about 25%), and 37% of acreage sales. In other words, corporations are buying larger properties than other buyer types. (Figures 6 & 7) Agriculture-related corporations accounted for 13.4% of all sales, and 21.2% of all sales by acreage. (Figures 6 & 7) Real Estate, etc.-related corporations accounted for 8.5% of all sales, and 10.7% of all sales by acreage. (Figures 6 & 7) Corporations unrelated to agriculture accounted for 11.5% of all sales, and 15.9% of all sales by acreage. (Figures 6 & 7) Agriculture-related corporations accounted for 2 of the top 10 buyers by price and 3 of the top 10 buyers by acreage. (Tables 2 & 3) Table 1. Columbia Gorge Region Farm Property Sales ( ) All Farm Property Sales Total Farm Property Acres Transferred 125,700 Qualified Farm Property Sales (Sales Under $1,000 removed from remainder of analysis) 305 (169) Average Annual Sales 51 Total Qualified Acres Sold 113,581 Average Annual Acres Transferred 18,930 Median Acreage (Average Acreage) (372) Median (Average) Price Per Acre $14,297 ($46,046) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, Improved $17,292 (71,336) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, Unimproved $ 9,903 (31,132) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, EFU $21,155 ($50,952) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, non-efu $4,421 (35,198) Average Net Annual Properties Purchased By Corporations from Individuals & Trusts 3 Average Net Annual Acres Purchased by Corporations from Individuals & Trusts 99 26

28 Figure 1: Number of Sales by Size Categories acres 5-10 acres acres acres acres acres 160 acres+ Figure 2: Number of Sales Per Year, EFU and non-efu zoned properties EFU-zoned properties Non EFU-zoned properties Figure 3: Median and Average Sales price per Acre in 2015 dollars Overall, Per Year $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $ Average Price Per Acre Median Price Per Acre Figure 4: Average Sales Price Per Acre by lot size, EFU and non-efu zoned properties $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $0 0-5 acres 5-10 acres acres20-40 acres40-80 acres acres 160 acres+ Non-EFU EFU 27

29 Figure 5: Percentage of Farm Properties and Acres Purchased, by Known Location of Buyer Properties Acres 15% 14% 71% 29% In State Out of State Unknown 57% 14% In State Out of State Unknown Figure 6. Percentage and Number of Farm Properties Purchased by Buyer Types 39, 13% 1, 0% 7, 2% 1 -, 0%, 0% 1, 0% Individual Trust/LP/Estate 26, 9% Fannie Mae or Bank Alone Other/Unknown Agriculture 76, 25% Banking/Finance/Mortgage Brokers 182, 60% 41, 14% 7, 2% -, 0% Investment Company Manufacturing Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management Wholesale and Retail Other Figure 7. Percentage and Number of Acres Purchased by Buyer Types 549, 1% 18,533, 16% 20,370, 18% 42,046, 37% 32,084, 28% 24,018, 21% 549, 0% 0, 0% 47, 0% 12,150, 11% 5,282, 5% 0, 0% Individual Trust/LP/Estate Fannie Mae or Bank Alone Other/Unknown Agriculture Banking/Finance/Mortgage Brokers Investment Company Manufacturing Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management Wholesale and Retail Other 28

30 Table 2. Columbia Gorge Region Top 10 Purchasers by Price ( ) Price Per Acre 1 $65,000,000 Greg Te Velde Individual $ 8,918 Real Estate, Land Development & 2 $13,855,000 Oregon Trail Highway LLC Property Management $7,300 Neal J Dow Family Limited Partners 3 $6,669,000 Trust/LP/Estate LP $502 4 $6,100,000 Western River Conservancy Other - Conservancy $431 Real Estate, Land Development & 5 $5,134,971 EAGLE CREEK NORTHWEST, LLC Property Management $151,922 6 $3,610,758 State of Oregon Government Agency $1,060 7 $3,600,000 Weedman Brothers Agriculture $907 Real Estate, Land Development & 8 $3,130,000 JPD LAND COMPANY, LLC Property Management $17,056 9 $2,775,000 Meadowbrook Farms, LLC Agriculture $2,555 Real Estate, Land Development & 10 $2,350,000 Bellinger Properties LLC Property Management $6,930 Table 3. Columbia Gorge Region Top 10 Purchasers by Acreage ( ) Price Per Acre 1 14,148 Western River Conservancy Other - Conservancy $ ,273 Neal J Dow Family Limited Partners LP Trust/LP/Estate $ ,483 McElligott LLC Agriculture $ ,288 Greg Te Velde Individual $8, ,752 Tritazu Investments LLC Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management $ ,234 Oregon EAT, LLC Unknown $ ,970 Weedman Brothers Agriculture $ ,949 John D & Debra Burns Co-Trustees Trust/LP/Estate $ ,406 State of Oregon Government Agency $1, ,135 Kamerrer Farms Inc Agriculture $447 Figure 8: Median Price Per Acre By County $100,000 $90,000 $80,000 $70,000 $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 Gillam Hood River Morrow Sherman Wasco Overall EFU Non-EFU Improved Non-Improved 29

31 Regional Analysis: Northeast Oregon Highlights: Sales and Prices There were 936 total sales in the time period. Only 6.5% of all sales during the reference time period were for less than $1,000. (Table 1) The median price per acre for improved farm properties ($3,292) was roughly 3 times higher than unimproved farm properties ($1,141). (Table 1) The median price per acre for non-efu farm properties ($1,528) sold for just around 61% of the median price per acre for EFU farm properties ($2,500). (Table 1) The median acreage per farm property sold was about 125 acres, compared to 389 acres for average acreage for purchases. (Table 1) Most properties sold were over 160 acres. (Figure 1) Smaller farm properties had higher median prices per acre than larger properties. (Figure 4) Baker County had the highest median price per acre for EFU-zoned properties ($2,721) and improved ($1,628) properties. (Figure 8) Highlights: Buyers Known out-of-state buyers bought about 14% of farms and 21% of acres. (Figure 5). Corporations bought approximately 2 properties of farm properties annually, shifting ownership of about 2,352 acres of farm properties from individuals to corporations. (Table 1) Corporations accounted for roughly 1 out of every 6 sales (17.4%), and 38% of acreage sales. In other words, corporations bought larger properties than other buyer types. (Figures 6 & 7) Agriculture-related corporations accounted for 8.8% of all sales, and 21.3% of all sales by acreage. (Figures 6 & 7) Real Estate, etc. related corporations accounted for 5% of all sales, and 10.5% of all sales by acreage. (Figures 6 & 7) Agriculture-related corporations accounted for 5 of the top 10 buyers by price and 2 of the top 10 buyers by acreage. (Tables 2 & 3) Table 1. Northeast Oregon Farm Property Sales ( ) All Farm Property Sales All Acres Sold ,264 Qualified Farm Property Sales (Sales Under $1,000 removed from remainder of analysis) 875 (62) Average Annual Sales, Qualified 146 Total Qualified Acres Sold 340,607 Annual Farm Property Acres Sold, Qualified 56,767 Median Acreage (Average Acreage) 125 (389) Median (Average) Price Per Acre $2,302 ($10,55) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, Improved $3,292 ($14,066) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, Unimproved $1,141 ($3,275) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, EFU $2,500 ($9,299) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, non-efu $1,528 ($12,659) Average Net Annual Properties Purchased By Corporations from Individuals & Trusts 2 Average Net Annual Acres Purchased by Corporations from Individuals & Trusts 2,352 30

32 Figure 1: Number of Sales by Size Categories, acres 5-10 acres acres acres acres acres 160+ acres Figure 2: Number of Sales Per Year, EFU and non-efu zoned properties EFU zoned properties Non-EFU zoned properties Figure 3: Average and Median Price Per Acre $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $ Average Price Per Acre Median Price Per Acre Figure 4: Average Price Per Acre by Lot Size and by EFU and Non-EFU Zoning acres 5-10 acres acres acres acres acres 160+ acres EFU Non-EFU 31

33 Figure 5: Percentage of Farm Properties and Acres Purchased, by Known Location of Buyer Properties Acres 18% 21% In State In State 13% 69% Out of State Unknown 58% 21% Out of State Unknown Figure 6: Number and Percentage of Properties Purchased, by Buyer Types Individual 63, 7% 5, 1% 7, 1% 1, 0% 4, 0% 7, 1% 44, 5% Trust/LP/Estate Fannie Mae or Bank Alone Other/Unknown Agriculture -, 0% Banking/Finance/Mortgage Brokers 648, 74% 152, 17% 77, 9% 19, 2% Investment Company Manufacturing Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management Wholesale and Retail Other Figure 7: Number and Percentage of Acres Purchased, by Buyer Types Individual 27,678, 8% 7,074, 2% 7,577, 2% 8,495, 3% 748, 0% 244, 0% Trust/LP/Estate Fannie Mae or Bank Alone Other/Unknown Agriculture 170,130, 50% 128,148, 38% 72,679, 21% 35,584, 11% Banking/Finance/Mortgage Brokers Investment Company Manufacturing -, 0% 10,398, 3% Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management Wholesale and Retail Other 32

34 Table 2: Northeast Oregon Top 10 Purchasers by Price ( ) Price Per Acre 1 $11,000,000 BLATCHFORD & SON, LLC Agriculture $2,200,000 2 $8,400,000 PROBERT FAMILY RANCHES, LLC Agriculture $707 3 $8,351,820 KREBS WIND LLC Agriculture $627 4 $7,348,200 MCEST RANCHES, LLC Agriculture $2,837 5 $6,296,788 SSD LANDS LLC Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management $2,465 6 $5,300,000 ELMER, LLC Other $774 7 $4,537,500 ALLEN POTATO LLC Agriculture $1,003 8 $4,001,330 ROVEY, BYRON G & STEPHANIE R Individual $2,405 9 $4,000,000 WILSON, JOHN JR Individual $ $4,000,000 BERNHARD, ALEX K TRUSTEE Trust/LP/Estate $843 Table 3: Northeast Oregon Top 10 Purchasers by Acreage ( ) 1 13,328 KREBS WIND LLC Agriculture $ ,874 PROBERT FAMILY RANCHES, LLC Agriculture $ ,071 BROOKS, KENNETH R & CECILIA B Individual $ ,820 WIKSTROM, CHARLES & CHARLENE Individual $ ,979 GALLATIN NE OR LAND & TIMBER Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management $ ,846 ELMER, LLC Other $774 Price Per Acre 7 6,759 SFG HCK TIMBER PARTNERSHIP LP Manufacturing None recorded Banking/Finance/Mortgage 8 6,219 AMERICAN AGCREDIT, FLCA Brokers $ ,060 WILSON, JOHN JR Individual $ ,171 BRANQUINHO-BUSH RANCH, LLC Other $416 Figure 8: Median Price Per Acre by County $14,000 $12,000 $10,000 $8,000 $6,000 $4,000 $2,000 $0 Baker Grant Union Wallowa Wheeler Overall EFU Non-EFU Improved Non-Improved 33

35 Regional Analysis: Southeast Oregon Highlights: Sales and Prices There were 1,063 transfers in the period. (Table 1) About 15% of all sales during the reference time period were for less than $1,000. (Table 1) The median price per acre for improved farm properties ($2,617) was roughly 2.4 times higher than unimproved farm properties ($ 1,085). (Table 1) The median price per acre for non-efu farm properties ($754) sold for 2.4 times less than EFU farm properties ($ 1,833). (Table 1) The median acreage transferred in the region was 80 acres, compared to an average acreage of 323. (Table 1) More farm properties sold in 2014 and 2015 compared to previous years. (Figure 2) Smaller farm properties have higher median prices per acre than larger properties. (Figure 4) Malheur County had the highest median price per acre for both EFU-zoned ($3,874) and improved properties ($3,950). (Figure 8) Highlights: Buyers Buyers with out-of-state addresses accounted for about 10% of buyers but 40% of acres purchased. (Figure 5) Corporations accounted for 1 out of every 5 sales (about 20%) and 45% of acreage sales. In other words, corporations bought larger properties than other buyer types. (Figures 6 & 7) Agriculture-related corporations accounted for about 13% of all sales, and 35% of all sales by acreage. (Figures 6 & 7) Real Estate, etc.-related corporations accounted for 4% of all sales, and almost 9% of all sales by acreage. (Figures 6 & 7) Agriculture-related corporations accounted for 2 of the top 10 buyers by price and 2 of the top 10 buyers by acreage. (Tables 2 & 3) Table 1. Southeast Oregon Farm Property Sales ( ) All Farm Property Sales ,063 All Farm Property Acres Transferred ,616 Qualified Farm Property Sales (Sales Under $1,000 removed from remainder of this analysis) 906 (157) Average Annual Sales 151 Total Qualified Acres Sold 292,316 Average Annual Acres Transferred 48,719 Median Acreage (Average Acreage) 80 (323) Median (Average) Price Per Acre $1,711 ($4,238) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, Improved $2,617 ($5,165) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, Unimproved $1,085 ($3,305) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, EFU $1,833 ($4,016) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, non-efu $757 ($6,206) Average Net Annual Properties Purchased By Corporations from Individuals & Trusts -1 Average Net Annual Acres Purchased by Corporations from Individuals & Trusts -3,112 34

36 Figure 1: Number of Sales by Size Categories, acres 5-10 acres acres acres acres acres 160+ acres Figure 2: Number of Sales Per Year, EFU and non-efu zoned properties 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000, , EFU-zoned properties Non-EFU zoned properties Figure 3: Median and Average Sales price per Acre in 2015 dollars Overall, Per Year $6,000 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $ Average Median Figure 4: Average Sales Price Per Acre by lot size, EFU and non-efu zoned properties $50,000 $45,000 $40,000 $35,000 $30,000 $25,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $5,000 $0 0-5 acres 5-10 acres acres acres acres acres 160+ acres EFU Non-EFU 35

37 Figure 5: Percentage of Farm Properties and Acres Purchased, by Known Location of Buyer Properties Acres 198, 22% 99, 11% 603, 67% In State Out of State Unknown 40% 15% 45% In State Out of State Unknown Figure 6. Percentage and Number of Farm Properties Purchased by Buyer Types 68, 8% 2, 0% 7, 1% 2, 0% 2, 0% -, 0% Individual Trust/LP/Estate Fannie Mae or Bank Alone 36, 4% Other/Unknown Agriculture 650, 72% 179, 19% 121, 13% 18, 2% -, 0% Banking/Finance/Mortgage Brokers Investment Company Manufacturing Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management Wholesale and Retail Other Figure 7: Percentage and Number of Acres Purchased By Buyer Types 38,363, 13% 10, 0% 1,009, 0% 10, 0% Individual Trust/LP/Estate Fannie Mae or Bank Alone Other/Unknown 120,969, 41% 132,568, 46% 101,058, 35% 25,408, 9% 798, -, 0% 0% Agriculture Banking/Finance/Mortgage Brokers Investment Company Manufacturing Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management -, 0% 5,294, 2% Wholesale and Retail Other 36

38 Table 2. Southeast Oregon Top 10 Purchasers by Price ( ) Price Per Acre 1 $10,850,000 BTAZ NEVADA LLC Agriculture $172 2 $9,900,000 Pueblo Mountain Land Company LLC Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management $576 3 $9,000,000 NOFZIGER TYLER C & JESSICA K Individual $112,500 4 $8,448,860 GREEN DIAMOND RESOURCE Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management $105,611 5 $8,100,000 Daniel P Wegner Trust, et al. Trust/LP/Estate $577 6 $5,777,000 Sunnyside Dairy LLC Agriculture $1,802 7 $4,100,000 Lorin & Katharine Sherburn Individual $1,901 8 $3,700,000 Alan & Sherry Shufelberger, Trustees Trust/LP/Estate $798 9 $3,400,000 Fred Briggs, Trustee Trust/LP/Estate $ $3,000,000 Larry & Susan Otley Individual $ 520 Table 3. Southeast Oregon Top 10 Purchasers by Acreage ( ) 1 63,222 BTAZ NEVADA LLC Agriculture $ ,196 Pueblo Mountain Land Company LLC Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management $ ,039 Daniel P Wegner Trust, etal Trust/LP/Estate $ ,539 Jonathan & Lacy Blake Individual $ ,124 Fred Briggs, Trustee Trust/LP/Estate $ ,769 Larry & Susan Otley Individual $ ,828 Lorin & Katharine Sherburn Individual $ ,639 Alan & Sherry Shufelberger, Trustees Trust/LP/Estate $ ,400 P-W Cow Co Inc Agriculture $ ,773 Willaim & Lori Peila Individual $371 Price Per Acre Figure 8: County-Specific Median Prices Per Acre $9,000 $8,000 $7,000 $6,000 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $0 Lake Harney Malheur Overall EFU Non-EFU Improved Non-Improved 37

39 Regional Analysis: Southern Oregon Highlights: Sales and Prices There were almost 1,000 sales in the time period, or 130 annual qualified sales over $1,000. (Table 1) 1 out of every 5 sales during the reference time period were for less than $100. (Table 1) The median price per acre for improved farm properties ($12,310) was roughly 2.3 times higher than unimproved farm properties ($ 5,282). (Table 1) The median price per acre for EFU farm properties ($5,482) was 2 times less than non-efu farm properties ($11,195). (Table 1) The median acreage of farm properties sold in the region was 19 acres, compared to 53 acres for the average acreage. (Table 1) Smaller farm properties had higher median prices per acre than larger properties. (Figure 3) Josephine County had the highest median price per acre for EFU-zoned properties ($13,711) while Jackson County had the highest median price per acre for improved properties ($18,381). (Figure 8) Highlights: Buyers Known in-state buyers accounted for about 3 out of every 4 farm properties purchase and farm acre purchase. (Figure 5) Individuals and trusts accounted for almost about 3 out of 4 farm properties purchases, and over 1 out of 2 farm acre transferred. (Figures 6 &7) Corporations bought approximately 6 properties of farm properties annually, shifting ownership of about 1,000 acres of farm properties from individuals to corporations. (Table 1) Corporations accounted for 1 out of every 4 sales (24%), and 41% of acreage sales. In other words, corporations are buying larger properties than other buyer types. (Figures 6 & 7) Agriculture-related corporations accounted for 10% of all sales, and 15% of all sales by acreage. (Figures 6 & 7) Real Estate, etc.-related corporations accounted for 10.5% of all sales, and 20.9% of all sales by acreage. (Figures 6 & 7) Agriculture-related corporations accounted for 3 of the top 10 buyers by price and 3 of the top 10 buyers by acreage. (Tables 2 & 3) Table 1. Southern Oregon Farm Property Sales ( ) All Farm Property Sales All Farm Property Acres Transferred ,600 Qualified Farm Property Sales (Sales Under $1,000 removed from remainder of regional analysis) 781 (197) Average Annual Sales 130 Total Qualified Acres Sold 41,702 Average Annual Acres Transferred 6,950 Median Acreage (Average Acreage) 19 (53) Median (Average) Price Per Acre $9,065 ($34,695) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, Improved $12,310 ($40,934) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, Unimproved $5,282 ($16,418) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, EFU $5,482 ($16,418) Median (Average) Price Per Acre, non-efu $11,195 ($28,677) Average Net Annual Properties Purchased By Corporations from Individuals & Trusts 6 Average Net Annual Acres Purchased by Corporations from Individuals & Trusts 1,071 38

40 Figure 1: Number of Sales by Size Categories acres 5-10 acres acres acres acres acres 160+ acres Figure 2: Number of Sales Per Year, EFU and non-efu zoned properties EFU-zoned properties Non EFU-zoned properties Figure 3: Median and Average Sales price per Acre in 2015 dollars Overall, Per Year $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $ Average Price Per Acre Median Price Per Acre Figure 4: Average Sales Price Per Acre by lot size, EFU and non-efu zoned properties acres 5-10 acres acres acres acres acres 160+ acres EFU zoned properties Non EFU-zoned properties 39

41 Figure 5: Percentage of Farm Properties and Acres Purchased, by Known Location of Buyer Properties Acres 9% 12% 14% In State 14% In State Out of State Out of State Unknown Unknown 77% 74% Figure 6. Percentage and Number of Farm Properties Purchased by Buyer Types 3, 0% Individual 67, 9% 2, 0% 1, 0% Trust/LP/Estate Fannie Mae or Bank Alone 3, 0% 82, 11% Other/Unknown 519, 67% 190, 24% 3, 0% 79, 10% 22, 3% Agriculture - Banking/Finance/Mortgage, 0% Brokers Investment Company Manufacturing Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management Wholesale and Retail Other Figure 7: Percentage and Number of Acres Purchased By Buyer Types Individual 159, 0% 86, 0% Trust/LP/Estate 21,519, 52% 2,812, 7% 17,126, 41% 88, 0% 123, 0% 159, 0% 6,200, 15% 8,716, 21% Fannie Mae or Bank Alone Other/Unknown Agriculture Banking/Finance/Mortgage Brokers Investment Company 1,840, 5% -, 0% Manufacturing Real Estate, Land Development & Property Management Wholesale and Retail Other 40

Where We Stand on the Takings Issue

Where We Stand on the Takings Issue Where We Stand on the Takings Issue John D. Echeverria Georgetown Environmental Law & Policy Institute Georgetown University Law Center American Planning Association Policy Conference October, 2007 Washington,.

More information

ROSS A. WALKER & ASSOCIATES SE Division St. #405 Portland, Oregon PHONE (503)

ROSS A. WALKER & ASSOCIATES SE Division St. #405 Portland, Oregon PHONE (503) TABLE OF CONTENTS EDUCATION, LICENSE PAGE 2 EXPERIENCE AND REFERENCES PAGE 3 BUSINESS AND PERSONAL REFERENCES PAGE 4 BASIC APPRAISAL FEE SCHEDULE AND COUTIES LIST PAGE 5 APPRAISAL ORDER FORM PAGE 6 SAMPLE

More information

THE ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACTS OF PROPOSED FIRST-TIME HOME BUYER INCOME TAX DEDUCTION LEGISLATION IN THE STATE OF OREGON

THE ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACTS OF PROPOSED FIRST-TIME HOME BUYER INCOME TAX DEDUCTION LEGISLATION IN THE STATE OF OREGON THE ECONOMIC AND FISCAL IMPACTS OF PROPOSED FIRST-TIME HOME BUYER INCOME TAX DEDUCTION LEGISLATION IN THE STATE OF OREGON Prepared by Lisa Sturtevant, PhD President, Dean D. Bellas, PhD President, March

More information

RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS

RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS CLANCY TERRY RMLS Student Fellow Master of Real Estate Development Candidate Oregon and national housing markets both demonstrated shifting trends in the first quarter of 2015

More information

RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS

RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS EVAN ABRAMOWITZ Joseph Bernard Investment Real Estate Oregon Association of Realtors Student Fellow Masters of Real Estate Development Graduate Student National housing market

More information

Measure 37: Is it Doing What Oregon Voters Wanted? American Land Institute Portland, Oregon. Henry R. Richmond Timothy G. Houchen

Measure 37: Is it Doing What Oregon Voters Wanted? American Land Institute Portland, Oregon. Henry R. Richmond Timothy G. Houchen Measure 37: Is it Doing What Oregon Voters Wanted? American Land Institute Portland, Oregon Henry R. Richmond Timothy G. Houchen September 17, 2007 AMERICAN LAND INSTITUTE 534 SOUTHWEST THIRD AVENUE, SUITE

More information

RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS

RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS RMLS Student Fellow Master of Real Estate Development Candidate Many of the single family housing trends in the second quarter of 2017 bounced upwards following a continuation

More information

RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS

RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS EVAN ABRAMOWITZ RMLS Student Fellow Master of Real Estate Development Graduate Student September existing-home sales declined modestly, but inventory continued to tighten and

More information

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program

Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program EXHIBIT 1 PC-2015-4106 ODFW Guide Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program Manual for Counties and Cities Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife March 2006 Table of Contents 1. Introduction

More information

House Bill 4031 Ordered by the Senate February 26 Including House Amendments dated February 15 and Senate Amendments dated February 26

House Bill 4031 Ordered by the Senate February 26 Including House Amendments dated February 15 and Senate Amendments dated February 26 th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--0 Regular Session B-Engrossed House Bill 0 Ordered by the Senate February Including House Amendments dated February and Senate Amendments dated February Introduced and printed

More information

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. House Bill 4031

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. House Bill 4031 79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--2018 Regular Session Enrolled House Bill 4031 Introduced and printed pursuant to House Rule 12.00. Presession filed (at the request of House Interim Committee on Agriculture

More information

2012 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers New Jersey Report

2012 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers New Jersey Report Prepared for: New Jersey Association of REALTORS Prepared by: Research Division December 2012 Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Highlights... 4 Conclusion... 7 Report Prepared by: Jessica Lautz 202-383-1155

More information

REAL ESTATE MARKET OVERVIEW 1 st Half of 2015

REAL ESTATE MARKET OVERVIEW 1 st Half of 2015 REAL ESTATE MARKET OVERVIEW 1 st Half of 2015 With Comparisons to the 2 nd Half of 2014 September 4, 2015 Prepared for: First Bank of Wyoming Prepared by: Ken Markert, AICP MMI Planning 2319 Davidson Ave.

More information

The Impact of Market Rate Vacancy Increases Eleven-Year Report

The Impact of Market Rate Vacancy Increases Eleven-Year Report The Impact of Market Rate Vacancy Increases Eleven-Year Report January 1, 1999 - December 31, 2009 Santa Monica Rent Control Board April 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary 1 Vacancy Decontrol s Effects on

More information

Appraisers and Assessors of Real Estate

Appraisers and Assessors of Real Estate http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos300.htm Appraisers and Assessors of Real Estate * Nature of the Work * Training, Other Qualifications, and Advancement * Employment * Job Outlook * Projections Data * Earnings

More information

2012 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers Florida Report

2012 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers Florida Report 2012 Profile of Home and Sellers Report Prepared for: REALTORS Prepared by: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS Research Division December 2012 2012 Profile of Home and Sellers Report Table of Contents Introduction...

More information

HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS

HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS EVAN ABRAMOWITZ Joseph Bernard Investment Real Estate Oregon Association of Realtors Student Fellow & Masters of Real Estate Development Graduate Student National housing market

More information

.40 Statistical Appendix...

.40 Statistical Appendix... TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary... Procedure... Part I: The Minnesota Farm Land Market in 1978... A. Land Market Trends.... Reporters' Estimates... Actual Sales... Activity in the Land Market... B. Analysis

More information

2012 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers Texas Report

2012 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers Texas Report 2012 Profile of Home and Sellers Report Prepared for: Association of REALTORS Prepared by: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS Research Division December 2012 2012 Profile of Home and Sellers Report Table

More information

CONTENTS. Executive Summary 1. Southern Nevada Economic Situation 2 Household Sector 5 Tourism & Hospitality Industry

CONTENTS. Executive Summary 1. Southern Nevada Economic Situation 2 Household Sector 5 Tourism & Hospitality Industry CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Southern Nevada Economic Situation 2 Household Sector 5 Tourism & Hospitality Industry Residential Trends 7 Existing Home Sales 11 Property Management Market 12 Foreclosure

More information

2011 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers Texas Report

2011 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers Texas Report 2011 Profile of Home and Sellers Report Prepared for: Association of REALTORS Prepared by: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS Research Division December 2011 2011 Profile of Home and Sellers Report Table

More information

RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS

RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS NGAN NGUYEN Oregon Association of Realtors Student Fellow & Certificate of Real Estate Development Graduate Student Oregon s Office of Economic Analysis warns that the housing

More information

2011 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers New York Report

2011 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers New York Report 2011 Profile of Home and Sellers Report Prepared for: Association of REALTORS Prepared by: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS Research Division December 2011 2011 Profile of Home and Sellers Report Table

More information

RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS

RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS 11 RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS Kyle Smith Portland State University National housing market statistics reflect an increase in value from the prior year, bucking the multi-quarter trend of declining sales

More information

City of Lonsdale Section Table of Contents

City of Lonsdale Section Table of Contents City of Lonsdale City of Lonsdale Section Table of Contents Page Introduction Demographic Data Overview Population Estimates and Trends Population Projections Population by Age Household Estimates and

More information

ECONOMIC CURRENTS. Vol. 5 Issue 2 SOUTH FLORIDA ECONOMIC QUARTERLY. Key Findings, 2 nd Quarter, 2015

ECONOMIC CURRENTS. Vol. 5 Issue 2 SOUTH FLORIDA ECONOMIC QUARTERLY. Key Findings, 2 nd Quarter, 2015 ECONOMIC CURRENTS THE Introduction SOUTH FLORIDA ECONOMIC QUARTERLY Economic Currents provides an overview of the South Florida regional economy. The report presents current employment, economic and real

More information

Measure 37 Report and Recommendations

Measure 37 Report and Recommendations Measure 37 Report and Recommendations to Sen. Floyd J. Prozanski, Jr. Rep. Gregory H. Macpherson Co-Chairs Joint Special Committee on Land Use Fairness 2007 Legislative Session from Gov. Victor Atiyeh

More information

HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS

HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS NGAN NGUYEN Oregon Association of Realtors Student Fellow & Certificate of Real Estate Development Graduate Student National housing market statistics reflect a decreasing prices

More information

Residential Real Estate, Demographics, and the Economy

Residential Real Estate, Demographics, and the Economy Residential Real Estate, Demographics, and the Economy Presented to: Regional & Community Bankers Conference Yolanda K. Kodrzycki Senior Economist and Policy Advisor Federal Reserve Bank of Boston October

More information

New Hampshire Report. Prepared for: New Hampshire Association of REALTORS. Prepared by: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS.

New Hampshire Report. Prepared for: New Hampshire Association of REALTORS. Prepared by: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS. New Hampshire Report Prepared for: New Hampshire Association of REALTORS Prepared by: Research Division January 2016 New Hampshire Report Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Highlights... 3 Methodology..8

More information

WIndicators. Housing Issues Affecting Wisconsin. Volume 1, Number 4. Steven Deller, Todd Johnson, Matt Kures, and Tessa Conroy

WIndicators. Housing Issues Affecting Wisconsin. Volume 1, Number 4. Steven Deller, Todd Johnson, Matt Kures, and Tessa Conroy WIndicators Housing Issues Affecting Wisconsin Volume 1, Number 4 Steven Deller, Todd Johnson, Matt Kures, and Tessa Conroy Housing is becoming an issue in Wisconsin. Housing prices are growing while new

More information

Charlotte Report. Prepared for: Greater Regional Charlotte Association of REALTORS. Prepared by: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS.

Charlotte Report. Prepared for: Greater Regional Charlotte Association of REALTORS. Prepared by: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS. Charlotte Report Prepared for: Greater Regional Charlotte Association of REALTORS Prepared by: Research Division January 2016 Charlotte Report Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Highlights... 3 Methodology..8

More information

The 2017 Flathead County Real Estate Market

The 2017 Flathead County Real Estate Market The 2017 Flathead County Real Estate Market The Flathead Real Estate Market continues to improve with record number of home sales in 2017 By Jim Kelley Kelley Appraisal 1001 South Main Street Kalispell,

More information

Las Vegas Valley Executive Summary

Las Vegas Valley Executive Summary ARROYO MARKET SQUARE Las Vegas Valley Executive Summary Retail Market 4th Quarter 2013 THE DISTRICT AT GREEN VALLEY RANCH January 23, 2014 Re: Commercial Real Estate Survey: 4th Quarter, 2013 Dear Reader,

More information

Sales Ratio: Alternative Calculation Methods

Sales Ratio: Alternative Calculation Methods For Discussion: Summary of proposals to amend State Board of Equalization sales ratio calculations June 3, 2010 One of the primary purposes of the sales ratio study is to measure how well assessors track

More information

Year to Date Summary. Average and Median Sale Prices

Year to Date Summary. Average and Median Sale Prices A Publication of RMLS, The Source for Real Estate Statistics in Your Community Residential Review: Metro Portland, Oregon September 2018 Reporting Period September Residential Highlights Cooler numbers

More information

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Summary Part. I: The Minnesota Farm Land Market in A. Land Market Trends...

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Summary Part. I: The Minnesota Farm Land Market in A. Land Market Trends... TABLE OF CONTENTS ] Page Summary... 1... -J... rrut uure...... *..... 3 Part I: The Minnesota Farm Land Market in 1981... A. Land Market Trends...... 5 5 Reporters' Estimates... Actual Sales... Activity

More information

Nonresidential construction activity in the Twin Cities region was robust in 2013

Nonresidential construction activity in the Twin Cities region was robust in 2013 1 Recent Nonresidential Construction Activity in the Twin Cities Region March 2015 Key Findings After bottoming out in 2010, nonresidential construction activity in the Twin Cities region is once again

More information

Myth Busting: The Truth About Multifamily Renters

Myth Busting: The Truth About Multifamily Renters Myth Busting: The Truth About Multifamily Renters Multifamily Economics and Market Research With more and more Millennials entering the workforce and forming households, as well as foreclosed homeowners

More information

2008 Mid-Year CAAR Market Report Real Estate Market is as Hot as ANWR

2008 Mid-Year CAAR Market Report Real Estate Market is as Hot as ANWR 2008 Mid-Year CAAR Market Report Real Estate Market is as Hot as ANWR By Dave Phillips, CEO Charlottesville Area Association of REALTORS Just about everything in life is relative to your perspective. Based

More information

Introduction. Bruce Munneke, S.A.M.A. Washington County Assessor. 3 P a g e

Introduction. Bruce Munneke, S.A.M.A. Washington County Assessor. 3 P a g e Assessment 2016 Report This report includes specific information regarding the 2016 assessment as well as general information about both the appeals and assessment processes. Contents Introduction... 3

More information

2013 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers Metro Indianapolis Report

2013 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers Metro Indianapolis Report Prepared for: Metro Indianapolis Board of REALTORS Prepared by: Research Division December 2013 Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Highlights... 3 Conclusion... 6 Methodology..7 Report Prepared by: Jessica

More information

Technical Description of the Freddie Mac House Price Index

Technical Description of the Freddie Mac House Price Index Technical Description of the Freddie Mac House Price Index 1. Introduction Freddie Mac publishes the monthly index values of the Freddie Mac House Price Index (FMHPI SM ) each quarter. Index values are

More information

Past & Present Adjustments & Parcel Count Section... 13

Past & Present Adjustments & Parcel Count Section... 13 Assessment 2017 Report This report includes specific information regarding the 2017 assessment as well as general information about both the appeals and assessment processes. Contents Introduction... 3

More information

Report on Nevada s Housing Market

Report on Nevada s Housing Market July Report on Nevada s Housing Market This series of reports on Nevada s Housing Market is presented by the Lied Institute for Real Estate Studies at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. These reports

More information

Research Report #6-07 LEGISLATIVE REVENUE OFFICE.

Research Report #6-07 LEGISLATIVE REVENUE OFFICE. HOUSING AFFORDABILITY IN OREGON Research Report #6-07 LEGISLATIVE REVENUE OFFICE http://www.leg.state.or.us/comm/lro/home.htm STATE OF OREGON LEGISLATIVE REVENUE OFFICE H-197 State Capitol Building Salem,

More information

Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association s Annual Meetings Mobile, Alabama, February 4-7, 2007

Selected Paper prepared for presentation at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association s Annual Meetings Mobile, Alabama, February 4-7, 2007 DYNAMICS OF LAND-USE CHANGE IN NORTH ALABAMA: IMPLICATIONS OF NEW RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT James O. Bukenya Department of Agribusiness, Alabama A&M University P.O. Box 1042 Normal, AL 35762 Telephone: 256-372-5729

More information

ON THE HAZARDS OF INFERRING HOUSING PRICE TRENDS USING MEAN/MEDIAN PRICES

ON THE HAZARDS OF INFERRING HOUSING PRICE TRENDS USING MEAN/MEDIAN PRICES ON THE HAZARDS OF INFERRING HOUSING PRICE TRENDS USING MEAN/MEDIAN PRICES Chee W. Chow, Charles W. Lamden School of Accountancy, San Diego State University, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego, CA 92182, chow@mail.sdsu.edu

More information

Briefing Book. State of the Housing Market Update San Francisco Mayor s Office of Housing and Community Development

Briefing Book. State of the Housing Market Update San Francisco Mayor s Office of Housing and Community Development Briefing Book State of the Housing Market Update 2014 San Francisco Mayor s Office of Housing and Community Development August 2014 Table of Contents Project Background 2 Household Income Background and

More information

PURDUE AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS REPORT SEPTEMBER 2000

PURDUE AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS REPORT SEPTEMBER 2000 PURDUE AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS REPORT SEPTEMBER T he Purdue Land Values Survey indicates that the value of an acre of average bare Indiana cropland was $2,173 per acre in June. This was $81 more than the

More information

Single Family Sales Maine: Units

Single Family Sales Maine: Units Maine Home Connection 19 Commercial St Portland, Maine 04101 MaineHomeConnection.com Office: (207) 517-3100 Email: Info@MaineHomeConnection.com For the fourth consecutive year, Maine home sales set a new

More information

Existing Conditions: Economic Market Assessment

Existing Conditions: Economic Market Assessment Existing Conditions: Economic Market Assessment Introduction The US 24/40 Corridor Study examined existing conditions as they related to economic and commercial market assessments, existing land use, and

More information

99 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE

99 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE OREGON ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY CLERKS 99 TH ANNUAL CONFERENCE August 17-19, 2011 The Mill Casino Resort & Hotel 3201 Tremont Ave. North Bend, OR 97459 Tuesday, August 16, 2011 Travel safely! 3-5:30 Committee,

More information

The Planning and Zoning Commission also recommended a building height of 58 with these added mitigating measures.

The Planning and Zoning Commission also recommended a building height of 58 with these added mitigating measures. April 27, 2018 Town Council Matt Pielsticker, AICP Planning Director Town of Avon 1 Lake Street Avon, CO 81620 Re: PUD 17001 - Village at Avon Planning Area F Amendment Dear Avon Town Council: This letter

More information

Volume Title: Well Worth Saving: How the New Deal Safeguarded Home Ownership

Volume Title: Well Worth Saving: How the New Deal Safeguarded Home Ownership This PDF is a selection from a published volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Well Worth Saving: How the New Deal Safeguarded Home Ownership Volume Author/Editor: Price V.

More information

MARKET ACTION. Year-to-Date Trends

MARKET ACTION. Year-to-Date Trends KET ACTION A Publication of RMLS, The Source for Real Estate Statistics in Your Community MONTH IN REVIEW: Metro Portland, Oregon August Residential Highlights The real estate market in the Portland, Oregon

More information

The Impact of Market Rate Vacancy Increases Eight-Year Report

The Impact of Market Rate Vacancy Increases Eight-Year Report The Impact of Market Rate Vacancy Increases Eight-Year Report January 1, 1999 - December 31, 2006 Santa Monica Rent Control Board March 2007 TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary 1 Units Rented at Market Rates Rates

More information

Assessment Quality: Sales Ratio Analysis Update for Residential Properties in Indiana

Assessment Quality: Sales Ratio Analysis Update for Residential Properties in Indiana Center for Business and Economic Research About the Authors Dagney Faulk, PhD, is director of research and a research professor at Ball State CBER. Her research focuses on state and local tax policy and

More information

Existing Land Use. Typical densities for single-family detached residential development in Cumberland County: 1

Existing Land Use. Typical densities for single-family detached residential development in Cumberland County: 1 Existing Land Use A description of existing land use in Cumberland County is fundamental to understanding the character of the County and its development related issues. Economic factors, development trends,

More information

Multifamily Market Commentary December 2015 Single-Family Rental Sector Attracting Institutional Investment

Multifamily Market Commentary December 2015 Single-Family Rental Sector Attracting Institutional Investment Multifamily Market Commentary December 2015 Single-Family Rental Sector Attracting Institutional Investment Prior to the Great Recession, the cratering of single-family home prices, and declines in the

More information

Report on Nevada s Housing Market

Report on Nevada s Housing Market October Report on Nevada s Housing Market This series of reports on Nevada s Housing Market is presented by the Lied Institute for Real Estate Studies at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. These reports

More information

Boone County, Kentucky Cost of Community Services Study Executive Summary

Boone County, Kentucky Cost of Community Services Study Executive Summary Boone County, Kentucky Executive Summary Suburban sprawl is an issue that many urban/rural fringe communities are faced with today. Pressures on building out instead of up result in controversies about

More information

2013 Arizona Housing Market Mid-Year Report

2013 Arizona Housing Market Mid-Year Report 2013 Arizona Housing Market Mid-Year Report This mid-year market report outlines the latest trends in Arizona real estate. The housing market hit bottom in mid to late 2011, and has been in recovery mode

More information

REGIONAL. Rental Housing in San Joaquin County

REGIONAL. Rental Housing in San Joaquin County Lodi 12 EBERHARDT SCHOOL OF BUSINESS Business Forecasting Center in partnership with San Joaquin Council of Governments 99 26 5 205 Tracy 4 Lathrop Stockton 120 Manteca Ripon Escalon REGIONAL analyst april

More information

Washington Market Highlights: Fourth Quarter 2018

Washington Market Highlights: Fourth Quarter 2018 Washington State s Housing Market 4th Quarter 2018 Washington Market Highlights: Fourth Quarter 2018 Existing home sales fell in the fourth quarter by 2.7 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of

More information

Re-sales Analyses - Lansink and MPAC

Re-sales Analyses - Lansink and MPAC Appendix G Re-sales Analyses - Lansink and MPAC Introduction Lansink Appraisal and Consulting released case studies on the impact of proximity to industrial wind turbines (IWTs) on sale prices for properties

More information

2013 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers Texas Report

2013 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers Texas Report 2013 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers Report Prepared for: Association of REALTORS Prepared by: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS Research Division December 2013 2013 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers

More information

The 2016 Flathead County Real Estate Market

The 2016 Flathead County Real Estate Market The 2016 Flathead County Real Estate Market The Flathead Real Estate Market continues to improve with a near record number of sales in 2016 By Jim Kelley Kelley Appraisal 1001 South Main Street Kalispell,

More information

US Worker Cooperatives: A State of the Sector

US Worker Cooperatives: A State of the Sector US Worker Cooperatives: A State of the Sector Worker cooperatives have increasingly drawn attention from the media, policy makers and academics in recent years. Individual cooperatives across the country

More information

Summary of Measure 37

Summary of Measure 37 Summary of Measure 37 Overview Oregonians approved Measure 37 in November 2004 by 61% to 39%. Measure 37 allows a property owner to receive compensation for any land-use regulation passed since the owner

More information

IMPACT FEES. The Real Estate Industry s Perspective

IMPACT FEES. The Real Estate Industry s Perspective ROCKY MOUNTAIN LAND USE INSTITUTE THE WILDERNESS CITY: NATURE, CULTURE, ECONOMY IN THE NEXT WEST Private Payment for Public Goods: Implementing Private Revenues in the West IMPACT FEES The Real Estate

More information

Paper for presentation at the 2005 AAEA annual meeting Providence, RI July 24-27, 2005

Paper for presentation at the 2005 AAEA annual meeting Providence, RI July 24-27, 2005 NEXT YEAR ON THE U.S. FARMLAND MARKET: AN INFORMATIONAL APPROACH Charles B. Moss, Ashok K. Mishra, And Kenneth Erickson Paper for presentation at the 2005 AAEA annual meeting Providence, RI July 24-27,

More information

Direct Financial Contribution of Farming Areas to Local Governments. Province of British Columbia

Direct Financial Contribution of Farming Areas to Local Governments. Province of British Columbia File Number 860.600-1 2005 Direct Financial Contribution of Farming Areas to Local Governments in British Columbia A Pilot Project in Pitt Meadows and Abbotsford Prepared by the Coast Region and Resource

More information

2011 Farmland Value Survey The survey was initiated in 1941 and is sponsored

2011 Farmland Value Survey The survey was initiated in 1941 and is sponsored File C2-70 January 2012 www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm 2011 Farmland Value Survey The survey was initiated in 1941 and is sponsored annually by the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station,

More information

Washington Market Highlights: Fourth Quarter 2017

Washington Market Highlights: Fourth Quarter 2017 Washington State s Housing Market 4th Quarter 2017 Washington Market Highlights: Fourth Quarter 2017 Existing home sales declined in the fourth quarter by 0.2 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate

More information

The Texas 2005 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers. Prepared by: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS Research Division

The Texas 2005 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers. Prepared by: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS Research Division The Texas 2005 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers Prepared by: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS Research Division February, 2006 The 2005 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers

More information

Phoenix, Central and Northern Arizona

Phoenix, Central and Northern Arizona Phoenix, Central and Northern Arizona End of Year Housing Report 1-8-354-5664 LongRealty.com 217 End of Year Housing Report SALES & INVENTORY Housing market trends For the overall real estate market in

More information

National Association of REALTORS Member Profile National Association of realtors

National Association of REALTORS Member Profile National Association of realtors National Association of REALTORS 2013 Member Profile 2013 National Association of realtors National Association of REALTORS Introduction In 2012, many areas of the country started to see both home sales

More information

Charlottesville Housing Market Report Year-End (Published by the Charlottesville Area Association of REALTORS )

Charlottesville Housing Market Report Year-End (Published by the Charlottesville Area Association of REALTORS ) Charlottesville Housing Market Report - 2009 Year-End (Published by the Charlottesville Area Association of REALTORS ) This Quarterly Market Report is produced by the Charlottesville Area Association of

More information

Washington Market Highlights: Third Quarter 2018

Washington Market Highlights: Third Quarter 2018 Washington State s Housing Market 3rd Quarter 2018 Washington Market Highlights: Third Quarter 2018 Existing home sales rose in the third quarter by 0.1 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of

More information

CHAPTER 3. HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

CHAPTER 3. HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER 3. HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT This chapter analyzes the housing and economic development trends within the community. Analysis of state equalized value trends is useful in estimating investment

More information

2014 Plan of Conservation and Development

2014 Plan of Conservation and Development The Town of Hebron Section 1 2014 Plan of Conservation and Development Community Profile Introduction (Final: 8/29/13) The Community Profile section of the Plan of Conservation and Development is intended

More information

The Governance of Land Use

The Governance of Land Use The Governance of Land Use COUNTRY FACT SHEET UNITED STATES The planning system Levels of government and their responsibilities The United States is a federal country with 4 levels of government; the national

More information

TENNESSEE HOUSING MARKET

TENNESSEE HOUSING MARKET 1st Quarter 212 TENNESSEE HOUSING MARKET David A. Penn, Director Business and Economic Research Center Jennings A. Jones College of Business Middle Tennessee State University This quarterly series is supported

More information

The 2018 Land Market Survey

The 2018 Land Market Survey The 2018 Land Market Survey REALTORS Land Institute National Association ofrealtors Released in January 2019 President s Message As the 2018-2019 National President of the REALTORS Land Institute (RLI),

More information

TUCSON and SOUTHERN ARIZONA

TUCSON and SOUTHERN ARIZONA TUCSON and SOUTHERN ARIZONA MID-Year Housing Report (520) 840-0963 MathewRodriguez@LongRealty.com 2018 Mid-Year Housing Report INVENTORY Housing market trends For the overall real estate market in Tucson

More information

2018 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers

2018 Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers Massachusetts Report Prepared for: Massachusetts Association of REALTORS Prepared by: Research Division December 2018 Massachusetts Report Table of Contents Introduction... 2 Highlights... 4 Methodology...

More information

How Did Foreclosures Affect Property Values in Georgia School Districts?

How Did Foreclosures Affect Property Values in Georgia School Districts? Tulane Economics Working Paper Series How Did Foreclosures Affect Property Values in Georgia School Districts? James Alm Department of Economics Tulane University New Orleans, LA jalm@tulane.edu Robert

More information

OVERVIEW OF RECENT/EXPECTED ECONOMIC/ HOUSING MARKET CONDITIONS

OVERVIEW OF RECENT/EXPECTED ECONOMIC/ HOUSING MARKET CONDITIONS OVERVIEW OF RECENT/EXPECTED ECONOMIC/ HOUSING MARKET CONDITIONS STRONG ECONOMIC FUNDAMENTALS *BUT* EXTRAORDINARY SHORT-TERM FACTORS RESULTING IN MAJOR SHIFTS IN TYPES OF HOUSING PRODUCTS AND GEOGRAPHICAL

More information

The Land Division Amendments to the Subdivision Control Act

The Land Division Amendments to the Subdivision Control Act Staff Paper The Land Division Amendments to the Subdivision Control Act Kurt J. Norgaard Visiting Assistant Professor and David E. Pierson McClelland & Anderson, L.L.P. Staff Paper No. 98-9 May 998 Department

More information

MULTIFAMILY MARKET ANALYSIS

MULTIFAMILY MARKET ANALYSIS MULTIFAMILY MARKET ANALYSIS MARC STRABIC Portland State University So as we roll through the summer here in the Northwest, now is a good time to take stock of the multi-family market, the progress made

More information

Village of Scarsdale

Village of Scarsdale Village of Scarsdale VILLAGE HALL / 1001 POST ROAD / SCARSDALE, NY 10583 914.722.1110 / WWW.SCARSDALE.COM Village Wide Revaluation Frequently Asked Questions Q1. How was the land value for each parcel

More information

MARKET AREA UPDATE Year: 2018 Report as of: 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q

MARKET AREA UPDATE Year: 2018 Report as of: 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q Market Area (City, State): Portland Metropolitan Area MARKET AREA UPDATE Year: 2018 Report as of: 1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q Provided by (Company / Companies): BHHSNW Real Estate, Archibald Relocation, Coldwell Banker

More information

Appendix 1: Gisborne District Quarterly Market Indicators Report April National Policy Statement on Urban Development Capacity

Appendix 1: Gisborne District Quarterly Market Indicators Report April National Policy Statement on Urban Development Capacity Appendix 1: Gisborne District Quarterly Market Indicators Report April 2018 National Policy Statement on Urban Development Capacity Quarterly Market Indicators Report April 2018 1 Executive Summary This

More information

SJC Comprehensive Plan Update Housing Needs Assessment Briefing. County Council: October 16, 2017 Planning Commission: October 20, 2017

SJC Comprehensive Plan Update Housing Needs Assessment Briefing. County Council: October 16, 2017 Planning Commission: October 20, 2017 SJC Comprehensive Plan Update 2036 Housing Needs Assessment Briefing County Council: October 16, 2017 Planning Commission: October 20, 2017 Overview GMA Housing Element Background Demographics Employment

More information

PROPERTY TAX IS A PRINCIPAL REVENUE SOURCE

PROPERTY TAX IS A PRINCIPAL REVENUE SOURCE TAXABLE PROPERTY VALUES: EXPLORING THE FEASIBILITY OF DATA COLLECTION METHODS Brian Zamperini, Jennifer Charles, and Peter Schilling U.S. Census Bureau* INTRODUCTION PROPERTY TAX IS A PRINCIPAL REVENUE

More information

2017 Land Market Survey

2017 Land Market Survey 2017 Land Market Survey Presented By National Association of REALTORS Research Division Lawrence Yun, Ph.D. Senior Vice President & Chief Economist Danielle Hale, MS, Managing Director, Housing Research

More information

IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Property Tax DECISION

IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Property Tax DECISION IN THE OREGON TAX COURT MAGISTRATE DIVISION Property Tax PETER METZGER, Plaintiff, v. CLATSOP COUNTY ASSESSOR, Defendant. TC-MD 120534D DECISION Plaintiff appeals the 2011-12 real market value of property

More information

Performance of the Private Rental Market in Northern Ireland

Performance of the Private Rental Market in Northern Ireland Summary Research Report July - December Performance of the Private Rental Market in Northern Ireland Research Report July - December 1 Northern Ireland Rental Index: Issue No. 8 Disclaimer This report

More information

Gold Beach Buildable Lands Analysis

Gold Beach Buildable Lands Analysis Gold Beach Buildable Lands Analysis Final Report Submitted to: City of Gold Beach Prepared by: Community Planning Workshop Community Service Center 1209 University of Oregon Eugene, OR 97403-1209 http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~cpw

More information