The Planning and Zoning Commission also recommended a building height of 58 with these added mitigating measures.
|
|
- Randolf Robinson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 April 27, 2018 Town Council Matt Pielsticker, AICP Planning Director Town of Avon 1 Lake Street Avon, CO Re: PUD Village at Avon Planning Area F Amendment Dear Avon Town Council: This letter is intended as an update and amendment to our application for a preliminary PUD amendment to Planning Area F, in The Village (at Avon). Below are a list of additional changes and some discussion of each, which we believe address issues raised by a majority of the Town Council members present at the hearing on April 10, We hope that our revisions will allow the Town Council to approve this amendment and allow us to start the process over again with a Final PUD Application where we can provide more detail and final refinements to the proposal. Building Height. The initial proposal by the applicant, based on information from a potential developer, was to increase the allowable building height from 48 to 66. Based on further analysis the applicant modified the proposal to increase the building height to 58, a 10 increase, along with two other proposed mitigating standards: New Setback: A proposed building setback of 40 from Post Boulevard and East Beaver Creek Boulevard for any structure taller than 48. The current setback is 25. This was to address the issue of taller buildings crowding the street. New Building Coverage Standard: A new standard changing the building coverage/building footprint standard from 80% of the site to 50% of the site. The provision addressed the site being overcrowded with buildings and applies to all buildings on the property regardless of height. The Planning and Zoning Commission also recommended a building height of 58 with these added mitigating measures. Town Council Concerns: Several Town Council members expressed concern about the impact of taller buildings as a transition from the southern boundary of the PUD to the northern boundary of Planning Area F but noting that the tall hillside leading to the interstate provides some relief to the height. 1
2 Revised Proposal: To address the concerns, the applicant is proposing a 100 setback from the south boundary of Planning Area F for any building over 48. This ensures that there will be a transition of building heights across Planning Area F to address the concern. Additionally, the applicant is proposing that buildings be limited to four (4) total stories above grade to assure that the added height is truly to address architectural and livability issues and not an attempt to gain additional stories or floor area. Density in Planning Area F: As discussed in the memo from the Town Attorney dated January 24, 2018, The Village (at Avon) has a density cap of 2,400 dwelling units. When the PUD was approved in 1998, all impacts of the entire PUD to the Town were evaluated including traffic, fiscal impacts, transit impacts, and many other impacts. The PUD mitigated for all of these impacts with improvements and other concessions. The change in the density only shifts dwelling units within the PUD to provide a slightly higher concentration on Planning Area F than is allowed today. The proposal as recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission is to increase the maximum potential density on Planning Area F from 18 units per acre to 25 units per acre. Planning Area F is approximately 13 acres so the result is a potential increase from 234 units to 325 units or an increase in 91 units. Town Council Concerns: Several Town Council members expressed concern about the increase in density on this parcel even though the net effect on density in the PUD is zero. To provide some context, in the core areas, residential densities range from 50 units per acre to 95 units per acre (upa) Westin Mountain Villas at 95 upa Westin Hotel at 70 upa Avon Center at 50 upa Wyndham at 54 upa In areas surrounding or outside the core: Eagle Bend Apartments at 32.5 upa (240 units on 7.38 acres) Avon Crossing at 24 upa Avon Lake Villas at 24 upa Sunridge at 20 upa. Revised Proposal: To address the concern of density we further analyzed the need for additional density to allow for the desired type and density for a multiple family project with a mix of units including smaller one and two bedroom units. Density is only based on unit or key count and does not discriminate between a 600 sq. ft. unit and a 2,000 sq. ft. unit (or a 5,000 sq. ft. unit for the matter). The applicant believes that 285 units are necessary to allow for a viable project on the site. That translates to 22 units per acre or an increase of 51 units on Planning Area F or a 2% shift in density within the PUD. PO Box 4777 Eagle, Colorado
3 We believe 22 units per acre is a reasonable shift in density. Commercial/Residential Allocation in Planning Area F: Planning Area F is currently restricted to a maximum of 50% of the floor area developed as residential. The commercial floor area allowed can be 100% of the floor area. The proposed amendment seeks to reverse that, allowing 100% of the floor area to be residential and 30% of the floor area developed as commercial, but not required. An example of what the current PUD requirement that might look like, if 100 dwelling units were proposed at an average of 1,000 sq. ft. each, the result is 100,000 sq. ft. of residential use. That would require an equal amount or greater of commercial floor area or 100,000 sq. ft. of commercial floor area. The Planning and Zoning Commission recommend a minimum of 10% of the floor area be required as commercial. An example of that might look like: 200 dwelling units which equals 200,000 sq. ft. requires another 20,000 sq. ft. of commercial floor area. Neither examples of a minimum commercial requirement are supportable given the retail trends and the vacancy rates in Avon and the mid-valley region. Town Council Concerns: At least one Town Council member expressed concern about removing the requirement for a minimum amount of commercial space in Planning Area F, despite the proximity of Planning Area F to existing commercial uses within the PUD and adjacent to the PUD. What was expressed was a desire to see some limited commercial uses within the planning area. Revised Proposal: While the applicant would prefer to have no requirement and allow the market to dictate whether commercial is appropriate or not, to address the concern the applicant is proposing to add a requirement that with each 150,000 sq. ft. of residential floor area completed in the planning area, there would be at least 1,000 sq. ft. of commercial floor area. The applicant hopes this approach supplies enough residential carrying capacity (approximately 150 units) to support the commercial space (in Planning Area F) provided to help prevent the commercial space from being vacant or under-utilized. We hope that the proposed changes help make the Town Council comfortable with the proposed amendments and shows a willingness on the part of the applicant to respond to real concerns of the Town Council as it works to enable a better product for Avon. We look forward to discussing this with you on May 8. Sincerely, Dominic F. Mauriello, AICP Principal 3
4 THE VILLAGE (AT AVON) PUD GUIDE REVISIONS MAY 3, 2018 B. TOTAL PERMITTED DENSITY. The total permitted density for The Village (at Avon) PUD shall not exceed: 1. Planning Areas A, C, D, E, F, G, H, J, K, RMF 1 and RMF 2 shall not exceed: (a) Commercial Uses. 825,000 consolidated Gross Square Footage of Commercial Space. (b) Dwelling Units. 2,400 Dwelling Units. Pursuant to the terms of the Affordable Housing Plan, 500 of the 2,400 Dwelling Units shall be constructed as affordable housing, and, subject to satisfaction of the conditions precedent set forth in the Affordable Housing Plan, an additional 23 of the 2,400 Dwelling Units shall be constructed as affordable housing. 2. The permitted Commercial Use and Dwelling Unit densities within Planning Area I shall be determined in the future pursuant to the formal amendment procedures set forth in Section Error! Reference source not found. of this PUD Guide; provided, however, the permitted Commercial Space for Planning Area I shall not be less than 196,970 consolidated Gross Square Footage (which shall be in addition to the 825,000 square feet of consolidated Gross Square Footage stated in Section A.1(a)), and the permitted Dwelling Units shall not be less than 750 Dwelling Units. The Town acknowledges that Planning Area I is entitled to be developed as mixed-use development, and Uses may include Residential Uses, Commercial Uses, and public and institutional uses at densities in addition to those set forth above as approved by the Town. Until such time as a secondary access road is constructed, no non-residential Uses shall be allowed and the maximum density of Dwelling Units shall not exceed 280 Dwelling Units. 3. Density calculations, as applicable, for development of Dwelling Units within all Planning Areas where Residential Uses are permitted shall be based on the gross acreage within the applicable Planning Area as reflected in the land use table contained in the PUD Master Plan. Density calculations shall be on a Planning Area by Planning Area basis rather than on a Final Plat by Final Plat basis or on a Site by Site basis. 4. Subject to the requirement that the maximum number of Dwelling Units within any particular Planning Area, as applicable, shall not exceed that permitted under the terms and conditions of this PUD Guide, as applicable, the actual number of Dwelling Units per acre within
5 a particular Final Plat or Site within the affected Planning Area may exceed the maximum number of Dwelling Units per acre based on the acreage within such Final Plat or Site. By way of example, in a Planning Area containing 20 acres and subject to a maximum residential density of 18 Dwelling Unit per acre (i.e., a total of 360 Dwelling Units), a 10 acre Site within that Planning Area would be permitted to be developed with 300 Dwelling Units (i.e., 30 Dwelling Units per acre) but the remaining 10 acres could be developed with no more than 60 Dwelling Units, with the resulting density within such Planning Area in the aggregate being 18 Dwelling Units per acre (i.e., ( = 360 Dwelling Units) / 20 acres = 18 Dwelling Units per acre). 5. Density calculations for development of Residential Uses within Planning Areas A through I, RMF 1 and RMF 2 shall exclude areas with slopes exceeding 40%. Notwithstanding the foregoing, areas with slopes exceeding 40% created by the placement of dirt stockpiles shall not be excluded for density calculations for development of Residential Uses within Planning Areas A through I, RMF 1 and RMF At final build-out of the particular Planning Area, the following minimum and maximum ratios of consolidated Gross Square Footage of Commercial Space and consolidated Gross Square Footage of Residential Uses, stated as a percentage of the aggregate Gross Square Footage the Planning Area [e.g., Gross Square Footage of Commercial Space (Gross Square Footage of Commercial Space + consolidated Gross Square Footage of Residential Uses) = percentage of Gross Square Footage of Commercial Space], shall apply within the following Planning Areas: Planning Area Residential Commercial Min% Max% Min% Max% Planning Area A 30% 80% 20% 70% Planning Areas C and D 90% 100% 0% 10% Planning Areas F 0% 50%100% 50%1,00 0 sq. ft. per each 150,000 sq. ft. of construct ed residentia l floor area 100%30 % Planning Areas G and H 0% 50% 50% 100% D. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS WITHIN THE VILLAGE (AT AVON) PUD. 6. Planning Areas F, G, H and I Regional Commercial Mixed Use Projects.
6 (d) Building Envelope Requirements: (i) Minimum Building Setbacks: (1) Commercial Uses: a. Front: 25 feet b. Side: None c. Rear: 10 feet feet d. Abutting Interstate 70 or railroad right-of-way: 20 (2) Industrial and Residential Uses: a. Front: 25 feet b. Side: 7.5 feet c. Rear: 10 feet feet d. Abutting Interstate 70 or railroad right-of-way: 20 e. In Planning Area F, any building over 48 in height shall be set back a minimum of 40 from the property line adjoining Post Blvd. and 100 to East Beaver Creek Blvd./future Main Street. (3) Vertically-integrated Mixed Use Projects: a. Front: 25 feet b. Side: None c. Rear: 10 feet feet d. Abutting Interstate 70 or railroad right-of-way: 20 e. In Planning Area F, any building over 48 in height shall be set back a minimum of 40 from the property line adjoining Post Blvd. and 100 to East Beaver Creek Blvd./future Main Street.
7 (ii) Maximum Building Height: (1) Commercial Uses: a. Hotel Uses (including without limitation, hotel Uses comprising a portion of a Mixed Use Project) on Planning Area I only: 55 feet, provided that such Uses may be permitted up to a maximum Building Height of 135 feet as specifically identified as a Special Review Use in Section Error! Reference source not found.. b. Hospitals on Planning Area I only: 80 feet. c. All other Commercial Uses: 48 feet. (2) Industrial Uses: 48 feet. (3) Residential Uses: feet. a. Single-family Dwellings and Duplex Dwellings: 35 b. Multi-family Dwellings: 48 feet in Planning Areas G, H, and I and 58 feet in Planning Area F. In Planning Area F, buildings are limited to four stories of habitable residential floor area (excluding vaulted spaces) above finished grade. (4) Vertically-integrated Mixed Use Projects (except as set forth in Section A.6(ii)(1) with respect to hotels comprising a portion of a Mixed Use Project): 48 feet. (iii) Minimum Landscaped Area: 20%. (iv) Minimum Lot Area: Not applicable. (v) Maximum Site Coverage in Planning Area F only: 50%. (b) Residential Density Maximum: (i) (ii) Planning Areas F, G and H: Dwelling Units per acre. Planning Areas G and H: 18 Dwelling Units per acre. (iii) Planning Area I: Subject to this Section A.6(b)(iii), 15 Dwelling Units per acre, subject to the following: cul-de-sacs may exceed 1,000 feet in length and service not more than 280 Dwelling Units within Planning Area I, and that the portion of a cul-de-sac that is in excess of 1,000 feet shall not service Commercial Uses. With respect to any cul-de-sac located both within and outside of Planning Area I, (i) no Dwelling Units served by the portion of such cul-de-sac located outside of Planning Area I shall be counted toward the foregoing 280 Dwelling Unit limitation; and (ii) the portion of any such cul-de-
8 sac located within Planning Area I shall be deemed separate and distinct from, and not included with, any portion of the same cul-de-sac located outside of Planning Area I for purposes of calculating the Dwelling Units counted toward the foregoing 280 Dwelling Unit limitation.
CITY PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CITY PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Request for a Change of Zoning and Preliminary Development Plan FROM: Mara Perry, Director of Planning & Development MEETING DATE: November 6, 2017 PETITION:
More informationTABLE (A): TABLE OF DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS IN THE RESIDENTIAL ZONE DISTRICTS REQUIRED YARDS [4], [5] SIDE YARD (FT) REAR YARD (FT) R-1 DISTRICT
ARTICLE : DENSITY, INTENSITY, & DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS Section -100: General Provisions TABLE 17--100(A): TABLE OF DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS IN THE RESIDENTIAL ZONE DISTRICTS R-1 DISTRICT AREA (SQ FT)[3] WIDTH
More informationBylaw No , being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" DRAFT
Bylaw No. 2600-2016, being "Official Community Plan Bylaw, 2016" Schedule "A" Urban Structure + Growth Plan Urban Structure Land use and growth management are among the most powerful policy tools at the
More informationDEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1
2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1 This Chapter presents the development standards for residential projects. Section 2.1 discusses
More informationCITY OF CASCADE LOCKS PLANNING COMMISSION ORDER VARIANCE WINDSONG TERRACE LLC
CITY OF CASCADE LOCKS PLANNING COMMISSION ORDER VARIANCE 07-01 WINDSONG TERRACE LLC APPLICATION The variance requested is to reduce various setback requirements for lots within the Windsong Terrace Subdivision.
More informationOrdinance No. 04 Series of 2013 RECITALS
AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF BASALT, COLORADO, APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO PORTIONS OF CHAPTER 16, ZONING, OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF BASALT, COLORADO, CREATING A NEW R-4 MIXED
More informationStaff Report: Date: Applicant: Property Identification: Acreage of Request: Current Zoning of Requested Area: Requested Action: Attached:
Staff Report: Completed by Jeff Palmer Director of Planning & Zoning Date: November 7, 2018, Updated November 20, 2018 Applicant: Greg Smith, Oberer Land Developer agent for Ronald Montgomery ET AL Property
More informationTown of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-20 Habitat for Humanity Evans Road Town Council Meeting October 16, 2014
Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-20 Habitat for Humanity Evans Road Town Council Meeting October 16, 2014 REQUEST To amend the Town of Cary Official Zoning Map by rezoning 0.53
More informationATLANTA ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE
CITY OF ATLANTA ZONING ORDINANCE QUICK FIXES In 2015 the City of Atlanta selected a team of consultants to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the City s Zoning Ordinance, including a review of the ability
More informationChapter URBAN VILLAGE ZONING DISTRICTS
Chapter 20.16 Sections: 20.16.010 Purpose of the Urban Village Zoning Districts 20.16.020 Land Use Regulations for the Urban Village Zoning Districts 20.16.030 Development Standards & Guidelines for the
More informationThis zone is intended to accommodate and regulate the development of medium density, high rise multiple family housing.
PART XXVI - RM-3 MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL ZONE THREE PART XXVI - RM-3 MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL ZONE THREE A. INTENT This zone is intended to accommodate and regulate the development of medium density, high rise
More informationDevelopment Requirements in the Residential Zoning Districts
Development Requirements in the Residential Zoning Districts Planning an Addition or Remodel? Get started with the following steps: 1. Zoning - Check the zoning of your property at www.redwoodcity.org/gis
More informationTHE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF PEACHLAND BYLAW NUMBER 2065, A Bylaw to Amend Zoning Bylaw Number 1375, 1996
THE CORPORATION OF THE DISTRICT OF PEACHLAND BYLAW NUMBER 2065, 2013 A Bylaw to Amend Zoning Bylaw Number 1375, 1996 WHEREAS the Council of the Corporation of the District of Peachland has adopted Zoning
More informationMay 12, Chapter RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS Sections:
May 12, 2017 Chapter 17.13 RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS Sections: 17.13.010 Title, intent, and description. 17.13.020 Required design review process. 17.13.030 Permitted and conditionally
More informationThis zone is intended to accommodate and regulate the development of low rise multiple family housing.
PART XXIV - RM-1 MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL ZONE ONE PART XXIV - RM-1 MULTIPLE RESIDENTIAL ZONE ONE A. INTENT This zone is intended to accommodate and regulate the development of low rise multiple family housing.
More informationArticle Optional Method Requirements
Article 59-6. Optional Method Requirements [DIV. 6.1. MPDU DEVELOPMENT IN RURAL RESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENTIAL ZONES Sec. 6.1.1. General Requirements... 6 2 Sec. 6.1.2. General Site and Building Type Mix...
More informationSECTION PLANNED RESIDENTIAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT
SECTION 1609. PLANNED RESIDENTIAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT It is the purpose of this section to encourage more imaginative and livable housing environments within the Residential Districts, as noted, through a
More informationLUC AND UNDERLYING ZONING: OCP DESIGNATION:
City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File: 7916-0581-00 Planning Report Date: February 20, 2017 PROPOSAL: Terminate Land Use Contract No. 554 to permit the existing underlying RA and RF Zones to
More informationCity of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report. Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council. Joel Rojas, Development Services Directo r~
10/17/2017 City of San Juan Capistrano Agenda Report F1a TO: FROM: SUBMITTED BY: PREPARED BY: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council ~n Siegel, City Manager Joel Rojas, Development Services Directo
More informationAppendix D MOUNTAIN PARK SPECIFIC PLAN EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
1. BACKGROUND Appendix D MOUNTAIN PARK SPECIFIC PLAN EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS This Specific Plan is regulatory and serves as zoning for all areas within the Mountain Park Specific
More informationCHAPTER 8. REVISION HISTORY
CHAPTER 8. REVISION HISTORY CHAPTER 8. RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS Ordinance # Plan Commission Town Council Approval Date Adoption Date Description 2002-14 09-24-02 11-14-02 Adoption of Chapter 8. 2010-20 09-27-10
More informationTO: Mayor & Council DATE: July 19, FROM: General Manager, Planning & Development FILE:
CORPORATE REPORT NO: L002 COUNCIL DATE: July 24, 2017 REGULAR COUNCIL LAND USE TO: Mayor & Council DATE: July 19, 2017 FROM: General Manager, Planning & Development FILE: 5480 01 SUBJECT: Proposed Amendments
More informationMEMORANDUM. DATE: November 9, 2016 PC Agenda Item 3.C
MEMORANDUM DATE: November 9, 2016 PC Agenda Item 3.C TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Planning Commission Eric Zweber, AICP, Interim City Planner Planning Case #16-029 Public Hearing Required Applicant: Bremer Bank,
More informationCompatible-Scale Infill Housing (R-2 Zones) Project
Project Scope: A targeted amendment to the regulations for building bulk/height in the R-2 zones. Objectives: Allow more housing opportunities in the R-2A, R-2D, and R-2M zones, while ensuring the height
More informationPLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS. Cadence Site
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS Cadence Site A Planned Development District 1. Statement of General Facts, Conditions and Objectives Property Size: Approximately 57.51 Acres York County Tax Map
More informationSection Low Density Residential (R1) Land Use District
(1) Application This section applies to the District designated as Low Density Residential (R1) on the Land Use District Map, Schedule A, of this Bylaw. Additional requirements are outlined in the Established
More informationCity of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Report
City of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Staff Report Applicant: Application: Public Hearing: Date & Time: Location: City of Coral Gables Giralda Restaurant Row Overlay Zoning Code Text Amendment Planning
More informationZ-MAX BLVD HARRISBURG, NC OFFERING MEMORANDUM
Z-MAX BLVD HARRISBURG, NC OFFERING MEMORANDUM INVESTMENT HIGHLIGHTS List Price: $2,445,500 Location: Southeast quadrant of NC Hwy 49 and I-485 at the southern terminus of Z-Max Boulevard extending south
More information17.13 RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS SECTIONS:
Effective April 14, 2011 Chapter 17.13 RH HILLSIDE RESIDENTIAL ZONES REGULATIONS SECTIONS: 17.13.010 Title, Intent, and Description 17.13.020 Required Design Review Process 17.13.030 Permitted and Conditionally
More informationPART XXIII - RT-1 TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL ZONE A. INTENT
PART XXIII - RT-1 TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL ZONE PART XXIII - RT-1 TOWNHOUSE RESIDENTIAL ZONE A. INTENT This zone is intended for the development of townhouse structures and related recreational facilities,
More informationSPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Parcel Identifier Number (PIN): TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL Planning Department 405 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd Chapel Hill, NC 27514 phone (919) 968-2728 fax (919) 969-2014 www.townofchapelhill.org
More informationLOCATION: LUC AND UNDERLYING ZONING: OCP DESIGNATION:
City of Surrey PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REPORT File: 7916-0404-00 Planning Report Date: October 24, 2016 PROPOSAL: Terminate Land Use Contract No. 320 to permit the existing underlying Zone to come into
More informationStaff Report: Date: Applicant: Property Identification: Acreage of Request: Current Zoning of Requested Area: Requested Action: Attached:
Staff Report: Completed by Jeff Palmer Director of Planning & Zoning Date: November 7, 2018 Applicant: Greg Smith, Oberer Land Developer agent for Ronald Montgomery ET AL Property Identification: Frontage
More informationCASTLES OF CALEDON URBAN DESIGN REPORT
CASTLES OF CALEDON URBAN DESIGN REPORT PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT CALEDON, ONTARIO 10 JULY, 2015 TABLE CONTENTS: 1.0 DEVELOPMENT 4.0 CONCLUSION 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Castles of Caledon- Urban Design
More information4 LAND USE 4.1 OBJECTIVES
4 LAND USE The Land Use Element of the Specific Plan establishes objectives, policies, and standards for the distribution, location and extent of land uses to be permitted in the Central Larkspur Specific
More informationgary b. coursey & associates architects inc. a.i.a. architecture interior design planning RE: CC: Attiva Malone 5251 Peachtree Boulevard Chamblee, Georgia 30071 Akash Gaur, Cortland Partners Gary Coursey,
More informationRe: Grand Jury Report No. 1707, Homelessness in the Cities by the Contra Costa Grand Jury
CITY OF SAN PABLO City Council Grand Jury Attn: Foreperson Jim Mellander P.O. Box 431 Martinez, CA 94553 (also by email to ctadmin@contracosta.courts.ca.gov) Re: Grand Jury Report No. 1707, Homelessness
More informationPINE CANYON PD ZONING REGULATIONS
Review Notes: Green highlight = blanks to be completed before recording. 1. DEFINITIONS For purposes of the PD Plan and these Zoning Regulations: (1) capitalized terms used but not defined in the PD Plan
More informationStaff Report PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. Salt Lake City Planning Commission. From: Lauren Parisi, Associate Planner; Date: December 14, 2016
Staff Report PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission From: Lauren Parisi, Associate Planner; 801-535-7932 Date: December 14, 2016 Re: 1611 South 1600 East PLANNED
More informationMEMORANDUM. DATE: April 6, 2017 TO: Zoning Hearing Board Jackie and Jake Collas. FROM: John R. Weller, AICP, Zoning Officer
MEMORANDUM DATE: April 6, 2017 TO: Zoning Hearing Board Jackie and Jake Collas FROM: John R. Weller, AICP, Zoning Officer SUBJECT: Zoning Hearing Board appeal of Jackie and Jake Collas Relief requested
More informationMEMORANDUM Planning Commission Travis Parker, Planning Director DATE: April 4, 2018 Lakewood Zoning Amendments Housing and Mixed Use
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Travis Parker, Planning Director DATE: April 4, 2018 SUBJECT: Lakewood Zoning Amendments Housing and Mixed Use In August 2017, the Lakewood Development Dialogue process began with
More informationBerry/University Form Based Code and Urban Residential Development
Berry/University Form Based Code and Urban Residential Development Presented to the City Council by the Planning and Development Department October 11, 2016 Purpose Review proposed Berry/University formbased
More informationArticle 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT
Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT this page left intentionally blank Contents ARTICLE 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT DIVISION 3.1 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT DESCRIPTION...3.1-1 Section 3.1.1
More informationPART 11 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES
PART 11 TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONES 1101 RT-1 Two-Family Residential (1) Intent This zone provides for the development of one-family residential, two-family residential, and detached two-family residential
More information(b) each living unit shall have a minimum floor area of 27 m 2 (290.6 sq.ft.). (B/L No ) (a) the zoning designations R4, R5, R9, or
104. RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R4) This District provides for the use and development of two-family dwellings on larger lots in medium density residential areas. 104.1 Uses Permitted: (1) Single family dwellings
More informationAir Rights Reference Guide
Air Rights Reference Guide Revision Date August 15, 2016 City Center Real Estate Inc. 1010 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10028 ROBERT I. SHAPIRO Founder (212) 396-9705 ris@citycenternyc.com RONALD NOVITA Executive
More informationHILLS BEVERLY. Planning Commission Report. City of Beverly Hills
BEVERLY HILLS 1 City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL, (310) 4854141 FAX. (310) 8584966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: February 14, 2013 Subject:
More informationTOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2011
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2011 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Matt Michels, Senior Planner mmichels@orovalleyaz.gov; tel. 229-4822 Public Hearing: Rancho de
More informationBUILDING AN ADU GUIDE TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS PLANNING DIVISION
BUILDING AN ADU GUIDE TO ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS PLANNING DIVISION 1 451 S. State Street, Room 406 Salt Lake City, UT 84114-5480 P.O. Box 145480 CONTENT 04 OVERVIEW 08 ELIGIBILITY 11 BUILDING AN ADU Types
More informationArch-Laclede s Landing Station
Arch-Laclede s Landing Station This station profile describes existing conditions around the Arch-Laclede s Landing MetroLink Station. This is one of a set of profiles for each of the MetroLink System
More informationSummary of Inclusionary Zoning Practices in Colorado Communities
Summary of Inclusionary Zoning Practices in Colorado Communities Basalt Boulder Carbondale Denver Eagle County Glenwood Springs Longmont Pitkin County & Aspen San Miguel County Telluride Basalt Inclusionary
More informationPLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT. For Planning Commission Meeting of May 6, 2014
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT For Planning Commission Meeting of May 6, 2014 SUBJECT: Amendments to Chapter 55 ( Ordinance) regarding Building and Requirements in the Main Street Character
More informationDIVISION 7. R-6 AND R-6A RESIDENTIAL ZONES* The purpose of the R-6 residential zone is:
Date of Draft: March 6, 2015 DIVISION 7. R-6 AND R-6A RESIDENTIAL ZONES* Sec. 14-135. Purpose. The purpose of the R-6 residential zone is: (a) To set aside areas on the peninsula for housing characterized
More informationTable of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1
Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1 SECTION 10.5A10 GENERAL... 1 10.5A11 Purpose and Intent... 1 10.5A12 Applicability... 1 10.5A13 Compliance with Regulating Plan... 1 10.5A14 Relationship
More informationChapter 17-2 Residential Districts
Chapter 17-2 Residential Districts 17-2-0100 District Descriptions...2-1 17-2-0200 Allowed Uses...2-2 17-2-0300 Bulk and Density Standards...2-5 17-2-0400 Character Standards...2-18 17-2-0500 Townhouse
More informationLITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY
LITTLE MOUNTAIN ADJACENT AREA REZONING POLICY JANUARY 2013 CONTENTS 1.0 INTENT & PRINCIPLES...1 2.0 APPLICATION...2 3.0 HOUSING TYPES, HEIGHT & DENSITY POLICIES...3 3.1 LOW TO MID-RISE APARTMENT POLICIES...4
More informationRM 4 and RM 4N Districts Schedule
Districts Schedule 1 Intent The intent of this Schedule is to permit medium density residential development, including a variety of multiple dwelling types, to encourage the retention of existing buildings
More informationCITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES Development Services Department Planning and Permitting Adopted August 15, 2005 SMALL LOT SINGLE FAMILY HOME GUIDELINES A. Purpose and Applicability.
More informationASPEN GLEN PUD. Eighth Amended PUD Guidelines
ASPEN GLEN PUD Eighth Amended PUD Guidelines A. Applicability Statement To carry out the purposes and provisions of the Garfield County Zoning Regulations, as amended, The Aspen Glen Club Planned Unit
More informationProvide a diversity of housing types, responsive to household size, income and age needs.
8 The City of San Mateo is a highly desirable place to live. Housing costs are comparably high. For these reasons, there is a strong and growing need for affordable housing. This chapter addresses the
More information130 - General Regulations for Residential Zones and Uses Only
Page 130-1 130 - General Regulations for Residential Zones and Uses Only 130.01 Accessory s and Structures (1) An accessory building or structure shall not be used as a dwelling. (2) An accessory building
More informationArticle 6: Planned Unit Developments
LUDC 2013 GARFIELD COUNTY, COLORADO Article 6: Planned Unit Developments ARTICLE 6 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS DIVISION 1. GENERAL.... 1 6-101. GENERAL PROVISIONS.... 1 A. Purpose....
More informationResidential Neighborhoods and Housing
Residential Neighborhoods and Housing 3 GOAL - To protect Greenwich as a predominantly residential community and provide for a variety of housing options The migration of businesses and jobs from New York
More informationZA and ZA Zoning Change and Concept / Site Plan Preliminary Plat Delta Southlake Center
ZA16-051 and ZA16-052 Zoning Change and Concept / Site Plan Preliminary Plat Delta Southlake Center ZA16-051 and ZA16-052 Owner: Applicant: Requests: Dominion Southlake Properties, LLC, White Chapel Village
More informationARTICLE I ZONE BASED REGULATIONS
ARTICLE I ZONE BASED REGULATIONS RZC 21.08 RESIDENTIAL REGULATIONS 21.08.290 Cottage Housing Developments A. Purpose. The purpose of the cottage housing requirements is to: 1. Provide a housing type that
More informationRM-3 District Schedule
District Schedule 1 Intent The intent of this Schedule is to permit medium density residential development, including high-rise apartment buildings, and to secure a higher quality of parking, open space
More informationExhibit A-1. Piney Creek Bend Planned Development
Exhibit A-1 Piney Creek Bend Planned Development A. Purpose and Intent The Piney Creek Bend PD is composed of approximately 90.91 acres, as described in Exhibit D (Field Notes). The development of this
More informationTown of Jamestown Planning Board Zoning Staff Report June 14, 2010
Town of Jamestown Planning Board Zoning Staff Report June 14, 2010 The information provided in this staff report has been included for the purpose of reviewing proposed zoning changes. Since the zoning
More informationDavid J. Gellner, AICP, Principal Planner, ,
Staff Report PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT To: From: Salt Lake City Planning Commission David J. Gellner, AICP, Principal Planner, 801-535-6107, david.gellner@slcgov.com Date: March
More informationPlan Making and Implementation AICP EXAM REVIEW. February 12-13, 2010 Georgia Tech Student Center
Plan Making and Implementation AICP EXAM REVIEW February 12-13, 2010 Georgia Tech Student Center Plan Making and Implementation A. Visioning and goal setting B. Quantitative and qualitative research methods
More informationGENERAL ZONING CODE DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MULTIPLE- DWELLING DEVELOPMENT
INFORMATION BULLETIN / PUBLIC - ZONING CODE REFERENCE NO.: L.A. Zoning Code Effective: 12-30-03 DOCUMENT NO. P/ZC 2002-010 Revised: Previously Issued As: None GENERAL ZONING CODE DESIGN CRITERIA FOR MULTIPLE-
More informationCITY OF HUDSONVILLE Planning Commission Minutes March 15, (Approved April 19, 2017)
CITY OF HUDSONVILLE Planning Commission Minutes (Approved April 19, 2017) 3523 Highland Drive Altron Automation Site Plan Amendment 3150 Shooks Drive Ventures Ave, LLC Formal Final PUD Amendment #2 3441
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION MAY 3, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING
PLANNING COMMISSION MAY 3, 2018 PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: REQUEST TO DEMOLISH TWO SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS ON TWO ADJOINING LOTS AND CONSTRUCT TEN RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS AT 947 GENESEE AVENUE AND 944
More informationNOTICE OF MEETING AND AGENDA FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF SPRINGVILLE, UTAH... JANUARY 23, 2018
NOTICE OF MEETING AND AGENDA FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF SPRINGVILLE, UTAH............................ JANUARY 23, 2018 Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission will hold a public meeting
More informationTable of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1
Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1 SECTION 10.5A10 GENERAL... 1 10.5A11 Purpose and Intent... 1 10.5A12 Applicability... 1 10.5A13 Compliance with Regulating Plan... 1 10.5A14 Relationship
More informationSILVER PINES SUBDIVISION
SILVER PINES SUBDIVISION Engineering Comments: Must comply with the Mobile County Flood Damage Prevention Ordinance. The plat illustrates the proposed 39.4+ acre, 153 lot subdivision, which is located
More informationARTICLE 3 DEFINITIONS
Sections: 3-1 Rules of Construction 3-2 Definitions ARTICLE 3 DEFINITIONS SECTION 3-1 RULES OF CONSTRUCTION 3-101. a. The language set forth in these regulations shall be interpreted in accordance with
More informationDivision 3: Zoning ( Zoning added by O N.S.; effective )
Article 12: Mid-City Communities Planned District ( Mid-City Communities Planned District added 3-27-2007 by O-19598 N.S.; effective 4-26-2007.) Division 3: Zoning ( Zoning added 3-27-2007 by O-19598 N.S.;
More informationBurlington Unincorporated Community Plan
Burlington Unincorporated Community Plan June 30, 2010 Meeting Page 1 of 24 Table of Contents (Page numbers to be inserted) I. Background a. Location and Community Description b. Planning of Unincorporated
More informationMEMORANDUM. Mr. Sean Tabibian, Esq. Dana A. Sayles, AICP, three6ixty Olivia Joncich, three6ixty. DATE May 26, 2017
MEMORANDUM TO FROM Dana A. Sayles, AICP, three6ixty Olivia Joncich, three6ixty DATE VIA Email RE 3409 W. Temple Street, Los Angeles, CA 90026 Zoning Analysis and Entitlement Strategy three6ixty (the Consultant
More informationthe conditions contained in their respective Orders until January 1, 2025, at the discretion of the Director of Planning, Property and Development.
Part 4: Use Regulations Temporary Uses and Structures Purpose the conditions contained in their respective Orders until January 1, 2025, at the discretion of the Director of Planning, Property and Development.
More informationEXHIBIT D. Planned Unit Development Written Description April 13, 2016 Rouen Cove Phase II PUD
1 EXHIBIT D Planned Unit Development Written Description April 13, 2016 Rouen Cove Phase II PUD Development # 8986.001 Developer: Curtis L. Hart Hart Resources LLC 8051 Tara Lane Jacksonville, Florida
More informationDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT PUD/DCI BAINBRIDGE MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: October 12, 2017 Item #: _PZ-2017-170_ STAFF REPORT PUD/DCI BAINBRIDGE MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT Request: Project Name: Planned Unit Development (PUD)/ Development
More informationSCHEDULE 32 TO CLAUSE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY
--/--/20-- Proposed GC81 SCHEDULE 32 TO CLAUSE 43.02 DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY Shown on the planning scheme map as DDO32. FISHERMANS BEND WIRRAWAY PRECINCT 1.0 Design objectives --/--/20-- Proposed
More informationHeights in Residential Zoning Districts Stakeholders Meeting September 17, 2009
Heights in Residential Zoning Districts Stakeholders Meeting September 17, 2009 TONIGHT S AGENDA Recap Ground Rules and Process Final Product Minority Opinion Background Information - Case That Brought
More informationCITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GENERAL LAND USE PACKET Attached is an Application for review of Development that requires Land Use Review pursuant to The City of Aspen Land Use Code: Included in this
More informationRM-2 District Schedule
District Schedule 1 Intent The intent of this Schedule is to permit low to medium density residential development, including low-rise apartment buildings, and to secure a higher quality of parking, open
More informationPacket Contents: Page #
CLEAR CREEK COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS FOR COMMERCIAL AND MULTI-FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS Prior to submitting a building permit application, the Planning staff will review the site plan and construction
More informationTown of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-31 Cary Park PDD Amendment (Waterford II) Town Council Meeting January 15, 2015
Town of Cary, North Carolina Rezoning Staff Report 14-REZ-31 Cary Park PDD Amendment (Waterford II) Town Council Meeting January 15, 2015 REQUEST To amend the Town of Cary Official Zoning Map by amending
More informationPlan Making and Implementation AICP EXAM REVIEW. February 11-12, 2011 Georgia Tech Student Center
Plan Making and Implementation AICP EXAM REVIEW February 11-12, 2011 Georgia Tech Student Center Subject Matter in Plan Making and Implementation (30%) A. Visioning and goal setting B. Quantitative and
More informationORDINANCE NO
ORDINANCE NO. 20060622-022 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2-1 OF THE CITY CODE TO ADD ARTICLE 53 RELATING TO THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN AND COMPATIBILITY COMMISSION; ADDING SECTION 25-2-566 TO THE CITY CODE
More information4027 and 4031 Ellesmere Road Zoning Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Request for Direction Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 4027 and 4031 Ellesmere Road Zoning Amendment and Draft Plan of Subdivision Applications - Request for Direction Report Date: August 22, 2013 To: From: Wards: Reference Number:
More informationAppendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017
Appendix1,Page1 Urban Design Guidelines DRAFT September 2017 Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses Appendix1,Page2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Urban Design Objectives 1 1.3 Building
More informationChapter 100 Planned Unit Development in Corvallis Urban Fringe
100.100 Scope and Purpose. Chapter 100 Planned Unit Development in Corvallis Urban Fringe (1) All applications for land divisions in the Urban Residential (UR) and Flood Plain Agriculture (FPA) zones within
More informationConditional Use Permit case no. CU 14-06: Bristol Village Partners, LLC
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 7, 2014 Conditional Use Permit case no. CU 14-06: Bristol Village Partners, LLC CASE DESCRIPTION: LOCATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXISTING LAND USE: ZONING:
More information(H) RM-10: LOW-DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 123
Section 23-3-2(H): RM-10: Low-Density Multifamily Residential District (H) RM-10: LOW-DENSITY MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 123 The Low-Density, Multifamily Residential (RM-10) District is established
More information. \. structure. portion of a. yard setback. in height. for that. above 45 ft. structure above. 20-ft. front. 2, additional.
Z089-254(RB) E-1 REGULATIONS Front Yard YARD, LOT, AND SPACE 00. \.,, Max.-6Oft. Mm. 15 ft. maximum front yard right-of-ways other way is dedicated existing Ft. Worth ft. from Ft. Worth Ave. or rights
More informationDate: January 9, Strategic Housing Committee. IZ Work Group. Legacy Homes Program
City of Whitefish 418 E 2 nd Street PO Box 158 Whitefish, MT 59937 Date: January 9, 2019 To: From: Subject: Strategic Housing Committee IZ Work Group Legacy Homes Program At our meeting, we are going to
More informationCover Letter with Narrative Statement
Cover Letter with Narrative Statement March 31, 2017 rev July 27, 2017 RE: Rushton Pointe Residential Planned Unit Development Application for Public Hearing for RPUD Rezone PL2015 000 0306 Mr. Eric Johnson,
More informationA New Zoning Code for a 21st Century Los Angeles
A New Zoning Code for a 21st Century Los Angeles To create livable communities, encourage sustainable development and foster economic vitality, we need a modern and user-friendly zoning code we need to
More information