Vision: Vision: Agenda Planning Committee at 5:30 pm Ordre du jour Comité de la planification à 17h 30

Transcription

1 Vision: The City of Greater Sudbury is a growing, world-class community bringing talent, technology and a great northern lifestyle together. Vision: La Ville du Grand Sudbury est une communauté croissante de calibre international qui rassemble les talents, les technologies et le style de vie exceptionnel du Nord. Agenda Planning Committee meeting to be held Tuesday, April 20th, 2010 at 5:30 pm Council Chamber, Tom Davies Square Ordre du jour réunion du Comité de la planification qui aura lieu mardi 20e avril 2010 à 17h 30 dans la Salle du conseil, Place Tom Davies

2 PLANNING COMMITTEE AGENDA For the 69th Planning Committee Meeting to be held on Tuesday, April 20, 2010 Council Chamber, Tom Davies Square at 5:30 pm COUNCILLOR ANDRÉ RIVEST, CHAIR Frances Caldarelli, Vice-Chair 4:45 P.M. Planning Committee "Closed Meeting" COMMITTEE ROOM C-12 To deal with: One Acquisition/Disposition of Land Matters: Purchase of Land - Long Lake Road, Sudbury 5:30 P.M. Regular Planning Committee Meeting COUNCIL CHAMBER, TOM DAVIES SQUARE (PLEASE ENSURE CELL PHONES AND PAGERS ARE TURNED OFF) The Council Chamber of Tom Davies Square is accessible to persons with disabilities. Please speak to the City Clerk s Office prior to the meeting if you require a hearing amplification device. Persons requiring assistance are requested to contact the City Clerk s Office at least 24 hours in advance of the meeting if special arrangements are required. Please call (705) , extension Telecommunications Device for the Deaf (TTY) (705) Copies of Agendas can be viewed on the City s website at DECLARATIONS OF PECUNIARY INTEREST AND THE GENERAL NATURE THEREOF MATTERS ARISING FROM THE "CLOSED MEETING" At this point in the meeting, the Chair of the Closed Meeting, Councillor Caldarelli, will rise and report the results of the Closed Meeting". The Committee will then consider any recommendations. PLANNING COMMITTEE (69 th ) ( ) - 1 -

3 PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Report dated April 7, 2010 from the General Manager of Growth and Development regarding Application for rezoning in order to permit the construction of two buildings containing 36 apartment units in addition to the two existing apartment buildings, 720 Cambrian Heights Drive, Sudbury Cambrian Heights Inc. (RECOMMENDATION PREPARED) 8-18 Letter of concern dated January 26, 2010 from Scott Snider, Turkstra Mazza Associates, Lawyers. 2. Report dated April 7, 2010 from the General Manager of Growth and Development regarding Application for rezoning in order to permit advertising signs in addition to residential uses, office space, banquet facilities and the restaurant uses currently permitted, Pearl Street, Sudbury - Westar Investments Inc. (RECOMMENDATION PREPARED) DELEGATIONS / PRESENTATIONS CONSENT AGENDA (For the purpose of convenience and for expediting meetings, matters of business of repetitive or routine nature are included in the Consent Agenda, and all such matters of business contained in the Consent Agenda are voted on collectively. A particular matter of business may be singled out from the Consent Agenda for debate or for a separate vote upon the request of any Councillor. In the case of a separate vote, the excluded matter of business is severed from the Consent Agenda, and only the remaining matters of business contained in the Consent Agenda are voted on collectively. Each and every matter of business contained in the Consent Agenda is recorded separately in the minutes of the meeting.) MINUTES C-1. Report No. 12, Municipal Heritage Minutes of March 8, (RECOMMENDATION PREPARED) ROUTINE MANAGEMENT REPORTS PLANNING COMMITTEE (69 th ) ( ) - 2 -

4 C-2. Report dated April 7, 2010 from the General Manager of Growth and Development regarding Application to remove an H, Holding Designation by Iseline Gandaho & Stephane Landry pertaining to By-law 97-66Z (H11PS-2) South Bay Road, Sudbury. (RECOMMENDATION PREPARED) C-3. Report dated April 7, 2010 from the General Manager of Growth and Development regarding Application to amend draft approval, Moonglo subdivision - south side of Moonrock Avenue, Sudbury. (RECOMMENDATION PREPARED) CORRESPONDENCE FOR INFORMATION ONLY REGULAR AGENDA REFERRED AND DEFERRED MATTERS MANAGERS' REPORTS R-1. Report dated April 7, 2010 from the General Manager of Growth and Development regarding New Comprehensive Zoning By-law. (RECOMMENDATION PREPARED) ADDENDUM 10:00 P.M. ADJOURNMENT (RECOMMENDATION PREPARED) (Two-thirds majority required to proceed past 10:00 P.M.) LISA OLDRIDGE, Deputy City Clerk LIZ COLLIN, Planning Committee Secretary PLANNING COMMITTEE (69 th ) ( ) - 3 -

5 COMITÉ DE LA PLANIFICATION ORDRE DU JOUR Pour la 69e réunion du Comité de la planification qui aura lieu le 20 avril 2010 dans la Salle du conseil, Place Tom Davies, à 17h 30 CONSEILLER ANDRÉ RIVEST, PRÉSIDENT(E) Frances Caldarelli, Vice-président(e) 16H 45 Séance à huis clos du comité de la planification Salle de réunion C-12 Objet : traiter de une acquisitions / aliénations de terrains 17H 30 Réunion ordinaire du comité de la planification Salle du Conseil, Place Tom Davies (VEUILLEZ ÉTEINDRE LES TÉLÉPHONES CELLULAIRES ET LES TÉLÉAVERTISSEURS) La salle du Conseil de la Place Tom Davies est accessible pour les personnes handicapées. Si vous désirez obtenir un appareil auditif, veuillez communiquer avec la greffi re municipale, avant la réunion. Les personnes qui prévoient avoir besoin d aide doivent s adresser au bureau du greffier municipal au moins 24 heures avant la réunion aux fins de dispositions spéciales. Veuillez composer le , poste 4209; appareils de télécommunications pour les malentendants (ATS) Vous pouvez consulter l ordre du jour au site Web de la Ville au DÉCLARATION D INTÉRÊTS PÉCUNIAIRES ET LEUR NATURE GÉNÉRALES QUESTIONS DÉCOULANT DE LA SÉANCE À HUIS CLOS Le président de la séance à huis clos, le conseillère Caldarelli, se lève maintenant et en présente les résultats. Le Comité examine ensuite les recommandations. COMITÉ DE LA PLANIFICATION (69 e ) ( ) - 1 -

6 AUDIENCES PUBLIQUES 1. Rapport du directeur général de la Croissance et du Développement, daté du 07 avril 2010 portant sur Demande de rezonage afin de permettre la construction de deux immeubles d habitation de 36 logements, en plus des deux existants, au 720, promenade Cambrian Heights, Sudbury 720 Cambrian Heights Inc. (RECOMMANDATION PRÉPARÉE) Rapport du directeur général de la Croissance et du Développement, daté du 07 avril 2010 portant sur Demande de rezonage afin de permettre des enseignes publicitaires en plus des usages résidentiels, des locaux à bureaux, des salles de banquet et du restaurant actuellement permis, rue Pearl, Sudbury Westar Investments Inc. (RECOMMANDATION PRÉPARÉE) DÉLÉGATIONS / PRÉSENTATIONS Ordre du jour des résolutions (Par souci de commodité et pou accélérer le déroulement des réunions, les questions d'affaires répétitives ou routinières sont incluses a l ordre du jour des résolutions, et on vote collectivement pour toutes les question de ce genre. A la demande d une conseillère ou d un conseiller, on pourra traiter isolément d une question d affaires de l ordre du jour des résolutions par voie de débat ou par vote séparé. Dans le cas d un vote séparé, la question d affaires isolée est retirée de l ordre du jour des résolutions ; on ne vote collectivement qu au sujet des questions à l ordre du jour des résolutions. Toutes les questions d affaires à l ordre du jour des résolutions sont inscrites séparément au procès-verbal de la réunion) PROCÈS-VERBAL C-1. Report No. 12, procès-verbal de la réunion du 8 mars 2010 du Comité municipal du patrimoine. (RECOMMANDATION PRÉPARÉE) RAPPORTS DE GESTION COURANTS C-2. Rapport du directeur général de la Croissance et du Développement, daté du 07 avril 2010 portant sur Demande visant à supprimer le symbole d utilisation différée «H» relativement au Règlement municipal 97-66Z (H11PS-2) 2181, chemin South Bay, Sudbury Iseline Gandaho et Stéphane Landry. (RECOMMANDATION PRÉPARÉE) COMITÉ DE LA PLANIFICATION (69 e ) ( ) - 2 -

7 C-3. Rapport du directeur général de la Croissance et du Développement, daté du 07 avril 2010 portant sur Demande de modification de l approbation de l ébauche, lotissement Moonglo, du côté sud de l avenue Moonrock, Sudbury. (RECOMMANDATION PRÉPARÉE) CORRESPONDANCE À TITRE D'INFORMATION Ordre du jour ordinaire QUESTIONS RENVOYÉES ET QUESTIONS REPORTÉES RAPPORTS DES GESTIONNAIRES R-1. Rapport du directeur général de la Croissance et du Développement, daté du 07 avril 2010 portant sur Nouveau règlement municipal de zonage général. (RECOMMANDATION PRÉPARÉE) ADDENDA LEVÉE DE LA SÉANCE À 22 H (RECOMMENDATION PRÉPARÉE) (Une majorité des deux tiers est requise pour poursuivre la réunion après 22 H.) LISA OLDRIDGE, Greffière municipal adjointe LIZ COLLIN, Secrétaire du Comité de la planification COMITÉ DE LA PLANIFICATION (69 e ) ( ) - 3 -

8 Request for Decision Application for rezoning in order to permit the construction of two buildings containing 36 apartment units in addition to the two existing apartment buildings, 720 Cambrian Heights Drive, Sudbury Cambrian Heights Inc Presented To: Planning Committee Presented: Tuesday, Apr 20, 2010 Report Date Wednesday, Apr 07, 2010 Type: Public Hearings File Number: 751-6/09-35 Recommendation That the application by 720 Cambrian Heights Inc. to amend By-law Z being the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the (former) City of Sudbury by changing the zoning classification of lands described as PIN , Parcel SES, Block J, Plan M-930, Lot 5, Concession 5, Township of McKim from "R4.D27", Multiple Residential to "R4.D48", and "R4.D65", Multiple Residential be approved subject to the following: 1) That the applicant provide the Development Services Section with a registered plan of survey in order to enable the preparation of the amending by-law. 2) That prior to a building permit being issued the applicant amend the existing site plan control agreement. STAFF REPORT Applicant: 720 Cambrian Heights Inc. Location: Signed By Report Prepared By Celia Teale Senior Planner Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 Reviewed By Art Potvin Manager of Development Services Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 Recommended by the Division Paul Baskcomb Acting Director of Planning Services Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 Recommended by the Department Bill Lautenbach General Manager of Growth and Development Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 Recommended by the C.A.O. Doug Nadorozny Chief Administrative Officer Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 PIN , Parcel SES, Block J, Plan M-930, Lot 5, Concession 5, Township of McKim, 720 Cambrian Heights, Sudbury Application: To amend By-law Z being the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the former City of Sudbury by changing the zoning classification from "R4.D27", Multiple Residential to "R4.D43", and "R4.D65", Multiple Residential Zone. Page 8 of 72

9 Proposal: This application is to allow the subject lands to be developed with 73 apartment units where 41 units are permitted. Official Plan Conformity: The subject property is designated Living Area One in the Official Plan for the City of Greater Sudbury. This land use designation permits a mixture of housing types through the rezoning process. The Official Plan places an emphasis on maintaining the existing physical character of established residential neighbourhoods, with special consideration extended to the proposed built form and density. This is balanced with the need to expand the range of housing options throughout the community. The following criteria under Section of the Official Plan shall be considered: - suitability of the site to accommodate the proposed density and building form; - physical compatibility with the surrounding neighbourhood in terms of scale, massing, height, siting, and setbacks; - adequate on-site parking; and, - traffic impact on local streets. Other matters under review include the availability of municipal sewer and water, and the proximity to community services, employment areas and public transit. Conformity with the Official Plan is based on a review of the above noted considerations. Site Description & Surrounding Land Uses: The subject lands consist of a land area of 1.5 hectares (3.8 acres) with frontage on Cambrian Heights. The site has two existing three storey apartment dwellings with one apartment block containing 18 units and the second apartment building containing 19 units for a total of 37 units. Surrounding land uses consist of a mixture of dwelling types including townhomes, semi-detached dwellings and multiple dwellings. To the west of the subject lands there are commercial uses located along Notre Dame Avenue. Departmental & Agency Comments: Development Engineering Development Engineering has reviewed the above noted application. Municipal water and sewer are available on Cambrian Heights for this development. From our water analysis, the following flows and domestic pressures were determined at the lot line at an elevation of 262.0m: Fire Flow = 186 l/s Maximum Day Pressure = 75 psi (50 psi required) Maximum Hour Pressure = 81 psi (40 psi required) A sanitary sewer request has been sent to Infrastructure Services to determine if there is adequate capacity in the existing municipal sanitary sewers. If adequate capacity does not exist, the owner must complete all required upgrades to the City s sewage collection system in order to provide the required capacity. Page 9 of 72

10 We will make further detailed comments as part of the Site Plan Control Agreement process. This would include but not limited to a review of the site servicing required for the proposed development, lot grading, stormwater management and work to be completed in the right-of-way. We have no objection to changing the zoning classification from "R4.D27", Multiple Residential to "R4D48", Multiple Residential Zone in order to permit the development for 73 apartment units where 41 units is now permitted on the subject land, provided this proceeds by way of site plan control agreement. Traffic and Transportation Services Subject to development proceeding by way of a Site Plan Control Agreement, we have no concerns. Operations No concerns. Public Consultation: The applicant was advised that a neighbourhood meeting should be held in order to address any neighbourhood concerns pertaining to this application. At the time of this report Planning Services had received one letter of objection. Planning Considerations: As outlined earlier, this housing form is permitted in the Official Plan. Given the mixture of land uses in the area neighbourhood compatibility would be maintained with this proposal. Municipal services are available and there is sufficient land area to accommodate the proposed buildings and parking. As such this proposal is deemed to conform with the policies established in the Official Plan. Intensification Section 3.3 of the Official Plan identifies residential intensification as an effective means of ensuring the efficient use of land and infrastructure in the City. The policies pertaining to intensification are consistent with the desire to concentrate future development in fully serviced communities, as well as promoting the provincial directives on housing policy. In order to ensure the development of healthy, balanced and efficient Communities, the City will encourage new growth to occur through intensification and as such the Official Plan has identified policies for intensification. Intensive forms of development can occur without dramatic change in the character and scale of existing neighbourhoods. Opportunities for intensification will be supported on lands that are vacant and/or underutilized within previously developed areas and, in fully serviced Living Areas that could accommodate infill developments. The Official Plan gives priority to meeting housing targets by means of intensification within existing established urban areas. In particular, intensification will be encouraged on major Arterial Roads in close proximity to employment areas and public transit. This development proposal would support the intensification policies identified within the Official Plan. As such this proposal complies with the Official Plan. Page 10 of 72

11 Provincial Policy Statement The Provincial Policy Statement issued in March 2005 indicates that municipalities shall provide for an appropriate range of housing types and densities to meet projected requirements of current and future residents. The provision of affordable housing is a key component of the revised policy statement. Municipalities must now establish and implement minimum annual targets for the provision of housing which is affordable to low and moderate income households (PPS Section a). An integral part of meeting this challenge is to maintain existing rental accommodation as a source of affordable housing and promote new rental accommodation that can address various needs. The addition of 36 rental units into the Sudbury Community would be consistent with the PPS. Land Use The subject lands are currently zoned "R4.D27", Multiple Residential which permits the 37 apartment units located on the property. In order for the applicant to build an additional 36 apartment units a rezoning is required in order to change the density factor permitted. The overall density for the development will change from 27 units per hectare to 48 units per hectare. It is however the applicant s intent to sever the property into two lots. Once the severance has taken place the portion of the site currently occupied by the two apartment buildings will have a density of approximately 65 units per hectare. The vacant portion will have a density of approximately 43 units. As such the amending by-law will have to address the density that will result if the consent application is approved. The applicant had submitted a consent application in 2008 (B0251/2008) which was granted conditional approval. This consent application has now lapsed and the applicant intends to resubmit the severance application. Parking If the rezoning is approved and the severance takes place the retained lands will contain 37 dwelling units with a total of 63 parking spaces provided where 56 spaces are required. Parking is adequately addressed on the retained lands. For the portion to be severed 36 dwelling units are proposed with 58 parking spaces being provided where 54 spaces are required. Based on the concept plan submitted this proposal can address on site parking. Summary Based upon a review of Official Plan policy and zoning this proposal would be deemed to be an appropriate use of the lands. In medium density proposals 90 units per hectare would be permitted. This proposal if approved would result in a maximum density of approximately 65 units. There are a mixture of land uses in the area and this proposal would be in keeping with the established built form in the area. Page 11 of 72

12 Surrounding multiple residential developments in the area range in density from 27 units per hectare up to 216 units per hectare. As such we see no adverse impacts resulting from approval of this application and therefore it is recommended for approval. Page 12 of 72

13 location sketch 1/1 Page 13 of 72

14 M plan 1/1 Page 14 of 72

15 Photo 1 SUBJECT PROPERTY LOOKING NORTHEAST FROM CAMBRIAN HEIGHTS DRIVE Photo 2 SUBJECT PROPERTY LOOKING NORTH FROM PARKING AREA AT 720 CAMBRIAN HEIGHTS DR /09-35 Photography March 30, Photos 1/2 Page 15 of 72

16 Photo 3 EXISTING BUILDING CAMBRIAN HEIGHTS DR. Photo 4 SUBJECT PROPERTY LOOKING EAST FROM CAMBRIAN HEIGHTS 751-6/09-35 Photography March 30, Photos 2/2 Page 16 of 72

17 letter of objection 1/2 Page 17 of 72

18 letter of objection 2/2 Page 18 of 72

19 Request for Decision Application for rezoning in order to permit advertising signs in addition to residential uses, office space, banquet facilities and the restaurant uses currently permitted, Pearl Street, Sudbury - Westar Investments Inc Presented To: Planning Committee Presented: Tuesday, Apr 20, 2010 Report Date Wednesday, Apr 07, 2010 Type: Public Hearings File Number: 751-6/10-13 Recommendation That the application by Westar Investments Inc. to amend By-law Z being the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the City of Sudbury by changing the zoning classification of lands described as Lots 6 to 10, Plan 28-S-B being Parts 14 to 18 and 20, Plan 53R-17879, Part of Lots 33 to 38, Plan 28-S-A being Parts 2 and 4 to 8, Plan 53R and Part of Pearl Street, Plan 28-S-A, being Parts 9 to 13, Plan 53R-17879, Lot 5, Concession 4, Township of McKim, Pearl Street, Sudbury be approved subject to the following condition: 1) a) That the amending by-law specify that the only permitted uses shall be a maximum of 12 advertising signs, measuring 20 feet by 32 feet, residential dwelling units, commercial office space, banquet facilities and restaurant uses. b) Advertising signs shall only be permitted in conjunction with permitted commercial uses and shall be mounted to the existing water tower. 2) That a temporary use by-law be passed for a period of 3 years in order to permit the advertising signs without a main use. Signed By Report Prepared By Celia Teale Senior Planner Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 Reviewed By Art Potvin Manager of Development Services Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 Recommended by the Division Paul Baskcomb Acting Director of Planning Services Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 Recommended by the Department Bill Lautenbach General Manager of Growth and Development Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 Recommended by the C.A.O. Doug Nadorozny Chief Administrative Officer Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 STAFF REPORT Applicant: Westar Investments Inc. Location: Lots 6 to 10, Plan 28-S-B being Parts 14 to 18 and 20, Plan 53R-17879, Part of Lots 33 to 38, Plan 28-S-A being Parts 2 and 4 to 8, Plan 53R and Part of Pearl Street, Plan 28-S-A, being Parts 9 to 13, Plan 53R-17879, Lot 5, Concession 4, Township of McKim, Pearl Street, Sudbury. Page 19 of 72

20 Application: 1) To amend By-Law Z being the Comprehensive Zoning By-Law for the (former) City of Sudbury by amending the "C3-24", Limited General Commercial Special zone to include advertising billboards measuring 20 feet by 32 feet, in conjunction with the permitted commercial and residential uses. 2) A temporary by-law for a period of three years is also proposed in order to permit the advertising signs without a main use. Proposal: The applicant wishes to convert the Pearl Street abandoned water tower into residential dwelling units, commercial office space, banquet facilities and a restaurant. The proposal also calls for the establishment of twelve advertising billboards to be leased by a variety of advertisers. The billboards will measure 20 feet by 32 feet and will be permitted in conjunction with the commercial space. Official Plan Conformity: The subject lands are designated Living Area One in the Official Plan for the City of Greater Sudbury. This proposal would re-introduce advertising signs as a permitted use, as well as maintain uses previously approved for residential use, commercial office space, and restaurant/banquet facilities. Section of the Official Plan deals specifically with the conversion of existing buildings and outlines that Council may pass by-laws to permit the use of an existing building or structure for a use that does not conform with the land use designation. As such this application would be deemed to conform with the Official Plan. Site Description & Surrounding Land Uses: The subject lands consist of the existing water tower site that has frontage along Pearl Street and contains a land area of approximately 0.5 hectares (1.3 acres). The applicant also owns lands across the street from the subject property that could be utilized for parking if required. The land uses surrounding the site consist of a mixture of dwelling types ranging from single detached dwellings to multiple dwellings. Departmental & Agency Comments: Since the subject lands were recently dealt with under applications for rezoning in 2006 and 2008, additional comments were not requested. Planning Considerations: Background On June 6, 2006 Planning Committee approved a rezoning application to permit the conversion of the abandoned Pearl Street water tower into restaurant, commercial office space, off site parking and advertising billboards. The initial proposal for the site outlined a potential for approximately 6,900 square feet of restaurant space, 6,900 square feet of office space or banquet facilities and 2000 square feet of bar/lounge area for a total floor space of approximately 16,000 square feet. Page 20 of 72

21 As part of this proposal advertising signs would be established between the pillars of the water tower. This approval was conditional on a site plan agreement. The site plan was finalized and the zoning by-law was passed on June 11, In order to allow the applicant the ability to place the advertising signs on the tower prior to a main use being established a temporary use by-law was passed for a period of two years. The temporary by-law expired on November 29, The owner then filed a second application in June of 2008 to introduce residential uses instead of the advertising signs previously approved. The applicant now wants the flexibility to proceed with the advertising signs that were part of the initial approval. Public consultation Given the fact that advertising signs were previously approved under the first application the applicant was not advised to hold a public hearing. Land Use In order to re-introduce the advertising signs as a permitted use a rezoning is required. The applicant has also requested that the advertising signs be permitted on a temporary basis without a main use for a period of three years. Since advertising signs have already been approved for the water tower as part of the initial application and a temporary by-law has been passed once for the signs, Planning Services is recommending that the applications for rezoning and the temporary use be approved. Page 21 of 72

22 location sketch 1/1 Page 22 of 72

23 site plan 1/1 Page 23 of 72

24 Photo 1/1 Page 24 of 72

25 concept - paris street 1/1 Page 25 of 72

26 Minutes Report No. 12, Municipal Heritage Minutes of March 8, Presented To: Planning Committee Presented: Tuesday, Apr 20, 2010 Type: Minutes Recommendation For Information Only Signed By No signatures or approvals were recorded for this report. Page 26 of 72

27 THE TWELFTH MEETING OF THE MUNICIPAL HERITAGE COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF GREATER SUDBURY Boardroom C-12 Monday, March 8, 2010 Tom Davies Square Commencement: 5:05 p.m. Adjournment: 6:46 p.m. ROLL CALL JOE DRAGO IN THE CHAIR Present Councillor E. Dutrisac; Councillor J. Landry-Altmann (A5:05 p.m. D5:47 p.m.); J. Drago; J. Larcher-Lalande (A5:07 p.m. D5:47 p.m.); S. Prusila; A. Salach (D6:27p.m.); M. Steedman; M. Stefura; S. Thompson Staff Declarations of Pecuniary Interest and the General Nature Thereof J. Fortin, Curator, City of Greater Sudbury Heritage Museums; K. Lang, Recording Secretary; K. Longston, Senior Planner; M. Simeoni, Acting Manager of Community and Strategic Planning; Jody Cameron, Project Manager, e-sudbury.com None declared. MINUTES Item 1 Adoption of Minutes January 11, Landry-Prusila: THAT the minutes of January 11, 2010 be approved with the noted change. S. Thompson was present at the meeting but was omitted from the minutes. CARRIED MANAGER S REPORTS Item 2 Draft Website Presentation Jody Cameron, Project Manager, e-sudbury.com Jody Cameron, Project Manager, e-sudbury.com provided an overview of web capabilities for the development of the Heritage web portal. The committee discussed potential components of the web portal. Some of the ideas that were encouraged for the site include: MHC ( ) 1 Welcome message Statement about the City of Greater Sudbury Statement about the Municipal Heritage Committee Various sections including people, places, landscapes Old photographs and oral histories Nostalgic audio recordings Education component Interactive, engaging, fun A component about saving heritage structures Listing of designated heritage sites MHC Notes March /4 Page 27 of 72

28 MANAGER S REPORTS (CONT D) Item 2 Draft Website Presentation Jody Cameron, Project Manager, e-sudbury.com (cont d) Links to other sites, relevant government services Opportunity for community members to be polled about heritage issues ensuring accurate results Then and now pictures First Nations component Preservation around industrial sites Capturing those buildings that were lost or destroyed but how they remain in collective memory Site design should be aesthetically pleasing, capture the attention of the visitor Exploring heritage City staff was directed to proceed with the ideas presented and design a preliminary website for feedback from the Municipal Heritage Committee. Item Strategic Plan Update Long List Item 4 Doors Open Greater Sudbury 2010 City staff provided an update on the strategic direction of the long list of sites to be assessed. Staff was further directed by the Committee to establish a special meeting at the end of March or beginning of April to examine the long list. It was agreed that the meeting should occur before the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Municipal Heritage Committee. Discussions surrounding the upcoming Doors Open Greater Sudbury 2010 event continued. City staff informed the Committee that registered sites for the calendar are confirmed and a flyer will be placed in the Globe and Mail in April promoting the provincial event. It was suggested that volunteers from 2 years ago be asked to volunteer again to maintain continuity. Item 5 Downtown Heritage District Susan Thompson Susan Thompson, Downtown Village Development Corporation, provided a historical overview of the downtown and explained the importance of recognizing Sudbury s first neighbourhood. There was further discussion about the downtown heritage buildings, including the need to preserve and protect their significance. City staff clarified what it means for an area to be designated a Heritage Conservation District and further identified the process for the designation. The downtown Master Planning process was further discussed and its implications in terms of the process for designation Steedman-Thompson: THAT the Municipal Heritage Committee request that the process to designate downtown Sudbury as a Heritage Conservation District be initiated; and further, The Municipal Heritage Committee recommends that Council initiate the process to designate downtown Sudbury as a Heritage Conservation District; and further MHC ( ) 2 MHC Notes March /4 Page 28 of 72

29 MANAGER S REPORTS (CONT D) Item 5 Downtown Heritage District Susan Thompson (cont d) Item 6 Flour Mill Silos THAT the Municipal Heritage Committee supports the development of the downtown Master Plan which, among other things will consider this issue. CARRIED Councillor Landry-Altmann provided an overview of the current situation with respect to the Flour Mill Silos. She reported that the SBE Energy Group is interested in developing a project that will enhance the current state of the silos by creating a green environment that requires pre-cast panels to be molded and placed on the concrete. The Group reported that this project will assist with green initiatives for Greater Sudbury and rehabilitate the current state of the Flour Mill Silos. Item 7 Draft Zoning By-Law There was discussion regarding the current designation of the exterior and it was determined that City Staff should further examine what can be done to the exterior and if it can be altered, based on its designation as a heritage site. It was also agreed in principle that the SBE Energy Group be invited to provide a presentation to the Committee during a future meeting. The committee was informed the City is currently drafting a new Zoning Bylaw. The current change will update all zoning by-law considerations with the new amalgamated City of Greater Sudbury from the former municipalities. Members of the Municipal Heritage Committee were encouraged to review the new draft zoning by-law on the City of Greater Sudbury website and/or request a compact disc with the draft. With this review, any comments can be directed to the Planning Services section to assist in its review. Item 8 Gear Box located in Hnatyshyn Park Mary Stefura read a letter that was sent to Councillor Doug Craig and the Municipal Heritage Committee with respect to the removal of a hydro gear box in Hnatyshyn Park. She indicated the gear box has not been removed and the Ukrainian Seniors Centre would like it removed as soon as possible and the park returned to its previous state. Councillor Landry-Altmann offered to contact Councillor Doug Craig to review the removal timeline. MHC ( ) 3 MHC Notes March /4 Page 29 of 72

30 MANAGER S REPORTS (CONT D) Item 9 Old Fire Hall in Capreol Jeanine Larcher-Lalande reviewed a media item that included information about the Northern Ontario Railroad and Heritage Museum s possible acquisition of the old fire hall in Capreol. Jeanine requested that if there is a designation implication with the acquisition that it be reviewed in advance with the Municipal Heritage Committee Prusila Larcher-Lalonde: That the decommissioned former fire hall in Capreol be considered for preservation through the Heritage Assessment Process. CARRIED Item 10 Recognition for Provincial Heritage Award for Volunteerism Jeanine Larcher-Lalande Councillor Landry-Altmann advised the Committee that Jeanine would be recognized during City Council s meeting on Wednesday March 10 th, All Committee members were invited to a special reception in her honour beginning at 5:15 p.m. in Committee Room C-13. Adjournment This meeting does now adjourn. Time: 6:46 p.m. CARRIED Kristina Lang, Secretary Joe Drago, Vice-Chair MHC ( ) 4 MHC Notes March /4 Page 30 of 72

31 Request for Decision Application to remove an H, Holding Designation by Iseline Gandaho & Stephane Landry pertaining to By-law 97-66Z (H11PS-2) South Bay Road, Sudbury Presented To: Planning Committee Presented: Tuesday, Apr 20, 2010 Report Date Wednesday, Apr 07, 2010 Type: Routine Management Reports File Number: 751-6/10-7 Recommendation That the application by Iseline Gandaho & Stephane Landry to amend By-law Z being the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the (former) City of Sudbury by removing the "H", Holding Designation on lands described as Parcel S.E.S., Part 1, Plan 53R in Lot 1, Concession 1, Township of McKim in order to permit the development of a single detached dwelling be approved. STAFF REPORT Applicant: Iseline Gandaho & Stephane Landry Location: Parcel S.E.S., Part 1, Plan 53R in Lot 1, Concession 1, Township of McKim (2181 South Bay Road, Sudbury) Application: Signed By Report Prepared By Mauro Manzon Planner Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 Reviewed By Art Potvin Manager of Development Services Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 Recommended by the Division Paul Baskcomb Acting Director of Planning Services Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 Recommended by the Department Bill Lautenbach General Manager of Growth and Development Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 Recommended by the C.A.O. Doug Nadorozny Chief Administrative Officer Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 To amend By-law Z being the Comprehensive Zoning By-law for the (former) City of Sudbury by removing the "H", Holding Designation with respect to the "H11PS-2", Holding Private Open Space Special zoning applied to the subject lands. Proposal: Application to remove a holding designation in order to permit a single detached dwelling on lands designated as Parks & Open Space and zoned as "H11PS-2", Holding Private Open Space Special. The proponent intends to develop a single detached dwelling on a 0.43 ha non-waterfront lot on South Bay Road. Page 31 of 72

32 Background: The property had been subject to prior applications for Official Plan Amendment and rezoning in 1996 in order to permit a single detached dwelling (File nos. 701/ & 751-6/95-39). Twelve other sites on South Bay Road were also under consideration at that time. The irregular-shaped parcel has a total site area of 0.43 ha (1.06 acre), with a road frontage of approximately 76 m and a property depth of 55 m. Similar to other properties on the west and southwest side of South Bay Road, the non-waterfront lot was formed by a natural severance created by the alignment of the roadway. On May 28, 1997, Regional Council adopted By-law 97-66Z, which rezoned the subject lands to "H11PS-2", Holding Private Open Space Special. Concurrent with the rezoning process, Council approved Official Plan Amendment #169, which provided a site specific exemption in order to permit a single detached dwelling on lands designated as Conservation. No further lot severances were permitted. In order to ensure that private services are adequate to support a residential use, Council placed an "H" Holding designation on the subject property. The holding designation was not be removed until the following requirements are met: 1. Proof of an adequate supply of potable water on the property to the satisfaction of the Regional Commissioner of Public Works; and, 2. Approval from the Sudbury & District Health Unit to establish a subsurface waste disposal system on the property to the satisfaction of the Health Unit. Summary: An application to remove the holding designation has been submitted on the following basis: The owners have obtained a Sewage System Permit from the Sudbury & District Health Unit indicating that a Class 4 Filter Bed can be accommodated on the site (SDHU File # SP005). Based on correspondence received from the Infrastructure Services Department, the owners have proven an adequate supply of water; however, the well water did not meet the guidelines for iron, manganese and turbidity. As a result, a signed potable water agreement is being registered on title (in process as of the date of this report). Planning Services Division recommends that the "H", Holding Designation be lifted based on fulfilment of the above noted conditions. Page 32 of 72

33 location sketch 1/1 Page 33 of 72

34 site plan 1/1 Page 34 of 72

35 Request for Decision Application to amend draft approval, Moonglo subdivision - south side of Moonrock Avenue, Sudbury Presented To: Planning Committee Presented: Tuesday, Apr 20, 2010 Report Date Wednesday, Apr 07, 2010 Type: Routine Management Reports File Number: 780-6/89019 Recommendation That the application by J.P. Max Construction to amend the draft subdivision approval for Parcels 43309, 40240, 28530, Part of Parcel 1446 in Lot 7 & 8, Concession 1, Township of McKim be approved subject to the following: 1) That part of the draft plan of subdivision south of Moonrock Avenue be amended to reflect the new road and lot configuration as outlined on a plan prepared by Terry Del Bosco O.L.S dated January 14th ) By deleting condition #24 3) By adding the following conditions: #31. The owner shall provide proof of sufficient fire flow in conjunction with the submission of construction drawings for each phase of construction. All costs associated with upgrading the existing distribution system to service this subdivision will be borne totally by the owner. #32. The owner shall provide proof of sufficient sanitary sewer capacity in conjunction with the submission of construction drawings for each phase of construction. All costs associated with upgrading the existing collection system and/or sewage lift stations to service this subdivision will be borne totally by the owner. Signed By Report Prepared By Celia Teale Senior Planner Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 Reviewed By Art Potvin Manager of Development Services Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 Recommended by the Division Paul Baskcomb Acting Director of Planning Services Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 Recommended by the Department Bill Lautenbach General Manager of Growth and Development Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 Recommended by the C.A.O. Doug Nadorozny Chief Administrative Officer Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 #33. That the owner contributes $1,000 per lot towards the cost of widening Regent Street between Caswell Drive and Telstar Avenue. #34. That the next phase of development include the construction of the east/west roadway south of Moonrock Avenue that the proposed park will front on. #35. That a sidewalk be constructed on the west side of the cul de sac from Moonrock Avenue to the south limit of the proposed east/west road. Page 35 of 72

36 Background An application has been received to amend the existing draft approval for the lands lying south of Moonrock Avenue that form part of the Moonglo draft approved lands. The above noted plan of subdivision received draft approval on March 9, 1990 and was revised on February 11, 1992 and further amended by on July 22, Several phases of the Moonglo subdivision have been registered over the years since draft approval was issued. An application has now been received to amend a portion of the draft approved lands located on the south east side of Moonrock Avenue. The draft amendment proposes a revised road layout consisting of one cul-de-sac with 23 lots proposed. The initial draft approval for this portion of the lands consisted of 73 lots. This amendment if approved would result in 50 lots being eliminated from the draft approval. Departmental & Agency Comments: Development Engineering Development Engineering has reviewed the above noted application and has the following comments: The proposed cul-de-sac exceeds the recommended maximum length of 150m from Moonrock Avenue. The official plan states that a connected street pattern or other such design alternatives are required to reduce the need for cul-de-sacs. The revised layout does not appear match into the proposed storm water retention pond plans prepared by Dennis Consultants submitted with the proposed western portion of this development. Connection of this pond must be taken into account with the design of the lot fabric. With regards to the revision of the draft plan, we ask that the following modification be made to the draft plan conditions: Please remove Condition #24 and add the following conditions. - The owner shall provide proof of sufficient fire flow in conjunction with the submission of construction drawings for each phase of construction. All costs associated with upgrading the existing distribution system to service this subdivision will be borne totally by the owner. - The owner shall provide proof of sufficient sanitary sewer capacity in conjunction with the submission of construction drawings for each phase of construction. All costs associated with upgrading the existing collection system and/or sewage lift stations to service this subdivision will be borne totally by the owner. Transportation Engineering Services The draft plan indicates that a larger than normal cul de sac is to be constructed. While we are not necessarily opposed to this, we will require a more detailed review of the engineering drawings to ensure that operational problems will not be created, and maintenance activities will not be impacted. We also require that the following conditions be included as part of any subsequent approval: - That the owner contributes $1,000 per lot towards the cost of widening Regent Street between Caswell Drive and Telstar Avenue. Page 36 of 72

37 - That the next phase of development include the construction of the east/west roadway south of Moonrock Avenue that the proposed park will front on. - That a sidewalk be constructed on the west side of the cul de sac from Moonrock Avenue to the south limit of the proposed east/west road. Operations No concerns. Planning Considerations: We see no adverse impacts resulting from the approval of this draft amendment as it is eliminating a number of lots (50) and will result in the creation of 23 very large lots. The overall impact of development on the neighbourhood will be reduced. Based on the above noted issues the draft amendment is recommended for approval. Page 37 of 72

38 registered plan 1/1 Page 38 of 72

39 subdivision sketch 1/1 Page 39 of 72

40 Request for Decision New Comprehensive Zoning By-law Presented To: Planning Committee Presented: Tuesday, Apr 20, 2010 Report Date Wednesday, Apr 07, 2010 Type: Managers' Reports Recommendation That the January 2010 draft zoning by-law be revised as set out in the staff comments in the report and on Table 1 to the report dated March 30, 2010 from the Acting Director of Planning Services; and, That a statutory public meeting on the revised draft Comprehensive Zoning By-law be scheduled for June 1, TO VIEW THE ENTIRE REPORT PLEASE SEE ATTACHMENT BELOW. Signed By Report Prepared By Eric Taylor Senior Planner Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 Reviewed By Art Potvin Manager of Development Services Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 Recommended by the Division Paul Baskcomb Acting Director of Planning Services Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 Recommended by the Department Bill Lautenbach General Manager of Growth and Development Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 Recommended by the C.A.O. Doug Nadorozny Chief Administrative Officer Digitally Signed Apr 7, 10 Page 40 of 72

41 New Zoning By-Law 1/32 Page 41 of 72

42 New Zoning By-Law 2/32 Page 42 of 72

43 New Zoning By-Law 3/32 Page 43 of 72

44 New Zoning By-Law 4/32 Page 44 of 72

45 New Zoning By-Law 5/32 Page 45 of 72

46 New Zoning By-Law 6/32 Page 46 of 72

47 New Zoning By-Law 7/32 Page 47 of 72

48 New Zoning By-Law 8/32 Page 48 of 72

49 New Zoning By-Law 9/32 Page 49 of 72

50 New Zoning By-Law 10/32 Page 50 of 72

51 New Zoning By-Law 11/32 Page 51 of 72

52 New Zoning By-Law 12/32 Page 52 of 72

53 New Zoning By-Law 13/32 Page 53 of 72

54 New Zoning By-Law 14/32 Page 54 of 72

55 New Zoning By-Law 15/32 Page 55 of 72

56 New Zoning By-Law 16/32 Page 56 of 72

57 New Zoning By-Law 17/32 Page 57 of 72

58 New Zoning By-Law 18/32 Page 58 of 72

59 New Zoning By-Law 19/32 Page 59 of 72

60 New Zoning By-Law 20/32 Page 60 of 72

61 New Zoning By-Law 21/32 Page 61 of 72

62 New Zoning By-Law 22/32 Page 62 of 72

63 New Zoning By-Law 23/32 Page 63 of 72

64 New Zoning By-Law 24/32 Page 64 of 72

65 New Zoning By-Law 25/32 Page 65 of 72

66 New Zoning By-Law 26/32 Page 66 of 72

67 New Zoning By-Law 27/32 Page 67 of 72

68 New Zoning By-Law 28/32 Page 68 of 72

69 New Zoning By-Law 29/32 Page 69 of 72

70 New Zoning By-Law 30/32 Page 70 of 72

71 New Zoning By-Law 31/32 Page 71 of 72

72 New Zoning By-Law 32/32 Page 72 of 72