CITY OF PAPILLION PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT NOVEMBER 29, 2017 AGENDA SUMTUR CROSSING PHASE 1 FINAL PLAT FP

Transcription

1 I. GENERAL INFORMATION CITY OF PAPILLION PLANNING COMMIION STAFF REPORT NOVEMBER 9, 0 AGENDA SUMTUR CROING PHASE FINAL PLAT FP--003 A. APPLICANT: Boyer Young Development Co. 99 Giles Road La Vista, NE B. PROPERTY ONER: Clarence J. Tex 3 S 99 th Street La Vista, NE Ronald & Sharon Tex 09 Schram Road Papillion, NE 0 C. LOCATION: SE corner of th Street and Schram Road D. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A tract of land being part of Tax Lots and, tax lots located in the NE/ of Section 5, T3N, RE of the th P.M., Sarpy County, NE E. REQUESTED ACTION: Approval of a Final Plat F. EXISTING ZONING AND LAND USE: Zoned AG (Agricultural), undeveloped G. SIZE OF SITE:.3 aces II. BACKGROUND INFORMATION A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SPECIFICATIONS: The Future Land Use map identifies this site as a mix of Greenway, Low Density Residential, and Medium Density Residential. Greenway is located on the eastern portion of the property. Medium Density Residential is located at the intersection of th Street and Schram

2 Road. Low Density Residential is south of the Medium Density Residential. B. EXISTING CONDITION OF SITE: Undeveloped. C. GENERAL VICINITY AND LAND USE: The area to the north consists of both Southbrook, which is zoned Single- Family Residential (Medium-Density) (R-) and is being developed with single-family residential and Southern Pointe, which is zoned Multiple- Family Residential (R-) and proposed to be developed as single-family residential. The areas to the east, west, and south are zoned AG (Agricultural) and undeveloped. D. RELEVANT CASE HISTORY: In 05, City Council approved the Southbrook Final Plat. In 0, City Council approved the Southern Pointe Final Plat. In August 0, City Council approved the SumTur Crossing Preliminary Plat. E. APPLICABLE ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS: Zoning and Subdivision Regulations and Comprehensive Plan. III. ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES STAFF COMMENTS: A. REQUEST:. This is a request for a Final Plat for the first phase of SumTur Crossing. SumTur Crossing is proposed to be platted in two phases.. Lots, Outlots A B, D I, and L are proposed to be zoned Single-Family Residential (Medium-Density) (R-) and developed with single-family residential. Lots 3 5 and Outlots C, J, and K are proposed to be zoned Multiple-Family Residential with a PUD- Overlay (R- PUD-) and developed with single-family residential. 3. outlots are proposed. The purpose and maintenance responsibility of the outlot is as follows: a. Outlots A, C, and G Post-Construction Stormwater Management Plan (PCSMP) facilities to be owned and maintained by the SID. Ownership of the outlots will be transferred to the Homeowners Association prior to annexation. b. Outlot B Storm sewer and drainage easement to be maintained by the SID. c. Outlots D and J Entrance signage to be owned and maintained by Homeowners Association. November 9, 0 Planning Commission FP--003

3 3 d. Outlots E and F Utility easements to be owned and maintained as open areas with a trail system by Homeowners Association. e. Outlots H and I Buffer and landscape easements to be owned and maintained by the developer or Homeowners Association. f. Outlot L Utility easement to be owned and maintained by the Homeowners Association.. Ownership of any outlot owned by the SID will automatically transfer to the City upon annexation. Prior to annexation, ownership and maintenance of any outlot owned by the SID, excluding Outlot B, will be required to be transferred to the Homeowners Association. This will be included as a provision in the Subdivision Agreement. B. LAND USE/COMPREHENSIVE PLAN:. The proposed Single-Family Residential (Medium-Density) (R-) and Urban Family Residential with a PUD- Overlay (R-3 PUD-) zoning conforms to the current Future Land Use designation of a mix of Greenway, Low Density Residential, and Medium Density Residential.. The proposed density of SumTur Crossing (all phases) is consistent with the density range for Low Density Residential established by the Comprehensive Plan. a. The Comprehensive Plan identifies Low Density Residential as having a density of one to four units per acre and Medium Density Residential as having a density of three to units per acre. (Comprehensive Plan, Pages -) b. SumTur Crossing proposes to have 335 units on 5. acres, which is a density of. units/acre. Such density is consistent with Low Density Residential. C. PARK/TRAILS:. SumTur Crossing does not include a dedicated park but it is in close proximity to alnut Creek Recreation Area. The internal trail system will indirectly provide pedestrian connectivity to alnut Creek Recreation Area.. Two pedestrian trails across the creek will connect Phases and. D. TRAFFIC AND ACCE:. Access will be provided to SumTur Crossing from: a. th Street (Arterial) b. Schram Road (Collector). The Preliminary Plat included dedication of right-of-way for: a. 0 th Street (Arterial), b. th Street (Arterial), c. Schram Road (Collector), d. hitewater Drive (Collector), and e. Local streets. November 9, 0 Planning Commission FP--003

4 3. The Final Plat for Phase includes dedication of right-of-way for: a. th Street (Arterial), b. Schram Road (Collector), c. hitewater Drive (Collector) abutting Phase, and d. Local streets.. hen the Preliminary Plat was presented, Phase lots had access to Schram Road (which is paved) and the applicant identified the PUD as part of Phase, which is why staff agreed that the improvement of th Street could be a Phase improvement. Given that the PUD is now being proposed as part of Phase and th Street is the sole access to the PUD, staff recommended that th Street be paved as a Phase improvement. Per the applicant, Sarpy County will be lead agent for the construction of th Street from Schram Road to Capehart Road. Further, the applicant reports that Sarpy County plans to design and acquire right-of-way in 09 with construction planned to start in 00. As such, the Subdivision Agreement will include provisions on the timing of improvements and the issuance of building permits prior to th Street being paved. Conflicts between building schedules and hindrances to th Street road construction will also be addressed in the Subdivision Agreement. 5. The alignment of hitewater Drive was shifted slightly to the north to address concerns presented by the property owner to the south. Collector Streets, such as hitewater Drive, are typically located on section lines. However, hitewater Drive would not be able to be dedicated on the section line on the property to the west due to the existing OPPD substation. As such, shifting the alignment of hitewater Drive will not negatively impact the future extension of hitewater Drive to the west. The property to the south will still be permitted access to hitewater Drive by extending right-of-way through the outlots proposed south of hitewater Drive.. OPPD has reviewed the proposed change to the alignment of hitewater Drive. Given the terms of OPPD s easement, OPPD has identified that trees will not be permitted to be planted in this area.. hitewater Drive will include bike lanes, which is consistent with Fenwick Drive within Southbrook and Gold Coast Road in Ashbury Creek. hitewater Drive will have two temporary termination points. For Phase, hitewater Drive will temporarily terminate at 3 th Street. For Phase, hitewater Drive will temporarily terminate at 0 th Street. An obligation to complete the construction to 0 th Street when 0 th Street is improved must be shown and will be included as a provision of the Subdivision Agreement.. As part of Phase, the applicant is proposing to partially delay construction of 0 th Street until the property to the east develops and dedicates the necessary right-of-way. hen Phase is developed, 0 th Street will be improved from Schram Road to Portage Drive to November 9, 0 Planning Commission FP--003

5 5 ensure that Phase has two full access points. This segment of 0 th Street is fully within SumTur Crossing so the acquisition of right-ofway from an adjoining landowner is not required. The construction of 0 th Street from Portage Drive to hitewater Drive will be delayed until the property to the east develops and said landowner dedicates the necessary right-of-way. 9. Future street connections will be provided as follows: a. A future street connection to the east will be provided via hitewater Drive. It will also be possible to extend Fox Run Drive to the east if desired by the future developer of the property to the east. The right-of-way required for such extensions will be dedicated as part of Phase. b. A future street connection to the south will be provided by 0 th Street, which will be dedicated as part of Phase. c. Right-of-way would need to be dedicated within the outlots south of hitewater Drive to allow for any of the north-south streets within SumTur Crossing to be extended to the south. Further, OPPD would also need to approve any streets through the easement within the outlots. The Subdivision Agreement will include provisions for the dedication of such right of way. 0. The Preliminary Plat included a street and trail crossing over a waterway under the jurisdiction of the Army Corps of Engineers. The trail crossing is part of Phase ; however, the alignment of the trail may be changed without altering lot configurations. Prior to City Council consideration of the Final Plat for Phase (which includes a street crossing), the applicant shall provide written confirmation from the Army Corps of Engineers indicating they are aware of the project and its details and the proposed crossings and general site design are acceptable. Formal approval will be required prior to construction document permitting.. Per Sarpy County Engineering Manager Pat Dowse, Sarpy County Public orks is establishing an access management policy that limits full movement access to the ¼ mile points along arterial roads. The S 0 th Street access to Schram Road is within close proximity to0 th Street, and 0 th Street access may be reduced to less than full access in the future. This has been acknowledged by the applicant.. Per Sarpy County Engineering Manager Pat Dowse, the SID will be required to enter into an interlocal cooperation agreement with the Sarpy County Board of Commissioners that will provide for cost share and timing of improvements to the adjacent roadway network and traffic control devices. It is assumed that Sarpy County contribution is 0.0% up and until the interlocal cooperation agreement is fully executed. The Subdivision Agreement will include provisions regarding the interlocal cooperation agreement. November 9, 0 Planning Commission FP--003

6 3. A commitment to cost share for potential future signalization of Schram Road at 0 th Street and th Street will be a provision in the subdivision agreement. Further, the subdivision agreement will include an obligation to conduct traffic studies, as necessary, to determine if or when signalization may be required.. Schram Road will be required to have decorative fencing, decorative lighting, and landscaping that is consistent with the Schram Road cross-section to the east. This requirement will be a provision of the Subdivision Agreement. 5. Consistent fencing will be required along 0 th Street and th Street. Provisions for consistent fencing have been included in the draft covenants. Enforcement of the requirement for consistent fencing will be a provision of the Subdivision Agreement. E. DRAINAGE:. The developer addressed over lot drainage in the covenants. Additionally, the following dedication is required: A Permanent Storm ater Drainage Easement is granted over all properties except where structures exist to provide for the positive flow of water drainage from one property to another. F. EASEMENTS:. Formal confirmation from OPPD, which typically occurs in the form of an encroachment agreement, will be required prior to construction of any sidewalk, trail, street, or post-construction stormwater management facility that is within the OPPD easement. The requirement to obtain the necessary formal approval from OPPD will be a provision of the Subdivision Agreement.. Standard utility easements are provided. 3. All proposed easements shall be by separate instruments including a prescription outlining the rights and terms of the easements. Copies of the recorded documents shall be provided to the City of Papillion. G. GRADING/UTILITIES:. All rights-of-way shall be graded full width with % grade projecting from top of curb elevation to edge of right-of-way.. Any proposed grading off site shall require written authorization or temporary easements from the property owner. H. PAVING/PROAG/STREET PROFILES:. The sidewalk on the south side of hitewater Drive shall be constructed by the SID in conjunction with the improvement of hitewater Drive. The Subdivision Agreement shall include a provision that the City will require the developer of the property to the south to reimburse the cost of the sidewalk construction to the SID. November 9, 0 Planning Commission FP--003

7 . The developer addressed street creep/driveway binding on curved streets in the draft covenants. 3. ADA: a. The developer addressed driveway cross slope/ada compliance in the draft covenants. b. ADA ramps shall be installed at intersections with original pavement installation, given that builders seem to have a hard time building these within compliance. I. ATER/SANITARY SEER:. SumTur Crossing will connect to the City of Papillion s water and sewer systems. The development is within the alnut Creek Outfall Service Area. The applicant is advised that connection to any other outfall will require the express written approval of the City Engineer or his designee. It is the applicant s responsibility to obtain such approval.. Given that SumTur Crossing is within the alnut Creek Outfall Service Area, an additional sewer connection fee is required to reimburse the Nebraska Christian College for pioneering the outfall sewer. Provisions for this fee will be included in the Subdivision Agreement. 3. Amendments to the astewater Sewer Agreements with the City of Omaha will be required in order to service this new area. The drainage basin area has been included but the development name and number of lots serviced will need to be added through administrative amendment.. The developer or its Engineers shall contract with Thompson, Dreessen and Dorner, Inc. (engineers for the City) for atercad Modeling of the development area and provide verification to City that main size, pressures and flow rates are all adequate as they relate to the entire City system. All costs associated with such modeling shall be an expense to the private development. J. GENERAL:. It should be noted that staff advised the applicant on 3/9/ that the proposed plat name may confuse the public since the name appears to be referencing a public facility, SumTur Amphitheater, which is not adjacent to the proposed subdivision. Staff recommended that an alternate name be considered. However, the applicant chose not to rename the subdivision. Staff continues to recommend that an alternate name be considered. If the applicant continues to use SumTur, it is recommended that the applicant obtain the consent from the families for which the SumTur Amphitheater is named.. The applicant shall revise the Final Plat: a. Show setbacks on Lot 93. November 9, 0 Planning Commission FP--003

8 3. SumTur Crossing is proposed to be platted in two phases. hen the Preliminary Plat was presented, the applicant asserted that the public improvements would be done in phases but the lots would be platted as a single plat. The applicant subsequently submitted a Final Plat for Phase only.. Per the applicant, a change in school district boundary to move SumTur Crossing from the Springfield Platteview Community Schools district to the Papillion La Vista Community Schools district has been approved. Documentation confirming the transfer was provided by the applicant. 5. The applicant provided draft covenants for review. Such covenants include both the single-family lots and the PUD lots. Given that the PUD is intended to be a unique area within the subdivision that has its own amenities, separate covenants shall be provided that a specific to the PUD lots. Such covenants shall include provisions for the maintenance of shared amenities, such as the trail, open space, and landscaping. The covenants for the PUD lots shall also be consistent with the design requirements established within the PUD Agreement.. The applicant shall complete the Subdivision Agreement process prior to City Council consideration of the Final Plat. The Source and Use of Funds will be finalized as part of such process.. The PUD Agreement will be presented to City Council s consideration in conjunction with the third reading of the change of zone ordinance. Comments regarding the PUD Agreement will be provided within the document and revisions shall be completed by the applicant prior to City Council consideration of the agreement.. A Sanitary and Improvement District will be formed for SumTur Crossing. IV. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Department recommends approval of the SumTur Crossing Final Plat (FP--003) based on:. General consistency with the Comprehensive Plan.. Compatibility with adjacent uses. 3. Compliance with the Zoning Regulations.. Compliance with the Subdivision Regulations. The recommendation for approval is contingent upon the applicant:. Revising the Preliminary Plat per Section III, J,.. Revising the draft covenants as detailed in Section III, J, Completing the Subdivision Agreement process per Section III, J,.. Completing the PUD Agreement process as detailed in Section III, J,. V. COPIES OF REPORT TO: Applicant November 9, 0 Planning Commission FP--003

9 9 Public upon request VI. ATTACHMENTS: Final Plat Application Final Plat Phasing Plan Approved Preliminary Plat 5/3/ Planning Commission Minutes (for Preliminary Plat) Aerial Report prepared by: Michelle Romeo, City Planner Derek Goff, Staff Engineer November 9, 0 Planning Commission FP--003

10 FINAL PLAT APPLICATION The followina items must be submitted with the application for consideratipn:. Five full sized, folded final plat drawings that meet the criteria of 0-0;. Final Plat checklist; 3. Application fee ($0, plus $0 per lot);. PDF files for all exhibits submitted; 5. A CAD file of the Final Plat and any supplemental exhibits (as requested by the City Engineer);. A list with contact information for applicant consultants not listed in the application such as the surveyor, attorney, etc.;. Source and Use of Funds with supporting documentation; and. A minimum of three Mylars and a digital copy of the plat shall be required upon City Council approval of the Final Plat. The following information must be provjde^^ to be considered complete: APPLICANT INFORMATION: Name: Boyer Young DeveIopmeniC^ tvouna(5),boveryounci.com Address: 99 Giles Road Citv/State/Zip: La Vista, NE Phone Number: Fax Number: PROPERTY ONER INFORMATION: (Attach a separate sheet if multiple properties.) BOYER YOUNG EQUITIES XVIII - SUMTER CROING LCC 99 Giles Road La Vista, NE ENGINEER INFORMATION: Name: E & A Consultinc) Group, Inc. mwestergard(%eacci.com Address: 0909 Mill Valley Road, Suite 00 Citv/State/ZiD: Omaha, NE 5 Phone Number: Fax Number:

11 PLAT INFORMATION: Plat Name: SumTur Crossjng SID #: General Location: SE Comer of th Street & Schram Road Legal Description: See attached Sheet Section: 05 Township: 3 Range: DEVELOPMENT DETAIL*: Zoning Acres # of Lots # of Units Use Type" R- R Residential - Outlets R- PUD R- PUD A,B,D,E,F,G,H,I,L,M Residential 3-5 Outlets C,J,K * A change of zone application must be filed for any change in zoning. **Single Family Residential, Townhomes, Multi-Family Residential, Commercial, Industrial, or Other Gross Acres: 9. Anticipated Total Taxable Valuation: Land: $9,33,00 Improvements: $3,3,00 Please note the followina procedures:. The Planning Commission will make a recommendation to the City Council.. City Council will make a final decision on the final plat. 3. If applicable, a subdivision agreement and a water and sewer connection agreement must be completed prior to City Council action on the final plat.. The City will prepare the subdivision agreement and water and sewer connection agreement. 5. The subdivision agreement, other necessary agreements, and any applicable easement dedications and/or vacations will be recorded with the Sarpy County Register of Deeds. The cost of which will be borne by the final plat applicant or property owner.. Please see the Planning Departments fee policy regarding revision/resubmittal fees., the undersiapeiondersta property fqpifispe; Oher Sig ifinal plat process as stated above and I authorize City Staff to enter the e specific request during this process. Date /0/^Q // ~^

12 FINAL PLAT CHECKLIST The following information is required with the submittal under ^0-C: D Date, title name and location of subdivision. D Streets, street names, lots, setback lines, lot numbers and other similar information. D Graphic scale and true north point. D Survey monuments. D Dimensions, angles, bearings and complete legal description of the property. D Location, dimensions and purpose of any easements. D Purpose for which sites are dedicated or reserved. D Certification by surveyor or engineer certifying to the accuracy of survey and plat. D Certification signed and acknowledged by all parties holding title or having any title interest in the lad subdivided and consenting to the preparation and recording of the plat as submitted. D Certification of approval by the Planning Commission, City Engineer and City Council. The followinci may be required: D Subdivision agreements and sewer and water connection agreements (to be drafted by City staff) D Protective covenants if any in form for recording (to be drafted by developer).

13 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OF LAND BEING PART OF TAX LOTS AND, TAX LOTS LOCATED IN THE NE/ OF SECTION 5, TONSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE EAST OF THE TH P.M., SARPY COUNTY, NEBRASKA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEST CORNER OF SAID NE OF SECTION 5, THENCE N0 50 (AUMED BEARING) ALONG THE EST LINE OF SAID NE/ OF SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 0.9 FEET; THENCE N 00 E, A DISTANCE OF.00 FEET TO EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-AY LINE OF TH STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-AY LINE OF TH STREET ON THE FOLLOING NINE (9) DESCRIBED COURSES: () N0 50 ON A LINE.00 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL ITH SAID EST LINE OF NE/ OF SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF.00 FEET; () THENCE N5 0 E, A DISTANCE OF 3. FEET; (3) THENCE N 3 E, A DISTANCE OF 0.5 FEET; () THENCE N 05 E, A DISTANCE OF.9 FEET; (5) THENCE S 30, A DISTANCE OF.0 FEET; () THENCE N05 030, A DISTANCE OF.0 FEET; () THENCE N3 533, A DISTANCE OF 0.0 FEET; () THENCE N 955, A DISTANCE OF.9 FEET; (9) THENCE N 0 E, A DISTANCE OF 3.5 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-AY LINE OF TH STREET AND THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-AY LINE OF SCHRAM ROAD; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-AY LINE OF SCHRAM ROAD ON THE FOLLOING FIVE (5) DESCRIBED COURSES; () N3 0 E, A DISTANCE OF.5 FEET; () THENCE N 9 E ON A LINE FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL ITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NE/ OF SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 09.5 FEET; (3) THENCE N 0 E, A DISTANCE OF 3. FEET; () THENCE N 330 E, A DISTANCE OF 0.30 FEET; (5) THENCE N 0 E, A DISTANCE OF 5. FEET TO A POINT 33 FEET SOUTH OF SAID NORTH LINE OF THE NE/ OF SECTION 5; THENCE N0 0, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO SAID NORTH LINE OF THE NE/ OF SECTION 5; THENCE N 9 E ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE NE/ OF SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 3.0 FEET; THENCE S0 0 E, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-AY LINE OF SCHRAM ROAD; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-AY LINE OF SCHRAM ROAD ON THE FOLLOING THREE (3) DESCRIBED COURSES: () N9 595 E, A DISTANCE OF. FEET; () THENCE S0 55 E, A DISTANCE OF. FEET; (3) THENCE S E, A DISTANCE OF 0.3 FEET; THENCE S0 5"E, A DISTANCE OF 3. FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT ITH A RADIUS OF.00 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 9. FEET, SAID CURVE HAVING A LONG CHORD HICH BEARS S0 03"E, A DISTANCE OF 9. FEET; THENCE S5 35", A DISTANCE OF. FEET; THENCE S3 0", A DISTANCE OF. FEET; THENCE S 09", A DISTANCE OF FEET; THENCE S5 095"E, A DISTANCE OF 0. FEET; THENCE S 5", A DISTANCE OF FEET; THENCE S9 33", A DISTANCE OF.3 FEET; THENCE S ", A DISTANCE OF 5. FEET; THENCE S33 33", A DISTANCE OF 5.9 FEET; THENCE S5 30", A DISTANCE OF 5. FEET; THENCE N55 030", A DISTANCE OF 0. FEET; THENCE S9 3", A DISTANCE OF 53.5 FEET; THENCE S55 3", A DISTANCE OF 3.00 FEET; THENCE S3 00", A DISTANCE OF 30. FEET; THENCE S 3"E, A DISTANCE OF 0.5 FEET; THENCE S3 0", A DISTANCE OF 3. FEET; THENCE S35 5"E, A DISTANCE OF 35.3 FEET; THENCE S5 0533", A DISTANCE OF. FEET; THENCE S 5", A DISTANCE OF 9.3 FEET; THENCE S0 5"E, A DISTANCE OF 5. FEET; THENCE S3 03"E, A DISTANCE OF.00 FEET; THENCE S55 55", A DISTANCE OF. FEET; THENCE S0 55", A DISTANCE OF.0 FEET;

14 THENCE S3 03"E, A DISTANCE OF 0.9 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT ITH A RADIUS OF 5.00 FEET, A DISTANCE OF.90 FEET, SAID CURVE HAVING A LONG CHORD HICH BEARS S 3059"E, A DISTANCE OF.0 FEET; THENCE S0 5"E, A DISTANCE OF.9 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT ITH A RADIUS OF 5.00 FEET, A DISTANCE OF.35 FEET, SAID CURVE HAVING A LONG CHORD HICH BEARS S0 53"E, A DISTANCE OF.33 FEET, THENCE S0 55"E, A DISTANCE OF 9.59 FEET; THENCE S55 55"E, A DISTANCE OF.0 FEET; THENCE S0 55"E, A DISTANCE OF 0.00 FEET; THENCE S0 55"E, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NE/ OF SECTION 5; THENCE S 00 ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE NE OF SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 0. FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID TRACT OF LAND CONTAINS A TOTAL AREA OF 3,9,3 SQUARE FEET OR 9. ACRES, MORE OR LE.

15 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A TRACT OF LAND BEING PART OF TAX LOTS AND, TAX LOTS LOCATED IN PART OF THE NE/ OF THE NE/, PART OF THE S/ OF THE NE/, PART OF THE N/ OF THE NE/, ALL LOCATED IN SECTION 5, TONSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE EAST OF THE TH P.M., SARPY COUNTY, NEBRASKA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEST CORNER OF SAID NE OF SECTION 5, THENCE N0 50 (AUMED BEARING) ALONG THE EST LINE OF SAID NE/ OF SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 0.9 FEET; THENCE N 00 E, A DISTANCE OF.00 FEET TO EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-AY LINE OF TH STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-AY LINE OF TH STREET ON THE FOLLOING NINE (9) DESCRIBED COURSES: () N0 50 ON A LINE.00 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL ITH SAID EST LINE OF NE/ OF SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF.00 FEET; () THENCE N5 0 E, A DISTANCE OF 3. FEET; (3) THENCE N 3 E, A DISTANCE OF 0.5 FEET; () THENCE N 05 E, A DISTANCE OF.9 FEET; (5) THENCE S 30, A DISTANCE OF.0 FEET; () THENCE N05 030, A DISTANCE OF.0 FEET; () THENCE N3 533, A DISTANCE OF 0.0 FEET; () THENCE N 955, A DISTANCE OF.9 FEET; (9) THENCE N 0 E, A DISTANCE OF 3.5 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-AY LINE OF TH STREET AND THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-AY LINE OF SCHRAM ROAD; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-AY LINE OF SCHRAM ROAD ON THE FOLLOING FIVE (5) DESCRIBED COURSES; () N3 0 E, A DISTANCE OF.5 FEET; () THENCE N 9 E ON A LINE FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL ITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NE/ OF SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 09.5 FEET; (3) THENCE N 0 E, A DISTANCE OF 3. FEET; () THENCE N 330 E, A DISTANCE OF 0.30 FEET; (5) THENCE N 0 E, A DISTANCE OF 5. FEET TO A POINT 33 FEET SOUTH OF SAID NORTH LINE OF THE NE/ OF SECTION 5; THENCE N0 0, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO SAID NORTH LINE OF THE NE/ OF SECTION 5; THENCE N 9 E ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE NE/ OF SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 3.0 FEET; THENCE S0 0 E, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-AY LINE OF SCHRAM ROAD; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-AY LINE OF SCHRAM ROAD ON THE FOLLOING THREE (3) DESCRIBED COURSES: () N9 595 E, A DISTANCE OF. FEET; () THENCE S0 55 E, A DISTANCE OF. FEET; (3) THENCE S E, A DISTANCE OF 0.3 FEET; THENCE S0 5"E, A DISTANCE OF 3. FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT ITH A RADIUS OF.00 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 9. FEET, SAID CURVE HAVING A LONG CHORD HICH BEARS S0 03"E, A DISTANCE OF 9. FEET; THENCE S5 35", A DISTANCE OF. FEET; THENCE S3 0", A DISTANCE OF. FEET; THENCE S 09", A DISTANCE OF FEET; THENCE S5 095"E, A DISTANCE OF 0. FEET; THENCE S 5", A DISTANCE OF FEET; THENCE S9 33", A DISTANCE OF.3 FEET; THENCE S ", A DISTANCE OF 5. FEET; THENCE S33 33", A DISTANCE OF 5.9 FEET; THENCE S5 30", A DISTANCE OF 5. FEET; THENCE N55 030", A DISTANCE OF 0. FEET; THENCE S9 3", A DISTANCE OF 53.5 FEET; THENCE S55 3", A DISTANCE OF 3.00 FEET; THENCE S3 00", A DISTANCE OF 30. FEET; THENCE S 3"E, A DISTANCE OF 0.5 FEET; THENCE S3 0", A DISTANCE OF 3. FEET; THENCE S35 5"E, A DISTANCE OF 35.3 FEET; THENCE S5 0533", A DISTANCE OF. FEET; THENCE S 5", A DISTANCE OF 9.3 FEET; THENCE S3 55", A DISTANCE OF.53 FEET; THENCE S0 5"E, A DISTANCE OF 5. FEET; THENCE

16 S3 03"E, A DISTANCE OF.00 FEET; THENCE S55 55", A DISTANCE OF 5.59 FEET; THENCE S0 55", A DISTANCE OF.0 FEET; THENCE S3 03"E, A DISTANCE OF 0.9 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT ITH A RADIUS OF 5.00 FEET, A DISTANCE OF.90 FEET, SAID CURVE HAVING A LONG CHORD HICH BEARS S 3059"E, A DISTANCE OF.0 FEET; THENCE S0 5"E, A DISTANCE OF.9 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ON A CURE TO THE LEFT ITH A RADIUS OF 5.00 FEET, A DISTANCE OF.35 FEET, SAID CURVE HAVING A LONG CHORD HICH BEARS S0 53"E, A DISTANCE OF.33 FEET, THENCE S0 55"E, A DISTANCE OF 9.59 FEET; THENCE S55 55"E, A DISTANCE OF.0 FEET; THENCE S0 55"E, A DISTANCE OF 0.00 FEET; THENCE S0 55"E, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NE/ OF SECTION 5; THENCE S 00 ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE NE OF SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 0. FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID TRACT OF LAND CONTAINS A TOTAL AREA OF 3,0,03 SQUARE FEET OR. ACRES, MORE OR LE.

17 SECTION 05-T3N-RE OF THE NE/ NORTHEST CORNER N 955".9 N5 0"E 3. N0 50".00 N 00"E.00 INST. No GRANTED TO CITY OF PAPILLION PERMANENT ATER MAIN EASEMENT SECTION CORNER TIES NE 5. TO OOD CORNER POST SE.9 TO POER POLE S. TO OOD CORNER POST N 3.9 TO OOD CORNER POST N3 533" SOUTHEST CORNER OF THE NE/ SECTION 05-T3N-RE (POINT OF BEGINNING) INST. No N05 030".0 S 30".0 N 05"E.9 N 3"E N0 50" N 0"E GRANTED TO CITY OF PAPILLION PERMANENT ATER MAIN EASEMENT SECTION CORNER TIES E 39.0 TO "X" NAIL FOUND ON TOP OF FENCE POST NE.0 TO "X" NAIL FOUND ON TOP OF FENCE POST NNE 3.05 TO "X" NAIL FOUND ON SOUTH FACE OF POER POLE S TH STREET N3 0"E.5 5 0" 0. AC OUTLOT "H" (5.) S TH STREET 5.5 N.R OUTLOT "I" 0.03 AC SANITARY SEER EASEMENT (SEE NOTE ) OUTLOT "C" 0.9 AC SUNBURST DRIVE PORTAGE CIRCLE O.L. "K" 0.0 AC OUTLOT "E" 0. AC. 3 3 OUTLOT "F" 3.05 AC. 5.0 OPPD RIGHT-OF-AY EASEMENT MISC. BK 9 PG STORM SEER AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT (SEE NOTE ) OUTLOT "G" 0. AC. S 3TH STREET TEMPORARY EASEMENT GRANTED TO CITY OF PAPILLION INST. NO. 0-9 (TO BE RELEASED) PORT ROYAL DRIVE TRAIL ACCE EASEMENT (SEE NOTE ) TEMPORARY EASEMENT GRANTED TO SARPY COUNTY INST. NO (TO BE RELEASED) (33.) SEE DETAIL "A" S 3TH AVENUE 9 59". (.) 5 00" " " " " " (.3) " (9.5) " N.R " N.R. (.) 05" 0" 0 09" S 3TH AVENUE 0 SIDE YARD SETBACK (TYP.) REAR YARD SETBACK (TYP.).00 (5.00) " " 0" " " OUTLOT "J" 0.00 AC. CIRCLE (9.9) R= R= 5305" " (.3) (.9) 0 090" 3" 009" 5 335" " (.5) (.5) SEE DETAIL "B" 5 359".. 0 (5.00) FRONT YARD SETBACK (TYP.) " N.R R= " 5 0" 0 3".00.0 R= " 93 5" 3" (9.0) " 33" 5 35" 9 5" " (0.) (0.9) (.5) (33.9) 9 333" " (.3) S 00" " 9 5" " " " " " 9 333" N 9"E " " " " " " " 30" (9.5) " 0.3 N.R (3.) 339" 9 5" PERMANENT EASEMENT ALNUT CREEK OUTFALL SEER INST. No INST. No INST. No FRONT YARD SETBACK (TYP.) 33. (53.30) 0 0" 0. (.9). 50".9 " 0.00 S 3TH STREET 9 5" " " " " HITEATER DRIVE SANITARY SEER, STORM " ". SEER & DRAINAGE EASEMENT (SEE NOTE ) INDEMNIFICATION AND ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT O.P.P.D. AND CITY OF PAPILLION, INST. No PERMANENT ATER MAIN EASEMENT GRANTED TO CITY OF PAPILLION INST. No , INST. No REAR YARD SETBACK (TYP.) 5 5" 5... (3.). 5 53" FRONT YARD SETBACK (TYP.) 39" " 5 53" (5.) (.9) 9 (.9) (0.09)..3.3 (0.3) " 0 00" S55 55". (.0) OUTLOT "M" 0.00 AC " " 9 5" 9.3 S0 55".0 S3 03"E (.0).0 (33.) " 0" " (5.3) (.) OUTLOT "B". AC. (55.00) S TH AVENUE (9.0) N.R SUNBURST DRIVE SCHRAM ROAD PERMANENT EASEMENT ALNUT CREEK OUTFALL SEER INST. No INST. No INST. No N.R (3.) " 5 9" R=5.00 L=.90 CH=S 3059"E.0 OUTLOT "L" 0. AC. 35 3" POER RIGHT-OF-AY EASEMENT MISC. BOOK 0 PAGE 0, BOOK 5 PAGE 0, MISC. BOOK 3 PAGE 5 MISC. BOOK 55 PAGE 0 5. S0 5"E " S0 5"E.9 S55 55"E S 5" 9.3. (.0) (.) 0 053" 35.3 R=5.00 L=.35 CH=S0 53"E.33 S0 55"E 9.59 (593.) 3. 5 FRONT YARD SETBACK (TYP.) S0 55"E 0.00 S0 55"E SETBACK (TYP.) S TH STREET 30 FRONT YARD SETBACK (TYP.) 30 FRONT YARD 3 59" 3 59" S3 03"E " 9 0" " 03" 9 " 59 95" 3" 9 3" 3" " N 330"E 0.30 N 0"E 3. 30" " S3 00" ".9 90 " 0 30" 9 03" 9 33" 3.00 S55 3" 3.00 S 3"E 0.5 S3 0" 3. S35 5"E 35.3 S5 0533". CURVE CURVE " " 0" R= (5.) 53.5 CENTER-LINE CURVE TABLE RADIUS LENGTH S TH (.5) R= TANGENT RIGHT-OF-AY CURVE TABLE RADIUS LENGTH TANGENT CIRCLE " AVENUE (3.9) 539" 55" 505" N 0"E 5. N0 0" N55 030" 0. S9 3" 53.5 R= 0 SIDE YARD STREET DELTA 3 5 " 3 05" 3 5" 30 0" 30 5 " " 0 33 " 5 5 3" 5 5 3" 3 0 0" 3 0" 3 5 " " " 5 0" 3 0" 5 3" 5 " 3 0 " 5 5 " DELTA 5 533" 5 533" 5 305" 5 305" " 0 SIDE YARD " 5 FRONT YARD SETBACK (TYP.) " (5.53) REAR YARD 0 SIDE YARD OL. "G" SUNBURST DRIVE 3 55" 30 FRONT YARD R- ZONING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS (LOTS THRU & OUTLOTS "A" & "B", "D" THRU "I","L" & "M") 5 SIDE YARD 3. 3" N.R PORT ROYAL DRIVE (33.0) " 30.0 S33 33" " 3 039" S5 30" 5. STREET STREET S TH STREET 3.5 S 3TH AVENUE AVE CIR.00 5 STREET SIDE YARD SIDE YARD.00 S 3TH 5 SIDE YARD.0 DETAIL "A" NOT TO SCALE 5. 30" (.) N.R. 095" 5 REAR YARD 3 59" OUTLOT "D" 0.0 AC TRAIL ACCE EASEMENT (SEE NOTE ) ".00.0 HITEATER DRIVE " 5 FRONT YARD R--PUD ZONING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS (LOTS 3 THRU 5 & OUTLOTS "C", "K", &"J") DETAIL "B"- LOT DIMS NOT TO SCALE 5 309" OUTLOT "J" STREET (3.) 5 309" N 9"E 3.0 (.33) S " STREET SIDE YARD (.) 33.3 S 0TH AVENUE LOT NO N.R N.R. 3. N.R " " " " 0.0 OUTLOT "A".5 AC LOT AREAS.3 SQ. FOOTAGE,99,0,,30,30,,5 5,55,35,0,3,39,39 0,5,39,39 0,5,39,033,39 3,9,90,90,3,93,3,3 3,5 0,35 0,5 0,5 0,55,5 0,5,39,39 0,5,9,39,39,39,39,3,5,5 9,9 9,3 0,9, S9 33".3 LOT NO REAR YARD SETBACK (TYP.) 39. SANITARY SEER EASEMENT (SEE NOTE ) S 5" LOT AREAS SQ. FOOTAGE,3,3,,,,,, 3,5,,33,5,5,5,5,5,9,30,0,0,9,9,, 0,5 0,9 0,,90 3,05,,53,3 3,395,,03 3,9,,09 0,9,5 0,3,,30,,9 9,99,95,, LOT NO S0 0"E N9 595"E " S 09" " " S5 095"E inch = 00 ft. LEGEND BOUNDARY LINE RIGHT OF AY LINE LOT LINE EASEMENTS EXIST. SECTION CORNER EXIST. SECTION LINES EXIST. PROPERTY LINES EXIST. EASEMENTS 5/" REBAR SET ITH CAP LS-59 LOT AREAS SQ. FOOTAGE 3, 0,0 0,0,0 0,00,9,033,5 9,90 0,5 9,9 0, 0,0 9,90 9,90 9,90 9,90 9,9 0,5 9,90 9,90 9,90,0 0,33 0,03,0,0,0,9,09,9 9,95, 3,39,,3,9,0,533,55,03,,35,,, 9, S0 55"E S "E 0.3 S0 5"E 3. R=.00 L=9. CH=S0 03"E 9. S5 35". S3 0". DEDICATION NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NE/ SECTION 05-T3N-RE SECTION CORNER TIES N 5.9 TO "X" NAIL FOUND IN FACE OF FENCE GUARD POST N.95 TO "X" NAIL FOUND ON TOP OF GUARD POST KNO ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS THAT E, BOYER YOUNG EQUITIES XVIII-SUMTER CROING, LLC; ONERS OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION AND EMBRACED ITHIN THIS PLAT, HAVE CAUSED SAID LAND TO BE SUBDIVIDED INTO LOTS AND STREETS TO BE NUMBERED AND NAMED AS SHON, SAID SUBDIVISION TO BE HEREAFTER KNON AS SUMTUR CROING (LOTS TO BE NUMBERED AS SHON), AND E DO HEREBY RATIFY AND APPROVE OF THE DISPOSITION OF OUR PROPERTY AS SHON ON THIS PLAT, AND E DO HEREBY DEDICATE TO THE PUBLIC FOR PUBLIC USE THE STREETS, AVENUES AND CIRCLES AND E DO HEREBY GRANT EASEMENTS AS SHON ON THIS PLAT, E DO FURTHER GRANT A PERPETUAL EASEMENT TO THE OMAHA PUBLIC POER DISTRICT (OPPD), COX COMMUNICATIONS, AND CENTURYLINK ACRO FIVE (5) FOOT IDE STRIP OF LAND ABUTTING ALL FRONT AND SIDE BOUNDARY LOT LINES; AN EIGHT () FOOT IDE STRIP OF LAND ABUTTING THE REAR BOUNDARY LINES OF ALL INTERIOR LOTS; AND A SIXTEEN () FOOT IDE STRIP OF LAND ABUTTING THE REAR BOUNDARY LINES OF ALL EXTERIOR LOTS. THE TERM EXTERIOR LOTS IS HEREIN DEFINED AS THOSE LOTS FORMING THE OUTER PERIMETER OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED ADDITION. THE SIXTEEN () FOOT IDE EASEMENT MAY BE REDUCED TO EIGHT () FEET IDE HEN THE ADJACENT LAND IS SURVEYED, PLATTED AND RECORDED. THE SUBDIVIDER SHALL GRANT PERPETUAL EASEMENTS TO METROPOLITAN UTILITIES DISTRICT AND/OR BLACK HILLS ENERGY, THEIR SUCCEORS AND AIGNS TO ERECT, INSTALL, OPERATE, MAINTAIN, REPAIR AND RENE PIPELINES, HYDRANTS AND OTHER RELATED FACILITIES AND TO EXTEND THEREON PIPES FOR THE TRANSMIION OF GAS AND ATER ON, THROUGH, UNDER AND ACRO A FIVE (5) FOOT IDE STRIP OF LAND ABUTTING ALL CUL-DE-SAC STREETS. NO PERMANENT BUILDINGS OR RETAINING ALLS SHALL BE PLACED IN SAID EASEMENT AYS, BUT THE SAME MAY BE USED FOR GARDENS, SHRUBS, LANDSCAPING AND OTHER PURPOSES THAT DO NOT THEN OR LATER INTERFERE ITH THE AFORESAID OR RIGHTS HEREIN GRANTED. BOYER YOUNG EQUITIES XVIII-SUMTER CROING, LLC TIM YOUNG, MEMBER DATE ACKNOLEDGEMENT OF NOTARY STATE OF NEBRASKA ) COUNTY OF SARPY ) ON THIS DAY OF,, BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED, A NOTARY PUBLIC IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY, PERSONALLY CAME TIM YOUNG, MEMBER OF BOYER YOUNG EQUITIES XVIII-SUMTER CROING, LLC, HO IS PERSONALLY KNON TO BE THE IDENTICAL PERSON HOSE NAME IS AFFIXED TO THE DEDICATION ON THIS PLAT AND ACKNOLEDGED THE SAME TO BE HIS VOLUNTARY ACT AND DEED. ITNE MY HAND AND NOTARIAL SEAL THE DAY AND YEAR LAST ABOVE RITTEN. NOTARY PUBLIC APPROVAL OF PAPILLION CITY ENGINEER THIS SUBDIVISION OF SUMTUR CROING AS APPROVED BY THE PAPILLION CITY ENGINEER THIS DAY OF 0. JEFFREY L. THOMPSON, PE, CPESC, CFM PAPILLION CITY ENGINEER APPROVAL OF PAPILLION PLANNING COMMIION THIS SUBDIVISION OF SUMTUR CROING AS APPROVED BY THE PAPILLION PLANNING COMMIION. REBECCA HOCH DATE CHAIRPERSON, PAPILLION PLANNING COMMIION APPROVAL BY PAPILLION CITY COUNCIL THIS SUBDIVISION OF SUMTUR CROING AS APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PAPILLION, NEBRASKA. DAVID P. BLACK, MAYOR DATE ATTEST NICOLE BRON, CITY CLERK NOTES:. ALL ANGLES ARE 90 UNLE OTHERISE NOTED.. ALL LOT LINES ARE RADIAL TO CURVED STREETS UNLE SHON AS NONRADIAL (N.R.). 3. ALL DIMENSIONS SHON ITH PARENTHESES ARE FOR THE LOCATION OF CENTERLINE.. DIRECT VEHICULAR ACCE ILL NOT BE ALLOED TO SCHRAM ROAD FROM LOTS THRU, LOTS THRU 0, LOTS 93 THRU 9, 0 & OUTLOTS "A", "B", "D", AND "E". DIRECT VEHICULAR ACCE ILL NOT BE ALLOED TO S TH STREET FROM LOTS 3 &, LOTS 30 THRU 3, & OUTLOTS "B", "C", "H", "I", AND "J". DIRECT VEHICULAR ACCE ILL NOT BE ALLOED TO HITEATER DRIVE FROM LOTS 3, 33, 5 & OUTLOT "K". DIRECT VEHICULAR ACCE TO OUTLOTS "J" & "L" SHALL BE LIMITED TO HITEATER DRIVE. 5. THE CHAMFERS FOR SIDEALKS ON CORNER LOTS ARE SET AT (.5) RADII FROM THE INTERSECTION OF RIGHT-OF-AY LINES.. ALL EASEMENTS THAT ARE NOT LABELED ITH RECORDING INFORMATION ILL BE RECORDED BY A SEPARATE DOCUMENT.. OUTLOTS "A", "C", AND "G" ARE TO BE USED FOR A PERMANENT PCSMP BASIN. A PERMANENT STORM SEER AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT IS GRANTED OVER ALL OF OUTLOTS "A", "C", AND "G". OUTLOTS "A", "C", AND "G" ARE TO BE ONED AND MAINTAINED BY THE SANITARY AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT. OUTLOTS "A", "C", AND "G" SHALL BE TRANSFERRED TO THE HOMEONERS AOCIATION PRIOR TO ANNEXATION.. OUTLOT "B" IS TO BE USED AS A PERMANENT STORM SEER AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT. OUTLOT "B" IS TO BE ONED AND MAINTAINED BY THE SANITARY AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT. MAINTENANCE OF THE PUBLIC TRAIL ITHIN OUTLOT "B" SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE HOMEONERS AOCIATION. 9. OUTLOTS "D" AND "J" ARE PARCELS OF LAND USED FOR A SIGNAGE EASEMENT. OUTLOTS "D" AND "J" ARE TO BE ONED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEONERS AOCIATION. 0. OUTLOTS "E", "F", & "M" ARE PARCELS OF LAND DEEMED UNBUILDABLE DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF AN EXISTING OPPD POER TRANSMIION LINE EASEMENT. OUTLOTS "E", "F", & "M" ILL CONTAIN A PUBLIC TRAIL AND THEREFORE THESE OUTLOTS ARE TO BE ONED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEONERS AOCIATION.. OUTLOTS "H" & "I" ARE TO BE USED AS A BUFFER AND LANDSCAPING EASEMENT. OUTLOTS "H" & "I" ARE TO BE ONED AND MAINTAINED BY THE DEVELOPER OR THE HOMEONERS AOCIATION.. OUTLOT "K" IS TO BE USED AS AN GREEN SPACE AREA. OUTLOT "K" IS TO BE ONED AND MAINTAINED BY THE DEVELOPER OR THE HOMEONERS AOCIATION. 3. OUTLOT "L" IS A PARCEL OF LAND DEEMED UNBUILDABLE DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF AN EXISTING OPPD POER TRANSMIION LINE EASEMENT. OUTLOT "L" IS TO BE ONED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEONERS AOCIATION.. LOT 3 DRIVEAY SHALL ONLY HAVE ACCE TO S 3TH AVENUE CIRCLE. 5. LOTS 0 & 93 DRIVEAYS SHALL ONLY HAVE ACCE TO PORT ROYAL DRIVE. SUMTUR CROING LOTS THRU 5 & OUTLOTS "A" THRU "M" INCLUSIVE A TRACT OF LAND BEING PART OF TAX LOTS AND, TAX LOTS LOCATED IN PART OF THE NE/ OF THE NE/, PART OF THE S/ OF THE NE/, PART OF THE N/ OF THE NE/, ALL LOCATED IN SECTION 5, TONSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE EAST OF THE TH P.M., SARPY COUNTY, NEBRASKA. SCHRAM ROAD PROJECT SITE SURVEYORS CERTIFICATION S. TH STREET S. 0TH STREET VICINITY MAP LAKE ALNUT CREEK TURKEY ROAD I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE MADE A GROUND SURVEY OF THE SUBDIVISION DESCRIBED HEREIN AND THAT PERMANENT MONUMENTS HAVE BEEN PLACED ON THE BOUNDARY OF THE ITHIN PLAT AND STAKES AT ALL CORNERS OF ALL LOTS, STREETS AND ANGLE POINTS IN SUMTUR CROING (THE LOTS NUMBERED AS SHON). A TRACT OF LAND BEING PART OF TAX LOTS AND, TAX LOTS LOCATED IN THE NE/ OF SECTION 5, TONSHIP 3 NORTH, RANGE EAST OF THE TH P.M., SARPY COUNTY, NEBRASKA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEST CORNER OF SAID NE OF SECTION 5, THENCE N0 50 (AUMED BEARING) ALONG THE EST LINE OF SAID NE/ OF SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 0.9 FEET; THENCE N 00 E, A DISTANCE OF.00 FEET TO EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-AY LINE OF TH STREET; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-AY LINE OF TH STREET ON THE FOLLOING NINE (9) DESCRIBED COURSES: () N0 50 ON A LINE.00 FEET EAST OF AND PARALLEL ITH SAID EST LINE OF NE/ OF SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF.00 FEET; () THENCE N5 0 E, A DISTANCE OF 3. FEET; (3) THENCE N 3 E, A DISTANCE OF 0.5 FEET; () THENCE N 05 E, A DISTANCE OF.9 FEET; (5) THENCE S 30, A DISTANCE OF.0 FEET; () THENCE N05 030, A DISTANCE OF.0 FEET; () THENCE N3 533, A DISTANCE OF 0.0 FEET; () THENCE N 955, A DISTANCE OF.9 FEET; (9) THENCE N 0 E, A DISTANCE OF 3.5 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-AY LINE OF TH STREET AND THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-AY LINE OF SCHRAM ROAD; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-AY LINE OF SCHRAM ROAD ON THE FOLLOING FIVE (5) DESCRIBED COURSES; () N3 0 E, A DISTANCE OF.5 FEET; () THENCE N 9 E ON A LINE FEET SOUTH OF AND PARALLEL ITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NE/ OF SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 09.5 FEET; (3) THENCE N 0 E, A DISTANCE OF 3. FEET; () THENCE N 330 E, A DISTANCE OF 0.30 FEET; (5) THENCE N 0 E, A DISTANCE OF 5. FEET TO A POINT 33 FEET SOUTH OF SAID NORTH LINE OF THE NE/ OF SECTION 5; THENCE N0 0, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO SAID NORTH LINE OF THE NE/ OF SECTION 5; THENCE N 9 E ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE NE/ OF SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 3.0 FEET; THENCE S0 0 E, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-AY LINE OF SCHRAM ROAD; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-AY LINE OF SCHRAM ROAD ON THE FOLLOING THREE (3) DESCRIBED COURSES: () N9 595 E, A DISTANCE OF. FEET; () THENCE S0 55 E, A DISTANCE OF. FEET; (3) THENCE S E, A DISTANCE OF 0.3 FEET; THENCE S0 5"E, A DISTANCE OF 3. FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT ITH A RADIUS OF.00 FEET, A DISTANCE OF 9. FEET, SAID CURVE HAVING A LONG CHORD HICH BEARS S0 03"E, A DISTANCE OF 9. FEET; THENCE S5 35", A DISTANCE OF. FEET; THENCE S3 0", A DISTANCE OF. FEET; THENCE S 09", A DISTANCE OF FEET; THENCE S5 095"E, A DISTANCE OF 0. FEET; THENCE S 5", A DISTANCE OF FEET; THENCE S9 33", A DISTANCE OF.3 FEET; THENCE S ", A DISTANCE OF 5. FEET; THENCE S33 33", A DISTANCE OF 5.9 FEET; THENCE S5 30", A DISTANCE OF 5. FEET; THENCE N55 030", A DISTANCE OF 0. FEET; THENCE S9 3", A DISTANCE OF 53.5 FEET; THENCE S55 3", A DISTANCE OF 3.00 FEET; THENCE S3 00", A DISTANCE OF 30. FEET; THENCE S 3"E, A DISTANCE OF 0.5 FEET; THENCE S3 0", A DISTANCE OF 3. FEET; THENCE S35 5"E, A DISTANCE OF 35.3 FEET; THENCE S5 0533", A DISTANCE OF. FEET; THENCE S 5", A DISTANCE OF 9.3 FEET; THENCE S0 5"E, A DISTANCE OF 5. FEET; THENCE S3 03"E, A DISTANCE OF.00 FEET; THENCE S55 55", A DISTANCE OF. FEET; THENCE S0 55", A DISTANCE OF.0 FEET; THENCE S3 03"E, A DISTANCE OF 0.9 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ON A CURVE TO THE RIGHT ITH A RADIUS OF 5.00 FEET, A DISTANCE OF.90 FEET, SAID CURVE HAVING A LONG CHORD HICH BEARS S 3059"E, A DISTANCE OF.0 FEET; THENCE S0 5"E, A DISTANCE OF.9 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ON A CURVE TO THE LEFT ITH A RADIUS OF 5.00 FEET, A DISTANCE OF.35 FEET, SAID CURVE HAVING A LONG CHORD HICH BEARS S0 53"E, A DISTANCE OF.33 FEET, THENCE S0 55"E, A DISTANCE OF 9.59 FEET; THENCE S55 55"E, A DISTANCE OF.0 FEET; THENCE S0 55"E, A DISTANCE OF 0.00 FEET; THENCE S0 55"E, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NE/ OF SECTION 5; THENCE S 00 ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF THE NE OF SECTION 5, A DISTANCE OF 0. FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID TRACT OF LAND CONTAINS A TOTAL AREA OF 3,9,3 SQUARE FEET OR 9. ACRES, MORE OR LE. JOHN. VON DOLLEN LS-59 COUNTY TREASURERS CERTIFICATE DATE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT I FIND NO REGULAR OR SPECIAL TAXES DUE OR DELINQUENT AGAINST THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE AND EMBRACED IN THIS PLAT AS SHON BY THE RECORDS OF THIS OFFICE. COUNTY TREASURER DATE REVIE BY SARPY COUNTY PUBLIC ORKS THIS PLAT OF SUMTUR CROING AS REVIEED BY THE THE SARPY COUNTY SURVEYORS OFFICE THIS DAY OF, 0. COUNTY SURVEYOR / ENGINEER E & A CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Engineering Planning Environmental & Field Services Revisions P Proj No: Date Description No /03/0 Date: SUMTUR CROING Date Description MA Designed By: LOTS THRU 5 AND OUTLOTS "A" THRU "M" INCLUSIVE PAPILLION, NEBRASKA FINAL PLAT TRH Drawn By: 0909 Mill Valley Road, Suite 00 Omaha, NE 5 Phone: Fax: "=00 Scale: of Sheet: K:\Projects\0\0\p0\Plat\Final Design\FP-PHI-000.dwg //0 :5 PM Brian Herr

18 OF THE NE/ SOUTHEST CORNER SECTION 05-T3N-RE HITEATER DRIVE S TH STREET T S 3TH STREET PORTAGE CIRCLE S TH STREET R- PHASE I OUTLOT "B" SECTION 05-T3N-RE NORTHEST CORNER OUTLOT "A" 3 5 OUTLOT "D" 0.9 AC.. AC. OUTLOT "F" OUTLOT "Q" 0.03 AC. OF THE NE/ OUTLOT "C" 0. AC. OUTLOT "E" 0.00 AC. S 3TH AVENUE CIRCLE 3 SUNBURST DRIVE S 3TH AVENUE S 3TH STREET OUTLOT "O" 0. AC. 0. AC AC R- PUD OUTLOT "G" 0.00 AC O.L. "R" 0.0 AC OUTLOT "S" R- 0. AC. PHASE I PORT ROYAL DRIVE S 0TH AVENUE HITEATER DRIVE S TH AVENUE S TH STREET S TH AVENUE.9 AC. OUTLOT "N" S 0TH STREET S TH STREET HARDOOD DRIVE RANCH DRIVE S TH AVENUE S TH STREET PORTAGE DRIVE OUTLOT "K" 03.5 AC OUTLOT "P".3 AC. 3 OUTLOT "I".0 AC R- PHASE II BEARCREEK DRIVE S 0TH STREET S 0TH AVENUE CIRCLE S TH AVENUE CIRCLE SUNBURST DRIVE PORTAGE DRIVE PORT ROYAL DRIVE SCHRAM ROAD OUTLOT "M" 0.0 AC OUTLOT "J".55 AC S 09TH STREET OUTLOT "L".3 AC. OUTLOT "H" 0.9 AC. FOX RUN DRIVE S 0TH STREET NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NE/ SECTION 05-T3N-RE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NE/ SECTION 05-T3N-RE S 0TH STREET S 0TH STREET PROJECT SITE SCHRAM ROAD VICINITY MAP inch = 00 ft. 0 LEGEND BOUNDARY LINE RIGHT OF AY LINE LOT LINE EASEMENTS BUILDING ENVELOPE EXIST. MAJOR CONTOURS EXIST. MINOR CONTOURS SUMTUR CROING LOTS THRU 335 AND OUTLOTS "A" THRU "S" INCLUSIVE S. TH STREET S. 0TH STREET TURKEY ROAD ALNUT CREEK LAKE Proj No: Date: Designed By: Drawn By: Scale: P /03/ MA TRH "=00 Sheet: of Revisions No Date Description E & A CONSULTING GROUP, INC. Date Description PHASE-LINE EXHIBIT SUMTUR CROING LOTS THRU 335 AND OUTLOTS "A" THRU "S" INCLUSIVE PAPILLION, NEBRASKA Engineering Planning Environmental & Field Services 0909 Mill Valley Road, Suite 00 Omaha, NE 5 Phone: Fax: Jeff Stoll 0//0 : AM K:\Projects\0\0\p0\Plat\Final Design\FP-PHASE LINE-000.dwg

19 Mill Valley Road, Suite 00 Omaha, NE 5 Phone: Fax: LN UT LA CRE KE EK STREET LOT AREAS LOT AREAS LOT AREAS LOT AREAS LOT AREAS LOT AREAS LOT AREAS LOT NO. SQ. FOOTAGE LOT NO. SQ. FOOTAGE LOT NO. SQ. FOOTAGE LOT NO. SQ. FOOTAGE LOT NO. SQ. FOOTAGE LOT NO. SQ. FOOTAGE LOT NO. SQ. FOOTAGE LOT NO. SQ. FOOTAGE 0 0,53 0, 5 0, 99, 30 3, 5,5,09 9,9 0,53 3 0, 55 0, 300,5,30 9,9 0,9 30 9,95 3, 0,3 5 0, 30,5 03 5,30 9,3 9,5 3, 3 0,3 5 0,0 5,3 30,5, 0,9 90 0,3 3 3,39 0, 0,0 5 0, 303,5,5 9, 9, 33, 5,03 9, ,00 30,9 5,55,3 9,30 3,,9 0,5 0 0,00 305,00 9,35 5,3 93, 35,3,3 9, 0, ,099 0,0 5, 9,9 3 0,9, 0 5,3 0,00 30,30,3 53, 95 9,99 3,3 9 0,0, 3 0,00 30,9,39 5, 9,95 3,35 0 0,0, 0, ,00 3,39 55, 9, 39,903,9 3, 5 0, ,530 0,5 5, 9,9 0,00,0, 0,00 3 0,530 5,39 5, 99 3,,30 3 0,0 5, 0,00 3 0,530,39 5 3,5 00 0,0,0 0,3,30 0, ,530 0,5 59, 0 0,0 3,0 5 0,00 9,99 9,09 3 0,5,39 0,33 0,0, 0,00,0 0, 35,9 9,033,5 03 0,00 5 9,59,30 9 0,35,5 3,9 0,39,5 0,9 3,59,0 30 0,3,30 3,9 3,9 3,5 05,033,39 9,90 3 0,39 3 0,0 3,39,90,5 0,5 3, 90 0, 3 0,00 0, 39 0,3 3,90 5,5 0 9,90 9,9 9 0,5 33 0,00 5 0,0 30,,3,9 0 0,5,0 9 0,5 3 0,00 0,39 3,3 5,93, ,9 5,0 93 0,5 35 0,00 0,0 3 0,33,3,0 0 0, 5,03 9 0,5 3 0,00 0,0 33 9,,3 9,0 0,0 53,0 95 0,5 3,3 9 0,0 3,3 3,5 0,9 9,90 5,0 9,39 3,59 0 0,0 35 9, 9 0,35,9 3 9,90 55,0 9 0,9 39 0,959 0,0 3 9, 30 0,5, 9,90 5, ,00 0 0,959 0,3 3 0,03 3 0,5 3, 5 9,90 5,3 99 0,00 0, ,9 3,0 3 0,55 0,5 9,9 5,0 00 0,00 0,959 0,95 39,05 33,5 5 0,9 0,5 59,9 0 0,00 3 0, , ,99 3 0,5 0, 9,90 0 0,0 0 0,00 0,959 0, ,99 35,39,90 9 9,90 3,0 03 0,00 5 0, , ,99 3,39 3,05 0 9,90,3 0,5 0, , ,99 3 0,5 9,,0 3,0 05 3,053,0 9, 33 0,59 3,9 0,53 0,33 3,90 0,, 93, ,935 39,39,3 3 0,03 5, 0 3,0 9 0, 9, 0,39 3,395,0, 0 3, 0, 95 3,,39 3, 5,0 0,93 09,55 5 0, 9,35,39,03,0 0,90 0,5 5 0, 9, 0 5 STORM SEER EASEMENT P OH 0.0 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NE/ SECTION 05-T3N-RE K:\Projects\0\0\p0\Plat\Preliminary Design\PRE-PLAT-000.dwg POER RIGHT-OF-AY EASEMENT MISC. BOOK 0 PAGE 0 BOOK 5 PAGE 0 MISC. BOOK 3 PAGE 5 MISC. BOOK 55 PAGE 0 /0/0 :0 PM Jeff Stoll of TRH 5 HITEATER DRIVE (93) Drawn By: 0 OUTLOT "H" 0.9 AC. Description 0 Date 30 FRONT YARD (TYP.) YA 30 RD RE (TY AR P.) MA Designed By: Description Date Sheet: 0 "= Scale: No 0/0/ 5 Date:,09 INDEMNIFICATION AND ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT O.P.P.D. AND CITY OF PAPILLION INST. No PERMANENT ATER MAIN EASEMENT GRANTED TO CITY OF PAPILLION INST. No LOT AREAS 5 FEET FROM LOT LINE 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET FRONT YARD: INTERIOR SIDE YARD: STREET SIDE YARD: REAR YARD:, ZONING R-PUD MINIMUM SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: 90.,5 3. LOTS 93 & 30 DRIVEAYS SHALL ONLY HAVE ACCE TO S 0TH AVENUE CIRCLE.. LOTS & 3 DRIVEAYS SHALL ONLY HAVE ACCE TO HARDOOD DRIVE.,0 0 LOTS THRU 335 AND OUTLOTS "A" THRU "R" INCLUSIVE PAPILLION, NEBRASKA 0. LOTS 9 & 9 DRIVEAYS SHALL ONLY HAVE ACCE TO S 09TH STREET. PRELIMINARY PLAT LOT 3 DRIVEAY SHALL ONLY HAVE ACCE TO S 3TH AVENUE CIRCLE SUMTUR CROING OUTLOT "R" IS TO BE USED AS AN GREEN SPACE AREA. OUTLOT "R" IS TO BE ONED AND MAINTAINED BY THE DEVELOPER OR THE HOMEONERS AOCIATION. ( ) (9 5) ( ) OUTLOT "Q" IS TO BE USED AS A BUFFER AND LANDSCAPING EASEMENT. OUTLOT "Q" IS TO BE ONED AND MAINTAINED BY THE DEVELOPER OR THE HOMEONERS AOCIATION Revisions P (9 ( ) Proj No: 0. 0 ) E Y 5 S AR TRE D( TY ET P.) SID ) ( ) (3 ) ( OUTLOT "P" IS TO BE USED AS A PERMANENT STORM SEER AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT. OUTLOT "P" IS TO BE ONED AND MAINTAINED BY THE SANITARY AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT. MAINTENANCE OF THE PUBLIC TRAIL ITHIN OUTLOT "P" SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE HOMEONERS AOCIATION. () 3 S TH AVENUE ) ( S 0TH STREET OUTLOT "O" IS TO BE USED AS A BUFFER AND LANDSCAPING EASEMENT. OUTLOT "O" IS TO BE ONED AND MAINTAINED BY THE DEVELOPER OR THE HOMEONERS AOCIATION (3) OUTLOTS "G", AND "M" ARE PARCELS OF LAND USED FOR A SIGNAGE EASEMENT. OUTLOTS "G", AND "M" ARE TO BE ONED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEONERS AOCIATION R= , OUTLOT "N" IS A PARCEL OF LAND DEEMED UNBUILDABLE DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF AN EXISTING OPPD POER TRANSMIION LINE EASEMENT. OUTLOT "N" IS TO BE ONED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEONERS AOCIATION (9) CLE OUTLOTS "A", "B", "E", AND "F" ARE PARCELS OF LAND DEEMED UNBUILDABLE DUE TO THE PRESENCE OF AN EXISTING OPPD POER TRANSMIION LINE EASEMENT. OUTLOTS "A", "B", "E", AND "F" ILL CONTAIN A PUBLIC TRAIL AND THEREFORE THESE OUTLOTS ARE TO BE ONED AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEONERS AOCIATION. 0 S 3TH A VENUE C IR R= (0) (53) OUTLOT "L" IS INTENDED TO BE USED AS A PERMANENT PCSMP BASIN FOR THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT TO THE EAST. UNTIL SUCH TIME OUTLOT "L" ILL BE USED AS GREEN SPACE AND SHALL BE ONED AND MAINTAINED BY THE DEVELOPER. 0, (9) , 3 3 OUTLOTS "C", "D", "H", "I", "J", AND "K" ARE TO BE USED FOR A PERMANENT PCSMP BASIN. A PERMANENT STORM SEER AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT IS GRANTED OVER ALL OF OUTLOTS "C", "D", "H", "I", "J", AND "K". OUTLOTS "C", "D", "H", "I", "J", AND "K" ARE TO BE ONED AND MAINTAINED BY THE SANITARY AND IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT. OUTLOTS "C", "D", "H", "I", "J", AND "K" SHALL BE TRANSFERRED TO THE HOMEONERS AOCIATION PRIOR TO ANNEXATION , , FULL RIGHT-OF-AY FOR HITEATER DRIVE ILL BE DEDICATED ITH THE SUMTUR CROING HERE APPLICABLE. COORDINATION ILL TAKE PLACE ITH THE ADJACENT LAND ONER FOR THE SOUTH / OF THE RIGHT-OF-AY REQUIRED FOR THE CONNECTION TO TH STREET. EXISTING AG PROPOSED: R-, LOTS THRU & LOTS THRU 335 & OUTLOTS "A" THRU "C", "E", "F", & "H" THRU "Q" R- PUD, LOTS 3 THRU 5 & OUTLOT "D", "G" & "R" 3, ZONING: 0 THE ESTERLY RIGHT-OF-AY OF 0TH STREET ILL BE DEDICATED ITH SUMTUR CROING. THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-AY ILL BE DEDICATED HEN THE EAST PROPERTY IS DEVELOPED TYPICAL UTILITY EASEMENTS ILL BE DEDICATED ITH THE FINAL PLAT RONALD & SHARON TEX 009 SCHRAM RD PAPILLION, NE 0. LOTS 0 & 93 DRIVEAYS SHALL ONLY HAVE ACCE TO PORT ROYAL DRIVE. 30. BOYER YOUNG DEVELOPMENT COMPANY CLARENCE J. TEX 99 GILES ROAD 3 S 99TH ST. LA VISTA, NE. LA VISTA, NE 5 33 THE CHAMFERS FOR SIDEALKS ON CORNER LOTS ARE SET AT (.5) RADII FROM THE INTERSECTION OF RIGHT-OF-AY LINES ONER, TEMPORARY TURNAROUNDS ILL BE CONSTRUCTED AT ALL DEAD END STREETS (3) FOX RUN DRIVE ) (33 9 DIRECT VEHICULAR ACCE ILL NOT BE ALLOED TO S 0TH STREET, SCHRAM ROAD, S TH STREET, AND HITEATER DRIVE FROM ANY LOT OR OUTLOTS ABUTTING SAID STREET OR ROAD. EXCEPT OF OUTLOT "L" AND OUTLOT "N". ACCE TO OUTLOT "L" SHALL BE LIMITED TO S 0TH STREET. ACCE TO OUTLOT "N" SHALL BE LIMITED TO HITEATER DRIVE. S 0TH STREET NOTES: G S 09TH STREET () 33 () S 0TH STREET ) ( 3 (3) S 0TH STREET 3 5) (9 ) ET 3 ) ( EET YP. STR D (T 5 E YAR SID TRE HS 0T 9 S ) ( ONER 3 3 () 9 A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED IN PART NE/ OF SECTION 05, ALL LOCATED IN TONSHIP 3, RANGE EAST OF THE TH P.M., SARPY COUNTY, NEBRASKA.,99 3 SANITARY SEER, STORM SEER & DRAINAGE EASEMENT OUTLOT "N".9 AC. (9) (0) (3) (593) 59 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOTS THRU 335 AND OUTLOTS "A" THRU "R" INCLUSIVE () (0) 3 SUMTUR CROING (3) HARDOOD DRIVE 5 (9) O RANCH DRIVE ) () () 5 0 ( () R= 3 30 S TH STREET FR 30 5 BEARCREEK DRIVE ) ( S T YA N 9 0 S.) H T (TYP RD (3 ) (3) (5) RADIUS DEVELOPER CURVE (90) T EE R T 5 FRONT YARD EXIST. MINOR CONTOURS STREET SIDE YARD R=5 (53) 9 3 EXIST. MAJOR CONTOURS SAID TRACT OF LAND CONTAINS AN AREA OF 5.30 ACRES MORE OR LE REAR YARD (TYP.) ) HITEATER DRIVE ( (3) S TH AVENUE (3) 3 (0) () 3 S TH AVENUE CENTER-LINE CURVE TABLE ) CIR CL 0 E R = ) ( NU E (55) ( ON VE P.) ) R F (TY RD A T Y ) 30 ) 5 S 0TH AVENUE ( () LE IRC EC ( DR U 0 R=5 VEN() HA T INTERIOR SIDE YARD R- ZONING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS ) (5) 39 T S (593) ) OUTLOT "F". AC S TH STREET 5 ( (55) 9 9 OUTLOT "E" 0.00 AC. 0 ONT.) () () ) ( GE IVE ) ( O.L. "G" AC GP OH O.L. "R" 0. AC ) NT SOUTHEST CORNER OF THE NE/ SECTION 05-T3N-RE 0 () ( 3 R= G G S TH STREET EME PERMANENT ATER MAIN EAS P OHON NTED TO CITY OF PAPILLI GRA INST. No P OH OH P 0 S 3TH STREET ER E S RY ITA ENT N SA SEM EA 5 39 ) 3 (3 0 E ) GE CL CIR A RT PO DR ( 9) (0 0 9 HA 5 (9 GE RTA () PO INTERIOR SIDE YARD 5 INTERIOR SIDE YARD BUILDING SETBACK IVE 9 () G P TA OR SANITARY SEER EASEMENT 0 OUTLOT "D" 0.9 AC. ( S OPPD Y EASEMENT -A -OF HT RIG MISC. BK 9 PG 53 ) ( G.0 0 ( ) FR P 30 D (TY R 9 YA OUTLOT "I".0 AC CMP 0 3 G EASEMENTS STREET DRIP LINE DRIP LINE 30.0 TRAIL ACCE EASEMENT OUTLOT "J".55 AC. 0 DRIP LINE LOT LINE OUTLOT "L".3 AC BOUNDARY LINE PERMANENT EASEMENT ALNUT CREEK OUTFALL SEER INST. No INST. No INST. No VICINITY MAP RIGHT OF AY LINE 0.0 R- ZONING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS LEGEND TEMPORARY EASEMENT GRANTED TO SARPY COUNTY INST. NO (TO BE RELEASED) DRIP LINE OUTLOT "P".3 AC. 30 FRONT YARD 5 REAR YARD SANITARY SEER EASEMENT HOG SHED ) 3 3 E RIV 30 0 SU ) 90 TD RS U NB (3 ( TRAIL ACCE EASEMENT 0 CMP G 3 5 ) 5 OUTLOT "K".5 AC ( NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NE/ SECTION 05-T3N-RE REAR YARD (TYP.) G R= SHED DRIP LINE R= ) 0 R 0 T EE TR YP.) S 5 D (T AR ) ( EY SID DRIP LINE 0 0 = E 3 30 REAR YARD (TYP.) 3 ( RO YA LD (3 RIV ) () P OHG S TH STREET OUTLOT "Q" 0.03 AC. OUTLOT "C" 0. AC. 0 DR RT 9 ) 5 PO CMP T 0 3 IVE ) 3 0 3) ( ) ( ( ST UR B N SU 0 () ) ( (9) ( G () ST ( ) G AY RIGHTGOF- DEDICATION () G S 3TH AVENUE (5) 5 S 3TH STREET OPPD NT RIGHT-OF-AY EASEME 53 PG 9 BK C. MIS G EMENT PERMANENT ATER MAIN EAS ON GRANTED TO CITY OF PAPILLI INST. No (9) 30 OUTLOT "O" 0. AC G 9 OUTLOT "B" 3.05 AC (5) PORT ROYAL DRIVE (9) (0) " RCP / FES 3 () " RCP / FES () 3 STORM SEER MANHOLE 5 30 FRONT YARD (TYP.) OUTLOT "A" 0. AC NORTHEST CORNER OF THE NE/ STREET 0.0 AC SECTION 05-T3N-R E STORM SEER MANHOLE OUTLOT "M" RIGHT-OF-AY P ION OH ICAT DED SCHRAM ROAD 00 inch = 00 ft. 33 TEMPORARY EASEMENT GRANTED TO SARPY COUNTY INST. NO (TO BE RELEASED) 0.0 STORM SEER AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT TEMPORARY EASEMENT GRANTED TO CITY OF PAPILLION INST. NO. 0-9 (TO BE RELEASED) 0 5 STREET SIDE YARD Engineering Planning Environmental & Field Services 00 E & A CONSULTING GROUP, INC. 0 INTERIOR SIDE YARD TEMPORARY EASEMENT GRANTED TO CITY OF PAPILLION INST. NO. 0-9 (TO BE RELEASED) PROJECT SITE STREET 0 INTERIOR SIDE YARD 0 INTERIOR SIDE YARD TUR KEY ROA D SCHRAM ROAD A S. 0TH STREET S. TH STREET 30 REAR YARD

20 DRAFT MINUTES PAPILLION PLANNING COMMIION MEETING MAY 3, 0 The Papillion Planning Commission met in open session at the Papillion City Hall Council Chambers on ednesday, May 3, 0 at :00 PM. Chairman Mike Mallory called the meeting to order. City Planner Michelle Romeo called the roll. Planning Commission members present were Howard Carson, Rebecca Hoch, Raymond Keller Jr., Jim Masters, and John E. Robinson III. David Barker, Leanne Sotak, and Herb Thompson were absent. Judy Sunde joined the Commission at :0 PM. Planning Director Mark Stursma, Assistant City Attorney Amber Rupiper, Assistant Planning Director Travis Gibbons, Staff Engineer Derek Goff, and Planning Assistant Andrea Blevins were also present. Notice of the meeting was given in advance by publication in the Papillion Times on May, 0. A copy of proof of publication is on file at the office of the City Clerk. Chairman Mallory led those present in the Pledge of Allegiance. Chairman Mallory announced that a copy of the Open Meetings Act is posted in the City Council Chambers. Approval of Agenda Motion was made by Mr. Robinson III, seconded by Mr. Masters, to approve the agenda as presented. Roll call: Six yeas, no nays. Motion carried. Approval of the Planning Commission Minutes Motion was made by Mr. Robinson III, seconded by Mr. Carson, to approve the April, 0 minutes. Roll Call: Six yeas, no nays. Motion carried. FINAL PLATS Final Plat A Final Plat for the property legally described as being a platting of the / of the SE/ of Section 3, TN, RE of the th P.M., Sarpy County, NE, generally located on the NE corner of th St & Schram Rd. The applicant is Loren Johnson Celebrity Homes. (Southern Pointe) FP John Fullenkamp, 0 Center Road, #C (Omaha), stepped forward to represent the applicant and offered to answer any questions. Chairman Mallory called for discussion amongst the Commission. ith no further discussion, Motion was made by Mr. Robinson III, seconded by Mr. Keller, to recommend approval of the Southern Pointe Final Plat (FP--0005) because it is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the approved Preliminary Plat, and is compliant with Zoning and Subdivision Regulations, contingent upon resolution of staff comments. Roll Call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion carried. Planning Commission May 3, 0

21 Final Plat A Final Plat for the property legally described as a platting of part of the S/ of the SE/ of Section, T3N, RE of the th P.M., Sarpy County, NE, generally located N of nd St & Capehart Rd. The applicant is Shadow Lake, LLC c/o John Allen. (Shadow Lake ) FP--000 Pat Hillyer, 0. Dodge Road, #00 (Omaha), stepped forward to represent the applicant He explained that this development is just south of the existing Shadow Lake subdivision, and will be very similar in nature. Mr. Hillyer offered to answer any questions. Chairman Mallory called for discussion amongst the Commission. ith no further discussion, Motion was made by Mr. Carson, seconded by Ms. Sunde, to recommend approval of the Shadow Lake Final Plat (FP--000) because it is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the approved Preliminary Plat, and compliant with the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Regulations, contingent upon the resolution of staff comments. Roll Call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion carried. PUBLIC HEARINGS Preliminary Plat A Preliminary Plat for the property legally described as a platting of Tax Lot D and Tax Lot of that part of the N/ of Section 35, TN, RE and Lots and, Corn s nd Addition Replat, Tax Lot and Tax Lot 9 of that part of the NE/, N/ and SE/ of Section 3, TN, RE of the th P.M., Sarpy County, NE, generally located south of HY 30, between I-0 and 5 th St. The applicant is Dowd Grain Co., Inc. (I 0-30 Commerce) PP Chairman Mallory opened the public hearing. Doug Kellner, 03 Old Mill Road (Omaha), stepped forward to represent the applicant. He established that the project encompasses a Mixed Use (MU) subdivision similar to the 30 North subdivision on the north side of Highway 30. He added that I 0-30 Commerce is intended to be developed in three different phases with light industrial and commercial uses. Mr. Kellner stated that there are already buyers interested in purchasing some of the proposed lots. Ms. Hoch asked whether the applicant was amenable to all of the contingencies listed in the Planning Commission Staff Report. Mr. Kellner answered in the affirmative. He reported that the Preliminary Plat was approved by Sarpy County prior to the area coming into Papillion s extraterritorial zoning jurisdiction (ETJ), and the County offered similar comments at that time. Chairman Mallory called for proponents and opponents. Penny Rosso owner of Pen Steel, Inc., 55 Cooper Street (Omaha), stepped forward to express opposition to the project. Ms. Rosso provided a handout to the Planning Commission that included a map of her business and a breakdown of the businesses operating in the area. She communicated that her business has resided on the southeast corner of 5 th Street and Cooper Street since 00. She explained that approximately operating businesses rely on th Street, which is the only major access to enter and exit the business park complex. She noted that other developable lots and empty bays that may become occupied will also use th Street for access. She added that Omaha Steaks, the biggest employer within the referenced area, generates a significant amount of traffic during their busy season. She asserted that the Planning Commission May 3, 0

22 congestion at the intersection of th Street and Highway 30 is dangerous and makes it difficult for emergency vehicles to enter and exit the complex. She expressed that a development of this size will aggravate the existing traffic problem. Chairman Mallory asked Ms. Rosso to point out her property on the provided map. Ms. Rosso obliged. Mr. Masters asked whether Ms. Rosso had reviewed the Planning Commission Staff Report regarding this development. Ms. Rosso explained that she had not reviewed the report. Ms. Hoch asked Ms. Rosso whether there was any access to Highway on the east side of the complex and whether such access was signalized. Ms. Rosso explained that there was access to Highway via 5 th Street and Schram Road, however, the portion of 5 th Street between Schram Road and Gold Coast Road is gravel and should be paved. The intersection is not signalized. Jim Krambeck, 530 Schram Road, stepped forward to express concern about the traffic that would be generated along 5 th Street and Schram Road and how said traffic may affect his farm on the northeast corner of 5 th Street and Schram Road. Tanya Hall owner of Interstate Battery of Eastern Nebraska, 55 Cooper Street (Omaha), stepped forward to express her concerns regarding the traffic and congestion that already exists at the site. She concurred with Ms. Rosso s assertions. Mr. Kellner explained that staff, Sarpy County, and the State of Nebraska are aware of the issues at the intersection of th Street and Highway 30 and added that Sarpy County has created an improvement plan for the paving of 5 th Street. He added that said improvements would be phased. He added that the issues expressed would likely be resolved with the buildout of the development. Ms. Rosso asked that the Planning Commission consider tabling this item until the some of the traffic issues were improved. Chairman Mallory explained that it is rare that the Planning Commission tables items; however, there would be opportunities in the future for her to attend additional public hearings. Ms. Hoch explained that subdivisions are created to help fund public improvements; therefore, the paving that she is requesting would require funding from subdivisions to the south and west of her business. She added that stopping the creation of the subdivision would stop the creation of the funding required to make those improvements. Seeing no further public input, Chairman Mallory closed the public hearing and called for Commission Discussion. Mr. Masters added that all staff comments were public information. Mr. Stursma explained that roads are typically built through development, and that it is a common misconception that the government pays for all roads. He acknowledged the traffic and access issues in the area and added that the funding from this project would be used to improve the roads and to help alleviate some of the existing problems. Mr. Carson acknowledged the traffic issues in the relative area of the project and asked staff to share the forecast for the intersection at th Street and Highway 30. Staff Engineer Derek Goff stated that the draft plan indicates that there will eventually be a full improvement of that intersection with signalization. He added that half of the improvements to the intersection would 3 Planning Commission May 3, 0

23 be funded by the 30 North SID with the other half of the funding coming from this project. He expressed that both the State and the County are working cooperatively on this effort. ith no further discussion, Motion was made by Mr. Robinson III, seconded by Mr. Carson, to recommend approval of the I 0 30 Commerce Preliminary Plat (PP--0003) because it is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, compatible with adjacent uses, and compliant with the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Regulations, contingent upon the resolution of staff comments. Roll Call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion carried. Mr. Masters recommended that applicants try to have better communication with the neighboring properties about new development prior to the public hearing at Planning Commission. Change of Zone A Change of Zone from Agricultural (AG), General Commercial (GC), and Limited Industrial (LI) to Mixed Use (MU) for the property legally described as a platting of Tax Lot D and Tax Lot of that part of the N/ of Section 35, TN, RE and Lots and, Corn s nd Addition Replat, Tax Lot and Tax Lot 9 of that part of the NE/, N/ and SE/ of Section 3, TN, RE of the th P.M., Sarpy County, NE, generally located south of HY 30, between I-0 and 5 th St. The applicant is Dowd Grain Co., Inc. (I 0-30 Commerce) CZ--000 Chairman Mallory opened the public hearing. Doug Kellner, 03 Old Mill Road (Omaha), stepped forward to represent the applicant and offered to answer any additional questions. Chairman Mallory called for proponents and opponents. Penny Rosso owner of Pen Steel, Inc., 55 Cooper Street (Omaha), stepped forward to express her opposition to the project due to the potential increase in traffic and congestion. Seeing no further public input, Chairman Mallory closed the public hearing and called for Commission Discussion. Mr. Keller asked whether the roads would be improved prior to additional businesses being built at the site. Mr. Kellner answered that the roads will not necessarily be improved prior to the development of the property. He added that the traffic signalization at the intersection of th Street and Highway 30 largely relies on a determination by the State. He added that the developer will work with the County and the State to determine the timing of said improvements. Mr. Kellner indicated that the improvement of the intersection may not happen within the first phase of this project. Mr. Keller asked Mr. Kellner to point out where the first phase is on the plat. Mr. Kellner obliged. Mr. Keller asked whether the improvements to 5 th Street to access Schram Road would happen right away. Mr. Kellner said that they likely would not. Mr. Keller stated that there could be serious traffic issues at the site until these improvements happened. Mr. Kellner explained that the subdivision has to create the tax base to be able to pay for the necessary improvements. He added that there is a subdivision developing to the east (Crossroads Commerce Park) that could alleviate some of the traffic with an additional access to Highway via Gold Coast Road. Planning Commission May 3, 0

24 Mr. Keller asked whether there was any type of timeline for the improvements. Mr. Goff explained that the timing largely relies on the State, and that the intersection needs to meet certain traffic counts to be considered for the signalization and improvements. Mr. Kellner added that these counts do not rely on platted lots but actual traffic generated by businesses. Ms. Sunde asked about the approval of the Preliminary Plat by Sarpy County. Mr. Kellner explained that the area had not been added to the City s ETJ when planning for the development began and that the developer changed gears to focus on the property on the north side of Highway 30 (30 North) prior to the area coming into the City s ETJ. Mr. Keller asked what businesses that might purchase land within this development. Mr. Kellner said that he could not say at this time. Mr. Carson asked whether there were any existing businesses within the proposed development. Mr. Kellner said that with the exception of the Volvo dealership at 0 S. th Street, there are not any existing businesses. He added that the Volvo dealership is expected to go away. Mr. Carson asked what would happen to the taxes for the existing business. Mr. Kellner stated that he did not believe that he was qualified to answer the question but assumed that the taxes would remain the same. ith no further discussion, Motion was made by Mr. Carson, seconded by Ms. Sunde, to recommend approval of the I 0 30 Commerce Change of Zone (CZ--000) from Agricultural (AG), General Commercial (GC), and Limited Industrial (LI) to Mixed Use (MU) because it is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, compatible with adjacent uses, and compliant with the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Regulations, contingent upon the resolution of staff comments. Roll Call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion carried. Preliminary Plat A Preliminary Plat for the property legally described as a tract of land being part of Tax Lots and, tax lots located in the NE/ of Section 5, T3N, RE of the th P.M., Sarpy County, NE, generally located on the SE corner of th Street and Schram Road. The applicant is Boyer Young Development Company. (SumTur Crossing) PP--000 Chairman Mallory opened the public hearing. Mark estergard, 0909 Mill Valley Road, #00 (Omaha), stepped forward to represent the applicant. Mr. estergard acknowledged that several members of Tex family, the land owners, were present. He explained that the project is proposed to be developed as single-family residential with 3 single-family residential lots and 3 PUD overlay lots meant for a townhome or villa concept. He added that the project would be developed in two phases with the first phase encompassing the portion north of the creek and the second phase encompassing the southern portion. Mr. estergard noted that the property is currently within the Springfield-Platteview School District, but the developer plans to petition the Papillion-La Vista School District to bring the project into that district. Mr. estergard acknowledged that there are some challenges in developing the property due to an OPPD power line that runs north and south through the development and another line that 5 Planning Commission May 3, 0

25 runs along the southern boundary line. He added that there is a sizable creek that runs through the property diagonally. He explained that there are also easements for an existing sanitary sewer line located a significant distance from the creek. He explained that the project is also bounded by three arterial streets (Schram Road, 0 th Street, and th Street) and one collector road (hitewater Drive) meaning that the development will be responsible for significant funds toward road improvements. He added that some of the necessary road improvements will become future obligations as the SID matures. Mr. estergard acknowledged the contingencies in the Planning Commission Staff Report and stated that the applicant did not have any major issues with said conditions. He pointed out that the applicant believed that contingency and 3 under Section IV regarding access and trail issues could be addressed in a more cost effective manner, as a crossing across the creek would be quite expensive. He suggested that constructing 0 th Street further south may be a better alternative. He also addressed contingency 3 and regarding the PUD component, and expressed that the applicant believes that there are enough amenities and greenspace to justify the PUD Overlay, but that this has not been demonstrated to staff yet. Mr. estergard added that Boyer Young Development has been successful with this type of concept in the past. Chairman Mallory asked Mr. estergard to clarify whether the applicant intended to seek relief from the aforementioned contingencies. Mr. estergard clarified that the applicant does not take exception to the contingencies, but wanted to make note of the contingencies that the applicant believes could be resolved in a different manner. Chairman Mallory noted that the Planning Commission s recommendation for approval partially depends on the applicant s willingness to resolve the contingencies provided, and that it is not often that an applicant asks for exceptions to said contingencies. Mr. estergard noted that the applicant needed to find mechanisms to address the contingencies in an affordable way. Chairman Mallory added that it appears that there is ample space for greenspace and recreational facilities along the creek. Mr. estergard answered affirmatively. Ms. Hoch asked Mr. Stursma to offer the Commission a refresher on PUD zoning. Mr. Stursma summarized that Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning is similar to Mixed Use (MU) zoning in that the applicant can ask for some change or relief from the prescribed zoning requirements. He explained that in this case the relief would be from the Urban Family Residential (R-3) setbacks to allow for smaller lots and smaller units to increase density. Ms. Hoch asked whether there would need to be a significant additional benefit to the residents beyond exterior maintenance, and whether that additional benefit seems to be lacking in this application. Mr. Stursma explained that the zoning ordinance regarding PUD zoning requires an offset, in other words, the applicant is granted relief from zoning in exchange for some other benefit. He noted that the applicant has not had the opportunity to respond to the City s comment regarding this offset. Mr. Keller asked for an example of an offset. Mr. Stursma answered that additional greenspace or a series of trails in exchange for reduced setbacks could be an example. He added that PUD zoning cannot be used as a mechanism to eliminate certain zoning requirements without an exchange for some other amenity. Mr. Carson asked Mr. estergard to reiterate the number of lots dedicated to single-family homes and townhouses. He also inquired as to the estimated price point for the single-family homes. Mr. estergard reminded the Commission that there are 3 townhomes/villas and 3 single-family homes proposed. He also added that the houses would fall within the $5,000 - $3,000 price range. Mr. Carson asked whether the reduced five foot side yard setback would only be present within the townhome/villa concept. Mr. estergard answered in the affirmative. Planning Commission May 3, 0

26 Mr. Masters asked whether the applicant would be willing to change the name of the development to avoid confusion with SumTur Amphitheater as recommended in the Planning Commission Staff Report. Mr. estergard noted that he was unable to speak for the developer on this issue; however, the developer has expressed that they would like to keep the name. Ms. Hoch agreed that the name was unusual because the development is not within close proximity to SumTur Amphitheater. Chairman Mallory called for proponents and opponents. Seeing no further public input, Chairman Mallory closed the public hearing and called for Commission Discussion. ith no further discussion, Motion was made by Mr. Robinson III, seconded by Mr. Carson, to recommend approval of the SumTur Crossing Preliminary Plat (PP--000) because it is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, compatible with adjacent uses, and compliant with the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Regulations, contingent upon the resolution of staff comments. Roll Call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion carried. Change of Zone A Change of Zone from Agricultural (AG) to Single-Family Residential (Medium-Density) (R-) and Urban Family Residential with a PUD- Overlay (R-3 PUD-) for the property legally described as a tract of land being part of Tax Lots and, tax lots located in the NE/ of Section 5, T3N, RE of the th P.M., Sarpy County, NE, generally located on the SE corner of th Street and Schram Road. The applicant is Boyer Young Development Company. (SumTur Crossing) CZ Chairman Mallory opened the public hearing. Mark estergard, 0909 Mill Valley Road, #00 (Omaha), stepped forward to represent the applicant and offered to answer any questions. Chairman Mallory called for proponents and opponents. Seeing no further public input, Chairman Mallory closed the public hearing and called for Commission Discussion. Mr. Carson noted that the first phase of the project will add to the traffic on th Street, which will further require improvement and signalization to the intersection of th Street and Highway 30. ith no further discussion, Motion was made by Mr. Keller, seconded by Ms. Sunde, to recommend approval of the SumTur Crossing Change of Zone (CZ--0005) from Agricultural (AG) to Single-Family Residential (Medium-Density) (R-) and Urban Family Residential with a PUD- Overlay (R-3 PUD-) because it is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, compatible with adjacent uses, and compliant with the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Regulations, contingent upon the resolution of staff comments. Roll Call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion carried. Preliminary Plat A Preliminary Plat for the property legally described as being a platting of the SE/ of the S/ of Section 9, TN, RE of the th P.M., Sarpy County, NE, generally located north of HY 30, on the west side of th St. The applicant is the Archdiocese of Omaha, Jim Stolze. (est Papillion Catholic Community) PP Chairman Mallory opened the public hearing. Planning Commission May 3, 0

27 Jim Stolze Chief Financial Officer for the Archdiocese of Omaha, 00 N. nd Street (Omaha), stepped forward to represent the applicant. Mr. Stolze noted that the project is intended to develop as a Catholic parish and school. He explained that there is currently one Catholic parish in Papillion, St. Columbkille, and noted that this parish is beginning to outgrow its current facility. He added that St. Columbkille currently has approximately 9,000 parishioners with a capacity for 0,000. Mr. Stolze explained that the Archdiocese commissioned a strategic study in 05 to analyze growth and capacity issues in western Douglas and Sarpy counties. He added that the result of this study strongly recommended that the Archdiocese acquire land along Highway 30 in the corridor between th Street and 3 nd Street. The Archdiocese Real Estate committee chose this site as the best alternative for a new Catholic parish. Nick Klimek, 900 Farnam Street, Suite 00 (Omaha), stepped forward to represent the applicant. Mr. Klimek explained that this project is to be developed as a Catholic Church and Kindergarten th grade school with associated facilities for both uses. He added that the plan illustrates the highest use on the northern parcel which is a senior living facility. He explained that this is generally a very compatible land use. Mr. Klimek expressed that the Preliminary Plat application proposes three lots and a new street (Cumberland Drive) that will connect th Street to Ballpark ay. He added that the applicant contacted the adjacent property owner for Schewe Farms, who he described as expressing support for the project. Mr. Klimek advised that the applicant is proposing a change of zone from Agricultural (AG) to Mixed Use (MU). He also explained that the Comprehensive Plan Amendment application requests that the Future Land Use Designation be changed from Mixed Use, Low Density Residential, and Medium Density Residential to Park, Civic, and Medium Density Residential. He stated that the applicant believes that this is appropriate because the Comprehensive Plan identifies mixed use town centers as being a mix of residential, commercial, park, and civic facilities. He noted that there is only commercial and residential of different densities proposed adjacent to this property and the civic use would be the final missing piece in the cluster of uses. Mr. Klimek acknowledged that the applicant agrees that there should be a second access point for the project via access to Ballpark ay, and that the applicant is exploring the best way to achieve this access. He also noted that since the Planning Commission Staff Report was drafted the applicant has provided a traffic impact study to the City. Chairman Mallory asked whether the applicant was aware of the contingencies outlined in the Planning Commission Staff Report. Mr. Klimek answered in the affirmative. Chairman Mallory called for proponents and opponents. Seeing no further public input, Chairman Mallory closed the public hearing and called for Commission Discussion. Mr. Masters asked whether the Archdiocese anticipates that parishioners at St. Columbkille will migrate to the new facility. Mr. Stolze answered that he does believe that this new facility will ease some of the congestion that St. Columbkille is experiencing. He added that the community is growing and that there is a need for an additional parish. Planning Commission May 3, 0

28 ith no further discussion, Motion was made by Ms. Sunde, seconded by Ms. Hoch to recommend approval of the est Papillion Catholic Community Preliminary Plat (PP--0005) because it is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as proposed to be amended, compatible with adjacent uses, and compliant with the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Regulations, contingent upon the resolution of staff comments. Roll Call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion carried. Change of Zone A Change of Zone from Agricultural (AG) to Mixed Use (MU) for the property legally described as being a platting of the SE/ of the S/ of Section 9, TN, RE of the th P.M., Sarpy County, NE, generally located north of HY 30, on the west side of th St. The applicant is the Archdiocese of Omaha, Jim Stolze. (est Papillion Catholic Community) CZ--000 Chairman Mallory opened the public hearing. Nick Klimek, 900 Farnam Street, Suite 00 (Omaha), stepped forward to represent the applicant and offered to answer any questions. Chairman Mallory called for proponents and opponents. Seeing no further public input, Chairman Mallory closed the public hearing and called for Commission Discussion. ith no further discussion, Motion was made by Mr. Robinson III, seconded by Ms. Hoch, to recommend approval of the est Papillion Catholic Community Change of Zone (CZ--000) from Agricultural (AG) to Mixed Use (MU) because it is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as proposed to be amended, compatible with adjacent uses, and compliant with the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Regulations, contingent upon the resolution of staff comments. Roll Call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion carried. Comprehensive Plan Amendment A Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the property legally described as being a platting of the SE/ of the S/ of Section 9, TN, RE of the th P.M., Sarpy County, NE, generally located north of HY 30, on the west side of th St. The applicant is the Archdiocese of Omaha, Jim Stolze. (est Papillion Catholic Community) CPA--000 Chairman Mallory opened the public hearing. Nick Klimek, 900 Farnam Street, Suite 00 (Omaha), stepped forward to represent the applicant and offered to answer any questions. Chairman Mallory called for proponents and opponents. Ms. Hoch thanked the applicant for their thorough application and presentation. Seeing no further public input, Chairman Mallory closed the public hearing and called for Commission Discussion. Mr. Carson noted that the Highway 30 corridor is an entry corridor to the City, and he welcomes the architecture of a Catholic Church on that corridor. ith no further discussion, Motion was made by Mr. Carson, seconded by Mr. Keller, to recommend approval of the est Papillion Catholic Community Comprehensive Plan 9 Planning Commission May 3, 0

29 Amendment (CPA--000) because it is generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan as proposed to be amended, compatible with adjacent uses, and compliant with the Subdivision Regulations and Zoning Regulations, contingent upon the resolution of staff comments. Roll Call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion carried. Ordinance No. An ordinance to annex certain Real Estate to the City of Papillion, Nebraska, the annexation area consists of Tracts,, and 3, legally described as Tract (Pink Industrial Park ): LOTS,, 3, 5,, AND, PINK INDUSTRIAL PARK, A SUBDIVISION IN SARPY COUNTY, NEBRASKA, TOGETHER ITH LOT AND OUTLOT A, PINK INDUSTRIAL PARK REPLAT, A SUBDIVISION IN SARPY COUNTY, NEBRASKA, TOGETHER ITH TH STREET AND VALLEY RIDGE DRIVE LYING ITHIN SAID PINK INDUSTRIAL PARK, ALL IN THE N / OF THE SE / OF SECTION 9, TN, RE OF THE TH P.M., SARPY COUNTY, NEBRASKA, ALL MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT, SAID PINK INDUSTRIAL PARK ; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON THE EAST LINES OF SAID PINK INDUSTRIAL PARK TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT, SAID PINK INDUSTRIAL PARK ; THENCE ESTERLY ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PINK INDUSTRIAL PARK TO THE SOUTHEST CORNER OF LOT, SAID PINK INDUSTRIAL PARK ; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE EST LINES OF SAID PINK INDUSTRIAL PARK AND SAID PINK INDUSTRIAL PARK REPLAT TO THE NORTHEST CORNER OF OUTLOT A, SAID PINK INDUSTRIAL PARK REPLAT ; THENCE EASTERLY ON THE NORTH LINES OF SAID PINK INDUSTRIAL PARK AND PINK INDUSTRIAL PARK REPLAT TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Tract (Bellino Ninety Six): ALL OF LOTS,, 3,, AND 5, BELLINO NINETY SIX, A SUBDIVISION IN SARPY COUNTY, NEBRASKA. Tract 3 (9th Street and Lincoln Road): TAX LOTS B AND BA IN THE EST / OF THE N / OF SECTION, TN, RE OF THE TH P.M., SARPY COUNTY, NEBRASKA, TOGETHER ITH TAX LOT B IN THE SE / OF THE NE / OF SECTION, TN, RE OF THE TH P.M., SARPY COUNTY, NEBRASKA, ALL MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOS: BEGINNING AT THE MOST NORTHERLY CORNER OF SAID TAX LOT BA; THENCE SOUTHESTERLY ON THE NORTHEST LINES OF SAID TAX LOT BA TO THE EAST LINE OF 9TH STREET; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON THE EAST LINES OF 9TH STREET TO THE NORTH LINE OF LINCOLN STREET; THENCE EASTERLY ON A LINE.00 FEET NORTH OF AND PARALLEL ITH THE SOUTH LINES OF THE SE / OF THE NE / OF SAID SECTION AND THE EST / OF THE N / OF SAID SECTION TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID TAX LOT B; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE EAST LINES OF SAID TAX LOTS B AND BA TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. The applicant is the City of Papillion. (0 Annexation No. ) MISC--000 Chairman Mallory opened the public hearing. Planning Director Mark Stursma, E. 3 rd Street, stepped forward to represent the applicant and offered to answer any questions. Chairman Mallory called for proponents and opponents. Seeing no further public input, Chairman Mallory closed the public hearing and called for Commission Discussion. 0 Planning Commission May 3, 0

30 ith no further discussion, Motion was made by Mr. Keller, seconded by Mr. Masters, to recommend approval of the Ordinance No. (MISC--000) 0 Annexation No. because it is consistent with the Annexation Policy found in the Comprehensive Plan. Roll Call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion carried. Ordinance No. An ordinance to change the official Zoning Map of the City of Papillion in accordance with Section 05-3 of the Papillion Municipal Code to adopt a Zoning Map and to apply existing or future zoning regulations, property use regulations, building ordinances, electrical ordinances, plumbing ordinances, and all other regulatory ordinances of the City of Papillion pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat The applicant is the City of Papillion. MISC Chairman Mallory opened the public hearing. Planning Director Mark Stursma, E. 3 rd Street, stepped forward to represent the applicant. He explained that this ordinance is set forth to amend the Official Zoning Map to add the tracts to be annexed by Ordinance No. to the Papillion city limits. Chairman Mallory called for proponents and opponents. Seeing no further public input, Chairman Mallory closed the public hearing and called for Commission Discussion. Mr. Carson asked for an overview of the tracts being annexed. Mr. Stursma identified the three tracts being annexed as Bellino Ninety Six, Pink Industrial Park (Phase ), and the piece of land on the northwest corner of 9 th Street and Lincoln Road that the City purchased and is incorporating into the Community Center and the City Park expansion. He further explained that there is no expansion to the City s extraterritorial zoning jurisdiction (ETJ). Ms. Sunde asked whether the City would absorb any debt from the areas being annexed. Mr. Stursma confirmed that no debt would be absorbed. ith no further discussion, Motion was made by Mr. Carson, seconded by Ms. Hoch, to recommend approval of the Ordinance No. (MISC--0005) because it is consistent with 05-3 of the Zoning Regulations. Roll Call: Seven yeas, no nays. Motion carried. OTHER BUSINE Mr. Carson asked Mr. Stursma to brief the Commission of the outcome of Ordinance No. regarding the parking of Recreational Vehicles in residential districts. Mr. Stursma offered a brief explanation of the approved ordinance amendment. Mr. Masters expressed his disappointment in development applicants bringing projects in front of the Planning Commission with numerous contingencies needing to be resolved. Chairman Mallory expressed his position on the number of contingencies. Chairman Mallory announced that he would be retiring from the Planning Commission after the June, 0 meeting and reminded the Commission that the election for Chair and Vice Chair would be held at the June Planning Commission meeting. Planning Commission May 3, 0

31 ith no further business to come before the Commission, Motion was made by Ms. Hoch, seconded by Mr. Carson, to adjourn. The meeting adjourned by unanimous consent at :5 PM. CITY OF PAPILLION Michael Mallory, Chairman Planning Commission May 3, 0

32 S 0th St S th St S th St S th St S 3th Ave S st St S th St S th St S 3th St S 0th St S 0th St Sand Hills Dr Glacier Dr Hwy 30 B Cumberland Dr Hwy 30 EB ittmus Dr S th Ave Shepard St Grissom St S 5th St S 0th Ave Glenn St Schirra St Mercury St Cooper St S 0th St S th Ave S th St Fenwick St S 5th St Gold Coast Rd Slayton St S th Ave S th St S 0th Ave S th Ave S th St Cooper Cir Slayton St S th Ave S th Ave Horizon Cir Edward St S 09th St Edgewater Dr Schram Rd Lake Tahoe Dr ood Bridge Cir Mallard View Cir Turkey Rd Portage Dr Area of Application Ranch Dr Capehart Rd SumTur Crossing (Phase ) FP