1. Roll Call. 2. Minutes a. April 8, 2019 Regular Meeting. 3. Declaration of Conflict of Interests. 4. Adoption of the Agenda. 5. Visitors to Be Heard

Transcription

1 1. Roll Call City of Vermillion Planning Commission Agenda 5:30 p.m. Regular Meeting Monday, April 22, 2019 Large Conference Room 2 nd Floor City Hall 25 Center Street Vermillion, SD Minutes a. April 8, 2019 Regular Meeting. 3. Declaration of Conflict of Interests 4. Adoption of the Agenda 5. Visitors to Be Heard 6. Public Hearings a. Request for a Conditional Use Permit to Construct a Telecommunications Tower at 105 Market Street (Described as the East Half of Lot 3, Block 22, Original Town of Vermillion, Clay County, South Dakota). 7. Old Business 8. New Business 9. Staff Reports 10. Adjourn WELCOME TO YOUR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING If you wish to participate in the discussion, the meeting provides several opportunities. After the minutes are approved, the Chairperson will ask if any visitors wish to be heard. Any item not on the agenda may be discussed. During the discussion of agenda topics, anyone may comment. The Chairperson will recognize you if you raise your hand. Please introduce yourself with your name and address when addressing the Planning Commission. Discussion occurs before motions are made and seconded. Discussion also occurs after the motion is seconded and before the vote. You may participate each time if you wish. Your suggestions and ideas are welcome. The best decisions are made when everyone participates and provides information. Meeting Assistance: The City of Vermillion fully subscribes to the provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act of If you desire to attend this public meeting and are in need of special accommodations, please notify the City Manager's Office at at least 3 working days prior to the meeting so appropriate auxiliary aids and services can be made available.

2 Unapproved Minutes Vermillion Planning Commission Monday, April 8, 2019 Special Joint Planning Commission Meeting with Clay County The special joint meeting of the Vermillion Planning Commission and Clay County Planning Commission was called to order in the City Council Chambers at City Hall on April 8, 2019 at 5:30 p.m. 1. Roll Call Present: Fairholm, Kleeman (left at 6:45), Gestring, Manning, Muenster, Wilson (left at 6:36), Iverson. Absent: Forseth, Tuve. Staff present: José Domínguez, City Engineer; James Purdy, Assistant City Manager Others present: Cynthia Aiden, Clay County Zoning Administrator; Clay County Planning Commissioners: Bottolfson; Hubert; Mockler; Gilbertson. 2. Minutes a. March 25, 2019 Regular Meeting. Moved by Commissioner Gestring to adopt March 25, 2019 regular meeting minutes as printed, seconded by Commissioner Wilson. Motion carried Declaration of Conflict of Interest Commissioner Muenster noted that he owns investment property. 4. Adoption of the Agenda Moved by Commissioner Kleeman to adopt the agenda as printed, seconded by Commissioner Muenster. Motion carried Visitors to be Heard None. 6. Public Hearing a. A request for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a single-family dwelling for Bret & Kim Johnson for property located at 210 Broken Spur, Vermillion, which is described as Tract D of Ranchette #1 E Ranch Estates, Section 20, Fairview Township, Clay County, South Dakota. Cynthia Aiden, Clay County Zoning Administrator, reported that Mr. Bret Johnson filed an application for a CUP for the construction of a singlefamily dwelling to be located in an area zoned A-1 Agricultural District on March 19, 2019 and all applicable fees were paid on March 20, She noted the following criteria the commissioners are required to consider when making their decision: IMPACT ON ADJACENT PROPERTY: The proposed residential use is consistent with other properties within the district. Page 1 of 5

3 CONSISTENCY WITH GENERAL CHARACTER OF NEIGHBORHOOD: The proposed single-family dwelling is consistent with other properties within the neighborhood. AFFECTS OF NOISE, ODOR, TRAFFIC, POLLUTION etc : None anticipated. ADVERSELY AFFECT PUBLIC: None. VISIBILITY AT INTERSECTIONS AND DRIVEWAYS: Applicant will comply with all setback requirements. OFF-STREET PARKING: N/A ON-PREMISE SIGNS: N/A Mrs. Aiden noted that following review of the application, Staff recommend approval of the CUP. Commissioner Iverson opened the floor for public comment. None. Moved by Commissioner Forseth to approve the Conditional Use Permit for a single-family dwelling for Bret & Kim Johnson for property located at 210 Broken Spur, Vermillion, which is described as Tract D of Ranchette #1 E Ranch Estates, Section 20, Fairview Township, Clay County, South Dakota). Seconded by Commissioner Wilson. Motion passed 7-0. Clay County Planning Commission voted unanimously to approve the CUP for 210 Broken Spur, Vermillion. b. A proposal to rezone certain areas from A1: Agriculture to RR: Rural Residential. The properties proposed for rezoning are located in Fairview Township, Sections 15, 20 and 21. Mrs. Aiden explained that the proposed rezone is the second half of the rezone process that began in Fall At that time, Rolling Hills Estates, Seilers Subdivision and old bridge and Deer Run Road areas were considered. The current proposed rezones include parcels within the Chaussee Subdivision, Valley View Court, Fairview Estates, Ranch Estates, and other properties as requested. All properties proposed have already been platted as part of subdivisions. In some areas farming is occurring, however, the majority of the uses within the proposed rezones are residential in nature. The farming will not be affected by the proposed rezone. The intent of the rezone is to eliminate the necessity of the CUP process for new single-family dwellings in an area that is clearly residential. The parcels should have been rezoned at the time the subdivision was created. Commissioner Iverson opened the floor for public comment. Craig Myron, 5011 Vahalla Place, Vermillion, SD is not in favor of his property being changed due to his belief that it will increase property Page 2 of 5

4 taxes. Commissioner Iverson explained that while property taxes may increase for a number of reasons, it would not be due to the rezoning process. Mrs. Aiden noted that the Clay County Director of Equalization has assured her on several occasions, that rezones do not impact property taxes. She continued by explaining that any platted parcel that has an existing house cannot have another. She made the point that the only real change would be that the few parcels that have not been improved or had houses built on them, will be able to apply for a building permit without going through the CUP process. She assured Mr. Myron that he could continue to utilize his land as he is now. The rezone is from agriculture to rural-residential, not an urban use. Commissioner Fairholm expressed concern about rezoning the property that is contiguous with the City of Vermillion without ensuring protection for the City in terms of residents using City services without being connected to City utilities. Should annexation of the property take place in the future, extending City utilities becomes a complex issue. Referring to a map, Mr. Domínguez, City Engineer, noted that the City has a water line just outside of City limits as an interconnect with Clay Rural Water. Clay Rural Water purchases water from the City at that location and distributes as necessary. Additionally, a sanitary sewer line is already extended in that area with the idea of extending it when there is future development on lots on the north side of Main Street in the area that are within City Limits. Developer s Agreements are in place with those property owners, but there is no intention of development there at this time. Chad Peterson, Auburn Court off of Hillside, expressed concern about the potential to build more houses within the area stating he didn t believe there would be enough space to comply with zoning regulations. Mrs. Aiden reiterated that there is one housing eligibility per lot. Moved by Commissioner Manning to rezone certain areas from A1: Agriculture to RR: Rural Residential. The properties proposed for rezoning are located in Fairview Township, Sections 15, 20 and 21. Seconded by Commissioner Manning. Motion passed 6-1 (Fairholm). Clay County Planning Commission voted unanimously to rezone the aforementioned area. Clay County Planning Commission adjourned and exited. 7. Old Business a. Discussion on Amendments to Zoning Ordinance Sections Country Side Planned Unit Development, Coyote Village Planned Development District, Cottage Place Planned Development District, Bliss Pointe Planned Development District, Community Oriented Healthcare Planned Development District, Page 3 of 5

5 Spady Planned Development District, and Dakota Commons Planned Development District. (comments from Commission). Discussion was moved to item 8.a in New Business since all of the proposed amendments would be discussed with that item. 8. New Business a. Discussion on Amendments to Zoning Ordinance Covering the Definitions, Natural Resource Conservation District, Residential District, Commercial District, Industrial District, and Planned Development District Sections of the Zoning Ordinance (Specifically, Sections Definitions, NRC Natural Resource Conservation District, R-1 Residential District, R-2 Residential District, R-3 Residential District, R-4 Residential District, CB Central Business District, GB General Business District, NC Neighborhood Commercial District, GI General Industrial District, HI Heavy Industrial District, Country Side Planned Unit Development, Coyote Village Planned Development District, Cottage Place Planned Development District, Bliss Pointe Planned Development District, Community Oriented Healthcare Planned Development District, Spady Planned Development District, and Dakota Commons Planned Development District). Dominguez reviewed the schedule to complete the amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and stated that this was the meeting where the draft on the definitions, residential, commercial, industrial and other districts was going to be reviewed. Commissioner Wilson asked for the definitions to awning/canopy and motel be amended, and that the definition of church be replaced with that of place of worship. Discussion followed. Commissioners concurred with Commissioner Wilson s recommendations. Commissioner Fairholm asked that the definition for rendering, slaughterhouse and stockyards be removed, and that the uses be removed from the ordinance. Also, that butcher shop be added to the uses in the definition of Retail Services and Trade. Discussion followed. Commissioners concurred with Commissioner Fairholm s recommendations. Commissioner Fairholm asked that the maximum height for multiple-family dwellings in the R-3 Residential Districts be increased from 45-feet to 75-feet. Dominguez commented that if this would be done, that the Commissioners also consider increasing the size of the side yards from 10-feet to 15-feet. The increase would increase the green space between buildings. Discussion followed. Commissioners concurred with Commissioner Fairholm s recommendations. Commissioner Fairholm asked that the verbiage under applicable standards in the GB General Business district for Veterinarian, Small Animal and Kennel be made the same. Fairholm suggested using the verbiage under Kennel. Discussion followed. Commissioners concurred with Commissioner Fairholm s recommendations. Page 4 of 5

6 Mr. Rich Holland, 902 Ridgecrest, asked if all of the areas and distances under the Lot and yard regulations of each of the districts was a minimum or a maximum. Discussion followed. Commissioner Iverson recommended that a sentence stating Values listed are minimums, unless otherwise stated. be added to Lot and yard regulations of each district. Commissioners concurred with Commissioner Iverson s recommendations. Several typographical errors were also brought up during the discussion with all of the Commissioners concurring with the typographical corrections. After each of the districts, and definition section, was reviewed Dominguez stated that there would be a public meeting to discuss the draft just finalized with the public. This meeting would be occurring on May 13 th. 9. Staff Report Next meeting will be April 22, 2019 to consider a Conditional Use Permit for a telecommunications tower on Market Street. 10. Adjourn Moved by Commissioner Muenster to adjourn, seconded by Commissioner Gestring. Motion carried 5-0. Commissioner Iverson declared the meeting adjourned at 7:12 p.m. Page 5 of 5

7 6. Public Hearings; item a From: Planning & Zoning Commission Agenda Memo Jose Dominguez, City Engineer Meeting: April 22, 2019 Subject: Presenter: Request for a Conditional Use Permit to construct a telecommunications tower at 105 Market Street (described as the east half of lot 3, block 22, original town of Vermillion, Clay County, South Dakota) Jose Dominguez Background: In 2018 the City Council amended the zoning ordinance to allow for the Planning Commission to hear requests for construction of cellular towers on land that is within 300-feet of a residentially zoned or used property. This change came about due to the fact that there has been interest in constructing a cellular tower in the Central Business District. This area of the City provides an advantageous location for telecommunication companies since it is close to an area of high demand and also improves coverage to parts of the City that are below the bluff. The process adopted by the Council is a two-step process. The first step is for the applicant to ask the Planning Commission for an exception for the tower to be located within 300- feet of a residentially zoned or used property. This exception is granted based on the design and aesthetics of the tower. With the first step of the process, the Planning and Zoning Commission is strictly deciding on the looks of the tower and whether it fits with the neighborhood. This step was completed on November 26, The second step in the process is for the applicant to submit a Conditional Use Permit application. At this time, the Planning and Zoning Commission decides if the proposed location is appropriate for the construction of a cellular tower, or if there needs to be conditions placed on the construction of the tower. An application was received on April 5, 2019 for the conditional use permit to be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission.

8 Discussion: This CUP is for the construction of a telecommunications tower in the Central Business District. The City s current process for conditional uses follows the Code of Ordinances section The City s ordinance sets the Planning and Zoning Commission as the body that grants CUPs. The City Council acts as the body of appeal if the applicant feels aggrieved by conditions set by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission may place conditions that are appropriate and necessary to ensure compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and protect health, safety, and general welfare Unless otherwise specified in the ordinance, the Planning and Zoning Commission reviews each permit for the following items: CRITERIA Ingress and egress (location of entrance, width of lane, access control, sidewalks, number of access points, fire lanes) Off-street parking and loading (number of off-street parking, location of offstreet parking, location of loading zone in relation to intersection pedestrians and vehicles) Refuse and services areas STAFF COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Access to the tower site will be mostly through the City s parking lot. The applicant has requested to extend a concrete driveway from the parking lot to the actual site. No parking requirements for this use. Not applicable (location of refuse area) Utilities (location of fire hydrants) Screening and buffering The City will not have to extend any utilities to serve this property. Utility services will be installed by the applicant. At the Commission meeting on November 26, 2018 the Commission required that the site be surrounded by opaque

9 (screening/buffering area, general description screen/buffer) Signs Required yards and open spaces General compatibility (construction to mimic residential structure, if within a residential district) fencing. The applicant is proposing a chain link fence with HDPE slats woven into the chain link fabric. The Commission may place additional requirements at this time. Not applicable. All construction will happen within the required setbacks. The proposed design is meant to minimize the visual impact of the tower on the surrounding area. The proposed visual design of the tower was decided on by the Commission at the November 26, 2018 meeting. At that meeting it was required by the Commission that the tower be of a sleek deign with no antennas being attached to the exterior of the structure. Additionally, the Commission required that the tower have a galvanized finish (silver-gray) with no lighting. At this point in the process the Commission is deciding if the proposed location is appropriate, and if any conditions need to be placed for it to be constructed on this site. The Commission can base its decision on the factors listed above. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) does not allow health concerns to influence the Commission s decision. Compliance with Comprehensive Plan: The City s Comprehensive Plan has several sections that address development within the community. The following goals and objectives may apply in this instance: A thriving central business district (p.2) Create and maintain neighborhoods that are safe, healthy, livable, and compatible with adjacent land uses (pg. 13) Increase the career opportunities and income of citizens (pg. 39) Business attraction and marketing (pg. 39) Maintain the appearance of Vermillion s neighborhoods, streets, and commercial districts (p.48) Conclusion/Recommendations: The Commission is asked to take public comment and grant, grant with conditions, or deny the conditional use permit application. Staff recommends granting the conditional use with no conditions.

10 James Purdy From: Sent: To: Subject: Friday, April 5, :40 PM Marty Washington; Jose Dominguez; James Purdy Online Form Submittal: Petition for Conditional Use Permit Petition for Conditional Use Permit THE PLANNING COMMISSION REQUEST THE FOLLOWING: (1) APPLICANT MUST COMPLETE THE ENTIRE APPLICATION, OTHERWISE APPLICATION WILL NOT BE PRESENTED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR CONSIDERATION. (2) APPLICANT MUST EITHER CHECK A BOX OR ANSWER EACH QUESTION. IF THE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION IS NOT KNOWN, WRITE 'DO NOT KNOW' AS THE ANSWER TO THE QUESTION. 1. Petitioner Information Name Address Donovan McCain dmccain@buellconsulting.com Address 1360 Energy Park Drive, STE 210 City State Saint Paul MN Zip Code Phone Number Fax Number Field not completed. (Section Break) 2. Information on Property Applying for Conditional-Use Permit Address of Property Legal Description Current Zoning District If you selected PDD - Planned Development 105 S Market Street East Half of Lot 3, Block 22, Original Town of Vermillion, City of Vermillion, SD CB - Central Business District NA 1

11 District, enter the name of the district. Otherwise enter 'N/A.' 3. Information on Adjoining Properties (Section Break) Describe the neighborhood where the Conditional-Use Permit is being sought. City-Owned property, Businesses to the North and East, National Guard Armory to the South, several residential parcels to the West. This area provides an ideal location to improve coverage to the surrounding area. Adjacent uses to proposed conditional-use (check all that apply): NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST Commercial Commercial Industrial Single-Family Detached (Section Break) 4. Standards for Conditional Use Permit Please address the following criteria. These standards will be addressed at the public hearing. A. How will the property and structures be accessed from the street? B. Where will the access points from the street be located? C. How wide will the access points be? D. How will the traffic (both vehicles and pedestrians) flow within the property? A 9' concrete driveway would be extended from the adjacent parking lot to the North, and one parking space would be removed from use to allow unhindered access to the driveway. Please see attached Construction Drawings. The existing parking lot access point from Market Street will be utilized. An Access Easement to the site would extend to the Market Street access point. Please see attached Construction Drawings. No change proposed to the existing access point from the street. Access from the parking lot to the driveway will be 15' wide. Please see attached construction drawings. There will be minimal change from existing flow surrounding the property. Security fencing as specified in the design would prevent unauthorized access in the area immediately surrounding the tower. Please see attached Construction Drawings. 2

12 E. Where will the offstreet parking and loading areas be located? F. How many off-street parking stalls and loading areas are being proposed? G. Where will refuse and service areas be located on the property? H. What is the availability of utilities in the area? Will they need to be installed or modified to service the property? I. Is screening and/or buffering being proposed? If so, what will it be, and where will it be constructed? J. Are any signs proposed for the property? If so, describe the signs being proposed (size and lighting). K. Will the signs be compatible with neighboring properties? L. How will the signs affect the surrounding areas? M. Are there any required yards and other open spaces? N. What is the general compatibility with the adjoining properties and other properties in the zoning district in which such use is to be located? Vehicles servicing the tower site would park off street within the access easement on the concrete driveway. 1, but there would be room for more. NA, the site will not generate refuse. Utilities will be connected through the 10'-wide utility easements as specified on the Construction Drawings. The fencing will feature screening in the form of HDPE fence slats woven vertically into the chain link fabric. No NA NA NA This stealth design and color of the tower is meant to minimize the visual impact. Design and aesthetics were approved by the Planning Commission when deciding on the 'looks' of the tower and whether it fits with the neighborhood. 3

13 Upload any plans or diagrams RevB_SD09_Coyote_ pdf (Section Break) Acknowledgement of Fees Electronic Signature Agreement Electronic Signature I acknowledge. I agree. Donovan L McCain Once submitted, Staff will verify that everything has been filled out correctly. Afterwards, you will be contacted to inform you of when your Petition for Conditional Use Permit will come before the Planning Commission. It is highly recommended that you attend this meeting. not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. 4

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23 80' E S87 40'08"W 10.83' UTILITY EASEMENT #2 POINT OF BEGINNING 15.07' N02 19'14"W S02 19'14"E 27.50' S87 40'46"W 16.00' N02 19'14"W 5.00' 14.00' S87 40'46"W S87 40'46"W 7.50' 27.5'x30' PREMISES 30.00' N87 40'46"E N02 19'14"W DETAIL A SCALE: 1" = 10' 22.50' PREMISES POINT OF BEGINNING S87 40'46"W 8.50' N02 19'14"W 5.00' 38.11' S87 40'46"W E1/2 OF LOT 3 BLOCK ' S02 18'16"E UTILITY EASEMENT #1 POINT OF BEGINNING 20' 10' 0 SCALE: 1" = 20' 20' ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE IN TERMS OF U.S. SURVEY FEET HORIZONTAL DATUM: - NAD 83 - PROJECTION: SOUTH DAKOTA STATE PLANE COORDINATES SOUTH ZONE (4002) VERTICAL DATUM: - NAVD 88 - GEOID 12A 40' PROPERTY DESCRIPTION (Taken from U.S. Title Solutions File No: SD , Effective Date 4/4/18) THE EAST ONE HALF OF LOT 3 IN BLOCK 22 OF THE ORIGINAL TOWN OF VERMILLION, CLAY COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA. AND LOTS 1 AND 2 OF BLOCK 22, ORIGINAL TOWN OF VERMILLION, CLAY COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA. EASEMENT DATA (Taken from U.S. Title Solutions File No: SD , Effective Date 4/4/18) (EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY) 7. NONE WITHIN PERIOD SEARCHED. LEGEND T TRANS ST G S W CO W OHE UGT UGF G S UGTV MONUMENT SET THIS SURVEY (5/8" REBAR W/CAP #10957) MONUMENT (FOUND) LIGHTPOLE POWERPOLE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER FIRE HYDRANT WATER VALVE STORM SEWER MANHOLE GAS METER SANITARY MANHOLE WATER METER CLEANOUT WATER LINE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC LINE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC GAS LINE SANITARY SEWER LINE UNDERGROUND TELEVISION LINE PARENT PROPERTY LINE CHAINLINK FENCE PROPOSED 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT #1 - Toll Free: BASIS OF BEARING: GEODETIC NORTH (OTHER FILED DOCUMENTS) PROPOSED 10' WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT #2 8. PLAT IN BOOK 1 PAGE 215. PROPOSED 15' WIDE ACCESS EASEMENT 12'' W CP UGT UGT '' W 12'' W 12'' W 1231 UGT G G G G G G UGT 20' T T PUBLIC ALLEY 6'' W 6'' W 6'' W 6'' W UGT CP T T T G W. KIDDER ST. 8'' S 8'' S 8'' S 8'' S G G G G 1230 CP UGT UGT UGT 1231 W1/2 OF LOT 3 BLOCK 22 LOT 1 BLOCK 22 LOT 2 BLOCK 22 E CONCRETE PARKING LOT UTILITY EASEMENT #2 POINT OF BEGINNING SEE "DETAIL A" 1229 UGF 12'' W 12'' W 12'' W PUBLIC R.O.W. 27.5'x30' PREMISES 62.14' S02 19'14"E S87 40'46"W 46.62' PREMISES POINT OF BEGINNING E1/2 OF LOT 3 BLOCK ' 67.14' 1229 S02 18'16"E S02 18'16"E '' W 10'' W 10'' W 10'' W 10'' W S 8'' S 8'' S 8'' S 8'' S POINT OF COMMENCEMENT ACCESS EASEMENT POINT OF BEGINNING UTILITY EASEMENT #1 POINT OF BEGINNING MARKET ST. 80' PUBLIC R.O.W CP CP ACCESS EASEMENT DESCRIPTION A 15 FOOT WIDE STRIP PARCEL OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS LOT 1; LOT 2; AND THE E1/2 OF LOT 3; ALL IN BLOCK 22 OF THE ORIGINAL TOWN OF VERMILLION, CLAY COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA, THE CENTERLINE OF WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE ASSUMED NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 22 OF THE ORIGINAL TOWN OF VERMILLION, CLAY COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA; THENCE S02 18'16"E, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S87 40'46"W, A DISTANCE OF 46.62' FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S02 19'14"E, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINATION. ACCESS EASEMENT SHALL CONTAIN 1,631 S.F., MORE OR LESS PREMISES DESCRIPTION COMMENCING AT THE ASSUMED NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 22 OF THE ORIGINAL TOWN OF VERMILLION, CLAY COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA; THENCE S02 18'16"E, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S87 40'46"W, A DISTANCE OF 46.62' FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S02 19'14"E, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S87 40'46"W, A DISTANCE OF 7.50 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S87 40'46"W, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S02 19'14"E, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N87 40'46"E, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N02 19'14"W, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N02 19'14"W, A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S87 40'46"W, A DISTANCE OF 8.50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 825 S.F., MORE OR LESS UTILITY EASEMENT #1 DESCRIPTION A TEN FOOT WIDE STRIP PARCEL OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS THE E1/2 OF LOT 3, BLOCK 22 OF THE ORIGINAL TOWN OF VERMILLION, CLAY COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA, THE CENTERLINE OF WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE ASSUMED NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 22 OF THE ORIGINAL TOWN OF VERMILLION, CLAY COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA; THENCE S02 18'16"E, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S02 18'16"E, A DISTANCE OF 67.14' FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S87 40'46"W, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINATION. UTILITY EASEMENT #1 SHALL CONTAIN 381 S.F., MORE OR LESS UTILITY EASEMENT #2 DESCRIPTION A TEN FOOT WIDE STRIP PARCEL OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS LOT 2; THE W1/2 OF LOT 3; AND THE E1/2 OF LOT 3; ALL IN BLOCK 22 OF THE ORIGINAL TOWN OF VERMILLION, CLAY COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA, THE CENTERLINE OF WHICH IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE ASSUMED NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 22 OF THE ORIGINAL TOWN OF VERMILLION, CLAY COUNTY, SOUTH DAKOTA; THENCE S02 18'16"E, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S02 18'16"E, A DISTANCE OF 67.14' FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S87 40'46"W, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N02 19'14"W, A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S87 40'46"W, A DISTANCE OF 8.50 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S87 40'46"W, A DISTANCE OF 7.50 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N02 19'14"W, A DISTANCE OF 5.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S87 40'46"W, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO A POINT; THENCE N02 19'14"W, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO A POINT; THENCE S87 40'46"W, A DISTANCE OF FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINATION. UTILITY EASEMENT #2 SHALL CONTAIN 419 S.F., MORE OR LESS NOTES ALL UTILITY COMPANIES WERE NOTIFIED TO MARK THEIR SERVICES AND MAIN LINES. ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HEREON WERE EITHER MARKED BY THEIR OWNERS OR TAKEN FROM MAPS SUPPLIED TO BANNER ASSOCIATES, INC. BY THE OWNERS AT THE TIME OF THIS SURVEY. BANNER ASSOCIATES, INC. DOES NOT CERTIFY TO THE COMPLETENESS AND/OR ACCURACY OF THESE LOCATIONS. PERSONS USING THIS SURVEY SHOULD CONTACT EACH UTILITY COMPANY TO VERIFY THAT ALL LINES ARE SHOWN HEREON. FRANKLIN ST NORTH WASHINGTON ST KIDDER ST AUSTIN ST HIGH ST RAILROAD PROSPECT ST MARKET ST SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA. AUSTIN L. JOHNSON, RLS PROJECT LOCATION MAP SCALE : NONE COURT ST CENTER ST CHURCH ST ELM ST PARENT PROPERTY N DAKOTA ST CLARK ST CEDAR ST NATIONAL ST MAIN ST S UNIVERSITY ST PROJECT / SHEET TITLE : SD09 COYOTE TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY VERMILLION, SOUTH DAKOTA REV. DATE DESCRIPTION JOB No.: DATE: FEBRUARY DESIGNED BY: CHECKED BY: DRAWN BY: --- ALJ JLU 0 1/2" 1" NATIONAL GUARD ARMORY BLDG. 12'' W DATE: REG. NO. SHEET No. : SCALE REDUCTION BAR 1 OF 1