COUNCIL ffleetimg1 1 MAY

Transcription

1 COUNCIL ffleetimg1 1 MAY 2 6 Report No.: 6-16 TO: FROM: RESOURCE STAFF: DATE OF MEETING: SUBJECT: Mayor and Council Mark Segsworth, Commissioner, Public Works & Emergency Services Malcolm Morris, Director of Transportation Proposed All-Way Stop Control Intersections (Earl Street at Albert Street, Victoria Street at First Avenue and Sydenham Street at Ordnance Street) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The City of Kingston adopted new guidelines for the installation of all-way stop control in the fall of 23. Since that time, the Traffic Division has been assessing intersections within the City in order to determine where all-way stop control is warranted. Based on recent assessments that include updated traffic counts and a collision hstory review, three additional intersections in the City require all-way stop control. RECOMMENDATION: That a by-law be presented to Council to amend By-law A By-law for Regulating Traffic in the Highways of the City of Kingston, Subject to the provisions of the Highway Traffic Act, as amended, is hereby further amended to install all-way stop controls at the following locations; Earl Street and Albert Street Victoria Street and First Avenue Sydenham Street and Ordnance Street and fwther THAT this by-law be given first and second readings.

2 COUNCIL MEETlNG1 1 MAY 2 '6 APPENDICES TO REPORT # Page 1 OPTIONS/DISCUSSION: If approved for installation, all-way stop control would be installed at the following three intersections as soon as the weather is warm enough to paint stop bars on the pavement and to install sign posts in the ground. Earl Street and Albert Street This location meets all of the requirements within the All-Way Stop Control Warrant which includes total vehicle volume, the number of vehicles and pedestrians on the minor street crossing the major street and the requirement for vehicle volume split. The updated traffic data at this location was collected in January of 26. This intersection is therefore recommended for all-way stop control. Victoria Street and First Avenue This location meets all of the requirements within the All-Way Stop Control Warrant which includes total vehicle volume, the number of vehicles and pedestrians on the minor street crossing the major street and the requirement for vehicle volume split. The updated traffic data at this location was collected in January of 26. This intersection is therefore recommended for all-way stop control. Svdenham Street and Ordnance Street This location meets the requirements within the All-Way Stop Control Warrant for total vehicle volume and the number of vehicles and pedestrians on the minor street crossing the major street but does not quite meet the requirement for vehicle volume split (76%/24% instead of the required 65%/35%). However, as the average number of preventable collisions is three per year, all-way stop is recommended for this location. The updated traffic data at this location was collected in March of 26. EXISTING POLICY/BY LAW: By-Law NOTICE PROVISIONS: N/A ACCESSIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS: N/A FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: The cost to install two additional stops signs ($14) and stop bars ($6) at one intersection is $2 plus labour. The total cost to install the required signage and pavement markings at the above-noted three intersections is $6 plus labour. This cost can be accommodated within the Traffic Division's Operating Budget. CONTACTS: Sgt. Charles Boyles, Kingston Police Ext 6 13 Deanna Green, P.Eng., Traffic Engineer Ext 317 Chris Sleeth, C.E.T., Traffic Supervisor Ext DEPARTMENTWOTHERS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED: Commissioner Beach, Sustainability and Growth; Commissioner Segsworth, Public Works and Emergency Services; Commissioner Hunt, Finance and Corporate Performance; Commissioner Thurston, Community Development Services; Commissioner Leger, Corporate Services; Jim Keech, President Utilities Kingston 2

3 REPORT TO COUNCIL. COUNCll MEETING1 1 blk'y' L '6 Report No.: - Page 3 - EXHIBITS ATTACHED: Drawings of the all-way stop control locations Draft By-law amendment 4-Way Control Stop Sign Warrants 3

4 COUNCIL MEEA~DIGA I Pic\f il Z 6 APPENDICES TO REPORT # Page 2 BY-LAW NO TRAFFIC A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW N.23-29, A BY-LAW FOR REGULATING TRAFFIC IN THE HIGHWAYS OF THE CITY OF KINGSTON, SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE HIGHWAY TRAFFIC ACT, (AMEND THROUGH HIGHWAYS C-1 and ALL-WAY STOP SIGNS C-3) PASSED:, 26 The Council of the Corporation of the City of Kingston enacts as follows: C- By-law 23-29, entitled A By-law for Regulating Traffic in the Highways of the City of Kingston, Subject to he Provisions of the Highway Traffic Acf, as amended, is hereby further amended as follows: Add: To Schedule C-1 Throuph Hichwavs Highway Earl Street Ordnance Street From East Side of Victoria Street West Side of Sydenham Street To West Side of Albert Street York Street Highway Earl Street Ordnance Street From East Side of Victoria Street West Side of Bagot Street To West Side of Frontenac Street York Street Add: To Schedule C-3 All-Wav Stor, Signs Victoria Street Earl Street Ordnance Street Highway First Street Albert Street Sydenham Street At 4

5 LI n I UL vu UNLlL I 2 u C C I Iu P D P I 3 3 L.. a z Y 3 m 3 2. D 3 P mu mn II 3N 3co n~ 1 T I rn 5

6 D r n.a W LWUNLIL MEETING 1 I f rn 3 -. Q 3 tq I MAY u z '6.. 1 ru 2 w 4 cn z D 2 2 -I m 6

7 P r z (D r 3 co -l rn 7

8 COUNCIL MEETING1 1 ba'f 2 '6 P z 9 < v) --I a v)

9 COUNCil MEETING1 1 MAY 2 '6 I Report No.: I TO: FROM: RESOURCE STAFF: Mayor and Council Mark Segsworth, Commissioner, Public Works & Emergency Services John Giles, Manager, Solid Waste Division DATE OF MEETING: SUBJECT: Award of RFP No. OS-SW-3-25 for Residential Organics Transportation and Processing EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Council directed staff to issue a Request for Proposals for processing Source Separated Organics starting in the fall of 26 in order to increase the diversion of waste fiom landfill beyond 5%. This report describes the RFP structure, the results and the recommended proposal. It is now in order for Council to award the RFP. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended: That the proposal submitted by David N. Moore and Son Environmental in response to RFP No. OS-S W-3-25 for residential organics transportation and processing be selected as the basis for preparing an agreement expiring June 3,21 1 with an option to extend one additional year at the sole discretion of the City; and That the agreement be in a form satisfactory to the Legal Services Division; and That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to sign the agreement. orks & Emergency Services I Glen Laubenstein, Chief Administrative Officer 9

10 APPENDICES TO REPORT # Pane 1 OPTIONS/DISCUSSION: Historv: July 19,25: Council unanimously carried Item 1 of Report No. 88 of the Operations Committee at City Council Meeting No. 2 stating: THAT a Request for Proposals be issued for processing Source Separated Organics with an anticipated start date of fall 26; and further THAT allocations received porn Waste Diversion Ontario be used to fund the capital expenditures required to purchase and retrofit trucks and to purchase carts and pails for a Source Separated Organics program; and further THAT an increase in operating expenses, estimated to be in the range of $35, is expected. March 1,26: RFP No. OS-SW-3-25 for Residential Organics Transportation and Processing closed. It requested proposals for the transportation and processing of Source Separated Organics. April 1,26: The Environment, Infrastructure & Transportation Policies Committee (EITPC) considered Report No. EITP-6-6 which recommended that the proposal submitted by David N. Moore and Son Environmental (DME) be selected as the basis for preparing an agreement from October 1,26 until June 3,212 with an option to extend one additional year. Scott Industrial Services made a delegation to the EITPC which raised a number of issues that had not been considered in the evaluation of the proposals including the impact of greenhouse gases, the impact on property tax generation and on local employment. The EITPC passed a resolution directing staff to review the proposals again taking into consideration these issues and to bring back a recommendation to Council for their consideration. April 12,26: Staff requested advice from Legal Services on implications that might arise from reconsidering the proposals based on a revised evaluation scoring system. It was determined that the preferred course of action was to negotiate a shorter term with DME, the originally recommended proponent and to consider issues from the EITPC resolution in the next RFP for organics processing. RFP Background: The RFP was structured to allow consideration for several options built into the proposal as follows: Processing could be at a private site or at a facility constructed at the Kingston East landfill; The base term expires June 3,212 with an optional one year extension, however, proposals could be based on longer terms expiring June 3th 217,222 or 227 in recognition that more capital intensive processes require longer terms in order to be cost effective; Brush, leaf and yard waste from the City brush and composting sites could be identified as a required feedstock; Accepting diapers added 4% to the evaluation as it is estimated to make up 13% of the SSO; Accepting pet waste added 4% to the evaluation as it is estimated to make up 11% of the SSO; Accepting organics in plastic bags added 4% to the evaluation as it will result in higher participation and capture rates, estimated to be at least 15%. 1

11 COUNCIL MEETING1 1 MAY (1 2 '6 APPENDICES TO REPORT # Page 2 Results & Scoring: Nine submissions were received, one of which simply noted that they were unable to provide a competitive proposal at this time. Of the remaining eight submissions, three proposed to construct a facility at the Kingston East landfill. The proposals were evaluated using weighting as detailed in the RFP document as follows: pricing and related costs (5%) profile, experience and references (1 %) proven ability of technology proposed to provide quality product (1 %) ability to accept pet waste (4%) ability to accept material in plastic bags (4%) ability to accept diapers (4%) quality of approach and methodology to meet project objectives & scope (15%) compliance with the Ontarians with Disabilities Act (3%) Summarv: Existing Costs Score cost Term Processing Location $78,61 -=-I= Waste Allowed David Moore Environmental K. Mulrooney Trucking Ltd. Scott Industrial Services GSI Environnement Inc. Advanced Compost Corporation Halton Recycling Ltd. Halton Recycling Ltd. Integrated Municipal Services Proposal analysis that do not i K. Mulrooney Trucking Ltd. Scott Industrial Services Advanced Compost Corporation GSI Environnement Inc. GiffelsNVCI Consortium Halton Recycling Ltd. Integrated Municipal Services Waste Management of Canada 92 $631,15 84 $772,28 81 $1,12,6 75 $1,281,35 73 $863,53 71 $1,197, 71 $1,337,35 64 $1,722,23 )w plastic bags to be used: I $646,28 $977,6 $83,53 $1,14,856 $1,1,23 $1,169, $1,57,53 No bid all terms all terms all terms Private Private Private Private KEL* KEL* Private Private Private Private KEL* Private KEL* KEL* Private No No No No No No No * KEL is the Kingston East Landfill The cost analysis was based on processing 7 tonnes of SSO, 4 tonnes of leaf and yard waste, and 3 tonnes of brush. 1 1

12 COUNCL APPENDICES TO REPORT # Page 3 MEETING^ 1 MAY u L 'U6 If diapers and/or pet waste were identified as not being acceptable feedstock in the response, then the cost analysis included landfilling equivalent quantities. If prices in the response to the RFP were not contingent on receiving the brush, leaf and yard waste, then the cost analysis considered the least costly means for composting these items and assumed that an expansion at the central composting facility would be required if processing were to occur there. Negotiations for a Shorter Term: DME have confirmed that a one or two year term is not feasible. DME will accept a three year term with a 15% premium added to their quoted price resulting in an annual cost of approximately $726,: roughly $47, less than the second highest scoring proposal that allows plastic bags to be used; $287, less than the third highest scoring proposal; but $17, more expensive than the existing costs. DME will accept a four year term with no change to their price, resulting in savings of approximately $77, compared to the existing costs. Recommended Proposal: It is recommended that the proposal submitted by David N. Moore and Son Environmental be used as the basis for preparing an agreement terminating June 3,21 1 with an option to extend one additional year at the sole discretion of the City. Description of the Recommended Proposal: The organics will be processed in a 25, tonne per year Transform Compost Systems Ltd in-vessel system. The facility will consist of six aerated 26 feet long x 1 feet wide x 8 feet high concrete channels for primary composting with a screening and curing area. Mixing will be done with an Enviro Processor from Supreme International Ltd. The City of Guelph uses an aerated channel system with a Transform Compost System turner for their organics program and has been very satisfied with the performance. Guelph accepts pet waste and diapers and collects in plastic bags. The DME site, located on Phillipston Road north of Belleville, is zoned to accept an organics waste processing facility. An application for a Certificate of Approval from the Ministry of the Environment has been made. In the event that the facility is not ready to accept SSO from Kingston on October 1,26 DME have proposed to landfill the organics at their expense. DME have proposed to accept pet waste and diapers in the organic stream and will accept plastic bags. The proposal is contingent on receiving the brush, leaf and yard waste fiom the City composting facilities. A truck will collect SSO from the Waste Management transfer station and proceed to the KARC site to load brush, leaf and yard waste daily. It will be transported to the processing site, blended, placed in an aerated channel and turned every four days. After 28 days the composted material will be screened and cured in covered windrows for a further three months. The DME proposed price includes paying the Waste Management transfer fee. DME propose to construct a transfer station at their expense at the KARC compost site in order to eliminate this fee and for better control of loading. DME would apply to the Ministry of the Environment on behalf of the City to amend the existing Certificate of Approval. 12

13 CCI~IULIL M33ING1 1 MAY U 6 APPENDICES TO REPORT # Page 4 The proposal includes an offer to promote and reinforce the SSO program in the spring of 27 by providing local residents a free trunk-full of compost on us. DME propose to use the KARC site to market a portion of the finished compost and offer the City a yet to be established percentage of the revenue from sales. This has not been included in the evaluation but remains a possibility. Selling compost generated from the program itself would have a positive effect by closing the loop and demonstrating a tangible benefit of diverting waste fi-om landfill. Joint management of the existing KARC composting and transfer site is proposed for the short to medium term whereby the City would share staffing costs with DME in order to comply with the Certificate of Approval requirement that an attendant be on site. The proposal suggests that DME will have an employee at the site full time upon completion of the transfer station, however $4, has been added to the cost analysis for this function in order to have an equitable comparison between proposals. This will require further negotiation. EXISTING POLICY/BY LAW: Purchasing By-law No NOTICE PROVISIONS: There are no notice requirements for the purposes of this report. ACCESSIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS: In accordance with the Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 21, S.O. 21, c. 32 the Council of every municipality shall have regard to the accessibility for persons with disabilities to the goods or services. DME confirm that where their services are made available to the public that full accessibility for those with disabilities will be ensured. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: The recommended proposal is approximately $77, less expensive than the sum of the projected cost to landfill the organics and process brush, leaf and yard waste annually. This savings will be reflected in the 27 operating budget. CONTACTS: Gerard Hunt, Commissioner, Finance & Corporate Performance John Giles, Manager, Solid Waste Division DEPARTMENTWOTHERS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED: Commissioner Beach, Sustainability and Growth; 2 ommissioner Segsworth, Public Works and Emergency Services; Commissioner Hunt, Finance and Corporate Performance; ommissioner Thurston, Community Development Services; Commissioner Leger, Corporate Services; Jim Keech, President Utilities Kingston EXHIBITS ATTACHED: None attached. 13

14 CITY OF KINGSTON REPORT TO COUNCIL Report No.: TO: FROM: RESOURCE STAFF: Mayor and Council Mark Segsworth, Commissioner, Public Works & Emergency Services Paula Nichols, Manager, Public Transit and Parking DATE OF MEETING: SUBJECT: Conversion of the Angrove Parking Lot from Attended to Pay and Display Operation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: Report OS-2 to the Operations Standing Committee in February 25, identified three attended parking lots where revenues did not cover expenses. Conversion to Pay and Display operation was recognized as a way to improve the financial efficiency of the parking lot while providing a similar level of service to the Parker. In April 25, the Upper Robert Bruce Memorial Lot was converted from attended to pay and display operation. This was achieved through staff attrition. There is now an opportunity to convert the Angrove parking lot, again through staff attrition. RECOMMENDATION: That a by-law be presented to Council to amend Schedule A of By-Law 4489 a By-law to regulate, supewise and govern the parking of vehicles on parking lots and to fix the rates and charges for parking on such parking lots to change the rates and times that payment is required, converting the Angrove Parking Lot fi-om attended to Pay and Display operation. f Public Works and Emergency Services 14

15 APPENDICES TO REPORT # COUNCIL MEETING1 1 MAY 2 6 OPTIONS/DISCUSSION : Page 1 The Angrove Parking Lot has 75 parking spaces, and an attendant is currently on duty fiom Monday to Friday 8:OO a.m. to 7:45 p.m. and Saturday 1 1 :3a.m. to 6:3p.m. This is a relatively small lot to operate using an attendant and it is believed that Pay and Display could offer a similar level of service to the customer, while saving the City a minimum of $7, per year. The maximum stay allowed of three (3) hours reflects the length-of-stay of most current parkers and is consistent with other parking lots in the centre of the core area where a higher turnover is desired. It is further recommended that the time payment is required would be changed to 8:OO a.m. to 5:3 p.m. versus the current 8:OO a.m. to 7:45 p.m., Monday to Friday, and Saturdays 11:3 a.m. to 6:3 p.m. This also reflects the current activity and level of demand. For people wishing to park longer, options for all day parking exist at both the Springer and Drury parking lots on Queen St., each within close proximity. Conversion to Pay and Display will mean that First Hour Free will no longer be offered. It should be noted that the added convenience of credit card payment is offered through Pay and Display meters and that payment can be made in advance of 8:OO a.m. Also, people will not be required to pay the $2. exit fee when the attendant is not on duty in the evenings, Saturday mornings and Sundays. Converting fiom attended to Pay and Display operation reduces the number of full time positions by one. As there is currently one vacancy within Parking operations due to a retirement, conversion would be accomplished through attrition. EXISTING POLICY/BY LAW: By-law 4489, Schedule A NOTICE PROVISIONS: N/A ACCESSIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS: Maintain designated disabled parking spaces. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: Savings are estimated to be $7,. per annum. CONTACTS: Malcolm Morris, Director of Transportation, , ext. 226 Paula Nichols, Manager, Public Transit and Parking, , ext Sam Tulk, Supervisor, Parking Operations, , ext DEPARTMENTSOTHERS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED: U Commissioner Beach, Sustainability and Growth; Commissioner Segsworth, Public Works and Emergency Services; 8 ommissioner Hunt, Finance and Corporate Performance; Commissioner Thurston, Community Development Services; Greg McLean, Supervisor, Parking and General By-law Commissioner Leger, Corporate Services; Jim Keech, President Utilities Kingston EXHIBITS ATTACHED: By-law amendment 15

16 BY-LAW NO. - A BY-LAW TO AMEND BY-LAW NO The Council of The Corporation of the City of Kingston enacts as follows: COUNCIL MEET~NG 1 1 MAY 2 6 Clause, Report No.,26 PASSED: By-law 4489, entitled A by-law to regulate, supervise and govern the parking of vehicles on parking lots and to fix the rates and charges for parking on such parking lots, as amended, is hereby further amended: Delete: SCHEDULE A Lot Name Time when payment Maximum Hourly rate (tax Daily maximum rate (tax is required time limit included) included) Monthly rate (plus taxes) Angrove Lot 24 hours No Daytime Maximum $1.oo $2. after 6:OO p.m. or (first hour free when attendant not on 24 hours when attendant duty on duty) Lost Ticket Charge $ Add: Lot Name Time when payment Maximum Hourly rate (tax Daily maximum rate (tax Monthly rate is required time limit included) included) (plus taxes) Mon. to Sat. 1 Angrove Lot I 8:OO a.m. to 5:3 p.m I 3 hours $1.oo NIA $69.57 GIVEN FIRST AND SECOND READINGS GIVEN THIRD READING AND FINALLY PASSED CITY CLERK MAYOR 16

17 CITY OF KINGSTON REPORT TO COUNCIL Report No.: TO: FROM: RESOURCE STAFF: Mayor and Council Cynthia Beach, P.Eng., Commissioner, Sustainability & Growth Group Speros Kanellos, P.Eng., Director, Growth & Initiatives DATE OF MEETING: SUBJECT: Conveyance of Blocks 57 & 58 on Registered Plan 1885 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: For subdivision developments in the former Township of Kingston, the Township accepted residential building lots to be held in-trust by the Township solicitor as security until the completion of the subdivision. Registered Plan 1885, known as Cataraqui Woods Phase 3A, was registered in November 1984 and Blocks 57 and 58 were transferred to the Township solicitor to be held in-trust until the completion of the subdivision. The subdivision works are now complete and it is time to convey these blocks back to the developer. The City has direction from the original developer to convey Blocks 57 & 58 to McKercher Holdings Limited, the adjacent property owner. Block 58 is currently encumbered with a sanitary easement in favour of the City of Kingston. The sanitary sewer has been relocated out of Block 58 under the Site Plan Agreement with McKercher Holdings for the Leon's store and therefore the sanitary easement is no longer required and should be released. Block 59 is a one foot reserve along Block 58. Staff recommends that this Block 59 be deeded as Public Highway to form part of Redwood Crescent. RECOMMENDATION: That the City convey Block 57 and Block 58, Registered Plan 1885 to McKercher Holdings Limited as per the Subdivision Agreement between the former Township of Kingston and Targus Corp., signed November 8, 1984 and as per the direction received from Ontario Inc., the successor of Targus Corp, and That the City release the sanitary sewer easement known as Instrument No from Block 58, Registered Plan 1885, and That the City dedicate, by By-law, Block 59 on Registered Plan 1885 as Public Highway in accordance with Section 3 1, of the Municipal Act, Chapter 25, S.O. 21, and That the Mayor and Clerk be authorized to sign the documentation required to implement the foregoing, said documentation to be in a form satisfactory to the Director of Legal Services. 17

18 REPORT TO COUNCIL. - Page 2 - COUI\ICIL MEETING1 1 MAY 2 '6 Report NO.: / a g., Commissioner, 18

19 OPTIONS/DISCUSSION: COUNCIL MEETlMG1 1 MAY 2 6 APPENDICES TO REPORT # May 2,26 Page 1 For subdivision developments in the former Township of Kingston, the Township accepted residential building lots to be held in-trust by the Township solicitor as security until the completion of the subdivision. Registered Plan 1885, known as Cataraqui Woods Phase 3A, was registered in November 1984 and Blocks 57 and 58 were transferred to the Township solicitor to be held in-trust until the completion of the subdivision. The subdivision works are now complete and it is time to convey these blocks back to the developer as per the terms of the Subdivision Agreement. The City has direction from the origmal subdivider to convey Blocks 57 & 58 to McKercher Holdings Limited, the adjacent property owner. Block 58 is currently encumbered with a sanitary easement in favour of the City of Kingston. The sanitary sewer has been relocated out of Block 58 under Site Plan agreement with McKercher Holdings for the Leon s store and therefore the sanitary easement is no longer required and should be released. All necessary easements for the new location of the sanitary sewer shall be granted in favour of the municipality under the authority of the Site Plan Agreement for Leon s. Block 59 is a one foot reserve along Block 58. Staff recommends that this Block 59 be deeded as Public Highway to form part of Redwood Crescent in accordance with Section 31, of the Municipal Act, Chapter 25, S.O. 21. EXISTING POLICY/BY LAW: Council passes by-laws to dedicate lands as part of the public highway and in conjunction with the dedication assumes those lands as per the requirements of Section 31 of the Municipal Act, Chapter 25, S.O. 21. NOTICE PROVISIONS: There are no notice requirements with this report. ACCESSIBILITY CONSIDERATIONS: There are no accessibility considerations in this report. FINANCIAL CONSIDERATIONS: There are no financial considerations in this report. CONTACTS: Hal Linscott, Director & City Solicitor, Legal Services, ext Peter Huigenbos, Project Engineer - Property Division, Growth and Initiatives, , ext

20 APPENDICES TO REPORT # May 2,26 Page 2 DEPARTMENTSOTHERS CONSULTED AND AFFECTED: George Wallace, Director, Planning & Development ext Kimberley Brown, Infrastructure Engineer, Engineering ext Luke Follwell, Engineering Intern, Utilities Technical Services ext Commissioner Beach, Sustainability and Growth; U Commissioner Segsworth, Public Works and Emergency Services; Commissioner Hunt, Finance and Corporate Performance; Commissioner Thurston, Community Development Services; Commissioner Leger, Corporate Services; Jim Keech, President Utilities Kingston EXHIBITS ATTACHED Exhibit A - Portion of Plan 1885 Exhibit B - By-law

21 ' / LOT 9 j i I ' L p- Leon's

22 COUNCIL MEETING1 1 MAY 2 6 Exhibit B Clause, Report No.,26 BY-LAW NO. 26- A BY-LAW TO ESTABLISH BLOCK 59 OF REGISTERED PLAN 1885 AS PART OF THE PUBLIC HIGHWAY IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 31, OF THE MUNICIPAL ACT, CHAPTER 25,.S.O. 21. PASSED: WHEREAS Section 31, of the Municipal Act, Chapter 25, S.O. 21 provides for the establishing and laying out of lands as public highways; THEREFORE NOW BE IT RESOLVED that the Council of the Corporation of the City of Kingston hereby ENACTS as follows: 1. That the land designated as Block 59 on Registered Plan 1885, be established as portions of the public highways to form part of Redwood Crescent in the City of Kingston in accordance with Section 3 1, of the Municipal Act, Chapter 25, S.O Ths By-law shall come into force and take effect on its passing. GIVEN FIRST AND SECOND READING GIVEN THIRD AND FINAL READING CITY CLERK MAYOR