FERGUSON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Regular Meeting Agenda Monday, July 17, :00 PM

Transcription

1 FERGUSON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Regular Meeting Agenda Monday, July 17, :00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER II. III. IV. CITIZENS INPUT MINUTES 1. July 3, 2017, Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting REPORTS 1. ABC Reports 2. COG Committee Reports 3. Other Regional Committees 4. Staff Reports V. PROCEDURE AMENDMENTS 1. Discussion of agenda structure 2. Discussion of appointment of alternates to committees VI. VII. OLD BUSINESS 1. Traditional Town Development Ordinance Amendment. 2. Ferguson Township Official Map continued discussion NEW BUSINESS 1. Consent Agenda 2. Award of Professional Design Services Contract Valley Vista Shared Use Path 3. Net Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions Strategy Discussion 4. Corl Street/W. College Ave. Lighting Project 5. Strategic Plan Progress Report VIII. COMMUNICATIONS TO THE BOARD CALENDAR ITEMS: JULY/AUGUST: 1. July 20, 2017 at 6:00pm in Conference Room CIP Worksession 2. July 27, 2017 at 5:30pm in Conference Room CIP Worksession IX. ADJOURNMENT Visit the Township's Web Site and sign up for Notify Me to receive notices about Township Information

2 Sour TOWNSHIP OF FERGUSON 3147 Research Drive State College, Pennsylvania Telephone: Fax: Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting Agenda Monday, July 17, :00 PM I. CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE II. CITIZENS INPUT III. MINUTES 1. July 3, 2017 Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting IV. REPORTS 1. ABC REPORTS a. Schlow Library Lewis Steinberg 2. COG COMMITTEE REPORTS a. Finance Committee b. Public Services & Environmental Committee c. Parks Capital Committee 3. OTHER REGIONAL COMMITTEES 4. STAFF REPORTS 20 minutes a. Township Manager b. Public Works Director c. Planning and Zoning Director d. Chief of Police e. Finance Director Second Quarter Financial Report f. Treasurer s Report V. PROCEDURE AMENDMENTS 1. DISCUSSION OF AGENDA STRUCTURE 10 minutes NARRATIVE Mr. Miller has requested that the Board discuss moving COG Committee Reports, Other Regional Committee Reports, and Staff Reports to the end of the Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting Agendas. 2. DISCUSSION OF APPOINTMENT OF ALTERNATES TO COMMITTEES 10 minutes NARRATIVE Ms. Dininni has requested that the Board discuss appointing alternates to COG and other regional committees. VI. OLD BUSINESS

3 Ferguson Township Board of Supervisors Monday, July 17, 2017 Page 2 1. TRADITIONAL TOWN DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 30 minutes NARRATIVE Residential Housing Development, LLC submitted an ordinance amendment application for the Traditional Town Development Zoning District on March 16 th. The application was referred to the Planning Commission for review and comment. The Planning Commission voted 3 2 to recommend approval of the amendments as requested at its June 26 th meeting. Provided with the agenda is a copy of the ordinance amendment application and a memorandum dated June 23 rd from Lindsay Schoch, Community Planner and Jeff Ressler, Zoning Administrator as was provided to the Planning Commission summarizing the history of the requested amendments. The Centre Regional Planning Commission will review the application at its meeting on August 3 rd. Recommended motion: Move that the Board of Supervisors authorize the ordinance amending Chapter 27 Zoning, Section 701, Traditional Town Development for public hearing on August 21 st. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Board of Supervisors authorize the ordinance amendment for public hearing. 2. FERGUSON TOWNSHIP OFFICIAL MAP CONTINUED DISCUSSION 10 minutes NARRATIVE The Board unanimously rejected the ordinance adopting a new Official Map at the public hearing on July 3 rd and further directed staff to evaluate the extension of Foxpointe Drive to a future intersection with Whitehall Road. Staff researched the history of the proposed extension and summarized its conclusions in an attached memorandum from Dave Modricker, Director of Public Works dated July 7 th. Staff has concluded that the inclusion of the Foxpointe Drive extension is prudent transportation planning. The Board should consider this extension and provide staff with direction on proceeding. If the extension is removed, the Official Map should be presented back to the Planning Commission for review and a recommendation. Recommended motion: Move that the Board of Supervisors authorize the ordinance adopting a new Ferguson Township Official Map for public hearing on August 7 th. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Board of Supervisors authorize the ordinance amendment for public hearing. VII. NEW BUSINESS 1. CONSENT AGENDA a. June 2017 Voucher Report b. Contract 2017-C5 Meadows Park Improvements 2. AWARD OF PROFESSIONAL DESIGN SERVICES CONTRACT VALLEY VISTA SHARED USE PATH 10 minutes NARRATIVE Ferguson Township partnered with Patton Township on a cooperative grant application to the PADOT Transportation Alternatives Program for the engineering design and construction of a shared use path along Valley Vista/Science Park Road. The grant was awarded in an amount of $1,040,212 to be used for construction and inspection. Patton Township issued an RFP for professional design services and received nine responses. The proposals were reviewed and ranked by a review committee. The committee is recommending the award of a professional services contract to Stahl Sheaffer in an amount of $122,90. Ferguson Township s share of the design fees is $40, The Township budgeted

4 Ferguson Township Board of Supervisors Monday, July 17, 2017 Page 3 $50,000 for this item. While this item would typically be placed on the Consent Agenda, staff felt that the regional significance and unique nature of this project merited separate consideration. A memorandum from Susan Wheeler, Patton Township Public Works Project Manager dated June 27, 2017 is provided with the agenda to summarize the project and projected milestones. Recommended motion: Move that the Board of Supervisors award a professional services contract for the design of the Valley Vista Shared Use Path to Stahl Sheaffer Engineering, LLC in an amount of $122,90. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Board of Supervisors award the design services contract to Stahl Sheaffer Engineering. 3. NET ZERO GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS STRATEGY DISCUSSION 20 minutes NARRATIVE The Board adopted a resolution on June 19 th committing the Township to immediately begin to identify a strategy to achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions no later than It is likely that this strategy will have multiple components and engage a variety of stakeholders. A prudent initial step would be for the Board to discuss the establishment and composition of an ad hoc board as permitted to be authorized by ordinance in the Administrative Code. The scope of work of this ad hoc board would be to draft a strategy that would be presented, reviewed, and approved by the Board of Supervisors. Provided with the agenda is a memorandum from the Township Manager dated July 13, 2017 summarizing the discussion item. Also provide with the agenda is a copy of the resolution as adopted. Recommended motion: Move that the Board of Supervisors establish an Ad Hoc Board whose purpose is to develop a strategy for consideration by the Board of Supervisors to achieve net zero greenhouse emissions as quickly as feasible, but not later than 2050, and to ensure that goals identified in said strategy are transparent, fair, and economically feasible. STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Board of Supervisors discuss the net zero greenhouse gas reductions strategy and direct staff to proceed based on the discussion. 4. CORL STREET/W. COLLEGE AVENUE LIGHTING PROJECT REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION 10 minutes NARRATIVE The Township was awarded a Green-Light-Go Grant in 2016 for traffic signalization and lighting improvements at the intersection of West College Avenue and Corl Street in the Terraced Streetscape District. In the project s design, an issue was identified in the TSD Design Standards (Ferguson Twp. Code of Ordinances, Chapter 22, Subdivision and Land Development, Section 5A09.D.1.) which limits street light height to 14 feet. This height restriction will not allow the light fixtures to meet PennDOT s required lighting and glare level at the intersection. Provided with the agenda is a memorandum from the Township Manager dated July 13, 2017 summarizing the requested modification. Also provided with the agenda is a copy of the Design Standards of the Terraced Streetscape District with the appropriate provision highlighted from which the Township is seeking relief. Finally, a copy of the plan is attached with the agenda. Recommended motion: Move that the Board of Supervisors grant the modification as requested to Chapter 22, Subdivision and Land Development, Section 5A09.D.1. to allow street lighting at the intersection of West College Avenue and Corl Street to be greater than 14 feet but not to exceed 16.2 feet.

5 Ferguson Township Board of Supervisors Monday, July 17, 2017 Page 4 STAFF RECOMMENDATION That the Board of Supervisors grant the modification as requested. 5. STRATEGIC PLAN PROGRESS REPORT 10 minutes NARRATIVE The Board adopted an updated Ferguson Township Strategic Plan on November 21, The Plan identifies nine goals and a series of action steps deemed desirable by the Board. The Strategic Plan is an overarching guiding document that helps direct staff and Board decisions in budgeting, capital improvement planning, and more. Dave Pribulka, Township Manager will report on progress made toward achieving the goals and action steps identified in the Strategic Plan. The report is for information only and no action is required by the Board. VIII. COMMUNICATIONS TO THE BOARD 10 minutes IX. CALENDAR ITEMS JULY/AUGUST 1. July 20, 2017 at 6:00pm in Conference Room CIP Worksession 2. July 27, 2017 at 5:30pm in Conference Room CIP Worksession X. ADJOURNMENT

6 FERGUSON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Regular Meeting, Monday, July 3, :00 PM I. ATTENDANCE The Board of Supervisors held its first regular meeting of the month on Monday, July 4, 2017, at the Ferguson Township Municipal Building. In attendance were: Board: Steve Miller Laura Dininni Peter Buckland Rita Graef Staff: Dave Pribulka, Township Manager Dave Modricker, Director of Public Works Ray Stolinas, Director of Planning & Zoning Chris Albright, Chief of Police Brian Wakefield, Officer Others in attendance included: Marisa Vicere, Bill Keough, Steve Jackson, Steve Bair, Andy Arnold, Pam Salokangis, Faith Norris, Recording Secretary II. CALL TO ORDER Mr. Miller called the Monday, July 3, 2017, regular meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. III. CITIZENS INPUT None noted. Mr. Miller recognized Chief Albright s introduction of Officer Brian Wakefield as the newest officer of the Ferguson Township Police Department. Chief Albright presented a brief history of Officer Wakefield s prior career with the State Police and welcomed him to the Police Department. IV. PROCLAMATIONS a. Proclamation designating the month of September 2017 as Ferguson Township Suicide Awareness and Prevention Month and designating September 10, 2017 as Ferguson Township Suicide Awareness and Prevention Day. Mr. Pribulka introduced the proclamation as included in the agenda packet. He recognized Ms. Vicere, President and Founder of the Jana Marie Foundation and Co-Chair for the Centre County Suicide Prevention Task Force. Ms. Vicere talked about mental health and wellness, suicide prevention, personal stories, statistics and ways on raising awareness on mental illness. Some upcoming events planned for September include: September 5 tt - Suicide Prevention Rally at the Bellefonte Courthouse; September 10 th - Community Dinner and service at Millbrook Marsh; and September 28 th - MoKita Dialogues at New Leaf Initiative. Mr. Buckland moved that the Board of Supervisors proclaim that the Township of Ferguson, Centre County, Pennsylvania designating the month of September 2017 as Ferguson Township Suicide Awareness and Prevention Month and designating September 10, 2017 as Ferguson Township Suicide Awareness and Prevention Day. Ms. Dininni seconded the motion. Mr. Miller read off the full proclamation. ROLL CALL VOTE: Ms. Dininni: YES; Ms. Graef: YES; Mr. Miller: YES; Mr. Buckland: YES. Motion passed unanimously.

7 Ferguson Township Board of Supervisors Monday July 3, 2017 Page 2 At this time Mr. Miller acknowledged Chief Albright as the new Chief of Police present at this meeting. b. Proclamation of Ferguson Township designating the month of July as Park and Recreation Month. Mr. Miller introduced the proclamation that was included in the agenda packet. Mr. Pribulka introduced Ms. Salokangis, Director of Centre Region Parks and Recreation (CRPR). Ms. Salokangis talked in more detail on promoting the parks and July as Parks and Recreation Month through municipal calendars, popup programs that interns have been working on and special events. Ms. Salokangis responded to a question asked on popup programs and that they are going to be posted on the CRPR social media pages. As an example, she went into further detail about one popup program on a scavenger hunt. Ms. Dininni had some process questions and suggestions on the proclamation in regards to input on the value of park programs and parkland. Ms. Salokangis noted other municipalities as well as Ferguson Township had an opportunity to look at the proposed proclamation and had provided input. Mr. Miller asked for a motion on the proclamation. Ms. Graef moved that the Board of Supervisors proclaim that the Township of Ferguson, Centre County, Pennsylvania designate the month of July as Park and Recreation Month. Ms. Dininni seconded the motion. Ms. Graef read off the Proclamation. Discussion followed on the value of parks and land assets. Ms. Dininni moved to amend the proclamation to insert after the second Whereas to read, WHEREAS, our parks and recreation land are and the fourth whereas to read, WHEREAS, parks and recreation programs and land assets increase a community s. Mr. Buckland seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Ms. Dininni moved to amend the proclamation to insert the word can at the sixth Whereas to read, WHEREAS, parks and natural recreation can improve water quality. Mr. Buckland seconded the motion. Mr. Miller asked for a vote on the proposed amendments to the proclamation. The motion passed unanimously. Ms. Dininni moved to amend the proclamation to add prior to the fifth Whereas to read, WHEREAS, parks can provide a vital community gathering space. Mr. Buckland seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. Buckland moved to amend the proclamation to add to the second Whereas to read, WHEREAS, communities, ensuring the health and happiness of all citizens, economic prosperity and environmental well-being of the community and region;. Ms. Dininni seconded the motion. Mr. Miller asked for a vote on the proposed amendments. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. Miller asked for a vote on the proclamation as amended.

8 Ferguson Township Board of Supervisors Monday July 3, 2017 Page 3 V. MINUTES ROLL CALL VOTE: Ms. Graef: YES; Mr. Miller: YES; Mr. Buckland: YES, Ms. Dininni: YES. 1. June 19, 2017, Board of Supervisors Regular Meeting. Ms. Graef made a motion to approve the June 19, 2017, regular meeting minutes. Mr. Buckland seconded the motion. VI. REPORTS Ms. Dininni moved the Board in Item 4, pg. 6, to add her concern that PSU is not the same type of governmental entity as other MS4 municipalities. Mr. Buckland seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. Miller asked for a vote on the original motion as amended. The motion passed unanimously. 1. ABC REPORTS a. State College Borough Water Authority Dr. Steven Jackson Mr. Jackson reviewed meetings since April 3 rd on content as provided in the agenda packet. Mr. Jackson met with Township staff on June 6 th regarding issues raised in his report in regards to the Nixon-Kocher water treatment plant. Mr. Jackson further highlighted the meeting items from the May 18 th SCBWA Board Meeting and detailed revenues and expenditures. Ms. Dininni called point of order and needed clarification whether questions can be addressed at this time with Mr. Jackson. Mr. Miller ruled questions can be addressed. Discussion followed on the growth and beneficial use of sourcewater in the Centre Region. Further discussion followed on the Spring Creek watershed. Mr. Buckland noted his concerns on the approach of certain issues, i.e. different science perspectives, and requested that the water authority board address the issues substantively and with more clarity for better understanding in general. Further discussion followed on the subject. 2. COG COMMITTEE REPORTS a. Executive Committee. Mr. Miller noted the agenda was provided in the meeting packet. 3. OTHER REGIONAL COMMITTEES a. Ms. Dininni reported on the meeting in Mr. Miller s place. Highlights: PennDOT connection on Route 45, PennDOT Connects Program. Discussion followed on upcoming projects. Mr. Buckland called point of order and asked that Mr. Miller request items of question from the committee reports be placed on the agenda per previous rule. Mr. Miller opted not to place his item of question on the agenda. b. Watershed Commission Meeting Mr. Miller reported the main topic was the MS4 activities. It was reported that we are in the 16 th wettest year since the 122 recorded years according to Mr. Giddings and this is good for the wells in the area.

9 Ferguson Township Board of Supervisors Monday July 3, 2017 Page 4 4. STAFF REPORTS a. Manager s Report Mr. Pribulka presented his report as provided in the agenda packet. Highlights include that the Township has met its Loss Control Standards for this year; for the Board s review: DRAFT CIP and CAFR FY 2016 report and financial statement of the Township; July 11 th is a scheduled road tour; CIP worksession dates will be forthcoming; attendance and panel participation at the CBICC s Economic Development Summit - panel session focused on retention and expansion of existing businesses in Centre County; Board was represented at the June 27 th Zoning Hearing Board meeting on the zoning appeal filed by HFL Corporation request for appeal and variance was denied; Township agreement with Chief Chris Albright who succeeds Chief Diane Conrad as Chief of Police effective June 30 th. b. Public Works Director Mr. Modricker presented his report as provided in the agenda packet. Highlights include Oak Wilt and LEED Gold Public Works building; engineers and MS4 partners continue to work on a pollutant reduction plan for Chesapeake Bay - presentation to the Board to follow after finalized; working with Amec Foster Wheeler to finalize a stormwater fee feasibility study; Hawbaker contracted paving work at Fairbrook Park and detail of construction activities - completion anticipated by mid-july; Kansa Avenue paving contract is on hold; Martin Street paving project contracted to Hawbaker followed by detail on pipe lining; Meadows Park Improvements project out to bid; installation of a water fountain at Tudak Park and requoting work to install water line to the butterfly garden; details on Meckley Road paving planned for August; various repairs update; brush and leaf collections and maintenance; next Tree Commission meeting is July 17 th. Mr. Buckland moved that the Board add to the agenda for discussion the Kansa Avenue paving project, discussion limited to 10 minutes. Ms. Dininni seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. c. Planning and Zoning Director Mr. Stolinas presented his report as provided in the agenda packet. Overview: meetings, active plan list, SCBWA proposed text amendment update and recommendation to the Board to have a joint meeting to further discuss the text amendment; Traditional Town development text amendment update and recommendation to the Board; conditional use skate park update; SALDO update; and permit report update. Mr. Miller moved that the Board add to the agenda for discussion the request for a joint meeting with the Planning Commission. Ms. Graef seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Ms. Dininni asked the Board if the Planning and Zoning Director can include in future reports the clock/timeframe and planned expiration on The Cottages. Mr. Pribulka responded by stating the general opinion of the solicitor is that the review clock is on hold during pending litigation. Mr. Pribulka went into further detail in terms of plan reviews, planning code and litigation. Ms. Dininni had some concerns and went into future detail of those concerns. Ms. Dininni moved that the Board add to the agenda for discussion the timeframe of the Cottages. Mr. Buckland seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.

10 Ferguson Township Board of Supervisors Monday July 3, 2017 Page 5 VII. OLD BUSINESS 1. Public Hearing on an ordinance of The Township of Ferguson, Centre County, Pennsylvania, amending the Code of Ordinances, Appendix D, by repealing all former official maps and portions of official maps of The Township of Ferguson and adopting a new Official Map. Mr. Pribulka introduced the ordinance as advertised that was provided in the agenda packet. Mr. Stolinas detailed further changes done to the official map and noted that per the Board s request, it does not include parcels for proposed parklands. Ms. Graef moved that the Board of Supervisors adopt the ordinance and map amending the code of ordinances by repealing all former Official Maps and portions of Officials Maps of the Township of Ferguson and adopting a new Official Map for the Township of Ferguson. Mr. Miller seconded motion. Discussion followed on some specific areas and eminent domain. Mr. Buckland had some concerns and discussion followed on Foxpointe Drive extension at Whitehall Road. Further discussion included clarification of map plans, using the map as a tool and grant mechanism, cost of development in and out of the growth boundaries, possible changes, roads entering onto Whitehall Road, traffic studies. More detailed discussion followed on growth boundaries and potential use of those boundaries by land owners and tax implications. Mr. Miller, seeing a consensus that there are potential changes and questions raised from this discussion, asked staff to respond to those questions and for the Board to forward any additional questions to staff for future discussion prior to re-advertising the map. Mr. Miller called for a roll call vote to adopt the Official Map. Ms. Graef called point of order to clarify if the person that made the motion can vote against their motion. Mr. Miller ruled yes. ROLL CALL VOTE: Mr. Miller: NO; Mr. Buckland: NO; Ms. Dininni: NO; Ms. Graef: NO. The motion failed 0 4 with all Board member dissenting. A discussion will be rescheduled to review the questions raised on the Official Map. 2. Public Hearing on a resolution repealing Resolution and adopting a new utilization policy for authorities, boards, and commissions. Mr. Pribulka introduced the resolution as advertised and provided with the agenda packet. The policy is applicable to any ABC member with a Township account. If adopted, the policy will be reviewed with the Township members, boards and commissions. He went into further detail of the draft policy as more comprehensive than the previous policy and it captures the applicable statues and is more useful in terms of how the account can be used for official business. Seeing no citizen input, Mr. Miller called for a vote on the resolution. Ms. Dininni moved that the Board of Supervisors adopt the Resolution of the Township of Ferguson, Centre County, Pennsylvania repealing Resolution and adopting a new Ferguson Township utilization policy for authorities, boards, and commissions. Mr. Buckland seconded the motion.

11 Ferguson Township Board of Supervisors Monday July 3, 2017 Page 6 Discussion followed on Sunshine violations, right-to-know law, explanation of resolution, extended discussion on limited personal use language, retention, penalties and interpretation of the policy. Further discussion followed with clarification needed on non-township business use. Mr. Keough noted a concern about the blanket policy for volunteers that are appointed as a citizen on the ABC boards that would have to abide by the policy and noted that there might be a conflict of interest. Discussion followed on the Administrative Code. ROLL CALL VOTE on Resolution : Mr. Buckland: YES; Ms. Dininni: YES; Ms. Graef: YES; Mr. Miller: YES. 3. Kansa Avenue Update - added as an agenda item. Mr. Modricker updated the Board on the history and referred to his report for reference. The Township withdrew the paving contract that was going out for bid originally without an easement. Previous detailed discussions with the Board, Township staff and citizens input produced a possible solution of an easement with a resident. However, after further discussion with the resident, the easement is on hold due to some factors, i.e., type of drainage pipe required on the property, drainage, maintenance, feasibility and costs. Discussion followed on the concerns and possible solutions. Following discussion, the consensus of the Board of Supervisors was to have Township staff draft a letter from the Board to the affected residents with visuals to show and explain in detail what is needed for the project. The Kansa Avenue paving project has been an ongoing discussion for the past three years and the project will not go forward unless an agreement is reached. VIII. NEW BUSINESS 1. CONSENT AGENDA a C6 Curb and Ramp Upgrades Payment Authorizations (3): $4,687.30, $12,792.54, $70, b C8 Pavement Markings Payment Authorization, $23, c C8 Pavement Markings Payment Authorization, $32, d C10 Bikepath and Parking Lot Sealcoat Ms. Dininni made a motion to approve the Consent Agenda. Mr. Buckland seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Mr. Miller moved the Fire Station Feasibility Study discussion to the next item of business without objection. 2. DISCUSSION OF STUDY OF DESIRABILITY AND FEASIBILITY OF A FIRE STATION IN FERGUSON TOWNSHIP MR. STEVE BAIR Mr. Pribulka reviewed the Desirability and Feasibility Study prepared by Steve Bair, Centre Region Fire Director. Mr. Pribulka requested that the Board provide staff with direction on how to prioritize land acquisition for the fire station. Discussion followed with Mr. Bair in detail on emergency services that included: Ag easement, environmental factors, cell service, economics, neighboring services, response time, infrastructure, cost range for the building, progression, timeline based on the growth of the area, ISO rating, the need for a fire station, appropriated budget, development perspective and neighborhood concerns. Mr. Stolinas addressed Ms. Dininni s question on emergency services not currently being a primary use in RA districts and that it will be added in the future. Further discussion followed on volunteers and traffic detail. The consensus of the Board was

12 Ferguson Township Board of Supervisors Monday July 3, 2017 Page 7 to get a layout of what is needed and direction, public input/survey, growth, process, zoning, timeframes, other locations to consider, what services we currently have in the Township and what emergency and cell services are needed. Further discussion on land acquisition and subdivision of property. Mr. Pribulka suggested a community survey update and feedback be done for public input. 3. APPLICATION FOR ZONING VARIANCE TOWERCO 2013 LLC, 500 SCIENCE PARK ROAD Mr. Pribulka introduced the variance application as presented in the agenda packet. He went into detail on the construction of the monopole cell tower. The variance request is proposing an allowance for 1 setback for each 1 of tower height, a total of 119 setback instead of the required 500 setbacks from the nearest adjacent property line. Discussion followed on an earlier point on the possible need to create an ordinance that allows the Township to collect a fee for cellular towers. Mr. Pribulka addressed Ms. Graef questions on whether there are cell towers in the Township and if there is revenue collected for their usage in the right-of-way. He went into detail on the typical cell phone towers/antenna systems, caps on height and current provisions in the ordinance that allow for collection of revenue for facilities located in the right-of-way. He noted the Township collects a franchise fee from Comcast which is a different type of fee. Mr. Miller noted separate from this discussion in regards to the fire station option, the Township could own the cell tower and lease it for a fee. Ms. Dininni questioned the recommendation to remain neutral since it goes against the rule. Mr. Pribulka used an example for perspective and historically in these cases the Board has taken a position of neutrality based on the merits of the request. Mr. Miller moved that the Board of Supervisors remain neutral on the request for zoning variance for property located at 500 Science Park Road and move forward with the Zoning Hearing Board for consideration. Ms. Graef seconded the motion. Mr. Miller called for a vote on the motion. The motion failed 2 2 with Ms. Dininni and Mr. Buckland dissenting. Mr. Buckland moved that the Board of Supervisors oppose the variance request. Ms. Dininni seconded the motion. The motion failed 2 2 with Mr. Miller and Ms. Graef dissenting. Mr. Miller ruled that the Board of Supervisors has no position or recommendation on the variance request. 4. SOURCEWATER PROTECTION ORDINANCE UPDATE MR. RAY STOLINAS Mr. Stolinas presented the latest draft ordinance update as provided in the agenda packet. Reviewed map overlays, timeline of planning meetings and hydrogeological conditions. SCBWA staff attended the May 8 th meeting and discussed their positon on the overlay proposal. The sourcewater Work Group met on June 15 th and plan to meet on July 12 th to discuss items of concern from the previous meeting. Concerns touched on included: feedback from Township staff and committee to better fit the language in the draft ordinance with SCBWA s goals and objectives in the 2017 sourcewater protection plan; Work Group member to talk with the Ag community within Zone 1 areas of the Township that are consistent with the specific proposed zoned area. Discussion followed that included clarification on grandfathering when wells change ownership, regulatory purview activity and if any effect on land owners in Zone 1. Mr. Stolinas stated the topics are still under discussion regarding Zone 1 areas that could be

13 Ferguson Township Board of Supervisors Monday July 3, 2017 Page 8 designated as critical sourcewater protection education areas and the purview does not go under DEP. Further detail on the subject followed. Ms. Dininni asked for more clarification on whether the grandfathering designation is taken out when wells change ownership and the effect on land owners. 5. DISCUSSION ON LEED GOLD PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE FACILITY MR. MODRICKER AND MR. BUCKLAND Mr. Modricker did an overview and provided a handout in the agenda packet for basis of design. June 14 th was the kickoff meeting for the building with Township staff, Board member Mr. Buckland, architects and site designers. A questionnaire was presented at the kickoff meeting for the sole purpose of expressing the basic needs of the building design in a narrative form response. Mr. Modricker went into further detail on the basis of design document. Mr. Buckland continued the discussion and highlighted enhanced commissioning is part of the requirement for LEED Gold buildings and further discussed the integrated design that falls in line with the state s constitution, the net zero climate resolution, the health and wellbeing of those who work in the building and a prime example of what it can do for the community. Discussion followed. Ms. Dininni discussed landscaping and rainwater control. 6. AUTHORIZATION OF EXPENDITURE FOR THE TREATMENT OF OAK TREES MR. MODRICKER Mr. Modricker reported the incident that was received from a resident of Oak wilt located on Cherry Ridge Road. It was investigated by the Township Arborist. Steps were taken to mitigate the Oak wilt on site and the Township is in the process of issuing a purchase order for a contractor to do the additional service work pending approval. The Public Works Director authorized immediate abatement of the infected tree to prevent transmission of the disease to other oak trees in the vicinity and went into further detail of Oak wilt mitigation, preventative maintenance, tree count and the adopted policy on treatment. Reviewed costs to-date and presented to the Board additional estimated mitigation costs, current budget and appropriations. Ms. Dininni move that the Board of Supervisors authorize the expenditure for the treatment of oak trees up to $13,000. Mr. Buckland seconded the motion. Discussion followed regarding the budget appropriations. Mr. Miller called for a vote on the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 7. DISCUSSION ON TIMELINE FOR THE COTTAGES PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT Mr. Miller introduced the item to discuss on The Cottages/Toll Brothers plan. Mr. Pribulka noted the question raised earlier in the meeting was the timeline a developer has to record a land development plan and after it has received additional approval. The municipalities planning code states 45 days. Mr. Pribulka went into further detail on the current land development plan, history of the court documentation, conditional approval and allowed time extensions. Mr. Stolinas further detailed the timeline dates of the legal delays and extensions with the project. In-depth discussion followed with a request from a Board member to have the points raised at this meeting and previous meetings answered in order to move forward regarding the timeline on this project.

14 Ferguson Township Board of Supervisors Monday July 3, 2017 Page 9 The consensus of the Board was to go back to the solicitor on the questions raised and have a response back to the Board in a reasonable amount of time. 8. JOINT MEETING WITH BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW SCBWA TEXT AMENDMENTS Mr. Stolinas introduced the suggested joint meeting to be set up for discussion regarding the State College Borough Water Authority s (SCBWA) text amendments. Mr. Pribulka went into detail on the other committees interest in having both the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors in a joint meeting to discuss the intent of the text amendments prior to a decision being made or recommendation to the Planning Commission. Joint meetings with the Board need to be approved by the Board prior to setting up the meetings. Mr. Miller asked the Board Members if they would like a joint session. Ms. Dininni asked if a speaker will be attending the joint session to talk about SCBWA sourcewater protection plan. Mr. Stolinas noted the person would be talking at the sourcewater Work Group. Ms. Dininni asked that a presentation come before the Board on the 2017 sourcewater protection plan. Consensus was the subject does not raise to the level of previous joint meetings and to give a recommendation. Mr. Miller asked that agenda items be sent to him via to forward to the Planning Commission. IX. COMMUNICATIONS TO THE BOARD Ms. Dininni had a communication from a resident on the wash-out on Tadpole/Whitehall roads that may require a longer term fix to alleviate that problem; Board received several s from concerned residents on the future land of The Cottages PRD; a resident from Pine Grove Mills that has a snow issue with PennDOT; and finally noted several editorial changes in a document presented by Penn State on The Cottages PRD. X. CALENDAR ITEMS JULY: None were noted. XI. ADJOURNMENT With no further business to come before the Board of Supervisors, Ms. Dininni made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Mr. Miller seconded the motion. Mr. Miller adjourned the meeting at 11:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, David Pribulka, Acting Township Manager For the Board of Supervisors

15 CENTRE REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 2643 Gateway Drive, Suite #3 State College, PA Phone: (814) Fax: (814) Website: 1. CALL TO ORDER Mr. Graham will convene the meeting. 2. CITIZEN COMMENTS FINANCE COMMITTEE COG Forum Room Thursday, July 6, :30 AM AGENDA Members of the public are invited to comment on any items not already on the agenda (five minute per person time limit, please). Comments relating to specific items on the agenda should be deferred until that point in the meeting. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A copy of the minutes of the June 8, 2017 Finance Committee meeting is enclosed COG PROGRAM PLAN The COG Agency Directors will present the draft 2018 COG Program Plan. The Program Plan is intended to provide municipal officials and the public with an understanding of: The mission statement and history of each COG budget fund. The ongoing services that COG Agencies provide. Unexpected budgetary occurrences during Significant Agency issues or initiatives under the Of Particular Note section. Tentative programmatic and budgetary changes being proposed by COG Agencies for the upcoming year in the Where are We Going section. The Finance Committee should review the draft 2018 Program Plan and note areas of concern. The document opens with the Executive Director s transmittal letter that identifies: 2017 budget highlights for the first six months, longer term trends affecting future budgets, where are we now with the 2017 budget, and preliminary 2018 COG Budget changes proposed by the Agency Directors for the upcoming year. The Agency Directors will be in attendance to present and respond to their Program Plan proposals. The Committee s comments are welcomed and encouraged. The recommendations offered by the Committee will be included in the next version of the Program Plan that will be

16 Finance Committee Agenda July 6, 2017 Page 2 of 6 distributed to the General Forum. At the closure of the Committee s discussion, consideration should be given to the following motion that begins the municipal review process for the Program Plan: That the General Forum receive the 2018 Program Plan for the Centre Region COG and refer it to the Centre Region municipalities for review; and, further, that comments be referred to the COG Executive Director by 8:00 AM, August 17, 2017* to be considered during the preparation of the draft 2018 COG Budget. *assumes that the Committee s meeting date will be changed COG staff will distribute copies of a sample matrix that the managers can use to record their Boards/Council comments on the 2018 Program Plan and return that information to the COG. It is believed that a prototype document will save time for both the COG and municipal staff. Please remember to bring your draft 2018 Program Plan to the meeting. An electronic copy is also available on the COG website TO 2022 COG CIP Mr. Viglione will present the enclosed 2018 to 2022 draft COG Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and discuss the major changes from the current CIP. The recommendations in the CIP have been included in the draft 2018 COG Program Plan. The Finance Committee should review the CIP, note areas of concern, and decide whether it should be referred to the Centre Region municipalities for comment. The Committee s comments are welcomed and encouraged. The recommendations offered by the Committee will be included in the next version of the CIP that will be distributed to the General Forum. At the closure of the Committee s discussion, consideration should be given to the following motion that begins the municipal review process for the CIP: That the General Forum receive the Capital Improvement Plan for the Centre Region COG and refer it to the Centre Region municipalities for review; and, further, that comments be referred to the COG Executive Director by 8:00 AM, August 17, 2017* to be considered during the preparation of the draft 2018 COG Budget. 6. CATA BUDGET PROCESS *assumes that the Committee s meeting date will be changed During its June 8, 2017 meeting the Finance Committee discussed the COG s involvement in coordinating the municipal reviews of CATA s annual local match share proposal and budget review. It was noted with the recent change in the CATA funding formula

17 Finance Committee Agenda July 6, 2017 Page 3 of 6 combined with state requirements for local match shares, the need for municipal comments on the local match shares and budget proposals has significantly diminished. To ensure that the municipal officials understand the new process, the Finance Committee suggested that a description be developed and shared with the General Forum. COG and CATA staff were asked to work together to prepare this explanation. The following is the draft narrative. CATA Local Match Approval and Budget Review Process **Dates Are Approximate** Date Action Fall - Local Match Shares document provided to municipalities. - CATA Staff contacts municipalities about attending municipal meetings to talk about service statistics for the concluded year and local match shares for both operating and capital for the coming year. - CATA staff meets with COG Transportation and Land Use Committee to discuss regional transit policy planning issues. Spring - CATA Staff contacts municipalities about attending municipal meetings for report on possible service changes and reminder of local match shares information. April - CATA Board adopts draft budget, posts it to website, and provides link and electronic document to municipalities. - Municipalities adopt PennDOT-required resolution committing to provide local match shares. June - CATA Board adopts final budget. July 1 - New CATA fiscal year begins As needed - Periodically, CATA staff may meet with the Finance Committee and/or General Forum to refresh the memory of the municipal officials of the reasoning behind the local match and to further explain the formula calculations to distribute the local match. - CATA staff will meet with Finance Committee and/or General Forum to discuss any proposed changes to the CATA Formula. - CATA staff will meet with Finance Committee and/or General Forum when new capital local match share levels need to be set. The Committee should review this draft and decide whether to forward it to the General Forum for informational purposes. 7. POTENTIAL DETAILED BUDGET PRESENTATION CHANGES Staff would like the Committee to discuss and give COG staff guidance on two potential changes to the 2018 Detailed Budget. The two changes relate to the creation of a new fund, an Unemployment fund, and a changing of the layout for the Parks Operating fund. Unemployment Fund When the Borough of State College managed the COG s finances, the COG Unemployment fund (Schlow and the Parks and Recreation Authority are not self-funded) was kept as part of the Borough s General Fund. COG staff received annual updates of transfers into the fund and expenditures from the fund. Staff now has a two year history and approximately $66,000 in available cash at the end of 2016 in the self-funded

18 Finance Committee Agenda July 6, 2017 Page 4 of 6 Unemployment account. The reported expenditures for were $14,985 and $12,789 respectively. The expenditures almost entirely were Parks and Recreation agency related for the seasonal maintenance staff. The approximately $66,000 in cash as of December 31, 2016 is comprised of the following balances (with the 2017 budgeted contribution amount in parenthesis) by agency: Administration - $6,000 ($4,000) Parks & Recreation - $21,400 ($12,000) Code - $19,600 ($0) Planning/MPO - $12,500 ($0) Emergency Mgmt. - $700 ($270) Fire - $2,900 ($780) Senior Citizens Center - $2,700 ($1,313) The Finance Director recommends that a new separate budget be established for COG s Unemployment Fund. The purpose of the budget is to serve as a depositary for the receipt and expenditure of funds designated for worker compensation payment in accordance with regulations of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The benefits of a separate budget are: Improved tracking of expenses and revenues (transfers from COG Agencies) Improved ability to assess whether the pool of funds is adequate to pay known and possible obligations. Parks Operating Fund Historically the Parks and Recreation Operating fund has been compiled on a line item and expense category basis. The focus has been on distributing costs into personnel and operating expenses. While this has served the agency well for budget review purposes for a number of years, the Parks Director, Executive Director, and Finance Director believe there is value in laying out the 2018 detailed budget in a more programmatic manner, by cost center. The Parks Operating fund has six primary cost centers: 450 Concessions 451 Summer Camps 452 Maintenance 453 Leagues, Tournaments & Rentals 454 Programs 455 Administration Both the Finance Director and the Park and Recreation Director recommend that the Parks Operating budget be separated into six cost centers for both revenue and expenditures. The benefit of this change are:

19 Finance Committee Agenda July 6, 2017 Page 5 of 6 Improved opportunity for COG, municipal officials, and staff to view in a concise manner the revenues and expenditures for each cost center. Improved tool for assessing the success of cost recovery efforts for each cost center. Staff does not believe there will be a significant change in the chart of accounts (if any at all) due to this action, rather the change will be limited to the appearance of the budget to give it a more programmatic feel, similar to the Aquatics budget which breaks out revenues and expenditures by pool location. The Finance Committee should review these potential changes and opine as to their desire to have them incorporated into the 2018 Detailed Budget. 8. AUGUST FINANCE COMMITTEE MEETING It is anticipated that the General Forum will refer the 2018 Program Plan to the municipalities for review and comment at its meeting on July 24, In order to give each municipality a chance to meet and discuss the document, it is being recommended that the Finance Committee consider changing the date for its next meeting from August 10, 2017 to August 17, MONTHLY REPORTS Copies of the April and May voucher report were distributed to the Committee in June. The Committee should consider the following motion: That the Finance Committee approves the April and May 2017 voucher report for the Centre Region COG. The June voucher report is enclosed in the electronic copy of this agenda packet. Paper copies of the voucher report will be available at the meeting. Action on this voucher report will occur at the Committee s August meeting. If the Committee has any questions about the items in this report, please let Finance Director, Joe Viglione (jviglione@crcog.net or ) know as soon as possible, so that the information can be researched prior to the next Committee meeting. Due to the date of the agenda distribution, bank reconciliations for June have not been completed at the time these reports were distributed. Copies of the June 2017 financial report will also be distributed at a later date. 10. OTHER BUSINESS A. Matter of Record The auditors have completed the fieldwork associated with 2016 Library Federation, Centre Region COG, Centre Region Parks and Recreation Authority, and Schlow Centre Region Library audits. To date, the Finance Director has reviewed and commented on the CRPR Authority and Centre Region COG audits which are quickly drawing to a close. The Finance Director is working with the auditors to draw the Library reports to a close as well.

20 Finance Committee Agenda July 6, 2017 Page 6 of 6 B. Matter of Record The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) is currently estimated to be 1.9% based upon the July 1, 2016 to May, 2017 CPI-U reading. Based upon recent trends, the Finance Director is predicting it will be either % at the end of the measurement year. The COG compensation plan provides for the 12 month average CPI-U for all items from July 1 to June 30 be used in budget preparation in determining a cost of living adjustment for the 2018 budget year for all employees meeting the expectations of their job performance. C. Matter of Record Staff is still in correspondence with Penn State about ways it can improve its capital budgeting. While staff is hopeful that a learning lunch with representatives from Penn State will occur in 2017, it may not occur until later in or after the 2018 budget process is complete. D. Matter of Record Due to the change in the date of the July meeting, the workers compensation presentation has been deferred until the August meeting. 11. ADJOURNMENT

21 CENTRE REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS 2643 Gateway Drive, Suite 3 State College, PA Phone: (814) Fax: (814) Website: PUBLIC SERVICES & ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE COG Building Forum Room Thursday, July 6, :30 AM AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER Mr. Hameister will convene the meeting. 2. CITIZEN COMMENTS Members of the public are invited to comment on any items not already on the agenda (five minutes per person time limit, please). Comments relating to specific items on the agenda should be deferred to that point in the meeting. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Copy of the minutes from the June 1, 2017 Public Services & Environmental Committee meeting is enclosed for approval. 4. SEWER SERVICE TO PORTIONS OF PENN STATE UNIVERSITY BY THE UNIVERSITY AREA JOINT AUTHORITY presented by Greg Garthe This item presents a draft policy document that provides context to the questions of past, current, and future sewer service arrangements between the University Area Joint Authority (UAJA) and Penn State University (PSU) for several areas on and around the University Park Campus that have not traditionally been handled at the Penn State Wastewater Treatment Plant. PSU and the UAJA have expressed differing viewpoints on several issues related to sewage collection, conveyance, and treatment of campus flows from three areas that, due to topography, are more efficiently served by the UAJA. These areas include Innovation Park, and parts of North and West Campus. Clarification and direction have been requested from the Centre Region COG. The issues have included: Provision of UAJA service connections to buildings and facilities located in Innovation Park, North Campus, and West Campus Allocation of treatment capacity at the UAJA plant for up to 600,000 gallons per day (GPD) generated by Penn State

22 Public Services & Environmental Committee Agenda July 6, 2017 Page 2 of 6 Measurement of the actual impact that a limited amount of PSU s sewage has on the UAJA s ability to serve the greater Centre Region and allow for growth Payment of tapping fees by the University The vast majority of wastewater from the University Park Campus is treated at the PSU plant, then conveyed to the Living Filter site where it is used to spray irrigate forest and cropland. The University has sufficient capacity at its treatment plant to meet its needs for the foreseeable future. However, sewage from Innovation Park, and parts of North and West Campus is collected and conveyed by gravity feed lines to the UAJA s Big Hollow Interceptor station, and ultimately to the UAJA treatment plant. This eliminates the need to pump the sewage uphill to a point where it can then be transmitted by gravity to the Penn State treatment plant. Penn State officials have asserted that a 1966 right-of-way agreement between the University and the predecessor to the UAJA, the Patton-Ferguson Joint Authority (PFJA), obligates the UAJA to allocate up to 600,000 GPD of treatment capacity for Penn State at the UAJA plant. However, the UAJA has indicated that the agreement was only related to conveyance, and that treatment capacity at the UAJA plant was not accounted for and must be specifically written into the Act 537 Plan. Based on Penn State s master planning documents, approximately 560,000 ft 2 of additional development is expected to occur in the areas outside of the University s sewer service area in North Campus, West Campus, and Innovation Park. These additional buildings are expected to generate approximately 33,000 GPD (187 EDUs) of sewage that would require treatment at the UAJA. The enclosed document provides updated mapping of Penn State s treatment plant service area, and recommends that the UAJA serve any buildings and facilities located outside of that area. Any buildings on the line would require a more thorough study of the topography of the area, and the University and the UAJA would need to agree on sewer service responsibilities. Any disagreements would potentially need to be brought before the COG Public Services and Environment Committee for resolution. In addition to service arrangements, another point of contention is the tapping fees that the UAJA collects whenever a new connection to the system is established. Tapping fees are based on Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDU), which are a measure of the expected flow of sanitary sewage equivalent to the amount that is typically generated by a single family home. The University has, on several occasions, requested waivers to the tapping fees because of the right-of-way agreement with the PFJA, which University officials believe exempts PSU from the tapping fees when connecting to the gravity line that is the subject of that agreement and serves a portion of North Campus.

23 Public Services & Environmental Committee Agenda July 6, 2017 Page 3 of 6 The enclosed report provides the following draft policies for discussion by the PSE Committee: Policy 1.0: The UAJA and Penn State University shall continue to maintain separate sewage treatment plants, but be part of a single Act 537 Plan. Policy 2.0: The UAJA shall continue to serve buildings and portions of campus that are not within the service area of the Penn State Wastewater Treatment Plant. Policy 3.0: Penn State shall be charged tapping fees from the most recent UAJA Rate Resolution for any new facilities that are connected to the UAJA sewer system, unless they utilize the gravity line that is the subject of the 1966 ROW agreement between the University and the Patton-Ferguson Joint Authority. Penn State shall also be charged tapping fees for all existing buildings connected to the UAJA system when they undergo a change of use that results in increased sewage flows. Flow estimates will be based upon equivalent dwelling units (EDUs). Policy 4.0: Penn State and the UAJA shall continue to informally coordinate activities and cooperate when needed to ensure public health and safety in the Centre Region. Both entities shall also participate in meetings of the Source Water Protection Agreement Project Management Team. To move forward, the Public Services and Environmental Committee should review the report and draft policies and provide a recommendation to the General Forum. ATTACHMENTS Draft Report: Sewer Service to Portions of Penn State University by the University Area Joint Authority 5. UPDATE ON THE PROPOSED AMERICORPS AND FULL-TIME PLANNER POSITION REQUESTS IN THE CRPA presented by Jim May At its April 24, 2017 meeting, the COG General Forum, as recommend by the Public Services and Environmental Committee endorsed putting the request to hire an AmeriCorps position in the 2018 Program Plan. This position would help to determine if there are opportunities for regional sustainability projects and develop a program to implement a sustainable projects. At its May 4, 2017 meeting, the PSE Committee discussed an item to consider hiring a full-time (FT) Planner position in lieu of hiring an AmeriCorps position. For the 2018 budget year, the CRPA Director asks the Committee to consider creating a FT Planner position in lieu of the AmeriCorps position. This FT Planner position, as recommended would work on the same issues proposed for the AmeriCorps position. The

24 Public Services & Environmental Committee Agenda July 6, 2017 Page 4 of 6 position would also provide a full-time employment opportunity to bring more long-term stability to the position and improve the ability to retain qualified staff in the CRPA. The CRPA Director recommends that the General Forum consider hiring a FT Planner position as the preferred alternative to support this effort. There is an opportunity to create a cost-effective, permanent full-time Planner position in the CRPA by combining two vacant part-time positions for about the same as it would cost to hire an AmeriCorps member. In the judgment of the CRPA Director, attempting to create successful regional-level sustainability program or projects should be led by a permanent full-time employee who will have the longevity to develop the community networks necessary to implement the recommendations of the General Forum. An AmeriCorps member could be hired as a temporary position to support the FT Planner position, if necessary in future years. A comparison of the two positions is provided below: What is the difference in duties between a temporary AmeriCorps position and a full-time permanent position? AmeriCorps Position This position would specifically be assigned to sustainability-related projects for the duration of employment with the CRPA (temporary position of one to two years). A new position would need to be created in 2020 or 2021, or other duties reassigned from existing staff to implement projects and activities, if components of a regional sustainability program are successful, and there is a desire to continue the programs and activities at a regional level in future years. Full-time Planner Position This position would be hired using the standard CRPA job description for a FT Planner. The position would be assigned initially to specific sustainability-related projects, sustainable transportation-related projects (about ten percent of the time), and would be able to work on other planning projects if sustainability-related work does not occupy a full-time position after an initial assessment of the potential for regional sustainability programs or activities. This alternative provides more flexibility and opportunity for long-term stability in the position. What is the hiring cycle? AmeriCorps Position The next cycle to apply to the Pennsylvania Mountain Service Corps (PMSC) for an AmeriCorps member begins in April The PMSC will review all submissions and notify those organizations that will become a host site. The position would start in August 2018.

25 Public Services & Environmental Committee Agenda July 6, 2017 Page 5 of 6 Full-time Planner Position If approved in the detailed budget, the FT Planner position could be recruited and hired by the CRPA in the first quarter of Is this a new position? AmeriCorps Position Yes, this would be a new full-time temporary position. Full-time Planner Position The Planner position would be created by combining two vacant PT positions. A PT Planner position that is approved for 25 hours/week and a PT Office Assistant that is approved for 20 hour/week. The CRPA Director anticipates not filling the PT Office Assistant position and increasing the number of hours from 25 to 40 hours/week for the Planner position, which will be vacated in late August What are the costs of the positions? AmeriCorps Position The AmeriCorps position is anticipated to cost $10,341 in 2018 (based upon figures as of June 2017). The Trump Administration has proposed to completely cut funding to the AmeriCorps Program in the next federal budget leaving some uncertainty as to the feasibility of the program. Full-time Planner Position The net cost of the FT Planner position is anticipated to be $15,319 in 2018 because the majority of funding for the position will be provided from salaries and benefits of existing part-time positions that will not be filled in Current funding for the existing PT positions amounts to $47,500 and an additional $7,882 is provided by the CCMPO. The total cost of the position is anticipated to be $70,701, of which $55,382 comes from existing funding sources. Total costs are estimated using the cost of family medical benefits. To move forward, the Public Services and Environmental Committee should discuss this proposal and determine if the CRPA should request a FT Planner position in lieu of the AmeriCorps position in the 2018 detailed budget. 6. SOURCE WATER PROTECTION AGREEMENT UPDATE presented by Jim May and Jim Steff Included in the Agenda packet for the June 26, 2017 General Forum meeting was a communication from the College Township Council Chair, Rich Francke, expressing Council s comments on the proposed UAJA Beneficial Reuse Expansion and the current

26 Public Services & Environmental Committee Agenda July 6, 2017 Page 6 of 6 Source Water Protection Agreement. Mr. Hameister asked that COG staff provide the Committee with additional background information on this topic. As requested this agenda item is presented for informational purposes only and does not require Committee action at this time. However, depending on the outcome of on-going discussions (see PMT below), there could be a future larger role for the COG in this area. The current Agreement was executed in 2003 and in the intervening 14 years many things have changed including the build-out of the beneficial reuse system, significant community growth, advancement in treatment and testing technologies, and heightened interest in protection of the groundwater and the long term fiscal standing of the Centre Region s water and sewer authorities. The parties to the Agreement are the University Area Joint Authority, College Township Water Authority and the State College Borough Water Authority. A Project Management Team (PMT) has been formed to update the Agreement to address current conditions and to set directions for the future. The PMT consists of representatives of the three Authorities, Penn State University and the COG staff. The PMT has met several times and discussions are on-going on how the Agreement should be revised. Mr. Francke s communication identifies three issues that should be addressed from College Township s point of view. 7. OTHER BUSINESS A. Matter of Record The next meeting of the PSE Committee is scheduled for Thursday, August 3, 2017 and will include updates on: the project to connect several municipalities, the COG, and several authorities with the KINBER fiber optics system; and discussions relating to the Source Water Protection Agreement. 8. ADJOURNMENT

27 CENTRE REGION COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS Centre Region Parks and Recreation 2643 Gateway Drive, Suite #1 State College, PA Phone: (814) Fax: (814) JOINT MEETING OF THE PARKS CAPITAL COMMITTEE AND THE CENTRE REGION PARKS AND RECREATION AUTHORITY COG General Forum Room Thursday, July 13, 2017 Regular Meeting 12:15pm AGENDA 1. CALL TO ORDER Vice-Chair Bruce Lord will convene the meeting. 2. CITIZEN COMMENTS Members of the public are invited to comment on any items not already on the agenda (five minutes per person time limit, please). Comments relating to specific items on the agenda should be deferred to that point in the meeting. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A copy of the minutes from the April 13, 2017 joint meeting of the COG Parks Capital Committee and Centre Region Parks and Recreation Authority is enclosed (attachment #1). 4. WHITEHALL ROAD REGIONAL PARK NEXT STEPS Ms. Salokangas will provide the Committee and the Authority with an update on activities relating to the Whitehall Road Regional Park Project. This report will include discussion of the following items: On February 27, Stahl Sheaffer Engineering (SSE) hosted the Scoping Meeting for the Whitehall Road Regional Park Traffic Impact Study (TIS). Meeting participants included three PennDOT staff, two Ferguson Township staff, State College Borough Engineer, three CRPR staff, COG Executive Director and two SSE staff. The purpose of the meeting was to reach agreement with the stakeholders on the TIS scope of work. When complete the TIS will identify the traffic and off-site improvements that are required in order to obtain the necessary approvals by PennDOT and Ferguson Township to construct the park. Changes were made to the TIS application, and PennDOT has approved the TIS. A copy of their approval, with signatures, is on file at this time. The TIS is based on the Phase 1A design proposal, and will include an evaluation of three intersections to determine if traffic signal improvements are needed. The three intersections are Whitehall Road and Blue Course Drive (Ferguson Township), Whitehall Road and Waupelani Drive (State College Borough), and Blue Course Drive and Bristol Avenue (Ferguson Township). At the March 16 Authority meeting, the board opted to hold on the TIS until there were results from the Commonwealth Court hearing. Stahl Sheafer was notified of this decision. 1

28 Joint Meeting Agenda July 13, 2017 Page 2 It is important to note that the TIS is required to be done while Penn State University and the State College Area School District are in session. Therefore, the TIS may not happen until the Fall, depending on when the Commonwealth Court results are known. Pam Salokangas, Jeff Hall, and Jim Steff presented an updated status report to the Central PA Convention and Visitor s Bureau on February 21. Staff discussed the status of the three phases, the on-going litigation, and the overall budget (including the additional funds needed if synthetic turf and ballfield lights were added to the project, which still remains over budget at this time). The information was well-received and Pam followed up with the CPCVB on February 22. The CPCVB staff indicated that the board members were gathering questions which were forwarded to Pam; she provided additional information prior to their March 21 board meeting. Pam discussed the CPCVB proposal with the retiring Executive Director just before she left her position and received feedback; it was requested that CRPR return in the Fall with an update for the CPCVB Board once the new Executive Director has been hired. Jeff Hall and Pam Salokangas continue to conduct follow-ups with several users groups, including Centre Soccer, State College Warriors Lacrosse (formerly known as Centre Lacrosse), Centre Bulldogs, State College Little Lions, and others who we originally approached about private donations toward the addition of synthetic turf and ballfield lights. The Commonwealth Court hearing on the Springton Pointe (Toll Brothers) project was held on March 6. There should be a judge s ruling was announced on May 17, ruling in favor of Toll Brothers. An appeal to the PA Supreme Court was filed on June 16, 2017 by the Nittany Valley Water Coalition; a copy of the docket sheet is enclosed (attachment #2). On June 29, 2017, Springton Pointe filed their Answer to Petition for Allowance of Appeal. At this time, we are awaiting the Supreme Court s decision on whether or not the court will hear the case. The Regional Park Loan amendment was approved at the General Forum meeting on Monday, May 22, Next steps for this project will become more clear once the Supreme Court s decision is known. 5. PARKS AND RECREATION REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE STUDY At the May 22 General Forum meeting and at the June 15 CRPR Authority meeting, the final members of the Steering Committee were chosen. At this time, the Steering Committee members include: 2

29 Joint Meeting Agenda July 13, 2017 Page 3 Organization Name Affiliation State College Borough Tom Daubert Council College Township Eric Bernier Council Ferguson Township Laura Dininni Board Halfmoon Township Kim Hyeseon Township Parks + Rec Board Harris Township Bruce Lord Board Patton Township Susan Wheeler Township Staff Centre Region Parks and Recreation Authority Chris Hurley Authority Chair Centre Region Parks and Recreation Agency Pam Salokangas Agency Director All members of the Steering Committee will receive a Welcome Letter outlining the overall responsibilities of the committee and the tentative next steps. Ms. Salokangas will be distributing some materials for Committee members to review before the first Steering Committee meeting, which will be held at the end of August or in early September. 6. MILLBROOK MARSH NATURE CENTER (MMNC): SCEB PHASE II DEVELOPMENT The Millbrook Marsh Nature Center Advisory Committee and MMNC Staff have been working very hard these past few months to fund the SCEB Phase II Development. As discussed previously, the MMNC staff applied for a $350,000 DCNR grant, which requires a 50% match of $350,000, to fund a portion of this development project. The grant application was made in April 2017 and award notifications will be coming in November The MMNC Advisory Committee is tasked with raising the $350,000 grant match plus the remaining $1,000,000 for the total $1.7 million project. Melissa Kauffman, Nature Center Supervisor will provide an update on this fundraising to date as well as plans for additional grant opportunities and the timeline for those applications. Additionally, the MMNC Advisory Committee visited each municipality in April and May, making a presentation on the Phase II Development of the SCEB and requesting that each municipality set aside capital funding for this project, either in the current budget if it was available or in the 2018 budget. The capital funding levels for the initial SCEB project were provided to each municipality during those presentations, and the Advisory Committee asked each municipality to fund either at the same level or higher. The Advisory Committee received constructive feedback from the elected officials, including the question of whether or not individual financial requests to the municipalities were the best method as opposed to making these requests via the MMNC Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), and if the current timing was 3

30 ideal since each municipality was in the midst of the 2017 budget and the 2018 budget process wouldn t start until later this year. Over the course of the last two-three years and during these presentations, there was discussion for developing a municipal-funded Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the MMNC. Therefore, as part of the 2018 COG/Authority budget process, a draft MMNC Capital Improvement Plan was developed that now includes donations, grants, and municipal contributions. This revised draft budget includes new projects, of which the SCEB Phase II Development Project is included, and replacement projects which includes capital items like the barn roof or the boardwalk repair. The replacement section notes municipal contributions beginning in 2018 and the amounts are placeholders as it is unclear to what level the municipalities would be willing to fund. A copy of the DRAFT MMNC Capital Improvement Plan is enclosed (attachment #3). At this time, CRPR staff are looking for direction from the Parks Capital Committee members regarding feedback from the Advisory Board s presentations; has there been any discussions among the municipal boards regarding funding levels for the SCEB Phase II Development s capital requests, or has there been any feedback on whether the individual requests vs. the capital improvement budget is the more appropriate method for the funding stream? Currently, the 2018 Program Plan and CIP Program is in draft format and was presented to the Finance Committee on July 6, Comments from Finance Committee members are due back in August, and then the 2018 Detailed Budget process will begin. Receiving feedback from this Committee and encouraging this Committee to discuss this item during the Program Plan review period will be helpful in providing direction to CRPR as it progresses through the 2018 budget process. 7. OTHER BUSINESS A. Matter of Record The next joint meeting between the Parks Capital Committee and the Centre Region Parks & Recreation Authority is scheduled for August 10, 2017, at 12:15pm in the COG General Forum. 8. ADJOURNMENT Enclosures: Attachment #1 April 13, 2017 Meeting Summary Attachment #2 Springton Pointe Supreme Court Docket Sheet, 409 MAL 2017 Attachment #3 DRAFT MMNC Capital Improvement Plan 4

31 Manager s Report July 17, Staff and By Design, LLC are currently finalizing the Building Master Plan to design interior renovations to the Township building to accommodate current and future staffing needs. The Board can expect a presentation from the design architect at a future meeting. 2. Coffee and Conversation is scheduled for Friday, July 21 st at the Naked Egg Café in Pine Grove Mills. The Police Chief and Township Manager will be in attendance along with Representatives Kerry Benninghoff and Rich Irvin, and a representative from Senator Corman s office. 3. The 118 th Pennsylvania Municipal League Annual Summit is Thursday, October 5 th through Saturday, October 7 th in Erie. Board members interested in attending should notify the Manager by Friday, July 28 th to allow time to register and secure overnight accommodations. 4. The public comment period for an update to the Centre Region Act 537 Sewage Facilities Plan has been announced and will conclude at 5:00 p.m. on Monday, August 28 th. The notice is provided with this report. A copy of the draft amendment is available online and for review at the Ferguson Township Municipal Building. The update is for the extension of beneficial reuse water lines to Harris Township. No changes are proposed in the update within Ferguson Township; however, should the Board wish to discuss and comment on the update, the Board may place this item on the evening s agenda or on the August 7 th Regular Meeting agenda.

32 TOWNSHIP OF FERGUSON 3147 Research Drive State College, Pennsylvania Telephone: Fax: Public Works Director s Report to the Board of Supervisors for the regular meeting on July 17, Roads in Capital Improvement Plan Staff and Board members conducted a road tour on July 11 th to review roads proposed for improvement. 2. Oak Wilt Mitigation is underway. Purchase orders were issued to Bartlett Tree Experts for tree removal and disposal, stump grinding, trenching, and root flare injections of surrounding trees. 3. LEED Gold Public Works Building: A LEED charrette is planned for July 26 th. Staff requests attendance by Peter Buckland. 4. Pollutant Reduction Plan (Chesapeake Bay and impaired waterways (Slab Cabin Run)): MS4 partner engineers met with our consultant, NTM, to continue working on BMP selection and discuss potential cost sharing between partners on various projects such as the channel stabilization of Thompson Run upstream of the Duck Pond. Once the final report is received from NTM, a presentation will be provided to the Board. 5. West College Avenue Streetscape Sidewalk Project: Work by the Township s contractor, M and B Services, LLC continues. Sidewalk is being installed on the north side of W College Ave near N Butz Street. A number of change orders have been issued to cover increases in quantity and unexpected conditions. Work is within the grant amount for construction. 6. Stormwater Fee Feasibility Study Awaiting kick off meeting with Amec Foster Wheeler. 7. Contract 2016-C11 ARLE Performance Metrics: This 2017 project, funded by the Automated Red Light Enforcement program, includes the engineering and construction of a system including hardware and software to improve traffic signal performance. 8. Contract 2016-C17 Fairbrook Park Parking Lot Paving: GOH started paving. Work to be completed includes the final wearing course and bumper blocks. Staff plans to plant trees in the spring of Contract 2016-C19 Corl Street/W College Ave Traffic Signal Upgrade: Funded in part with a Green Light Go grant, this project is currently in design to upgrade pedestrian accommodations at this location. Construction is planned for Contract 2017-C2 Valley Vista/Science Park and Bachman/Valley Vista turn lanes: This contract was awarded to GOH and is under construction. Work is expected to continue through early August. - A Home Rule Municipality -

33 11. Contract 2017-C3 Martin Street: The paving contract was awarded to GOH and paving is planned for mid-july. Pipe lining is planned for July 24 th and traffic impacts should be minimal since the road does not need to be excavated to do the pipe lining. 12. Contract 2017-C5 Meadows Park Improvements: Work includes the construction of a pavilion and pedestrian access. See separate award memorandum. 13. Contract 2017-C9 Microsurfacing: This contract was awarded to APS. Work is expected to take place in July and August. Affected residents will be sent notices in advance by the Township. In addition, the contractor installs no parking signs and places door hangers to notify residents of upcoming work. 14. Contract 2017-C10 Sealcoating bikepaths and parking lots: Every year the Township evaluates bikepath and parking lot conditions and prepares a contract and lets bids for a double sealcoat application and line striping. Awaiting return of a signed agreement and bonds prior to setting up a pre-construction meeting. 15. Contract 2017-C11 Pedestrian push button upgrades: As in years past, the Township continues to upgrade pedestrian access at signalized intersections. Work is done by FTPW. 16. Contract 2017-C12 Traffic Signal LED replacements: Each year the Township purchases LEDs and replaces them at signalized intersections after approximately 7 years of service. Work is performed by FTPW. 17. Contact 2017-C16 Oak Wilt Treatment: See above narrative. Additional oak wilt abatement is expected under this contract. 18. Contract 2017-C17 Lois Silvi Baseball Field Improvements: Utilizing DCNR funding, improvements to the complex include construction of paved ADA parking and path, a concrete pad under the pavilion, sidewalk, removal of existing building(s), and installation of stormwater facilities in the fall or in Contract 2017-C18 Haymarket Park Playground Improvements: Work includes the replacement of an existing play structure. Staff prepares a contract for work by a certified playground installer. 20. Contract 2017-C19 Fairbrook Park Baseball Backstop: A new backstop is planned for Contract 2017-C20 Tudek Dog Park Improvements: Staff has been tasked with the design of a new parking lot for the dog park with ADA parking and connecting sidewalk,

34 landscaping, stormwater facilities, and a monument sign. The project is to be constructed in Contract 2017-C21 Tudek Park waterline: This project includes the design and construction of a new water service to the butterfly garden. Quotes were requested. A purchase order will be issued to Ameron Construction for this work. 23. Contract 2017-P3 Tudek Park restroom: This work includes installing a water fountain and pressure pump inside the restroom at Tudek Park. A purchase order was issued to Allied Mechanical. 24. Contract C22 Meckley Road Paving: This project was awarded to New Enterprise Stone and Lime. Paving is planned for August. FTPW is currently replacing a cross pipe and performing base repair. 25. Contract 2017-C25 Park Drinking Fountain Upgrade Program: Staff designed and is receiving and reviewing quotes to replace the drinking fountain in Park Hills playground. 26. Contract 2017-C26 Sidewalk Repairs: Inspections are complete and repair notices have been mailed. Each year FTPW staff inspects a portion of the sidewalks (approximately ¼) in the Township right of way. A contract is put out to bid and awarded to a contractor to repair those sidewalks not repaired by residents. 27. Contract 2017-P2 Stormpipe Video Assessment: Each year staff puts out a contract to video and document the condition of storm pipes in advance of capital projects to determine replacement and maintenance needs. 28. East Park Hills Avenue Traffic Calming Study Staff continues to evaluate the feasibility of options (in addition to the those identified in the initial study) including speed humps and the feasibility of small traffic circles. 29. Arborist and Ferguson Township Tree Commission: The next meeting is July 17 th at which time the FTTC will tour the Township viewing potential tree removal sites. 30. Maintenance Section: Work includes road side mowing, finalization of base repair on Meckley Road, start of base repair on Tadpole Road, various work orders including sign installations, and equipment and vehicle maintenance.

35 TOWNSHIP OF FERGUSON 3147 Research Drive State College, Pennsylvania Telephone: Fax: Planning & Zoning Director s Report Monday, July 17, 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION The Ferguson Township Planning Commission cancelled their meeting on July 10 th, 2017 as the Planning Commission will resume their meeting schedule on July 24, LAND DEVELOPMENT PLANS AND OTHER PROJECTS An Active Plan List is attached for the Board of Supervisors consideration (7/12/17). Unofficial Planning Commission Minutes from the June 26, 2017 meeting. - A Home Rule Municipality -

36 TOWNSHIP OF FERGUSON 3147 Research Drive State College, Pennsylvania Telephone: Fax: TO: FROM: Ferguson Township Board of Supervisors Lindsay K. Schoch, Community Planner Raymond J. Stonlinas, AICP, Planning & Zoning Director DATE: July 12, 2017 SUBJECT: Active Plans in the Township In order to keep the Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors up-to-date on the current developments taking place, staff is providing a list of Active Plans in the Township. Currently, the Township has five (5) Active Plans, four (4) have not been heard by the Board and one (1) has been conditionally approved. They are as follows: West Cherry Lane Multi-Use Building Lot Consolidation Plan & Land Development Plan: This submission, made on April 3, 2017 by Penn Terra Engineering, Inc., on behalf of HFL Corporation proposes a Lot Consolidation and Final Land Development Plan. This proposal will first combine three (3) existing properties, creating a acre parcel. Five (5) of the existing structures on the property will be removed, making room for the development of a 3-story, 10,100 square foot multi-use building, as well as a 4-bay garage. This property is located at 1217 North Atherton Street. Plan Expiration: September 26, A Zoning Hearing was held on June 27, The Appeal of the Zoning Administrator s interpretation of the definition of Multi-Family and Variance were both denied by the Zoning Hearing Board. No Update JL Cidery at JL Farms Land Development Plan: This submission, made on February 24, 2017 by HLA Architects, LLC. on behalf of Dr. John W. LeClair is proposing the change of use of two (2) existing agricultural buildings into buildings that will provide for the production and sale of hard cider made on site. The site currently contains a single family home/business, several green houses, a pond, driveway, apple orchards and a vineyard. A Variance was granted by the Township Zoning Hearing Board July 28, 2015 to allow an orchard use and a Cidery use on the 31-acre lot, and a dimensional variance of 26 acres from the maximum 5-acre lot area to allow the Cidery and winery (including tasting and sales room). This property is located at 3392 Shingletown Road, State College, PA. Plan Expiration: August 16, A Variance was granted for relief from the requirements for Buffer Yards on the property. Penn Terra is in the process of working on the remaining comments and will submit to staff for review. Staff received an from S. Etters inquiring about Land Development Requirements for this use. A call was returned on June 30. No further update is available.

37 CSC Northland/Proposed Commercial Development-Buffalo Wild Wings/Corner of North Atherton and Blue Course Drive: This Plan was submitted on December 12, CSC Northland, LP is proposing to develop a portion of a 3.55-acre parcel with a 5,440 SF restaurant. The site will also contain related site amenities and improvements inclusive of parking, access roadways, lighting, landscaping, utilities, and stormwater management facilities. Plan Expiration is 9/11/2017 Plan is on hold; Applicant is reevaluating traffic improvements. Staff requested an update of the status of the Plan, Bohler Engineering is still indicating the plan is on hold and will notify us when they want to move forward. No Update. The Cottages at State College Final PRD, located at the intersection of Whitehall Road and Blue Course Drive: This Final Planned Residential Development (PRD) Plan was submitted on March 3, 2015, Conditionally Approved by the Board of Supervisors on November 17, At the time of Conditional Approval, the Plan had 45-days to be recorded (December 31, 2015). A 90-day time extension was approved by the Board of Supervisors on December 14, 2015, allowing the conditions to be met and Plan to be recorded on or before March 31, An Appeal to the County Court of Common Pleas was filed on December 15, 2015 and on July 18, 2016, Judge Jonathan Grine reversed and vacated the Final Approval of the PRD Plan. This decision was then appealed to the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court on March 6, 2017, where the decision of the County Court was reversed and the Commonwealth ruled in favor of the developer. The decision by the Commonwealth Court was appealed. On June 16, 2017, Petitioners filed a Petition for Allowance of Appeal to the PA Supreme Court, Ferguson Township notified the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania that it will not be filing an answer to the Petition dated June 29, 2017 and Springton Pointe, LP filed a response to Petition for Allowance of Appeal on the same date. Now the Pennsylvania Supreme Court will decide if they will choose to hear the Appeal of the Commonwealth Court decision. Plan Expiration is still yet to be determined based upon a decision made by the PA Supreme Court. Whitehall Road Regional Park: This Plan was first submitted on June 21, Centre Region Parks and Recreation (CRPR) is proposing a 100-acre regional park on Whitehall Road via the proposed Blue Course Drive extension, including a mix of baseball fields, soccer fields, basketball courts, basketball courts, a dog park, an area for community gardens, an indoor turf facility, a future centralized CRPR maintenance facility and agency. Plan Expiration: September 30, CRPR is working with Stahl Sheaffer on a Feasibility Study, but has asked them to hold off on any plans until the outcome of The Cottages is determined by the PA Supreme Court.

38 FERGUSON TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES MONDAY, JUNE 26, :00 PM I. ATTENDANCE The Planning Commission held its regular meeting of the month on Monday, June 26, 2017 at the Ferguson Township Municipal Building. In attendance were: Commission: Marc McMaster, Chairman Rob Crassweller, Vice Chair Ralph Wheland Lisa Strickland Bill Keough Eric Scott, absent Andrea Harman, absent Cristin Mitchell, alternate Staff: Ray Stolinas, Director of Planning & Zoning-absent Lindsay Schoch, Community Planner Jeff Ressler, Zoning Administrator Others in attendance were: Marcella Bell, Recording Secretary; Derek Anderson, Residential Housing Development LLC; Peter Crowley, Land Design; Charles Suhr, Stevens & Lee; Brian Heiser, State College Borough Water Authority; Andy Arnold, Gwin, Dobson & Foreman; Ken Beldin, Gwin, Dobson & Foreman; Fran Jones, Private Skate Park in the TSD; David Vandenbugh, Pine Hall TTD Text Amendment; Jeremie Thompson, Ferguson Township Resident; Deanna Nardozzo, Toll Brothers Appeal; Anne Fry, Toll Brothers Appeal; Mary Lou Pae, Toll Brothers Appeal; Joe Green, Ferguson Township Solicitor; Dwight Ferguson, Circleville Road Partners Solicitor; and David Pribulka, Ferguson Township Manager II. III. IV. CALL TO ORDER Mr. McMaster called the June 26, 2017 Planning Commission meeting to order at 6:00 p.m. CITIZEN INPUT There was no citizens input. STATE COLLEGE BOROUGH WATER AUTHORITY (SCBWA) PROPOSED TEXT AMENDMENT Ms. Schoch stated that on May 25, 2017, the State College Borough Water Authority (SCBWA) submitted an application proposing changes to both Chapter 26 (Stormwater Management) and Chapter 27 (Zoning). The SCBWA has an interest in constructing a new Water Treatment Facility on tax parcel F in Ferguson Township and the current regulations do not allow for this use. On March 28, 2017, the SCBWA went before the Zoning Hearing Board with a variance request, and the Zoning Hearing Board denied the request. The SCBWA has decided to take a different route since the variance was denied and is now requesting an ordinance change to allow the Water Treatment Facility in the Rural Agricultural (RA) Zoning District. This is an opportunity for the Planning Commission to take time and review the amendment while staff prepares a thorough analysis and response to the proposed ordinance change. Ms. Schoch then opened the floor for any questions or comments.

39 Ferguson Township Planning Commission June 26, 2017 Page 2 The discussion centered around the proposed text amendment for Chapter P. The proposed text amendment includes any form of essential service to be permitted as a conditional use by the Board of Supervisors. It was also proposed to revise the use tables (Tables , , , and ) to include essential services as a conditional use. The Commission members were concerned about including all essential services in the proposed text amendment because the requirements that might be needed for a sewer service plant would be vastly different than the requirements for a water treatment facility. Mr. Brian Heiser of the SCBWA stated that their intention was not to propose a text amendment to strictly benefit the SCBWA, but also benefit other essential services. Mr. Hesier stated that the SCBWA could certainly tailor the text amendments specifically to the water authority s needs. Mr. Ressler stated that he is opposed to the text amendments, specifically allowing the SCBWA to build in the floodplain. The Township does not allow anyone to build in the floodplain and Mr. Ressler is concerned that there would be issues if the Township allows the water authority to build in the floodplain. The Planning Commission provided the following comments: Mr. Crassweller stated that on page two of the SCBWA s application, number 7 mentions having a 400-foot setback from all adjacent properties; however, number 12 on the same page states that the minimum lot size shall be one (1) acre. The Planning Commission requested that the SCBWA go back to the drawing board and create text amendments that only pertain to what the water authority needs to build the Water Treatment Facility. The Commission felt that the proposed text amendment was too broad and could be problematic for other essential services. Mr. Crassweller stated that a maximum of 75% impervious coverage could be problematic. Define essential service as it related to the proposed text amendments. The Planning Commission requested that the SCBWA provide a strike through copy to easily see the changes from the current ordinance and the proposed text amendments. There was concern about the impact that the proposed text amendments might have on the ordinance itself, as well as other entities that want to build in the floodplain. Mr. McMaster was concerned that the property in question would not be covered under the National Floodplain Insurance. Mr. Crassweller was concerned that Township staff would not have the resources to conduct a hydrological analysis. Define laboratory as it relates to the proposed text amendment. The Planning Commission would like to schedule a work session to review all of the proposed text amendments as to not tie up regular meeting times.

40 Ferguson Township Planning Commission June 26, 2017 Page 3 Township Planning & Zoning staff will review the comments provided and provide a thorough analysis and response to review at a meeting in July. V. PROPOSED TRADITIONAL TOWN DEVELOPMENT (TTD) ORDINANCE AMENDMENT Ms. Schoch stated that on March 16, 2017, Charles M. Suhr, on behalf of Residential Housing Development LLC, submitted an application proposing changes to the Traditional Town Development (TTD) section of the Zoning Ordinance. On Thursday, June 22, 2017, an updated letter and amended application was submitted. Staff had the opportunity to meet with Derek Anderson and Michael Pratt and discussed, in detail, each proposed amendment. Early in June, Planning & Zoning staff sent the Planning Commission members a packet of information regarding Pine Hall and the events leading up to this point. At this time, staff feels the amendment is acceptable to move forward to the Board of Supervisors so the project can move forward. Land Design, Inc. will be present to make a presentation, describing the proposed amendments. Ms. Schoch turned the floor over to Mr. Charles Suhr and Mr. Peter Crowley. Mr. Suhr stated that the Planning Commission last saw the ordinance amendment at the May 8, 2017 meeting. Since then, the Commission has heard a presentation from Mr. Dwight Ferguson and his land use planning consultant, Steven Victor. After the presentation from the Circleville Road Partners representatives, the Pine Hall representatives revised the proposed text amendments to minimize some the changes that were being requested while still being able to implement the overall goal of the project. Mr. Suhr referred to the history sheet located in the agenda packet of how Pine Hall has arrived at this point in time with the proposed text amendments. Mr. Suhr stated that zoning ordinances are living documents that are meant to be changed, developed, and meant to be reactive and proactive. Mr. Suhr turned the floor over to Mr. Crowley for a short presentation. Mr. Crowley referred to the projector and showed several of the towns and areas that Land Design has worked with to create traditional town developments. The images he showed are the design manual interpretations that Pine Hall representatives felt represented the Township s specifications. He reiterated that the goal of the of the TTD ordinance is encourage innovation; promote flexibility, economy, ingenuity, and development. Mr. Crowley feels that over the past 18 months, staff and Pine Hall representatives have come up with a good product that shows the values of the community, as well as how a place can be created, designed, and built that works in the market. 10 key elements came out of the design charrette that Township staff held with Pine Hall representatives, the Planning Commission, the Board of Supervisors, and several community members that have been incorporated into the plan. Providing a diverse community, preserving open space, and vibrancy were just a few of the key elements that came from the charrette. Mr. Crowley stated that the proposed text amendment really just accommodates the master plan of Pine Hall, which reflects the community vision. The intention of Pine Hall is to sell the for sale homes, to operate the retail, and to be a long-term tax payer in Ferguson Township.

41 Ferguson Township Planning Commission June 26, 2017 Page 4 Mr. Suhr reviewed the biggest changes to the proposed text amendment from the last time the Planning Commission saw the proposed text amendments: In section A(1)-Changed the five (5) unrelated people to four (4) unrelated people. In Section A(2), regarding the percent of commercial structures with two (2) or more stories the percentage was 25% and has been changed to 35%. In Section A(2), regarding the maximum number of stories on a residential unit the number changed from no more than three (3) stories to no more than eight (8) to allow for higher density. In Section C(1)(e), section 10 was deleted. There was a limitation of 24 condominium units in a single structure. That limitation was removed to allow for greater density. In Section C(1)(e), regarding the maximum number of townhouse structures that may be located adjacent to each other when townhouse dwellings are established on individual lots the number changed from ten (10) to six (6). In Section D(1), regarding the percentage of the front façade on the ground floor of non-residential structures a minimum percentage of 50% of transparency (consisting of window or door openings to allow views into and out of the interior) is being proposed for all non-residential structures except for grocery stores, pharmacies, and hotels. The Planning Commission provided a few comments: Ms. Mitchell expressed her thanks to the Pine Hall developers for being responsive in their revised text amendments by lowering the unrelated persons rule to four (4) or less per unit. She added that she is concerned about the 85% allowable impervious coverage. Ms. Mitchell clarified that the number of unrelated people that can reside in a multi-family dwelling unit depends on the housing code which comes from the Centre Region Council of Governments Codes Office. Mr. Keough stated that while it may not be suitable to place in the text amendments, he is concerned about the continuity of management onsite and addressing changes of ownership and management. He stated that this plan needs to maintain and achieve a sense of community, which is a major part of the intent of the TTD ordinance. Ms. Strickland stated that she appreciates the effort of the Pine Hall developers to get the plan right. She also appreciates receiving the Pine Hall history from back in She is still concerned about the totality of the zoning ordinance changes. It is Ms. Strickland s opinion that the revised text amendments have not changed much from the last version, especially with the four (4) vs. five (5) unrelated persons rule. Ms. Strickland agrees with Mr. Keough about the continuity of management and the transition of retail spaces. She stated that there is nothing nostalgic about student housing, and it s not as if there isn t development/retail in other parts of the Township.

42 Ferguson Township Planning Commission June 26, 2017 Page 5 Mr. Crassweller asked clarifying questing regarding what common management means regarding 100 or more dwelling units, the percentage of total acreage in Section B(1), and off-street parking pertaining to a snow emergency in Section E(1) After receiving comments, Attorney. Dwight Ferguson, Turnberry Solicitor, was invited up to speak. Attorney Ferguson asked the Planning Commission why it is thinking about recommending the proposed text amendments to the Board of Supervisors for approval. He went on to ask if the Planning Commission has been persuaded that the Pine Hall developers cannot build their plan without modifications. He stated that if the Commission believes that Pine Hall cannot be built without modifications, then modifications should be the first step of recommending an ordinance change to the Board of Supervisors; however, if the Planning Commission doesn t believe that, then they should rethink the text amendment recommendation. Attorney Ferguson stated that by going through the text amendment process, both the Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors are stripping themselves of discretion. He stated that Pine Hall wants to make their modifications the laws so that the Board of Supervisors don t have any discretion, whereas the current ordinance allows the Board to consider each of the requests as a modification. Attorney Ferguson claimed that the Planning Commission is being boot strapped. In response to a question from Mr. Keough regarding the granting of modifications, Attorney Ferguson explained that every time the Pine Hall developers wanted to make a change to the ordinance, they would have to present it to the Board of Supervisors for consideration. Attorney Ferguson stated that Pine Hall can request modifications without changing the current ordinance. He went on to explain that on page three of the TTD Design Manual, it states When there are standards that use the term shall, compliance is required unless it can be demonstrated that an acceptable alternative one or more of the following conditions: the alternative better achieves the stated intent, the intent which the standards was created to address will not be achieved by application of the standard in this particular circumstance, the application of other standards and guidelines to achieve stated intents will be significantly improved by not applying this standard, and unique site factors make the standard impractical or cost prohibitive. Attorney Ferguson stated that yes, the Turnberry Development received many of the modifications that Pine Hall is seeking via the text amendments which was done by modification requests through the Board of Supervisors. He stated that if the text amendments were made law, the Board of Supervisors could not carefully review the plan and compare it to the TTD ordinance. Mr. Keough stated that the Planning Commission and Ferguson Township staff were under the impression that modification requests were not the right procedure. Mr. McMaster stated that the Planning Commission has gone back and forth regarding whether or not modifications or text amendments were the appropriate process, so it s confusing. Mr. McMaster added that he believes it was Attorney Ferguson s client (Turnberry) that stated modifications were not the right avenue and requested that the Pine Hall developers ask for text amendments to the zoning ordinance.

43 Ferguson Township Planning Commission June 26, 2017 Page 6 Attorney Ferguson referred to the proposed language for page three of the TTD Design Manual, The Board of Supervisors may allow for modification of the design standards and criteria applicable to a Traditional Town Development provided for in this Section , including, but not limited to compactness, pedestrian orientation, street geometry or other related design features, in accordance with the standards applicable to the grant of modifications under Chapter 22, Subdivision and Land Development, He stated that the Municipalities Planning Code (MPC), which is state law, with regard to Traditional Town Developments (TTDs), says you may modify design standards. He explained that the proposed text under section three allows the Board to modify the criteria in addition to design standards, which goes beyond what state law permits. Attorney Ferguson explained that if the aforementioned proposed text only referenced to the design standards and did not include criteria, it would be legal and he would not challenge it in court. It was of his opinion that the proposed text is too broad and goes beyond the power that the Board of Supervisors has been given under the MPC. He went on to state that the Board can only grant modifications to design standards and nothing else. Attorney Ferguson stated that at every meeting he s been to regarding the Pine Hall Development, there is a heartwarming, tear jerking, and beautiful panorama presentation of other towns that have been designed; however, the Planning Commission does not have possession of these presentations, nor a conceptual plan. He stated that the Planning Commission does not know if the text amendments are even needed since they have never seen a plan, which is why he believes the ordinance calls for the plans to be seen first, and if necessary, modifications could then be requested. Attorney Ferguson stated that Pine Hall developers should be able to present plans that show why they need modifications or text amendments. In response to a question from Mr. Keough regarding Turnberry s modifications, Attorney Ferguson clarified that yes, Turnberry presented a master plan and then requested modifications. Mr. Keough stated that Pine Hall first sought to request modifications, but it was determined that the Ferguson Township ordinance did not actually give the Board of Supervisors the power to grant modifications, thus recommending that Pine Hall request text amendments. Mr. McMaster asked what Turnberry s objection was to Pine Hall when they first presented their plan and requested modifications. Attorney Ferguson stated that their objection was that Pine Hall was not being held to the same standards as Turnberry. Mr. McMaster stated that it was at that point that a representative of Turnberry recommended that Pine Hall pursue text amendments instead of modifications, since they were not legal through the ordinance. Attorney Ferguson stated that modifications do not apply to everything, only design standards, and Turnberry felt that some of the modifications that Pine Hall was seeking was best achieved through a zoning variance. Township Manager, David Pribulka, stated that he thought Attorney Ferguson characterized the applicability of modifications accurately. He explained that inserting the modification language, which the MPC enables, into the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance applies to the TTD district. Municipalities can put modification language into the TTD ordinance that would relieve applicants from having to abide by

44 Ferguson Township Planning Commission June 26, 2017 Page 7 the design guidelines if they met certain criteria. Mr. Pribulka stated that staff plans to place the design guidelines in the Subdivision and Land Development Ordinance as an alternate, so this way the modification language being proposed applies. Any modifications requested from the text of the ordinance amendment is intended to be done through variances or text amendments to the ordinance overall. Variances are stricter, whereas modifications are more flexible. Attorney Ferguson agreed with Mr. Pribulka s statements. Mr. Pribulka clarified that when requesting text amendments, the typical procedure starts with the text amendment application and then a land development plan is submitted after the fact. Attorney Ferguson replied that the Township should not even consider a text amendment until a plan is presented that justifies the text amendment requests. Attorney Ferguson addressed Mr. Keough s concerns about having a sense of community within the Pine Hall plan, stating that he doesn t believe it will be traditional families moving into single-family homes instead it will be students with pricey cars, similar to what has happened in the Turnberry development. He wondered why the Planning Commission would consider exacerbating the problem, regarding the proposed text amendment that would allow four (4) unrelated people in one dwelling unit. He questioned why the proposed text amendment depicts a 5% minimum of single-family dwelling units, when the only way there will be a sense of community is if people who plan to stay in the area move into the development. Attorney Ferguson asked why the Planning Commission would allow the Pine Hall developers to maximize the percentage of multi-family units to 50% and reduce the percentage of single-family dwelling units. He explained that the Pine Hall text amendments propose to decrease the lot sizes to build more houses, increase impervious coverage, increase the population, decrease the garage setbacks, increase the commercial footprint, increase the number of residential units, and decrease the useful greenspace. Attorney Ferguson stated that this area is a rural community and what is being proposed at Pine Hall is for an urban area. The retail space being proposed is a regional retail space, instead of being scaled for the Pine Hall community. In response to a question from Mr. Keough, Attorney Ferguson stated that his objection to the Pine Hall Development is that the Planning Commission is being shown beautiful pictures of other places and is being asked to change the ordinance without ever seeing a plan. Attorney Ferguson stated that the pictures being shown are the antithesis to the TTD ordinance, and Ms. Strickland stated that she agreed with that comment. Mr. McMaster stated that in every meeting with the Pine Hall Developers, they have explained why they cannot build the Pine Hall development under the current TTD Ordinance. Attorney Ferguson replied that they have only said that the Planning Commission has not actually received a plan that demonstrates that. Mr. McMaster stated that the Planning Commission has seen a sketch plan of Pine Hall. Attorney Ferguson replied that when he did a right-to-know request to the Township, the sketch plan was not included. Mr. Pribulka explained that the Township has received a concept plan, but not an actual general master plan. Attorney Ferguson asked if the sketch plan persuades the Planning Commission to think that the Pine Hall Developers cannot build their plan any other way. Mr. McMaster reiterated that at each meeting, the Pine Hall

45 Ferguson Township Planning Commission June 26, 2017 Page 8 Developers have explained why they cannot build their development under the current TTD Ordinance. Mr. Pribulka referred to a memo that the Township Solicitor, Joe Green, wrote regarding the modifications that were granted to the original general master plan of Pine Hall. There has been a question to whether or not the modifications granted to that plan can be transferred to the new master plan that will be submitted by the Pine Hall developers. It was of the opinion of Attorney Green that there was no enabling ability to transfer those modifications from the original master plan to a new general master plan, unless the Board of Supervisors determines that the new master plan, when submitted, has significantly deviated from the original master plan. If it has, the modifications granted to the original Pine Hall Master Plan will not carry over to the new master plan. In response to a question from Mr. Keough, Attorney Ferguson stated that his client (Turnberry) would be harmed if the proposed text amendments were to be approved by the Board of Supervisors. He stated that his client was held to the standards of the Township s TTD ordinance and presented a general master plan and then went to the Board of Supervisors to request modifications. It was of his opinion that his client would get buried if the Pine Hall Development received special legislation, especially since the Planning Commission has yet to see an actual plan of what s being proposed at Pine Hall. He believes that if Section , section three is approved, it would give the Board of Supervisors authority to grant modifications outside of the design manual, which surpasses what state legislation allows. Mr. Crassweller stated that Turnberry has only built student housing. Attorney Ferguson clarified that multi-family, townhomes, and single-family detached units have been built in the Turnberry development so far. Mr. McMaster replied that all but about a dozen units are student housing. Attorney Ferguson stated that if the fact that Turnberry has mostly students living in the dwelling units displeases the Planning Commission, why in the world would it recommend changes to the ordinance that encourages more student housing. Mr. Keough stated that when the Planning Commission was reviewing the proposed plan for the Turnberry development, the representatives avoided using the words student housing. He went on to say that within a week of master plan approvals, there was a very large sign placed on Turnberry property that advertised student housing. Attorney Ferguson asked Mr. Keough if he felt the Pine Hall representatives have presented their plans as predominately student housing. Mr. Keough replied that he would not use the word predominately, however, they have shown that there will be student housing in the Pine Hall development. Mr. Keough stated that the representatives of the Turnberry development were not forthcoming with their plan. Mr. Crassweller suggested that the Planning Commission table the recommendation for the Pine Hall text amendments. Mr. Keough stated that believes the Planning Commission should move it forward and let the legal process take place if need be.

46 Ferguson Township Planning Commission June 26, 2017 Page 9 Attorney Suhr pointed out that in 2016, Turnberry requested a text amendment to the TTD ordinance to allow for personal care homes. He explained that he received word from the Township Solicitor that under the current ordinance, the Board of Supervisors could not grant modifications, so without amending the ordinance to begin with, Pine Hall could not request modifications. The modifications that Turnberry received were improperly granted. Attorney Suhr explained that reason for amending the ordinance to include the language in chapter , section three is to actually give the Board of Supervisors the authority to grant modifications under the design manual of the TTD ordinance. Attorney Suhr stated that their intent is to implement the concept plan of Pine Hall that came out of the charrette process. He explained that if Pine Hall could build the current approved plan, it would; however, there is evidence through the market that it cannot be built, which is why it has not been built in the first place. Attorney Suhr stated that he knows this is a complicated process and that it s been in the works a very long time, which is why the Pine Hall representatives would like to move this forward. He stated that the Board of Supervisors don t have to schedule a Public Hearing for the plan, and if they don t, Pine Hall will sit empty and Mr. Anderson will probably walk away from the project. Mr. David Vandenbugh, Ferguson Township resident, commented that the Planning Commission has to decide whether the proposed text amendments are going to improve the TTD ordinance, and one way to answer that is by asking whether or not the development, after it has been built, looks better than what they had envisioned it to be. A motion was made by Mr. Keough and seconded by Mr. Wheland to recommend approval to the Board of Supervisors the proposed Pine Hall TTD text amendments as presented in the June 23, 2017 memo. The motion carried 3-2. VI. ACTIVE PLANS UPDATE Ms. Schoch reviewed the active plans in the Township which includes: West Cherry Lane Multi-Use Building, J.L. Cidery at J.L. Farms, CSC Northland-Buffalo Wild Wings, The Cottages at State College, and the Whitehall Road Regional Park. Ms. Schoch stated that the opposers of the Cottages at State College have appealed the Commonwealth Court s decision to the Pennsylvania Supreme court, so at this time the plan is still on hold. Ms. Schoch stated that staff will not have a timeline for this project until the Supreme Court makes a decision. The plan has been conditionally approved, so once the time clock starts, the applicants have 45 days to complete the remaining comments and conditions of approval, as well as to record the plan In response to a question from Mr. Keough, Ms. Schoch explained that the Whitehall Road Regional Park plan expires at the end of the month, and Pam Salokangas, Director of Centre Regional Parks and Recreation, has indicated that they will not be moving forward with their plan until a decision is made by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court regarding the Cottages at State College.

47 Ferguson Township Planning Commission June 26, 2017 Page 10 VII. CENTRE REGION PLANNING COMMISSION (CRPC) REPORT Ms. Strickland stated that CRPC has not met since her last report. However, she attended the State College Borough Water Authority Board meeting, and the Cottages at State College plan was discussed. The water authority Board motioned a proposal to perform a die trace study on the Toll Brother s property. The water authority would like to be certain that there is no risk of contamination should the Cottages at State College plan be built. The water authority also discussed the blasting that is occurring at the Turnberry development, specifically at the Crossings and the proximity of the Chestnut Ridge well. Mr. Keough mentioned that there is a development occurring on Shingletown Road, across from Hess Field. He believes that the development is occurring less than or almost 1,000 feet from the Thomas-Harter well field. He stated that he is not hearing any protests about the impacts from that housing development on the Thomas-Harter well field. VIII. SOURCEWATER PROTECTION WORK GROUP UPDATE Ms. Schoch stated that the work group met on June 15, Todd Giddings reported on the State College Borough Water Authority Board meeting regarding the Board suggesting to stop allowing new water connections in Ferguson Township. The work group reviewed the Executive Summary from the State College Borough Water Authority Sourcewater Protection Plan that was adopted in May The work group was concerned that the State College Borough Water Authority s Sourcewater Protection Plan did not mention that Ferguson Township was in the process of creating a Sourcewater Protection Ordinance. The work group decided to draft a memo to the State College Borough Water Authority to ask them to review the Ferguson Township draft Sourcewater Protection Ordinance and compare the Township s goals to their own goals. Ms. Schoch stated that Mr. Stolinas will go back to the drawing board and draft a new version of the Sourcewater Protection Ordinance based on the State College Borough Water Authority s goals from their Sourcewater Protection Plan. The work group will meet again in July. IX. ZONING/SALDO STEERING COMMITTEE UPDATE Planning & Zoning staff has received the draft Zoning/SALDO ordinance and will meet with EPD in the near future. After meeting with EPD, staff will schedule a meeting with the Zoning/SALDO Steering Committee. X. APPROVAL OF THE REGULAR MEETING MINUTES APRIL 10, 2017 A motion was made by Mr. Crassweller and seconded by Mr. Keough to approve the June 12, 2017 Planning Commission meeting minutes. The motion carried unanimously.

48 Ferguson Township Planning Commission June 26, 2017 Page 11 XI. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business for the Planning Commission, Mr. Wheland made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 8:41 p.m. The motion carried unanimously. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, LISA STRICKLAND, SECRETARY FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION

49 FERGUSON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT June 2017 Calls for Service Part I Crimes Summary Previous Month June 2016 Current Month June 2017 Previous YTD June 2016 Current YTD June 2017 Homicide Rape Robbery Assault Burglary Theft Auto Theft Arson Total Part II Crimes Summary Previous Month June 2016 Current Month June 2017 Previous YTD June 2016 Current YTD June 2017 Forgery Fraud Embezzlement Receiving Stolen Property Criminal Mischief Weapons Violation Prostitution and Commercialized Vice Sex Offense Drug Violation Offenses Against Family DUI Liquor Laws (minors law, furnishing, false ID) Public Intoxication Disorderly Conduct All Other Criminal Total Total Crimes Previous Month June 2016 Current Month June 2017 Previous YTD June 2016 Current YTD June 2017 Part I Crimes Part II Crimes Total

50 FERGUSON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT June 2017 Calls for Service Other Calls for Service Previous Month June 2016 Current Month June 2017 Previous YTD June 2016 Current YTD June 2017 Vehicle Code - Crashes Vehicle Code - Other Traffic Incidents Health and Safety EMS Assist Health and Safety Fire Assist Other Health and Safety Incidents Alarms Suspicious Activity Unsecure Property Found Property Lost Property Community Relations/ Crime Prevention Car Seat Check School Check Township Ordinances Request for Assistance Attempt to locate Request for Assistance Can-Help Request for Assistance Civil Matter Request for Assistance - Other Missing Persons/ Runaways Animal Complaints Department Information Assist Other Agencies Total Total Calls for Service Previous Month June 2016 Current Month June 2017 Previous YTD June 2016 Current YTD June 2017 Part I Crimes Part II Crimes Other Calls for Service Total

51 FERGUSON TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT JUNE Previous YTD Current YTD Notes: Traffic Citations Parking Tickets Traffic Stops Criminal Arrests Supplements Hearings Med Return Box in service 6/21/2016 Measured in pounds Note: Traffic Stops may not include pre scheduled selective enforcement details where two or more police vehicles are assigned for specific enforcement purposes (such as Aggressive Driving Grant details). Criminal Arrests are the number of people arrested, not the number of charges, counts or cases cleared. These include arrests made at the time of the incident as well as those filed after an extended investigation. Department Notes: Chief Diane Conrad retired. The department hosted the annual Bike Rodeo at the Martin Street Weis Market. The turnout was good. Officers and staff participated in the Special Olympics Torch Run. TraCS (Traffic and Criminal Software) The electronic citation system is fully operational. Traffic citations are being filed electronically with the Magisterial District Judge s Office. Officer Brian Wakefield started June 19. Officer Wakefield comes to us after serving 25 years with the Pennsylvania State Police. During his tenure with PSP, Officer Wakefield worked patrol, vice / narcotics and criminal investigations. He was an investigator for 11 years. JUNE 2017

52 The department hosted a 40 hour Crisis Intervention Training course. I started the reorganization of supervisory responsibilities. This picture shows a skimming device found affixed to a gas pump at a local business. As the customer s credit card information is processed, the memory card captures and stores the data. JUNE 2017

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61 FERGUSON TOWNSHIP MONTHLY TREASURERS REPORT JUNE 2017

62 CASH BALANCES BY FUND - JUNE 30, 2017 Non Uniform 457 Pension Trust $1,412,678 Tudek Trust Fund $135,118 General Fund $6,335,108 Street Light Fund $1,586 Hydrant Fund $3,378 Non Uniform 401 Pension Trust $3,460,624 Transportation Improvement Fund $5,107,398 Police Pension Trust Fund $5,012,061 Park Improvement Fund $99,173 Liquid Fuels Fund $880,785 Regional Cap Rec Projects Fund $996,862 Piney Ridge Fund $0 General Obligation Fund $1,420 Agricultural Preservation Fund $71,461 Pine Grove Mills Streetlight Fund $21,605 Capital Reserve Fund $1,782,585

63 General Fund Checking Jersey Shore State Bank Operating (3245) 4,581, JSSB Flex Plan Checking (8757) 22, JSSB Circleville/Science Park Road Checking (6018) 95, Ameriserv Money Market , Ameriserv CD (0152) 250,00 PLGIT General Fund (3017) 48, PLGIT General Fund CD (3017) 250,00 Investments Morgan Stanley Brokerage Account market) 831, TOTAL GENERAL FUND 6,335, Other Funds Fund 02 Street Lights JSSB Checking (4836) 1, Fund 03 Fire Hydrant JSSB Checking (4844) 3, Fund 16 General Obligation JSSB Checking (4852) 1, Fund 18 Piney Ridge JSSB Checking (4860) Fund 19 Agricultural Preservation JSSB Checking (4879) 71, Fund 30 Capital Reserve Paypal Account 2, JSSB Checking (Employee Wellness Sinking Fund)(4909) 12, JSSB Capital Reserve Checking (3555) 460, JSSB Checking (Police Equipment Sinking Fund) (1711) 50, JSSB Checking (PW Equipment Sinking Fund)(4895) 988, JSSB Checking (Bldg Equipment Sinking Fund)(4887) 268, Fund 31 Regional Capital Recreation Projects JSSB Checking (3547) 492, Ameriserv Money Market , Ameriserv CD (0154) 250,00 Fund 32 Transportation Improvement Ferguson Township Treasurer's Report June 30, 2017 Statement of Cash Balances JSSB Checking (3539) 4,603, PLGIT Checking Ameriserv Money Market , Ameriserv CD (0153) 250,00 Fund 33 Pine Grove Mills Street Lights JSSB Checking (4917) 21, Fund 34 Park Improvement

64 Ferguson Township Treasurer's Report June 30, 2017 Statement of Cash Balances JSSB Checking (4925) 99, Fund 35 Liquid Fuels JSSB Checking (4933) 244, PLGIT Checking ( , PLGIT CD (3020) 300,00 Fund 93 Tudek Memorial Trust JSSB Checking (4976) 7, FNB Investments 127, TOTAL OTHER FUNDS 9,101, TOTAL NON PENSION FUNDS 15,436, Employer Pension Trust Funds Fund 60 Police Pension Trust JSSB Checking (4941) PNC Enterprise Checking (9642) 4, PNC Investments accrued interest) 5,006, Fund 65 Non Uniformed 401a Pension Trust JSSB Checking (4968) ICMA-RHS Employee Retirement Health Savings Trust market) 65, ICMA-401 Employer Pension Investment Trust market) 3,394, TOTAL PENSION TRUST FUNDS 8,472, GRAND TOTAL 23,909, Employee Pension Trust Funds Fund 66 Non Uniformed 457 Pension Trust ICMA-457 Employee Pension Investment Trust market) 1,400, ICMA-ROTH IRA Employee Pension Investment Trust market) 12, ,412,678.11

65 Bank Reconciliation Uncleared Checks by Fund User: Printed: Checks Before: eendresen 07/12/2017-8:22AM 06/30/2017 Fund/Check No. Check Date Clear Date System Vendor/Employee No. Vendor/Employee Name Amount 01 GENERAL FUND 0 06/30/2017 Uncleared AP PNC INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENTS 2, /30/2017 Uncleared AP VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS , /30/2017 Uncleared AP VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS 457 5, /30/2017 Uncleared AP VANTANGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS ROTH /14/2016 Uncleared AP MILLER KISTLER & CAMPBELL /29/2016 Uncleared AP WALKER & WALKER EQUIPMENT II LLC /31/2016 Uncleared AP GEISINGER CLINIC /14/2016 Uncleared AP CLEVELAND BROTHERS 1, /14/2016 Uncleared AP GRAEF RITA /31/2016 Uncleared AP WITHERS KARYN /31/2016 Uncleared AP PINEHURST HOMES INC /31/2017 Uncleared AP LAWMEN SUPPLY COMPANY /31/2017 Uncleared AP TRIMBLE NAVIGATION LIMITED /31/2017 Uncleared AP DELL MARKETING LP 10, /31/2017 Uncleared AP DONS POWER EQUIPMENT /31/2017 Uncleared AP FASTENAL COMPANY /31/2017 Uncleared AP FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC /31/2017 Uncleared AP ROSE BRIAN /31/2017 Uncleared AP SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY PROFESSION /31/2017 Uncleared AP WACOR ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, INC /15/2017 Uncleared AP AMTEC LESS LETHAL SYSTEMS 1, /15/2017 Uncleared AP COLONIAL PRESS /15/2017 Uncleared AP COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA /15/2017 Uncleared AP DONS POWER EQUIPMENT /15/2017 Uncleared AP FERGUSON TOWNSHIP POLICE ASSOCIATION /15/2017 Uncleared AP FISHER DUANE /15/2017 Uncleared AP GREAT AMERICA FINANCIAL SERVICES /15/2017 Uncleared AP GROFF TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT /15/2017 Uncleared AP MAXSON PRODUCTS COMPANY /15/2017 Uncleared AP OLD DOMINION BRUSH BR-Uncleared Checks by Fund (07/12/2017-8:22 AM) Page 1

66 Fund/Check No. Check Date Clear Date System Vendor/Employee No. Vendor/Employee Name Amount /15/2017 Uncleared AP PA DEP /15/2017 Uncleared AP PATCTECH /15/2017 Uncleared AP PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC /15/2017 Uncleared AP ROBINSON SEPTIC SERVICE INC /15/2017 Uncleared AP WILLIAMS BROTHERS /15/2017 Uncleared AP WINDSTREAM /20/2017 Uncleared AP TASER INTERNATIONAL 1, /26/2017 Uncleared AP HRIC 3, /26/2017 Uncleared AP PRK MOR INC /30/2017 Uncleared AP AFLAC /30/2017 Uncleared AP ALLIED MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL /30/2017 Uncleared AP AMERICAN ROCK SALT COMPANY LLC 2, /30/2017 Uncleared AP AUL ONE AMERICA 2, /30/2017 Uncleared AP BEST LINE EQUIPMENT /30/2017 Uncleared AP CALVERT KEN /30/2017 Uncleared AP CENTRAL PA CHIEFS OF POLICE /30/2017 Uncleared AP CENTRE COUNTY UNITED WAY /30/2017 Uncleared AP CENTRE DAILY TIMES /30/2017 Uncleared AP CLAYTON, PH.D. LAWRENCE T. 2, /30/2017 Uncleared AP COLLEGIATE PRIDE INC /30/2017 Uncleared AP COLONIAL PRESS /30/2017 Uncleared AP COLUMBIA GAS OF PA INC /30/2017 Uncleared AP CONRAD DIANE /30/2017 Uncleared AP CUSTOM ALTERATIONS /30/2017 Uncleared AP ECOLAWN /30/2017 Uncleared AP FASTENAL COMPANY /30/2017 Uncleared AP FERGUSON TOWNSHIP POLICE ASSOCIATION /30/2017 Uncleared AP FRYE'S SWEEPER AND SEWING CENTER, INC /30/2017 Uncleared AP GREAT AMERICA FINANCIAL SERVICES /30/2017 Uncleared AP LEONARD DANA S 1, /30/2017 Uncleared AP MAGLOCLEN /30/2017 Uncleared AP MAXSON PRODUCTS COMPANY /30/2017 Uncleared AP MCCARTNEYS INC /30/2017 Uncleared AP NITTANY OIL COMPANY 12, /30/2017 Uncleared AP NORTH CENTRAL DIGITAL SYSTEMS INC /30/2017 Uncleared AP OLD DOMINION BRUSH /30/2017 Uncleared AP PA CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCIATIN /30/2017 Uncleared AP PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL LEAGUE /30/2017 Uncleared AP PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LLC /30/2017 Uncleared AP R H MARCON INC /30/2017 Uncleared AP RED THE UNIFORM TAILOR 1, BR-Uncleared Checks by Fund (07/12/2017-8:22 AM) Page 2

67 Fund/Check No. Check Date Clear Date System Vendor/Employee No. Vendor/Employee Name Amount /30/2017 Uncleared AP SAM'S CLUB /30/2017 Uncleared AP SIGNAL CONTROL PRODUCTS INC /30/2017 Uncleared AP SOSMETAL PRODUCTS INC /30/2017 Uncleared AP STATE COLLEGE BOROUGH WATER AUTHORITY /30/2017 Uncleared AP STATIONERS INC /30/2017 Uncleared AP STEVE HACKMAN BUILDERS /30/2017 Uncleared AP STONEBRIDGE HOUSING LP /30/2017 Uncleared AP T-MOBILE USA INC /30/2017 Uncleared AP THE HARTMAN GROUP 1, /30/2017 Uncleared AP UNITED RENTALS 2, /30/2017 Uncleared AP WELLS FARGO /30/2017 Uncleared AP WEST PENN POWER 3, /30/2017 Uncleared AP WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC STREET LIGHT FUND Fund 01Total: 87, /30/2017 Uncleared AP WEST PENN POWER HYDRANT FUND Fund 02Total: /30/2017 Uncleared AP STATE COLLEGE BOROUGH WATER AUTHORITY 8, CAPITAL RESERVE FUND Fund 03Total: 8, /12/2016 Uncleared AP GLOBAL /30/2017 Uncleared AP ALLIED MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL 13, /30/2017 Uncleared AP ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING & DESIGN, LLC 7, /30/2017 Uncleared AP GOV HR USA 7, TRANSPORT IMPROVEMENT FUND Fund 30Total: 30, /30/2017 Uncleared AP WOLYNIEC CONSTRUCTION, INC. 5, LIQUID FUELS FUND Fund 32Total: 5, /30/2017 Uncleared AP HANSON AGGREGATES PA INC 1, /30/2017 Uncleared AP HRI INC 6, Fund 35Total: 7, BR-Uncleared Checks by Fund (07/12/2017-8:22 AM) Page 3

68 Fund/Check No. Check Date Clear Date System Vendor/Employee No. Vendor/Employee Name Amount 93 TUDEK PARK TRUST FUND /30/2017 Uncleared AP NITTANY OIL COMPANY /30/2017 Uncleared AP STATE COLLEGE BOROUGH WATER AUTHORITY /30/2017 Uncleared AP WEST PENN POWER Fund 93Total: Grand Total: 140, BR-Uncleared Checks by Fund (07/12/2017-8:22 AM) Page 4

69 General Ledger Revenue Analysis User: Printed: eendresen 7/13/ :22 AM Period: 04 to 06, 2017 Fiscal Year: 2017 JE Number: 0 Account Number Description Budgeted Revenue Period Revenue YTD Revenue Uncollected Bal % Received 01 GENERAL FUND 301 REAL PROPERTY TAX REVENUE CURRENT REAL ESTATE TAXE 1,393, ,287, ,306, , DELINQUENT REAL ESTATE T 16,00 2, , , REAL ESTATE SUPPLEMENTA REAL PROPERTY TAX REVENU 1,410, ,289, ,309, , LOCAL ENABLING TAX REVENUE REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX 1,300,00 340, , , EARNED INCOME TAXES 6,936,00 1,925, ,662, ,273, LOCAL SERVICES TAX 310,00 60, , , LOCAL ENABLING TAX REVE 8,546,00 2,327, ,688, ,857, BUSINESS LICENSES & PERMITS TRANSIENT RETAILER PERMI HOME OCCUPATION PERMITS CABLE TV FRANCHISE FEES 250,00 69, , , WINDSTREAM FRANCHISE FE 3,20 3, BUSINESS LICENSES & PERMI 253,90 69, , , NON-BUSINESS LICENSES/PERMITS MUNICIPAL LIENS-GRASS/WE SIGN PERMITS 11, , CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS DRIVEWAY PERMITS 3,00 1,20 2, PAVE CUT PERMITS 4,00 1,05 1,80 2, FIBEROPTIC LICENSE FEES 27, , NON-BUSINESS LICENSES/PER 45, , , , GL- Revenue Analysis (7/13/ :22 AM) Page 1

70 Account Number Description Budgeted Revenue Period Revenue YTD Revenue Uncollected Bal % Received 331 FINES MAGISTRATE FINES 3, , DUI FINES 33,00 7, , , FALSE ALARM FINES PARKING/SNOW/WEEDS FINE 65,00 13, , , FINES 101, , , , INTEREST EARNED INTEREST REVENUE-BANKS/C 26,25 14, , , INTEREST REVENUE-RE ACCT INTEREST REVENUE-MORG S 10,00 10, INTEREST EARNED 36,45 14, , , RENTS & ROYALTIES RENT OF TOWNSHIP PROPERT COG BUILDING RENT REVENU 42, , , , MOBILE COMM POST STORAG 1,28 1, RENTS & ROYALTIES 44, , , , FEDERAL GRANTS DUI GRANT REVENUE 43, , , , FEDERAL GRANTS 43, , , , STATE GRANTS BUCKLE UP REVENUE 2, , POLICE ACADEMY GRANT RE 10, , DRIVE SAFE GRANT REVENU 3,00 1, , , BNI LOCAL TASK FORCE REV 12,00 4, , , WINTER SNOW AGREEMENT 3, , MISC STATE GRANT REVENUE 12,05 12,05-12, STATE GRANTS 31, , , , STATE SHARED REVENUES PURTA REVENUE 11, , LIQUOR LICENSE REVENUE 3,30 3,00 3, ACT 205 STATE AID REVENUE 332, , GL- Revenue Analysis (7/13/ :22 AM) Page 2

71 Account Number Description Budgeted Revenue Period Revenue YTD Revenue Uncollected Bal % Received FOREIGN FIRE RELIEF AID 139, , MARCELLUS SHALE IMPACT 2,30 2, STATE POLICE FINES 5,50 5, , STATE SHARED REVENUES 494, , , , STATE PAYMENT IN-LIEU OF TAX STATE FOREST LAND REVENU 2, , STATE GAME COMMISSION RE 3, , STATE PAYMENT IN-LIEU OF T 5, , LOCAL SHARED PAYMENTS SHARED CUSTODIAN REVENU 28,30 5, , , LOCAL SHARED PAYMENTS 28,30 5, , , LOCAL PAYMENTS IN-LIEU OF TAX PENN STATE SETTLEMENT RE 146, , , LOCAL PAYMENTS IN-LIEU OF 146, , , DEPARTMENTAL EARNINGS NSF CHARGES REVENUE MISCELLANEOUS PERMITS SUBDIVISION PLAN FEES 2, , SITE PLAN REVIEW FEES TOWNSHIP ENGINEER REVIEW 15, , , ZONING PERMITS 16,00 4,28 7, , RENTAL PERMITS 5, , , HEARING/VARIANCE FEES 5,00 2,75 3,75 1, LIGHTING PLAN APPLICATION ZONING MAP SALES SCASD TAX COLLECTION REV 40,25 7, , , TAX CERTIFICATION REVENU 7,00 1, ,99 4, MISCELLANEOUS BID FEES ORDINANCE AMENDMENT FE DEPARTMENTAL EARNINGS 92, , , , PUBLIC SAFETY GL- Revenue Analysis (7/13/ :22 AM) Page 3

72 Account Number Description Budgeted Revenue Period Revenue YTD Revenue Uncollected Bal % Received MISCELLANEOUS POLICE REV 86 1,11-1, AG PROGRESS DAYS REVENU 6,50 6, POLICE ASSISTANCE AT PSU 53, , , , ACCIDENT REPORT SALES 3, , , PARKING PERMITS SPECIAL EVENTS PERMITS PUBLIC SAFETY 63, , , , PUBLIC WORKS SERVICE REVENUE STREET TREE REVENUE 6,00 6,00-6, PUBLIC WORKS SERVICE REV 6,00 6,00-6, HEALTH SERVICES REVENUE HEALTH INSPECTION FEES 8,50 1,76 4, , HEALTH SERVICES REVENUE 8,50 1,76 4, , MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 2, , SAFETY PROGRAM AWARD RE 2,00 2, HEALTH INSURANCE REFUND 119, , , WORKERS COMP REFUNDS 3, , MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 4,00 120, , , , INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN TRANSFER FROM LIQUID FUE 11, , , TRANSFER IN N/U PENSION FU 80, , INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN 80, , , , GENERAL FUND 11,437, ,937, ,604, ,833, GL- Revenue Analysis (7/13/ :22 AM) Page 4

73 Account Number Description Budgeted Revenue Period Revenue YTD Revenue Uncollected Bal % Received 02 STREET LIGHT FUND 341 INTEREST EARNED INTEREST REVENUE INTEREST EARNED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS STREET LIGHT ASSESSMENTS 18, , , , SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 18, , , , STREET LIGHT FUND 18, , , , GL- Revenue Analysis (7/13/ :22 AM) Page 5

74 Account Number Description Budgeted Revenue Period Revenue YTD Revenue Uncollected Bal % Received 03 HYDRANT FUND 341 INTEREST EARNED INTEREST EARNINGS INTEREST EARNED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS HYDRANT ASSESSMENTS 34, , , , SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS 34, , , , HYDRANT FUND 34, , , , GL- Revenue Analysis (7/13/ :22 AM) Page 6

75 Account Number Description Budgeted Revenue Period Revenue YTD Revenue Uncollected Bal % Received 16 GOA FUND 341 INTEREST EARNED INTEREST EARNINGS INTEREST EARNED INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN TRANSFER IN GENERAL FUND 560,00 560,00 560, INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN 560,00 560,00 560, GOA FUND 560,00 560, , GL- Revenue Analysis (7/13/ :22 AM) Page 7

76 Account Number Description Budgeted Revenue Period Revenue YTD Revenue Uncollected Bal % Received 18 PINEY RIDGE FUND 341 INTEREST EARNED INTEREST EARNED INTEREST EARNED PINEY RIDGE FUND GL- Revenue Analysis (7/13/ :22 AM) Page 8

77 Account Number Description Budgeted Revenue Period Revenue YTD Revenue Uncollected Bal % Received 19 AG PRESERVATION FUND 341 INTEREST EARNED INTEREST EARNED INTEREST EARNED INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN TRANSFER IN-GENERAL FUND 25,00 25,00 25, INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN 25,00 25,00 25, AG PRESERVATION FUND 25,35 25, , GL- Revenue Analysis (7/13/ :22 AM) Page 9

78 Account Number Description Budgeted Revenue Period Revenue YTD Revenue Uncollected Bal % Received 30 CAPITAL RESERVE FUND 341 INTEREST EARNED INTEREST EARNINGS 15,00 4, , , INTEREST EARNED 15,00 4, , , RENTS & ROYALTIES CODES FIRE TRAILER BLDG L 10,00 10, RENTS & ROYALTIES 10,00 10, STATE GRANTS RECYCLING EQUIPMENT 83,00 98, , MISC STATE GRANTS 10,00 1, , STATE GRANTS 93,00 99, , SALE OF FIXED ASSETS SALE OF FIXED ASSETS 1,00 13,55 15,35-14,35 1, SALE OF FIXED ASSETS 1,00 13,55 15,35-14,35 1, INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN TRANSFER IN GENERAL FUND 750,00 750,00 750, INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN 750,00 750,00 750, CAPITAL RESERVE FUND 869,00 767, , , GL- Revenue Analysis (7/13/ :22 AM) Page 10

79 Account Number Description Budgeted Revenue Period Revenue YTD Revenue Uncollected Bal % Received 31 REG CAP REC PROJECTS FUND 341 INTEREST EARNED INTEREST EARNED 8,00 1, , , INTEREST EARNED 8,00 1, , , PRIVATE CONTRIBUTIONS DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTIONS 400,00 400, PRIVATE CONTRIBUTIONS 400,00 400,00 31 REG CAP REC PROJECTS FUND 408,00 1, , , GL- Revenue Analysis (7/13/ :22 AM) Page 11

80 Account Number Description Budgeted Revenue Period Revenue YTD Revenue Uncollected Bal % Received 32 TRANSPORT IMPROVEMENT FUND 341 INTEREST EARNED INTEREST EARNINGS 30,00 11, , , INTEREST EARNED 30,00 11, , , FEDERAL GRANTS PTCI GRANT REVENUE 151, , , FEDERAL GRANTS 151, , , STATE GRANTS PTCI GRANT FUNDING 1,518,00 1,518, STATE GRANTS 1,518,00 1,518, INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN TRANSFER IN-GENERAL FUND 1,302, , , , INTERFUND TRANSFERS IN 1,302, , , , TRANSPORT IMPROVEMENT F 2,850, , , ,877, GL- Revenue Analysis (7/13/ :22 AM) Page 12

81 Account Number Description Budgeted Revenue Period Revenue YTD Revenue Uncollected Bal % Received 33 PGM STREETLIGHT FUND 341 INTEREST EARNED INTEREST EARNED INTEREST EARNED PGM STREETLIGHT FUND GL- Revenue Analysis (7/13/ :22 AM) Page 13

82 Account Number Description Budgeted Revenue Period Revenue YTD Revenue Uncollected Bal % Received 34 PARK IMPROVEMENT FUND 341 INTEREST EARNED INTEREST EARNED-HAYMAR INTEREST EARNED LOCAL PAYMENTS IN-LIEU OF TAX FEE IN LIEU-TBD 6, , LOCAL PAYMENTS IN-LIEU OF 6, , PARK IMPROVEMENT FUND , , GL- Revenue Analysis (7/13/ :22 AM) Page 14

83 Account Number Description Budgeted Revenue Period Revenue YTD Revenue Uncollected Bal % Received 35 LIQUID FUELS FUND 341 INTEREST EARNED INTEREST EARNED 4, , , INTEREST EARNED 4, , , STATE SHARED REVENUES STATE GRANT REVENUE 605, , , , STATE SHARED REVENUES 605, , , , LIQUID FUELS FUND 610, , , , GL- Revenue Analysis (7/13/ :22 AM) Page 15

84 Account Number Description Budgeted Revenue Period Revenue YTD Revenue Uncollected Bal % Received Report Totals: 16,813, ,660, ,728, ,085, GL- Revenue Analysis (7/13/ :22 AM) Page 16

85 General Ledger Expense vs Budget User: Printed: eendresen 7/13/ :27 AM Period: 04 to 06, 2017 Fiscal Year: 2017 JE Number: 0 Account Number Description Budgeted Amount Period Amount YTD Amount YTD Var Encumbered Available % Avail 01 GENERAL FUND 400 LEGISLATIVE BODY SUPERVISORS COMPENSATIO 20, , , , , GENERAL EXPENSE 4, , , CNET CONTRIBUTIONS 21, , , , , TRANSPORTATION DUES/SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMB 11,12 5, , , LEGISLATIVE BODY 58, , , , , EXECUTIVE TOWNSHIP MANAGERS SALA 112, , , , , ASSISTANT MANAGER SALAR 59, , , , , ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF SAL 90, , , , , OFFICE SUPPLIES 3, , , GENERAL EXPENSE 5,00 3, , COMMUNICATIONS 19,60 1, , , , TRANSPORTATION ADVERTISING AND PRINTING 33, , , , , BONDING , REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 7,00 1, , , , DUES/SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMB 11, , , , CONTRACTED SERVICES 20,00 4, , , EDUCATION OFFICE EQUIPMENT EXECUTIVE 362, , , , , FINANCE GL-Expense vs Budget (7/13/ :27 AM) Page 1

86 Account Number Description Budgeted Amount Period Amount YTD Amount YTD Var Encumbered Available % Avail FINANCE DIRECTORS SALARY 82, , , , , FINANCE STAFF SALARIES 67, , , , , OFFICE SUPPLIES 2, , , GENERAL EXPENSE FEES FOR ANNUAL AUDIT 27, ,50 28,80-1, , COMMUNICATIONS TRANSPORTATION ADVERTISING AND PRINTING 50 1, , , , REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE AGR 29,83 2, , , , DUES/SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMB 3, , , , , FINANCE 213, , , , , TAX OFFICE TAX DEPARTMENT SALARY 39, , , , , TAX STAFF OVERTIME OFFICE SUPPLIES GENERAL EXPENSE TCC COSTS 50 1, POSTAGE 3,65 6,00-2,35-2, TRANSPORTATION ADVERTISING AND PRINTING 1, BONDING REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE AGR DUES/SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMB CONTRACTED SERVICES 3,35 2, OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1, , , , TAX OFFICE 49, , , , , LEGAL SOLICITORS SERVICES 13,50 1, , , , LEGAL SERVICES-SPEC COUN 4,00 4,00 4, LEGAL SERVICES-OTHER 9,50 1, , , , LEGAL 27,00 3, , , , OTHER GOVT ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION & GENERA 108, , , , , CRCOG BUILDING CAPITAL 5, , , , , GL-Expense vs Budget (7/13/ :27 AM) Page 2

87 Account Number Description Budgeted Amount Period Amount YTD Amount YTD Var Encumbered Available % Avail CRCOG CONTINGENCY 2, , , OTHER GOVT ADMINISTRATIO 116, , , , , IT-NETWORKING GENERAL EXPENSE REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE AGR 60,52 19, , , , DUES/SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMB COMPUTER SERVICES 73,50 20, ,50 34,00 34, REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT 15,10 12, , IT-NETWORKING 149,62 52, , , , ENGINEERING PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR SA 93,55 25, , , , TOWNSHIP ENGINEER SALAR 201, , , , , ENGINEERING STAFF SALARI 90,78 16, , , , ENGINEERING INTERN WAGE 24,00 7, , , , OFFICE SUPPLIES 2, , , , GENERAL EXPENSE 2, , , ENGINEERING - SPECIALTIES 37, , , , ,50 23, COMMUNICATIONS 5,40 1, , , , TRANSPORTATIONS ADVERTISING AND PRINTING 5,00 1, , REPAIRS/MAINTENANCE AGR 13, , , , DUES/SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMB 6, , , CONTRACTED SERVICES 33,28 3, , , OFFICE EQUIPMENT 2,50 1, , ENGINEERING 517, , , , ,74 307, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS CUSTODIANS SALARY 69, , , , , CUSTODIAN OVERTIME OPERATING SUPPLIES 6,40 1, , , , REPAIR & MAINTENANCE 34, , , , , , ELECTRICITY 30,42 6, , , , NATURAL GAS 10, , , , WATER 1, CONTRACTED SERVICES GL-Expense vs Budget (7/13/ :27 AM) Page 3

88 Account Number Description Budgeted Amount Period Amount YTD Amount YTD Var Encumbered Available % Avail 409 BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 154, , , , , , POLICE POLICE CHIEFS SALARY 102, , , , , POLICE OFFICERS SALARIES 1,513, , , , , POLICE STAFF SALARY 78, , , , , LONGEVITY PAY 19, ,40 9,50 9, , GENERAL OVERTIME 153, , , , , UNIFORM EQUIPMENT PURCH 27, , , , , , OFFICE SUPPLIES 3, , , , CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS 6, , , VEHICLE FUEL - GASOLINE 48, , , , , VEHICLE FUEL - CNG 6,72 6,72 6, OIL/LUBRICANTS AND FLUID 5, , , , GENERAL EXPENSE 8,00 3, , , , AMMUNITION & RELATED SU 14, , , , COMMUNITY RELATIONS SUP 2, , , VEHICLE PARTS 30,00 10, , , , DNA TESTING 10,00 10,00 10, OTHER AGENCY (DUI) CHARG 28, , , , , COMMUNICATIONS 9,30 2, , , , RADIO MAINTENANCE TRANSPORTATION 4,10 1, , , , ADVERTISING AND PRINTING 4, , , , REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 7,50 4, , OUTSIDE VEHICLE REPAIRS 6,00 2, , , , DUES/SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMB 18, , , , , CONTRACTED SERVICES 70,23 19, , , , TRAINING SEMINARS 17,24 3, , , , ACADEMY TRAINING 37, , , , , OFFICE EQUIPMENT 30, , , POLICE 2,234, , ,063, ,170, , ,166, FIRE CRCOG FIRE CONTRIBUTION 292, , , , , WARRIORS MARK FIRE CONT 3,50 3,50 3, PORT MATILDA FIRE CONTRIB 3,50 3,50 3, CRCOG FIRE CAPITAL CONT 93, , , , , GL-Expense vs Budget (7/13/ :27 AM) Page 4

89 Account Number Description Budgeted Amount Period Amount YTD Amount YTD Var Encumbered Available % Avail FOREIGN FIRE RELIEF 139, , , FIRE 533, , , , , AMBULANCE PORT MATILDA EMS CONTRIB AMBULANCE CODE ENFORCEMENT SEWAGE ENFORCEMENT SERV CODE ENFORCEMENT PLANNING & ZONING PLAN/ZONING DIRECTOR SAL 75, , , , , ZONING ADMINISTRATOR SA 61, , , , , P & Z STAFF SALARIES 120, , , , , ORDINANCE ENFORCEMENT 18, , , , , UNIFORM EQUIPMENT PURCH OFFICE SUPPLIES , GENERAL EXPENSE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 15,00 5, , , , COMMUNICATIONS TRANSPORTATION ADVERTISING AND PRINTING 4,75 1, , , , REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE DUES/SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMB 7,93 1, , , , CONTRACTED SERVICES TRAINING SEMINARS 2, , , CRCOG - CR PLANNING AGEN 74, ,59 37,18 37, , CRCOG - METRO PLANNING O 30, , , , , PLANNING & ZONING 415, , , , , EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT CRCOG EMS CONTRIBUTION 35, , , , , CRCOG - EMS CONTINGENCY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 35, , , , , GL-Expense vs Budget (7/13/ :27 AM) Page 5

90 Account Number Description Budgeted Amount Period Amount YTD Amount YTD Var Encumbered Available % Avail 421 HEALTH & WELFARE HEALTH OFFICER SERVICES 8,50 1, , , , HEALTH & WELFARE 8,50 1, , , , RECYCLING RECYCLING - LEAVES & GRAS 33, , , RECYCLING 33, , , PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION UNIFORM SERVICE 6,50 1, , , , , OFFICE SUPPLIES GASOLINE 12, , , , DIESEL FUEL 30,60 7, , , , OIL/LUBRICANTS/FLUIDS 7, , , , CLOTHING ALLOWANCE 7,00 3, , , , GENERAL EXPENSE 21,00 4, , , , SMALL TOOLS AND EQUIPME 8,00 2, , , ,62 2, COMMUNICATIONS 1, RADIO MAINTENANCE 2,00 1, , REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 2, , , EQUIPMENT RENTALS 15,40 4, , , , , DUES/SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMB 4, , , , , CONTRACTED SERVICES 15, , , OFFICE EQUIPMENT PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRA 133, , , , , , WINTER MAINTENANCE CHEMICAL AND SUPPLIES 50,00 15, , , , GENERAL EXPENSE 4, , REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE CONTRACTED SNOW REMOVA 22,44 5, , , WINTER MAINTENANCE 76,44 15, , , , TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES STREET SIGNS AND SUPPLIES 15,00 7, , , , TRAFFIC SIGNAL CHARGES 12,40 3, , , , GL-Expense vs Budget (7/13/ :27 AM) Page 6

91 Account Number Description Budgeted Amount Period Amount YTD Amount YTD Var Encumbered Available % Avail TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPAIRS 9,00 1, , , , TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES 36,40 12, , , , TOOLS & EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE MECHANICS SALARY 57, , , , , MECHANIC OVERTIME 1, MECHANICS SMALL TOOLS 4,10 1, , , , REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 60,00 16, , , , OUTSIDE REPAIRS 11,00 12, , , , , DUES/SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMB 437 TOOLS & EQUIPMENT MAINT 134, , , , , , ROAD & BRIDGE MAINTENANCE ROAD SUPERINTENDENT SAL 72, , , , , ROAD CREW SALARIES 470, , , , , PART-TIME HELP WAGES 51, , , , , ROAD CREW OVERTIME 53, , , , , MATERIALS/SUPPLIES (NON-L 13,00 2, , , , ROAD & BRIDGE MAINTENAN 661, , , , , TRANSIT SYSTEM CATA-TRANSPORTATION 130, , , , TRANSIT SYSTEM 130, , , , PARTICIPANT RECREATION CRCOG - PARKS & RECREATIO 426, , , , , CRCOG - REGION POOLS CAPI 128, , , , , CRCOG - NATURE CENTRE 23, , , , , CRCOG - PARKS/REC CAPITAL 45, , , , , CRCOG - REGION PARKS CAPI 452 PARTICIPANT RECREATION 624, , , , , SPECTATOR RECREATION SPECTATOR RECREATION 5,55 5, , SPECTATOR RECREATION 5,55 5, , GL-Expense vs Budget (7/13/ :27 AM) Page 7

92 Account Number Description Budgeted Amount Period Amount YTD Amount YTD Var Encumbered Available % Avail 454 PARKS TWP PARK OPERATING EXPEN PARKS SHADE TREES ARBORIST SALARY 56,15 15, , , , PART-TIME HELP WAGES 39, , , , , OPERATING SUPPLIES 1, GENERAL EXPENSE 1, , , SUPPLIES & MATERIALS 1,00 1,00 1, SMALL TOOLS 2, , , REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE 1,00 1,00 1, STREET TREES - NEW 1, , , , STREET TREE REPLACEMENT 70,50 51, ,24 19,26 19, DUES & SUBSCRIPTIONS 4,50 1, , , , CONTRACTED SERVICES 73,71 7, , , , , TRAINING SHADE TREES 250, , , , , , LIBRARIES CRCOG - SCHLOW LIBRARY 405, , , , , CRCOG - SCHLOW LIBRARY 22, , , , LIBRARIES 428, , , , , SENIOR CITIZENS CRCOG - SENIOR CENTER 42, , , , , FERGUSON SENIOR CITIZENS SENIOR CITIZENS 43, , , , , NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION SPRING CRK WTRSHD COMM SPRING CREEK MONITORING 5,00 4, NATURAL RESOURCE CONSER 5, , LAND & HOUSING GL-Expense vs Budget (7/13/ :27 AM) Page 8

93 Account Number Description Budgeted Amount Period Amount YTD Amount YTD Var Encumbered Available % Avail LAND & HOUSING 5,00 5, SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES 3,00 3,00 3, SLAB CABIN RUN INITIATIVE 150,00 150,00 150, SLAB CABIN RUN INITIATIVE 158,00 5,00 153,00 3,00 150, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT C 25,00 25,00 25, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 25,00 25,00 25, DEBT SERVICE INTEREST INTEREST ON ESCROW DEPOS 1, , , DEBT SERVICE INTEREST 1, , , PAYROLL TAXES EMPLOYER SOCIAL SECURITY 305, , , , , UMEMPLOYMENT COMPENSA 16, , , , , PAYROLL TAXES 321,27 86, , , , PENSIONS NON UNIFORM PENSION EXPE 411, , , , , PENSIONS 411, , , , , PROPERTY INSURANCE SAFETY IMPROVEMENT EXPE 8, , ,00 2, INSURANCE CLAIM EXPENSE 4, , , , PROPERTY INSURANCE 42,00 15, , POLICE LIABILITY INSURANC 25,20 7, , , , PUBLIC OFFICIALS INSURANC 15,00 5, , WORKERS COMPENSATION 189, , , , , VEHICLE INSURANCE 24,25 9, , , , CRIME INSURANCE , PROPERTY INSURANCE 305, , , , , HEALTH INSURANCE HEALTH INSURANCE WAIVER 45, , , , , GL-Expense vs Budget (7/13/ :27 AM) Page 9

94 Account Number Description Budgeted Amount Period Amount YTD Amount YTD Var Encumbered Available % Avail VISION INSURANCE 8, , , , , , HEALTH INSURANCE 979, , , , , HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT 5,50 5,00 10,00-4,50-4, DENTAL INSURANCE 41, , , , , LIFE INSURANCE 7, , , , , DISABILITY INSURANCE 8, , ,60 3, , EMPLOYEE WELLNESS 1, HEALTH INSURANCE 1,098, , , , , MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE SALARIES & WAGES MERIT IN 37, , , SALARIES & WAGES MARKET 7,50 7,50 7, SALARIES/WAGES DEFERRED 20, , , , , EMPLOYEE SERVICE AWARDS UNCOMMITTED EXPENSE RES 26,60 26,60 26, MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSE 92, , , , , INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT TRANSFER TO GOA FUND 560,00 560,00 560, TRANSFER TO AG PRES FUND 25,00 25,00 25, TRANSFER TO CAP RES FUND 750,00 750,00 750, TRANSFER TO TIF FUND 1,302, , , , , INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT 2,637, ,901, ,137, , , GENERAL FUND 12,491, ,192, ,675, ,816, , ,758, GL-Expense vs Budget (7/13/ :27 AM) Page 10

95 Account Number Description Budgeted Amount Period Amount YTD Amount YTD Var Encumbered Available % Avail 02 STREET LIGHT FUND 434 STREET LIGHTING STREET LIGHT SERVICE 19, , , , , STREET LIGHT MAINTENANC 1, ,30 1, STREET LIGHTING 20, , , , , STREET LIGHT FUND 20, , , , , GL-Expense vs Budget (7/13/ :27 AM) Page 11

96 Account Number Description Budgeted Amount Period Amount YTD Amount YTD Var Encumbered Available % Avail 03 HYDRANT FUND 448 WATER SYSTEMS HYDRANT SERVICE 32,20 9, , , , WATER SYSTEMS 32,20 9, , , , HYDRANT FUND 32,20 9, , , , GL-Expense vs Budget (7/13/ :27 AM) Page 12

97 Account Number Description Budgeted Amount Period Amount YTD Amount YTD Var Encumbered Available % Avail 16 GOA FUND 471 DEBT SERVICE PRINCIPAL PRINCIPAL PMTS PNC LO 556,00 556,00 556, DEBT SERVICE PRINCIPAL 556,00 556,00 556, DEBT SERVICE INTEREST INTEREST PMTS-2014 PNC LOA 2, , , DEBT SERVICE INTEREST 2, , , GOA FUND 558, , , GL-Expense vs Budget (7/13/ :27 AM) Page 13

98 Account Number Description Budgeted Amount Period Amount YTD Amount YTD Var Encumbered Available % Avail 18 PINEY RIDGE FUND 492 INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUN INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT PINEY RIDGE FUND GL-Expense vs Budget (7/13/ :27 AM) Page 14

99 Account Number Description Budgeted Amount Period Amount YTD Amount YTD Var Encumbered Available % Avail 19 AG PRESERVATION FUND 461 NATURAL RESOURCE CONSERVATION AG EASEMENT PURCHASES 33, , , ,92 11, NATURAL RESOURCE CONSER 33, , , ,92 11, AG PRESERVATION FUND 33, , , ,92 11, GL-Expense vs Budget (7/13/ :27 AM) Page 15

100 Account Number Description Budgeted Amount Period Amount YTD Amount YTD Var Encumbered Available % Avail 30 CAPITAL RESERVE FUND 401 EXECUTIVE CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCH 52,00 30, , , , , EXECUTIVE 52,00 30, , , , , IT-NETWORKING CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCH 50,00 18, , , , IT-NETWORKING 50,00 18, , , , BUILDINGS & GROUNDS CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCH 394, , , , , , BUILDING MAINTENANCE FU 29, ,50 35,35-5, , WELLNESS/FITNESS FUND 4, , ,50 2, BUILDINGS & GROUNDS 428, , , , , , POLICE POLICE CAPITAL PURCHASES 251, ,95 86, , , , POLICE/PW RADIO SYSTEM 31, , , , POLICE 251, , , , , , PLANNING & ZONING CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCH 81, , , , , PLANNING & ZONING 81, , , , , PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRATION NEW EQUIPMENT 45, , , , , , REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT 283, , , , ,52 3, PUBLIC WORKS ADMINISTRA 328, , , , , , ROAD CONSTRUCTION CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION 138,00 17, , , , ROAD CONSTRUCTION 138,00 17, , , , PARTICIPANT RECREATION GL-Expense vs Budget (7/13/ :27 AM) Page 16

101 Account Number Description Budgeted Amount Period Amount YTD Amount YTD Var Encumbered Available % Avail MISC PARK EXPENDITURES 991, , , , , , PARTICIPANT RECREATION 991, , , , , , PROPERTY INSURANCE COMPUTER SELF-INSURANCE 6, , , PROPERTY INSURANCE 6, , , CAPITAL RESERVE FUND 2,328, , , ,761, , ,594, GL-Expense vs Budget (7/13/ :27 AM) Page 17

102 Account Number Description Budgeted Amount Period Amount YTD Amount YTD Var Encumbered Available % Avail 31 REG CAP REC PROJECTS FUND 452 PARTICIPANT RECREATION CRCOG-REG PARKS CAPITAL 108,12 27,03 54,06 54,06 54, PARTICIPANT RECREATION 108,12 27,03 54,06 54,06 54, REG CAP REC PROJECTS FUND 108,12 27,03 54,06 54,06 54,06 5 GL-Expense vs Budget (7/13/ :27 AM) Page 18

103 Account Number Description Budgeted Amount Period Amount YTD Amount YTD Var Encumbered Available % Avail 32 TRANSPORT IMPROVEMENT FUND 408 ENGINEERING ENGINEERING SPECIALTIES 268, ,76 267, ENGINEERING DESIGN ENGINEERING 268,00 1, , , , ROAD CONSTRUCTION ROW APPRAISAL FEES 4,00 4,00 4, PROF SERVICES - ROW ACQUI 2,00 2,00 2, ROW LEGAL FEES 1,00 1,00 1, ROW ACQUISITION COSTS 52, , , CONSTRUCTION COSTS 3,915,00 122, , ,792, , ,661, ROAD CONSTRUCTION 3,974, , , ,851, , ,720, TRANSPORT IMPROVEMENT F 4,242, , , ,118, , ,987, GL-Expense vs Budget (7/13/ :27 AM) Page 19

104 Account Number Description Budgeted Amount Period Amount YTD Amount YTD Var Encumbered Available % Avail 34 PARK IMPROVEMENT FUND 454 PARKS use for new park 44,00 44,00 44, PARKS 44,00 44,00 44, PARK IMPROVEMENT FUND 44,00 44,00 44,00 10 GL-Expense vs Budget (7/13/ :27 AM) Page 20

105 Account Number Description Budgeted Amount Period Amount YTD Amount YTD Var Encumbered Available % Avail 35 LIQUID FUELS FUND 432 WINTER MAINTENANCE CHEMICAL AND SUPPLIES 67, , , , WINTER MAINTENANCE 67, , , , TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES PAVEMENT MARKINGS 76,30 76,30 76, TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES 76,30 76,30 76, ROAD & BRIDGE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES & MATERIALS 90,00 36, , , , CONTRACTED MAINTENANC 561, , , , ROAD & BRIDGE MAINTENAN 651, , , , , , ROAD CONSTRUCTION CAPITAL CONSTRUCTION 3,00 88,00 88,00-85,00-85,00-2, ROAD CONSTRUCTION 3,00 88,00 88,00-85,00-85,00-2, INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT TRANSFERS TO GENERAL FUN 11, , , , INTERFUND TRANSFERS OUT 11, , , , LIQUID FUELS FUND 798, , , , , , GL-Expense vs Budget (7/13/ :27 AM) Page 21

106 Account Number Description Budgeted Amount Period Amount YTD Amount YTD Var Encumbered Available % Avail Report Totals: 20,658, ,362, ,250, ,407, , ,980, GL-Expense vs Budget (7/13/ :27 AM) Page 22

107 TOWNSHIP OF FERGUSON Centre County, Pennsylvania ORDINANCE NO. of 2017 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWNSHIP OF FERGUSON, CENTRE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, AMENDING, MODIFYING AND CHANGING THE FERGUSON TOWNSHIP ZONING ORDINANCE (CHAPTER 27) TO ALLOW FOR DWELLING UNITS IN A TRADITIONAL TOWN DEVELOPMENT (TTD) TO BE USED BY A FAMILY OF UP TO FOUR UNRELATED PERSONS WHEN 100 OR MORE DWELLING UNITS ARE UNDER COMMON MANAGEMENT; TO ALLOW FOR DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITIES WITHIN A TTD; TO PROVIDE FOR MODIFICATIONS; AND TO AMEND DESIGN CRITERIA FOR A TTD RELATING TO ACCESS TO TOWNHOUSES, LOCATION OF UTILITIES, COMMERCIAL BUILDING HEIGHT, THE DIVERSITY AND REQUIRED MIX OF RESIDENTIAL USES, THE MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, THE MINIMUM REQUIRED RESIDENTIAL DENSITY, THE MINIMUM LOT SIZE, FRONT YARD AND REAR YARD SETBACKS, THE MAXIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS, MAXIMUM IMPERVIOUS COVERAGE AND BUILDING FOOTPRINT; OPEN SPACE STORMWATER FACILITIES AND PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING. BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Supervisors of the Township of Ferguson, Centre County, Pennsylvania, as follows: SECTION 1. Section A.(1)(Composition of Uses) of the Ferguson Township Zoning Ordinance (the Zoning Ordinance ) is hereby amended to read as follows: (a) Residential. 1) Single family attached, detached and semi-detached units.** 2) Accessory residential units. 3) Zero lot line units. 4) Two-family dwellings. 5) Multi-family dwelling units. 6) Mixed-use buildings. ** When 100 or more such dwelling units in a Traditional Town Development are under common management, each such dwelling unit under such common management may be used by one family or up to four unrelated persons, subject to the permitted occupancy of the dwelling as determined by the SL v

108 Centre Region Code Office in accordance with the provisions of the Ferguson Township Housing Code. SECTION 2. Section C (Chapter 22, Subdivision and Land Development) of the Zoning Ordinances hereby amended to add: Modifications SECTION 3. Section of the Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to add the following to the end of that section: The Board of Supervisors may allow for modification of the design standards applicable to a Traditional Town Development provided for in this Section , including, but not limited to compactness, pedestrian orientation, street geometry or other related design features, in accordance with the standards applicable to the grant of modifications under Chapter 22, Subdivision and Land Development, SECTION 4. Section B(1)(b) 7) of the Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to read as follows: Rear Access Required. Townhouse Access. In general, townhouse dwelling units shall not be accessed from the front rear. However, in certain cases, side some instances, front entry garages may be provided for townhouse dwelling end units. No more than 30% 50% of the overall number of townhouse dwelling units is are permitted to utilize such side front entry garages. Other than as noted above, garages associated with townhouse or live/work units shall either be integral to the structure or oriented to the rear and accessed by a lane or alley. SECTION 5. Section C(3)(a) of the Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended to provide as follows: Location. All utilities other than public sewer and water are prohibited within the Township right-of-way. All electric, gas, telecommunication, telephone, television, and other utility connections, both main and service lines, shall be provided underground either within private easements that are or located within an alley or public street right-of-way. All alleys shall be designed to accommodate such infrastructure whenever possible. All infrastructure shall be installed in alleys in accordance with the prevailing standards and practices of the utility or other companies providing such services. SECTION 6. Section A(2) of the Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended as follows: Height. Structures shall be a minimum of two stories except where specially approved for single story development or, in the case of civic buildings, when SL v

109 designed to appear as a multi-story structure. Commercial structures shall be taller, and shall provide the opportunity for upper story housing or office space above permitted retail uses in a minimum of 50% of the structures. 35% of all commercial structures shall have two or more stories, with upper stories occupied by residential or office uses above first floor permitted non-residential uses. New residential structures within a TTD shall be no more than three stories. Multi-family, commercial, or mixed-use structures shall not exceed eight stories. five stories except through conditional use approval which could permit up to eight stories in appropriate locations. SECTION 7. The chart in Section B(1) (TTD Standards) of the Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended as follows, and in all other respects remains as heretofore enacted, ordained and amended: Permitted Percentages Minimum % Maximum % Residential* (of total acreage) Single family detached Single family semi-detached Single family attached Multi-family Live-work units (of total units) *A minimum of 80% of all residential units must be designed to permit fee simple conveyance. 35% 15%5% 10% 15% 5% % 45% 40% 35% 30%50% 5% SECTION 8. Section C(1)(e) is hereby amended by deleting subsections 1), 2), 3) (a), 3) (b), and 3) (d). SECTION 9. The provisions of Section C(1)(e) of the Zoning Ordinance are hereby amended as follows: (1) Standards (a) Width. Block depth/width (houses back to back) shall range from feet 400 feet. * * * (e) Required Mixture. A mix of housing types shall be provided within blocks. * * * SL v

110 3) Townhouse units must may be dispersed among a variety of other residential and/or non-residential uses, and not may also be segregated in clusters of single residential-type buildings. * * * c) The maximum number of townhouse structures that may be located adjacent to each other when the townhouse dwellings are established on individual lots is four six. which provides for 16 dwelling units. * * * 7) Lot sizes shall be consistent with the following dimensions: Type Lot Size Width Depth Single family detached Single family semidetached max: 12,000 sf min: 4,000 1,700 sf max: 10,000sf/unit min: 4,000 3,000 sf/unit max: 75 min: max: 60 /unit min: Single family attached max: 6,000 sf/unit min: 3,000 1,100 sf/unit min: 20 /unit max: 50 /end unit min: Multi-family Max: 65,000 min: 43,560 35,000 sf Min: 36 Max: 144 Live/work units and other mixed use structures outside of any retail core Mixed use in a substantially commercial area Max: 15,000 sf Min: 36 Max 108 Max: 25,000 sf Min: 45 Max: 135 Civic, cultural, and community facilities Commercial Max: 80, ,000 sf Min: 36 Max: * * * SL v

111 following: 8) Residential and non-residential unit sizes shall be consistent with the Type Retail Size Maximum non-residential building footprint: 30,000 60,000 s.f. Max: 6,000 15,000 SF/unit or leasehold except grocery stores which may consume the entire permitted footprint of 30,000 60,000 s.f. Anchor Retail Apt/Condo Located at prominent intersections or focal points of the civic/commercial core maximum of 10,000 60,000 sq. ft. No more than one such unit for every 50,000 sq/ ft/ of non-residential development. Min: 600 sf * * * 10) Section deleted. The maximum number of apartment or condominium units in a single structure shall be 24 except when such structure is shown to be a critical element of an existing commercial or civic core of focal point. In such instances, structures with 25 to 50 apartment or condominium units may be developed. However, the massing and articulation of such structures is subject to approval by the Township. 11) The maximum impervious coverage for the overall Traditional Town Development is 85%. lot coverage permitted, regardless of use, is 50%. Through the use of incentives provide for in subsection.4f, this coverage may be increased as high as 65%. 12) The maximum impervious coverage building footprint permitted on each lot, regardless of use, is 85%. This includes any incentives that may be applied to lot coverage through subsection.4.f. SECTION 10. The provisions of Section D(1) of the Zoning Ordinance are hereby amended as follows: * * * (g) Garage Setback. Front entry garages shall maintain a front yard setback of a minimum of feet. (j) Rear Yard Setback. In general, a minimum rear yard setback of 25 feet is applicable to all primary dwelling units, and 5 feet is applicable to all accessory structures and detached garages. However, in some instances where excessively lengthy driveways are not desirable, the rear yard setback for primary dwelling units, accessory structures, and detached garages from an alley may be reduced to 0 feet. However, accessory structures and detached garages shown on the approved plan may be set back only 5 feet from the rear lot line. SL v

112 (k) Front Setback. Structures which are designed for commercial, light industrial, or mixed-use purposes, shall have a minimum front setback of 0 feet and a maximum front setback of 25 feet. However, such structures shall maintain a minimum of 65% of their frontage along the sidewalk s edge (zero setback). 1) For all non-residential structures, with the exception of grocery stores, pharmacies, and hotels, a minimum of 50% of the front façade on the ground floor shall be transparent, consisting of window or door openings allowing views into and out of the interior. * * * SECTION 11. Section E(1) of the Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended as follows: * * * (b) Off-Street Parking. Where necessary to meet the applicable standards or to provide shared parking arrangements, off-street parking compounds may be provided on the lot containing the principal use which necessitates such vehicle storage. No more than 60% 90% of the required parking for residential or nonresidential uses shall be accommodated in this fashion. * * * (d) Number of Spaces. The total amount of parking provided (on and off-street) shall not exceed be less than the amount required by B. However, if all parking is accommodated with on-street spaces, this number may be reduced by 10%. Additionally, the provisions to reduce off-street parking spaces, as provided in E(1)-(4) shall be applicable. * * * (n) Landscaping. Parking areas shall be suitably landscaped to minimize noise, glare, and other nuisance characteristics as well as enhance the environment and ecology of the site and surrounding area. At a minimum, all surface parking areas shall be landscaped in accordance with the provisions of A F; provided, however, interior landscaping within a parking lot shall be provided with a raised island for every 10 spaces, on average. SECTION 12. Section A(1)(c) of the Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended as follows: (1) Food Services. Eating and licensed drinking establishments such as: bakery, butcher shop, café (including outdoor spaces), catering, coffee shop, delicatessen, neighborhood grocer, ice cream and confections, restaurant (not including drivethrough service), diner, neighborhood market/farm market. SL v

113 * * * (4) Services. Personal service shops, businesses and professional offices such as: barber, beautician, daycare, hair-nail salon or spa, home occupations and no impact home based businesses, administrative, or financial offices (not including drive-through service), medical/dental offices, frame shop, laundromat, shoe repair, tailor, phone store, accountant, architect, day care center, health club, community center, government buildings. * * * (6) Drive-through service. A maximum of two commercial uses may provide drive-through service. The drive-through facilities may not directly access a road along the periphery of the Traditional Town Development. The drive-through facilities may not be located on adjacent lots. The layout of the drive-through facility must be approved by Township staff, and may be required to deviate from standard franchise footprints. All layout and design shall consider and shall not compromise pedestrian convenience, safety, or detract from the overall walkability of the Traditional Town Development. SECTION 13. Section A(1)(d) of the Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended as follows: (d) Prohibited Uses. Uses which are expressly prohibited in a Traditional Town Development of associated Mixed Residential Area shall include: Heavy or light manufacturing; storage or distribution as a primary use; outdoor advertising or billboards; prisons; detention centers; scrap yards; kennels; sand, gravel or other mineral extraction; cemetery or crematorium; mobile home park; automobile sales, service or repair; car wash; hospital(s); personal care homes; bulk fuel storage; heavy equipment storage, sales, or rental; warehouse; drivethrough or drive-in establishments; food processing and/or packing; fuel generation; landfill; campgrounds; manufactured home sales or storage; automobile storage facilities; shopping centers; free-standing telecommunications towers; truck terminals; waste transfer facilities; adult business uses; convenience food stores that include gas sales; race track, riding stable, self-service storage facilities; dormitory; surface mining operations; motels; and non-municipality owned surface parking lots that constitute the principal use of a property. SECTION 14. Section A(1)(b)(3) of the Zoning Ordinance is hereby amended as follows: 3) Please note that the regenerative percolation of stormwater runoff stormwater management facilities may, where appropriate, be permitted to be included in areas designated for open or public spaces. Additionally, facilities that are designed as permanent water features and are provided with associated walking or seating areas will be credited. However, stormwater management facilities such as detention basins and swales shall only be permitted to be included to the extent SL v

114 that the open space exceeds the 25% required minimum, or through the use of one or more design incentives identified below. SECTION 15. Any ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION 16. This Ordinance shall become effective five (5) days after enactment. DULY ENACTED AND ORDAINED INTO LAW as Ordinance No. of 2017, this day of, 2017 by the Board of Supervisors of the Township of Ferguson. ATTEST: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TOWNSHIP OF FERGUSON Township Secretary (Vice) Chairman SL v

115 TOWNSHIP OF FERGUSON 3147 Research Drive State College, Pennsylvania Telephone: Fax: MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Ferguson Township Board of Supervisors David Pribulka, Manager David Modricker, PE, Public Works Director AND: Raymond Stolinas, Planning and Zoning Director Ronald Seybert, PE, Township Engineer DATE: July 12, 2017 RE: Official Map Foxpointe Drive Extension This memorandum is in response to an inquiry by the Board of Supervisors at their regular meeting on July 3, The Board asked staff to research the history of showing the extension of Foxpointe Drive from its terminus near Prairie Rose Lane to Whitehall Road on the official map. Records show that this section of Foxpointe Drive has been on the official map since March 18, 2002 and is shown on the May 19, 2008 official map (attachments 1 and 2). A review of the files indicates that this section of road was included in a Township wide traffic study prepared by the Township s traffic engineer consultant, Trans Associates, in the early 1990s (attachment 3). In addition, this section of road was considered in a report titled Ferguson Township Traffic Study, Future Land Use Assumptions: A Technical Report presented to the Ferguson Township Board of Supervisors and prepared by the Centre Regional Planning Commission in June 1992 (attachment 4). From an engineering perspective, showing the Foxpointe Drive extension on the official map is good transportation planning. It is classified as a collector street, provides neighborhood connectivity, and provides another north/south transportation corridor in the future which could alleviate congestion on West College Avenue and Science Park Road. The road extension was considered in the Township wide traffic study and planning discussions completed in the 1990s. The more recent transportation planning study completed in 2009 did not include any analysis on the merits of this connector roadway. From a public right of way acquisition perspective, showing the road extension on the official map provides the Board of Supervisors the opportunity (for one year) to acquire property for the purpose of a transportation corridor, should the land owner anytime in the future submit to the Township a land development plan for approval. If the Board removes this section of road from the official map,

116 this opportunity may be lost, and certainly the right to acquire it consistent with the Municipalities Planning Code regarding the official map is lost. From a planning and zoning perspective, the proposed road would traverse four properties, all zoned Rural Agricultural (RA). Currently, three out of four parcels are enrolled in the Township Agricultural Security Area program. Three out of the four parcels are undeveloped and are observed to be used as cropland. Alternatively, if these property owners so choose to further develop, the range in permitted uses outside the Regional Growth Boundary include such uses as typical farm structures, including barns, greenhouses, 2-family dwellings, not to exceed 3 dwelling units on any single farm parcel, establishments for the raising, processing, storage sales and services of farm products, communication towers, neighborhood civic or faith-based places of assembly, kennels, group homes, veterinary office/clinic, and bed and breakfast. The above mentioned do vary in minimum and maximum lot size requirements, but would potentially hinder future alignment if permitted before an acquisition take place. The Official Map process notifies the property owner (s) of any proposed alignment and gives the Township one year to pursue acquisition upon submission of a plan or permit application. A discussion with a former Planning and Zoning Director reveals that the growth boundary in the early 90 s was changing. From a planning perspective, the thought at the time was to connect the existing developments based on the plans they had in mind at that time. The connection to Whitehall Road would have just been another north / south connection through property that had the potential to be developed. So, even though the property was not proposed to be developed at the time, and even though it is outside of the growth boundary, it shows the intention of a connection in the future if things change and something happens on that property. The official map is a long-term planning tool which may look 20 years into the future. Just because something is shown on the map doesn t mean that it will happen. In conclusion, the Foxpointe Drive extension has been included in documents and maps for the past 25 years. The Board of Supervisors should consider the merits of showing this section of road on the official map and any potential reasons not to show it, and provide direction to staff. Copy: Lindsay Schoch, Community Planner 2

117

118

119

120 Ferguson Township Official Map This is to certify that this is the Official Map of Ferguson Township as adopted by Ordinance 770 on April 16, 2001 and amended by Ordinance on, Intent: The proposed roads and bikepaths on this map are shown for general location purposes only. North Atherton Street Martin Street Chairman Board of Supervisors Township Manager Date Date Note: Right-of-way of roads and bikepaths to be determined at the Planning, Subdivision or Land Development Stage. Circleville Road Legend Science Park Road Western Inner Loop Bikepaths Proposed Bikepaths Roads To Widen Proposed Roads Parks Agricultural Easements Old Gatesburg Road Bristol Avenue West College Avenue Nixon Road Foxpointe Drive Whitehall Road PA Rte 45 PA Rte 26/45 PA Rte 26 Bypass Plainfield Road PA Rte 45 PA Rte 26 1, ,100 2,200 3,300 4,400 5,500 Feet June 2002

121 January 2008 Ferguson Township - North Atherton St. Official Map Martin St. Intent: The proposed roads and bikepaths on this map are shown for general location purposes only. Circleville Rd. Note: Alignment of roads and bikepaths to be determined at the Planning, Subdivision or Land Development Stage. Blue Course Dr. Science Park Rd. Foxpointe Dr. Bristol Ave. Nixon Road West College Avenue Old Gatesburg Rd PA Rt. 45 PA Rt. 26 & 45 Whitehall Rd Plainfield Rd Tadpole Road Rt. 26 Bypass Rt. 45 PA Rt. 26 This is to certify that this is the Official Map of Ferguson Township as adopted by Ordinance 770 on April 16, 2001 and amended by Ordinance on, Chairman Board of Supervisors Township Manager Date Date Legend Growth Boundary Roads To Widen Bike Paths Proposed Bike Paths Proposed Roads Municipal Property Parks Agricultural Easements Potential Parkland Acquisition: Neighborhood Potential Parkland Acquisition: Community Natural Area Conservation Feet 0 1,500 3,000 6,000 9,000 12,000

122 B TR EET O PS DR UN VD ND R OX PO INTE DR L ES TE R W LL LN RD E PIN E GR OV E ST SW AT E R R T RN UT S E BU TT E D EG EP IN ER SC IR T TS NU BE EC H LN VE R AL Y DANNLEY DR G T N FI EL M RO VE RD W AR D SH AW B EC KL EY RD SO W RI D GE LVD W OE N C S CIR KH W PA R CAMBRIDGE DR WILTSHIRE DR BERKSHIRE DR NORTHWICK BLVD CHESTNUT HICKO N FO XP O IN T E DR TANAGER DR CURTIN ST G G E PARK HILLS AVE q 10, 000F eet 5, 000 2, Miles GR A 1 PARK LN 0. 5 S CORL ST 0 GRAC E ST N U C H O U Data Sources N T Centr e County GI S Y Centr e RegionCouncil ofgover nments Tow ns hipoff er gus on U. S. Depar tmentofthe I nter ior, F is h and Wildlife S er vice. National Wetlands Inventory - Wetlands. [http: / / w w w. fw s. gov/ wetlands ]. Was hington, D. C. :U. S. F is h and Wildlife S er vice National WetlandsI nventor y, May U. S. Depar tmentofhomeland S ecur ity, F eder al Emer gency ManagementAgency. National Flood Hazard Layer. [https : / / ms c. fema. gov/ ]. Was hington, D. C. :F E MAF lood MapS er vice Center, May P. A. Depar tmentofe nvir onmental Pr otection, Office ofwatermanagement, Bur eau ofwaters upply and Was tewatermanagement, WaterQuality As s es s mentand S tandar dsdivis ion. DEP Streams Integrated List Layers - Attaining and Non-Attaining. [http: / / w w w. pas da. ps u. edu/ ]. Har r is bur g, P A:Penns ylvania Depar tmentofenvir onmental Pr otection, J anuar y Penns ylvania His tor ical and Mus eum Commis s ionand Penns ylvania Depar tmentoft r ans por tation. Ask ReGIS - National Historic Registry Locations. [http: / / cr gis. s tate. pa. us ]:Cultur al Res our cesgeogr aphic I nfor mations ys tem, May 2017 IN T D N op opop G O N C O U Y T VE RD E GRO W PIN ñ Meadows Park Bucher Ayres Farm Buildings O RD ST ER T A SW SANDY DR Ferguson Twp Watershed Preserve BARNSTABLE LN MCBATH ST RTHAM PTON ST NO R LN BE R U U O O R R H RY Fairbrook Park N CORL ST O Ferguson Township Elementary School k W RD ALL H ITE WH MADISON ST E Ferguson Elementary Ballfields L LOW RD OL RD Inset 3 RD L FALC ON P O D IEL NF AI PL D C CHEL TEABERRY LN Cecil Irvin Park op opopop RD E BI R P OLD BLOCK RD H I AIRPORT RD LONGFELLOW LN BLUE COURSE DR W Inset 2 PINE HALL RD SCIENCE PARK RD CIR AB S CCANDLEF N P UT H T O SCIENCE PARK CT E T HI RD NS N OW LET G IN SH W TO S CT CT E LD T D A OO D C H A RLES T IS RED WILLO W VE EA EG LL CO Whitehall Road Regional Park R R K IN G RED LI COUNTRY G L JULES DR A CIR FAIRFI N _ ^ T ON HA W E W PS R HA D ER OL P D TA N XO NI Autumnwood Park RD S DR CT RK PA SSFF S & A Homes Park The Park at E V A Stonebridge OL IST R B D OO W AU TUM N R D RD opopop State College Teener League Fields CE IEN SC N XO NI D OL G UR SB E T GA Y KW YP Haymarket Park RD RD RK PA L AL EH PI N N RD RG SBU E T GA LD N TL ES N ER DR CE IEN SC Science Park Recreation Association Greenbriar Saybrook Park SE UR CO UE BL H H DR op TA VI S S TAT E C O L L E G E BOROUGH EY LL VA H U N T I N G D O N Homestead Park DR Overlook Heights Tot Lot FI E ER DE RD ILLE V E L CIRC P HI MA RE NG ST RO AA Park Hills Park SS HH II PP NN op op W W NN DR NA TH ER TO N Tom Tudek Memorial Park 1 t se N RO AA E In BL RO VA I W 1, 000 F eet 500 AA 250 q 0. 2Mile TT TT q COLLEGE TOWNSHIP OO 1, 000 F eet Mile E RD ROV G E IN WP LIGHTNER ST 0 OO LN MP CA Fairbrook Park RD F er gus ontow ns hipmunicipal Building 3147Res ear ch Dr ive S tate College, P A ( 814) w w w. tw p. fer gus on. pa. us MapDate:6/ 28/ 2017 N EN GL K OA R GE SIN S I GR DATE RR KK DD OOOO BBRR R AD RD E LV VA K T OWNS HI PMANAGER RD DATE BOARDOFS U PERVI S ORS RD q ER IBL DE N OL NG E R MA ROSEWOOD CIR 2, 000 F eet RD LE DA N VE RA LN EERR AVV BBEEA op D DR OK RO RB FAI 0. 4Mile T HI S I S T OCE RT I F Y T HAT T HI S I S T HEOF F I CI AL MAPOFT HET OWNS HI P OF F E RGU S ON RE F E RRE D TO I N SE CT I ON _ OF ORDI NANCE OF T HE T OWNS HI P OF F E RGU S ON,CE NT RE COU NT Y, PE NNS Y L VANI A.E NACT E DAS OF _, DATE W DO EA M M EL O FM ON T LE E EEN GR LN L HA CHAI RMAN W PP W OW TT *Per the Centre Regional Planning Agency (CRPA) NS R S ES HO Regional Bike Plan, as amended May 23, Proposed Bicycle Facilities are shown as amended by Ferguson Township. R CI 1, 000 ARD DD GO CT 500 RD ALL H IT E WH 0 EE 0. 2 DR IN TA EE C C RD RD RESEARCH DR Whitehall Road Regional Park O O LL GG LL Ferguson Twp Watershed Preserve E ST UT N T ES CH SH E F F II SH E L L ER S BND W WHITEHALL RD E HH PP HHIIGG MAN CIR H O E INT CV MO NE STO T AIN R ED OR M CA SY DR N DO RRDD C R CIR ST D OO EW BL M RA W DD N RR WN LLAAW K K O O O BBRRO HE R LN ST C S BUTZ CE N ILD L CH R I FA OI M DDM OOAA BBRR S CT _ ^ SCENT CIR S KIR K ST T TS NU T ES CH UN EE GR S EERRS ST DR Z ST N BUT CONOV ER L N DR AY DER W W CAL T HOY S MIDDLE ST E NS DR OW ON WESTERLY PKWY WAY DR N IRIO MO W D OO PW DEE FFIELD DR SHE DA CIN RD VE GRO E P IN ALY SMITH D TA DP OL ER D LEISURE LN VE CE A RU P S MYRTLE ST The Park at Stonebridge EE SS AAVV JAM EE FIR DR Pur chas ed BRISTOL AVE CATO AVE D S EL ST UT RN E T BUT Z ST MART ES ST MAY CT S&A Homes Park WASHINGTON PL OR RIDGEVIEW RD BLOOMSDORF DR P ending Pur chas e GALA DR JUNIPER DR PAME LL CH Haymarket Park QUA IL RU N DR RRLL CCOO CCIIRR ( Centr e County' spur chas e of Agr icultur al Cons er vatione as ement[p ACE ] Pr ogr am) CONCORD DR D TE DR OOIIN R R ABIN GG O YLEN CIR C IR N HO LLOW RD PARK CENTE R BL V BREEZEWOOD DR F loodplains IR EELLD C DR k VIE RO ES T N MOS L SAINT E L ALY REED EA GL TH RU SH ST SP AR R ST OW K ST N KIR DR CYPRESS DR VER ST O WE P ar cels Parcels Included in PACE Agricultural Easements Clear Water Ferguson Township Elementary School BLA IR Autumnwood Park FIELDSTONE DR Municipal Boundar ies HalfmoonOS PP RR TEE EESST CCHH CCTT DR YAN BAN IEW WV O AD ME KO C Ferguson Elementary Ballfields HAW KNEST R D Y EY AL HARL VE VER A W BEA AVE LLEGE W CO GRASS ALY DR AR VE ASH A RA Regional Gr ow th Boundar y ON VE R TD ON M SE RO DR ELD P SEA N NL EN STAFFORD CIR B R USH W O O ENTERPRISE DR LN CT GATE S YY G ATEWAA Boundary Lines & Natural Features AY SUND HOLLY OGA DR S ARAT Tow ns hipow ned Pr oper ty P ar ks R BNE State College Teener League Fields LN E xis ting S tate Bike Route* S tr eets MUNCY RD R R U N LN TTE SE E xis ting S har ed U s e Path* WOOD DR MN TU AU E xis ting Bike L ane* IN PO S FO X SO I N E H AL L C T PIN E CLIFF RD DR B RD S RD N U R R ED HARVES T NT DF RRAAD O op RUN RD Mus s ergapgr eenw ay &T r ail P ar kp aths Overlook Heights Tot Lot BEA G LLEE RUN CT LOIS L N EST RV HA Existing Municipal Facilities SH EL D SR RT SPO ICK CRE T D NR S NIX O HA VE RSHIRE B TE R C HES AN EG M EEE CIR AATTLL LONGFELLOW CT LINN ST TEAL LN DS PL LINNET LN PARTRIDGE LN R DR STE MA OORD HT S Science Park Recreation Association D LV Pr opos ed Par kland S idew alks N ALLEN ST S N YL W RR T DO HE S C E H EA T I M E D NG O L K ST OA OLD GATESBURG RD F utur ef ir e S tation op SON JO HHNNS TTEERR DR SAGAM OR E Cecil Irvin Park DR GE VILL A W CHERR Y LN ST HT Pr opos ed Bicycle F acilities * Wells H I LL Inset 3 E NORTH HILLS PL CTR K NOB MUIR Pr opos ed Roads RUSHC Proposed Facilities PARK CREST LN P LN Y TO ROCK E CLINTON AVE ER SETT ON WAY His tor ic S ite (per National Register of Historic Places) ñ H ERRY HILL RD CIRCLEVILLE RD E L IF F SC ARRDD VIN E YYA N HHVVN F er gus ontow ns hipe lementar y S chool k Tom Tudek Memorial Park OXFORD C op NAN TUCKET CIR Greenbriar Saybrook Park R VEST DR ME R C RO ST AVEBU RRYY ABBY PL IIRR Park Hills Park CIR LILAC LN H Homestead Park RRY HILL RD HE A Landmarks er gus ontow ns hipmunicipal Building _ F ^ STEAD LN FARM op GLENWOOD CIR S CC GE DR RID S ILL IR WES IR TW OODD CC Suburban Park IL LS PL H H ORT N W E AV E AARON DR ND NORTHL A RY HILL D R GR TIN S T MA R RE D OA K LN HERMA N DR CCIIRR CARDINAL LN VAL LEY VISTA DR OFFI CI AL MAP OAK LEAF D R PI NE HU R ST DR PRINCETON DR DD OOOO NNWW EEEE DR N DR ARO WA Inset 2 D BLV SUBURBAN AVE N RTO THE NA A CHE D Y R IDG E R RR DEVONSHIRE DR LN FARM OLD AALL DR NNDD CCRRAA HARRIS ST P P T T T T A A N N O O N N W W O O T T S S BLV D AN GM P P II H H RO VAI MARJORIE MAE ST I AC AC Inset 1

123 Accounts Payable Checks by Date - Detail by Check Number User: Printed: eendresen 7/11/2017 9:16 AM Check No ACH Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference PNC INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENTS 06/15/ POLICE PENSION WITHHELD 2, Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10870: 2, ACH VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFR AGENTS RH06/15/ KUNKLE RETIREMENT HEALTH SAVINGS 5,00 Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 11156: 5,00 ACH VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS 4 06/15/ , Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 11218: 5, ACH VANTANGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS 06/15/ ROTH IRA Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 11381: ACH PNC INSTITUTIONAL INVESTMENTS 06/30/ POLICE PENSION WITHHELD 2, Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 10870: 2, ACH VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS 4 06/30/ , Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 11216: 15, ACH VANTAGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS 4 06/30/ , Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 11218: 5, ACH VANTANGEPOINT TRANSFER AGENTS 06/30/ ROTH IRA Total for this ACH Check for Vendor 11381: STATE COLLEGE BOROUGH WATER AU06/30/ FIRE HYDRANT 2-28/5/26 8, Total for Check Number 17: 8, WEST PENN POWER 06/30/ JUN17 HAVASHIRE BLVD LIGHTING Total for Check Number 66: NITTANY OIL COMPANY 06/30/ HEATING OIL AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Number (7/11/2017 9:16 AM) Page 1

124 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference Total for Check Number 139: STATE COLLEGE BOROUGH WATER AU06/30/ PARK CREST LANE BANK BARN PARK CREST LANE - DOG PARK Total for Check Number 140: WEST PENN POWER 06/30/ JUN PARK CREST LANE HOUSE JUN PARK CREST LANE Total for Check Number 141: HANSON AGGREGATES PA INC 06/15/ A SUBBASE A SUBBASE 1, A SUBBASE A-STANDARD Total for Check Number 181: 2, HRI INC 06/15/ MM 3<30 15% RAP 7, MM 3<30 15% RAP 7, MM 3<30 15% RAP 4, Total for Check Number 182: 20, R C BOWMAN INC 06/15/ TRIAXLE LOAD SCREENED TOPSOIL Total for Check Number 183: HANSON AGGREGATES PA INC 06/30/ A SUBBASE 1, Total for Check Number 184: 1, HRI INC 06/30/ MM 3<30 15% RAP WMA 6, Total for Check Number 185: 6, NTM ENGINEERING INC 06/15/ CENTRE REGION MS4 PARTNERS PRP PLAN 2, Total for Check Number 328: 2, ALLIED MECHANICAL & ELECTRICA 06/30/ REPLACE ROOFTOP UNITS #2 & #3 PER QU 13,50 Total for Check Number 329: 13, ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING & DESIG06/30/ ZONING ORDINANCE, ZONING MAP AND S 7, Total for Check Number 330: 7, GOV HR USA 06/30/ EXECUTIVE SEARCH FOR POLICE CHIEF 7, AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Number (7/11/2017 9:16 AM) Page 2

125 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference Total for Check Number 331: 7, A & A SALES ASSOCIATES 06/15/ T-SHIRTS GREEN FOR PW/VESTS/T-SHIRTS 2, Total for Check Number 5736: 2, ALLIED MECHANICAL & ELECTRICA 06/15/ COMMERCIAL MAINTENANCE 75 Total for Check Number 5737: AMERICAN ROCK SALT COMPANY LL 06/15/ BULK ICE CONTROL SALT 4, BULK ICE CONTROL SALT 4, BULK ICE CONTROL SALT 4, BULK ICE CONTROL SALT 2, Total for Check Number 5738: 14, AMTEC LESS LETHAL SYSTEMS 06/15/ TRAINING SLATER & LAMB 1,59 Total for Check Number 5739: 1, ASAP HYDRAULICS STATE COLLEGE, 06/15/ ROLLER PARTS Total for Check Number 5740: BAKER TILLY VIRCHOW KRAUSE, LLP 06/15/2017 BT CAFR 1,50 Total for Check Number 5741: 1, BARTLETT TREE EXPERTS 06/15/ OAK WILT TREATMENT 7, Total for Check Number 5742: 7, BASTIAN TIRE & AUTO CENTERS 06/15/ TIRES 88 Total for Check Number 5743: BEST LINE EQUIPMENT 06/15/2017 P39785 AIR FILTER/FILTER/HYD FILTER/AC FILTER Total for Check Number 5744: CAMPBELL DURRANT BEATTY PALOM06/15/ PERSONNEL MATTER EXTENDED MEDICA 1, Total for Check Number 5745: 1, CENTRE COMMUNICATIONS INC 06/15/ BATTERIES FOR PORTABLE RADIO REPROGRAM 3 UNITS FOR POLICE NEW H Total for Check Number 5746: CENTRE DAILY TIMES 06/15/2017 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Number (7/11/2017 9:16 AM) Page 3

126 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference BOS MTG REPEALING THE CENTRE REGIO BOS MTG JUNE 5TH Total for Check Number 5747: CINTAS CORPORATION # /15/ GLOVES PW UNIF CLN 5/ PW UNIF CLN 5/ Total for Check Number 5748: CLEARFIELD WHOLESALE PAPER COM06/15/ FACIAL TISSUE Total for Check Number 5749: CLEVELAND BROTHERS 06/15/2017 INPP HOSE/ELEMENT/FILTER/HYDO INPP REESE/PEDAL/PLUG INPP AIR FILTER SERV FIX HYDROSTATIC DRIVE SKID STEER 1, Total for Check Number 5750: 2, CALEB CLOUSE 06/15/ ST QTR CLOTHING ALLOWANCE ND QTR CLOTHING ALLOWANCE RD QTR CLOTHING ALLOWANCE TH QTR CLOTHING ALLOWANCE Total for Check Number 5751: COLONIAL AUTO SUPPLY 06/15/ WIPER BLADES/BELTS/OIL FILTER/GASKE 1, ANTIFREEZE WIPER BLADES/OIL FILTER/BATTERY Total for Check Number 5752: 1, COLONIAL PRESS 06/15/ EA TRAFFIC/NON-TRAFFIC CITATIONS 32 Total for Check Number 5753: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA06/15/ MS4 INDIVIDUAL PERMIT 50 Total for Check Number 5754: DAVIDHEISERS INC 06/15/ SPEED TESTED/STOP WATCHED/VASCAR T 1, Total for Check Number 5755: 1, DONS POWER EQUIPMENT 06/15/ FUEL KIT/AIR CARB/CLEAN CARB/ADJUST CARB/CHECK HEAD ECHO Total for Check Number 5756: AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Number (7/11/2017 9:16 AM) Page 4

127 Check No 5757 Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference ECOLAWN 06/15/ PROPERTIES MOWING EAST CHESTNUT STREET Total for Check Number 5757: FAYETTE PARTS SERVICE INC 06/15/ IDLER PULLEY BATTERY/LICENSE KIT Total for Check Number 5758: FERGUSON TOWNSHIP POLICE ASSOC 06/15/ POLICE UNION DUES 38 Total for Check Number 5759: FERGUSON TOWNSHIP SUPERVISORS 06/15/ TIF TRANSFER MAY , Total for Check Number 5760: 200, DUANE FISHER 06/15/ MILEAGE REIMBURSEMENT FOR POLICE C Total for Check Number 5761: FISHER AUTO PARTS 06/15/ MINI LAMP/SPARK PLUG/REFLECTOR/FILT ANTIFREEZE ANTIFREEZE MINI FUSE BLACK SILICONE 10.3 CARTRIDGE/ENGINE AIR TOOL PLUG Total for Check Number 5762: FRED CARSON DISPOSAL SERVICE IN 06/15/ COMMERCIAL WASTE SERVICE/RECYCLIN Total for Check Number 5763: GREAT AMERICA FINANCIAL SERVICE 06/15/ COPIER LEASE 5052CI Total for Check Number 5764: GROFF TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT 06/15/2017 PSO HARNESS Total for Check Number 5765: CHARLES F HERR JR 06/15/ \106 SEO FOR SHELL/LAURA 30 17\108 SEO FOR BISH/NATHAN 60 17\407 SEO FOR MOORE/MICHAEL 40 17\407-1 SEO FOR MOORE/MICHAEL 14 17\905 PUMPING WAVIER REQUEST CORAY/MARY Total for Check Number 5766: 1, HUNTER KEYSTONE PETERBILT, LP 06/15/2017 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Number (7/11/2017 9:16 AM) Page 5

128 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference X :01 STRAP-DOOR CHECK 2 EA Total for Check Number 5767: JOHN DEERE FINANCIAL 06/15/ LUBRICANT FILTER ELEMENT Total for Check Number 5768: K & S DISTRIBUTION 06/15/ GREASE/CLEANER Total for Check Number 5769: KISTLER OBRIEN 06/15/ PANEL HALON 1301 PRIMARY INSPECT SE Total for Check Number 5770: DANA S LEONARD 06/15/ FTPD ACCREDITATION 2,40 Total for Check Number 5771: 2, MAXSON PRODUCTS COMPANY 06/15/ BUSINESS CARDS PRIBULKA BUSINESS CARDS ANECKSTEIN Total for Check Number 5772: MCCARTNEYS INC 06/15/ CASE/BOOK STENO/FOLDERS/PENS CASE/BOOK STENO/FOLDERS/PENS/PENCI LABELS/FILES Total for Check Number 5773: MIDSTATE TOOL & SUPPLY INC 06/15/ &48183 AUTO RANGING DMM Total for Check Number 5774: MOERSCHBACHER ENTERPRISES INC 06/15/ MARK'S RETIREMENT DINNER Total for Check Number 5775: MONARCH CLEANERS 06/15/ PW UNIF CLN MAY POLICE UNIF CLN MAY MARTIN'S DRY CLN MAY CHIEF'S UNIF CLN MAY CHIEF'S DRY CLN MAY Total for Check Number 5776: NEW PIG 06/15/ MATS 2 EA Total for Check Number 5777: NOERRS GARAGE 06/15/2017 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Number (7/11/2017 9:16 AM) Page 6

129 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference &31,408, FUEL FILTERS/OIL FILTERS/TRANS FILTER FIX TURBOS/VENTED CRANK CASE SYSTE 3, Total for Check Number 5778: 3, NORTH CENTRAL DIGITAL SYSTEMS I 06/15/2017 ARIN TRAY 13 CNIN B & W COPIES CNIN COLOR COPIES CNIN B & W COPIES CNIN COLOR COPIES 8.87 CNIN B & W COPIES 2.63 CNIN COLOR COPIES 4.49 CNIN B & W COPIES 6.56 CNIN COLOR COPIES CNIN B & W COPIES 5.00 CNIN COLOR COPIES CNIN B & W COPIES 0.23 CNIN B & W COPIES 3.30 CNIN COLOR COPIES 2.03 CNIN COPIER LEASE TASKALFA/CS 3010I CNIN COPIER LEASE TASKALFA CNIN COPIER LEASE M3550IDN Total for Check Number 5779: 1, NTM ENGINEERING INC 06/15/ CENTRE REGION MS4 PARTNERS PRP PLAN 7, ES ES ES Total for Check Number 5780: 7, OLD DOMINION BRUSH 06/15/ IN HEX NUT POLY GUTTER BRM Total for Check Number 5781: OLYMPIC UNIFORMS 06/15/ PANTS/SHIRTS Total for Check Number 5782: PA DEP 06/15/ STORAGE TANK GAS STORAGE TANK DIESEL 5 Total for Check Number 5783: PA ONE CALL SYSTEM 06/15/ MONTHLY ACTIVITY FEE/SUPPLEMENTAL Total for Check Number 5784: PAMELA R. WINTER, SEO 06/15/2017 D17-5 SEO FOR BISH/NATHAN 30 Total for Check Number 5785: PATCTECH 06/15/2017 ALC PATCTECH SERVICES MAY AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Number (7/11/2017 9:16 AM) Page 7

130 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference Total for Check Number 5786: PENN POWER GROUP 06/15/ REINSTALL BRAKE SWITCH/REINSTALLED Total for Check Number 5787: PENN PRIME TRUST 06/15/ PROPERTY INSURANCE 15, PUBLIC OFFICIALS INSURANCE 5, VEHICLE INSURANCE 9, CRIME INSURANCE POLICE LIABILITY INSURANCE 7, Total for Check Number 5788: 38, PENN PRIME WORKERS COMPENSATI 06/15/ WORKERS' COMP 40, Total for Check Number 5789: 40, PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL HEALTH 06/15/ HEALTHCARE INS JUL 17 73, DENTAL INS JUL 17 3, EYECARE INS JUL Total for Check Number 5790: 76, POWER DMS 06/15/ SDMS-AS-RECURRING-POLICY & TRAININ 3,95 Total for Check Number 5791: 3, PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC 06/15/ JACKET Total for Check Number 5792: PSATS 06/15/2017 INV N7H PA TOWNSHIP NEW SUBSCRIPTION 4 Total for Check Number 5793: QUILL CORPORATION 06/15/ DOORHANGERS Total for Check Number 5794: RED THE UNIFORM TAILOR 06/15/2017 0M TROUSERS/CARGO PANTS M JACKETS 1, Total for Check Number 5795: 2, ROBERT W. BEHRER LLC 06/15/ STREET TREE PLANTING 1, STREET TREE PLANTING 51,06 Total for Check Number 5796: 52, ROBINSON SEPTIC SERVICE INC 06/15/ PORTABLE TOILET STATE COLLEGE AREA AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Number (7/11/2017 9:16 AM) Page 8

131 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference Total for Check Number 5797: SAFECHECKS 06/15/ SUPER BUSINESS CHECK LASER 3000 ORD Total for Check Number 5798: STAHL SHEAFFER ENGINEERING LLC06/15/ HUNTERS CHASE PHASE 6 7, Total for Check Number 5799: 7, STOCKER CHEVROLET INC 06/15/ WIPER BLADES/AXLE SEALS/SEAL/NUTTE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT FT Total for Check Number 5800: TEL POWER INC 06/15/ INSURANCE CLAIM 4, REPAIR & TEST GENERATOR CORDS/TRAF Total for Check Number 5801: 5, TRANSUNION RISK AND ALTERNATIV 06/15/ ID SEARCHES Total for Check Number 5802: TW CONSULTING INC 06/15/ CONSUMER CREDIT ANALYSIS ARGIRO/AR 12 Total for Check Number 5803: U S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY INC 06/15/ SIGNS SIGNS SIGNS SIGNS 2, SIGNS SIGNS 10 Total for Check Number 5804: 4, ULINE 06/15/ EARPLUGS UNCORDED/EAR PLUGS CORD Total for Check Number 5805: VERIZON WIRELESS 06/15/ ADM CELL USE MAY ENG CELL USE MAY POLICE CELL USE MAY OEO CELL USE MAY CELL PHONE WITHHOLDING MAY MARK'S CELL PHONE WITHHOLDING MAY DAVE'S CELL PHONE WITHHOLDING MAY POLICE CELL PHONE WITHHOLDING MAY Total for Check Number 5806: AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Number (7/11/2017 9:16 AM) Page 9

132 Check No 5807 Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference WELLS FARGO 06/15/ COPIER LEASE 3010I COPIER LEASE M3550IDN Total for Check Number 5807: WESCO RECEIVABLES CORP 06/15/ PHOTO CELL BALLAST Total for Check Number 5808: WEST PENN POWER 06/15/ JUN17 S WATER ST JUN N ATHERTON ST JUN17 PINE GROVE BLINKER WEST JUN17 PINE GROVE BLINKER EAST 9.92 Total for Check Number 5809: WILLIAMS BROTHERS 06/15/ LAG/HEX/WAHER/RECIP HEX HEX/WASHER FOR JUNCTION BOX Total for Check Number 5810: WINDSTREAM 06/15/ LONG DIST MAY LONG DIST MAY LINE/BASIC SERV MAY LINE/BASIC SERV MAY LINE/BASIC SERV MAY Total for Check Number 5811: WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC 06/15/2017 S HANDCUFF POUCH Total for Check Number 5812: WOODRINGS FLORAL GARDENS 06/15/ FLOWERS FOR KUNKLE RETIREMENT Total for Check Number 5813: STOCKER CHEVROLET INC 06/19/2017 CVW STRAP/SHEILD Total for Check Number 5814: CENTRAL PA JULY 4TH INC 06/20/ TH FEST ,00 Total for Check Number 5815: 1, CENTRE REGIONAL PLANNING AGEN 06/20/ SPONSORSHIP OF PA APA CONFERENCE Total for Check Number 5816: TASER INTERNATIONAL 06/20/2017 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Number (7/11/2017 9:16 AM) Page 10

133 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference ANNUAL SUPPORT & MAINTENANCE - ME 1, Total for Check Number 5817: 1, HRIC 06/26/ CHECK FOR HOUSING, DEPOSITS, APPLICA 3, Total for Check Number 5818: 3, PRK MOR INC 06/26/ NEW HIRE PARKING FOR OSOSKIE & NEEL 33 Total for Check Number 5819: AFLAC 06/30/ INSURANCE WITHHELD Total for Check Number 5820: ALLIED MECHANICAL & ELECTRICA 06/30/ FIX PINHOLE IN LINE Total for Check Number 5821: AMERICAN ROCK SALT COMPANY LL 06/30/ BULK ICE CONTROL SALT 2, Total for Check Number 5822: 2, AUL ONE AMERICA 06/30/ STD INS JUL LTD INS JUL VOL LIFE INS JUL LIFE INS JUL Total for Check Number 5823: 2, BEST LINE EQUIPMENT 06/30/2017 P40305 FILTER Total for Check Number 5824: KEN CALVERT 06/30/ HOTEL AND MEAL EXPENSES Total for Check Number 5825: CENTRAL PA CHIEFS OF POLICE 06/30/ MEMBERSHIP FEE ALBRIGHT/CHRIS 5 Total for Check Number 5826: CENTRE COUNTY UNITED WAY 06/30/ U-WAY Total for Check Number 5827: CENTRE DAILY TIMES 06/30/ ZHB MTG MTG JUNE BOS MTG ORD #1032 & # BOS MTG MTG JUNE SEALED BIDS FOR PROJ 2016-C10 BIKEPAT SEALED BIDS PROJ 217-C AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Number (7/11/2017 9:16 AM) Page 11

134 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference Total for Check Number 5828: LAWRENCE T. CLAYTON, PH.D. 06/30/ TEST CANDIDATE NEELY, LAUREN TEST CANDIDATE OSOSKIE, SKYLER TEST CANDIDATE WAKEFIELD, BRIAN 85 Total for Check Number 5829: 2, COLLEGIATE PRIDE INC 06/30/ ROSTER PLAQUE/ENGRAVING Total for Check Number 5830: COLONIAL PRESS 06/30/ #10 REGULAR LETTERHEAD ENV Total for Check Number 5831: COLUMBIA GAS OF PA INC 06/30/ JUN17 OFFICE GAS JUN17 GARAGE GAS Total for Check Number 5832: DIANE CONRAD 06/30/ CHIEF DRY CLEANING MEETING EXPENSES Total for Check Number 5833: CUSTOM ALTERATIONS 06/30/ PATCHES & REPAIRS Total for Check Number 5834: ECOLAWN 06/30/ COUNTY STRIP ALONG PARK CENTRE BLV Total for Check Number 5835: FASTENAL COMPANY 06/30/2017 PASTA GLOVES Total for Check Number 5836: FERGUSON TOWNSHIP POLICE ASSOC 06/30/ POLICE UNION DUES 38 Total for Check Number 5837: FRYE'S SWEEPER AND SEWING CENTE06/30/ SWEEPER BAGS Total for Check Number 5838: GREAT AMERICA FINANCIAL SERVICE 06/30/ COPIER LEASE 5052CI Total for Check Number 5839: DANA S LEONARD 06/30/2017 AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Number (7/11/2017 9:16 AM) Page 12

135 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference FTPD ACCREDITATION 1,70 Total for Check Number 5840: 1, MAGLOCLEN 06/30/ P82 MAGLOCLEN MEMBERSHIP USER FEES JU 40 Total for Check Number 5841: MAXSON PRODUCTS COMPANY 06/30/ BUSINESS CARDS FOR WAKEFIELD AND L Total for Check Number 5842: MCCARTNEYS INC 06/30/ PENCILS 3.00 Total for Check Number 5843: NITTANY OIL COMPANY 06/30/ POLICE FUEL 3, PW FUEL DIESEL FUEL 7, Total for Check Number 5844: 12, NORTH CENTRAL DIGITAL SYSTEMS I 06/30/2017 TASKALFA 3051CI COPIER LEASE & COPY COUNT TASKALFA Total for Check Number 5845: OLD DOMINION BRUSH 06/30/ IN HEX NUT POLY GUTTER BROOM Total for Check Number 5846: PA CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCIATIN 06/30/ MEMBERSHIP FEE FOR PA CHIEFS OF 25 Total for Check Number 5847: PENNSYLVANIA MUNICIPAL LEAGUE 06/30/ FN 2017 PATH BOOKKEEPING & ACCOUNTING 8 Total for Check Number 5848: PITNEY BOWES GLOBAL FINANCIAL S 06/30/ POSTAGE MACHINE RENTAL Total for Check Number 5849: R H MARCON INC 06/30/ ROOF INSPECTION: REPAIR METAL FLASH Total for Check Number 5850: RED THE UNIFORM TAILOR 06/30/2017 0M QUOTE FOR UNIFORM PURCHASE - SEE AT M QUOTE FOR UNIFORM PURCHASE - SEE AT M QUOTE FOR UNIFORM PURCHASE - SEE AT Total for Check Number 5851: 1, AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Number (7/11/2017 9:16 AM) Page 13

136 Check No 5852 Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference SAM'S CLUB 06/30/ LYSOL/BATH TISSUE/COFFEE/TABLECOVE WATER BOOM COMMITTEE LUNCH Total for Check Number 5852: SIGNAL CONTROL PRODUCTS INC 06/30/ SIGNAL MONITOR Total for Check Number 5853: SOSMETAL PRODUCTS INC 06/30/ BUTTON BATTERY/LITHIUM BATTERY/HO Total for Check Number 5854: STATE COLLEGE BOROUGH WATER AU06/30/ RESEARCH DRIVE BLDG # BRISTOL AVE FROM 5/17-5/ Total for Check Number 5855: STATIONERS INC 06/30/ OFFICIAL POLICE NOTEBOOKS Total for Check Number 5856: STEVE HACKMAN BUILDERS 06/30/2017 ES-345 ES Total for Check Number 5857: STONEBRIDGE HOUSING LP 06/30/ ES ES Total for Check Number 5858: T-MOBILE USA INC 06/30/ TOWER DUMP 5 Total for Check Number 5859: THE HARTMAN GROUP 06/30/ CONSULTING FEE 1,50 Total for Check Number 5860: 1, UNITED RENTALS 06/30/2017 RENTAL OF MINI EXCAVATOR FOR 1 MONT 2, Total for Check Number 5861: 2, WELLS FARGO 06/30/ COPIER LEASE 3051CI COPIER LEASE 3051CI Total for Check Number 5862: WEST PENN POWER 06/30/ JUN17 WHITEHALL RD/RESEARCH DR JUN17 WHITEHALL RD/WEST COLLEGE AVE AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Number (7/11/2017 9:16 AM) Page 14

137 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference 1054-JUN17 W COLLEGE AVE JUN SCIENCE PARK RD JUN17 WESTERLY PKWY BLUE CR JUN17 W CHERRY LN MARTIN ST JUN17 SCIENCE PARK ROAD JUN17 SCIENCE PARK ROAD JUN17 BRISTOL AVE JUN CIRCLEVILLE ROAD JUN17 OFFICE COMPLEX , JUN W COLLEGE AVE JUN17 GARAGE/MAINT BLDG JUN17 OLD GATESBURG ROAD JUN17 BIKE TUNNEL JUN17 BLDG # JUN17 N HILLS DR JUN N ATHERTON ST JUN17 N ATHERTON ST JUN W COLLEGE AVE JUN17 BLUE COURSE DR & HAVENSHIRE DR JUN17 W COLLEGE AVE JUN17 AARON DR MARTIN ST Total for Check Number 5863: 3, WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC 06/30/2017 S HOLSTER/BELTS Total for Check Number 5864: BMO HARRIS MASTERCARD 06/03/2017 ANGELA PAYPAL APMM 5 ANGELA PA STATE POLICE 8.00 ANGELA BAUDVILLE INC ANGELA CABELLAS ANGELA WALMART ANGELA PARTY CITY ANGELA AMAZON ANGELA WALMART ANGELA PAYPAL APMM 5 ANGELA PA STATE POLICE 8.00 ANGELA TARGET ANGELA TARGET ANGELA PA STATE POLICE 8.00 ANGELA PAYPAL APMM 5 BRIAN ROSE CHIAROS PIZZA BRIAN ROSE WAWA 6.98 BRIAN ROSE SUBWAY BRIAN ROSE HOLIDAY INN BRIAN ROSE MCDONALDS 9.41 BRIAN ROSE EXXON BRIAN ROSE WAWA 4.87 BRIAN ROSE THE MILL BRIAN ROSE WAWA 8.97 BRIAN ROSE HOLIDAY INN BRIAN ROSE SUNOCO BRIAN ROSE GULF OIL BRIAN ROSE 1750 BISTRO BRUCE IATN.NET BRUCE ACADEMY.COM BRUCE TRUCKNTOW.COM AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Number (7/11/2017 9:16 AM) Page 15

138 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference BRUCE PRECISION SALES BRUCE KLINES GARAGE CHRIS ALBRIGHT INTERNATIONAL OUTERWEAR 1,00 CHRIS ALBRIGHT TIFFIN METAL PRODUCTS CHRIS ALBRIGHT LOWES 8.33 CHRIS ALBRIGHT WEIS MARKETS CHRIS ALBRIGHT CARVERS DELI CHRIS LEIDY BROTHERS PIZZA CHRIS LEIDY FORESTRY SUPPLIERS CONRAD PARKING SCB 1.50 CONRAD PARKSUPPLIES CONRAD WEIS MARKETS CONRAD SQUARE BAGELS CONRAD OTTOS PUB DEVON ARC SERVICES TRAINING 2 DEVON ARC SERVICES TRAINING DEVON ARC SERVICES TRAINING ENDRESEN AMAZON 8.95 ENDRESEN CALIFORNIA TORTILLA 7.34 ENDRESEN AMERICAN ENDRESEN RTD EAST DIA ENDRESEN LEBUS 8.91 ENDRESEN SYRUP DOWNTOWN ENDRESEN GRAND HYATT ENDRESEN KMC DENVER ZOO 4.50 ENDRESEN SNARFS 5.67 ENDRESEN HENRYS TAVERN ENDRESEN DENVER AIRPORT 7.83 ENDRESEN AMERICAN ENDRESEN WAWA ENDRESEN RTD DUS RAIL ENDRESEN CARIBOU COFFEE 5.16 ENDRESEN DENVER AIRPORT 7.83 ENDRESEN GFOA 28 ENDRESEN ALLEN STREET GRILL ENDRESEN AMAZON ENDRESEN AMAZON ENDRESEN AMAZON ENDRESEN AMAZON ENDRESEN AMAZON ENDRESEN AMAZON ENDRESEN AMAZON 5.17 ENDRESEN SHEETZ ENDRESEN SHEETZ 4.77 ENDRESEN LLBEAN ENDRESEN AMERICAN ENDRESEN AMERICAN ENDRESEN GFOA 5 ENDRESEN GFOA 5 ENDRESEN RITE AID 7.54 ENDRESEN GRAND HYATT JONATHAN MAYER UPS 9.85 JONATHAN MAYER STAPLES JONATHAN MAYER UPS 9.85 JONATHAN MAYER DAMONS LANCE KING GIANT 6.35 LANCE KING GIANT LANCE KING ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION LANCE KING GIANT AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Number (7/11/2017 9:16 AM) Page 16

139 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference LANCE KING ACE OF STATE COLLEGE 5.37 LINDSAY CVS PHARMACY LINDSAY DICKS SPORTING GOODS 5 LINDSAY ULTA 5 MARCELLA GIANT MARCELLA STAPLES MARCELLA STAPLES MARCELLA STAPLES MCDONALD BEDFORD DINER MCDONALD TRACTOR SUPPLY MCDONALD BEDFORD DINER MCDONALD SEARS MODRICKER AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS MORRISON USPS 7.20 MORRISON AMAZON PRIBULKA TARGET PRIBULKA EVO STUDIOS PRIBULKA INT IN NEW MOON PRIBULKA SCB PARKING 1.50 RESSLER MCDONALDS 6.08 RESSLER UNITED RESSLER DENNYS RESSLER MARRIOTT RESSLER MARRIOTT RESSLER MARRIOTT RESSLER MARRIOTT RESSLER MARRIOTT RESSLER HARRISBURG INTERNATIONAL RESSLER SUBWAY 8.99 RESSLER MARRIOTT RESSLER UNITED RESSLER MARRIOTT RYAN HENDRICK INTOXIMETERS 25 RYAN HENDRICK TRACTOR SUPPLY RYAN HENDRICK AMAZON RYAN HENDRICK NEW ENGLAND FLAG RYAN SCANLAN BUREAU OF FORESTRY 4 SLATER ULINE SHIPPING ZELLERS BURGER KING 8.68 Total for Check Number : 11, CMT LABORATORIES 06/15/ CONCRETE CYLINDERS FIELD COMPACTION TESTING Total for Check Number : WOLYNIEC CONSTRUCTION, INC. 06/15/ FERGUSON TWP CURBS AND RAMPS 68, Total for Check Number : 68, WOLYNIEC CONSTRUCTION, INC. 06/30/ FERGUSON TWP CURBS & RAMPS 5, Total for Check Number : 5, AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Number (7/11/2017 9:16 AM) Page 17

140 Check No Vendor No Vendor Name Check Date Void Checks Check Amount Invoice No Description Reference Report Total (155 checks): 740, AP Checks by Date - Detail by Check Number (7/11/2017 9:16 AM) Page 18

141 TOWNSHIP OF FERGUSON 3147 Research Drive State College, Pennsylvania Telephone: Fax: TO: FROM: Ferguson Township Board of Supervisors Ryan Scanlan, E.I.T., Assistant Township Engineer DATE: July 12, 2017 SUBJECT: AWARD OF 2017-C5, MEADOWS PARK IMPROVEMENTS Bids were opened publicly for Contract 2017-C5 Meadows Park Improvements at 2:00 pm on Tuesday July 11, 2017 and read aloud. The bid opening was attended by Jim Porter of J. Porter Enterprise, Evan Stearns of Landserv Inc., Ron Seybert, Marcella Bell and myself. The bid was advertised in the Centre Daily Times on June 22, 2017 and the invitation to bid was sent to 19 qualified contractors. Bids were received as follows: Ameron Construction Co., Inc. $72, Landserv Landscaping $76,83 John Claar Excavating $80, J. Porter Enterprises $104, Attached is a copy of the bid tabulation. The engineer s estimate for this contract is $82,04. The budget included $96,100 to complete this work. I recommend that the Board of Supervisors award the contract to Ameron Construction Co., Inc. for a total of $72, per their bid. Attachments: 2017-C5 Bid Tabulation Copy: D. Modricker 2017-C5 File - A Home Rule Municipality -

142 2017-C5 MEADOWS PARK PICINIC PAVILION & PATH 12-Jul-17 BID TAB - ADDENDUM 1 QTY ITEM No. UNIT CY SY SY LS LS LS SY EA LF EA SY DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL UNIT PRICE TOTAL CLEARING AND GRUBBING $ $ 4,41 $ $ 3, $ 1.00 $ 5,00 $ 3 $ 2,94 $ 4 $ 3,92 SUBBASE 4" DEPTH (NO. 2A) $ 2 $ 2,32 $ $ 2, $ $ 4, $ 4 $ 4,64 $ $ 1, CEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK, MODIFIED (FOR PAVILION PAD & DRINKING FOUNTAIN) $ $ 9,86 $ $ 11, $ $ 17, $ 10 $ 11,60 $ $ 16, PLACING STOCKPILED TOPSOIL, MODIFIED $ 50 $ 50 $ 2, $ 2, $ 2,20 $ 2,20 $ 3,50 $ 3,50 $ 5,00 $ 5,00 DEMOLITION/REMOVAL OF EXISTING PICNIC PAVILION STRUCTURE $ 7,80 $ 7,80 $ 6,56 $ 6,56 $ 3,60 $ 3,60 $ 3, $ 3, $ 7,05 $ 7,05 FURISH AND INSTALL 24' x 36' PAVILION STRUCTURE 44,00 $ 44,00 $ 20, $ 20, $ 20,00 $ 20,00 $ 35,00 $ 35,00 $ 45,00 $ 45,00 SEEDING, SOIL SUPPLEMENTS, AND MULCHING $ 3.50 $ 1, $ 6.75 $ 2, $ 2.90 $ 1, $ $ 5,34 $ 1.00 $ REMOVE & RESET GRILLS/TRASH RECEPTACLE $ 18 $ 36 $ 42 $ 84 $ 50 $ 1,00 $ 50 $ 1,00 $ 1,48 $ 2,96 FURNISH AND INSTALL WATER LINE TO MATCH EXISTING DIAMETER AND MATERIAL FURNISH AND INSTALL MDF MODEL 440 SM WATER FOUNTAIN ENGINEERS ESTIMATE Ameron Construction Co., Inc. Landserv Landscaping John Claar Excavating Inc. J. Porter Enterprises $ 5 $ 50 $ $ 1,48 $ $ 1,85 $ 15 $ 1,50 $ $ 1,05 $ 7,00 $ 7,00 $ 7,85 $ 7,85 $ 6,50 $ 6,50 $ 5,50 $ 5,50 $ 8,20 $ 8,20 AGGREGATE TRAIL MIX, 3" DEPTH $ $ 4, $ 4 $ 13,48 $ 4 $ 13,48 $ $ 6, $ $ 12, TOTAL $ 82,04 $ 72, $ 76,83 $ 80, $ 104, RED text above denotes a mathmatical error made by the Contractor in their bid.

143 PATTON TOWNSHIP CENTRE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 100 PATTON PLAZA STATE COLLEGE, PENNSYLVANIA PHONE: 814/ FAX: 814/ publicworks@twp.patton.pa.us - WEB SITE: To: Patton Township Board of Supervisors Doug Erickson, Patton Township Manger Ferguson Township Board of Supervisors Dave Pribulka, Ferguson Township Manager From: Susan Wheeler, Patton Township Public Works Project Manager Dave Modricker, Ferguson Township Director of Public Works RE: Professional Design Services Valley Vista Shared Use Path Background: Patton and Ferguson Townships entered into an agreement to cooperate on the submission of a grant application, the engineering design and construction of the Valley Vista Shared Use Path which will be located along the length of Valley Vista Drive. The shared use path will be 1.8 miles in length, with approximately 1.2 miles located in Patton Township and 0.8 miles located in Ferguson Township. Patton Township budgeted for $100,00 and Ferguson Township budgeted for $50,00 for a total of $150,00 that would be available for engineering design services. The Transportation Alternatives Program (TAP) grant award for this project is $1,040, to be used for construction and construction inspection. A request for proposals (RFP) was advertised in the May 3 and May 12, 2017 editions of the Centre Daily Times, notices were directly mailed to a number of firms that are on file as interested professionals and the RFP was posted on the Patton Township website. The RFP due date was May 24, The Review Committee comprised Susan Wheeler of Patton Township, Dave Modriker of Ferguson Township, Trish Meek of Centre Region Planning Agency and Matt Dickey of PennDOT District 2-0. Scope: Tasks for this design project are as follows: 1. Surveying 2. Right-of-Way Plan Preparation

144 Page 2 3. Environmental Clearance Support 4. Utility Coordination 5. Preliminary and Final Plans Preparation 6. PS&E Package Preparation 7. Permit Preparation 8. Construction Consultation Milestones and Timelines: Engineering Design Services Notice to Proceed July 2017 Preliminary Design July-September 2017 E&E SFV Meeting August 2017 Environmental Clearance October 2017 Design Field View Submission October 2017 Utility Meeting October 2017 Agency Review Period October 2017 Final Design November 2017-January 2018 Complete R.O.W. Plans January 2018 Agency Review Period February 2018 Construction Plans Check/Constructability Review March-May 2018 R.O.W. Acquisition March-May 2018 R.O.W. Clearance June 2018 Utility Clearance June 2018 Utility Relocate July-August 2018 Completed PS&E to ECMS July 2018 Advertisement Date July 2018 Bid Letting September 2018 Notice to Proceed Construction Begin Proposal Evaluations: November 2018 Early 2019 Nine (9) proposals were received and ranged in total cost from $79,90 to $151, The proposals were evaluated by the Review Committee based on project understanding, the experience of firm with shared use path design, construction and experience with TAP funded projects, the resume of the assigned Project Manager, and demonstrated ability to meet the milestones and timelines and cost. The RFP requested that the engineering design fees specify the right-of-way costs as an item that may be removed from the scope of work should it be determined during design that rights-of-way will not be required. Recommendation: Based on the ranking criteria and review of proposals submitted, the Review Committee recommends award of a professional services contract to Stahl Sheaffer Engineering, LLC of State College, Pennsylvania for the work as outlined in the RFP in the amount of $122,90. As per the cooperative agreement between Patton and Ferguson Townships, the engineering design fees shall be shared 2/3 by Patton Township ($81,933.00) and 1/3 by Ferguson Township ($40,967.00).

145 Ferguson Township 3147 Research Drive State College, PA Telephone: Fax: Memo To: From: Board of Supervisors David Pribulka, Township Manager CC: Date: July 13, 2017 Re: Net Zero Greenhouse Gas Emissions On June 19 th, the Board adopted Resolution committing the Township to immediately begin to develop a strategy to become a net-zero greenhouse gas emitter as soon as possible but no later than Given the likely complexity of such a strategy, staff is suggesting the establishment of an Ad Hoc Board tasked with its development. Per Part 4 of the Ferguson Township Administrative Code, the Board of Supervisors is permitted to establish Ad Hoc Boards as deemed necessary for a specific and temporary purpose. The Board of Supervisors is obligated to define that purpose at the time such a board is created. Ad Hoc Boards are advisory and may make recommendations to the Board of Supervisors in specific areas of responsibility prescribed to them. Staff is recommending that the Board of Supervisors discuss establishing an Ad Hoc Board with the task of developing a strategy to achieve net zero greenhouse gas emissions as quickly as feasible, but no later than 2050, and to ensure that such a strategy establishes goals which are transparent, fair, and economically feasible. These tasks are aligned with the adopted Resolution. If desirous, an application period would be opened for candidates to apply for membership on the Board. Page 1

146

147

148 Ferguson Township 3147 Research Drive State College, PA Telephone: Fax: Memo To: From: CC: Board of Supervisors David Pribulka, Township Manager David Modricker, Director of Public Works Ron Seybert, Township Engineer Ray Stolinas, Director of Planning & Zoning Jeff Ressler, Zoning Administrator Date: July 13, 2017 Re: West College Avenue/Corl Street Intersection Lighting Request for Modification In accordance with Section of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code (MPC), Ferguson Township hereby formally requests a modification be granted to the street lighting height restriction of the Design Standards of the Terraced Streetscape District. Per the MPC, the governing body may grant modifications to the design standards where literal enforcement will enact undue hardship because of peculiar conditions pertaining to the land in question, provided that such modification will not be contrary to the public interest and that the purpose and intent of the ordinance is observed. Page 1

149 The TSD Design Standards limit the height of street lighting to 14 feet. It has been observed and concluded by the Township Engineer and PennDOT Senior Traffic Designer that the PennDOT required light levels for intersection lighting and disability glare cannot be met with a 14 foot height restriction. The solution identified that was most viable and adhered to the approved product specifications identified in the Design Standards is a 14-foot pole and LED post top. The total height of the luminaire would be just over 16 feet. While this is a capital project and not the subject of land development per se, staff believes it is prudent to request the appropriate modification. The undue hardship caused by this provision of the Design Standards, in this case, is that the intersection cannot be illuminated in congruence with the intent of the pedestrian-style street lighting identified in the TSD, to the required light level and disability glare requirement of PennDOT. If a modification is not granted, an alternate solution is to install standard cobra-head street lighting that would not align with the Design Standards and intent of the TSD. Ferguson Township is requesting a modification be granted from Chapter 22, Subdivision and Land Development, Section 5A09, Streetscape Design Standards, Subsection 1.D.1. Street lights shall not exceed 14 feet in height, to allow street lighting at the intersection of Corl Street and West College Avenue not to exceed 16.2 feet in height. Sincerely, Township of Ferguson David Pribulka Township Manager Page 2

150 DISTRICT COUNTY ROUTE SECTION SHEET 2-0 CENTRE 0026 OF REVISION NUMBER FERGUSON TOWNSHIP REVISIONS DATE BY Z Z TG ' INV SE ' INV NW ' Z Z TG ' INV SE ' INV NW ' CORL ST (T-340) W BIT Z Z Z Z WE 1191' W W W W WEST COLLEGE AVE (SR 0026) WEST COLLEGE AVE (SR 0026) S S W W W W W S BIT LEGEND TG ' INV S ' INV W ' POST TOP ACORN PERIOD STYLE LUMINAIRE, IES TYPE III (14'POLE) JUNCTION BOX, TYPE AS INDICATED DIRECT BURIAL COPPER CABLE IN 2" DIRECT BURIAL CONDUIT BIT BIT CORL ST (T-340) BIT W BIT W W FH S TG ' INV NE ' INV NW ' PRELIMINARY $DATE$ FILENAME: $TIME$ $FILE$ HIGHWAY LIGHTING PLAN DRIVE ENGINEERING

151 22-5A09. Streetscape Design Standards. [Ord. 374, 1/10/1989; as added by Ord. 943, 2/7/2011, 4; as amended by Ord. 991, 8/18/2014, 2; and by Ord. 1006, 10/5/ 2015, 2] 1. The West College Avenue Corridor is intended to be the center and focal point of the district. The corridor is conducive to density and mixed-use development and is intended to be accompanied by streetscape treatment that is pedestrian friendly and consistent with the following design requirements or any officially adopted Streetscape Plan: A. Sidewalks shall be a minimum of 12 feet in depth from back of curb to building face along West College Avenue. (1) (2) (3) (4) Sidewalks shall be scored in patterns that modulate the scale of the sidewalk and may include a variety of dimensional sizes including square, rectangular or diagonal patterns at the applicant's discretion and in keeping with the intent of the design standards. All score lines shall utilize a twice tooled troweled edge on all pattern joints including construction and expansion joints. In the case of stamped or colored concrete, this requirement may be modified at the discretion of the Board of Supervisors. All curbs, sidewalks, handicapped ramps and crosswalks shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the latest official version of the Americans with Disabilities Act. All proposed sidewalks, curbs, crosswalks shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the provisions and specifications established by the Township and specified herein or in an officially adopted Streetscape Plan. B. A two-foot wide minimum paver accent band shall be installed along the back of the curb line along all sidewalks on West College Avenue. The pavers shall be standard four inches by eight inches brick size, red color. Pavers may be traditional clay brick or pressed concrete. Color and pattern of the paver field may include various size pavers and colors at the discretion of the applicant, subject to approval by the Board of Supervisors. (1) (2) Decorative brick, concrete pavers or pavement treatments shall be considered as an integrated feature to properties on gateway corners in the Township, the main entrance of buildings, public plazas, pedestrian access areas and public roads as noted. Street signs, regulatory signs, wayfinding signs, utility poles, street lighting, utility appurtenances and traffic signal poles are to be placed within the paver accent band unless otherwise required by ordinance or upon review by the Township Engineer. :1

152 22-5A A09 C. Four-foot wide by twenty-foot long minimum, planter beds shall be incorporated parallel to the curb line adjacent to West College Avenue. Measurement shall be from outside edge to outside edge of planting area. (1) (2) Planters shall be spaced a minimum of 40 feet on center for the width of the proposed lot or length of the unit block where the site is located. The spacing and location may be adjusted dependent on site conditions, clear sight triangles and at the discretion of the Township Engineer and Board of Supervisors. Planters may intersect the two-foot side accent paver bans as noted above. (3) (4) (5) Planters shall be curbed with brick or pavers to match adjacent paver accent band or other materials consistent with the architecture of the proposed project. In no case shall the width and height of the raised curb exceed six inches in either direction. Planter edge may include a decorative metal fencing garden edge to accent and highlight the planting area. The fencing may be part of the raised curb or independent thereof. In no case shall the fencing exceed 24 inches in height. Planters shall be backfilled with CU-Structural Soil or approved equal for the full length and width of the planter to a depth of three feet where feasible or otherwise directed by the Township Engineer. Planter areas shall be planted with a perennial, semi or evergreen ground cover as a year-round base planting. Planters shall also incorporate seasonal plantings to provide four season visual interest. The applicant shall provide a list of proposed seasonal plantings to be provided and maintained by the property owner and/or tenant. These may include but are not limited to tulips, impatiens, petunias, mums and ornamental kale. The use of ornamental grasses, perennials, and ornamental shrubs is also encouraged. :2

153 22-5A A09 (6) (7) The planting plan for the accent planting beds shall be prepared and sealed by a Pennsylvania registered landscape architect. Where feasible, applicants are encouraged to utilize and incorporate planter areas into the project's overall storm water management strategy as bioretention/water quality filter areas. The use of planter areas as a stormwater best management practice (BMP) will be subject to review and approval by the Township Engineer and must be consistent with the Township's overall stormwater management plan and objectives for improving water quality and reducing runoff volumes. D. Pedestrian scale, period style lighting standards shall be used along the West College Avenue street edge, immediately adjacent to the proposed project site. The horizontal spacing of the light fixtures shall be consistent with meeting required light levels established by Township ordinance. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) Street lights shall not exceed 14 feet in height. Street lights shall utilize decorative, fluted or tapered poles with decorative base covers to match the style of pole. Poles shall be cast iron, steel or aluminum, painted black. Poles shall be located within the proposed paver accent band. Street light lamps shall Incorporate night sky friendly, energy efficient, full cut-off optics. The use of LED technology is encouraged. Poles along West College Avenue shall incorporate banner brackets for upper and lower banner arms, to hang one banner, perpendicular to the street edge. Poles along West College Avenue shall include provisions for two planter arms, one on each side of the pole, parallel to the street edge. Poles along West College Avenue shall include provisions for one exterior rated duplex electrical outlet located immediately below the point of attachment between luminaire and pole. :3

154 22-5A A09 E. F. A minimum of one street tree shall be planted in the center of each four foot by twenty foot accent planting bed. The selected species of tree shall be in accordance with Chapter 25, "Trees." Shrub varieties shall be included in a landscaping and planting plan prepared and sealed by a Pennsylvania registered landscape architect and approved by the Township Tree Commission. Each project with frontage on West College Avenue shall include the provision of site furnishings consistent with the intended creation of an inviting, safe and enjoyable pedestrian experience. These furnishings may include benches, trash and recycling receptacles, bike racks, bus shelters, and individual free standing planters. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) Site furnishings shall be constructed of non-biodegradable, vandal resistant materials such as cast iron, steel, aluminum, or recycled plastic components. Site furnishings shall be period style consistent with the overall character of the area or any officially adopted Streetscape Plan. Site furnishings shall be from a coordinated family of furnishings by the same manufacturer unless otherwise approved by the Township. Benches shall be a minimum of six feet in length and shall incorporate a center armrest. Trash receptacles shall be a minimum of 32-gallon capacity and shall utilize the smallest possible semi-covered top opening to prevent the deposition of large trash bags or household debris. Recycling receptacles shall be provided and incorporated consistent with Centre Region refuse and recycling requirements. Benches and receptacles shall be grouped together along the street edge but not within the required accent paver band. Where feasible these groupings may occur between accent planting beds when two or more beds are included along the frontage of a project. Bus shelters may be incorporated subject to the review and approval of CATA. The style of shelter shall be consistent with the overall site furnishings palette. 2. Streets perpendicular to the West College Avenue Corridor will also provide for a variety of uses but at a slightly reduced scale. The sidewalks and streetscape treatment along these streets will be correspondingly reduced in scale, with fixtures and landscape features more conducive to a side street location. :4

155 2017 Strategic Plan

156 Chapter 1: Who We Are Our Mission It is Ferguson Township s mission to provide efficient, cost effective, professional services to our residents in a fair, cooperative, ethical and honest manner. The Township will endeavor to manage its resources allowing planned, sustainable growth while preserving the quality of life and its unique characteristics. Our Vision The Township will strive to appropriate staff and resources to maintain its infrastructure in acceptable condition, provide exemplary service, keep Township operations financially stable and keep pace with technology. As a result, the Township can continue to be a leader and model for the Centre Region and other Home Rule municipalities. The Township is considered a Best Place to Live by aspiring to create a sense of place, preserving agriculture and environmentally sensitive areas, and establishing a vibrant town center. Ferguson Township is home to a strong, diversified community and provides an effective transportation system, a rural, small town atmosphere, and the location and availability of open space. We Value Effective, efficient, professionalism in delivering services to our residents. Residents, elected and appointed officials expect the highest quality service delivery from Township staff. It is our duty to meet and exceed those expectations in our daily work. Preserving the unique character of the Township. The Township proudly boasts a diverse community of all ages and professions including farmers, scholars, small and large business employers and employees, professionals, and students. Each give the area a character all its own. It is our responsibility to ensure that policies and service delivery are directed at maintaining that character for generations to come. A well-maintained and safe environment. Every resident and guest deserves to live, work, study, and recreate in a high quality environment. Therefore, it is our responsibility to properly maintain and provide for the safety of our community s neighborhoods, streets, parks, and common areas. Managing our resources wisely. It is recognized that resources, including tax revenue, public utilities such as water and sewer, and services such as police and fire, are finite and must be allocated in the most efficient manner. It is our responsibility to continuously review and refine our practices to improve the management of public resources to provide the highest quality service delivery Strategic Plan 2

157 Partnering with our neighboring municipalities to provide cost effective services. The Centre Region is home to one of the premier and oldest Council of Governments in the Commonwealth. For decades, the municipalities that comprise the Centre Region have recognized the benefits of regional cooperation to improve the effectiveness and efficiency of service delivery. It is our responsibility to maintain our commitment to the Centre Region Council of Governments and neighboring municipalities for programs where regional cooperation maximizes our return on investment. Ethical and honest behavior. As elected officials and employees of the Township, every official, employee and service provider to the Township is directly accountable to conduct themselves in an ethical and honest manner. It is our responsibility to ensure that all who perform work for the Township operate with the highest standards of ethical and honest behavior. Chapter 2: Executive Summary History Since its formation in 1801, Ferguson Township has grown into a diverse community, combining the characteristics of residential life with those of high-technology industry and agriculture interests. Named for Thomas Ferguson, an early settler who operated a mill in the Village of Pine Grove Mills at the base of Tussey Mountain, the Township sits on the southern edge of Centre County. The Township encompasses an area of approximately 50 square miles and is home to more than 18,000 residents. Several high-tech industries have found a home in Ferguson Township over the years including AccuWeather, Minitab, Sound Technology, Avail, the Applied Research Lab and Raytheon. The Township is also home to major research facilities of The Pennsylvania State University, one of the nation s premier agricultural and engineering institutions. Organization Ferguson Township is a council-manager form of government, consisting of a Board of five elected Supervisors (one from each of the three wards that make up the Township and two at-large) and a Township Manager who is responsible for administering the programs and policies authorized by the Board of Supervisors. Additionally, the Township government includes the Planning Commission, Zoning Hearing Board, and other appointed authorities, boards, and commissions that convene on an as-needed basis to address a variety of issues. Since the 1960s, Ferguson Township has been an active participant in the Centre Region Council of Governments (COG). The Centre Region COG is a voluntary association of the Borough of State College and the townships of College, Ferguson, Halfmoon, Harris, and Patton. It is responsible for administering a number of programs including regional planning, refuse and recycling, code enforcement, the regional library, fire protection, and parks and recreation. On March 14, 1974, a Government Study Commission recommended the Township modify its governing structure and become a Home Rule municipality. The electorate s approval of Home Rule permitted the Township to adopt its own Charter outlining the manner in which the Township would be governed. Home Rule in Pennsylvania permits the municipality to enact its own regulations except where explicitly superseded by state or federal law. This is different from, for example, a second class township that can only carry out duties assigned to it by the Second Class Township Code. Since becoming Home Rule, the Board of Supervisors has codified and adopted a code of ordinances. Ferguson Township consists of five departments, each responsible for the provision of services enumerated by the governing body. The Police Department is charged with criminal and traffic regulation enforcement and protecting the health, welfare, and safety of students, residents, businesses, and visitors. The Public 2017 Strategic Plan 3

158 Works Department maintains Township roads and infrastructure, and assists the departments of Planning & Zoning and Police in their duties. The Finance Department is responsible for managing the Township s finances and preparing the Annual Operating Budget and 5-year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget. For the purposes of this document, the Finance Department also includes oversight of the Township s Information Technology operations. The Department of Planning and Zoning manages growth and development in the Township, and is responsible for ordinance enforcement. The Department of Administration includes the Township Manager, Assistant Manager, and staff dedicated to the oversight of Township operations. For this Strategic Plan update, the Administration Department also includes the Board of Supervisors, where the completion of a goal, objective, or action step is contingent upon their actions. The staff of Ferguson Township is guided in its decision-making by several documents, some of which have been outlined in greater detail above. The Township s ordinances, resolutions, budgets, comprehensive plan, and the CIP are all examples of guiding documents that staff utilize on a daily basis to help allocate resources, capital and otherwise, to provide effective services. However, with all of these supporting documents there still remain several questions. How do we know our actions today are leading towards where residents want the Township to be in the coming years? How can we be sure that our resource allocation is advancing the Township s mission and vision? How are the decisions we make on a staff level related to the goals of our elected officials? An effective Strategic Plan can address these questions and more. The purpose of this Strategic Plan is to identify the goals of the elected officials and map out the objectives associated with each of them. With a clear direction moving forward, staff can be better positioned to allocate resources to achieve those goals. The document is not meant to serve as a specific work plan nor is it meant to be a formal authorization to allocate resources. Rather, it is meant to provide a true north that all Township departments can move toward for the good of the community. The Ferguson Township Manager, is primarily responsible for ensuring that these goals and the steps needed to achieve them are kept in front of the Board of Supervisors and the staff. It is only by constantly measuring Township operations against these goals that progress can be made to achieve them Strategic Plan 4

159 Chapter 3: Strategic Planning Process The Strategic Planning Process During the summer of 2016, the Ferguson Township Board of Supervisors made the decision to revisit and update the Township s 2014 Strategic Plan. Working with the Township staff, it was decided to invite significant resident comment and opinion regarding the services provided by the Township, what could be done to improve the Township, and what residents want to see in the future. It was decided that the Township would seek resident comment primarily through two means. The first effort was through the use of an electronic survey using SurveyMonkey. The Township opened the survey June 27 and closed it July 22. The survey consisted of five multiple choice questions and a comment box. The results of the survey were tallied and published and are available at the Ferguson Township offices, as well as on the Township s website. In July, 2016, the Township engaged Peter S. Marshall & Associates to continue work on updating the Township s Strategic Plan. The second effort to obtain resident input regarding the Township operations and future was by holding a series of three resident focus groups one in each voting ward of the Township. The first focus group was held in the Baileyville Community Hall on August 4, The second focus group was held in the Ferguson Township Main Meeting Room on August 9, The third and final focus group was held at the Quality Inn on North Atherton Street on August 10, The results of these meetings were published and are also available at the Ferguson Township offices and Township website. The Strategic Planning Work Session was held on Saturday, September 10, 2016 in the Ferguson Township Main Meeting Room. The Work Session was facilitated by Peter Marshall. All of the members of the Ferguson Township Board of Supervisors participated along with Township Manager Mark Kunkle, Assistant Township Manager David Pribulka, and the Township Department Heads. During the Workshop, all participants had the following available to them: The resident survey executive summary The resident focus group notes The 2014 Strategic Plan During the first part of the Workshop, each participant was asked to think 10 years into the future and to identify the conditions, services, infrastructure, and nature of the Township they would like to see. The following 25 answers were provided by the participants. What Participants in the Strategic Planning Workshop of September 10, 2016 wanted to see in the Ferguson Township of the future (not prioritized) More art and cultural opportunities Return on investment for parklands Financial stability A prosperous community Long-term economic sustainability Scientifically informed decision making 2017 Strategic Plan 5

160 Citizen advisory boards A light rail system Reduced poverty More small businesses A vibrant business community Residents living and working in Township Connectivity to PSU, other municipalities, residents A safe community Cleanliness well-maintained businesses and residential properties Multi-modal transportation options A government focused on carbon reduction and support of renewable energy Increase conserved and preserved land More support for diversified agriculture Partnership between the Township and industry to promote alternative energy Use of state legislation to address and make new policies Neighborhood schools Mixed housing in neighborhoods affordability Well-built housing Centralized town square Regionalization of services Engaged and involved community As the Workshop continued, the participants, working in small groups, identified the goals that they believed would move Ferguson Township forward in the next five years. During much of the remaining time, the participants discussed, considered, and then voted for the goals and objectives they felt were most important for the future of Ferguson Township. Finally, in the last portion of the Workshop, participants identified the steps that would be needed to achieve the goals that they had agreed upon. The process involved visioning, reflections on today s reality, and decisions about Ferguson Township s tomorrow Strategic Plan 6

161 Chapter 4: Ferguson Township Strategic Plan Goals and Steps to Achieve Them (Those responsible for each goal and step are noted in parentheses) 1) Financial Stability a. Make realistic estimates of program costs. (Staff) b. Regularly compare the cost of providing services in-house with costs from private contractors, other municipalities, other government agencies, and costs of providing services regionally. (Staff) c. Adjust revenues (taxes, fees, etc.) to adequately fund Township programs and needs. (Staff proposes, the Board initiates) 2) Economic Development a. Establish an economic development advisory group (with economic development expertise). b. Consider the employment of an economic development director (full-time, part-time, or a contracted service). This individual or contractor would be responsible to assist and support existing businesses to help them prosper and expand in Ferguson Township. He/she would be the Township s liaison with the business development community. He/she would develop an inventory of vacant commercial and industrial sites and would make that information available to interested parties. He/she would identify and pursue programs and grants to support economic development in Ferguson and would have responsibility for managing the Community Development Block Grant Program. (Board to initiate, staff to implement) 3) Growth Management a. Identify and complete (develop) plans for specific small areas. (Board, Staff, Planning Commission) b. Develop a future land use plan (Comprehensive Plan). (Staff, Planning Commission, Board) c. Develop a Township housing plan to provide for low and moderately priced housing in the Township (workforce housing). (Staff, Regional input, possible ad hoc advisory group) 4) Environmental Stewardship a. Identify and use existing tools to preserve the environment - Chesapeake Bay Tributary strategy, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, source water protection, conservation easements, climate action plans, referendums, agricultural conservation easements, etc. (Board, Staff) b. Make certain that land development regulations and development plans are consistent with environmental values (Staff, Planning Commission, Board) c. Identify and preserve natural resources and environmentally significant areas (Staff, Board, Planning Commission, possible ad hoc advisory group) d. Develop and adhere to green policy for buildings, vehicles, and operations (Staff, consultants) 2017 Strategic Plan 7

162 e. Update the Recreation, Parks, and Open Space Plan with a specific emphasis on green infrastructure and sustainable parkland development 5) Best Management Practices for Operations a. Ensure adequate staffing and resources necessary to carry out Township services and programs (Staff, Board) b. Ensure proper training and professional development (Staff, Board) c. Ensure that operational practices are fiscally responsible (Staff) 6) Increase Participatory Government a. Utilize both ad hoc and standing citizen advisory boards with subject matter experts from the Township and the region to address issues related to parkland development and other matters of community interest. b. Fully utilize two-way communication and online platforms used to communicate (Staff) 7) Promotion of Clean Renewable Energy a. Assess the Township for opportunities for renewable energy (Staff, possible advisory group) b. Practice and promote energy conservation (Staff, Board) c. Establish zoning incentives to encourage renewable energy and energy conservation (Staff, Board, Planning Commission, possible ad hoc advisory group) d. Establish an advisory group on renewable energy (Staff, Board) 8) Promotion of Municipal Identity a. Develop our Sense of Place by developing a vibrant Town Center, preserving our agricultural heritage, and promoting the features that make the Township unique. (Staff) b. Develop a Marketing Strategy (possible advisory group) c. Establish and promote community events with Township help/promotion (farmer s markets, flea markets, etc.) 9) Partnerships and Regional Thinking a. Identify non-profits, businesses, and community groups for input on a variety of issues b. Work towards regional cooperation on issues that affect the entire Centre Region c. Increase financial stability through partnerships d. Monitor partnerships to ensure they continue to be beneficial 2017 Strategic Plan 8