City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Public Hearing

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Public Hearing"

Transcription

1 City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Public Hearing Agenda Item # 8c. City Council Meeting 11/18/2014 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Robert Sisson, City Manager Public hearing and Council action on a requests of Forrest Higginbotham/Lowe s Home Centers, LLC, owners and applicant, by Molly Novotny, agent, for Special Exceptions to City Code Section to allow building-mounted signage to exceed the maximum allowable sign area and be located on non-building frontage walls, allow more than one ground-mounted shopping center identification sign, and allow ground-mounted shopping center identification signage to exceed the maximum height, square footage area, and identify the names of individual tenants, in the C-2 Retail Commercial District and the Highway Corridor Overlay District on the premises known as 4080 Jermantown Road and more particularly described as Tax Map parcel B. ISSUE(S): SUMMARY: City Council Public Hearing and consideration of Special Exception requests that would allow increased signage for a new Lowe s store at 4080 Jermantown Road (the former K-Mart site) in the C-2 Retail Commercial District and the Highway Corridor Overlay District. The applicant proposes signage improvements that do not meet the requirements of the City Code. On June 18, 2014, the Board of Architectural Review approved the proposed architecture to allow by-right redevelopment of the site with a Lowe s Home Improvement Center retail store. The applicant requests approval of Special Exceptions for proposed building-mounted signage on the new building s facades and two new ground-mounted signs. FISCAL IMPACT: RECOMMENDATION: ALTERNATIVE COURSE OF ACTION: RESPONSIBLE STAFF/POC: No negative fiscal impact is anticipated as a result of approval of these Special Exception requests. Approval of the Special Exception requests with conditions. City Council may instead choose to approve or deny the requests. Mike Jaskiewicz, Planner Jason Sutphin, Community Development Division Chief COORDINATION: Zoning Code Administration Commissioner of Revenue City Attorney Public Works Treasurer Police Revenue ATTACHMENT: Staff Report

2 CITY OF FAIRFAX Department of Community Development & Planning Special Exception Request SE PUBLIC HEARING DATE November 18, 2014 APPLICANT Lowe s Home Centers. LLC AGENT Molly Novotny, Agent PARCEL DATA Tax Map ID 57-2 ((08)) 026D Street Address 4080 Jermantown Road Zoning District C-2 Retail Commercial District Highway Corridor Overlay District APPLICATION SUMMARY Forrest Higginbotham/Lowe s Home Centers, LLC, proposes to add new building-mounted and ground-mounted signage to a portion of the existing West Fairfax Shopping Center in support of a new Lowe s Home Improvement Store being located there. In order to achieve this, the applicant is seeking Special Exceptions: To allow building-mounted signage to exceed the maximum allowable sign area and be located on non-building frontage walls; To allow more than one ground-mounted shopping center identification sign; and To allow ground-mounted shopping center identification signage to exceed the maximum height, square footage area, and to identify the names of individual tenants. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the Special Exception (SE) applications subject to the following conditions: 1. All signage shall be in substantial conformance with the attached Lowe s signage graphics (pages 1 14), dated September 17, 2014 and revised through October 29, 2014, Sign Exhibit EXH-1 dated , and the Sign Plan Matrix, dated as revised through October 29, 2014 or as further amended by these conditions. City Hall Armstrong Street Room 207 Fairfax Virginia (FAX) If any future public right-of-way improvements that require the removal of Sign F, then any and all costs associated with the removal, and any future relocation or modification of Sign F, shall be fully and wholly borne by the landowner or its assigns and not by the City of Fairfax or its assigns.

3 Special Exception SE Page 2 BACKGROUND INFORMATION The subject property is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Lee Highway and Jermantown Road. The site is adjacent to commercial development to the north (Fairfax Court) and residential to the west (Stevenson Street Townhomes). The site comprises three separate lots, one with the former K-Mart and associated parking spaces, one an out-lot with a freestanding commercial building with two tenant spaces on a pad site and associated parking spaces, and a third with the remaining six commercial tenant spaces that lie to the north and directly abutting the former K-Mart building and associated parking spaces. Together, all three lots form the West Fairfax Shopping Center, with a total of 10.8 acres of land with approximately 105,905 square feet total of enclosed commercial space. Of the enclosed commercial space, approximately 84,180 square feet is vacant and was occupied by a K-Mart, with an additional 15,000 square feet of retail space occupied by various existing tenants directly adjacent to the K-Mart to the north. The remaining commercial tenant space is located in a freestanding building located on a pad site on an out-lot within the parking field. The overall site has access from Jermantown Road, Lee Highway, and James Swart Circle. The applicant has a site plan under review to demolish the former K-Mart portion of the existing commercial building and rebuild a new building within essentially the same footprint (87,518 sf) to accommodate a Lowe s Home Improvement store on the subject parcel. In June 2014 the Board of Architectural Review (BAR) approved Lowe s architecture at the subject site for the proposed store and associated facilities. Staff identified that the site s proposed signage would necessitate a separate application for approval beyond the maximums allowed by the Ordinance. The existing subject site includes a freestanding pylon sign for K-Mart along the site s Lee Highway street frontage which is slated to be removed as part of this application. Other existing site signage associated with K-Mart is located on the existing building which is slated to be removed with the construction of the new Lowe s Home Improvement store. Other existing signage for the West Fairfax Shopping Center is all mounted on the two existing commercial buildings on the other two separate lots and are slated to remain and thus are not part of the subject Special Exception request. There is no existing ground-mounted sign identifying the West Fairfax Shopping Center. PROPOSAL The current Special Exception application is a request to provide five new building-mounted signs on the proposed Lowe s retail building and provide two new ground-mounted tenant identification signs on the subject site, with one such ground-mounted sign featuring a secondary but integral tenant directory component. There are no proposed signs that would identify the overall site nor be labeled as the West Fairfax Shopping Center. There are also no plans for any building improvements or signage changes to the two existing site buildings that currently house the remaining tenants at the West Fairfax Shopping Center. LAND USE REQUESTS The applicant s Special Exception requests are to: Modify Sections (b)(2)(a)(1), (b)(2)(a)(3), and (b). To allow two ground-mounted and illuminated shopping center identification signs totaling 154 sq. ft. in cumulative area (where only one such sign is allowed at a maximum area of 50 sq. ft.) and to City Hall Armstrong Street Room 207 Fairfax Virginia (FAX)

4 Special Exception SE Page 3 allow both of these signs to identify an individual business (only tenant Lowe s on Sign F but tenant Lowe s plus the remaining eight existing tenants located elsewhere in the shopping center on Sign G) and to allow one of these two proposed signs (Sign G at 105 sq. ft.) to exceed such a sign s maximum allowable sign area of 50 sq. ft.. Further, to allow each of these two ground-mounted signs to exceed the maximum allowed height of six feet (Sign F would be 7-0 tall and Sign G would be 12 feet tall). Further, to allow Sign F to lie within a Jermantown Road reservation area whose purpose is to allow for possible future right-of-way expansion due to possible future improvements. Modify Section (b)(2)(a)(2)(i): o To allow signage on non-building frontage walls; o To allow signage greater in total area than 1.50 sq. ft. per linear foot per tenant and greater than 150 sq. ft. total for each tenant. The applicant proposes modifications of the cumulative signage development standards for signage as shown in their submitted sign plan matrix, included in Attachment 4. These modifications can be generally summarized as follows: Proposed ground-mounted signs. The applicant proposes two free-standing internallyilluminated ground-mounted signs, both of which meet the required setbacks. One proposed ground-mounted sign (Sign F) would be labeled Lowe s, would be 49 sq. ft. in area and would have a height of 7 feet, and would be located the required 20 feet outside the current Jermantown Road right-of-way. However, proposed Sign F would only lie 15 feet from the designated future Jermantown Road right-of-way line for and thus partially within the 20-foot setback area reserved for possible future Jermantown Road right-of-way expansion. The other proposed ground-mounted sign (Sign G) would also be labeled Lowe s, would have a height of 12 feet, and would be located outside of the required 20-foot setback from Lee Highway. Proposed Sign G would also feature an integral shopping center directory sign and would have a total proposed sign area of 105 sq. ft.. Proposed building-mounted signs. The City sign code provisions specify a ratio of 1.5 sq. ft. of permissible sign area for each linear foot of building frontage, up to a maximum sign area of 150 sq. ft. for each tenant. The cumulative frontage of the proposed Lowe s building would be linear feet (i.e linear feet for the southern frontage wall linear feet for the eastern frontage wall) which would otherwise allow a maximum cumulative sign area of sq. ft. (i.e. 1.5 x ) if the 150 sq. ft. maximum allowable sign area requirement per tenant did not already govern. All five proposed building-mounted signs for Lowe s total 1, sq. ft. in area. The five proposed building-mounted signs include: Sign A. Lowe s main entrance sign on east frontage wall. Sign area = 1, sq. ft.; Sign B. Lowe s side entrance sign on south frontage wall. Sign area = sq. ft.; Sign C. Garden Center sign on non-frontage wall. Sign area = sq. ft.; Sign D. Product Pickup sign on east frontage wall. Sign area = sq. ft.; and Sign E. Indoor Lumber Yard sign on east frontage wall. Sign area = sq. ft.. ANALYSIS The Zoning Ordinance provides criteria for consideration of Special Exceptions. Analysis of the proposal using these criteria is provided in Attachment 1. City Hall Armstrong Street Room 207 Fairfax Virginia (FAX)

5

6 ATTACHMENT 1 ANALYSIS Lowe s Home Improvement Center This is for consideration of the applicant s requests for a Special Exception (SE). The SE is evaluated using the provisions of Sec Each separate SE will be further evaluated under Zoning Ordinance criteria specific to each respective request which is listed below. Section (Zoning Map Amendments and Special Use Permits). (3) The City Council may approve zoning map amendments and grant special use permits and the board of zoning appeals may grant special use permits only after considering the applicable standards provided below: a) Consistency with the comprehensive plan and other adopted city goals and policies; b) The size and shape of the lot on which the use is proposed; c) Vehicular and pedestrian traffic; d) Trip generation characteristics of the proposed use; e) Site design; f) Lighting, noise, traffic, sight, smoke, dust, odor, vibration and other factors which may affect the serenity of the neighborhood; g) The safety and movement of vehicular traffic upon adjacent streets; h) The safety and welfare of residents living in the area; i) The location, height, and design of buildings, walls, fences and landscaping proposed; j) Overall impact of the proposed use upon the development and use of adjacent land; k) Safety and welfare of persons working in the neighborhood; l) Harmony of the proposal with the general purpose and intent of the applicable article of this chapter; and m) The purposes of zoning ordinances set forth in the Code of Virginia, Sec Special Exceptions. City Council may, by special exception, modify the requirements contained in this division in accordance with the following provisions: (1) Special exceptions shall be granted only in accordance with the procedures and limitations established for special use permits in section (2) Special exceptions shall be granted only if: a. The applicant has clearly demonstrated that requirements contained in this division will present a unique burden due to unusual topography, vegetation, building design or lot shape; and b. The city council has determined that the granting of special exceptions will not be inconsistent with the comprehensive plan or the purpose of this division as stated in section The applicant s SE requests are to: To allow building-mounted signage to exceed the maximum allowable sign area and be located on non-building frontage walls, To allow more than one ground-mounted shopping center identification sign, and To allow ground-mounted shopping center identification signage to exceed the maximum height, square footage area, and to identify the names of individual tenants. City Hall Armstrong Street Room 207 Fairfax Virginia (FAX)

7 Special Exception SE Page 2 Consistency with Comprehensive Plan and adopted goals The Community Appearance Plan (CAP) section of the Comprehensive Plan states that Commercial signage should be an integral component of the landscape, contributing to ambiance and order, rather than a distracting, disorganized competition of messages resulting in a visual liability. Sign designers should ensure that letters and logos on signs are proportional to the sign, and are large enough to be legible for the intended viewer. Shopping centers should have signage that is coordinated and complementary. The Comprehensive Plan s Community Appearance Plan section contains Strategy CA-1.6 that in part reads as follows: CA-1.6 Bring nonconforming signs into compliance with current regulations. Although signs serve a useful purpose, they can quickly overpower and dominate an area if not controlled. In an effort to provide for signage that is adequate but not excessive, the City has amended its sign regulations on four occasions since However, because nonconforming signs are protected as grandfathered, there is little incentive for sign owners to replace or upgrade nonconforming signs pg CA-1.6 further states that provisions for special exceptions are included in the City s sign regulations, and that the City should evaluate each request for an exception from the sign regulations from a critical perspective, with an eye toward reducing visual clutter and improving the appearance of the City. Similarly, the Comprehensive Plan calls for the elimination of distracting elements from the City s roadways, such as sign clutter that blemishes these roadways. Altogether, the City has had a long-standing and multifaceted policy of bringing nonconforming signs up to current standards whenever possible. Staff supports the applicant s decision to remove the site s existing pylon sign located on the Lee Highway street frontage, and believes that this application is in general conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, the Community Appearance Plan and the purposes set forth for signage in the City Code. Since none of the existing or proposed signage includes the name of the overall shopping center (i.e. the West Fairfax Shopping Center), such an omission could serve to further confuse potential customers seeking a specific tenant within the West Fairfax Shopping Center. Staff therefore urges the applicant to consider adding the name of the shopping center (i.e. West Fairfax Shopping Center) within the confines of the proposed site signage. Site and signage design The proposed Lowe s retail store will occupy a revamped existing tenant space (the former K-Mart building) located on the southern side of a row of seven side-by-side leasable tenant spaces in the existing West Fairfax Shopping Center. It has been designed as a one-story structure with a flat roof, with an average roof height of approximately 32 feet and a maximum height of the associated parapet of approximately 49 feet. Note that the former K-Mart building is approximately 18 feet in height with a maximum parapet height of 22 feet. The proposed Lowe s tenant space lies entirely on the subject site, and six existing tenant spaces will remain as-is and are themselves situated in an existing one-story commercial building located on an adjoining but separate parcel to the north that is not part of this application. Two other existing tenant spaces also exist in a one-story free-standing commercial building located on a separate out-lot of the overall shopping center that is also not part of this application. This shopping center lies on the extreme western end of the City of Fairfax, and lands adjoining the site to the West lie outside the City in Fairfax County. This adjacent property is currently developed with low-rise multifamily dwellings. The proposed Lowe s architecture and site features have already been approved by the City of Fairfax s Board of Architectural Review (BAR), and the proposed Lowe s is currently under site plan review. The proposed Lowe s building-mounted signage and the proposed site ground-mounted signs are slated to be constructed in City Hall Armstrong Street Room 207 Fairfax Virginia (FAX)

8 Special Exception SE Page 3 colors and of materials already reviewed and approved by the BAR. At this prior review, the BAR reviewed plans showing proposed signage labeled as for illustrative purposes only, and BAR action on signage was not required. The subject site is adjacent to low-rise retail shopping centers and low-rise industrial uses that have an assortment of signage displays. The subject site also includes existing landscaping along its periphery adjacent to the existing roadway network that reduces direct views by passersby and potential customers in the adjacent street network of the West Fairfax Shopping Center s commercial tenants in general and of the site s existing building in particular. There is also existing landscaping on the site s western periphery between the proposed Lowe s building and the adjoining multifamily residential buildings located in Fairfax County, that, when combined with the proposed placement of the proposed signage will greatly minimize any adverse views of the proposed signage from these residences. Because City Code requires clear demonstration of need prior to the granting of increased signage, oversized building-mounted signs have generally been approved commensurate with their distance from the surrounding street network. The applicant is requesting approval of a total of seven illuminated signs that include two illuminated groundmounted signs and five illuminated building-mounted signs, and has included graphics in their submittal illustrating and detailing each of the proposed signs. Please note that while the proposed sign appearances, locations, materials, and dimensions are accurate, most of the sign area calculations shown for the proposed signs are inaccurate as they were not calculated according to City standards. All sign areas discussed in this staff report reflect the actual sign areas as calculated by staff to City standards. Building mounted signage Two of the five building-mounted signs would include the tenant name (i.e. Lowe s), while the remaining three illuminated building-mounted signs would identify specific retail functions within the proposed Lowe s store (i.e. Garden Center, Product Pickup, and Indoor Lumber Yard). All five proposed building-mounted signs total 1, sq. ft.. The sign provisions of the Zoning Ordinance currently limit the cumulative size of the building-mounted signage for each tenant such as Lowe s to a maximum of 150 sq. ft. total area for all signs combined. The two primary building-mounted tenant identification signs total 1, sq. ft., and include the Lowe s Sign A at 1, sq. ft. and the Lowe s Sign B at sq. ft.. Sign A would be attached to the building s east façade above its main retail entrance facing Jermantown Road and Sign B would be attached to the building s south façade facing Lee Highway. The remaining three proposed building-mounted signs, totaling sq. ft., describe distinct retail functions within the proposed Lowe s store and would be attached to the building s east façade facing Jermantown Road. These three proposed signs include the Garden Center Sign C at sq. ft., the Product Pickup Sign D at sq. ft., and the Indoor Lumber Yard Sign E at sq. ft.. Staff believes the applicant s request for their proposed building-mounted signage, both for the two proposed tenant identification signs and the three proposed tenant function signs, all but one to be located on the proposed Lowe s eastern façade, are complementary to the West Fairfax Shopping Center as a whole and are consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff believes that both proposed tenant identification signs prominence due to their proposed size is warranted due to the 360-foot minimum distance between the building and Jermantown Road, the presence of the existing vegetative screening along the site peripheries which restricts views of the structure by passersby and potential customers while on the adjacent public roadways, and the scale of the proposed Lowe s building s structure. Staff is further supportive of the applicant s City Hall Armstrong Street Room 207 Fairfax Virginia (FAX)

9 Special Exception SE Page 4 desire to add the three proposed tenant function building-mounted signs to the building s eastern façade as both a way to better direct and minimize congestion by customers in the parking field as well as help improve on-site circulation and traffic flow. Ground-mounted signage The applicant s Special Exception request includes the removal of an existing pylon sign and the addition of two proposed illuminated ground-mounted signs. One of the proposed illuminated ground-mounted signs (Sign F at 49 sq. ft. and at seven feet in height) would feature the Lowe s tenant name only, and would be located within 15 feet of the future extended right-of-way for Jermantown Road but would meet the required 20 foot setback from the existing property line. The other proposed illuminated ground-mounted sign (Sign G at 105 sq. ft. and at twelve feet in height) would feature a prominent Lowe s tenant identification sign located above an illuminated eight-panel tenant directory sign, and is proposed to be located so as to achieve the required 20-foot setback from the Lee Highway property line. Both proposed ground-mounted signs would be constructed of materials and clad in colors that match materials and colors used in the construction of the new proposed Lowe s store on the subject site, which have already been reviewed by the BAR. The Community Appearance Plan provides general concepts applicable to appropriate signage, one of which states: Freestanding signs should be ground-mounted, monument style signs, and not the taller, polemounted pylon signs. Monument signs are discreet, located at eye level for the motorist, and are not usually obstructed by the tree canopy. (P.48) Staff believes that the applicant s proposal to remove the site s existing pylon sign located along Lee Highway is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and with the Community Appearance Plan. Staff believes proposed illuminated ground-mounted Sign F and Sign G are generally consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and with the Community Appearance Plan for ground-mounted signs. Staff supports proposed Sign F as it would be located at a site access point directly in front of the primary Lowe s retail entrance, and supports proposed Sign G as it would be located on the eastern side of the site s primary Lee Highway access point. Staff believes the proposed slight increases in heights of both signs are acceptable so as to allow for both proposed ground-mounted signs to be better seen by motorists. Staff believes that the proposed general location and need for relief from the strict provisions of the setback requirement for proposed Sign F is reasonable if it is conditioned to ensure that if future relocation of this sign is necessary due to any future Jermantown Road right-of-way improvements then the costs associated with any relocation of this sign shall be borne by the landowner or its assigns and not by the City of Fairfax or its assigns. City Hall Armstrong Street Room 207 Fairfax Virginia (FAX)

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21 4080 Jermantown Road Lowe s Home Improvement Center Statement of Support Special Exception for Master Sign Plan September 17, 2014 Updated October 29, 2014 Introduction Lowe s Home Centers, LLC, (the Applicant, Lowe s ) is entering into a lease to build a new Lowe s store at 4080 Jermantown Road on the parcel identified as Fairfax City Parcel Identification Number Parcel 26-B, (the Property ). Lowe s will be the anchor tenant of the shopping center, which includes an additional 15,000 square feet of inline retail and a 5,000- square-foot out parcel (collectively, the Center ). This special exception request is specific to the Lowe s store and the signs are reflected in accordance with the Lowe s building reviewed and approved by the Board of Architectural Review in June of this year. As evidenced by those drawings, the new building will replace a 36-year-old K-Mart store, largely in the same footprint, greatly modernizing the Center. Signage Proposed Located at the intersection of Lee Highway and Jermantown Road, the Property itself has strong street presence. Despite those road alignments, the siting of the Lowe s, with its main entrance to Jermantown Road and surface parking separating it from those important transportation corridors, the visibility is impeded. Therefore, the Applicant is requesting this Comprehensive Sign Plan to amend the following sections of the zoning ordinance: Section (b)(2)(a)(2)(i) to allow building-mounted signs to exceed the 150 square foot maximum for shopping centers and be located on building facades without an entrance. Section (b)(2)(a)(1) to allow two ground mounted signs for the shopping center, both with tenant names and both in excess of the 6 foot height maximum and 50 square foot overall size maximum. Section (b) to amend the same specifications above that are repeated in Table 2. Building-Mounted Signs Shopping centers are afforded a slight size increase (10 percent) in terms of building-mounted signs, as stated in Section b.2.d. That increase allows building-mounted retail signs to reach 1.65 SF per linear foot of store frontage with an ultimate cap of 165 square feet per tenant Those specifications work well for smaller inline stores, but the 165 square foot cap proves limiting for a retail building at the size and scale of Lowe s. Therefore, with this special exception request, Lowe s is requesting the elimination of the individual sign cap and instead allow the signs illustrated in the Lowe s Master Sign Plan. The Lowe s store, at 87,518 square feet of finished space, has a linear frontage along Jermantown Road of 456 feet. Setting aside the 165 square foot cap for an individual sign, Section b.2.d would allow 752 square feet of signage along that façade (1.65 times 456). This application is requesting four signs facing Jermantown, each related to one of the v2

22 four customer entrances along that facade: the main store, the garden center, the lumber yard and the holding area for internet purchased packages, for a total sign text of 690 SF. That total sign text equates to a ratio of signage to linear foot of store of 1.51 SF:1 LF, consistent with the base allowance for retail signs. Jermantown Road Sign A. The main Lowe s moniker is proposed as both a sign and an important architectural element to help diversify the store s front façade. The Lowe s letters are proposed at 350 square feet and would be placed within the peak of the building and adhered to the blue Lowe s icon. The icon is not a physical sign structure, rather it is created through colored EIFS, and so is not included in the 350-square foot measurement. When included, the main Lowe s sign would measure 805 square feet. This sign is scaled to fill the peak feature, evenly spaced in relation to the columns on the side and the pillars beneath. The Lowe s letters are internally illuminated at night. Sign C. As is typical at Lowe s stores, there are multiple customer entrances established to place the customer closer to the items they desire. The southern most entrance along the Jermantown Road façade provides direct entry into the garden center, and therefore the Applicant has proposed a sign above that entrance that reads Garden Center. This sign, including the blue background which is an integrated element of the sign, measures 105 square feet. Similar to the main Lowe s sign, the Garden Center sign is designed to mimic the building s architecture in that section of the building. Sign D. As Lowe s competes with internet stores, it has re-thought its product delivery and so has created a unique entrance at its newer stores for customers to pick up the items they purchase online. This service allows Lowe s customers to shop from the comfort of their home and receive the item without having to physically shop for it in the store. Sign D, which measures 154 square feet, is proposed to be located above the customer door designated for internet purchases. The key element of this new service is convenience, so having a sign that is clearly visible and appropriately located above this entrance is critical to its success. Sign E. The final Lowe s sign along the Jermantown Road façade is above the entrance to the Indoor Lumber Yard. At 80 square feet, the sign text is adhered directly to the façade atop the blue painted Lowe s icon. When measured with the blue background, the entire element is 182 square feet. Similar to Signs A and C, the Indoor Lumber Yard sign is proportionate to the architecture feature it supports and provides a clear path for customers looking for building-related materials. When measured together, the text of those four signs is 690 square feet. That total area of sign text equates to 1.51 square foot of sign per linear foot of building, below the 1.65 square feet allowed for shopping centers with the Design Bonus, and consistent with the 1.5 square feet for individual retail tenants. Lee Highway As noted previously, the Store will be visible from Lee Highway and has a strong street presence there. Unfortunately, there are no customer entrances to the Store along the southern façade, so the Applicant is requesting relief from the requirement that signs can only be affixed to a building frontage, to allow a sign absent an entrance. The Lee Highway façade measures v2

23 210 linear feet, so using the same 1.65 multiplier would allow up to square feet of building-mounted signage. Sign B. Lowe s is proposing one building-mounted sign along the Lee Highway façade that is well within the parameter referenced above. Specifically, the Applicant has proposed a sign that includes the Lowe s text that measures 245 square feet adhered directly to the building. This sign will be visible for those traveling along Lee Highway and will help establish a relationship between the building and that important façade. Further, the sign allows and supports the introduction of a strong architectural feature along the Lee Highway façade. When the blue background is included in the overall measurement, the total area of that architectural element is 619 square feet. Ground-Mounted Project Identity Sign With the introduction of the Lowe s to the Center, the Applicant proposes to remove the outdated K-Mart pylon sign from the Lee Highway frontage. To complement the upgraded architecture and design of the center, the Applicant proposes two new ground-mounted project identification signs in its place: one along Lee Highway and a second along Jermantown Road. Specifically, the Applicant requests to modify Section (b)(2)(a)(1) and Section (b) to allow the two ground-mounted project identity signs that exceed 6 feet in height and 50 square feet in total size and include tenant names. Jermantown Road Sign F. Located at the Store s primary entrance from Jermantown Road, this secondary ground-mounted sign will include just the Lowe s moniker and logo. This is a double-sided, internally lit sign that is 7 feet in total height, when including the 2-foot tall masonry base, with a sign area of 49 square feet. It will be set back at least 20 feet from the existing property line, as required by the Zoning Ordinance, and at least 15 feet should the revised property line, should Jermantown ever get widened. Lee Highway Sign G. Located at the primary entrance from Lee Highway, this sign is proposed to include the Lowe s moniker and logo at the top and include sign panels for the Center s eight (8) additional tenants. The sign panels will each measure approximately four feet long by one foot tall. The total height of the sign structure is 12 feet, which includes a 1.5-foot masonry base. The sign is internally lit, double-sided and has a total sign area of 105 square feet. It will be set back at least 20 feet from Lee Highway, as required by the Zoning Ordinance. Conclusion The proposed Lowe s Sign Plan includes all of the signs specific to the Lowe s store. The building-mounted signs complement the important architectural features of the Lowe s façade and help reduce the overall massing of the Store. Further, those signs allow customers, before they even park, to know what part of the 88,000-square-foot store they want to enter. The ground-mounted signs aide travelers along the two important arterials that border the Property and assist the smaller retail shops that are set significantly back from Lee Highway and even tucked a bit behind the Lowe s store by providing them a street presence they have lacked v2

24 4080 Jermantown Road: Lowe's Sign Plan Matrix Revised Sign Type Ordinance Section to be Modified Ordinance Allowance Requested Allowance Specific Sign Text Overall Text Size Proposed Text Dimensions Proposed Background Dimensions Sign Size including background element Building- Mounted Tenant (b)(2)(a)(2)(i) 1.5 SF/LF of building for a maximum of 150 SF of signage per tenant 1.51 SF/LF of building along Jermantown for a maximum of 584 SF of text; 1.2 SF/LF of building along Rt. 29 for a maximum of 245 SF of text Sign A Lowe's 350 SF H: 9'4" W:37'4" Maximum H: 22'11" W:50' 805 SF Sign B Lowe's 245 SF H: 7'9" W: 31'6" n/a 619 SF Sign C Garden Center 105 SF H: 7'3" W: 14'6" n/a 105 SF Sign D Product Pickup SF H: 4'10.5" W: 31'5.25" n/a SF Maximum H:11'7" Sign E Indoor Lumber Yard 80 SF H: 7'8" W: 10'5" W: 18'8" 108 SF Sign Type Ground- Mounted Project ID Ordinance Sections to be Modified (b)(2)(a)(1) and (b) Ordinance Number One ground-mounted or building-mounted sign; shall not be used to identify individual tenant names Proposed Number Two groundmounted signs both with individual tenant names Specific Sign Sign F Sign G Text Lowe's Lowe's with space for 8 additional tenant names Ordinance Dimensions H: 6' SF: 50 Setback: 20' H: 6' SF: 50 Setback: 20' Proposed Dimensions H: 7' SF: 49 SF Setback: >/= 20' from existing property line; >/=15 feet from proposed property line H: 12' SF: 105 SF Setback: >/= 20'

25 R 20 FT SETBACK FROM EXISTING PROPERTY LINE REVISIONS PRE-BID SET ISSUE DATE POST BID SET ISSUE DATE DATE DESCRIPTION SITE DISTANCE TRIANGLES (TYP.) LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC CURTIS BRIDGE ROAD REEC DOCK WILKESBORO, NC VIRGINIA OFFICE Broderick Drive Suite 110 Sterling, VA Phone: maserconsulting.com AREA FOR SIGN (V) (F) THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC. ANY USE OR REPRODUCTION IN WHOLE OR PART IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC. COPYRIGHT 2010 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED NOTE: SIGNS TO BE INSTALLED PERPENDICULAR TO RIGHT-OF -WAYS CITY OF FAIRFAX CHECKED BY: JMJ CME SITE DISTANCE TRIANGLES (TYP.) 20 FT SETBACK FROM EXISTING PROPERTY LINE 20 FT SETBACK FROM FUTURE FRONTAGE DEDICATION VCS 83 (NORTH ZONE) I M S S I M S S U U T T I I L L I I T Y T Y SIGN EXHIBIT DRAWING ISSUE DATE: PERMIT SET ISSUE DATE: LOWE'S - FAIRFAX CONSTRUCTION SET ISSUE DATE: DRAWING NUMBER: 4080 JERMANTOWN ROAD FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA EXH-1 DRAWN BY: A PROJECT No:

26 City of Fairfax, Virginia Master Sign Plan September 17 th, 2014 Revised October 29, 2014

27

28 Segment A Segment C Segment D Segment E FRONT ELEVATION Scale: 1" = 30'-0" Segment B LEFT ELEVATION Scale: 1" = 30'-0"

29 Indoor Lumber Yard Signage: 7'-8" x 10'-5"= 80 square feet Background Area = 108 square feet Product Pick-up Signage: 31'-51/4" x 4'-10 1/2"= square feet FRONT ELEVATION Segment E Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0" Front Entry Signage: 9'-4" x 37'-4" = 350 square feet Background Area = 805 square feet FRONT ELEVATION Segment D Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0" Garden Center Signage: 7'-3" x 14'-6"= 105 square feet Garden Center Signage: 7'-9" x 31'-6"= 245 square feet Background Area = 619 square feet FRONT ELEVATION Segment C Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0" LEFT ELEVATION Segment B Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0" FRONT ELEVATION Segment A Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0"

30 9'-9" TENANT TENANT 12'-0" 5'-0" 9'-9" 4'-4 1/2" 1'-0" 5'-0" 7'-0" TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT 4'-8" TENANT TENANT 1'-6" 4'-4 1/2" X 1'-0" Tenant Panels 2'-0" MONUMENT SIGN Scale: 1/2" = 1'-0" MONUMENT SIGN Scale: 1/2" = 1'-0"

31 WHITE LOWES RED PMS 200 LOWES Blue PMS 280 Note: *Masonry Match Per Building or equivalent as approved by City Staff Match Bricks By: Carolina Ceramics Cherry (1) Pebble Beach (2)

32 Sign Text Street Frontage SIGN ID PROPOSED SQFT

33 Blue Area Calculations: 50-0 wide x high

34

35

36

37 Blue Area Calculations: 18-8 wide x 11-7 high

38 BRICK BASE TIO MATCH BUILDING : BY GC

39 BRICK BASE TIO MATCH BUILDING : BY GC

40 ATTACHMENT 5 City Council City of Fairfax PROPOSED RESOLUTION APPROVAL RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST OF FORREST HIGGINBOTHAM/LOWE S HOME CENTERS, LLC, OWNERS AND APPLICANT, BY MOLLY NOVOTNY, AGENT, FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS TO CITY CODE SECTION TO ALLOW BUILDING- MOUNTED SIGNAGE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SIGN AREA AND BE LOCATED ON NON-BUILDING FRONTAGE WALLS, TO ALLOW MORE THAN ONE GROUND-MOUNTED SHOPPING CENTER IDENTIFICATION SIGN, AND TO ALLOW GROUND-MOUNTED SHOPPING CENTER IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT, SQUARE FOOTAGE AREA, AND TO IDENTIFY THE NAMES OF INDIVIDUAL TENANTS, IN THE C-2 RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND THE HIGHWAY CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT ON THE PREMISES KNOWN AS 4080 JERMANTOWN ROAD AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS TAX MAP PARCEL B. WHEREAS, Forrest Higginbotham/Lowe s Home Centers, LLC, owners and applicant and Molly Novotny, Agent have submitted Application SE requesting a Special Exception to modify the requirements of City Code to allow building-mounted signage to exceed the maximum allowable sign area and be located on non-building frontage walls, to allow more than one ground-mounted shopping center identification sign, and to allow ground-mounted shopping center identification signage to exceed the maximum height, square footage area, and to identify the names of individual tenants, and WHEREAS, City Council has carefully considered the application, the recommendation from Staff, and testimony received at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, City Council has determined that the proposed Special Exception would be appropriate because the proposal would meet the requisites established by City of Fairfax Code , and for the following reasons: 1. The request is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and other adopted city goals and policies; 2. The request is appropriate given the size and shape of the lot and the lot s site design on which the signage is proposed; 3. The request will not result in increased traffic congestion or otherwise negatively impact existing traffic flow or pedestrian and vehicular safety; 4. The request will not adversely impact adjacent property or the surrounding area; 5. The request will not adversely impact the safety and welfare of residents living in the area; and 6. The request is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the applicable article of Chapter 110 of the City Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fairfax on this 18 th day of November, 2014, that Application No. SE be and hereby is APPROVED, as requested with the following conditions: City Hall Armstrong Street Room 207 Fairfax Virginia (FAX)

41 1. All signage shall be in substantial conformance with the attached Lowe s signage graphics (pages 1 14), dated September 17, 2014 and revised through October 29, 2014, Sign Exhibit EXH-1 dated , and the Sign Plan Matrix, dated as revised through October 29, 2014 or as further amended by these conditions. 2. If any future public right-of-way improvements that require the removal of Sign F, then any and all costs associated with the removal, and any future relocation or modification of Sign F, shall be fully and wholly borne by the landowner or its assigns and not by the City of Fairfax or its assigns. The motion to adopt the resolution was approved. Votes Councilmember DeMarco Councilmember Greenfield Councilmember Loftus Councilmember Meyer Councilmember Miller Councilmember Schmidt Mayor Date City Hall Armstrong Street Room 207 Fairfax Virginia (FAX)

42 City Council City of Fairfax PROPOSED RESOLUTION DENIAL RESOLUTION TO DENY THE REQUEST OF FORREST HIGGINBOTHAM/LOWE S HOME CENTERS, LLC, OWNERS AND APPLICANT, BY MOLLY NOVOTNY, AGENT, FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS TO CITY CODE SECTION TO ALLOW BUILDING- MOUNTED SIGNAGE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SIGN AREA AND BE LOCATED ON NON-BUILDING FRONTAGE WALLS, TO ALLOW MORE THAN ONE GROUND-MOUNTED SHOPPING CENTER IDENTIFICATION SIGN, AND TO ALLOW GROUND-MOUNTED SHOPPING CENTER IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT, SQUARE FOOTAGE AREA, AND TO IDENTIFY THE NAMES OF INDIVIDUAL TENANTS, IN THE C-2 RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND THE HIGHWAY CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT ON THE PREMISES KNOWN AS 4080 JERMANTOWN ROAD AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS TAX MAP PARCEL B. WHEREAS, and Forrest Higginbotham/Lowe s Home Centers, LLC, owners and applicant and Molly Novotny, Agent have submitted Application SE requesting a Special Exception to modify the requirements of City Code to allow building-mounted signage to exceed the maximum allowable sign area and be located on non-building frontage walls, to allow more than one ground-mounted shopping center identification sign, and to allow ground-mounted shopping center identification signage to exceed the maximum height, square footage area, and to identify the names of individual tenants, and WHEREAS, City Council has carefully considered the application, the recommendation from Staff, and testimony received at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, City Council has determined that the proposed Special Exceptions are not appropriate because the proposal does NOT meet the requisites established by City of Fairfax Code , and for the following reasons: (Reasons to be chosen by City Council; sample list below) The request is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and other adopted city goals and policies; The request is not appropriate given the size and shape of the lot and the lot s site design on which the signage is proposed; The request will result in increased traffic congestion or otherwise negatively impact existing traffic flow or pedestrian and vehicular safety; The request will adversely impact adjacent property or the surrounding area; The request will adversely impact the safety and welfare of residents living in the area; and The request is not in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the applicable article of Chapter 110 of the City Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Fairfax on this 18 th day of November, 2014, that Application No. SE be and hereby is DENIED. City Hall Armstrong Street Room 207 Fairfax Virginia (FAX)

43 The motion to adopt the resolution was approved. Votes Councilmember DeMarco Councilmember Greenfield Councilmember Loftus Councilmember Meyer Councilmember Miller Councilmember Schmidt Mayor Date City Hall Armstrong Street Room 207 Fairfax Virginia (FAX)

44 ATTACHMENT 6 MOTIONS ATTACHMENTS: [If City Council wishes to approve the applicant s request, Motion 6A is appropriate; if City Council wishes to deny the applicant s request, Motion 6B is appropriate.] 6A. Motion to adopt resolution to approve Special Exception (Staff Recommended) 6B. Motion to adopt resolution to deny Special Exception

45 6A SAMPLE MOTION FOR APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS I MOVE THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION TO APPROVE THE REQUEST OF FORREST HIGGINBOTHAM/LOWE S HOME CENTERS, LLC, OWNERS AND APPLICANT, BY MOLLY NOVOTNY, AGENT, FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS TO CITY CODE SECTION TO ALLOW BUILDING-MOUNTED SIGNAGE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SIGN AREA AND BE LOCATED ON NON-BUILDING FRONTAGE WALLS, TO ALLOW MORE THAN ONE GROUND- MOUNTED SHOPPING CENTER IDENTIFICATION SIGN, AND TO ALLOW GROUND- MOUNTED SHOPPING CENTER IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT, SQUARE FOOTAGE AREA, AND TO IDENTIFY THE NAMES OF INDIVIDUAL TENANTS, IN THE C-2 RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND THE HIGHWAY CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT ON THE PREMISES KNOWN AS 4080 JERMANTOWN ROAD AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS TAX MAP PARCEL B SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. All signage shall be in substantial conformance with the attached Lowe s signage graphics (pages 1 14), dated September 17, 2014 and revised through October 29, 2014, Sign Exhibit EXH-1 dated , and the Sign Plan Matrix, dated as revised through October 29, 2014 or as further amended by these conditions. 2. If any future public right-of-way improvements that require the removal of Sign F, then any and all costs associated with the removal, and any future relocation or modification of Sign F, shall be fully and wholly borne by the landowner or its assigns and not by the City of Fairfax or its assigns.

46 6B SAMPLE MOTION FOR DENIAL I MOVE THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT THE ATTACHED RESOLUTION TO DENY THE REQUEST OF FORREST HIGGINBOTHAM/LOWE S HOME CENTERS, LLC, OWNERS AND APPLICANT, BY MOLLY NOVOTNY, AGENT, FOR SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS TO CITY CODE SECTION TO ALLOW BUILDING-MOUNTED SIGNAGE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE SIGN AREA AND BE LOCATED ON NON-BUILDING FRONTAGE WALLS, TO ALLOW MORE THAN ONE GROUND-MOUNTED SHOPPING CENTER IDENTIFICATION SIGN, AND TO ALLOW GROUND-MOUNTED SHOPPING CENTER IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT, SQUARE FOOTAGE AREA, AND TO IDENTIFY THE NAMES OF INDIVIDUAL TENANTS, IN THE C-2 RETAIL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT AND THE HIGHWAY CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT ON THE PREMISES KNOWN AS 4080 JERMANTOWN ROAD AND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS TAX MAP PARCEL B FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON(S): (CITY COUNCIL TO CHOOSE FROM THE FOLLOWING REASONS) The request is not consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and other adopted city goals and policies; The request is not appropriate given the size and shape of the lot and the lot s site design on which the signage is proposed; The request will result in increased traffic congestion or otherwise negatively impact existing traffic flow or pedestrian and vehicular safety; The request will adversely impact adjacent property or the surrounding area; The request will adversely impact the safety and welfare of residents living in the area; and The request is not in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the applicable article of Chapter 110 of the City Code.

City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Public Hearing

City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Public Hearing City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Public Hearing Agenda Item # 8a City Council Meeting 1/27/2015 TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council FROM: Robert Sisson, City Manager SUBJECT: Requests

More information

Urban Planning and Land Use

Urban Planning and Land Use Urban Planning and Land Use 701 North 7 th Street, Room 423 Phone: (913) 573-5750 Kansas City, Kansas 66101 Fax: (913) 573-5796 Email: planninginfo@wycokck.org www.wycokck.org/planning To: From: Board

More information

CITY OF FAIRFAX. Agenda Item 8a With Amended Motions. Department of Community Development & Planning

CITY OF FAIRFAX. Agenda Item 8a With Amended Motions. Department of Community Development & Planning Agenda Item 8a With Amended Motions CITY OF FAIRFAX Department of Community Development & Planning Rezoning Request Z-15010010, Special Exception Request SE- 15010011, Variance Request V-15030030 and Comprehensive

More information

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT THE PARK AT 5 TH

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT THE PARK AT 5 TH DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT ARB Meeting Date: July 3, 2018 Item #: _PZ2018-293_ THE PARK AT 5 TH Request: Site Address: Project Name: Parcel Number: Applicant: Proposed Development: Current Zoning:

More information

- CITY OF CLOVIS - REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION

- CITY OF CLOVIS - REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA ITEM NO: X-A - CITY OF CLOVIS - REPORT TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO: FROM: Clovis Planning Commission Planning and Development Services DATE: March 22, 2018 SUBJECT: Consider Approval Res. 18-,

More information

Comprehensive Sign Package

Comprehensive Sign Package Comprehensive Sign Package March 5, 2007 Revised April 4, 2007 Revised June 15, 2007 Revised July 26, 2007 Revised August 20, 2007 Revised September 4, 2007 Revised September 21, 2007 Revised November

More information

Uniform Sign Plan (USP) Village Square 88-USP-004

Uniform Sign Plan (USP) Village Square 88-USP-004 Uniform Sign Plan (USP) Village Square 88-USP-004 A sign permit application must be submitted and a permit issued prior to installation of a sign. USP identifier: Also known as Cary Village Square Location:

More information

Department of Planning & Zoning 4200 Springdale Road Colerain Township, Ohio 45251 Staff Report: Prepared By: FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN MINOR AMENDMENT CASE #: ZA1998-01 PLANET FITNESS 9345 COLERAIN AVENUE

More information

ARTICLE 9: Sign Standards

ARTICLE 9: Sign Standards ARTICLE 9: Sign Standards... 9-1 17.9.1: General...9-1 17.9.1.1: Purpose and Intent... 9-1 17.9.1.2: Applicability... 9-1 17.9.1.3: Severability... 9-1 17.9.1.4: Prohibited Signs... 9-2 17.9.2: Types of

More information

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Meeting Date: November 2, 2017 Zoning Board of Appeals Case No. 3356 Dr. Alice Moore Apartments Variances Location Aerial I. REQUEST Site is outlined in

More information

MAUDLIN INTERNATIONAL ROOF SIGN 2200 S. DIVISION AVE.

MAUDLIN INTERNATIONAL ROOF SIGN 2200 S. DIVISION AVE. Staff Report to the Board of Zoning Adjustment December 19, 2017 VAR2017-10031 I TEM #6 MAUDLIN INTERNATIONAL ROOF SIGN 2200 S. DIVISION AVE. UNINCORPORATED ORANGE COUNTY S. Parramore Ave. Lake Angel Ex

More information

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Meeting Date: January 10, 2019 Item #: PZ2019-393 Project Name: Applicant and Owner: Proposed Development: Requests: STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI Dresden Heights Phase

More information

M-43 CORRIDOR OVERLAY ZONE

M-43 CORRIDOR OVERLAY ZONE ARTICLE 26.00 M-43 CORRIDOR OVERLAY ZONE Section 26.01 Findings A primary function of the M-43 state highway is to move traffic through the Township and to points beyond. As the primary east-west arterial

More information

Georgetown Planning Department

Georgetown Planning Department Georgetown Planning Department Zoning Board of Adjustment Staff Report Meeting Date: March 19, 2013 Item: 4 File No: VAR-2013-002 Project Planner: Mike Elabarger, Senior Planner Report Date: March 14,

More information

HUERFANO COUNTY SIGN REGULATIONS SECTION 14.00

HUERFANO COUNTY SIGN REGULATIONS SECTION 14.00 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page 14.01 SIGN CODE... 14-1 14.01.01 Intent and Purpose... 14-1 14.02 GENERAL PROVISIONS... 14-1 14.02.01 Title... 14-1 14.02.02 Repeal... 14-1 14.02.03 Scope and Applicability

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of April 25, 2009 DATE: April 14, 2009 SUBJECTS: A. Amendments to the Arlington County Zoning Ordinance, Section 20. (Appendix A), CP-FBC Columbia

More information

ARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose.

ARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose. ARTICLE VII. NONCONFORMITIES. Section 700. Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to regulate and limit the development and continued existence of legal uses, structures, lots, and signs established either

More information

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION Application No.: CA-2012-00688 Control No.: 2011-00552 Applicant: Garry Bernardo Owners: Garry Bernardo Agent: Frogner Consulting,

More information

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Date of Hearing: July 8, 2015 AND ZONING STAFF REPORT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS PUBLIC HEARING

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Date of Hearing: July 8, 2015 AND ZONING STAFF REPORT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS PUBLIC HEARING SUBJECT: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Date of Hearing: AND ZONING STAFF REPORT BOARD OF SUPERVISORS PUBLIC HEARING SIDP-2015-0003, Cascades Overlook Sign Plan # 11 ELECTION DISTRICT: Sterling CRITICAL ACTION

More information

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: September 13, 2018 Item #: PZ2018-319 STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI Request: Project Name: Development of Community Compact (DCI) and six concurrent

More information

ALTON TOWN CENTER SIGN PROGRAM DECEMBER 2017

ALTON TOWN CENTER SIGN PROGRAM DECEMBER 2017 ALTON TOWN CENTER SIGN PROGRAM DECEMBER 2017 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS KEY MAP... MATERIALS AND FINISHES... 3 4-5 GROUND SIGNS... 6-9 DIRECTORY SIGNS... BUILDING DIRECTIONAL SIGNS... WALL SIGNS... 10-11 12-15

More information

RED LOBSTER GROUND SIGN 450 S. ORANGE AVE.

RED LOBSTER GROUND SIGN 450 S. ORANGE AVE. Staff Report to the Board of Zoning Adjustment November 25, 2014 VAR2014-00107 I TEM #4 RED LOBSTER GROUND SIGN 450 S. ORANGE AVE. INTERSTATE 4 CSX RR/SUNRAIL Parking Garage CNL 2 CNL 1 A-loft Location

More information

South Portland City Council Position Paper of the City Manager

South Portland City Council Position Paper of the City Manager Agenda Item #16 Meeting of May 4, 2015 South Portland City Council Position Paper of the City Manager Subject: ORDINANCE #12-14/15 Amending Chapter 27, Zoning, regarding a zone change from Residential

More information

RC ; Reclassification The Garrison at Stafford Proffer Amendment (formerly Stafford Village Center)

RC ; Reclassification The Garrison at Stafford Proffer Amendment (formerly Stafford Village Center) Board of Supervisors Robert Bob Thomas, Jr., Chairman Laura A. Sellers, Vice Chairman Meg Bohmke Jack R. Cavalier Wendy E. Maurer Paul V. Milde, III Gary F. Snellings Anthony J. Romanello, ICMA CM County

More information

MASTER SIGN PLAN AMBERLY PLACE. Carpenter Fire Station Green Level Church Road

MASTER SIGN PLAN AMBERLY PLACE. Carpenter Fire Station Green Level Church Road MASTER SIGN PLAN AMBERLY PLACE Unless exempt from regulation per Cary s Land Development Ordinance (LDO), a sign permit is required prior to the installation of all wall and ground signs. MSP identifier:

More information

Article 9 Signs and Billboards

Article 9 Signs and Billboards Article 9 Signs and Billboards Section 9.01 Intent and Purpose The intent of this article is to regulate the type, number, physical dimensions, erection and placement of signs in Arbela Township. The purpose

More information

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 06/07/2012

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 06/07/2012 PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 06/07/2012 APPLICATION NO. CODE SECTION REQUIRED PROPOSED VARIANCE ZV-2009-03300 Variance

More information

Zoning Regulations of the Town of Redding Connecticut

Zoning Regulations of the Town of Redding Connecticut Zoning Regulations of the Town of Redding Connecticut Statutory zoning authority was adopted for the Town of Redding, and a Zoning Commission established as provided by law, at a Town Meeting held May

More information

CHAPTER 154: SIGNS. Section

CHAPTER 154: SIGNS. Section CHAPTER 154: SIGNS Section 154.01 Permit required 154.02 Where prohibited 154.03 Street decorations 154.04 Approval by state 154.05 Purpose 154.06 Definitions 154.07 General sign and street graphics regulations

More information

CITY PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT

CITY PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT CITY PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Request for a Change of Zoning and Preliminary Development Plan FROM: Mara Perry, Director of Planning & Development MEETING DATE: November 6, 2017 PETITION:

More information

City of Newport. Zoning Board of Review

City of Newport. Zoning Board of Review City of Newport Zoning Board of Review Application for a Special-Use Permit Revision 3/13/15 Instructions (Please read and follow carefully) This application is to be used when submitting an appeal to

More information

9. REZONING NO Vicinity of the northwest corner of 143 rd Street and Metcalf Avenue

9. REZONING NO Vicinity of the northwest corner of 143 rd Street and Metcalf Avenue 9. REZONING NO. 2002-15 Vicinity of the northwest corner of 143 rd Street and Metcalf Avenue 1. APPLICANT: Andrew Schlagel is the applicant for this request. 2. REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is requesting

More information

CHAPTER 13 SIGNS 13-1

CHAPTER 13 SIGNS 13-1 SECTION 13.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT The purpose of this Chapter is to promote traffic safety, public safety, and the conservation of property values through the application of reasonable controls over the

More information

Sign, Canopy: A sign attached to the underside of a canopy.

Sign, Canopy: A sign attached to the underside of a canopy. SECTION 15 SIGNS 15.1 Purpose: The requirements established herein are designed to regulate sign structures in order to insure light, air, and open space; to reduce hazards at intersections; to prevent

More information

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT EASTSIDE CHAMBLEE LINK DCI

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT EASTSIDE CHAMBLEE LINK DCI DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Public Hearing Date: April 12, 2018 Item #: PZ-2018-248 STAFF REPORT EASTSIDE CHAMBLEE LINK DCI Request: Development of Community Compact (DCI), ten concurrent variances,

More information

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM City and County of Broomfield, Colorado PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: John Hilgers, Planning Director Anna Bertanzetti, Principal Planner Meeting

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of May 14, 2011

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of May 14, 2011 ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of May 14, 2011 DATE: May 11, 2011 SUBJECT: SP #240 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT for a kiosk for the Department of Environmental Services located at the

More information

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL JOINT PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF HEARING: December

More information

ARTICLE XI CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS

ARTICLE XI CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS ARTICLE XI CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS 11.1 Purpose. The City of Hailey recognizes that certain uses possess unique and special characteristics with respect to their location, design, size, method of operation,

More information

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (East), PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (West) STAFF REPORT Date: September 18, 2014

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (East), PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (West) STAFF REPORT Date: September 18, 2014 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (East), PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (West) STAFF REPORT Date: September 18, 2014 DEVELOPMENT NAME LOCATION McGowin Park, LLC PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (East) 1401 Satchel Paige Drive

More information

Staff Report PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. Salt Lake City Planning Commission. From: Lauren Parisi, Associate Planner; Date: December 14, 2016

Staff Report PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. Salt Lake City Planning Commission. From: Lauren Parisi, Associate Planner; Date: December 14, 2016 Staff Report PLANNING DIVISION COMMUNITY & NEIGHBORHOODS To: Salt Lake City Planning Commission From: Lauren Parisi, Associate Planner; 801-535-7932 Date: December 14, 2016 Re: 1611 South 1600 East PLANNED

More information

New Millennium Senior Living Communities, LLC

New Millennium Senior Living Communities, LLC Applicant Property Owners Baylake Limited Partnership, W. Heywood Fralin 2012 Revocable Trust, W. Heywood Fralin Irrevocable Children s Trust, & Karen Holly Waldron Trust Public Hearing August 9, 2017

More information

1 September 9, 2015 Public Hearing

1 September 9, 2015 Public Hearing 1 September 9, 2015 Public Hearing APPLICANT & PROPERTY OWNER: HOLLOMON- BROWN FUNERAL HOME, INC. STAFF PLANNER: Carolyn A.K. Smith REQUEST: Change of Zoning (R-5D Residential District to Conditional O-2

More information

CITY OF MORRO BAY SIGN PERMIT. Public Services Department Planning Division 955 Shasta Avenue Morro Bay, CA (805)

CITY OF MORRO BAY SIGN PERMIT. Public Services Department Planning Division 955 Shasta Avenue Morro Bay, CA (805) Introduction The City s Sign Ordinance, Title 17.68 of the City of Morro Bay Municipal Code, contains regulations for the various types of signs allowed. The Sign Ordinance of the City of Morro Bay is

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of February 12, 2005 DATE: February 8, 2005 SUBJECT: Request to Advertise public hearings on the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendment to Section

More information

Zoning Ordinance Chapter 9

Zoning Ordinance Chapter 9 CHAPTER 9 SIGNAGE SECTION 9.0 PURPOSE A. The purpose of this Ordinance is to establish comprehensive provisions that will eliminate confusing, distracting and unsafe signs located on private property;

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING STAFF REPORT

ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING STAFF REPORT ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING STAFF REPORT Providence Place Apartments Utility Box No. 2 Conditional Use Petition PLNPCM2011-00426 309 East 100 South September 22, 2011 Planning and Zoning Division Department

More information

ARTICLE V SIGN REGULATIONS

ARTICLE V SIGN REGULATIONS ARTICLE V SIGN REGULATIONS Section 5-1. Purpose The purpose of this Article is to protect the dual interest of the public and the advertiser. The regulations herein are designed to protect public safety

More information

Village of Glenview Plan Commission

Village of Glenview Plan Commission Village of Glenview Plan Commission STAFF REPORT October 14, 2014 TO: Chairman and Plan Commissioners CASE #: P2014-074 FROM: Community Development Department CASE MANAGER: Michelle House, Planner SUBJECT:

More information

May 23, 2017 Staff Report to the Board of Zoning Ad justment. C AS E # VAR I t e m #1. Location Map. Subject

May 23, 2017 Staff Report to the Board of Zoning Ad justment. C AS E # VAR I t e m #1. Location Map. Subject May 23, 2017 Staff Report to the Board of Zoning Ad justment C AS E # VAR 2 0 1 7-00031 I t e m #1 U N I T E D R E N TA L S O R L A N D O Location Map S U M M A R Y Owner Herbert R. Matthews, Jr. Applicant

More information

Introduction. Background DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. Planning Division. m e m o r a n d u m TO: The Urbana Zoning Board of Appeals

Introduction. Background DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES. Planning Division. m e m o r a n d u m TO: The Urbana Zoning Board of Appeals DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Planning Division m e m o r a n d u m TO: FROM: The Urbana Zoning Board of Appeals Christopher Marx, AICP, Planner I DATE: March 16, 218 SUBJECT: ZBA Case ZBA-218-C-2:

More information

VARIANCE APPLICATION. Note: Staff reports can be accessed at Project Name: New Carrollton Town Center

VARIANCE APPLICATION. Note: Staff reports can be accessed at  Project Name: New Carrollton Town Center The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George s County Planning Department Development Review Division 301-952-3530 Note: Staff reports can be accessed at www.mncppc.org/pgco/planning/plan.htm.

More information

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION

MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MONTGOMERY COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT THE MARYLAND-NATIONAL CAPITAL PARK AND PLANNING COMMISSION MCPB Item No.: 10 Date: 06-28-18 Park Potomac: Site Plan Amendment No. 82004015N Benjamin Berbert, Planner

More information

Lone Tree Landing Hillcrest Ave & Lone Tree Way Antioch, CA

Lone Tree Landing Hillcrest Ave & Lone Tree Way Antioch, CA Lone Tree Landing Hillcrest Ave & Lone Tree Way Antioch, CA Sign Criteria Multi Tenant and Freestanding Commercial Prepared By: Charity Bowman June 3, 2008 United Sign Systems 5201 Pentecost Drive Modesto,

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 19, 2015

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA. County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 19, 2015 ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of September 19, 2015 DATE: August 28, 2015 SUBJECT: Request to authorize advertisement of public hearings by the Planning Commission and the

More information

Project: Address: MAJOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW

Project: Address: MAJOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS FOR THE BOARD OF ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW The BAR recommended approval of the major COA with the following 10 conditions at the special meeting on March 28, 2018. Project: Address: Case Number: Applicant: ATTACHMENT 9e Paul VI Redevelopment 10675

More information

DISTRICT COUNCIL FOR PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY, MARYLAND OFFICE OF ZONING HEARING EXAMINER SPECIAL EXCEPTION 4658 DECISION

DISTRICT COUNCIL FOR PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY, MARYLAND OFFICE OF ZONING HEARING EXAMINER SPECIAL EXCEPTION 4658 DECISION DISTRICT COUNCIL FOR PRINCE GEORGE S COUNTY, MARYLAND OFFICE OF ZONING HEARING EXAMINER SPECIAL EXCEPTION 4658 DECISION Application: Three Chair Barber Shop Applicants: Danta L. & Felicia B. Wright/Fort

More information

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT MCDONALD S ZONING MAP AMENDMENT AND CONCURRENT VARIANCES

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT MCDONALD S ZONING MAP AMENDMENT AND CONCURRENT VARIANCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: October 12, 2017 Item #: _PZ2017-172_ STAFF REPORT MCDONALD S ZONING MAP AMENDMENT AND CONCURRENT VARIANCES Request: Rezone property from MU-BC to CC,

More information

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

Composition of traditional residential corridors. Page 1 of 7 St. Petersburg, Florida, Code of Ordinances >> PART II - ST. PETERSBURG CITY CODE >> Chapter 16 - LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS >> SECTION 16.20.060. CORRIDOR RESIDENTIAL TRADITIONAL DISTRICTS

More information

CUP ; Conditional Use Permit - 5 Twelve Convenience Store Expansion

CUP ; Conditional Use Permit - 5 Twelve Convenience Store Expansion Board of Supervisors Meg Bohmke, Chairman Gary F. Snellings, Vice Chairman Jack R. Cavalier Thomas C. Coen L. Mark Dudenhefer Wendy E. Maurer Cindy C. Shelton 2 March 28, 2018 Thomas C. Foley County Administrator

More information

NOTICE OF MEETING AND AGENDA FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF SPRINGVILLE, UTAH... JANUARY 23, 2018

NOTICE OF MEETING AND AGENDA FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF SPRINGVILLE, UTAH... JANUARY 23, 2018 NOTICE OF MEETING AND AGENDA FOR THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF SPRINGVILLE, UTAH............................ JANUARY 23, 2018 Notice is hereby given that the Planning Commission will hold a public meeting

More information

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS. August 2, 2018

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS. August 2, 2018 A. Call to Order 7:00 p.m. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS August 2, 2018 1. Roll Call - the following members were present: M. Coulter; L. Reibel; D. Falcoski; and C. Crane; and

More information

ADUs and You! Common types of ADUs include mother-in-law suite, garage apartments and finished basements.

ADUs and You! Common types of ADUs include mother-in-law suite, garage apartments and finished basements. ADUs and You! Accessory Dwelling Units Town of Lyons Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) are a form of housing that can be an important tool for diversifying and increasing the local housing stock. Lyons lost

More information

ARTICLE VI. SPECIAL EXCEPTION REGULATIONS

ARTICLE VI. SPECIAL EXCEPTION REGULATIONS ARTICLE VI. SPECIAL EXCEPTION REGULATIONS SECTION 601. GENERAL DESCRIPTION Special exceptions are deemed to be permitted uses in their respective districts, subject to the satisfaction of the requirements

More information

MARK BELLMAWR, LLC - # RESOLUTION

MARK BELLMAWR, LLC - # RESOLUTION RESOLUTION OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE BOROUGH OF BELLMAWR FOR USE VARIANCE, BULK VARIANCE AND PRELIMINARY AND FINAL MAJOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL MARK BELLMAWR, LLC

More information

R E S O L U T I O N. 2. Development Data Summary:

R E S O L U T I O N. 2. Development Data Summary: R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the Prince George's County Planning Board is charged with the approval of Detailed Site Plans pursuant to Part 3, Division 9 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Prince George's

More information

City of Harrisburg Variance and Special Exception Application

City of Harrisburg Variance and Special Exception Application City of Harrisburg Variance and Special Exception Application Note: The Planning Bureau will review all applications for completeness; incomplete applications may cause a delay in processing. Contact Ben

More information

CHAPTER 2 RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER LAWS.

CHAPTER 2 RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER LAWS. CHAPTER 2 General Provisions 12-2-1 Minimum Requirements 12-2-2 Relationship with Other Laws 12-2-3 Effect on Existing Agreements 12-2-4 Scope of Regulations 12-2-5 Building Permit 12-2-6 Nonconforming

More information

SCHEDULE B. Comprehensive Mixed Use Sign and Awning Package Replacing Section VI.P.3 of the Redevelopment Plan As amended January 22, 2013

SCHEDULE B. Comprehensive Mixed Use Sign and Awning Package Replacing Section VI.P.3 of the Redevelopment Plan As amended January 22, 2013 SCHEDULE B Comprehensive Mixed Use Sign and Awning Package Replacing Section VI.P.3 of the Redevelopment Plan As amended January 22, 2013 3. Mixed Use District a. All dwellings shall clearly display the

More information

CHAPTER 5. Signs. It is further the intent of this section to prohibit signs which:

CHAPTER 5. Signs. It is further the intent of this section to prohibit signs which: CHAPTER 5 Signs 12-5-1 Purpose 12-5-2 Permitted Signs 12-5-3 Prohibited Signs 12-5-4 Computation of Number and Square Footage of Signs 12-5-5 District Regulations 12-5-6 Maintenance and Removal 12-5-7

More information

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT

CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL JOINT PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF HEARING: May

More information

THE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA

THE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA THE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA Tuesday, January 17, 2017 Fourth-Floor Council Chambers 3:30 p.m. County-City Building, South Bend, IN EXECUTIVE SESSION: A. Election of Officers

More information

ATLANTA ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE

ATLANTA ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE CITY OF ATLANTA ZONING ORDINANCE QUICK FIXES In 2015 the City of Atlanta selected a team of consultants to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the City s Zoning Ordinance, including a review of the ability

More information

SIGNS MASTER SIGN PROGRAM

SIGNS MASTER SIGN PROGRAM SIGNS MASTER SIGN PROGRAM How to apply for a Master Sign Program What is the purpose of a Master Sign Program? A Master Sign Program (MSP) is used to create standard sign design guidelines for projects

More information

BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT Date: January 9, 2017

BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT Date: January 9, 2017 # 1 HOLDOVER Revised ZON2016-02346 BOARD OF ZONING ADJUSTMENT STAFF REPORT Date: January 9, 2017 CASE NUMBER 6082 4140 1874 APPLICANT NAME LOCATION VARIANCE REQUEST ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT ZONING

More information

CHAPTER 5 ZONING SECTION 5.1 PURPOSE

CHAPTER 5 ZONING SECTION 5.1 PURPOSE CHAPTER 5 ZONING SECTION 5.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Chapter is to regulate the nature and extent of uses of land, and of buildings and structures thereon, in order to promote the purposes of this

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 19, 2014 DATE: July 8, 2014 SUBJECTS: A. ZOA-14-03 Zoning Ordinance amendments to: 1. Revise Map 34-1 (Sign Map) to update the placement

More information

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Application for Variances, Special Exceptions through the Board of Adjustment

DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Application for Variances, Special Exceptions through the Board of Adjustment DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING Application for Variances, Special Exceptions through the Board of Adjustment Dear Applicant: To assist you in completing this application and providing the Board with sufficient

More information

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND REVIEW CRITERIA

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND REVIEW CRITERIA Page 3 CITY PLANNING COMMISSION COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND REVIEW CRITERIA COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The City Planning Commission uses the Comprehensive Plan as a guide in all land use matters. The Plan is available

More information

City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session

City of Fairfax, Virginia City Council Work Session City Council Work Session Agenda Item # City Council Meeting 5a 10/7/2014 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council Robert Sisson, City Manager Discussion of a request by The IDI Group

More information

Board of Zoning and Planning Members. Justin A. Milam, AICP, Planning Officer. Positive recommendation of a rezoning to City Council.

Board of Zoning and Planning Members. Justin A. Milam, AICP, Planning Officer. Positive recommendation of a rezoning to City Council. To: From: Board of Zoning and Planning Members Justin A. Milam, AICP, Planning Officer Prepared for Meeting Dated: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 Subject: Action Requested: Master Plan Objective: BZAP review

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of July 21, 2012 DATE: June 26, 2012 SUBJECT: SP #402 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT for a comprehensive sign plan amendment to add a projecting sign for

More information

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 07/05/2012

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 07/05/2012 PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 07/05/2012 APPLICATION NO. CODE SECTION REQUIRED PROPOSED VARIANCE ZV-2012-00690 3.D.1.A

More information

ARTICLE 20 SIGNS. SIGN, AREA: The entire area of all sign faces, cumulatively, including sign faces on which no copy is currently displayed.

ARTICLE 20 SIGNS. SIGN, AREA: The entire area of all sign faces, cumulatively, including sign faces on which no copy is currently displayed. ARTICLE 20 SIGNS 7 TCC 1-20 (a) Purpose. The purpose of the article is to provide regulation and control of the location, size, content and placement of signs throughout the County in order to promote

More information

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY

PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY Meeting Date: February 1, 2018 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT SUMMARY Subject: Prepared by: 400 Main Street, Proposed Real Estate Office Jon Biggs, Community Development Director Attachment(s): A. Revised

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Board of Zoning Appeals Agenda Item V-11250-17-UP-2: Meeting of April 19, 2017 DATE: April 14, 2017 APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: LOT AREA: GLUP DESIGNATION: Robert and Tania

More information

SUBJECT: CUP ; Conditional Use Permit - Telegraph Road Vehicle Sales / Storage

SUBJECT: CUP ; Conditional Use Permit - Telegraph Road Vehicle Sales / Storage 2 Board of Supervisors Robert Bob Thomas, Jr., Chairman Laura A. Sellers, Vice Chairman Meg Bohmke Jack R. Cavalier Wendy E. Maurer Paul V. Milde, III Gary F. Snellings August 24, 2016 Anthony J. Romanello,

More information

City Council 1-15-08- Exhibit A Mansionization Code Amendments Recommended by Planning Commission 11-14-07 INCREASE OPEN SPACE AND SETBACKS Section 10.12.030 and A.12.030 Property Development Regulations:

More information

UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA JOINDER DEED / LOT CONSOLIDATION TOWNSHIP REVIEW PROCESS When accepting proposed Joinder Deeds / Lot Consolidations, review the Joinder Deed

More information

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING CITY OF ST. PETE BEACH

BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING CITY OF ST. PETE BEACH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING CITY OF ST. PETE BEACH 155 Corey Avenue St. Pete Beach, Florida Wednesday, 7/26/2017 2:00 p.m. Call to Order Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call 1. Changes to the Agenda Agenda items

More information

A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR

A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR A G E N D A CITY OF BUENA PARK ZONING ADMINISTRATOR September 2, 2016 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE ROOM 10:00 a.m. Members of the public who wish to discuss an item should fill out a speaker identification

More information

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PLANNING BOARD Meeting Date: July 17, 2018 Planning Board Case No. 1670I

CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PLANNING BOARD Meeting Date: July 17, 2018 Planning Board Case No. 1670I CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PLANNING BOARD Meeting Date: July 17, 2018 Planning Board Case No. 1670I Palms Gateway Commercial Planned Development (CPD) Southeast Corner of Belvedere Road and Australian Avenue

More information

PLANNING DEPARTMENT Application for a Type 2 Use through the Board of Adjustment & Appeals

PLANNING DEPARTMENT Application for a Type 2 Use through the Board of Adjustment & Appeals PLANNING DEPARTMENT Application for a Type 2 Use through the Board of Adjustment & Appeals Dear Applicant: Type 2 uses (formerly called Special Exceptions) are uses that may be approved if certain criteria

More information

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION

PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION Application No.: W-2014-00288 Application Name: O Reilly Auto Parts Control No.: 2013-00286 Applicant: Hutton Growth Blue Sky

More information

McGowin Park, LLC. B-3, Community Business District

McGowin Park, LLC. B-3, Community Business District # 10, 11, 12 SUB2014-00024 ZON2014-00500 ZON2014-00501 SUBDIVISION, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (East), PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (West) STAFF REPORT Date: April 3, 2014 DEVELOPMENT NAME LOCATION McGowin Park,

More information

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)

Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707) Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA 94559-0660 (707) 257-9530 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT MARCH 3, 2016 AGENDA ITEM # 7.B. File No. 15-0158

More information

CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL

CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF VAN BUREN BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS AGENDA September 13, 2016-7:00 PM VAN BUREN TOWNSHIP HALL Board of Trustees Room 46425 Tyler Road CALL TO ORDER PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL Chair

More information

City of Brisbane. Zoning Administrator Agenda Report

City of Brisbane. Zoning Administrator Agenda Report City of Brisbane Zoning Administrator Agenda Report TO: John A. Swiecki, Zoning Administrator For the Meeting of 11/16/2015 FROM: Julia Capasso, Associate Planner SUBJECT: 185 Valley Drive; Sign Review

More information

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA Board of Zoning Appeals Agenda Item V-11394-18-UP-1: Meeting of October 17, 2018 DATE: October 12, 2018 APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONING: LOT AREA: GLUP DESIGNATION: Sarah Sunday

More information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 04/06/2017

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 04/06/2017 AGENDA ITEM #22 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 04/06/2017 COUNCIL AGENDA SUBJECT: Discuss and consider the Second Reading of an Ordinance regarding 16-OR-006a amending the Leander Code of Ordinances, Chapter 14, Zoning,

More information