DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI
|
|
- Francine Patterson
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: September 13, 2018 Item #: PZ STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI Request: Project Name: Development of Community Compact (DCI) and six concurrent variances Dresden Townhomes Site Addresses: 2186 Dresden Drive Parcel Numbers: Applicant: Owner: Proposed Development: Current Zoning: W. Barry Dunlop, Paradigm Engineering Housing Development Corporation of DeKalb DCI to construct 12 three-story townhomes Village Residential (VR) - This zoning district is intended primarily for single-family attached and detached residences, two-family residences, and multifamily residences with related accessory uses, supportive nonresidential uses, open space, and amenities. Staff & ARB Recommendation: APPROVAL of DCI, APPROVAL of four variances and one waiver, DENIAL of two variances District Standards: VR Zoning District Standards FAR (max.) 2.0 Front Yard Setback (min.) 0 Impervious Surface (max.) 80% Rear Yard Setback (min.) 0 Open Space (min.) 20% Side Yard Setback (min.) 0 Building Height (max.) 48 Landscape Strip (Sec.) 5 Building Height (min.) (Sec.) 18 Sidewalk Clear Zone (Sec.) 10 Lot Size (min.)/ Lot Width (min.) N/A Supplemental Zone (Sec.) 8 Current Use: Existing single-story residential structure used for office/retail space. Surrounding Land Uses: West Corridor Commercial (CC): Retail/Commercial, including a new and used tire shop, barber shop, etc. Page 1 of 11
2 East CC: Multi-family residential, Rosalynn Apartments North CC: Retail, including Talpa Supermarket South VR: Single-family residential Future Development Map: The subject property is within the Clairmont Residential character area of the Future Development Map in the City of Chamblee Comprehensive Plan. The vision of the Clairmont Residential character area is: A strong residential area containing a diversity of housing types, and limited neighborhood commercial uses. The area will have easy access to both shopping and employment opportunities located at Century Center and along Buford Highway. Appropriate zoning districts are: NR-1 Neighborhood Residential 1 district NR-3 Neighborhood Residential 3 district NR-2 Neighborhood Residential 2 district VR Village Residential district Key Policies and Implementation Measures include the following: Support home maintenance and home ownership assistance programs to support long term sustainability of housing stock Promote higher-density infill development near Clairmont Road, but maintain the character of the single-family neighborhoods further away from the road Site Description: The subject property is a single parcel that is approximately one acre in size. The property is located east of the intersection of Dresden Drive and Buford Hwy. Currently, there is one curb cut providing access to the site that would be moved and reconstructed. There is currently a single-story, wood-frame residential structure with a rear deck and two accessory structures that are estimated to be between 120 and 140 square feet in size. The site has a roughly 24-foot downward slope towards Dresden Drive from the northwestern corner of the property to the southeastern corner of the property. The existing site is mostly vegetation, with a good amount of shade provided by existing trees. The rear lot line is a little more than 100 feet shorter than the front lot line, which causes for the parcel to have an irregular shape. There are no natural barriers present on site, such as streams, and the site is not restricted by any easements or height limitations outside of the regulations of the Unified Development Ordinance. History of the Property This property was annexed into the City of Chamblee during the 2013 annexation. This property has no previous zoning cases since the annexation. Page 2 of 11
3 Description of Proposed Project: The applicant proposes to construct 12 three-story townhomes, with a new private narrow street and an alley that would run parallel to Dresden Drive to provide access to the units in the back of the development. The six units with frontage along Dresden Drive would be rear-entry and the six units towards the back of the development would be front-entry. A summary of the project is as follows: - Demolish the existing primary and accessory structures and close off the one curb-cut that currently provides access; - Remove trees and grade the site as necessary; - Construct a new curb-cut and a private narrow street perpendicular to Dresden Drive, which would convert into an alley that would run parallel to Dresden Drive to provide access to the rear six units; - Install a 7-foot landscape strip and an 8-foot sidewalk along Dresden Drive; - Install a 5-foot landscape strip and a 4-foot sidewalk along the west side of the new private narrow street; - Install a 3-foot landscape strip and a 5-foot sidewalk along the alley in the back of the property; - Install a retaining wall along the west property line that at the highest point would measure roughly 10 feet in height; - Install a wing-wall that would act as a retaining wall in the northeast area of the lot along the east property line that at the highest point would measure roughly seven feet in height; - Install three parking spaces to provide access to the mail kiosk structure; and - Bury all utilities on site. The project qualifies as a Development of Community Impact (DCI). The purpose of the DCI shall be to: (1) Provide for unified approaches to the development of land; (2) Provide for the development of stable environments that are compatible with surrounding areas of the community; and (3) Provide for architectural review and approval for individual large-scale structures not subject to other legislative review. DCI applications require review and recommendation by the Architectural Review Board (ARB), prior to a public hearing by Mayor and City Council. DCI Review and Approval Criteria: The following review and approval criteria, described in Sec , must be used in reviewing and taking action on all DCI applications: Page 3 of 11
4 1. Design shall be in harmony with the general character of the neighborhood and surrounding area, considering factors such as mass, placement, height, changing land use patterns, and consistency of exterior architectural treatment, especially in areas of historic and special design interest. The design of the proposed project is in harmony with the general character of the neighborhood and surrounding area. The property is zoned VR, which is the residential zoning district that allows the highest density. Both sides of Dresden Drive are zoned for either highdensity commercial (CC) or single-family at a higher density (VR), and the density that is existing varies from low-density, single-family residential structures, to high-density, multi-family residential. The density of the proposed townhouse development would be in between the two. The development would have street-facing facades and a full streetscape, which the property does not have now. 2. Design components shall be planned such that they are physically and aesthetically related and coordinated with other elements of the project and surrounding environment to ensure visual continuity of design. The facades of the buildings as well as the colors are proposed to be uniform throughout the development, with a subtle color presence being proposed on the entry doors and garage doors. The front doors would share a front porch, with direct access to the sidewalk along Dresden Drive. The buildings would incorporate shingle roofs, with brick and cementitious siding as façade materials, which may be seen on surrounding buildings in the area. 3. Design shall protect scenic views, particularly those of open space, and utilize natural features of the site. There are no scenic views that are present on the site today. The most prominent feature on the site would be the amount of landscaped area and number of trees that are existing. The townhomes that have frontage on Dresden Drive would have landscaped area in. Some trees would be required to be removed, however there are about 11 trees of significant size that would be saved towards the back of the property. 4. Design shall protect adjacent properties from negative visual and functional impacts. The design would not create any negative or functional impacts for neighboring properties. The existing building is a one-story, all-siding structure with a cracked asphalt driveway and some gravel walkways. The proposed development, which includes a streetscape, would be a visual and functional improvement for adjacent properties. 5. Design shall respect the historical character of the immediate area as integral parts of community life in the City and shall protect and preserve structures and spaces which provide a significant link within these areas. Page 4 of 11
5 There is no notable historical character that would be impacted. The design of the project would maintain the single-family character that is seen on Dresden Drive, with a higher density that coincides with the neighboring commercial and multi-family developments. 6. All exterior forms, attached to buildings or not, shall be in conformity with, and secondary to, the building. All exterior forms, attached to buildings or not, such as the mail kiosk, appear to be in conformity with, and secondary to, the buildings. 7. The proposed development is suitable in view of the use and development of adjacent and nearby property. The proposed development is suitable in view of the use and development of adjacent and nearby property. This development would provide the adjacent and nearby properties with a new sidewalk that is currently only provided on the opposite side of Dresden Drive. 8. The proposed development does not adversely affect the existing use or usability of adjacent or nearby property. The proposed development does not adversely affect the existing use or usability of adjacent or nearby property. Dresden Drive would see increased sidewalk connectivity, nearby commercial uses would have more residents living nearby, and the proposed development is suitable in the context of the existing residential uses in the area. 9. The proposed development does not result in a use which will or could cause an excessive or burdensome use of existing streets, transportation facilities, utilities or schools. The proposed development is unlikely to result in an excessive or burdensome use. Staff has sent the proposed development to the Board of Education for comments, which are currently pending. The City Engineer reviewed and approved the plan with the condition that the DeKalb Fire Marshal also reviews it and provides comments. 10. The proposed development is in conformance with the applicable zoning district. The VR zoning district is intended primarily for single-family attached and detached residences, two-family residences, and multifamily residences with related accessory uses. The proposed development is in conformance with the purpose and intent of the VR zoning district. 11. The proposed development is in conformance with the provisions of the future development plan articulated in the City s Comprehensive Plan. The proposed development is in conformance with the provisions of the Future Development Plan from the City s Comprehensive Plan. The Clairmont Residential Character Area calls for a diversity of housing types, which this development provides. Page 5 of 11
6 Applicant s Concurrent Variance Requests: The project requires approval of variances with respect to the requirements of the UDO. Per Sec of the UDO, concurrent review for variance applications may be filed with a DCI application. The applicant requests approval of concurrent variances from the following regulations of Title 2 of the UDO: 1. Variance from Section (b)(1)(a) to reduce the required minimum lot width for townhome units from 20 feet to 18 feet for Units 7 through Variance from Section (b)(1)(l) to reduce the required number of garage spaces per townhome unit from 2 spaces per unit to 1 space per unit for Units 7 through Variance from Section (b)(1)(m) to reduce the required path from each individual unit from 5-feet per unit to allow a 6 10 path to be shared between two units. 4. Variance from Section (a) to reduce the width of the sidewalk from the required 10 feet to 8 feet. 5. Variance from Section (f)(1) to allow the streetscape to not span the entire length of the frontage along Dresden Drive. 6. Variance from Section 230-6(d)(1) to allow a retaining wall in the side yard to be taller than eight feet in height. Per the review and approval criteria described in Section (a), the Mayor and City Council may authorize variances from the provisions of this UDO only after making the following findings: a. There are extraordinary and exceptional conditions pertaining to the particular property in question because of its size, shape or topography; The property narrows towards the rear property line, which restricts the buildable area. There is a significant topographical increase of about ten feet from the street to where the first building will be located, and an overall downward slope of about 24 feet from the northwestern corner of the property toward the street. b. The application of this zoning ordinance to the particular piece of property would create an unnecessary hardship; The application of the zoning ordinance to the proposed property would create a hardship in regards to the provisions of Sec (d) for retaining walls of heights greater than those allowed by right in the side and rear yards because of the changes in topography throughout the site. Because of the shape of the lot, a variance from Section (b)(1)(a) and Section (b)(1)(l) are requested to allow smaller units to be developed towards the rear of the Page 6 of 11
7 property where the lot narrows. The shape of the lot does present a hardship in terms of buildable area. In regards to the requested variance from Sec (f)(1) to install an 8-foot sidewalk instead of a 10-foot sidewalk, there is not an unnecessary hardship present to support not installing the required width of the sidewalk. The applicant is proposing to match the streetscape that is present on the neighboring property, 2198 Dresden Drive, which was built to the UDO standards that have since been revised to require a wider sidewalk. The developer is proposing to increase the width of the landscape strip, which could be used to install the correct width of the sidewalk instead. The requested variance to not install the streetscape along the entire frontage on Dresden Drive is because of the topographical change at the southwest corner of the property. While there is a change in grade in this area, the hardship caused by the requirement of installing a complete sidewalk that will connect to neighboring properties is not unnecessary. The applicant may be able to overcome this hardship through some means other than leaving a gap between the end of the sidewalk and the property line. Because of the topographical changes that occur throughout the site, staircases of significant size would be required in order to access the sidewalks in front of each unit. The applicant is proposing to have the paths between the unit and the sidewalk be shared by two units, which requires a variance from Section (b)(1)(m) to allow a shared 6 10 path instead of two 5- foot paths. This would reduce the visual impact of the staircases lining Dresden Drive. c. Such conditions are peculiar to the particular piece of property involved; While the topographical conditions are similar to several neighboring properties, they are significant. The shape and the size of the lot are comparable as well to neighboring properties. d. Such conditions are not the result of any actions of the property owner; or The site conditions are not the result of the property owner. The design of the units does require the need of variances from the UDO. The requested variances from Section (b)(1)(a) and Section (b)(1)(l) to allow narrower townhome lots as well as a reduction in required garage parking spaces for each unit could be considered the result of the actions of the property owner in that they are only required in order to fit a greater number of units on the site. e. Relief, if granted, would not cause substantial detriment to the public good nor impair the purposes or intent of this zoning ordinance. For four of the requested variances, relief would not cause substantial detriment to the public good. The reduction in townhome width, along with the reduction in associated garage parking, would not create any visual impacts from the street, would not require any parking variances, Page 7 of 11
8 and would add to the diversity of housing supply in the area. The development would provide important streetscape connections, as well as adequate landscaping that will activate the streetscape and maintain the single-family residential character of Dresden Drive. The requested variances for the retaining wall and for narrowed shared paths to street-facing units would also not have any detriment to the public good, and help allow for a development with an activated, pedestrian-oriented streetscape. The requested streetscape variances could cause a detriment to the public good. While the required sidewalk would not match that on neighboring property, City Council has determined that a 10-foot-wide sidewalk is appropriate in this location, and there is no hardship on the site requiring a variance. Likewise, the applicant s request not to install the full streetscape could result in a gap in the sidewalk network in the future. Applicant s Concurrent Waiver Requests: The project requires approval of waivers with respect to the requirements of the UDO. Per Sec of the UDO, concurrent review for waiver applications may be filed with a DCI application. The applicant requests approval of concurrent waivers from the following regulations of Title 3 of the UDO: 1. Waiver from Section 350-3(d)(3)(f) to allow a private narrow street to not have a 4-foot sidewalk on both sides of the street. Only in situations as described in Section 300-8, where, because of severe topographical or other conditions peculiar to the site, strict adherence to the provisions of Title 3 of the UDO would cause an unnecessary hardship that is not caused by the owner, the Mayor and City Council may, after considering the written recommendation of the Development Director, authorize a waiver from the terms of Title 3 only to the extent that is absolutely necessary and not to an extent which would violate the intent of Title 3. There are topographical conditions to support approval of a waiver to not install the full streetscape along both sides of a new private narrow street. Topography limits where on the site units could be built, and without the requested waiver, a street-facing unit may have to be relocated or lost altogether. Staff sees more importance in keeping the proposed number of units that have frontage directly on Dresden Drive in place in order to maintain an active streetscape. Instead of proposing a four-foot wide sidewalk on both sides of the new private narrow street, the applicant is proposing to provide a 3-foot wide landscape strip and a 5-foot wide sidewalk along the alley along Units 7 through 12. Proposing the sidewalk along Dresden Page 8 of 11
9 Drive, on the west-side of the private narrow street, as well as along the alley in front of Units 7 through 12 allows each unit to have access directly to at least one sidewalk. Staff Recommendation: Based on the analysis of this application, using the standards and criteria found in Chapter 280 of the UDO, staff recommends APPROVAL of the DCI application PZ Staff recommends APPROVAL of the following variance and waiver requests: 1. Variance from Section (b)(1)(a) to reduce the required minimum lot width for townhome units from 20 feet to 18 feet for Units 7 through Variance from Section (b)(1)(l) to reduce the required number of garage spaces per townhome unit from 2 spaces per unit to 1 space per unit for Units 7 through Variance from Section (b)(1)(m) to reduce the required path from each individual unit from 5-feet per unit to allow a 6 10 path to be shared between two units. 6. Variance from Section 230-6(d)(1) to allow a retaining wall in the side yard to be taller than eight feet in height. 1. Waiver from Section 350-3(d)(3)(f) to allow a private narrow street to not have a 4-foot sidewalk on both sides of the street. Staff recommends the following conditions of approval: 1. The development shall be constructed in substantial conformity with the DCI packet EXHIBIT A: DCI Plan Book for Dresden Townhomes, dated July 30, The crosswalk that crosses the alley shall be a continuation of the sidewalk along the west side of the new private narrow street. 3. Each townhome shall be sold as fee simple lots. 4. The new private narrow street shall remain private and shall not be gated. Staff recommends DENIAL of the following variance requests: 4. Variance from Section (a) to reduce the width of the sidewalk from the required 10 feet to 8 feet. 5. Variance from Section (f)(1) to allow the streetscape to not span the entire length of the frontage along Dresden Drive. Page 9 of 11
10 Architectural Review Board Recommendation: At its September 5, 2018 meeting, ARB recommended APPROVAL of the DCI application PZ ARB recommends APPROVAL of the following variance and waiver requests: 1. Variance from Section (b)(1)(a) to reduce the required minimum lot width for townhome units from 20 feet to 18 feet for Units 7 through Variance from Section (b)(1)(l) to reduce the required number of garage spaces per townhome unit from 2 spaces per unit to 1 space per unit for Units 7 through Variance from Section (b)(1)(m) to reduce the required path from each individual unit from 5-feet per unit to allow a 6 10 path to be shared between two units. 6. Variance from Section 230-6(d)(1) to allow a retaining wall in the side yard to be taller than eight feet in height. 1. Waiver from Section 350-3(d)(3)(f) to allow a private narrow street to not have a 4-foot sidewalk on both sides of the street. ARB recommends the following conditions of approval: 1. The development shall be constructed in substantial conformity with the DCI packet EXHIBIT A: DCI Plan Book for Dresden Townhomes, dated July 30, The crosswalk that crosses the alley shall be a continuation of the sidewalk along the west side of the new private narrow street. 3. Each townhome shall be sold as fee simple lots. 4. The new private narrow street shall remain private and shall not be gated. 5. The elevations facing Dresden Drive, which include the front and side of Unit 1, the fronts of Units 2 and 3, the front and side of Unit 4, and the front and sides of Units 5 and 6, shall be constructed with 100% brick or stone up to the decorative band at the top of the wall adjoining the gable. Brick or stone is not required to be used for gables, soffits, windows, or bay windows, as shown on Attachment 4. ARB recommends DENIAL of the following variance requests: 4. Variance from Section (a) to reduce the width of the sidewalk from the required 10 feet to 8 feet. 5. Variance from Section (f)(1) to allow the streetscape to not span the entire length of the frontage along Dresden Drive. If the applicant can demonstrate to City Council that extending the streetscape to the property line is impractical, the ARB recommends that City Council approves the Variance if the applicant is willing to enter into an easement that would permit the adjoining property owner (4285 Buford Hwy) to complete the missing section of the streetscape at a later date. Page 10 of 11
11 Attachments: Attachment 1 EXHIBIT A: DCI Plan Book for Dresden Townhomes, dated August 2, 2018 Attachment 2 Application Attachment 3 Location Maps Attachment 4 Recommended ARB elevation conditions Page 11 of 11
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT THE PARK AT 5 TH
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT ARB Meeting Date: July 3, 2018 Item #: _PZ2018-293_ THE PARK AT 5 TH Request: Site Address: Project Name: Parcel Number: Applicant: Proposed Development: Current Zoning:
More informationDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Meeting Date: January 10, 2019 Item #: PZ2019-393 Project Name: Applicant and Owner: Proposed Development: Requests: STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI Dresden Heights Phase
More informationDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT EASTSIDE CHAMBLEE LINK DCI
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Public Hearing Date: April 12, 2018 Item #: PZ-2018-248 STAFF REPORT EASTSIDE CHAMBLEE LINK DCI Request: Development of Community Compact (DCI), ten concurrent variances,
More informationDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: January 11, 2018 Item #: PZ2017-151 STAFF REPORT VARIANCES RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THROUGH Request: Multiple Variances for a new restaurant with drive-through
More informationDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT VARIANCE AND WAIVER THE ROSALYNN APARTMENTS
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: September 14, 2017 Item #: _PZ-2017-153_ STAFF REPORT VARIANCE AND WAIVER THE ROSALYNN APARTMENTS Request: Variance and Waiver Project Name: The Rosalynn
More informationDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT PUD/DCI BAINBRIDGE MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: October 12, 2017 Item #: _PZ-2017-170_ STAFF REPORT PUD/DCI BAINBRIDGE MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT Request: Project Name: Planned Unit Development (PUD)/ Development
More informationDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT BOJNANGLES SIGN VARIANCES
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: February 15, 2018 Item #: _PZ2018-222_ STAFF REPORT BOJNANGLES SIGN VARIANCES Request: Multiple variances for signage for a drive-through establishment
More informationDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT MCDONALD S ZONING MAP AMENDMENT AND CONCURRENT VARIANCES
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: October 12, 2017 Item #: _PZ2017-172_ STAFF REPORT MCDONALD S ZONING MAP AMENDMENT AND CONCURRENT VARIANCES Request: Rezone property from MU-BC to CC,
More informationDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT EDISON AT EASTSIDE DCI
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: September 13, 2018 Item #: PZ2018-309 STAFF REPORT EDISON AT EASTSIDE DCI Request: Project Name: Site Addresses: Parcel Numbers: Applicant: Owner: Development
More informationPLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT PREMIER AUTO SERVICES, INC. VARIANCES
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: February 14, 2019 Item #: PZ2019-402 STAFF REPORT PREMIER AUTO SERVICES, INC. VARIANCES Project Name: Premier Auto Services, Inc. Applicant:
More informationDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT CRESCENT ANIMAL HOSPITAL (ICE HOUSE BUILDING)
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: June 14, 2018 Item #: PZ2018-266 STAFF REPORT CRESCENT ANIMAL HOSPITAL (ICE HOUSE BUILDING) Request: Eleven variances and three waivers for a veterinary
More information11/15/2017 taxcommissioner.dekalbcountyga.gov/taxcommissioner/tcdisplay.asp Print this page for your records Contact Us Online Payments are for 2017 Only For additional assistance, contact (404) 298-4000.
More informationDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT CRESCENT ANIMAL HOSPITAL (ICE HOUSE BUILDING)
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: May 10, 2018 Item #: PZ2018-266 STAFF REPORT CRESCENT ANIMAL HOSPITAL (ICE HOUSE BUILDING) Request: Ten variances and three waivers for a veterinary clinic
More informationPLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT SAVOY DRIVE AREA ZONING MAP AMENDMENT II
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: March 14, 2019 Item #: PZ2019-429 SAVOY DRIVE AREA ZONING MAP AMENDMENT II Project Name: Savoy Drive Area Zoning Map Amendment II Site Addresses:
More informationThe V Development Company, Inc. 297 E Paces Ferry Rd NE, Unit 1701 Atlanta, GA 30305
4 of 40 40 of 40 The V Development Company, Inc. 297 E Paces Ferry Rd NE, Unit 1701 Atlanta, GA 30305 Letter of Intent The V Development Company desires to redevelop the property located at 4970, 4974,
More informationDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT DCI ATTIVA MALONE
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: June 15, 2017 Item #: _PZ-2017-101_ STAFF REPORT DCI ATTIVA MALONE Request: Major Modification to an Approved DCI Site Address: 5251 Peachtree Blvd. Project
More informationApplicant Name: Parkside Partners, LLC Name of Project: Edison at Eastside Edison at Eastside Executive Summary Location: Site: Zoning: Former Interna
Applicant Name: Parkside Partners, LLC Name of Project: Edison at Eastside Edison at Eastside Executive Summary Location: Site: Zoning: Former International Village Sites Chamblee, Georgia Multiple Parcels
More informationInfill & Other Residential Design Review
Infill & Other Residential Design Review December 2018 Infill and Other Residential Design Review applies to projects that are located within the Infill Regulations District, on properties immediately
More information8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District
8.5.1 R1, Single Detached Residential District The purpose of this district is to provide for residential development in the form of single detached dwellings. Dwelling, Single Detached Home Business,
More informationArticle 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT
Article 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT this page left intentionally blank Contents ARTICLE 3. SUBURBAN (S-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT DIVISION 3.1 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT DESCRIPTION...3.1-1 Section 3.1.1
More informationUnified Development Ordinance. Chamblee Chamber of Commerce Meeting May 21, 2015
Chamblee Chamber of Commerce Meeting May 21, 2015 What is the UDO? Consolidates multiple development ordinances into a coordinated format Zoning Ordinance Uses and District Standards Use Standards Subdivision
More informationCity of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 3
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 Legislation Text File #: 2018-0144, Version: 1 ADM 18-6094 (AMEND UDC 164.19/ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS): AN
More informationMEMORANDUM. DATE: April 6, 2017 TO: Zoning Hearing Board Jackie and Jake Collas. FROM: John R. Weller, AICP, Zoning Officer
MEMORANDUM DATE: April 6, 2017 TO: Zoning Hearing Board Jackie and Jake Collas FROM: John R. Weller, AICP, Zoning Officer SUBJECT: Zoning Hearing Board appeal of Jackie and Jake Collas Relief requested
More information2. The modification is consistent with the objectives of this chapter.
DRAFT February 11, 2009 BMC 20.28 Infill Housing 20.28.010 Purpose. This chapter establishes special development regulations for a series of housing forms that are different than the traditional detached
More informationVARIANCE APPLICATION PACKET
VARIANCE APPLICATION PACKET A variance is a modification of the specific provisions of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) granted when strict enforcement of the UDO would cause undue hardship owing
More informationAction Recommendation: Budget Impact:
City of Fayetteville Staff Review Form Garner Stoll Submitted By 2018-0144 Legistar File ID 4/17/2018 City Council Meeting Date - Agenda Item Only N/A for Non-Agenda Item 3/22/2018 Submitted Date Action
More informationRezoning Petition Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 17, 2017
Rezoning Petition 2017-041 Pre-Hearing Staff Analysis April 17, 2017 REQUEST Current Zoning: R-5 (single family residential), R-22MF (multifamily residential), and I-1 (light industrial) Proposed Zoning:
More informationArticle Optional Method Requirements
Article 59-6. Optional Method Requirements [DIV. 6.1. MPDU DEVELOPMENT IN RURAL RESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENTIAL ZONES Sec. 6.1.1. General Requirements... 6 2 Sec. 6.1.2. General Site and Building Type Mix...
More informationO-I (Office-Institutional) and AG-1(Agricultural)
PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 3503 and 3505 Bethany Bend DISTRICT, LAND LOTS 2/1 973 and 974 OVERLAY DISTRICT State Route 9 PETITION NUMBERS EXISTING ZONING O-I (Office-Institutional) and AG-1(Agricultural)
More informationComposition of traditional residential corridors.
Page 1 of 7 St. Petersburg, Florida, Code of Ordinances >> PART II - ST. PETERSBURG CITY CODE >> Chapter 16 - LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS >> SECTION 16.20.060. CORRIDOR RESIDENTIAL TRADITIONAL DISTRICTS
More informationATLANTA ZONING ORDINANCE UPDATE
CITY OF ATLANTA ZONING ORDINANCE QUICK FIXES In 2015 the City of Atlanta selected a team of consultants to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the City s Zoning Ordinance, including a review of the ability
More informationCITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT. Marisa Lundstedt, Director of Community Development
CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: Planning Commission Marisa Lundstedt, Director of Community Development THROUGH: Laurie B. Jester, Planning Manager BY: Ted
More informationSupplemental Application Form Request for a Waiver of Development Standards via Density Bonus
County of Sacramento Office of Planning and Environmental Review (PER) 827 7 th Street, Room 225 Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 874-6141 Supplemental Application Form Request for a Waiver of Development Standards
More informationVARIANCE APPLICATION. Note: Staff reports can be accessed at Project Name: New Carrollton Town Center
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George s County Planning Department Development Review Division 301-952-3530 Note: Staff reports can be accessed at www.mncppc.org/pgco/planning/plan.htm.
More informationCOMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT CASE
COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT CASE 30 Clubhouse Road, Woodbridge October 19, 2017 Prepared for: Jason Gabriele 78 Rushworth Cres Kleinburg, Ontario LOJ1C0 Prepared by: FRANKFRANCO ARCHITECTS T 647.749.0557 E
More informationSTAFF REPORT. To: Planning Commission Meeting date: May 11, 2016 Item: VN Prepared by: Marc Jordan
# 12 ) VN-02-16 K & G ENTERPRISES VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING STAFF REPORT To: Planning Commission Meeting date: May 11, 2016 Item: VN-02-16 Prepared by: Marc Jordan GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: Property
More informationLetter of Intent for Application requested by 30AIP Chamblee, LLC (the Applicant )
Matt Dickison, Director of Development Department of Development 5485 Peachtree Blvd Chamblee, GA 30341 770-986-5024 Letter of Intent for Application requested by 30AIP Chamblee, LLC (the Applicant ) Dear
More informationa. provide for the continuation of collector streets and thoroughfare streets between adjacent subdivisions;
Section 7.07. Intent The requirements of this Section are intended to provide for the orderly growth of the Town of Holly Springs and its extra-territorial jurisdiction by establishing guidelines for:
More informationLOT AREA AND FRONTAGE
LOT AREA AND FRONTAGE Lot Area & Frontage for the R2.1 Zone Lot Area & Frontage for the R2.4 Zone Minimum Lot Minimum Lot Zone Area Width R2.1 700 sq m 18 m R2.4 600 sq m 16 m Lot Area means the total
More informationMin. Lot Frontage (Ft.) 1. Min. Front Yard (Ft.) Min. Rear Yard (Ft.) R , R , R ,
SECTION 11 - DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS A. The following standards shall be required for single family dwellings and associated accessory uses and structures within Residence s, except as expressly permitted
More informationCITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT. Marisa Lundstedt, Director of Community Development
CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: Planning Commission Marisa Lundstedt, Director of Community Development THROUGH: Laurie B. Jester, Planning Manager BY: Ted
More informationChapter SPECIAL USE ZONING DISTRICTS
Chapter 20.20 Sections: 20.20.010 Urban Transition (U-T) Zoning District 20.20.020 Planned Development (P-D) Zoning Districts 20.20.010 Urban Transition (U-T) Zoning District A. Purpose. The purpose of
More informationDEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1
2 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS RESIDENTIAL BUILDING TYPES: APPROPRIATE ZONES AND DENSITIES 2-1 This Chapter presents the development standards for residential projects. Section 2.1 discusses
More informationPublic Review of the Slot Home Text Amendment
Public Review of the Slot Home Text Amendment The proposed amendments to the Denver Zoning Code have been informed by the Slot Home Strategy Report. This document has been developed out of a robust process
More information30AIP CHAMBLEE, LLC CR Hwy. 30A West Bldg. M-1 Unit 228 Santa Rosa Beach, FL (850)
30AIP CHAMBLEE, LLC 2050 CR Hwy. 30A West Bldg. M-1 Unit 228 Santa Rosa Beach, FL 32459 (850) 660-1917 Table of Contents Location Map... 2 Letter of Intent... 3 Preapplication form signed and dated by
More informationSTAFF DESIGN REVIEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDING APPLICATION SUPPLEMENT
STAFF DESIGN REVIEW RESIDENTIAL BUILDING APPLICATION SUPPLEMENT OFFICIAL USE ONLY Case #: Received By: Master File #: Project Planner: Date: Related Cases: Single Family, including Townhomes (ln-fill housing
More informationSECTION 73 CHESTER VILLAGE DISTRICT REGULATIONS
SECTION 73 CHESTER VILLAGE DISTRICT REGULATIONS 73.1 AUTHORITY 73.1.1 Authority and Uniformity. It is the intention of the Commission to adopt use regulations and design standards for the area known as
More informationBoard of Zoning Adjustments Staff Report Monthly Meeting Monday, June 13, 2016
Board of Zoning Adjustments Staff Report Monthly Meeting Monday, June 13, 2016 Docket Number: BZA 043-16 Prepared by: Valerie McMillan Applicant or Agent: Roger Whatley Property Location: 3727 Constance
More informationCITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES
CITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES Development Services Department Planning and Permitting Adopted August 15, 2005 SMALL LOT SINGLE FAMILY HOME GUIDELINES A. Purpose and Applicability.
More informationMEMORANDUM. I1 District Industrial Living Overlay District 110,703 square feet / 2.54 acres
Department of Community Planning & Economic Development 250 South 4th Street, Room 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415-1385 MEMORANDUM To: City Planning Commission, Committee of the Whole Prepared By: Peter Crandall,
More informationFREQUENTLY USED PLANNING & ZONING TERMS
City Of Mustang FREQUENTLY USED PLANNING & ZONING TERMS Abut: Having property lines, street lines, or zoning district lines in common. Accessory Structure: A structure of secondary importance or function
More informationAppendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017
Appendix1,Page1 Urban Design Guidelines DRAFT September 2017 Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses Appendix1,Page2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Urban Design Objectives 1 1.3 Building
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY 04/06/2017
AGENDA ITEM #22 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 04/06/2017 COUNCIL AGENDA SUBJECT: Discuss and consider the Second Reading of an Ordinance regarding 16-OR-006a amending the Leander Code of Ordinances, Chapter 14, Zoning,
More informationZONING HEARING BOARD APPLICANTS
ZONING HEARING BOARD APPLICANTS All applications to the Manheim Township Zoning Hearing Board shall include all of the following information. 1. One (1) application form (no copies needed), signed by the
More informationIntroduction. General Development Standards
Introduction The development standards will set the zoning regulations for the East Park development. This section will illustrate lot standards, approximate open space locations and road standards. The
More informationPlanning and Zoning Commission
Village of Lemont Planning and Zoning Commission 418 Main Street Lemont, Illinois 60439 phone 630-257-1595 fax 630-257-1598 PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Regular Meeting Wednesday, January 18, 2012 6:30
More informationDuplex and Tandem Development Community Workshop. Presented by: Elisabeth Dang, AICP
Duplex and Tandem Development Community Workshop Presented by: Elisabeth Dang, AICP September 21, 2016 Staff presentation Agenda Overview Outreach to date Explanation of proposed code amendments Examples
More informationARTICLE I ZONE BASED REGULATIONS
ARTICLE I ZONE BASED REGULATIONS RZC 21.08 RESIDENTIAL REGULATIONS 21.08.290 Cottage Housing Developments A. Purpose. The purpose of the cottage housing requirements is to: 1. Provide a housing type that
More informationPLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS. Cadence Site
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS Cadence Site A Planned Development District 1. Statement of General Facts, Conditions and Objectives Property Size: Approximately 57.51 Acres York County Tax Map
More informationThat the Planning Commission finds and advises EBMUD that the proposed disposal of property is in conformance with the County General Plan.
STAFF ANALYSIS JUNE 19, 2006 GPC 2006-02 DISPOSAL OF PROPERTY EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT PROPOSED SALE OF EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT S SYDNEY RESERVOIR PROPERTY: Request by the Real Estate
More informationChesapeake Bay Critical Area Conservation Plan
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George s County Planning Department Development Review Division 301-952-3530 Note: Staff reports can be accessed at www.mncppc.org/pgco/planning/plan.htm.
More informationPLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Town Hall Annex, 66 Prospect St., Ridgefield, CT Fax
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT Town Hall Annex, 66 Prospect St., Ridgefield, CT 06877 203-431-2766 Fax 203-431-2737 ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE ZONING REGULATIONS NEW Section 5.6 Neighborhood Business Zone
More information4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR
4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL MIXED-USE PROJECTS This chapter presents standards for residential mixed-use projects in the Ashland-Cherryland Business District and the Castro Valley Central Business
More informationEric Feldt, Planner II, CFM Community Development Department
DATE: August 28, 2014 TO: FROM: Board of Adjustment Eric Feldt, Planner II, CFM Community Development Department FILE NO.s: VAR2014 0017 & VAR2014 0018 PROPOSAL: A Variance to reduce two side yard setbacks
More informationArticle 2. Rules of Interpretation
Article 2. Rules of Interpretation Article 2. Rules of Interpretation Sec. 2.1. Building Types 2.1.1. Building Type Descriptions... 2-2 Sec. 2.2. Rules Applicable to all Districts 2.2.1. Site... 2-5 2.2.2.
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION REPORT REGULAR AGENDA
PP-4-4-11 Item No. 9-1 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT REGULAR AGENDA PC Staff Report 06/22/11 ITEM NO 9: PRELIMINARY PLAT; KASOLD WATER TOWER ADDITION; SE OF TAM O SHANTER & KASOLD DR (MKM) PP-4-4-11: Consider
More informationCombined Zoning/Minor Variance and Boulevard Parking Agreement Exception
Residential Front Yard and Boulevard Parking Policy Name: Residential Front Yard and Boulevard Parking Legislative History: Enacted September 19, 2017 (By-law No. CPOL.-223-475); Amended June 26, 2018
More informationACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN THE SOUTHEAST SECTOR
February 19, 2019 Staff Report to the Municipal Planning Board LDC2018-10020 Item #11 S U M M A R Y Applicant The City of Orlando ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS IN THE SOUTHEAST SECTOR Applicant s Request Update
More informationCommunity Development
Land Use Petition RZ-15-010 Concurrent Variance VC-15-010-01 Date of Staff Recommendation Preparation: August 14, 2015 Date of Planning Commission Recommendation: September 1, 2015 PROJECT LOCATION: DISTRICT/SECTION/LANDLOT(S):
More informationR E S O L U T I O N. 2. Development Data Summary:
R E S O L U T I O N WHEREAS, the Prince George's County Planning Board is charged with the approval of Detailed Site Plans pursuant to Part 3, Division 9 of the Zoning Ordinance of the Prince George's
More informationResidential Design Guide Appendices
Residential Design Guide Appendices Appendix 1 Thorndon Appendix 2 Mt Victoria Appendix 3 Aro Valley Appendix 4 Southern Inner Residential Areas Appendix 5 Oriental Bay Appendix 6 Residential Coastal Edge
More informationThe Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division
The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission Prince George's County Planning Department Development Review Division 301-952-3530 Note: Staff reports can be accessed at www.mncppc.org/pgco/planning/plan.htm.
More information1. APPLICANT: The City of Overland Park is the applicant for this request.
8. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - ZRR 2590 - Residential Neighborhood District 1. APPLICANT: The City of Overland Park is the applicant for this request. 2. REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is
More informationPALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION
PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION Application No.: W-2014-00288 Application Name: O Reilly Auto Parts Control No.: 2013-00286 Applicant: Hutton Growth Blue Sky
More informationCity of Placerville Planning Commission AGENDA REPORT ITEM 6.2
Placerville, a Unique Historical Past Forging into a Golden Future City of Placerville Planning Commission AGENDA REPORT ITEM 6.2 MEETING DATE: APPLICATION & NO: 996 Thompson Way - Site Plan Review 2015-07
More informationArticle 6. GENERAL URBAN (G-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT
Article 6. GENERAL URBAN (G-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT this page left intentionally blank Contents ARTICLE 6. GENERAL URBAN (G-) NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT DIVISION 6.1 NEIGHBORHOOD CONTEXT DESCRIPTION...6.1-1 Section
More informationCITY OF FATE, TEXAS UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE. Article III Zoning Districts
CITY OF FATE, TEXAS UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE Article III Zoning Districts 3.1. General to all Zoning Districts and Zoning Map 3.1.1. Zoning Districts Established This article establishes the zoning
More informationARTICLE 65- DORCHESTER NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT TABLE C
Table C Dorchester Neighborhood District s Dimensional Regulations Lot Area One-Family 1F-3,000 (5) 1 Family 3,000 N/A 40 40 0.5 2½ 35 750 15 10 20 25 Any Other 3,000 N/A 50 50 0.5 2½ 35 none 15 10 40
More informationPLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT KELVIN PARKER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER/ZONING ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: JUNE 21, 2017 PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS KELVIN PARKER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER/ZONING ADMINISTRATOR SUBJECT: APPEAL OF HEARING OFFICER S
More informationMidwest City, Oklahoma Zoning Ordinance
2010 Midwest City, Oklahoma Zoning Ordinance 9/2/2010 Table of Contents Section 1. General Provisions... 5 1.1. Citation... 5 1.2. Authority... 5 1.3. Purpose... 5 1.4. Nature and Application... 5 1.5.
More informationDEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING JEFFERSON PARISH, LOUISIANA SUBDIVISION REPORT DOCKET NO: ES-89-15-PF SUMMARY NO: COUNCIL DISTRICT 2 Paul D. Johnston COUNCIL AT LARGE: A Chris Roberts B Elton M. Lagasse ADVERTISING
More informationVICINITY MAP. Board of Adjustment File No.: VAR & VAR January 9, 2014 Page 2 of 11 ATTACHMENTS
Board of Adjustment File No.: VAR2013 0024 & VAR2013 0025 January 9, 2014 Page 2 of 11 VICINITY MAP ATTACHMENTS Attachment A Applicant s Letter Attachment B Site Plan Attachment C Elevation Drawings Board
More informationPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019 DEVELOPMENT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME Springhill Village Subdivision Springhill Village Subdivision LOCATION 4350, 4354, 4356, 4358,
More informationWASECA COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING July 9, :00 p.m. WASECA COUNTY EAST ANNEX AGENDA
To navigate thru agenda, click on the bookmark icon on the left hand side to open bookmarks/links WASECA COUNTY BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING July 9, 2015 7:00 p.m. WASECA COUNTY EAST ANNEX AGENDA 1. CALL
More informationThe following regulations shall apply in the R-E District:
"R-E" RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT (8/06) The following regulations shall apply in the R-E District: 1. Uses Permitted: The following uses are permitted. A Zoning Certificate may be required as provided
More informationORDINANCE NO
ORDINANCE NO. 20060622-022 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 2-1 OF THE CITY CODE TO ADD ARTICLE 53 RELATING TO THE RESIDENTIAL DESIGN AND COMPATIBILITY COMMISSION; ADDING SECTION 25-2-566 TO THE CITY CODE
More informationCity of Placerville Planning Commission AGENDA REPORT ITEM 6.1
Placerville, a Unique Historical Past Forging into a Golden Future City of Placerville Planning Commission AGENDA REPORT ITEM 6.1 MEETING DATE: APPLICATION & NO.: 994 Thompson Way - Site Plan Review 2015-06
More informationMEMORANDUM. District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment Maxine Brown-Roberts, Project Manager JL
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: District of Columbia Board of Zoning Adjustment Maxine Brown-Roberts, Project Manager JL Joel Lawson, Associate Director Development Review DATE: September 9 2016 SUBJECT: OP Report
More informationMissing Middle Housing in Practice
Missing Middle Housing in Practice Daniel Parolek Principal, Opticos Design, Inc. dan@opticosdesign.com New Partners for Smart Growth Kansas City, MO 2013 1 Bungalow Courts Missing MIddle Housing 2012
More informationPlanning Rationale in Support of an Application for Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-Law Amendment
Planning Rationale in Support of an Application for Plan of Subdivision and Zoning By-Law Amendment The Kilmorie Development 21 Withrow Avenue City of Ottawa Prepared by: Holzman Consultants Inc. Land
More informationPlanning Commission Report
cjly City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (370) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: April 28, 2016 Subject: Project
More informationCITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Meeting Date: November 2, 2017 Zoning Board of Appeals Case No. 3356 Dr. Alice Moore Apartments Variances Location Aerial I. REQUEST Site is outlined in
More informationClaude G. Tatro, Jr. Pharmacon Nuclear Inc., Owner 3548 Shallowford Road Chamblee, GA 30341 Cel: 404-310-8190 Email: TatroProperties@att.net Secondary Mailing Address: 118 Main Street SW Gainesville, GA
More informationTOWNHOUSE. TYPICAL UNIT SIZE 1,200 to 1,600 square foot average unit (two to three stories) DENSITY dwelling units/acre without cottages
TOWNHOUSE Townhouses are typically two to three stories in height. Some townhouses include separate rental units, either on the top or bottom floor of a three-story townhouse unit, or in a cottage above
More information1. Cuyler-Brownsville planned neighborhood conservation (P-N-C) districtphase I (section ). (2) Single-family semiattached dwellings;
Sec. 8-3035. Planned unit development multifamily (PUD-M). A. Purpose. The PUD-M district is intended to allow a variety of residential development including single-family residential, two-family residential,
More informationArticle 7: Residential Land Use and Development Requirements
Article 7: Residential Land Use and Section 701: Statement of Intent (A) (B) (C) The intent of Article 7 is to develop certain land use and development requirements for the residential uses within Cumru
More informationTable of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1
Table of Contents ARTICLE 5A CHARACTER-BASED ZONING 1 SECTION 10.5A10 GENERAL... 1 10.5A11 Purpose and Intent... 1 10.5A12 Applicability... 1 10.5A13 Compliance with Regulating Plan... 1 10.5A14 Relationship
More informationDRAFT -- PROPOSED EXPANSION AND REVISIONS TO DIVISION 24. SPECIAL DISTRICT--COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOODS DISTRICT
DRAFT -- PROPOSED EXPANSION AND REVISIONS TO DIVISION 24. SPECIAL DISTRICT--COLLEGE AND UNIVERSITY NEIGHBORHOODS DISTRICT Sec. 28-831. Purpose. The college and university neighborhoods district purposes
More informationStaff Report & Recommendation Rezoning Case RZ Date of Report: June 6, 2014 Report by: Doug Stacks
Staff Report & Recommendation Rezoning Case RZ-2014-02 Date of Report: June 6, 2014 Report by: Doug Stacks Hearing Dates: Planning Commission June 26, 2014 Mayor and Council July 14, 2014 GENERAL INFORMATION
More informationUrban Design Brief (Richmond) Corp. 1631, 1635, 1639, 1643 and 1649 Richmond Street City of London
Urban Design Brief 1635 (Richmond) Corp. 1631, 1635, 1639, 1643 and 1649 Richmond Street City of London Site Plan Control Application Holding Provision Application April 1, 2015 Prepared for: Rise Real
More information