THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BLUEWATER COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA MONDAY, APRIL 4, 2016 BLUEWATER COUNCIL CHAMBERS VARNA, ON

Transcription

1 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BLUEWATER COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT AGENDA MONDAY, APRIL 4, ROLL CALL AND CALL TO ORDER 2.0 APPOINTMENT OF SECRETARY-TREASURER RECOMMENDATION: BLUEWATER COUNCIL CHAMBERS VARNA, ON MOVED BY: SECONDED BY: Resolved, That under s. 44. (8) of the Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.p.13, as amended, the Committee of Adjustment hereby appoints Arlene Parker, Planning Co-Ordinator to be the secretary-treasurer. 3.0 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA RECOMMENDATION MOVED BY: SECONDED BY: Resolved, That the April 4, 2016 agenda of the regular Committee of Adjustment meeting be approved. 4.0 DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST a) Disclose any pecuniary interest and its general nature thereof for this meeting. b) Disclose any pecuniary interest and its general nature thereof for the previous meeting, if absent. 5.0 ADOPTION OF MINUTES RECOMMENDATION MOVED BY: SECONDED BY: Resolved, That the minutes of the December 7, 2015 Committee of Adjustment Meeting be adopted as presented. 6.0 APPLICATION FOR MINOR VARIANCE FILE: A1/16 G. Geoffrey for J. & J. Yoo 73249A Denomme St. Lot 3, RP 526 Harvey-Denomme Subdivision Hay West Ward RECOMMENDATION MOVED BY: SECONDED BY: Resolved, That application File A1/16 affecting 73249A Denomme St., Lot 3, RP 526

2 Harvey-Denomme Subdivision, Hay West Ward be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. the structure be located within the footprint contained on the sketch that accompanied the application (last revised on March 13, 2016); 2. the structure be as shown in the elevation drawings that accompanied the application (last revised on March 13, 2016); and 3. the variance approval is valid for a period of 18 months from the date of the Committee s decision. PLANNER DENISE VAN AMERSFOORT WILL OUTLINE THE STATUTORY PROCESSES ASSOCIATED WITH THIS APPLICATION. 3.0 ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY: SECONDED BY: Resolved, That the Committee of Adjustment meeting adjourn at.

3 THE CORPORATION OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF BLUEWATER COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES MONDAY, DECEMBER 7, ROLL CALL AND CALL TO ORDER BLUEWATER COUNCIL CHAMBERS VARNA, ON 1.1 APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA MOVED BY: Councillor Zimmerman SECONDED BY: Councillor Hill Resolved, That the December 7, 2015 agenda of the regular Committee of Adjustment meeting be adopted. Carried. 1.2 DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST a) Disclose any pecuniary interest and its general nature thereof for this meeting. No disclosures were made. b) Disclose any pecuniary interest and its general nature thereof for the previous meeting, if absent. No disclosures were made. 2.0 APPLICATION FOR MINOR VARIANCE FILE: A7/15 Allan & Sharon Brokenshire Part Lots 83 & 84, Plan Rosalie St. Zurich Ward Senior Planner Craig Metzger presented the details of the report to the Committee. Allan and Sharon Brokenshire were in attendance. No member of the public made any comment. MOVED BY: Councillor Zimmerman SECONDED BY: Councillor Becker Resolved, That application File A7/15 affecting Part Lots 83 & 84, Plan 320, 19 Rosalie St. Zurich Ward be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. the shed be located within the footprint contained on the sketch that accompanied the application; 2. the variance approval is valid for a period of 18 months from the date of the Committee s decision. Carried. 3.0 ADJOURNMENT MOVED BY: Councillor Gillespie SECONDED BY: Deputy Mayor Fergusson Resolved, That the Committee of Adjustment meeting adjourn at 7:14 p.m. Carried. Valuing our unique quality of life, recognizing our diversity, respecting our traditions.

4 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 57 Napier Street, Goderich, Ontario N7A 1W2 CANADA Phone: Ext. 3 Fax: Toll Free: Ext. 3 To: Kyle Pratt, CAO, Municipality of Bluewater Members of Committee of Adjustment From: Denise Van Amersfoort, Planner Date: March 29, 2016 Re: Application A1/16 Lot 3, Plan 526, 73249A Denomme Street, Hay West Ward, Municipality of Bluewater Applicant: Greg Geoffrey Owners: John & Jinnie Yoo RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that application A1/16 (73249A Denomme Street) be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. the structure be located within the footprint contained on the sketch that accompanied the application (last revised on March 13, 2016); 2. the structure be as shown in the elevation drawings that accompanied the application (last revised on March 13, 2016); and 3. the variance approval is valid for a period of 18 months from the date of the Committee s decision. PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION This application proposes to reconstruct a dwelling below the top of bank; this is permitted by the Zoning Bylaw provided the same size, height and general footprint are maintained. This application proposes a reconstructed dwelling with an increase in height and area, and a different footprint. The specific variances requested from Section 21.3 are: 1. to permit the reconstructed dwelling to be square metres (approx. 130 square feet) larger than the existing cottage; 2. to permit the reconstructed dwelling to be 2.7 metres (approx. 8.5 feet) higher in height than the existing cottage; 3. to permit the reconstructed cottage to be rebuilt 3.94 metres (approx. 13 feet) closer to the south property line than the existing cottage. COMMENTS RECEIVED Person/Agency Municipality of Bluewater Staff Ausable Bayfield Conservation Authority Summary of Comments - No concerns, applicant to retain existing water meter for use in new dwelling - No objections from either a natural heritage or natural hazards perspective. - An ABCA permit for the requested work will be required. Planning with the community for a healthy, viable and sustainable future.

5 Minor Variance Application A1/16: Geoffrey for Yoo Page 2 of 5 March 29, 2016 Neighbours - Comments received from D. Dzuida who owns the property immediately to the south of the subject lands. Concerns relating to changes to the grade (overall height increase), construction timeline and removal of trees. REVIEW The subject property is designated Lakeshore Residential and Natural Environment on Schedule B of the Bluewater Official Plan and zoned Lakeshore Residential (LR1), Natural Environment (NE2), and Natural Environment (NE3) in the Bluewater Zoning By-law (Zone Map 4C). The following figures contain photographs of the subject property as well as a site plan showing the proposed location of the reconstructed dwelling and elevation drawings of the proposed structure. Figure 1. Subject Parcel Air Photo (subject property outlined in yellow) Figure 2. Photo of Existing Dwelling (Looking North)

6 Minor Variance Application A1/16: Geoffrey for Yoo Page 3 of 5 March 29, 2016 Figure 3. Site Plan Figure 4. Elevation Drawings West Elevation East Elevation North Elevation South Elevation

7 Minor Variance Application A1/16: Geoffrey for Yoo Page 4 of 5 March 29, 2016 Minor variances are required to satisfy four tests under the Planning Act before they can be approved. To be approved the requested variance must be: 1) minor, 2) desirable for the appropriate development or use of the land, building or structure, 3) maintain the general intent and purpose of the zoning by-law, and 4) maintain the general intent of the official plan. The variances requested are minor and appropriate in terms of their impact on the surrounding properties, from a natural hazard perspective and from a cumulative impact perspective. The variances required are due, in part, to the change in orientation of the dwelling s layout: the reconstructed cottage footprint being longer and narrower than the existing footprint. This change allows the reconstructed cottage to be built further from the hazard and results in a decrease in overall lot coverage (from 10.2% to 9.6%). The reconstructed dwelling will be located 2.36 metres further from the lake when measured from the westerly extent of the current deck; this shift away from the hazard is supported by both the Official Plan and the Conservation Authority. Another positive aspect of this reconstruction is that the septic bed which is currently located below the bank will be relocated to the portion of the lot which is above the top of bank. Due to the additional length of the proposed dwelling s footprint, it does extend further into the southerly interior yard requiring a variance. The setback to the southerly lot line is proposed to be reduced from.28 metres to 8.34 metres. The area onto which the proposed dwelling will extend is currently a hard-surfaced patio area. Lakeshore properties, and particularly those below the top of bank, are unique in that most of the outdoor activity on the property will occur in the front yard (lakeside). The reconstructed dwelling features a patio along the front and south side of the dwelling. The reduction in the south interior yard has the potential to impact neighbours because it is both visible and an area where activity is directed to (with the location of the patio). The application states that the existing shed on the south side will be replaced with an open air structure that will house a barbeque and cooking preparation area. The potential visual impacts are mitigated in part by the fact that the south side of the structure contains several architectural elements which create interest and contribute to the building s aesthetic appeal. The potential impacts are also mitigated by the depth of the side yard. An 8 metre interior side yard is generous for most properties; for comparison sake, in the Lakeshore Residential Zone (LR1), dwellings are required to maintain a 3 metre interior side yard. Finally, there is no dwelling below the bank on the property immediately to the south and therefore the potential impacts of the decreased side yard are lessened. The abutting property does have a small accessory building below the bank to which the southerly yard of the subject property would be visible; while little screening exists presently, the depth of the side yard would allow the applicants to explore options for screening should both parties feel it would be beneficial. In terms of size, the reconstructed dwelling is proposed to be square metres (130 square feet) larger than the existing dwelling. The reconstructed dwelling will be 93.3 square metres (approximately 1000 square feet) which is considered modest in size and appropriate with respect to the context of the surrounding development. This variance is considered to be minor and to have little to no impact on the neighbouring properties. The reconstructed dwelling is proposed to be built as a two-storey building as opposed to a one and a half storey; this change requires a variance to recognize an increase in height from 6.1 to 8.8 metres. The neighbour most impacted from the increase in height is the neighbour to the north. The dwelling on the abutting property to the north is a two-storey structure so while the increase in height to the subject dwelling

8 Minor Variance Application A1/16: Geoffrey for Yoo Page 5 of 5 March 29, 2016 may impact their views to the south, the fact that the abutting structure is also two-storeys in height, may help to mitigate some of that impact. In terms of other neighbours impacted, the dwelling on the property immediately to the south is located above the top of bank and therefore is not impacted by the change. There is another dwelling below the top of bank on the second property to the south but this dwelling is located at a distance to the subject property, contains few windows facing north (towards the subject property) and therefore is it considered unlikely that the change in height will create an impact. One of the concerns raised by a neighbour involves the grade change which will occur on the subject property as a result of this project. The existing dwelling is built below the grade of the existing driveway and the finished grade for the reconstructed dwelling will be approximately the same height of the existing driveway; this represents a 0.8 metre (2 feet, 8 inches) increase in grade. The Zoning By-law does not regulate changes to grade; it regulates height as measured from the finished grade to the highest point of the roof structure exclusive of chimneys, antennas or similar structures which do not provide habitable living space. A change in grade is not permitted to impact abutting properties and this will be addressed through the building permit and Conservation Authority process. Finally, the Ausable Bayfield Conservation Authority (ABCA) has been entrusted by the Province with the responsibility to comment on natural hazard concerns within the Municipality of Bluewater. As ABCA has indicated they do not object to the reconstruction of the dwelling as proposed, the requested variance is minor and appropriate from a natural hazards perspective. Overall, each variance is considered to be minor and appropriate and further, the cumulative impact of the three variances is considered to be minor and appropriate. The reconstructed dwelling will be located further from the hazard, does not adversely impact neighbouring properties and is an aesthetically pleasing structure which continues to be modest in size and overall impact. The use of the subject property will be residential as intended by the Bluewater Official Plan and the Bluewater Zoning By-law. Consequently, the variances maintain the intent of both the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. As the four tests for a minor variance have been met, it is recommended that the requested variances be approved with conditions. Please note this report is prepared without the benefit of input from the public as may be obtained through the hearing. The Committee should carefully consider any comments and/or concerns expressed at the hearing prior to making their decision on this application. Sincerely, Denise Van Amersfoort Planner Site Inspection: March 17, 2016

9

10

11 EX. COTTAGE N m - N85 04'30"E EX. WOOD RETAINING WALL (TO REMAIN) EX. CONCRETE DRIVEWAY (TO REMAIN) 3.0m INTERIOR YARD SETBACK EX. COTTAGE 81.3 sq.m. LAKE HURON EX. PORCH 8.08 EX. CONCRETE 7.5m FRONT YARD SETBACK FRONT YARD 7.5m REAR YARD SETBACK EX. CONCRETE PATIO REAR YARD EX. SHED EXISTING CONCRETE WALL (TO REMAIN) WATER'S EDGE - OCT 30, (EX. COTTAGE TO WATER'S EDGE) 7.62 EX. HYDRO POLE (TO REMAIN) " DISTRIBUTION PIPING 13.75m LONG (EACH) 55m LONG (TOTAL) EX. WOOD RETAINING WALL (TO REMAIN) TOP OF BANK m - N3 56'30"E m - N5 13'00"E 3.0m INTERIOR YARD SETBACK EX. WALL ALONG DRIVEWAY (TO REMAIN) EX. OVERHEAD WIRES (TO REMAIN) EX. OVERHEAD WIRES (TO REMAIN) EX. WALL ALONG DRIVEWAY (TO REMAIN) m TOP OF BANK SETBACK EX. UPPER SHED (TO BE MOVED FOR SEPTIC CONSTRUCTION) EX. ASPHALT DRIVEWAY (TO REMAIN) WATERLOO BIOFILTER TANK PUMP CHAMBER 7'-0" X 5'-0" X 5'-5" HIGH 800 GALLON SEPTIC TANK EX. HYDRO POLE (TO REMAIN) EX. SHED EX. WOOD STEPS (TO REMAIN) EX. ROCKS (TO REMAIN) LOT 3 PIN ***SEPTIC DESIGN BY OTHERS*** PROPOSED PATIO 16.50m x 2.36m sq.m PROPOSED RESIDENCE 14.67m x 6.97m 81.3 sq.m. FOOTPRINT (INTERIOR) 93.3 sq.m FOOTPRINT (EXTERIOR) DENOMME STREET m- N85 04'30"E SYMBOL ZONING ZONE AREA COTTAGE DECK NE2 NE3 LR1 EXISTING PROPOSED 81.3 sq.m sq.m sq.m. 0.67m 0.75m 61.07m 61.07m COTTAGE EXISTING LOWER SHED (TO BE RENOVATED) FORCE MAIN FROM PUMP BELOW COTTAGE SETBACK AREA NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST HEIGHT ZONING ZONE COVERAGE.28m 11.48m 8.34m.13m 6.10m 8.80m NE2 9.3% (10.2 TOTAL) 8.7% (9.6 TOTAL) sq.m sq.m sq.m. MIN/MAX EXISTING (min) VARIANCE REQ'D? YES NO NO YES NO COMMENT INCREASE IN AREA GREATER SETBACK THAN EXISTING SETBACK SAME AS EXISTING DECREASE IN SETBACK THAN EXISTING GREATER SETBACK THAN EXISTING INCREASE IN HEIGHT FROM EXISTING N/A EXISTING (max) NO DECREASE IN TOTAL ZONE COVERAGE AREA NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST HEIGHT ZONING ZONE COVERAGE EXISTING LOWER SHED (TO BE RENOVATED) EXISTING PROPOSED MIN/MAX VARIANCE REQ'D? COMMENT 9.6 sq.m. 9.6 sq.m. EXISTING (max) NO 16.84m 16.84m EXISTING (min) NO 64.70m 64.70m EXISTING (min) NO 3.30m 3.30m EXISTING (min) NO 13.15m 13.15m EXISTING (min) NO 3.05m 3.05m EXISTING (max) NO NE2 N/A EXISTING (max) NO DECREASE IN TOTAL ZONE COVERAGE SETBACK NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST 5.37m 66.34m 10.62m 9.90m 0.9% (10.2 TOTAL) 0.9% (9.6 TOTAL) AREA NORTH EAST SOUTH WEST HEIGHT ZONING ZONE COVERAGE EXISTING UPPER SHED (TO BE MOVED) EXISTING PROPOSED 9.2 sq.m. 6.58m 25.35m 13.24m 51.24m MIN/MAX N/A 3.00m (MIN) 7.50m (MIN) 3.00m (MIN) 7.5m (MIN) DECK SETBACK SETBACK NOTES: 1. LEGAL PROPERTY LINES AND LOCATION OF EXISTING FEATURES FROM REGISTERED PLAN No. 526 (PLAN OF ALL OF LOT 3, GEOGRAPHICAL TOWNSHIP OF HAY, MUNICIPALITY OF BLUEWATER, COUNTY OF HURON) BY D. CULBERT LTD., ONTARIO LAND SURVEYOR DATED OCTOBER 30, 2015, SIGNED JANUARY 22, EXISTING (max) EXISTING (max) EXISTING (min) EXISTING (min) EXISTING (min) EXISTING (min) EXISTING (min) EXISTING (min) EXISTING (min) EXISTING (max) NO NO NO NO NO YES 3.05m.00m (MAX) LR1 N/A 1.2% 25.0% (MAX) FEET METERS VARIANCE REQ'D? CONSULTANT CONTRACTOR STAMP: JOHN & JINNIE YOO LOT LAYOUT PLAN THAMES ROAD EXETER, ON N0M 1S5 C: E: matt@mrengdesign.com DENOMME ST BLUEWATER, ON N0M 2T0 No. MM/DD/YY REVISION DESCRIPTION CH'KD PROJECT No.: DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: SCALE: LLP-1 PRELIMINARY 1. 02//16 ISSUED FOR MINOR VARIANCE APPLICATION 2. 02/27/16 REVISED FOR MINOR VARIANCE APPLICATION 3. 03/13/16 REVISED FOR MINOR VARIANCE APPLICATION FEBRUARY : 250

12 m INTERIOR YARD SETBACK EX. COTTAGE 81.3 sq.m. EX. CONCRETE PATIO EX. SHED EX. PORCH m FRONT YARD SETBACK FRONT YARD EX. COTTAGE 3.0m INTERIOR YARD SETBACK EX. WOOD RETAINING WALL (TO REMAIN) EX. CONCRETE PROPOSED RESIDENCE 14.67m x 6.97m 81.3 sq.m. FOOTPRINT (INTERIOR) 93.3 sq.m FOOTPRINT (EXTERIOR) EXISTING LOWER SHED (TO BE RENOVATED) m- N85 04'30"E m - N3 56'30"E EX. OVERHEAD WIRES (TO REMAIN) PROPOSED PATIO 16.50m x 2.36m sq.m EXISTING CONCRETE WALL (TO REMAIN) LANDSCAPED AREA FEET METERS PROJECT No.: DATE: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: m - N85 04'30"E EXISTING AND PROPOSED COTTAGE 1 1 : 100 CONSULTANT CONTRACTOR STAMP: THAMES ROAD EXETER, ON N0M 1S5 C: E: matt@mrengdesign.com JOHN & JINNIE YOO DENOMME ST BLUEWATER, ON N0M 2T0 No. MM/DD/YY REVISION DESCRIPTION CH'KD EXISTING AND PROPOSED COTTAGE FEBRUARY 2015 SCALE: LLP-2 PRELIMINARY 1. 02//16 ISSUED FOR MINOR VARIANCE APPLICATION 2. 02/27/16 REVISED FOR MINOR VARIANCE APPLICATION 3. 03/13/16 REVISED FOR MINOR VARIANCE APPLICATION 1 : 100

13 DRAWINGS S-0 S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 SLP TITLE SHEET ELEVATIONS FOUNDATION PLAN MAIN FLOOR PLAN SECTIONS & DETAILS NOTES & DETAILS SITE LOCATION PLAN JOHN & JINNIE YOO BLUEWATER, ON NO. 01/11/16 01/15/16 01/06/16 11/26/15 10/27/15 MM/DD/YY REVISED BASED ON CLIENT'S COMMENTS REVISED BASED ON CLIENT'S COMMENTS REVISED BASED ON CLIENT'S COMMENTS PRELIMINARY - REDUCED FOOTPRINT PRELIMINARY - FOR SITE REVIEW CH'KD 4. 01/20/16 REVISION DESCRIPTION 5. DANCELAN D RD DENOMME ST CHURCH LN Y N AR IO IN SS IM CU Y EL IS NL PR R D O FO E X E T E R, O N N0M 1S5 matt@mrengdesign.com REVISED EXTERIOR PATIO - 02/22/16 FEBRUARY 2015 S-0 DRAWING NO PROJECT NO. TITLE SHEET DENOMME ST BLUEWATER, ON N0M 2T0 JOHN & JINNIE YOO SITE ROAD 6. NOTES: CONTRACTOR: CONSULTANT: THAMES CELL NORTH KEY PLAN N DESIGN DRAWN CHECKED APPROVED DATE SCALE (21) BLUEWATER HIGHWAY Y BLUE JAY WA ARNOLD CR ES HARRIS AVE BENCHMARKS: LAKE HURON

14 RIDGE COPPER ROOF (TYP.) 3 4 TOP PLATE SECOND FLOOR TOP PLATE PATIO (SLOPE AWAY) MAIN FLOOR PATIO COMPACTED GRANULAR BACKFILL EXISTING WOOD RETAINING WALL (GEOMETRY IS APPROXIMATE) EXISTING GRADE RIDGE RIDGE TOP PLATE SECOND FLOOR TOP PLATE 5" 10'-1" 1'-4 5/8" 8'-1" 8'-9 7/8" 28'-9 1/2" 5" 28'-9 1/2" 10'-1" 1'-4 5/8" 8'-1" 8'-9 7/8" MAIN FLOOR PATIO PATIO (SLOPE AWAY) EXISTING WOOD RETAINING WALL (GEOMETRY IS APPROXIMATE) COMPACTED GRANULAR BACKFILL EXISTING GRADE 7'-0 5/8" 5" 10'-1" 1'-4 5/8" 8'-1" 8'-9 7/8" 8/ TOP PLATE SECOND FLOOR TOP PLATE MAIN FLOOR PATIO t/o SLAB 7'-0 5/8" 5" 10'-1" 1'-4 5/8" 8'-1" 8'-9 7/8" 28'-9 1/2" 8/ RIDGE TOP PLATE SECOND FLOOR TOP PLATE MAIN FLOOR PATIO t/o SLAB 3/ DRAWN 1. PRELIMINARY - FOR SITE REVIEW 10/27/15 SHEET No. CHECKED 2. PRELIMINARY - REDUCED FOOTPRINT 11/26/15 APPROVED 3. REVISED BASED ON CLIENT'S COMMENTS 01/06/16 1/4" = 1'-0" S-1 DATE FEBRUARY REVISED BASED ON CLIENT'S COMMENTS 01/15/16 SCALE N NOTES: NORTH 3 WEST ELEVATION 1 1/4" = 1'-0" NORTH ELEVATION 2 1/4" = 1'-0" EAST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION 4 1/4" = 1'-0" DESIGN No. REVISION DESCRIPTION MM/DD/YY CH'KD 5. REVISED BASED ON CLIENT'S COMMENTS 01/20/16 6. REVISED EXTERIOR PATIO 02/22/16 CONSULTANT CONTRACTOR DENOMME ST BLUEWATER, ON N0M 2T0 JOHN & JINNIE YOO ELEVATIONS PROJECT No PRELIMINARY - FOR DISCUSSION ONLY

15 COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION relating to the proposed variance is available for inspection during regular office hours at the Municipal office, 14 Mill Ave. Zurich, ON N0M 2T0 or by contacting Arlene Parker, Secretary-Treasurer Ph: x 235 F: planninginfo@municipalityofbluewater.ca Provide Your Input ANY PERSON may attend the public meeting and/or make a written or verbal submission either in support of or against the proposed application. APPEALING TO THE ONTARIO MUNICIPAL BOARD The applicant, the Minister or any other person or public body who has an interest in the matter may within 20 days of the making of the decision appeal to the Municipal Board against the decision of the Committee by filing with the Secretary-Treasurer of the Committee a notice of appeal setting out the objection to the decision and the reasons in support of the object accompanied by payment to the Secretary-Treasurer of the fee prescribed by the Municipal Board. Usually any person, public body or incorporated group can appeal to the OMB either a decision or a failure to make a decision. An unincorporated neighbourhood association must appeal under the name of one of its members. When no appeal is lodged within twenty (20) days of the date of the making of the decision, the decision becomes final and binding and notice to that effect will be issued by the Secretary-Treasurer. s. 45 Planning Act, R.S.O. 1990, c.p.13 DATED AT THE MUNICIPALITY OF BLUEWATER THIS 14 th DAY OF MARCH, 2016 NOTICE OF MEETING APPLICATION FOR MINOR VARIANCE Date of Hearing: April 4, 2016 Time of Hearing: 7:00 p.m. Location: Application No.: A1/16 Municipality of Bluewater Council Chambers, Stanley Complex, 38594B Mill Road (west of Varna on County Road 3.) Location of Property: 73249A Denomme St.; Lot 3, RP 526 Harvey-Denomme Subdivision Ward: Hay West PURPOSE AND EFFECT: A reconstructed cottage is permitted in the NE2 zone provided the same size, height and general footprint are maintained. The proposed cottage is m 2 larger than the existing cottage is proposed to be 2 storeys (8.8 m) in height as opposed to 1.5 storeys (6.1 m) and will be set back from the south property line 8.34 m as opposed to.28 m. municipalityofbluewater.ca

16 Official Plan Designation: Lakeshore Residential, Natural Environment Zoning Designation: LR1, NE2, NE3 The property is not the subject of an application under the Planning Act or for approval of a plan of subdivision or consent. Note: Drawing modified from its original format to fit on this page.

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24