CASE NUMBER: 16SN0581 APPLICANT: Pocoshock Green Development, LLC

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "CASE NUMBER: 16SN0581 APPLICANT: Pocoshock Green Development, LLC"

Transcription

1 CASE NUMBER: 16SN0581 APPLICANT: Pocoshock Green Development, LLC STAFF S ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission (CPC) Public Hearing Date: JULY 19, 2016 CPC Time Remaining: 100 DAYS Applicant s Agent: JENNIFER D. MULLEN ( ) Applicant s Contact: MITCHELL BODE ( ) Planning Department Case Manager: RYAN RAMSEY ( ) APPLICANT S REQUEST CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA Magisterial District: CLOVER HILL & MIDLOTHIAN 7681 Elkhardt Road Request I: Rezoning from Residential Townhouse (R-TH) to Residential Townhouse (R-TH) plus conditional use planned development to permit exceptions to ordinance requirements. Request II: Waiver to street connectivity requirements. A 128 unit age-restricted townhouse development is planned, yielding a density of 3.8 dwelling units per acre. Exceptions to buffer widths and recreational facilities (community building) are requested. Further relief is requested to the Residential Subdivision Connectivity Policy to eliminate potential road connections to adjacent subdivision development. Notes: A. Conditions may be imposed or the property owner may proffer conditions. B. Proffered conditions, Textual Statement, conceptual development plans, and conceptual elevations are located in Attachments 1-5. C. The Connectivity Policy requires that separate action be taken on each request. RECOMMENDATION Request I (Rezoning & CUPD) - RECOMMEND DENIAL STAFF Fails to fully address development impacts Appropriate active recreational facilities for residents (i.e. community building) not provided Providing a FIRST CHOICE community through excellence in public service

2 RECOMMENDATION (CONTINUED) Request II (Waiver to Connectivity) - RECOMMEND APPROVAL STAFF Street connections to Amber Heights and Forestdale Subdivisions would exacerbate existing drainage problems Similar request was approved with previous zoning request (Case 05SN0188) 2 16SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

3 SUMMARY OF IDENTIFIED ISSUES Department PLANNING BUDGET AND MANAGEMENT Issue Lack of a community building would not provide appropriate recreational facilities that are typical to a development of this size and character. Age-restricted development, applicant has not proffered cash allocated to schools; however, recent Board of Supervisor action has approved zoning cases without schools cash proffer when applicant proffers an age-restricted community Deviation from current cash proffer policy regarding escalation of the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index FIRE - PARKS AND RECREATION - LIBRARIES - SCHOOLS Age-restricted development, applicant has not proffered cash allocated to schools; however, recent Board of Supervisor action has approved zoning cases without schools cash proffer when applicant proffers an age-restricted community. CDOT - VDOT - UTILITIES - ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING - REVITALIZATION SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

4 4 16SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

5 Map 2: Comprehensive Plan (The Eastern Midlothian Plan) Classification: RESIDENTIAL The designation suggests the property is appropriate for 2.51 to 4.0 dwellings per acre. Map 3: Surrounding Land Uses & Development Single-family Residential Use Elkhardt Road Single-family Residential Use (Surreywood North) Single-family Residential Use (Amber Heights) Pocoshock Boulevard 5 16SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

6 ZONING HISTORY PLANNING Staff Contact: Ryan Ramsey ( ) Case Number BOS Action Request 05SN0188 Approved (07/27/2005) Rezoning from A & R-7 to R-TH of 32.9 acres with Conditional Use Planned Development to permit exceptions to Ordinance requirements. A development consisting of 128 detached age-restricted dwelling units was planned. Neo-traditional cluster style development with sidewalks, street trees, open spaces, rear-loaded garages and alleys Architectural proffers include building materials and minimum dwelling size Supporting recreational uses to include a clubhouse Waiver to street connectivity requirements (Lily Drive and Cheltenham Drive) PROPOSAL A 128 unit residential age-restricted townhouse development is planned. The applicant has proffered design requirements and passive recreational facilities in conjunction with residential townhouse development. The following chart provides an overview of the proffered conditions offered by the applicant: Requirements Master Plan Density Age-Restriction General Overview Details The Textual Statement serves as the Master Plan and outlines exceptions to permit modified R-TH standards Exhibit A Concept Plan o Layout of development to generally conform to Concept Plan Exhibit B Conceptual Architectural Elevations Proffered Conditions 1 & 10 Maximum of 128 Dwelling Units Proffered Condition 7 Restricted to Housing for Older Persons Prohibits occupants under the age of 19 Precludes play equipment for children Proffered Conditions 2 & SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

7 Requirements Architecture & Building Materials Dwelling Size Driveways Recreational Uses for Community Amenity Area Sidewalks, Street Trees, Buffers and Yard Landscaping Maintenance of On-Site Improvements (Restrictive Covenants) General Overview (Continued) Details Building materials include: Brick, stone, hardiplank and higher-quality vinyl siding (minimum wall thickness of and excludes Dutch lap style siding) Brick or stone foundations No cantilevering of architectural features or chimneys Brick or stone chimneys 1-car garage for each dwelling Dimensional roof material with a 30-year warranty Proffered Conditions 9, 11-14, Attachment 4 Minimum dwelling size of 1,850 square feet Proffered Condition 8 Asphalt or concrete driveways with one treatment selected for the development Proffered Condition 16 Passive recreation facilities consisting of pavilion, raised garden area (with storage shed), lawn area and benches in Community Amenity Area Proffered Condition 17 Sidewalks and street trees along all internal public roads Buffers Recorded in open space 35 buffer along Pocoshock Boulevard with opaque fence o Shadow-box or picket fence Front, corner side and side yards to be sodded and irrigated Proffered Conditions 15, 19, 20 and 21 Attachments 3 and 5 Site improvements to be properly maintained and repaired: Dwelling exteriors, landscaping and improvements constructed in the Community Amenity Area County will only insure the recordation of covenants and is not responsible for enforcement, once recorded, they can be changed. Association/owner to provide maintenance on Pocoshock Boulevard fence Proffered Conditions 3 and SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

8 DEVELOPMENT EXCEPTIONS Townhouse uses will be developed in accordance with the Residential Townhouse (R-TH) District development standards, with the exception of buffers and recreational provisions as detailed below: R-TH Development Exceptions (Textual Statement) Community Building & Active Recreation Facilities Buffers, (Adjacent to Residential Zoning & Vacant Agricultural Zoning Designated on Plan for Residential Use) Development Standards Overview Zoning Ordinance Requirement Required 50 Proposed No Community Building Active recreational uses, such as a pool and/or playfields is not guaranteed Textual Statement, Item 1 50, with various locations reduced to 10, 15, 25 and 40 Textual Statement, Item 2 Attachment 5 COMMUNITY BUILDING & ACTIVE RECREATION FACILTIES To balance the reduced lot sizes within townhouse developments, the Ordinance requires provisions for open space and recreational amenities. Recreational areas must include a community building, as well as active and passive recreation facilities. A community building serves as a focal point for residents to congregate in an all-weather facility for activities and typically contains, at a minimum, a meeting room, office, and bathroom. Larger community buildings may also contain gyms, kitchens and dining areas for residents. The applicant s request would delete the requirement to construct a community building as well as provide no guarantee that active recreation facilities, such as a pool or playfield (i.e. tennis court) would be built. Consequently, the only amenities proposed to facilitate community gathering space are a pavilion, benches along trails, and community gardens. Each of these facilities lacks the benefit of being an all-weather facility used year-round by the community s residents. BUFFERS Buffers provide transition and enhance visual separation between differing residential types. While reduced buffers are proposed adjacent to neighboring residential development, the applicant has offered to provide the required quantity of buffer plantings for a fifty (50) foot wide buffer in areas where the buffer width is reduced. As such, impacts resulting from reductions in buffer widths would be offset by planting requirements for a fifty (50) buffers. It should be noted that the applicant has also offered a wooden shadow box fence or picket fence along the thirty-five (35) buffer on Pocoshock Boulevard (Proffered Condition 19, Attachment 3). To reduce maintenance costs and increase durability, staff recommends that both fence options be constructed of vinyl material. 8 16SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

9 ARCHITECTURE Within Residential Townhouse District, architecture for buildings should impart harmonious proportions and avoid monotonous facades or large bulky masses; and provide architectural variety while maintaining an overall cohesive residential character. Conceptual elevations offered by the applicant provide the option for a Craftsman or Colonial-style townhouse building, with a one or two-car front-loaded garage (Attachment 4). As proffered, fifty (50) percent of the buildings in this development would be Craftsman-style, with at least thirty (30) percent of the buildings also being Colonial-style. To provide some variation in design, the applicant has offered an alternative elevation (Elevation 2) of each style that includes dormer windows on one (1) unit of the front elevation. A minimum of forty (40) percent of the townhome buildings must be constructed per the alternative elevation (Proffered Condition 1.b). In addition, no two (2) townhouse buildings adjacent to each other would have identical design elements. Buildings would be required to vary with at least two (2) of the following design elements: Craftsman or Colonial style building Color scheme Garage door detail Dormers Other similar architectural detail (as determined by the Planning Department) No more than 20% of the buildings facing each other may have an identical design Recent revisions to proffered conditions have offered additional variation in unit and building design. These elements include: Covered porch or stoop for all front (primary) entry doors Variation of garage door style between units and a minimum number of garage doors containing windows in each townhouse building Staff notes that the Ordinance will continue to require unit offsets (being a minimum of two (2) or four (4) feet) in each townhouse building. Therefore, these offsets will create unit to unit variation in the roofline, as well as additional offsets visible along the front, side and rear building elevations. As proffered, staff can support the applicant s proposed architectural treatment. WAIVER TO CONNECTIVITY The applicant has proffered to prohibit street connections to the Amber Heights and Forestdale Subdivisions (Proffered Condition 21). Currently two streets, Cheltenham Drive and Lily Drive, stub into the eastern portion of the request properties. In Case 05SN0188, the Board approved a waiver of connectivity to Cheltenham Drive and Lily Drive on the basis of drainage and topography concerns. Staff noted that the higher elevation of the request property and existing drainage issues on Chevelle Drive would be exacerbated if these street connections were made. Adjoining property owners supported and continue to support a waiver to connectivity for these street connections. 9 16SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

10 FINANCIAL IMPACT ON CAPITAL FACILITIES Budget and Management Staff Contact: Natalie Spillman ( ) The need for schools, parks, libraries, fire stations and transportation facilities in this area is identified in the County s adopted Public Facilities Plan, Thoroughfare Plan and Adopted Capital Improvement Program and further detailed by specific departments in the applicable sections of this request analysis. This proposed development will have an impact on capital facilities. Staff has calculated the fiscal impact of every new dwelling unit on schools, roads, parks, libraries and fire stations at $23,418 per unit. On July 27, 2005, the Board of Supervisors approved zoning case 05SN0188 to rezone the requested property from Agricultural (A) and Residential (R-7) to Residential Townhouse (R-TH) with Conditional Use Planned Development, with a density of approximately 128 dwelling units. At the time the maximum cash proffer in place was $6,017 per dwelling unit; the case was approved with a cash proffer of $5,991 per unit. The current amount for that cash proffer has escalated to $9,542 per unit. In this case, the applicant is requesting to rezone the property from Residential Townhouse (R- TH) to Residential Townhouse (R-TH) with conditional use planned development (CUPD) to permit ordinance exceptions. The applicant has proffered a maximum density of 128 dwelling units, as well as a condition for all dwelling units to be restricted to housing for older persons and no one under 19 years of age shall reside therein. To address the impact of this development on capital facilities, the applicant has proffered $11,152 per dwelling unit, to be allocated pro rata among all categories except schools. Traditionally, cash proffers would remain unchanged for a period of four years after which they would be escalated by the cumulative change in the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index, a provision recently adopted by the Board of Supervisors. However, in this case the applicant has requested that the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index adjustment not cause the cash proffer payment to exceed the amount of the maximum cash proffer policy in effect at the time of payment, less the schools component. This request deviates from the cash proffer policy regarding the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index adjustment. In recent years, the Board of Supervisors has approved zoning cases without a cash proffer for schools when the applicant has proffered an age-restricted community. The applicant has proffered all dwelling units to be restricted to housing for older persons, and likewise, the applicant has not proffered cash to be allocated to schools. The Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors, through their consideration of this request, may determine that there are unique circumstances relative to this request that may justify acceptance of proffers as offered for this case SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

11 Per Dwelling Unit Impact on Capital Facilities 128 Potential Units Facility Categories FY16 Calculated Impact Current BOS Maximum Applicant Proposal Variance from Maximum Schools $9,648 $7,814 $0 ($7,814) Parks $1,347 $1,091 $1,091 $0 Libraries $318 $258 $258 $0 Fire Stations $861 $697 $697 $0 Roads $11,244 $9,106 $9,106 $0 Total $23,418 $18,966 $11,152 ($7,814) Overall Impact on Capital Facilities Schools $1,234,944 $1,000,192 $0 ($1,000,192) Parks $172,416 $139,648 $139,648 $0 Libraries $40,704 $33,024 $33,024 $0 Fire Stations $110,208 $89,216 $89,216 $0 Roads $1,439,232 $1,165,568 $1,165,568 $0 Total $2,997,504 $2,427,648 $1,427,456 ($1,000,192) *Based on a proffered maximum of 128 units. Actual number of units and corresponding impact may vary SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

12 PUBLIC FACILITIES FIRE SERVICE Staff Contact: Anthony Batten ( ) The mission of Fire and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) is to protect life, property and the environment through a comprehensive fire and life safety program that ensures an adequate and timely response to emergencies. The Public Facilities Plan, as part of the Comprehensive Plan, indicates: 1 With the aging of population, medical emergency incidents are expected to increase faster than the rate of population growth over time. 1 The financial impact of residential development on fire facilities is addressed in the Financial Impact on Capital Facilities section of the report. Additional Information: County-wide Fire & EMS Service Information & Needs Recommendations for Fire Stations by 2022 New 5 Replacement/Revitalization Incidents as a percent of total 1 Fire 24% EMS (Emergency Medical Services) 76% Fire/EMS Increases in Call Volume from 2001 and % County Population Increase from 2001 to % Fire Service - Project Impacts Estimated Number of Calls for Service Annually Applicant s Proposal to Address Impacts 1 Amount offered in accordance with Policy. Escalator deviates from Policy. When the property is developed, the number of hydrants, quantity of water needed for fire protection, and access requirements will be evaluated during the plans review process SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

13 PARKS AND RECREATION Staff Contact: Brian Geouge ( ) The County supports a high-quality park system to provide residents and visitors with equitable access to active and passive recreation opportunities. The Public Facilities Plan, as part of the Comprehensive Plan, indicates: County-wide Parks and Recreation Needs Park Type Number of New Parks Aggregate Acreage Regional Community Neighborhood Special Purpose Urban Linear The Public Facilities Plan notes facility recommendations for water-based parks. All other facilities are acquired and developed on a site-by-site basis. 2 Facilities are recommended in urban areas where there is limited acreage available for park development. 3 Facility needs are assessed on a site-by-site basis as recommended in the Public Facilities Plan County Level of Service Target Level of Service Applicant s Proposal to Address Impacts 1 1 The financial impact of residential development on parks facilities is addressed in the Financial Impact on Capital Facilities section of the report. Parks and Recreation Project Impacts 5.9 Acres of Regional, Community and/or Neighborhood parkland per 1,000 persons 9 Acres of Regional, Community and/or Neighborhood parkland per 1,000 persons Amount offered in accordance with Policy. Escalator deviates from Policy. Proffered Condition SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

14 LIBRARIES Staff Contact: Jennifer Stevens ( ) The public library system s role in the county has expanded beyond its traditional function as a resource for information and materials, and now serves as a community gathering place for educational, cultural and informational services; community support during emergencies; economic development; and revitalization activities. The Public Facilities Plan, as part of the Comprehensive Plan, indicates: Facility Action Expand or Replace Construction of New Facilities County-wide Library Needs County-wide Facility Needs 5 Libraries 5 Libraries 1 Community Arts Center Libraries - Project Impacts 2011 County Level of Service 0.45 square feet of library space per person Standard Level of Service 0.82 square feet of library space per person Applicant s Proposal to Amount offered in accordance with Policy. Escalator deviates Address Impacts 1 from Policy. Proffered Condition 6 1 The financial impact of residential development on library facilities is addressed in the Financial Impact on Capital Facilities section of the report SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

15 SCHOOLS Staff Contact: Atonja Allen ( ) High performing, high quality public schools contribute to the quality of life and economic vitality of the County. The Comprehensive Plan suggests a greater focus should be placed on linking schools with communities by providing greater access, flexible designs and locations that better meet the needs of the communities in which they are located. The Public Facilities Plan, as part of the Comprehensive Plan, indicates: County-wide School Needs School Types Facilities to Revitalize/Replace New Facilities Elementary 16 3 Middle 6 2 High 2 3 Technical - 1 Average Student Yield Applicant s Proposal to Address Impacts 1 Schools - Project Impacts Elementary 27 Middle 14 High 20 Total 61 Not offered in accordance with Policy Proffered Condition 6 1 The financial impact of residential development on school facilities is addressed in the Financial Impact on Capital Facilities section of the report. Additional Information: While 128 age-restricted dwelling units are proposed, based on the cash proffer methodology this development would yield 61 new students. After review of this request, based on current school assignments and student enrollment the proposed rezoning case will have an impact on schools. It is possible that over time this case, combined with other tentative residential developments and other zoning cases in the area will continue to push schools to their capacity and therefore impact the capacity of facilities division-wide. The approved School Board Capital Improvement Program (CIP) plan for FY2016-FY2022 includes the construction of a new elementary school in the Midlothian area and revitalization or replacement of ten existing schools. These ten facilities are Providence Middle School, Monacan High School, Manchester Middle School, Beulah Elementary School, Enon Elementary School, Matoaca Elementary School, Harrowgate Elementary School, Reams Elementary School, Crestwood Elementary School, and Ettrick Elementary School. Additional information on the CIP can be found in the financial section of the CCPS Adopted Budget for FY SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

16 COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Staff Contact: Jim Banks (804) The Comprehensive Plan, which includes the Thoroughfare Plan, identifies county-wide transportation needs that are expected to mitigate traffic impacts of future growth. The anticipated traffic impact of the proposal has been evaluated and recommendations are detailed in the chart below: Recommendation Right of Way Dedications 35 feet from the centerlines of Pocoshock Boulevard and Elkhardt Road. Vehicular Access Control Access to Pocoshock Boulevard limited to two (2) public roads. No direct access to Elkhardt Road. Applicant s Proposal Offered as Recommended. Proffered Condition 22 Offered as Recommended. Proffered Condition 24 Vehicular Access Control No direct access to Lilly Drive or to Cheltenham Drive. Offered to address neighbor concerns. Proffered Condition 24 Road Improvements Additional pavement along Pocoshock Boulevard at each access to provide right turn lane tappers. Shoulder widening along the east side and asphalt overlay the full width of Pocoshock Boulevard for the entire property frontage. An asphalt sidewalk along the east side of Pocoshock Boulevard for the entire property frontage. Handicap ramps in the southeast and southwest corners of the Pocoshock Boulevard/Elkhart Road intersection and associated painted crosswalk. Cash Proffer Policy Offered as Recommended. Proffered Condition 23 Reference Financial Impact on Capital Facilities Section. Proffered Condition SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

17 VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Staff Contact: Brian Lokker ( ) VDOT Land Use Regulations Traffic Impact Analysis (24VAC30-155) - Access Management (24VAC30-73) - Subdivision Street Acceptance (24VAC30-91/92) - Land Use Permit (24VAC30-151) - Summary Department acceptance of the proposed connections to Pocoshock Blvd, of the proffered right-of-way improvements and of the internal roadways (as depicted on the Conceptual Plan, Exhibit A dated 3/14/16) for maintenance is subject to roadway design and construction in accordance with Department standards. VDOT will evaluate compliance through the Chesterfield County subdivision review process SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

18 WATER AND WASTEWATER SYSTEMS Staff Contact: Jamie Bland ( ) The proposal s impacts on the County s utility system are detailed in the chart below: Water and Wastewater Systems Currently Size of Existing Line Connection Required by County Code? Serviced? Water No 12, 8 & 6 Yes Wastewater No 8 Yes Map 5: Existing Water & Wastewater Systems 18 16SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

19 Additional Information: Property is located in the mandatory water and wastewater connection area. There is an existing twelve (12) inch water line extending along both Elkhardt Road and Pocoshock Boulevard, adjacent to this site. In addition a twelve (12) inch water line extends along portions of Cheltenham Drive and a six (6) inch water line extends along Lilly Drive. Both of these water lines terminate adjacent to the eastern boundary of the request site. Per Chesterfield County s Water and Sewer Specifications and Procedures, subdivisions with more the twenty-five (25) lots shall provide with two (2) supply points to the public water system. There is an existing eight (8) inch wastewater collector line in a portion of Pocoshock Boulevard that terminates adjacent to the southern boundary of this site. In addition an eight (8) inch wastewater collector line extends along a portion of Cheltenham Drive and terminates approximately 100 feet east of the request site. During subdivision plan review the engineer will need to ensure that sewer lines are designed to be deep enough and with appropriate easements to provide future sewer service to homes adjacent to the subdivision that are currently on septic systems. ENVIRONMENTAL Drainage, Erosion and Water Quality Staff Contact: Rebeccah Ward ( ) WardR@chesterfield.gov Issue Geography Drainage Stormwater Discussion/Conditions Located within the Falling Creek watershed. Property drains east through the Amber Heights subdivision, then through tributaries to the Foresetdale subdivision and under Turner Road to Pocoshock Creek. Culverts under Chevelle Drive and the drainage ditches leading to the culverts from the property are inadequate. Development will require onsite retention/detention to prevent downstream flooding. Drainage system shall be designed in a manner that water shall be retained onsite and released at such a rate that: a. the manmade conveyance channels to Chevelle Drive are capable of containing a 10-year storm; b. the existing culverts beneath Chevelle Drive shall function in compliance with the current VDOT criteria for culverts under secondary roads; c. the 100-year storm shall not come within twenty-five (25) feet of any existing home located along Chevelle Drive; and d. no impervious areas shall sheet flow through Amber Heights. Proffered Condition SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

20 REVITALIZATION Staff Contact: Carl Schlaudt ( ) The subject site is located in the Eastern Midlothian Turnpike Special Focus and Gateway Revitalization Area, as denoted by Chapter 7 of the Comprehensive Plan, and the Providence Middle School revitalization area identified as part of the county s school-based revitalization efforts. The Revitalization Office supports development in revitalization areas that represents a substantial improvement above current conditions. This analysis examined the proposed development and proffered conditions, with existing contiguous area development conditions in the Surreywood North, Amber Heights, Forestdale, and Elkhardt Heights subdivisions. The proposed development would generally exceed development standards of nearby development in terms: common area, paved driveways, garages, sidewalks, roofing materials, building color, fences, and front porches / stoops. The proposed development would generally equal the development standards of nearby development in terms of: chimneys, foundation materials, landscaping, street trees, roof form, and building repetition. Upon further review, staff determined that prior concerns regarding large, undifferentiated, and monotonous roof forms would be satisfactorily addressed by zoning standards for R-TH development (i.e., C), and therefore would not be a matter for a proffered condition. Specifically, the Zoning Ordinance requires variation of front yard setbacks of townhouse units, and this would carry through to the roof form, resulting in a variation of roof lines. Proffered condition 9.a allows use of four different siding materials, including vinyl siding (excluding Dutch lap style siding). While surrounding development includes a variety of siding materials (predominately brick and lap-style siding of various composition), it should be noted that many contiguous housing units are brick. On balance, the proposed zoning request would result in a substantial improvement above current conditions. Therefore, the Revitalization Office supports the proposal as presented SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

21 CASE HISTORY Applicant Submittals 12/7/15 Application, proffered conditions textual statement and conceptual drawings were submitted 3/14/16 Revised proffered conditions, textual statement and conceptual drawings were 4/5, 4/6, 4/7 & 4/16 5/5 & 5/9/16 6/24, 6/28 & 6/30/16 submitted Revised proffered conditions, textual statement and/or conceptual drawings were submitted Revised proffered conditions were submitted Revised proffered conditions and textual statement were submitted Community Meeting 2/18/16 Issues Discussed: House sizes and pricing Treatment of landscaping and buffer along Pocoshock Boulevard Maintenance of open space and requirement for homeowners association Location of public sewer extension to service development Existing stormwater issues and impacts from the development on adjacent properties Planned transportation improvements for Pocoshock Boulevard Traffic impacts on adjoining streets in Surreywood Planning Commission Meetings 4/19/16 Citizen Comments No citizens spoke to this case. Commission Discussion The Commission desired additional time for the applicant to work with staff relative to proffers for impacts on capital facilities, architecture and building materials. Action DEFERRAL TO MAY 17, 2016 ON COMMISSION S MOTION AND WITH APPLICANT S CONSENT 5/17/16 Citizen Comments No citizens spoke to this case. Commission Discussion The applicant desired additional time to work with staff relative to proffers for impacts on capital facilities, architecture and buffers. Action DEFERRAL TO JULY 19, 2016 ON COMMISSION S MOTION AND WITH APPLICANT S CONSENT 21 16SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

22 ATTACHMENT 1 PROFFERED CONDITIONS The Owner-Applicant in this zoning case, pursuant to Section of the Code of Virginia (1950 as amended) and the Zoning Ordinance of Chesterfield County, for itself and its successor or assigns, proffers that the development of the property (the Property ) will be developed as set forth below; however, in the event the request is denied or approved with conditions not agreed to by the Owner-Applicant, these proffers shall be immediately null and void and of no further force or effect. The Applicant hereby proffers the following conditions: 1. Master Plan. The textual statement dated June 30, 2016 and the following exhibits, each of which is made a part of these proffers by this reference thereto, shall be considered the Master Plan. a. Exhibit A Sheets Pg. 1, Pg. 2, and Pg.3 on the site plan entitled Schematic Master Plan, Pocoshock Green Townhouse Community, Chesterfield County, Midlothian District, prepared by Stewart HG, and dated April 5, b. Exhibit B Elevations entitled Colonial Front Elevation, Colonial Rear Elevation, Craftsman Front Elevation, and Craftsman Rear Elevation, prepared by Housing Design Matters, and dated November 13, 2015 ( Elevation 1 ), and alternative elevations entitled Colonial Front Elevation, Colonial Rear Elevation, Craftsman Front Elevation, and Craftsman Rear Elevation, prepared by Housing Design Matters, dated March 7, 2016 ( Elevation 2 ). The development shall include at least forty (40%) percent of the buildings being either Colonial or Craftsman style from Elevation 2. A minimum of fifty (50%) percent of the buildings in the development being either Elevation 1 or Elevation 2 shall be Craftsman style and a minimum of thirty (30%) percent of the buildings in the development being either Elevation 1 or Elevation 2 shall be Colonial style. (P) 2. Age Restriction. Except as otherwise prohibited by the Virginia Fair Housing Law, the Federal Fair Housing Act, and such other applicable federal, state or local legal requirements, all dwelling units shall be restricted to housing for older persons as defined in the Virginia Fair Housing Law and no persons under 19 years of age shall reside therein. (P) 3. Restrictive Covenants. Restrictive covenants shall be recorded, and a homeowners association established for the enforcement of such covenants, to limit the use and occupancy of the dwellings as specified herein, and to provide for the maintenance of the dwelling exteriors, landscaping, fence and improvements constructed in the Community 22 16SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

23 Amenity Area, as more particularly described within such restrictive covenants. Restrictive covenants on the Property shall incorporate the architectural requirements set forth in Proffered Condition 9 herein and shall be recorded prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy. (P) 4. Fence. The fence along Pocoshock Boulevard shall be maintained by the owner or the Association to be free of warping, loose/damaged/missing boards, leaning posts and panels, mildew and other discoloration, and weeds and other wild vegetation. (P) 5. Drainage. The drainage system shall be designed in a manner that water shall be retained onsite and released at such a rate that: a. the manmade conveyance channels to Chevelle Drive are capable of containing a 10-year storm; b. the existing culverts beneath Chevelle Drive shall function in compliance with the current Virginia Department of Transportation (VDOT) criteria for culverts under secondary roads; c. the 100-year storm shall not come within twenty-five (25) feet of any existing home located along Chevelle Drive; and d. no impervious areas shall sheet flow through Amber Heights. (EE) 6. Impacts. For each dwelling unit, the Applicant, sub-divider, or assignee(s) shall pay the following to the County of Chesterfield, prior to the issuance of a building permit, for infrastructure improvements within the service district for the property, unless state law prevents enforcement of that timing: a. $11,152 per dwelling unit for the period beginning the July 1 preceding the Board of Supervisors approval of the case through July 1 four years later, at which point the amount will be adjusted for the cumulative change in the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index during that time period, except that such adjustment shall not exceed the amount of the maximum cash proffer (less the portion of the calculation attributable to schools) in the cash proffer policy in effect at the time of payment. b. Thereafter, the per dwelling unit cash proffer amount shall be automatically adjusted, annually, by the annual change in the Marshall and Swift Building Cost Index on July 1 of each year, except that the total amount shall not exceed the amount of the maximum cash proffer less the portion of the calculation attributable to schools) in the cash proffer policy in effect at the time of payment SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

24 c. Cash proffer payments shall be spent for the purposes proffered or as otherwise permitted by law. (BM) 7. Density. The maximum number of dwelling units shall be 128. (P) 8. Dwelling Size. The dwelling units shall have a minimum gross floor area of 1,850 square feet. (P) 9. Architectural Treatment. The architectural treatment of and exterior materials for the buildings on the Property shall be compatible and consistent with the elevations identified as Exhibit B, with the following provisions: a. Exterior building materials shall consist of brick, stone, hardiplank or vinyl siding. Any vinyl siding shall have a minimum wall thickness of and shall not be dutch lap in style. b. No two buildings adjoining each other side by side shall have identical design elements, including but not limited to, the Craftsman or Colonial style of building, color scheme, garage door detail, dormers or other similar architectural details (as determined by the Planning Department) for Elevation 1 or Elevation 2. At least two (2) of the aforementioned design elements shall be used to provide variation between adjoining buildings and no two (2) adjacent or directly facing buildings shall have identical color schemes. No more than twenty (20%) percent of the buildings on the Property may be identical to the building directly facing such building. c. No two units adjoining each other side by side shall have identical garage doors. There shall be a minimum of two (2) different styles of garage doors. A minimum of two (2) units within buildings containing five (5) units or less or a minimum of three (3) units within buildings containing six (6)units or more shall have garage doors with windows. d. All front (primary) entry doors shall have a covered porch or stoop. e. Roof materials shall be architectural dimensional shingles with a minimum of a thirty (30) year warranty. (P) 10. Concept Plan Requirements. The site shall be designed as generally depicted on the Concept Plan (Exhibit A); provided, however the exact location of the dwellings, streets, Community Amenity Area and other improvements may be modified provided that the general intent of the Concept Plan is maintained. (P) 11. Foundations. The exposed exterior portions of any exterior dwelling foundation below the first floor level shall be constructed of brick or stone. (P) 24 16SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

25 12. Chimneys. No chimneys or gas vents shall be cantilevered. The exposed portions of all fireplace chimneys shall be of brick or stone. This proffer shall not apply to direct vent gas fireplaces or appliances. (P) 13. Garages. All dwellings shall have a minimum of a one (1) car garage with minimum clearspace inside of ten (10) X eighteen (18) feet. (P) 14. Cantilevering. No architectural features shall be cantilevered. (P) 15. Yards. All front, corner and side yards of each dwelling unit shall be sodded and irrigated. (P) 16. Driveways. All driveways shall be asphalt or concrete. One (1) treatment shall be selected for driveways within the development. (P) 17. Common Area. The area(s) designed as Community Amenity Area on page 2 of the Conceptual Plan shall be designed to include pedestrian scale amenities, such as, but not limited to: decorative paving units; pavilion; gazebo; decorative pedestrian-style lighting; benches; landscaped areas; plantings; plazas; gathering areas; water feature; walking trails; garden area and other pedestrian elements, as generally shown on the Conceptual Plan. A pavilion, raised garden area (with storage shed), lawn area and benches shall be constructed within the Community Amenity Area. (P) 18. Restriction on Children s Play Facilities. The pedestrian scale amenities associated with any multifamily use shall not include playground equipment, play fields or other facilities primarily associated with children s play. (P) 19. Buffers. All buffers shall be located within recorded open space. In addition to the landscaping requirements for the thirty-five (35) foot buffer along Pocoshock Boulevard, a wood shadow-box or picket fence shall be installed within the buffer. (P) 20. Street Trees. Street trees, consisting of deciduous trees, a minimum of two and one-half (2 ½ )inch caliper at the time of planting, a maximum of forty (40) feet on center, shall be planted along both sides of all public roads internal to the development. (P) 21. Sidewalks and Trails. An internal system of sidewalks, trails, and crosswalks (where necessary), shall be constructed within the development in the locations generally shown on the Concept Plan (Exhibit A). Sidewalks shall be constructed on both sides of any local street, internal to the Property. (P) 22. Right of Way Dedication. The following right-of-way on the Property shall be dedicated, free and unrestricted, to Chesterfield County in conjunction with recordation of the initial subdivision plat, or within sixty (60) days from a written request by the Transportation Department, whichever comes first: 25 16SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

26 a. Where the Property abuts both sides of Pocoshock Boulevard, thirty-five (35) feet of right-of-way on both sides of Pocoshock Boulevard measured from the centerline; b. Where the Property abuts only the east side of Pocoshock Boulevard, thirty-five (35) feet of right-of-way on the east side of Pocoshock Boulevard measured from the centerline; and c. Thirty-five (35) feet of right-of-way on the south side of Elkhardt Road measured from the centerline of that part of Elkhardt Road immediately adjacent to the Property frontage. (T) 23. Pocoshock Boulevard Improvements. Prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit, the following road improvements shall be completed, as determined by the Transportation Department: a. Improve the east side of Pocoshock Boulevard to provide a four (4 ) foot gravel (i.e., unpaved) shoulder for the entire Property frontage. b. Construction of additional pavement along Pocoshock Boulevard to provide a right turn lane taper at each approved access. c. Overlay the full width of Pocoshock Boulevard with one and one-half (1.5 ) inches of compacted bituminous asphalt concrete, with modifications approved by the Transportation Department. [Note: Milling up to one and one-half (1.5 ) inches may be required, to the extent determined to be necessary by VDOT, prior to overlaying the road.] d. Construction of a five (5 ) foot wide asphalt sidewalk along the east side of Pocoshock Boulevard for the entire Property frontage, with modifications approved by the Transportation Department. e. Construction of VDOT standard handicap ramps in the southeast and southwest corners of the Pocoshock Boulevard/Elkhart Road intersection, and associated painted crosswalk with modification approved by the Transportation Department. f. Dedication to Chesterfield County, free and unrestricted, of any additional right of way (or easements) required for the improvements identified above. (T) 24. Access. There shall be no direct vehicular access or road connection from the Property to Lilly Drive or to Cheltenham Drive. No direct vehicular access shall be provided from the Property to Elkhardt Road. Direct vehicular access from the Property to Pocoshock 26 16SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

27 Boulevard shall be limited to two (2) public roads. The exact location of these accesses shall be approved by the Transportation Department. (T) 25. Stormwater Management/Best Management Practice (BMP) Basin. The stormwater management/bmp basin shall be designed with a hard surface sidewalk, path or trail around it. (EE) 27 16SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

28 TEXTUAL STATEMENT June 30, 2016 ATTACHMENT 2 Pocoshock Green Development, LLC Case Number 16SN0581 Requested: Rezone 33.5 acres from R-TH to R-TH with CUPD. Specifically, the applicant requests the following exceptions to the Zoning Ordinance: Single-family attached dwellings (townhouses) shall be subject to the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance for the Residential Townhouse District (R-TH) Districts, except as follows: 1. Common Area. Within required common area, a minimum of 10% of the subdivision acreage, but in no case less than 1.5 acres, shall be provided for recreation facilities, including active recreation and passive recreation (the amenities described in Proffered Condition 17) as deemed appropriate during plan review. A community building shall not be required as a recreational amenity. Unless a phasing plan is approved through preliminary plat review, construction shall be completed prior to issuance of building permits for individual townhouse units. An approved phasing plan may include limitations on the issuance of building permits for individual townhouse units. 2. Buffers between Different Zoning Districts. Buffers shall conform to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance, with the following exceptions as more particularly shown on that certain site plan, prepared by Timmons Group, dated October 16, 2015, last revised March 14, 2016, entitled Pocoshock Green, Cloverhill District, Chesterfield County, Virginia, Conceptual Plan- Pocoshock Green, known as Exhibit C: a. Buffers adjacent to the R-7 district properties to the east at the northern portion along the rear portion of Lot 16, where a variable width buffer from 25 to 50 is provided; b. Buffers adjacent to the R-7 district properties at the southern portion of the property along the rear lot lines of lots , where a 15 buffer is provided. c. Buffers adjacent to the R-7 district properties at the southern portion of the property along the side lot lines of lots 110 and 110, where a 40 buffer is provided. The revised width buffers as provided in subsection (a)-(c) above shall be planted to Buffer Treatment standard required for the 50 buffer of RTH pursuant to the Zoning Ordinance prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the building adjacent to such reduced buffer in subsections (a)-(c) SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

29 CONCEPTUAL PLAN, EXHIBIT A PAGE 1 ATTACHMENT SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

30 CONCEPTUAL PLAN, EXHIBIT A PAGE 2 ATTACHMENT SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

31 CONCEPTUAL PLAN, EXHIBIT A PAGE 3 ATTACHMENT SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

32 ATTACHMENT 4 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS, EXHIBIT B PAGE 1 ELEVATION SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

33 ATTACHMENT 4 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS, EXHIBIT B PAGE 2 ELEVATION SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

34 ATTACHMENT 4 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS, EXHIBIT B PAGE 3 ELEVATION SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

35 ATTACHMENT 4 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS, EXHIBIT B PAGE 4 ELEVATION SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

36 ATTACHMENT 4 CONCEPTUAL ALTERNATIVE ELEVATIONS, EXHIBIT B PAGE 1 ELEVATION SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

37 ATTACHMENT 4 CONCEPTUAL ALTERNATIVE ELEVATIONS, EXHIBIT B PAGE 2 ELEVATION SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

38 ATTACHMENT 4 CONCEPTUAL ALTERNATIVE ELEVATIONS, EXHIBIT B PAGE 3 ELEVATION SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

39 ATTACHMENT 4 CONCEPTUAL ALTERNATIVE ELEVATIONS, EXHIBIT B PAGE 4 ELEVATION SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

40 CONCEPTUAL PLAN FOR BUFFERS, EXHIBIT C ATTACHMENT 5 Buffer Reduction Areas 40 16SN JUL19-CPC-RPT

CASE NUMBER: 16SN0581 APPLICANT: Pocoshock Green Development, LLC

CASE NUMBER: 16SN0581 APPLICANT: Pocoshock Green Development, LLC CASE NUMBER: 16SN0581 APPLICANT: Pocoshock Green Development, LLC STAFF S ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission (CPC) Public Hearing Date: APRIL 19, 2016 CPC Time Remaining: 100 DAYS Applicant

More information

CASE NUMBER: 12SN0154 (Amended) APPLICANT: Charles Edward Townes, Managing Partner, Dominion Investment Partners, LLC

CASE NUMBER: 12SN0154 (Amended) APPLICANT: Charles Edward Townes, Managing Partner, Dominion Investment Partners, LLC CASE NUMBER: 12SN0154 (Amended) APPLICANT: Charles Edward Townes, Managing Partner, Dominion Investment Partners, LLC STAFF S ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION Board of Supervisors (BOS) Public Hearing Date:

More information

CASE NUMBER: 16SN0504 APPLICANT: Windswept Development LLC

CASE NUMBER: 16SN0504 APPLICANT: Windswept Development LLC CASE NUMBER: 16SN0504 APPLICANT: Windswept Development LLC ADDENDUM CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA Magisterial District: MIDLOTHIAN 2200 N Otterdale Road Board of Supervisors (BOS) Public Hearing Date:

More information

CASE NUMBER: 16SN0676 APPLICANT: Christopher Neil Carty

CASE NUMBER: 16SN0676 APPLICANT: Christopher Neil Carty Board of Supervisors (BOS) Public Hearing Date: APRIL 27, 2016 BOS Time Remaining: 365 DAYS CASE NUMBER: 16SN0676 APPLICANT: Christopher Neil Carty STAFF S ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION Applicant s Contact:

More information

CASE NUMBER: 15SN0649 APPLICANT: Chad White

CASE NUMBER: 15SN0649 APPLICANT: Chad White ADDENDUM CASE NUMBER: 15SN0649 APPLICANT: Chad White CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA Magisterial District: MIDLOTHIAN Board of Supervisors (BOS) Public Hearing Date: JUNE 24, 2015 BOS Time Remaining: 365

More information

CASE NUMBER: 15SN0657 APPLICANT: The Grove at Lucks Lane, LLC

CASE NUMBER: 15SN0657 APPLICANT: The Grove at Lucks Lane, LLC CASE NUMBER: 15SN0657 APPLICANT: The Grove at Lucks Lane, LLC STAFF S ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA Magisterial District: CLOVER HILL 11700 Lucks Lane Board of Supervisors (BOS)

More information

CASE NUMBER: 15SN0652 APPLICANT: JMS Investments, LLC and J. Mark Sowers

CASE NUMBER: 15SN0652 APPLICANT: JMS Investments, LLC and J. Mark Sowers CASE NUMBER: 15SN0652 APPLICANT: JMS Investments, LLC and J. Mark Sowers ADDENDUM CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA Magisterial District: MIDLOTHIAN 1600 Huguenot Springs Road Board of Supervisors (BOS) Public

More information

CASE NUMBER: 17SN0606 APPLICANT: Twin Rivers, LLC CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA BERMUDA DISTRICT

CASE NUMBER: 17SN0606 APPLICANT: Twin Rivers, LLC CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA BERMUDA DISTRICT CASE NUMBER: 17SN0606 APPLICANT: Twin Rivers, LLC CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA BERMUDA DISTRICT STAFF S ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission Hearing: JULY 18, 2017 Planning Commission Time

More information

CASE NUMBER: 13SN0132 (AMENDED) APPLICANTS: Chesterfield Business Partners LLC, Eastwood Homes of Richmond, LLC and Kingsland Towncenter LLC

CASE NUMBER: 13SN0132 (AMENDED) APPLICANTS: Chesterfield Business Partners LLC, Eastwood Homes of Richmond, LLC and Kingsland Towncenter LLC CASE NUMBER: 13SN0132 (AMENDED) APPLICANTS: Chesterfield Business Partners LLC, Eastwood Homes of Richmond, LLC and Kingsland Towncenter LLC CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA DALE DISTRICT STAFF S ANALYSIS

More information

CASE NUMBER 15SN0665 APPLICANT: Henry E. Myers, Jr.

CASE NUMBER 15SN0665 APPLICANT: Henry E. Myers, Jr. CASE NUMBER 15SN0665 APPLICANT: Henry E. Myers, Jr. STAFF S ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission (CPC) Public Hearing Date: JULY 21, 2015 CPC Time Remaining: 100 DAYS Applicant s Agent: BENJAMIN

More information

CASE NUMBER: 16SN0591 APPLICANT: Glenn M. Hill

CASE NUMBER: 16SN0591 APPLICANT: Glenn M. Hill CASE NUMBER: 16SN0591 APPLICANT: Glenn M. Hill CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA CLOVER HILL DISTRICT STAFF S ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION Board of Supervisors Hearing: NOVEMBER 15, 2017 Board of Supervisors

More information

CASE NUMBER: 15SN0652 APPLICANT: JMS Investments, LLC and J. Mark Sowers

CASE NUMBER: 15SN0652 APPLICANT: JMS Investments, LLC and J. Mark Sowers CASE NUMBER: 15SN0652 APPLICANT: JMS Investments, LLC and J. Mark Sowers ADDENDUM CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA Magisterial District: MIDLOTHIAN 1600 Huguenot Springs Road Planning Commission (CPC) Public

More information

CASE NUMBER: 18SN0824 APPLICANT: Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors

CASE NUMBER: 18SN0824 APPLICANT: Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors CASE NUMBER: 18SN0824 APPLICANT: Chesterfield County Board of Supervisors CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA MATOACA DISTRICT STAFF S ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission Hearing: JUNE 19, 2018 Planning

More information

CASE NUMBER: 15SN0596 APPLICANT: Colony Village LLC

CASE NUMBER: 15SN0596 APPLICANT: Colony Village LLC ADDENDUM CASE NUMBER: 15SN0596 APPLICANT: Colony Village LLC CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA Magisterial District: BERMUDA Board of Supervisors (BOS) Public Hearing Date: NOVEMBER 19, 2014 CPC Time Remaining:

More information

CASE NUMBER: 15SN0648 APPLICANT: Wegmans Food Markets

CASE NUMBER: 15SN0648 APPLICANT: Wegmans Food Markets CASE NUMBER: 15SN0648 APPLICANT: Wegmans Food Markets STAFF S ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION Board of Supervisors (BOS) Public Hearing Date: JULY 22, 2015 BOS Time Remaining: 365 DAYS Applicant s Agent: BRENNEN

More information

CASE NUMBER: 18SN0731 APPLICANTS: Bettie Weaver, George Weaver, and Ross W. Weaver

CASE NUMBER: 18SN0731 APPLICANTS: Bettie Weaver, George Weaver, and Ross W. Weaver CASE NUMBER: 18SN0731 APPLICANTS: Bettie Weaver, George Weaver, and Ross W. Weaver CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT STAFF S ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION Planning Commission Hearing: APRIL

More information

STAFF S REQUEST ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION 05SN0239 (AMENDED) The Cheatham Family Limited Partnership

STAFF S REQUEST ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION 05SN0239 (AMENDED) The Cheatham Family Limited Partnership February 20, 2007 CPC May 15, 2007 CPC July 17, 2007 CPC August 21, 2007 CPC September 18, 2007 CPC October 16, 2007 CPC November 20, 2007 CPC January 9, 2008 BS March 12, 2008 BS May 28, 2008 BS September

More information

CASE NUMBER: 15SN0668 APPLICANT: Joseph B. Marsala and Kelly Lynne Marsala

CASE NUMBER: 15SN0668 APPLICANT: Joseph B. Marsala and Kelly Lynne Marsala CASE NUMBER: 15SN0668 APPLICANT: Joseph B. Marsala and Kelly Lynne Marsala STAFF S ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION Board of Supervisors (BOS) Public Hearing Date: JULY 22, 2015 BOS Time Remaining: 365 DAYS

More information

STAFF S REQUEST ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION 07SN0341. Acquisitions Plus LLC

STAFF S REQUEST ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION 07SN0341. Acquisitions Plus LLC STAFF S REQUEST ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION September 18, 2007 CPC November 20, 2007 CPC December 18, 2007 CPC January 15, 2008 CPC February 19, 2008 CPC March 18, 2008 CPC April 23, 2008 BS 07SN0341 Acquisitions

More information

STAFF S REQUEST ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION 05SN0239 (AMENDED) The Cheatham Family Limited Partnership

STAFF S REQUEST ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION 05SN0239 (AMENDED) The Cheatham Family Limited Partnership February 20, 2007 CPC May 15, 2007 CPC July 17, 2007 CPC August 21, 2007 CPC September 18, 2007 CPC October 16, 2007 CPC November 20, 2007 CPC January 9, 2008 BS March 12, 2008 BS May 28, 2008 BS September

More information

CASE NUMBER: 15SN0562 APPLICANT: R. E. Collier Builder, Inc. APPLICANT S REQUEST

CASE NUMBER: 15SN0562 APPLICANT: R. E. Collier Builder, Inc. APPLICANT S REQUEST CASE NUMBER: 15SN0562 APPLICANT: R. E. Collier Builder, Inc. ADDENDUM CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA Magisterial District: CLOVER HILL Board of Supervisors (BOS) Public Hearing Date: JANUARY 28, 2015 BOS

More information

STAFF S REQUEST ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION 07SN0340. Francis Beers

STAFF S REQUEST ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION 07SN0340. Francis Beers September 18, 2007 CPC November 20, 2007 CPC February 19, 2008 CPC June 17, 2008 CPC August 19, 2008 CPC September 24, 2008 BS STAFF S REQUEST ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION 07SN0340 Francis Beers Matoaca

More information

CASE NUMBER: 15SN0656 APPLICANT: Marc Greenberg and Midlothian Land Partnership, LLC CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT

CASE NUMBER: 15SN0656 APPLICANT: Marc Greenberg and Midlothian Land Partnership, LLC CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT CASE NUMBER: 15SN0656 APPLICANT: Marc Greenberg and Midlothian Land Partnership, LLC CHESTERFIELD COUNTY, VIRGINIA MIDLOTHIAN DISTRICT STAFF S ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION Board of Supervisors Hearing:

More information

4 June 11, 2014 Public Hearing

4 June 11, 2014 Public Hearing 4 June 11, 2014 Public Hearing APPLICANT: FRANKLIN JOHNSTON MANAGEMENT DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C. PROPERTY OWNER: TRUSTEES OF FIRST LYNNHAVEN BAPTIST CHURCH STAFF PLANNER: Stephen J. White REQUEST: Change of

More information

CHAPTER 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS

CHAPTER 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS 9-14-1 9-14-1 CHAPTER 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS SECTION: 9-14-1: Purpose 9-14-2: Governing Provisions 9-14-3: Minimum Area 9-14-4: Uses Permitted 9-14-5: Common Open Space 9-14-6: Utility Requirements

More information

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE OFFICIAL CODE OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE RELATIVE TO CLUSTER OPTION DEVELOPMENTS

AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE OFFICIAL CODE OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE RELATIVE TO CLUSTER OPTION DEVELOPMENTS ORDINANCE 74-2012-13 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY ZONING ORDINANCE AND THE OFFICIAL CODE OF THE CITY OF CLARKSVILLE RELATIVE TO CLUSTER OPTION DEVELOPMENTS BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY

More information

SPECIAL ZONING DISTRICTS

SPECIAL ZONING DISTRICTS SPECIAL ZONING DISTRICTS 5.01 5.99 RESERVED 5.100 PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS: Purpose: This district is intended to accommodate unified design of residential, commercial, office, professional services, retail

More information

Request Conditional Rezoning (R-7.5 Residential to Conditional A-18 Apartment) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara

Request Conditional Rezoning (R-7.5 Residential to Conditional A-18 Apartment) Staff Recommendation Approval. Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara Applicants Property Owners Baker Villas, LLC; Ocean Rental Properties, LLC; James Edward Sollner; & Linda Susan Sollner Public Hearing November 8, 2017 City Council Election District Kempsville Agenda

More information

The following regulations shall apply in the R-E District:

The following regulations shall apply in the R-E District: "R-E" RESIDENTIAL ESTATE DISTRICT (8/06) The following regulations shall apply in the R-E District: 1. Uses Permitted: The following uses are permitted. A Zoning Certificate may be required as provided

More information

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT THE PARK AT 5 TH

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT THE PARK AT 5 TH DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT ARB Meeting Date: July 3, 2018 Item #: _PZ2018-293_ THE PARK AT 5 TH Request: Site Address: Project Name: Parcel Number: Applicant: Proposed Development: Current Zoning:

More information

CHAPTER 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT

CHAPTER 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT 10-3-1 10-3-3 SECTION: CHAPTER 3 PRELIMINARY PLAT 10-3-1: Consultation 10-3-2: Filing 10-3-3: Requirements 10-3-4: Approval 10-3-5: Time Limitation 10-3-6: Grading Limitation 10-3-1: CONSULTATION: Each

More information

EXHIBIT D. Planned Unit Development Written Description April 13, 2016 Rouen Cove Phase II PUD

EXHIBIT D. Planned Unit Development Written Description April 13, 2016 Rouen Cove Phase II PUD 1 EXHIBIT D Planned Unit Development Written Description April 13, 2016 Rouen Cove Phase II PUD Development # 8986.001 Developer: Curtis L. Hart Hart Resources LLC 8051 Tara Lane Jacksonville, Florida

More information

CASE NUMBER: 16SN0674 APPLICANT: Shawn D. Dunn

CASE NUMBER: 16SN0674 APPLICANT: Shawn D. Dunn STAFF S ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION Board of Supervisors (BOS) Public Hearing Date: APRIL 27, 2016 BOS Time Remaining: 365 DAYS Applicant s Agent: DEAN E. HAWKINS (804-748-6519) Applicant s Contact: SHAWN

More information

ADDENDUM 14SN0504. Glen Abbey Partners LLC

ADDENDUM 14SN0504. Glen Abbey Partners LLC CASE MANAGER: Darla Orr April 23, 2014 BS ADDENDUM 14SN0504 Glen Abbey Partners LLC Matoaca Magisterial District Woolridge Elementary, Tomahawk Creek Middle and Cosby High Schools Attendance Zones North

More information

Approved 58 Unit Residential Condo Development for Sale. For Sale: Price Upon Request

Approved 58 Unit Residential Condo Development for Sale. For Sale: Price Upon Request Approved 58 Unit Residential Condo Development for Sale 185 Thorpe Street Fairfield, 06824 For Sale: Price Upon Request u u u u Approved 58 Unit Residential Condo Development For Sale on 6.7 Acres in Fairfield

More information

Community Development

Community Development Land Use Petition RZ-16-002 Date of Staff Recommendation Preparation: April 15, 2016 (CEL) Date of Planning Commission Recommendation: May 3, 2016 PROJECT LOCATION: DISTRICT/SECTION/LANDLOT(S): ACREAGE

More information

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS. Cadence Site

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS. Cadence Site PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT STANDARDS Cadence Site A Planned Development District 1. Statement of General Facts, Conditions and Objectives Property Size: Approximately 57.51 Acres York County Tax Map

More information

CHAPTER 5. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS

CHAPTER 5. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Section 5.1. Purpose CHAPTER 5. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 5.1. PURPOSE The purpose for Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) is established in Section 4.5 Zoning District Purpose Statements. 5.2.

More information

Planned Unit Development (PUD). Sections:

Planned Unit Development (PUD). Sections: Chapter 19.07. Planned Unit Development (PUD). Sections: 19.07.01. Purpose. 19.07.02. PUD Definition and Design Compatibility. 19.07.03. General PUD Standards. 19.07.04. Underlying Zones. 19.07.05. Permitted

More information

Charter Township of Plymouth Zoning Ordinance No. 99 Page 208 Article 21: Residential Unit Developments Amendments: ARTICLE XXI

Charter Township of Plymouth Zoning Ordinance No. 99 Page 208 Article 21: Residential Unit Developments Amendments: ARTICLE XXI Charter Township of Plymouth Zoning Ordinance No. 99 Page 208 ARTICLE XXI RESIDENTIAL UNIT DEVELOPMENTS PURPOSE The purpose of the Residential Unit Development (RUD) is to permit two (2) optional methods

More information

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019 DEVELOPMENT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME Springhill Village Subdivision Springhill Village Subdivision LOCATION 4350, 4354, 4356, 4358,

More information

RP-2, RP-3, RP-4, AND RP-5 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS

RP-2, RP-3, RP-4, AND RP-5 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS 6.10 - RP-2, RP-3, RP-4, AND RP-5 PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS 6.10.1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION: 6.10.1.1 The regulations established in this Section are intended to provide optional methods of land development

More information

Community Development

Community Development Land Use Petition RZ-15-010 Concurrent Variance VC-15-010-01 Date of Staff Recommendation Preparation: August 14, 2015 Date of Planning Commission Recommendation: September 1, 2015 PROJECT LOCATION: DISTRICT/SECTION/LANDLOT(S):

More information

CHAPTER34 PRUD - PLANNED RESIDENTIAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT

CHAPTER34 PRUD - PLANNED RESIDENTIAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER34 PRUD - PLANNED RESIDENTIAL UNIT DEVELOPMENT 17-34-1 17-34-2 17-34-3 17-34-4 17-34-5 17-34-6 17-34-7 17-34-8 17-34-9 Purpose Planned Residential Unit Development Defined Planned Residential Unit

More information

Courtyards at Kinnamon Park Sketch Plan

Courtyards at Kinnamon Park Sketch Plan Courtyards at Kinnamon Park Sketch Plan Courtyards at Kinnamon Park Sketch Plan Staff Analysis PART 1: PROJECT SUMMARY Applicant: EPCON Communities Property Owner: Johnsie M. Kinnamon Heirs, Douglas and

More information

11 November 13, 2013 Public Hearing

11 November 13, 2013 Public Hearing 11 November 13, 2013 Public Hearing APPLICANT:. D/B/A RYAN HOMES PROPERTY OWNER: MUNDEN LAND, LLC STAFF PLANNER: Carolyn A.K. Smith REQUEST: Modification of Conditional Change of Zoning approved by the

More information

ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION: Northeast corner of Sandbridge Road and Atwoodtown Road ELECTION DISTRICT: PRINCESS ANNE

ADDRESS / DESCRIPTION: Northeast corner of Sandbridge Road and Atwoodtown Road ELECTION DISTRICT: PRINCESS ANNE 10 & 11 March 14, 2012 Public Hearing APPLICANT: MARLYN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PROPERTY OWNER: CORAL DEVELOPMENT, LLC STAFF PLANNER: Faith Christie REQUEST: Modification of Conditional Change of Zoning

More information

ARTICLE 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DISTRICT

ARTICLE 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DISTRICT ARTICLE 14 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) DISTRICT Section 14.01 Intent. It is the intent of this Article to allow the use of the planned unit development (PUD) process, as authorized by the Michigan Zoning

More information

3 July 13, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT / PROPERTY OWNER: MARQUETTE & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. /G.S. DEVELOPERS, L.L.C.

3 July 13, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT / PROPERTY OWNER: MARQUETTE & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. /G.S. DEVELOPERS, L.L.C. 3 July 13, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT / PROPERTY OWNER: MARQUETTE & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. /G.S. DEVELOPERS, L.L.C. STAFF PLANNER: Faith Christie REQUEST: Conditional Change of Zoning (AG-2 Agricultural

More information

Chapter Planned Residential Development Overlay

Chapter Planned Residential Development Overlay Chapter 19.29 Planned Residential Development Overlay Sections 010 Purpose 020 Scope 030 Definitions 030 Minimum Size 040 Allowable Uses 050 Minimum Development Standards 060 Density Bonus 070 Open Space

More information

Chapter 22 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT.

Chapter 22 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. Chapter 22 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. Sec. 22.1 INTENT. The use of land and the construction and use of buildings and other structures as Planned Unit Developments in Georgetown Township may be established

More information

ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS

ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IV-53 409 PRIVATE STREETS A private street means any way that provides ingress to, or egress from, property by means of vehicles or other means, or that provides travel

More information

1. APPLICANT: The City of Overland Park is the applicant for this request.

1. APPLICANT: The City of Overland Park is the applicant for this request. 8. UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE AMENDMENT - ZRR 2590 - Residential Neighborhood District 1. APPLICANT: The City of Overland Park is the applicant for this request. 2. REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is

More information

Section 7.22: Multifamily Assisted Housing in AA-30 Residential Zone (MAHZ) [Note: an additional line will be added to the Table in Article 3, 3.1.

Section 7.22: Multifamily Assisted Housing in AA-30 Residential Zone (MAHZ) [Note: an additional line will be added to the Table in Article 3, 3.1. Section 7.22: Multifamily Assisted Housing in AA-30 Residential Zone (MAHZ) [Note: an additional line will be added to the Table in Article 3, 3.1.1A] 7.22.1 Purpose The purpose of this Special Regulation

More information

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS (Ordinance No.: 3036, 12/3/07; Repealed & Replaced by Ordinance No.: 4166, 10/15/12)

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS (Ordinance No.: 3036, 12/3/07; Repealed & Replaced by Ordinance No.: 4166, 10/15/12) 159.62 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTS (Ordinance No.: 3036, 12/3/07; Repealed & Replaced by Ordinance No.: 4166, 10/15/12) A. PURPOSE 1. General. The Planned Unit Development (PUD) approach provides the flexibility

More information

Staff Planner Carolyn A.K. Smith

Staff Planner Carolyn A.K. Smith Applicant Property Owner, Pamela K. & Steven A. Gray Public Hearing April 13, 2016 City Council Election District Princess Anne Agenda Item 8 Request Modification of Proffers (Modification to the proffer

More information

4.2 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS

4.2 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS 4.2 RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS A. Purpose: To define regulations and standards for each residential zoning district in the City. The following sections identify uses, regulations, and performance standards

More information

Article 7: Residential Land Use and Development Requirements

Article 7: Residential Land Use and Development Requirements Article 7: Residential Land Use and Section 701: Statement of Intent (A) (B) (C) The intent of Article 7 is to develop certain land use and development requirements for the residential uses within Cumru

More information

16 February 9, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: GEO I, L.L.C.

16 February 9, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: GEO I, L.L.C. 16 February 9, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: GEO I, L.L.C. PROPERTY OWNER: GEO I, L.L.C., DONALD K. PILAND, AND BOOTSIE LORAINE TERRY STAFF PLANNER: Faith Christie REQUEST: Conditional Change of Zoning

More information

Chapter Residential Mixed Density Zone

Chapter Residential Mixed Density Zone Chapter 19.16 Residential Mixed Density Zone 19.16.010 Purpose and Intent 19.16.020 Permitted Uses 19.16.030 Accessory Permitted Uses 19.16.040 Secondary Permitted Uses 19.16.050 Conditional Uses 19.16.060

More information

TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2011

TOWN OF ORO VALLEY PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2011 PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: December 6, 2011 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Matt Michels, Senior Planner mmichels@orovalleyaz.gov; tel. 229-4822 Public Hearing: Rancho de

More information

3 NOVEMBER 9, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT:

3 NOVEMBER 9, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: REQUEST: Conditional Change of Zoning (B-2 & I-1 to Conditional A-18) 3 NOVEMBER 9, 2011 Public Hearing APPLICANT: S.L. NUSBAUM REALTY COMPANY PROPERTY OWNER: USF PROPCO II, LLC STAFF PLANNER: Leslie Bonilla

More information

ZONING ORDINANCE: OPEN SPACE COMMUNITY. Hamburg Township, MI

ZONING ORDINANCE: OPEN SPACE COMMUNITY. Hamburg Township, MI ZONING ORDINANCE: OPEN SPACE COMMUNITY Hamburg Township, MI ARTICLE 14.00 OPEN SPACE COMMUNITY (Adopted 1/16/92) Section 14.1. Intent It is the intent of this Article to offer an alternative to traditional

More information

Washington County, Minnesota Ordinances

Washington County, Minnesota Ordinances Washington County, Minnesota Ordinances Ordinance No. 153 Text Amendment to the Washington County Development Code - Chapter One, Section 2 and Chapter Two, Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, of the Development Code

More information

FREQUENTLY USED PLANNING & ZONING TERMS

FREQUENTLY USED PLANNING & ZONING TERMS City Of Mustang FREQUENTLY USED PLANNING & ZONING TERMS Abut: Having property lines, street lines, or zoning district lines in common. Accessory Structure: A structure of secondary importance or function

More information

CITY OF EAU CLAIRE, WISCONSIN. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY (Dated: November 8, 2016)

CITY OF EAU CLAIRE, WISCONSIN. SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY (Dated: November 8, 2016) CITY OF EAU CLAIRE, WISCONSIN SPECIAL ASSESSMENT POLICY (Dated: November 8, 2016) (Adopted by reference by Ordinance No. 7207 adopted November 8, 2016) PURPOSE The purpose of this Policy is to assure fair

More information

ARTICLE IV DISTRICT REGULATIONS

ARTICLE IV DISTRICT REGULATIONS PART 1. RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS 4-101. RS. Single-Family Residential Suburban District. The RS District is designed for single-family dwellings, and compatible uses, at a density no greater than one dwelling

More information

Cover Letter with Narrative Statement

Cover Letter with Narrative Statement Cover Letter with Narrative Statement March 31, 2017 rev July 27, 2017 RE: Rushton Pointe Residential Planned Unit Development Application for Public Hearing for RPUD Rezone PL2015 000 0306 Mr. Eric Johnson,

More information

Draft Zoning Changes for the 2nd Planning Board Public Hearing, January 22, 2018.

Draft Zoning Changes for the 2nd Planning Board Public Hearing, January 22, 2018. Draft Zoning Changes for the 2nd Planning Board Public Hearing, January 22, 2018. No changes were made at the 1st Public Hearing. Proposed wording for the 1 st Public Hearing in red, eliminated text in

More information

STAFF REPORT. Guttman Development Group, LLC. PUD-R (Residential Planned Unit Development Plan)

STAFF REPORT. Guttman Development Group, LLC. PUD-R (Residential Planned Unit Development Plan) P a g e 1 STAFF REPORT CASE: APPLICANT: LOCATION: ZONED: REQUEST: ZC09-2017 Guttman Development Group, LLC 4990 Wilmington Pike PUD-R (Residential Planned Unit Development Plan) A Major Change to an Approved

More information

CITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES

CITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES CITY OF MERCED SMALL LOT SINGLE-FAMILY HOME DESIGN GUIDELINES Development Services Department Planning and Permitting Adopted August 15, 2005 SMALL LOT SINGLE FAMILY HOME GUIDELINES A. Purpose and Applicability.

More information

SECTION 10.7 R-PUD (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) ZONE

SECTION 10.7 R-PUD (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) ZONE Article X Zones 10-20 SECTION 10.7 R-PUD (RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) ZONE A. PURPOSE AND INTENT: The R-PUD Residential PUD Zone is intended to provide alternative, voluntary zoning procedures

More information

ARTICLE 12 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS (PUDS) Sec Intent CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF BRIGHTON ZONING ORDINANCE

ARTICLE 12 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS (PUDS) Sec Intent CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF BRIGHTON ZONING ORDINANCE ARTICLE 12 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS (PUDS) Sec. 12-01 Intent 1 2 (a) The intent of this Article is to permit the coordinated development on larger sites, protect significant natural features

More information

Staff Report: Date: Applicant: Property Identification: Acreage of Request: Current Zoning of Requested Area: Requested Action: Attached:

Staff Report: Date: Applicant: Property Identification: Acreage of Request: Current Zoning of Requested Area: Requested Action: Attached: Staff Report: Completed by Jeff Palmer Director of Planning & Zoning Date: November 7, 2018, Updated November 20, 2018 Applicant: Greg Smith, Oberer Land Developer agent for Ronald Montgomery ET AL Property

More information

TOOELE COUNTY LAND USE ORDINANCE CHAPTER 31 Page 1

TOOELE COUNTY LAND USE ORDINANCE CHAPTER 31 Page 1 CHAPTER 31 PLANNED COMMUNITY ZONE (P-C) Section 31-1 Definitions. 31-2 Purpose. 31-3 Land use districts. 31-4 P-C zone area minimum requirements. 31-5 Permitted uses. 31-6 Conditional uses. 31-7 Planning

More information

ARTICLE C. ZONING TEXT, DISTRICT CLASSIFICATIONS AND BOUNDARIES

ARTICLE C. ZONING TEXT, DISTRICT CLASSIFICATIONS AND BOUNDARIES ARTICLE C. ZONING TEXT, DISTRICT CLASSIFICATIONS AND BOUNDARIES Sec. 10-2054. ZONING TEXT, DISTRICT CLASSIFICATIONS AND BOUNDARIES. In order to regulate the location of structures, the height and bulk

More information

19 December 8, 2010 Public Hearing APPLICANT: GEO I, L.L.C.

19 December 8, 2010 Public Hearing APPLICANT: GEO I, L.L.C. 19 December 8, 2010 Public Hearing APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER:, DONALD K. PILAND, AND BOOTSIE LORAINE TERRY STAFF PLANNER: Faith Christie REQUEST: Conditional Change of Zoning (R-10 Residential to Conditional

More information

MINOR SUBDIVISION PLAT CHECKLIST

MINOR SUBDIVISION PLAT CHECKLIST MINOR SUBDIVISION PLAT CHECKLIST Project Name: Tax ID #: Project Number: Date: _ Reviewed By: Telephone: NOTES: All lots on septic systems must comply with the Fulton County Health Department requirements

More information

Final Plats for Major Residential and Commercial Subdivisions Checklist

Final Plats for Major Residential and Commercial Subdivisions Checklist Project Name: : This form is a checklist of Zoning Ordinance requirements for major residential and commercial subdivision plats to assist the applicant in their submittal. It is not intended to be a comprehensive

More information

Chapter SPECIAL USE ZONING DISTRICTS

Chapter SPECIAL USE ZONING DISTRICTS Chapter 20.20 Sections: 20.20.010 Urban Transition (U-T) Zoning District 20.20.020 Planned Development (P-D) Zoning Districts 20.20.010 Urban Transition (U-T) Zoning District A. Purpose. The purpose of

More information

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI

DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: September 13, 2018 Item #: PZ2018-319 STAFF REPORT DRESDEN DRIVE TOWNHOMES DCI Request: Project Name: Development of Community Compact (DCI) and six concurrent

More information

CHAPTER 14 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENTS

CHAPTER 14 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENTS 10-14-1 10-14-1 CHAPTER 14 SPECIAL DEVELOPMENTS SECTION: 10-14-1: Cluster and Inner Block Development 10-14-2: Planned Unit Development 10-14-1: CLUSTER AND INNER BLOCK DEVELOPMENT: A. Land Use: Cluster

More information

KASSON TOWNSHIP PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO (EFFECTIVE: MAY 12, 2007)

KASSON TOWNSHIP PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO (EFFECTIVE: MAY 12, 2007) KASSON TOWNSHIP PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD ORDINANCE ORDINANCE NO. 2007-01 (EFFECTIVE: MAY 12, 2007) An ordinance providing for the standards and specifications incident to the development of Private Motor Vehicle

More information

ARTICLE 23 CONDOMINIUM STANDARDS

ARTICLE 23 CONDOMINIUM STANDARDS ARTICLE 23 CONDOMINIUM STANDARDS Section 23.01 Intent. The intent of this Article is to provide regulatory standards for condominiums and site condominiums similar to those required for projects developed

More information

(a) Commercial uses on Laurel Avenue, abutting the TRO District to the

(a) Commercial uses on Laurel Avenue, abutting the TRO District to the 32X Zoning Code 150.36 TRANSITIONAL RESIDENTIAL OVERLAY DISTRICT. (A) Intent and purpose. (1) It is the intent of the Transitional Residential Overlay District (hereinafter referred to as the "TRO District")

More information

19 June 9, 2010 Public Hearing APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER: KEMP ENTERPRISES, INC.

19 June 9, 2010 Public Hearing APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER: KEMP ENTERPRISES, INC. 19 June 9, 2010 Public Hearing APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNER: KEMP ENTERPRISES, INC. STAFF PLANNER: Karen Prochilo REQUEST: Change of Zoning District Classification, Conditional A-24 Apartment District

More information

ARTICLE 8C SITE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE

ARTICLE 8C SITE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE ARTICLE 8C SITE CONDOMINIUM DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE SECTION 8C.01 PURPOSE It is the purpose of this Ordinance to insure that plans for development within Oceola Township proposed under the provisions of

More information

M E M O R A N D U M. Meeting Date: October 23, Item No. F-1. Planning and Zoning Commission. Daniel Turner, Planner I

M E M O R A N D U M. Meeting Date: October 23, Item No. F-1. Planning and Zoning Commission. Daniel Turner, Planner I M E M O R A N D U M Meeting Date: October 23, 2017 Item No. F-1 To: From: Subject: Planning and Zoning Commission Daniel Turner, Planner I PUBLIC HEARING: Consider a recommendation of a of Planned Development

More information

Chapter 21 MOBILE HOME PARK REGULATIONS.

Chapter 21 MOBILE HOME PARK REGULATIONS. Chapter 21 MOBILE HOME PARK REGULATIONS. Sec. 21.1 SCOPE. For the preservation of the interests of various types of residential developments which should be permitted in every community and for the protection

More information

1. Cuyler-Brownsville planned neighborhood conservation (P-N-C) districtphase I (section ). (2) Single-family semiattached dwellings;

1. Cuyler-Brownsville planned neighborhood conservation (P-N-C) districtphase I (section ). (2) Single-family semiattached dwellings; Sec. 8-3035. Planned unit development multifamily (PUD-M). A. Purpose. The PUD-M district is intended to allow a variety of residential development including single-family residential, two-family residential,

More information

Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara. Location 3736 & 3744 Shore Drive GPINs & Site Size 24,288 square feet AICUZ Less than 65 db DNL

Staff Planner Jimmy McNamara. Location 3736 & 3744 Shore Drive GPINs & Site Size 24,288 square feet AICUZ Less than 65 db DNL Applicant Property Owner 3744 Shore Associates, LLC Public Hearing October 12, 2016 (Previously deferred 09/14/2016) City Council Election District Bayside Agenda Item D4 Requests Conditional Rezoning

More information

CHECKLIST FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW

CHECKLIST FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW CHECKLIST FOR DEVELOPMENT REVIEW Petitions and related documents and plans for land development or other proposals regulated by Title 16 of the Municipal Code (Development Ordinance) and Title 17 of the

More information

Chapter ZERO LOTLINE, SINGLE-FAMILY DISTRICT R-4 Sections:

Chapter ZERO LOTLINE, SINGLE-FAMILY DISTRICT R-4 Sections: ZONING Chapter 18.36 ZERO LOTLINE, SINGLE-FAMILY DISTRICT R-4 Sections: 18.36.010 Purpose for Establishment. 18.36.020 Permitted Uses. 18.36.030 Conditional Uses. 18.36.040 Dimensional Requirements. 18.36.050

More information

STAFF S REQUEST ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION 07SN0341. Acquisitions Plus LLC

STAFF S REQUEST ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION 07SN0341. Acquisitions Plus LLC September 18, 2007 CPC November 20, 2007 CPC December 18, 2007 CPC January 15, 2008 CPC February 19, 2008 CPC arch 18, 2008 CPC April 23, 2008 BS June 25, 2008 BS September 24, 2008 BS January 28, 2009

More information

Shillelagh Property CITY COUNCIL PACKAGE FOR SEPTEMBER 16, 2014

Shillelagh Property CITY COUNCIL PACKAGE FOR SEPTEMBER 16, 2014 Docket Item "B" R(C)-14-01 Shillelagh Property CITY COUNCIL PACKAGE FOR SEPTEMBER 16, 2014 Page 1 2 Application Summary 3 15 Revised Proffer Statement 16 22 Planning Commission Draft Minutes 23 30 Staff

More information

Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia STAFF REPORT

Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia STAFF REPORT Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia STAFF REPORT REZONE CASE #: 7332 DATE: November 28, 2017 STAFF REPORT BY: Gabriel Quintas, Planner APPLICANT NAME: Smith Planning Group PROPERTY OWNER: John Hadden

More information

Exhibit D. Tallow Ridge PUD. Written Description. Date: January 5, E. City Development Number:

Exhibit D. Tallow Ridge PUD. Written Description. Date: January 5, E. City Development Number: Exhibit D Tallow Ridge PUD Written Description Date: January 5, 2016 I. SUMMARY DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY A. Current Land Use Designation: RR B. Current Zoning District: PUD C. Requested Zoning District:

More information

Composition of traditional residential corridors.

Composition of traditional residential corridors. Page 1 of 7 St. Petersburg, Florida, Code of Ordinances >> PART II - ST. PETERSBURG CITY CODE >> Chapter 16 - LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS >> SECTION 16.20.060. CORRIDOR RESIDENTIAL TRADITIONAL DISTRICTS

More information

610 LAND DIVISIONS AND PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENTS OUTSIDE A UGB

610 LAND DIVISIONS AND PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENTS OUTSIDE A UGB ARTICLE VI: LAND DIVISIONS AND PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENTS VI-21 610 LAND DIVISIONS AND PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENTS OUTSIDE A UGB 610-1 Property Line Adjustments (Property Line Relocation) A property line

More information

PUD 42 - Warner Ranch PUD - Amend. 2 Item No. 4B ZONING ZON

PUD 42 - Warner Ranch PUD - Amend. 2 Item No. 4B ZONING ZON PUD 42 - Warner Ranch PUD - Amend. 2 Item No. 4B ZONING ZON1210-001 CASE PLANNER: Steve Hopkins REQUEST: Approval of PUD 42 - Warner Ranch PUD - Amend. 2 ZONING AT TIME OF APPLICATION: PUD 42 CURRENT USE

More information