PLAN COMMISSION Village of Deerfield Agenda. October 12, 2017 Deerfield Village Hall, Franz Council Chambers

Transcription

1 PLAN COMMISSION Village of Deerfield Agenda October 12, 2017 Deerfield Village Hall, Franz Council Chambers Public Hearing & Workshop Meeting 7:30 p.m. Public Comment on a Non-Agenda Item PUBLIC HEARING (1) Public Hearing on the Request for Approval of a Class B Special Use to Permit the Establishment of a Bartaco (Unit A, west end-cap space) Restaurant and a Café Zupas (Unit C, east end-cap space) Restaurant in the 711 Deerfield Road Building at the Shops at Deerfield Square (CRM Properties, LTD., Barteca Restaurant Group and Café Zupas) (2) Public Hearing on the Request for an Amendment to the Signage Plan for Parkway North Center to Allow a Wall Sign on the Parking Garage at 3 Parkway North Boulevard (TNREF III Parkway North JV). WORKSHOP MEETING (1a) (2a) Discussion of Bartaco and Café Zupas Special Use Discussion of the 3 Parkway North Parking Garage Wall Sign Document Approval Items from the Commission Items from the Staff Designation of Representative for the next Board of Trustees Meeting Adjournment

2 MEMORANDUM TO: Plan Commission FROM: Jeff Ryckaert, Principal Planner and Dan Nakahara, Planner DATE: October 5, 2017 RE: Public Hearing on the Request for Approval of a Class B Special Use to Permit the Establishment of a Bartaco (Unit A, west end-cap space) and a Café Zupas (Unit C, east end-cap space) Restaurant in the 711 Deerfield Road Building at the Shops at Deerfield Square (CRM Properties, LTD., Barteca Restaurant Group and Café Zupas) Subject Property The subject property consists of the Deerfield Square planned unit development, which is bounded by Deerfield Road to the north, Waukegan Road to the east, Osterman Avenue to the south, and the railroad tracks to the west. The subject building at 711 Deerfield Road that the proposed Special Uses will be located in is to be redeveloped. On December 19, 2016, the petitioner received approval to redevelop the existing building located at 711 Deerfield Road. The approved plan proposed to tear down the existing building and replace it with a new multi-tenant building. The building was previously occupied by Biaggi s Ristorante Italiano, which is closed. The setbacks, access points, lot coverage, open space, site landscaping, parking lot lighting, sign criteria, and storm water management for this Planned Unit Development were previously approved. Note: Recall the petitioner went before the Plan Commission for changes to the site plan and sign criteria to allow a roof top sign on September 14, 2017 and that recommendation will be before the Board of Trustees on October 16, Proposed Plans The petitioners are proposing the following items: 1) A Special Use for a Bartaco restaurant. 2) A Special Use for a Café Zupas restaurant. The two (2) requests that are in front of the Plan Commission have been separated out and each request has a separate heading that is capitalized and underlined below:

3 SPECIAL USE FOR A BARTACO RESTAURANT The petitioners will be seeking approval of a Special Use for a 4,228 square foot, casual dining restaurant concept for Bartaco with approximately 735 square foot outdoor patio to be located at 711 Deerfield Road building, Unit A, part of Deerfield Square. Staff has asked the petitioners for a detailed written description of the proposed restaurants including peak hours of operation, elevation changes, outdoor seating, company background, etc. and the petitioners have provided these written description in their materials. In order to avoid repetition by including a detailed description of the proposed store operations in the staff memo, please see detailed information on the proposed plans in the petitioner s written materials under Special Use Request, Bartaco Operations, and Barteca Restaurant Group Background (pages 1 through 3 of petitioner s booklet). Zoning Conformance The proposed use is a Special Use in the C-1 Village Center District pursuant to Article 5.01-C, 2,a,(3) of restaurants and similar operations of 3,001 square feet in area or greater (including the square footage of any outdoor seating area), without a drive thru operation. Attached are the Special Use criteria. The petitioners are also seeking to amend the commercial PUD for Deerfield Square sign variations to the Zoning Ordinance and exceptions to the established sign criteria for the 711 Deerfield Road building. Signage Wall signs Number: Permitted: For each use occupying a ground floor, one (1) sign facing a public street, public right-of-way or parking area. Proposed: Three (3) wall signs are proposed for Bartaco one (1) wall sign on the north (front) wall, one (1) wall sign on the south wall and one (1) blade (projecting) wall sign located off the wood trellis at the southwest corner of the outdoor patio. The proposed wall signs on the north and south walls will be painted directly on the brick façade and read Bartaco with a brick border around the text. The painted Bartaco wall sign will be externally illuminated with gooseneck lights. The sign will require a variation, as signs are not allowed to be painted on a façade surface. The petitioner will also be seeking a variation for the blade (projecting) wall sign, as they are not allowed. 2

4 Area: Location: Height: Permitted: The Zoning Ordinance allows 8% of the area of the wall or 80 square feet for a front and rear wall sign whichever is greater, and 4% of the area of the wall or 40 square feet for a side wall sign, whichever is greater. Permitted sign area is not a given, signs must be in proportion to the wall and reflect the high standards of visual quality and compatibility that the Village strives for. Proposed: Front (north) wall: The north wall sign is 77.3 square feet in area (19.3 x 4.0 ) when a box is placed around all of the sign elements as the ordinance requires. 8% of the north wall is 100 square feet. Rear (south) wall: The south wall sign is 77.3 square feet in area (19.3 x 4.0 ) when a box is placed around all of the sign elements, as the ordinance requires. 8% of the west wall is 100 square feet. One (1) blade (projecting) wall sign is 10.4 square feet when a box is place around all of the sign elements, as ordinance requires. A variation is needed for the blade (projecting) wall sign. Permitted: Walls signs may be located on the outermost wall of the principal building fronting a public street, public right-way, easement for access or parking area. Proposed: Located on the north and south walls of the building and blade (projecting) wall sign located off the wood trellis at the southwest corner of the outdoor patio. Permitted: Wall signs may not project higher than the parapet line of the roof or more than 30 feet above curb level, whichever is lower. Proposed: Front (north) wall: The north wall sign is below the roof deck (roof deck is 20.0 ). Rear (south) wall: The south wall sign is below the roof deck (roof deck is 20.5 ). One (1) blade (projecting) wall sign is approximately 12 high and below the roof deck. 3

5 Illumination: Permitted: Any illuminated sign located within 120 feet of a residential district shall be extinguished at the close of business or 11:00 p.m. whichever is later. Proposed: North and south wall signs will be externally illuminated by gooseneck light fixtures. The blade (projecting) wall sign is externally illuminated. No wall sign is located within 120 feet of a residential district. 711 Deerfield Road Building Sign Criteria Deerfield Square has an approved sign criteria for the 711 Deerfield Road building that the petitioners are required to follow. See attached. The petitioner s will be seeking approval of the following exceptions to the established sign criteria for the 711 Deerfield Road building: 1. To permit a 10.4 square foot Bartaco blade (projecting) wall sign located off the wood trellis at the southwest corner of the outdoor patio. 2. To permit a 77.3 square foot Bartaco painted wall sign on the north and south building elevations. 3. To permit wall signs on the north and south building elevations with no backer panel 4. To permit a blade (projecting) wall sign with no backer panel. The Appearance Review Commission (ARC) will have to approve the exterior signage and any other exterior changes to the building. The petitioner is scheduled to go before the ARC on October 30, SPECIAL USE FOR A CAFÉ ZUPAS RESTAURANT The petitioner will also be seeking approval of a 4,020 square foot, fast casual Café Zupas restaurant serving soups, salads, sandwiches and desserts to be located in Unit C of the 711 Deerfield Road building. Staff has asked the petitioners for a detailed written description of the proposed restaurants including peak hours of operation, elevation changes, company background, etc. and the petitioners have provided these written description in their materials. In order to avoid repetition by including a detailed description of the proposed store operations in the staff memo, please see detailed information on the proposed plans in the petitioner has written materials under Special Use Request, Café Zupas Operation (pages 1 through 3 of petitioner s booklet). Zoning Conformance The proposed Café Zupas restaurant is a Special Use in the C-1 Village Center District pursuant to Article 5.01-C,2,a,(3) of restaurants and similar operations of 3,001 square feet in area or greater (including the square footage of any outdoor seating area), 4

6 without a drive thru operation. Attached are the Special Use criteria. The petitioners are also seeking to amend the commercial PUD for Deerfield Square sign variations to the Zoning Ordinance and exceptions to the established sign criteria for the 711 Deerfield Road building. Signage Wall signs Number: Area: Location: Permitted: For each use occupying a ground floor, one (1) sign facing a public street, public right-of-way, or parking area. Proposed: Two (2) wall signs are proposed for Café Zupas one (1) wall sign on the north (front) wall and one (1) wall sign on the south wall. The proposed wall signs will read Café Zupas Soup, Salad & Sandwich Kitchen text on a background panel. The text will be aluminum channel letters and internally illuminated with white text faces. Permitted: The Zoning Ordinance allows 8% of the area of the wall or 80 square feet for a front and rear wall sign whichever is greater, and 4% of the area of the wall or 40 square feet for a side wall sign, whichever is greater. Permitted sign area is not a given, signs must be in proportion to the wall and reflect the high standards of visual quality and compatibility that the Village strives for. Proposed: Front (north) wall: The north wall sign is 60 square feet in area (10 x 6 ) when a box is placed around all of the sign elements as the ordinance requires. 8% of the north wall is 96 square feet. Rear (south) wall: The south wall sign is 60 square feet in area (10 x 6 ) when a box is placed around all of the sign elements, as the ordinance requires. 8% of the west wall is 96 square feet. Permitted: Walls signs may be located on the outermost wall of the principal building fronting a public street, public right-way, easement for access or parking area. Proposed: Located on the north and south walls of the building. 5

7 Height: Permitted: Wall signs may not project higher than the parapet line of the roof or more than 30 feet above curb level, whichever is lower. Proposed: Illumination: Front (north) wall: The north wall sign is below the roof deck (roof deck is 20.0 ). Rear (south) wall: The south wall sign is below the roof deck (roof deck is 20.0 ). Permitted: Any illuminated sign located within 120 feet of a residential district shall be extinguished at the close of business or 11:00 p.m. whichever is later. Proposed: Internally illuminated with LED lights. No wall sign is located within 120 feet of a residential district. Roof Top Sign As part of the 2016 sign criteria for the 711 Deerfield Road building, the Plan Commission recommended approval for the petitioner s request to allow roof top signage on the glass appendages (east and west sides of the building) with a maximum of twenty-four (24) inches in height. The ARC was unanimously against allowing the roof top signage on the glass appendages. This request for the rooftop signage was later withdrawn by the petitioner at the January 17, 2017 Board of Trustees meeting for further review and refinement. The Deerfield Zoning Ordinance does not allow for signs to be erected on the roof of any building or structure (Article 9.01-B,2). The petitioner is proposing a roof top sign on the east glass enclosure of the building for Café Zupas. This roof top sign will be a maximum of twenty-four (24) inches in height and have the following text, Soup, Salad & Sandwich Kitchen. The previously approved sign criteria for the 711 Deerfield Road building will need to be amended to add language allowing a roof top sign on the east glass enclosure and that request to change the sign criteria is before the Board of Trustees on October 16, Deerfield Road Building Sign Criteria Deerfield Square has an approved sign criteria for the 711 Deerfield Road building that the petitioners are required to follow. See attached. The petitioner s will also be seeking approval of the following exceptions to the established sign criteria for the 711 Deerfield Road building: 1. To permit a 72 inch high backer panel for Café Zupas on the north and south building elevations as opposed to the 42 inch maximum backer panel height under the established sign criteria. 6

8 2. To permit the total text height of inches, excluding spacing and four (4) rows of text as opposed to the maximum 36 inches in total height and exceeding two (2) lines of text for the tenant signs for Café Zupas on the north and south building elevations. 3. To permit a tenant identification roof top sign on the east side of the building of 24 inches high for Café Zupas with the wording Soup Salad & Sandwich Kitchen on the glass enclosure facing the existing plaza area on the corner. The Appearance Review Commission (ARC) will have to approve the exterior signage and any other exterior changes to the building. The petitioner is scheduled to go before the ARC on October 30, Parking for Bartaco and Café Zupas Restaurants Parking for the Deerfield Square Planned Unit Development was approved at 5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for retail use (i.e., 1 parking space per 200 square feet), and 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area for office use (i.e., 1 parking space per 250 square feet) with a 15% reduction for storage areas in the building (Ordinance granted a variation for parking in the development). A total of 1,000 spaces (including 100 underground spaces) are provided for Deerfield Square. When Deerfield Square was approved, the various uses in the development were to share the parking within the development. The amount of parking for the different mix of uses in the development will vary throughout the day. In other words, the different uses in the development will have varying peak hour parking times. As part of the approval process of a Special Use for the proposed restaurant, the petitioners must demonstrate that adequate parking will be provided. Sit-down restaurants require one (1) parking space for each 60 square feet of gross floor area. The proposed casual dining Bartaco restaurant would require a total of 71 parking spaces based on the projected 100% dine-in (71 parking spaces for the sitdown: 4,228 square feet / 60 = 70.4 spaces and 13 (735 s.f./60=12.25 or 13 parking spaces) spaces for the outdoor seating area. Outdoor seating areas are counted in the parking requirement unless it is determined that outdoor seating areas should not be included in the parking requirement. If the space were all retail, then a total of 22 parking spaces would be required (4963/200 = = 25 spaces) as retail requires one (1) parking space per 200 square feet of gross floor area. The proposed fast casual Café Zupas restaurant would require a total of 67 parking spaces based on the projected 100% dine-in (67 parking spaces for the sit-down: 4,020 square feet / 60 = 67.0 spaces). Café Zupas is not proposing any outdoor seating. The petitioner s consultant (KLOA) conducted a parking study for the proposed Bartaco restaurant (dated September 25, 2017). The parking survey was conducted every 30 minutes between 11:00AM and 9.00PM on a Thursday, October 6, 2016 and Saturday, October 8, 2016 to coincide with the peak parking demand of the center and the proposed restaurant. Table 1 on page 3 and Table 2 on page 4 of the petitioner s 7

9 parking study indicate the number of cars parked in the Deerfield Square parking lots on these dates. Table 1 on page 3 indicates that the parking lots peak at 12:00PM on Friday with 655 parking spaces occupied, which is approximately 74 percent of the available parking supply, not including the underground parking spaces. Table 2 on page 4 indicates that the parking lots peak at 12:30PM on Saturday with 546 parking spaces occupied, which is approximately 62 percent of the available parking supply, not including the underground parking spaces. According to the petitioner s parking study, peak parking demand on both days drop after 12:00PM-12:30PM with the demand considerably lower during evening hours. The drop in demand is primarily due to the large amount of office space at Deerfield Square which peaks middays on Monday through Friday and decreases substantially in the evenings and on Saturdays. The parking study assumes that peak demand will occur during the lunch hour and the additional demand of parking spaces needed for both proposed restaurants will be accommodated by available parking in Deerfield Square on Thursday and on Saturday with ample parking spaces available. The parking study also considers vacant retail space in the 711 Deerfield Road building and concludes a surplus of parking as seen on Table 3 on page 6 and Table 4 on page 7. The owners of Deerfield Square have implemented a parking plan that requires all Deerfield Square employees to park in designated areas and the middle portion of the main parking lot. 8

10 Village of Deerfield Appearance Review Commission Approval: February 27, Deerfield Road The Shops at Deerfield Square Criteria for Tenant Signage Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in Deerfield Square's existing sign criteria, the 711 building is establishing the following criteria in order to provide a uniform appearance and for the mutual benefits of all its tenants. The following shall not apply to any other buildings at Deerfield Square. Tenant Identification Signs On the north, south, east or west facing facades, the Tenant Identification Signs shall be comp rised of three-dimensional fabricated channel type individual letters with either face lit or back lit illumination. The individual letters of each tenant sign shall not exceed 24" in height in the event of one line of text or 36" in total letter height in the event of two lines of text (with any individual letter no more than 24 in height). Excluding glass facades which shall have a maximum total letter height of 24 inches see paragraph below. On glass facades containing any type of horizontal steel brow or horizontal steel canopy, sign letters may be installed on top of such protrusion and located a maximum of 36" from face of wall to the face of letters, provided such letters are no more than 6 inches beyond the adjacent facades. The sign shall be one line of text (no logos) with a maximum of 24 inches in height. All conductors, transformers and conduits are to be concealed as much as possible. On facades with no horizontal brows or no horizontal steel canopy, sign backer panels shall be used, the colors of which shall be the color of the respective façade's fabric awnings. Backer panels shall be the overall width of the respective facade's storefront windows and shall be a reasonable height to accommodate the foregoing text criteria with a maximum hei ght no greater than 42 inches. The sign s height (letters and backer panel) shall be no more than 3 feet above the roof deck top (20-0 ). All logos must fit within the above stated sign criteria.

11 SPECIAL USE CRITERIA Does it meet the standards for a Special Use? A Special Use shall be authorized only when the Plan Commission finds all of the following: 1. Compatible with Existing Development The nature and intensity of the activities involved and the size, placement and design of any structures proposed will be so planned that the Special Use will be compatible with the existing development and will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property. 2. Lot of Sufficient Size The size of the lot will be sufficient for the use proposed. 3. Traffic The location of the Special Use within the Village will be such that adverse effects on surrounding properties will be minimal, particularly regarding the traffic generated by the Special Use. 4. Parking and Access Parking areas will be of adequate size for the particular use and properly located, and the entrance and exit drives will be laid out so as to prevent traffic hazards and nuisances. 5. Effect on Neighborhood In all respects the Special Use will not be significantly or materially detrimental to_the health, safety and welfare of the public or injurious to the other property or improvements in the neighborhood, nor will it diminish or impair property values in the surrounding area. 6. Adequate Facilities That adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and/or other necessary facilities have been or are being provided. 7. Adequate Buffering Adequate fencing and/or screening shall be provided to ensure the enjoyment of surrounding properties, to provide for the public safety or to screen parking areas and other visually incompatible uses. 8. If in C-1 Village Center District: That the establishment of the Special Use will not be injurious to the character of the C-1 Village Center District as a retail center for the Village.

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

55

56

57

58

59

60

61

62

63

64

65

66

67

68

69

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

100

101

102

103

104

105

106

107

108

109

110

111

112

113

114

115

116

117

118

119 MEMORANDUM TO: Plan Commission FROM: Jeff Ryckaert, Principal Planner and Dan Nakahara, Planner DATE: October 4, 2017 RE: Public Hearing on the Request for an Amendment to the Signage Plan for Parkway North Center to Allow a Wall Sign on the Parking Garage at 3 Parkway North Boulevard (TNREF III Parkway North JV). Subject Property The subject property consists of the Parkway North Center planned unit development (PUD) The property is approximately 86 acres and is located at the southeast corner of Deerfield Road and Saunders Road. The subject property is zoned I-1 Office, Research, and Restricted Industrial District. The site is currently developed with six office buildings (buildings 1, 3, 4, 6, 9 and 10), a Marriott Suites Hotel (2 Parkway North), and a childcare facility and health club in a one story building (5 Parkway North). The annexation agreement sets out the development requirements for the Parkway North Center Planned Unit Development. Last year the 7 Parkway North (ABPN), a two-story office building was approved, and it is under construction. In addition, 8 Parkway North, a five-story office building, was approved and the developer is working to attract a build to suit tenant for the building. The specific property where the expansion of the parking garage is proposed is Parkway North 3, which is a five-story office building of approximately 255,092 square feet which is located at the south end of the development east of the Parkway North 4 office building, and west of the Marriott Suites Hotel. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning for Woodview Parcels North (across Deerfield Road): Unincorporated R-1 Residential District Tollway onramp; Village of Riverwoods - Deerfield Park District Golf Course South: Unincorporated GO General Office office buildings East: Tollway, and across the Tollway is I-1 Office Research and Restricted Industry District Siemens three-story office building West (across Saunders Road): Village of Riverwoods R-1 PUD Residential District Proposed Plan The petitioners are proposing to install one (1) internally illuminated wall sign for their tenant (PRA Health Sciences) on a parking garage located at 3 Parkway North Boulevard. The wall sign will be located at the northwest corner of the building on the

120 north wall of the new section of the parking garage. The sign will be 92 square feet in size (9.2 by 10.0 ) and will consist of the letters PRA Health Sciences and a logo. The sign will be 6.0 deep. The signs will be located above the top floor of the three-story parking garage north facing the interior of the office park. The sign will be aluminum, mounted onto the garage façade, and internally illuminated by LED units. The text and logo color will be vivid rose. The sign box will be painted to match the parking garage structure. The graphics will be cut out from the aluminum face and backed with a translucent acrylic sheet. The sign will be controlled by a photocell. The petitioners have provided a detailed written description/summary of the proposal in their material that explains the following: Their rationale for the wall sign on the parking structure; location of the wall sign on the parking structure and sign details. Zoning Conformance The petitioners must amend their existing sign plan for the Parkway North Center to allow the proposed wall signs. Signage - I-1 Planned Unit Development (9.02-C) Number and Content: Permitted: Limited to one (1) sign for each wall, which fronts a public street, public right-of-way, easement for access or parking. Said sign shall only contain the name of the building, or the name of tenant, or the name of the development. Such signage may include a logo. Proposed: One (1) wall sign on the parking garage facing the office park interior is proposed for the northwest corner of the 3 Parkway North parking garage with the content to be PRA Health Sciences and logo. Area: Permitted: The maximum surface area shall not exceed one percent (1%) of the gross surface area of the wall to which it is affixed, or 100 square feet, whichever is lesser. Proposed: The proposed sign is 92 s.f. in area (9.2 x 10.0). The area of the wall to which the proposed wall sign is affixed is approximately 3,237 square feet. 1% of 3,237 is s.f. which is the maximum size wall sign allowed. A variation is needed for the area of the wall sign. Location: Permitted: Wall signs maybe located on any principal building fronting on a public street, public right-of way, easement for access, or parking area.

121 Proposed: The proposed wall sign is proposed on the parking garage facing the interior of the office park. The Zoning Ordinance defines a principal building as a nonaccessory building in which the principal use is conducted. A parking garage is not a principal building, and a wall sign on the parking garage will require a variation. Height: Permitted: Wall signs shall not be located higher than the roof deck of the principal building. Proposed: The structure on which the sign is proposed is not the principal building therefore this parking garage does not have the traditional office roof deck. The proposed wall sign is above the top parking floor of this parking deck and will require a variation. Illumination: Permitted: Any illuminated sign within 120 feet of a residential district must be extinguished at the close of business conducted within any building or upon the premises to which such sign is located or 11:00 p.m. whichever is later. Proposed: The wall sign will be internally illuminated, and is not within 120 feet of a residential district. Prefiling Conference The minutes from the September 14, 2017 Prefiling Conference are attached.

122 Workshop Meeting September 14, 2017 Page 3 Commissioner Moyer asked the petitioner if he has considered video security surveillance. Dr. Wolfson stated he would consider this. Commissioner Moyer added that costs are more reasonable now than in the past and it would add a layer of protection. The back parking area (north end) would also be fenced in. He reported that he has tenants there and would like them to have the opportunity to have gated parking and secured back entrances to the building. Commissioner Bromberg clarified the exact location of the property. Dr. Wolfson replied that it is behind Whitehall and to the right is Carson s. Commissioner Moyer asked what action needs to be taken to approve the petitioners requests. Mr. Ryckaert replied that this Planned Unit Development and whenever there is a change or improvement to a PUD the owner must come before the Village for the change. Commissioner Bromberg commented that it is just a fence and if it will prevent people from doing things they shouldn t be then it seems very reasonable. Commissioner Bromberg moved to find that the addition of the fence is in substantial conformance with the approved Planned Unit Development. Commissioner Moyer seconded with the recommendation to get video surveillance at the property. Said motion passed with the following roll call: Ayes: Bromberg, Goldstone, Moyer, Berg (4) Nays: None (0) (4) Prefiling Conference on the Request for an Amendment to the Signage Plan for Parkway North Center to Allow a Wall Sign on the Parking Garage at 3 Parkway North Boulevard (Fulcrum Asset Advisors) The petitioner Peter Broccolo with Fulcram Asset Advisors reported that Fulcram owns this property and introduced representatives from ICG Construction and Priority Signs also in attendance. Mr. Broccolo reported that the one of the building s new tenants, PRA Health Sciences, is requesting a sign on the property s new parking garage. They are here seeking feedback on this sign request. Mr. Broccolo stated that as the property owner, they want to express strong support for what their tenant is seeking and they believe it will enhance and continue Deerfield s strong corporate environment. He added that as corporate tenants seek spaces, signage and branding opportunities are important to them. He added that they came before the Plan Commission for approval of the development of their parking garage and they are now back with a signage request on that garage. PRA wanted their company s signage on the office building however the Zoning Code allows for only one sign on the building and it was already taken by another tenant. They came up with the idea of using the garage as a different structure to still provide their tenant with brand identity. The tenant sees this as an attractive opportunity and they are seeking Plan Commission feedback on this idea. Mr. Broccolo added that PRA Health Sciences is renting 50,000 square feet of the building, the entire second floor. Commissioner Moyer commented that he likes the idea of the garage signage. He added that it is located in the middle of the business park and is not visible from the road. Mr. Ryckaert

123 Workshop Meeting September 14, 2017 Page 4 explained that this request requires Plan Commission approval and does not have to go before the Appearance Review Commission. Mr. Broccolo stated that they respectfully submit to the Commission for approval on the signage on the garage. Mr. Ryckaert stated that this is the Prefiling Conference to gain Commission feedback and they will need to return for a Public Hearing and formal vote. He added that this request includes several variations for location on the garage, total area, and height of the wall sign as it is above the highest floor of the parking deck. Commissioner Bromberg asked if the sign s illumination will turn off. The petitioner responded that it would light up when it gets dark out and go off during daylight hours. Commissioner Bromberg provided supportive comments for the idea of the garage sign. Mr. Broccolo added that it is the tenant s desire to install a temporary banner for a period of time before the sign is complete. Mr. Ryckaert stated that the regulations for temporary signs do not allow banners. Document Approval All Commissioners agreed that they approve the Jon Ric Recommendation document. There being no further discussion, the Workshop Meeting adjourned at 9:15 P.M. with a unanimous voice vote. Respectfully Submitted, Laura Boll

124 Village of Deerfield 2017 Zoning Ordinance Map Subject Property

125 3 Parkway North Approved Site Plan Parking Garage

126 Municipal Code Amendment Request PRA Health Science - Deerfield, IL PRA Health Services is a new company to your area, seeking approval to amend the current municipal signage code to allow for them to have exterior signage on the newly constructed parking garage to allow for their their customers to be able to clearly identify where they are located. Upon discovering that wall signage of any kind was not allowed on the parking structure per the Village Municipal Code, we began to seek alternate routes for our client. Unfortunately, we then discovered that the existing tenant, Mondeléz, will continue to have exclusive rights over all building signage on the property, as per the lease. Mondeléz will be reducing their use on the existing monument sign, thus allowing for PRA Health Sciences to become an additional tenant in the building. The newly built parking garage provides a convenient alternative for wall signage for this additional business, since no additional signage can be added to the building. Upon reviewing this new information, PRA Health Sciences has agreed to move forward with seeking approval for the wall signage on the parking structure, as it is the best way to identify their brand to the public. We are currently proposing to place an 8 0 by 9 6 illuminating logo on a self contained background panel of the company on the North elevation to the right of the garage doors. The proposed sign design was previously reviewed by the Village Planning Dept and has not been altered since the initial review. If approved, the sign would be installed by a local licensed signage company. The sign would be anchored to the existing facade, and the electrical work would be supplied by the general contractor. The initial installation would take no more than a half day to complete, so there should be little concern for noise or traffic issues. We greatly hope that the proposed sign plan appeals to the Village of Deerfield, and that plans can be put in place to amend the Municipal Code to allow for this type of signage, both for PRA health Sciences, but also for future tenants in this building. P F Corp Office: 837 Riverfront Drive Sheboygan, WI An Employee-Owned Company

127 Sign Identity Manual Document: PRA Health Address: 3 Parkway North, Deerfield, IL Date Created:

128 Site S1 Fascia width: 12'-6 3/8" Sign width: 9'-2" Revisions: Revisions: Revisions: X X X X X X X X X File Location: Drive/Clients/ AS STND CSTM CR Date: EN 8/31/17 Designer: AS PM: JW City/State: Deerfield, IL Drawing # Address: 3 Parkway North OE # C

129 Site 9'-2" 22'-0" +/- 122'-11 1/16" Revisions: X X X Revisions: X X X Revisions: X X X File Location: Drive/Clients/ STND CSTM AS CR EN Date: 8/31/17 City/State: Deerfield, IL Designer: AS PM: JW Address: 3 Parkway North Drawing # OE # C

130 S1 Illuminated Wall Sign EVENING VIEW 12'-6 3/8" New aluminum cabinet with a routed face and push through graphics. Sign to be internally illuminated with the LED units and power supply housed within the aluminum cabinet. Sign to be controlled by photocell. 9'-2" 22'-0" 34'-0" Electrical to be supplied by the G.C. 5" 8'-0" 1" 2'-10 1/8" 3'-9 15/16" 1 1/16" LOGO DETAIL 9'-6 7/16" 10'-0" 1 1/4" clear acrylic LETTER DETAIL 1/8" face 1/8" face 1/8" lip 1/8" lip Mill finish on edges Mill finish on edges 3M # Vivid Rose diffuser film 1" push thru 4 3/8" 1 1/4" clear acrylic 1/2" 7'-11 9/16" 1/2" push thru 3/4" clear acrylic 3/4" clear acrylic scale 1/2" = 1' Revisions: Revisions: Revisions: change to S1b / JAB / increase logo thickness / JAB / Add photocell note / EO / X X X X X X File Location: Drive/Clients/ AS STND CSTM CR Date: EN 8/9/17 Designer: PB PM: JW City/State: Deerfield, IL Drawing # Address: 3 Parkway North OE # C