AGENDA TOWN OF SUNNYVALE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TUESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2019 TOWN HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS 127 N. COLLINS RD. 7:00 P.M.

Transcription

1 P&Z 1/22/219 AGENDA TOWN OF SUNNYVALE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TUESDAY, JANUARY 22, 219 TOWN HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS 127 N. COLLINS RD. 7: P.M. CALL MEETING TO ORDER Planning and Zoning Commission Chairperson calls the meeting to order, state the date and time. State Commissioners present and declare a quorum present. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR THE 11/19/218 REGULAR MEETING DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS Consider testimony and other information provided, and take necessary action with respect to the following: 2. CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A REQUEST BY COLLIN HELFFRICH TO APPROVE A FINAL PLAT FOR STONEY CREEK PHASE 2F AT OR ABOUT 334 JOBSON ROAD. PUBLIC HEARING Open or continue public hearing, consider testimony and other information provided, close public hearing, and take necessary action with respect to the following: 3. HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A REQUEST BY DON PING PING INTEREST, INC. TO CHANGE THE TOWN S FUTURE LAND USE PLAN FROM EMPLOYMENT (COMMERCIAL) TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND THE ZONING MAP FROM HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL AND SINGLE FAMILY- 3 TO SINGLE FAMILY - PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CREEKVIEW COVES) AT OR ABOUT US HWY 8, SOUTH OF US HWY 8 AND EAST OF LONG CREEK ROAD. 4. HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A REQUEST BY THE TOWN OF SUNNYVALE TO APPROVE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TOWN UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (ORD. 17-9) DULY PASSED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL ON MARCH 26, 218; AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME; SO AS TO REVIEW AND AMEND SECTION B SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATIONS, AS WELL AS ANY OTHER ASSOCIATED SECTIONS. ADJOURN ALL LOCATIONS IDENTIFIED ARE IN THE TOWN OF SUNNYVALE UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. FOR A DETAILED PROPERTY DESCRIPTION, PLEASE CONTACT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL AT TOWN HALL. ALL ITEMS ON THE AGENDA ARE FOR POSSIBLE DISCUSSION AND ACTION. PLEASE TURN OFF ALL TELEPHONES AND HANDHELD COMMUNICATION DEVICES WHILE IN ATTENDANCE AT THIS MEETING. MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC ARE REQUESTED TO LIMIT THEIR COMMENTS, WHETHER AT THE PUBLIC FORUM OR DURING A PUBLIC HEARING, TO NO MORE THAN FIVE () MINUTES.

2 P&Z 1/22/219 THE SUNNYVALE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RESERVES THE RIGHT TO ADJOURN INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT ANY TIME DURING THE COURSE OF THIS MEETING TO DISCUSS ANY OF THE MATTERS LISTED ABOVE, AS AUTHORIZED BY TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 1.71 (CONSULTATION WITH ATTORNEY), 1.72 (DELIBERATION ABOUT REAL PROPERTY), 1.73 (DELIBERATIONS ABOUT GIFTS AND DONATIONS), 1.74 (PERSONNEL MATTERS), 1.76 (DELIBERATIONS ABOUT SECURITY DEVICES), AND 1.86 (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT). THE TOWN OF SUNNYVALE IS COMMITTED TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA). REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS AND EQUAL ACCESS TO COMMUNICATIONS WILL BE PROVIDED TO THOSE WHO PROVIDE NOTICE TO THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES AT AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. THE FOREGOING NOTICE WAS POSTED IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: SUNNYVALE ISD 417 E. TRIPP ROAD SUNNYVALE LIBRARY AT 42 TOWER PLACE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING NOTICE WAS POSTED ON JANUARY 18, 219 IN THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS AND REMAINED SO POSTED CONTINUOUSLY FOR AT LEAST 72 HOURS PRECEDING THE SCHEDULED TIME OF SAID MEETING: TOWN HALL AT 127 N. COLLINS ROAD RACHEL RAMSEY, TOWN SECRETARY

3 MP&Z 11/19/218 MINUTES TOWN OF SUNNYVALE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MONDAY, NOVEMBER 19, 218 TOWN HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS 127 N. COLLINS RD. 7: P.M. CHAIRMAN CO-CHAIR COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER ALTERNATE COMMISSIONER ALTERNATE COMMISSIONER KEN DEMKO JOHN PEASE ANTHONY OKAFOR DON KLINE JOSH SANDLER ABSENT SARAH MITCHELL KING MOSS ABSENT SHINEY DANIEL LISA BURTON CALL MEETING TO ORDER Planning and Zoning Commission Chairman Demko called the meeting to order at 7: p.m. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR 1/1/218 REGULAR MEETING Commissioner Daniels made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Moss, to approve the minutes of the October 1, 218 Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting. Chairman Demko called for a vote, and with all members voting affirmative, the motion passed /. 2. ELECT CHIARPERSON AND CO-CHAIRPERSON Commissioner Daniels made a motion to nominate Chairman Demko to continue to be chairperson of the Commission, seconded by Commissioner Pease. Chairman Demko then asked for a nomination for co-chairperson. Chairman Demko made a motion to nominate Co- Chair Pease to continue to be co-chairperson, seconded by Commissioner Mitchell. Chairman Demko called for a vote, the motion passed /. DISCUSSION/ACTION ITEMS Consider testimony and other information provided, and take necessary action with respect to the following: 3. CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A REQUEST BY CHRIS HAGAN TO APPROVE A REVISED LANDSCAPE PLAN AT OR ABOUT 1 CLAY ROAD Town Planner, Erick del Angel, introduced the request. Staff Recommendation

4 MP&Z 11/19/218 Town Staff recommends approval of the revised landscape plan and request for alternative compliance to Section Landscape Requirements of the Unified Development Code. Background With the recent passage of Ordinance amending Section Landscape Requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance, property owners now have the ability to request alternative compliance to landscape requirements. The applicant is the owner of an industrial property (Vince Hagan Corporation) which recently received site plan approval for the addition of an office building located off of Clay Road. He is asking for alternative compliance to the landscape requirements for his industrial property in order to reduce the amount of landscaping. Below are images of the landscaping originally approved for the site this past summer followed by images of the alternative landscaping plan for which approval is being requested. Mr. del Angel stated that the applicant is mostly concerned with reducing the amount of shrubbery used for screening of the parking lot and that most of the trees will be kept with the exception of a few. Chairman Demko asked Staff where in the Unified Development Code (UDO) it allowed for a reduction in landscaping unless one where substituting other materials (e.g. drought-resistant) is allowed. Direction Jackson stated that there is a section that makes exceptions for situations where compatibility issues may arise between properties. Chairman Demko responded that he could not find that section in the UDO to which Director Jackson responded that it was added about two weeks prior and is only in the newest edition. Mr. del Angel went on to further explain conforming landscaping between adjacent lots and stated the landscaping for the subject property would have to be similar to the Flowers building to the south. Chairman Demko commented that he and the other commissioners will need new copies of the Code to which Director Jackson responded that he can the PDF to everyone but that it is also on the Town website. Commissioner Pease asked if the Town had contacted the Vince Hagan Corporation about the code changes to which Mr. del Angel responded explaining the history of the code change and the subject property. He stated that earlier in the summer the company had approached the Town with the intention of expanding their existing facilities with the addition of an office building. This, as Mr. del Angel stated, started a discussion of the excessive landscaping requirements of the UDO, especially towards industrial-zoned properties. The company has returned now that the new code has been approved by Town Council. Commissioner Daniels asked if other businesses in the industrial area could come forward with similar requests/variations from the code. Mr. del Angel responded stating that other businesses could in fact do so, however, that there are little to no other businesses in the industrial area. Commissioner Pease made a motion to approve the minor plat, seconded by Commissioner Okafor. Chairman Demko called for a vote, the motion passed /. PUBLIC HEARING Open or continue public hearing, consider testimony and other information provided, close public hearing, and take necessary action with respect to the following:

5 MP&Z 11/19/ HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A REQUEST BY RICHARD SHELDON TO APPROVE A REPLAT FOR THE SUNNYVALE CENTRE ADDITION PHASE 1 AT OR ABOUT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF US HWY 8 AND SOUTH COLLINS ROAD (HWY 32) Director of Development Services, Rashad Jackson introduced the request. Staff Recommendation Town staff recommends approval contingent to addressing all Staff comments. Town staff has found that the request meets all other requirements of the Unified Development Ordinance and Sunnyvale Centre MPD-1. Background The subject property is located within the Sunnyvale Centre master planned development. The property was originally platted as part of the Sunnyvale Centre Phase 1 addition. The applicant has submitted a replat for the subject property to prepare for future development and long-term maintenance of the property. The key changes for the plat are noted below. The existing ring road (mutual access public road) will now be an individual lot which will be maintained by the property owner association for Sunnyvale Centre. The deed restrictions note the road as community property for the entire development. Per ordinance requirements, a 1 landscape buffer has been added along the interior portions of the ring road. Additional revisions will likely be required as future development happens within the site. Chairman Demko asked about some of the specific dimensions on the site plan to which Director Jackson answered stating that the ring road would be approximately 2 feet and that on both sides of the road and that there would be a 1-foot landscape buffer. He also stated that the intent behind the buffer was to go along with the pedestrian sidewalk in order to create safe connectivity from lot to lot within the master planned development. Public Hearing Open Larry Cates, 18 Quorum Drive, Dallas, TX spoke on behalf of the applicant stating that he was available to answer any questions the commissioners might have. Public Hearing Closed Commissioner Pease made a motion to approve the replat, seconded by Commissioner Mitchell. Chairman Demko called for a vote, the motion passed /.. HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A REQUEST BY THE TOWN OF SUNNYVALE TO APPROVE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TOWN UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (ORD. 17-9) DULY PASSED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL ON MARCH 26, 218; AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME; SO AS TO REVIEW AND AMEND SECTION 3.6 ZONING DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, SPECIFICALLY SECTION 3.6. FENCE STANDARDS; AS WELL AS ANY OTHER ASSOCIATED SECTIONS

6 MP&Z 11/19/218 Town Planner, Erick del Angel, presented the request. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the maximum height for front and rear yard fences be 8 feet for nonresidential properties with wrought iron being the required material of construction. Background Since the adoption of the Unified Development Code (UDO) in April Staff and Town Council have been amending and customizing various sections of the UDO to be in harmony with the rural yet refined style of Sunnyvale. Staff has now chosen to address noncommercial fencing regulations due to increasing inquiry by residents and local business owners. Public Hearing Open Public Hearing Closed Commissioner Kline asked which were the current legal nonconforming fences in Sunnyvale. Mr. del Angel pointed out on the map display which properties would have fences that would become legal nonconforming if the ordinance were to pass. Chairman Demko stated that he did have some problems with limitng the fences to eight feet because it would mean that a gate would only be eight feet tall which would limit certain vehicles, mainly emergency vehicles, from getting through. A discussion was had concerning exceptions for fences taller than eight feet which would be approved through a site plan. Commissioner Moss made a motion to approve the amendment for eight foot tall commercial fencing with exceptions for taller fences given in the site plan process, seconded by Commissioner Burton. Chairman Demko called for a vote, the motion passed /. 6. HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A REQUEST BY THE TOWN OF SUNNYVALE TO APPROVE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TOWN UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (ORD. 17-9) DULY PASSED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL ON MARCH 26, 218; AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME; SO AS TO REVIEW AND AMEND SECTION 3.6 ZONING DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, SPECIFICALLY SECTION SIGN REGULATIONS; AS WELL AS OTHER ASSOCIATED SECTIONS Town Planner, Erick del Angel, presented the request. Staff Recommendation Staff is seeking approval of the addition of an ordinance addressing residential subdivision directional signage. Background Due to a recent increase in unregulated signage in residential subdivisions, Staff recommends creating new regulations for residential development signage. This decision is coupled with the fact that the existing UDO does not address signage for large subdivisions with amenities

7 scattered throughout its boundaries. The UDO currently only addresses directional signs in nonresidential terms (e.g. bank drive-thru, fast food drive-thru, etc.) MP&Z 11/19/218 With the uptick in development within Stoney Creek, Staff has noted new directional signage being installed for amenities within the development. Although Stoney Creek is the only subdivision with directional signs, Staff feels that it would be in the Town s best interest to implement regulations for all current and future subdivisions. Commissioner Daniels asked why Staff is recommending that the signage at the entrances be taken down to which Director Jackson responded that they were installed without proper Town Staff review and could actually be treated like a development sign which have stricter regulations. Commissioner Mitchell added that the signs are all cluttered in one area and that the area actually contains the amenities being advertised so there is no point in them being there. Director Jackson further stated that they shouldn t even be allowed as development signs since they have passed the threshold of development allowed. Commissioner Daniels asked at what point they are no longer allowed to which Director Jackson responded that once 9% of the lots have been developed the signs are no longer allowed. A discussion was had concerning the difference between the various types of signage. Commissioner Pease praised Mr. del Angel for the maps and signage renderings which he prepared for the meeting of which Mr. del Angel thanked him. Chairman Demko stated that he liked the idea of having a maximum allowance of ten signs and then more based on larger development. He stated that he would like to see the addition of a clause to keep signage from being installed in the sight-visibility triangle. Director Jackson and Mr. del Angel responded to Chairman Demko s question by stating that the visibility triangle he is referring to is mentioned in various other parts of the UDO. They also stated that the setbacks will ensure that the signage is installed outside of the triangle. Commissioner Okafor asked why Code Enforcement has allowed the signage to remain to which Director Jackson stated that most of those signs were installed at the very beginning of the development before we had a full time code officer and we are now addressing it because the number of unpermitted signs has risen dramatically. Public Hearing Open Public Hearing Closed Commissioner Mitchell made a motion to approve the amendment with the addition of a clause forbidding installation within the visibility triangle, seconded by Commissioner Okafor. Chairman Demko called for a vote, the motion passed /. ADJOURN Chairman Demko adjourned the meeting at 7:42 p.m.

8 MP&Z 11/19/218 The undersigned presiding officer certifies that this is a true and correct record of the proceedings. Ken Demko, Chairman ATTEST: Rachel Ramsey, Town Secretary

9 Town of Sunnyvale Town Secretary Fiscal Year January 22, 219 Prepared By: Rashad Jackson, AICP Director of Development Services DISCUSSON/ACTION ITEM CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A REQUEST BY COLLIN HELFFRICH TO APPROVE A FINAL PLAT FOR STONEY CREEK PHASE 2F AT OR ABOUT 334 JOBSON ROAD. Staff Recommendation Town staff has the following comments/recommendations for consideration: 1. Staff recommends approval. All staff review comments have been addressed by the applicant. The proposed final plat is in accordance with the development standards for the property. 2. The applicant is subject to the payment of traffic mitigation fees in accordance with Ordinance No. 463 at $1,1 per lot to be paid at final plat approval. Fee amount - $88, 3. The applicant is subject to an escrow payment for the future construction of an underground crossing near Nance and N. Collins Road. Ordinance No.463 requires payment of the funds at the completion of Tract 2 for Stoney Creek. Phase 2F will finalize the development of Tract 2 for the Stoney Creek development. The escrow amount was approved during the preliminary plat review for the phase. Approved Escrow Amount - $98, HOA documents will be required for the development with the recording of the final plat. Background The applicant is requesting final plat approval for Stoney Creek Phase 2F. The phase received preliminary plat approval from Town Council on November 13, 217. The applicant has returned to finalize the phase. The property is located east of Jobson Road, south of Stoney Creek Blvd, west of Benwick Drive and north of Falls Drive. The plat proposes a total of 8 single family residential lots approximately 17, 3, square feet in size. Open space lots will serve as a landscape buffer along the east, north and south sides of the development. The overall design of Phase 2F is consistent with the approved tentative development plan and preliminary plat for the phase. The tentative development plan was approved in May 216 with the following variations to the original Stoney Creek Concept plan. May 216 Tentative Development Plan approved variations Variation to the Stoney Creek Boulevard roadway alignment as seen in Ordinance No. 463 Exhibit C Concept Plan. The reason for this variation is to avoid the Water of United States (WOUS) that was determined to be located on this property. The WOUS is located within the called Lot 1X Block A. 1

10 The minimum lot width for any sized lot shall be 1 feet minimum. Width measurement shall be as set forth in the Town of Sunnyvale s Zoning Ordinance Chapter 2: Definitions. Deviation from the typical planting of a Red Tipped Photinia as called out in Ordinance No. 463 Exhibit D Open Space & Trail Plan. Due to the growing environment the Town has requested we provide Chinese Photinia in lieu thereof. Ordinance No. 463 calls out for a water feature to be within the Stoney Creek Boulevard median. After discussions with the Town, it is in our opinion the water feature called out in Ord. No. 463 was the WOUS area. Due to the Corp restrictions we are avoiding the WOUS with a slight variation to the Stoney Creek Blvd alignment. In doing this the water feature now is located along side Stoney Creek Blvd in lieu of within the median. No variations are requested of the Open Space and Landscape Buffers. To keep the consistency of previously approved plats, the Open Space and Landscape Buffer terms and calculations will be as shown on the Tract 2 Open Space Exhibit. It shall be noted this exhibit was previously approved at the time of Stoney Creek Phase 2G Preliminary Plat approval. Alley requirement shall be waived for lots less than 2, square feet. The minimum setback requirements shall be as set forth in the Town of Sunnyvale s Zoning Ordinance Chart 3.2: Area Standards for Residential Lots except for Lots 1-1 Block G and Lot 13 Block H shall have a front build line and 3 rear build line and Lot 9 Block H shall have a 4 front build line and 3 rear build line. Town staff has evaluated the proposed plat against the Zoning Ordinance, Subdivision Ordinance and the more specific requirements for a PRO contained within Ordinance No Density and Lot Count Requirements The subject property is zoned PD (SF-3 PRO), Single Family Residential 3 Planned Residential Overlay. Per ordinance 463, the total number of dwelling units provided within Tract 2 of Stoney Creek shall not exceed 472 lots. To date, Tract 2 has a total of 39 platted lots. Upon completion of 3

11 Phase 2F (8 lots), Tract 2 will have a final total of 47 lots. The density upon completion of Tract 2 will be 1.42 dwelling units per acre. In accordance with the approved variations for Phase 2F, the final plat notes the following lot sizes. Number of Units Lot Size 2 1, 17,999 square feet 33 18, 23,999 square feet 4 Greater than or equal to 24, square feet The Stoney Creek development ordinance 463 was adopted under previous zoning regulations for the Town. Previous regulations required the following lot width, lot depth, and setbacks for residential lots. Under the base zoning district requirements, setbacks and lot width requirements for lots within the size ranges noted above were as follows: Lot Size Width Front Setback Side Setback Rear Setback 14, to 19, , to 34, The final plat maintains the required minimum setback requirements noted above except for the following variations. The lot variations below were approved with the approval of the tentative development plan and preliminary plat. Lots 1-1 Block G and Lot 13 Block H has a front build line and 3 rear build line Lot 9 Block H has a 4 front build line and 3 rear build line. The minimum lot width for any sized lot shall be 1 feet minimum. Landscaped Buffer Areas and Open Space Perimeter landscape buffering is required for Tract 2 of the Stoney Creek development. The minimum buffer area is required to be twenty-five (2) feet in width. The final plat shows a perimeter buffer along the east, north and south side of the phase. The plat and constructed site are consistent with the approved open space/landscape concept plan and buffer requirement for Stoney Creek. Tract 2 requires a total of 4.64 acres of open space be provided. Once complete, approximately acres of open space will be provided for within Tract 2 based on the open space plan. Access and Infrastructure Direct access is provided to Phase 2F from Jobson Road and Stoney Creek Blvd. A two lane extension of Stoney Creek Blvd was constructed as part of this phase. When opened for public use, the extension will complete the connection of Stoney Creek Blvd from N. Collins Road to Jobson Road. The Stoney Creek ordinance notes that a water feature shall be developed within the median of the proposed Stoney Creek Blvd extensions, as depicted on the Concept Plan. Upon review, the applicant found that the proposed alignment would go through a restricted area designated by the Army Corp. of Engineers as the Waters of the U.S. In order to avoid the restricted area and realign the roadway extension, the applicant was required to remove the large median water feature. The realignment / revision was noted and approved with the tentative development plan and preliminary plat for the phase. 4

12 Trail Development Tract 2 Ordinance No. 463 stipulates, An Americans with Disabilities Act compliant above-grade crossing shall be constructed over Collins Road within a portion of Nance Road (if abandoned by the Town Council) or in such other suitable location as selected by the Town Council in order to connect the pedestrian and bicycle trails and to provide safe access to the Nature Center, continuation of the trail to Tract 4, and the public school. The design of the above-grade crossing shall be in accordance with Exhibit G-1. The crossing is shown as part of the development requirements of Stoney Creek Tract 2. In 216, a survey of Stoney Creek residents noted that the neighborhood preferred an underground trail connection when compared to an above grade or at grade crossing. Town Council requested that the developer move forward with the underground crossing proposal. The underground crossing will be located directly east of the Tract 2 amenity center and south of Nance Road (as shown below). During review of the tunnel, it was suggested that it would be best to delay the construction of the underground crossing so that it may be done simultaneously with the future roadway expansion of Collins Road. Subsequently, Town Council approved the Phase 2F preliminary plat contingent to an escrow account being established for the underground pedestrian crossing construction cost. For the escrow, the applicant was required to submit a cost estimate for the proposed crossing which was reviewed by the Town Engineer. The cost estimate was noted as satisfactory by the Town Engineer. The approved cost estimate is attached and shall be submitted upon final plat approval of Phase 2F. Fiscal Impact Phase 2F Mitigation Fee At the final plat stage, ordinance No. 463 requires that the developer contribute $1,1 per lot for traffic mitigation fees. This would equate to $88,2 for phase 2F. These fees are to be set aside for two (2) designated roadway projects: Collins Rd (from Town East to Tripp Rd) and

13 Tripp Rd/Collins Rd intersection improvements. To date, $619,. has been contributed to the fund (not including +$88, for phase 2F). Tract 2 Tunnel Escrow Ordinance No. 463 stipulates, An Americans with Disabilities Act compliant above-grade crossing shall be constructed over Collins Road within a portion of Nance Road (if abandoned by the Town Council) or in such other suitable location as selected by the Town Council in order to connect the pedestrian and bicycle trails and to provide safe access to the Nature Center, continuation of the trail to Tract 4, and the public school. The design of the above-grade crossing shall be in accordance with Exhibit G-1. (Revised to underground crossing) The crossing is noted as part of the development requirements of Stoney Creek Tract 2. Approved Escrow Amount - $98,92.79 Attachments Location Map Stoney Creek Phase 2F Final Plat Stoney Creek Below Grade Pedestrian Crossing - Construction Escrow Estimate 6

14 DCAD ID: Stoney Creek 2F This product is for informational purposes only and may not have been prepared for or be suitable for legal, engineering, or surveying purposes. It does not represent an on-the-ground survey and represents only the approximate relative location of property boundaries. - Dallas Central Appraisal District 2949 N Stemmons Freeway Dallas, TX (214) inch equals 1, feet 8 1,6 3,2 ft m DCAD, NCTCOG, USGS, Esri.Inc

15 GRAPHIC SCALE D D D Y:\1214\1214-2FFP.dwg, FP1, 12/19/218 7::32 AM, tmoss, Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc., TDM DOWDEY, ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, IN 22 Village Creek Drive, Suite 2 Plano, Texas STATE REGISTRATION NUMBER: F-399 SURVEY FIRM REGISTRATION NUMBER: 1778

16 GRAPHIC SCALE D D Y:\1214\1214-2FFP.dwg, FP2, 12/19/218 7::39 AM, tmoss, Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc., TDM DOWDEY, ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, IN 22 Village Creek Drive, Suite 2 Plano, Texas STATE REGISTRATION NUMBER: F-399 SURVEY FIRM REGISTRATION NUMBER: 1778

17

18 GRAPHIC SCALE Y:\1214\1214-Ped Crossing.dwg, 36X24, 9/6/217 1::36 PM, rcarreno, Dowdey, Anderson & Associates, Inc., RPC NO. DATE BY REVISION TOWN OF SUNNYVALE DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS DOWDEY, ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, IN 22 Village Creek Drive, Suite 2 Plano, Texas STATE REGISTRATION NUMBER: F-399 SURVEY FIRM REGISTRATION NUMBER: 1778 DESIGN DRAWN CHECKED DATE SCALE JOB SHEET TFK AS TFK 12/1/216 1"=2' PLATE NO.:

19 Stoney Creek Below Grade Pedestrian Crossing September 28, 217 ENGINEER'S OPINION OF PROBABLE COST ITEM NO. ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE TOTAL 1 8' x 8' RCBC 1 LF $ 7. $ 7,. 2 FW- Headwall on 8' x 8' RCBC (16' tall x 21' long) 2 EA $ 96,1. $ 192,3. 3 8' Conc Hike Trail 12 LF $ 7. $ 8,4. 4 ' x ' Y Inley w/ Conc Apron 2 EA $ 4,4. $ 8,91. Handrail 3 LF $ 1. $ 31,. 6 12" wide Slotted Drain 8 LF $ 32. $ 2, " RCP 16 LF $ 92. $ 14,72. 8 Temp Asphalt Paving on 6" Flex Base 1 SY $ 11. $ 11,. 9 Crushed Stone for Backfill 1 CY $ 4. $ 6,. 1 Trench Safety 26 LF $ 1.1 $ TV Storm Sewer 26 LF $ 2. $ ' Trail Tie in on Wet Side 3 LF $ 7. $ 21,. 13 Bollard 2 EA $. $ 1,. 14 Hydromulch & Temp Irrigation (for disturbed area) 14,4 SF $. $ 7,2. 1 Iron Fence (On top and along wings of headwall) 26 LF $ 42. $ 1, Lighting, Electrical, Misc 1% of items 1-13 $, Subtotal Construction $ 1, Construction Bonds 2% of item 17 $ 8, Engineering, Surveying & Material Testing 1% of item 17 $ 66, Project Subtotal $ 16, Inflation for 3% per year $ 82, TOTAL ESCROW AMOUNT $ 98,92.79 NOTES 1. ITEMS 1-11 ARE BASED OFF A BUDGET PROPOSAL FROM KCK DATED MAY 17, 217. (attached)

20 Town of Sunnyvale Town Secretary Fiscal Year January 22, 219 Prepared by: Erick del Angel Town Planner PUBLIC HEARING ITEM HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A REQUEST BY DON PING (PING INTEREST, INC.) TO CHANGE THE TOWN S FUTURE LAND USE PLAN FROM EMPLOYMENT (COMMERCIAL) TO MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL AND THE ZONING MAP FROM HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL AND SINGLE FAMILY-3 TO SINGLE FAMILY- PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CREEKVIEW COVES) Staff Recommendation More detailed plans and drawings would be provided at the Preliminary Plat level to ensure that every regulation required by Town ordinance has been adequately addressed. Town staff provides the following comments/recommendations for consideration: 1. Per Town Engineer review, a water capacity analysis will need to be performed prior to final design. If the concept plan is approved, it will be contingent upon positive results of said study. Study shall be submitted with future plat and civil plans if zoning is approved. 2. Per Town Engineer review, a flood study will need to be conducted to verify that there will be no negative impact on the floodplain as a result of the development. Study shall be submitted with future plat and civil plans if zoning is approved. 3. Per Town Planner review, a revised open space and trail plan will need to be submitted in order to reconcile discrepancies in measurements and lack of details of amenity center and trails materials. 4. Per Town Land Use Attorney review, in order to lock down the details of the age restriction requirements, our attorney noted that a development agreement should be done prior to the zone change or as a condition of approval.. Proposed developments/zone changes are required to adhere to the future land use intent of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff may not recommend approval of such requests that do not adhere to the land use plan. Staff notes that this proposal does not adhere to the land use plan; although a residential land use could be appropriate in the subject area. Due to the isolated location, retail/commercial may not to develop on the subject property as it is designated for Commercial on the land use plan. If the amendments are approved, a development agreement should be finalized within 9 days of approval of the Planned Development. Background The applicant has submitted a zone change request in order develop Creekview Coves, a proposed agerestricted residential planned development (PD). The PD will encompass approximately 8 acres south of Highway 8 and the overpass near Watha Drive (behind former Bull s Pen Café). The property is mostly undeveloped (aside from sheds and other agricultural equipment) and zoned SF-3, Single Family Residential and HC, Highway Commercial. The future land use category for the property is Employment (Commercial). With the exception of Community Life and Accent Antiques to the west and the former 1

21 Bull s Pen Café to the north, all surrounding land is undeveloped. All land lying to the south and southwest of the subject property is located within floodplain. The applicant proposes to rezone the property to allow for the development of a master planned community. The PD would use the SF-, single family residential zoning district as its underlying base zoning district. With a PD, an applicant can request variations from the base zoning district development standards with regard to lot size, design standards and proposed uses. The types of uses allowed and standards applicable to planned developments may vary from the base district with which the district combines. In order to proceed with the proposed development, the applicant has requested a zone change and future land use plan amendment for the subject property. Details of the planned development standards are attached to the staff memo. Comprehensive Plan / Future Land Use Plan The 217 Comprehensive Plan is the document that provides direction for the development of individual properties, according to the Town s vision. Individual development requests should fit into the overall development plan that has been prescribed in the comprehensive plan. Changes may be made to the comprehensive plan if it is believed that the change is more appropriate than what was initially proposed for the area. The comprehensive plan is a flexible document that should grow with the development of the Town. Employment (Commercial) Medium Density Residential The Future Land Use Plan designation for the subject site is Employment (Commercial). The 217 Comprehensive Plan notes that this designation is representative of commercial and office uses that provide employment opportunities. These uses are most suitable along the US Highway 8 corridor. With the proposed development, the applicant has requested a change of the Employment (Commercial) land use category to the Medium Density Residential land use category. The 217 Comprehensive Plan stipulates that the Medium Density category is intended to provide for the development of single-family homes on smaller lots. The land use can serve as a transition zone between large lot, single-family neighborhoods and commercial development. Medium Density Residential is generally lots between 7, sq. ft. and 24, sq. ft. (4. to 1.4 dwelling units per gross acre). If the future land use designation is changed, the proposed planned development would adhere to the development intent for the Medium Density Residential category. Considering the fact that the tracts of land proposed do not directly abut US 8, it would be unlikely that commercial businesses would acquire the land due to its lack of visibility from the highway. In addition, a portion of the subject property is zoned for residential development as shown on the second map. 2

22 Future Land Use Map excerpt Base Zoning District SF-3 Single Family and HC, Highway Commercial to SF- Single Family As noted, the applicant proposes to use SF- zoning district as the base zoning district for the proposed planned development. This will require a zone change from SF-3 and HC to SF-. A description of each district is noted below along with the district development standards. HC The Highway Commercial district (HC) is intended to accommodate a wide variety of commercial uses and have a general application as a highway service district. The minimum lot size is two (2) acres. SF- 3 The Single-Family Residential 3 district (SF-3) is intended for low density residential uses on large and medium size lots. This district is noted as appropriate where low-density urban development is desired and where public services exist or could reasonably be extended to the development. The minimum lot size is one (1) acre. The maximum base density is one (1) dwelling units per gross acre. SF- The Single-Family Residential district (SF-) is intended primarily for medium density single family uses on small lots. High density development may be permissible where certain criteria are met through the use of flexible planned residential development. The minimum lot size is 7, square feet. The maximum base density is four (4) dwelling units per gross acre. 3

23 Zoning Map excerpt Zoning District Dimensional Regulations HC, Highway Commercial SF-3, Single Family Residential SF-, Single Family Residential Minimum Lot Area 2 Acres 87,12 Square Feet 1 Acre - 43,6 Square Feet 7, Square Feet Maximum Density Per Gross Acre There is no maximum density. 1. Dwelling Units Per Gross Acre 4. Dwelling Units per Gross Acre Minimum Lot Width 2 Feet 17 Feet 7 Feet Minimum Lot Depth 2 Feet 17 Feet 7 Feet Minimum Front Yard Setback Feet 7 Feet 2 Feet Minimum Side Yard Setback Minimum Rear Yard Setback 2 Feet / Feet when adjacent to residential zoning district 2 Feet / Feet when adjacent to residential zoning district 3 Feet feet for one (1) side yard and 1 Feet for the other side yard 8 Feet 2 Feet Minimum Dwelling Unit Size District prohibits residency 2,2 Square Feet 1,6 Square Feet Maximum Height (feet) 6 Feet/Height shall not exceed a 1 to 3 slope when adjacent to Residential Zoning District 4 Feet-6 Feet** 4 Feet 4 Feet 4

24 Maximum Lot Area allowed to be Covered by Buildings 1% 3% % Creekview Coves Planned Development District SF- The purpose of a planned development district is to encourage higher quality development in the Town by allowing flexibility in the planning and development of projects. A PD, Planned Development may be used to permit new or innovative concepts in land utilization or diversification that could not be achieved under conventional zoning approaches. Any combination of residential, commercial, light industrial, public or recreational uses as approved by the Town Council may be permitted. A PD district is typically based on the conventional zoning district that most closely resembles the intensity and type of development anticipated. The SF- zoning district most closely represents the intent for the Creekview Coves planned development. Any use allowed by right in the base district of the PD district shall be permitted in the district, either by right or conditionally, unless the use is prohibited in the regulations adopted by the MPD ordinance. The Unified Development Ordinance stipulates a PD designation shall be used for the following purpose(s): a. Master planning; b. To carry out specific goals of the Comprehensive Plan, and Town or public/private partnered projects; c. Development of mixed use, transit-oriented, or traditional neighborhoods with a variety of uses and housing types; and d. To preserve natural features, open space, and other topographical features of the land. Proposed PD Standards & Dimensional Variations The proposed planned development will be constructed in accordance with the standards of SF-, Single- Family Residential district regulations EXCEPT FOR the variations highlighted in the charts below to the SF- dimensional regulations and development standards. All other details of the development will adhere to the base zoning district requirements. Zoning District Dimensional Regulations Minimum Lot Area Maximum Density Per Gross Acre SF-3, Single Family Residential (Standard) 1 Acre (43,6 Square Feet) 1. dwelling units per gross acre Creekview Coves Planned Development (Proposed) 6, Square Feet (typical lot size) 2.92 dwelling units per gross acres (including floodplain) 3.82 dwelling units per net acre (not including floodplain) SF-, Single Family Residential (Standard) 7, Square Feet 4. dwelling units per gross acre Minimum Lot Width 17 Feet Feet 7 Feet Minimum Front Yard Setback 7 Feet 2 Feet (homes with front entry garages) 1 Feet (homes with J-swing garages) 2 Feet Minimum Side Yard Setback 3 Feet Feet feet for one (1) side yard and 1 Feet for the other side yard

25 Minimum Rear Yard Setback 8 Feet 2 Feet 2 Feet Minimum Dwelling Unit Size 2,2 Square Feet 2,2 Square Feet 1,6 Square Feet Maximum Height (feet) 4 Feet 4 Feet 4 Feet Maximum Lot Area allowed to be Covered by Buildings 3% 6% % Additional Development Details Age-restriction for residents Open Space and Outdoor Recreation Required Lot Landscape SF-3, Single Family Residential (standard) There are no age restrictions in this or any zoning district in the Town In relation to a PD where open space improvements are to be provided, active recreation facilities shall be installed. a. Active recreation facilities include, but are not limited to, the following: i. Pedestrian pathways, located in street Right-of-Way or pedestrian easements, ii. Multi-purpose trails located in street Right-of-Way or other open space, iii. Trails for equestrians, or iv. Nature trails. Each residential lot shall be required to have two (2) canopy trees in the front yard and one (1) canopy tree in the back yard. Creekview Coves Planned Development (Proposed) The development is intended for persons fifty-five () years of age or older, subject to the rights reserved by declarant Trails have been shown on the concept plan, however, the applicant will need to reconcile discrepancies in measurements and the lack of detail of the amenity center and trails materials before final plat is approved. Each lot shall be required to have one (1) canopy tree in the front yard and no canopy tree in the back yard SF-, Single Family Residential (Standard) There are no age restrictions in this or any zoning district in the Town In relation to a PD where open space improvements are to be provided, active recreation facilities shall be installed. a. Active recreation facilities include, but are not limited to, the following: i. Pedestrian pathways, located in street Right-of-Way or pedestrian easements, ii. Multi-purpose trails located in street Right-of-Way or other open space, iii. Trails for equestrians, or iv. Nature trails. Each residential lot shall be required to have two (2) canopy trees in the front yard and one (1) canopy tree in the back yard. Homeowner Association Homeowners association only required when open space is included with a base SF-4 development Park Land Dedication New subdivisions are subject to payment of Park Land Fees and Dedications. The Town-wide park fee is $2,8.62 per dwelling unit. The Town-wide park fee is intended to offset the cost of the Town-wide trail system. In lieu of the imposed park fee, the developer of any area zoned to be used for single-family or multifamily residential purposes within the Town may elect to apply a contribution of dedication of park land acceptable to the Town at the rate of one (1) acre of land per dwelling units, with the minimum park land site being at least five () acres in size. Garage Orientation The Town prohibits frontentry garages. All homes will be part of a mandatory homeowners association Thus far, there has been no mention of park land dedication; however, it will need to be addressed by development ordinance standards. Front-entry garages will be primarily used. Homeowners association only required when open space is included with a base SF-4 development New subdivisions are subject to payment of Park Land Fees and Dedications. The Townwide park fee is $2,8.62 per dwelling unit. The Town-wide park fee is intended to offset the cost of the Town-wide trail system. In lieu of the imposed park fee, the developer of any area zoned to be used for single-family or multifamily residential purposes within the Town may elect to apply a contribution of dedication of park land acceptable to the Town at the rate of one (1) acre of land per dwelling units, with the minimum park land site being at least five () acres in size. The Town prohibits front-entry garages. 6

26 Recommendation from Town Engineer Considering the density of the development and the fact that it directly abuts floodplain to the south and southwest, the Town Engineer feels that a flood study should be conducted to verify that there will be no negative impact on the floodplain as a result of the development. In addition, due to the slope of the land and current infrastructure in the area, a water capacity analysis will need to be performed prior to final design. If the concept plan is approved, it will be contingent upon positive results of said study. Public Notice Public notice was provided to the Town s Official Newspaper for publication by December 26, 218. Letters were also sent to abutting property owners. A total of eight (8) letters were mailed. As of the release of the staff memo, the following responses had been received. In Favor In Opposition Attachments Location Map Applicant Letter Creekview Coves PD development standards & concept plan exhibits 7

27 TOWN OF SUNNYVALE TH WA Creekview Coves - Planned Development AD R Feet 74 Legend Property owners within 2' Lot proposed for development 8 F

28 Ping Interest, INC. PO Box Dallas, TX 7379 November 16, 218 Town of Sunnyvale Planning Department 127 Collins Rd Sunnyvale, Texas 7182 Re: Letter of Intent Rezoning PD Request To Whom It May Concern, Ping Interest, INC respectfully submits the rezoning request for the Town of Sunnyvale s review on behalf of Ocampo s Brothers LLC and Fausto Martinez. The subject properties total plus acres and is located on south of US 8, between Collins Road and Lawson Road. The intent is to develop the subject properties into one single family housing development. The proposed project site is currently zoned as HC and SF 3 and are owned by two individual parties. Both parties haven given consent to selling their individual lots, 36 acres pertain to Ocampo s Brother LLC. (3 E. Tripp Rd. Sunnyvale, Texas 7182) and 19 acres belongs to Fausto Martinez (3 E. Tripp Rd. Sunnyvale, Texas 7182). With this letter and the attached documents, we request the proposed subject property to be rezoned from HC and SF 3 to PD Planned Development District Ordinance with base SF, Single Family Residential District zoning. The subject property is an ideal candidate to be rezoned as SF, Single Family Residential District due to the location on HWY 8 and adjacent land uses. The intent of this rezone PD application is to modify the base SF requirements to allow for product types consisting of wide homes, while maintaining a density gross rate of approximately 2. units per gross acre. The proposed development targets the active adult population segment, limited to residences years and older. If further information is required for the City s review of this zoning package request, please contact: Matt Duenwald, Kimley Horn & Associates, Inc., , Duenwald, Matt <matt.duenwald@kimley horn.com> Bill Dahlstrom, Jackson Walker, LLP , Dahlstrom, Bill <wdahlstrom@jw.com> Brian Mayes, Mayes Media Group, , Brian Mayes <brianmayes@mayesmediagroup.com> Sincere regards, Donald Ping Ping Interest, INC. T: C: E: don.pinginterest@gmail.com

29 E. FORK RD. GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET x34 Land Use Acreage Summary PL 6' ' 2'RYSB Lot Type Summary x % Total 17 B/C Gross 2.7 CL Net of Floodplain TYPICAL LOT (' x 12') X. LOC ATION FUTUR TXDOT E RIG HT OF WAY APPRO NOTES: 1) FLOODPLAIN LINES FROM FEMA NFHL DIGITAL DATA, 218 2) TOPOGRAPHIC DATA FROM TNRIS LIDAR, CALLED ACRES 4 FINAL PLAT OCAMPO PLAZA INST # O.P.R.D.C.T. ZONED: HC USE: COMMERCIAL TRACT 13 PATRICIA GREENSHAW INST. # O.P.R.D.C.T. ZONED: HC USE: VACANT HIGHW AY 8 LONG CREEK RD. D. AR ECC REB FUTURE STREET CONNECTION ORNAMENTAL FENCING FOR LOTS BACKING FLOOD PLAIN FEMA NFHL FLOODWAY 4 WATHA DR. STATE 42 6' TRAIL PECAN CREEK DR. LONG CREEK RD. LARKIN RD. north CALLED ACRES FINAL PLAT OF VALDEZ-HWY 8 ADDITION BLOCK A, LOT 1 INST # O.P.R.D.C.T. ZONED: SF-3, SF-4 USE: AG S. PASCHALL RD. 43 E. FORK RD. CALLED 2 ACRES FMDA KHAFAF LLC INST. NO O.P.R.D.C.T. ZONED: SF-3, SF-4 USE: AG 43 VICINITY MAP SCALE 1:2 EXHIBIT "C" CONCEPT PLAN Creekview Coves FEMA NFHL ZONE "AE" FEMA NFHL FLOODWAY BEING 7.79 AC. IN THE THOMAS COATES SURVEY ABSTRACT #33, IN THE TOWN OF SUNNYVALE, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS OPENING FOR UTILITIES 4 6' TRAIL 4 CALLED ACRES TEXAS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY VOLUME 317, PAGE 327 D.R.D.C.T. ZONED SF-3, SF-4, HC / USE: UTILITIES File Path: \\dalfp1\data\project\dal_civil\no_proj\dsf_ Sunnyvale\Cad\Exhibits\PlanSheets\Zoning\Exhibit C.dwg Total Density Summary (Units per Acre) :37:22am 4.7 2'BL CALLED ACRES RONALD G. ROBISON VOL , PG. 37 O.P.R.D.C.T. ZONED: HC USE: COMMERCIAL 41 Date: January 11, 219 Residential Lots / Residential Rights of Way AMENITY CENTER 42 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc Plotted By: Bussell, Allen 41 CALLED ACRES FINAL PLAT MLLER ADDITION VOL PG. 861 O.P.R.D.C.T. ZONED: HC USE: COMMERCIAL US H IGHW AY 8 APPR OX. LO CA FUTU RE RIG TION TXDO T HT OF WAY.' 7'PAD 12' 1'BL 4'PAD Floodplain LOT 3, BLOCK 1 WHITEHURST ADDITION NO. 1 INST. NO O.P.R.D.C.T. ZONED: SF-4 USE: RESIDENTIAL REMAINING PORTIN OF A CALLED ACRES SANFORD H. WHITEHURST, JR. AND WIFE, MARTHA RUTH WHITEHURST VOLUME 3264, PAGE 378 D.R.D.C.T. TO WILLIAM JOE WHITEHURST INST. NO O.P.R.D.C.T. ZONED: SF-4 USE: AG OPENING FOR UTILITIES APPLICANT / OWNER: OWNER: ENGINEER / SURVEYOR: Ping Interest, Inc. Contact: Don Ping 181 Dallas Parkway Addison, TX 71 P: (214) E: don.pinginterest@gmail.com OCampo Brothers, LTD 619 Creekbend Court Mesquite, TX 7149 (214) Phone: edmtz2@att.net Kimley-Horn and Associates Contact: Matt Duenwald, PE State of Texas Registration No. F Noel Road Two Galleria Office Tower, Suite 7 Dallas, Texas 724 P (972) OWNER: TRACT 1 (CALLED 7.62 ACRES) FAUSTO MARTINEZ AND WIFE, MARIA MARTINEZ INST. NO O.P.R.D.C.T. ZONED: SF-4 USE: AG Martinez Fausto 3 East Tripp Road Sunnyvale, TX 7182 Phone: (214) edmtz2@att.net Date: November 218 Revision: December 218

30 E. FORK RD. Land Use Acreage Summary GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET Floodplain 12.7 Ac. Residential Lots / Residential Rights of Way 41.1 Ac. Total 3.8 Ac. 22x34 Lot Type Summary x12 17 Lots Total 17 PL 6' ' Density Summary (Units per Acre) 2'RYSB.' 7'PAD 12' 1'BL 4'PAD 2.9 U/Ac. Gross Net of Floodplain 3.8 U/Ac. Open Space Summary 3.8 Ac. Gross Area US H IGHW AY 8 Trail Summary (Linear Feet) % Within Floodplain 1 37.% Total X. LOC ATION FUTUR TXDOT E RIG HT OF WAY APPRO Outside of Floodplain LF CALLED 2 ACRES FMDA KHAFAF LLC INST. NO O.P.R.D.C.T. ZONED: SF-3, SF-4 USE: AG TRACT 13 PATRICIA GREENSHAW INST. # O.P.R.D.C.T. ZONED: HC USE: VACANT CALLED ACRES FINAL PLAT OF VALDEZ-HWY 8 ADDITION BLOCK A, LOT 1 INST # O.P.R.D.C.T. ZONED: SF-3, SF-4 USE: AG S. PASCHALL RD. 43 E. FORK RD LF LF WATHA DR. STATE HIGHW AY 8 LONG CREEK RD. D. AR ECC REB FUTURE STREET CONNECTION 11 LF 41 PROPOSED 6' TRAIL (IN FLOODPLAIN) (typ) PECAN CREEK DR LONG CREEK RD. LARKIN RD. ORNAMENTAL FENCING FOR LOTS BACKING FLOOD PLAIN 41 VICINITY MAP SCALE 1:2 6 LF 41 FEMA NFHL FLOODWAY 4 north 2 LF EXHIBIT "D" OPEN SPACE PLAN Creekview Coves FEMA NFHL ZONE "AE" FEMA NFHL FLOODWAY 7 LF BEING 3.79 AC. IN THE THOMAS COATES SURVEY ABSTRACT #33, IN THE TOWN OF SUNNYVALE, DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS 4 LF OPENING FOR UTILITIES 1 LF 4 17 LF 4 LOT 3, BLOCK 1 WHITEHURST ADDITION NO. 1 INST. NO O.P.R.D.C.T. ZONED: SF-4 USE: RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED 6' TRAIL (OUTSIDE FLOODPLAIN) (typ) CALLED ACRES TEXAS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY VOLUME 317, PAGE 327 D.R.D.C.T. ZONED SF-3, SF-4, HC / USE: UTILITIES NOTES: 1) FLOODPLAIN LINES FROM FEMA NFHL DIGITAL DATA, 218 2) TOPOGRAPHIC DATA FROM TNRIS LIDAR, CALLED ACRES 4 FINAL PLAT OCAMPO PLAZA INST # O.P.R.D.C.T. ZONED: HC USE: COMMERCIAL % TYPICAL LOT (' x 12') File Path: \\dalfp1\data\project\dal_civil\no_proj\dsf_ Sunnyvale\Cad\Exhibits\PlanSheets\Zoning\Exhibit D.dwg 1% Proposed Open Space Provided CALLED ACRES RONALD G. ROBISON VOL , PG. 37 O.P.R.D.C.T. ZONED: HC USE: COMMERCIAL 41 4:13:7pm UDO Required Open Space CL Date: January 1, Ac. B/C 41 CALLED ACRES FINAL PLAT MLLER ADDITION VOL PG. 861 O.P.R.D.C.T. ZONED: HC USE: COMMERCIAL Open Space / Amenity Center 2'BL AMENITY CENTER Plotted By: Bussell, Allen This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 3 APPR OX. LO CA FUTU RE RIG TION TXDO T HT OF WAY 43 REMAINING PORTIN OF A CALLED ACRES SANFORD H. WHITEHURST, JR. AND WIFE, MARTHA RUTH WHITEHURST VOLUME 3264, PAGE 378 D.R.D.C.T. TO WILLIAM JOE WHITEHURST INST. NO O.P.R.D.C.T. ZONED: SF-4 USE: AG 26 LF 12 LF OPENING FOR UTILITIES APPLICANT / OWNER: OWNER: ENGINEER / SURVEYOR: Ping Interest, Inc. Contact: Don Ping 181 Dallas Parkway Addison, TX 71 P: (214) E: don.pinginterest@gmail.com OCampo Brothers, LTD 619 Creekbend Court Mesquite, TX 7149 (214) Phone: edmtz2@att.net Kimley-Horn and Associates Contact: Matt Duenwald, PE State of Texas Registration No. F Noel Road Two Galleria Office Tower, Suite 7 Dallas, Texas 724 P (972) OWNER: TRACT 1 (CALLED 7.62 ACRES) FAUSTO MARTINEZ AND WIFE, MARIA MARTINEZ INST. NO O.P.R.D.C.T. ZONED: SF-4 USE: AG Martinez Fausto 3 East Tripp Road Sunnyvale, TX 7182 Phone: (214) edmtz2@att.net Date: November 218 Revision: December 218

31 A. Base Zoning a. SF-, Single Family Residential B. Land Use Regulations a. Amenity Center is a permitted use. Creekview Coves PD Ordinance (Draft) C. Dimensional Regulations a. Lot Dimensions i. Minimum Lot Area = 6, square feet ii. Maximum Density Per Gross Acre = 4. Dwelling Units Per Acre iii. Minimum Lot Width = feet iv. Minimum Lot Depth = 1 feet b. Yard Setback Dimension i. Minimum Front Yard Setback (Front Garages) = 2 feet ii. Minimum Front Yard Setback (J-Swing Garages) = 1 feet iii. Minimum Side Yard Setback = feet iv. Minimum Rear Yard Setback = 2 feet c. Dwelling Unit Size i. Minimum Dwelling Unit Size = 2,2 square feet d. Structure Height i. Minimum Height = 4 feet e. Building Coverage Area = 6% D. Development Standards a. Landscape Regulations i. Single-Family Residential Requirements a. A minimum of one (1) Shade Trees shall be provided in the front yard of each lot for all residential subdivisions. These required trees shall be from different species. b. Design Standards i. Exterior Building Materials a. Residential Development a. The use of masonry stucco, as a masonry material, may not exceed percent of the exterior walls. ii. Architectural Standards a. Garage Orientation and Access a. Front entry garages are allowed. c. Supplemental Regulations a. Mailboxes a. Mailbox banks are allowed.

32 E. Age Restriction The development is intended to provide housing primarily for persons fifty-five () years of age or older, subject to the rights reserved to Declarant. The Properties shall be operated as an age restricted community in compliance with all applicable state and federal laws. No person under nineteen (19) years of age shall stay overnight in any Property for more than ninety (9) days in any consecutive twelve (12) month period. And no representation of residency by the Property Owner or Occupant for any person under 19 years of age for any reason. Each Property, if occupied, shall be occupied by at least one (1) individual () years of age or older; provided, however, that once a Property is occupied by an Age-Qualified Occupant, other Qualified Residents of the Property may continue to occupy the Property, regardless of the termination of the Age-Qualified Occupant s occupancy. Notwithstanding the above, at all times, at least ninety percent (9%) of the Property s within the Subdivision shall be occupied by at least one (1) individual years of age or older. The Board shall establish policies and procedures from time to time as necessary to monitor and maintain its status as an age restricted community under state and federal law. The Association shall provide, or contract for provision of those facilities and services designed to meet the physical and social needs of older persons as may be required under such laws. The provisions of this Section may be enforced by the Association administratively under Covenant restrictions and/ or by action in law or in equity, including, without limitation, an injunction requiring specific performance herein.

33 Sunnyvale Plus Preliminary Concepts Creekview Coves

34

35 Preliminary Entry Sketch

36

37 Preliminary Amenities Center

38 Preliminary Creekview Sketch

39 Preliminary Character

40 Preliminary Conceptual Elevations

41 Town of Sunnyvale Town Secretary Fiscal Year 212 January 22, 219 Prepared by: Erick del Angel, Town Planner Rashad Jackson, AICP Dev. Serv. Director PUBLIC HEARING ITEM HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON A REQUEST BY THE TOWN OF SUNNYVALE TO APPROVE AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TOWN UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (ORD. 17-9) DULY PASSED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL ON MARCH 26, 218; AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME; SO AS TO REVIEW AND AMEND SECTION B SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATIONS, AS WELL AS ANY OTHER ASSOCIATED SECTIONS. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff has proposed an amendment to add design criteria for centralized mail boxes. The criteria will be used by developers when installing these units. Please note, in some cases the USPS may override the suggested Town locations if they approve a specific location for their delivery route. Staff is seeking feedback and recommendations for the proposed amendment. BACKGROUND USPS has mandated that all new developments utilize centralized mailboxes (also known as cluster box units) as opposed to individual mailbox units. Staff surveyed existing centralized mailboxes within the Town limits and they are shown below. Staff reviewed installation design options in other cities as well. Staff has proposed these regulations in order to address design concerns and negative feedback received for the placement and style of current centralized mailboxes. The centralized mailboxes shown above are in the Homestead and Stoney Creek subdivisions. 1

42 Placement / Locations Most of the feedback received from residents concern the locations of the units. The USPS typically requests the units be placed midblock at a shared lot line in front of or on the side of a lot. If open spaces exist nearby, the USPS may locate multiple units within the open space area. Examples below are from a neighborhood in Rockwall which show units placed midblock as noted above. Staff believes there are better aesthetically pleasing locations for these cluster mailbox units. Staff suggests requiring open spaces be mandated as the first choice when considering placement of these units. The open space areas would provide adequate room for mail delivery and resident pick-up without obstructing anyone s home. Staff hopes that the proposed regulation will assist developers when they are initially designing a subdivision in order to get more advantageous placement for the mail boxes during USPS review. If developers do not plan to have this style of mail delivery at the onset of design you end up with mail box placements similar to what is show above. 2

43 When clustered, a canopy could be used to help protect those picking up their mail. It would also provide for a more upscale appearance for the mail boxes. Please note, in some cases the USPS may override the suggested Town location if they require a specific location based their delivery route. The design style of the mail box must also adhere to USPS mail box standards. Various canopies and structures are shown in the examples below. Public Notice Public notice was provided to the Town s Official Newspaper for publication by December 26 th, 218. Given that this is a text amendment initiated by the Town, which does not specifically affect one property, written letters were not provided to specific property owners. Attachments Ordinance 19-xx 3

44 TOWN OF SUNNYVALE, TEXAS ORDINANCE 19-xx AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE TOWN UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE (ORD. 17-9) DULY PASSED BY THE TOWN COUNCIL ON MARCH 26, 218; AS AMENDED FROM TIME TO TIME; SO AS TO REVIEW AND AMEND SECTION B SUPPLEMENTAL REGULATIONS, AS WELL AS ANY OTHER ASSOCIATED SECTIONS, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, notice of the public hearings was published according to state law; and WHEREAS, the Town Council has received and considered the recommendations of the Planning and Zoning Commission; and WHEREAS, the Town Council hereby finds that it is in the best interest of the Town of Sunnyvale, taking into consideration the public health, safety, and welfare, to adopt amendments to the text of the Zoning Ordinance as set forth herein; NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Town Council of the Town of Sunnyvale, Texas: SECTION 1. That the foregoing recitals are found to be true and correct in all respects. SECTION 2. That the text of the Unified Development Ordinance, Ordinance No. 17-9, of the Town of Sunnyvale, Texas is hereby amended as shown in Exhibit 1, which is attached to this Ordinance, and which is incorporated by reference herein as if fully set forth. The proposed zoning amendments, as set forth in Exhibit 1 attached hereto, are hereby adopted and the Town of Sunnyvale Zoning Ordinance Text is revised accordingly. SECTION 3. That it is the intent of the Town Council that each paragraph, sentence, subdivision, clause, phrase, or section of the ordinance be deemed severable and should any such paragraph, sentence, subdivision, clause, phrase or section be declared invalid or unconstitutional for any reason, such declaration of invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not be construed to affect the validity of those provisions of this ordinance left standing with the validity of any code or ordinance as a whole. SECTION 4. All ordinance and provisions of the Town of Sunnyvale, Texas, that are in conflict with this Ordinance shall be and the same are hereby repealed to the extent in conflict, and all ordinances and provisions or ordinances of said Town not so expressly repealed are hereby retained in full force and effect.

45 SECTION. That this ordinance shall take effect upon adoption by Town Council. PASSED AND APPROVED by the Town Council, the Town of Sunnyvale, on the 2th day of February 219. ATTEST: Mayor Saji George Rachel Ramsey, Town Secretary

46 Section 3: Zoning Regulations Supplemental Regulations Town of Sunnyvale: Unified Development Ordinance EXHIBIT 1 A. Construction Standards Residential a. All residential buildings and structures shall be of exterior fire resistant construction in accordance with the Town s building code and fire prevention code. b. Residential homes with an area under roof of over, square feet are required to be sprinklered. Nonresidential a. Fire sprinkler requirements for commercial buildings shall comply with Building Standards. b. Glass walls shall include glass curtain walls or glass block construction. c. Glass curtain walls shall be defined as an exterior wall which carries no structural loads, and which may consist of the combination of metal, glass, or other surfacing material supported in a metal framework. B. Individual Mail Boxes 1. Mail boxes shall be constructed entirely of the following materials: a. Aluminum, b. Wrought iron, c. Stone, d. Brick, or e. Cast stone. 2. The use of wood for mailbox construction is prohibited. 3. The post and supporting structure for a mail box shall be constructed of the following materials: a. Wrought iron, b. Stone, or c. Brick. C. Centrailized Mail Boxes 1. Mail boxes and related canopy structures shall be constructed of the following materials: a. Aluminum, b. Wrought iron, c. Stone, d. Brick, or e. Cast stone. Clustered locations with more than 3 cluster mail boxes shall be covered. Cover shall be designed with a pitch roof similar to the examples shown. 3. Clustered locations with more than 3 boxes shall be located within open space areas when feasible. Single boxes may be located mid-block in accordance with USPS standards. All locations shall be ADA accessible. 2. Page 272