2.2 72ND STREET STATION ENTRANCE ALTERNATIVES
|
|
- Bertha Leonard
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Chapter 2: Entrance Alternatives 2.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter describes the alternatives that are evaluated in this Supplemental Environmental Assessment (EA) for the 72nd Street Station and 86th Street Station entrance modifications. For each station, preliminary designs for a range of alternatives were developed and evaluated for their ability to meet the purpose and need and goals and objectives described in Chapter 1 of this EA. Those alternatives that were found to meet the purpose and need and to best meet the goals and objectives in comparison to other alternatives are evaluated in detail in this EA. Section 2.2 of this chapter describes the entrance alternatives evaluated for the 72nd Street Station and section 2.3 describes the entrance alternatives evaluated for the 86th Street Station. These include the No Action Alternative, which is the approved design for the station, and three potential Build alternatives. In addition, for each station the chapter identifies the other alternatives considered but eliminated because they did not meet the purpose and need described in Chapter 1 of this EA, or they did not sufficiently meet the goals and objectives for the station entrances, also described in Chapter 1, in comparison to the other alternatives. Appendix A of this EA provides further information on the alternatives that were considered but were eliminated from further analysis in this EA ND STREET STATION ENTRANCE ALTERNATIVES MTA New York City Transit has developed alternatives to the No Action Alternative for the northern entrances at the 72nd Street Station. As shown in Table 2-1, eight new alternatives were developed, based on the site selection process for entrances (see section in Chapter 1 of this EA, Purpose and Need ). These alternatives were also developed with input from the community. These alternatives were then evaluated for their ability to meet the purpose and need (siting requirements) and their ability to best meet the goals and objectives for the station entrances in comparison to other alternatives. As a result of that evaluation, five alternatives were eliminated. As described in Chapter 1, Purpose and Need (section 1.3.1), the 72nd Street Station will include an entrance on the northeast corner of East 69th Street and Second Avenue, an ancillary building on the northwest corner of East 69th Street and Second Avenue, and an entrance and ancillary building on the northwest corner of East 72nd Street and Second Avenue. The location and design of these structures would not be changed by the Build alternatives for the 72nd Street Station described below. Therefore, the descriptions that follow focus on proposed changes in station entrances on the northeast and southeast corners of 72nd Street and Second Avenue. 2-1
2 Supplemental EA to the Second Avenue Subway FEIS: 72nd and 86th Street Stations Entrance Alternatives Alternative Entrance Location: Second Avenue at 72nd Street Vertical Circulation No Action Northeast corner 1 stair leading to escalator bank to Southeast corner 2 elevators to Table nd Street Station Entrance Alternatives Property Acquisition and Sidewalk Bump-Outs Permanent easement in Block 1447, Lot 7501; Permanent subsurface easement, Block 1446, Lots 51 and 7502; 6-foot bump-out on north sidewalk of 72nd Street extending 95 feet east of Second Avenue; 6-foot bump-out on south sidewalk of 72nd Street extending 80 feet east of Second Avenue. Preliminary Review Alternative would require complex construction and utility relocation that would present a risk to the Second Avenue Subway project s construction schedule and budget (see section ) but is carried forward as the baseline condition for detailed analysis in this EA. 1 (Preferred) Southeast corner 5 elevators to Acquisition of Block 1446, Lot 51; No sidewalk bump-out. Meets purpose and need and is carried forward for detailed evaluation in this EA. 2 Northeast corner: east sidewalk of Second Avenue between 72nd and 73rd Streets Southeast corner 3 Northeast corner: west canopy north sidewalk of 72nd Street between Second and First Avenues Northeast corner: east canopy north sidewalk of 72nd Street between Second and First Avenues Southeast corner 4 Northeast corner: north sidewalk of 72nd Street between Second and First Avenues Northeast corner: east sidewalk of Second Avenue between 72nd and 73rd Streets Southeast corner 2 Escalators Acquisition of Block 1446, Lot 51; At least a 6-foot bump-out of east sidewalk of Second Avenue extending 144 feet north of 72nd Street. 2 Elevators 1 escalator, 1 stair leading to escalator bank to 2 escalators leading to escalator bank to 2 elevators to 2 escalators leading to escalator bank to 2 escalators leading to escalator bank to 2 elevators to Acquisition of Block 1446, Lot 51; 6-foot bump-out of north sidewalk of 72nd Street extending 270 feet east of Second Avenue. Acquisition of Block 1446, Lot 51; 6-foot bump-out of north sidewalk of 72nd Street extending 150 feet east of Second Avenue 6-foot bump-out of east sidewalk of Second Avenue extending 100 feet north of 72nd Street. Would not meet purpose and need because it would not meet passenger demand with two escalators. Meets purpose and need and is carried forward for detailed evaluation in this EA. Meets purpose and need and is carried forward for detailed evaluation in this EA. 2-2
3 Chapter 2: Entrance Alternatives Alternative Note: Entrance Location: Second Avenue at 72nd Street 5 Northeast corner within existing building at 305 East 72nd Street; accessible from east sidewalk of Second Avenue between 72nd and 73rd Streets Southeast corner 6 Northeast corner: east sidewalk of Second Avenue between 72nd and 73rd Streets Southeast corner: east sidewalk of Second Avenue between 71st and 72nd Streets Southeast corner Vertical Circulation Table 2-1 (Cont d) 72nd Street Station Entrance Alternatives Property Acquisition and Sidewalk Bump-Outs 3 Stairs Acquisition of Block 1446, Lot 51 and permanent easement of Block 1447, Lot 7501; No sidewalk bump-out. 2 Elevators 2 Escalators Acquisition of Block 1446, Lot 51; 6-foot bump-outs of east sidewalk of Second Avenue extending 100 feet north and south of 72nd 2 Escalators Street. 2 Elevators 7 Southeast corner 2 Elevators Acquisition of Block 1446, Lot 51; 3 Escalators 6-foot bump-out of south sidewalk of 72nd Street extending 50 feet east of Second Avenue. 8 Northwest corner 4 Escalators (1 more than in No Action) Southeast corner 2 Elevators Acquisition of Block 1446, Lot 51 and permanent subsurface easement of Block 1426, Lots 25 and 27; No sidewalk bump-out. Preliminary Review Would not meet purpose and need because the proximity of Second Avenue entrance to the station cavern would result in inadequate rock pillar to maintain station stability. Thus, this alternative would not be constructible in accordance with good engineering practice. Would not meet the goal of maintaining traffic flows, unlike other alternatives. This alternative would require a bump-out of the east sidewalk of Second Avenue south of 72nd Street into moving traffic lane, resulting in a permanent constraint on traffic flows on Second Avenue. Would not meet purpose and need because it would require relocation of Con Edison highpressure transmission steam main and present a risk to the Second Avenue Subway s construction schedule and budget. Would not meet purpose and need because there would be insufficient space to accommodate fourth escalator in ancillary building. Thus, the entrance would not be large enough to accommodate the anticipated ridership. The No Action Alternative and Alternatives 1 through 8 will include an ancillary building on the northwest corner of 69th Street and Second Avenue, an entrance on the northeast corner of 69th Street and Second Avenue, and an ancillary building and entrance on the northwest corner of 72nd Street and Second Avenue. The location and configuration of the entrance and ancillary building at 69th Street would be the same for the No Action Alternative and Alternatives 1 through 8. The location and configuration of the ancillary building and entrance on the northwest corner of 72nd Street and Second Avenue would be the same for the No Action Alternative and Alternatives 1 through 7; however, Alternative 8 would include an additional escalator at this location. The three Build alternatives would fully avoid the use of space within 305 East 72nd Street by relocating the subway entrance to another location. All three Build alternatives would also relocate the elevator entrance at the southeast corner of Second Avenue and 72nd Street from the sidewalk to a location within a new building at the southeast corner (300 East 72nd Street). The existing four-story building at that location would be acquired and replaced with a new structure that would house the station s elevators. (The number of elevators at this location would vary depending on the alternative that is selected and implemented.) Figure 2-1 illustrates the No Action Alternative and the three Build alternatives for the 72nd Street Station entrance, and these alternatives are described in more detail below. 2-3
4 Supplemental EA to the Second Avenue Subway FEIS: 72nd and 86th Street Stations Entrance Alternatives ND STREET STATION NO ACTION ENTRANCE ALTERNATIVE The 72nd Street Station will include an entrance on the northeast corner of East 69th Street and Second Avenue, an ancillary building on the northwest corner of East 69th Street and Second Avenue, and an entrance and ancillary building on the northwest corner of East 72nd Street and Second Avenue. In the No Action Alternative, the 72nd Street Station would have an entrance to the north end of the station located within commercial space at the base of the existing condominium apartment building on the northeast corner of Second Avenue and 72nd Street (305 East 72nd Street). Figure 2-2 illustrates the layout of this entrance. This entrance was anticipated in the FEIS, but revised as a result of design changes evaluated in Technical Memorandum No. 1 in November Space on the ground floor (occupied by a CVS pharmacy) and in the basement would be acquired for use by this entrance. The entrance would have stairs from street level to an upperlevel landing in the building s basement. From the upper-level landing, escalators would connect to the station, passing beneath 72nd Street. To allow enough headroom for the upperlevel landing and top of the escalator without interference with utilities and the subgrade portions of 72nd Street, the existing sidewalk along the north side of 72nd Street would be widened, or bumped out, by approximately 6 feet into the parking lane for a length of approximately 95 feet from the intersection. The bump-out along the north side of 72nd Street has been reviewed and approved by the New York City Department of Transportation (NYCDOT). In addition, two elevators in the sidewalk on the south side of 72nd Street east of Second Avenue would connect the street level with the station (see Figure 2-2). These elevators, required to meet the Americans with Disabilities Act, were incorporated into the Second Avenue Subway project as part of the design changes evaluated in Technical Memorandum No. 1. The two elevators together would be approximately 22 feet tall, 18 feet long, and 12 feet wide. To accommodate the new elevators in the sidewalk on the south side of 72nd Street, the existing sidewalk would be widened in this area by approximately 6 feet, for a length of 80 feet from the intersection. 1 The bump-out along the south side of 72nd Street has been reviewed and approved by NYCDOT. None of the station entrances will be used to ventilate the station, since the station would have an active ventilation system. Rather, station ventilation functions will be located within the ancillary building on the northwest corner of Second Avenue and 69th Street and the ancillary building on the northwest corner of Second Avenue and 72nd Street. All Second Avenue Subway stations will have adequate emergency access to meet the National Fire Protection Association s guidance for transit stations (NFPA 130, Standard for Fixed Guideway Transit and Passenger Rail Systems ), and this access includes additional staircases not normally available for passengers to enter and exit the station. For example, at the 72nd Street Station, emergency stairs will be located in the ancillary building at the northwest corner of Second Avenue and 72nd Street. As discussed in Chapter 1, Purpose and Need (section ), the design for these entrances in the No Action Alternative presents complex property acquisition, utility relocation, and 1 Please note that the text of Technical Memorandum No. 1 incorrectly identified this bump-out as 95 feet long. The correct length of 80 feet was reviewed and approved by the New York City Department of Transportation. 2-4
5 3 Escalators 3 Escalators Stairs 2 Elevators 1 Escalator 72ND ST. 2 Escalators 3 Escalators 3 Escalators No Action Alternative 5 Elevators Alternative 1 - Preferred Alternative 2 Escalators 72ND ST. 1 Stair 72ND ST. 2 Escalators 72ND ST. 2 Elevators 2 Elevators Alternative 3 Alternative 4 Curb Bump Out Below-Grade Portion of Station Escalator to/from Street Level Elevator to/from Street Level Stairs to/from Street Level Below-Grade Escalator Bank Direction of Passenger Flow Entering Station (at street level) Direction of Passenger Flow Entering Station (below grade) SECOND AVENUE SUBWAY 72nd Street Station Entrance Alternatives Evaluated in EA Figure 2-1
6 Stairs to Upper-Level Landing N Elevators in Sidewalk Enter from Sidewalk Outline of Below-Grade Structure Escalator to/ from Mezzanine Widened Sidewalks SECOND AVENUE SUBWAY 72nd Street Station: No Action Entrance Alternative Figure 2-2
7 Chapter 2: Entrance Alternatives construction difficulties and would result in substantial risk to the Second Avenue Subway s overall schedule and budget.. For this reason, alternatives to the No Action Alternative have been developed, as discussed below ND STREET STATION ENTRANCE ALTERNATIVE 1 (ELEVATORS AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER AT 300 EAST 72ND STREET) PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE Alternative 1 would eliminate the subway entrance from within the building at 305 East 72nd Street and would relocate the entrance from this corner. At the southeast corner, no elevators would be constructed in the sidewalk on the south side of 72nd Street; instead, the four-story building at 300 East 72nd Street would be acquired and replaced with a new subway entrance building that would house five elevators that would comply with ADA requirements. Figure 2-3 shows plans and a section of the entrance. As described in Chapter 1, Purpose and Need, 40 percent of the passengers who will use the north end of the station will come from/go to the northeast of the intersection of Second Avenue and 72nd Street, and 14 percent will come from/go to the southeast of the intersection. Those passengers going from/to the northeast would have to cross either 72nd Street or Second Avenue to enter the station with Alternative 1. However, since they would have the option of entrances on both the northwest and southeast corners, they could choose their entrance based on the permitted pedestrian crossing ( walk sign) when they arrive at the intersection, and as a result, they would not have to wait long for a walk signal to cross the street and enter the station. With Alternative 1, the street-level station access to the level from the east side of Second Avenue would be via elevator from the southeast corner. The entrance would include five elevators. Based on the ridership estimates described in Chapter 1, Purpose and Need (see section ) four elevators would be needed to meet peak demand; however, five would be provided to allow for one elevator to be out of service for maintenance or repairs. All passengers would enter the elevators from Second Avenue, and the elevators would take passengers directly to the level. At the level, passengers from the elevators would merge with those from the northwest entrance. All passengers would proceed through the turnstiles and then to the stairs, escalators, or elevators that lead to the platform. In subway stations, straight passages with clear sightlines from areas where people congregate and/or areas where station personnel are present are preferred by passengers. In Alternative 1, the area at the base of the elevators would be open to the fare array area and station service area. In addition, the waiting area at street level and the elevators would be monitored by security cameras. The elevator entrance would be located on the southeast corner of 72nd Street and Second Avenue. The existing four-story building at 300 East 72nd Street would be demolished and a new building would be constructed. The new building would be no taller than the existing building. It would be open onto Second Avenue, with a canopy over the sidewalk beyond the building line. Within the building, space would be provided for passengers waiting for the elevators. No bump-outs would be required along the Second Avenue or 72nd Street sidewalks for the elevator. As noted earlier, none of the station entrances, including the proposed entrance on the southeast corner of 72nd Street and Second Avenue, would be used to ventilate the station. All Second Avenue Subway stations will have adequate emergency access to meet the National Fire Protection Association s guidance (NFPA 130) for transit stations; at the 72nd Street Station, additional 2-5
8 Supplemental EA to the Second Avenue Subway FEIS: 72nd and 86th Street Stations Entrance Alternatives emergency staircases will be provided in the station s ancillary building at the northwest corner of Second Avenue and 72nd Street. As described later in this EA (see Chapter 12, Recommendation of the Preferred Alternative ), 72nd Street Alternative 1 has been identified as the preferred alternative for the 72nd Street entrance modification ND STREET STATION ENTRANCE ALTERNATIVE 3 (ESCALATORS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF 72ND STREET EAST OF SECOND AVENUE) Alternative 3 would relocate the subway entrance at the northeast corner of 72nd Street and Second Avenue from within the building at 305 East 72nd Street to two new locations in the sidewalk on the north side of East 72nd Street east of Second Avenue. At the southeast corner, no elevators would be constructed in the sidewalk on the south side of 72nd Street; instead, the building at 300 East 72nd Street would be acquired and replaced with a new subway entrance building housing two ADA-compliant elevators. Figure 2-4 shows plans and a section of the design for Alternative 3. In Alternative 3, two escalator entrances to the new subway station would be provided on the north side of 72nd Street within the sidewalk. One, with a stair and an escalator, would be located in front of 305 East 72nd Street with its entrance and exit oriented westward toward Second Avenue. The other, with two escalators, would be located in front of the apartment buildings at 311 and 315 East 72nd Street with its entrance and exit oriented eastward toward First Avenue. These entrances are shown in the street-level plan provided in Figure 2-4. These entrances would converge at a common upper-level landing. From the upper-level landing, passengers would descend to the station via a bank of three escalators. As shown in Figure 2-4, this escalator bank would cross diagonally beneath 72nd Street. The escalator bank would reach the level in the rock beneath the building at 300 East 72nd Street. Passengers would then continue a short distance to the fare control (turnstile) area, located on the level beneath Second Avenue. Figure 2-4 provides a plan of the level near the escalator bank and fare control (turnstile) area. Canopies above the subway entrances are required by code to protect the escalator equipment. 1 Each pair of escalators or stairs and escalator would be covered by a canopy located on the public sidewalk. Each canopy would have a granite base with a glass enclosure above and would be approximately 41 feet long and 14 feet wide. The canopies would be approximately 16 feet high at the entrance and would slope downward to a height of approximately 6 feet at the rear. The west canopy would be close to Second Avenue in front of the service entrance for the building at 305 East 72nd Street. The east canopy would be located in front of portions of the two buildings at 311 and 315 East 72nd Street, straddling the property line between these buildings. The building at 305 East 72nd Street is a large apartment building, 17 stories tall and with 85 feet of frontage on East 72nd Street, with ground-floor retail space that opens onto Second Avenue. The buildings at 311 and 315 East 72nd Street are 17 and 20 stories tall, respectively, with frontages of 115 feet and 100 feet along East 72nd Street, respectively. The entrance canopies would not block or interfere with the main entrances to the buildings or the doctor s office entrance at 311 East 72nd Street. 1 American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Elevator and Escalator Code, ASME A Section Outdoor Escalators. 2-6
9 Alternative 1 3 Escalators ANCILLARY BUILDING N 72ND ST. 5 Elevators ESCALATORS 72ND ST. KEY MAP (see Figure 2-1 for Legend) EMERGENCY EGRESS OUTLINE OF BELOW-GRADE STRUCTURE ELEVATORS Street Level Plan N 72ND ST. ESCALATORS NORTHWEST CORNER ANCILLARY BUILDING PLATFORM EMERGENCY EGRESS ELEVATORS Mezzanine Level Plan ELEVATOR STREET LEVEL MEZZANINE LEVEL PLATFORM AND TRACK LEVEL Section Looking North NOT TO SCALE SECOND AVENUE SUBWAY 72nd Street Entrance Alternative 1 Figure 2-3
10 Alternative 3 OUTLINE OF BELOW-GRADE STRUCTURE 3 Escalators ENTER FROM SIDEWALK ELEVATOR ESCALATOR AND STAIR 72ND STREET 2 Elevators 1 Stair 1 Escalator ESCALATOR MEZZANINE 2 Escalators 72ND ST. KEY MAP (see Figure 2-1 for Legend) N 72ND ST. ESCALATOR 72ND STREET ENTER FROM SIDEWALK Street Level Plan PLATFORM ELEVATORS ESCALATOR UPPER LEVEL N Mezzanine Level Plan ELEVATOR ESCALATOR STREET LEVEL UPPER LEVEL LANDING MEZZANINE LEVEL SECOND AVENUE SUBWAY Section Looking South NOT TO SCALE 72nd Street Entrance Alternative 3 Figure 2-4
11 Chapter 2: Entrance Alternatives To accommodate the new subway entrances, the sidewalk would be widened (bumped out) by 6 feet along the north side of East 72nd Street for a total of 270 feet from the intersection (longer than the 95 feet with the No Action Alternative). This bump-out would provide sidewalk capacity for the pedestrians using the new subway entrance here and would ensure that adequate sidewalk space would be available for pedestrians passing the entrance. (The FEIS notes on page 2-19 that in certain locations where space and traffic levels permit, entrances could include locations where the sidewalk is widened into the parking lane. These bump-outs would create enough sidewalk space to allow entrances that would be wide enough to accommodate escalators and stairs needed to access the new stations.) With the bump-out, the sidewalk would be 12.5 feet wide alongside the proposed entrance canopies. NYCDOT has reviewed preliminary plans for the lengthened bump-out and indicated its acceptance of this design concept in a letter dated October 15, Additional information was subsequently provided for review by NYCDOT in March 2008; after reviewing this information, NYCDOT again indicated its acceptance of this design concept in a letter dated March 27, Copies of these letters are provided in Appendix B. The elevator entrance would be located on the southeast corner of 72nd Street and Second Avenue. The existing four-story building at 300 East 72nd Street would be demolished and a new building would be constructed there. The new building would be no taller than the existing building. It would be open onto Second Avenue, with a metal and glass awning over the sidewalk beyond the building line. Within the building, two elevators and a waiting area for passengers would be provided. No bump-outs would be required along the Second Avenue or 72nd Street sidewalks for the elevator. The elevators would open into the level within the passageway that links the to the escalators beneath 72nd Street. Providing a new entrance on the north side of 72nd Street east of Second Avenue would be convenient for the passengers projected to arrive at and depart from the station from northeast of the intersection (of the passengers who will use the north end of the station,40 percent will come from northeast of the intersection). Therefore, many passengers using the station would not need to cross Second Avenue or 72nd Street to reach the station entrance. In subway stations, straight passages with clear sightlines from areas where people congregate and/or areas where station personnel are present are preferred by passengers. In Alternative 3, the two escalator banks from street level would directly access the upper-level landing, and the long escalator to the level would connect directly to the fare array area and station service area ND STREET STATION ENTRANCE ALTERNATIVE 4 (ESCALATORS ON THE EAST SIDE OF SECOND AVENUE NORTH OF 72ND STREET AND NORTH SIDE OF 72ND STREET EAST OF SECOND AVENUE) Alternative 4 would relocate the subway entrance at the northeast corner of 72nd Street and Second Avenue from within the building at 305 East 72nd Street to two sidewalk locations alongside 305 East 72nd Street. One escalator entrance would be on the north side of East 72nd Street east of Second Avenue, and the other would be on the east side of Second Avenue north of 72nd Street. Both of these entrances would have two escalators. At the southeast corner, no elevators would be constructed in the sidewalk on the south side of 72nd Street; instead, the building at 300 East 72nd Street would be acquired and replaced with a new subway entrance building housing two ADAcompliant elevators. Figure 2-5 shows plans and a section of the design for Alternative
12 Supplemental EA to the Second Avenue Subway FEIS: 72nd and 86th Street Stations Entrance Alternatives With Alternative 4, passengers entering the station from the northeast corner of Second Avenue and 72nd Street could enter from either of the two new escalator entrances. The entrance on the north sidewalk of 72nd Street would be oriented westward toward Second Avenue, and the entrance on Second Avenue would be oriented northward toward 73rd Street. Both entrances would have two escalators that would lead passengers from street-level to a common landing area. Passengers who enter from the east side of Second Avenue would descend southward via escalator to the common upper-level landing. Those entering from 72nd Street would descend eastward via escalator to an intermediate landing, make a 180-degree turn, and proceed down a second escalator in a westward direction to the common landing. All passengers would then descend from the common landing via a bank of three escalators beneath 72nd Street to the station s level. As required by code, each pair of escalators would be covered by a canopy at street level. Each canopy would have a granite base with a glass enclosure above and would be approximately 41 feet long and 14 feet wide. The canopies would be approximately 16 feet high at the entrance and would slope downward to a height of approximately 6 feet at the rear. To accommodate the pedestrians passing by on the sidewalk and the anticipated passengers entering and exiting the station at the new entrances, Alternative 4 would require a six-foot bump-out of the north sidewalk of 72nd Street into the parking lane for 150 feet from the corner of Second Avenue (longer than the 95 feet required for the No Action Alternative) and a six-foot bump-out on the east sidewalk of Second Avenue into the parking lane for 100 feet north from the corner of 72nd Street. These bump-outs would provide sidewalk capacity for the pedestrians using the sidewalk and passengers entering and exiting the subway entrances. With the bumpouts, the sidewalk on the north side of 72nd Street would be 12.5 feet wide alongside the proposed entrance canopies, and the Second Avenue sidewalk would be 9.5 feet wide. MTA New York City Transit would need to seek concurrence by NYCDOT for these proposed bumpouts if Alternative 4 is selected as the Preferred Alternative. As in Alternative 3, the elevator entrance would be located on the southeast corner of 72nd Street and Second Avenue. The existing four-story building at 300 East 72nd Street would be demolished and a new building would be constructed that would house two ADA-compliant elevators and a passenger waiting area. The new structure would be no taller than the existing building. It would be open onto Second Avenue, with a canopy over the sidewalk beyond the building line. No bump-outs would be required along the Second Avenue or 72nd Street sidewalks for the elevator. The elevators would open into the level within the passageway that links the to the escalators beneath 72nd Street. Providing a new entrance on the east side of Second Avenue north of 72nd Street and the north side of 72nd Street east of Second Avenue would be convenient for the passengers projected to arrive at and depart from the station from northeast of the intersection (40 percent of the passengers who will use the north end of the station). In this alternative, entrances would be provided to the station at three corners of the intersection the northeast, southeast, and northwest. As noted earlier, in subway stations, straight passages with clear sightlines from areas where people congregate and/or areas where station personnel are present are preferred by passengers. In Alternative 4, several switchbacks, intermediate landings, and turns would be less convenient for passengers and would limit visibility in the entrance passages, which would be harder for station personnel to monitor. 2-8
13 Alternative 4 N 72ND ST. 3 Escalators 2 Elevators 2 Escalators 2 Escalators ESCALATOR STREET ENTER FROM SIDEWALK 72ND ST. ELEVATORS OUTLINE OF BELOW-GRADE STRUCTURE KEY MAP (see Figure 2-1 for Legend) ESCALATOR STREET Street Level Plan N ESCALATOR STREET ELEVATORS ESCALATOR UPPER LEVEL Upper Landing Level Plan N ESCALATORS NORTHWEST CORNER PLATFORM ELEVATORS ESCALATORS UPPER LEVEL Mezzanine Level Plan ESCALATORS ESCALATORS STREET LEVEL MEZZANINE LEVEL PLATFORM AND TRACK LEVEL SECOND AVENUE SUBWAY Section Looking North NOT TO SCALE 72nd Street Entrance Alternative 4 Figure 2-5
14 Chapter 2: Entrance Alternatives Alternative TH STREET STATION ENTRANCE ALTERNATIVES MTA New York City Transit has developed alternatives to the No Action Alternative for entrances at the north end of the 86th Street Station. As shown in Table 2-2, seven new alternatives were developed, based on the site selection process for entrances (see section of Chapter 1 of this EA, Purpose and Need ). These alternatives were also developed with input from the community. These alternatives were then evaluated for their ability to meet the purpose and need (siting requirements) and their ability to best meet goals and objectives for station entrances in comparison to other alternatives. As a result of that evaluation, four alternatives were not carried forward for further evaluation, and the No Action Alternative and the three remaining Build Alternatives Alternatives 2, 5, and 7 were carried forward for detailed analysis in this EA. The alternatives that were eliminated are described in Appendix A to this EA. Entrance Location: Second Avenue and 86th Street Vertical Circulation No Action Northeast corner 3 escalators leading directly to Southeast corner 1 elevator to 1 Southeast corner of 86th Street Northeast corner: north sidewalk of 86th Street between Second and First Avenues 2 Southeast corner: west canopy south sidewalk of 86th Street between Second and First Avenues Southeast corner: east canopy south sidewalk of 86th Street between Second and First Avenues Southeast corner 3 Southeast corner of 86th Street Northeast corner: East sidewalk of Second Avenue between 86th and 87th Streets Northeast corner: north sidewalk of 86th Street between Second and First Avenues Table th Street Station Entrance Alternatives Property Acquisition and Sidewalk Bump-Outs Permanent easement in Block 1549, Lot 1; Permanent subsurface easement of Block 1548, Lots 49 and 148; 6-foot bump-out of south sidewalk of 86th Street extending 150 feet east of Second Avenue. 1 Elevator Permanent subsurface easement of Block 1548, Lot 49 and Block 2 Stairs 1549, Lot 1; 6-foot bump-out of south sidewalk of 86th Street extending 270 feet east of Second Avenue. 2 escalators leading to escalator bank to 2 escalators leading to escalator bank to 1 elevator to Permanent subsurface easement of Block 1548, Lot 49; 6-foot bump-out of south sidewalk of 86th Street extending 330 feet east of Second Avenue. 1 Elevator Permanent subsurface easement of Block 1548, Lot 49; 1 Escalator 6-foot bump-out of north sidewalk of 86th Street extending 250 feet east of Second Avenue; 6-foot bump-out of south sidewalk of 86th Street extending 150 feet 2 Escalators east of Second Avenue; 6-foot bump-out of east sidewalk extending 80 feet of Second Avenue north of 86th Street. Preliminary Review Alternative would present significant difficulties during construction that would result in risk to the Second Avenue Subway project s budget and schedule (see section ) but is carried forward as the baseline condition for detailed analysis in this EA. This alternative is a design option to Alternative 7. It would require structural modifications to 305 East 86th Street and would not provide any additional benefit greater than Alternative 7. Therefore this design option was not further evaluated. Meets purpose and need and is carried forward for detailed evaluation in this EA. Would not meet the purpose and need because Second Avenue entrance would be too close to station cavern. Thus, this alternative would not be constructible in accordance with good engineering practice. 2-9
15 Supplemental EA to the Second Avenue Subway FEIS: 72nd and 86th Street Stations Entrance Alternatives Alternative Note: Entrance Location: Second Avenue and 86th Street 4 Southeast corner of 86th Street Northeast corner of 86th Street Vertical Circulation 5 Southeast corner 5 elevators to 6 Southeast corner of 86th Street Southeast corner of 85th Street 7 Northeast corner: west canopy north sidewalk of 86th Street between Second and First Avenues Northeast corner: east canopy north sidewalk of 86th Street between Second and First Avenues Southeast corner Table 2-2 (Cont d) 86th Street Station Entrance Alternatives Property Acquisition and Sidewalk Bump-Outs 1 Elevator Permanent subsurface easement of Block 1548, Lots 49 and 148; 2 Escalators 6-foot bump-out of north sidewalk of 86th Street extending 100 feet east of Second Avenue; 6-foot bump-out of south sidewalk of 86th Street extending150 feet east of Second Avenue. Acquisition of Block 1548, Lots 49 and 50; No sidewalk bump-out. 1 Elevator Acquisition and demolition of Block 1548, Lot 1 and permanent 3 Escalators 2 escalators leading to escalator bank to 2 escalators leading to escalator bank to 1 elevator to subsurface easement of Block 1547, Lot 49, Block 1548, Lots 1, 2, 4, 49, 50, 51, 52; 6-foot bump-out of south sidewalk of 86th Street extending 150 feet east of Second Avenue. Permanent subsurface easement of Block 1548, Lots 49; 6-foot bump-out of north sidewalk of 86th Street extending 270 feet east of Second Avenue; 6-foot bump-out of south sidewalk of 86th Street extending 150 feet east of Second Avenue.. Preliminary Review Would not meet the purpose and need because does not meet minimum capacity requirements for station design. Meets purpose and need and is carried forward for detailed evaluation in this EA. The escalator entrance would not be located at intersection of 86th Street and Second Avenue. It would permanently block the main entrance to 300 East 85th Street and would require acquisition and demolition of a residential building only to facilitate construction. Therefore, this alternative would not meet the purpose and need or the goals and objectives. Meets purpose and need and is carried forward for detailed evaluation in this EA. The 86th Street Station will include an entrance on the northeast corner of East 83rd Street and Second Avenue, an ancillary building on the northwest corner of East 83rd Street and Second Avenue, and an ancillary building on the northwest corner of East 86th Street and Second Avenue. The location and design of these structures would not be changed by the No Action Alternative or Alternatives 1 through 7. As described in Chapter 1, Purpose and Need (section 1.3.2), the 86th Street Station will include an entrance on the northeast corner of East 83rd Street and Second Avenue, an ancillary building on the northwest corner of East 83rd Street and Second Avenue, and an ancillary building on the northwest corner of East 86th Street and Second Avenue. The location and design of these structures would not be changed by the Build alternatives for the 86th Street Station described below. Therefore, the descriptions that follow focus on proposed changes in station entrances on the east side of Second Avenue at 86th Street. The three 86th Street Build alternatives carried forward for detailed evaluation in this EA would fully avoid the use of space within 305 East 86th Street by relocating the subway entrance to another location. All three Build alternatives would also provide an ADA-compliant elevator entrance at the southeast corner of Second Avenue and 86th Street. The No Action Alternative and the three 86th Street Build alternatives are illustrated in Figure 2-6 and discussed in more detail below. 2-10
16 86TH ST. 3 Escalators 86TH ST. Elevator 2 Escalators Elevator 2 Escalators No Action Alternative Alternative 2 2 Escalators 2 Escalators 86TH ST. 86TH ST. Elevator 5 Elevators Emergency Egress Staircase Alternative 5 Alternative 7 - Preferred Alternative Curb Bump Out Below-Grade Portion of Station Escalator to/from Street Level Elevator to/from Street Level Stairs to/from Street Level Below-Grade Escalator Bank Direction of Passenger Flow Entering Station (at street level) Direction of Passenger Flow Entering Station (below grade) SECOND AVENUE SUBWAY 86th Street Station Entrance Alternatives Evaluated in EA Figure 2-6
17 Chapter 2: Entrance Alternatives TH STREET STATION NO ACTION ENTRANCE ALTERNATIVE The 86th Street Station will include an entrance on the northeast corner of East 83rd Street and Second Avenue, an ancillary building on the northwest corner of East 83rd Street and Second Avenue, and an ancillary building on the northwest corner of East 86th Street and Second Avenue. In the No Action Alternative, the 86th Street Station would have an entrance to the north end of the station within commercial space at the base of the existing apartment building at the northeast corner of Second Avenue and 86th Street (305 East 86th Street). Figure 2-7 illustrates the layout of this entrance. This entrance was anticipated in the FEIS, but revised as a result of design changes evaluated in Technical Memorandum No. 1 in November Space on the ground floor and in the basement (currently occupied by a Food Emporium supermarket) would be acquired for use by this entrance. Escalators in this entrance would lead from Second Avenue directly to the station. The escalators from the entrance to the would pass southward beneath 86th Street as they descended toward the level. In addition, an elevator in the sidewalk on the south side of 86th Street east of Second Avenue would connect the street level with the station. This elevator, required to meet ADA, was incorporated into the Second Avenue Subway project as part of the design changes evaluated in Technical Memorandum No. 1. The elevator would be 22 feet high and approximately 12 feet long by 12 feet wide. To accommodate the elevator, the sidewalk on the south side of 86th Street would be widened by approximately six feet in a bump-out extending 150 feet east of the intersection. The bump-out along the south side of 86th Street has been reviewed and approved by NYCDOT. 1 The entrance at the northeast corner of 86th Street and Second Avenue is the entrance now proposed for modification. As discussed in Chapter 1, Purpose and Need (section ), the design for this entrance in the No Action Alternative is no longer proposed, because construction of an entrance within the building at 305 East 86th Street would require major structural modifications to the building, including in residential apartments, and would likely require the Food Emporium to close entirely because of the amount of space needed for temporary construction easements and for permanent subway structures. For this reason, alternatives to the No Action Alternative have been developed, as discussed below. None of the station entrances will be used to ventilate the station, since the station would have an active ventilation system. Rather, station ventilation functions will be located within the ancillary building on the northwest corner of Second Avenue and 83rd Street and the ancillary building on the northwest corner of Second Avenue and 86th Street. All Second Avenue Subway stations will have adequate emergency access to meet the National Fire Protection Association s guidance for transit stations (NFPA 130), and this access includes additional staircases not normally available for passengers to enter and exit the station. 1 During review, NYCDOT requested that the bump-out constructed on the south side of 86th Street be extended for a total distance of 150 feet to accommodate a bus stop, rather than the 95 feet proposed in Technical Memorandum No. 1. Therefore, the bump-out would extend 150 feet along the south side of 86th Street east of Second Avenue. 2-11
18 Supplemental EA to the Second Avenue Subway FEIS: 72nd and 86th Street Stations Entrance Alternatives TH STREET STATION ENTRANCE ALTERNATIVE 2 (ESCALATORS ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 86TH STREET EAST OF SECOND AVENUE) Alternative 2 would relocate the subway entrance at the northeast corner of 86th Street and Second Avenue from within the building at 305 East 86th Street to two new locations in the sidewalk on the south side of East 86th Street east of Second Avenue. A total of four escalators would be provided, two at each location (see Figure 2-8). The elevator entrance in the sidewalk on the south side of 86th Street would not be changed from the No Action Alternative. With Alternative 2, no entrance to the 86th Street Station would be provided on the north side of 86th Street. With Alternative 2, passengers entering the station from the southeast corner of Second Avenue and 86th Street could enter from either of two new escalator entrances (or via the elevator entrance). From either entrance, passengers would travel down the escalator to one common upper-level landing. Passengers entering from the west entrance would descend eastward on the escalator; those entering from the east entrance would descend westward on the escalator to reach the same upper-level landing beneath the sidewalk on the south side of 86th Street. Passengers would then use the upper-level landing to travel northward (beneath 86th Street) to reach the escalator bank that descends to the station. The upper-level landing must extend beneath 86th Street in order to allow enough space for the inclined escalator bank to the level. At the level, passengers would then continue a short distance to the fare control (turnstile) area, located on the level beneath Second Avenue (see Figure 2-8). As required by code, each pair of escalators would be covered by a canopy located on the sidewalk. Each canopy would have a granite base with a glass enclosure above and would be approximately 41 feet long and 14 feet wide. The canopies would be approximately 16 feet high at the entrance and would slope downward to a height of approximately 6 feet in the rear. Figure 2-8 shows a plan and section of Alternative 2 for the 86th Street Station entrance. One sidewalk entrance with two escalators would be located in front of , 304, and 306 East 86th Street and the other would be located in front of 316, 320, 322, and 324 East 86th Street. These are four- and five-story buildings with narrow frontage (15.5 to 22 feet wide) on 86th Street and ground-floor retail space on 86th Street. Construction of Alternative 2 would require modifications to these and other existing buildings that front the south side of East 86th Street. These modifications would include the temporary removal of stoops from 310 and 312 East 86th Street, which would be replaced. During the early phases of the cut-and-cover construction, sidewalk access to these buildings would be fully restricted, meaning that businesses and residents would be temporarily displaced for up to eight months. Cellar doors for , 304, 306, 308, and 322 East 86th Street would be permanently removed. Since the cellar doors currently provide a means of egress from the cellars, sprinklers would need to be installed within the cellars of buildings where they are not currently present or where two means of egress cannot currently provided to meet the fire code. In addition to the escalators, the elevator in the south sidewalk of 86th Street east of Second Avenue (included as part of the No Action Alternative) would remain in this alternative. To accommodate the escalators, the elevator would be moved slightly to the west, but would still be on the south side of 86th Street. The relocated elevator would be in front of the north side of the 2-12
19 N Widened Sidewalk Enter from Sidewalk Escalators to/ from Mezzanine Outline of Below-Grade Structure Elevator in Sidewalk Daylight Pavers 3 Escalators SECOND AVENUE SUBWAY 86th Street Station: No Action Entrance Alternative Figure 2-7
20 DRIVEWAY FOR 305 EAST 86TH STREET Alternative 2 ESCALATOR BANK MEZZANINE OUTLINE OF BELOW-GRADE STRUCTURE 86TH ST. 86TH ST. Elevator KEY MAP (see Figure 2-6 for Legend) 2 Escalators 2 Escalators ELEVATOR TO MEZZANINE ENTER FROM SIDEWALK ESCALATOR 86TH STREET UPPER LEVEL LANDING BELOW SIDEWALK AND STREET ESCALATOR 86TH STREET ENTER FROM SIDEWALK N Street Level Plan ESCALATOR BANK MEZZANINE PLATFORM Mezzanine Level Plan 86TH STREET SOUTH SIDEWALK SIDEWALK UPPER LEVEL LANDING Section Looking South NOT TO SCALE SECOND AVENUE SUBWAY 86th Street Entrance Alternative 2 Figure 2-8
21 Chapter 2: Entrance Alternatives building at the corner, 1656 Second Avenue (also known as East 86th Street), a fourstory building with ground-level retail that fronts Second Avenue. To accommodate the escalator entrances and elevator, the sidewalk would be widened (bumped out) by 6 feet along the south side of East 86th Street for a total of 330 feet from the intersection, farther than the 150-foot-long bump-out required for the No Action Alternative. This bump-out would provide additional sidewalk capacity for the pedestrians using the new subway entrance and would ensure that adequate sidewalk space would be available for pedestrians passing the entrance. With the bump-out, a 12.5-foot-wide sidewalk would remain alongside the elevator and a 9.5- and 10-foot-wide sidewalk would remain alongside the escalator entrances. Of the passengers who enter or exit at the north end of the station, 68 percent are predicted to come to/from the northeast and 8 percent to/from the southeast, with the remaining 24 percent coming to/from west of Second Avenue. Providing a new entrance on the south side of 86th Street east of Second Avenue would be convenient for the 8 percent who would come from that direction; the other 92 percent would have to cross 86th Street and/or Second Avenue to reach the station entrance, since no entrances would be provided on the other corners of the intersection. In subway stations, straight passages with clear sightlines from areas where people congregate and/or areas where station personnel are present are preferred by passengers. In Alternative 2, the upper-level landing would have a long passageway with a turn leading to the escalator bank connecting to the. This would be less convenient for passengers and would limit visibility in the entrance passages and be harder for station personnel to monitor TH STREET STATION ENTRANCE ALTERNATIVE 5 (ELEVATORS AT SOUTHEAST CORNER) Alternative 5 would eliminate the entrance at the northeast corner and the elevator from the sidewalk on the south side of 86th Street. In this alternative, a new building would be constructed at the southeast corner of Second Avenue and 86th Street that would house elevators connecting to the subway station (see Figure 2-9). This alternative would require the full acquisition and demolition of two buildings at that corner: 1656 Second Avenue (also known as East 86th Street) and 1654 Second Avenue. The new entrance at the southeast corner would provide five elevators and an emergency egress stairway within the newly constructed building. No entrance to the 86th Street Station would be provided on the north side of 86th Street in this alternative. Providing a new entrance on the south side of 86th Street east of Second Avenue would be convenient for the 8 percent of projected passengers who would come from/go to that direction; the other 92 percent would have to cross 86th Street and/or Second Avenue to reach the station entrance, since no entrances would be provided on the other corners of the intersection. With Alternative 5, the street-level access to the station would be via one of five elevators from the southeast corner. Five elevators are needed to meet the anticipated morning peak hour ridership while allowing for one elevator to be out of service for maintenance at any given time. The elevators would take passengers directly to the level. At the level, an elevator lobby would provide queuing space for passengers waiting to board elevators. The west end of this room would open to the main portion of the 2-13
Displacement and Relocation
Chapter 7: and Relocation 7.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter summarizes the displacement and relocation impacts previously identified in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and then evaluates the
More information2.1 INTRODUCTION 2.2 BACKGROUND
Chapter 2: Project Alternatives 2.1 INTRODUCTION Two alternatives are evaluated in the 68th Street/Hunter College Subway Station Improvement Project EA. This chapter describes the alternatives considered
More informationResponse to Community Questions Regarding Hunter College-68th Street ADA Project
Response to Community Questions Regarding Hunter College-68th Street ADA Project 1. Has the MTA completed and/or published an Environmental Impact Statement or Environmental Assessment under NEPA (or the
More information2014 OSSC CHAPTER 10 - MEANS OF EGRESS TABLE OF CONTENTS
2014 OSSC CHAPTER 10 - MEANS OF EGRESS TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1001 ADMINISTRATIVE 1001.1 General 1001.2 Alterations to existing means of egress 1001.3 Maintenance 1001.4 Fire safety and evacuation plans
More informationNEW YORK METHODIST HOSPITAL STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL ORDER CALENDAR (SOC). AMENDMENT TO APPROVAL
NEW YORK METHODIST HOSPITAL STATEMENT OF FACTS IN SUPPORT OF AN APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL ORDER CALENDAR (SOC). AMENDMENT TO APPROVAL AFFECTED PREMISES: 505-525 6 th Street (Block 1084, Lots 39, 164, 1001,
More information2018 CSBC / 2018 CSFSC Part III. Chapter #10. Means of Egress. Table of Contents. Based on the 2015 IBC and the 2015 IFC.
2018 CSBC / 2018 CSFSC Part III. Chapter #10. Means of Egress. Table of Contents. Based on the 2015 IBC and the 2015 IFC. October 23, 2018 Section 1001. Administration. See Section 107.2.3 for Egress Drawing
More informationE1-12: Final Decision AS
BCAC COMPILATION OF GROUP A E1-12: Final Decision AS 202, 1006 (New), 1007 (New), 1014.3, 1015, 1020.1, 1021 (IFC [B] 1006 (New), 1007 (New), 1014.3, 1015, 1020.1, 1021) Proponent: Charles S. Bajnai, Chesterfield
More informationEnvironmental Analysis, Chapter 4 Consequences, and Mitigation
Environmental Analysis, Chapter 4 4.2 Displacement and Relocation This section describes the potential displacements and relocations that could be needed to construct the proposed Regional Connector Transit
More informationTHE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
PAGE 37 THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FUTURE LAND USE The Silver Terrace Redevelopment Area is currently designated as Redevelopment Area #4 on the City of Delray Beach Future Land Use Map (FLUM). This designation
More information9. REZONING NO Vicinity of the northwest corner of 143 rd Street and Metcalf Avenue
9. REZONING NO. 2002-15 Vicinity of the northwest corner of 143 rd Street and Metcalf Avenue 1. APPLICANT: Andrew Schlagel is the applicant for this request. 2. REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant is requesting
More information4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR
4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL MIXED-USE PROJECTS This chapter presents standards for residential mixed-use projects in the Ashland-Cherryland Business District and the Castro Valley Central Business
More informationAppendix1,Page1. Urban Design Guidelines. Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses. DRAFT September 2017
Appendix1,Page1 Urban Design Guidelines DRAFT September 2017 Back to Back and Stacked Townhouses Appendix1,Page2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Urban Design Objectives 1 1.3 Building
More informationPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: July 20, 2017
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: July 20, 2017 DEVELOPMENT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME LOCATION Rangeline Crossing III Subdivision Rangeline Crossing III Subdivision 5289 Halls Mill
More informationRezoning Petition Final Staff Analysis May 21, 2018
Rezoning Petition 2017-182 Final Staff Analysis May 21, 2018 REQUEST LOCATION Current Zoning: R-3 (single family) and no zoning (current NC State right-of-way) Proposed Zoning: B-2(CD) (general business,
More informationSeptember 29, Dear Chautauquan,
The owner of 4 Elm Lane (Christine Odell Potts) is coming before the Architectural Review Board with revised plans for the construction of a new two-story home on the same lot. A demolition permit and
More informationDraft Model Access Management Overlay Ordinance
Draft Model Access Management Overlay Ordinance This model was developed using the City of Hutchinson and the Trunk Highway 7 corridor. The basic provisions of this model may be adopted by any jurisdiction
More informationCITY PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
CITY PLAN COMMISSION STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: Request for a Change of Zoning and Preliminary Development Plan FROM: Mara Perry, Director of Planning & Development MEETING DATE: November 6, 2017 PETITION:
More informationSection 1: US 19 Overlay District
Section 1: US 19 Overlay District Section 1.1 Intent and Purpose The purpose of the US Highway 19 Overlay District is to manage access to land development along US Highway 19 in a manner that preserves
More informationPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT August 18, 2016
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT August 18, 2016 DEVELOPMENT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME Mullinax Ford Subdivision Mullinax Ford Subdivision LOCATION CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT District 6 Southeast
More informationM-43 CORRIDOR OVERLAY ZONE
ARTICLE 26.00 M-43 CORRIDOR OVERLAY ZONE Section 26.01 Findings A primary function of the M-43 state highway is to move traffic through the Township and to points beyond. As the primary east-west arterial
More informationATTACHMENT A REQUEST/BACKGROUND INFORMATION VENTURA/TYRONE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT PROJECT OVERVIEW/REQUEST BACKGROUND Ventura Boulevard
Revised October 28, 2016 ATTACHMENT A REQUEST/BACKGROUND INFORMATION VENTURA/TYRONE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Sherman Oaks, CA 91423 PROJECT OVERVIEW/REQUEST The Applicant, 14311 Ventura Development, LLC,
More information170 West Broadway. South Boston, MA Application for Article 80 Small Project Review Boston Redevelopment Authority April 28, 2014
South Boston, MA 02127 Application for Article 80 Small Project Review Boston Redevelopment Authority April 28, 2014 Owner/Developer:, LLC. Legal Consultant: McDermott, Quilty & Miller, LLP Architect:
More informationPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: October 19, 2017
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT STAFF REPORT Date: October 19, 2017 DEVELOPMENT NAME LOCATION Custom Boat Storage 3975 Demetropolis Road (East side of Demetropolis Road, 0.2± miles South of Halls Mill Road.)
More informationThe Scarborough Rapid Transit (SRT) Extension Study has expanded its scope and boundaries southerly to include a new multimodal facility at Kennedy
The Scarborough Rapid Transit (SRT) Extension Study has expanded its scope and boundaries southerly to include a new multimodal facility at Kennedy Station. The Transit Project Assessment (TPA) work for
More informationPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: April 18, 2019 DEVELOPMENT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME Springhill Village Subdivision Springhill Village Subdivision LOCATION 4350, 4354, 4356, 4358,
More informationLes Saisons Sai Wan Ho Building Journal, June 2002
Project name Location Publication Les Saisons Sai Wan Ho Building Journal, June 2002 C O V E R S T O R Y L E S S A I S O N S Les Saisons, Sai Wan Ho Seasonal change by Tim Youngs When joint developers
More informationMOTION NO. M Property Exchange Agreement with the University of Washington for the Northgate Link Extension
MOTION NO. M2012-93 Property Exchange Agreement with the University of Washington for the Northgate Link Extension MEETING: DATE: TYPE OF ACTION: STAFF CONTACT: PHONE: Board 12/20/12 Final Action Ahmad
More informationDirector, Community Planning, North York District NNY 23 OZ, NNY 23 RH, NNY 23 SA
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 4841 to 4881 Yonge Street, 2 and 50 Sheppard Avenue East, 2, 4 and 6 Forest Laneway Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment, Site Plan and Rental Housing Demolition
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item
PDP-13-00518 Item No. 3B- 1 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT Regular Agenda -Public Hearing Item PC Staff Report 2/24/14 ITEM NO. 3B PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR HERE @ KANSAS; 1101 INDIANA ST (SLD) PDP-13-00518:
More informationHennepin County Department of. Housing, Community Works and Transit. Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Guidelines
Hennepin County Department of Housing, Community Works and Transit 2007 Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Guidelines Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Bond Funds Hennepin County Housing,
More informationThe Forecaster Building Notice of Project Change
The Forecaster Building June 13, 2013 Mr. Peter Meade, Director Boston Redevelopment Authority One City Hall Plaza, 9 th Floor Boston, MA 02201 Attn: Heather Campisano, Deputy Director for Development
More informationCommunity Development Department Council Chambers, 7:30 PM, June 7, 2018
STAFF REPORT 2018-19P: Special Use Permit Community Development Department Council Chambers, 7:30 PM, June 7, 2018 To: From: Re: Paul Luke, Plan Commission Chairperson Carrie Haberstich, AICP, Planner/CDBG
More informationDIFFERENCES IN THE EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING CODE IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS
DIFFERENCES IN THE EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING CODE IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS FOUR CASE STUDIES OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT This guide is intended to illustrate the differences in development currently allowed
More informationDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Meeting Date: January 10, 2019 Item #: PZ2019-393 Project Name: Applicant and Owner: Proposed Development: Requests: STAFF REPORT DRESDEN HEIGHTS PHASE II DCI Dresden Heights Phase
More informationARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
ARTICLE IV: DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IV-53 409 PRIVATE STREETS A private street means any way that provides ingress to, or egress from, property by means of vehicles or other means, or that provides travel
More informationA APPENDIX A: FORM-BASED BUILDING PROTOTYPES
A : A.1 Introduction Form-based prototypes are specific building types that are either encouraged or discouraged in historic multi-family residential or mixed-use neighborhoods. Their intent is to ensure
More informationZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: July 9, 2015
ZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: July 9, 2015 APPLICANT NAME 2513 Dauphin Street, Inc. SUBDIVISION NAME Audubon Place Extension No. 3, Resubdivision of Lots 1-5 LOCATION 2513 Dauphin Street
More informationMemorial Northwest Homeowners Association Master Plan Project Phasing
Memorial Northwest Homeowners Association Master Plan Project Phasing October 2011 Contents Master Plan Key Learning s Construction Phasing Construction Phasing Issues Project Estimates Project Financing
More informationTROWBRIDGE & WOLF. August 21, 2002 WEST CAMPUS RESIDENTIAL INITIATIVE DEIS ADDENDUM THREE
TROWBRIDGE & WOLF L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t s P l a n n e r s August 21, 2002 WEST CAMPUS RESIDENTIAL INITIATIVE DEIS ADDENDUM THREE 1. Replace pages 121-a, 121-b and 121-c Section 2.11 Community
More informationCITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G.2 STAFF REPORT August 5, Staff Contact: Fred Buderi (707)
CITY OF VACAVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item No. G.2 STAFF REPORT August 5, 2008 Staff Contact: Fred Buderi (707) 449-5307 TITLE: REQUEST: RECOMMENDED ACTION: OPPORTUNITY HOUSE EMERGENCY SHELTER RELOCATION
More informationSAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY
THIS PRINT COVERS CALENDAR ITEM NO. : 10.3 DIVISION: Central Subway Project BRIEF DESCRIPTION: SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL TRANSPORTATION AGENCY Authorizing the Director of Transportation to execute a Memorandum
More informationWALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT. AGENDA: July 6, 2016 ITEM 4b.
WALNUT CREEK DESIGN REVIEW COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Attachment 3 AGENDA: July 6, 2016 ITEM 4b. ORIGINATED BY: COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING PROJECT NAME APPLICATION TYPE APPLICATION
More informationBETHESDA STATION MONTGOMERY COUNTY COUNCIL T&E COMMITTEE PROJECT BRIEFING SEPTEMBER 23, 2010
BETHESDA STATION SOUTH ENTRANCE & CAPITAL CRESCENT TRAIL MONTGOMERY COUNTY COUNCIL T&E COMMITTEE PROJECT BRIEFING SEPTEMBER 23, 2010 Agenda 1. Project Description 4. Renderings Ridership and Operation
More informationVillage of Glenview Plan Commission
Village of Glenview Plan Commission STAFF REPORT May 13, 2014 TO: Chairman and Plan Commissioners CASE #: P2014-037 FROM: Community Development Department CASE MANAGER: Tony Repp, Planner SUBJECT: Final
More informationVillage of Port Jefferson Urban Renewal Plan
Urban Renewal Plan Village of Port Jefferson Urban Renewal Plan Port Jefferson, New York PREPARED FOR Village of Port Jefferson Village Board 121 West Broadway Port Jefferson, NY 11777 631.473.4724 PREPARED
More information2015 IBC Allowable Heights and Areas
2015 IBC Allowable Heights and Based on the 2015 International Building Code (IBC ) Course Description This seminar addresses the key issues of the 2015 International Building Code (IBC ) Chapter 5 regarding
More informationNEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION SPECIAL TELEPHONE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING JUNE 25, 2013 ACTION ITEM
NEW JERSEY TRANSIT CORPORATION SPECIAL TELEPHONE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING JUNE 25, 2013 FINAL AGENDA PAGE CALL TO ORDER PUBLIC COMMENTS ON AGENDA ITEM ONLY EXECUTIVE SESSION AUTHORIZATION ACTION ITEM
More informationThe demolition required for the project came before the Landmark Preservation Commission (LPC) on November 3, 2016, where no action was taken.
D E S I G N R E V I E W C O M M I T T E E S t a f f R e p o r t 2072 ADDISON STREET PRELIMINARY DESIGN REVIEW For Committee Discussion/ Majority Recommendation JULY 20, 2017 Design Review #DRCP2016-0002
More information1 Application Form 4
1 Application Form 4 5 2 Project Summary Location The proposed development is located at 216 Cobequid Road in Sackville, Nova Scotia. Site Characteristics The mixed-use development is situated on the corner
More informationCity of Grande Prairie Development Services Department
City of Grande Prairie Development Services Department COUNTRYSIDE SOUTH OUTLINE PLAN Prepared by: GPEC Consulting Ltd. #202, 10712-100th Street Grande Prairie, AB Council Resolution of August 20, 2001
More informationTRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION
TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT PLAN EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT LAWRENCE TO BRYN MAWR MODERNIZATION March 2018- FINAL DRAFT SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT CONCEPTS This report
More informationA M H E R S T
Town of TOWN HALL 4 Boltwood Avenue Amherst, MA 01002-2351 A M H E R S T Massachusetts PLANNING DEPARTMENT (413) 259-3040 (413) 259-2410 [Fax] planning@amherstma.gov April 7, 2015 Memo To: From: Subject:
More informationDirector, Community Planning, North York District NNY 23 OZ and NNY 23 RH
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 2 & 50 Sheppard Avenue East 4841 to 4881 Yonge Street and 2 to 6 Forest Laneway Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and Rental Housing Demolition Applications
More informationGuidelines for the Approval of New Homes Sales Offices (Building Permits, Agreements, Securities)
Guidelines for the Approval of New Homes Sales Offices (Building Permits, Agreements, Securities) ENCLOSURES: Site Plan Application Building Permit Application Grading and Drainage Approval Requirements
More informationKidbrooke Village, Greenwich
Village, Greenwich Key details Name Village Location Royal Borough of Greenwich, London Number of dwellings 4,763 (1,906 council homes demolished to make way for the development) Date first homes sold
More informationPALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 07/05/2012
PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION ZONING COMMISSION VARIANCE STAFF REPORT 07/05/2012 APPLICATION NO. CODE SECTION REQUIRED PROPOSED VARIANCE ZV-2012-00690 3.D.1.A
More informationThe Miramar Santa Monica
The Miramar Santa Monica Project Description The Santa Monica Miramar Hotel (the Miramar or the Hotel ) has been an institution in the City of Santa Monica since originally opening on the site in 1920.
More informationCounty of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report
County of Sonoma Agenda Item Summary Report Agenda Item Number: 36 (This Section for use by Clerk of the Board Only.) Clerk of the Board 575 Administration Drive Santa Rosa, CA 95403 To: Board of Supervisors
More informationCommitted to Service
Committed to Service Paul Woods, President Rebecca W. Arnold, Vice President Sara M. Baker, Commissioner Jim D. Hansen, Commissioner Kent Goldthorpe, Commissioner August 25, 2017 Development Services TO:
More informationEquality and Access Plan The Abbey School, Reading
Equality and Access Plan 2017-2020 The Abbey School, Reading , Reading Accessibility Plan Scope The School recognises the benefits of a diverse School Community, with individuals who value one another
More informationSouthall Gas Works: Design Statement by URBED with Capita Symonds, WYG, Lovejoys, Jestico and Whiles and RPSDesign Statement. Typologies.
9 Typologies Page 95 9:1. Approach to typologies 1. 3. 2. 4. Far left: Traditional walk-up flats: With 2 of 4 flats per landing off a core. The bottom plan shows a perimeter block arrangement based on
More informationPROPOSED APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT 32 & 34 TENNYSON AVE TAKAPUNA INTEGRATED TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT
PROPOSED APARTMENT DEVELOPMENT 32 & 34 TENNYSON AVE TAKAPUNA INTEGRATED TRANSPORT ASSESSMENT Prepared by E.R Hebner 30 th November 2016 Z:\2015_Projects\15155-34 Tennyson Ave\doc\34 Tennyson Ave - Traffic
More informationBYLAW NO. 15/026 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW NO. 99/059
Attachment 2 BYLAW NO. 15/026 A BYLAW OF THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF WOOD BUFFALO TO AMEND THE LAND USE BYLAW NO. 99/059 WHEREAS Section 639 of the Municipal Government Act requires every municipality
More informationComposition of traditional residential corridors.
Page 1 of 7 St. Petersburg, Florida, Code of Ordinances >> PART II - ST. PETERSBURG CITY CODE >> Chapter 16 - LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS >> SECTION 16.20.060. CORRIDOR RESIDENTIAL TRADITIONAL DISTRICTS
More information201 College Avenue. Zoning Compliance. City of Ithaca, New York Date:
201 College Avenue City of Ithaca, New York Date: 3.29.2016 Project Description The project involves the construction of a 5 story apartment building at the corner of College Avenue and Bool Street, in
More informationConditional Use Permit case no. CU 14-06: Bristol Village Partners, LLC
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT August 7, 2014 Conditional Use Permit case no. CU 14-06: Bristol Village Partners, LLC CASE DESCRIPTION: LOCATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EXISTING LAND USE: ZONING:
More informationCOMMUNICATION URBAN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CITY OF DES MOINES, IOWA NOVEMBER 1, 2016, 2016 MEETING
COMMUNICATION URBAN DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CITY OF DES MOINES, IOWA NOVEMBER 1, 2016, 2016 MEETING Subject: Recommendation Prepared by: PRELIMINARY DESIGN AND FINANCIAL REVIEW 401 SE 6 TH STREET- CONNOLLY
More informationInspira Medical Center Woodbury Development Options Report
Development Options Report Prepared for: City of Woodbury, Gloucester County Improvement Authority, Inspira Health Network Prepared by: Urban Partners (Draft Final) October 25, 2018 1. INTRODUCTION Inspira
More informationCommunity Development Department
Community Development Department SUBJECT: Reconsideration of Final Site Plan Review, Preliminary Subdivision, and Planned Development for Park Place Glenview at 1225 Waukegan Road MEETING DATE: March 28,
More informationZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: November 3, 2016
ZONING AMENDMENT & SUBDIVISION STAFF REPORT Date: November 3, 2016 APPLICANT NAME SUBDIVISION NAME David Shumer 5955 Airport Subdivision CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT District 6 5955 Airport Boulevard, 754 Linlen
More information3. Miscellaneous Instructions and Definitions.
Last page revision- March 31st, 1999 TEXAS ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS (TAS) TAS Table of Contents 3. Miscellaneous Instructions and Definitions. 3.1 Graphic Conventions. Graphic conventions are shown in Table
More information1. the height and setback regulations of Section (Alternative Height and Setback Regulations - Daylight Evaluation); and
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION July 14, 2010 / Calendar No. 31 C 100049 ZSM IN THE MATTER OF an application submitted by 401 Hotel REIT, LLC and 401 Commercial, L.P. pursuant to Sections 197-c and 201 of the
More information74af ANTELOPE VALLEY REDEVELOPMENT PLAN
74af T. Telegraph District Phase 2: Telegraph Flats & Telegraph Lofts East 1. Project Area Description Phase 2 will include two building subphase areas with connecting streetscape enhancements: The Telegraph
More informationMay 21, ACHD Board of Commissioners Stacey Yarrington, Planner II DRH /DRH
Development Services Department May 21, 2013 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: ACHD Board of Commissioners Stacey Yarrington, Planner II DRH13-00106/DRH13-00108 Executive Summary: This is a design review application
More informationPUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT OF OFF-STREET PARKING PROPOSAL CITY OF OAKLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT OCTOBER 2015
PUBLIC REVIEW DRAFT OF OFF-STREET PARKING PROPOSAL CITY OF OAKLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT OCTOBER 2015 1. Downtown Parking Minimums Problem: The current regulations do not prescribe a minimum amount of required
More information5. Land Acquisition and Displacement
Northern Branch Corridor SDEIS March 2017 5. Land Acquisition and Displacement 5.1. Chapter Overview 5.1.1. Introduction Implementation of the Preferred Alternative would require the acquisition of property
More informationPLAINFIELD CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING, ZONING & BUILDING SERVICES MEMORANDUM
PLAINFIELD CHARTER TOWNSHIP COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING, ZONING & BUILDING SERVICES 6161 BELMONT AVENUE N.E. BELMONT, MI 49306 PHONE 616-364-1190 FAX: 616-364-1170 www.plainfieldchartertwp.org
More informationDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT EASTSIDE CHAMBLEE LINK DCI
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Public Hearing Date: April 12, 2018 Item #: PZ-2018-248 STAFF REPORT EASTSIDE CHAMBLEE LINK DCI Request: Development of Community Compact (DCI), ten concurrent variances,
More informationGROSVENOR-STRATHMORE METRO STATION MANDATORY REFERRAL APPLICATION NORTH BETHESDA, MD
GROSVENOR-STRATHMORE METRO STATION MANDATORY REFERRAL APPLICATION NORTH BETHESDA, MD Submission by: Fivesquares JDA at Grosvenor Metro, LLC On behalf of Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority 1
More informationStaff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission
Staff Report to the North Ogden City Planning Commission SYNOPSIS / APPLICATION INFORMATION Application Request: Public Hearing regarding a legislative application, special exception for the Stone Crest
More information144 and 150 Berry Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 144 and 150 Berry Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Preliminary Report Date: December 16, 2014 To: From: Wards: Reference Number: Etobicoke York Community Council
More informationADA/TAS Plan Review & Inspection Worksheet Texas Access
ADA/TAS Plan Review & Inspection Worksheet Texas Access www.texasaccess.com Client: Project No: Address: City/Town: State/ZIP: Project Type: PLAN REVIEW INSPECTION BY DATE Applicable to project scope Results:
More informationMEMORANDUM. C3A District Shoreland Overlay District 32,055 square feet / 0.74 acres. West Calhoun, adjacent to Cedar-Isles-Dean
Department of Community Planning & Economic Development 250 South 4th Street, Room 300 Minneapolis, MN 55415-1385 MEMORANDUM To: City Planning Commission, Committee of the Whole Prepared By: Peter Crandall,
More informationMEMORANDUM. Mr. Sean Tabibian, Esq. Dana A. Sayles, AICP, three6ixty Olivia Joncich, three6ixty. DATE May 26, 2017
MEMORANDUM TO FROM Dana A. Sayles, AICP, three6ixty Olivia Joncich, three6ixty DATE VIA Email RE 3409 W. Temple Street, Los Angeles, CA 90026 Zoning Analysis and Entitlement Strategy three6ixty (the Consultant
More informationSCHEDULE B. Comprehensive Mixed Use Sign and Awning Package Replacing Section VI.P.3 of the Redevelopment Plan As amended January 22, 2013
SCHEDULE B Comprehensive Mixed Use Sign and Awning Package Replacing Section VI.P.3 of the Redevelopment Plan As amended January 22, 2013 3. Mixed Use District a. All dwellings shall clearly display the
More informationCounty Lot C Redevelopment
County Lot C Redevelopment La Crosse County La Crosse, WISCONSIN 03.20.14 Orientation What is the purpose of this process? La Crosse County is exploring ways to maximize the value of Lot C by completing
More informationPlan Area and Current Facilities
Plan Area and Current Facilities The Plan Area is bounded by South Delaware Street to the east and Concar Drive to the south (Figure 2.01). Parallel to Concar Drive on the south, SR 92 rises above grade
More informationARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA
ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of November 15, 2005 DATE: November 22, 2005 SUBJECT: SP #331 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT to incorporate 4420 N. Fairfax Dr. into site plan, construct
More informationPALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION
PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING, ZONING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION Application No.: W-2014-00288 Application Name: O Reilly Auto Parts Control No.: 2013-00286 Applicant: Hutton Growth Blue Sky
More informationMEMORANDUM. DATE: August 31, Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator. Matthew Bachler, Associate Planner
NEW BUSINESS 8B MEMORANDUM DATE: August 31, 2015 TO: FROM: Honorable Mayor and City Councilmembers Patrick Klaers, City Administrator Matthew Bachler, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Planning Case #15-016 Applicant:
More informationP. H. Robinson Consulting Urban Planning, Consulting and Project Management
PLANNING RATIONALE REPORT FOR SITE PLAN AND DRAFT PLAN OF CONDOMINIUM APPLICATIONS 73-75 HARVEY STREET CITY OF OTTAWA PREPARED BY: P H ROBINSON CONSULTING AUGUST 2012 1 This report has been prepared on
More informationa. provide for the continuation of collector streets and thoroughfare streets between adjacent subdivisions;
Section 7.07. Intent The requirements of this Section are intended to provide for the orderly growth of the Town of Holly Springs and its extra-territorial jurisdiction by establishing guidelines for:
More informationApproval to Negotiate and Execute a Term Sheet at Branch Avenue
Planning, Program Development and Real Estate Committee Item V-F July 11, 2013 Approval to Negotiate and Execute a Term Sheet at Branch Avenue Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority Board Action/Information
More informationSECTION 7000 LAND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS
SECTION 7000 LAND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 7000 LAND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS... 1 7001 LEGISLATIVE AUTHORITY... 1 7001.1 LAND DEVELOPMENT... 1 7001.1.1 Title 40, Idaho Code... 1 7001.1.2 Idaho Code 40-1415
More informationIV. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
IMPLEMENTATION IV. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN IV.A Phasing and Priorities The proposed city-wide network plan for the Decatur Preservation Corridor is a long term vision and guide for future implementation. It
More informationth Avenue NW Early Design Guidance Meeting - SDCI # EDG Meeting
- Proposed New Residential Construction Project (SDCI #3024352) 1 SEATTLE DESIGN REVIEW Date of EDG Meeting Early Design Guidance Meeting 1 PROJECT SUMMARY The proposed project consists of 74 residential
More informationKassner Goodspeed Architects Ltd.
Kassner Goodspeed Architects Ltd. 29 & State Street Developments Ltd. The Promenade at Robie South Case 20761: Application for Development Agreement Design Rationale The land assembly is a 1.3 Acre parcel
More informationApproval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement and Compact Public Hearing
Planning, Program Development and Real Estate Committee Item IV - B March 13, 2014 Approval of Takoma Amended Joint Development Agreement and Compact Public Hearing Washington Metropolitan Area Transit
More information1. APPLICANT: Polsinelli, Shalton & Welte is the applicant for this request.
5. REVISED PRELIMINARY PLAN APPROVAL - THE RETREAT AT MAPLECREST - Vicinity of the northeast corner of 159 th Street and U.S. 69 Highway 1. APPLICANT: Polsinelli, Shalton & Welte is the applicant for this
More informationHOUSING ISSUES REPORT
HOUSING ISSUES REPORT 8, 12 & 14 HIGH PARK AVENUE AND 1908, 1910, 1914 & 1920 BLOOR STREET WEST CITY OF TORONTO PREPARED FOR: 619595 ONTARI O INC. February 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0
More information