White City Metro Township Planning Commission Public Meeting Agenda

Transcription

1 Planning and Development Services 2001 S. State Street N3-600 Salt Lake City, UT Phone: (385) Fax: (385) White City Metro Township Planning Commission Public Meeting Agenda Tuesday, November 28, :30 P.M. **AMENDED** Location SALT LAKE COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER 2001 SOUTH STATE STREET, ROOM S1-120 SOUTH BUILDING, MAIN FLOOR (385) UPON REQUEST, WITH 5 WORKING DAYS NOTICE, REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS FOR QUALIFIED INDIVIDUALS MAY BE PROVIDED. PLEASE CONTACT WENDY GURR AT TTY USERS SHOULD CALL 711. The Planning Commission Public Meeting is a public forum where, depending on the agenda item, the Planning Commission may receive comment and recommendations from applicants, the public, applicable agencies and County staff regarding land use applications and other items on the Commission s agenda. In addition, it is where the Planning Commission takes action on these items, which may include: approval, approval with conditions, denial, continuance or recommendation to other bodies as applicable. BUSINESS MEETING 1) Approval of Minutes from the August 1, and September 26, 2017 meetings 2) Jena Carver, Traffic Engineer UDOT project East between Carnation Drive to 9400 South will have an overlay project in 2018, construction to be completed Spring/Summer 2018, ADA ramps in White City portion will be replaced. Additional information to be provided as design progresses. There is an opportunity to apply for funding from WFRC to complete a planning study for Sego Lily Drive. Will explain the TLC program. There are currently no long term plans for changes in roadway widths in White City. Suggest Helen Peters from the Office of Regional Development to come in to discuss Regional ATIP plan at a future meeting. 3) General Plan Work Session 4) Other Business Items (as needed) PUBLIC HEARING Jake Hone is requesting approval of a zone change for 2 parcels that amount to 2.68 acres from the A-2 (Agricultural) zone to the R-1-21 (Residential Single Family) zone. Location: 1160 East and 1186 East South. Community Council: White City. Planner: Debora Riddle ADJOURN November 28, 2017 Page 1 of 1 AGENDA WHITE CITY METRO PC

2 This page intentionally left blank

3 Planning and Development Services 2001 S. State Street N3-600 Salt Lake City, UT Phone: (385) Fax: (385) MEETING MINUTE SUMMARY WHITE CITY METRO TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Tuesday, August 1, :00 p.m. Approximate meeting length: 1 hour 40 minutes Number of public in attendance: 14 Summary Prepared by: Wendy Gurr Meeting Conducted by: Commissioner Spagnuolo *NOTE: Staff Reports referenced in this document can be found on the State and County websites, or from Salt Lake County Planning & Development Services. ATTENDANCE Commissioners and Staff: Commissioners Public Business Mtg Mtg Christy Seiger-Webster x x Christopher Spagnuolo x x Robert Frailey x x Darrin Webster x x Jim Mitchell x x Absent Planning Staff / DA Public Mtg Business Mtg Wendy Gurr x x David White x x Spencer Hymas Todd Draper Tom Zumbado 6:00 PM BEGIN STAFF MEETING: 6:05 pm The Public is invited and welcome to attend the Staff Meeting 1. Discussion / Clarification of Agenda Items 2. Close Staff Meeting and recess until Public Meeting 1. Welcome and Determine Quorum: Christopher Spagnuolo, Chair Darrin Webster, Vice-Chair Christy Seiger-Webster Robert Frailey Jim Mitchell 6:10 PM OPEN PUBLIC MEETING: 6:08 pm Staff: Wendy Gurr, Spencer Hymas, David D. White White City Metro Township Planning Commission August 1, 2017 Meeting Summary Page 1 of 5

4 6:15 PM PUBLIC HEARINGS Hearings began at 6:10 p.m. The Planning Commission Chair Will Read the Public Hearing Rules 1. Rezoning Application 30326: The White City Metro Township Council has remanded Rezoning Application back to the Planning Commission for their recommendation on the R-1-12 zoning district as an alternative and replacement for the R-1-8 zone request Jake Hone is requesting approval of a zone change for 3 parcels that amount to 3.21 acres from the R-1-21 (Residential Single Family) & A-2 (Agricultural) zone to the R-1-8 (Residential Single Family) zone. Location: 1186 E; 1170 E; 1160 E; S. Community Council: White City. Planner: Spencer Hymas The Planning Commission s recommendation will be sent to the White City Metro Township Council for consideration on August 3 rd, 2017 at the White City Water District Office, 999 East Galena Drive Sandy, Utah, Please see the Utah Public Notice Website. Salt Lake County Planning and Development Services Principle Planner David D. White provided an analysis of the staff report. Commissioner Seiger-Webster confirmed this item is under consideration from zone A-2 to R Mr. White said all parcels will be zoned R Commissioner Webster confirmed four horses per parcel in R Mr. White said you would have 21,000 square feet per parcel. Commissioner Webster said under R-1-21 is their potential for someone purchasing two parcels and using one for home and one for horses. Mr. White said use of property, you cannot have a parcel and just have horses on it, and you need accessory uses. Commissioner Spagnuolo asked if rezoned into R-1-8, that would put into conflict some structures on neighboring properties and the neighbors could be non-conforming, and rights would be restricted on new requirements. Mr. White advised no, whatever the requirements are now, stay. Commissioner Frailey said we are going after R-1-21, six parcels, single family, and can t be multifamily. Commissioner Webster asked for remaining A-2, if the property changed hands, would the new owner still be able to maintain it the way it is. Mr. White said he has not inspected and cannot confirm non-conforming. PUBLIC PORTION OF MEETING OPENED Speaker # 1: Applicant Name: Jake Hone Address: South Harvest Pointe Drive Comments: Mr. Hone said stick with original application of R-1-8, but due to history request, alternative of R-1-21 zone. They are looking at a concept and they do meet the application requirements or rezoning standards. Six parcels meet R-1-21 standards and requirements. One parcel proposed is already zoned R and would like to see all parcels zoned R-1-21, because two are in A-2. Thirty foot right-of-way of the street to the west. Street would be within the parcels and not as a public street. Cul-de-sac size for fire and turnaround. Met all requirements and ask commission to reconsider the negative and positively recommend. White City Metro Township Planning Commission August 1, 2017 Meeting Summary Page 2 of 5

5 Speaker # 2: Citizen Name: Dionne Rasmussen Address: South Amberley Lane Comments: Ms. Rasmussen asked how far apart the houses are and how far are their backyards. Mr. White said side yard setback is ten feet and twenty between the houses. Rear yard setback is thirty feet, but could build a detached garage fifteen feet from the property. Commissioner Mitchell confirmed detached garage from fifteen feet from the property line. Speaker # 3: Citizen Name: Chariti Carmon Address: 5857 Emmeline Drive Comments: Ms. Carmon said when you have the developer and builder separate and trying to replicate and no one will have horses. Trying to make it look like the other one. They won t have horses and if trying to protect. He keeps putting R-1-21 sandwiched, but on the concept plan they aren t all R The building plan is not to protect the horse property. Speaker # 4: Citizen Name: Deanna Bierman Address: South 1225 East Comments: Ms. Bierman provided a handout with highlights. East is A-2 zoning bordered. Per Mr. Hymas, because of the type of property in this development this land would go commercial. New homes going in to these properties what they were zoned. Look at the use of surrounding properties. These properties are high equestrian use and the houses will not be conducive to horses. R-1-21 can only have four horses per parcel. They feel can be developed as existing zone. They can be developed as three, one acre horse sights and developed A-2. Provided exhibit with five complaints made, new residents came in and thought they were moving into equestrian and by complaints, old residents are forced to make changes. Safety not familiar with horses, neighbors are not conducive, concerned with fireworks and fire danger. Not a lot of ground allowing for equestrian use and allowed to have direct access. If you rezone and take away, that is a huge change to that area. They feel like own personal central park. Mr. White said they aren t in disagreement per parcels. Speaker # 5: Citizen Name: Lee Sprouse Address: 1224 East South Comments: Ms. Sprouse said this rezone backs on her property. Give as much consideration to remain A-2. Just because you can change doesn t mean you should. Speaker # 6: Citizen Name: Kristy Shelton Address: Not provided Comments: Ms. Shelton said she understands the conceptual plan, but he has not brought to see what size product he is putting on the parcels. Couple people that live on Amberley lane and will be affected due to the type of product on the parcel. Two stories really means three stories if you have privacy, you won t have it. Ten foot feet easement is not scaled on the plan. The lots are likely to be eighty feet wide. You could only put thirty-five foot wide two stories or rambler with forty-eight feet. Forty feet from the back of dwelling to where the horse is housed. White City Metro Township Planning Commission August 1, 2017 Meeting Summary Page 3 of 5

6 Speaker # 7: Citizen Name: Melissa Higgs Address: South Amberley Lane Comments: Ms. Higgs asked not to zone this for something other than the zone property. To remember who s living there and effect their lives. Speaker # 8: Applicant Name: Jake Hone Address: South Harvest Pointe Drive Comments: Mr. Hone said the drawing is to scale. Frontage is to one hundred feet minimum. Ten foot side setback on each side, between homes twenty feet required, with eighty foot wide building envelope. He wants to use Ms. Bierman's exhibit. No R-1-21 bordering on the east side of the property. R-1-21 frontage than A-2. He respects the comments on the way of life, agricultural uses. You can have up to four horses, they aren t limiting that. Everyone has the right to do what they want with the property they own. Haven t restricted. When you have an HOA, bylaws and CC&R s and considered in the approval with a development agreement. Commissioner Frailey said no matter how zoned the road will still be impacted, by fireworks and throwing things. Private drive on the other side of property. Commissioner Webster said in terms of homes built, are you looking for custom homes. Mr. Hone said they would be custom homes. Commissioner Webster said the owners would be able to build how they choose. Mr. Hone said they are 275 feet in depth. Commissioner Webster said the horse users would be the rear away from the public. Commissioner Mitchell asked HOA community, as a planning board would they have access to input or decisions. Mr. White said no involvement with HOA, if PUD and street built to city standards and they decide to make a private road, they can decide, until they decide to make a PUD some flexibility. Commissioner Mitchell confirmed what he said. Commissioner Webster asked with a private road what type of barrier or fence line proposed between existing property and road. Mr. Hone said this stage is not addressed, but they would propose what is done on western border and a six foot privacy concrete or masonry. Commissioner Spagnuolo said chopped it up, with two lots on south side by cul-de-sac, how do you figure that out. Mr. White said there is a map in the ordinance, you have to meet one hundred feet at the setback requirements. Meeting setback requirements side yards will be greater than ten feet because of the angles. Ms. Bierman asked if including the road it would be a PUD. Mr. White said when it s a private road it can be part of the lot, if public then no. 2. Close Public Hearing: (Motion/Discussion) Commissioner Seiger-Webster motioned to close the public hearing, Commissioner Frailey seconded that motion. PUBLIC PORTION OF MEETING CLOSED BUSINESS MEETING Meeting began at 6:56 p.m. 1. Approval of Minutes from the May 23, 2017 meeting. Motion: To approve minutes from the May 23, 2017 meeting as presented. Motion by: Commissioner Webster 2 nd by: Commissioner Seiger-Webster Vote: Commissioners voted unanimous in favor 2. Approval of Minutes from the June 27, 2017 meeting. White City Metro Township Planning Commission August 1, 2017 Meeting Summary Page 4 of 5

7 Motion: To approve minutes from the June 27, 2017 meeting as presented. Motion by: Commissioner Webster 2 nd by: Commissioner Seiger-Webster Vote: Commissioners voted unanimous in favor 3. Rezoning Application Recommendation. (Motion/Discussion) Commissioner Mitchell read something regarding larger homes and not with equestrian. Commissioner Seiger-Webster advised of the general plan. Making changes without guidance from the township council is not in the best interest of community. Commissioner Webster said primary concern is being a premature decision, without setting long term goals and impressed another suggestion has come forward. Commissioner Spagnuolo said not much agricultural in White City. Commissioner Mitchell said across 1300 east, there are animal rights, so many per acreage. Motion: To recommend denial of application #30326 to the White City Metro Township Council. Motion by: Commissioner Mitchell 2 nd by: Commissioner Frailey Vote: Commissioner Webster voted nay, all other commissioners voted in favor. Motion passed. 4. General Plan Timeline and Questions. (Discussion) Commissioners discussed where to begin and what s important and the public input, zoning, commercial, historical development. Ms. Bierman asked if removing houses is that something the city or the state. Commissioner Mitchell said responsibility to make sure community is preserved, can get out and transportation. Regional traffic plan and Sandy general plan bordering their area. 5. Other Business and Future Agenda Items (As Needed, Discussion) 6. Adjourn. (Motion) Commissioner Mitchell motioned to adjourn, Commissioner Frailey seconded that motion. MEETING ADJOURNED Time Adjourned 7:45 p.m. White City Metro Township Planning Commission August 1, 2017 Meeting Summary Page 5 of 5

8 File # Rezone Summary and Recommendation Meeting Date: November 28, 2017 Public Body: White City Metro Township Planning Commission Property Address: 1160 East South Parcel ID s: ; Request: Rezone allow for development of a 6 lot subdivision. Current Zone: A-2 Proposed Zone: R-1-21 Planner: Debora Riddle Planning Staff Recommendation: Continuance for 6 months Applicant(s) Name: Jake Hone PROJECT DESCRIPTION The applicant is requesting approval of a zone change for 2 parcels that amount to 2.68 acres from the A2: Agricultural Zone to the R-1-21: Single-Family Residential Zone. The stated purpose for the rezone is to allow for the development of a 6-lot subdivision on the property. The A-2 zone is described in the ordinance as an area intended for low-density residential development and agricultural uses. [ ] The minimum lot size in the A-2 zone is 1 acre and horses are permitted in the zone. The R-1 zones are described as areas intended to. establish single-family neighborhoods The minimum lot size in the R-1-21 is ½ acre. A maximum of four horses is permitted in the R-1-21 zone. SITE & VICINITY DESCRIPTION (see attached map) This property is located on the south side of South in an area that is comprised of properties zoned A-2 and R It is within a block of the Dimple Dell Fitness and Recreation Center and is also close to Dimple Dell Regional Park.

9 Request: Rezone File #: Property to the North across South is a large single-family residential area which is zoned R-1-8 (8000 sq. ft. minimum lot size). Additional neighborhood areas on the South side of South street (within the jurisdiction of Sandy City) are zoned with a similar R-1-8 single-family residential zoning. R-1-21 R-1-21 A-2 A-2 ZONE CONSIDERATIONS Bldg Requirements A-2 Zone (Existing) R-1-21 Zone (Proposed) Height Limit none 35 feet Front Yard Setback 30 feet (50 feet if on a Private Road) 30 feet (50 feet if on a Private Road) Side Yard Setback 10 feet each side 10 feet each side Rear Yard Setback 30 feet 30 feet (15 feet with garage) Lot Width 100 feet 100 feet Lot Area 43,560 sq.ft. min. (1 acre) 21,780 sq.ft. min. (1/2 acre) Parking 2 per Dwelling Unit 2 per Dwelling Unit Compatibility with existing buildings in terms of size, scale and height. Based on the requirements listed above homes built under the proposed zone would be similar to those existing in the area. Rezone Summary Page 2 of 3

10 Request: Rezone File #: GENERAL PLAN CONSIDERATIONS There is not currently an adopted general plan for the White City Metro Township. White City Metro-Township as a newly created entity is currently working towards adoption of a General Plan to guide the long term development of the Metro. NEIGHBORHOOD RESPONSE None received at the time of the writing of this report. Any received prior to the Planning Commission meeting will be presented directly in the meeting. EPLANATION OF AUTHORITY Chapter of the zoning ordinance covers amendments to the zoning map and rezoning. It states that the [Metro] Council can approve amendments after review and recommendation from the Planning Commission Amendment procedure. The White City Township Metro Council may amend the number, shape, boundaries or area of any zone or any regulation within any zone. Any such amendment shall not be made or become effective unless the same shall have been proposed by or be first submitted for the recommendation of the relevant planning commission Determination of council. The White City Township Metro Council, after review of the recommendation of the planning commission, may approve, deny, alter or remand for further review and consideration any application for zone change referred to the council by the planning commission. PLANNING STAFF RECOMMENDATION Generally, in instances where an area does not have an adopted General Plan, the planning staff looks at the surrounding land uses and characteristics in determining if the rezone proposal is consistent with the surrounding neighborhood and needs of the community. Staff has reviewed this proposal in light of these circumstances and believes that while the proposal would be consistent with the surrounding development pattern with regards to maintaining residential areas it is unclear at the present time what direction the Metro-Council and the community at large wish to take with respect to future (long term) development. Because there are limited opportunities for development within the Township it is important that a General Plan be adopted prior to consideration of re-zone applications. Planning Staff recommends a minimum 6 month continuance to allow for the continued development and adoption of a General Plan at which time the application could be reconsidered in light of that plan. The Planning Commission s decision will be a recommendation to the White City Metro Township Council who is the final authority for zone change requests. Rezone Summary Page 3 of 3

11 GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 40 ft. ZONING LINEAL FEET BORDERING PROPERTY R LF (53%) A LF (34%) R LF (13%) TOTAL PERIMETER 1700 LF (100%) ZONING: R-1-8 EIST. FIRE HYDRANT ZONING EHIBIT ZONING: R-1-21 ZONING: R-1-21 ZONING: A-2 ZONING: A-2 ZONING: A-2 ZONING: R-1-21 WHITE CITY REVISION BLOCK # DATE DESCRIPTION 1 2 WHITE CITY, SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH FOCUSã 3 ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, LLC 32 WEST CENTER STREET MIDVALE, UTAH PH: (801) E S. 5 6 ZONING EHIBIT GENERAL NOTE: Scale: Date: Sheet: 1"=40' 06/02/17 C Drawn: Job #: AW

12 32 WEST CENTER STREET MIDVALE, UTAH PH: (801) ENGINEERING AND SURVEYING, LLC ã FOCUS CONCEPT PLAN GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 40 ft. CONCEPT NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION OF LAND USE sqft 745 sqft sqft ) 30.0' (465 ZONING: R-1-21 ZONING: A ' 504 sqft 30.0' STREET 368 sqft 5) 4) ( sqft 0.57 acres 792 sqft 3 (465 ) 1547 sqft sqft 0.51 acres sqft 0.52 acres sqft 0.52 acres sqft 0.52 acres 2) (465 EIST. POWER POLE sqft 20.0' SOUTH ZONING: R-1-8 WHITE CITY 6 (465 ZONING: A-2 1) (465 PROPOSED 30' PRIVATE ROAD EIST. FIRE HYDRANT sqft 0.58 acres 344 sqft 1160 E S. ZONING: A-2 ZONING: R sqft 1448 sqft 2739 sqft WHITE CITY, SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH ZONING: R sqft 4041 sqft 4191 sqft 4247 sqft 4209 sqft 3978 sqft 3. THERE ARE NO CANALS, RIVERS, STREAMS, IRRIGATION DITCHES ETC. ON THE PROPERTY CONCEPT PLAN 4. ALL BUILDINGS CONTAINED WITHIN THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY WILL BE REMOVED. GENERAL NOTE: 1 2. NO RETAINING WALLS ARE ANTICIPATED ECEPT FOR LANDSCAPING AROUND EACH HOME. DATE 1. THE ONLY LANDSCAPING WITH BE IN THE PARKSTRIPS. # NOTES REVISION BLOCK DESCRIPTION 680 sqft 4472 sqft Scale: 1"=40' Drawn: AW Date: 06/02/17 Job #: Sheet: C

13

14