Quasi-Judicial Proceeding
|
|
- Merry Charles
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF GOLDEN, COLORADO Quasi-Judicial Proceeding FIRST READING: August 8, 2013 REPORT DATE: July 31, 2013 SECOND READING: August 22, 2013 CASE NO: PC APPLICANT: Evergreen Devco, Inc. REQUESTED ACTION: Rezoning to Allow Residential Use at 520 Golden Ridge Road EXHIBITS: Vicinity Map Ordinance 1951 Resolution PC13-18 PC Meeting Minutes for July 10, 2013 Official Development Plan (Proposed Zoning) Golden Ridge Filing No. 2 PUD (Current Zoning) Section of South Neighborhoods Plan Neighborhood Letters BACKGROUND AND PRIOR ACTION The current Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning and Official Development Plan for this portion of the Golden Ridge area was adopted in 1997 in an era before the resurgence of mixed use zoning, mass transit expansion, and community goals that now include pedestrian friendly design and Golden Vision 2030 values of community connectedness. Development at this time promoted the separation of uses such as office, retail and residential, and this area was seen as a future office park with up to two sit down restaurants to serve the office workforce. The commercially zoned lots in the Golden Ridge area have mostly sat vacant, with the exception of Panorama Orthopedics, two low rise office buildings, and the Climbing Gym that was recently approved and currently under construction. The lots in question comprise roughly 7.6 acres and sit at the southeastern end of Golden Ridge. This includes a recently purchased triangular parcel of land previously owned by Jefferson County. If the applicant secures both a zoning change from Council to allow residential and retail, as well as site plan approval from Planning Commission on August 7, 2013, the lots will be replatted into one property prior to construction. Planning Commission s role in zoning change requests is to hold a public hearing after a required neighborhood meeting, and make a recommendation to Council. Commission can recommend approval, approval with conditions, or denial. The result of Commission s July 10,
2 Planning Staff Report PC August 8, 2013 Page No public hearing of this zoning change request was to recommend to Council an approval with conditions. The applicant s initial ODP request included alterations to the current height and setback regulations. The existing PUD zoning limits the allowable height of structures to 60 feet and four stories. The applicant proposed an ODP that would raise this to 65 feet but still limit the number of stories to four. The structural setback requirement for the distance from Highway 6 was also proposed to be slightly altered. The current requirement is that structures 40 feet or less in height have a minimum setback of 50 feet, and structures greater than 40 feet must be setback from Highway 6 at least 100 feet. The applicant was proposing to keep this setback requirement in place, but with one exception. Building A on the conceptual site plan was four stories tall and about 54 feet high, and a small portion of this building encroached into the 100 foot setback area. Due to the shape of the site, the applicant had asked for this exception to make the project work with the number of units needed. Commission s action recommended approval but with conditions, as outlined in the attached Resolution PC The South Neighborhoods Plan addresses height in this area, and states that, a more sensitive height and bulk treatment is appropriate along the northern edges of the lots adjacent to US 6 to assure a compatible character of design. Commission s resolution recommends retaining the 60 foot height limit and removing the requested exception to the setback requirement for Building A based on the perceived visual impact from below the development and guidance provided by the South Neighborhoods Plan. In addition, Commission recommended against allowing the applicant to convert the retail space to residential use after one year if market conditions do not generate success, and instead recommended that the applicant return to Commission for any change of use request. The applicant has since revised the ODP to reflect Commission s recommendations on height and building setback limits, but has retained wording that would allow a change of use after 1 year if the retail space proves unsustainable. The applicant has cited concerns that the location of the retail is somewhat challenging due to the somewhat inconvenient placement at the end of Golden Ridge Road. PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE The applicant is seeking approval of an Official Development Plan (ODP), which would supplant the existing PUD zoning and allow retail and residential uses for this specific property. A conceptual site plan has been provided as well, in order to help judge the appropriateness of the project. Among other advantages, this requirement helps ensure that an anticipated project will be feasible under the proposed zoning. 2
3 Planning Staff Report PC August 8, 2013 Page No. 3 As previously described, the current PUD zoning allows office, light industrial, limited sit down restaurant use, and private recreation uses. The applicant is requesting a zoning change in the form of a new ODP to create specific requirements for this proposed mixed use project. The applicant is seeking permission to build 172 apartment units, as well as 5,200 square feet of neighborhood scale retail and restaurant space. REFERRAL AND NEIGHBORHOOD COMMENTS Referrals have been sent to internal city departments. In advance of an initial required neighborhood meeting held on May 30, 2013, notice letters regarding the zoning proposal were mailed to all property owners and residents within 500 feet of the property. Concerns raised by residents included the following: Existing traffic problems will increase at the intersection of Heritage Road and Golden Ridge Road There will be more traffic along Golden Ridge Road Golden Ridge Condo owners who wish to rent their units will face difficulty because of the perceived attractiveness of the new rental units New residents will harm the low key character of the area and they may use the Golden Ridge Condo amenities, such as the ponds and other landscaped areas. DISCUSSION OF ZONING CHANGE CRITERIA City zoning was established in a way which zoned land to its projected use in accordance with the comprehensive plan use areas, anticipating which portions of the city should expect which types of development. As a general rule, staff has not supported zone change requests, except where the standards for zoning change approval are met, and there are demonstrated reasons why change is desirable to the public. The standards for approval of zoning changes are: (a) (b) That the proposed zoning promotes the health, safety, or welfare of the inhabitants of the City of Golden and the purposes of the zoning ordinance; and At least one of the following additional factors exist: (1) The proposed zoning is consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan; 3
4 Planning Staff Report PC August 8, 2013 Page No. 4 (2) There has been a material change in the character of the neighborhood or in the City generally, such that the proposed zoning would be in the public interest and consistent with the change. (3) The property to be rezoned was previously zoned in error. Most rezonings upon which the City deliberates are justified by the factor that the proposed zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, including applicable neighborhood plans. The South Neighborhoods Plan states in Section that, The current zoning within the Golden Ridge Business Park area is a PUD that allows primarily office and light industrial uses. This zoning was approved in the mid-1990 s and may no longer reflect the best uses for the site. This section goes on to talk about the need for mixed use and transit supportive development, as long as it is not overly dense, and the importance of building height, placement and design. This section of the plan has been included in your packet for more careful review. The topic within Section that receives the most attention deals with the importance of public space. If the project is to enhance the neighborhood by creating a focal point for area residents to gather, as well as provide a linkage to the pedestrian bridge and the light rail station, an active and appealing public space is necessary to help create place. The neighborhood plan outlines what this public space should look like and how it should function, and the applicant is onboard with this pedestrian friendly vision. The applicant has also been working with staff on the ramps and walkways associated with the pedestrian bridge, as well as constructing a portion of what will become the south side trail along US 6 once funding is secured in the future to complete it. In considering the request to rezone, and the appropriateness of the proposed zone district, Council may want to consider the following additional points: The West Corridor light rail line opened in April 2013, and Golden s new end-of-line station is directly across Highway 6 from Golden Ridge and the proposed development. A new pedestrian and bike bridge is now starting construction, and will link the proposed development with the light rail station across Highway 6. The current zoning was put in place long before the light rail and pedestrian bridge projects were conceived of, and before the community outlined the GV 2030 values, which support walkable and transit friendly neighborhoods. 4
5 Planning Staff Report PC August 8, 2013 Page No. 5 REQUIRED REPORTS, STUDIES AND APPROVALS A traffic study has been submitted and shows that adding 172 apartment units and some neighborhood scale retail will add to existing traffic, as will any development on the lot, but that traffic volumes will be manageable with current road infrastructure. The location of the development across the pedestrian bridge from light rail will help reduce the number of trips and mitigate the impact. Drainage, grading, and erosion control plans will be addressed during site plan review and building permit. Also, in order to make this project to construct up to 172 units feasible in the near term, the applicants indicate that approval under the recent change to the administration of the 1% residential growth system will need to be approved by Council, and this is currently scheduled for first reading on August 22 nd, PARK AND SCHOOL LAND DEDICATION Park fees have already been paid for this property when the zoning did not include residential use. The proposed rezoning would create the potential for residential units and school fees would apply as per the zoning code. STAFF COMMENTS Council is being asked by the applicant to approve the proposed ODP to allow residential multifamily use and retail. Commission has recommended that the proposed development is appropriate, with conditions, based upon the Comprehensive Plan and specific recommendations in the recently adopted South Neighborhoods Plan. In addition, the recent opening of the light rail station and the pedestrian bridge that will soon link Golden Ridge to the station highlight the transformational changes going on in the area since the original PUD was adopted. Staff feels that the proposed ODP to allow transit oriented development is more consistent with GV 2030 values and community goals than the current PUD zoning. Ordinance 1951 has been drafted, but can be amended based on Council s findings. The applicant would like an objective trigger regarding the ability to use the retail space for residential if it proves infeasible. Staff feels that the most important consideration is that the applicant has committed to building the space to commercial standards so that, no matter the use, there is the built-in flexibility to adapt to an ever changing market, in the same spirit as form based zoning codes. Additionally, the applicant argues that empty storefronts are worse for the community than a residential conversion for some length of time. 5
6 FAWN STREET JOHNSON ROAD C470 HIGHWAY TELEGRAPH CALVARY EAGLE JEFFERSON COUNTY PARKWAY 6 HIGHWAY UTE 6 HIGHWAY Proposed Site G STREET GOLDEN CIRCLE D STREET C STREET B STREET A STREET W 4TH AVENUE ZODIAC STREET F STREET E STREET ZETA STREET D STREET C STREET B STREET A STREET W 4TH AVENUE 500ft Notification Boundary ZURICH STREET WEST STREET PINTO STREET SAGEBRUSH STREET C470 RAMP VIOLET STREET Vicinity Map Feet ² ,000 Case No.: Applicant: Location: Request: PC13-18 Evergreen Devco Inc. on behalf of NexCore GR Land LLC 520 Golden Ridge Road Rezoning Request
7 ORDINANCE NO AN ORDINANCE OF THE GOLDEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING THE GOLDEN RIDGE OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN FILING NO. 6 (PUD) AS REQUESTED BY EVERGREEN DEVCO, INC. AND NEXCORE GROUP WHEREAS, Nexcore Group is the owner of certain real property described as Lot 3, Block 1, Golden Ridge Subdivision, Filing No.6, which property is located within the Golden Ridge Filing No.2 P.U.D. Official Development Plan, and is subject to the provisions of said Official Development Plan; and WHEREAS, Nexcore Group, on behalf of Evergreen Devco, Inc. has submitted an application for approval of a new P.U.D. Official Development Plan (ODP), entitled Golden Ridge Official Development Plan Filing No. 6 for said property owned by Nexcore Group, as contained within the Golden Ridge Filing No.2 PUD Official Development Plan, thereby repealing the Golden Ridge Filing No.2 PUD Official Development Plan as it pertains to said property; and WHEREAS, the application for the Golden Ridge Official Development Plan Filing No. 6 is complete and in accordance with the zoning ordinance of the City of Golden, and public hearings before the Planning Commission and City Council have been held in accordance with the zoning ordinance of the City of Golden. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF GOLDEN, COLORADO: Section 1. City Council accepts the Planning Commission s findings of fact in this case, as detailed in the Resolution PC Section 2. As it relates to Lot 3, Block 1, Golden Ridge Subdivision, Filing No.6, the Golden Ridge Filing No.2 PUD Official Development Plan is hereby repealed and of no effect. Golden Ridge Official Development Plan Filing No. 6 as presented to City Council on August 22, 2013 is hereby approved. Section 3. If any article, section, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is held to be unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such decision will not affect the validity or constitutionality of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each part or parts hereof irrespective of the fact that any one part or parts be declared unconstitutional or invalid. Section 4. All other ordinances or portions thereof inconsistent or conflicting with this ordinance or any portion hereof are hereby repealed to the extent of such inconsistency or conflict. Section 5. This ordinance is deemed necessary for the protection of the health, welfare and safety of the community. Section 6. The repeal or modification of any provision of the Municipal Code of the City of Golden by this ordinance shall not release, extinguish, alter, modify or change in whole or in part any penalty, forfeiture or liability, either civil or criminal, which shall have been incurred under such provision. Each provision shall be treated and held as still remaining in force for the purpose of sustaining any and all proper actions, suits, proceedings and prosecutions for enforcement of the penalty,
8 Ordinance No Page 2 forfeiture or liability, as well as for the purpose of sustaining any judgment, decree or order which can or may be rendered, entered or made in such actions, suits, proceedings or prosecutions. Introduced, read, passed and ordered published the day of, Passed and adopted upon second reading and ordered published this day of, Marjorie N. Sloan Mayor ATTEST: Susan M. Brooks, MMC City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: David S. Williamson City Attorney
9 RESOLUTION PC13-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF GOLDEN PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A REZONING REQUEST FOR 520 GOLDEN RIDGE ROAD THAT REPLACES THE CURRENT PUD ZONING AND ODP WITH A NEW ODP WHEREAS, Evergreen Devco, Inc. has submitted a rezoning request in accordance with the requirements of Chapter of the City of Golden Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, proper notice of the required public hearing has been accomplished according to law, including posting on the subject property, publication in the local newspaper, as well as the necessary letters to all owners and tenants of real property within 500 feet of the site, and the required neighborhood meeting was held; and WHEREAS, a public hearing regarding the rezoning request has been held at a public meeting of the City of Golden Planning Commission on July 10, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF GOLDEN, COLORADO Section 1. The evidence and testimony presented during the required public hearing demonstrate that the standards for rezoning in Section of the Code are met as follows: a. The proposed rezoning promotes the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of Golden by accommodating a transit oriented development that supports the goals of the City Comprehensive Plan, including the South Neighborhoods Plan. b. The proposed zoning is consistent with the goals found in the following values in the Comprehensive Plan: Value Theme A: We value being a community which is walkable, bikeable and accessible to all. Value Theme B: We value being an active, healthy community that appreciates the outdoors and our connection to the natural environment. Value Theme C: We value safe, quiet, clean, well-maintained neighborhoods. Value Theme E: We value retaining convenience to services and amenities and our proximity to Denver and the Mountains. Value Theme H: We value maintaining friendliness and connections with neighbors and other residents. Value Theme I: We value keeping and enhancing our sense of community, pride, our diversity and tolerance, and our community character and community events.
10 Resolution PC13-18 Page 2 c. There has been a material change in the character of the neighborhood, given the new light rail station and the pedestrian bridge under construction. The South Neighborhoods Plan indicates that it is in the public interest to take advantage of this multimodal transportation infrastructure with development that provides the uses, linkages and public spaces that support and enhance this new accessibility. d. Based upon the above findings, the proposed rezoning and Official Development Plans meet the criteria for rezoning in Section and Section 2. The Planning Commission recommends the rezoning in Case No. PC13-18 to City Council for approval with the following conditions: a. Development in conformance with the conceptual site plan depicted in the ODP. b. The maximum height allowed is 60 feet. c. The reference to a maximum of four stories is removed. d. The exception to the setback requirement for Building A is removed. e. Retail may be converted to residential use only if approved by Commission as a change of use. Resolved this 10th day of July, ATTEST: Suzanne Stutzman, Chair Stacy McClure, Secretary to Planning Commission
11 CITY OF GOLDEN PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES EXCERPT JULY 10, 2013 RESCHEDULED REGULAR MEETING The Planning Commission met in regular session at th Street, Golden, Colorado at 6:30 p.m. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL The following members were present at the roll call. PRESENT: ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Casey Brown, Don Cameron, Diane Chesbro, Stephen Cummings, Jim Dale, Amity Moore, and Suzanne Stutzman Matt Burde Rick Muriby, Steve Glueck, and Stacy McClure Chair Stutzman declared a quorum. 3. REGULAR BUSINESS A. PC13-18 Official Development Plan (Rezoning) Recommendation Muriby presented a vicinity map of the proposed site and stated that a request had been received for a rezoning of a parcel to allow for retail and residential uses on the property. Muriby explained that property is currently zoned PUD under the Golden Ridge Official Development Plan which does not allow residential uses. He noted that the conceptual site plan is a tool to be used in demonstrating the appropriateness of the rezoning request and the site plan criteria would not apply at this time. He explained that the proposal would be for a 172 unit apartment development that would include retail space. Additionally, the request seeks changes in the height and setback requirements to allow up to 65 feet in height where currently 60 feet is allowed. Also, setback requirement from Hwy 6 currently states a 50 foot setback for buildings less than 40 feet in height and a 100 foot setback for buildings exceeding 40 feet in height. Muriby noted that the plan calls for six buildings and explained that only one portion of the proposed Building A would benefit from this change. Muriby pointed out that the property would provide public access and a pedestrian plaza that would connect to the Golden Ridge area to the pedestrian bridge. Muriby stated that a neighborhood meeting was held and most comments received were regarding traffic impacts on Golden Ridge Road and Heritage Road. Muriby added that the traffic study results show that this proposal would add traffic to the area but that staff thinks components are in place to handle the traffic and the city engineers do not have concerns. Muriby reviewed the criteria for zoning changes and stated that staff finds the criteria has been met and that the South Neighborhoods Plan has identified this area as transit oriented development (TOD).
12 Planning Commission July 10, 2013 Page 2 of 4 Cameron asked where sidewalk would go and how it would connect to the pedestrian bridge. Glueck provided the pedestrian bridge plan and explained the slopes and issues with connections on the south side of the highway. Chesbro commented that she did not like the connection through the site and that pedestrians would be crossing through parking lots. Glueck reminded the Commission that they need to be considering just the zoning change and whether or not residential uses should be allowed on the site and whether the setbacks should be modified. He explained that during the site plan approval process the actual design of the site would be reviewed. Glueck stated that the revised comprehensive plan states that residential use is probably the best use for land in this area. Jeff Wigstrom, Evergreen Devco, stated that he had done TOD in Denver and that this type of project is exactly what should occur near the lightrail station. Nathan Sciarra, architect, stated that the proposal calls for 172 high end apartments, to include retail space, with a target demographic of year olds who would spend time out in the community and utilize the lightrail system. He stated that they believe they have addressed the overall goal for the South Neighborhoods Plan by creating a community plaza area where the lightrail bridge meets the property. He explained that the retail portion of the site would not benefit from the pedestrian traffic but mostly address the needs of businesses along Golden Ridge Road. He provided renderings of the building elevations noting that the neighboring mobile home site sits feet above this property. Jarred Carlon, landscape architect, commented that the goal of the site was to follow the South Neighborhoods Plan (SNP) early on in the process and that they will develop design details during the site plan review. He stated they used the design photos from the SNP document to plan for the pedestrian plaza space and included seating areas, a water feature and intimate public spaces. Steve Cocker, commented that the rezoning is a land use matter and that any development will increase traffic. He noted two main points; traffic volumes generated by the proposal can be handled by the existing infrastructure, and the site will be designed to handle drainage. He explained that the site currently receives runoff from Golden Terrace and this project will redirect that runoff into a new detention pond. Chair Stutzman asked why the corner of Building A has to encroach into the existing setback regulations. Wigstrom stated that the site is challenging due to the triangular shape of the north parcel boundary. He stated it would really only be two units that would be encroaching into the existing setbacks and that the rest of the units are in compliance. He added that to remove the two units would be difficult because it alters the construction type regulations. Cameron asked for the height of the proposed buildings. Sciarra responded that the buildings are planned to be in the mid to lower 50 foot height range but they are asking for 65 feet in height so that they would not have to return if they ran into issues during the design process but that they have no intention of building up to 65 feet.
13 Planning Commission July 10, 2013 Page 3 of 4 Chair Stutzman commented that the proposed location is in a critical spot and asked if they had considered turning the building 90 degrees. Wigstrom stated they have ran through a dozen different plans on how to develop the site to address the slope and lot conditions as well as the access to the pedestrian bridge. He noted that they also have to design a property that works for the tenants and keeps handles parking onsite. Chair Stutzman OPENED the Public Hearing at 11:01 p.m. Don Merriam, property manager and resident of Golden Ridge Condominiums, commented that he hosted the neighborhood meeting for Evergreen Dev at his property. He stated he feels like staff is selling the project for the developer and is concerned about how the project would impact his property. He believes the residents of the development would use his property to walk their dogs and to let their children play. Merriam stated that the Golden Ridge area currently has a nice balance of residential and commercial and does not have a need for an additional 172 units. In regards to the traffic study Merriam claimed that the traffic counter was placed past Golden Circle and didn t take in to account the 1,000 people living on his property. He concluded that the addition of these units would greatly impact the neighborhood and Commission should do their duty and deny the request. Chair Stutzman CLOSED the Public Hearing at 11:15 p.m. Wigstrom responded that they will be providing a dog park on their property and would not anticipate that his tenants to walk them at the condos. He asked staff to address the traffic study questions. Glueck stated that there was not a previous traffic study, just City engineering staff counting cars on Golden Ridge Road. Wigstrom stated that they would have a management company that would monitor the property and perform credit checks and criminal backgrounds during the application process. Wigstrom commented that there are currently no vacancies at the Golden Ridge condos and that demonstrates there is a demand for rental units in Golden. Cummings asked if there would be a playground for children. Wigstrom stated that contrary to comments made he does not believe there will be a need for a playground based on demographics. Chesbro asked if there would be parkland dedication fees charged to the developer. Glueck stated that the parkland fees were addressed and collected in 1996 when the property was rezoned from residential to commercial. Moore commented that it could be expensive to eliminate 1000 sq.ft in order to accommodate the existing setbacks. Cummings agreed that it could be a hardship to a point as the project needs to be financially viable. Chair Stutzman commented that the zoning would be going back to residential as it was originally planned and that the rezoning isn t so much about being developer driven as it is the needs of the community. She added that through public comment during the comprehensive plan update, SNP and GoldenVision 2030 this area was identified as a TOD site and she feels comfortable that the criteria for rezoning has been met. Moore asked how the development would be constructed with the 1% growth ordinance. Glueck explained that city council will be deciding on whether to allow TOD construction to begin building prior to receiving all of the required allocations. He stated if the changes are approved, City Council could then decide to borrow allocations for up to four years in the future.
14 Planning Commission July 10, 2013 Page 4 of 4 Brown commented on his concerns regarding a statement to allow up to 100% residential uses on the property in the event that the commercial space doesn t lease. Chair Stutzman asked what types of options do they have to ensure a mix of commercial uses on the property. Muriby explained that the applicant is concerned that retail is a little dicey in this area and would like to have the ability to convert to 100% residential if the market conditions don t support retail. Brown asked if the Commission could require them to return for a review if they are considering converting the space to residential. Muriby stated it could be a request for a change on the ODP. Dale commented that the project makes sense from a health, welfare, and safety perspective and that the rezoning should be approved. Cameron commented that he doesn't see the need to allow the extra five feet in height just in case they might need it. Chair Stutzman, Brown and Chesbro agreed noting that it creates the expectation that they can build up to 65 feet. Chair Stutzman suggested leaving it at the existing 60 feet height limit. Chair Stutzman asked for thoughts on the encroachment of Building A in to the required setback. Dale commented that they have a hardship with fitting into the parcel shape and suggested that they allow the encroachment. It was MOVED by Jim Dale and seconded by Amity Moore to recommend approval of Resolution PC13-18 as amended during discussion. To clarify the Hwy 6 setback request it was MOVED by Diane Chesbro and seconded by Amity Moore to deny the encroachment of Building A into the required setback. The motion passed 4-3 with Dale, Cummings and Brown voting against. Muriby stated the amendments to be 100% residential uses to be approved by Planning Commission as a change of use, to require the height of the buildings to not exceed 60 feet, and to leave the required setbacks from Hwy6 as they are written in the original PUD. The motion passed unanimously 7 0.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF GOLDEN, COLORADO. Quasi Judicial Matter
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY BUSINESS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF GOLDEN, COLORADO Quasi Judicial Matter MEETING DATE: July 10, 2014 REPORT DATE: June 30, 2014 CASE NO: PC 14-26 DEPT. OF ORIGIN: Community and Economic
More informationCouncil Memorandum Background: Proposal Description:
Council Memorandum To: City Council From: Steve Glueck, Director of Community and Economic Development Through: Jason T. Slowinski, City Manager Date: August 3, 2016 Re: Contract to Sell Lots 1 and 2,
More informationAgenda Item No. October 14, Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: David J. Van Kirk, City Manager
Agenda Item No. October 14, 2008 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Honorable Mayor and City Council Attention: David J. Van Kirk, City Manager Scott D. Sexton, Community Development Director ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
More informationMountain Village seeks to amend Community Development Code to better align with Comprehensive Plan
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Mountain Village seeks to amend Community Development Code to better align with Comprehensive Plan MOUNTAIN VILLAGE, COLO. (Dec. 21, 2018) On Thursday, Jan. 3, 2019 the Town of Mountain
More informationCITY OF TYLER CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CITY OF TYLER CITY COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Agenda Number: Z-2 Date: January 23, 2019 Subject: PD18-035 FAIR NANCY WOOD (2801 AND 2835 SOUTH BROADWAY AVENUE) Request that the City Council consider approving
More informationCOUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date: October 24, 2017 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Agenda Item: Agenda Location: Public Hearings Work Plan # Legal Review: X 1 st Reading 2 nd Reading Subject: A public hearing regarding Zoning and a
More informationALL ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT HEREWITH; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
ORDINANCE 2013-07 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE TOWN OF LONGBOAT KEY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE ZONING CODE, DIVISION 3, COMMERCIAL REVITALIZATION, CHAPTER 158.180, DISTRIBUTION OF
More informationORDINANCE NO
ORDINANCE NO. 2014-160 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF MENIFEE, CALIFORNIA, REPEALING SECTION 10.35 OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY LAND USE ORDINANCE NO. 460.152 AS ADOPTED BY THE CITY OF MENIFEE
More informationDRAFT PARK COUNTY US HIGHWAY 89 SOUTH EAST RIVER ROAD OLD YELLOWSTONE TRAIL ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS
Formatting: Changes recommended by the Board and accepted by the County Commission are formatted in RED: Changes made by the Park County Commission are formatted in YELLOW highlight: and changes made by
More informationItem 10C 1 of 69
MEETING DATE: August 17, 2016 PREPARED BY: Diane S. Langager, Principal Planner ACTING DEPT. DIRECTOR: Manjeet Ranu, AICP DEPARTMENT: Planning & Building CITY MANAGER: Karen P. Brust SUBJECT: Public Hearing
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT REZONING CASE: RZ-16-001 REPORT DATE: March 8, 2016 CASE NAME: Trailbreak Partners Rezoning PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: March 16, 2016 ADDRESSES OF REZONING PROPOSAL: 5501
More informationSTAFF REPORT FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISION
STAFF REPORT FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT CASE NO. FA-13-001 HEARING DATE: November 6, 2013 CASE NAME: Solterra Subdivision Filing No. 14 PROCEDURE: Planning Commission ADDRESS OF MAJOR SUBDIVISION
More informationTown of Holly Springs Town Council Meeting Agenda Cover Sheet
Town of Holly Springs Town Council Meeting Agenda Cover Sheet Meeting Date: Feb. 19, 2019 Agenda Item #: 8c Agenda Placement: Public Hearing (Recognitions (awards, proclamations), Requests & Communications
More informationSTAFF REPORT FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISION
STAFF REPORT FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT CASE NO. FA-14-001 HEARING DATE: January 6, 2016 CASE NAME: Solterra Subdivision Filing No. 16 PROCEDURE: Planning Commission ADDRESS OF MAJOR SUBDIVISION
More informationMembers of the Public in attendance are asked to be recognized by the Mayor before participating in any discussions of the Town Board AGENDA
TOWN BOARD WORK SESSION August 27, 2018 // 5:30 p.m. // First floor conference room 301 Walnut Street, Windsor, CO 80550 GOAL of this Work Session is to have the Town Board receive information on topics
More informationCOUNCIL COMMUNICATION
Meeting Date: January 22, 2019 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Agenda Item: Agenda Location: Consent Calendar Goal(s): Legal Review: 1 st Reading X 2 nd Reading Subject: An ordinance approving a Rezoning of approximately
More informationORDINANCE NO
ORDINANCE NO. 2015-07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MOUNTAIN VILLAGE, COLORADO APPROVING MAJOR PUD AMENDMENT TO ETEND THE LENGTH OF V ALIDITY AND VESTED PROPERTY RIGHTS FOR A SITE SPECIFIC
More informationOrdinance No. 04 Series of 2013 RECITALS
AN ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF BASALT, COLORADO, APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO PORTIONS OF CHAPTER 16, ZONING, OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE TOWN OF BASALT, COLORADO, CREATING A NEW R-4 MIXED
More informationAgenda Information Sheet
Page 90 Agenda Information Sheet December 13, 2018 Agenda Item Z-18-10 - Conduct a public hearing and consider approval of an ordinance rezoning a 33.4 tract of land out of the H. Teal Survey Abstract
More informationCITY OF RAYTOWN Request for Board Action
CITY OF RAYTOWN Request for Board Action Date: April 23, 2013 Bill No. 6316-13 To: Mayor and Board of Aldermen Section No: XIII From: John Benson, Director of Development and Public Affairs Department
More informationCity of Sunny Isles Beach Collins Avenue Sunny Isles Beach, Florida 33160
City of Sunny Isles Beach 18070 Collins Avenue Sunny Isles Beach, Florida 33160 (305) 947-0606 City Hall (305) 949-3113 Fax MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: The Honorable Mayor and City Commission Hans Ottinot, City
More informationAttachment 4. Planning Commission Staff Report. June 26, 2017
Planning Commission Staff Report June 26, 2017 Agenda #: Regular Agenda - 2 Title: Applicant: Request: Location: Existing Zoning: Proposed Use: Staff Planner: The Brands and The Brands West Eagle Crossing
More informationPLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM
City and County of Broomfield, Colorado PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: John Hilgers, Planning Director Anna Bertanzetti, Principal Planner Meeting
More informationCITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO ORDINANCE NO. 1603
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO ORDINANCE NO. 1603 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NOVATO ADDING SECTION 4-15 TENANTING, MANAGEMENT, AND SAFETY FOR MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING TO CHAPTER IV,
More informationCITY OF FARMERSVILLE CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA November 17, :30 P.M. 1, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL
I. PRELIMINARY MATTERS CITY OF FARMERSVILLE CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA November 17, 2014 6:30 P.M. 1, COUNCIL CHAMBERS, CITY HALL Call to Order, Roll Call, Prayer and Pledge of Allegiance Welcome
More informationCITY OF RIO VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
MEETING DATE: January10, 2018 CITY OF RIO VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT AGENDA ITEM #4.2 PREPARED BY: Lamont Thompson, Planning Manager SUBJECT: Vesting Tentative Tract No. 2017-001: To consider
More informationARTICLE 3: Zone Districts
ARTICLE 3: Zone Districts... 3-1 17.3.1: General...3-1 17.3.1.1: Purpose and Intent... 3-1 17.3.2: Districts and Maps...3-1 17.3.2.1: Applicability... 3-1 17.3.2.2: Creation of Districts... 3-1 17.3.2.3:
More informationSTAFF REPORT FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISION
STAFF REPORT FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT CASE NO. FA-12-003 HEARING DATE: November 6, 2013 CASE NAME: Solterra Subdivision Filing No. 13 PROCEDURE: Planning Commission ADDRESS OF MAJOR SUBDIVISION
More informationORDINANCE NO. The Board of Supervisors of the County of Sonoma, State of California, ordains as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SONOMA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE TEXT OF CHAPTER 26C (COASTAL ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE SONOMA COUNTY ZONING CODE TO: 1)
More informationRESOLUTION PC NOW THEREFORE, the Planning Commission of the City of Duarte resolves as follows:
RESOLUTION PC 18-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF DUARTE APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 14-02, FOR THE USE AND OPERATION OF A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY FOR VERIZON WIRELESS,
More informationDraft Ordinance: subject to modification by Town Council based on deliberations and direction ORDINANCE 2017-
ORDINANCE 2017- Draft Ordinance: subject to modification by Town Council based on deliberations and direction AN INTERIM URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF LOS GATOS ESTABLISHING A TEMPORARY
More informationRequest. Recommendation. Recommended Motion. Planning Division Department of Community and Economic Development
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Legislative Item 900 South 900 East Rezone Zoning Map Amendment PLNPCM2010-00360 700 East 900 East, 700 South 900 South December 12, 2012 Applicant: City Council Luke Garrott
More information1069 regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) were signed into law; and
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARROYO GRANDE AMENDING TITLE 16 OF THE ARROYO GRANDE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW AND ADDITIONALLY ROOFTOP
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT REZONING CASE: RZ-15-002 REPORT DATE: January 26, 2016 CASE NAME: Thursday Lunch Club Rezoning PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: February 17, 2016 ADDRESS OF REZONING PROPOSAL:
More informationWAYZATA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES MAY 21, AGENDA ITEM 1. Call to Order and Roll Call
PC00-0 0 0 0 WAYZATA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES MAY, 0 AGENDA ITEM. Call to Order and Roll Call Chair Buchanan called the meeting to order at :00 p.m. Present at roll call were Commissioners:
More information201 General Provisions
201 General Provisions 201.01 Title 201.09 Amendments 201.02 Purpose and Intent 201.10 Public Purpose 201.03 Authority 201.11 Variances and Appeals 201.04 Jurisdiction 201.12 Nonconformances 201.05 Enactment
More informationDraft Zoning Changes for the 2nd Planning Board Public Hearing, January 22, 2018.
Draft Zoning Changes for the 2nd Planning Board Public Hearing, January 22, 2018. No changes were made at the 1st Public Hearing. Proposed wording for the 1 st Public Hearing in red, eliminated text in
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT West Capitol Hill Zoning Map Amendment Petition No. PLNPCM2011-00665 Located approximately at 548 W 300 North Street, 543 W 400 North Street, and 375 N 500 West Street
More informationTown of Holly Springs
Meeting Date: 9/18/2018 Agenda Topic Cover Sheet / last modified June 13, 2018 Town of Holly Springs Town Council Meeting Agenda Form Agenda Placement: Public Hearing (Special Recognitions (awards, proclamations),
More informationREZONING GUIDE. Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application. Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3. Return completed form to
Zone Map Amendment (Rezoning) - Application COMMUNITY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT REZONING GUIDE Rezoning Application Page 1 of 3 PROPERTY OWNER INFORMATION* CHECK IF POINT OF CONTACT FOR APPLICATION Property
More informationDEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT STAFF REPORT EASTSIDE CHAMBLEE LINK DCI
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT STAFF REPORT Public Hearing Date: April 12, 2018 Item #: PZ-2018-248 STAFF REPORT EASTSIDE CHAMBLEE LINK DCI Request: Development of Community Compact (DCI), ten concurrent variances,
More informationCity of Brooklyn Park Planning Commission Staff Report
City of Brooklyn Park Planning Commission Staff Report Agenda Item: 6D Meeting Date: August 9, 2017 Originating Agenda Section: Public Hearing Department: Community Development Resolution: X Ordinance:
More informationCITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.3 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: January 6, 2016
CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.3 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: January 6, 2016 TO: FROM: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Matthew C. Bassi, Planning Director SUBJECT:
More informationCITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MEMORANDUM
City and County of Broomfield, Colorado To: From: Prepared by: Owner Applicant Property Size Property Location: CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION MEMORANDUM Mayor and City Council Charles Ozaki, City and County
More informationARTICLE 2: General Provisions
ARTICLE 2: General Provisions 2-10 Intent The basic intent of the Town of Orange s Zoning Ordinance is to implement the goals and objectives of the adopted Town of Orange Comprehensive Plan, hereafter
More informationOffice of the Zoning Administrator and Planner. Saugatuck Township Planning and Zoning Applicants. Notice of Information for PC and ZBA Applicants
From: To: Subject: Office of the Zoning Administrator and Planner Saugatuck Township Planning and Zoning Applicants Notice of Information for PC and ZBA Applicants Land developers, engineers, surveyors,
More informationPlanning Department Oconee County, Georgia
Planning Department Oconee County, Georgia STAFF REPORT REZONE CASE #: 6985 DATE: October 31, 2016 STAFF REPORT BY: Andrew C. Stern, Planner APPLICANT NAME: Williams & Associates, Land Planners PC PROPERTY
More informationSTAFF REPORT FOR ANNEXATION AND ZONING. CASE NAME: Taylor Annexation and Zoning PC DATE: August 7, 2013
STAFF REPORT FOR ANNEATION AND ZONING ANNEATION CASE NO: A-13-001 ZONING CASE NO: RZ-13-002 REPORT DATE: July 30, 2013 CASE NAME: Taylor Annexation and Zoning PC DATE: August 7, 2013 ADDRESS OF PROPOSAL:
More informationPlanned Unit Development (PUD). Sections:
Chapter 19.07. Planned Unit Development (PUD). Sections: 19.07.01. Purpose. 19.07.02. PUD Definition and Design Compatibility. 19.07.03. General PUD Standards. 19.07.04. Underlying Zones. 19.07.05. Permitted
More informationSTAFF REPORT PLN September 11, 2017
Page: 1 TO: SUBJECT: GENERAL COMMITTEE APPLICATIONS FOR OFFICIAL PLAN AMENDMENT AND ZONING BY-LAW AMENDMENT 37 JOHNSON STREET WARD: WARD 1 PREPARED BY AND KEY CONTACT: SUBMITTED BY: GENERAL MANAGER APPROVAL:
More informationPLANNING BOARD FEBURARY 11, 2019
MINUTES 7:30 PM PRESENT: T. Ciacciarelli ABSENT: C. Ely D. Haywood L. Frank S. McNicol M. Mathieu L. Riggio L. Voronin M. Syrnick K. Kocsis, Alt #2 S. Harris, Alt #1 D. Pierce, Attorney CALL TO ORDER The
More informationROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT
ROSEMEAD CITY COUNCIL STAFF REPORT TO THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM JEFF ALLRED CITY MANAGER DATE JUNE 9 2015 6 SUBJECT MUNICIPAL CODE AMENDMENT 15 02 AMENDING CHAPTERS 17 04 AND 17 72 OF TITLE
More informationREPRESENTATIVE: Centerline Solutions Table Mountain Parkway Golden, CO 80403
COMMISSIONERS: DARRYL GLENN (PRESIDENT) MARK WALLER (PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE) STAN VANDERWERF LONGINOS GONZALEZ PEGGY LITTLETON PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CRAIG DOSSEY, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
More informationCITY COUNCIL AND BURA AGENDA MEMORANDUM
City and County of Broomfield, Colorado CITY COUNCIL AND BURA AGENDA MEMORANDUM To: From: By: Agenda Title Mayor, City Council, and Broomfield Urban Renewal Authority Charles Ozaki, City and County Manager
More informationCITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL
AGENDA ITEM NO. 6 CITY OF HAWTHORNE CITY COUNCIL AGENDA BILL For the meeting of: February 23, 2016 Originating Department: Planning Department Head: Gregg McClain City Manager: Arnold Shadbehr SUBJECT:
More informationCITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.1 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: June 6, 2018
CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.1 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: June 6, 2018 TO: FROM: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Alfredo Garcia, Associate Planner SUBJECT: WPS/Mission
More informationSTAFF REPORT FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISION
STAFF REPORT FOR MAJOR SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT CASE NO. FA-12-002 HEARING DATE: September 5, 2012 CASE NAME: Solterra Subdivision Filing No. 12 PROCEDURE: Planning Commission ADDRESS OF MAJOR SUBDIVISION
More informationFULL TEXT OF MEASURE I CITY OF YORBA LINDA
FULL TEXT OF MEASURE I CITY OF YORBA LINDA ORDINANCE NO. 2011-962 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF YORBA LINDA ADOPTING THE YORBA LINDA TOWN CENTER SPECIFIC PLAN AND AN AMENDMENT TO THE
More informationSAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY
CITY OF C YA SAN JOSE CAPITAL OF SILICON VALLEY TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL SUBJECT: SEE BELOW COUNCIL AGENDA: 04/19/16 ITEM: il.tcb') Memorandum FROM: Planning Commission DATE: March 28, 2016
More informationStaff Report: Date: Applicant: Property Identification: Acreage of Request: Current Zoning of Requested Area: Requested Action: Attached:
Staff Report: Completed by Jeff Palmer Director of Planning & Zoning Date: November 7, 2018, Updated November 20, 2018 Applicant: Greg Smith, Oberer Land Developer agent for Ronald Montgomery ET AL Property
More informationORDINANCE NO
ORDINANCE NO. 2017-06 ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN COUNCIL OF THE TOWN OF MOUNTAIN VILLAGE, COLORADO APPROVING: (1) REZONE LOTS lo0lr AND lo0sr, ZONED MULTI-FAMILY AND FULL USE ACTIVE OPEN SPACE ZONE DISTRICTS
More informationStaff Report: Date: Applicant: Property Identification: Acreage of Request: Current Zoning of Requested Area: Requested Action: Attached:
Staff Report: Completed by Jeff Palmer Director of Planning & Zoning Date: November 7, 2018 Applicant: Greg Smith, Oberer Land Developer agent for Ronald Montgomery ET AL Property Identification: Frontage
More informationMINUTES OF THE VINEYARD TOWN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Vineyard Town Hall, 240 East Gammon Road, Vineyard, Utah January 21, 2015, 7:00 PM
MINUTES OF THE VINEYARD TOWN PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Vineyard Town Hall, 240 East Gammon Road, Vineyard, Utah January 21, 2015, 7:00 PM PRESENT ABSENT Commission Chair Wayne Holdaway Commissioner Garrett
More informationBunker Hill Part II Urban Design. Specific Plan. Case No. CPC SP TABLE OF CONTENTS
Bunker Hill Part II Urban Design Specific Plan Case No. CPC-2011-684-SP TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1. Section 2. Section 3. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 7. Section 8. Section 9. Section 10.
More informationThe requested rezoning would be consistent with the City of Wilmington Focus Area of Welcoming Neighborhoods and Public Spaces.
ITEM PH3 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER (910) 341-7810 FAX(910)341-5839 TDD (910)341-7873 1/6/2015 City Council City Hall Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 Dear Mayor and Councilmembers: Attached for your consideration
More informationDRAFT PARK COUNTY US HIGHWAY 89 SOUTH EAST RIVER ROAD OLD YELLOWSTONE TRAIL ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS
DRAFT PARK COUNTY US HIGHWAY 89 SOUTH EAST RIVER ROAD OLD YELLOWSTONE TRAIL ZONING DISTRICT REGULATIONS I. TITLE These regulations and the accompanying map(s) shall be known as, and shall be cited and
More informationPlanning Commission Hearing Date: 2/21/2017 Board of County Commissioners Hearing Date: 3/8/2017
COMMISSIONERS: DARRYL GLENN (PRESIDENT) MARK WALLER (PRESIDENT PRO TEMPORE) STAN VANDERWERF LONGINOS GONZALEZ PEGGY LITTLETON PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CRAIG DOSSEY, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
More informationCITY COUNCIL REPORT 2006-xx
CITY COUNCIL REPORT 2006-xx RESOLUTION NO. 2006-37 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PINOLE, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING ADMINISTRATIVE REGULATIONS IMPLEMENTING THE
More informationCITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT
CITY OF CHARLOTTESVILLE DEPARTMENT OF NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT SERVICES STAFF REPORT APPLICATION FOR A SPECIAL USE PERMIT PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL JOINT PUBLIC HEARING DATE OF HEARING: December
More information1417, , 1427 & 1429 Yonge Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED 1417, 1421-1425, 1427 & 1429 Yonge Street - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Amendment Applications - Preliminary Report Date: March 24, 2015 To: From: Wards: Reference Number:
More informationIndicates Council-recommended changes Introduced by: Mr. Tackett Date of introduction: June 14, 2016 SUBSTITUTE NO. 1 TO ORDINANCE NO.
Indicates Council-recommended changes Introduced by: Mr. Tackett Date of introduction: June 14, 2016 SUBSTITUTE NO. 1 TO ORDINANCE NO. 16-067 TO AMEND NEW CASTLE COUNTY CODE CHAPTER 40 (ALSO KNOWN AS THE
More informationEDGERTON CITY HALL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING REGULAR SESSION March 12, 2019
EDGERTON CITY HALL PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING REGULAR SESSION The met in regular session with Chair John Daley calling the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. All present participated in the Pledge of Allegiance.
More informationCITY OF ALBERT LEA PLANNING COMMISSION ADVISORY BOARD
CITY OF ALBERT LEA PLANNING COMMISSION ADVISORY BOARD 9/1/2015, 5:30 p.m. City Council Chambers AGENDA A. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL B. APPROVAL OF THE AGENDA C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. PC Minutes from
More informationTHE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA
THE AREA PLAN COMMISSION OF ST. JOSEPH COUNTY, IN AGENDA Tuesday, June 20, 2017 Fourth-Floor Council Chambers 3:30 p.m. County-City Building, South Bend, IN PUBLIC HEARINGS: 1. Rezonings: A. A combined
More informationCITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. CC
CITY OF PALMDALE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. CC 2011-118 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALMDALE, CALIFORNIA, UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL
More informationPROJECT: Manhattan Townhomes, Modification of Standard, MOD #130003
ITEM NO _MOD 130003 MEETING DATE January 30, 2014 STAFF Holland HEARING OFFICER STAFF REPORT PROJECT: Manhattan Townhomes, Modification of Standard, MOD #130003 APPLICANT: OWNER: Cathy Mathis TB Group
More informationChair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Doug Reeder, Interim City Administrator
Item 10 Date Application Received: 02/22/17 Date Application Considered as Complete: 03/06/17 60-Day Review Period Expires: 05/05/17 To: From: Chair Thiesse and Planning Commission Members Doug Reeder,
More informationCITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH [DRAFT] PLANNING COMMISION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 28, 2015
CITY OF MANHATTAN BEACH [DRAFT] PLANNING COMMISION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 28, 2015 A Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Manhattan Beach, California, was held on the 28
More informationPLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT. 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance. Jon Biggs, Community Development Director
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REPORT Meeting Date: May 3, 2018 Subject: Prepared by: Initiated by: 17-CA-02 Accessory Dwelling Unit Ordinance Jon Biggs, Community Development Director City Council Attachments:
More informationCity of South Daytona
City of South Daytona Community Development Dept. Post Office Box 214960 South Daytona, FL 32121 386/322-3020 FAX 386/322-3029 MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Re: Joseph W. Yarbrough, City Manager John Dillard,
More informationPlanning & Transportation Commission Staff Report (ID # 8862)
Planning & Transportation Commission Staff Report (ID # 8862) Report Type: Action Items Meeting Date: 2/14/2018 Summary Title: Title: From: Affordable Housing (AH) Combining District Draft Ordinance PUBLIC
More informationCity of Fayetteville, Arkansas Page 1 of 3
City of Fayetteville, Arkansas 113 West Mountain Street Fayetteville, AR 72701 (479) 575-8323 Legislation Text File #: 2018-0144, Version: 1 ADM 18-6094 (AMEND UDC 164.19/ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS): AN
More informationORDINANCE NO (As Amended)
ORDINANCE NO. 01-2015 (As Amended) To Amend the Official Zoning Map of the City of Worthington, Ohio, to Change Zoning of Certain Land from the C-3 District (Institutions and Office), AR-4.5 District (Low
More informationCOUNTY OF ALBEMARLE PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY
COUNTY OF ALBEMARLE PLANNING STAFF REPORT SUMMARY Project Name: ZMA 2010-00015, Cedar Hill Planning Commission Worksession: February 15, 2011 Public Hearing: Not scheduled Staff: Judith C. Wiegand, AICP
More informationBE IT ORDAINED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF THE CITY OF CHEYENNE, WYOMING: FIRST READING: SECOND READING: 3RD AND FINAL READING:
ORDINANCE NO. ENTITLED: AN ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.2.1 ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS, SECTION 5.1.2 ZONING DISTRICTS ESTABLISHED, AND SECTION 5.1.3 OFFICIAL ZONING MAP, OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE,
More information2/16/2016. City Council City Hall Wilmington, North Carolina Dear Mayor and Councilmembers:
ITEM O1 2/16/2016 OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER (910) 341-7810 FAX(910)341-5839 TDD (910)341-7873 City Council City Hall Wilmington, North Carolina 28401 Dear Mayor and Councilmembers: Attached for your consideration
More informationFor Vintages of Four Mile Creek Town of Niagara on the Lake, Ontario
Planning Impact Analysis For Vintages of Four Mile Creek Town of Niagara on the Lake, Ontario Prepared by: Upper Canada Consultants 261 Martindale Road Unit #1 St. Catharines, Ontario L2W 1A1 Prepared
More informationSUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE
SUBSTITUTE ORDINANCE WHEREAS, the City of Chicago ("City") is a home rule unit of government by virtue of the provisions of the Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970, and as such, may exercise
More informationSTAFF REPORT. Community Development Director PO Box 4755 Beaverton, OR 97076
STAFF REPORT HEARING DATE: July 7, 2010 TO: Planning Commission STAFF: Jana Fox, Assistant Planner PROPOSAL: Southeast Beaverton Office Commercial Zoning Map Amendment (ZMA2010-0006) LOCATION: The subject
More informationStaff Report & Recommendation Rezoning Case RZ Date of Report: June 6, 2014 Report by: Doug Stacks
Staff Report & Recommendation Rezoning Case RZ-2014-02 Date of Report: June 6, 2014 Report by: Doug Stacks Hearing Dates: Planning Commission June 26, 2014 Mayor and Council July 14, 2014 GENERAL INFORMATION
More informationSERVICE & IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND ASSESSMENT PLAN:
DOWNTOWN MIDLAND MANAGEMENT DISTRICT SERVICE & IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND ASSESSMENT PLAN: 2010-2019 August 25, 2009 Table of Contents 1. Introduction...1 2. Background: The First Five Years...2 3. Service &
More informationCommunity Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA (707)
Community Development Department Planning Division 1600 First Street + P.O. Box 660 Napa, CA 94559-0660 (707) 257-9530 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT May 7, 2015 AGENDA ITEM# 6.A. PL15-0041 UNIVERSAL
More informationPlanning Commission Report
cjly City of Beverly Hills Planning Division 455 N. Rexford Drive Beverly Hills, CA 90210 TEL. (310) 285-1141 FAX. (370) 858-5966 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: April 28, 2016 Subject: Project
More informationORDINANCE NO
ORDINANCE NO. 2006-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PINOLE ADDING CHAPTER 8.30 TO THE PINOLE MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING A RESIDENTIAL HEALTH AND SAFETY RENTAL INSPECTION PROGRAM WHEREAS,
More informationMINUTES PARK TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION Park Township Hall nd Street Holland, MI Regular Meeting September 12, :30 P.M.
MINUTES PARK TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION Park Township Hall 52 152 nd Street Holland, MI 49418 Regular Meeting September 12, 2018 6:30 P.M. DRAFT COPY CALL TO ORDER: Chair Pfost called to order the regular
More informationNOTICE OF MEETING The City of Lake Elmo Planning Commission will conduct a meeting on Monday December 10, 2018 at 7:00 p.m. AGENDA
3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 (651) 747-3900 www.lakeelmo.org NOTICE OF MEETING The City of Lake Elmo Planning Commission will conduct a meeting on Monday December 10, 2018 at 7:00 p.m.
More informationCITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.3 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: June 6, 2018
CITY OF WILDOMAR PLANNING COMMISSION Agenda Item #2.3 PUBLIC HEARING Meeting Date: June 6, 2018 TO: FROM: Chairman and Members of the Planning Commission Robert Kain, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Change of
More informationRESOLUTION NO. (ANNEXATION AREA NO. 2)
RD:EEH:LCP 4-6-16 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN JOSE TO ANNEX TERRITORY INTO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 8 (COMMUNICATIONS HILL) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE
More informationTOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF GYPSUM, STATE OF COLORADO ORDINANCE NO. 10 SERIES 2017 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STRATTON FLATS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GUIDE
TOWN COUNCIL TOWN OF GYPSUM, STATE OF COLORADO ORDINANCE NO. 10 SERIES 2017 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STRATTON FLATS PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GUIDE WHEREAS, the Town of Gypsum, Colorado ( Town ), is a
More informationKETCHUM PLANNING AND ZONING
IN RE: ) Barrow Variance and ) Fence Design Review ) KETCHUM PLANNING AND ZONING ) COMMISSION - FINDINGS OF FACT, ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND DECISION Permit Number: 13-122 ) BACKGROUND FACTS OWNER: Strada
More information