City Hall: 317 College St, Grand Prairie, Texas. MEETING AGENDA Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals August 21, 2017

Transcription

1 BRIEFING: City Hall: 317 College St, Grand Prairie, Texas MEETING AGENDA Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals August 21, :30 P.M. The staff will brief the board and preview the cases on tonight s agenda. Board members will have the opportunity to ask questions that may facilitate the meeting and the presentation of the cases. No action will be taken during the briefing. CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 P.M. The Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals is appointed by the City Council to consider variances, exceptions and appeals as prescribed by the s Unified Development Code. In accordance with Section of the Local Government Code of the State of Texas and Article 1 of the Unified Development Code of the, the concurring vote of seven members of the Board is necessary to decide in favor of an applicant on any matter on which the Board has jurisdiction. Members of the public may address the Board on items listed on the agenda under Public Hearing Items. INVOCATION: APPROVAL OF MINUTES: PUBLIC HEARING: 1. CASE NUMBER BA NE 23 rd St, platted as Lot 2, Block 2, My Estate (Council District 5). Consider a setback Variance request for an already constructed accessory structure. This property is zoned Single Family-4 (SF-4). 2. CASE NUMBER BA Meadow Park Ln, platted as Lot 2, Block 24, Meadow Park (Council District 2). Consider a Special Exception request to construct a carport. This property is zoned Planned Development-144 (PD-144). 3. CASE NUMBER BA Vineyard Rd, WH Beeman ABST 126 PG 011, (Council District 6). Consider a masonry Special Exception request to construct an accessory structure. This property is zoned Single Family-1 (SF-1). 4. CASE NUMBER BA Dodge Trl, platted as Lot 15, Block G, Trailwood 1 (Council District 6). Consider a side yard setback variance request to construct a carport. This property is zoned Planned Development-81 (PD-81).

2 Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals Agenda August 21, CASE NUMBER BA Capetown Dr, platted as Lot 10, Block 0, Holiday Hill Estates (Council District 5). Consider a Special Exception request to construct a carport. This property is zoned Single Family-2 (SF-2). 6. CASE NUMBER BA Carrolls Croft Ct, platted as Lot 3, Block 1, Croft on the Creek (Council District 1). Consider a request for a front yard setback variance. This property is zoned Single Family-1 (SF-1). NEW BUSINESS: CITIZENS COMMENT: ADJOURNMENT: In accordance with Chapter 551, Subchapter 6 of the Texas Government Code, V.T.C.A., the Zoning Board of Adjustment and Appeals agenda was prepared on the day of August 2017 at 5:00 p.m. Posted By: The City Hall is wheelchair accessible. If you plan to attend this public meeting and you have a disability that requires special arrangements, please call at least 24 hours in advance. Reasonable accommodations will be made to assist your needs.

3 MEETING MINUTES Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals July 17, 2017 CALL TO ORDER: A regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals (ZBA) was held in the City Council Chambers, Grand Prairie, Texas on Monday, July 17, The meeting convened at 7:00 P.M., Chairperson Rodgers presiding, and Steve Alcorn, Assistant City Attorney, Colby Collins, Planner, and Jennifer Morones, Building Inspections. MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCE: Melinda Rodgers, Eric Hedin, Heather Mazac, Ed Gray, Barry Sandacz, Clayton Hutchins, Max Coleman, Jim Parker. MEMBERS ABSENT: Debbie Hubacek, Cindie Moss INVOCATION: Eric Hedin APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Motion was made by Mr. Barry Sandacz, and seconded by Mr. Ed Gray to approve the minutes of the June 26, 2017 meeting. Motion Carried. PUBLIC HEARING: 1. CASE NUMBER BA Quail Hollow Dr., platted as Lot 25, Block 4, Cinnamon Ridge (Council District 2). Consider a Special Exception request to construct a carport. This property is zoned Planned Development-75 (PD-75). Mr. Colby Collins presented the case. Jose Cruz, 2122 Quail Hollow Dr., represented the request. Motion: Moved by Mr. Barry Sandacz and seconded by Mr. Jim Parker that the board close public hearing. Motion carried. Motion: Moved by Mr. Barry Sandacz and seconded by Mr. Jim Parker that case number BA be approved as presented by staff. Ayes: Melinda Rodgers, Eric Hedin, Max Coleman, Heather Mazac, Ed Gray, Barry Sandacz, Clayton Hutchins, Jim Parker Nays: N/A Motion carried: CASE NUMBER BA Birch St., platted as Lot 12, Block B, North Haven 2 (Council District 5). Consider a Special Exception request to construct a carport. This property is zoned Single Family-4 (SF-4). Mr. Colby Collins presented the case. Effrain Hernandez, 918 Birch St., represented the request. Motion: Moved by Mr. Barry Sandacz and seconded by Mr. Jim Parker that the board close public hearing. Motion carried. 1

4 Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals Meeting Minutes of July 17, 2017 Motion: Moved by Mr. Barry Sandacz and seconded by Mr. Jim Parker that case number BA be approved as presented by staff. Ayes: N/A Nays: Melinda Rodgers, Eric Hedin, Max Coleman, Heather Mazac, Ed Gray, Barry Sandacz, Clayton Hutchins, Jim Parker Motion denied: CASE NUMBER BA Estate Dr., platted as Lot 6, Country Creek Estates (Council District 2). Consider a Special Exception request to construct a carport. This property is zoned Single Family-2 (SF-2). Mr. Colby Collins presented the case. Ms. Shirley Dabbs, 535 Estate Dr., represented the request. Motion: Motion: Moved by Mr. Barry Sandacz and seconded by Mr. Ed Gray that the board close public hearing. Motion carried. Moved by Mr. Barry Sandacz and seconded by Mr. Ed Gray that case number BA be approved as presented by staff to construct a carport. Ayes: Max Coleman, Heather Mazac, Ed Gray, Barry Sandacz, Melinda Rodgers, Clayton Hutchins, Eric Hedin, Jim Parker Nays: N/A Motion carried: CASE NUMBER BA Roble, platted as Lot 16, Block A, Mira Lagos D-1 (Council District 6). Consider a variance request to allow a side yard setback variance to the home. This property is zoned Planned Development-271A (PD- 271A) for residential uses. Mr. Colby Collins presented the case. Ignacio Vasquez (contractor), 7208 Roble, represented the request. Motion: Motion: Moved by Mr. Barry Sandacz and seconded by Mr. Jim Parker that the board close public hearing. Motion carried. Moved by Mr. Barry Sandacz and seconded by Mr. Jim Parker that case number BA be approved as presented by staff. Ayes: Melinda Rodgers, Eric Hedin, Max Coleman, Heather Mazac, Ed Gray, Barry Sandacz, Clayton Hutchins, Jim Parker Nays: N/A Motion carried: CASE NUMBER BA SE 4th St., platted as Lot 6, Block B S ½, 2

5 Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals Meeting Minutes of July 17, 2017 Grand Prairie Prize Acres (Council District 2). Consider a Special Exception request to construct a carport. This property is zoned Planned Development-201 (PD-201). Mr. Colby Collins presented the case. Richard Roybal, 2110 SE 4 th St., represented the request. Motion: Motion: Moved by Mr. Barry Sandacz and seconded by Mr. Jim Parker that the board close public hearing. Motion carried. Moved by Mr. Barry Sandacz and seconded by Mr. Ed Gray that case number BA be approved as presented by staff. Ayes: Eric Hedin, Max Coleman, Heather Mazac, Ed Gray, Barry Sandacz, Melinda Rodgers, Clayton Hutchins, Jim Parker Nays: N/A Motion carried: CASE NUMBER BA Ravenwood Dr., platted as Lot 7, Block 1, Sherwood Forest Addition (Council District 1). Consider a Special Exception request to construct a carport. Also, please consider a side yard setback variance to allow construction of a carport. This property is zoned Single Family-1 (SF-1). Mr. Colby Collins presented the case. Applicant not present Motion: Motion: Moved by Mr. Barry Sandacz and seconded by Mr. Jim Parker that the board close public hearing. Motion carried. Moved by Mr. Barry Sandacz and seconded by Mr. Jim Parker that case number BA be approved as presented by staff. Ayes: Melinda Rodgers, Eric Hedin, Max Coleman, Heather Mazac, Ed Gray, Barry Sandacz, Clayton Hutchins, Jim Parker Nays: N/A Motion carried: CASE NUMBER BA Hickory St., platted as Lot 12, Block A, Fairview 1 (Council District 5). Consider a Special Exception request to construct a carport. Also, please consider a side yard setback variance to allow construction of a carport. This property is zoned Single Family-4 (SF-4). Mr. Colby Collins presented the case. Benito Cordero, 1533 Hickory St., represented the request. Motion: Moved by Mr. Barry Sandacz and seconded by Mr. Jim Parker that the board close public hearing. Motion carried. 3

6 Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals Meeting Minutes of July 17, 2017 Motion: Moved by Mr. Barry Sandacz and seconded by Mr. Jim Parker that case number BA be approved as presented by staff. Ayes: Melinda Rodgers, Eric Hedin, Max Coleman, Heather Mazac, Ed Gray, Barry Sandacz, Clayton Hutchins, Jim Parker Nays: N/A Motion carried: CASE NUMBER BA Pioneer Pkwy., as Tract 11, James Ferguson Abst. 454, Pg. 507 (Council District 3). Consider a height variance request to construct a proposed retail commercial development. This property is zoned General Retail (GR). Mr. Colby Collins presented the case. Matthew Maly (Engineer), 601 Pioneer Pkwy, represented the request. Motion: Motion: Moved by Mr. Barry Sandacz and seconded by Mr. Max Coleman that the board close public hearing. Motion carried. Moved by Mr. Barry Sandacz and seconded by Mr. Max Coleman that case number BA be approved as presented by staff. Ayes: Melinda Rodgers, Eric Hedin, Max Coleman, Heather Mazac, Ed Gray, Barry Sandacz, Clayton Hutchins, Jim Parker Nays: N/A Motion carried: 8-0 CITIZENS COMMENT: COMMENTS BY THE BOARD: Board members Melinda Rodgers and Cindie Moss were recognized by the ZBA Board for their hard work and service throughout the years. ADJOURNMENT: July 17, 2017 and the City Council Chambers, Grand Prairie, Texas, were fixed as the time and place of the next regular meeting and the meeting was adjourned at 8:11 P.M. Chairperson Date of Approval An audio recording of this meeting is available on request: (972)

7 BA NE 23 rd St. Variance - Setback Zoning Board of Adjustments & Appeals: August 21, 2017 Case Manager: Owner: Colby Collins Maria Armijo SUMMARY 722 NE 23rd St, platted as Lot 2, Block 2, My Estate (Council District 5). Consider a setback Variance request for an already constructed accessory structure. This property is zoned Single Family-4 (SF-4). DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting approval for an already constructed accessory structure (s) for storage. The applicant constructed the accessory structure before receiving a building permit. Staff noticed that the structure encroached the 5 ft. rear utility in the rear of the property. Currently, the applicant has applied for a License Agreement with the city s right-of-way agent to legally encroach the utility easement line to be in compliance with the (UDC). If approved by the ZBA Board and receives approval to encroach the easement, the applicant will be in compliance with the. During site visits, staff noticed that there were several homes with wood accessory structures within 300 ft. of the subject property. According to the Dallas County Appraisal District (DCAD), the 1,838 square foot home constructed in The exterior of the home is wood. Subject to approval of this application, an approved building permit will be required prior to the final inspection of the structure. As part of the building permit review process, Building Inspections will ensure that the addition complies with all regulations. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Legal notice of this item was published in the Fort Worth Star Telegram on August 11th and August 20th. Property owner notices (PON s) were placed in the out-going-mail on August 10, As of the date of this report, staff has not received any written correspondence as a result of this request. FINDINGS Pursuant to Section of the UDC, the ZBA may grant variances and exceptions provided the following findings are met: PAGE 1 of 4

8 A. Such variance or exception will not substantially or permanently injure the appropriate use of adjacent property in the same district. Staff Evaluation: Staff contends that the exception will not substantially or permanently injure the appropriate use of adjacent property. Accessory structures are typical in residential zoning districts. There are other accessory structures in the rear yard of the neighboring properties. Staff has not received any opposition to the request at the time of this report. This finding has been met. B. Such variance or exception will not adversely affect the health, safety or general welfare of the public. Staff Evaluation: Staff contends that the variance will not adversely affect the health, safety or general welfare of the public. Accessory structures are typical in residential zoning districts. There are other accessory structures in the rear yard of the neighboring properties. Staff has not received any opposition to the request. This finding has been met. C. Such variance or exception will not be contrary to the public interest; and such variance or exception will not authorize the operation of a use other than those uses specifically authorized for the district in which the property for which the variance is sought is located. Staff Evaluation: The proposed accessory structure, if approved, will not authorize the operation of a use other than those already allowed in the Single Family-4 (SF-4) zone district. The applicant proposes to use the shed as personal storage space, which is a typical use of accessory buildings in residential zoning districts. The special exception and variance request, if approved, is in no way authorizing uses that are inconsistent with the underlying single family detached residential zoning of the property. This finding has been met. D. Such variance or exception will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. Staff Evaluation: The granting of this exception will allow the homeowner to maintain an already constructed accessory structure out of wood to store personal property, typical of usage of other accessory structures within the neighborhood. Staff suggests that the variance is in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. This finding has been met. E. Such variance or exception will not alter the essential character of the district in which is located the property for which the variance is sought. Staff Evaluation: There are neighboring properties within the neighborhood with accessory PAGE 2 of 4

9 structures. Staff finds that the applicant s request is consistent with the neighborhood. Staff suggests that the granting of this exception will not alter the essential character of the district. This finding has been met. F. Such variance or exception will not substantially weaken the general purposes of the zoning regulations established for the district in which the property is located. Staff Evaluation: Staff believes that such exception for an accessory structure will not substantially weaken the general purpose of the underlying zoning district. Staff notes the existence of accessory structures surrounding the subject property within 300 ft. of the accessory structure. Staff has yet to receive any communications in opposition to the proposal that has been submitted. This finding has been met. G. The plight of the owner of the property for which the variance or exception is sought is due to unique circumstances existing on the property, including but not limited to the area, shape or slope, and the unique circumstances were not created by the owner of the property and are not merely financial, and are not due to or the result of general conditions in the district in which the property is located. Staff Evaluation: Staff cannot find that the property owner has a hardship that is a unique circumstance of the property; however, the philosophy of the City is to work in cooperation with property owners to address their needs within the framework of the UDC. H. The variance or exception is not a self-created hardship. Staff Evaluation: While the hardship is self-created, the philosophy of the City is to work in cooperation with property owners to address their needs within the framework of the UDC. Additional, Section of the UDC stipulates that the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall consider the following factors when considering an exception or variance to a requirement for an accessory building: A. That the building is not intended to be used as a dwelling and does not contain any elements of a dwelling such as facilities for food preparation, sleeping and bathrooms. Staff Evaluation: The accessory building does not contain any facilities for food preparation, sleeping or bathrooms. The accessory building is not intended to be used as a dwelling. B. Whether separate utility hook-ups are proposed for the structure. Staff Evaluation: Separate utility hook-ups are NOT proposed for this structure. C. The extent to which windows may impact adjacent properties when a two-story structure is proposed. PAGE 3 of 4

10 Staff Evaluation: The accessory structure is a single-story structure. RECOMMENDATION Staff suggests that ZBA board grant the 5 ft. rear setback variance, and the right to encroach the easement line (pending the License Agreement process/city Council approval) to the accessory structure(s). CONDITIONS If the Zoning Board of Adjustment and Appeals chooses to grant the variance, then staff recommends the following conditions: 1. The variances are to be no more than what is approved by the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals. 2. The applicant will need to obtain a building permit. 3. The accessory structure cannot be used for a dwelling. 4. The applicant will need to pass the final building inspection for the accessory structure. 5. The applicant will need to pay a double permit fee. 6. Any construction or building allowed by this variance or special exception must conform to the requirements set forth by the Unified Development Code, the 2015 International Building Code, the Grand Prairie Municipal Code of Ordinances, city adopted fire codes and with other applicable regulatory requirements administered and/or enforced by the state and federal government. 7. If a building permit or certificate of occupancy shall not have been applied for or issued within a ninety (90) day period or as the Board may specifically grant, the special exceptions shall be deemed waived; and all rights there under terminated. PAGE 4 of 4

11

12

13 Notice of Public Hearing Para obtener información acerca de este aviso, sírvase llamar al (972) To Whom It May Concern: Notice is hereby given that the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals of the City of Grand Prairie, Texas will consider the following variance and/or special exception to the Unified Development Code of the : CASE NUMBER BA NE 23 rd St, platted as Lot 2, Block 2, My Estate (Council District 5). Consider a setback Variance request for an already constructed accessory structure. This property is zoned Single Family-4 (SF-4). You are being notified in accordance with state law requiring the notification of property owners within 200 feet of the subject property for the variance or special exception. The public hearing will be held in City Hall, 317 College Street, on August 21, 2017, at 7:00 p.m. At that time the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals will hear from any property owners in support of, or in opposition to, the requested variance or special exception. Upon reviewing the request the Board will make a final decision. These hearings are not limited to those who receive this notice. If you know of any affected property owner whom has not received a notice, it would be appreciated if you would inform them of this meeting. Should you have further questions regarding this case, please contact me at (972) Please specify the case number or address of the subject property when calling. Please refer to the opposite side of this notice for the location of the subject property. Sincerely, Colby C. Collins Colby Collins City Planner

14

15 NotifyNo OWNERNAME OWNERADDRE OWNERADD_1 OWNERCITYS OWNERZIP 0 I 30 MEYERS JV II 2331 GUS THOMASSON RD STE 126 SUITE 126 DALLAS TEXAS MUSSELWHITE DOUGLAS 2310 SHARLIS CIR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS ZAVALA RAUL 2309 SHARLIS CIR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS F & M PROPERTIES INC 4576 BILTMORE FRISCO TEXAS JAVALERA NISEFORO & 2310 SHERRY CIR JOANN M GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS MUNOZ ROBERT 820 NE 23RD ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS WISE J V & LORENE 2305 GRAHAM ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS ZAMORA MARIA 2309 SHERRY CIR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS MUSSELWHITE MYRA SUE 2313 SHARLIS CIR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS BORG EDWIN A 1106 MCCALLUM DR GARLAND TEXAS LIRA TERESA IVONNE 726 NE 23RD ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS MOLINA HECTOR 702 NE 23RD ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS MAGDALENO GUSTAVO 729 NE 23RD ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS FREEMAN NELL RAY 709 NE 23RD ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS STRICKLIN SHIRLEY 713 NE 23RD ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS RODRIGUEZ ROBERT U 2209 COTTONWOOD CT GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS MARTIN EDDIE B 2213 GRAHAM ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS MORENO RONNIE & 905 BEVERLY CIR HEATHER CEDAR HILL TEXAS ROSS CARROLL JEAN 2206 COTTONWOOD CT GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS GONZALES JOSE M & 802 NE 23RD ST MIGUELA R GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS SALAZAR ANDRES 2305 SHERRY CIR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS ARMIJO MARIA ELVIA 722 NE 23RD ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS LITTLE DUDLEY E 1725 BRENT CT GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS DUPREE RONALD D PO BOX GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS EQUITY TRUST COMPANY CUSTODIAN PO BOX FBO JONATHAN MOORE IRA PLANO TEXAS HOLLINGSHEAD SARAH BETH 718 NE 23RD ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS TRUJILLO JOSE 1006 NE 22ND ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS RODRIGUEZ EZEQUIEL 733 NE 23RD ST JESSICA RODRIGUEZ GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS FLORES RAMON T & JANIE A 808 WILLOW WOOD DR CEDAR HILL TEXAS GILMORE ELOISE I 725 NE 23RD ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS NE 22ND STREET 1010 LAND TRUST PO BOX 1088 KATHRYN BALL, TRUSTEE ROCKWALL TEXAS DELGADO JACQUELINE & 1022 NE 22ND ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS BORCHERDING MARY 518 OAK RIDGE PL GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS HOPKINS N D 822 FORT WORTH ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS ACEVEDO ALEJANDRO & NILVA 809 NE 23RD ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS MOLINA HECTOR & ELVA G 705 NE 23RD ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS GRAHAM JO 2306 SHARLIS CIR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS VEGA MARIO 1014 NE 22ND ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS HERNANDEZ HECTOR M 805 NE 23RD ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS ANDRADE JESUS JOSE 1102 NE 22ND ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS GARCIA JESSIE JR 2306 SHERRY CIR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS

16 BA Meadow Park Ln. Special Exception Carport Zoning Board of Adjustments & Appeals: August 21, 2017 Case Manager: Owner: Colby Collins Miguel Perez SUMMARY 1110 Meadow Park Ln, platted as Lot 2, Block 24, Meadow Park (Council District 2). Consider a Special Exception request to construct a carport. This property is zoned Planned Development-144 (PD-144). DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting approval for a Special Exception to construct a carport. The applicant is proposing to construct a 15 ft. x 15 ft. 10 ft. tall carport out of wood. During site visits, staff noticed that there were at least two carports within 300-ft (four within 500-ft.) of the subject property. However, staff could not find a legal permit for any of the properties with carports surrounding the home. At the time of this report (8/14/2017), staff has not received any opposition from surrounding neighbors. According to the Dallas County Appraisal District (DCAD), the subject property consists of a 1,766 square foot home constructed in The exterior of the home is primarily brick veneer. The existing rear yard driveway has room to park two-full sized vehicles. Subject to approval of this application, an approved building permit will be required prior to the commencement of the carport construction. As part of the building permit review process, Building Inspections will ensure that the carport materials and construction complies with all regulations. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Legal notice of this item was published in the Fort Worth Star Telegram on August 11 th and August 20 th. Property owner notices (PON s) were placed in the out-going-mail on August 10, As of the date of this report, staff has not received any written correspondence as a result of this request. FINDINGS The following section evaluates findings for a Special Exception for the carport. Section (A) of Article PAGE 1 of 5

17 6, Density and Dimensional Requirements, of the Unified Development Code, stipulates that carports are not permitted by right in any single family residential zoning district; however, Section (B) of Article 6, Density and Dimensional Requirements, of the Unified Development Code grants the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals the authority to grant a Special Exception to the regulations for the purpose of constructing a carport in a residential zoning district upon a finding by the board that: 1. The carport will not exceed a maximum size of 20 feet in length by 20 feet in width, or a maximum square footage of 400 sq. ft. Staff Evaluation: The proposed carport will be 15 feet in length by 15 feet in width, 10 feet tall and 225 sq. ft. in total area. 2. The carport will be setback a minimum of five (5) feet from all property lines adjacent to public rights of way. Staff Evaluation: The proposed drawing shows that the carport will be setback a minimum of five (5) feet from all property lines adjacent to public rights of way. 3. The carport will be setback a minimum of three (3) feet from all internal property lines, and any projection or overhang of eaves, gutters, or other roof elements that protrude into the established building setback may not exceed twenty four (24 ) inches in accordance with Section A of this Article. Staff Evaluation: The proposed carport will meet the required minimum setbacks to construct the carport. 4. The carport will not encroach, intrude, or overhang any easements that have been established on the subject property. Staff Evaluation: The proposed carport will not encroach, intrude, or overhang any easements that have been established on the subject property. 5. All areas beneath the roof of the carport should be paved with a city approved paving material and the poles or supports of the carport should be anchored in or to the paving. Staff Evaluation: The proposed carport will be constructed over the existing concrete driveway. 6. The carport is to be constructed in a manner and design consistent in materials and color to the primary residential structure and may not be composed of any materials explicitly prohibited in Section (C) of this Article, Staff Evaluation: Based on information provided by the applicant as noted above, the structure will meet this condition; however, during the permit process the building inspections department will verify all materials. 7. The carport does not pose a negative impact on any of the adjacent or surrounding properties PAGE 2 of 5

18 based on its proposed location, design, or visual impact to the streetscape. Staff Evaluation: During site visits, staff noticed that there were several carports throughout the neighborhood area surrounding the subject property. At the time of this report (8/14/2017), staff has not received any opposition from surrounding neighbors. 8. The carport does not create a possible sight obstruction to motorists. Staff Evaluation: The structure will not create any sight obstruction to motorists C In no case should any carport contain or be constructed of the following prohibited building materials: canvas, vinyl, PVC siding, galvanized or corrugated metal, aluminum, corrugated or flat fiberglass panels, or any plastic construction materials. Staff Evaluation: All building materials will be reviewed for compliance with Section (C) of the UDC by Building Inspections during the permit review process. As authorized in Section of the UDC, the ZBA may grant variances and exceptions provided the following findings are met: A. Such variance or exception will not substantially or permanently injure the appropriate use of adjacent property in the same district. Staff Evaluation: The UDC grants the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals the authority to grant an exception allowing the placement of a carport. The proposed carport special exception request is typical of many families living in older neighborhoods that were not necessarily designed to accommodate the number of vehicles typically owned by today s modern families. Due to potential inclement weather, including large hail, the applicant desires to protect their vehicles that are parked outside in their driveway. During site visits, staff noticed that there were at least two carports within 300-ft (four within 500- ft.) of the subject property. However, staff could not find a legal permit for any of the properties with carports surrounding the home. B. Such variance or exception will not adversely affect the health, safety or general welfare of the public. Staff Evaluation: The proposed carport does comply with the minimum development standards. Staff suggests that the exception will not adversely affect the health, safety or general welfare of the public. C. Such variance or exception will not be contrary to the public interest; and such variance or exception will not authorize the operation of a use other than those uses specifically authorized for the district in which the property for which the variance is sought is located. PAGE 3 of 5

19 Staff Evaluation: The proposed carport special exception, if approved, will not authorize the operation of a use other than those already allowed in the Planned Development-144 (PD-144) zone district. Staff suggests that the exception is not contrary to the public interest and it will not authorize any currently unauthorized uses in the zone district. D. Such variance or exception will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. Staff Evaluation: The granting of this exception will allow the homeowner to protect their vehicle from inclement weather. Staff suggests that the exception is in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. E. Such variance or exception will not alter the essential character of the district in which is located the property for which the variance is sought. Staff Evaluation: During site visits, staff noticed that there were at least two carports within 300-ft (four within 500-ft.) of the subject property. However, staff could not find a legal permit for any of the properties with carports surrounding the home. F. Such variance or exception will not substantially weaken the general purposes of the zoning regulations established for the district in which the property is located. Staff Evaluation: Approving the exception and variance will not substantially weaken the general purposes of the zoning regulations established for the district in which the property is located. G. The plight of the owner of the property for which the variance or exception is sought is due to unique circumstances existing on the property, including but not limited to the area, shape or slope, and the unique circumstances were not created by the owner of the property and are not merely financial, and are not due to or the result of general conditions in the district in which the property is located. Staff Evaluation: Staff cannot find that the property owner has a hardship that is a unique circumstance of the property; however, the philosophy of the City is to work in cooperation with property owners to address their needs within the framework of the UDC. H. The variance or exception is not a self-created hardship. Staff Evaluation: While the hardship is self-created, the philosophy of the City is to work in cooperation with property owners to address their needs within the framework of the UDC. RECOMMENDATION PAGE 4 of 5

20 Staff recommends approval of the proposed 15x15x10 ft. tall carport. If the board chooses to grant the applicants request, he/she must abide to the conditions listed below: CONDITIONS 1. The variances and/or special exceptions are to be no more than what is approved by the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals. 2. The applicant will need to obtain a building permit from Building Inspections prior to the completion of the proposed structure; 3. The carport must conform to material standards listed in Section (C) of the Unified Development Code. 4. Any construction or building allowed by this variance or special exception must conform to the requirements set forth by the Unified Development Code, the 2015 International Building Code, the Grand Prairie Municipal Code of Ordinances, city adopted fire codes and with other applicable regulatory requirements administered and/or enforced by the state and federal government. 5. If a building permit or certificate of occupancy shall not have been applied for or issued within a ninety (90) day period or as the Board may specifically grant, the special exceptions shall be deemed waived; and all rights there under terminated. PAGE 5 of 5

21

22

23 Notice of Public Hearing Para obtener información acerca de este aviso, sírvase llamar al (972) To Whom It May Concern: Notice is hereby given that the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals of the City of Grand Prairie, Texas will consider the following variance and/or special exception to the Unified Development Code of the : CASE NUMBER BA Meadow Park Ln, platted as Lot 2, Block 24, Meadow Park (Council District 2). Consider a Special Exception request to construct a carport. This property is zoned Planned Development-144 (PD-144). You are being notified in accordance with state law requiring the notification of property owners within 200 feet of the subject property for the variance or special exception. The public hearing will be held in City Hall, 317 College Street, on August 21, 2017, at 7:00 p.m. At that time the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals will hear from any property owners in support of, or in opposition to, the requested variance or special exception. Upon reviewing the request the Board will make a final decision. These hearings are not limited to those who receive this notice. If you know of any affected property owner whom has not received a notice, it would be appreciated if you would inform them of this meeting. Should you have further questions regarding this case, please contact me at (972) Please specify the case number or address of the subject property when calling. Please refer to the opposite side of this notice for the location of the subject property. Sincerely, Colby C. Collins Colby Collins City Planner

24

25 NotifyNo OWNERNAME OWNERADDRE OWNERADD_1 OWNERCITYS OWNERZIP 0 PARDUE LAND COMPANY LTD WOODMEADOW PKWY STE A SUITE A DALLAS TEXAS VUONG VAN 6502 HALSEY CT AUSTIN TEXAS JONES MICHAEL C & DARLENE 3200 S ROBINSON RD GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS GONZALES JUANA & 1113 MEADOW PARK LN ESTEBAN GONZALES GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS RAMIREZ LUIS A 1131 MEADOWS DR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS BASS MARIE J 1137 MEADOW PARK LN GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS WORLEY LARRY W 1145 MEADOW PARK LN GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS CHAMES ELAINE 1109 MEADOW PARK LN GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS WYATT ANNIE F 1141 MEADOW PARK LN GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS CORDONA LEONOR 1138 MEADOW PARK LN GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS HOPKINS N D 822 FORT WORTH ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS WOODS LETICIA M 1130 MEADOW PARK LN GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS SILVA ROLANDO & 858 SPRINGWOOD DR MARIA E ARELLANO GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS WYRICK BARBARA ANN 1122 MEADOW PARK LN GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS DELGADO WALTER R MORNINGSIDE DR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS SCHWARTZ ROSEMARY IRREVOCABLE TRUST & 934 OUR LN CODY M SCHWARTZ TRUSTEE GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS HEBBE HERBERT E JR 1801 SANTA CLARA CT GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS ROBINSON KATHLEEN 1129 MEADOW PARK LN GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS SHEANER RICHARD H 1111 MEADOWS DR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS MEADOWS JAMES D & MARIA E 8113 QUAIL TRL LIFE ESTATE GRANDVIEW TEXAS BOMAR JARRETT W ETAL 1135 MEADOWS DR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS SPRUIELL SHIRLEY ANN 1119 MEADOWS DR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS SAENZ SYLVIA 1125 MEADOW PARK LN GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS REED JANICE CAROL 1134 MEADOW PARK LN GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS CASHMAN GREGORY 1121 MEADOW PARK LN GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS RIEMER MAGDALINE V & 510 MOORGATE CT RICHARD GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS SANCHEZ DOLORES G 1127 MEADOWS DR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS PEREZ SORANGEL & 1110 MEADOW PARK LN PEREZ MIGUEL RAMON GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS BLTREJV3 DALLAS LLC PO BOX 2249 CUMMING GEORGIA FAVILA ADRIANA & 3120 FAIRFIELD DR AGUILAR JORGE GUILLERMO R GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS VARGAS JOSE J 3124 FAIRFIELD DR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS DELGADO DONALD DANA 1117 MEADOW PARK LN GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS MOORE DEBORAH A 3116 FAIRFIELD DR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS EDWARDS CAL & 1115 MEADOWS DR MANUELA GONZALEZ GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS VO CAROL 1142 MEADOW PARK LN GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS SWARTZENDRUBER ROBERT & 3112 FAIRFIELD DR SHELLY GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS AVILA SALVADOR & MARIA 6561 COUNTY ROAD 4098 KAUFMAN TEXAS PALLICK WILLIAM C & 1123 MEADOWS DR PALLICK MARIA GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS SOLARES MARIA O & 1133 MEADOW PARK LN GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS NGO TUYET MAI THI 4125 SALEM ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS HORTON M W & DOROTHY J 1114 MEADOW PARK LN GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS

26 BA Vineyard Rd. Special Exception Accessory Structure Zoning Board of Adjustments & Appeals: August 21, 2017 Case Manager: Owner: Colby Collins Jake Tran SUMMARY 1522 Vineyard Rd, WH Beeman ABST 126 PG 011, (Council District 6). Consider a masonry Special Exception request to construct an accessory structure. This property is zoned Single Family-1 (SF-1). DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting approval to construct a 30 ft. x 50 ft. 12 ft. tall accessory structure for storage. Due to the size of the structure being over 200 sq. ft. (1,500 sq. ft.), the (U)nified (D)evelopment (C)ode states that the building must be constructed of masonry as defined in Section 13, Minimum Masonry Content for Structures in Residential Zoning Districts, or be of a standard residential siding material consistent with materials used on the primary residential structure if 50 percent of all developed lots within the block on both sides of the street between two intersecting streets have been constructed with non-masonry materials. Due to the price of brick, the applicant is requesting for a masonry exception. During site visits, staff noticed that there were several homes with wood or metal accessory structures within the neighborhood area. According to the Dallas County Appraisal District (DCAD), the 1,726 square foot home constructed in The exterior of the home is brick veneer. Subject to approval of this application, an approved building permit will be required prior to the final inspection of the structure. As part of the building permit review process, Building Inspections will ensure that the addition complies with all regulations. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Legal notice of this item was published in the Fort Worth Star Telegram on August 11th and August 20th. Property owner notices (PON s) were placed in the out-going-mail on August 10, As of the date of this report, staff has not received any written correspondence as a result of this request. FINDINGS PAGE 1 of 4

27 Pursuant to Section of the UDC, the ZBA may grant variances and exceptions provided the following findings are met: A. Such variance or exception will not substantially or permanently injure the appropriate use of adjacent property in the same district. Staff Evaluation: Staff contends that the exception will not substantially or permanently injure the appropriate use of adjacent property. Accessory structures are typical in residential zoning districts. There are other accessory structures in the rear yard of the neighboring properties. Staff has not received any opposition to the request at the time of this report. This finding has been met. B. Such variance or exception will not adversely affect the health, safety or general welfare of the public. Staff Evaluation: Staff contends that the variance will not adversely affect the health, safety or general welfare of the public. Accessory structures are typical in residential zoning districts. There are other accessory structures in the rear yard of the neighboring properties. Staff has not received any opposition to the request. This finding has been met. C. Such variance or exception will not be contrary to the public interest; and such variance or exception will not authorize the operation of a use other than those uses specifically authorized for the district in which the property for which the variance is sought is located. Staff Evaluation: The proposed accessory structure, if approved, will not authorize the operation of a use other than those already allowed in the Single Family-1 (SF-1) zone district. The applicant proposes to use the shed as personal storage space, which is a typical use of accessory buildings in residential zoning districts. The special exception request, if approved, is in no way authorizing uses that are inconsistent with the underlying single family detached residential zoning of the property. This finding has been met. D. Such variance or exception will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. Staff Evaluation: The granting of this exception will allow the homeowner to construct an accessory structure out of metal, opposed to masonry due to the proposed size, to store personal property; typical of usage of other accessory structures within the neighborhood. Staff suggests that the variance is in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. This finding has been met. E. Such variance or exception will not alter the essential character of the district in which is located the property for which the variance is sought. PAGE 2 of 4

28 Staff Evaluation: There are neighboring properties within the neighborhood with accessory structures. Staff finds that the applicant s request is consistent with the neighborhood. Staff suggests that the granting of this exception will not alter the essential character of the district. This finding has been met. F. Such variance or exception will not substantially weaken the general purposes of the zoning regulations established for the district in which the property is located. Staff Evaluation: Staff believes that such exception for an accessory structure will not substantially weaken the general purpose of the underlying zoning district. Staff notes the existence of accessory structures surrounding the subject property. At the time of this report (8/16/2017), staff has yet to receive any communications in opposition to the proposal that has been submitted. This finding has been met. G. The plight of the owner of the property for which the variance or exception is sought is due to unique circumstances existing on the property, including but not limited to the area, shape or slope, and the unique circumstances were not created by the owner of the property and are not merely financial, and are not due to or the result of general conditions in the district in which the property is located. Staff Evaluation: Staff cannot find that the property owner has a hardship that is a unique circumstance of the property; however, the philosophy of the City is to work in cooperation with property owners to address their needs within the framework of the UDC. H. The variance or exception is not a self-created hardship. Staff Evaluation: While the hardship is self-created, the philosophy of the City is to work in cooperation with property owners to address their needs within the framework of the UDC. Additional, Section of the UDC stipulates that the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals shall consider the following factors when considering an exception or variance to a requirement for an accessory building: A. That the building is not intended to be used as a dwelling and does not contain any elements of a dwelling such as facilities for food preparation, sleeping and bathrooms. Staff Evaluation: The accessory building does not contain any facilities for food preparation, sleeping or bathrooms. The accessory building is not intended to be used as a dwelling. B. Whether separate utility hook-ups are proposed for the structure. Staff Evaluation: Separate utility hook-ups are NOT proposed for this structure. PAGE 3 of 4

29 C. The extent to which windows may impact adjacent properties when a two-story structure is proposed. Staff Evaluation: The accessory structure is a single-story structure. RECOMMENDATION Due to the size of the property (2 acres), staff suggests that ZBA board grant the proposed masonry exception to the 30 ft. x 50 ft. 12 ft. tall accessory structure. CONDITIONS If the Zoning Board of Adjustment and Appeals chooses to grant the variance, then staff recommends the following conditions: 1. The variances are to be no more than what is approved by the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals. 2. The applicant will need to obtain a building permit. 3. The accessory structure cannot be used for a dwelling. 4. The applicant will need to pass the final building inspection for the accessory structure. 5. Any construction or building allowed by this variance or special exception must conform to the requirements set forth by the Unified Development Code, the 2015 International Building Code, the Grand Prairie Municipal Code of Ordinances, city adopted fire codes and with other applicable regulatory requirements administered and/or enforced by the state and federal government. 6. If a building permit or certificate of occupancy shall not have been applied for or issued within a ninety (90) day period or as the Board may specifically grant, the special exceptions shall be deemed waived; and all rights there under terminated. PAGE 4 of 4

30

31

32

33 NotifyNo OWNERNAME OWNERADDRE OWNERADD_1 OWNERCITYS OWNERZIP 0 JOHNSON AURORA 1529 VICKY LN GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS WILLIS MRS WM H PO BOX GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS GRAND PRAIRIE CITY OF 206 W CHURCH ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS SAMUEL WALTER DANIEL 1641 VICKY LN GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS SAMUEL WALTER DANIEL 1641 VICKY LN GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS SHARP DORIS JEAN 1501 VINEYARD RD GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS HARRIGAN JUDITH L 710 WOODLAWN DR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS LIEVROUW DAN A & 1715 VICKY LN CYNTHIA A GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS RAMOS OMAR & ADRIANA 1630 VINEYARD RD GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS RAMOS JAVIER 1631 VINEYARD RD GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS TRAN DARIEN 1522 VINEYARD RD GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS RHODES RANDALL & DELILAH 1634 VICKY LN GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS COLONIAL BAPTIST CH PO BOX GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS DRISCOLL MATT 1510 VINEYARD RD GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS HALL LEE ANN 111 LAKECREST DR WAXAHACHIE TEXAS WILLIAMS TERRY RAY 1618 VINEYARD RD GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS BRITAIN KENT EDWARD 1626 VINEYARD RD GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS NGUYEN NGUYET THU 4710 GOODNIGHT CT GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS

34 BA Dodge Trl. Special Exception Carport Variance Setback Zoning Board of Adjustments & Appeals: August 21, 2017 Case Manager: Owner: Colby Collins Sherry Scott SUMMARY 2017 Dodge Trl, platted as Lot 15, Block G, Trailwood 1 (Council District 6). Consider a side yard setback variance request to construct a carport. This property is zoned Planned Development-81 (PD-81). DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting approval for a 3 ft. side yard setback variance and a Special Exception to construct a carport. The applicant is proposing to construct a 18 ft. x 20 ft. 10 ft. tall carport out of metal. During site visits, staff noticed that there were at least two carports within 300-ft. of the subject property. At the time of this report (8/14/2017), staff has not received any opposition from surrounding neighbors. According to the Dallas County Appraisal District (DCAD), the subject property consists of a 2,341 square foot home constructed in The exterior of the home is primarily brick veneer. The existing rear yard driveway has room to park two-full sized vehicles. Subject to approval of this application, an approved building permit will be required prior to the commencement of the carport construction. As part of the building permit review process, Building Inspections will ensure that the carport materials and construction complies with all regulations. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Legal notice of this item was published in the Fort Worth Star Telegram on August 11 th and August 20 th. Property owner notices (PON s) were placed in the out-going-mail on August 10, As of the date of this report, staff has not received any written correspondence as a result of this request. FINDINGS The following section evaluates findings for a Special Exception for the carport. Section (A) of Article PAGE 1 of 5

35 6, Density and Dimensional Requirements, of the Unified Development Code, stipulates that carports are not permitted by right in any single family residential zoning district; however, Section (B) of Article 6, Density and Dimensional Requirements, of the Unified Development Code grants the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals the authority to grant a Special Exception to the regulations for the purpose of constructing a carport in a residential zoning district upon a finding by the board that: 1. The carport will not exceed a maximum size of 20 feet in length by 20 feet in width, or a maximum square footage of 400 sq. ft. Staff Evaluation: The proposed carport will be 18 feet in length by 20 feet in width, 10 feet tall and 360 sq. ft. in total area. 2. The carport will be setback a minimum of five (5) feet from all property lines adjacent to public rights of way. Staff Evaluation: The proposed drawing shows that the carport will be setback a minimum of five (5) feet from all property lines adjacent to public rights of way. 3. The carport will be setback a minimum of three (3) feet from all internal property lines, and any projection or overhang of eaves, gutters, or other roof elements that protrude into the established building setback may not exceed twenty four (24 ) inches in accordance with Section A of this Article. Staff Evaluation: Due to the internal property line being close to the home, the applicant is requesting a 3 ft. side yard setback variance to construct a 18x20x10 ft. tall carport. 4. The carport will not encroach, intrude, or overhang any easements that have been established on the subject property. Staff Evaluation: The proposed carport will not encroach, intrude, or overhang any easements that have been established on the subject property. 5. All areas beneath the roof of the carport should be paved with a city approved paving material and the poles or supports of the carport should be anchored in or to the paving. Staff Evaluation: The proposed carport will be constructed over the existing concrete driveway. 6. The carport is to be constructed in a manner and design consistent in materials and color to the primary residential structure and may not be composed of any materials explicitly prohibited in Section (C) of this Article, Staff Evaluation: Based on information provided by the applicant as noted above, the structure will meet this condition; however, during the permit process the building inspections department will verify all materials. 7. The carport does not pose a negative impact on any of the adjacent or surrounding properties PAGE 2 of 5

36 based on its proposed location, design, or visual impact to the streetscape. Staff Evaluation: During site visits, staff noticed that there were at least two carports within 300-ft. of the subject property. At the time of this report (8/14/2017), staff has not received any opposition from surrounding neighbors. 8. The carport does not create a possible sight obstruction to motorists. Staff Evaluation: The structure will not create any sight obstruction to motorists C In no case should any carport contain or be constructed of the following prohibited building materials: canvas, vinyl, PVC siding, galvanized or corrugated metal, aluminum, corrugated or flat fiberglass panels, or any plastic construction materials. Staff Evaluation: All building materials will be reviewed for compliance with Section (C) of the UDC by Building Inspections during the permit review process. As authorized in Section of the UDC, the ZBA may grant variances and exceptions provided the following findings are met: A. Such variance or exception will not substantially or permanently injure the appropriate use of adjacent property in the same district. Staff Evaluation: The UDC grants the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals the authority to grant an exception allowing the placement of a carport. The proposed carport special exception request is typical of many families living in older neighborhoods that were not necessarily designed to accommodate the number of vehicles typically owned by today s modern families. Due to potential inclement weather, including large hail, the applicant desires to protect their vehicles that are parked outside in their driveway. B. Such variance or exception will not adversely affect the health, safety or general welfare of the public. Staff Evaluation: The proposed carport does comply with the minimum development standards. Staff suggests that the exception will not adversely affect the health, safety or general welfare of the public. C. Such variance or exception will not be contrary to the public interest; and such variance or exception will not authorize the operation of a use other than those uses specifically authorized for the district in which the property for which the variance is sought is located. Staff Evaluation: The proposed carport special exception, if approved, will not authorize the operation of a use other than those already allowed in the Planned Development-81 (PD-81) zone district. Staff suggests that the variance or exception is not contrary to the public interest and it will PAGE 3 of 5

37 not authorize any currently unauthorized uses in the zone district. D. Such variance or exception will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. Staff Evaluation: The granting of this exception will allow the homeowner to protect their vehicle from inclement weather. Staff suggests that the exception is in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. E. Such variance or exception will not alter the essential character of the district in which is located the property for which the variance is sought. Staff Evaluation: During site visits, staff noticed that there were at least two carports within 300-ft of the subject property. Such variance or exception will not alter the essential character of the district. F. Such variance or exception will not substantially weaken the general purposes of the zoning regulations established for the district in which the property is located. Staff Evaluation: Approving the exception and variance will not substantially weaken the general purposes of the zoning regulations established for the district in which the property is located. G. The plight of the owner of the property for which the variance or exception is sought is due to unique circumstances existing on the property, including but not limited to the area, shape or slope, and the unique circumstances were not created by the owner of the property and are not merely financial, and are not due to or the result of general conditions in the district in which the property is located. Staff Evaluation: Staff cannot find that the property owner has a hardship that is a unique circumstance of the property; however, the philosophy of the City is to work in cooperation with property owners to address their needs within the framework of the UDC. H. The variance or exception is not a self-created hardship. Staff Evaluation: While the hardship is self-created, the philosophy of the City is to work in cooperation with property owners to address their needs within the framework of the UDC. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposed 18x20x10 ft. tall carport. Staff also recommends approval for a 3ft. side yard setback variance. If the board chooses to grant the applicants request, he/she must abide to the conditions listed below: PAGE 4 of 5

38 CONDITIONS 1. The variances and/or special exceptions are to be no more than what is approved by the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals. 2. The applicant will need to obtain a building permit from Building Inspections prior to the completion of the proposed structure; 3. The carport must conform to material standards listed in Section (C) of the Unified Development Code. 4. Any construction or building allowed by this variance or special exception must conform to the requirements set forth by the Unified Development Code, the 2015 International Building Code, the Grand Prairie Municipal Code of Ordinances, city adopted fire codes and with other applicable regulatory requirements administered and/or enforced by the state and federal government. 5. If a building permit or certificate of occupancy shall not have been applied for or issued within a ninety (90) day period or as the Board may specifically grant, the special exceptions shall be deemed waived; and all rights there under terminated. PAGE 5 of 5

39

40 GOODNIGHT DODGE CASE LOCATION MAP Case Number: BA Dodge Trail Planning and Development (972)

41 Notice of Public Hearing Para obtener información acerca de este aviso, sírvase llamar al (972) To Whom It May Concern: Notice is hereby given that the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals of the City of Grand Prairie, Texas will consider the following variance and/or special exception to the Unified Development Code of the : CASE NUMBER BA Dodge Trl, platted as Lot 15, Block G, Trailwood 1 (Council District 6). Consider a side yard setback variance request to construct a carport. This property is zoned Planned Development-81 (PD-81). You are being notified in accordance with state law requiring the notification of property owners within 200 feet of the subject property for the variance or special exception. The public hearing will be held in City Hall, 317 College Street, on August 21, 2017, at 7:00 p.m. At that time the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals will hear from any property owners in support of, or in opposition to, the requested variance or special exception. Upon reviewing the request the Board will make a final decision. These hearings are not limited to those who receive this notice. If you know of any affected property owner whom has not received a notice, it would be appreciated if you would inform them of this meeting. Should you have further questions regarding this case, please contact me at (972) Please specify the case number or address of the subject property when calling. Please refer to the opposite side of this notice for the location of the subject property. Sincerely, Colby C. Collins Colby Collins City Planner

42 GOODNIGHT ALAMO PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION CHISHOLM DODGE ZANES CHALK POLO SPANISH 2017 Dodge Trail Case Number: BA Case Location 300ft Buffer Properties Within Buffer

43 NotifyNo OWNERNAME OWNERADDRE OWNERADD_1 OWNERCITYS OWNERZIP 0 BOSLEY STEVEN & 2009 DODGE TRL CHRISTINA BOSLEY GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS BAHSOON MAURICE H PO BOX GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS PEARL WILLIE PO BOX GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS MURPHYTREVINO MARY ANGELA 4622 GOODNIGHT TRL GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS STODGHILL RODNEY D & 4625 GOODNIGHT TRL M GABRIELE STODGHILL GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS ANDERSON JOSEPH R 3803 S ROBINSON RD GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS PATRICK RONALD & LINDA 4602 ZANES CT GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS HERNANDEZ REYNALDO I 2014 DODGE TRL GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS MANCILLAS ANDRES & BRIGETTE L 2010 DODGE TRL GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS MICHAELSON EDGAR ALLAN JR 4610 ZANES CT GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS MORRIS DANNY A & KATHY 2005 CHISHOLM TRL GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS ALSHARIF MOHAMED S & 4614 ZANES CT PAMELA D GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS STEPHENS FRANCES R 4606 GOODNIGHT TRL GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS BOWDEN INC LLC 1850 OTTINGER RD WTB? PPTIES LLC KELLER TEXAS SMITH DIVINA C & 4621 GOODNIGHT TRL BUFORD SMITH JR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS MALONE SARAH DELL 4617 CHALK CT GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS CARTER DAVID A & SHEREE N 4601 ZANES CT GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS COURSON ROBERT E 2018 DODGE TRL COURSON INGEBORG GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS VELASQUEZ OSCAR 4626 GOODNIGHT TRL GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS ANDERSON STEVEN M & 2006 DODGE TRL BARBARA J GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS SELF JAMES A 4601 CHALK CT GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS KINGERY ROGER ALLEN 4629 GOODNIGHT TRL GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS ZUNG BURTON J 2109 CHISHOLM TRL GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS VOGELS BOB J TR & 4606 ZANES CT MARY M VOGELS TR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS CHANCE KRISTINE ANDREA 4621 CHALK CT GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS WAGNER MICHAEL KENT 4618 GOODNIGHT TRL GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS ZAMARIPPA RAYMOND & 4605 CHALK CT VIRGINIA GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS DUNN DANIEL L 4610 GOODNIGHT TRL GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS BELL BRENDA A & RODDY L 1284 LONGLEAF DR CEDAR HILL TEXAS VENZOR OSCAR RAMOS & 2005 DODGE TRL GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS QUIROGA GLORIA 2001 CHISHOLM TRL GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS CRAWFORD JILL ANN & CHRISTOPHER 4625 CHALK CT GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS MOHAMED YUSUF H 2009 CHISHOLM TRL GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS VANDUSEN KEN 2105 CHISHOLM TRL GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS JACKSON DANIEL RICHARD & 2013 CHISHOLM TRL MARY LOU GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS MOULTON ROGER & VICKIE L 2013 DODGE TRL GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS RAMOS EDUARDO ALFREDO & 4613 CHALK CT GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS SLADE BRENDA A 4614 GOODNIGHT TRL GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS SCOTT RANDAL E 2017 DODGE TRL GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS WALKER DON W & 4609 CHALK CT CYNTHIA T GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS HARVEY EMILY YVONNE 4617 GOODNIGHT TRL GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS JOHNSON WALTER H JR 2002 DOGE TRL GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS AUZENNE CARL & 4630 GOODNIGHT TRL BYRD ERMA J GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS

44 BA Capetown Dr. Special Exception Carport Variance Setback Zoning Board of Adjustments & Appeals: August 21, 2017 Case Manager: Owner: Colby Collins Brenda Ferman SUMMARY 1513 Capetown Dr, platted as Lot 10, Block 0, Holiday Hill Estates (Council District 5). Consider a Special Exception request to construct a carport. This property is zoned Single Family-2 (SF-2). DISCUSSION The applicant is requesting approval for a Special Exception to construct a carport. The applicant is proposing to construct a 26 ft. x 22 ft. 10 ft. tall carport out of wood. During site visits, staff noticed that there was at least one carport and several accessory structures within the neighborhood area. At the time of this report (8/14/2017), staff has not received any opposition from surrounding neighbors. According to the Dallas County Appraisal District (DCAD), the subject property consists of a 1,836 square foot home constructed in The exterior of the home is primarily brick veneer. The existing rear yard driveway has room to park two-full sized vehicles. Subject to approval of this application, an approved building permit will be required prior to the commencement of the carport construction. As part of the building permit review process, Building Inspections will ensure that the carport materials and construction complies with all regulations. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Legal notice of this item was published in the Fort Worth Star Telegram on August 11 th and August 20 th. Property owner notices (PON s) were placed in the out-going-mail on August 10, As of the date of this report, staff has not received any written correspondence as a result of this request. FINDINGS The following section evaluates findings for a Special Exception for the carport. Section (A) of Article PAGE 1 of 5

45 6, Density and Dimensional Requirements, of the Unified Development Code, stipulates that carports are not permitted by right in any single family residential zoning district; however, Section (B) of Article 6, Density and Dimensional Requirements, of the Unified Development Code grants the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals the authority to grant a Special Exception to the regulations for the purpose of constructing a carport in a residential zoning district upon a finding by the board that: 1. The carport will not exceed a maximum size of 20 feet in length by 20 feet in width, or a maximum square footage of 400 sq. ft. Staff Evaluation: The proposed carport will be 26 feet in length by 22 feet in width, 10 feet tall and 572 sq. ft. in total area. The finding has not been met. 2. The carport will be setback a minimum of five (5) feet from all property lines adjacent to public rights of way. Staff Evaluation: The proposed drawing shows that the carport will be setback a minimum of five (5) feet from all property lines adjacent to public rights of way. 3. The carport will be setback a minimum of three (3) feet from all internal property lines, and any projection or overhang of eaves, gutters, or other roof elements that protrude into the established building setback may not exceed twenty four (24 ) inches in accordance with Section A of this Article. Staff Evaluation: The proposed structure will meet the minimum setback requirements for property lines and will not overhang into any easement lines. 4. The carport will not encroach, intrude, or overhang any easements that have been established on the subject property. Staff Evaluation: The proposed carport will not encroach, intrude, or overhang any easements that have been established on the subject property. 5. All areas beneath the roof of the carport should be paved with a city approved paving material and the poles or supports of the carport should be anchored in or to the paving. Staff Evaluation: The proposed carport will be constructed over the existing concrete driveway. 6. The carport is to be constructed in a manner and design consistent in materials and color to the primary residential structure and may not be composed of any materials explicitly prohibited in Section (C) of this Article, Staff Evaluation: Based on information provided by the applicant as noted above, the structure will meet this condition; however, during the permit process the building inspections department will verify all materials. PAGE 2 of 5

46 7. The carport does not pose a negative impact on any of the adjacent or surrounding properties based on its proposed location, design, or visual impact to the streetscape. Staff Evaluation: During site visits, staff noticed that there was at least one carport and several accessory structures within the neighborhood area. Such variance or exception will not alter the essential character of the district. At the time of this report (8/14/2017), staff has not received any opposition from surrounding neighbors. 8. The carport does not create a possible sight obstruction to motorists. Staff Evaluation: The structure will not create any sight obstruction to motorists C In no case should any carport contain or be constructed of the following prohibited building materials: canvas, vinyl, PVC siding, galvanized or corrugated metal, aluminum, corrugated or flat fiberglass panels, or any plastic construction materials. Staff Evaluation: All building materials will be reviewed for compliance with Section (C) of the UDC by Building Inspections during the permit review process. As authorized in Section of the UDC, the ZBA may grant variances and exceptions provided the following findings are met: A. Such variance or exception will not substantially or permanently injure the appropriate use of adjacent property in the same district. Staff Evaluation: The UDC grants the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals the authority to grant an exception allowing the placement of a carport. The proposed carport special exception request is typical of many families living in older neighborhoods that were not necessarily designed to accommodate the number of vehicles typically owned by today s modern families. Due to potential inclement weather, including large hail, the applicant desires to protect their vehicles that are parked outside in their driveway. B. Such variance or exception will not adversely affect the health, safety or general welfare of the public. Staff Evaluation: The proposed carport does comply with the minimum development standards. Staff suggests that the exception will not adversely affect the health, safety or general welfare of the public. C. Such variance or exception will not be contrary to the public interest; and such variance or exception will not authorize the operation of a use other than those uses specifically authorized for the district in which the property for which the variance is sought is located. PAGE 3 of 5

47 Staff Evaluation: The proposed carport special exception, if approved, will not authorize the operation of a use other than those already allowed in the Single Family-2 (SF-2) zone district. Staff suggests that the variance or exception is not contrary to the public interest and it will not authorize any currently unauthorized uses in the zone district. D. Such variance or exception will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. Staff Evaluation: The granting of this exception will allow the homeowner to protect their vehicle from inclement weather. Staff suggests that the exception is in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. E. Such variance or exception will not alter the essential character of the district in which is located the property for which the variance is sought. Staff Evaluation: During site visits, staff noticed that there was at least one carport and several accessory structures within the neighborhood area. Such variance or exception will not alter the essential character of the district. F. Such variance or exception will not substantially weaken the general purposes of the zoning regulations established for the district in which the property is located. Staff Evaluation: Approving the exception and variance will not substantially weaken the general purposes of the zoning regulations established for the district in which the property is located. G. The plight of the owner of the property for which the variance or exception is sought is due to unique circumstances existing on the property, including but not limited to the area, shape or slope, and the unique circumstances were not created by the owner of the property and are not merely financial, and are not due to or the result of general conditions in the district in which the property is located. Staff Evaluation: Staff cannot find that the property owner has a hardship that is a unique circumstance of the property; however, the philosophy of the City is to work in cooperation with property owners to address their needs within the framework of the UDC. H. The variance or exception is not a self-created hardship. Staff Evaluation: While the hardship is self-created, the philosophy of the City is to work in cooperation with property owners to address their needs within the framework of the UDC. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the proposed 26x22x10 ft. tall carport. PAGE 4 of 5

48 If the board chooses to grant the applicants request, he/she must abide to the conditions listed below: CONDITIONS 1. The variances and/or special exceptions are to be no more than what is approved by the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals. 2. The applicant will need to obtain a building permit from Building Inspections prior to the completion of the proposed structure; 3. The carport must conform to material standards listed in Section (C) of the Unified Development Code. 4. Any construction or building allowed by this variance or special exception must conform to the requirements set forth by the Unified Development Code, the 2015 International Building Code, the Grand Prairie Municipal Code of Ordinances, city adopted fire codes and with other applicable regulatory requirements administered and/or enforced by the state and federal government. 5. If a building permit or certificate of occupancy shall not have been applied for or issued within a ninety (90) day period or as the Board may specifically grant, the special exceptions shall be deemed waived; and all rights there under terminated. PAGE 5 of 5

49

50

51

52 1514! ! 1506! 1510! Tripoli Trl !!!! 1422! Capetown Dr Dallas Tony Shotwell HOLIDAY HILL ESTATES !! 1609! ! 1505! !! 1605!! This data has been compiled by the City of Grand Prairie IT/GIS department. Various official and unofficial sources were used to gather this information. Every effort was made to ensure the accuracy of this data, however, no guarantee is given or implied as to the accuracy of said data. City Limits Counties Council Districts Zip Codes Floodways Dallas OTHER Subdivisions Parcels 1513 Capetown Dr. Easement Plat 90 0 Ft Date: 8/16/2017 Time: 10:50:30 AM R

53 CAPETOWN CASE LOCATION MAP Case Number BA Capetown Planning and Development (972)

54 Notice of Public Hearing Para obtener información acerca de este aviso, sírvase llamar al (972) To Whom It May Concern: Notice is hereby given that the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals of the City of Grand Prairie, Texas will consider the following variance and/or special exception to the Unified Development Code of the : CASE NUMBER BA Capetown Dr, platted as Lot 10, Block 0, Holiday Hill Estates (Council District 5). Consider a Special Exception request to construct a carport. This property is zoned Single Family-2 (SF-2). You are being notified in accordance with state law requiring the notification of property owners within 200 feet of the subject property for the variance or special exception. The public hearing will be held in City Hall, 317 College Street, on August 21, 2017, at 7:00 p.m. At that time the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals will hear from any property owners in support of, or in opposition to, the requested variance or special exception. Upon reviewing the request the Board will make a final decision. These hearings are not limited to those who receive this notice. If you know of any affected property owner whom has not received a notice, it would be appreciated if you would inform them of this meeting. Should you have further questions regarding this case, please contact me at (972) Please specify the case number or address of the subject property when calling. Please refer to the opposite side of this notice for the location of the subject property. Sincerely, Colby C. Collins Colby Collins City Planner

55 DENMARK CONTINENTAL 16TH TRIPOLI HALIFAX PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION TARRANT HAWAII BAHAMAS WESTRIDGE PARIS HWY 161 SVC NB HWY 161 OFF RP NB JUNEAU CAPETOWN TH ROMAN BURLESON HWY 161 NB HUDDLESTON HWY 161 SB STRONG HILL 1513 Capetown Drive Case Number: BA Case Location 300ft Buffer Properties Within Buffer

56 NotifyNo OWNERNAME OWNERADDRE OWNERADD_1 OWNERCITYS OWNERZIP 0 GRAND PRAIRIE CITY OF 317 COLLEGE ST % REBECCA KOO GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS EDMONDSON RICHARD B 1505 CAPETOWN DR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS VIDALES BRENDA 1513 CAPETOWN DR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS PAYNE WARREN & JUDY JANELL 1509 CAPETOWN DR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS MCCARTNEY MARK & 1602 CAPETOWN DR LOLA MCCARTNEY GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS TONEY FRED M & 1421 CAPETOWN DR GRACE O TONEY GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS CAMPBELL PAULINE 1502 ROMAN RD GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS KING LESLIE KAREN 1501 CAPETOWN DR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS TYNER KATHLEEN L & PO BOX GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS ARIAS JUAN & EUSTOLIA 1514 ROMAN RD GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS ESPINOZA ANNETTE Y & 1506 ROMAN RD MANUEL N GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS GRUPP KATHRYN ANN & 1510 ROMAN RD JOHN G GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS VILLARS WILLIAM A & 1418 ROMAN RD VILLARS LINDA JEAN GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS SEEBER WILLIAM B & RHONDA 1502 CAPETOWN DR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS VILLA CELIA H 1705 ERNIE LN GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS HOLLINS TAMECKA L 1513 JUNEAU ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS WHITMIRE ROBERT K 1943 RIO BLANCO DR FRISCO TEXAS HAFDAHL RANDAL W JR & 1610 CAPETOWN DR REBECCA D GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS LEWIS LAWRENCE A & SHAKKIRA 1517 ROMAN RD GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS MARTINEZ EMILLO DE JESUS GUARDADO 1501 JUNEAU DR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS WILLIAMS JANICE N & 1509 JUNEAU ST ALMA I GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS MCNIEL DAVID LYNN & 1517 CAPETOWN DR KATHY M GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS ADKINS EDDIE J & WANDA J 1606 ROMAN RD GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS FLOYD RICHARD BLAKE 1606 CAPETOWN DR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS WARREN MITZI 1510 CAPETOWN DR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS PEREZ ERIKA GONZALEZ 1605 CAPETOWN DR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS CAFFEY LELLA PEARL 1514 CAPETOWN DR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS LAURANGE SCOTT J & KATHERINE M 1521 JUNEAU ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS SZKOLA EDWARD 1601 CAPETOWN DR SUZANNE LAFOLLETTE GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS BSISO MAHER & MAHA G 1525 JUNEAU ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS CHAN YOK SHUET 833 CAMBRIDGE PL GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS MINYARD SIDNEY A JR & 1506 CAPETOWN DR CONNIE G GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS STOVALL LEE O 1529 JUNEAU ST GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS GONZALEZ CARLOS 1513 ROMAN RD GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS HUMPHREYS COLE A 1609 CAPETOWN DR GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS LOAYZA FERMIN 1602 ROMAN RD GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS MORALES JESUS & 1505 JUNEAU ST MARIA CRISTINA RODRIGUEZ GRAND PRAIRIE TEXAS

57 BA Carrolls Croft Ct. Setback Variance Zoning Board of Adjustments & Appeals: August 21, 2017 Case Manager: Owner: Colby Collins James Carroll SUMMARY 1912 Carrolls Croft Ct, platted as Lot 3, Block 1, Croft on the Creek (Council District 1). Consider a request for a front yard setback variance. This property is zoned Single Family-1 (SF-1). DISCUSSION Due to an easement being located in the rear of the residential property, the applicant is asking for a 20 ft. front setback opposed to the required 30 ft. front setback. By starting construction at 20 ft. opposed to 30 ft., it would allow for the applicant to construct the entire home without interfering with the easement line in the rear of the home. Due to the Single Family-1 (SF-1) front yard setback requirement being 30 ft., the applicant is requesting a 10 ft. setback reduction in order to be in compliance with the city to construct a home on the proposed lot. According to the Tarrant Appraisal District (TAD), the property is listed as Lot 3 Block 1 in the Croft on the Creek Addition. Subject to approval of this application, an approved building permit will be required prior to the commencement of the construction. As part of the building permit review process, Building Inspections will ensure that the construction complies with all regulations. PUBLIC NOTIFICATION Legal notice of this item was published in the Fort Worth Star Telegram on August 11 th and August 20 th. Property owner notices (PON s) were placed in the out-going-mail on August 10, As of the date of this report, staff has not received any written correspondence as a result of this request. FINDINGS Pursuant to Section of the UDC, the ZBA may grant variances and exceptions provided the following findings are met: A. Such variance or exception will not substantially or permanently injure the appropriate use of adjacent property in the same district. PAGE 1 of 4

58 Staff Evaluation: Staff contends that the variance will not substantially or permanently injure the appropriate use of adjacent property for the following reasons: Staff has not received any communication from the surrounding property owners. This finding has been met. B. Such variance or exception will not adversely affect the health, safety or general welfare of the public. Staff Evaluation: Staff contends that the variance will not adversely affect the health, safety or general welfare of the public. Staff has not received any communication of opposition from the surrounding property owners. This finding has been met. C. Such variance or exception will not be contrary to the public interest; and such variance or exception will not authorize the operation of a use other than those uses specifically authorized for the district in which the property for which the variance is sought is located. Staff Evaluation: Staff contends that the variance will not be contrary to the public interest; and such variance or exception will not authorize the operation of a use other than those uses specifically authorized for the district in which the property for which the variance is sought is located. Staff has not received any communication of opposition from the surrounding property owners. This finding has been met. D. Such variance or exception will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. Staff Evaluation: The granting of this exception will allow the homeowner to build a home on the proposed lot. Staff suggests that the exception is in harmony with the spirit and purpose of this ordinance. This finding has been met. E. Such variance or exception will not alter the essential character of the district in which is located the property for which the variance is sought. Staff Evaluation: Staff suggests that the granting of this exception will not alter the essential character of the district. Staff noted that there were at least four homes located within the neighborhood area that did not meet the front yard setback requirements. This finding has been met. F. Such variance or exception will not substantially weaken the general purposes of the zoning regulations established for the district in which the property is located. PAGE 2 of 4

59 Staff Evaluation: Approval of the exception will not weaken the general purposes of the zoning regulations established for the district. Staff noted that there were at least four homes located within the neighborhood area that did not meet the front yard setback requirements. This finding has been met. G. The plight of the owner of the property for which the variance or exception is sought is due to unique circumstances existing on the property, including but not limited to the area, shape or slope, and the unique circumstances were not created by the owner of the property and are not merely financial, and are not due to or the result of general conditions in the district in which the property is located. Staff Evaluation: Typically staff cannot find that the property owner has a hardship that is a unique circumstance of the property and generally it is the philosophy of the City is to work in cooperation with property owners to address their needs within the framework of the UDC. This finding has been met. H. The variance or exception is not a self-created hardship. Staff Evaluation: While the hardship is self-created, the philosophy of the City is to work in cooperation with property owners to address their needs within the framework of the UDC. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the board grant the applicant s request for a 20 ft. front yard setback variance, opposed to the required 30 ft. for the zoning area, to allow a single family detached unit. CONDITIONS If the Zoning Board of Adjustment and Appeals chooses to grant the variance, then staff recommends the following conditions: 1. The variances are to be no more than what is approved by the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals. 2. The applicant will need to obtain a building permit. 3. Any construction or building allowed by this variance or special exception must conform to the requirements set forth by the Unified Development Code, the 2015 International Building Code, the Grand Prairie Municipal Code of Ordinances, city adopted fire codes and with other applicable regulatory requirements administered and/or enforced by the state and federal government. 4. If a building permit or certificate of occupancy shall not have been applied for or issued within a ninety (90) day period or as the Board may specifically grant, the special exceptions shall be PAGE 3 of 4

60 deemed waived; and all rights there under terminated. PAGE 4 of 4

61

62

63 Notice of Public Hearing Para obtener información acerca de este aviso, sírvase llamar al (972) To Whom It May Concern: Notice is hereby given that the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals of the City of Grand Prairie, Texas will consider the following variance and/or special exception to the Unified Development Code of the : CASE NUMBER BA Carrolls Croft Ct, platted as Lot 3, Block 1, Croft on the Creek (Council District 1). Consider a request for a front yard setback variance. This property is zoned Single Family-1 (SF-1). You are being notified in accordance with state law requiring the notification of property owners within 200 feet of the subject property for the variance or special exception. The public hearing will be held in City Hall, 317 College Street, on August 21, 2017, at 7:00 p.m. At that time the Zoning Board of Adjustments and Appeals will hear from any property owners in support of, or in opposition to, the requested variance or special exception. Upon reviewing the request the Board will make a final decision. These hearings are not limited to those who receive this notice. If you know of any affected property owner whom has not received a notice, it would be appreciated if you would inform them of this meeting. Should you have further questions regarding this case, please contact me at (972) Please specify the case number or address of the subject property when calling. Please refer to the opposite side of this notice for the location of the subject property. Sincerely, Colby C. Collins Colby Collins City Planner

64 PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION POSTBRIDGE AVENUE K EAST CARROLLS CROFT ROUNDTABLE CROFT CREEK DUNCAN PERRY PRINCE JOHN TOURNAMENT QUEST HIDDEN BROOK 1912 Carrolls Croft Court Case Number: BA Case Location 300ft Buffer Properties Within Buffer